News

A $200 Privacy Device Has Been Killed, And No One Knows Why

Benjamin-Caudill

ProxyHam creator offers no explanation for his abrupt decision to abandon it.

A SECURITY RESEARCHER has abruptly cancelled next month’s scheduled unveiling of a privacy device designed to mask Internet users’ physical locations. It’s a move that has both disappointed privacy advocates and aroused suspicions.

Ben Caudill (pictured), a researcher with Rhino Security Labs, took the unusual step of saying he no longer plans to release the software or hardware schematics for his so-called ProxyHam box. He said the devices already created have been destroyed. Caudill has offered no explanation for the killing of the project, but he has reportedly ruled out both intellectual property disputes and Federal Communications Commission licensing concerns.

That has left some people to speculate a secret government subpoena known as a National Security Letter is at play in the decision to kill the project. That speculation seems unlikely because NSLs are a very specific legal process typically served on e-mail providers, phone companies, or the like for specific information, Electronic Frontier Foundation General Counsel and Deputy Executive Director Kurt Opsahl said.

“It’s not clear to me how that could possibly map to the product you described,” he said after Ars explained how ProxyHam worked. “It’s not a catch-all letter by which the government can obtain any action for anybody.”

The ProxyHam device was able to mask the location of an Internet user by broadcasting on a 900MHz radio frequency so the owner could connect from up to 2.5 miles away from the source of the Internet connection. As a result, even if someone tracked down the location of an IP address, the user wouldn’t automatically be discovered. The box was billed as using open-source software and requiring less than $200 in hardware. It was scheduled to be the topic of a now-canceled talk at next month’s Defcon hacker conference in Las Vegas.

Other speculation on why the project was cancelled holds that ProxyHam was never the break-through device some journalists and privacy advocates made it out to be. ProxyHam, according to Errata Security CEO Rob Graham, was little more than the combination of a Raspberry Pi computer and a $125 900 MHz bridge from a company called Ubiquiti Networks, with some software that made them interoperate.

“I don’t know why the talk was canceled,” Graham wrote in a blog post published Monday afternoon. “One likely reason is that the stories (such as the one on Wired) sensationalized the thing, so maybe their employer got cold feet. Or maybe the FBI got scared and really did give them an NSL, though that’s incredibly implausible.”

Whatever the reason for the cancellation, it wouldn’t be hard for someone else with expertise in hardware to create a box that does exactly what Caudill described. So far, there’s no word of anyone offering to sit in for Caudill.

* * *

Source: Ars Technica

Previous post

Censored by Sanction? Barclays Freezes Accounts of Russia's News Agency

Next post

The End of Freedom of Speech in Spain

3 Comments

  1. Martin Graves
    15 July, 2015 at 10:17 pm — Reply

    An interesting idea, but using a trustworthy VPN or two is more effective.

  2. Aryan_Pride
    16 July, 2015 at 2:50 am — Reply

    Could be wrong, but my jew-radar is pegged out on his photo—no loss here.

  3. SAMUEL U
    16 July, 2015 at 3:10 am — Reply

    The reason all these modern things seem complex is because most white people have lost the Faustian spirit for building things – for programming computers, understanding how radio transmitters and receivers work and appreciating basic electronics. Suffice it to say that if you are fluent in assembler there is not a computer platform or system on the planet that is beyond your reach. And it matters not if the system is running Windows, Linux, Apple or any other high level language software. It is truly sad that these days there are many white people who do not know how to change the spark plug in their automobiles. Sad Indeed!!!

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.