EssaysH. Millard

Understanding Our Struggle for Existence

by H. Millard

TOO MANY of our people (non-Jewish White people of European descent no matter where they were born or live) don’t seem to understand the nature of the existential struggle that we are in as White people and mistakenly paint it in non-racial terms. Thus, we’ll hear many Whites saying we need to fight for “democracy” or for “Western values” or “conservatism” or for other ideas — and then we’ll hear them saying that this or that non-White person would be “great” in some leadership role in regard to those ideas.

The reality, however, is that the struggle we are in is far greater — it goes beyond mere ideas and involves our continued existence as the biological beings that we are. Ideas are always secondary, and come from our biology — it is our biology that is primary. We must always know this. We do not exist in ideas. We exist in flesh and blood. We do not exist if our ideas exist, but our flesh and blood does not exist. But, we do exist no matter what our ideas are, even if they are mistaken, if our flesh and blood exists. And, for us Whites, it is essential that we always think in terms of our flesh and blood: that is, in genetic or racial terms. We must always ask: Is this good for White people?

However, even though we, as Whites, must always think in genetic or racial terms, the basic struggle throughout Nature is not unique to us as Whites, nor is it unique to other organisms. It is a struggle that all organisms are engaged in from the smallest, least conscious virus on up to the most conscious of living organisms. It is a struggle to be and to be more and more and more. It is, in the first instance, a struggle for self-preservation — and this includes making more like ourselves so that the most essential part of us, our DNA code (aka genome or essence), can continue on after our bodies wear out.

The struggle is also about evolution and natural selection. And, this latter term — natural selection — can be called eternal gene wars. Genes, you will remember, are sections of our DNA code, which is also called our genome. So we can say there is a White genome or a Black genome or an Asian genome, etc. I prefer the term DNA code and that’s the term I will continue to use here.

Our White DNA code struggles and competes against similar but different DNA codes (as found in different human races) to win the battle for dominance and to be the only DNA code of our species in existence. And the non-White human DNA codes also so struggle. It is the way of Nature and is as it should be. Will Whites win the war for survival and have the White DNA code be the only DNA code of our species in existence — or will some other race win? As Whites, we should be rooting for ourselves and we should not be helping others to win the competition against us.

As Whites, we should naturally want to win. But to help win, we have to understand the struggle as it really is — and we must compete to win. We must understand the struggle and we must live right to win it. Understanding, but not living right, counts for nothing. And living right means, in this context, and at least in part, to live White and to breed White and to make as many more like yourself as possible. There’s more to it, but these are the most important things — living White and making as many more like yourself as your body allows according to your Nature (your health and your gender) during what should be a long and happy life.

About Our DNA Code

Our DNA code is the blueprint or recipe or program that makes us, us. At its most basic and simplest, this program is a bare-bones code that reads “life.” And this bare-bones program turns so-called non-living minerals into the so-called living minerals that we call life. Call this bare-bones code the life force, if you will. And, from there — from that unchanging basic program that reads life — the program is added to, and brings forth all the billions of different organisms that have ever existed. It also becomes more and more specific and leads to us as unique individuals who can also logically and naturally be grouped by Nature as part of a race made up of similar individuals who share the same general racial DNA code such that what is good for our racial group as a whole is generally good for us as individuals, and what is bad for us as a racial group is bad for us as individuals.

What is primarily important to each of us is ourselves as individuals. Then comes what we can think of as expanding circles that include, first, our close family, followed by our extended family, and then those closest to us ethnically, and then to others of our race.

It is beyond this circle of the our race — the White race circle — where we Whites should stop looking for likenesses with our kind. Any such likenesses are too remote to be important to us. We exist only as White people. If we lose our essential Whiteness (meaning not just color but all our racial characteristics) we do not exist. Beyond the White race circle are those who are unlike us. They should not be important to us and we should not mix with them or interfere in their own distinct destinies. We should be polite but indifferent to them. We should treat them with the respect we have for all life, but not blend with them.

These other kinds have their Nature-given paths and we have ours. The paths should remain separate. But our fellow Whites are important to us because they carry the same general DNA code that reads “White human,” which is what we also have. The more Whites there are in existence the better are our chances of surviving as White individuals to make more like ourselves — while those beyond the same race circle as us are not like us in important ways for our existence and, in fact, they pose a danger to us from the possibility of gene flow that can destroy us as the unique people we are.

Just to be clear and to the point: Those beyond this circle of the same race as us, but who are in the same so-called species as us, pose the greatest danger to us for our survival because they can breed with us and corrupt and destroy our White DNA code and make our family lines non-White. It other words, miscegenation can destroy our White kind. And, if we are no longer White, we no longer exist. No conscious intent to harm us on their part is required. They might even like us. The danger to our DNA code is from their ability to mate with us and change and replace our DNA code.

The competition for survival and dominance is not only on the racial level, it exists right in our own bodies as our genes compete to be the dominant ones that “make us us,” and it also exists between us as individuals and our fellow Whites — but on these levels the competition is more friendly in that it does not have the power to destroy us as White people but simply has the power to change us in minor ways within our same racial type.

In the many brothers’ and cousins’ wars Whites have fought over the centuries, we saw Nature fine-tuning our kind. Today, we cannot afford brothers’ and cousins’ wars. We have an external enemy that can destroy all White people. Whites from all our White nations must join together for our mutual protection and survival. We must stay White and we must not be killed off and replaced via bedroom genocide, which is another name for miscegenation.


Here are some important quotations that all Whites should know:

On human beings: “[T]he varieties of mankind are so different that similar differences found in any other animals would warrant their classification in different species, if not in different genera.” — Charles Darwin

On what all living beings, including humans, must do: “Living organisms must necessarily compete, for food, for mates and for living space, especially with other members of their own species [i.e. those they can breed with]. They must avoid predators and other dangers. For all these various reasons, some will leave more offspring than others, and it is the genetic characteristics of such preferred replicators which will be passed on preferentially to succeeding generations. This is the essence of natural selection.” — Francis Crick (Nobel laureate and co-discoverer of the structure of DNA)

On our White destiny: “Man is something that shall be overcome. Man is a rope, tied between beast and Overman — a rope over an abyss. What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end. …Lo, I am a herald of the lightning, and a heavy drop out of the cloud: The lightning, however, is the Overman.” — Friedrich Nietzsche

* * *

©2017 H. Millard

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion
messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard

In Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics in Millard’s edgy style and lead up to “Homeless Jack’s Religion,” in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. ISBN-10: 0-595-32646-3
Related link: Our Way for Ourselves Alone – (blogspot)
“We are a different kind, and we wish to remain a different kind and to live our ways for ourselves alone.”
Roaming the WastelandsRoaming the Wastelands
by H. Millard (available at “The groundbreaking novel of post-American America and of a life-affirming philosophy that is beyond left and right.” from BOSTON – Chapter 1 – “There are some among us who can’t help but listen to a different drummer. The drumming they hear is from their DNA. Some try to block it out, but it is heard in the blood which has no ears that can be covered to stop the sound that is not a sound. It is a call of the wild from centuries past to the wild in some humans. Those who try to deny the drummer are doomed to unhappy lives, for they are denying what they were born to be.” – ISBN-10: 0-595-22811-9.
The OutsiderThe Outsider
by H. Millard “Non-conformist and alienated, Buck wanders alone through a post-American America seeking meaning and the authentic. H. Millard’s iconoclastic, sacred-cow toppling essays and fiction on post-American America have appeared in everything from the high I.Q. society Mensa’s publications to newspapers and magazines.” Get it by telephone: 1-877-823-9235; at your bookstore, or at by following this link. ISBN-10: 0-595-19424-9
Previous post

Israeli Operatives "Take Down" Politicians: Here's One Who Got Caught

Next post

Actual Journalist, Actual Reality Check

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
19 January, 2017 2:56 pm

What I find many people doing in this struggle for survival is referring to themselves as European Americans or European Canadians, as if they can’t bring themselves to say “White” for fear of being called racist, neo-Nazi, White supremacist, and so on. Unfortunately, this focus on our individual nationalities, culture or ethnicity, instead of collective race, still serves to divide us, as long as we continue to think of ourselves as Brits, Americans, Australians, Canadians, etc. While all our nations are important to us and currently struggle under the siege of massive Third World immigration, I believe the survival of all our nations and primarily ourselves as a people hinges on us viewing ourselves as White first and foremost above anything else. After all, Americanism or Britishism isn’t found in… Read more »

Ted Ford
Ted Ford
Reply to  Tinley12
17 January, 2022 2:51 pm

As proud as we should be of our historical achievements as individual countries or ethnicities, our survival depends on our ability to transcend these differences and unite under our genetic bond as White people, as well as the courage to say the word itself, “White”.”

I agree.

We are Whites, of a particular nationality, ethnicity, or religion, but always Whites first. It is vital for our genetic survival that we put our genetic common interests first.

If we bring our race to mind constantly by naming it, this will help us defend our vital common interests.

What we won’t plainly name, what we won’t bring to mind and count, we won’t defend effectively enough.

We should say White.

19 January, 2017 9:57 pm

Ben Klassen (Creativity) said the same thing. All of Klassen’s writings held this up to be the highest priority in the Universe. “Whatever is good for the White Race is the highest virtue; whatever is bad for the White Race is the ultimate vice. This is the Golden Rule” — Ben Klassen “Natures Eternal Religion” 1973 So did David Lane in his 14 words. “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.” “because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.” — David Lane So did Adolf Hitler in his 88 words. “What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, the sustenance of our children and the purity of… Read more »