Essays

Leftist Indifference to the Bombing of German Civilians

by Hadding Scott

A famous image from the vastly overrated “London Blitz.” According to one estimate, about nine times as many German civilians were killed by Anglo-American bombing, compared to British civilians killed by German bombing, during the Second World War.

RECENTLY I heard Jewish radio talker Michael Savage ( Weiner) claim during one of his usual rants that nobody ever hears about the bombing of British cities by Germans during the Second World War.

Really? Nobody ever mentions the so-called Battle of Britain? In my experience, this is rubbish.

Perhaps they are not quite as loudly publicized nowadays, but the “London Blitz” and the supposedly unprovoked bombing of Coventry, as subjects of Anglo-American war-propaganda, for a long time received attention that was quite disproportional, given the compared tolls in civilian deaths and wrecked cities wrought by Anglo-American vs. German bombs.

On just one night in one city, Darmstadt on 11 September 1944, about ten times as many civilians were intentionally killed by the RAF as were inadvertently killed by the Luftwaffe’s bombs in Coventry — “targeted due to its high concentration of armaments, munitions and engine plants which contributed greatly to the British war effort,” says Statemaster Encyclopedia — during the entire war. Yet the bombing of Darmstadt is nowhere near as well known as “the bombing of Coventry.” An RAF-officer named F.W. Winterbotham stated in his book The Ultra Secret that Churchill had advance notice of one of the raids, but rather than take steps to avoid civilian casualties in Coventry, Churchill kept the information to himself. There are denials, but if the story is true it means only that Churchill did not have much more regard for British civilian lives than for German civilian lives.

Dresden, post-bombing

I just happened to run across an essay from 1972 by syndicated newspaper-columnist John Chamberlain that touches on the disparity:

A careful researcher, Benjamin Coleman of Washington, D.C., has estimated that during World War II 537,000 German civilians were killed by bombing. The Colby account has it that 61 German cities, with a total population of 25 million, either were destroyed or devastated beyond recognition. Britain, by contrast, got off lightly, with a loss of 60,000 civilians.

Cologne, save for its cathedral, and Hamburg were gutted; Dresden was gratuitously ruined after the Allies had the war all wrapped up.

At this point, Chamberlain unintentionally indicates why, in 1945, false accusations about gas-chambers, etc., may have seemed necessary:

Because Hitler was what he was, a monster, I don’t weep much for what happened to his country, which had become a totalitarian war-machine.

Take away the gas-chamber story, rebranded 35 years later as “the Holocaust,” and what was done to Germany no longer seems justified, Chamberlain implies.

The point of the essay, however, was to show the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party’s leftist 1972 presidential candidate, George McGovern, who moralized about inadvertent civilian casualties in the U.S. bombing of North Vietnam, but seemed to have no second thoughts about the bombing of civilians in which he had participated during the Second World War:

Senator George McGovern, who goes about the land weeping for the North Vietnamese Prussians, is fully cognizant of the nature of air warfare. After all, he flew 35 World War II missions. By his own admission, he bombed through overcast, which means that he could have hit civilians and even, if they had been present, a dike or two.[1]

His admiring biographer, Sam Anson, quotes him as saying to a friend after the war, “You just dropped those damn bombs where you could and got the hell out of there.” On one occasion, his plane, Dakota Queen, jettisoned its bombs over Yugoslavia, vaporizing a farmhouse. It wasn’t bomber-pilot McGovern’s fault that the bombs hit where they did, and he subsequently kicked the careless bombardier off his crew. But he made no issue of the episode, nor did he report a conversation he heard about a possible war crime involving fighter pilots who shot Italian civilians off a bridge for sport. If he had, we might have had a My Lai[2] then.

McGovern never has made excuses for being part of something in World War II that he condemns in Vietnam now. We must assume, then, that he makes a distinction between the spread of fascism and the spread of communism. It was alright to hit civilians inadvertently in the course of doing away with the Nazis. But when a General Giap, pursuing his Communist objectives, stages an invasion of another country through a demilitarized zone and through bordering neutrals, it is not the same thing as Hitler swinging through the neutralized North European lowlands[3] or descending on neutral Norway[4]

Not, at least, in the mind of George McGovern.

[…]

So let it be understood: McGovern isn’t against bombing per se. It was all right to knock the Rhineland to pieces. But it is wrong to bomb Communists in Asia. Stated baldly, that is McGovern’s position. He is entitled to it, but let us be spared his tears. [The Evening Independent, 4 October 1972]

George McGovern, in 1972, seems to have been ahead of his time with an axiom that could be stated: White lives don’t matter.

Notes

1. Bombing dikes to create floods that interrupt supply-lines was a strategy used successfully against the Communists in Korea, forcing them to make peace, but during the Vietnam War a propaganda-offensive by the Communists, echoed by American leftists like McGovern, prevented the same method from being used.

2. The My Lai Massacre was a war-crime by soldiers of the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War that was heavily publicized by news-media in the early 1970s.

3. The Anglo-French strategy in 1940 was based on the expectation that Germany would cross Belgium to invade France, since going through the Maginot Line or the Ardennes Forest was considered too difficult. This strategy of declaring war, then waiting to be attacked, was understood to mean that Belgium must become a battleground; thus Britain and France deliberately precipitated a German invasion of Belgium, although Germany would get the blame.

4. In early 1940 Britain and France were waging war against Germany by means of a blockade. To tighten the blockade by cutting off a route whereby raw materials were still reaching Germany, First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill proposed to invade and occupy Norway. Without the prospect of a British occupation of Norway, there would have been no pressing need for Hitler to occupy Norway, but as it happened the British intention was discovered and German forces barely beat the British forces to it. In the case of Norway, as in the case of Belgium, the British forced a German action then blamed the Germans for it.

* * *

Source: National-Socialist Worldview

Previous post

The War on Dissent: FBI Gives Man 6 Months in Prison For His Political Beliefs

Next post

The State of the Race

16
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment authors
PaulWilliam SageTruthweedAngry SwedeUlysses Freire da Paz Junior Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
David Westerlund
David Westerlund

From David Irving\s lips I head Germany warned England 2 times if they continued bombing Berlin, Germany would bomb London. At that time Germany was only bombing military targets. Then the 3rd time England bomber Berlin, Germany bombed London. It was probably an error to get off military targets bombing England, as it was after Germany retaliated by bombing London that the British air force was able to have superiority in the air.

Truthweed
Truthweed

Greetings David. Evil Hitler had no intention of attacking Britain. After Britain carpet-bombed seven German cities, Hitler bombed London with peace pamphlets.

Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior

Was ist Nationalsozialismus? Der Nationalsozialismus (Abkürzung NS) ist eine auf Führergrundsatz und Rassegedanken fußende Weltanschauung, die völkischen Nationalismus mit Sozialismus vereint; er war von 1933 bis 1945 als staatliches, volkssouveränes Einparteiensystem im Deutschen Reich verwirklicht. Der Nationalsozialismus bekennt sich ausdrücklich zum Deutschen Volk und wendet sich u. a. gegen Marxismus und Liberalismus. Zudem erachtet er die fortschreitende jüdische Beeinflussung der nationalen Volkskörper historisch gewachsener Völker als eine existentielle Bedrohung aller Völker schlechthin, weswegen zur Erhaltung der Deutschen Volksgemeinschaft die zeitnahe Lösung der Judenfrage gefordert wird. Der Nationalsozialismus erstrebt nicht die Totalität des Staates, sondern den Anspruch auf die Totalität der Idee im Gesamtbereich des politischen Lebens des Volkes. Eine direkte Übertragung des Nationalsozialismus auf andere Völker wurde von Adolf Hitler stets abgelehnt[1]eine Adaption jedoch nicht generell ausgeschlossen.[2] Wirtschaftspolitisch fordert das… Read more »

James Clayton
James Clayton

Seth MacFarlane’s Family Guy reflecting such compassion these days: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIpGwmFrfkc

Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior

comment image

The tree that bears the most fruit is the one that is most stoned.
comment image

“… Teacher Don Salvador Borrego speaks of the star fighting the cross in World War II. American Scherman tanks had a five-pointed star, and Soviet tanks had another five-pointed star that was identical to the American one red and the other was silver, and the Germans wore the Teutonic Knight’s Cross, which represented European Christianity”
https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/deutsch/archiv/artikel/NSChristentum.html
comment image

The facts and not the propaganda denote that Hitler’s Third Reich https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/04/francis-parker-yockey-on-adolf-hitlers-historical-legacy/ sealed the peak of moral, intellectual, economic, environmental and social progress reached by humanity http://www.zundelsite.org/archive/news_english/0102_barnes.html corroborating the quote below “These magnanimous words distinguish good from evil”: “By their fruits you will know them. ”Matthew 07:16
comment image

Angry Swede
Angry Swede

The ones who loudly condemn the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are very often the same ones who defend and justify the firestorm over Dresden.

So, my dear SJW:s over the world, maybe the americans should have given the same treatment to Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Instead of the nukes a firebombing, firestorm over Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Would you be ok with that instead?

I my self, i am not ok with neither, and not the blitzen either actually.
Anyone of you wish to give me an answer? I know you are here reading.

Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior

Satan, quoted by Jesus in John 8:44, as the father of liars and murderers, he will always pretend himself a martyr to incriminate his victims of their own barbarism. “Adolf Hitler did not gass Jews, however Jews gassed non-Jews en masse! Mass gassing invented by the Russian Bolsheviks was attributed to Hitler after the war ” “And if someone asks you, then of course tell him that we set you free” “This is Isai Davidowitsch Berg, the Jewish inventor of gas trucks for the mass destruction of people. Mass gassing of Jews under Stalin was later attributed to Adolf Hitler in favor of Jews. Of course, a large part of the thinking population now knows that the story of the gassing of Jews by Adolf Hitler is the greatest lie… Read more »

Angry Swede
Angry Swede

Thank you for your answer and the information you are sharing with me.
I appreciate it and i hope there are many people out there who will read it.

Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior

“The truth wins, but it can only win if told” “The Luciferian principle is the art of darkness in the light of dissimulation, war in peace, and, finally, the liberation from captivity in self-control. In this way, people are seduced to embrace their own destroyer.” (Eliezer) “Every leftist speech is a farce because it preaches fighting something that it really does not want to destroy. All traitors and conspirators have the same attributes as a cockroach, as they work in the dark and despair when the light of truth catches them. https://archive.org/details/MenuhinGerardTellTheTruthAndShameTheDevilHolohoax/page/n1/mode/2up The story is guided by the project of God, a project that is always focused on freedom and life. The fate of a society always depends on the attitude it takes in the face of this project: either… Read more »

Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior

comment image

Henry Kissinger said in Brussels in 1979 as follows: “You Europeans must understand that if there is a conflict in Europe, we Americans of course do not intend to die with you.” (Independent news Bochum No. 8, 1981).

Source – Last § http://members.kfs.at/kingralf/ufo/buch/buch2/8.html

Truthweed
Truthweed

Thank you Ulysses. I recall that Berg’s gas vans were converted bakery trucks.

Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior

comment image

THERE IS NOTHING THAT THE INTERNATIONAL JEW FEARS SO MUCH AS THE TRUTH ABOUT HIMSELF OR HIS PLANS “ Henry Ford – The International Jew Vol.1 Page 200 http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id61.html

Truthweed
Truthweed

Greetings Angry Swede. I have read that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the two Christian cities of Japan.

Angry Swede
Angry Swede

Greetings!

They were?
I didn´t know about that.

William Sage
William Sage

Why do the jews who are left-wing communists , fight wars against communism as in, Korea, Vietnam , and Laos.

Paul
Paul

Is this question rhetorical?