EssaysHadding Scott

Media Tricks and Racial Mixture

by Hadding Scott

IN 2013 White racial activist Craig Cobb appeared on NBC’s Trisha show, where another guest, neurotic mulatto Herman Williams III (brother of Montel Williams) asserted that everybody in the entire world had Negro ancestors and therefore carried Negro DNA. This is an absurd claim. But the absurd claim was subsequently supported by the even more absurd claim that Trisha’s producer, the pink-skinned and fine-featured Alyson DiFranco, had been shown by a genetic test to have 19% “Subsaharan” DNA. Everybody of course understood “Subsaharan” to mean Negro. That is how it was meant to be understood. “Subsaharan” had to be taken to mean Negro, because otherwise Herman Williams’ claim would not have been validated.

Trisha producer Alyson DiFranco

Based on her general appearance, it is practically impossible that Miss DiFranco has anywhere near 19% Negro genes. Any old-fashioned White person from the South would have laughed at this claim, because we know (as Madison Grant observed a century ago in The Passing of the Great Race) that a person that is half-Black and half-White looks completely Black, and it is only after many generations of dilution that Negroid characteristics cease to be detectable. At 19% Negro Miss DiFranco would be an obvious mulatta. Since she is far from that, an appropriate response to that imputation would have been something along the lines of: I may have been born at night, but it wasn’t last night.

A typical one-eighth (12.5%) Negro, with broad, flat nose, kinky hair, etc. This person could not have passed for White.*

For some reason though — maybe he was still thinking about the cleavage that Miss DiFranco had displayed while interviewing him in Leith — Craig Cobb evidently did not suspect anything rotten, and, when the host asked him to submit to a DNA test like that taken by Miss DiFranco, Mr. Cobb agreed to it. Predictably, they announced that Craig Cobb had some “Subsaharan” genes too — although only 14% in his case.

What’s going on here? Are they making it up?

Most likely the claim of “Subsaharan DNA” is a half-truth, calculated to give the unwary public a false impression. The word “Subsaharan,” is not a racial term. It is a geographic term.

A Moroccan Berber family

Since prehistoric times there have been people of White ancestry in Africa. These are the Berbers and their mixed-race descendants, who are found especially in Somalia (which is geographically Subsaharan) and Morocco, but also to some extent throughout eastern and northern Africa. Most Berbers today are mongrelized, but some only to a slight degree. Especially those Berbers living within the seclusion of mountain-ranges often retain, even today, the blue eyes and blond hair of their ancestors, who migrated from Europe into Africa during the Ice Age.

The fact that most people do not know the extent and antiquity of White heritage in Africa has been exploited for propaganda-purposes before. In 2010 Belgian journalist Jean-Paul Mulders insinuated that Adolf Hitler had some Negro ancestry based on the fact that he carried a Y-chromosome that is also carried by some people in Africa. So as not to defeat his own propaganda, Mulders omitted to mention that the same Y-chromosome has a substantial presence in Europe, especially in the Balkans. The deception consisted in pretending that White DNA found in both Europe and Africa was really Negro DNA that somehow made its way into Europe (magically, without bringing any observable Negroid characteristics with it).

My guess is that this is the kind of game that the Trisha show is playing.

* It seems necessary to show such an illustration of a typical one-eighth Negro for clarification, because many Americans today seem not to realize how dilute the Negro ancestry is of the “African Americans” that they regularly see on television. When an octoroon on television is called “African American” and then through further mixing produces a child that can pass for White (to the unobservant) and is erroneously called “half-Black,” the public gets a falsely optimistic picture of how easy it might be for Negroid characteristics to be bred out.

* * *

Source: National-Socialist Worldview

Previous post

Nationalist Party Critical of Israel Rises to 2nd in Slovakia As Gypsy Violence Engulfs Country

Next post

New Pierce Speeches: Dramatically Powerful

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
31 January, 2020 6:22 pm

Ethnocentrism is the most powerful life force in the universe. Ethnocentrism is survival, therefore, the path to a higher state and finally to God and the stars. Without ethnocentrism there is no chance of survival. The ethnocentric Jew (according to them the chosen people) aims to damage and demonize the racial unity of whites, since he does not want competition. The equation is homogeneity + high IQ. Asians take the lead as they do not believe in the self-chosen people (Jews).

Reply to  Panadechi
31 January, 2020 9:07 pm

Greetings Panadechi. Yes, and the high IQ Asians have escaped the destructive false guilt complex inflicted on other innocent peoples by the self chosen people.

Mencken's Ghost
Mencken's Ghost
1 February, 2020 1:20 am

Us goyim should start our own show inviting some red-pilled Russian and Chinese geneticists. The entire Out-of-Africa Hypothesis was put in place by sociologists and never had anything to do with science. They needed a propaganda tool to push desegregation and race mixing.

Franklin Ryckaert
Franklin Ryckaert
1 February, 2020 4:54 am

Berbers live in northern Africa and thus are by definition not “Sub-Saharan” Africans. They should be called “Supra-Saharan” Africans instead. The trick our enemies use is to confuse African with “Sub-Saharan African” and thus with “Negro”. It is the same trick Afro-centrists use by declaring the Ancient Egyptians “Black” because they were “Africans”. I don’t think though that the Berbers came originally from Europe. I think these Hamitic speaking Whites came originally from Anatolia, from where one branch went to Europe and another branch via the Middle East to North and East Africa. In East Africa the Hamites mixed with the local Negroids which produced the Somalians. In Egypt they slightly mixed with the local Negroids, which produced the Ancient Egyptians, still mainly White. Later on admixture with Negroids increased… Read more »

Reply to  Franklin Ryckaert
1 February, 2020 4:53 pm

Greetings Franklin. Always a pleasure to be informed by a knowledgeable scholar such as yourself.

1 February, 2020 3:43 pm

This article explains more thoroughly and accurately what everyone already knows: the obvious allegory about race found in the observation that a drop of chocolate milk in a glass of white milk ruins the color of the white milk; whereas a drop of white milk, in a glass of chocolate milk, does nearly nothing to improve the color of the chocolate milk.

Guest from the East
Guest from the East
3 February, 2020 3:09 pm

This article is spot on
I am of pure Berber (Algeria) blood and yes we have in my family blond hair , blue and green eyes.
DNA test in the US is a joke and the info collected is also shared with the Intel Agencies
Fuck Low IQ Niggers

The Eye
The Eye
Reply to  Guest from the East
3 February, 2020 6:35 pm

Great to have you on our side, brother. A couple of the DNA testing outfits in the US were found to be attributing phony %s of sub-Saharan African ancestry to whites… just to “screw with racists.” And I believe you that the info is shared with intel agencies. No surprise at all

Joe Lowsac
Joe Lowsac
14 April, 2020 9:01 am

People should not take tests that they do not understand. Only particular regions of our genome are significantly variable. The vast majority is not only homologous with that of the Negro but all the apes and even fruit flies. These companies use markers and then tell you where geographically they turn up most often. While no other race evolved from the Negroid race, that is nonsense on many levels, we certainly share a common ancestor. As we do with all apes, though the last one we share with the Negro was relatively more recent but still many, many millennia ago. None of the present races even existed at that time. Since we share a common ancestor, it is entirely possible and not uncommon that our two subspecies share some of… Read more »

tony bonn
tony bonn
11 April, 2021 11:48 am

Almost no one realizes that DNA science is not infallible. People have been brainwashed again by jew-tv, such as CSI, that DNA is a perfectly mechanical unfailing tool for finding the truth. It is not – it requires skills to properly interpret results and to understand its limits. When it comes to ancestry, the results are even more precarious. Some time ago, a sibling obtained DNA results showing nearly a quarter Scandinavian genes and 2% African. I almost went into shock when I saw the 2% African, but quickly recovered by realizing that the whole industry was a racket controlled by jews, and comments I had read that no one is ever identified as jewish due to the politics involved. Hence I realized that the ancestral DNA game can be… Read more »