Humor

Staying Sane in a Crazy World

weightHaving purpose in life is vital

by Dean Darcy

I WAS dusting and rearranging my collection of porcelain Aunt Jemimas when a memory of Stepin’ Fetchit came to mind. Stepin’ Fetchit was a Black movie star in the 1920s — the first Black movie star, and a true representative of his people.

In 1969, one of Stepin’s sons, Donald Lambright, went nuts on the Pennsylvania Turnpike, shot and killed two people, wounded fifteen, and then killed his wife and himself. He must have been crazy.

I looked up “schizophrenic” to see if it would be a better word to use than “crazy” but one of the definitions for schizophrenic was; a condition that results from the co-existence of disparate or antagonistic qualities, identities or activities. Unfortunately, that sounds like a lot of people I know. Like those people who pass for politically correct at work but are proud racists when away from work. The ones with an American flag decal on their car and a Confederate flag hanging in the study. The kind of people who keep their Aunt Jemima collectibles in an armoire so they can’t be seen unless the doors are unlocked.

Every time someone goes along to get along with something they know to be wrong, his character and mental health suffers.

Just as resistance training will develop a stronger body; resistance to a corrupt, Jew-controlled regime will develop a stronger character. Joining the resistance and offering resistance are good for your psyche. Sharing a bond with a group of like-minded individuals will lessen that schizoid feeling you get when you’re in a situation where you cannot express how you really feel about something. Joining an organization can increase the organization’s effectiveness just as adding beryllium to plutonium can double plutonium’s explosive power.

Before the Internet, at the end of World War Two, most newspapers in America were individually owned. When the book, The Media Monopoly, was first published in 1983, it stated there were fifty corporations that dominated the media. With each new edition of the book the number went down; twenty-nine in 1987, twenty-three in 1990, fourteen in 1992, ten in 1997, and six in 2000. This would not be good even if they weren’t all Jewish corporations.

The six corporations that own the majority of the media outlets are not there to inform us but rather to divert us. These media conglomerates do not worry that their journalists and reporters will say or write something of which they would not approve. The journalists wouldn’t have those jobs if they hadn’t proven that they have the right attitude, will say the right things, and put the right spin on it.

Local newspapers look to the Associated Press for most of their national and international news. The AP is a news wire service that sends information out to 1700 newspapers and 5000 radio and television stations in the US and over 8500 media outlets in over 100 other countries. Every afternoon the AP puts out a “Notice to Editors”: “Tomorrow’s New York Times is going to have the following stories on the front page….” This makes it easy for the dimwits who publish your hometown paper to follow the party line.

Because Jews control the media, all fifty states have Holocaust Remembrance Days, there are seven Holocaust Museums in the U.S. (the one in Washington, DC, is federally funded at $30 million), and seventeen states have Holocaust programs in the public schools. All this because six million Jews, supposedly, lost their lives during WW2? Hell, forty-two million Christians lost their lives during WW2.

Since 9/11 it has become easier to express some of the opinions that previously were publicly uttered only by people like Dr. William Pierce (not to be confused with Franklin Pierce, the fourteenth president of the US). Opinions about the Jewish Problem for example. “Anti-semitism” was a force long before Wilhelm Marr coined that questionable term in 1879. Through out history this peculiar and predatory race has been run out of every country they were ever in but today, thanks to the US government, they are one of the world’s most formidable military powers. We are starting a new millennium with a bigger, more complex Jewish Problem than the world has ever known, including an Israel with nuclear capabilities.

Thankfully we are not alone in our awareness any more: Israel educated the Moslem and Arab peoples, and the Europeans are waking up too.

The Jewish Problem has created a sick, violent world and we need to take positive action to maintain our focus, not to mention our sanity. We’re like the people in the movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers, fighting to stay human.

One thing we can do is to have an individual mission or purpose in life, a unique mission suited to our talents and interests. We need to have an inner vision of ourselves growing toward that mission or goal — which should include making the world a better place for the White race.

Previous post

Nearly All Leaders of Liberal Opposition in Russia Are Either Fully Jewish or Have Jewish Background

Next post

Saudis: Israel Can Use Our Airspace to Attack Iran

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment authors
Susan A. KenenAnthony CollinsJohn Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

More than forty years ago now, in late spring or early summer 1974, I began dating a girl who, not long after we started going out, mentioned that the parents of a boy she’d known a few years theretofore had been killed by a sniper on the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Being only twenty years old that summer, I was not entirely surprised I’d not heard of the killings, because the girl said they’d occurred when the boy was a youngster–before she knew him, that is–and thus when she and I, too, would have been youngsters. I figured the killings had been a news story before I was old enough to be noticing such things. You can imagine my surprise when I saw, at the beginning of your post, the reference to… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

If you think I’m giving this subject more attention than it deserves, please don’t hesitate simply to discard the present comment and the comments that will continue it. I submit them only because your post has touched on what turns out to be a significant, if nearly forgotten, episode in America’s racial history. As I half-explained in my previous comment, I did a mental two-step, those forty years ago, when my lady friend mentioned the killing of the parents of a boy she’d known before I met her. Because my conversation with her was taking place in 1974, when, as I’ve said, the turmoil of the counterculture was still Big-Bang-fierce (or nearly so), my first thought had been to wonder whether the sniper incident she’d mentioned had been part of… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

If you’d like to view “Black History: Lost, Stolen or Strayed,” you may find it in its entirety on the internet (though whether in violation of copyright, I don’t know). It runs about an hour and, as I’ve learned in the course of the research that has resulted in the present comments, was the first of seven installments of a documentary series entitled “Of Black America.” It, the installment, was written by Andy Rooney and Perry Wolff, the former of whom was credited as one of its two producers. Wolff is credited as executive producer. The show’s part about Stepin Fetchit begins just past the twenty-two minute mark and runs three minutes. It includes clips from Fetchit’s old movies and is narrated, as is the entire hour, by Bill Cosby.… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

Although I myself didn’t see “Black History: Lost, Stolen or Strayed”—or at least, have no memory of it—I see now, from my research for the present comments, that it was quite a success. It was first broadcast on July 2, 1968, and “was so well received that CBS reran it in prime time three weeks later.” That wasn’t all: “CBS, which had two years earlier purchased educational film company BFA, struck prints of the film for classroom distribution. It soon became a staple in virtually every school film library in the country, providing African-American students with an exciting, hard-hitting view of ‘lost’ elements in their own culture, while giving students of other races a new perspective on lesser-known and important historical aspects of their nation.” At the end of the… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

When “Black History: Lost, Stolen or Strayed” was broadcast, Stepin Fetchit was decades past his career’s heart, which, as far as I can tell, ran from about 1925 to 1945 (i.e., from the silent-film era to the end of World War II). By what had been said about him in the documentary, Fetchit was displeased, so much that he brought a lawsuit against parties responsible for the creation and presentation of it. In an interview he gave in December 1970, Fetchit spoke of the lawsuit, which had been filed the previous July: “I filed a $3 million lawsuit against something that Bill Cosby said about me in a show called Of Black Americans [sic]. But I didn’t make Cosby a defendant. Know the reason why? Because that’s not the source… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

In my 5:31 a.m., March 7, 2015, comment, which the present comment-series follows up, I mentioned that Donald Lambright’s murderous shooting spree took place on April 5, 1969. Should you Google search the subject, you’ll find that details of the shooting spree are available in a number of internet sources, including facsimiles of contemporaneous newspaper articles about it. Among the details presented at a website called Amok Wiki are the names of Lambright’s four kills, including his wife. Interestingly, it seems to have been quite clear, at the time of the spree, that it (the spree) was motivated by racial resentment on Lambright’s part. Among the headlines I’ve encountered in newspapers that were reporting the event are “Racial Frustration Blamed for Shooting” and “Sniper Killer of 3 Termed Black Man… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

In the limited research I’ve conducted, via the internet, I’ve seen no connection drawn between the Lambright shootings and the “Black History” broadcast, which had taken place nine months before them. Although the interview in which Fetchit spoke of his lawsuit against the broadcast took place less than two full years after the shootings, the shootings are mentioned in neither the interviewer’s written introduction of the interview nor the interview proper (which is presented as a Fetchit monologue, i.e., without questions from the interviewer). In the 2005 book I’ve mentioned, the “Black History” broadcast and Fetchit’s personal reaction to it are addressed in a passage that appears before the account of the shootings; Fetchit’s legal reaction to the broadcast is addressed in a passage that appears after the account of… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

The following is my source-list, as promised in “Part 3” of my comment-series above. FOR PART 2: At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRqvygZECLM is the complete “Black History: Lost, Stolen or Strayed.” It runs fifty-three-and-a-half minutes and includes, at its end, the credits of Andy Rooney and Perry Wolff. FOR PART 3: At http://jfredmacdonald.com/bawtv/bawtv11.htm is “TV in the Age of Urban Rebellion,” which is chapter 11 of “Blacks and White TV: African Americans in Television since 1948.” It lists the titles and the original broadcast dates of each of the seven episodes of “Of Black America.” It reports what I stated, namely, that “Black History: Lost, Stolen or Strayed,” was originally broadcast on July 2, 1968, and “was so well received that CBS reran it in prime time three weeks later.” The information about… Read more »

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

Addendum, April 29, 2016:

In my “Part 6,” above, I wrote the following …

“Possibly, militant blacks of the first rank regard Lambright’s shooting spree as heroism, a small revenge upon the America whose racist pressures had twisted his own father into a piece of black suicide. That Lambright ended the spree with his personal suicide can only enhance, in their view, his nobility.”

Today, when I reread my above comments (after they were linked in a comment at another website), I was struck by that surname, Lambright, a Jesus-y combination of “lamb” and “right.” Were Lambright’s shootings to be dramatized, turned into a movie, with his name retained, some viewers of the said movie might think the name fiction, a bit of symbolism.

John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
Guest
John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia

PS “Personal suicide” is redundant, I guess.

Susan A. Kenen
Guest
Susan A. Kenen

I saw a victim of this shooting. I assumed she was dead but would really like to know. Should you desire to correspond I am on Facebook. Susan A Kenen

Anthony Collins
Guest
Anthony Collins

“When the book, The Media Monopoly, was first published in 1983, it stated there were fifty corporations that dominated the media. With each new edition of the book the number went down; twenty-nine in 1987, twenty-three in 1990, fourteen in 1992, ten in 1997, and six in 2000. This would not be good even if they weren’t all Jewish corporations.” The book in question was by Ben Bagdikian. It can be safely presumed that his book doesn’t identify who controls the media oligopolies in racial terms: in his interview with Playboy magazine, George Lincoln Rockwell referred to Bagdikian as “a frequent writer for the Anti-Defamation League.”