AfD Leader Petry Wants to Strike Right to Asylum From German Constitution

Introductory Note by Kevin Alfred Strom: Though AfD is moving in the right direction, it’s far too slow and far too little. We should not exclude Middle Easterners because they espouse their primitive religion (which they can change at a moment’s notice). No. We should exclude them because they are not White. And we should no longer be talking of just “limiting” their immigration. No. With their birthrates, they will destroy us even if immigration is absolutely halted and never resumes. We should be talking of expelling them all, forever. Nothing less will do.

THE HEAD OF Germany’s nationalist AfD has argued that the framers of the constitution had a post-War context that is no longer relevant. In a newspaper interview, she argued that it should not apply to Syrian refugees.

“Persons persecuted on political grounds shall have the right of asylum,” reads Article 16 of Germany’s Basic Law, the constitution adopted in 1949 — seen by most Germans not only as the law of the land but as the country’s bulwark against the return of dictatorship.

But now, Frauke Petry, leader of the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, has said it’s time to strike the right to asylum from the books. Petry’s comments came in an interview with German newspaper Die Zeit, in which she was invited to lock horns with the Green party’s Katrin Göring-Eckardt.

Petry told the newspaper that she did not believe the laws laid down in the 1940s should apply to refugees fleeing conflict in the Middle East and Africa.

“The many fathers and rather fewer mothers of our constitution were thinking about a very small group of people, in the context of who should bear the responsibility of the atrocities of the Second World War in post-war Germany.” This right to asylum should not, therefore, carry the same weight for today’s refugees.

The AfD has carved out a niche for itself in the German political landscape as the party with the most openly critical stance towards immigration and asylum — at least among those in a position to win seats. They have also officially adopted the policy that “Islam does not belong in Germany” to their party manifesto.

Green Party: How We Live Forces People to Flee

Göring-Eckhardt, for her part, scoffed at what she saw as a self-servingly narrow interpretation of the Basic Law. She pointed out that now, as then, Germany was part of the root cause as to why people had to flee in the first place.

“Many waves of refugees came about because we live the way we live. People also flee because there are droughts, because there is no water where they are, because they cannot grow their own food anymore because they have to grow soy for our meat industry,” said the Green politician.

In stark contrast to the AfD, the Green party believes that immigration, including of refugees, is key to solving the problems inherent with Germany’s aging population and should be encouraged.

* * *

Source: DW

Previous post

Rothschild Family Wealth is Five Times that of World’s Top 8 Billionaires Combined

Next post

The Utility of Shame: "Europe Has Never Had a Golden Age and Will Never Have One"

Notify of
1 Comment
Inline Feedback
View all comments
1 February, 2017 11:34 am

The proposal by Frauke Petry of the AfD to get rid of the obsolete post-WW II Basic Law right to asylum which allows Germany to be flooded with Third World invaders, is no doubt just and honourable – and exactly what patriotic Germans need to save this great European nation. The EU is worse than useless, serving the Third World invaders and the Leftist political Establishment. The present Marxist-created EU(SSR) is a nation-wrecking Marxist dictatorship which is destroying our White nations and our White people (White genocide). As for that female Green politician (Green on the outside, Red on the inside) I’ve never heard or seen a Green politician who wasn’t totally naive and downright loopy to boot – and I don’t suppose this one will be any different from… Read more »