American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

They Can Never Be Appeased

I75_BLMAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of July 9, 2016

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

OVER THE LAST TWO DAYS, a series of possibly coordinated attacks on White police officers has been carried out by Black attackers. The known attacks — there may be others — took place in Dallas, Texas; St. Louis, Missouri; Bristol, Tennessee; and Valdosta, Georgia. These killings and shootings are linked to massive “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) protests which have besieged several major cities. Huge BLM mobs inundated and surrounded CNN headquarters and shut down Interstate 75 in Atlanta. In California, Interstate 880 near Oakland was totally shut down in both directions by BLM agitators.  (ILLUSTRATION: Black Lives Matter “protesters” in a standoff with police)

Black BLM mob surges at CNN headquarters
Black BLM mob surges at CNN headquarters

The attack in Dallas got the most press and resulted in multiple fatalities — 12 police officers were shot and five were killed by a Black sniper who was influenced by the Black Lives Matter movement (the attack took place during a Black Lives Matter anti-police protest). The sniper, Micah Xavier Johnson, who was himself killed by a robot-operated police bomb, was enraged at Whites in general and White police officers in particular. He said he was “upset about Black Lives Matter.” He stated, according to Dallas police, that he wanted to “exterminate Whites.”

Interstate 880 closed by Black Lives Matter mob
Interstate 880 closed by Black Lives Matter mob

According to police and eyewitnesses, in Ballwin, Missouri (suburban St. Louis) — near Ferguson where Blacks rioted, looted, and burned down part of the city two years ago, spurred on in part by Black Lives Matter agitators — a Black male named Antonio Taylor ambushed and shot a White police officer just hours after the Dallas attacks.

In Bristol, Tennessee, near the Virginia line and not far from our National Alliance business office, a Black male named Lakeem Keon Scott killed a White woman, Jennifer Rooney; shot another White woman, Deborah Watts; shot a White man, David Whitman Davis; and shot a White police officer, Matthew Cousins. The killer, according to CBS News, was motivated by the issues raised by Black Lives Matter and targeted his victims because they were White: “Preliminary findings indicate Scott may have targeted people and officers after being troubled by recent events involving African-Americans and law enforcement officers in other parts of the country.” Lakeem Scott went on his killing rampage during intense coverage of Black Lives Matter protests around the country and just hours before the sniper attack in Dallas: “The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation says the attacker told authorities that he was frustrated by the recent killings by police of black men in Louisiana and Minnesota.” Witnesses reported hearing someone yell, “Police suck! Black Lives Matter!” before the bullets were fired.

In Valdosta, Georgia, early Friday morning, just hours after the sniper murders of officers in Dallas, and during non-stop media coverage of the killings and the associated Black Lives Matter protests,

Authorities say a [Black] man called 911 in south Georgia to report a break-in, then ambushed and shot the [White] officer who came to investigate. Both men were wounded in the ensuing gunfire, and both are expected to survive.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation says in a news release that 22-year-old Stephen Paul Beck called 911, saying his car was broken into Friday morning. Officer Randall Hancock came to investigate, and police say Beck shot at him as soon as he got out of his car. He was hit twice in his protective vest and once beneath the vest in his abdomen.

The GBI says the motive is unknown . . . [in contrast,] Valdosta Police Chief Brian Childress . . . would not discuss a possible motive.

Killer Micah Johnson poses with man wearing Black militant garb with Africa patch. Will the tricolor Africa flag and related symbols now be attacked and banned as was the Confederate flag?
Killer Micah Johnson poses with man wearing Black militant garb with Africa patch. Will the tricolor pan-Africa flag and related symbols now be attacked and banned as was the Confederate flag? Don’t hold your breath.

Though authorities now say that the Dallas sniper, Micah Johnson, was a “lone shooter,” initial reports showed that officers and witnesses believed there were several snipers attacking at once. A Dallas police officer can be heard on his radio during the attacks saying “We have an open window on Lamar with rifles hanging out.” Rifles — plural. And quite a few of these “peaceful Black Lives Matter protesters” were well-armed: The Washington Post quoted the mayor of Dallas, Michael Rawlings, as stating: “About 20 civilians with ammo gear and rifles over their shoulders began to run away when the shooting began.” About 20 civilians with ammo gear and rifles over their shoulders . . . . Shortly after the attacks, police stated the slain officers “were killed by snipers perched atop elevated positions.”

A Dallas police spokesman said: “During the search of the suspect’s home, detectives found bomb making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition, and a personal journal of combat tactics.” I wonder if the sniper had any books or other publications — or a history of visiting anti-White Web sites — that might have aided or inspired him in his murderous rampage against White officers. Will his political affiliations and book purchases going back years be analyzed and publicized as were those of Thomas Mair? Will the billionaire Jew and vulture capitalist George Soros — who, according to the Washington Times, funds Black Lives Matter and associated groups to the tune of dozens of millions every year — be publicly “linked” to these killings? Remember that Soros proudly boasts of his funding of revolutions and coups, such as the so-called “color revolutions” in Ukraine and other countries — revolutions and coups designed to enslave whole nations to Jewish media and financial oligarchs and install puppet governments, all prettied up with rhetoric about “freedom” and a “diverse, open society.” What do you think Soros is up to in our country?

Were these attacks coordinated? Or were they merely “inspired” by the non-stop controlled media coverage of — and agitation by Black Lives Matter protesters against — alleged “racist” White policemen?

We don’t know for certain. But we do know that a militant Black group calling itself the “Black Power Political Association (or BPPO) claimed responsibility for the Dallas murders, saying on their now-removed Facebook page: “#‎BlackPower‬! ‪#‎BlackKnights‬! Sniper Assassins Take Down Five Police Officers! And More Will Be Assassinated In The Coming Days! . . .  Do You Like The Work Of Our Assassins? Get Your Own Sniper Rifle And Join Our Thousands Of Sniper Assassins Worldwide In The Fight Against Oppression!”

A part of the BPPO Facebook page
A part of the BPPO Facebook page

Most interestingly — and unmentioned by other media outlets — the BPPO Facebook page lists its home page URL as — a promotional site for a recent, virulently anti-White film — with the amazing and frankly Marxist title The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution — lionizing the violent “Black Panther” movement of the 1960s and 1970s.

The film’s producers proudly proclaim that the film was funded — partly by involuntary contributions by White taxpayers, of course — by Jewish-run PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, with even more help from the anti-White Ford Foundation.

Peel back the skin of these White-hating, murdering street thugs that are being whipped into a revolutionary army to be used against us — peel back just a couple of layers and you find billionaire Jews, and major corporate and US government involvement.

These oligarchs preach to us — and have preached to us for years — that, given enough White-taxpayer-funded “benefits” and rainbow-colored “diversity” initiatives, and if Whites give up their neighborhoods and their rights to self-defense and free speech, somehow we will bring about a multiracial utopia of “love” and harmony. But that’s not happening — in fact, the opposite is happening:

The truth is this: The Blacks can never be appeased. Their impulsivity — their violence — their rage — their primitive nature — constitute a permanent condition, unchangeable even in a hundred lifetimes. Their primitive — and, for us, highly dangerous — inner nature transcends time and transcends geography. And it sure as Hell transcends all the “social programs” and EBT cards rained down from Heaven upon them by crazy, suicidal White folks led by the Jewsh pied pipers of “equality” and “diversity.” We could give them our entire nation, lay down in our front yards bound hand and foot with our throats exposed and sharpened knives within easy reach, our daughters chained to the bedroom door for their delectation, the entire contents of our bank accounts converted to cash and laid out neatly in unmarked bills on the kitchen table — and it still would not be enough. They would still hate, they would still rage, and they would still kill. And, when they had done away with us, they would turn on others, including themselves.

And now their primitive rage is being organized and honed for use as a weapon to be used against Whites, in case of the looming White resurgence that our enemies fear.

There is a rational, reasonable solution. But the Jewish oligarchs don’t want you to know about it and demonize anyone who speaks of it. That solution is racial separation. As I said in 2014:

There are some 38 million people of African descent in this country. The current national debt of the United States is 17 trillion dollars. If we paid each and every Black person in the United States $100,000 to return to Africa — that’s half a million dollars for a family of five, more than enough for a bountiful start there — it would only cost $3.8 trillion, less than a 23 per cent. increase [in the debt]. The national debt is now increasing at a rate of some $2.6 billion per day. At that rate, which we’re going to spend anyway, we could pay it all back in a little over four measly years. (And it would be even easier to separate from the Mestizo invaders, who are still within walking distance of their home countries.) Wouldn’t it be an act of mercy and deep morality to give our children their own nation again? Doesn’t Nature teach us, as the ecologist Garrett Hardin once said, that no two subspecies of the same species ever coexist peacefully in the same territory? Wouldn’t it be the ultimate act of wisdom and kindness to ourselves and others to separate what Nature has already separated by100,000 years of evolution?

And I made my proposal for racial separation two years ago. The rate of spending — and debt growth — has gone up since then, so it wouldn’t even take four years these days to pay for the separation we need to save our people and our nation. And if we’d started two years ago, we’d be halfway there by now.

The National Alliance is organizing Whites to use our power, wealth, and influence to end the murderous and treacherous dispossession and genocide of our people. Men and women just like you can make a difference. Right now, most Whites are just standing aside, with the flickering lights of their LCD screens reflecting in their eyes, doing absolutely nothing as our people are being murdered, raped, exploited, and manipulated into funding and supporting their own genocide. But it doesn’t have to be that way. In our homelands today, there are still more — far more — of us than there are of them. If we stand together, there is nothing we can’t do; no enemy we can’t defeat; no limit to the greatness we can achieve. Join us today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at and You can join and support us by visiting — or write to National Alliance, Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to never give up.

Listen to the broadcast
Previous post

Minneapolis: Mob of Somali Muslims Threaten Women with Rape

Next post

Building Understanding


    9 July, 2016 at 8:37 pm — Reply


    It should be obvious to all racially aware whites that, that hook-nosed and kinky-haired kike Soros is behind the BLM movement. Today’s broadcast highlights the Jews proclivity for causing social chaos by applying the old ‘divide and conquer’ strategy. I know it and so do many white people, but what about the kiddies.

    We must get this message out to young white boys and white girls – racially pure stock. The National Alliance does a splendid job of educating mature age white people about the evils of the Jews. By mature age I am referring to people who are at least in their last year or two of high school. I feel we must start educating white people as soon as they can speak. We need a modern-age Aesopica for the kiddies.

    When my grand-nieces and grand-nephews come over for a visit I often tell them the story of the homeless hook-nosed stranger. Mom and Dad take pity on the poor hook-nosed stranger and allow him to stay in the house because they feel sorry for him. But as soon as he arrives he starts causing trouble! He tries to get mommy and daddy fighting, he tries to get mommy and daddy shouting at the kids and he tries to get the kids fighting each other. He spends all his time trying to cause trouble. It becomes so bad that he is booted out of the house and told never to return again – etc., etc.

    Perhaps the ladies of the NA can put pen to paper and produce some enchanting stories for the kiddies about the destructive nature of the kikes. I think the kids would love such stories especially if they were part of a picture book. Just a thought!!!

    • 10 July, 2016 at 8:52 am — Reply

      The Jewish problem is not new, and neither is the problem of explaining it to your children. Unfortunately, most material on this subject has been dropped down the memory hole. Please consider making good use of the following, which come to mind in no particular order:

      George Lincoln Rockwell’s Fable of the Ducks and Hens might be a good start. (I may be confusing it with something else, but I seem to recall there was an illustrated version drawn by Rockwell himself; I have never seen same.) Read aloud Aesop and Rockwell together, and then have fun discussing ants, grasshoppers, and hen-pecking chicken Jew hens all at once! Its style also makes it a charming antidote for the kids who have already been brainwashed by the so-called “Dr. Seuss”.

      Julius Streicher’s The Poisonous Mushroom [PDF] could use some updating to match the imagery familiar in post-post-postmodern society, and may be good as is for older (or smarter) kids.

      Looking beyond Streicher, there is likely to be a goldmine of nowadays-obscure National Socialist material I have not heard of. How did HJ and related organizations explain the Jewish question? What was the approach in German schools? Very smart people with nation-state resources worked for six years of peacetime to build the foundation of, among so many other things, a racially conscious children’s education programme. Surely, age-appropriate introductions to the Jewish question (and race generally) must have been produced with high quality and in large quantity. The rest is a matter of translation, or teaching your kids pre-1996 German (and Fraktur).

      Any story involving an evil witch can probably be adapted. Actually, such a statement may be backwards: I have long suspected that many old stories involving an evil witch originated as anti-Jewish fables, or even as legends descended from the faded memories of real-life occurrences involving Jewry. Else wherefore would the hook-nosed “witch” image have become so ingrained?

      Little Red Riding Hood, as well as anything involving a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” motif, could be used by way of analogy (“You see, that Jew is acting like the wolf wearing Grandma’s clothes”). I am firmly against rewriting such stories to add the desired spin, but such is really unnecessary when they already carry the right moral.

      The fable of the scorpion and the frog addresses the unchangeable nature of people generally. A Jew will always sting you sooner or later, even if doing so is detrimental to him also!

      There are probably some anti-Jewish subtexts in Roald Dahl stories. Anybody who explicitly proclaimed his lack of “anti-Semitism” and whined that he has Jewish friends most likely hated the Jews in his heart. He tried to get away with it by even-handedly smearing Adolf Hitler when he criticized the Jews, putting on the spin that “even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them [Jews] for no reason”. (Dear Mr. Dahl: Speak not so ill of the Führer. Please wash your mouth out with Jewish soap.) And, again, there are all those witches!

      For children who have attained a sufficient level of reading, don’t forget that the Fagin character in Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist was not only a Jewish stereotype, but based directly on a real-life Jew criminal whose exploits were making contemporary headlines (Isaac Solomon). Under the usual Jewish pressure, Dickens rewrote parts of Oliver Twist to tone down Fagin’s Jewishness. I am rather curious about how the original read: Even in the thus-censored result, Fagin is so obviously a filthy kike that during the Jew-dazed era of my life, the character made me quite uncomfortable.

      (Aside: Dickens also had his arm twisted until he agreed to write a story with a kindly Jewish protagonist who helps children; I have never read the result, Our Mutual Friend, and do not care to unless it were to prove useful for activist purposes. Dickens sufficiently upset the Jews that if he were similarly so situate to-day, he would be vapourized; but at the time, the Jews were only powerful enough to coerce him into kissing their feet.)

      I have a rather warped view of what constitutes a children’s book, because I cracked into Shakespeare several years before I hit puberty—a reading level at that age which used to be commonplace. If your children are sufficiently undamaged by public schools and happy-pills to do likewise, introduce them to The Merchant of Venice—without the philojudaic re-spin. The play was published with an explicitly anti-Jewish subtitle in the early 1600s; also it was alternatively titled, The Jew of Venice (cf. Marlowe’s The Jew of Malta, which I intend to read one fine day).

      Around 1800, Shylock was suddenly transmuted into a victim; it is amazing how the moral of a story can be inverted by the emotions of a performance, without changing the literal words of the script. Since the Führer was himself an avid admirer of Shakespeare, the National Socialists produced a German Radio reading performed consistently with the author’s original intent; the Jews actually insinuate that this was some kind of dirty, underhanded trick by those ever-lying “Nazis”. Of course once your kids have reached this level of reading, there is a whole world of old books (fiction and non-fiction) for explaining the Jewish problem to them.

      There must be countless others which either I have not heard of, or I simply do not call to mind at the moment. And yes, new material would also be an excellent idea. Though a woman’s touch may add a special quality to children’s stories, men can produce them, too! You yourself mentioned Aesop; and Grimm’s Fairytales were not written by a woman.

      I am actually not so well-read; others are encouraged to add to the foregoing. Oh, and one more thing: It is imperative that you inculcate your children at an early age with a love of European classical music! A ten-year-old who prefers Vivaldi to nigger trash may suffer some social friction (speaking from experience), but is also somewhat immunized against it. Music is the heart of culture, and teaching your kids good music is equally important to anything you can teach them with words.

    10 July, 2016 at 8:49 pm — Reply

    Many thanks for the tip. I married late in life so my children are almost young enough to be my grand-children. My parents were from the UK – father born 1900, and mother born 1906. Both were politically active in their youth so they too knew about the Jews’ activities in England and Europe prior to WWI and WWII. They passed this knowledge onto their children – all nine of them. My father was an engineer and during WWII he worked in Coventry during the bombings, but he never had an unkind word to say about the Germans. Shortly before his death in the 70’s he reflected on the state of the UK and sincerely believed that Hitler should have won the war and we were fighting on the wrong side. He exchanged many letters with Enoch Powell.

    I have spent considerable time and effort in educating my children about their heritage, their race and the inherent malevolence of the Jew. They now spread the word to other young people. I started educating them when they were young. In my country home-schooling is illegal but it still did not stop me from re-educating them after school. Thus my children and I had many debriefing sessions.

    My experience with my children and others has shown me that we must get the NA message out to the kids as soon as they can speak. We must have literature written for very young minds, and perhaps even videos.

    • 11 July, 2016 at 6:12 am — Reply

      It is wise of you protect your kids by educating them. As a former Judeophile who was raised that way, you can only imagine the reaction when, speaking of the unmitigated disaster the Jew made of my life as reward for my loyal service as a Shabbos Goy, I said to one of my parents: “You should have warned me about the Jew.” Actually no, you cannot imagine it. (Earliest memory of Holocaust storytime: Age 3, tucked into bed, mother reading aloud to me. Remember too that she is a race-mixer.)

      I have more to say about the substance of your idea. It is an idea which needs to happen, but will meet violent opposition. Here’s hoping that either I will return hereto or it will happen elsewhere.

  3. Nandarani
    10 July, 2016 at 9:22 pm — Reply

    This is only the beginning. BLM is in communication with LYNCH – and is planning to eliminate the possibility of the fall elections by precipitating marshal law this summer. SOROS is funding them, and provides funding for paying for the advertised protest positions – blm brags that the size of the crowds expected will be far beyond what Trump may expect. Recently hacked e-mails prove this to my satisfaction – research online to find them: e-mails between two prominent BLMers, discussing contacts with Lynch, who has encouraged them to beef up calls of racism as a prelude to the action.

    • 11 July, 2016 at 6:19 am — Reply

      Lynch is a puppet (like Obama and Trump and of course all of BLM). The question is what the Oberjuden want. They do not need martial law to cancel elections, which are in themselves inconsequential, but may desire pre-election riots as a pretext for imposing martial law—or as the start of all-out race war. Never forget that race war is a Jewish concept and Judeo-Marxist doctrine (incidentally I was just contemplating some exemplars of Marxist propaganda explicitly promoting race war…).

      BLM and their ilk are tools, only tools. Their wire-pullers need to keep them wound-up and at the ready, but can reel them in and stow them at any time. Do you think Soros et al. do not have a plan in place to shut BLM down if it goes against Jewish interests, or becomes otherwise inconvenient?

      So look to Europe. It is all about Europe. Critical events in Europe will determine the fate of USA, just as with the War and just as always. If those e-mails are what you say, it could be a matter of flipping the safety catch off a pistol—just in case things get messy (Europe!) and the Oberjuden need to open fire at a moment’s notice. The senders and recipients of these mails would not know that; they think they are big dogs, everybody does. Do not overestimate the niggers, and do not underestimate the Jew.

      “It is later than you think.”

  4. Anthony Collins
    8 August, 2016 at 1:54 am — Reply

    “Doesn’t Nature teach us, as the ecologist Garrett Hardin once said, that no two subspecies of the same species ever coexist peacefully in the same territory?”

    There’s an incorrect attribution here: the Russian biologist G. F. Gause, not Garrett Hardin, is generally credited with formulating the law of competitive exclusion. (To complicate matters, the American biologist Joseph Grinnell seems to have been the first to formulate the principle in an article published in 1904, but Gause seems to have developed it more fully in his book The Struggle for Existence published in 1934.)

    One’s memory can play all kinds of tricks, and mistakes of this kind are easily made. I suspect that Kevin Alfred Strom was thinking of Michael W. Masters’ article, “The Morality of Survival,” which refers to both the law of competive exclusion and Hardin’s book, The Limits of Altruism: An Ecologist’s View of Survival. Masters wrote:

    “Interracial crime is just one manifestation of a fundamental biological principle called Gause’s Law of Exclusion. In his book The Mammals of North America, University of Kansas biology professor Raymond Hall states the law as follows: ‘Two subspecies of the same species do not occur in the same geographic area. [emphasis in original] One will inevitably eliminate or displace the other.’ Prof. Hall specifically includes humans in this rule: ‘To imagine one subspecies of man living together on equal terms for long with another subspecies is but wishful thinking and leads only to disaster and oblivion for one or the other.'”

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.