David SimsEssays

The One Evil Group That May Destroy the World

As our planet runs out of cheap energy, billions will die and our descendants may be trapped on a doomed Earth instead of spreading Life to the stars. Is it “scapegoating” to assign blame for this disaster where it really belongs?

by David Sims

IN THE VIDEO above, Richard Heinberg makes some valid points about energy and the destructive effects of an economy that depends on perpetual, unnatural growth. But, at the 1:03:48 mark, he is also doing a lot of preliminary rhetorical maneuvering on behalf of the one evil group that is primarily responsible for that economy. He’s raised the suggestion that the one evil group isn’t to blame — although, really, it is. He’s raised the idea that it isn’t productive to punish the guilty — although, really, there’s no reason to make the one evil group an exception to the idea of justice, which should be swift and sure, but better late than never. All the more so, since what the one evil group has done to the world is, in aggregate, by far the worst crime that has ever been committed upon it.

So what’s Heinberg’s motive for his hints, for his suggestions, for his verbal hedging with regard to the one evil group? Is he, perhaps, a member of that group?

At 36:12 you may notice a distinct equivocation. One group of evil people did bring about most of our problems. The financial system we have, for example, which forces industry into perpetual (and unsustainable) growth was the invention of that one evil group of people. Mostly, anyway.

That same group pushes America into wars in the Middle East so that their favorite little country there can expand into territories occupied (and rightfully owned) by other people.

That one evil group wants American soldiers to be their puppets, so that they themselves need fight no wars at risk of their own lives, and take for themselves the spoils of that war, leaving American taxpayers to pay all the bills.

Sure, there’s blame to go around. That one evil group didn’t do all of the bad things. But they did do, by far, by so very very far, such a disproportionately large fraction of the bad things that they are in moral terms the lowest and most despicable of the villains in the drama of the real world.

Without that one evil group having accelerated our descent into fossil fuel depletion, through one means or another, we’d be a thousand times better off today.

I’m beginning to get the impression that, along with each 99 grains of wisdom in this presentation, there’s one grain of obfuscation on behalf of this one evil group.

True, “finding scapegoats” is no solution. But punishing the guilty is a worthwhile thing to do. The guilty are not “scapegoats.” This speaker should not pretend, nor imagine that he can get away with pretending, that this one evil group really isn’t guilty, and that assigning it the blame it deserves is “scapegoating.” Not so. That group really is the cause of many of our problems and for the severity and the immediacy of most of them.

The German National Socialists did correctly identify who was causing them trouble with usury, with governmental corruption, with the debasement of culture, and with control of the mass media. Their aggression wasn’t misplaced. It was an eminently rational and thoroughly understandable reaction to what a certain parasitical group had been doing to them. That same parasitical group is doing all of those same things now in the United Kingdom, in America, and throughout Europe. Germany alone tried to bite the irritating tick from its hide, but ultimately was unable to do so.

This group has never suffered unjustly from pogroms, as far as I know. More than a hundred different countries chased them out at one time or another, and on every occasion the ejection was entirely rational.

Just think about it for a moment. Suppose that you’re a teacher in an elementary or high school, and you hear a ruckus start up in one of the classrooms. You go in there to straighten things out. Seeing several children at odds with each other, you ask who is to blame. Immediately twenty kids all point their fingers at one kid, while at the same time that one kid is trying to indicate everyone besides himself.

That’s the situation. You have one group, the parasite group, who claims as loudly and as often as they can, that nobody likes them, everybody hates them — irrationally, and for no reason at all. Meanwhile, you have dozens of other groups who claim, when they can — when they aren’t being censored, when they aren’t afraid of going to jail — that this one group has odious habits that cause its members to be disliked, for reasons that anyone can appreciate. Odious habits such as usury. Such as corrupting government. Such as debasing culture. Such as making child pornography a huge industry of international commerce. Such as controlling the media and the education system in such a way that knowledge of the parasite’s odious habits isn’t reinforced by these channels for public information.

In fact, the parasite group has brought about for other peoples the kinds of trouble that it falsely claims it has endured at the hands of Germans.

Both the famine in Ukraine in 1932-33 and the Armenian Genocide of 1915 were brought about by the same group that made itself so very unwelcome in Germany in the 1940s. Research Lazar Kaganovich for the former and, for the latter, the “Young Turks,| Emmanuel Currasso, and the Caspian and Black Sea Petroleum Company.

Do your own research, both on the plight of our race and culture and on the plight of our entire planet as the age of cheap energy comes to an end, likely closing forever the door of opportunity for the colonization of other worlds and the survival of Life when catastrophe strikes the Earth. Then ask yourself honestly how you now feel about the one evil group.

Here are some more videos by other contributors to the same series:





* * *

Source: David Sims

Previous post

Mexican Invader Rapes and Murders a White Woman

Next post

The Demographic Catastrophe of Europe


  1. Anthony Collins
    30 April, 2017 at 10:12 am — Reply

    Interestingly, the practice of scapegoating was invented by the Jews, as even the Wikipedia entry on the subject notes. The ancient Jews would symbolically transfer their sins on to a goat, and then literally drive the goat into the wilderness.

    The Kapparot ritual is somewhat similar: “In strictly observant Hasidic communities around the world, the lead-up to Yom Kippur is the time for Kapparot, a ritual in which one buys a live chicken — hens for women, roosters for men — waves it over one’s head while reciting a prayer to transfer one’s divine punishments for the coming year to the bird, then has it slaughtered for it, or a cash equivalent, to be donated to the poor.”


    Needless to say, Jews do not make themselves innocent by casting their sins on to innocent animals, or by accusing those who want to make them accountable for their wrongdoing of “scapegoating,” “prejudice,” “persecution,” “bigotry,” “hate,” and “anti-Semitism.”

  2. Anthony Collins
    30 April, 2017 at 10:40 am — Reply

    I don’t know if Richard Heinberg is a Jew, but it might be worth noting that he briefly worked as a personal assistant for the Jewish crackpot Immanuel Velikovsky.

  3. PTFogg
    1 May, 2017 at 9:21 am — Reply

    No doubt, the Jews have earned the justice they have coming to them, six million times over, both those who have acted, the criminals, and those who have remained silent in the face of the sins of their tribe.

    Still, I believe that the biggest problem is that the white race does not value its own continued existence, and it has no resistance to those who would destroy it, the white race. The greatest need is to awaken the white race to the need to ensure its own existence.

    That is the message to which Ben Klassen devoted his life. From “Nature’s Eternal Religion“:

    “Without a doubt the most difficult obstacle in the White Man’s struggle to save himself from destruction and mongrelization by the colored races is the strange and perverted attitude of the White Man towards himself. The main problem now is not overcoming the Jews or the blacks, but strictly a matter of straightening out the White Man’s thinking.”

    Natures Eternal Religion
    — Ben Klassen

    (Kindle Locations 465-466). Kindle Edition.

  4. PPight1931
    2 May, 2017 at 6:50 am — Reply

    “Fossil Fuel” – are you sure that’s not scarcity-price-maintenance (((propaganda)))? Abiotic oil? etc etc

    Yes the debt money system is the driver for perennial, unsustainable growth. Richard Kelly Hoskins has imo the best populist presentation of cause and effects (War Cycles Peace Cycles), disregarding his C.I. preoccupation.

    Plenty of White Race Traitors are happy to assist in the running of the scam where necessary, although the casual observer has remarked that their numbers in the City of Finance appear depleted these days, having been replaced by “Asians”, Blacks, women of all shades and more conspicuous numbers of Jews.

    Unless I’m very profoundly mistaken, the photo above is from the Occupy demonstration at St Paul’s Cathedral in London a few years ago. The banner is displayed in front of the Statue of Queen Victoria. I only comment on this because in all the many months the demonstrators’ camps was there or later at Finsbury Square, I recall never seeing ANY reference to The Money Question, period. That should come as no surprise given their reputed source of finance – a reputed source whose identity is possibly corroborated by the fact that a few hundred yards from St Paul’s is an office block that was also squatted by Occupy but mysteriously and quietly vacated without police involvement, in readiness its gutting, conversion and fitting out works as more Agenda 21 urban living space that followed tout de suite.

  5. James Clayton
    2 May, 2017 at 11:49 am — Reply

    Hoskins was an investment broker, if I recall correctly, and therefore had to deal, daily, with communicating the reality of planned inflation to his clients.

    Reading his books and his newsletter for a season, I enjoyed his writing and, of course, didn’t agree with everything he wrote. He appeared to have done his homework particularly on history and, like most of us who were raised in the South, we were bred on Christianity. That has a lasting effect.

    Especially liked a short one, Our Nordic Race.

    Virginia Publishing Company Online
    Christian Revisionist History, Reformed Christianity, Saxon Identity – Virginia Publishing Company publishes the books of Richard Kelly Hoskins …

    • Anthony Collins
      3 May, 2017 at 4:00 am — Reply

      It seems that Richard Kelly Hoskins’ book Vigilantes of Christendom promoted something called the Phineas Priesthood. Although no such priesthood exists or has ever existed, this didn’t stop Danny W. Davis, an adjunct professor at a Texas university, from writing a 238-page book about it, The Phinehas Priesthood: Violent Vanguard of the Christian Identity Movement. There’s a justly scathing review of this book by Mark Pitcavage at Amazon.


      Although Pitcavage is hostile to White nationalism and has worked with the ADL, his review is worth a read. It comes across as well-reasoned and factual. That might sound surprising, but it shouldn’t be.

      It’s not impossible for anti-White spy and smear groups such as the ADL and the SPLC to conduct professional intelligence work while peddling the most egregious disinformation to their donors and the mass media, although groups oriented towards the latter will find less use for the former. Perhaps this is the difference: good intelligence is more useful for police work against dissident goyim, while bad intelligence is more useful for getting attention, smearing enemies, spooking audiences, and raising funds.

      By the way, I think I’ve seen the National Alliance listed as a terrorist group in at least two editions of a book whose name eludes me at the moment. Needless to say, the book referenced ADL and SPLC publications.

      • Anthony Collins
        3 May, 2017 at 10:57 am — Reply

        The book that listed the National Alliance as a terrorist group that I mentioned in my comment above is Michael Ronczkowski’s Terrorism and Organized Hate Crime: Intelligence Gathering, Analysis, and Investigations, 3rd ed. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2012). This book is quite dishonest in the way it conflates “hate groups” — i.e., groups hated by the SPLC and ADL — with domestic terrorism.

        Attentive readers will notice how elastic and unrealistic the figures of the SPLC are: we are told that “[t]he total number of [neo-Confederate] groups in 2001 was 124, and in 2002 it was 91”; as for Black separatists, “[t]he total number of groups counted in 2001 was 51 and in 2002 the number reached 82, which denotes a 61% increase” (p. 36). In real life, groups do not grow or shrink in numbers like this. But Ronczkowski can swallow and regurgitate such absurdities without blinking, even when writing a book about “intelligence gathering, analysis, and investigations.”

        Ronczkowski admits: “Calculations and determinations that make up the SPLC’s categories are based on group activities such as criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, and publications. Whether a group advocates or engages in violence or criminal activities is not considered” (p. 36). Nevertheless, he thinks the SPLC’s categories are useful for his book, even though the vast majority of the “hate groups” listed, and the individuals within them, aren’t involved in violence or criminal activities.

        The book reproduces a “hate map” of the United States published by the SPLC (p. 33). Somewhat surprisingly, it doesn’t feature the words, “Here be monsters.”

        The book depicts White nationalists as a terrorist threat that warrants the attention of police agencies. It reproduces flyers published by the World Church of the Creator and the National Alliance as if these were examples of terrorist propaganda (pp. 156, 157). (One can tell that the latter flyer was produced in the Gliebe era as it’s crudely worded and amateurishly formatted, quite below Kevin Alfred Strom’s standards for such things.)

        Appendix A of the book lists and briefly describes 29 alleged “domestic-based terrorist organizations.” The offenses of this appendix are many. It manages to get the name of Aryan Nations wrong. It lists the fictitious Phineas Priesthood as a terrorist organization. It perversely lists the Branch Davidians as a terrorist organization, although it never engaged in terrorism, and was in fact destroyed by state terrorism. It lists groups that have long expired, or are hopelessly moribund, as if they still exist and pose a terrorist threat. It uses slippery and dishonest wording, such as “no major illegal activity was directly traced to this group’s membership.” Indeed, it says virtually nothing about illegal or terrorist acts committed by many of the groups listed, including the National Alliance.

        I’m incredulous that a third edition of this contemptible book could be published by CRC Press.

  6. Andrew Hamilton
    3 May, 2017 at 10:51 am — Reply

    Very useful background, thanks. I don’t know what prompted Pitcavage to write such a thing. Perhaps now that you’ve drawn attention to it the ADL will order it expunged.

    If you check the responses to the review you’ll see that Laird Wilcox commented favorably on Pitcavage’s remarks, which caused the latter to take umbrage because Wilcox has been critical of the ADL from a civil rights/free speech perspective. So Pitcavage dredged up a couple of examples of killers he implies partially validate the Phineas Priesthood concept as peddled by Davis. Wilcox made short work of that bit of dishonesty.

    Davis’ book, published it should be noted by Praeger Security International, shows how anti-White hatred among global elites quickly mutates into bizarre racial lies, defamation, and ultimately violence and oppression on a large scale.

    Two commenters who praise the book highly on the same page, both presumably White, are a self-identified “professor of terrorism studies” named James Forest, and one of the best-selling popular science writers ever, Forrest M. Mims III, whose electronics pamphlets sold over 7 million copies in Radio Shack over the years. Even I own some of them.

    Of Davis’ hateful book Mims writes: “Recommended for professionals and academics involved in law enforcement and terrorism studies”–exactly the people who no doubt are using it, Pitcavage’s scathing review notwithstanding.

    • Anthony Collins
      4 May, 2017 at 4:31 am — Reply

      Yes, I noticed the exchange between Laird Wilcox and Mark Pitcavage.

      I think that Pitcavage’s breach of professional etiquette — don’t give the game away! don’t show up your fellow crooks! don’t be a moser! — can be explained by the following:

      1. Pitcavage is, judging by his reviews on Amazon, a highly critical person. (By the way, I noticed that in one review he kvetched about some low carb bagels he bought.)

      2. Pitcavage works with intelligence rather than propaganda, work which obliges him to have some respect for facts and logic, and knows something abut the subject matter of Davis’ book, insofar as it deals with something that exists.

      3. Davis’ book is so egregiously bad that Pitcavage couldn’t restrain himself from criticizing it.

      I should have noted in my comment on Ronczkowski’s book that CRC Press is a major publisher of books relating to law enforcement (e.g., investigation, interrogation, forensics, terrorism), just like Praeger is a significant publisher of books on terrorism with its PSI (Praeger Security International) imprint.

      By the way, I believe that Praeger once published a pseudo-academic book on American skinheads that managed to conflate Creativity, the vehemently anti-Christian doctrine of Ben Klassen’s Church of the Creator, with Christian Identity! And this was not a simple slip of the pen, such as a simple mix-up or transposition of names.

      Some authors regard their work and their audiences with utter contempt. Their ethic recalls the words of Theodor Mommsen: “When a man no longer enjoys his work but works merely in order to procure himself enjoyments as quickly as possible, then it is only an accident if he does not become a criminal.” Of course, such authors may have other motives than making a fast buck, but Mommsen’s point stands. Bad motives will inevitably translate into bad work, and will often translate into crooked or criminal behavior.

      While checking the spelling for moser, I found a revealing article by Sara Levin, “The Jewish Snitch” (Moment, March-April 2013), which is well worth a read. It includes this story:

      “Earlier this year, Nechemya Weberman, a member of the Hasidic Satmar community in New York, was sentenced to 103 years in prison for sexually abusing a young girl over the course of three years, beginning when she was 12. The case, needless to say, sparked an uproar within the community. Some were outraged over the 54-year-old Weberman’s behavior, but others were furious for a different reason — that he had been turned over to the police at all. Four men were arrested on charges of witness intimidation, after allegedly offering the girl, who later testified against Weberman, half a million dollars to drop the case and suggesting that she move to Israel. To some, the girl was a moser, a rabbinic term for a Jew who informs on another Jew.”


  7. James Clayton
    3 May, 2017 at 11:48 pm — Reply

    On Mr. Collins on Pitcavage, et al., rat poison, to be effective, is 99%-plus pure food or rats shy away from it.

  8. Gus Webb
    5 May, 2017 at 12:41 pm — Reply

    From the article: “As our planet runs out of cheap energy, billions will die…”

    Why is this a problem? If billions die due to lack of energy, it will be mostly non-whites. Therefore, this would be a net gain for whites. Therefore, I see no concern for this.

    5 May, 2017 at 7:05 pm — Reply


    And let me tell you what the kike will say at the end of days, and most goyim will swallow it just like the proverbial hook, line and sinker.

    Oy Vey vat you mean – blame, already. We are so small in number and you are so large in number. How could we make you do what you really did not want to do in the first place? You are to blame – – really!!! You did not have to do as we directed.

    The excuse only a parasite could utter. I look forward to the day when the furnaces are lit, and the burning embers of filthy parasites and the Shabbat goys that enabled them, will be visible from the surface of the moon.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.