Chimps Given Human Rights by U.S. Court for the First Time (Sort of)


EDITOR’S NOTE: Giving “human rights” to chimps is no more preposterous than giving them to Congoids — and far less disastrous than giving free rein in our society to the Jews and their power structure. The truth is that human treatment of animals is often atrocious and un-Aryan, and needs to be rethought and reformed. But there is not and never can be “equality” between species, or between races. Neither is there any sharp dividing line between “human” and “animal.” There are humans with lower value and lower consciousness than those of some animals. From such humans we must be eternally separate if we are to continue our upward evolution.

ON MONDAY, a New York judge appeared to grant two chimpanzees a writ of habeas corpus. In other words, the chimps have the right to a day in court — under a law that only applies to people. But after much kerfuffle over the implications of applying habeas corpus to a chimp, the judge, on Tuesday, struck those words from her order. The chimps still get representation in court, but their personhood is not up for debate at the moment. (ILLUSTRATION: It’s unlikely that they’ll be officially recognized as people, but they get their day in court.)

This isn’t coming from nowhere: The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) has been trying to get chimps the rights of personhood for years. They represent the animals in court, arguing that their living situations — as pets or performers — should be considered as unlawful as the inhumane detention of a human. So when the judge failed to specify that the Order to Show Cause did not include the writ of habeas corpus, it’s not surprising that NhRP started doing cartwheels. Metaphorically.

Previous cases in the United States have failed to produce such a result, but in December an Argentinian orangutan won her case (which was of course actually brought to the court by animal rights activists) and was moved from a zoo to a sanctuary.

The U.S. case isn’t quite at that point yet: The judge never ruled that the two chimps, who live in a Stony Brook University lab, need to be released. The decision really only means that the chimps have the right to fight their detention in court. It’s entirely possible that the judge will hear all sides of the case and rule that Stony Brook researchers have every right to keep using the chimps in their lab.

While it’s a little soon to start throwing open the doors of every zoo in the country, NhRP representatives are thrilled.

“This is a big step forward to getting what we are ultimately seeking: the right to bodily liberty for chimpanzees and other cognitively complex animals,” Natalie Prosin, the executive director of the NhRP, told Science Magazine. “We got our foot in the door. And no matter what happens, that door can never be completely shut again.”

NhRP has made no secret of its long-term plans to seek out basic human rights for intelligent animals, such as dolphins, whales, elephants, and great apes. While it’s unlikely that judges will grant these two chimps the rights of full personhood, the progress of their case will almost certainly lead to even more lawsuits against zoos, research facilities, and private chimp owners.

* * *

Source: The Washington Post

Previous post

To Evangelicals, Zionism an Increasingly Tough Sell

Next post

Friends in Germany: The National Democratic Party

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
Thomas Plaster
Thomas Plaster
3 September, 2017 2:36 pm

Chimps given human rights??? Surprised? The other branch of that species was given the same in 1865 by the 13th – 15th amendments of the US Constitution.

8 October, 2020 9:08 am

The notion that humans are somehow ‘separate from’ or even ‘above’ other animals is an Abrahamic concept that has no place in White/European thinking.
The biggest difference between us and other animals is that we make life more complicated for ourselves than it needs to be.