Jew Ingrate Asks Where America Would Be Without His Tribesmen (The Horror!)
by Dissident Millennial
THE LAST TIME we discussed Bret Stephens it was because of his New York Times editorial which “jokingly” suggested that America would be better off disposing of its historic population rather than its Third World immigrants.
Now the same Jew is back again to regale us with a thought experiment asking us where the United States would be today had it not previously allowed immigrants like himself to wash up on our shores:
A Modest Immigration Proposal: Ban Jews
Bret Stephens | The New York Times
Until his dying day, my dad’s Uncle Bern was a communist sympathizer. I remember him as an affable old man with a gracious wife who made a modest living selling antique lace. He probably wouldn’t have hurt a fly. Yet he found much to admire in the most murderous ideology of the 20th century, responsible for tens of millions of deaths from the killing fields of Cambodia to the gulags of Murmansk.
If you’re Jewish in America, chances are there’s at least one Uncle Bern somewhere in your family tree. As the scholar Ruth Wisse noted last year in Tablet magazine, Jewish intellectual life in the 1930s and 40s was largely defined by one’s stance toward one thing: The Party. Historians reckon that Jews accounted for nearly half the Communist Party’s total membership in those years, while many other Jews were close fellow travelers.
Most of these people, like my great-uncle, were deeply misguided idealists who otherwise led quiet and decent lives. A tiny handful of others — including atomic spies Julius Rosenberg, David Greenglass, Harry Gold and Morton Sobell — betrayed America’s most important military secrets to Stalinist Russia and did incalculable damage to the country and the world.
Here’s a thought experiment: Would the United States have been better off if it had banned Jewish immigration sometime in the late 19th century, so that the immigrant parents of Rosenberg and Sobell had never set foot here?
I know my answer to that!
The question is worth asking, because so many of the same arguments made against African, Latin-American and Muslim immigrants today might have easily been applied to Jews just over a century ago. . . .
. . . and the arguments that were valid then are just as valid now.
Yet imagine if the United States had followed the advice of the immigration restrictionists in the late 19th century and banned Jewish immigrants, at least from Central Europe and Russia, on what they perceived to be some genetic inferiority.
If only that had been the case!
Ah yes, how would us founding-stock Americans be able to sleep at night knowing we left Stephens’ kinsman in Europe to be slaughtered by the Cossacks and then the Germans? That clearly would’ve been our greatest tragedy ever! (cough)
On a serious note, let’s briefly examine what Jewish immigration to America has actually done to the former republic. As Greg Johnson put it:
Our race was not set on the path to destruction when Hitler was elected Chancellor of Germany in 1933. The problem started long before then, but a real turning point began in the 1880s with the immigration of millions of Jews from Eastern Europe to the United States, a country that was simply not culturally or politically capable of understanding and containing the threat they posed. By 1917, the organized Jewish community — operating through a cabal around Woodrow Wilson — had sufficient power to bring the United States into the First World War as a quid pro quo for the British Empire’s Balfour Declaration, which paved the way for the foundation of the state of Israel.
When Jews arrived in America en masse, they found a largely innocent and trusting people and only the weakest barriers to their rise to wealth and power. And what gratitude did the Jewish community feel toward America and its people? As soon as they were able, they traded the lives of 116,000 of the sons of those trusting Americans, plus the suffering of 205,000 more young men who were wounded, some of them unspeakably, plus the mental anguished suffered by ten million soldiers and their loved ones, plus the years robbed from the lives of the ten million soldiers and all those who worked to support them, plus the untold millions of Europeans who suffered and died because America’s entrance prolonged the war — all in order to gain a British promise to allow Jews to displace the Arabs of Palestine to found a Jewish state.
This was a pivotal moment in world history: In the United States, it became clear that whites had lost control of our destiny to Jews, and ever since then, Jews have been able to use their hegemony in the United States to take control of the destinies of white nations around the world and turn more and more of them onto the path to extinction.
No, their control was not absolute. In 1924, white Americans passed immigration restriction. But by 1941, Jews and their allies had delivered America into another World War; in the 1950s and ’60s they spearheaded, funded, and controlled the civil rights movement; and by 1965, after more than 40 years of lobbying, Jews were pivotal in opening America’s borders to non-white immigration.
In other words, let’s take a step back to recap here. If the United States hadn’t allowed the Jewish immigration which led to our entry into two world wars against the Germans, would the founding population of America really be worse off today? How pathologically ignorant and/or dishonest does one have to be to even suggest that? How many hundreds of trillions of dollars wealthier would we be had we not allowed the Jewish immigration to America which led to the unnecessary prolongation of the First World War, the annihilation of Hitler’s Germany, a nuclear standoff with the Soviet Union and the disastrous wars in Korea and Vietnam, not to mention the recent Zionist debacle in Iraq along with the past fifty years of open borders immigration policy, radical feminism, affirmative action and forced racial integration?
The truth is that you can’t even possibly put any kind of meaningful dollar valuation on all that we’ve lost thanks to Jewish power in the States, since such losses include not just mountains of gold and rivers of blood, but really our entire racial heritage and the death of the West itself.
So no, Commissar Stephens, it was not in America’s interest to allow rats like yourself to wash up on our shores, and it is not in America’s interest to continue to allow non-White immigration here thanks to your parasitic lobbying.
* * *
(H/T Steve Sailer of The Unz Review)