American Bar Association “Model Rules”: Lawyers May Not Oppose Multiracialism or Sex Perversion
AMERICA HAS a noble tradition of lawyers standing up for unpopular causes. John Adams, signer of the Declaration of Independence, defended British soldiers accused in the Boston Massacre. Lawyers have stood up throughout the history of the Republic and have not been shy about offering their opinions.
But soon, if the leftist, Jewish-dominated American Bar Association has its way, the only opinions allowed will be Cultural Marxist opinions.
The American Bar Association, whose Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer is Jack L. Rives, a Jew, just passed changes to their “Model Rules of Professional Conduct” for American lawyers. The ABA does not have disciplinary powers over American lawyers, but its “model rules” are often adopted verbatim by states, which do have the authority to regulate attorneys.
In its recent meeting, the ABA changed part of the model rules regarding attorney conduct. That kind of minutiae is guaranteed to generate yawns from 99 per cent. of Americans. But every American should be alarmed by this — because the purpose of these rules is to do nothing less than drive racially conscious Whites and other principled people from the legal profession, and ultimately deny non-leftists their day in court by denying them legal representation.
The new rule states in part: “(Paragraph G) [shall not] engage in conduct that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is harassment or discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status or socioeconomic status in conduct related to the practice of law. This paragraph does not limit the ability of a lawyer to accept, decline or withdraw from a representation in accordance with Rule 1.16. This paragraph does not preclude legitimate advice or advocacy consistent with these Rules.”
This involves far more than denying lawyers the right to discriminate — to choose to freely associate or not associate as their conscience dictates. That would be bad enough.
Read the notes to that section to understand what is really going on: “Discrimination and harassment by lawyers in violation of paragraph (G) undermines confidence in the legal profession and the legal system. Such discrimination includes harmful verbal or physical conduct that manifests bias or prejudice toward others. Harassment includes sexual harassment and derogatory or demeaning verbal or physical conduct.”
The important part is where it says “discrimination includes harmful verbal or physical conduct that manifests bias or prejudice toward others.” In plain, non-lawyer English, if a lawyer happens to not approve of homosexual behavior, homosexual marriage, transgenderism, Islam, mass Third World immigration — or if he holds any number of other opinions at variance with Cultural Marxism, and comments on them, the lawyer can lose his law license.
This rule is not limited to the courtroom. If a lawyer posts something on social media or offers an opinion that is not an approved opinion, he can and will be disciplined.
The purpose of this model rule is simple. It is to silence all lawyers who disagree with the Establishment’s agenda of racial and cultural destruction of the West.
Imagine this rule in practice. What if a lawyer was asked to sue the ADL or SPLC or other ant-White group: Can you imagine how representatives of these Jewish groups could use the lawyer’s opinions on these groups’ agendas — or anything they had ever said on the subject, or Politically Incorrect clients they might have had — to take out the lawyers who want to sue?
How about some of the lawyers who have stood up for religious freedom? Lawyers who have advocated for bakers who will not bake cakes for homosexual weddings will be targeted. So will lawyers who have ever represented a racially conscious White person. If the attorney says anything about his clients’ positions on such issues, it is grounds for a disciplinary complaint.
Lawyers are terrified of disciplinary complaints. After all, a disciplinary complaint can cost a lawyer his or her license to practice law. How many lawyers are going to refuse to take cases because they simply do not wish to endanger their ability to provide for their families?
Americans who dissent from the Establishment are going to find it ever harder to even hire a lawyer under these circumstances.
That is the ultimate objective. These new regulations, if adopted by the states, will open the doors to having lawyers disbarred simply for offering an opinion that is not politically correct. It will make the “justice system” in this country into even more of a travesty than it already is.
How do we know this will happen? The rules pretty much give it away. While this new rule prohibits attorneys for engaging in discrimination, there is an out for those who want to discriminate against White people. Footnote four of the new rule helpfully notes that: “Lawyers may engage in conduct undertaken to promote diversity and inclusion without violating this Rule.”
The American Bar Association has long been a hack organization that does little more than advance our enemies’ agenda.
Today they look more like the Bar Association in the old Soviet Union, whose mission was to protect the Communist Party, not advance the rule of law.
* * *
Source: based on an article in the Washington Times