Diversity & Evolution


by Michael Woodbridge

MANY Racial Loyalists have come to the conclusion that racial diversity is not such a bad thing; if only it really meant diversity, or “Separate Development”! The purpose of this brief essay is to point out the short comings of such a concept.

The Apartheid system of racial segregation in South Africa was founded on the notion of “Separate but Equal”. Before the oppressive days of “Political Correctness” even the one time Archbishop of Canterbury said that Apartheid could be morally justified if it meant a complete separation of the races. Of course, despite such idealistic hopes, what destroyed South Africa eventually was when the Whiteman came to rely ever more heavily on Negro labour for his economic survival. Negro labour therefore became a crutch upon which the Whiteman had to rely. Once the crutch was taken away of course it was found that the muscles had atrophied and the whole system broke down into the murder and chaos we have today. So the question remains, could a system be sustained whereby the different races of the world live in mutual respect and cooperation, whilst retaining their separate identities?

Unfortunately, despite its obvious attractions, the idea of a perfect racially harmonious world overlooks the fundamental condition of mankind which is one of struggle. The ideal of universal racial peace is reminiscent of the cover pictures we see on the front of Jehovah Witness publications like ‘Watchtower’ or ‘Awake’. It suggests that all we have to do in life is to be accommodating and love one another unconditionally and we’ll be rewarded with a glorious picnic in the sky. However, just as cheap Negro labour became a crutch and eventually a weakness for the Apartheid system, so does a pie in the sky belief in the possibility of universal harmony, between self-identifying races, pose a threat to our own position.

Although such a conclusion may seem bleak it actually provides the only framework upon which true love can exist. Life is constantly changing, no two experiences, no two feelings, no two moments are ever the same. It is our God defying theft from the ‘Tree of Knowledge’, the impulse to peer round the next corner which gives our lives significance. This Faustian, Promethean hunger is fundamental to White/Aryan man. It is the pinnacle of our blind evolutionary purpose. It defies the liberal notion of inclusivity and seeks exclusivity. It is through our evolutionary quest for the ever elusive perfection that we discover, bond and love one another.

When Rudyard Kipling wrote ‘The Stranger’ he was describing what our struggle is about. It’s about our constant need to eliminate that which is alien, poison, toxic to our blood and racial being. Thus we free our essence for the next evolutionary step.

‘The Stranger’

The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk..
I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock,
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wanted to,
They are used to the lies I tell;
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy or sell.

The stranger within my gates,
He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control..
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the gods of his far off land
Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes,
They think the likes of me.

This was my father’s belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all of one sheaf..
And the grapes all of one vine,
Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

[Poem by Rudyard Kipling]

* * *

Source: Western Spring

Previous post

CO₂ Level Rise Near-Vertical Now; Warming Impossible to Prevent

Next post

The Rachel Dolezal Phenomenon

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
16 June, 2015 10:22 pm

Diversity is the word of our enemies. In North America, the proper word is ‘amalgamation—forced amalgamation’.

Michael R
Michael R
17 June, 2015 4:01 am

When people try to defend the Black race by saying, “But what about [Fill in the Blank] Black who’s highly intelligent?”, does anyone know which logical fallacy that defense would fall under?

Franklin Ryckaert
Franklin Ryckaert
17 June, 2015 3:15 pm

@ Michael R

That is called : * Fallacy of Hasty Generalization (Faulty Induction) *

Occurs when an isolated or exceptional case is used as the basis for a general conclusion which is unwarranted.

* I had a bad relationship with the first person I ever dated. I’m sure all relationships are bad.
* The government’s bailout of Penn Central was a fiasco. Therefore, the government should never provide bailouts.

From : Logical Fallacies in Argument :

When you compare groups, you compare the averages of those groups. Exceptional cases don’t disprove those averages.

Franklin Ryckaert
Franklin Ryckaert
17 June, 2015 3:42 pm

Our planet is a “diverse” planet, i.e. it is a planet inhabited by various racial and ethnic groups. These groups are often so different both in character and in level of development, that the idea of creating a coherent society by mixing all these groups together must be sheer insanity. Diverse societies are never stable or peaceful. Life in such societies is a constant fight for resources between the various groups. The best solution therefore is territorial separation. There is no “racial conflict” between Nigerians and Japanese, simply because these two peoples live in their own countries, and so should all different groups that live now in “diverse” societies. The Whites of South Africa never lived “apart” from the Blacks. They lived together in the same society in a master-servant… Read more »

An Actual Jehovah's Witness
An Actual Jehovah's Witness
8 May, 2020 3:57 pm

Jehovah’s Witnesses follow the Bible, which has a Euro-centric view. Advertising and recruiting other races is not supporting multiculturalism. According to the Bible, all humans were once Caucasians who landed in Mount Ararat, and the different races came about due to post-flood conditions. Look at how Jehovah’s Witnesses portray many early ancient civilizations, they are all Caucasian looking. We do not look at the world as a struggle between races that can be overcome with love. You will not find a more anti-liberal religion in existence than that of Jehovah’s Witnesses, which I am proud to admit.

Patrick Pappano
Patrick Pappano
9 October, 2021 5:46 am

As Hans Hermann Hoppe postulates, if there is no scarcity then there is no conflict and man needs no rules or government. But, alas, there is scarcity and all around and thus man is required by the maintenance of life itself, to formulate rules and the first rule, is feeding one’s own kind, it is a matter of survival. But there are enemies, always, and they invented Unitarianism, which in plain terms, means to just play nice in the sandbox, regardless who else is in it. As a stark and easily understood illustration, Unitarians feel that Christ driving the money changers out of the Temple was out of line and not in keeping with rule #1, be nice to everybody. This bifurcation then separates white man into two camps, “Nice”… Read more »