The Donald Deception
A FAVORITE MEME of opposition Twitterites these days is the #cuckservative classification for limp lamestream “conservative” stalwarts like Lindsey Graham, Glenn Beck, Jeb Bush, and John Boehner. So eager are many on the race-realist Right to see the Overton window expanded to include such characterizations that several have chosen to embrace sideshow attraction presidential “candidate” Donald Trump as the natural foil and antidote to the complacency of the fancy lads in the Republican establishment. Trump has won a devoted following by daring to be marginally honest and comparatively impolite in addressing the ongoing demographic dispossession of the American citizenry.
Trump is the Republicans’ Zito and Switek from Miami Vice. He’s the comic relief cop posing as a sleazy john. https://t.co/QGEb1wGBRF
— R. Chlodwig von Kook (@icareviews) July 19, 2015
“Trump is the man!” trumpets End Cultural Marxism account @genophilia. “I have endorsed Donald Trump for the Presidency of these United States,” proclaims The Daily Stormer’s Andrew Anglin, who even dubs his contender the “Great White Hope”. Trolls on Twitter are clearly elated and see Trump as one of their own — a trash-talking shitlord. “The Donald Doxxes Lindsey Graham in Front of a Live Audience,” hoots the Stormer, framing Trump’s publicity coup as an act of hilarious real-world trollery. He “DID IT FOR THE LULZ,” concurs fellow white nationalist Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer. “We Are All Donald Trump Now,” says James Kirkpatrick, offering his support at VDare. Notwithstanding their noted aversion to “demotism”, a number of tweeters who tag their opinions with #NRx are also expressing interest in the Donald. It seems worth asking in this situation if anything else distinguishes Trump from his cuckservative opponents. Does he represent a return to populism and realism, or have disgruntled rightists merely been duped into lending support to controlled cuckservative opposition?
— End Cultural Marxism (@genophilia) July 14, 2015
Writing at Occam’s Razor, Alfred W. Clark establishes a useful definition of the cuckservative type.
Very basically, the cuckservative is a white gentile conservative (or libertarian) who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t. In fact, the cuckservative is an extreme universalist and seems often to suffer from ethnomasochism & pathological altruism. In short, a cuckservative is a white (non-Jewish) conservative who isn’t racially aware. In some ways, the cuckservative is the counterpart of the SJW (social justice warrior), and they are more alike than dissimilar. You often will hear the cuckservative screaming at an SJW about how “the Democrats are the real racists.” The cuckservative feels very passionate about issues like abortion, which rarely directly affects his own life. In fact, you might often hear a cuckservative talking about how abortion is “racist” since blacks and mestizos overwhelmingly get more abortions that whites. On the other hand, the cuckservative feels uncomfortable about issues like immigration. If the cuckservative is not an outright open-borders shill, he will only give lip service about “securing the border” or “opposing illegal but favoring legal immigration” but he will never talk about immigration very much. After all, immigration has very serious implications for Western Civilization, so it doesn’t concern the cuckservative.
The cuckservative is often fanatically in favor of transracial adoption. He sees it as some divine calling. In a sense, this is cuckoldry at its essence, since these whites are usually forgoing their own inclusive fitness to adopt someone from another race. As Heartiste notes, they’re race-cucking their own families. Although the cuckservative is eager to show his PC bona fides by openness to other races, he really doesn’t want to know about other races. Human biodiversity terrifies the cuckservative, as deep down he has bought into blank-slatism and egalitarianism. The cuckservative would rather just have a Herman Cain or Clarence Thomas poster on his wall than actually have to honestly think about race. The cuckservative, although never Jewish, often seems vicariously to live through Israel. Since the cuckservative feels that he cannot defend his own ethnic interests, he’ll defend Israel’s. The cuckservative cares more about Israel’s borders than his own. Israel adamantly defends its own ethnic interests and perhaps deep down the cuckservative respects this on some unconscious level. On the other hand, the idea of whites acting as a group to secure their own interests terrifies the cuckservative. If you ever want to troll a cuckservative, just repeatedly use the word “white,” such as “this isn’t beneficial for the white community.” The cuckservative will be triggered immediately.
Keeping this definition in mind, does Trump exhibit any behaviors that might be deemed cuckservative in any way? A number of photo ops suggest that if Trump is truly the great race-realist supporters want him to be, he has frequently been at pains to advance an altogether different image for public consumption. “Nelson Mandela and myself had a wonderful relationship,” Trump says of the celebrated South African terrorist, adding that Mandela “was a special man and will be missed.”
Who, too, can forget the contemptible foible that seems to have been memory-holed in the desperate rush to embrace anybody but Bush, Graham, Christie, Paul, Rubio, or Walker, when Trump shamelessly stated that Oprah Winfrey would make a “great” running mate for him? Nor was this the first time Trump has suggested such a pairing. Exploring his options for the 2000 race, Trump informed Larry King that Winfrey would be his first choice for running mate. “I mean, she’s popular, she’s brilliant, she’s a wonderful woman.” Clearly, Trump is not averse to playing the sad and degrading “Some of my best friends are . . .” game – the true sport of cuckservative champions.
I really like Nelson Mandela but South Africa is a crime ridden mess that is just waiting to explode-not a good situation for the people! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 13, 2013
— Asawin Suebsaeng (@swin24) July 22, 2015
A. Nolen, in the essential essay “What Is Donald Trump?”, makes the following observations about Trump’s pseudo-populist politics:
There is nothing about Trump’s past, nor the way he made his fortune, that suggests he is “conservative” or sensitive to the struggles of most Americans. Despite this, Trump is being championed/vilified through both “conservative” and “liberal” media outlets – and especially through Twitter – as some sort of champion of the silent, “conservative” majority. Back before Trump’s fall out with Univision [and] NBC he was a business partner to both. [. . .] Trump’s tacky Miss USA pageant promotes Washington D.C. values, not American ones. Remember the “Miss California Controversy” in 2009? Trump’s show chose celebrity blogger Perez Hilton, real name Mario Armando Lavandeira Jr., as a judge for that year’s pageant. Mr. “Hilton” had a gay marriage agenda and asked the Californian contestant Carrie Prejean her “thoughts on legalizing gay marriage”. Her answer cost her the title and drew “thinly veiled disgust” from ‘Hilton’, who later called her “a dumb bitch”.
Trump waxed wishy-washy on gay marriage as quoted in this article at Today “News”:
Donald Trump [like Barack Obama] described himself as “evolving” on the issue of LGBT rights Saturday in an interview in Russia with openly gay MSNBC anchor Thomas Roberts. [. . .]
Trump said the issue is one that’s rapidly evolving.
“I think really what you have is a very changing stance, and you see if changing very rapidly. If you go back ten years ago it’s very different,” Trump said.
When asked about his own evolution, Trump echoed a sentiment he’s said in the past, saying, “I think I’m evolving, and I think I’m a very fair person, but I have been for traditional marriage…I am for traditional marriage, I am for a marriage between a man and a woman.”
“As everyone is aware, Trump has a Jewish son-in-law,” acknowledges Anglin. “Many people are bringing this up, but I’m not clear on what it is supposed to mean when brought up. Does it mean that he is controlled by Jews?” he asks. “I don’t really see that it means that, and it strikes me as a bit tinfoilish, along the lines of ‘if you see it on TV it means Jews want you to see it’ type of conspiracy extremism. I haven’t seen any real commentary on what exactly the thinking is here, so I can’t really comment further.” “Jews hate Trump because he’s a WASP who beat them at their own NYC real-estate game,” declares Lord Humungus in solidarity with this Trump-the-racialist wishful-thinking narrative.
— Lord Humungus (@DarklyEnlighten) July 21, 2015
— R. Chlodwig von Kook (@icareviews) July 19, 2015
“The only kind of people I want counting my money are little short guys that wear yarmulkes every day,” Ziocuck Trump once reportedly said. What about Trump’s business dealings? Can anything of his political origin story be inferred from these? Nolen offers a few intriguing speculations:
If Trump’s previous politics weren’t enough to blow the cover on this latest deception, consider that he is a New York real estate developer. NYC’s real estate business is incredibly corrupt– even the smallest construction projects need “fixers”, i.e. professional consultants who know who to pay off in local government to prevent harassment and ‘shake-downs’ of developers. You don’t get rich in that business without playing fast and loose with the law– just like the illegal immigrants Trump criticizes. Trump’s business has gone bankrupt no less than four times, each time involving his gambling operations in Atlantic City, The Tackiest Place on Earth. When ordinary people like you or I go bankrupt, it makes getting subsequent loans– especially loans for the same type of project– more difficult. But Donald Trump isn’t hampered by market forces. Trump has the connections and the credit lines to insulate himself, which suggests he’s simply the promotional face of *someone else’s money*. Perhaps that’s why he’s so sensitive to criticisms of “his fortune”. Whose money might Trump front for? Trump’s financial success is based around NYC and its surrounding environs… remember too big to fail? Trump’s backing probably comes from the same financial interests which pay to promote social change agendas in the USA and abroad, and which benefit so much from illegal immigration and the resultant social dysfunction.
The late Michael Collins Piper, writing in American Free Press in 2011, revealed the following information about the history of Trump’s fortune-amassing gambling enterprises:
Donald Trump’s rise to stardom came as a consequence of his having been a flamboyant front man for some unsavory behind-the-scenes sponsors. Here’s the story: In his memoir, Trump proudly described how in 1987 he bought his first casino interests when he purchased 93 percent of the voting stock in the Resorts International (RI) gambling concern. What Trump didn’t say was that RI was controlled by a clique of sordid, international big-money elements in alliance with the Jewish crime syndicate which was, in turn, collaborating with the CIA and Israel’s Mossad in an array of inter-connected money-laundering operations. The casinos laundered money for the CIA and the Mossad. In return, these agencies used their influence to ensure the mob remained protected from interference by law enforcement. To understand where Trump fits in, we turn to RI’s murky origins. RI evolved from a CIA front—the Mary Carter Paint Company—set up in the 1950s by then-CIA director Allen Dulles and his close associate, New York Gov. Thomas E. Dewey, a leader of the “Rockefeller wing” of the GOP. While the company did in fact operate a national paint store chain, its real purpose was to function as a covert CIA money-laundering operation. In 1958 and 1959 Dewey and several associates used CIA funds to buy a controlling interest in the Crosby-Miller Corporation (headed by Dewey friend James Crosby), which was then merged with Mary Carter. The new concern laundered CIA money for the arming of the anti-Castro Cuban exiles and also launched lucrative gambling enterprises in the Caribbean where the CIA was active, having engaged the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate in plots to topple Fidel Castro. How many law-abiding Americans who bought Mary Carter’s paint would have thought they were funding a joint CIA-mob operation posing behind the smiling face of a “typical American housewife,” the fictional “Mary Carter” whose visage adorned its products? In 1963 the company spun off its paint division and began focusing on its casino operations, particularly in the Bahamas. In 1967 and 1968 Mary Carter changed its name to Resorts International and expanded. Several principal investors provided the assets: • Meyer Lansky, the “chairman of the board” of the Jewish crime syndicate; • David Rockefeller, who provided his family’s clout with the CIA and in global banking to assist; • The Investors Overseas Service, then the world’s largest “flight-capital” conglomerate, headed by notorious Bernard Cornfeld who was no more than a frontman for two behind-the-scenes principals: • Tibor Rosenbaum, the Mossad’s Swiss-based arms procurer, who headed the Banque De Credit Internationale of Geneva, the Lansky syndicate’s chief European money launderer; • Baron Edmond de Rothschild of the infamous banking family and a personal business partner of Rosenbaum in many Mossad-related ventures; and • William Mellon Hitchcock, an heir to the Mellon dynasty—one of America’s largest family fortunes which has collaborated closely with the CIA for years. In 1970 the mob moved to expand legalized gambling on U.S. soil. Mob chief Lansky called a high-level syndicate conference where the fading resort of Atlantic City was pinpointed as their new target. Prior to this, Lansky-controlled Nevada was the only outpost of legal gambling in the United States. RI’s resources were used to finance the lobbying campaign that brought legalized gambling to Atlantic City and RI quickly moved in. In 1987 upon the death of RI’s nominal head—CIA frontman James Crosby—up-and-coming New York real estate tycoon Trump stepped in and bought Crosby’s RI holdings. So while the name “Trump” appeared in the headlines, RI’s real movers remained hidden from public view. Trump shed his RI investments in his much-publicized “bankruptcy” but he remains a major player in the gambling industry—and now he may be running for president of the United States.
Perhaps, some readers may be thinking, Trump has at one time or another in his career entertained some shady associations; but what is the evidence that Trump the shitlord of 2015, the truth-teller on immigration and troller of Lindsey Graham and John McCain, is a Zio-catamite the same as those he ridicules? One need look no further than the man’s own comments as to his policy leanings where the Middle East is concerned.
This item dredged by The Ugly Truth may also be of interest:
In the middle of a phone interview with JNS.org on June 26, billionaire real estate mogul and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump leaves his desk to scan the wall of his office for awards he has received from the Jewish community.
Trump reads the text of some relevant plaques before returning to his desk. But before this reporter can move on to the next question, Trump eagerly points out that he was the grand marshal of New York City’s annual Salute to Israel Parade (now the Celebrate Israel Parade) in 2004 “at a time when it was quite dangerous to do that” and “a pretty tough time for Israel,” in the middle of the second Palestinian intifada (uprising against Israel). He also cites a video endorsement he gave Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the Jewish state’s January 2013 election, expressing pride that it was “at the time the only ad done by a celebrity” for Netanyahu.
What does all of this have to do with the 2016 American presidential election? President Barack Obama won 78 percent of Jewish votes when he was first elected in 2008, and despite a rocky relationship with Israel when compared to most other U.S. presidents, he garnered 69 percent of the Jewish vote in 2012. Trump, however, touts his close relationship with Israel and the Jewish community as the reason he believes he can outperform Republican contenders of both the past and present among Jewish voters.
How close, in fact, is Trump’s relationship with Judaism? Unlike the name of his reality TV show, he is no apprentice when it comes to the Jewish faith. Trump’s daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism in 2009, and her observance of Shabbat with her husband Jared Kushner (a well-known real estate developer as well as the owner and publisher of the New York Observer newspaper) is well-documented.
“I have great respect for [the Shabbat traditions], and I see Ivanka during Saturday, and from Friday evening on through Saturday night, she won’t take phone calls and they live a very interesting life,” Trump said. “And it’s actually a beautiful thing to watch, with Jared and Ivanka. In a very hectic life, it really becomes a very peaceful time. So there’s something very nice about it.”
There are already 14 declared Republican presidential candidates, and many of them are publicly expressing support for Israel, but Trump argues—in his typically brash and blunt fashion—that his history with the Jewish people and the Jewish state can set him apart from the rest of the crowded GOP field.
— Libertarian Realist (@GetRealist) July 16, 2015
“I think that even a casual observer will recognize that Donald Trump screams ‘managed opposition’,” continues Nolen. “So why is he being trotted out to oppose a policy which is central to the USA’s oligarchical power structure?”
Trump’s political career is not about appealing to the masses, it’s about threatening a subset of American elites who back negotiating with Iran rather than crushing Iran under a jackboot. The jackboot contingent is threatening the negotiating contingent with unleashing popular discontent to push through their war agenda. Unfortunately, the USA signed the world up for a nuclear Middle East when we decided to ignore Israel’s stockpile of nuclear weapons. Once that became our policy, it was imperative for Israel’s neighbors to arm themselves in a similar fashion if they could possibly find a way. Obama’s strategy of negotiating – i.e. influencing how Iran chooses to protect itself – is a more enlightened strategy, but there’s nothing about being an American oligarch which predisposes someone to enlightenment. There are a significant number of American power-brokers who share the blind Realitatsflucht of those mid-century politicians who doomed the “Jewish State” by poo-pooing St. John Philby’s plan for Israel which respected native Arabs’ rights. These hawks probably don’t like the reception which Bibi recently received from the Obama administration; they probably feel time is not on their side. Hence, The Hair in 2016.
Iran continues to delay the nuclear deal while doing many bad things behind our backs. Time to WALK and double the sanctions. Stop payments! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 10, 2015
This hawkish anti-Iran faction is threatening to “rock the boat” by unleashing popular unrest unless their peers follow suit and support the “jackboot” method of dealing with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. However, “the threat of Trump” is not a credible threat for the hawks to make. Neither the hawks nor the negotiators can afford to let popular anti-illegal immigration sentiment off its leash, which is why a narcissistic NYC property mogul/casino operator is spearheading criticism of law-breaking. When it’s time to shut Donald up, gory details from his unsavory past will be suddenly discovered by Gawker, etc. The hopes of millions of law-abiding American citizens will be consumed in Trump’s fireball of corruption and demoralization.
“Do you think Trump is any more of a clown than any other ‘legit’ candidate?” asks Chateau Heartiste. “The ship of state is steered by an army of malevolent clowns. May as well shake it up and enjoy the spectacle of the ruling globo-equalist class sweating bullets.” Terminal unseriousness notwithstanding, there is an undeniable entertainment value to the Trump candidacy, and his campaign should continue to be monitored with interest; but to expect anything more than “lulz” from some self-aggrandizing Shabbos goy money-grubber who spouts Israeli propaganda with a straight face would be a bigger joke than Donald Trump’s notorious hair itself. Trump has cited theatrical impresario Flo Ziegfeld as one of his most important role models when he was growing up – an admission which pretty well sums up the whole Donald Trump phenomenon for what it really is – gaudy political theater of the showgirls-and-comedians variety.