Is World Peace Possible?

by Oswald Spengler

THE QUESTION WHETHER world peace will ever be possible can only be answered by someone familiar with world history. To be familiar with world history means, however, to know human beings as they have been and always will be. There is a vast difference, which most people will never comprehend, between viewing future history as it will be and viewing it as one might like it to be. Peace is a desire, war is a fact; and history has never paid heed to human desires and ideals.

Life is a struggle involving plants, animals, and humans. It is a struggle between individuals, social classes, peoples, and nations, and it can take the form of economic, social, political, and military competition. It is a struggle for the power to make one’s will prevail, to exploit one’s advantage, or to advance one’s opinion of what is just or expedient. When other means fail, recourse will be taken time and again to the ultimate means: violence. An individual who uses violence can be branded a criminal, a class can be called revolutionary or traitorous, a people bloodthirsty. But that does not alter the facts. Modern world-communism calls its wars “uprisings,” imperialist nations describe theirs as “pacification of foreign peoples.” And if the world existed as a unified state, wars would likewise be referred to as “uprisings.” The distinctions here are purely verbal.

Talk of world peace is heard today only among the White peoples, and not among the much more numerous colored races. This is a perilous state of affairs. When individual thinkers and idealists talk of peace, as they have done since time immemorial, the effect is always negligible. But when whole peoples become pacifistic it is a symptom of senility. Strong and unspent races are not pacifistic. To adopt such a position is to abandon the future, for the pacifist ideal is a static, terminal condition that is contrary to the basic facts of existence.

As long as man continues to evolve there will be wars. Should the White peoples ever become so tired of war that their governments can no longer incite them to wage it, the earth will inevitably fall a victim to the colored men, just as the Roman Empire succumbed to the Teutons. Pacifism means yielding power to the inveterate non-pacifists. Among the latter there will always be White men — adventurers, conquerors, leader-types — whose following increases with every success. If a revolt against the Whites were to occur today in Asia, countless Whites would join the rebels simply because they are tired of peaceful living.

Pacifism will remain an ideal, war a fact. If the White races are resolved never to wage war again, the colored will act differently and be rulers of the world.

* * *

Commentary by Martin Kerr: Oswald Spengler (1880-1936) was a German philosopher and historian. He is best known for his magnum opus, The Decline of the West, the first volume of which was published in 1918 and the second in 1923.

Spengler’s core thesis is that civilizations are like biological organisms: they are born, they mature, they grow old, and then they die. His belief was that Western civilization was in its twilight years, that is, the period of decline preceding its death.

Spengler was not a National Socialist. Indeed, his relationship with the National Socialist state and movement was contentious. He voted for Hitler in the 1932 presidential election. After Hitler was named Reich’s Chancellor in 1933, he was granted a lengthy audience with him. He came away unimpressed, and subsequently made disparaging remarks about the Führer. He saw Mussolini, not Hitler, as the embodiment of his ideals in the 20th century.

However, he remained in Germany. He quarreled publicly with Alfred Rosenberg over points of ideology, and when Dr. Joseph Goebbels invited him to give a series of public lectures, he refused. His final book, The Hour of Decision, was published in Germany in 1933 and quickly became a bestseller. However, it was later banned because of its hostile tone towards National Socialism.

Privately, Spengler was highly critical of National Socialist racial thought, especially as it pertained to the Jews. It should be noted that Spengler himself was part Jewish: one of his great-grandmothers, born Bräunchen Moses, was a Jewess, making Spengler one-eighth Jewish. Perhaps he unconsciously took NS attitudes towards the Jews as some sort of personal affront.

But at the heart of things was a divergence between Spengler and Hitler concerning the importance of race in civilization. To Hitler, biological race was primary. Spengler, in contrast, championed a mystical, spiritual racialism, that was divorced from biological reality.

As time went on, he moderated his earlier position on race to a degree. In his 1931 book Man and Technics, he allowed that race played an important role in the birth of all high cultures, and he specified that the Germanic race of Northern Europe was the progenitor of Western civilization.

The essay presented here appeared in print just a few short months before Spengler’s untimely death at age 56. In it, he expresses a purely racial view of history, and warns the White peoples of Europe of the dire fate that awaits them if they fully succumb to the degeneracy of their times.

This brief work was Spengler’s response to a poll that had appeared in Cosmopolitan magazine on the subject of world peace. A number of well-known personalities responded, which resulted in a series of articles. Spengler’s submission was printed in the January 1936 issue of the magazine.

* * *

Source: New Order

Previous post

Chaos at the Compound

Next post

On Oradour

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
Gail Raubal
Gail Raubal
31 March, 2019 6:06 am

World peace is possible when people live among their own race. The misery that follows the judens is forever tarnished in their nefarious biological cells. They have no state, no property, no culture or history and their race is not pure. Richard Wagner believed that the German people should have faith in their destiny for greatness, even Johann Fichte said to the German nation, “Those who speak the same language are joined to each other by a multitude of invisible bonds by nature herself, long before any human art begins; they understand each other and have the power of continuing to make themselves understood more and more clearly; they belong together and are by nature one and an inseparable whole. Such a whole, if it wishes to absorb and mingle… Read more »

Martin Kerr
Martin Kerr
Reply to  Gail Raubal
31 March, 2019 5:49 pm

From Spengler’s perspective, world peace is neither possible nor even desirable, because it runs contrary to the basic nature of human beings: we are predators, and killing, warfare and aggression are hardwired into our DNA. As a National Socialist, I would add that historically the Aryan race has been a race of warriors and conquerors, and that pacifism is not a component of our core racial personality. However, that does not mean that we are doomed to a world of perpetual warfare: White racial thinkers from James Madole in the 1950s to Kevin Alfred Strom today have suggested that our aggressive instincts can be sublimated into space exploration and colonization. For in addition to being a race of warriors and conquerors, we are also a race of explorers and settlers,… Read more »

Jožef Tone
Jožef Tone
4 April, 2019 2:29 pm

The true meaning of the word “peace” is not “harmony” as most believe. Peace means “Order.” That’s why Globalists have long used the phrase “World Peace.” War could be symbolized with the image of soldiers, while Peace could be symbolized with the image of police officers (“peace officers”). Order/Peace/Police can be very violent in order to achieve “order,” which is based solely on the established politic of the day. There has never been harmony, nor do our rulers want even want it. War is waged for their endgame: World Order: One World, One Religion, One Race, One Politic, One Government.

4 April, 2019 4:26 pm

More hogwash. Nature doesn’t care about peace anymore than it does good or bad. Nature is about healthy and unhealthy. Nature takes the upward path which explains why the earth is beautiful. If something is unhealthy, it will perish on its own time. Bring forward the hurricane and cleanse the place.

Natural selection and survival of the fittest is the same thing. What is healthy will move forward. It gets cold in the desert. Life exist at the mercy of nature.

4 April, 2019 4:35 pm

To plunder, to slaughter, to steal, these things they misname empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace.

I hate those men who would send into war youth to fight and die for them; the pride and cowardice of those old men, making their wars that boys must die.
~Mary Roberts Rinehart