Reports

Israeli Army Rabbi: Jewish Soldiers May Rape Non-Jewish Women

Rabbi_Colonel_Eyal_KarimA Jewish soldier can do whatever he wants to “satisfy the evil urge in his soul” — including rape — if it helps advance the Jews’ success in war, according to this rabbi.

AN ISRAELI RABBI, Colonel Eyal Qarim of the Israeli Military Rabbinate (pictured), has stated it is permissible for Jewish soldiers to rape Gentile women, including White women or Palestinian women, during wartime.

The permission came as an answer to this question: “Is it allowed in our days for an Israeli occupation soldier, for example, to rape girls during a fight, or is such a thing forbidden?”

“The wars of Israel are religious wars, in which they differ from the rest of the wars the nations wage among themselves,” the Israeli rabbi said.

He stated that during wars waged by Jews, which are fundamentally different from wars waged by non-Jews, the Israeli soldier has to maintain his fighting ability; therefore, any prohibitions which weaken his ability must be broken — even if they are related to morals.

“As in war the prohibition against risking your life is broken for the benefit of others, so are the prohibitions against immorality,” the rabbi said.

To make things clearer, he explained: “Wine touched by Gentiles, consumption of which is prohibited in peacetime, is allowed at war, to maintain the good spirit of the warriors. Consumption of prohibited foods is permitted at war to maintain the fitness of the warriors, even though they are prohibited during peacetime.

“Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations and even though fraternising with a Gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors.”

He even went beyond rape, saying: “And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge in his soul.”

Here is the full exchange from Mondoweiss:

Q. Is it allowed in our days [sic] for an IDF soldier, for example, to rape girls during a fight, or is such a thing forbidden?

Rabbi Qarim answered thus:

“The wars of Israel […] are mitzvah wars, in which they differ from the rest of the wars the nations wage among themselves. Since, essentially, a war is not an individual matter, but rather nations wage war as a whole, there are cases in which the personality of the individual is “erased” for the benefit of the whole. And vice versa: sometimes you risk a large unit for the saving of an individual, when it is essential for purposes of morale. One of the important and critical values during war is maintaining the army’s fighting ability […]

As in war the prohibition against risking your life is broken for the benefit of others, so are the prohibitions against immorality and of kashrut. Wine touched by gentiles, consumption of which is prohibited in peacetime, is allowed at war, to maintain the good spirit of the warriors. Consumption of prohibited foods is permitted at war (and some say, even when kosher food is available), to maintain the fitness of the warriors, even though they are prohibited during peacetime. Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations (gilui arayot in the original – YZG), and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge (yetzer ha’ra in the original -YZG), under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.”

Wow. Herein lies a hornet’s nest. The first is that according to Qarim, the rape of female prisoners is not just permitted, it is also essential to war; the success of the whole at war relies on it. Even Genghis Khan, who (according to tradition) said that the best thing in the world is “to crush your enemies, to see them fall at your feet — to take their horses and goods and hear the lamentation of their women. That is best” – even he, who excelled at rape, did not see it as essential to warfare, just a satisfactory outcome. Stalin, likewise, dismissed complaints about rapes carried out massively by the Red Army by saying “a soldier has urges,” but he did not see it as an essential element of military life.

This is indicative of the underlying mentality of Jews, who control so much of the media, finance, and the political process in the United States — and who are using their power to exterminate Whites.

* * *

Source: Days of Palestine and National Vanguard correspondents

Previous post

Canada: Anti-White Judge Voids Another Will — Because Whites Would Benefit

Next post

Brooklyn Rabbi Charged with Teen Sex Assault Gets 60 Days in Jail

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment authors
Bruce ArneyAnthony Collins Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Anthony Collins
Anthony Collins

This article is shocking and revealing. I think, however, that the Jews have effectively committed or enabled a larger number of rapes by proxy, such as by suppressing the truth about interracial rape via the mass media, by “integrating” and importing racial aliens whose instincts and “culture” make them prone to rape, by dissolving social and state controls on rape (as seen in Rotherham, where so-called authorities did nothing for fear of being accused of “racism”), and even by explicitly inciting rape, à la Ilya Ehrenburg (“Break the pride of the Germanic women”). It can thus be seen that, in more than one way, the Jews have given their blessing to the rape of White women, who in their eyes are nothing but shiksas, i.e., unclean meat. Needless to say,… Read more »

Bruce Arney
Bruce Arney

Talmudic logic is used to justify all the evil they do. The Rabbis justify sociopathic behavior as being good for the Jew, therefore, morally good, but for them, only.

Anthony Collins
Anthony Collins

There’s a term for Talmudic logic: pilpulism. In The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed wrote: “What was actually permitted in the synagogues and schools was a unique form of dialectics, designed still further to strengthen the edifice of The Law. The disputants were merely allowed to prove that anything was legal under the Talmud; one debater would state a proposition and another the contrary, each demonstrating that The Law allowed it! “This practice (the brothers Thoreau [i.e., Jean and Jérôme Tharaud] give glimpses of it in their books) was called ‘pilpulism.’ It gives the key to a mystery which often baffles Gentiles: the agility with which Zionists are often able to justify, in themselves, precisely what they reproach in others. A polemist trained in pilpulism would have no difficulty in… Read more »

Bruce Arney
Bruce Arney

Pilpulism. A new word to add to my vocabulary and knowledge base, Anthony Collins — thanks. Insights into the Jewish mindset are always interesting and many may prove to be valuable tools in exposing and defeating their agenda.

Anthony Collins
Anthony Collins

Understanding the Jewish mentality can be very hard because one is dealing with a mentality profoundly foreign to our own. It isn’t surprising that many people react to anti-Jewish publications with incredulity — even Adolf Hitler, George Lincoln Rockwell, and David Duke did this when they were new to the Jewish problem — because the information they present is so bizarre and disturbing. There are some things that are hard to accept even when you know they’re true. The evidence may be incontrovertible, the logic may be irrefragable, but something in your mind says “That can’t be!” The monstrous facts about this monstrous people are mind-boggling. Misology is defined as the hatred of reason, discussion, learning, or knowledge. Among the Jews, misology involves the perversion rather than the open denigration… Read more »