EP President Schulz: Germany Exists Only in Order to Ensure the Existence of the Jewish People


MARTIN SCHULTZ has been active in European politics for almost thirty years, and so he is a person who does not need an introduction. His position however is not one that is understood very well by normal people, because a lot of people don’t know what the roles of the institutions of the European Union in the post-Lisbon Treaty environment are. (ILLUSTRATION: Martin Schultz and Angela Merkel)

In his role as President of the European Parliament, Schulz would be responsible for the overall direction of international relations, and also is the custodian of the fundamental values of the European Union. The European Parliament is the first institution in the European Union, which prior to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty had been seen as a mere talking shop, but subsequently developed into becoming one of the most powerful legislatures in the world in terms of both its legislative powers and executive oversight powers.

Of course, informally, the political history which the individual was acculturated with along with that person’s connection to the national political power, means that it can usually be considered advantageous to a member state if one of their citizens is holding such an EU position.

Schulz hails from Germany, but what does Schulz think Germany’s raison d’etre is? A look at his own words in Haaretz as reported by his friend Avraham Burg, reveals something interesting:

Haaretz, ‘Say a big ‘thank you’ to Martin Schulz’, Avraham Burg, 14 Feb 2014 (emphasis added):

[…] Martin Schulz, the president of the European Parliament, is a close friend of mine. On most issues connected to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict we disagree. He is closer to the Israeli mainstream, and his positions resemble those of Labor Party chairman Isaac Herzog. He once told me, during a frank and stern conversation, “For me, the new Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the State of Israel and the Jewish people.” […]

Schulz is of course, Jewish.

* * *

Source: Majority Rights

Previous post

Why Did They Do It?

Next post

Tennessee: Evangelicals Work to Give High-Paying Jobs to Non-White Invaders


  1. Eugene Williams
    13 July, 2016 at 4:45 pm — Reply

    Someone who is younger and has the ability to search much better than I should check out this Black radical activist and anarchist Deray McKesson and see if he is Jamican, Hatian, French, South African, or another nationality. This Black radical and agitator is too well-versed, trained, and knowledgeable about his topics to be an untrained black just wanting to be a part of a protest movement.

    Where does this black come from, get his money and training, to be such an fluent talker about his role on the Katie Couric interview?

    Where did he come from and get his agitator training?

    Also: I have a tape from Rick Wiles who interviewed Dr. Tatyana Keryagina who claims Barack OBama is a trained communist agent and their first communist President. Dr. James Wickstrom has a video on YouTube telling of Dwight Esinhower having a Black mother and Jewish father.
    I have even read Dr. Wickstrom’s claims that Eisenhower’s other cadets called him Ike the Kike.

  2. 15 July, 2016 at 12:53 am — Reply

    It is an official BRD (supposed German government) position that the foundation of the German state is war guilt.

    So now Jewry admits that the purpose of what he calls “the new Germany” (translation from Jewspeak to English: perpetually occupied Germany) is, in substantial essence, to serve the Jews.

    It is not surprising that this was disclosed openly, either; and if you think Burg stabbed his pal Schulz in the back by leaking a private conversation, no, think again. It is not some big secret; and the Jews are sometimes quite frank, particularly in Jewish publications, because it is safe for them to do so and has been for a very long time. They can feel free to rub our tiny goy noses in it, because there is a mental wall which prevents such things from being noticed (even if pointed out to them) by people who are afraid of being called “anti-Semites”.(1) The barrier is internal, not external; it is not ignorance, but rather bigotry in favour of the Jews.

    (1. Judeophiles are a different but related matter. As a recovered Judeophile, I have the memory of once having had a young Jewess casually remark to me, in a conversation about the perpetual disaster of Israeli factional politics, that “Jews are good at governing everybody but themselves.” What is remarkable and frightening is not that she did not find anything wrong with that statement, but rather that neither did I.)

    Jews understand this. “Anti-Semites” do not.

    Thus many “anti-Semites” with excellent intentions think that exhibiting large collections of such quotes to others will “educate the public”. The public is ineducable.(2) The only people who will be benefit from being shown such quotes are the few of those who are already in the process of discovering the truth about the Jews, and thus are halfway “anti-Semites” anyway.

    (2. See Mein Kampf, vol 1. ch. 12, enumerated item 8.)

    Nevertheless, this is good for the “Jews said it” scrapbook and useful for helping that said few. Thanks to National Vanguard for running this (and to Majority Rights for not misidentifying that Jew as German, although I would not have been so delicate as to say he “hails from Germany”).

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.