Putin to Russians: Western Europe Has “No Future”; Do Not Follow Their Example

Says Russians better understand how to found and manage a multicultural empire.

by Marcus Cicero

RUSSIA IS AN example of a country that in reality never totally gave up on their status as an empire. For a thousand years the Slavic Russians have fought, conquered, and occupied foreign realms of subhumans as a means to protect their own from consistent encroachment and tribal migrations.

But unlike the Egyptians, Persians, Romans, and even Americans to some degree, Russia has never attempted to fully assimilate their alien subjects into their society and bloodlines.

Of course there were limited periods of bad behavior (such as at points during Soviet rule), and there have been continuous efforts over the centuries to impose the Orthodox faith and Russian language upon the subjugated outsiders, but the situation never quite transformed into a land on the way to the Jewish dream of a pure melting pot of races.


It’s actually a seriously complicated subject, worthy of tens of thousands of pages of commentary, but what we need to understand is that it has worked for them (for the most part), even if it is not something we could implement in our own homelands.

Thus it must come to the Russians as a rather bizarre shock to watch the West wipe themselves out over the course of just a couple of generations (Jew involvement has sped things up), while trashing those who have through circumstance, innovation, and history kept something resembling a multicultural empire intact (the term is different when applied to Russia).

Here is a transcription and translation of Putin’s remarks:

“A migrant has just raped a child in one of the European countries. The court found him “not guilty” based on two things: the migrant did not understand the language of his host country, and he did not understand that the boy – and it was a boy – didn’t want this.

It doesn’t fit into my head what on earth they’re thinking over there. This is the result of the dilution of national values [identity].

I can’t even explain the rationale – is it a sense of guilt before the migrants? What’s going on? It’s not clear.

But a society that cannot defend its children today has no tomorrow. It has no future.

So relying on their [migration policy] experience is not the best thing to do, if I can be frank.

But we have a 1000 year history of forming a multicultural society – our understanding of [these intricacies] is much deeper.”

Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin

* * *

Source: InfoStormer

Previous post

ISIS, Out of Arms, Near Collapse -- Until US Weapons Drop

Next post

Atlantic's New Editor Jeffrey Goldberg: Maniacal Warmongering Zionist Jew


  1. dalex
    2 November, 2016 at 7:15 am — Reply

    )) You know nothing about the real situation with immigrants in Russia…

  2. Arvin N. Prebost
    4 November, 2016 at 12:09 pm — Reply

    I like what Putin is saying but this just gets more confusing.

    Is not Putin strongly allied with the Russian Orthodox Church?

    But previous articles have said that Christianity is the root of our troubles. It sounds to me that Putin has tapped into it as a rallying point.

    • 4 November, 2016 at 1:36 pm — Reply

      Putin is not a racial-nationalist. He is a civic nationalist. He does want traditional Russia to survive; he sees the Russian Orthodox church as essential to that. He caters to Jews because he knows what they can do for Russia and against Russia, but he is obviously not an instrument of them as America and Western Europe have become — in fact he opposes them geopolitically almost all the time. He did tolerate an international racial-nationalist summit in Russia recently. Dimitry Rogozin, who wants a worldwide alliance of European powers opposed to Third World incursions, is a minister in his government. On the other hand, he has persecuted radical racial-nationalists, he tolerates “cooperative” Jewish oligarchs (while imprisoning or exiling others), he glories in the “patriotic anti-fascist victory” myths of World War 2, his desire to see a weakened West leads him to push Leftist, multiracialist ideas through his international media like RT (Thom Hartmann, Larry King, et al.), and he evidently believes he can construct a benevolent Eurasian multicultural “Empire” of sorts that won’t be fatal to Russians and will in fact be dominated forever by them. Those are some serious negatives.

      But the most important thing for us is this: Russia’s power structure — at this time; it could change — does not have as one of its core tenets the abolition of the White race. The Judeo-American alliance that misrules the West does. That is an extremely important difference.

  3. Arvin N. Prebost
    4 November, 2016 at 4:19 pm — Reply

    Thanks, Kevin.

    Putin is a strange character. As a reference point, I kept trying to compare him to someone I was more familiar with, such as the Russian Orthodox Brother Nathaniel, or Pat Buchanan, but kept coming up short.

    I don’t know . . perhaps Marine le Pen or Donald Trump.

  4. 5 November, 2016 at 3:33 pm — Reply

    Sure there are some negatives in Russia today for race-thinking Whites, foremost being the increasing number of non-White Muslims from former Soviet Republics. It’s not difficult to argue that there are more racial negatives in the current U.S. however.

    My wife returned last week from a month in Russia, her homeland. She spent time in the big cities of Novosibirsk (1.5 million population) and Moscow (11.5 million), as well as in her family’s hometown in the Golden Altai Mountain region of Southern Siberia. Her most remarkable observation was that she only saw one Negro during the entire trip. Imagine that. When she arrived back at Dulles Airport near Washington, D.C., she might as well have landed in Africa.

    Mr. Putin, the politician, all his faults in the minds of racial nationalists is very popular among the Russian people. Read about the Putin-approved policy to reserve many jobs for ethnic Russians over non-White immigrants, and compare to America’s almost total lack of any such protection of her founding stock:

  5. Groto
    15 November, 2016 at 9:29 am — Reply

    Americans should remember that Putin, a former KGB-ist (based in East Germany), said the breakup of the Soviet Union was the 20th century’s worst geopolitical catastrophe. What does his statement say about him? I hope you haven’t forgotten what deadly danger Soviet Russia posed to the US and the world during the Cold War (ca. 1945-93).

  6. Groto
    15 November, 2016 at 9:51 am — Reply

    RE: “For a thousand years the Slavic Russians have fought, conquered, and occupied foreign realms of subhumans”
    Historical facts seem to show that a thousand years ago, i.e. in 1016, there was no Russia nor Russians, only remote and unimportant Muscovy. The name “Russia” was started being widely used sometime in the 18th century, wasn’t it? As for the “Slavic Russians’ ” (aren’t they in reality a Slavic and Mongol-Asiatic mix?) conquest and occupation of “subhumans,” does the author mean by the latter, for example, the Poles, Lithuanians, Estonians, Latvians, Finns? The Russians also conquered Nazi Germany and occupied a big chunk of it….

  7. 5 May, 2017 at 12:08 pm — Reply

    All else aside, White America and White Russia must build a bridge between our peoples, based on common blood, with what is best for us together to be of the highest virtue. With what is recognized as detrimental to our kind, we must join together with Whites everywhere to oppose that threat with every means available to us. We must organize for that, without compromise!

    Putin, whatever his scary KGB baggage, is an effective politician. Politicians try to please everyone they can. Bottom line: President Putin is better for White Russia than is President Trump for White America. No contest.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.