EssaysVideo

The Generals Should Have Listened to Hitler!

by Hadding Scott

IT HAS LONG BEEN a facile judgment of semi-informed people that Hitler lost the war in the east because he was a megalomaniac who would not heed the advice of his experienced Prussian generals. “Hitler should have listened to his generals!” However, as the moral obligation to find fault with Hitler fades into the past, eroded by easily available historical truth in the Age of Internet, one begins to hear more and more that wisdom was on the side of Hitler in that disagreement, that Hitler’s strategic plan in Operation Barbarossa was quite sensible, and that it was the generals — specifically Halder and Bock — who fouled up a good plan.

Even with flawless execution of Hitler’s plan, a victory over the Soviet Union would have been remarkable, due to the enormous imbalance of quantities favoring the Soviet side, but it was some generals who made this difficult situation even worse. 

Why invade the Soviet Union at all? Contrary to what the old propaganda says, Hitler’s fundamental motive in 1941 was not to gain  the Lebensraum about which he had written in 1925. To the extent that people are willing to believe that Hitler undertook an unnecessary invasion of the USSR with the war against Britain still ongoing, they have assumed that Hitler was very foolish. Hitler was not so foolish, and the invasion of the USSR in 1941 was not optional. It was necessary. It had to be done because the Red Army was deployed for attack in 1941, and the best hope for saving the situation was a war of prevention. See “Hitler’s Policy toward the USSR Justified,” republished below.

* * *

Hitler’s Policy Toward the USSR Justified
(abbreviated version)

Passages from Heinrich Haertle, Freispruch für Deutschland (1965), translated, redacted, rearranged, and somewhat rewritten by Hadding Scott, 2010. (To read a fuller presentation of Haertle’s writing go here.)

Hitler’s Calculations in 1939

Hitler as chancellor assumed that a clash between National-Socialist Germany and world-revolutionary Soviet imperialism would be inevitable, and that he must do everything to prepare for this danger.

The gathering of all Germans into a Great Germany (Großdeutschland) and Hitler’s policy of reconciliation with the West, especially his offers of friendship to England, served this purpose.

However, when England and France had demonstrated through their guarantee to Poland that they were unwilling to tolerate a Germany that would have been strong enough to stand up to the growing Soviet colossus, Hitler began to reorient his foreign-policy overtures from West to East.

In mid-1939 when England and France were trying to complete their encirclement-policy by enlisting even the Soviet Union in an alliance against the Reich, Hitler saw only one escape from the trap: conciliation with Russia. Through that alone, he believed that he would be able to avert a two-front war.

Stalin’s Calculations

Meanwhile, Stalin was counting on the certainty of a war waged by England and France against Germany, from which he could at first remain aloof so as to prepare his military might, and at the favorable moment enter the war and win, either with the Reich against the capitalist West or, even more advantageously, with the capitalist West against the national-socialist Reich. It turned out that Stalin had much less time to prepare than he could have expected, because Germany conquered Poland and France with unprecedented speed.

Stalin’s calculations in 1939-40 were based on hostility between Germany and France and England. When, however, Stalin saw Germany making peace-offers to France and England in late 1939 and 1940, the Bolshevik dictator began to ally himself with England and America against the ever-stronger Germany, so as to expand the Soviet dictatorship into Europe and Asia with the help of “democracy” and “capitalism.”

Precisely on account of the repeated German peace offers to France and England, Stalin feared the end of Europe’s fratricidal war and therefore from fall 1940 directed his aggression  also against Germany, in violation of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. The American Secretary of State Byrnes writes in his memoirs: “It is obvious that the Soviet Government has concluded this pact with the clear intention of breaking it.” Even [Czechoslovakian President Edvard] Beneš affirms in his memoirs that the Soviet Union concluded the “non-aggression pact” only to gain time, i.e. so as to enter into the war later, when the warring parties had been weakened.

Molotov’s November 1940 extortion attempt in Berlin already practically signaled Stalin’s determination for war. He was pressuring Germany, which was still at war with England and already in a de facto war with the United States, to hand over to the Soviet Union the Balkans, the Baltic Sea, and above all the war-deciding oil supply in Romania, thereby making it clear that he would stab Germany in the back at the first opportunity.

Already in 1940 Stalin had begun negotiations in Moscow with the English representative Sir Stafford Cripps, thus with the enemy of a still allied Germany.

In spring 1941 the anti-German coup in Yugoslavia, which mortally threatened Germany’s position in the Balkans and therewith its oil supply, had been instigated and supported by Moscow together with England.

The Red Army increased its divisions in Germany’s rear from 65 divisions in September 1939 to 153 divisions and 36 motorized brigades in 1940-41.

The Preemptive War

Germany’s preemptive war forestalled a gigantic Soviet offensive. The Bolshevik danger was even greater than could even be reported previously. One of Hitler’s enemies, Chief of Staff Franz Halder, demonstrates that. He affirms that Hitler’s conviction “that Russia was preparing for an attack on Germany” was justified, and declares, “We know today from good sources that he was right about that.”

At Nuremberg General Winter testified under oath: “We had at the time the subjective impression that we were striking into an offensive deployment in progress.” Field Marshal von Rundstedt is also a witness to that.

In a secret session of the House of Commons in 1940, Churchill rationalized his rejection of the German peace offer and his decision to broaden the war, with the affirmation that he had at that time, because of the negotiations conducted by the ambassador Sir Stafford Cripps in Moscow, obtained the explicit pledge that the Soviet Union would enter the war on the English side.

Jewish journalist Alexander Werth, who was a correspondent in Russia and in his heart still stands on the Soviet side, reports about Stalin’s speech of 5 May 1941:

All my sources agree in fundamental features with the most important points of Stalin’s speech: the conviction that the war “almost unavoidably” would be decided in 1942, wherein, if necessary, the Soviets must seize the initiative.

The testimony of Senior-General Jodl at Nuremberg is thereby proven correct on all essential points by the Soviet side.

In his conversation with Hitler, in fall 1940 when the possibility of a preemptive war against the Bolshevik threat first came up, the motive of acquiring Lebensraum was never mentioned.

At Nuremberg Senior-General Jodl testifies: “The Fuehrer has never named in my presence even just one hint of a reason other than the purely strategic.” For months on end Hitler continuously repeated to Jodl’s face:

“There is no doubt now that England puts her hopes in this last mainland proxy; otherwise she would have already called off the war after Dunkirk….  Agreements have certainly already been made. The Russian deployment is unmistakable. One day suddenly we shall be either coldly blackmailed or attacked.”

What Germany Gave Up for the Preemptive War

Jodl himself had placed great hopes in the famous negotiations with Molotov, since with a neutral Russia in the rear — which furthermore would help Germany with economic supplies — the D-Day Invasion would never have been possible. No statesman and no field-marshal could sacrifice such a favorable situation without being forced by circumstances. It is a fact that Hitler “for months struggled inwardly in the most serious way with this decision, certainly influenced by the many opposing pictures that both the Reichsmarschall and the Supreme Commander of the Kriegsmarine as well as the Foreign Minister raised.”

That the actions of 1941 were a preemptive strike in defense of Germany, permitted under international law, is most strongly proven by the strategic situation. It would have been political and military madness that contradicted all accomplishments of the German leadership up to that point, if one had given up the victory over England, certainly possible at the time [by pushing British forces out of the Mediterranean, which would have caused Britain to sue for peace], in order to attack Russia, if the German leadership had not been compelled first to fight off the threat in the east.

How the Final Decision was Reached

The foreign-backed coup that overthrew the pro-German government of Yugoslavia, the hostile doings of the Soviet Government in combination with England, compelled the final decision. Jodl testifies:

“Until then the Fuehrer still had doubts. On 1 April and no sooner … his decision to conduct the attack stood firm, and on 1 April he gave the order to expect the launch of Operation Barbarossa for approximately 22 June.”

Why Didn’t Germany Simply Prepare a Defense?

To his defense-attorney’s question, whether later discoveries had proven the military necessity of this decision, Jodl testified:

“It was without a doubt a purely preemptive war. What we later established was in any case the certainty of an enormous Russian military preparation facing our borders. I want to forgo details but I can just say that we succeeded in achieving tactical surprise with the day and hour of attack, but not strategic surprise. Russia was fully prepared for war.”

Continuing, Senior General Jodl again named an essential reason for the preemptive war:

“We were never strong enough to be able to defend ourselves in the East; events since the year 1942 have proven it. It may sound grotesque, but in order to cover this front of over 2,000 kilometers we would have needed at least 300 divisions, and we never had that.

“If we had waited until we had been caught perhaps in the pincers of a simultaneous Allied invasion and Russian attack, with certainty we would have been lost….”

Nuremberg defense-attorney Dr. Exner argued that a preemptive war was justified:

“The true preemptive war is one of the essential means of self-preservation. It was also indisputably permitted according to the Kellogg-Briand Pact. Thus was the right of defense of all signatory states understood.”

* * *

Source: National-Socialist Worldview

Previous post

Jewish Company Literally Harvesting "Young Blood" for Wealthy to Inject

Next post

American Conservatives Cannot and Will Not Win

13 Comments

  1. Chandala
    30 January, 2019 at 7:33 am — Reply

    Excellent article.

    • victor
      31 January, 2019 at 4:01 pm — Reply

      Awesome article. Always wondered why they captured or destroyed so much equipment on the frontiers. And why the soviet rail system was undetgoing massive movements. The russians wouldve attacked in summer of 1941. also russians developed tanks to be used on good roadways, like in germany. russia itself had a primitive road system.

  2. George Wright
    30 January, 2019 at 6:20 pm — Reply

    Some internal Soviet military communiqués from October 1940 support the idea that Stalin was planning to conquer Europe at least as far as the Rhine River.

  3. Truthweed
    31 January, 2019 at 4:03 pm — Reply

    Hitler never wanted a war with anyone. He did everything possible to prevent wars. He attempted to compromise with Poland. He waited for eight months to retalliate after France invaded the Saar territory of Germany. After Britain carpet-bombed several German cities, targetting civillians, he bombed London with peace pamphlets. He made a truce with Stalin’s USSR but discovered Stalin was preparing for an attack against Germany (see Suvorov, ‘Icebreaker’), and then ALL of Europe.

    Stalin had 23,000 of the world’s fastest tanks but no Russian roads could hold them – they could only be driven on Germany’s autobahns. He began building them before the war.

    Hitler was reluctant to invade Greece but was compelled to because Churchill wanted to open a second front there to distract Hitler from Russia.

    Hitler did not want to invade countries to then incorporate other non-Germans into Germany. He never permanently seized any land unless it formerly belonged to Germany. Through the magic of the media we have been taught the exact opposite of the facts.

    • 4 February, 2019 at 11:40 am — Reply

      I’ve read recently the tanks you mention were lighter and faster than the newer T-34’s, they were meant to lose their tracks after leaving Soviet territory and be replaces with wheels to take advantage of the German and European road network.

    • Angelicus
      8 July, 2019 at 1:16 am — Reply

      Trutweed you have been spot on in your analysis, just an important detail, you said that Hitler was compelled to invade Greece because Churchill wanted a second front; well it was Mussolini who actually spoiled everything by invading Greece and thus opening a second, if not a third front.

      Now the question is: Did Mussolini attack Greece driven by his ego, or was he lured into it by the British? I know that there is no evidence of this but it has been suggested that the British intelligence service manipulated Italian generals who hated Mussolini to propose the invasion of Greece as an easy opportunity to achieve a glorious victory, something that must have appealed to the egotistical Italian leader. What do you think?

      Churchill always had a soft spot for military operations in the Balkans, he already proved that in 1916 when he planned the disastrous landing at Gallipoli. After the German occupation of the Yugoslavia and Greece, it was Churchill who helped to organize the resistance against the Germans, he even sent his son as a liaison officer with Tito.

      • Truthweed
        8 July, 2019 at 5:44 pm — Reply

        As I understand it, Mussolini wanted to establish a military base in Greece but the Greeks refused so he invaded them. The Greeks were successfully defending themselves and winning. Hitler was compelled by his alliance with Mussolini to aid him. Hitler regretted invading Greece and stated that he considered himself to be “an Helene”, that is, someone who benefited from the culture created by the ancient Greeks.

  4. Hans Schneider
    4 February, 2019 at 12:36 pm — Reply

    read the interesting books from David Irving (England) about WW2 and gain a new realistic view of history.

  5. Paul
    5 February, 2019 at 12:47 pm — Reply

    In this case as all during war , time is critical.
    The Third Reich had little time . They agreed they had to win before a year. They were before Moscow in 6 months.

    Then turned against better judgment south. The Ukraine. This was reasonable only for a long war and because the goal of Barbarosa was the mouth of the Volga at Astrachan . Did Hitler believe Russian in north collapse was imminent? The South armies success were contingent upon the great front all the way to north ports of Murmansk.

    Never forget that General Stab and Hitler himself were receiving disinformation. Central control was fatal. This false information left Hitler optimistic that Russsians would collapse because of political reasons . Political and ideological doctrines were his enemy.

    This was false. He was after the disaster at Moscow forced into a war of attrition (Zermuerbungskrieg) he could not win. They forget to follow good (Clausewitz) military doctrine. They were deceived.
    And were not prepared for winter war . Another sabotage success.

    It is impossible to know what should have been done but they had forgotten a long war could not
    be won. And BLitz Krieg was their only chance. Guderian was far more reliable than anyone. And although relieved at the end Hitler never distrusted him. He would not accept his conconclusions.

  6. 12 February, 2019 at 6:19 pm — Reply

    Revisionistic. Hitler stalled Jet-engine progress for over a year with an order (insane). This while knowing how big the Soviet Union is (thus innovative Jet aircraft’s being essential for long-range attacks against them) and this while knowing the Brits could primarily only hurt Germany with air attacks at that point in time. Air supremacy was key to winning the war.

    The Soviets were easily overrun initially aka not well prepared for war at all with Germany early on. They had a hard time with Finland, let alone attacking the Axis without having full mobility of their tanks and men near their borders. They were also scared of Japan eastwards. It’s false to suggest they would have attacked Germany in those years at least.

    Hitler cared little for the East-Baltic Eastern-Slav race and he as such most definitely would have attacked the Russians regardless of communism or anything else playing there for land. Note Stalin was supplying the Reich continually with supplies while they were fighting the French and Brits pre Hitler attacking. Stalin was focussing his efforts on small Baltic states mainly and Finland.

    The reason the Reich lost is because Hitler didn’t wait a few years for the incredible wonder weapons (those that eventually came) after impressively taking France with Blitzkrieg,- namely the V1, V2, V3 plus those better bigger tanks and essentially the first proper jet aircraft which all came too late in the war while fighting on two fronts (which he should not have started at that point). Thousands of those first Jets under solid bunkers (massive bunkers which they eventually build across German and German-occupied or friendly led territory) would have won the war against Britain, even with America officially in the war with Britian at that point, they would have gotten destroyed in combination with the V1 and V2 which were all close to being operative. He should have focused on Britain first before attacking the Soviets let alone while knowing it could mean the US officially entering the war as well thus fighting 3 world powers. He lost the war by attacking the Soviets while the Anglo’s were still in the game.

    There is little doubt the Reich would have won with the first Jet aircraft operative in the thousands, the v1, v2 especially as well (first working ballistic missile), v3 (insane), effective subs (which worked well until 43) and the great huge & effective tanks they eventually produced. He should not have attacked the Soviets that year at least who I don’t believe would have attacked the Axis that early on anyway. Having those Jets in the high thousands operative and beating Britain first and foremost – should have been the goal after 1940″.

    • 13 February, 2019 at 5:06 am — Reply

      According to a book I read circa mid 70’s written by Adolph Galland, who was chief of fighter forces, called “the first and the last”, Hitler stalled the jet fighter development for two years because he insisted that it have “fighter bomber” capabilities. According to Galland this presented a big problem at first and the necessary resources weren’t committed to solve the problem, in other words it was put on the back burner.

  7. cc
    12 February, 2019 at 9:07 pm — Reply

    Germany was smothered by an international army.

    People should be talking about why Germany is under perpetual occupation. The Federal multi-racial army (compliments of the 19th century Black Republicans) have been in Germany for so many years the numbers lose their meaning.

  8. Angelicus
    8 July, 2019 at 2:08 am — Reply

    The man presenting the video made a very important mistake at the beginning when he said that Halder tried to apply the concept of the campaign of France against the Soviet Union. Halder was an unimaginative officer that opposed to Manstein’s brilliant plan that led to the spectacular victory in the West. It was Hitler’s support of Manstein’s idea that secured victory, something that also showed Hitler’s strategic wisdom.

    Halder was not the chief of the Army’s High Command (OKH = Oberkommando des Heeres) but field-marshall von Brauchitsch, but as chief of staff of the OKH, it was Halder who presented the plan to Hitler. According to this plan, the principal goal was the capture of Moscow. Since the Soviet government was highly centralized with Moscow as his headquarters it was vital to capture the nation’s capital.

    Halder’s idea was the right one. Hitler approved it although he said that in his opinion it was vital to capture Leningrad to secure the supply of Swedish iron.

    I have to say that, in my opinion, Hitler was wrong when he ordered the Panzergruppe Guderian that was advancing almost without opposition towards Moscow, to turn south to help destroy the Soviet armies surrounded in Kiev. His idea of securing fertile Ukraine and its important mineral resources cost him the final victory

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.