David SimsEssays

Trust-busting the Social Media Giants

by David Sims

ROBERT Epstein, testifying before the Judiciary Subcommittee/US Congress, recently said: “This system must be built to keep an eye on Big Tech in 2020. If these companies all support the same candidate they will have the power to shift fifteen million votes to that candidate. To let Big Tech get away with subliminal manipulation on this scale would be to make the free and fair election meaningless.”

Where were “good Jews” like Robert Epstein during the entire 20th century, when the Jews controlled nearly all of the mainstream media: television, Hollywood movies, publishing houses, popular magazines, and newspapers? Through their media control, Jews made “free and fair” elections meaningless — until the rise of the Internet [partially] broke the Jews’ information stranglehold.

I’m beginning to believe that the political elite sub-population in the West is either plural or has rival factions. One part of that elite is Zionist. The other part is goyish corporate leftist. Both of these factions hate White nationalism. Neither of them wants the White race to be anything other than high-level slave labor, until it has become extinct. But between the two there’s tension.

The goyish corporate left seems to have, at present, and with some exceptions (like Jewish Mark Z), control of the big tech companies that censor the web and oppose Donald Trump.

The Jewish part of the elite generally supports Donald Trump (that’s the most suspicious thing about him) and appears to be preparing to use the coercive power of the federal government against their goyish corporate leftist rivals by busting up their power with anti-trust litigation.

White nationalists might benefit from that move — incidentally. However, that move won’t be made for that reason.

[I think it’s more of an internal split among Jews, who dominate both the globalist/left faction and the Zionist/war faction. Whites are secondary or tertiary players, or mere employees, in both factions. Think CNN. And there are plenty who straddle both factions, as circumstances and career dictate. The Zionist/war faction might want to curb the social media oligopolies, but only to impose their own different flavor of censorship, I feel sure. — NV editor]

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

Germany: Loyal National Socialist Karl Munter, 96, Faces Trial for “Holocaust Denial”

Next post

Jew-Worshiping National Review Helped Jeffrey Epstein Rehab His Image After His First Child Sex Conviction

4 Comments

  1. Travon Martinberg
    26 July, 2019 at 10:57 am — Reply

    Since you are applying broad terms, one confounding issue is mainstream media’s advertising support, which has been moving into social media, though with growing pains per https://www.wfanet.org/news-centre/global-advertisers-demand-reform-of-digital-ad-ecosystem/. Corporate sponsors, publicly traded with elected, voting board members and directors (some nearly entirely Japanese, like Sony, https://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/executive/), can withhold advertising on TV networks or shows they find objectionable, e.g. the backlash against Tucker Carlson: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/tucker-carlson-tonight-loses-advertiser-as-bowflex-backs-1170195 . Bayer for example, *didn’t* drop advertising his show, yet stated “Bayer supports a culture that ensures respect, dignity and opportunity for every individual. We also value the opinions of our consumers, and take them into consideration when making advertising placement decisions.” The browning of America prevents its un-browning, since corporations are forced to consider the demographics of the viewers regardless of the show’s messages, above all. The Board of Directors (BoD) of Exxon, found at https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/company/who-we-are/corporate-governance/exxonmobil-board-of-directors#xxonobilorporationoardfirectors has no jews on it based on names (googling reveals two blacks. 8 whites). Exxon’s annual advertising spending easily exceeds $100 million, although some is targeted to the industry or commercial customers, per https://advertisers.mediaradar.com/exxon-mobil-advertising-profile#MediaSpend. Identifying America’s biggest advertisers at https://advertisers.mediaradar.com/Top_Prime_Time_Advertisers , and examining their BoD’s for jews, may show that jews are barely represented based on their 2.5% of US population. One of the worst entities in its media influence on whites today is the NFL, which generated $15 billion in revenue for 2018, of which $8.1 billion was from national TV deals – funded by large corporate sponsors and cable TV subscription revenue. Much of the remaining $7 billion came from direct corporate sponsorship of teams locally. So while WN’s hark back to when Henry Ford published “The International Jew”, today’s Ford Foundation’s goals are as different from his as the Boss 429 Mustang was to the lump called the Mustang II.

  2. James Clayton
    26 July, 2019 at 2:05 pm — Reply

    When I pass-it-on, I embed these hyperlinks to Zuckerberg.

    His “dancing” during the Gay Pride parade in San Francisco… https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=11&v=lAU-UBIiOQg

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Congressional testimony — and the awkward moments it bred — gave rise to countless memes…

    https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=zuckerberg+booster+seat+meme&qpvt=zuckerberg+booster+seat+meme&FORM=IGRE

    Lots of great material at http://RobertSGriffin.com.

    • Travon Martinberg
      29 July, 2019 at 10:52 am — Reply

      Zuckerberg scares people because he shows how swiftly mediocrity can rise to the pinnacle of power these days. 50 years ago he’d be a draft dodging /AP-admin breaking up cafeteria fights in some stinky middle-school in Queens NY. 100 years ago he’d be a tailor bumping his hand into groins as he measured inseams at Barneys. He is less than the sum of his parts.

      Jeffrey Epstein is the opposite. He has supposedly near genius-level talents at math and financial analysis, though his overstated fortune is mostly loot from money laundering, pyramid schemes and probably shakedowns of Lolita-island visitors. So while he has gifts, he leveraged them to build a fortress around his despicable lifestyle and not much more.

      In today’s lingo, so, um, where’s the positivity?

  3. Charley
    30 July, 2019 at 3:22 pm — Reply

    “Jeffrey Epstein is the opposite. He has supposedly near genius-level talents at math and financial analysis, … ”
    Give me a break! He is no more a genius, then Netanyahu is an honest politician! In fact, it’s more likely that ALL of his money comes from funding from the Israeli government (which means his money comes from us) than from anything that he’s accomplished!

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.