David SimsNews

Scientist: Negroes Bred With Pre-Humans

African skull only 13,000 years old matches primitive skulls from 140,000 years ago

Introduction by David Sims: The reason humanoids didn’t evolve as much in Africa as they did elsewhere is that, elsewhere, lesser species of humanoid were driven out or exterminated, whereas in Africa they were tolerated and mixed with. And here we are, today, in the United States, in the UK, and in Europe, making the same mistake that caused the Africans to be the obsolete hominids that they are.

SCIENTISTS HAVE COLLECTED more evidence to suggest that ancient and modern humans interbred in Africa.

Reanalysis of the 13,000-year-old skull from a cave in West Africa reveals a skull more primitive-looking than its age suggests.

The result suggests that the ancestors of early humans did not die out quickly in Africa, but instead lived alongside their descendents and bred with them until comparatively recently.

The results are published in PLoS ONE.

The skull, found in the Iwo Eleru cave in Nigeria in 1965, does not look like a modern human.

It is longer and flatter with a strong brow ridge; features closer to a much older skull from Tanzania, thought to be around 140,000 years old.

Prof Katerina Harvati from the University of Tuebingen in Germany used new digitising techniques to capture the surface of the skull in detail.

The new technique improved upon the original measurements done with callipers by letting researchers see subtler details about the skull’s surface.

“[The skull] has got a much more primitive appearance, even though it is only 13,000 years old,” said Chris Stringer, from London’s Natural History Museum, who was part of the team of researchers.

“This suggests that human evolution in Africa was more complex… the transition to modern humans was not a straight transition and then a cut off.”

Prof Stringer thinks that ancient humans did not die away once they had given rise to modern humans.

They may have continued to live alongside their descendants in Africa, perhaps exchanging genes with them, until more recently than had been thought.

The researchers say their findings also underscore a real lack of knowledge of human evolution in the region.

But palaeontologists are not all agreed on precisely what the new analysis is telling us – or, indeed, whether it is telling us anything definitive at all.

“I do not think that these findings add anything new to our view,” said Prof Clive Finlayson, director of the Gibraltar Museum, who was not connected to the study.

“We have a few fossils, and no idea of natural variation within populations. That the situation is not simple and is deep and complex is what we would expect.

“In my view, it is the field of genetics that will help us most in clarifying matters,” he told BBC News.

Separate research published earlier this month suggests that genetic mixing between hominin species happened in Africa up to 35,000 years ago.

* * *

Source: BBC News

Previous post

Fooling the People

Next post

The Jewish Double Standard

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
31 December, 2016 7:40 pm

It’s funny how, no matter the direction of the research, most of the researchers still use the “all human beings originally came from Africa” assumption as the foundation for whatever they find there. This latest finding, in my view, only adds to evidence that African NEGROS were effected in their own evolution by these sub-human hominids… not Whites or some of the other races. I for one have never bought into the whole “out of Africa” theory. It’s like saying that every tree on earth came from only one place on earth.

Reply to  JimB
1 January, 2017 3:00 pm

Exactly. People never realize that the Out of Africa theory is only that–just a theory. It’s someone’s opinion with absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever behind it, entirely unproven. Yet, it’s repeated over and over in the media so often that today, it’s simply taken as fact. It’s astonishing, but such is the power of simple repetition. It’s preposterous to even think that some Blacks left Africa and over time turned into White people in the northern hemisphere simply because it’s cold there–because we all know snow is cold and “cold” places have lots of white stuff like ice and little sun, so that’s what makes people White. Really? Then why are the ancestors of the ancient Inuit (Eskimos) of the Arctic, who continue to live among the tundra, still a… Read more »

31 December, 2016 8:18 pm

Even though Egypt is located on the continent of Africa, I found this article called “The Surprising DNA Studies That Sent Egyptology Into a Tizzy” nonetheless enlightening inasmuch as it points to a distinct difference between the sub-Saharan Negro and the original Egyptians that peopled the north-eastern portion of the continent at the time that the pyramids were built: http://www.renegadetribune.com/surprising-dna-studies-sent-egyptology-tizzy/

Because Kemp’s ‘The Children of Ra’ evidence supports that the Egyptians of the era were a 99.6 match, DNA-wise, to western European Y-Chromosomes, it still doesn’t support the “fact” that we all originally came from the continent. Only that one branch of our proto-Aryan ancestors dwelt there for several thousand years…

2 January, 2017 2:49 am

Does that really surprise any perceptive white person? It is a well-established fact that niggers will have, or attempt to have, coitus with anything that moves – dogs, cows, goats, pigs, monkeys, – and now even pre-human hominids.

The degeneracy that is nigger is without bounds!

Robert Ferrara
Robert Ferrara
2 January, 2017 12:18 pm

Also too, look at the “Jew-know who’s “who promote the “Out of Africa” bollocks.

Anthony Collins
Anthony Collins
9 January, 2017 3:51 am

Human evolution in sub-Saharan Africa might be summed up as “the survival of the thickest.”

Incorrigibly stupid and superstitious savages have nothing to contribute to human progress, and have no place in White societies. As John Tyndall remarked of Blacks, “What have they ever given us apart from black magic, witchcraft, voodoo, cannibalism, and AIDS?” (I’m not sure if this quotation is exact; some versions include “cannibalism” while others omit it.)