Essays

You Can’t Fix Stupid

by Michael Walsh

SIT THE STUDENTS down and explain slowly: “According to the World Jewish Encyclopaedia there resided 2.4 million Jews in German-occupied Europe. After the war, 3.8 million Jewish ‘holocaust survivors’ were receiving pensions from the German government. Tragically, the remaining six million were lost.”

Let us see if the students have been paying attention and now ask the class how many Jews died during World War 2.

“Six million, sir!”

Okay, let’s start again: Doctor Charles P. Larson, one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, in 1945 was assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s department. As part of a US war crimes investigation team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other camps examining on some days more than 100 corpses.

Dr. Larson confirmed that none of the autopsies he performed showed any evidence of death by poison gas. His conclusion was that death had occurred by the agencies of typhus and starvation (as a consequence of USAAF and RAF saturation bombing).

Testing the students to see if attention is being paid the question is again asked — and the knee-jerk Pavlovian response is, “Six million, sir.”

It is exasperating, I know — but let us persist. “Poland has cut its estimate of the number of people killed by the National Socialists in Auschwitz from four million to just over one million. According to Jewish media in Tel Aviv, ‘The revised figures support claims by Israeli researchers that Poland’s former (Communist) government exaggerated the number of victims.’”

Deep breath: “Students; how many Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?”

The six million figure is again parroted — and the lesson on truth awareness becomes a surreal experience.

You try again: “Students, Norman Finkelstein joins others, including prominent Jews, in conceding that the ‘Holocaust’ is a criminal deception: The prominent Jewish researcher says, ‘Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud.'”

Exasperated, you repeat your earlier question — and again the reply is that six million died. Yes, it is wearying — but surrender to gormlessness simply isn’t an option. With a thin smile, the straightening of your spine, and marshaling whatever patience you have left, you press home your point.

“I see you have been paying attention (eyes roll). Listen: Germany is trapped in a defensive war not of its making. Caught in a pincer movement by three world empires, this nation, smaller than the state of Texas, is fighting for its very survival against hopeless odds. Throughout Germany the basic necessities of life are exhausted; life is in disarray; its outnumbered and near-defeated armies are out of ammunition; schoolboys are conscripted to defend German cities. Yet, despite these tribulations, we are supposed to believe that Germans find the time to identify three times as many Jews as are known to exist. They then transport them thousands of miles across war-torn Europe in rail cars they don’t possess. These millions are delivered to a score of camps scattered across remote areas of Germany and Poland. There they are fed, tattooed, and then afterwards gassed in gas chambers that have never since been discovered. Nor have the remains of six million corpses. Students, this is what you believe?”

“Yes, sir.”

Do you give up at this point? No; let’s try another direction:

“Any normal court of law requires evidence of a crime. However — and bizarrely — Articles 19 and 21 of the ‘Nuremburg Statute of Court’ dispensed with any requirement that evidential proof of deliberate homicide be provided. Now, tell me again, how many Jew were killed?”

“Sir, six million!”

Your fingers are now drumming on your desk: “Did you know, students, 9 million of the 16 million Jews in this world are collecting ‘reparations’? Benefits extend to children and dependents born to ‘survivors’ even though they had been born after World War 2. On registering their claim they are handed $35,000, receive $2,000 per month, and receive free health care for life. Tell me again, how many Jews died?”

“Six million, sir.”

“According to the Jewish World Almanac the Jewish world population in 1933 stood at 13,315,859. By 1938, one year before the outbreak of war, the census showed a total of 15,748,091 Jews. Residing in the Third Reich were 210,000 Jews, some refugees fleeing Polish pogroms. In 1948, three years after the war ended, the census reveals a total of 15,753,638 Jews worldwide. In 2017 the figure is still under 16 million. Now, let’s repeat my question: How many Jews died in the war?”

“Er, six million, sir!”

The aforementioned explains the power of what Hitler accused the Jews of using: the big lie. If a lie is big enough, and it is repeated often enough, the gullible will continue to believe the lie — even in the face of absolute proof to the contrary.

Now you know why Winston Churchill remarked, “The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”

DOUGLAS REED COULD NOT UNDERSTAND EITHER

“Gentile worship of, kowtowing to, servile deference toward, and desire to be led by Jews baffles me. Their maniacal, frenzied, foaming-at-the-mouth hatred and bloodthirsty cruelty, their endless Big Lies — I don’t get the worship.” — Douglas Reed (1895-1976), chief central European correspondent for the London Times, later the author of classic Politically Incorrect books of dissent such as The Controversy of Zion

* * *

WITNESS TO HISTORY Mike Walsh

HISTORY WITHOUT SPIN

New Stories and YouTube videos every day.

http://spinfreehistory.com/

Previous post

2017 John Tyndall Memorial Meeting

Next post

Hood Lives Matter

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Inline Feedback
View all comments
Realist
Realist
9 June, 2017 1:29 pm

For the record, Norman Finkelstein absolutely believes in the official narrative of the “holocaust” including “gas chambers”. He’s stated publicly that his parents are “survivors”. The only thing he objects to, and which he states in his book, The Holocaust Industry, is turning the official narrative into a cash-making machine, as he believes that denigrates the memory of the “millions of dead Jews”. When he says that the holocaust is “replete with fraud” and “nonsense”, he’s ONLY referring to many of the outlandish survivor stories that are too preposterous to be believed even by the holocaustians. In admitting the obvious, he’s just covering his Jewish ass and trying to save whatever shred of credibility is left of the Big Lie. The only thing that’s “replete with fraud” is Finkelstein himself.… Read more »

Realist
Realist
12 June, 2017 9:11 pm

Weird. I commented on this post three days ago and yet, it’s never been approved. I see it on my computer, but likely no one else can view it. Hmmm.

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admin
Reply to  Realist
18 June, 2017 12:44 pm

Sorry for the delay in approving comments. We suffered a spam attack and had to manually sort through thousands of fake comments, which took a great deal of our volunteer editors’ time.

Realist
Realist
13 June, 2017 3:32 pm

“You try again: “Students, Norman Finkelstein joins others, including prominent Jews, in conceding that the ‘Holocaust’ is a criminal deception: The prominent Jewish researcher says, ‘Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud.’” Norman Finkelstein believes in the official holocaust narrative and claims his parents are “survivors”. The only thing he objects to in his book, The Holocaust Industry, is using the holocaust narrative as a money-making machine, because he believes that disrespects the “millions of dead Jews”. He also says the holocaust narrative is “replete with fraud” ONLY referring to the so-called survivor stories that are too preposterous for even the exterminationists to believe. In doing so, he’s trying to save any shred of false credibility that the official narrative still contains. No,… Read more »

Realist
Realist
14 June, 2017 12:56 am

Odd. I’ve posted to this article three times and yet none of my comments appear. An explanation would be nice for giving my perfectly relevant comments the Amazon.com treatment.

Realist
Realist
14 June, 2017 3:53 pm

You people running this site have zero integrity. You talk about freedom and such, yet you refuse to let people speak. What’s next? Censoring people for what you deem to be “hate speech”? Apparently, my last three posts on this article and one on the Bilderberg piece, which was also deleted, rang too true for someone on the other side of the National Vanguard veil. Dr. Pierce would be appalled at this despicable behavior. Mike Walsh is presenting disinformation in this piece by stating that Norman Finkelstein and other “prominent Jews” support the holocaust truth movement. Nothing could be further from the truth. Walsh has even posted articles on other sites where he claimed–quote: “The holocaust isn’t about race” (!!!???) and that we shouldn’t be so hard on Jews and… Read more »

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admin
Reply to  Realist
18 June, 2017 12:55 pm

I agree that some ostensibly pro-White authors and sites and organizations are questionable and possibly funded by our enemies, though I also think it’s preposterous to even think that Mike Walsh ought to be put into that category. But you seriously err when you start making such accusations simply because it took some days for your comments to be approved. Our unpaid, dedicated volunteer staff were not all available this week, which just happened to be the same week that a large attack was launched on this site, resulting in our having to manually go through thousands of fake comments in order to locate and approve the real ones.

Will Williams
Will Williams
Reply to  Realist
18 June, 2017 6:59 pm

Get real, Mr. Realist. Do you often shoot from the hip like that? I doubt that Mr. Paine would find your criticism of nv.org to be very honest, but at least you are being offensive. Maybe you haven’t noticed, but nv.org is the National Alliance’s online magazine. When you accuse nv.org of being just another infiltrated, co-opted front organization, spreading disinformation to keep people from “coalescing into action,” do you also claim the same of the National Alliance? You say “Dr. Pierce would be appalled at this [perceived] despicable behavior.” Really? How do you know that? Did you know Dr. Pierce? I knew him and saw him work through and solve real world adverse challenges a lot worse than spam attacks and infiltrators, and Kevin Strom was usually right by… Read more »

Anthony Collins
Anthony Collins
Reply to  Will Williams
19 June, 2017 6:25 am

You can’t fix stupid, but I hope that Realist is able to fix his bad manners, and I think he should apologize for his offensive comments. It’s out of order to make nasty insinuations and accusations about others simply because one’s comments weren’t published, or because some writer expresses views that differ or appear to differ from one’s own. One should try to clarify things as much as possible before condemning others, rather than read things into their writings and write them off as fools, liars, and traitors. There is some value in Norman Finkelstein’s work — I believe that William Pierce discussed The Holocaust Industry in one of his ADV programs and had National Vanguard Books sell it — but this doesn’t mean that people on our side should… Read more »