Big (((Sue))) is Watching: The Sovietization of YouTube

Talk about the dystopian feminization and Judaization of America! Here we have the female Jewish host of “60 Minutes” Lesley Stahl interviewing the female Jewish CEO of YouTube Susan Wojcicki about how to best censor content online so that only kosher-certified views are available to the general public. This is disgusting. Neither of these women are remotely qualified for the powerful roles they hold in our society. Both are perfect examples of female and Jewish privilege, and what’s particularly notable about the exchange between these two commissars is their total lack of shame and self-awareness as they openly conspire to Sovietize the internet. These harridans represent the culture of the shtetl in all of its ugliness, repression, stupidity and entitlement, and we want absolutely nothing to do with any of it — in any way, shape, or form — ever again. — Dissident Millennial

YouTube CEO Wojcicki: We’ve Cut Amount Of Time Americans Watch “Controversial Content” By 70%
by Ian Schwartz

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki tells Lesley Stahl what the video platform is doing about hate speech in an interview Sunday on the CBS newsmagazine program ’60 Minutes.’

Wojcicki told ’60 Minutes’ that Google employs 10,000 people to focus on “controversial content.” She described their schedule, which includes time for therapy. Stahl also said there are reports that the “monitors” are “beginning to buy the conspiracy theories.”

“What we really had to do was tighten our enforcement of that to make sure we were catching everything and we use a combination of people and machines,” Wojcicki explained. “So Google as a whole has about 10,000 people that are focused on controversial content.”

Lesley Stahl: I’m told that it is very stressful to be looking at these questionable videos all the time. And that there’s actually counselors to make sure that there aren’t mental problems with the people who are doing this work. Is that true?

Susan Wojcicki: It’s a very important area for us. We try to do everything we can to make sure that this is a good work environment. Our reviewers work five hours of the eight hours reviewing videos. They have the opportunity to take a break whenever they want.

Lesley Stahl: I also heard that these monitors, reviewers, sometimes, they’re beginning to buy the conspiracy theories.

Susan Wojcicki: I’ve definitely heard about that. And we work really hard with all of our reviewers to make sure that, you know, we’re providing the right services for them.

Wojcicki on Section 230, stopping 70% of controversial content:

Lesley Stahl: Once you watch one of these, YouTube’s algorithms might recommend you watch similar content. But no matter how harmful or untruthful, YouTube can’t be held liable for any content, due to a legal protection called Section 230.

The law under 230 does not hold you responsible for user-generated content. But in that you recommend things, sometimes 1,000 times, sometimes 5,000 times, shouldn’t you be held responsible for that material, because you recommend it?

Susan Wojcicki: Well, our systems wouldn’t work without recommending. And so if–

Lesley Stahl: I’m not saying don’t recommend. I’m just saying be responsible for when you recommend so many times.

Susan Wojcicki: If we were held liable for every single piece of content that we recommended, we would have to review it. That would mean there’d be a much smaller set of information that people would be finding. Much, much smaller.

Lesley Stahl: She told us that earlier this year, YouTube started re-programming its algorithms in the U.S. to recommend questionable videos much less and point users who search for that kind of material to authoritative sources, like news clips. With these changes Wojcicki says they have cut down the amount of time Americans watch controversial content by 70%.

* * *

Source: RealClear Politics

Previous post

Brainwashing in America

Next post

Rose By Another Name

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
8 December, 2019 5:10 pm

“Lesley Stahl: I also heard that these monitors, reviewers, sometimes, they’re beginning to buy the conspiracy theories.” Well of course they are! They are intelligent, thoughtful, honest and discerning people. If you want reasoning people to avoid being contaminated by what they are observing then all you need to do is demonstrate that the subject material is false and that they are working for trustworthy people. It’s that easy!

9 December, 2019 3:14 pm

SOCIAL NODE: To have the chance to win, let’s understand the following first: In general terms, a node is a space in which part of the connections of other real or abstract spaces converge that share their same characteristics and which in turn are also nodes. All interrelate in a non-hierarchical way and conform what in sociological or mathematical terms is called a network. The network concept can be defined as “set of interconnected nodes. A node is the point at which a curve intersects itself. What a node is specifically, depends on the type of networks to which we refer.” In nodes it is not only interconnected, it is also able to exchange information. The most powerful and effective Social Node is the Ethnic (Racial), the Jews know it… Read more »

Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
Ulysses Freire da Paz Junior
14 December, 2019 10:53 am Der “absolute Despotismus” ist im internationalen Superstaat am Ende der Straße zu verbreiten. In der Zwischenzeit werden regionale Marionettendespoten als wesentlich für den Abbau der Struktur von Staaten und die Verteidigung von Völkern dargestellt: “Von den Premier-Diktatoren der Gegenwart leiden die Völker geduldig und tragen solche Misshandlungen, als ob sie für die wenigsten von ihnen zwanzig Könige enthauptet hätten. Was ist die Erklärung …? Es erklärt sich aus der Tatsache, dass diese Diktatoren zu flüstern die Völker durch ihre Agenten, die durch diese Missbräuche den Staaten mit dem höchsten Ziel Schaden zufügen – das Wohlergehen der Völker, die internationale Brüderlichkeit von allen, ihre Solidarität und Gleichberechtigung zu sichern Völker, dass diese Vereinigung nur unter unserer souveränen Herrschaft erreicht werden muss “. Die Worte, die vor 1905 geschrieben wurden, scheinen… Read more »

Bruce Winship Wright
Bruce Winship Wright
2 March, 2020 1:43 pm

My YouTube Channel was terminated by Susan and her TRUTH CENSORS. They simply label any information that reveals the criminal activities of The World’s wealthiest and most powerful people as HATE SPEECH. Susan and YouTube are simply modern day Book Burners who are protecting America’s biggest criminals by labeling the Truth about them…Hate Speech. Susan Wojcicki, in my opinion, is far worse than Adolf Hitler ever was. Susan simply hates God (a synonym for the Truth) and has proven herself to be as disgraceful as one can be.