Genocide: The Roll Call of Dishonor
THOSE HOOKED on mainstream media firmly believe that the Germans were the worst mass killers in history; indeed the only genocidal psychopaths set on exterminating entire peoples. The dreadful irony is that such propaganda is now conclusively proven to be untrue. The alleged Holocaust of the Jews by Germany is today so convincingly debunked that its only protection is the imprisonment of investigators who challenge the official narrative. When the prison cell replaces debate, you can be certain that the case for their side is full of holes.
Most damning of all are real holocausts that go undebated, even undescribed. The worst crimes in human history are airbrushed out of the media by pay-rolled journalists and palace publishers. A recent report discloses that genocide and mass murder during the 20th century claimed the lives of 170,000,000 (170 million) people. Even if the ludicrous claim of six million victims of “Nazism” was to pass muster, who then was responsible for the other 164 million deaths?
Bolshevik-Occupied Russia (BOR) accounted for 62,000,000 dead; this figure is likely to be a gross underestimate. Russia is the world’s largest country; it crosses eight different time zones. Until Alaska was sold to Americans, Russia was the only country to straddle three continents. Yet Russia’s immediate post-Bolshevik population was less than that of Bangladesh, one of the world’s tiniest countries. Any media mention of the Soviet holocaust is as rare as rocking horse droppings.
Communist China comes in as an also-ran with 35,000,000 deaths by extermination. Again, one looks in vain for any major media mentions of such unfortunates; they are airbrushed out of mainstream media and the abundant output of palace publishers.
Any amateur writer who cobbles together some ludicrous, even physically impossible, claims of persecution by “Nazis” can be assured of publishers’ agents clamouring for the publishing rights. However, any professional writer-researcher who submits a solid account of any program of genocide other than that alleged against the Workers’ Reich will find himself airily dismissed.
World War 2 statistics alone suggest that mass extermination committed by the Allies puts Britain and the United States in third place after the USSR and Communist China. We can say with a great degree of certainty that 13,000,000 Germans disappeared from 1945 onwards. To these victims can be included millions of refugees caught up in the advance of the Red Army during 1944-1945. The scale of Allied genocide was put into perspective by Senator Homer Capehart. Taking the floor in the U.S Senate on February 5, 1946, he stated:
Since the end of the war about 3,000,000 people, mostly women and children and over-aged men, have been killed in Eastern Germany and south-eastern Europe; about 15,000,000 people have been deported or had to flee their homesteads and are on the road. About 25% of these people — over 3,000,000 — have perished. About 4,000,000 men and women have been deported to Eastern Europe as slaves. It seems that the elimination of the German population of eastern Europe, at least 15,000,000 people, was planned in accordance with decisions made at Yalta.
Churchill had said to Mikolakczyk when the latter protested, during the negotiations with Moscow, against forcing Poland to incorporate eastern Germany: “Don’t mind the five or more million Germans. Stalin will see to them. You will have no trouble with them; they will cease to exist.”
Today, it is generally accepted that deaths caused by America’s wars of aggression since 1945 can be calculated at 20,000,000. If so then this puts the US and its Allies not in third but second place. Communist China is therefore relegated to third place.
It is thought that as many as twenty to thirty million Africans died in conflict or of famine since European nations transferred their colonies to America’s banking and corporate dynasties. Comparatively speaking, the massacres of the Khmer Rouge, which do occasionally get media mention, were sideshows.
If you don’t recall reading real history in mainstream media or publishers’ pap then you might consider whether media and bookshop-bought books are worth the paper they are printed on.
* * *