Most Serial Killers are Black

Source: Serial Killer Statistics

THERE IS AN OLD canard that serial killers are always White and that Blacks are never serial killers. This myth has been so powerful that some criminal investigations (for example, about the murders of Derrick Todd Lee from 1992 to 2003) have been hindered by the presumption that the perpetrator, since he is a serial killer, must be White.

In fact, as this chart reveals, Negroes have always been overrepresented in serial murder as in other violent crimes — just not as much.

Until 1980 the total number of serial killers classified as White exceeded the total number of serial killers identified as Black in each decade, but that is no longer the case. For three decades now statistics have shown more Black than White serial killers.

Since the statistical shift happens to coincide with the invention of DNA profiling in 1984, it seems entirely likely that improved detection, rather than a sudden change in Negro behavior, is the main reason why so many more Black serial killers are now appearing in statistics.

* * *

Source: National-Socialist Worldview

Previous post

Am I Right, or Am I Crazy?

Next post

The Amazing Lessons I Learned When I Decided to Stop Buying New Things for 200 Days


  1. Michael R
    1 August, 2017 at 1:26 am — Reply

    I’m sure Jews bring up the “White” statistical percentage in serial killings.

    • Thomas Plaster
      1 August, 2017 at 12:52 pm — Reply

      jews also add hispanic violent crime into the White category to make it look like White/Euro people are committing more crime than they actually are. They use all kinds of tricks.

  2. James Clayton
    4 August, 2017 at 8:44 am — Reply

    White people should be more afraid of other whites than they are of …
    1 day ago – Rates of homicide, gun killings and illicit-drug fatalities are highest for white Americans in counties where nine in 10 residents are white.

    • 4 August, 2017 at 12:25 pm — Reply

      That link from the LA Times leads to a really astounding article by Mike Males, a hardcore leftist who “worked in the civil rights movement” in the 1960s “culminating in arrest and release for blocking the Santa Monica Freeway” during a protest. (On one of the “statistics” pages he uses — he runs it himself, by the way — he deplores, and claims that “research” reveals, “the appalling racism, xenophobia, homophobia, anti-environment, anti-science, reactionary tribal politics rampant among the elderly and many middle-aged Americans.”)

      His thesis in the article is: “Diverse” areas are safer for Whites than majority-White areas.

      At a quick glance: Males provides zero links to actual data, just generic links to the front pages of statistical Web sites he presumably used.

      Males juggles his figures by conflating drug overdose deaths with murders — taking out the overdose deaths, the stats would tell a far different story, I predict. But I can’t test my prediction, because Males has hidden his data; I wonder why.

      Naturally Whites who die from drug overdoses are going to be dying mostly at home, in mostly White areas (often “fly over” areas neglected by America’s elites, where the general despair and malaise of the hated and unwanted Whites gets more intense by the day).

      Males admits that drug overdose deaths are eight times as common as murder, so his conflated statistics (even assuming he’s telling the truth about them) tell us almost nothing about murder.

      Also naturally, Whites who live many miles away from heavily non-White areas are less likely to be murdered by them. The fact that even under such circumstances (as Males admits) 20 per cent. of White murder victims are nevertheless killed by non-Whites speaks volumes. The real significant statistics are interracial murder and crime rates and the raw violent crime rates by race, and Males is mum on them — of course, because they would blow his twisted, lying conclusion (“safety comes with diversity”) out of the water.

      Want to know the facts? Look here:

      Looks like neither you nor I will be able to question Mike Males’ article, though. The Los Angeles Times has disabled public comments. [UPDATE Saturday 5 August: Probably in response to public outcry, the LA Times did finally turn on comments for the Males article, and quite a few commenters, to my gratification, see through the lies of Mr. Males.]

      • Thomas Plaster
        4 August, 2017 at 2:14 pm — Reply

        Saying that Whites are safer in “diverse” i.e. non-White areas than (hefty) majority White areas is akin to a herpetologist telling the public they are safer handling a (100 m.p.h. striking speed) viper than a garter snake.

        It just defies imagination and all common sense. Truly delusional.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.