The Great Revilo Oliver: The Jewish Plague, part 4
A rational look at the Jewish Question: The ancient history of the Jews gives us clues to their psychology and strategies.
American Dissident Voices broadcast of September 2, 2017Listen to the broadcast
by Kevin Alfred Strom
THE JEWISH STRATEGY of dominance and power is seldom one of open conquest by force of arms. Instead, it is the strategy of biological parasites, which make their way into a society built by another people, often in disguise. Once ensconced inside the gates, they begin to secretly and then openly work in concert against the host society: they undermine its solidarity, corrupt its institutions, and spread memes of anarchy, chaos, and a concocted morality the central tenets of which are the “evil” of protecting or preserving the host population, and the “moral imperative” to protect the parasites, which are newly and increasingly defined as possessing a kind of “divinity.”
It is most instructive to study the Jewish strategy at work in the ancient world.
No man is better qualified to increase our understanding of the subject than the late, great Professor Revilo Pendleton Oliver — classicist, linguist, scholar, and one of the greatest writers of the 20th century. This week we continue our excerpts from his insightful work on the subject, under the title, “The Jewish Plague, part 4.” I give you the words of Revilo P. Oliver:
* * *
The Jewish Plague
by Revilo P. Oliver
THE JEWS HAVE always been physically (i.e., numerically) a weaker people. Wherever they have lodged themselves, they have been a small minority among the goyim.
A large part of the Jewish force in every country consists of Marranos, Jews who, using the chameleon-like ability of their species, effectively disguise themselves. I have often glanced through the lists of births reported by the Jews in their own Detroit Jewish News, and I could not but notice that on many days there was no name that betrayed the race of the child. The personal names of the parents and children were all “Christian” names, with some preference for names that are traditionally Scottish, and the family names all suggested British, French, or sometimes Slavic, ancestry. Those instances of the Jews’ masquerading under assumed names, it should be remembered, are all of Jews who, by inserting such announcements in their own newspapers, confess their race.
Many Marranos eschew such indiscretion, and some are so adept at disguise that their acquaintances and associates are astonished when some accident or indiscretion discloses the race of a person who seemed to be an American, Englishman, South African, German, Frenchman, or other member of our own race. But even when we make every allowance for the Jews’ mastery of disguise, we must admit that they are still a minority in the United States, where they are surely outnumbered by the Aryans, who are probably still an absolute majority in their own country and outnumber the total of all the aliens in their midst, Jews, Congoids, mulattoes, mestizos, Mongolians, and the like.
If the feeble-minded Aryans, instead of subsidizing the prodigious breeding and proliferation of their domestic enemies and even importing hordes of others from Vietnam, Haiti, and elsewhere as “refugees” for the eventual extermination of the Aryans’ own children, were sufficiently intelligent and resolute, they would still have the power to expel or otherwise eliminate all of their alien parasites, among which the Jews are a small, though prepollent, minority.
Throughout history, the Jews have everywhere been a minority in the countries into which they have intruded themselves, and they have necessarily employed the weapons of the physically weak against the physically strong.
[Before the foundation of the highly-militarized state of Israel, which depends on American money and technology,] the Jews have never captured a territory by open warfare and invasion: they have never been sufficiently numerous and strong to attempt an open conquest, even if they had been so temerarious as to waste their own lives to attain what they could more easily and safely attain by deceit.
It is true that the Jews’ myths include two claims of open conquest, but both of these are indubitably fictitious. One of those stories is well known, since it is found in the collection of Jewish tales commonly called the “Old Testament” by our people. According to that myth, the Jews (with the help of their tribal deity) openly invaded the land of Canaan, ruthlessly butchered all the inhabitants and even the inhabitants’ domestic animals, and then appropriated the country they had made a bloody desert.
The tale, even when divested of such nonsense as a claim that the Jews’ god stopped the sun and moon, luminous disks that were floating in the atmosphere at an altitude of about 50,000 feet, and held them stationary for a time to facilitate the rapine, is utterly incredible and no reputable historian, not even among those who profess to be Christians, pretends to believe it.
The tale of armed conquest is intrinsically so incredible that Philo Judaeus, one of the ablest of the Jews’ apologists and propagandists, who, in the early years of the First Century, tried to convince intelligent Greeks and Romans that the Jews were not a menace to civilization, had to admit (Hypoth. 6.5-8) that the story was preposterous and that what must have happened was that the Canaanites voluntarily permitted the Jews to penetrate their country peacefully and set up synagogues and the rest of the Jewish racial organization, after which the Jews, of course, took over. Philo candidly admits that when the Jews peacefully penetrate a country to despoil it, they, in their own minds, naturally regard the inhabitants as enemies, but he seems to hesitate between alternative explanations of the Canaanites’ suicidal folly in permitting the Jewish immigration: the stupid Canaanites were either impressed by the holiness and superiority of their covert invaders or had their minds befuddled by the Jews’ god.
It is possible, of course, that some nucleus of truth may underlie the Jews’ story that they captured city after city of the Canaanites, butchered all the men, butchered all the women, butchered all the children, butchered all the oxen, butchered all the sheep, butchered all the donkeys, and then relaxed in blissful contemplation of their own holiness (e.g., Jos. 6.21). There is archaeological evidence of the destruction of cities by war as well as by earthquakes in or near the time of the supposed conquest, but from what we know of the Jews’ racial habits, we may guess that after their “peaceful” immigration, they promptly started subversion and civil wars and were soon able to use one army of stupid goyim against another army of stupid goyim, so that the natives slew one another and destroyed themselves, while the Jews egged on the contestants and rubbed their hands gleefully together, much as recently they stampeded their British and American cattle into Germany to facilitate their pious appropriation of the earth that their tribal god contracted to give them.
The second story of armed conquest comes from another Jewish propagandist, Josephus, who was a little younger than Philo, and whose story (Cont. Af. 1.75-94, 224) of a conquest of Egypt by the Hyksos long imposed on historians who did not take into account the Jews’ racial genius for forgery and deception, which is now so vividly illustrated by such hoaxes as “Anne Frank’s Diary” and the nonsense about the “six millions” of God’s Race that the Germans supposedly killed before the six million crawled into the United States and other Western nations.
Whether Josephus forged the passage that he claims to quote from Manetho or utilized the work of some earlier Jew is uncertain; he relies heavily on the Jewish forgers of earlier centuries, especially the ones who assumed Greek names, much as Jews now masquerade under such names as Ashley Montagu, Lyle Stuart, and Craig Schiller, so that Josephus can pretend that they were Aryans who testified to the vast superiority of God’s Race.
What is certain is that there was no conquest of Egypt by the Hyksos. It is now known (see Cambridge Ancient History, Vol. II, 1, pp. 54-64, 288-296; and especially the definitive work on this subject, The Hyksos, by John Van Seters, Yale University Press, 1966) that the “Hyksos” were peoples, probably of several different tribes that spoke Semitic languages, whom the Egyptians indiscriminately described as “Asiatics,” and who infiltrated Egypt by gradual immigration across the Sinai peninsula, and probably never were numerous enough to form a very large fraction of the population; they were clever enough, however, to spread sedition and incite civil wars until they attained a rule over the entire nation, placing as governors in each district tributaries and stooges, many of whom were certainly or probably native Egyptian traitors, and using an uncertain proportion of Egyptians in the troops by which they maintained their dominion for almost two centuries.
An Egyptian revolt finally succeeded in overthrowing the alien rulers and expelling many of them (for we may be sure that some of the aliens managed to blend themselves into the native population and escape notice). But during their control of Egypt, the immigrants incited massacres of the upper classes and promoted the mongrelization that the stupid Egyptians had themselves begun by importing black slaves from the south, and they left the nation genetically impoverished by a great infusion of both black and Semitic blood, from which Egypt never recovered.
There are some indications that the “Asiatic” immigrants came from the regions that are now Syria and Palestine, and the methods they employed to ruin Egypt make us consider seriously Josephus’s claim that they were Jews and that when they condescended to leave Egypt, they built Jerusalem as the capital of the region they then occupied. Unfortunately, there is no evidence (other than the remarkable similarity of methods) to confirm or refute a conjecture that the “Hyksos” were organized and directed by Jews.
In the past century, before the Jews’ habitual duplicity and mendacity were generally recognized by historians, Josephus’s story was rejected because the enemy aliens brought with them into Egypt a god named Set (Seth), whom they regarded as the enemy of the Egyptian gods, although they also talked about religious toleration when it suited their purposes in keeping their stupid subjects bemused. They evidently proselytized for their patron deity so effectively that he remained in the huge crowd of Egyptian gods after the end of their rule, although he was then most commonly represented as the diabolic assassin of Osiris and other native deities.
So long as it was supposed that the Jews were uniquely devoted to a tribal god whom they called Yahweh or Ya’o (who is designated in the “Old Testament” by a wide variety of names that have been concealed by the translators, who, beginning with the Septuagint, use a word meaning ‘Lord’ to translate a number of different names), it was thought axiomatic that the worshippers of Set could not be the holy Jews; but it is now known that the Jewish colony at Elephantine, which was regarded as perfectly orthodox in Jerusalem, had five gods in a pantheon of which Ya’o was merely the chief, and that the Jews worked any convenient religious racket, for example, claiming in Egypt that the Egyptian god Osiris, the greatest of all gods, had inspired Moses and the “prophets of Israel” and had chosen the Jews as his special pets.
So, in the present state of knowledge, we must leave it an open question whether or not the enemy immigrants into Egypt were led by Jews; if they were, the Jews were at work as early as c. 1760 B.C.; if not, we have no certain historical trace of the race before more than a thousand years later.
* * *
You’ve been listening to “The Jewish Plague, part 4,” written by Professor Revilo Pendleton Oliver and presented by your host, Kevin Alfred Strom. To read more of Dr. Oliver’s works, visit https://nationalvanguard.org/oliver.
We’ll continue this important discussion of the Jewish Question by classicist, scholar, and teacher Dr. Revilo P. Oliver, next week on American Dissident Voices.
* * *
You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival and advancement. To help us, send donations to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. For free fliers to spread the truth in your community, visit natall.com/fliers. Once again, our postal address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.Listen to the broadcast