EssaysH. Millard

There Is No Place in America for Those Who Hate Whites

And there is no place for their evil ideology, either.

by H. Millard

THE WHITE-HATERS and anti-White bigots, with their toxic and hateful ideology that they hide behind terms such as “anti-racism,” “anti-fascism,” “anti-White supremacy,” and “anti-neo-Nazi,” have to be seen for what they are — and what they want to do.

The haters of Whites are not just removing statues of Confederate leaders. These statues represent all Whites. They are removing statues, paintings, street names, college names, and more — of Whites.

They are symbolically erasing Whites from existence.  These symbolic erasures of Whites should be seen as trial balloons or early steps leading up to the actual physical erasure of living White people. And, in colleges all across the land, some of these anti-White bigots are teaching students to hate Whites.  You’ve seen the many news articles about this.  These people are evil and they are genocidal.

The true message of the anti-Whites, unmassaged by the media liars who support them, was spotted today in Huntington Station, New York.

These bigoted and hateful anti-Whites include many neurotic self-hating Whites who are caught up in the evil anti-White ideology and who are able to psychologically justify their  self hate as hatred of  the socially acceptable boogey men who they call “racists,” etc.  In this way, they lie to themselves as they dehumanize ordinary Whites who express any healthy sense of self and group esteem.

What happened in Charlottesville is not difficult to understand, and those who hate Whites and Whiteness are trying to hide the reality of what happened there.

Here’s what Charlottesville was about.  A group of people wanted to hold a peaceful and legal rally. Under the law it doesn’t matter who they were or what they legally wanted to say. They had a Constitutional right to do so. And they also had a legal permit to do so. They wanted to use their First Amendment rights of free speech to express their views.  All peaceful and legal.

Then, another group, with no permit, tried to keep them from exercising their free speech rights. And the government that is supposed to protect the Constitutional right of free speech stood down and let those with no permit attack those with a permit. That’s it.  That’s all that Charlottesville was about. Evil triumphed in Charlottesville as the haters of Whites did keep peaceful people from using their first amendment rights.  It was a very sad day for those who support the Constitution and freedom.

Sadly, as we have seen so many times in history, the haters are trying to once again destroy peaceful people who just want to believe as they want to believe and live their lives in peace and happiness.

The modern evil-doers caught up in a mob frenzy against Whites who want to live peacefully and believe as they want, are no different than the past evil-doers who killed “witches” and various people who didn’t agree with the religious or social beliefs of their day.

You know about the hate aimed at Galileo and the persecution he faced as those all around him attacked him for his Copernican belief that the Earth was not the center of the Universe.  “How dare he believe such a thing!” And one imagines that the haters of his day used their versions of terms such as “racist” to describe and attack him.  But today we are much more enlightened, aren’t we? Nope. We are not. Just look at how the haters of Whites are trying to destroy us as a people.  We are the modern Galileos.

When you were in school and you read about the horrors of the past; about people being burned at the stake for not believing in certain religious creeds and about the Salem witch trials, you probably wondered how people could have been so ignorant as to go along with such things. Well, look around yourself. The same ignorant and evil hatred is destroying lives today. It is exactly the same thing.

Small minded bigots never change — they just change their targets. The persecutors of Galileo are still with us. The killers of innocent people in Salem are still with us. They have just changed their targets.

Even with our wonderful First Amendment, we have evil-doers today who try to subvert it as they attack others. These evil-doers will say they are for free speech, but they sidestep the issue by calling speech they don’t like “hate speech.” And they do this word shuffle about many other things. They simply define what is good and just as something else — and they then rely on a compliant media to repeat their evil lies to whip up the mob.

But there is more to this evil anti-White ideology. There really is an attempt to kill off all Whites. It is genocide of Whites that they are aiming at. And it is taking many forms. The removal of statues and street names are just part of the bigger picture. There are calls for Whites to not have White babies. There are moves to try to increase miscegenation by Whites. And it goes on and on. Whatever can remove Whites from existence is being tried.

Everyone should ask this question:  Is it okay for Whites to survive?  Isn’t the moral answer one that says that it is certainly okay for Whites to survive? And, if it is okay for Whites to survive, what does “survive” really mean? Doesn’t it mean that Whites have a right to survive as Whites? That is, to be who and what we are by birth? To try to be all that we can be? To live in a society where we don’t have to fear being attacked in the cities that we largely built? To be treated fairly in school admissions and job placements? To be a free people not afraid to speak our minds? To be able to associate with — or not associate with — anyone we ourselves choose?

* * *

©2017 H. Millard

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion: Messages of Ennui and Meaning in Post-American America by H. Millard — In this book, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. They deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics in Millard’s edgy style — and lead up to “Homeless Jack’s Religion,” in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. ISBN-10: 0-595-32646-3

Roaming the Wastelands by H. Millard — The groundbreaking novel of post-American America and of a life-affirming philosophy that is beyond left and right. From Chapter 1: “There are some among us who can’t help but listen to a different drummer. The drumming they hear is from their DNA. Some try to block it out, but it is heard in the blood which has no ears that can be covered to stop the sound that is not a sound. It is a call of the wild from centuries past to the wild in some humans. Those who try to deny the drummer are doomed to unhappy lives, for they are denying what they were born to be.” ISBN-10: 0-595-22811-9

The Outsider by H. Millard — Non-conformist and alienated, Buck wanders alone through a post-American America seeking meaning and the authentic. H. Millard’s iconoclastic, sacred-cow-toppling essays and fiction have appeared in everything from the high-IQ society Mensa’s publications to newspapers and magazines. Follow the linked title or get it by telephone: 1-877-823-9235. ISBN-10: 0-595-19424-9

 

Previous post

Hundreds Confess to Eating Human Flesh in South Africa

Next post

Clare Boothe Luce’s The Women

17 Comments

  1. Alfred R.
    23 August, 2017 at 9:19 pm — Reply

    Let’s imagine that somehow all non-whites could be removed from America. So far so good.
    What would you do with these liberal whites? I’d want them out as well. But how to go about with this? where would these whites be expelled to? what would be the numbers of the remaining population?

    • 23 August, 2017 at 9:54 pm — Reply

      The liberal Whites would be expelled to the socialist-communist paradises they constantly praise, but have never set foot in like Cuba, China, Russia, North Korea or any country in Africa or the Middle East where they could live closest to the “refugees” they love so much.

      More realistically, I’d strip them of their citizenship and banish them all to U.S. territories like Puerto Rico or Guam, then sever all political ties with those places and place a lifetime ban on all of them, prohibiting travel to the U.S., putting them on no-fly lists marked as social terrorists, with the penalty of death for entering the U.S. under any circumstances.

    • Thomas Plaster
      23 August, 2017 at 11:18 pm — Reply

      Alfred R.: I’ve thought the same, as well. It has occurred to me that if there is to be a future race war, it will not be all White people versus non-Whites. Not so simple. We know that Whites on the political LEFT will do anything to take sides against their own race; witness WW2 veterans being duped into going to Europe to kill their own kind/folk/race at the behest of jews.

      It will not be Whites on the political Right (like me) … versus … all political LEFT Whites allied with non-Whites.

      It will be racially aware/loyal political Right Whites (like me) … versus … political LEFT Whites allied with non-Whites. Whites on the political Right but not racially aware/loyal will sit it out, on the fence, waiting to see how the chips fall.

      If it appears political Right and racially aware/loyal Whites are losing, political Right Whites sitting on the fence will leap up, point fingers (at us) and screech “raysis”. “Die raysis m&^%#rf#@*er!!!” Or some such.

      If non-Whites and LEFTIST Whites are losing, political Right Whites sitting on the fence will wait until the very last, possible moment to join our ranks. But they will have a look in their eyes like someone who is waiting for you to turn your back to them so they can cold cock you.

      They will always think you the trouble maker for disrupting (in their twisted view) their tranquil existence and robbing them of the few spare moments of calm before the storm of non-Whites overrunning every conceivable corner of this country and making it third world hell hole. In their minds they would not have gratitude for you who did the fighting to make the country all White again. Even though they are enjoying the benefits of an all White nation. Plus, you ruined and ended their various forms of negrophilia; NFL, NBA etc.

      What to do with the Whites who were not really in the fight? They will predictably expect/demand to still have a vote about what gov’t is established. Never mind that the “democracy” they so love is what led to the garbage dump or landfill of a society/culture that lead ended up in racial war. You will have to tell them they have no more vote and will never have such again. Maybe their grandchildren, ascertained to not be brainwashed, will vote. But no way in hell can they.

      They will balk at this. They think it is their god given right to elect whoever they want (jew approved/financed/blackmailed establishment candidates who do jew bidding) and you can’t deny them this. So, some dictatorship will need to be effected. It need not be a tyranny. It is possible for it to be benevolent dictatorship. Just depends. It may turn out that life boat style ethics need to be enacted.

    • Anthony Collins
      26 August, 2017 at 3:02 am — Reply

      I like David Sims’ aphorism: “I believe that for a better world we should dump the liberals into Jupiter.”

      • JimB
        30 August, 2017 at 2:21 am — Reply

        Jew-pitter. A jew-pit. Sounds good to me, too.

  2. Norbert
    24 August, 2017 at 8:26 pm — Reply

    Thank y’all for your contributions. I think it’s worth thinking through practicalities like this one, what to do with “wrong” whites should we achieve our goals.

    It’s clear that the lefties zealots must be gone but the suggestions of expelling them to Cuba, Venezuela, etc. bear in mind that those countries should agree to take them in.

    About the whites who weren’t leftist zealots, yes, I guess that like Thomas Plaster points out, I’d tolerate them with wings severely clipped.

  3. WHITE_WARRIOR
    25 August, 2017 at 5:55 pm — Reply

    I might have got it wrong, if so please tell me, and by it I mean the hard-core left-wing and right-wing belief systems. A true white nationalist is in my opinion neither right-wing nor left-wing, but rather a politically neutral being in the most fundamental sense. Their only concern should be focused on what is best for the white race and only the white race. I know of many so-called white right-wingers who are just as dangerous to the future of the white race as is the most evil anti-white left winger.

    After the ‘day of the rope’ we can deal with the remaining race traitors, left- and right-wing traitors, by expatriating them to the third-world. In the third-world they will get all the diversity they want – and some. I say this with a smile! Then we are left with the very difficult task of rebuilding the white world. This task will, in my opinion, take several generations, but it is a debt we owe our descendants.

    • Thomas Plaster
      25 August, 2017 at 10:23 pm — Reply

      White_Warrior: I am pretty sure I know what you mean by “true white nationalist”. But I am also sure that there will never be any true White nationalists from the political LEFT. (I’m sure there will be some agent-provocateurs trying to infiltrate us to betray us at the worst moment)

      So, that leaves the political Right. Unless you were to believe there are some persons are neutral. Neutral as far as participating in political movements and political parties? Absolutely, neutral. But neutral as to political beliefs held? I’d have to say no.

      I do believe, however, that concepts normally associated with the political Right such as free market economics, personal responsibility, fire arms ownership, free speech/assembly/worship/thought … Whites should only practice/advocate those among themselves. Dealing with other races, whatever is necessary to protect Whites, anything goes. Like you said regardless of LEFT/Right what needs to be done to protect and advance the White race. As Germany did after WW1 and throughout the 1920s; socialism was a central aspect of gov’t.

      This is admittedly a slippery subject to get worked out, explained properly.

      • NR
        26 August, 2017 at 5:15 pm — Reply

        There are all kind of socialisms, but the core of the Left plaguing the West is the willful relinquishing of one’s Self. No responsibility, no ownership, no conscience, no Self. No will, no structure, no progression. Without the Self, there’s no family, kin, or race. Happiness lies in being nothing, a mass. Freedom from judgement, a rejection of Nature. The core of the Left is death, a dishonourable death that is.

        • Thomas Plaster
          30 August, 2017 at 9:35 am — Reply

          NR: Yes, but the LEFT is about the death of the White race, not any others. Maybe the LEFT can be properly characterized as trying to create a new racial mix; a mongrel combo of different races, as long as there are no pure Whites.

          • NR
            30 August, 2017 at 5:32 pm

            You are right. I had that in mind when writing. Thanks for adding this extra note.

            The Left is a poison especially made for Whites. It seems that non Whites are not affected by this poison.

            When being fed this poison for the first time, I immediately recognised it as poison. It took a number of years to objectively see what the poison is, what is does, its target, its aim, and some years later, its administrators.

  4. Anthony Collins
    26 August, 2017 at 3:26 am — Reply

    The way I see it, one can be a White nationalist and endorse particular values and measures associated with both the left and the right, but one must define such values and measures in relation to the racial-national community (Volksgemeinschaft), and reject both the left and right as overarching ideologies and identities.

    Today, White nationalism has to be more than leftism or rightism plus White racism, for the task of White nationalism is one of fundamentally recreating White societies. One can be a conservative or a liberal, a capitalist or a socialist, and think and act as a race realist to a greater or lesser degree (usually the lesser!), but this is not the same thing as being a White nationalist. (Even liberals can be race realists. As the late Joseph Sobran wrote, “In their mating and migratory habits, liberals are indistinguishable from members of the Ku Klux Klan.”) White nationalism is a profoundly radical cause, with a logic and teleology of its own.

  5. The Unknown WN
    26 August, 2017 at 10:44 am — Reply

    From the article: “Here’s what Charlottesville was about. A group of people wanted to hold a peaceful and legal rally. Under the law it doesn’t matter who they were or what they legally wanted to say. They had a Constitutional right to do so. And they also had a legal permit to do so. They wanted to use their First Amendment rights of free speech to express their views. All peaceful and legal.”
    ======================================

    The Constitution is now (and has been for some time) a document made of moral/legalistic Play Doh, open to whatever interpretation those in power want it to be. The Founding Fathers, as brilliant as they were, made a major blunder by not explicitly stating such things as:

    1 – No negroes can ever become citizens or vote.

    2 – No non-whites can ever become citizens or vote.

    3 – America is a white country, and will forever remain so.

    4 – Any attempt to contradict any of these founding principles will constitute treason.

    And that’s just for starters. But, alas, the great Founding Fathers certainly thought it inconceivable that their newfound document needed to be so blunt, when all the above points seemed so utterly self-evident. It would have been the equivalent (to them) of stating that the sun rises in the east, and that any attempt to say otherwise would be treason. In other words, it was so obvious (in their day and age) it need not be said, out-loud, or in a document, and so was left it out. But that oversight has created the America we know today.

    We white Americans no longer have the fundamental rights we once had. Case in point control of our property, where in living memory one could rent houses or apartments one owned to whites only, if one chose. In other words, there are people alive right now who once had that right, a right which was subsequently stripped of them. Now, one cannot refuse to rent apartments or houses to negroes, homosexuals, or leftists in today’s America. That right has been stripped, but it is a right anyone younger than 60 never knew. So imagine what’s coming, if this tyranny is not overthrown.

    As for Charlottesville, it no longer is true that “under the law it doesn’t matter who they were or what they legally wanted to say” because it does. It does matter what you “want to say”. Yes, here and there the old meaning still prevails, and white patriots have their “rights” defended, but in the whole that “right” is fast eroding. Because Americans never really had “rights”, but only privileges. Privileges granted and maintained only when the powers that be approved of them. But now less and less of our cowardly and treasonous politicians are, and so, like our “right” to once choose not to rent to negroes, we are also losing the right to speak in public places without being physically assaulted – or simply banned by the local government from doing so.

    Yes, Virginia, it’s later than you think.

    • Thomas Plaster
      26 August, 2017 at 3:32 pm — Reply

      The Unknown WN: The Constitution is now (and has been for some time) a document made of moral/legalistic Play Doh, open to whatever interpretation those in power want it to be.
      =======================================

      Agreed. Many in the late 1960s claimed that the Nixon administration started the shredding of the US Constitution. Wrong. It was already in tatters/shreds from the Warren Court and the Roosevelt stacked court of the 1930s. At least those went hog wild in gutting the US Const. It is really Marbury vs. Madison that is the keystone of this iniquitous virus that has plagued us.

      After a century it is easier to claim that those words a century ago mean something other than what was understood by the Framers and Founding Fathers.

      The Preamble of the Constitution is clear that the USA was established for the White men and their posterity. Not every third world hootenanny on the planet to come here and suck parasitically from White/Gentile effort.

  6. James Clayton
    26 August, 2017 at 3:10 pm — Reply

    Nothing new under the sun, as they say. The U.S. ARMY military police protected the forced integration of government schools (“public schools) Selma, Alabama, in 1965 if memory serves. They were led by a Finn with surname Anglicized by changing a “K” to a “C” due to the prejudice against so many Finn immigrants professing communism.

    The story goes that the British troops ordered the Minutemen assembled to, “Lay down your arms, god damn you.” And that was answered with a militiaman’s shot.

    The following is from the Minuteman National Historic Park, “Shot Heard Round the World”

    The line written in the 1830’s by writer/philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson for the dedication of a monument at the site of Concord’s North Bridge. (My father took me there, when I was four years old and he was a graduate student at Harvard, which I recall clearly.)

    “Here once the embattled farmers stood, and fired the shot heard round the world.”

    No one can dispute Lexington’s claim to the first shots, and sadly, the first colonial casualties of the Revolutionary War. Emerson’s poem is definitely referring to the fighting at the North Bridge, where colonial militiamen were first ordered to fire on British soldiers, thus committing treason. Here also the first British soldiers were killed.

    Some argue that the true “shot heard round the world” is not a physical musket shot, but the ideals of liberty and self-determination for the defense of which New Englanders were roused into action (rather than simply complaining) against the British in April of 1775.

  7. James Clayton
    26 August, 2017 at 4:10 pm — Reply

    Monuments elsewhere

    Left-liberal National Public Radio (“NPR”) on the Finnish Monument in St. Paul
    https://s.smugmug.com/Finntown/i-GStkzk5

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.