Essays

Brief Comments on the “Reconstruction” of Cheddar Man

by Hadding Scott

CHEDDAR MAN is the name given to a complete male human skeleton approximately 9,100 years old that was found in southwestern England. It constitutes evidence of what kind of people inhabited Britain in prehistoric times.

In the new reconstruction of Cheddar Man, the eyes are blue. The hair is wavy. These are unmistakable Caucasoid traits.

The features do not contradict this conclusion. The nose is a bit broad, but not Negroid. This is not even the kind of nose that mulatta Meghan Markle had before her plastic surgery.

Note also the lips. Those are not Negroid lips. We are so accustomed to seeing mixed-race people with only fractional Negroid ancestry and calling them “Black” that we sometimes forget how a real full-blooded Negro looks. This is not how a Negro looks.

Look at the jaw. The jaw of a Negro projects forward (prognathism). The jaw on this skull is quite the opposite.

What they’ve done, is that they’ve tried to muddle the race of this person by matting the hair and by assuming a skin-tone that seems quite unlikely in combination with blue eyes. When have you ever seen such a dark-complected person with blue eyes? Most likely never. It would be quite an oddity. We have a right to be skeptical about this.

In any event, these people were not Negroes, because the bone structure is all wrong, and bone structure is far more important than pigment in determining race. If you know the bone structure, you know the race, as these images demonstrate:

The skull of Cheddar Man is consistent with his being Caucasoid. Here is an earlier reconstruction, based on the same skull:

And here is an Englishman, Adrian Targett, whose DNA shows that he is a direct descendant of  Cheddar Man (Daily Mail, 7 February 2018):

The face of Cheddar Man is the face of a British peasant, the people that were conquered by the Aryans: first by the Britons, then by the Anglo-Saxons, then by the Normans. It is not an especially attractive face by White standards, but it is a White face.

* * *

Source: National-Socialist Worldview

For Further Reading

Previous post

If Left Unchecked, the Problem of Goyim Noticing Inevitably Becomes One of Goyim Knowing

Next post

Our Biggest Mistake

5 Comments

  1. February 13, 2018 at 5:10 am — Reply
  2. Mr. Frosty
    February 13, 2018 at 7:43 pm — Reply

    They chose the dark skin tone because Cheddar Man does not have the light skin gene that the modern British have. This makes sense because he predates agriculture. Agricultural societies create larger, but more malnourished populations than hunter-gatherers. Selective pressure for light skin only began when grains became the primary food source and sunlight became the primary source of vitamin D. Add consistent cloudy skies and London fog and you have strong, rapid selective pressure for light skin.

    Even without these genes, he couldn’t have been any darker than a mediterranean or arab.

    • February 15, 2018 at 8:58 am — Reply

      I largely agree, however while agriculture may have spurred the lightening of skin colour, the process would have begun with the arrival of the first anatomically modern humans in Europe c. 40-50,000 years BP.

      The very fact that the eye colour of Cheddar Man’s community have mutated from dark brown to blue indicates that a tremendous amount of colour lightening had taken place by the Mesolithic 10,000 years BP and it is therefore unrealistic to suppose that skin colour would have remained so dark.

      It is interesting that despite contributions to this project dealing with the reconstruction of Cheddar Man, from the Natural History Museum, University College London and a host of other geneticists, none of these academics has seen fit to publish their scientific findings and in doing so expose their work to critical scrutiny.

      There are a number of genes that have been found to have an effect upon human skin colour, eye colour and hair colour, such as: SLC24A5, SLC45A2, HERC2, OCA2, ASIP, MC1R, MATP, TYR, TYRP1 and MFSD12, to name but a few. None of these genes or their variants is an on:off switch as far as colouration is concerned however, although they all contribute to some extent. Furthermore it is admitted that the way in which these all interact is not fully understood, which is why the academics are only saying that there is a 74% probability that Cheddar Man’s skin was “brown to black”.

      All that the academics have said so far is that Cheddar Man and a couple of other Mesolithic humans possessed versions of some of these genes that are normally found in sub-Saharan African populations. However the San people of the Kalahari must possess the sub-Saharan versions of all these genes and yet their skin is in many cases not much darker than the average Arab. There has therefore been a degree of ‘artistic licence’ employed in the decision to make Cheddar Man appear as dark as the reconstruction project group have and I believe this is down to virtue signalling and the desire to push the multiracial agenda.

      The primary gene responsible for skin colour would appear to be SLC24A5, and such designations are simply short-hand versions of the full scientific names given to these genes.

      SLC24A5 differs between various human populations in three places where certain single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are located, and these SNPs are named: rs1426654, rs2555364 and rs16960620.

      What I have managed to ascertain so far is that there are three versions of rs1426654, and two versions of the other two SNPs. For example: version rs1426654(A;A) contributes to lighter skin colour; whereas rs1426654(A;G) contributes to medium skin colour; and rs1426654(G;G) contributes to darker skin colour, and when we calculate the total number of variations that can be caused by a combination of these seven SNP variants, there are twelve (3 x 2 x 2).

      When we then add to this the effect of a second gene, SLC45A2, which has 3 SNP variants, it creates the possibility of 36 variations between the darkest and the lightest skin colour, and what the academics are not telling anyone is the variants of all of these genes that Cheddar Man possessed, and in doing so they are preventing anyone from challenging their interpretations. They expect us to simply believe what we have been told despite the fact that in this area of academic research a special working group has been established, the sole purpose of which is to vet scientific findings and present them in a sanitised form that inhibits the potential for those findings to be used to support the racial beliefs of ‘far-right’ groups.

      Do you see how Orwellian this all is?

  3. February 13, 2018 at 8:01 pm — Reply

    (((Science))) is desperately trying to start a false historic narrative in Britain of dark-skinned peoples that pre-dated the Britons in order to make the accusation that White Brits have no legitimate claim to their own land or country, the very same way they’ve done with Americans and the so-called “Native” Americans or Amerindians, which is just as false. It doesn’t matter if it’s Nefertiti, Cleopatra or another figure from history. Every time a “new” bust is revealed it becomes increasingly less White and more racially ambiguous. Blue eyes are a trait of ONLY White people. The fact that this Cheddar Man has skin nearly as dark as an African but with blue eyes only proves the unscientific nature of this historical hoax…and I don’t think Cheddar man’s daddy was mixing it up with a White Briton woman to get his blue eyes 9,100 years ago. More junk (((science))).

  4. Walt Hampton
    February 14, 2018 at 1:57 pm — Reply

    The Memory Hole is working overtime!

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.