by Revilo P. Oliver
THE FEW WHO ARE seriously interested in preserving our civilization and race have frequently observed that the local weekly newspapers will often print letters and even small articles that could never appear in the Jewspapers, i.e., the daily press of large circulation.
An interesting example is the issue of the Post Eagle for 12 April 1989, of which a copy was recently sent me. The Post Eagle is a weekly, published, almost entirely in English, for Poles in this country. Letters to the editor are published as though they were signed articles.
One letter begins with a description of the way in which a hatchet man on one of the television stations ganged up with a rabbi to interview a young White man, “a twenty-year old skinhead,” who was not ashamed of his race. Using the technique of the Spanish Inquisitors, who often trapped their victims by verbal trickery, using a word in several different senses, thus confusing them and making them make inconsistent statements, the rabbi and his goy hunting dog were able to make the Aryan youth seem somewhat ridiculous.
The author of the letter then deplores a doctrine of “White Supremacy,” the term now applied to the wicked notion that even creatures so self-degraded and abject as White men and women have rights. He gives a list of major crimes committed by Whites, among which one especially notices, e.g., “The Jewish traitors, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, were white.” “The Russian and Jewish KGB agents who murdered…Polish officers and intellectuals at Katyn were white.” “The Russians and Jews who starved 8 million Ukrainians in the 1920’s and 30’s were white.” “The violence and filth televised into American homes is done primarily by white people. Fifty-nine percent of them were raised in Jewish homes (from statistics).” I do not know what was the writer’s purpose, but I am sure he must have incited serious reflection in some readers.
“Anti-Semitism Phrase by Jews a Fraud” is the title in large type before a good letter that exposes one of the sneaking tricks, the pollution of language, used by God’s People to stultify their victims.
In English, the term ‘anti-Semitism’ must mean opposition to or antagonism toward Semites, the race now most fully represented by the Arabs and the Arabic-speaking Semites in the Near and Middle East. The Kikes have contrived to make the average reader understand the word in a sense that it cannot have, if language is not to become mere babble. If the word is used correctly, it becomes obvious that the Yids, a hybrid race that contains some Semitic blood, are now the most violently and viciously anti-Semitic people in the world, since they are now engaged in an effort to liquidate the Palestinians and eventually all the Semitic nations.
In the Post Eagle Wladek Zierkiewicz observes that, “The Jews are always wailing about Polish antisemitism, their biggest fraud. Poland is 100% pro-Arab…which equals 95% pro-Semitic and 5% anti-Zionist.” He then comments on “Jewish antisemitism against Palestinians” and concludes: “Anti-Semitism…refers to…’hostility to Arabs’ and is racial. Jewish anti-Semitism (hostility to Arabs) is the only one in the world…. Anti-Semitism, signifying ‘hostility to Jews’ as printed in U.S. dictionaries is a fraud, a falsehood, and should be removed from all editions.”
What Mr. Zierkiewicz says is, of course, obvious to everyone who respects the English language and believes in the use of words as a means of communication, rather than as noises made to excite emotions in the mindless rabble. The constant misuse of the word by the Jews and their stooges has made many otherwise intelligent persons accept it without thinking about its meaning. What makes the letter in the Post Eagle so valuable is that, by exhibiting one crude Jewish hoax, it will make intelligent readers aware of the systematic dishonesty and perfidy of the parasitic race, and that is the first step toward understanding the dark age in which we now live.
Weekly newspapers, addressed to the residents of a county or to a White ethnic group, have circulations that are trivial when they are compared to metropolitan liepapers, but although some are being bought up and formed into chains, most of them, I believe, are still independently owned. Their editors, although they have not been openly intimidated by the Jews, probably share the general ignorance created by the Communist-“Liberal” control of schools and the media of communication, but may still retain our racial sense of logic. They would probably be made incredulous or frightened by sweeping statements such as readers of Liberty Bell take for granted, but they can see logic when it is applied to a single specific point, such as the absurdity of the catachrestic meaning now generally given to the term ‘anti-Semitic.’
Weekly newspapers, I believe, offer the only outlet still available to persons who hope to accomplish something by writing letters. If you send a letter to one of the large daily papers, it will, barring the unlikely chance of a blunder by an inexperienced underling, end in a wastebasket or be printed so mutilated or rearranged as to make it innocuous. If you write to a member of the den of thieves in the Capitol of the District of Corruption, his secretary’s secretary’s assistant will either toss it in a wastebasket or press a button that will make a computer churn out a letter thanking you for your advice and promising that it will be given “due consideration.” That usually means that your name and address will be transmitted to the Defamation League for addition to the Jews’ watch-list.
Many editors of small weeklies are still simple folk, unsophisticated and holding the illusions about the Untied States that you had before you began to doubt what you read in the big liepapers or saw on the boob-tube. Write to him the kind of letter to which you would have given sympathetic consideration in the days before you had to face the terrible realities of the occupied country in which you now live.
* * *
Source: Liberty Bell magazine, August 1989