NewsOpinion

Medium: I’ve Had Sex With Well Over 100 Men, but That Does Not Define Me as a Slut

by Dissident Millennial

WHEN THE HEADLINES of a culture become indistinguishable from satire, that culture is beyond parody. Such is the case with a recent Medium post by Kelly Tyler titled “I’ve Had Sex With Well Over 100 Men, but That Does Not Define me as a Slut”.

What is your number?

It’s a question that comes up sooner or later. But if you have been sexually active for 10 plus years, it is surprisingly easy to rack up a number so big you can’t even precisely recall.

Of course if I were a man I would be celebrated for this. But I’m a woman so many men simply call me a slut and refuse to date me (but still offer me the privilege of having sex with them).

Having an active sex life is important to me. Sex is one of the most basic human functions. And 8 partners per year on average actually doesn’t sound like that much to me at all.

Anyone who has been single in a major city know [sic] that you can line up a weeks worth on tinder dates in a matter of hours. Sometimes multiple meet ups in the same night.

I regularly get tested, I don’t have daddy issues, and I was not abused as a child (as one guy wondered aloud as we lay in bed after fucking).

But it does seem to be a sticking point with guys when it comes to relationships. Maybe I should just lie? But honestly, it’s not something I’m that embarrassed about. My collection of cats, crushing student loans, and pitiful excuse for a car are things that embarrass me. Not my number.

How about you guys? Do you share your number of sexual partners with those you are dating or in relationships with? How many is too many? Honest feedback appreciated!

XOXO Kelly

Yikes!

A user called Mad Con replied in the comments section to Ms. Tyler’s post:

You wrote in your article that you had 8 partners on average per year. In your quora account, however, you wrote this:

“I stopped counting in college but I can easily get 1–2 guys per week. Sometimes it just a bj or me eating their ass. Then again I’ve been to a few orgies where I would have added 10+ partners per event. Well over 100.”

and this

“I lost track but could Be as high as 500, personally. And I’m not even the “sluttiest” friend lol”

You have yourself mentioned that you are a slut in quora. Your article contradicts your own words! If a woman that slept with 500+ men in 10 years (1 per week for 10 years continuously) isn’t called slut, then who is?

Another user Mike M comments:

This woman’s issue, as with all women like her, is a complete inability to put themselves in men’s shoes for even a minute and consider their perspectives and desires.

That’s because of an inherent solipsism, reinforced in childhood by being treated like a princess, then in teenage-years by excessive amounts of male attention, add in later years by gobbling up the feminist narrative that women can have it all and deserve it all. All their life, they’ve been experiencing the idea that other people’s wants and preferences (and particularly, guys) don’t matter one bit.

And so it really bites them when one day they discover that their path to their desires are obstructed by men’s unwillingness to cooperate. I believe their shock is genuine. Men aren’t supposed to tell her “no thanks I’ll pass”. That never happened before! Nobody told her that this was even an option! And so, as usual when a woman doesn’t get her way, the classic response is to try to shame people into changing their mind, and that’s how you get articles like this.

While these remarks say enough about this mess of a woman on a micro-level, the question naturally arises as to what the example of this woman says about the state of our once-great country writ large, and I’m afraid it implies that we are pretty well doomed. Here are my thoughts:

  1. When you understand that sex is the foundation of the family, the family is the foundation of the nation, and the nation is the foundation of the race, then it becomes glaringly obvious that sexual liberation can only lead to racial suicide and the death of the West.
  2. The so-called conservative movement, the Republican Party, and the Christian-right are all missing-in-action and totally useless on this front. If Conservatism, Inc. can’t prevent America’s national institutions from churning out girls like Ms. Tyler, what conservative function do they serve exactly?
  3. Radical feminism has resulted in a stupendous and almost unimaginable waste of resources. Contrary to the dogma of free market capitalism, a nation’s most valuable asset is its racial blood — i.e., its human capital, and since only fertile women can give birth to this capital, they are by nature the most valuable members of society. As such, a truly sane nation would invest in its young women by creating the optimal environment for them to get married and create large families so as to extend the lifeblood of the race. This is the only “right” that young women of good stock have any business demanding, and consequently it is precisely this right — call it the right to family — that is the most systematically ignored, stunted, and degraded by the alien and parasitic gatekeepers of the modern West, including those who call themselves “conservatives”.
  4. As a corollary to the above, our corporate and educational systems perform the opposite function for which they are intended due in no small part to the cancer of radical feminism. Traditional schooling had as its primary task the instilling of a positive identity and the building of character, while national industry was originally designed to serve the economic needs of families and communities so as to sustain heritage-America’s organic way of life. Nowadays these institutions have it so obviously backwards it is clear that our present degradation can only have come about by malicious design. Far from burning the racial instinct into the hearts and minds of our children, our corporate and educational systems instill in them a purely negative identity which would only have them subsidize their own ethnic cleansing, and far from upholding the ideals of chastity, marriage, and motherhood, our corporate and educational systems encourage the lesbian fad of “women’s rights” and “women’s liberation” which can only lead — again, obviously enough — to racial sterility and national suicide.

Isteve commenter Paleo Retiree provides an excellent summation of America’s remarkable descent into sexual lunacy:

I think that 1) girls tend to be happier when they’re raised into roles and activities that have traditionally given women a lot of pleasure and satisfaction (food! style! social activities! dance!); and that 2) sports are a metaphor for combat, which has traditionally been a male domain. Why we’re pushing our girls into combat-derived activities I have no idea. (Actually I do, but I’ll keep it to myself.)

Pushing our girls into sports has played a role in the creation of a couple of generations of young American women who are completely graceless and out of tune with their feminine natures. No matter how fit they are, or what good team players they’ve become, or how sweet or amusing individuals may be, today’s American girls and young women are generally amazingly clumpy, grace-free and charm-free creatures. They judge themselves and each other by how aggressive and will-driven they are, they have zero clue what it is to be creatures of mystery, style and allure, and they’ve got no idea how to run social circles or maintain kitchens and households. On the other hand, high-fiving each other, being pushy corporate drones, drinking themselves shitfaced and running marathons … They’re really good at all that.

And we wonder why so many of them get fat, take anti-depressants, and fail to reproduce. We’re actively discouraging our girls from realizing themselves as women. Awesome cultural achievement, America.

Yeah, and again, great job conservatives!

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

Great Masters of the Lie

Next post

Florida: Jews Demand That Everyone Believe Exactly as They Are Told

10 Comments

  1. Arvin N. Prebost
    8 July, 2019 at 9:22 am — Reply

    No, this woman is not a slut; she is the Great Whore of Babylon!

    She is going to lose her sex-chemicals as she gets older, and then what will she do? Nature gives us those sex-chemicals for one reason—to induce us to have babies and keep the species going.

    Good article.

  2. Walt Hampton
    8 July, 2019 at 12:29 pm — Reply

    Some of my input is required on this item. WLP and
    many other pro-Caucasian intellectuals recognized
    what they called “the family unit” as the basis of
    organized society. This is quite sensible. “LBGTQ’s”
    and other misfits cannot reproduce, although their
    type of sexual activity is preferable to that of the
    practitioners of miscegenation, which create mongrelized
    offspring. However, this “family values” acronym has
    far too much Christian baggage attached to it. I
    believe it was coined by the rabid Christian Jerry
    Falwell and his “moral majority” coalition sometime
    back in the early 1980’s by using the then-prevailing
    “Reaganomics” economic misery to propound and promote
    Christian guilt-mongering as a mean to the end – just
    another reincarnation of Christian “original sin.”
    For instance, if I were dating a woman who happened
    to be a porn star, I would be immediately labeled a
    “sinner…pagan…heretic..,” what-have-you.

    “Family unit” is grounded in science, whereas “family
    values” carries with it the Christian protocol of
    guilt-mongering and the “holier-than-thou” attitude
    I find so prevalent among Christian fundies. It is not
    necessary to use cliches of cultism to promote
    the logically race-based and sound concept of the
    family unit. The family unit can take many forms.
    Polygamy is still practiced in some areas of the
    world, for example. This family unit would certainly
    generate more offspring, and isn’t that what it is
    all about? I certainly think so, and personally I
    could not give a lesser rip about walking “the
    straight and narrow.”

  3. cc
    8 July, 2019 at 3:19 pm — Reply

    She’s been passed around like a 2 dollar whore.

    What’s disturbing to me is the kind of man that would come in behind all that.

  4. Jeff
    8 July, 2019 at 5:44 pm — Reply

    The talmudvision has helped greatly to produce these hoochies. I remember years back at how excited I was when cable tv was a new concept and folks were being wired for it. Boy, talk about going from a puppy to out of control pit bull. All these extra stations simply created more grotesque sexual sluttiness and foul mouth talk. That was mixed in with the women’s movement and homosexual stuff and here we are.

    The white world got too filled with pleasures and a hatred of GOD. Thus baby loving moslems come in to fill the void as white women are too busy with their stupid careers or being bi sexual or chopping up their babies with a huge push from tv, Hollywood and the entire Democrat Party.

    Crazy capitalism has also pushed women into being sluts. Too often it costs too much to ” settle down” so the party life extends into late 30s or 40s. I know many attractive women who never married or waited late to do it. Others got divorced and are living badly due to living in expensive cities or their increasingly expensive burbs. Their Prince Charmings turned into Prince Broke Azz.

    The Democrat Party in particular is all about perversion, killing unborn babies, pushing women into lame ” careers” most don’t even really want and being independent that hearing stories of a woman sleeping with 100 men is now viewed as empowering. I am expecting full scale witches and demonologists at the Democrat convention next year.

  5. Susan
    9 July, 2019 at 12:04 am — Reply

    Girls and young women really need to hear this information. Many–maybe most– don’t value themselves as critically important future mothers. They do hear that earning money and career status is more important than motherhood, and little guidance is given about what to look for in a good husband. Parents have been made to feel like they can’t foist their old-fashioned ideas on their daughters.

    Also, I remember watching population control scare movies in 8th grade biology class. It gave the impression that we were helping the world by having few or no children.

  6. Walt Hampton
    9 July, 2019 at 1:04 pm — Reply

    CC: What was acceptable in the past
    and is not considered acceptable today,
    but still CANNOT be controlled is…

    Sex.

    What is disturbing to me is a man
    like you who thinks he can build
    himself up by tearing someone else
    down.

    • 9 July, 2019 at 3:38 pm — Reply

      Hey Walt Hampton – you’re welcome to her ! I’m sure she is
      great in the sack after all that experience. Nobody is trying
      to build themselves up here. This is a lose/lose for us all.

  7. cc
    9 July, 2019 at 2:48 pm — Reply

    WALT HAMPTON: It appears you have singled me out.
    I never said I was better than the woman. But I agree my expression was rough.

    Some of your rambling text have a tendency to lecture the reader, evoking images of a self-righteous authoritarian.

    If my comments are to be approved by you, please say so.

  8. James Clayton
    10 July, 2019 at 10:47 am — Reply

    I’ve got a quite younger cousin who married a Protestant preacher in a small Tennessee town. His last name sounds Jewish to me. 30 years later, I checked on them via the internet, since I don’t keep in touch. He’s not preaching and they have what I consider unacceptable language on their FACEBOOK page, which doesn’t surprise me but does disappoint me.

    Much of my generation was corrupted during its college years. There is a series of articles here on the usual suspects and their sowing of porn and its effects. However, I don’t think the details of these people’s behavior need to be discussed in graphic detail; we get it that this woman is corrupted, and terminally, as a wife and a mother. However, it’s understanding and role models that are needed rather than ridicule.

    There is a difference in the quality of language as our culture and race have deteriorated and degenerated respectively. We can be better role models.

    Lately, I’ve been asking myself how Robert S. Griffin would describe such behavior, as opposed to individuals. And I believe our choice of language can be carried-away by an attempt to express itself forcefully and believe we can do better. Hypocrisy is difficult to ignore. However, gentlemanly behavior is never out of fashion and includes not being lazy in our descriptions.

  9. Walt Hampton
    10 July, 2019 at 1:46 pm — Reply

    James Clayton, I agree. There is no need of Christian-
    like behavior such as “finger-pointing,” belittling, character
    assassination. Dare I say it? It is often found as cult-
    like behavior and I will not stand for it.

    https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/belittling-man-angry-another-35306004.jpg

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.