Classic Essays

Amerindian Apotheosis

oracle_cardsby William Scott, Jr.

THE “New Age” craze has merged with “liberalism” in several interesting ways. Both new-ageism and liberalism spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both elevate wishful thinking to a kind of moral and philosophical principle, and both operate on the basis of an unremitting hatred of European civilization and the race that created it. In this latter characteristic we find both crystal-gazers and neo-Communists united in a frenetic promotion of the superior civilization and spirituality of the aboriginal inhabitants of North and South America, the Indians.

You’ve seen it all, I’m sure, from documentaries on the achievements of the Aztecs and Incas which were wiped out by the wicked Spaniards, to Hollywood’s Dances With Wolves, to anti-Columbus pronouncements on Columbus Day, to the ridiculous compeers of Shirley MacLaine all decked out in their Indian feathers and moccasins.

I note in passing a catalog which crossed my desk. It was from a firm which sells New Age trinkets by mail, including “magic Indian stones” found at the “precise center of the North American continent,” devices to “catch evil spirits” before they can “disturb your dreams,” etc. I was astounded to discover that they do not accept wampum in payment for these goods, just Visa or Mastercard. But on to more serious things.

Was the civilization of the Mongoloid peoples, sometimes called Indians or Amerindians, who migrated across the Bering straits some 14,000 years ago, actually superior to our own?

First, it must be pointed out that the trans-Bering migrants and pre-Columbian inhabitants of what is today the United States and Canada did not have a civilization. They were nomadic hunters and gatherers, with a few exceptions. They did live in harmony with their environment, but only out of need, not out of choice or design. No moral superiority can be assigned to them thereby, since all peoples at the savage stage of development live in a generally similar manner relative to their environments.

As to the more advanced cultures of Central and South American Amerindians, the Inca and the Maya and the Aztec, we have a more complex question. As I make no claim to be an authority on the subject, I defer to the judgments of Dr. John Baker, Chairman of the Physical Anthropology Department at Oxford University. In his book Race Dr. Baker goes into some detail comparing various cultures around the world and analyzing their relative positions. Baker starts by making it clear that the only Indian cultures that can even be compared to non-Indian cultures are the Aztec, Mayan, and Inca cultures.

Baker shows that these Indians did have noteworthy achievements in mathematics, astronomy, and architecture. While recognizing their talents he goes on to state:

“When all these great achievements are held in mind, one might be inclined to pronounce these people as civilized without further consideration. But further consideration is precisely what is necessary.”

He then goes on to state that they had no comparable written language, no money (only barter), no weights for measuring, no metal-bladed agricultural implements, and they had never invented the wheel. With regard to their much ballyhooed “spirituality” he says:

“Their religions, which actually governed their lives, contained no other element than superstition… [and] did not enter into the field of ethics.”

So we see that there were many areas where these cultures never really came close to European or Oriental civilization.

Another area covered by Mr. Baker that the Politically Correct cadres do not like to discuss is the cannibalism that was openly practiced in these so-called civilizations and which was a major part of their “deep spirituality.” On this he comments:

“It was their custom to make war with the sole purpose of obtaining prisoners, who were kept in cages until required and then killed at special ceremonies by a cruel method involving the slitting open of the living body and tearing out the still beating heart. At one festival each year, babies were killed instead…. The slaughter was not all… the custom of eating flesh of sacrificed persons became almost universal. For instance, the Maya reserved the hands and feet of the victims for the high priest and supreme lord.”

Of course these descriptions can only to a small degree convey the horror that would be felt by any normal White man or woman were he or she to witness these acts personally. Finally to sum up the professor’s opinion he states bluntly:

“The mathematics, astronomy, and calendar of the Middle Americans suggest unqualified acceptance into the ranks of the civilized, but other features flatly forbid it.”

Keep in mind that these were the most developed of the native cultures and nothing of this scale existed in what is now the United States or Canada. I have tried here to deliver a factual counterbalance to the ideas propounded by the liberals and the New Agers, but I’m sure that there will be some who still do not want to see the plain truth. The belief in “noble savages” and the other hokum dished out for the public in the media will continue, and many will continue to watch Hollywood’s sophisticated propaganda like Dances With Wolves and believe that they have actually taken a trip back into time and witnessed the Amerindians as they really existed. But the plain truth cannot be — and will not be — suppressed forever.

* * *

Source: Free Speech magazine, February 1995

Previous post

Cui Bono?

Next post

The Limits of Toleration


    13 March, 2016 at 6:21 pm — Reply

    Australoid Apotheosis

    On the Australian continent the indigenous people known colloquially as Abo’s, Bungs or coconuts have, since the passage of the Mabo decision back in 1992, been elevated to the level of demi-gods by politicians, the media, the churches and egalitarian idiots of all types. There is not a public museum in the country that does not have at least one floor of the building devoted to Australoid artifacts – most made within the last two decades – and some made by whites I suspect. On the wall of the Australoid exhibit you will find a map of Australia which clearly shows regions (states) with geographical boundaries that existed before the evil whites came to the continent. The suckers accept this map as a clear indication of the state of Australia before Europeans arrived. I have it on good authority that the map was the creation of a deluded guilt ridden white who feels Europeans have stolen Aboriginal land. On a side note ask the same guilt ridden white to give his house to an Australoid family and go back to Europe and you will find him running away from you at light speed.

    Like Amerindians, Australoids too were a nomadic people. They were simple hunters and gathers, and though nomadic it is highly unlikely that they had any contact with other Australoids outside their immediate area. There was no central or local government of any description. Australia is a large continent similar in size to the continental United States so it is highly unlikely that a tribe on the east coast of the country would have communicated with or even known about another tribe on the west coast of the country. The map is entirely a white creation. Whites also create other maps too -maps showing bird and insect territories, fish and marine mammal migration boundaries and pathways. The number of possible maps is immense – they are a white creation and always have been. Australia as a nation did not exist until Europeans settled the land in the late 1700’s.

    I have had extensive first-hand experience with Australoids acquired during my time with the mining industry. And there is a funny story I would like to relate to you all. It clearly indicates the Australoid mentality. It happened at the Gove in the Northern Territory in the 90’s. There is a world-class bauxite deposit near the town of Nhulunbuy in the Gove Peninsula. The Mining Company (Nabalco) paid the local aboriginal tribes royalties – millions of dollars – to mine bauxite on Aboriginal land. What some of the Australoids do with the money is hilarious. One day I had decided to go with a few others to a local fishing spot. It required a careful trek though the bush and you had to be very cautious and very alert. The area was home to salt-water crocodiles – huge and very territorial reptiles. On the way we heard some noise and decided to investigate. Beneath a tree was a semi-naked Aboriginal woman and placed neatly around the base of the tree was a TV, a bar refrigerator and a Hi-Fi system. Of course there was no power, but this did not concern her. She had what the white folks in Nhulunbuy had, so this made her the equal of those white folks. She told us so!

    And Public Museums would have you believe that Australoids had developed an advanced civilization on the Australian continent and that civilization was destroyed by Europeans. Don’t make me laugh!!!

    • John Calhoun
      14 March, 2016 at 7:13 am — Reply

      Are there White Australians who are obsessed with the fantasy that they have aboriginal blood, that they had a grandma that was an aboriginal princess?

      I assure you that there are plenty of Whites (some of good Nordic Stock) that claim to be 1/4 Cherokee and that their grandmothers were Indian Princesses.

  2. Arvin N. Prebost
    14 March, 2016 at 10:17 am — Reply

    Mark Twain’s essay on the “noble savage” says it all.

    But what is it about White people, that we actually have such an intense yearning to believe the noble savage claptrap?

    • John Calhoun
      14 March, 2016 at 10:25 am — Reply

      We are an idealistic people. It is our greatest strength but when perverted, it becomes our greatest weakness. That is the best at that I know how to express it.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.