News

More Anti-Natal Propaganda: “I Prefer to Welcome Migrants Than to Have Children”

PUSHING WHITE PEOPLE to have fewer children to “help the environment” is a meme that has been around before. But it looks like they’re giving it another whirl.

Here’s Friday’s front page from the French newspaper Libération.

“Fewer children to save the planet?”

“Diapers or the ozone layer, do we need to choose?”

This is a pun in French. It’s also complete nonsense, since the ozone layer problem has already been solved.

The article references a similar piece in the New York Times.

It’s accompanied by personal commentaries like this one, from Gaëlle.

Personally, I don’t plan to have children in my life. I don’t like them but I don’t detest them either. The environment is a factor that reassures me about my choice. There are so many people emigrating because of climate change and, in parallel, they tell us that we need to continue to procreate, particularly for retired people. I prefer to welcome migrants than to have children with an uncertain future who will go on consuming ever more. They tell us: between now and 2040 it could all fall apart. Children are a chasm for finance and energy. When I meet people, I try to make the situation clear quickly by saying I don’t want them. I don’t see myself changing for anyone, nor putting my career in parentheses.

Of course these messages are only ever pushed upon White people, despite White birthrates being below replacement level in virtually every country where White people live. And White people will be the only ones who can come up with technological solutions to whatever problems exist. Are the teeming hordes of Africa going to help with environmental engineering?

* * *

Source: Diversity Macht Frei

For Further Reading

Previous post

The Clinton Foundation Racket and Trump’s Failure to Drain the Swamp, Part 2

Next post

As Ye Sow . . .

4 Comments

  1. Franklin Ryckaert
    December 1, 2018 at 7:12 am — Reply

    This is all propaganda for the White Genocide Project by the usual subjects. Rest assured that that “French” newspaper Libération is owned by the same subversive ethnic Mafia that also owns the New York Times.

    That comment by “Gaëlle” sounds too good to be true. She wants no children because :
    1) “I don’t like children”. (very unusual for normal women).
    2) “The environment” (as if the high birthrate of non-Whites is not a greater threat to the environment than the sub-replacement birthrate of Whites).
    3) “Climate Change”. (another Jewish scam).
    4) “I welcome immigrants”. (Mass non-White immigration is a major part of the White Genocide Project).
    5) “Children cost money and energy”. (So do non-White children).
    6) “My career”. (A major part of the White Genocide Project is to turn White women into feminists choosing a career above motherhood).

    I suspect that “Gaëlle” is not a real person but a sock puppet of a Jewish member of the White Genocide Brigade.

    As a counter measure, let us start a campaign with posters with the text “It’s OK To Have White Children” and add the picture of a White couple with many beautiful White children. That will of course be decried as “hate” but expose our enemies the more.

  2. Sethmoto101
    December 1, 2018 at 10:57 am — Reply

    “Children are a chasm for finance and energy”. White children are the bridge across that chasm, meaning that without them here as adults to out-engineer your “climate change”, finance becomes meaningless and insufficient energy exists to survive it.

  3. Titus
    December 1, 2018 at 6:43 pm — Reply

    Whoever is still hooked to this propaganda deserves what he gets.

  4. Sethmoto101
    December 2, 2018 at 9:57 pm — Reply

    She/it is not the only one to welcome migrants. In the US, it’s a cash cow for those who know how to milk federal grants for supposed non-profits to feed, clothe, shelter and educate little wandering wonders – and have the correct racial profile to fit the cause. Yet another shakedown for which whites will be disproportionately billed, is born! And not from the genetically inferior impulse-control and dearth of empathy as found in the students that fulfill the Special Education shakedown, but out of a simple lack of border control. From: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/02/us/southwest-key-migrant-children.html :

    “Juan Sanchez earned $1.5 million last year as Southwest Key’s chief executive.”

    “Southwest Key has collected $1.7 billion in federal grants in the past decade, including $626 million in the past year alone. But as it has grown, tripling its revenue in three years, the organization has left a record of sloppy management and possible financial improprieties, according to dozens of interviews and an examination of documents. It has stockpiled tens of millions of taxpayer dollars with little government oversight….”

    “Showing the ambition that brought him from the barrio to the Ivy League, Mr. Sanchez seized the chance to expand his nonprofit when thousands more unaccompanied children began crossing the border during the Obama era. When the Trump administration needed to house migrant children it had separated from their parents, Mr. Sanchez took them in.”

    “Southwest Key has created a web of for-profit companies — construction, maintenance, food services and even a florist — that has funneled money back to the charity through high management fees and helps it circumvent government limits on executive pay.”

    This shakedown would make the jews running Special Ed. schools in NY even paler – with envy.

    Southwest Key is a large institution (and not in the good definition of the word), meaning no matter what the oversight, problems will arise to drain social services budgets. Problems that wouldn’t exist if we had proper border control. Thus this article: https://www.texasmonthly.com/news/records-reveal-southwest-key-cited-hundreds-violations-last-three-years/ .

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.