Conservatives Admit their Guilt: Plan Was To Dispossess Whites All Along

Ross Douthat, the New York Times‘ pet conservative

Toward the “redefinition” of a nation… or another American Revolution?

by A Dissident Millennial

IN AN editorial titled “Who Are We,” New York Times’ “conservative” Ross Douthat portrays the divide in American politics as a battle between those who want the country to be a patriotic and traditional nation versus those who want it to serve as a liberal and “universalist” safe haven for oppressed people around the world. The latter group considers America to be, in Douthat’s words,

a propositional nation bound together by ideas rather than any specific cultural traditions — a nation of immigrants drawn to Ellis Island, a nation of minorities claiming rights too long denied, a universal nation destined to welcome foreigners and defend liberty abroad.

Although Douthat supports the end-game of the “universalists” — namely, the transformation of America into a multi-ethnic, transnational democracy — he is concerned that the left’s dogmatism on the issue has undermined the viability of the liberal experiment by alienating middle-American Whites and leading to the election of Donald J. Trump as president of the country. Therefore, Douthat pitifully hopes that liberals can somehow find a way to “correct” — i.e., negate — the traditional story of America while somehow still managing to “honor” the country’s “white-male-Protestant-European protagonists, to whom, for all their sins,” admits Douthat, “we owe so much of our inheritance.”

Such is what passes for “conservative” commentary in the New York Times.

(As an aside, consider Douthat’s above use of the term “sin” in reference to America’s founding. In Douthat’s eyes, America’s Founding Fathers didn’t simply make mistakes or experience lapses in judgment; no, instead they were terribly compromised before God for their horrid racism. Such thinking supports the notion that modern liberalism is, at least in some respects, a secularized form of Christianity’s universalist ethics. See Greg Johnson’s essay at Counter-Currents titled “Racial Civil Religion” for a discussion on how Christianity in the modern West evolved into the “civil religion” of Liberal Universalism — and how a comprehensive and assertive racial ethos ought to replace this ethno-masochistic slave-morality.)

Piggybacking off Douthat’s adolescent meanderings, National Review’s John O’Sullivan also expresses concern that the open hostility of liberals towards Whites has poisoned America’s experiment in multi-racial governance. In an article titled “Notes Towards the Redefinition of a Nation,” O’Sullivan writes that:

The “universalist” narrative [of modern liberalism] has no real place in it for white Americans, especially white males, except perhaps as permanent penitents for everything that happened before, say, 1968. They are the only group expected to make sacrifices under affirmative action — sacrifices that grow heavier because the protected classes grow steadily through immigration. They are the only permitted butts of ethnic humor. And they are regularly called upon to confess “white privilege” (or be written out of debate) in academic courses hard to distinguish from Communist reeducation classes under Mao. As usually happens, moreover, theory limps along after practice to embrace expressions of simple, unqualified anti-white racism…

Today’s America is the result of the liberal experiment having become unhinged, in O’Sullivan’s view. Amazingly, O’Sullivan admits:

[I]t was a common and largely undiscussed assumption of both major parties and the elites that serve them that the old America [i.e., the historic White American nation] would gradually give ground to the new until a fresh American synthesis was achieved, not without hurt feelings along the way but in the end broadly tolerable to all major social groups.

Within the limits of partisan advantage, therefore, both parties saw it as their responsibility to ensure that this gradual transformation of America’s national identity occurred without violence and undue conflict. Why not? It was inevitable, wasn’t it? But this required, and got, a degree of collusion between the parties that took the form of not strongly opposing policies such as affirmative action and not exploiting popular opposition to high levels of immigration and not following through on election promises to do something on such matters.

In other words, instead of defending the interests of the historic American nation over the past fifty years, the country’s ruling elites consciously took it upon themselves to engage in a subversive campaign of ethnic cleansing against the founding White racial stock of the country. The fact that O’Sullivan admits this in a publication which bills itself as “the flagship of conservatism” is nothing short of astounding. Does O’Sullivan realize he just admitted to being a party to treason, and does he know what the penalty for that is?

National Review editor John O’Sullivan

O’Sullivan concludes his sorry editorial by meekly hoping that the “new America” can “find a place for the descendants of the original settlers,” who, in O’Sullivan’s view, deserve an “honored place” within America but not an “exclusive place nor even a privileged one.” O’Sullivan then exults, like a true “conservative” cuckold, that

Today the richest Americans are not white Protestants but Asian and Asian-white mixed race families.

Actually, whether O’Sullivan is too cowardly to admit it or too stupid to notice, the richest and most privileged “Americans” today are most definitely Jewish elites, followed by the members of a managerial class that is disproportionately Asian, under which exists the hollowed-out mass of White Americans living paycheck to paycheck struggling to keep their distance from a growing and revanchist “Hispanic” population and a horrific Black underclass. Yet O’Sullivan is perfectly content — nay, ecstatic even — to keep this arrangement in place so long as the expressions of hostility towards Whites are toned down a notch to keep things from getting too uncomfortable for him.

Such is what “conservatives” like O’Sullivan have to offer dispossessed White Americans: Absolutely nothing.

Fortunately, our options as dispossessed Whites are not limited to begging for a nominally “honored” place within O’Sullivan’s “new America” versus accepting the status of second-class citizens within our own country. No, a third option exists, one that conserva-cucks like O’Sullivan would shudder to even think of: Initiate a Second American Revolution, one that would partition America into sovereign regional entities based upon the insoluble racial and ethnic divisions introduced to the country in the name of liberals’ much-heralded “tolerance” and “diversity.”

O’Sullivan doesn’t want us to consider this latter option to secede because if we choose it, that would represent not just a vote of “no confidence” in O’Sullivan and his fellow elites, but an out-and-out rejection of them and everything they’ve done and stand for, leaving these obnoxious parasites stranded without a host to leech off any more.

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

To Honor Darwin

Next post

Assad, Syria, and Jewish Deception in a Nutshell


  1. 9 April, 2017 at 8:17 pm — Reply

    How bad does it have to get before we finally say, Enough”? How bad? Guys like the ones in this article need to be taken to the nearest cliff and thrown off, White or not. There’s no curing that kind of mind virus.

    • Anthony Collins
      10 April, 2017 at 7:15 am — Reply

      It would be quicker to transport such traitors to the tops of tall buildings and throw them off as a form of exemplary punishment. After that, such traitors should be thin on the ground!

  2. Anthony Collins
    10 April, 2017 at 6:34 am — Reply

    Yes, it is amazing that John O’Sullivan writes, “it was a common and largely undiscussed assumption of both major parties and the elites that serve them that the old America would gradually give ground to the new until a fresh American synthesis was achieved” without apparently asking a few obvious questions. Such as, who exactly was promoting this suicidal policy of race replacement, why were they promoting it, and why was it “a common and largely undiscussed assumption” of the elites misruling the United States? But the conservative line on such things is: “Move on, move on, nothing to see here, folks.” Conservatism is a diversion.

    The American colonists revolted against “taxation without representation”; contemporary White Americans have much greater reason to revolt, given the existential threat now before them.

    Opponents of the Jews refer to “the kosher tax,” i.e., the charges imposed on countless food and other grocery products by kosher certification. Perhaps this term could be redefined to encompass all the costs the Jews impose on their host populations through their misrule and their efforts to “mend the world” (tikkun olam). “Taxation without representation” indeed.

  3. Dr. Doom
    10 April, 2017 at 11:24 am — Reply

    Now you know why all the White shills are invariably faggots. Like Billy Butthead Cuckley, they don’t care about the future, cause they don’t have one. Lispy Lindsey and Kasuck all day, the homosexual shills who do not care, cause their worthless genes will die in someone’s ass.

  4. MC227
    11 April, 2017 at 1:14 pm — Reply

    It seems that National Review agrees 100% that whites have to be eradicated. Kevin Williamson said as much in an article several months ago. All immigration should be stopped except for Europe, Australia and New Zealand. If Hispanics, Muslims and Africans could build a modern civilization with a high standard of living they would have done it a long time ago. If they can’t build it they can’t maintain it either.

  5. Sethmoto101
    15 April, 2017 at 9:53 am — Reply

    A white ethno-state is obviously needed if whites are to restore the rights their forefathers authored and fought for them. Once achieved, whites will still be needed by the non-whites, at minimum to feed those interested into the multicultural pool, to retain and expand infrastructure and heavy-manufacturing centers (at least in N. America), and to maintain civil and financial order and even governance, regardless of Indian-subcontinent genius at building database systems. In a way, neocon interventionism may be good, in that to continue it, only the white ethno-state could provide the top-flight military capability to keep the non-white hordes from killing each other (and others) over interpretations of mideast religious tracts. List the sciences and systems where Euros excel and others don’t, from environmentalism, structured financial markets, to bio-sciences – where the better non-white nations have been grossly lacking or just mimicking the West, and see the opportunity for a white ethno-state to expand branch offices beyond its borders, as Japan has done with its auto industry, as it retains its homogeneity and culture at home. White protestants still reside in large majorities in some of the greatest places to be in the US, from the volcanic region of Northern California to the hill country of North Georgia. And Europe simply has to repatriate its muslim and jewish problems to their mideast homelands as needed. Whites just have to decide when.

  6. Sethmoto101
    15 April, 2017 at 10:02 am — Reply

    The Japanese social model is a role model for white nations – firmly racist and culturally monolithic at home, but highly capable abroad among non-Japanese.

  7. Bruce Arney
    17 April, 2017 at 1:22 pm — Reply

    “Perhaps this term could be redefined to encompass all the costs the Jews impose on their host populations through their misrule and their efforts to “mend the world” (tikkun olam).”

    Certainly food for thought. An idea whose time is rapidly approaching.

    • Anthony Collins
      18 April, 2017 at 12:37 am — Reply

      Regarding the kosher tax in the extended sense I used in my comment above, one newspaper in the nineteenth century said that the Tsarist government was powerful enough to tax the Jews, but elsewhere the Jews were powerful enough to tax the government.

  8. Thomas Plaster
    31 August, 2017 at 7:20 pm — Reply

    First of all, that sentence “.. both parties and the elites that serve them ..” Wrong, more wrong and most wrong. The “elites” are the jews and their shabbat goy. Pure and simple. They do not “serve” anyone. Others “serve” them. They control the banking and finance of this nation. Its proceeds (unjustly extorted wealth) are enjoyed by jews and if anything is left over the goyim worshiping them can have the crumbs. The rest of America gets …. squat. The author did get that right when he said “hollowed out mass of White Americans living paycheck to paycheck”.

    The elite/jews use this banking/financial power to obtain and then dominate news media, entertainment media and academia with which they use to diminish the affect that family/religion/local community had on American culture and insert news/entertainment/academia in place. So, today’s culture is overwhelmingly driven by news/entertainment/academia and since the jews control that the jews control culture.

    I have no clue how the author thought the elites serve the political parties. It is the other way around. And it is important to see the difference. If White Americans were to create new political parties the jews would just simply infiltrate and corrupt/cripple those as before.

    It’s the jews that need to be gotten rid of. Not political parties.

    Second, the author believes that the continental USA is going to be divided among races and all will live happily ever after?????? Nope, meskins and negroes will find their way into the new White homeland and we’ll be right back in the same racial puke/drivel stew of a society we are currently in. Why??? Because there are still those Whites like O’Sullivan et alia who are race traitors. And they will repeat their treason again.

    Even if (some) Whites have a second revolution, win, take over this entire USA and declare it their land and all other races have to leave to other continents the aforementioned race traitor Whites are right there with you in this new(ly) White(ened) land. They will not give up their race traitor ideas, goals and desires.

    So, that will be a problem to be solved. And as they say, every problem has a “solution”.

  9. Jeremiah Johnson, Jr.
    30 July, 2019 at 3:24 pm — Reply

    I agree with Thomas Plaster, if and when we have another revolution, it will not be as simple as a race war: as in shoot anyone who doesn’t look like you. Many if not most of the ones we will have to fight are whites. Most of Antifa is white, most of the leftist college profs are white, most of the traitorous pols are white, most of the media is white. Having an ethno-state composed of whites will still include the aforementioned race traitors. They would have to be dealt with. If we had an ethno-state surrounded by others, muslim, black and Hispanic ethno-states, we would end up like Israel, a tiny country surrounded by neighbors who hate them and want to kill them. The hatred non-whites have for whites is at the point where they will not be able to tolerate us living next to them. If they see us doing well while they are still living in poverty, they will blame it on whitey just as they do now. As for the muslims, their “religion” tells them to conquer the world. They would not be able to leave us alone. They would have to try to conquer us. We simply cannot expect to be left alone just because we want to be left alone.

  10. Duke
    30 July, 2019 at 8:02 pm — Reply

    I agree totally with Thomas and Jeremiah above. I have never felt a White ethnostate would have the slightest chance of working. First of all, without whites, the majority black and latino states and cities will be basket cases. They will be moving heaven and earth to get into our cleaner, prosperous, and safe areas. And there will be plenty of brain dead Whites that will help them… liberals of various stripes, churches, social agencies, universities. There will always be the degenerate White girls who will meet some charming Tyrone or Juan on the internet and have them come to live with them.

    Let’s say we could have an ideal (i.e. impossible) scenario where we create an ethnostate comprised entirely of straight, racially-conscious Whites who will keep the others out by any means. The future, probably Latino federal government will be hostile to this whites-only ethnostate, and will use its minority and white liberal hordes to bring it down, via blockading highways and rail lines into our areas, depriving us of food, consumer goods, and medical supplies, cutting off utilities and communications into our areas, etc.

    • Anonymous
      31 July, 2019 at 3:12 pm — Reply

      Yeah, it is going to be a messed up situation.
      To quote Dr. Pierce- “I guess it has been planned that way.”

      The US fedgov is going to make reconquest of the “liberated zone” top priority.
      The only way I could see this situation working out is if the state had a mutual defense pact with Russia.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.