Homosexual Jewess Admits True Purpose of Gay Agenda is to Destroy Marriage
EVEN KNOWING that there are radicals in all movements, doesn’t lessen the startling admission recently by lesbian journalist Masha Gessen. On a radio show last year, she actually admits that homosexual activists are lying about their radical political agenda. She says that they don’t want to access the institution of marriage; they want to radically redefine and eventually eliminate it. (ILLUSTRATION: Homosexual Jewess Masha Gessen)
Here is what she said on the radio interview:
“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.
The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.
I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”
For quite some time, the defenders of natural marriage have attempted to point out that the true agenda behind the homosexual demands organizations is not marriage equality; it is the total unraveling of marriage and uprooting traditional values from society. (This will ultimately include efforts to silence and punish some churches that openly adhere to their religious teachings about marriage and sexual morality.)
While few have been as vocal as this lesbian activist was in this interview, we do have numerical examples proving her point. When given the opportunity to marry, after laws have been struck down relatively small percentages of homosexuals actually bother to marry compared to their heterosexual counterparts. This raises question about the true need to unravel marriage for the “fair” extension of its benefits. Only 12 percent of homosexuals in the Netherlands marry compared to 86 percent of their heterosexual peers. Less than 20 percent of same-sex couples already living together in California married when given the chance in 2008. In contrast, 91 percent of heterosexual couples in California who are living together are married.
Clearly this is about cultural change and tearing down the traditional family ethic, since it seems that most homosexuals living together neither need nor desire to marry, though they do desire to radically change marriage. …
* * *
Source: News for the Blind
Their motivations for defaming marriage also explain their motivations for homosexual behaviour; yet what explains their motivations? I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reacting to the broad spectrum of destructive effects embedded in this criminogenic motivation. I really would!
“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist.”
Isn’t it beautiful how she happily contradicts herself? Basket case!
Also, stomach-churning the mess with biological parents of her children.
Harvey makes a valid point.
Any and Everywhere these FAKE impostor jew’s go they destroy the goodness of GOD!+
I have a dream. Every 212 becomes a homo. Evolution at its finest.
Why are so many Jews so physically repulsive?! It has to be a reflection of their souls. I mean there are some attractive Jews no doubt, but I think the ugliest people I’ve ever encountered, or seen, are either Jew, Arab, or Chinese.
I recall hearing a radio interview presenting both sides of the homosexual marriage debate. First we heard a homosexual present the pro-gay marriage viewpoint, and then halfway through the anti-gay marriage presentation the debater revealed that he too was a homosexual – what could be fairer than that. Both sides of the issue were covered. Have intending parents ever been given the opportunity to be asked whether they want to invest their lives and resources to raise a child for the benefit of the homosexual community and see their family line expire?