Breeding Cheerleaders

Sheer quantity of White people is not the main consideration when acting for our future.

by Dean Darcy

FIRST, let’s agree that how many children a couple chooses to have is their business.

For the misguided few who believe race is a race to see who can outbreed whom, let’s exercise a little forethought to see if further overpopulating the world is really the best solution.

Yes, it sounds like a lot of fun in the bedroom, but breeding our way to numerical superiority is even more of a long shot than adopting a sane population policy. America doesn’t need more people; it needs fewer non-White people. The Immigration Act of 1965 helped get us into this mess, and an immigration démarche could help get us out of this mess.

The Immigration Act of 1924, which was in effect until the Immigration Act of 1965, allowed 178,000 people a year to immigrate to the U.S. The 1924 Act lasted about forty years. The 1965 Act has helped destroy American culture for fifty years. It is time for a new immigration act.

In 1958 Senator John Kennedy wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which was pretty much ignored. Kennedy wrote that we should change who came to America, not how many came to America. Within a year of Kennedy’s death, a new edition of the book was published, and the Immigration Act of 1965 was put on the fast track. These were, in part, tributes to JFK and to show the Soviets that we were friendly to Third World countries. The Hart-Celler Amendments to the Act made it possible for an almost unlimited number of ‘refugees’ to come to America.

Congress runs a population growth program that is not in the best interest of the majority of Americans. Overpopulation is the root cause of most of America’s misfortune, yet not one politician can get a sane population policy implemented. A sane population policy would have a population goal of maybe half the present population.

Our democratically elected officials, after much toing and froing, have succeeded in turning America the Beautiful into a trailer park nation pocked with crowded, bustling styes overrun with Third World immigrants.

Religion’s contribution to our population problem is a result of Catholic Church policies on birth control. All those Mexicans are Catholic. There is also a correlation between wealth, education, and the number of children a couple has.

America has now exceeded a population of three hundred million, and our government encourages millions more to come here every year. Phoenix covers the desert at the rate of an acre per hour. The extra weight of all those people could slow down the earth and increase gravity (haha). It’s a miserable calculus.

One of the warm favorites of the cheerleaders for breeding is Family Values. Sometimes when people believe Family Values are the most important thing, they think that as long as they breed and put food on the table, their lives are complete. They ask no more of themselves. Family Values don’t imply social responsibility, political activism, or ambition. These days, when most Americans are choosing low risk lifestyles revolving around home entertainment and obsessing about their health, Family Values are an easy fit.

Also, Family Values doesn’t have the numbers on its side. For example, half the marriages end in divorce, 25 percent of households are single person households, there are about three hundred thousand homeless, and you’re more likely to be killed by a relative than by a stranger. Less than 20 percent of children live with both parents with a stay-at-home mom. Five thousand kids die each year from child abuse; it is the fourth leading cause of death for children aged one to four, and the second leading cause of death for Black children ages one to four.

In conclusion, there is nothing wrong with being revanchists and wanting to reclaim America. It doesn’t make us xenophobes to want a return to White America, but to think we will achieve it with some kind of go-go reproduction is as lunatic as thinking we can just send all the immigrants back. Outbreeding them would be a Pyrrhic victory, and a kludge. We don’t want to let ourselves be overwhelmed by this problem. Whelmed, maybe, but not overwhelmed. Because, as they say, “Blood will out.” We just need to get back on the thick end of the whip.

* * *

EDITOR’S NOTE: Amen to the thick end of the whip being paramount. I don’t think White racialists have any chance of outbreeding the millions of invaders of our White homelands, but a pro-natal attitude (and practice) in our subculture is still a good thing. It helps ensure the passing on of memes as well as genes. It’s no panacea or substitute, of course, for the hard work of winning the minds and hearts of our folk so people like us will be in decision-making positions one day. That is the key to everything.

As you say, a sane immigration policy is needed yesterday. How about this: Only Whites can immigrate; non-Whites must emigrate. Sound workable? Cost? Whatever the cost, our people’s future is worth it.

Our vision of a future society should include programs to counter the tendency for bright, successful people to have fewer children, on average, than the dull and irresponsible. That’s a serious problem: It leads to a lowering of the genetic quality of our people with each passing generation. It causes the culture-bearing and leadership strata of society to wither away.

When Margaret Sanger (who was sympathetic to the survival of Whites as a higher race, by the way) and other birth control pioneers made their push for contraception early in the last century, they actually thought that the lower-quality women for whom motherhood was such a burden (and whose offspring were a burden on society) would embrace birth control with open arms as a solution to their personal problems.

It didn’t work out that way. The dull and the non-White continued to proliferate madly, while contraception mainly reduced the birth rate of the intelligent and responsible and White — those whom we would prefer to have more children than the underclass.

Part of the solution to that will be a cultural change that will make parenthood a more important, highly honored, and dare I say fashionable aspect of elite White life — both motherhood and fatherhood included.

We will also need measures to reward (and celebrate, and finance) parenthood for normal and above-normal persons whose increased fertility would benefit the race. And we shouldn’t shy away from proven techniques (that don’t involve messing around with the human genome in any experimental way) that could bring about quick improvements in our racial quality, like subsidized voluntary surrogate motherhood of very high-quality children, on a large scale if possible.

Now, we stupidly use the tax and social benefits system to reward the worst among us for reproducing. We can use those same systems, and other voluntary and non-coercive incentives, to encourage the best to have a larger proportion of the children in each generation — and the unfit to have few or none. At the same time, we can manage our population so it doesn’t outrun the ecosystem or crash to levels where others will take our lands. Racial progress — upbreeding, eugenics — is, next to getting hold of the thick end of the whip, the most important precursor to progress in every field. The race that implements it in earnest will inherit the Earth. — K.A.S.

Source: National Alliance