News

White Americans Are Very White Indeed

A GENETICS ancestry survey published by 23andme some time ago deserves greater publicity than it received in the controlled media. It found that White Americans (European Americans) on average are: “98.6 percent European, 0.19 percent African and 0.18 percent Native American.” Wow, that’s pretty white. I’ll come back to that in a minute.

The survey also found that Latinos are “18 percent Native American, 65.1 percent European and 6.2 percent African.” There might be a little self-selection here, resulting from testing more upper-class Hispanics, who tend to be more White. For instance, Rubén Lisker found the average admixture of a lower-income mestizos in Mexico City to be: 59% Amerindian,
34% European,  and 6% black.

Back to European Americans and their utter Whiteness. The 98.6% figure, mind you, is an average. According to other studies, more than 95% of White Americans have no African or Amerindian ancestry and the 5% who do, seem to have very little, so it is probably this 5% of White Americans who might be adding the 1.4% admixture into the average.

Let that sink in: 95% of White Americans have no African or Amerindian ancestry and those who do seem to have very little. Wow.

Nonetheless, this study puts African Americans at “73.2 percent African, 24 percent European and 0.8 percent Native American.” Other studies have estimated African Americans at around 80% African and 20% European.

What does this mean?

As I previously noted:

First, the USA historically has not been a hotbed of miscegenation as Cultural Marxists like to tell us. Your eyes and common sense should tell you that if there were widespread miscegenation, there would be hardly any White Americans but rather large mestizo/mulatto-like populations such as one finds in many Latin American countries (and even there, small White upper classes still exist).

Second, the people in USA tended to cross the color line in only one direction: White —> Black. Mulatto people would identify as Black and then reintegrate into the Black gene pool.

Which brings us to another question, why do mulattoes almost always identify as Black?

The standard Cultural Marxist answer to this question is because of culture, such as the one-drop rule. But the reality of the situation belies this half-truth.

The most straightforward answer is what Oxford zoologist Jonathan Kingdon suggested in 1996: Black looks are dominant while other looks are recessive. Observation seems to bear this out. A person with only 1/16th Black ancestry will still often have visible Black characteristics, whereas a White person with 1/16th Japanese ancestry would probably pass for 100% White.

In other words, the reason why most mulattoes identify as Black is at least in part biological.  Perhaps the White phenotype really is recessive and is easily diminished.

As philosopher Nick Land succinctly formulated: White + Color = Color.

* * *

Source: Occam’s Razor

Previous post

The Economist Magazine: Always Shilling for Open Borders

Next post

Resolution Radio Interviews Kevin Alfred Strom, part 3

7 Comments

  1. 5 January, 2018 at 10:54 pm — Reply

    I’m glad to see this coming to the surface in our media again. This flies in the face of the Controlled Media, Advertising Media and NPR liberal notion that the sensitive, progressive mixed race couple is as common as cock roaches in a Jewish ghetto.

    This number, 98%, should be compared to the racial purity of American blacks and Mestizos. Both are hybrid mixtures.

    The only group the elites are pushing miscegenation on 24/7/365 through endless propaganda and conditioning is Whites because we rarely mix.

  2. 6 January, 2018 at 2:42 am — Reply

    I wouldn’t trust anything from 23andMe or ancestry.com, as (I believe) both organizations are run by jews. 23andMe is trying to imply that “on average” most White Americans, even at 98.6% White aren’t “pure” or really White. That works to their propaganda advantage of saying that we’re all mixed and no one is pure, so we should keep on mixing it up anyway. Nonsense. Even in spite of so many White women crossing the color line, Whites overall are still overwhelmingly drawn to their own kind, and I believe as the (((media))) continues to overplay its hand with the race-mixing in advertising, TV and film, that it will only strengthen the resolve of Whites to not mix even more.

    I’ve read other studies that show that the vast majority of Whites in the U.S. are entirely European with no non-White admixture…much to the consternation of various special interests. My uncle (mother’s brother) was silly enough to use one of these DNA services, and it returned 65% English/Irish, 20% German and 15% Scandinavian. I would have guessed that. My father’s side, going back 400 years, is similar.

    • Uncle Cracker
      6 January, 2018 at 3:17 pm — Reply

      All whites who mix with these things, commit bestiality and throwing their pearls before the swines, should be treated like dirt.
      I wouldn´t hesitate to reject my own flesh and blood in that case.

  3. cc
    6 January, 2018 at 10:58 am — Reply

    I’d run in the opposite direction of those dna labs.

    If the lab testers are running the dna sample through a liquid chromatograph machine, the results are printed out in hardcopy to pass around. Even if the machine is correct, the results are at the mercy of disinformation specialists.

  4. Uncle Cracker
    6 January, 2018 at 3:22 pm — Reply

    You know, pollutions are very dominant by nature, that´s true.
    If you look at some famous actors, so called mulattoes, i see a degenerated being.
    Like if there has been a reverse evolution.

  5. Dave Neesan
    6 January, 2018 at 11:58 pm — Reply

    Q: “Which brings us to another question, why do mulattoes almost always identify as Black?”
    A: The philosopher Karmen’s First Law of Miscegenation states that the racial bastard will almost always identify with the lower breed. He says it is nature’s way of maintaining racial purity.

  6. Frank N. Furter
    10 January, 2018 at 10:49 am — Reply

    What does one obtain by mixing clean water with dirty water? Dirty water.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.