U.S. Midterms: Race-Blind Republicans Lose Control of House

Millions of first-time non-White voters in urban areas have ensured that the race-blind Republican Party — which still ignores the reality that Whites are rapidly becoming a minority — has lost control of the House in yesterday’s mid-term elections, making it clear that ethnic balkanization of America offers the only route for White survival on that continent.

WITH ALL 435 House seats up for grabs, it was inevitable that the racial demographic change which has been underway since the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which changed the way quotas were allocated by ending the National Origins Formula that had been in place in the United States since the Emergency Quota Act of 1921.

Democrats need to “flip” — that is, take Republican-held seats to seize control of the House of Representatives. Most of these seats are located in the nation’s urban areas, most of which are already, or nearing White minority status.

In Texas, for example, where the White population is now only 42 percent of the total, “Latinos” make up 40 percent of the state’s population, ensuring that a number of seats “flipped.”

White faces at a Trump election rally in Florida last week

The Republicans — and Trump in particular — whose political position was staked out on immigration, appealed mainly to Whites.

As a result, the mid-terms 2018 are but a portend of what is coming in the very near future. According to a Brookings Institute review of official US Census Bureau statistics, America will become minority White in 2045 — just 27 years away.

However, this cut off date does not tell the full picture, as in the younger age groups, this switch will happen even sooner.

Because non-Whites as a group are younger than Whites, the minority White tipping point comes earlier for younger age groups.

As shown below, census projections indicate that, for youth under 18 – the post-millennial population – non-Whites will outnumber Whites in 2020 — just 13 months away.

For those age 18-29 — members of the younger labor force and voting age populations — the tipping point to majority non-White, will occur in 2027, just nine years away.

The Brookings Institute review (falsely using the term “minorities” to describe non-Whites), went on to say:

“Minorities will be the source of all of the growth in the nation’s youth and working age population, most of the growth in its voters, and much of the growth in its consumers and tax base as far into the future as we can see.”

Apart from the immediate policy implications for the Trump administration (namely that it is now highly unlikely that the “wall” will ever be built), the long-term meaning of this demographic shift is that Whites will soon lose what little political clout they had left inside the government, and the fulcrum will swing to an alliance made up of the non-White groups and the small White left wing.

Once again, the election results make it clear that the only way in which Whites are going to survive in America is to start gathering together in an area where they can quickly become an outright majority, and force a balkanization of that country.

If Whites fail to consolidate in a geographic area on racial grounds, they will face ultimate extermination at the hands of the non-White majority, which is rapidly going to plunge the rest of the country into Third World status.

* As the racial demographic change speeds up, more and more political changes which previously would have been impossible, will occur. The first of these took place in Florida during the mid-term elections, where voters approved an amendment that will restore voting rights to more than a million convicted of felonies. Most of those barred from voting were Black, because of that racial group’s higher crime rate.

* * *

Source: Daily Archives

Previous post

Did Jews Provoke the Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting?

Next post

The Tomb of Pan


  1. Jim
    9 November, 2018 at 6:59 am — Reply

    Thank you for the excellent article. Assuming the validity of the statistics you cite, which I have no reason to doubt, then the conclusions you reach and the predictions you make are, in my opinion, incontrovertible.

  2. Travon Martinberg
    9 November, 2018 at 10:57 am — Reply

    Accumulation of a white homeland must happen, and could be driven by those responsible for our food production – white farmers. A recent review of occupational backgrounds in the US showed that about 95% of farm and ranch managers are white, per Yes, they hire many n0n-white laborers at times, but those are non-residents who won’t vote. The small farm communities in liberal northeast PA are a world away from the nearby ghetto-bunny suburbs along the route 80 to route 84 corridor known as the “Poconos” as an example, and overwhelmingly support Trump unlike those others. What is needed is unionization by the farm owner-operators, to wind down the process of hiring non-white aliens to do picking for starters, then proceed to form a voting block and begin additional land acquisitions as reserves and land bridges. Unfortunately, the rise of corporate farming starting in force in the 1980s has complicated this issue, due to the level of regulation corporations face in political influence, however non-family corporate farms account for only 1.36 percent of US farmland area per . A possible factor is climate change, spawning droughts which may eventually require moving the growing centers northward into areas of the US and Canada currently not heavily farmed, though possibly ranched. This will coalesce farming populations having the complicated skill set that’s now needed to farm, and advance racial separation logistics based on land ownership.

  3. cc
    9 November, 2018 at 1:23 pm — Reply

    Virtually 100% of all farms and ranches in Texas are owned by White people.

    Why should I care that Republicans lost control of the House? It has no effect on Federal tyranny. The instant you internalize the enemy, it’s over. Go home and collect postage stamps and drink milk. Don’t forget to vote for Jewish Democratic Capitalism.

    • Travon Martinberg
      10 November, 2018 at 1:50 am — Reply

      Virtually all those Texas farmers and ranchers are good Christian Republicans who will talk your ear off on why Jerry Jones wants to keep Jason Garrett as head coach. Mention race and they’re bound to get flustered, I’d guess. Could be from the number of white men with Mexican girlfriends? Time is not ripe for the process I mentioned then.

  4. cc
    10 November, 2018 at 6:49 am — Reply

    West Texas cowboys coined the expression ‘Wet Mexican’ — they cross the river. I know of one high school in the early ’70s in West Texas that had separate entrances for White students and Mexicans.

    The ranchers/cowboys across Texas come from White, educated families. They have diplomas in Range Animal Science — RAS degree.

  5. Sethmoto101
    10 November, 2018 at 1:36 pm — Reply

    This is a great article! Consider how well the US economy, especially manufacturing, is supposedly doing – including providing health care insurance without Obamacare with record-low unemployment and cheap energy, and how well Wall St. is doing, and how international conflicts seem to have fallen off the headlines to the benefit of our largely non-white military – and still, non-whites are uniformly dissatisfied. We all know when they will be satisfied – when they can attack whites with impunity (although race-based jury nullification already looms greater then ever), when they can make all their foreign relatives automatically into citizens (although chain migration already does much of it). When they can ignore paying their personal debts without being harassed, as they would put it. When every monument, great structure, work of art, invention and discovery by whites is removed, erased from school books, renamed, or conditioned as a product of the oppression of indigenous peoples. When felons nationwide, including illegals, are given the right to vote, and full citizenship is granted to all illegals in the US. That’s when.

  6. 11 November, 2018 at 1:35 am — Reply

    “Once again, the election results make it clear that the only way in which Whites are going to survive in America is to start gathering together in an area where they can quickly become an outright majority, and force a balkanization of that country. If Whites fail to consolidate in a geographic area on racial grounds, they will face ultimate extermination at the hands of the non-White majority….”

    None of this is necessarily true.

    In the first place, elections are on their way out. It’s elections that make majorities so important. In 1996, 2000, 2008, 2012, and 2016, there were complaints either in primaries or in general elections about important voting irregularities, and other unfair practices used to suppress candidates who had popular support but were repellent to the plutocratic establishment. The more disillusionment there is about the electoral process, the less resistance there will be to getting rid of elections and replacing them with an autocrat who represents the good of the ordinary people. This is going to happen sooner or later. In my opinion, sooner would be much better.

    An autocrat whose goal would be simply to make the country function as well as possible would eliminate many of the problems that White people have been facing for decades. We see this tendency already with Trump. Perhaps without any specifically racial motive, he sees some destructive policy and asks, why are we doing this?

    Even under an elected government, it is not impossible for a White minority to prevail. White people in Mississippi and South Carolina managed to retake control after Reconstruction despite the Black majorities in both states.

    Presentday Republicans could learn something from oldtime Democrats about how to maintain an electoral majority. The key to it is not being stingy with government handouts to ordinary people, including Blacks.

    Now, unfortunately, the pinheads who have dominated the Republican Party in recent decades would apparently rather cut their own throats than raise taxes on the rich or give assistance to people with below-average incomes, but that is the kind of thing that has to be done, not only to unify the White vote, but also to win Black support for the existing order.

    At least half of the Black population regards Hispanic immigration as a serious problem, and I am sure that this is a big part of why Trump got more Black votes than any Republican candidate in recent decades.

    White people have a chance to maintain dominance even if elected government continues, but only if we jettison the Republican Party’s established plutocratic ideology and do what is practical to unify the White electorate, and to strengthen our position. Some of our worst enemies are not leftists but ideologically rigid Republicans.

    Trying to force balkanization is Tubby Tubbington’s stupid idea. Balkanization could happen someday, but if you try to force it, guaranteed you are acting prematurely and will be crushed.

    • Travon Martinberg
      16 November, 2018 at 1:01 am — Reply

      Whites will not maintain electoral dominance under the current scenario, based on simple demographic trends that we all know, such as white minority status for younger age groups within just a few years. Jews have supported that trend in legislative and judicial agendas on immigration, and with media that label any reactionary alternative as racist, with an accompanying media isolation of its proponent, as is happening to Ann Coulter now. A future example could be over the reaction to the Electoral College count that enabled Trump’s victory. If the same scenario were to repeat for his reelection, the groundswell toward the College’s repeal likely will be as heavily supported and funded by jews as their support of the Clinton campaign. Jews who expediently support skirting federal law in their support of sanctuary cities and similar legal trickery that endangers or out-populates the white majority with non-whites (e.g. Darrell Steinberg’s actions noted at If jews had any sense, they’d *always* side with the rule of law, and not force judicial activism that weakens judicial merit in the long run; jews should know that mob rules apply when justice du jour rules, such as its letting negroid criminals destroy jewish urban communities with crime in the 1970s. Yet you can be sure that those opposing a constitutional amendment to eliminate the Electoral College in 3 years, such as Justice Kavanaugh, will earn “Racist” whispers and might find their less-secure careers stalled. With the repeal, white “red” states will loose electoral authority and more non-whites than whites will likely be elected nationally, representing the country’s demographic change. And we already have a defacto multi-racial plutocracy that gives Trump just enough wiggle room to raise cackles for being reactionary, but not enough to do any major course change to substantially protect whites long term. Where is the moratorium on legal immigration? Or reversal of the 1965+ policy, by using education and resettlement incentives to build West-friendly industry leaders in places like India and China? Furthermore, whites need a nation without the financial drain of the black underclass, not a method of gaining its votes to build an anti-hispanic majority. This drain has been documented into the trillions of dollars since LBJ’s Great Society. Who has been paying for it?

      • 16 November, 2018 at 2:08 pm — Reply

        “Whites will not maintain electoral dominance under the current scenario….”

        “Will not”? That’s a prediction, not a statement of the possibilities.

        Your possibilities are limited by your thinking.

  7. JM/Iowa
    11 November, 2018 at 2:17 am — Reply

    “If Whites fail to consolidate in a geographic area on racial grounds, they will face ultimate extermination at the hands of the non-White majority, which is rapidly going to plunge the rest of the country into Third World status.”

    If those same Whites fail to develop and implement a creed that is for Whites only, even consolidation in a geographic area will fail. We have that creed now: Cosmotheism. It’s high time you learn and implement it into all our lives. Need help with that?

    • 16 November, 2018 at 10:17 am — Reply

      You and the author are both correct, Jim. We need our own exclusive living space and we need a shared world view that holds firm to the primacy of race, is preservationist and forward looking. You and I and a few others recognize William Pierce’s Cosmotheisn as that best world view for our race to embrace. Our people will be organized around that core of responsible kinsmen who agree with our Cosmotheist values and who support or join the National Alliance, the sponsor of National Vanguard online magazine.

      Speaking of Dr. P and the midterm election, with all the uproar about voter fraud and recounts in the racially-charged races for Florida governor and Senator — two wimpy Republican Whites pitted against two aggressive Black Democrats — I’m reminded of an ADV broadcast he did during the Bush/Gore contest. It’s like déjà vu: with the same three heavily Jewish counties, Broward, Dade and Palm Beach, again at the center of the recount this time around. What I’m not hearing now from the Jew-controlled TV news networks about the situation is what WLP pointed out: that there are a significant number of Israeli dual citizens in these Florida counties who are allowed to vote absentee. They vote as a bloc, but apparently they are not tipping those two Florida elections to the anti-White Democrats this go ’round. Ah! democracy. Next time. I keep picturing those two drooling wolves and the little white lambkin, voting on what’s for supper.

      I wish I could quote what Dr. Pierce said about the Florida recount 18 years ago and paste some of it here, but Metapedia, my last best source for finding stuff like that, “is having problems” so that will have to wait. It should be an ADV from around November, 2000.

      • Travon Martinberg
        16 November, 2018 at 1:21 pm — Reply

        Democrat and Republican are two sides to the same shekel, as we see on legal immigration policy, for example. But who wins or loses a congressional race is a product of how congressional district lines are drawn by state legislatures, not county lines, and that fact has been seized upon by federal courts to ensure state compliance with the Voting Rights Act – parts of which is affirmative action in congressional representation – strongly supported by jews, per , with the litigation results seen at , by scrolling down to “Cases Relating to Race”. American jurisprudence therefore has been complicated with a legal made-sense-at-the-time patchwork, and you’ll quickly realize that it’s an endless problem with one certain realization: In American politics, there is no working around race. This alone, without any religious overtone, justifies separate living space.

  8. cc
    16 November, 2018 at 7:15 pm — Reply

    White separatists have no government. Voting is another example of internalizing the enemy. Two-timers have one foot in the establishment and one foot out.

    Awhile back there was conversation about building White settlements in Appalachia. Good idea!

  9. 17 November, 2018 at 12:22 pm — Reply

    CC: Two-timers have one foot in the establishment and one foot out. Awhile back there was conversation about building White settlements in Appalachia. Good idea!

    The thing is, CC, settlements require settlers — pioneers, not two-timers.

    Appalachia is a good idea, and doable. Those few serious, courageous folks here at who have already either pledged support for or joined the National Alliance, and who therefore receive the the National Alliance BULLETIN each month, are well aware of not just the one but two southern Appalachian foothold “settlements” that the Alliance owns, free and clear.

    I’m curious. What other serious White separatist groups are there in Appalachia that are both ideologically sound and already gathering those Folk who are attracted to our values here to our homeland? NA would like to network with those who recognize as we do that the pale yellow region in this map of the U.S. makes for a nice homeland:

  10. cc
    17 November, 2018 at 8:27 pm — Reply

    Will Williams, thanks for responding.

    “The thing is, CC, settlements require settlers — pioneers, not two-timers.”

    100% correct. That’s my position.

    Example: Two-timers are those who support White separation and portions of the anti-White establishment at the same time. Oftentimes they’re not aware of it. It’s either ‘this’ or ‘this’. You can’t have both.

  11. 21st Century WN
    18 November, 2018 at 11:14 am — Reply

    Hadding: “Trying to force balkanization is Tubby Tubbington’s stupid idea.”

    It’s just as much, if not more so, Billy Roper’s “idea” – though neither he nor Covington originated it.

    That said, it’s rather amusing how every white nationalist “leader” who advocates a specific area of the country for white nationalists to concentrate in also just so happens to have a home smack in the middle of that “ideal” region. Best region for an ethnostate? Why, exactly where Harold Covington lives. Or: Best region for a white ethnostate? Why, exactly where Billy Roper lives. How convenient – for them! They rant on and on about how “lazy” others are for not moving to such an “ideal” region, but never once point out that they don’t need to sell their current homes and pull up stakes. In other words, there’s never any sacrifice on their part.

    Even Matt Hale once claimed that the ideal ethnostate should be in the Illinois region, which, “by mere coincidence” just so happened to be exactly where he lived! And John De Nugent posts on his website that the “ideal ethnostate” just so happens to be in the Upper Peninsula region of Michigan, where, “by coincidence” he also happens to live.

    Is the pattern clear now? I hope so. But if it isn’t, neither Covington nor Roper nor Hale nor De Nugent know what they’re talking about. Their only objective is to get enough dues-paying people into their area so they can establish their own little WN fiefdom. But none of these ideas or “leaders” have the strategic forethought or mental acuity to lead any such ethnostate. And therein lies the problem: bad leadership begets bad strategic planning.

    Time is running out; on that we all agree. But scattering our efforts in little pockets across America following tin-pot “leaders” is a failed strategy. “Oh, but the more little groups we have the harder it is to destroy us!” comes the anemic cry. Okay, but what have all those “little groups” ever accomplished? The answer is: “nothing”.

    What is needed is the WN version of an SPLC-type, well-financed operations center – with satellite offices from coast-to-coast. Our movement has had over half a century to achieve this and what do we have to show for our efforts?

    The answer is obvious.

    • 18 November, 2018 at 6:33 pm — Reply

      I’m glad you didn’t lump the National Alliance or its leadership in with those other folks you criticize. You probably meant to and just forgot. You say:

      What is needed is the WN version of an SPLC-type, well-financed operations center – with satellite offices from coast-to-coast. Our movement has had over half a century to achieve this and what do we have to show for our efforts?b The answer is obvious.

      Needs, needs, needs…

      Is the WN solution that really obvious, Mr. 21ST CENTURY WN? SPLC has a reported $425 million in its endowment to fight “hate” with. Who finances your imaginary WN operation?

      The SPLC is still regularly quoted by controlled media, saying the National Alliance is the most organized, best financed “hate group” extant, when, in actuality we’re lucky when we receive 1,000,000th of SPLC’s tax-exempt war chest from those in the White majority. It’s not our fault. They are not ready to support a “hate group.” They lack the necessary moral courage and a sense of urgency. Hopefully we will be there for the best of our race, much stronger, whenever they are ready.

  12. Axis Sally
    18 November, 2018 at 8:23 pm — Reply

    I am utterly unable to imagine what kind of mind it takes to believe that an alien terrorcrat, entrenched in state power, including the monopoly on creating the fiat legal tender currency, whose openly stated goal is the genocide of our race, is simply going to clean out his desk and go toddling home with his tail between his legs because a simple majority of “white” schlubs went out and voted. By this I do not mean the 537 popularly elected smiley-face rubber stamps you are told “represent” you, but rather the (((inner party))) whom the former protect and serve. Such a scenario may have obtained in George Orwell’s allegorical tale Animal Farm, but even then, only temporarily. The plantation called the United States of America DOES NOT BELONG TO US. We Aryans are not going to achieve hegemony within the territory thereof; neither politically, economically, nor militarily: read it and weep!

    Who can guess how much time, effort, and money has been wasted pursuing the delusion, “If we only could get our hands on enough Federal Reserve Shekels to get our message out to the white masses, they would come flocking to our standard… ?” Has it happened? Can it happen? One might point-out that the Enemy has no trouble getting the “white” masses to swallow their toxic nonsense hook, line, and sinker.

    The problem lies, in my opinion, in the fact that we are operating on a flawed premise of who or what constitutes the White Race. I propose that we establish a new racial category: WINOs (White In Name Only.) Once having excluded WINOs from demographic estimates, we can obtain a more realistic picture of that with which we have to work, and be able to plan intelligently. We will realize the problem before us is how to preserve a small kernel of the best surviving Aryan genetics though the ongoing debacle. James Hilton’s novel Lost Horizon, George Bernard Shaw’s Back to Methuselah, and Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged (minus the Jewish materialism) contain ideas along the lines of what I have in mind.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.