National Vanguard http://nationalvanguard.org News. For us. For a change. Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:00:45 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Conservatism: Witness the Witless http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/conservatism-witness-the-witless/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/conservatism-witness-the-witless/#comments Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:00:45 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1674 RPO-19690809a

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 30, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WITNESS THE WITLESS call of the White American conservative:

“Eugenics is an elitist plot to exterminate the Black race.”

“Abortion should be opposed because it is drastically limiting the number of Black births.”

“Martin Luther King was a Republican.”

“Democrats are the real racists. Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and he was a Republican.”

“Black people and Latinos and Muslims need sound money and the Constitution too!”

And the most witless of all: “It’s not about race! If Obama was White, I’d feel the same. It’s not about race! It’s about illegal immigrants breaking the law!” According to today’s conservatives, nothing is ever about race. They pride themselves on being more color-blind than the most fanatical liberal, more “anti-racist” than . . . → Read More: Conservatism: Witness the Witless]]> RPO-19690809a

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 30, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WITNESS THE WITLESS call of the White American conservative:

“Eugenics is an elitist plot to exterminate the Black race.”

“Abortion should be opposed because it is drastically limiting the number of Black births.”

“Martin Luther King was a Republican.”

“Democrats are the real racists. Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and he was a Republican.”

“Black people and Latinos and Muslims need sound money and the Constitution too!”

And the most witless of all: “It’s not about race! If Obama was White, I’d feel the same. It’s not about race! It’s about illegal immigrants breaking the law!” According to today’s conservatives, nothing is ever about race. They pride themselves on being more color-blind than the most fanatical liberal, more “anti-racist” than the most extreme multiracialist. (ILLUSTRATION: The eminent writer and classical scholar Revilo P. Oliver, once a leading conservative, abandoned conservatism when he realized it had failed in all its professed goals and had become an instrument of our enemies.)

The White race is threatened with extinction today, but conservatism — which once stood for racial integrity and the continued existence of our race — has switched sides and has now openly embraced multiracialism and White genocide.

Conservatives today are heavily fixated on avoiding being called “racists,” which is the political equivalent of the Mafia’s “kiss of death” for any movement which wants to be popular among the lemmings these days. And conservatives, despite the fact that demographics and Jewish media control have doomed their movement and stripped them of most of their power, need popularity to hold on to what income and sinecures they have left.

Almost all non-Whites in America, no matter how conservative some might be in personal habits or family traditions, cleave to the liberal line and the Democrat party — because the Democrats are the party of White dispossession, payoffs to the underclass, and wide open borders. There is no hope that these people can ever be brought to support American conservatism. The more tradition-minded Blacks have their churches. The more tradition-minded non-White immigrants have their Asian or Muslim or nationality- or race-based groups to fall back on. Their conservatism is based on conserving their culture and preserving their people. Both liberal universalism and the new universalist, non-racial conservatism are alien to them. True belief in “everyone-is-equal” universalism is limited almost exclusively to White folks, whom the more intelligent non-Whites probably, and rightly, regard as crazy.

Nevertheless conservatives try to out-liberal the liberals when it comes to race. They make sure that the very few Blacks or Mestizos who show up at conservative events are highlighted in their publications. They lionize the very mediocre Herman Cain to prove to us how “non-racist” they are.

Despite the fact that almost all American conservatives are White, the conservatives and Republicans would rather have a limb amputated than do anything to secure the continued existence of White people — or even admit that they represent White interests. They can get away with this because they know that White Americans have nowhere else to go politically. They take Whites for granted. They can keep all their White support by just being a little less anti-White than the liberals. And they can avoid being called “racist” by the Jewish media by taking the same tack — shouting “slow down a bit” at some of the more outrageous anti-White policies of the regime in Washington, but never taking effective action or even speaking out against White genocide — or telling us who’s responsible for it.

Conservatives try to position themselves as the “truly color blind” people, as opposed to the very race-conscious self-hating liberals and the “race hustlers” like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. The unstated assumption is that being “color blind” (meaning race blind) is a moral good — and being racially conscious is a moral evil.

What a change from the days when the great Revilo P. Oliver — an open partisan of Western man and his continued biological survival — was a leading light of conservatism, helping to found the John Birch Society and writing for conservative journals like National Review, American Opinion, and The American Mercury. By the 1960s, Oliver realized that, in his words, “conservatism was a cause not only lost but unworthy” — and in the years since then, with the takeover of the conservative movement by the Jewish-led neoconservatives, it has only gotten worse. In 1966, Oliver quit conservatism, and quit pulling the punches he was increasingly required to pull by conservative editors and leaders, and began speaking frankly and forthrightly about the existential plight of our race. By 1969, he was helping William Pierce found the National Youth Alliance, predecessor to the National Alliance, and telling all who would listen that only a radical affirmation that we were White — and that we intended to survive as Whites in this hostile world — could possibly save us. And he identified the Jewish power structure as our principal opponent and the primary engine of our destruction.

The conservative opposition to multiracialism back in the 1960s and 1970s has now totally collapsed as the Jewish neoconservatives, who are enthusiastic multiracialists, have taken over. But even the old-line traditional conservatives were doomed to fail. For fear of being called “racists” by the Jewish-owned mass media, even then they fought with one arm tied behind their backs. The old-line conservatives could argue against Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Acts, for example, on every ground but the most crucial one. They could say that many of the people pushing these forced association laws were Communists, and that was true. They could argue that forced association and ‘fair employment’ laws were unconstitutional, which was also true. They could point out the undoubtedly bad economic consequences of hiring unqualified non-Whites in our businesses and industries. But what they wouldn’t do and what they didn’t do was say, and I paraphrase Dr. Oliver:

“We are Americans, White people of Western civilization. Our values, and the great culture and science and wealth we have created, are ours and ours alone. Our survival depends on us keeping them for ourselves, and on keeping the land that sustains us, as our property and no one else’s. Furthermore, the very existence of that culture and that science depends on our continued existence, and we cannot risk losing what we are by mixing with other and incompatible races. All that we and our ancestors built depends on us — and we in turn depend on it for our sustenance and progress. No group of outsiders will be allowed to take our land or corrupt our blood, whether by force or by stealth, and any who attempt to do so will pay the ultimate penalty.”

But the conservatives didn’t take that position; they didn’t stand their ground. One can hardly call them ‘conservatives’ at all, since they absolutely failed to conserve. They gave up ground so fast that the conservatives’ position on matters of race is hardly distinguishable from that taken by radical multiracialists just 40 years ago, and in fact we now have soi-disant conservatives claiming to be the true intellectual heirs of the Black Communist agitator ‘Martin Luther’ King.

A better name for the conservatives would be the comfortable cowards. As long as they could move to a relatively safe suburb, smoke their imported cigars, puff themselves up with dogmatic 17th-century morality, engage in purposeless militarism and utterly empty patriotism to a flag and not a people, they were content. They like the comfortable reservation their enemies have allowed them in payment for their treason, and in their softness they fear a direct battle with those enemies. So they never fight one. They just keep on making deals (with people who are much better at making deals than they are) and selling out their children’s future, right to the end. Eventually, the children of those conservatives will be a tiny and hated minority, most of them unable to advance into even the third tier of the new elite, and will be forced to live cheek by jowl with the lowest peons of the Third World underclass that the billionaire Jewish elite is importing to our country. Whites are being pushed down to the proletarian level everywhere in North America.

One especially egregious example of how conservatives are given false hope and offered false solutions was brought out on this program several years ago by the writer Hadding Scott:

“For years the Republican party has tried to smooth over the differences within its coalition by deceiving the pro-White supporters of the party into thinking that their stake in the party is greater than it actually is. One especially clear example of how persons of pro-White sentiment are fooled is the Jewish ex-Marxist David Horowitz. Horowitz has written several books with titles like Hating Whitey, intended to be sold a White readership — White people who of course are starved for recognition of some of their problems such as anti-White crime and anti-White discrimination. Any White person who cares about his race and reads Horowitz carefully, however — which most people do not do — will be disappointed to learn that Horowitz the Jew has no interest whatsoever in preserving the White race. On the contrary, he complains that the more blatant anti-White policies actually backfired and have increased racial separatism. That is the kind of thing that worries Horowitz; he is not interested in the survival of the White race at all. But this fact is missed by many readers, who seem to regard his books simply as collections of useful anecdotes for complaining about how ‘unfair’ things are, a typical conservative playpen activity.”

Pretending to be the ‘true’ exponents of ‘fair’ multiracialism will not stop the importation of cheap labor and the proletarianization of the White worker. It will not prevent the ever-more-numerous members of the more favored non-White groups from pushing our children out of the best schools. It will not close the wide open sluices of non-White immigration into the West. It will not stop the rape and sexual slavery of our children and women by peoples with a very different understanding of their value than we have. It will not stop the rising tide of non-White crime and corruption. It will not stop the open pandering to non-White interest groups by our careerist politicians. It will not stop the academic establishment’s pushing of multiracialist values on our students. It will not change the anti-White alien control of our mass media. Accepting the multiracialist values promulgated by people who want to kill you, and meekly asking for ‘fairness’ from those people and their employees is not a formula for success. It is a formula for death.

To all of you good people who are supporting efforts based on that formula, I urgently ask you to reconsider. At this late hour, only an affirmation that we are White and that we must do whatever is necessary to ensure that our race survives can save us. White people have an absolute non-negotiable right to exist, to organize and govern ourselves, to have our own exclusive territories for our nations and peoples, and to keep the products of our labor for ourselves and our posterity. Only by taking that uncompromising stand, and backing it up with all the wealth and will and power we can muster, do we have a chance to provide for future generations of our people. Only by stopping our pretenses and halting our retreat do we have a chance of being worthy descendants of our ancestors.

That is the message of the men and women of the National Alliance. As our society descends into darkness, we must be building alternative structures of community and communication and racial and cultural preservation, structures which will survive this dark time and emerge into a brighter future of our own making. We need your help.

Stay a part of the more timid efforts if you like, but with a goal of radicalizing and enlightening your co-workers there. Tell the other Whites in these groups about the Alliance. Support the Alliance with all you can afford in time and energy. Give as much as you can to the cause of our children’s future. Use your influence and intelligence to add to our efforts — and make them better. Take a stand. The half-measures and pretending of the conservatives are really a kind of lie, and a rather weak and ineffectual lie at that. The National Alliance represents the uncompromised truth.

Conservatism, even at its best, before the takeover by the Jewish neocons, was always doomed to fail. It was always a defensive, rear-guard action. It had no new vision of its own, no real vision at all except stopping change and keeping what we once had — at which it failed miserably.

The National Alliance, in contrast, tells the rising generation of young Whites, without weasel words or evasion, that they will be the last generation of Whites unless radical action is taken now. We tell them  truthfully that they have been lied to their entire lives by the academy and by the media. We show them that they have been fed a false religion from birth, whether that religion was universalist Christianity or the secular liberal faith in “equality.” We tell them the truth that no one else will tell them — that they are the heirs and last living representatives of the race which first measured the stars and set foot on the surface of another world, and that the future of Life in the universe depends on what they do, right here and right now. And we give them a vision of the great future, the world of unimaginable new discoveries, power, and progress, that can be if we take control of our nation — and our evolutionary destiny — once again. Only such a vision can save us, only such a vision can inspire the actions and sacrifices necessary for victory, and only the Alliance is giving the new generation that vision. Please join us — today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/conservatism-witness-the-witless/feed/ 1
Zionism I: Theory http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/zionism-i-theory/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/zionism-i-theory/#comments Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:55:06 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1667 Israeli AmbassadorExclusiveness, Belief in Superiority, Hostility

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE RESOLUTION by the General Assembly of the United Nations on November 10, equating Zionism and racism, has provoked a torrent of response in the news media. Much of this response has been deliberately deceptive, and there consequently exists a state of confusion in the average citizen’s mind as to just what Zionism is and what its relationship is, if any, with racism. (ILLUSTRATION: Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Chaim Herzog, sneers at “goyim” in the UN General Assembly as he contemptuously tears up their resolution condemning Zionism. It is arrogant behavior like this which has earned the Jews the well-deserved hatred of all the other peoples of the world.)

The Jewish response to the UN action, has been to deny that Zionism is . . . → Read More: Zionism I: Theory]]> Israeli AmbassadorExclusiveness, Belief in Superiority, Hostility

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE RESOLUTION by the General Assembly of the United Nations on November 10, equating Zionism and racism, has provoked a torrent of response in the news media. Much of this response has been deliberately deceptive, and there consequently exists a state of confusion in the average citizen’s mind as to just what Zionism is and what its relationship is, if any, with racism. (ILLUSTRATION: Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Chaim Herzog, sneers at “goyim” in the UN General Assembly as he contemptuously tears up their resolution condemning Zionism. It is arrogant behavior like this which has earned the Jews the well-deserved hatred of all the other peoples of the world.)

The Jewish response to the UN action, has been to deny that Zionism is racism and to charge to the contrary that anti-Zionism is merely a thinly veiled anti-Semitism. Jews maintain that Zionism, with its call for an exclusive Jewish homeland comprising Palestine and portions of other Arab countries, cannot be separated from Judaism and the Jewish people. In the words of Chaim Herzog, Israeli ambassador to the UN:

“Zionism… is the modern expression of the ancient Jewish heritage. The Zionist ideal, as set out in the Bible, has been and is an integral part of the Jewish religion.”

The Jews are essentially correct in asserting that one cannot be against Zionism without also being against Jews. Even though many Jews do not participate actively in any of the numerous Zionist political organizations, it is an undeniable fact that Jews, non-religious as well as religious ones, are nearly unanimous in their support for the government of Israel and for the political goals of Zionism.

Those who oppose Zionism or who are totally indifferent to it are an utterly insignificant minority. As Israel’s leaders are fond of boasting, “The Six Day War (of June 1967, in which the Jews seized Egypt’s Sinai, Jordan’s West Bank, and Syria’s Golan in a surprise assault on their Arab neighbors) Zionized world Jewry.”

Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, the organ of the powerful American Jewish Committee, says essentially the same thing: “It has become clearer and clearer that something has happened to the Jews of America: they have all been converted to Zionism.”

But is Zionism equivalent to racism? Jews are the very image of wounded innocence as they hotly deny this. They correctly point out that Jews have been the instigators, the financiers, the propagandists, the generals, and, to a great extent, the soldiers in the war against racism, both in the United States and in other parts of the world.

As just one example, the most important organization in America seeking to bring about racial mixing between Blacks and Whites, the National Association far the Advancement of Colored People, has been an almost exclusively Jewish enterprise from its founding by Jews in 1910 until the death of its last Jewish president, Kivie Kaplan, last year. A Jewish lawyer, Jack Greenberg, still heads the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, which has instigated most of the moves toward court-enforced racial mixing in the last 25 years, including the original school-integration decision by the Supreme Court in 1954, from which all of today’s forced-busing orders have stemmed.

And the record of votes by Jewish legislators in the Congress and statements by Jewish spokesmen in the media is clear: they overwhelmingly favor all moves, including the racial busing of school children, which bring about increased racial mixing.

In other countries it is the same story. In South Africa, for example, the crumbling of the government’s policy of apartheid and the decision to abandon Rhodesia are the direct result of Jewish pressure. Harry Oppenheimer, the Jewish multibillionaire who controls the De Beers diamond mines, practically all of South Africa’s gold mines, her uranium industry, and a dozen other South African industries as well, has used his enormous wealth to buy control of many of the English-language news media in South Africa and has made substantial inroads into Afrikaans newspapers and magazines. He uses his media control to propagandize for Black-White “equality” and eventual Black rule for South Africa while simultaneously applying more direct pressures to government officials. He is supported in his efforts by South Africa’s very substantial Jewish community.

So, if nearly all Jews are Zionists and if nearly all Jews believe in racial mixing, how can Zionism be a form of racism?

In trying to answer this question, it is helpful to consider what a few prominent Zionists have had to say about Zionism. Moses Hess (1812-1875) is regarded as the real father of the modern, political form of Zionism. In his book Rome and Jerusalem, published in 1862, he wrote:

“We Jews shall always remain strangers among the goyim (Gentiles)… It is a fact that the Jewish religion is above all Jewish nationalism… Each and every Jew, whether he wishes it or not, is automatically, by virtue of his birth, bound in solidarity with his entire nation… One must be a Jew first and a human being second.”

Hess was more a Jewish nationalist than a Jewish racist — although he clearly did consider Jewishness to be a matter of birth rather than conviction. Other Zionists were much more explicit on this point. Louis Brandeis, a former U.S. Supreme Court justice and a leading Zionist, stated it succinctly: “Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or his shade of belief, is necessarily a member.”

The Zionist historian Simon Dubnow wrote in his book, The Foundation of National Judaism (published in 1906):

Assimilation is common treason against the banner and ideals of the Jewish people… But one can never ‘become’ a member of a natural group, such as a family, a tribe, or a nation. One may attain the rights or privileges of citizenship with a foreign nation, but cannot appropriate for himself its nationality too. To be sure, the emancipated Jew in France calls himself a Frenchman of Jewish faith. Would that mean, however, that he became a part of the French nation, confessing to the Jewish faith? Not at all. Because in order to be a member of the French nation one must be a Frenchman by birth, one must be able to trace his genealogy back to the Gauls, or to another race in close kinship with them, and finally one must also possess those characteristics which are the result of the historic evolution of the French nation. A Jew, on the other hand, even if he happened to be born in France and still lives there, in spite of all these, he remains a member of the Jewish nation, and whether he likes it or not, whether he is aware or unaware of it, he bears the seal of the historic evolution of the Jewish nation.

All three Zionists quoted above may be correctly regarded as racists, in that they reject the prevailing notion of the day that only the individual has any real significance and that it is wicked even to take into consideration the biological and cultural connections of the individual to a “natural group” (to use Dubnow ‘s term) of which he is a member.

It can be argued, nevertheless, that Jewish racism is at least a little different from the racism of most other peoples, in that it does place relatively less emphasis on purely biological connections and relatively more on other tribal connections: a shared culture, history, and attitude toward the non-Jewish world.

But this is to be expected in a people who exhibit as much biological diversity as the Jews do. They have absorbed physical traits from many of the other races among whom they have lived, until today, although most Jews still have many racial factors in common, they cannot be easily classified as a distinct race — and certainly not as a homogeneous race.

That which defines the Jews is only partly racial. They are also a partly national, partly religious, partly historical, partly cultural entity.

Indeed, because Jews are much more uniform psychically than physically, it is very difficult to decide whether they are more nearly a racial entity or a cultural entity. But that may be an irrelevant point. The fact is that Jews, now and always, have regarded themselves as a distinct, separate, and very special category of people — the “chosen people,” the “people of God,” and, as such, superior to all other peoples of the earth.

This idea that all Jews, whatever the country of their birth, are members of a single tribe, separate from and superior to all others, is the central theme of Zionism and of Judaism. Nahum Goldmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, touched on it when he said:

Diaspora Jewry (all Jews outside Palestine) has to overcome the conscious or subconscious fear of so-called double loyalty. It has to be convinced that it is fully justified in tying up its destiny with Israel’s. It has to have the courage to reject the idea that Jewish communities owe loyalty only to the states where they live.”

Dr. Goldmann expressed himself more clearly in addressing the Jews of Germany, before World War II, attempting to persuade them to emigrate to Palestine:

Judaism can have nothing in common with Germanism, if we go by the standards of race, history, and culture, and the Germans have the right to prevent the Jews from intruding into the affairs or their volk… The same demand I raise for the Jewish volk, as against the German… The Jews are divided into two categories, those who admit that they belong to a race distinguished by a history thousands of years old, and those who don’t. The latter are open to the charge of dishonesty.

Nahum Goldmann, top Zionist leader. He speaks openly of a "Jewish race" and urges Jews everywhere to be loyal only to Israel.

Nahum Goldmann, top Zionist leader. He speaks openly of a “Jewish race” and urges Jews everywhere to be loyal only to Israel.

If the racism expressed by Goldmann in the above statements were all there is to it, it would be hard to find fault with Zionism. Racism — the feeling of belonging to a “natural group,” of owing loyalty to that group, of wanting to preserve its identity and promote its welfare, of preferring to associate with members of that group rather than with aliens — is a universal, natural, and healthy condition of mankind. Indeed, it is a natural condition of all living things, in a sense, and they all owe their very existence to its universality.

But Zionism — whether one prefers to call it Jewish nationalism or Jewish racism — goes far beyond that. It is a distorted racism, a perverted and predominantly negative racism, expressing itself more in hostility toward other peoples than in positive aspirations for the Jewish people.

This has been true from the time of Moses, who instructed his fellow Jews to massacre without pity the Gentiles whose lands they wanted to seize, lest they later be inconvenienced by the survivors:

“But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you, then it shall come to pass that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes and thorns in your sides and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.’” (Numbers 33:55)

The advice was generally followed in the old days, and it is still followed today. Joshua, after capturing the city of Jericho and looting it of all its “silver and gold and vessels of brass and iron”… “utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox and sheep and ass, with the edge of the sword.”

And, more than 3,000 years later, the Haganah and the Irgun and the Stern Gang massacred the entire populations of Palestinian villages in order to terrify the other Arab inhabitants of Palestine into fleeing the country and leaving their homes and farms and businesses to be taken over by Jews.

This hostility toward other peoples, this extreme Jewish xenophobia and ethnocentricity, this contempt for everything not Jewish is revealed over and over again in the writings of Zionists, just as in their actions. It is a masochistic sort of racism, which glories and revels in the anti-Jewish hostility which it in turn provokes.

This clipping from the November 21, 1975, issue of the Jewish Press, which claims to have the largest circulation of any English-language weekly newspaper for Jews, complains that Gentiles are "infiltrating" into Israel posing as Jews, thus "desecrating" the Jewish state and religion. In the eyes of orthodox Jews, "goyim" (Gentiles) are mere cattle, not human beings.

This clipping from the November 21, 1975, issue of the Jewish Press, which claims to have the largest circulation of any English-language weekly newspaper for Jews, complains that Gentiles are “infiltrating” into Israel posing as Jews, thus “desecrating” the Jewish state and religion. In the eyes of orthodox Jews, “goyim” (Gentiles) are mere cattle, not human beings.

Theodor Herzl, the Zionist leader whose efforts were most essential to the founding of the state of Israel, wrote in his book The Jewish State (published in 1896):

Every nation in whose midst Jews live is, either covertly or openly, anti-Semitic… Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among the Gentiles… We are one people — our enemies have made us one in our despite… Distress binds us together, and, thus united, we suddenly discover our strength.

The Zionist Jakob Klatzkin (1882-1948) carried the idea further in his book Crisis and Decision, published in 1921, and addressed to the German people:

…We are not hyphenated Jews (i.e., German-Jews); we are Jews with no qualifications or reservations. We are simply aliens; we are a foreign people in your midst, and, we emphasize, we wish to stay that way. There is a wide gap between you and us, so wide that no bridge can be laid across. Your spirit is alien to us; your myths, legends, habits, customs, traditions and national heritage, your religious and national shrines, your Sundays and holidays… they are all alien to us. The history of your triumphs and defeats, your war songs and battle hymns, your heroes and their mighty deeds, your national ambitions and aspirations, they are all alien to us. The boundaries of your lands cannot restrict our movements, and your border clashes are not of our concern. Far over and above the frontiers and boundaries of your land stands our Jewish unity… Whosoever calls the foreign (Gentile) land a fatherland is a traitor to the Jewish people … A loyal Jew can never be other than a Jewish patriot… We recognize a national unity of diaspora Jews, no matter in which land they may reside. Therefore, no boundaries can restrain us in pursuing our own Jewish policy…

And the “American” Zionist, Samuel Untermyer, said in 1933: “Other races have come and gone. The Jew has survived. Persecution cannot crush him. The Jews are the aristocrats of the world.”

Such unbridled and reckless arrogance, stemming from the persistent Jewish notion that the children of Israel have been “chosen” to rule the world and must, therefore, remain aloof from the goyim, destined to be their slaves when the Messiah comes, has led to a great deal of friction between the Jews and their Gentile hosts throughout the ages. And yet even this negative and peculiarly Jewish form of racism could be tolerated, if that were all.

The Jews could all go off to the Middle East and finish butchering the Palestinians, or they could all settle on a large island by themselves somewhere, and they could then indulge their narcissist fantasies and their hatred of the rest of mankind to their hearts’ content, and we would not care.

But gathering the Jews of the world together in one place is not really part of the Zionist scheme. They want an exclusively Jewish homeland, all right, but they also want to maintain their death grip on the economies and the governments of the Gentile lands where they live as minorities. Zionism is built not only on the ideas of Jewish exclusiveness and Jewish superiority, but also on the idea of Jewish world dominion.

Not a world dominion achieved by force of Jewish arms or by any frontal assault on the hated goyische world, but a dominion brought about by infiltration and subversion, by the encouragement of weakness and decadence among the Gentiles, by the imperceptibly slow injection of a Jewish spiritual poison into the hearts and minds of the goyim, destroying their will to resist.

And therein we have the explanation of the seeming dilemma: Jews who have devoted all their talents and energies to combatting racism being themselves charged with racism by the world community. Yes, Jews are against racism — racism among the Gentiles, that is, because they want to destroy the unity of the Gentile nations. And, yes, Jews (or Zionists, if you prefer) are racists, because they, more than any other people, realize the necessity of maintaining their own unity.

Theodor Herzl, one of the "founding fathers" of Israel. He dreamed of an all-Jewish state from which the Gentile world would be ruled, in fulfillment of Jewish "prophecies."

Theodor Herzl, one of the “founding fathers” of Israel. He dreamed of an all-Jewish state from which the Gentile world would be ruled, in fulfillment of Jewish “prophecies.”

The condemnation by the United Nations of Zionism is, on the whole, a welcome move, but it nevertheless fails to face the issue as squarely as it should. The UN has condemned the Jews for their behavior in Palestine, for practicing both physical and cultural genocide against the Palestinian people. But that is only a negative form of the same racism which is practiced by all healthy peoples. What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians is what the Turks did to the Armenians, what the Serbs did to the Croats, what the American pioneers did to the Indians, what the Germans did to the Jews (although hardly to the tune of 6,000,000 as the Jews claim). It is the way of the world, even if, in our Western squeamishness, we would like to see more positive and fewer negative expressions of this natural and universal racism.

And so, in this regard, the Jews are at least justified in their claim that the UN condemnation of Zionist racism is hypocritical, because most of the members of the UN practice their own forms of racism. But if the UN were really an honest organization, it could have issued a denunciation of Zionism against which the Jews would have no defense.

The UN could have pointed out that Jewish racism is a unique evil — a unique danger to the world — not because the Jews want Palestine all to themselves or even because they aspire to world rule, but because of the truly unique ways in which the Jews go about implementing their Zionist designs.

Recognizing more clearly than any other people the importance of racism as a natural defense — as Nature’s way of maintaining racial integrity — the Jews deliberately go about neutralizing the racism of their intended victims, thus destroying their unity, their cohesiveness, and their will to resist. It is a tactic which has proven extraordinarily effective in the past, a tactic to which the Western peoples in particular have proven susceptible.

It is for this reason that the Germans, the one nation in modern times which developed a defense against Jewish racism, named the Jews “der Weltfeind” — the world enemy.

* * *

From Attack! No. 42, 1976

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/zionism-i-theory/feed/ 0
Unless We Cure Ourselves http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/unless-we-cure-ourselves/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/unless-we-cure-ourselves/#comments Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:56:48 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1661 The Camp of the Saintsby Nick Camerota

I BEGAN READING The Camp of the Saints after a long and tiring day. Although I promised myself only a few chapters before retiring, I remained in the grip of Jean Raspail’s forceful, apocalyptic narrative until dawn. I finished it in one sitting.

That was almost a month ago. Since then I’ve read several other books, all of which I could have reviewed with little or no difficulty. A few days ago I was drawn back to Raspail’s book and read it for the second time. Even now I am not confident I can review it properly. Nonetheless, something must be said about this book.

The Camp of the Saints first came to my attention a couple of years ago while I was traveling around Europe. Originally published . . . → Read More: Unless We Cure Ourselves]]> The Camp of the Saintsby Nick Camerota

I BEGAN READING The Camp of the Saints after a long and tiring day. Although I promised myself only a few chapters before retiring, I remained in the grip of Jean Raspail’s forceful, apocalyptic narrative until dawn. I finished it in one sitting.

That was almost a month ago. Since then I’ve read several other books, all of which I could have reviewed with little or no difficulty. A few days ago I was drawn back to Raspail’s book and read it for the second time. Even now I am not confident I can review it properly. Nonetheless, something must be said about this book.

The Camp of the Saints first came to my attention a couple of years ago while I was traveling around Europe. Originally published in 1973, this work sent violent shock waves through France which later reverberated across the entire continent.

Raspail’s story, set in some unspecified period in the future, might, in fact, spring to life some time soon. Briefly, The Camp of the Saints is the chronicle of nearly a million starving beings from India who have boarded ships and headed west. France, terminally sick with liberalism, falls to their unarmed invasion.

The average person may feel more than a few tugs of doubt when considering Raspail’s vision of the future but still might wish to read his book as “entertaining” fiction. There are other readers who simply don’t care for fictional works and will pass it up for that reason. However, both categories of readers should bear in mind that this controversial novel wasn’t written without considerable risk to the career of the author, who, as the recipient of the Jean-Walther literary prize and a columnist for Le Figaro, was well known to literate Europeans long before the appearance of The Camp of the Saints.

Indeed, Raspail takes his task very seriously. In the preface he points out that the idea of an invasion by the Third World, or some part of it, “is no wild-eyed dream.” He explains, “Even if the specific action (i.e., the invasion), symbolic as it is, may seem far-fetched, the fact remains that we are inevitably headed for something of the sort.” Raspail reminds the reader that by the year 2,000 the planet will be populated by seven billion people. Of that number only 900 million will be White.

The dust jacket of the American edition of The Camp of the Saints (published this summer) contains an arresting quote from President Boumedienne of Algeria. In an interview given in 1974, nearly two years after Raspail wrote the book, Boumedienne expressed the belief that “billions of human beings” might someday “leave the poor, southern part of the world to erupt into the relatively accessible spaces of the rich, northern hemisphere, looking for survival.” The way Raspail depicts said eruption causes him what public-relations types prefer to call “image problems.”

The reaction of the French media to the publication of Raspail’s book shouldn’t surprise regular readers of ATTACK! With rare exceptions, both the book and the author were denounced in the strongest imaginable language. Raspail became a full-blown “racist,” a moral monster, a champion of everything ugly, sick, and evil.

The media’s sharp response is no doubt due to the way they are treated by Raspail in the novel. For him, they are among the chief inner enemies of the nation. It is as a result of their urgings that France is ultimately swamped by invaders. Marxists, anarchists, homosexuals, overexcited university students, hippies, radical clergymen, one-worlders, racial equalitarians, and neo-liberal members of government also take a drubbing in this book. Black and Arab “guest workers” emerge as sinister national allies of the alien swell of humanity battering down France’s door.

The most disturbing thing about Raspail’s treatment of these anti-national characters, however, is that he draws many of their statements from real life. He culled actual editorials, speeches, pastoral letters, laws; his sampling constitutes a veritable treasure trove of neo-liberal ravings.

Evidence of the inner attitude of the media masters toward Raspail is also given by their reaction to another writer on racial matters. When Negro Communist Frantz Fanon, a hater of all things Western (with a highly cultivated rancor for the French, in particular), packaged his undisguised loathing in book form, he had no difficulty finding a publisher in France. In his Les Damnes de la Terre (now almost 15 years old), Fanon wrote: “For if the last shall be first, this will only come to pass after a murderous and decisive struggle… (for) when the native hears a speech about Western culture he pulls out his knife — or at least makes sure it is within his reach.”

Fanon also observed that the overthrow of the Western world “will be carried out with the indispensable help of the European peoples” who have also decided the White man should be stamped out. Enter, stage left, the lubricous French “philosopher,” Jean Paul Sartre, with the introduction to Fanon’s book. “Read Fanon,” he cries. “You will learn how their impulse to murder is the expression of the natives’ collective unconscious.” We are also told, “Fanon is the first since Engels to bring the processes of history into the clear light of day.”

“Make no mistake about it,” Sartre pants, “by this mad fury, by this bitterness of spleen, by their ever-present desire to kill us, by the permanent tensing of powerful muscles which are afraid to relax, they have become men… hatred, blind hatred, which is yet an abstraction, is their only wealth.”

When Fanon’s book made its debut in France there were few jeers or catcalls from the media. Instead it was hailed as a masterpiece by the decadent French intelligentsia. The message spread. In New York, the Jewish-owned Evergreen Publishing Company (longtime specialists in the porno trade) published the book in English under the title The Wretched of the Earth. It received generally favorable reviews and even a plug from a former president of the United Nations General Assembly.

And at cocktail parties throughout the Western world sensitive intellectuals shivered with delight at the prospect of being humiliated — or, better yet, savagely punished — for their “racism.” Sartre had, after all, noted that even “our worthiest souls contain racial prejudice.” Masochism and self-hatred are now very much in style for Westerners.

Is it any wonder that Jean Raspail (or anyone, for that matter) should write a novel telling us that Western man is on the verge of extinction? That we have been softened and corrupted by a sick and unnatural social philosophy concocted by our inner enemies? That we are losing the will to survive?

The signs are all around us. As this review goes to press the European administrators of the Spanish Sahara are facing a mini-version of Raspail’s apocalypse, and they are reacting just as he predicts the French will react when their time comes.

And as the storm clouds continue to gather and Western man moves closer to the abyss, the media still howl at Raspail and others who underscore the danger. The American edition of The Camp of the Saints was greeted by insult, disgust, and opprobrium. “Preposterous,” snapped the New York Times. “Looney,” screamed the International Herald Tribune. “Trash,” brayed Time magazine.

Read Raspail’s book and then look into the morning headlines and editorial sections of our leading newspapers. It shouldn’t be difficult to determine who is the enemy.

* * *

From Attack! No. 41, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

Camp of the Saints PDF

Camp of the Saints via archive.org

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/unless-we-cure-ourselves/feed/ 1
Tests Show Students Learning Less http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/tests-show-students-learning-less/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/tests-show-students-learning-less/#comments Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:40:26 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1658 RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN

by Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR the thirteenth straight year, graduating high school seniors in 1975 were dumber than those of the year before. Nearly one million college-bound seniors took the Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) offered by the College Entrance Examination Board this year, and their scores were the lowest which have been recorded since the SATs were first offered more than 20 years ago. The scores began dropping in 1963 and have fallen each year since then, with a particularly sharp decline this year.

(PHOTO: RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN still have the benefits of order and discipline in their classrooms, not to mention a greatly superior racial environment. The slack-jawed “do your own thing” philosophy of the U.S. advocates of race-mixing and permissiveness has been rejected by Soviet educators. They are training a generation . . . → Read More: Tests Show Students Learning Less]]> RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN

by Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR the thirteenth straight year, graduating high school seniors in 1975 were dumber than those of the year before. Nearly one million college-bound seniors took the Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) offered by the College Entrance Examination Board this year, and their scores were the lowest which have been recorded since the SATs were first offered more than 20 years ago. The scores began dropping in 1963 and have fallen each year since then, with a particularly sharp decline this year.

(PHOTO: RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN still have the benefits of order and discipline in their classrooms, not to mention a greatly superior racial environment. The slack-jawed “do your own thing” philosophy of the U.S. advocates of race-mixing and permissiveness has been rejected by Soviet educators. They are training a generation of disciplined, hard-working, self-confident men and women to take up the role of world leadership which America is letting slip from its grasp.)

The tests measure mathematical reasoning ability and “verbal skills” — i.e., the ability to understand written English — and College Board staffers who have been studying and analyzing the declining scores for the past few years are convinced the slump is not the result of technicalities in the tests.

“There is a decline in the verbal and mathematical reasoning ability among those who choose to take the SATs,” concluded Carol Halstead of the College Board. Other educators across the nation have been forced to the same conclusion.

“The verbal skills of students have gone down incredibly in the last 10 years,” said Dr. Shirley Kenny, head of the University of Maryland’s English department.

At the University of Wisconsin, where prospective journalism students are required to take a qualifying examination in English usage, the failure rate has increased from 25 per cent of those taking the exam in 1971 to 60 per cent this year. “Students are not convinced they need to know how to write,” said Wisconsin English Professor William Lenehan.

The same, sad story is told at the country’s prestige schools: “There has to be some truth in the statements that the writing experience of our students is not as rich as it used to be, ” said Donald Dickason, Cornell University’s dean of admissions. “Our students arc following the national trends, although at a slower rate.”

The sharp national decline in the ability of college-bound high school graduates to reason mathematically and to read and write can be explained in part by the increasing number of Negroes who are being recruited by U.S. colleges and universities, under pressure from the Federal government. As the percentage of Negro students taking the SATs has risen, the average scores have fallen. It is in the abstract mental processes tested by the SATs that Negroes suffer their most severe genetic shortcoming.

But the scores of White students have also been falling, and this can only be attributed to two things: growing alienation, which is affecting every segment of our society, and a declining habit of self-discipline among young people.

In a sense, however, both these factors are related to the racial factor. Alienation is the inevitable consequence of the destruction of a racially homogeneous environment, while the decline in self-discipline has followed the catastrophic disruption of external discipline in America’s racially mixed schools.

The ability for self-discipline — the most important and valuable ability an individual can acquire — is developed most readily in an orderly, disciplined environment. The disappearance of the latter — completely aside from racial considerations — is not unrelated, of course, to the rise of neo-liberalism as the dominant factor in the philosophy of the American educational “Establishment” in recent decades. The liberal instinctively abhors all authority, structure, form, order, discipline.

But the growing formlessness of school curricula and teaching methods is being accelerated by the influx of Blacks into formerly White schools. Since Negro children score lower on tests and fail courses more often than White children, the educators have decided that tests are “culturally biased” against Negroes and that course grades are “unfair.”

For a child, Black or White, to be given a grade lower than some other child is running the risk of damaging the child’s self-esteem, they reason. Thus grows the “fun-and games” approach to education.

Since Blacks simply are not equipped by Nature to cope with the abstract reasoning required to solve problems in algebra or prove theorems in geometry, educators have begun shifting away from the former stress on problem-solving, with its requirements for sufficient intelligence to acquire a rigorous mastery of subject matter. Instead, the emphasis is now being placed on such ill-defined qualities as student “originality” and “creativity.” Students are given a superficial overview of subject matter and misled into believing that they have mastered it.

School courses in the humanities are suffering a fate similar to the sciences. Since Black students find it hard to maintain much interest in history courses which deal almost exclusively with White Civilization, history is being de-emphasized for all students. Instead of being required to study the past, with its vital lessons for the present, students are allowed to enroll in “Modern Ceramics” or “Art Forms in the Cinema.” Needless to say, Black performance in such “fun” courses much more nearly equals White performance than in the older curriculum.

With the same result in mind, educators are looking for alternatives to the SATs. “If the skills demanded by these tests (SATs) are what it takes to get through college, then maybe it’s the colleges that ought to change,” says David Darland, an official of the neo-liberal National Education Association. And so a Federally subsidized program has recently developed a new set of tests — the National Assessment Tests (NAT) — which are claimed to be more “relevant” than the SATs.

The NATs have been designed to measure student mastery of such basic “life skills” as interpreting highway signs, giving correct change, telling time, understanding road maps, using telephone directories, and reading advertisements. Much to the disappointment of the NATs’ designers, however, the gap between Black and White performance on the new tests remains nearly as large as on the SATs. In 1974, for example, the NATs were given to 5,200 17-year-old high school juniors. Of these, 93.8 per cent of the Whites were able to achieve a passing score of 75 per cent, while only 62 per cent of the Blacks passed.

It seems clear that all such misguided efforts to establish educational “equality” between Blacks and Whites are doomed to failure by the unavoidable facts of biological inequality. The professed equalitarian goal of “a quality education for all children, regardless of race” is being exposed as a hypocritical sham, as its advocates continue to undermine the quality of education for all children.

The truly horrendous result of the destruction of America’s schools by racial mixing and permissiveness is that we are now raising a generation of White Americans who cannot compete in an increasingly dangerous and hostile world.

* * *

From Attack! No. 40, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/tests-show-students-learning-less/feed/ 0
The Law of the Land http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-law-of-the-land/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-law-of-the-land/#comments Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:21:10 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1656 John McNaughton's "Wake Up America"

by Dr. William L. Pierce

A NAUSEATINGLY FAMILIAR spectacle of our times is one of our elected “leaders,” whether President Gerald Ford or Boston Mayor Kevin White, appearing on television and solemnly announcing that he is as opposed to the forced racial busing of school children as anyone, but that it is “the law of the land.” The implication, of course, is that “the law of the land” is something sacred, which every right thinking citizen must meekly accept and quietly obey.

(ILLUSTRATION: John McNaughton’s painting “Wake Up America”)

Now, it is true that the orders issued by any old man in a black robe who has been appointed to a Federal court by the politicians in Washington have the force of law, regardless of how outrageous or immoral or socially disruptive . . . → Read More: The Law of the Land]]> John McNaughton's "Wake Up America"

by Dr. William L. Pierce

A NAUSEATINGLY FAMILIAR spectacle of our times is one of our elected “leaders,” whether President Gerald Ford or Boston Mayor Kevin White, appearing on television and solemnly announcing that he is as opposed to the forced racial busing of school children as anyone, but that it is “the law of the land.” The implication, of course, is that “the law of the land” is something sacred, which every right thinking citizen must meekly accept and quietly obey.

(ILLUSTRATION: John McNaughton’s painting “Wake Up America”)

Now, it is true that the orders issued by any old man in a black robe who has been appointed to a Federal court by the politicians in Washington have the force of law, regardless of how outrageous or immoral or socially disruptive those orders may be — provided only that some other old man appointed to a higher Federal court by the politicians in Washington doesn’t overrule him. Under the present American system of government, Federal judges are the wielders of awesome power.

It is also true that Americans have a long and deeply rooted tradition of respect for law. All the peoples of northern Europe, from whom most White Americans are descended, have similar traditions of obedience to the legally constituted authorities. It is this tradition which is being invoked when the politicians urge us to do as the old men in the black robes order us, like it or not. Either we are law-abiding citizens, and we obey, or we are lawbreakers — criminals.

At least, that’s the way it used to be. But, alas, life is no longer so simple these days. Thirty years ago, in Nuremberg, Germany, we and our wartime allies donned black robes and ruled that there is a higher law than the laws written by Congresses, Parliaments, and Reichstags.

Every man, we ruled, is bound by this higher law. When it conflicts with written laws, then we must disobey those written laws. On the basis of our ruling at Nuremberg we then proceeded to hang by the neck until dead more than 5,000 law-abiding German soldiers and civilians. Their “crime” had been to faithfully obey the laws of their land.

More recently the precedents established at Nuremberg have been applied in this country — selectively, to be sure. For example, the members of our armed forces have been instructed that they must not obey “immoral” orders from their commanding officers, and they are subject to punishment if they do. On the other hand, if they guess wrong and refuse to obey a “moral” order, they will also be punished.

The situation is at least as confusing for civilians. They are taught in school that, as American citizens, they have certain inalienable rights and that those rights are set forth in the U.S. Constitution, the highest law of the land. When a citizen, who has noted that the Constitution assures him that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” is confronted with a myriad of Federal, state, and local laws which do, indeed, infringe that right, what is he to do? Many of those who reasoned that the Constitution has precedence and then acted accordingly are now reflecting on their error behind prison bars.

The same is true of those who reasoned, on Constitutional grounds, that the Federal government cannot legally compel them to rent a house they own to someone not of their own choosing, or to admit someone not of their own choosing into their lodge or craft guild or place of business, or to fill out a Form 1040 each April.

Actually, it shouldn’t be confusing at all. There is a very simple common denominator which resolves all these apparent contradictions. It is this: the concept of “a rule of laws, not of men” is a myth, a fiction maintained by America’s rulers to deceive those who are ruled.

The politicians and the media masters understand this. That is why they raised such a fuss a few years back when Mr. Nixon tried to put a couple of “conservative” judges on the Supreme Court, and it is why they were so disappointed when the secret wheelings and dealings of Mr. Johnson’s appointee to be Chief Justice, Abe Fortas, came to light and forced his resignation. They understand that it is not what the Constitution says that is important, but what the political appointees in black robes say it says.

Thus, the victorious democrats and communists did not hang Germans for obeying German laws or for disobeying the ex post facto laws passed at Nuremberg. We hanged them because they lost the war and were no longer capable of protecting themselves from our hatred and thirst for vengeance. We hanged them for the same reason we raped their women and gave half their country away, namely, because after the war we had guns and they didn’t.

It is for the same reason that the Internal Revenue Service never has to lose a moment’s sleep worrying about the involved Constitutional arguments of various tax protestors, so long as the IRS is on good terms with the various political appointees in black robes who sit in the tax courts. Simply stated, the Internal Revenue Service and its friends in the courts have more muscle than all the “tax strike” groups put together, and so it really doesn’t matter what the Constitution says.

That is why J. Stanley Pottinger, the smirking little Jew who heads the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, can strut arrogantly around Boston, ordering White children into Black schools and arresting any parents who raise a fuss about it.

He has an army of gunmen — armed Federal marshals — to protect him and to enforce his orders for him, and Boston’s White parents do not.

And that is why the politicians in Washington can calmly go ahead with their plans to send American “technicians” to the Middle East and to empty our treasury and strip our arsenals for the sake of the Israelis, despite the overwhelming opposition of the American people to these things. The people may not like it, but the politicians and the media masters, not the people, are the ones with the muscle.

And is it ever otherwise? Is it possible to govern a people by their informed consent, to have a legal system based on something other than superior force? The answer is “yes” — when certain conditions are met: when the written law — the acts passed by Congress and the rulings issued by judges — corresponds with the moral sense of the people, with their traditions, with their deepest feelings of what is right and proper; when it corresponds with the people’s common law, which is the set of unwritten rules which has evolved organically along with a people over the millennia, so that it is an integral part of that people’s cultural and spiritual heritage. Then — and only then — can it rightly be called “the law of the land,” to which every man owes obedience.

But these conditions do not prevail in America today, and so we do not have a “rule of law,” but a tyranny. Under the present System, whoever is in a position to give the orders to the largest number of hired gunmen is the man whose view of what is “legal” prevails. So long as no one with more hired gunmen opposes him, he can order children bused and private property confiscated and the right to bear arms infringed and the patrimony of the people turned over to an alien power.

But let us also remember this: to defy a tyrant, to refuse to obey his edicts, to kill him or his enforcement agents, while it may be “illegal,” is not contrary to the law of our land, in the truest sense of that phrase. Indeed, it is in harmony with that higher law to which we are all subject, the higher law under which obedience to tyrants and collaboration with their agents are themselves crimes.

* * *

From Attack! No. 40, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-law-of-the-land/feed/ 0
Two Minutes Hate http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/two-minutes-hate/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/two-minutes-hate/#comments Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:59:23 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1654 Race Relations Study

ILLUSTRATION: WASHINGTON POST story tells of Nathan Cohen decision compelling Federal workers to submit to sensitivity-training sessions. Applying many of the same techniques which were used to brainwash American POW’s in communist prison camps in Korea and Vietnam, Federal psychologists are able to control attitudes and opinions with a high degree of success. These techniques are also being used in high schools now to “adjust” White students to a multiracial environment.

by Dr. William L. Pierce

IN 1984, the well-known political horror-fantasy by George Orwell, it was called the Two Minutes Hate. At eleven o’clock each morning the workers in all government offices assembled in front of television screens for a sensitivity-training session in which they released their pent-up hostilities and became, thereby, better-adjusted subjects of Big Brother.

In 1975 they don’t call it . . . → Read More: Two Minutes Hate]]> Race Relations Study

ILLUSTRATION: WASHINGTON POST story tells of Nathan Cohen decision compelling Federal workers to submit to sensitivity-training sessions. Applying many of the same techniques which were used to brainwash American POW’s in communist prison camps in Korea and Vietnam, Federal psychologists are able to control attitudes and opinions with a high degree of success. These techniques are also being used in high schools now to “adjust” White students to a multiracial environment.

by Dr. William L. Pierce

IN 1984, the well-known political horror-fantasy by George Orwell, it was called the Two Minutes Hate. At eleven o’clock each morning the workers in all government offices assembled in front of television screens for a sensitivity-training session in which they released their pent-up hostilities and became, thereby, better-adjusted subjects of Big Brother.

In 1975 they don’t call it the Two Minutes Hate, but it amounts to exactly the same thing. Federal employees are increasingly being forced to submit to mind-bending group-therapy sessions designed to suppress “undesirable” attitudes — primarily attitudes toward members of racial-minority groups — and mold their psyches in directions deemed more suitable by the clever people who plan the therapy sessions.

Beginning (appropriately) in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and the now-defunct Office of Economic Opportunity a few years ago, the government’s sensitivity-training program is gradually being extended to other Federal agencies, both in Washington and in the boondocks.

Many government workers are complaining about this not-very-subtle program of thought control, but a recent decision in the case of an employee at the Watervliet (NY) Arsenal indicates that Big Brother is determined to press on.

Backed by his union, the American Federation of Government Employees, the Watervliet Arsenal employee argued that the government unjustly suspended him from his job without pay when he refused to attend sensitivity-training sessions which had been scheduled for workers at the arsenal.

A Federal labor arbitrator, Nathan Cohen, ruled against the union and the employee, saying the government has the right to enforce attendance and punish employees who do not go to the sessions. Cohen’s ruling will not halt all employee resistance to compulsory sensitivity training, but it will give the government an advantage in being able to threaten with dismissal all Federal workers who balk.

 The Federal thought-control program is most solidly established in the Department of Defense. Under Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger sensitivity training has been institutionalized in each of the armed services as a mandatory part of the training of all personnel.

Some of the “shock techniques” used in earlier military sensitivity-training sessions are primarily responsible for the notoriety the program has received. Stripped of all insignia of rank, officers and enlisted personnel, Black and White, male and female, were herded into classrooms and subjected to various experiences designed to rub their noses collectively in the filth of racemixing.

In some sessions Black instructors would scream obscenities at White participants and encourage them to reciprocate: “You White honky motherfucker, call me a nigger! Come on, you honky bastard, you’re thinking ‘nigger’; now say it! ” The idea was to bring latent racial hostility to the surface, so that it could be dissipated.

In one Navy program at Charleston, S.C., a Black instructor took a White female assistant to the front of the class and fondled and kissed her, after a series of obscene “bedroom” remarks. The Navy received such strenuous objections to this program that it was temporarily halted.

But Federal psychologists have found that they are able to achieve their purpose just as well with more subtle techniques. One “final exam” devised by the mind-controllers, for example, simply involves passing a soft drink around the sensitivity-training classroom. Anyone in the racially mixed group who declines to take a drink from the common bottle is considered to have flunked.

Herd instinct — the drive to conform to group standards — is very powerful, and Big Brother’s experts have learned how to manipulate it in such a way that they can modify the opinions and attitudes of their subjects. The basic method used is to strip the individual’s personality naked, to deprive him of his privacy, to make him bare his innermost thoughts and feelings—and then to apply overwhelming pressure to him to make those thoughts and feelings conform to those of the others in the group. In the context of the sensitivity-training class, to be non-conforming is equivalent to being anti-social.

And the method works. Only persons of extraordinarily strong will and personality are immune to its effects.

Unfortunately, employees of the Federal government are not the only persons being subjected to the new thought-control program; workers in some industrial plants with Federal contracts are also being required to attend therapy sessions. Worse, pilot programs have been established in a number of the nation’s high schools.

Whereas the program for adults aims primarily at keeping natural racial hostilities in check, the high school programs are more ambitious. Their purpose is to utterly destroy any sense of racial identity in young Whites, to nip in the bud any incipient feeling of racial pride and replace it instead with self-hatred and guilt. The sensitivity trainers want to produce a new generation of racially castrated Whites — raceless White zombies who will blend unobtrusively into the multi-racial future they are planning for America.

In most cases the high school programs have adopted formats rather similar to the adult program, except that they have taken full advantage of the greater impressionability of their participants. But the thought-controllers are always experimenting, attempting to improve their craft.

One of their newer inventions is a “White studies” course for the White minority at the mostly Black Berkeley (CA) High School. It is called “What Is White?”

As proudly reported in the June 30 issue of Newsweek, the course complements “Black studies” courses in which Black students are taught that the only reason their race has a record of failure and lack of achievement throughout history is that the wicked and greedy Whites have held them back. Berkeley’s new “White studies” course teaches young Whites that they must accept the guilt for White repression of non-White races and try to make it up to them.

“After exploring such topics as prejudice and white culture,” reports Newsweek, the White students “come around to the view that the white man’s burden of guilt for America’s imperfections is really an opportunity and that there is much whites can do to help because of their position in society.”

One student who took the course, 17-year-old Anthony Cody, said: “I feel better about being white now. The course gave me the ability to deal with it.”

When the time comes to settle scores in America, there will be no place in hell hot enough for the depraved creatures responsible for destroying the racial consciousness of these White boys and girls. Meanwhile, however, the thought-controllers are going ahead as fast as prudence allows, and the number of young people being subjected to their program is growing at an alarming rate.

Unless Americans who still have the capacity to think for themselves act soon, that capacity may be taken from them; certainly it will be taken from their children. Unless we upset Big Brother’s plans, 1984 may be here in less than nine years.

* * *

From Attack! No. 39, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/two-minutes-hate/feed/ 0
Falling Apart http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/falling-apart/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/falling-apart/#comments Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:00:05 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1648

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 23, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

AS WILLIAM PIERCE warned you in 1970, and as I’ve been warning you for decades, multiracial societies are not healthy societies. They inevitably rend themselves to bloody pieces, killing and torturing uncounted innocents along the way. The recent events in Ferguson, Missouri prove my point. It’s about time we heeded the warnings that the National Alliance — and Nature — are giving us, or our children will not have a future.

(ILLUSTRATION: In this video — made in the aftermath of the shooting of a Black man named Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson, a White policeman — a Black crowd shouts “Who do we want? Darren Wilson! How do we want him? Dead!”)

When huge, thuggish . . . → Read More: Falling Apart]]>

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 23, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

AS WILLIAM PIERCE warned you in 1970, and as I’ve been warning you for decades, multiracial societies are not healthy societies. They inevitably rend themselves to bloody pieces, killing and torturing uncounted innocents along the way. The recent events in Ferguson, Missouri prove my point. It’s about time we heeded the warnings that the National Alliance — and Nature — are giving us, or our children will not have a future.

(ILLUSTRATION: In this video — made in the aftermath of the shooting of a Black man named Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson, a White policeman — a Black crowd shouts “Who do we want? Darren Wilson! How do we want him? Dead!”)

When huge, thuggish Michael Brown, an aggressive 18-year-old Black male high on drugs and fresh from a convenience store robbery in which he physically tossed aside the store manager as if he were a toy, was stopped by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, he was ready to fight. Initially, Wilson just stopped to ask Brown and a companion to stop walking in the middle of the road, blocking traffic. If Brown were a rational human being, he would have peacefully and instantly complied no matter how much the order rankled him. Brown matched the description of the robber, though Wilson apparently didn’t know that at first. He had the stolen goods — cigars — on his person, and was apparently even brandishing them for all to see. To challenge an officer, even verbally, under such circumstances, was profoundly stupid. To physically scuffle with the officer over a non-issue like staying on the sidewalk, when unarmed and facing two armed men with a radio that could bring immediate backup, would have been insanely stupid even if he hadn’t just risked years in prison for a handful of smokes. But that’s exactly what he did. During the scuffle, in which Brown’s body was halfway inside the police car, Darren Wilson’s gun went off and Brown and his friend ran some distance off.

The accounts diverge at that point. Some say that Brown turned around and began to charge Officer Wilson, who felt in danger for his life. Others say that Brown was already injured and merely stumbled forward after turning around. But all agree that Darren Wilson then fired several rounds into Michael Brown, killing him. Photographs of the scene immediately after the killing show Brown face down, facing the police cruiser, with blood flowing from the front of his body only.

The killing of Michael Brown has set off days of protests, rioting, and looting by Blacks in the Ferguson area. Initially there was a military-style response from the police, complete with curfews,  gas attacks, armored vehicles, military-style assault gear, and the like. (Later, authorities instituted a “softer” approach, and even took a hands-off attitude toward looters, who were unmolested while they were filmed freely and gleefully “fighting the power” by breaking windows and stealing athletic shoes and electronics. A number of Blacks even questioned the wisdom of that police decision.)

The evidence suggests to me that Officer Darren Wilson’s belief — that he was about to be charged by an insane and violent thug whose goal was to wrest his gun away and use it against him — was a very reasonable belief. But exonerating Darren Wilson and the police in Missouri is not my goal. My goal is to show you reality — the reality that almost no one wants to face.

We are placing the police officer on the street in an almost impossible position. On the one hand, he is supposed to be totally “non-racist” and respect the civil rights of Blacks and other non-Whites with especial zeal, since they are the pampered pets of the multiracialist System that rules over us. We forbid him to take any notice of race in his enforcement efforts, lest he be guilty of “racial profiling.” Never mind that Blacks commit aggravated assault at 200 times the rate of Whites. Never mind that they commit interracial rape at tens of thousands of times the rate of Whites. He must never even allow the whiff of a suggestion that he uses such facts to find a perpetrator. On the other hand, no one knows more than a street-level policeman the impulsive, explosive, unreasoning, virtually insane violence-prone nature of a large number of low-IQ, high-testosterone young Black males. He knows that to err on the side of civil rights once a situation has escalated is to invite death. He knows that life is cheap on ghetto streets and that these thugs take each other’s lives by the dozens every month. He has a wife and kids and doesn’t want to die. He knows well the saying that it’s “better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.” If he’s smart and sufficiently corrupt, he knows to carry an untraceable “throwdown” gun at all times so he can claim his attacker was armed. He knows that fellow officers will often back up whatever story he tells, because they’re all part of the “Thin Blue Line,” risking their lives daily keeping order among the feral class. He knows that officers sometimes have to look out for each other — because no one else will if the System turns against them in a racially-charged case.

Street-level Blacks may have a low average IQ, but they are smarter than the average White lemming in a way, because they have figured all that out while most Whites have not. And they resent it, deeply. They see it as a war on young Black men, some 30 per cent. of whom are in trouble with the law in one way or another and who swell our jails and prisons by the millions.

Police departments may have lowered their standards so that more Blacks and other non-Whites can  enter their ranks, but they still do have at least some minimal requirements. And even these lowered standards and drop-dead easy tests still guarantee that White officers will usually outnumber non-White officers  — even in majority-Black communities like Ferguson, Missouri. And it’s a biological reality that no race takes well to being policed or ruled by another race. The protests in Ferguson are an expression of outrage against the killing of a single Black man by a White policeman, part of a pattern that seems obvious to the Blacks. But the shooting deaths of over 500 Blacks in Chicago, almost all of them killed by other Blacks — including 52 in a single weekend — pass with very little notice, to say nothing of protests or riots. Why the difference? I’d say it’s an unconscious biological drive to throw off the rule of your people by an alien tribe, in this case Whites. The killing of one of your own by an outsider you perceive as ruling over you is an outrage that eclipses even ten thousand “ordinary” murders. There’s one way in which Blacks are vastly superior to Whites. Their inborn racial consciousness is still strong, and they are not at all shy about expressing their outrage when they feel threatened, and striking back at their perceived oppressor. It’s about time that Whites started showing some outrage against the people who are killing them, and doing something intelligent about it.

The oligarchs, desperate to keep the forced multiracialist System in place so that White genocide and money-making can proceed as usual, have an answer to non-White crime — and that answer is the same answer they give to the alleged “terrorist” threat. First, they lie: They deny there is any racial dimension to the problem. Then they strip us of our ancient rights to privacy and freedom, give the police carte blanche to do almost anything to anybody, and spend billions militarizing the police forces across the nation, effectively turning America into an occupied country. They empower the corrupt and (justifiably) frightened officer to kill and get away with it even more than he did previously, fueling Black resentment and violence. The friendly officer on the corner is a quaint memory of the past. Today, even the law-abiding White folks fear and dread not only the police, but any contact whatsoever with the out-of-control “criminal justice system,” its jackbooted thugs, its corrupt courts, and its selectively-enforced labyrinth of laws that no one person could even read in a dozen lifetimes.

America is slowly becoming a prison camp writ large. We incarcerate more of our citizens than any nation on Earth, even more than the filthiest Third World dictatorships. And two huge symbiotic components of that equation are Black criminal behavior and police state tyranny, which seem to increase in lock step. What’s the answer to Black rage, Black “youth” unemployment (read: unemployability), and Black crime? More “education” and midnight basketball? Give me a break. More and more prisons, more and more laws, more and more “no knock” warrants, more and more militarized police on  every corner, more and more surveillance, more and more checkpoints and SWAT teams? Is that the way you want to live? Is that what you want for your children? And what about the things that go with that? What about more and more interracial sex and marriage? What about fewer and fewer White children to the point where our population plummets, we lose control to an even greater degree, and are at the mercy of those who hate us — and then it’s all over?

If we lived in a White society — and I remember the 90-plus per cent. White America of my youth — incidents like the Michael Brown killing would be almost unknown. Almost no White people are stupid enough to do all of the insane things Michael Brown did in just the last few minutes of his life. Almost no White youth ever has been crazy enough to challenge a police officer to the point of mortal combat with everything to lose and nothing to gain. But the African race has an average IQ between 70 and 80, and a huge percentage of them are below that range, literally in the retarded category by our standards. Impulsive and unreflective on average, they are dangerous, volatile, and unpredictable. Perhaps those traits, coupled with their high birthrate, conferred a survival advantage on the African savannah. Perhaps, given the freedom to naturally develop their own societies, in 100 years or centuries they would find their own uniquely African way of solving their serious social problems. I don’t claim to know. But I do know this: Their presence in our society is not compatible with our survival.

Many of them want their self-determination already. America’s founders were mostly of the opinion that Black slaves should be freed and then separated from us with 5,000 miles of ocean in between, and many American leaders since then, even including Abraham Lincoln, agreed. So the idea has a long and honorable tradition in this land.

There are some 38 million people of African descent in this country. The current national debt of the United States is 17 trillion dollars. If we paid each and every Black person in the United States $100,000 to return to Africa — that’s half a million dollars for a family of five, more than enough for a bountiful start there — it would only cost $3.8 trillion, less than a 23 per cent. increase. The national debt is now increasing at a rate of some $2.6 billion per day. At that rate, which we’re going to spend anyway, we could pay it all back in a little over four measly years. (And it would be even easier to separate from the Mestizo invaders, who are still withing walking distance of their home countries.) Wouldn’t it be an act of mercy and deep morality to give our children their own nation again? Doesn’t Nature teach us, as the ecologist Garret Hardin once said, that no two subspecies of the same species ever coexist peacefully in the same territory? Wouldn’t it be the ultimate act of wisdom and kindness to ourselves and others to separate what Nature has already separated by100,000 years of evolution?

The way America is going now is immoral and unsustainable. America is falling apart. There will be more riots. There will be more prisons, more laws, more killings by and of the police. Yes, they were able to put a temporary bandage on things in Ferguson by cutting out the local police and placing the Highway Patrol, led by a Black, temporarily in charge and having him sing hymns and denounce the local officers in Black churches and on television. But we are dealing with two peoples who simply do not want to live together — and, if they intend to survive, cannot live together — being forced to live together by the money-men who rule over us; the same money-men, members of the world’s wealthiest ethnic group, who are dispossessing us all with their mass immigration and usury con game. The only question is whether we will still be around when Nature reasserts herself and multiracial America disintegrates completely. We can make our survival more likely by doing everything we can now to build a new, racially healthy and racially conscious society, and hastening the day of the rotten System’s demise — hastening the day when we’ll sit in a position of strength at a negotiating table from which the money-men are excluded, and found a new nation in North America.

As much as we may sympathize with Darren Wilson in his moment of decision, we cannot cleave to a System that is committed to multiracialism and therefore incompatible with our survival. We cannot leave this to the police. The System and its police have abandoned us. From this day forward it’s all up to us.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/falling-apart/feed/ 0
Jewish Aggression, part 2 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-2/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-2/#comments Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:00:55 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1642 Putin_crimea

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 16, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

RIGHT NOW the Jewish power structure is very worried about Russia. In order to weaken Russia, and eventually install a pro-Jewish government there, the Jewish/US axis has engineered a coup d’etat in Ukraine.

Russians have historically been among the most Jew-aware people on Earth. A century ago the Imperial Russian government set many restrictions on Jewish activity there to prevent the exploitation of its citizens. When that government was overthrown and Russia was converted into the Soviet Union by the Jewish-dominated Bolsheviks in 1917, a period of overt Jewish rule took place in which millions of the best men and women in Russia were killed, imprisoned, and had their property stolen. Under Communism, “anti-Semitism” was . . . → Read More: Jewish Aggression, part 2]]> Putin_crimea

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 16, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

RIGHT NOW the Jewish power structure is very worried about Russia. In order to weaken Russia, and eventually install a pro-Jewish government there, the Jewish/US axis has engineered a coup d’etat in Ukraine.

Russians have historically been among the most Jew-aware people on Earth. A century ago the Imperial Russian government set many restrictions on Jewish activity there to prevent the exploitation of its citizens. When that government was overthrown and Russia was converted into the Soviet Union by the Jewish-dominated Bolsheviks in 1917, a period of overt Jewish rule took place in which millions of the best men and women in Russia were killed, imprisoned, and had their property stolen. Under Communism, “anti-Semitism” was a capital offense. (ILLUSTRATION: Faced with a Jewish-led coup on Russia’s border, Vladimir Putin took steps to annex Crimea and supports the resistance to the new Jewish puppet regime in Ukraine.)

When a non-Jew, Stalin, evidently an even more vicious player of power politics than his Jewish “comrades,” took control, he distrusted the tribally-focused Jews and proceeded to systematically reduce their power, killing quite a few of them in the process. When faced with the German invasion in 1942, and realizing that more than a few Russians and Ukrainians (Ukraine was then a part of the Soviet Union) were welcoming the Germans as liberators, Stalin ditched much of the Communist party line and embraced Russian nationalism. As a result the post-war Soviet Union became less and less Jewish-controlled and more and more under the control of Russian nationalists. Despite still paying lip service to Marxism, by the 1960s Russian leaders were openly opposed to Zionism, and Jews, no longer favored, were queuing up by the thousands to leave the country. By the late Soviet period, we had the then-premier of the USSR, Leonid Brezhnev, telling the British representative at a leadership summit “Prime Minister, the only important question facing us is: Will the white race survive?”

Fast forward to the late 1980s. The fall of Communism brought the Jewish oligarchs back in droves as they successfully schemed to obtain the factories, infrastructure, and natural resources of Russia for pennies on the dollar — much of which wealth they then looted and sent out of the country. This theft of the Russian people’s property caused an economic collapse and widespread suffering — and a large percentage of the Russian leadership and rank-and-file knew exactly who was responsible.

Enter Vladimir Putin. In 2000, after ousting the corrupt US/Jewish puppet Boris Yeltsin, Putin called a meeting between himself the almost entirely Jewish oligarchs, the billionaires who then dominated Russia just as other Jewish billionaires now dominate the West. As National Vanguard writer Justin Cowgill puts it:

“…Vladimir Putin gathered the 18 most powerful businessmen in Russia for an unprecedented discussion. This was the beginning of Putin’s campaign to undermine and reduce the power of a group of men who had made titanic fortunes from reforms designed to pave the way for a transformation of the Soviet planned economy into a free market economy. Russian President Vladimir Putin was rewriting the rules again. In no uncertain terms, Putin told Russia’s wealthiest that the jig was up, and he denounced them as creators of a corrupt state.

“A very small number of people — known now as the oligarchs— were able to concentrate a very large portion of the Russian people’s wealth into their hands through backroom deals and insider connections. Some who read this essay might condemn me because I point out the Jewish identity of the majority of these oligarchs. My reason for doing so is not to be unfair to Jews or to increase hostile feelings towards them. The reason is the simple fact that their Jewishness is a factor and must be taken into consideration when dealing with Russian politics. In Russia, everyone is aware of the Jewish identity of these men, and the acts of the Jewish oligarchs themselves have done quite a bit to increase anti-Jewish feelings there. The oligarchs themselves recognize this, as do many Russian Jews, who blame the oligarchs for giving Jews a bad name. In my opinion, it is much better to be honest about it than try to pretend that this factor doesn’t exist.”

Vladimir Putin, whatever he may believe personally, is forced by political necessity to praise the “heroic Soviet soldiers” who “saved the Motherland from Hitler.” Russia has quite as many “my country is always right” patriots as does America, where the fighters in the “good war” (which wasn’t good at all) must be praised in Politically Correct terms by all politicians or those politicians will face political suicide. Putin therefore presents himself as (and may even believe himself to be) an “anti-Fascist” even while he pursues essentially nationalist policies, simply because those are the policies that are objectively good for Russia, even going so far as to decry the low White birthrate and implement laws designed to increase it.

Though Putin speaks highly of Jews and disparagingly of anti-Semitism, though he keeps some pet Jews (with no trace of real power) in his circles, and though he has outlawed “extremism” as a versatile way of cementing his rule, he nevertheless has overthrown the Jewish oligarchs and taken away their power and much of their ill-gotten wealth. And in the last few years, every time the US/Israeli warmongers were attempting to start another war in the Middle East — first in Iran and then in Syria — Vladimir Putin checkmated them. For these things, the Jews cannot forgive him. They are very worried about a resurgent, nuclear-armed, and Jew-aware Russia — and any alliances she may build in an increasingly Jew-aware world.

So the Jewish power structure is most anxious that Russia be surrounded, its government overthrown, and a new “democracy” installed there. It is in pursuit of this goal that the Jews’ surrogate, the regime in Washington, is welcoming eastern European states into NATO, building missile bases there, and has now fomented a coup d’etat in Ukraine.

Since late last year, the Jewish power structure, through its puppet, the United States, was trying to overthrow the legitimate elected government of Ukraine, which had taken a position of moderate and positive engagement with Russia. Hundreds of millions of US taxpayer dollars were expended to recruit a group of supposedly “right wing fascist” mercenaries, who were carefully watched at all times by Jewish and US intelligence operatives, since they were not entirely trusted. These groups were politically and philosophically descended from the Ukrainians who joined the German forces in World War 2 to liberate their country from Communism. The understanding of the members of these groups ranged from full awareness that the Jews were responsible for the historical starvation and enslavement of Ukrainians — to jingoistic petty nationalists who blamed everything on “Russians.” Frustrated by political impotence and long-fooled by American anti-Communist rhetoric, they were ripe for exploitation. These mercenaries were provided with weapons and other military hardware. They provided much of the “muscle” for the overthrow of Ukraine’s president Viktor Yanukovych last February.

As pointed out by writer David Sims: As soon as the US-backed revolution succeeded, Jews began to be appointed to top government positions all over Ukraine. The new prime minister, Arseniy Petrovych Yatsenyuk, was Jewish. When Yatsenyuk‘s political coalition collapsed, he stepped down, but his successor, Volodymyr Borysovych Groysman, is also a Jew — as confirmed by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Even a number of provinces in Ukraine suddenly acquired Jewish governors — in a country that is 0.2 per cent. Jewish (estimates vary widely, by the way: is it 70,000 or 400,000?). That’s 500 Ukrainians for each Jew. What are the mathematical chances that so many governors and two successive prime ministers would be Jews, if this were not a Jewish coup?

The new government in Ukraine immediately sent all of Ukraine’s gold stocks to the Federal Reserve Bank in New York City — robbing the Ukrainian people of their wealth just as the Jewish oligarchs and their puppet Yeltsin did to Russia.

The revolutionary government then immediately made arrangements for military “aid and cooperation” with the regime in Washington — and took out large loans from the Jewish banking system to pay for military and other operations. The coup leaders then instituted new taxes on the Ukrainians to “pay back” these fictitious loans — plus interest. They then flagrantly stole about half of the pension funds of the now-impoverished Ukrainian people. You can be sure that soon, “foreign investors” (read: Jewish billionaires) will be allowed to establish newspapers and television networks in Ukraine and will tell the hapless Ukrainians how lucky they are to be able to go into debt and welcome millions of new immigrants from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.

Russia knows that, beyond the purpose of enslaving Ukraine, this coup has a deeper purpose: to encircle and conquer Russia. In response, the citizens of mostly-Russian Crimea have broken away from Ukraine and joined the Russian Federation. All over Ukraine, resistance fighters supported by Russia are battling for independence from the Jewish-led illegal government in Kiev. Ukraine has now become a stage for a racial and political drama of world-changing import.

The naive nationalists in Ukraine were fooled. They were tricked into fighting the wrong enemy. They were fooled by promises of support from their real enemy — the regime in Washington. They were fooled because they were petty nationalists, not racial-nationalists. I pray that some of them are racial-nationalists now. They were fooled — not unlike the way their grandfathers were fooled into thinking that the Russian foot soldiers who enforced the Jews’ orders to starve Ukraine were the real enemy. They didn’t see the big picture. The big picture of Jewish power ranged against the freedom and self-determination of all peoples — and against the very survival of our race itself. That’s the reality of what’s happening in Ukraine — that’s the reality of what’s happening all around the world today, from Cleveland to Gaza to Stockholm to Vladivostok: the Jewish war against our freedom, against our future, and against our very existence. And showing our people that reality is our highest duty.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-2/feed/ 10
Jewish Aggression, part 1 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-1/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-1/#comments Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:00:17 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1641 APTOPIX Mideast Israel Palestinians

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 9, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THERE ARE now two major atrocities being carried out by the Jews at present — I mean real war crimes, real people being killed, along with the usual intelligence agency disinformation and media lies to keep the populace supporting the killing and pointed at the wrong enemy. The Jewish power structure has this sort of thing down to a science now and they’re very good at it — but, once you see the pattern, you’re cured; you’ll see it every time. I’m talking about the Jewish coup in Ukraine and the resistance against it, which I talked about earlier this year — and got some bloody Hell for . . . → Read More: Jewish Aggression, part 1]]> APTOPIX Mideast Israel Palestinians

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 9, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THERE ARE now two major atrocities being carried out by the Jews at present — I mean real war crimes, real people being killed, along with the usual intelligence agency disinformation and media lies to keep the populace supporting the killing and pointed at the wrong enemy. The Jewish power structure has this sort of thing down to a science now and they’re very good at it — but, once you see the pattern, you’re cured; you’ll see it every time. I’m talking about the Jewish coup in Ukraine and the resistance against it, which I talked about earlier this year — and got some bloody Hell for — and the current massacre of Palestinians in Gaza which I talked about last week. (ILLUSTRATION: An Israeli bomb targets the civilian population of Gaza.)

In Gaza, the Jews are carrying out an open campaign of murdering civilians regardless of age or sex, blowing up schools, bombing apartment buildings, and cutting off food and medical supplies, using the latest powerful high-tech weapons given to them by the regime in Washington. These weapons are capable of not only huge destructive potential, but they are also capable of hitting their targets with a high degree of precision — which proves that the Jewish state’s consistent, ongoing use of them to kill schoolchildren, women, and innocent civilians guilty of nothing more than being Gentiles in Palestine, is deliberate.

The death toll there in the last month is now approaching 2,000, almost all of them Palestinian civilians. Hamas, on the other hand, uses its tiny scrap metal rockets, smaller than some fireworks, primarily against the Israeli military.

In the US media, largely owned or controlled by Jews, the slaughter in Gaza is presented to the boobs as “Israel defending itself” against “Hamas terrorism.” The killing of innocents by Israel is downplayed as “collateral losses” or never mentioned at all. In publications intended for a primarily Jewish readership, though, it’s a different story. Last week, The Times of Israel published a piece by Yochanan Gordon about Gaza titled “When Genocide is Permissible.” He puts it in the form of a question  — “If political leaders and military experts determine that the only way to achieve its goal of sustaining quiet is through genocide is it then permissible to achieve those responsible goals?” — but it is clear that, to Yochanan Gordon and a substantial ruling majority of Jews, the answer to that question is “yes.” The very title of his piece — which has now been yanked off line — screams that fact. Gordon and the Jewish leadership and many of the Jewish rank and file know exactly what they’re doing.

Make no mistake — genocide is in the offing. The Palestinians are an obstacle to Jewish goals in the Middle East. And they are nearly totally powerless, unarmed, and vulnerable. They have no state, no government of their own. They’re under Israeli control. They live in what amounts to an ever-shrinking open-air concentration camp. They’re like a beagle puppy with its throat bared, being ripped to shreds by a timber wolf.

Look at the map I’ll include in the text version of this broadcast — look at the ever-shrinking territory in which Palestinians are allowed to live for graphic proof of what I’m saying.

palestine-israel-map

Some people write me and ask: “Why should we care about what Israel is doing to Gaza? Aren’t Gazans ruled by Hamas, and aren’t they mostly Muslims and Arabs and therefore part of the problem, invading White countries and sponsoring acts of terror? Shouldn’t we just give Israel a ‘high five’ and hope they kill them all? Why should we care?”

There are several important reasons we should care:

1. The world, including growing parts of Europe, but especially the non-White world, is very aware of Jewish power, Jewish intentions, and the fact that the Jews rule over the Western world with the help of their Washington regime bully boys. There’s going to be a reckoning one day for this, and it’s important that we be on the right side of that reckoning. America’s bought-off European “allies” are more and more reluctant to toe the Jewish line and Russia is out-and-out sabotaging it (though talking as though it were not). This vector leads to a near-term future situation of the US and Israel versus everybody else. White Americans need to lead the charge away from that toxic death-trap, and telling the truth about the genocide of Palestinians moves us in that direction.

2. Awareness of the real nature of the Jewish mentality, and its dramatic contrast with the European mentality — with our mentality — is necessary for any understanding of the Jewish Question and the real issues that we face as a people. The fact that Jews projected their own hyper-hateful mentality and blood-lust onto White people, especially Germans and White Americans, calling us bigots, racists, killers, et cetera in their propaganda, is very telling. Seeing what the Jews are actually doing, right now, before our eyes in Gaza — and seeing how they brazenly lie about what they are doing in their media — has the potential to awaken more people in a single month than all the revisionist writings about World War 2 have in a decade.

3. It is in our interest to one day have a modus vivendi with the non-European world that includes mutual respect, thorough separation and self-determination, and cooperation to ensure that the parasitic race never gains a foothold in any nation again. That modus vivendi will not be based on the phony “multiracial democracy” paradigm that currently fuels Jewish power. There is no point in alienating those who will be part of making that new vision a reality — and there is no point in supporting the Jewish power structure that is literally killing us.

4. It is in our people’s nature to be kind and gracious to others — including even members of other species, to say nothing of other races, who have been harmed. This is especially true when the harm has been a result, at least partially, of our own acts or failures — and our failure to reject the Jewish parasitic organism, and our abject subservience to it, are egregious flaws which have grievously harmed millions of people. As long as such gestures do not imperil our survival or progress, we should honor our inner nature. There is wisdom in it.

5. The invasion of White living space, both here and in Europe, by the overwhelmingly non-White and culturally incompatible Muslims must be stopped and then reversed. This migration is fueled in large degree by the wars for Israel which the West has been waging in the Middle East, the corrupt puppet governments the Washington regime has set up there, and the depradations of the Zionist entity itself. It is within our power to stop these destructive wars and to end all American funding of Israel, without which the Zionist project would probably be doomed. Absent bombs falling on their cities, and absent the perpetual threat of CIA/Mossad coups or military intervention, it will be much easier to relocate Muslims to their home countries. The sooner we ditch Israel, the better this will work.

6. Accepting the reality of the Muslim threat to European civilization, it is quite insane to keep the immigration gates open to them while at the same time supporting the mass killing of the Muslims who are minding their own business and staying in their homelands. Our policy should be the exact reverse of what it is — no wars for Israel, no support for Israel’s genocidal acts, and zero tolerance for Muslims (or any non-Whites) who invade our nations. The Jews themselves engineered the opening of our borders, and part of the reason for that was to make their enemies, the Muslims of the Middle East, into our enemies too. In this way they could more easily get Americans and Europeans to make war on Muslims and destabilize and weaken Israel’s Middle Eastern enemies — while at the same time advancing the Jewish agenda of fewer and fewer White people in this world.

In short, opposing Israel’s massacre in Gaza is consistent with our best interests — and supporting it only strengthens those who are killing us and makes new enemies for us by the millions.

How close are we to total isolation — to the “US and Israel versus everybody else on Earth” paradigm? Very close. I told you last week about the recent UN vote to investigate Israel for war crimes violations in Gaza — only the US and Israel voted “no.” In 2008, the vote for another such resolution went 179 to 2, with only the US and Israel opposed. In 2013, another similar vote went 165 to 6 — with a few US-dependent island nations in Micronesia being the only backers of the Washington/Tel-Aviv axis. This pattern has been repeated hundreds of times, and it’s evident in places besides the UN too. Although under heavy Jewish pressure, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have exposed and protested the abuses of the Jewish state. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a group of nations striving to be independent of any major power bloc, has condemned Israel’s genocidal campaign against Palestinians in no uncertain terms and called for a boycott of the Jewish state. And the Non-Aligned Movement consists of 120 member nations comprising some 55 per cent. of the Earth’s population. Take away Jewish control of the US and Israel will become totally isolated — and able to be defanged. By spreading the truth about Gaza — and about the Jewish-led genocidal campaign against White people — we hasten the day of the defanging, and make it more likely to be a thorough one. It’s a joyful task.

So, for example, in 2008, the vote for one such resolution went 179 to 2, the whole world (always including Iran) in favor, and only the US and Israel opposed.In 2013, one vote went 165 to 6, – See more at: http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-solution-to-israel-palestine.html#sthash.Vof5ller.dpuf
So, for example, in 2008, the vote for one such resolution went 179 to 2, the whole world (always including Iran) in favor, and only the US and Israel opposed.In 2013, one vote went 165 to 6, – See more at: http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-solution-to-israel-palestine.html#sthash.Vof5ller.dpuf
So, for example, in 2008, the vote for one such resolution went 179 to 2, the whole world (always including Iran) in favor, and only the US and Israel opposed.In 2013, one vote went 165 to 6, – See more at: http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-solution-to-israel-palestine.html#sthash.Vof5ller.dpuf

The reason Jews have been expelled from dozens of countries throughout history is not because of some mysterious and contagious mental disease called “anti-Semitism,” a kind of “hate” that needs to be routed out so that decent people can live peacefully. No. Jews have been expelled from over 100 countries according to the historical record. When two former friends snub you, it may be something about them that’s the reason. But when 100 former friends snub you, the reason is something about you. Jews have made themselves unwanted for centuries by their own behavior — by corrupting leaders and officials, by their fraudulent “loans” to governments and citizens which draw off the wealth of the people into Jewish hands, by their perversion of the legal system, by their nepotism and favoritism.

In the last century, the Jewish power structure has metastasized and multiplied all of these crimes a hundredfold through their newly-gained control of the media of information, education, and entertainment. They have proceeded to use their unprecedented new power in the most arrogant and hateful ways imaginable — to literally wipe out anyone who opposes them. After 1945, they evidently decided that White people were to be exterminated wherever they lived on Earth, and have worked assiduously toward that goal, until today it is hardly concealed anymore. Around the same time, they realized the Zionist dream of a Jewish state, and began the process of driving out and extirpating the Palestinians whose land they had stolen.

Due to these egregious Jewish acts of hate and genocide, and also due to the free flow of information sparked by the rise of the Internet and alternative media outside of Jewish control, there is now a growing global awareness of Jewish power and its toxic effects on all societies. As this awareness grows, there will soon be no new hunting grounds for the parasitic power structure to infect when the world — not just one nation anymore — says “Enough!”

In my next program in this series on Jewish aggression, I’ll detail how the conflict in Ukraine is really a battle between the US/Jewish power structure and Russia. Be with me then.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-1/feed/ 2
The Gaza Holocaust http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-gaza-holocaust/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-gaza-holocaust/#comments Sat, 02 Aug 2014 12:00:56 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1637 Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of "Palestinian rockets."

Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of “Palestinian rockets.”

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 2, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

A HOLOCAUST — a word which means consumption and destruction by fire — and which also means a sacrifice, in this case a human sacrifice — is now taking place in Gaza. Matan Vilnai, Israel’s deputy defense minister and former Israeli general, used that very term when he let the truth slip out in 2008 and warned us that the continued resistance of Palestinians to the . . . → Read More: The Gaza Holocaust]]> Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of "Palestinian rockets."

Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of “Palestinian rockets.”

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 2, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

A HOLOCAUST — a word which means consumption and destruction by fire — and which also means a sacrifice, in this case a human sacrifice — is now taking place in Gaza. Matan Vilnai, Israel’s deputy defense minister and former Israeli general, used that very term when he let the truth slip out in 2008 and warned us that the continued resistance of Palestinians to the Israeli blockade of Gaza would bring “a bigger Holocaust” upon that troubled land. And now, six years later, that threat is being carried out with a vengeance.

Gaza is a tiny strip of land, 25 miles long and about 5 miles across, squeezed between the sea, Egypt, and Israel, and almost surrounded by the Jewish state. It is home to almost 2 million people, mostly Semitic Muslims, but with various religions and races, including Whites, among them. Many of these people are refugees pushed out of Jewish-controlled areas into this tiny enclave, now with their backs to the sea and nowhere else to go. It is one of the most densely-populated areas on Earth. They have been under a brutal Israeli blockade for years, and the US-paid Egyptians block them at that border too.

With minuscule exceptions, Palestinians cannot travel freely and are trapped in their tiny, shrinking enclaves. Gaza is totally blockaded, just like the few remaining Palestinians in the West Bank. These areas are often called Palestinian ghettos, but they more closely resemble concentration camps. The Jewish state is gradually taking over even the tiny slices of land they did not steal in 1948 and 1967. They are hemmed in by armed goons, barbed wire, endless “checkpoints,” and walls of steel and concrete that make the Berlin Wall look like a kid’s sand castle. Their access to their loved ones, to hospitals and sources of food and water, is being destroyed and their homes are being bulldozed to make room for Jewish “settlers” — and now their bodies are being blown into bloody pulp and they are being burned alive in a real holocaust before our very eyes.

In just the last few weeks, the Jewish state, using high-tech drones, missiles, and bombs — all of them provided by the Washington regime, all of them paid for by you — has slaughtered over 1500 men, women, and children in Gaza, about 85 per cent. of them civilians. (In constrast, in the same time period, 63 Jewish soldiers were killed — and two civilians. Clearly Hamas is targeting Israeli troops — and Israel is targeting Palestinian civilians.) By the time you read or hear these words, the death toll will be even higher. The Jews have killed — in just the last few weeks — nearly one in every thousand Gazans. That’s the equivalent of 250,000 Americans being killed relative to our population, about five times the number we lost in the entire two-decade-long Vietnam War. In just one month! It’s the equivalent of one hundred 9/11 attacks.

Israel’s ostensible reasons for launching this holocaust are 1) the three Jewish teenagers supposedly killed last month by Hamas, a group which constitutes the elected government of Gaza, and 2) the rockets launched by militants in Gaza into Israel. The first reason was shown to be untrue when it was revealed that a rogue Palestinian group known to regularly act contrary to Hamas policies was involved. Such groups are also known to be heavily monitored and infiltrated by Israeli intelligence, causing some commentators to suspect an Israeli false flag operation, sacrificing their own children in an effort to build public support for the long-planned massacre of Gazans. Whatever the case may be, it’s clear that the Hamas government had nothing to do with the deaths. As to the second reason — the rockets launched periodically by militants into Israel from Gaza — no one denies that they exist. But Gazans have been fighting back against severe oppression, including decades of outright Israeli military occupation, for many years. Their “rockets” are small weapons — about four and a half inches in diameter — and even Israeli Defense Minister Director-General Yaakov Toran said in 2005 that they “are more a psychological than physical threat.” In fact, so few Israelis have been killed by these low-tech fireworks-style “rockets” that Israeli propagandists have had to inflate the death toll by including nearby heart attack deaths in the casualty figures.

Israel is not only lobbing US-made phosphorus firebombs into civilian neighborhoods and apartment buildings, but they are also targeting schools. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) operates some 170 schools in Gaza, and many of these are now also being used as shelters for some of the 117,000 Gazans made homeless by the Israeli attacks. These UN schools alone have been bombed on six different occasions, with several schools being destroyed.

One Israeli goal is to force the almost 2 million Palestinians in Gaza even further toward the sea — creating a no-man’s land that shrinks the already-tiny Gaza strip by 40 per cent., forcing tens of thousands of people out of their homes to create a 1.8-mile “buffer zone” along the entire border. That’s a lot of territory when you consider that Gaza is less than four miles wide along much of its length. This bloody campaign to drive people from their homes and businesses, destroying their lives and killing any who resist, is an openly-announced goal of the Israeli regime.

The US Congress has already passed an “emergency aid package” to give Israel additional hundreds of millions of dollars (in addition to the billions they already receive from the US each year) to help the Jewish state slaughter more innocents, and Senator Harry Reid is reportedly working on another bill to give the Jewish state even more “emergency help.”

It’s eerie watching the Israeli bombs fall on Gaza via the live, unedited feed from Russia Today (RT). (There are other live feeds as well; sometimes the RT feed is used for other purposes, but most of the time lately it has been focused on Gaza.) As the cameraman pans and zooms, you see a very realistic high-definition picture that fills your screen of a very crowded city going on about the business of life — while random destruction is meted out to apartment buildings, homes, offices, and city streets — and the high fidelity sound being transmitted lets you hear the deep impact of the firebombs and other weapons of mass destruction being unleashed on that peaceful city.

In the written version of this program, I’ll provide some video recordings from these news sources so you can see for yourself what I saw. As you can see, the Israelis have targeted ambulances carrying the wounded (and hospitals), and murdered an unarmed man who was merely looking for his loved ones — or their remains — among the rubble of their homes:

And the attacks of the Israelis on these civilian targets are wildly disproportionate to any force the Palestinians have ever used against the Israeli military:

Right now, 167,000 men, women, and children are homeless in Gaza. Electric power is off for over 90 per cent. of the people there. Food and perishable medical supplies are spoiling and running out and the blockade and the attacks makes resupply difficult.

Hamas has a few largely ineffective weapons. But the vast majority of the Palestinians are unarmed. Their response to the savage firebombing of their homes and neighborhoods is to run away — to hug their surviving family members — and to cry. Far different from the image of the “masked terrorists” the Jewish-controlled media in the US and Britain vend to us 24 hours a day.Fox News has even been so brazen as to show video of people fleeing in terror from incoming Israeli missiles, with the subsequent carnage and dead, mutilated bodies — while the voice-over from the Fox anchor or anchorette tells us about “Hamas rockets,” giving the viewer the completely false impression that he is seeing Israeli victims and Palestinian attackers — a complete inversion of reality.

In Israel, Jews have taken to bringing lawn chairs and refreshments to high vantage points overlooking Gaza and laughing and cheering as Israeli firebombs and missiles and tanks kill the hated Palestinians and their children in their homes, schools, and hospitals below. One of these Jews, who speaks in the video I’ll embed below, states that bombing Palestinians is “the only solution” and that the entire city should be wiped out. This is a truly sick, deranged, and mentally ill people.

The strange mentality of the Jews has a long history, and can be seen in the genocidal ravings that make up a large part of their “holy book,” the Torah, from which I excerpt this passage:

“When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy…You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…”

The Torah — which Christians call the “Old Testament” — is full of such bloody insanity.

And what did the US Senate — and the US House — do in response to the horrific slaughter in Gaza? They appropriated hundreds of millions of dollars to help fund it. And they passed two resolutions heartily approving of it. And these resolutions passed unanimously. Reflect on that fact for a moment, and then tell me you still think there is hope for any kind of meaningful change from the political system as it exists in this country.

But there is hope. All over the world, millions of people are awakening to the destructive acts and agenda of the Jewish power structure. Faced with the holocaust in Gaza, the UN overwhelming passed a resolution calling for an investigation of Israel’s acts as war crimes. Only one nation voted against the resolution — the United States of America. Even America’s coerced “allies” in Europe, beholden to the same power structure, would not dare face their own people if they voted against it, and merely abstained. In the Third World, the educated classes have known for decades the toxic nature of Jewish power, and in Europe, ravaged by the Jewish money power, resistance is building and Jew-aware parties are taking seats in government. The outrageous, genocidal behavior of the Jewish state and of Jewish institutions worldwide is providing an education to all who see it with open eyes. Right now relatively few Americans have their eyes open, but, with the rise of alternative media, that is changing.

It isn’t only the Palestinians who have lost the right to exist. So have we. So have all nations who come under the thumb of the US/Israel/banking/media complex, which destroys every nation that it touches with its poisoned claws. And millions upon millions are awakening to that fact, as the Jewish establishment well knows.

To those of you who are hearing my voice for the first time, investigate for yourself — find out what is really happening in Gaza — and then come back here and find out what is being done by the same gang to our people — and to all the peoples of the West. To those of you who already know the truth of what I’m saying, spread the word far and wide and awaken all those who are still capable of independent thought. There is no better use of your life and your time. To those of you having a moment of cognitive dissonance because you’re hearing an alleged “White racist” championing the Palestinians’ right to exist, I say: Open your mind. Understand this: There are two basic ways to organize the world. One is the coercive way, the way of empire and oligarchy, which always involves one people or a plutocracy ruling over a multiracial, multicultural empire from which no one is allowed to secede. The other way is the way of nationalism, self-determination, and freedom, under which every people which considers itself to be a people is able to live under its own government. Allowing the Jewish oligarchs to continue to rule over us will eventually kill us as dead as the bombed-out people of Gaza. It will terminate forever our genetic and cultural heritage. And we must do whatever is necessary to prevent that from happening. That is the purpose of the National Alliance.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-gaza-holocaust/feed/ 3
Casting Off the Chains http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/casting-off-the-chains/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/casting-off-the-chains/#comments Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:00:25 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1626 OnwardAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of July 26, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

We are held down by an irrational concentration on the botched and the stupid. Conscious upward evolution has the potential to liberate us in every realm of life.

by Kevin Alfred Strom (pictured, right, in a recent meeting with National Alliance director Will Williams)

A FRIEND OF MINE has a wife who is dying of cancer. While she was undergoing cancer surgery, she suffered a severe stroke. It’s a tragedy on many levels. Not only is her life impaired by the ravages of chemotherapy, but the stroke has partially paralyzed her and made it difficult for her to communicate. But the greatest tragedy of all is that her husband can find no one who will provide her with the . . . → Read More: Casting Off the Chains]]> OnwardAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of July 26, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

We are held down by an irrational concentration on the botched and the stupid. Conscious upward evolution has the potential to liberate us in every realm of life.

by Kevin Alfred Strom (pictured, right, in a recent meeting with National Alliance director Will Williams)

A FRIEND OF MINE has a wife who is dying of cancer. While she was undergoing cancer surgery, she suffered a severe stroke. It’s a tragedy on many levels. Not only is her life impaired by the ravages of chemotherapy, but the stroke has partially paralyzed her and made it difficult for her to communicate. But the greatest tragedy of all is that her husband can find no one who will provide her with the therapies she needs.

My friend is a professional engineer and has been a close student of medical innovations and life extension therapies for many decades. He knows more than many physicians do about the latest life-saving techniques. He knew that his wife needed hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and needed it fast, after her stroke. He knew that Vitamin C infusion therapy had no bad side effects — unlike big-Pharma’s drugs — and very promising results in studies involving patients with the same kind of cancer as his wife. And he had medical power of attorney and so he should have been in complete charge of the treatments given to his beloved one.

But he could get none of the treatments he wanted for her. Not at the hospital where she was staying. Not at any of the hospitals in his state. And in her condition, long distance travel was not an option. Not only could he not get the treatments he knew she needed or could benefit from, but she was given drugs and treatments against his express wishes (some of them with terrible side effects and a very bad track record for results). Then, to top it all off, the doctors (at least one of the leading figures being a Jew) conspired to rend asunder the trust between man and wife and get her, while in a very confused state of mind, to reject her husband’s help and advice and nullify her medical power of attorney — a neat trick which rendered my friend helpless while the medical establishment packed her off to a hospice after selling her a lot of inappropriate drugs at absurdly high cartel prices.

I am sure that some of you know the reason this happened. The reason the government regulators, the medical establishment, the insurance companies, and Big Pharma have such a hammerlock on what therapies we’re allowed to have is because we “have to be protected” from quack doctors and quack cures. Once the government and the megacorporations and the lawyers get hold of those powers, of course, money and corruption come into play and there’s a lot more going on than protecting the gullible.

But the reason I brought up this tragic example of our lack of medical freedom is to show you how much we’re losing by catering, always catering to and basing decisions on, the needs of the lowest, stupidest, and least capable among us. Because some people are incapable of making intelligent decisions about their health care, and would gladly fork over their life savings to snake oil salesmen, all of us must have all of our decisions made for us by bureaucrats, legislators, and insurance executives, and none of us have freedom to choose our own treatment anymore, even in matters of life and death. We are bound by chains, even the best and most well-informed among us,  basically because stupid people need chains to keep them from killing themselves. Innovation is stifled. New ideas take decades to get to the people who need them, many of whom don’t live that long as a result. Brilliant minds who can’t stand red tape and bureaucracy leave — or never enter — the field.

Now probably, at this stage of our evolution, we need some kind of regulation to keep wicked liars from becoming millionaires by telling the rubes that they can cure cancer with holy water or the like. I’m not arguing that we don’t. What I am arguing is that the lives and the liberty of the best among us — those who would never fall for the snake oil salesmen — would be greatly enhanced if we could operate under a different set of rules. And I am arguing that we have too many rubes. And I am especially arguing that our stage of evolution isn’t high enough. Imagine if we were more evolved. Imagine if everyone in our society were as intelligent and well-informed — and of as good character — as my engineer friend. What a different world it would be.

There are many other areas in our society where the best among us are held in chains because of the presence of the inferior — including inferior races. Look at education. Because we’ve accepted the false notions that “we’re all equal” and that everyone is entitled to a college education, we’ve dumbed down admission requirements to the point where huge numbers of university freshman have to take remedial courses in reading and basic mathematics. Our high schools, afraid to fail Blacks and Mestizos or be accused of “discrimination” and losing their federal funding, graduate increasingly ignorant and even illiterate students. It’s been shown that many of today’s university seniors have difficulty passing high school tests from 50 or 75 years ago. In such an environment, what happens to the best students? They languish, they are bored, they’re ignored, and never receive the attention and encouragement that they need. This is increasingly true as the current equalitarian policy-makers gut programs for gifted and advanced students. And huge numbers of today’s teachers are themselves products of a dumbed-down “Afiirmative Action” education system. What could they possibly offer our best young minds? Less than nothing. Is it any surprise that so many of our best young people end up alienated, anti-social, and self-destructive?

Now imagine a world in which the very best and greatest teachers you ever had in high school and college were the norm. Imagine a world in which the all the students were at least what we would call “gifted” now. Imagine a world without Blacks and Mestizos in our schools and everything that implies. Imagine every class able to teach the most advanced concepts at a pace suitable for our best young minds — and imagine every graduate having truly mastered the body of knowledge that currently exists in every basic field and standing ready to add to that body of knowledge, instead of struggling to pronounce words of more than two syllables and unable to give the answer to 4= 2 + x.

Look at the insane number of laws that have proliferated in our society. America has gone from a bastion of freedom and liberty in which a man was free to speak or act in any way as long as he didn’t harm the race, the nation, or his neighbors — to the most oppressively over-regulated society this side of Hoxha’s Albania. You can’t turn around without bumping into some law or regulation you have to obey. Consider just one of our larger law libraries in this sad country, consisting of several huge rooms, crowded with shelves and with the shelves stuffed full of books, each of which contains hundreds or thousands of pages of tiny type. I ask you: Is it possible in one hundred lifetimes to even read all of the laws we are supposed to obey? Be honest. That’s crazy. It’s insane. I doubt that there is any one man who has even read, much less carefully considered and understood, all of the tax laws alone in this country. Yet the regime can send you to prison for “breaking” them, and “ignorance of the law is no excuse.”

It’s been estimated that each of us unwittingly commits three felonies a day. Laws as many as these have to be selectively enforced, or they cannot be enforced at all, so having so many laws gives the lie to the old claim that America is “a nation of laws, not of men.” (Meaning that you cannot be prosecuted because a rich man or an official doesn’t like you.) But, boy oh boy, that certainly is not true today. When anyone, upon investigation, can be found to have broken several obscure laws this week alone, then anyone the oligarchs or officials don’t like can be put in chains whenever they so choose.

And the plain fact of the matter is that the excuse for most of these laws is that people can’t be trusted to do right. They do stupid things. They do immoral things. They must be watched. They must do everything they are told to do. And they must not do anything that are not told to do. It’s easy to get the mob to clamor for protection. When you live in a society consisting of people of high character and intelligence, however, far fewer laws are needed. You are freed from so many dangers, therefore you can be freed of so many chains.

The answer, as I said before, is better people. More highly-evolved people. And the science of ensuring that each generation is better than the one that preceded it — the only way to the better world I’ve been talking about — is called eugenics. It means “of good birth.” The basic problems are the presence of alien, and less-evolved, races in our society; and the fact that, under current social conditions, the worst specimens of our own race tend on average to have the most children, and the best tend to have the fewest. The society the National Alliance intends to build would be racially based, like any healthy society, and so the other races would have their own societies and would not be present in our living space. And we would have a positive, healthy, and Nature-based eugenics program to ensure that each succeeding generation would be of higher evolutionary grade, of higher racial quality, than the one before.

Far from being “evil,” eugenics is actually the most beneficial and humane discipline ever devised by the mind of man. In fact, eugenics is the only viable long-term solution to all our social problems. As I said on this program in 1993, eugenics is the only way to a better world. Science has shown us that genetic structure is by far the greatest determinant of intelligence, character, and behavior. Unfortunately, those with the best genetic inheritance tend to have the fewest children — and those with the lowest intelligence, lowest potential, and worst character tend to have the most children. This leads to a genetic deterioration of the race that gets worse with each passing generation. No amount of education, no laws, and no increase in the power of the police or of the state can counter this degeneration.

Eugenics is simply the idea that we should humanely use our social policies to encourage as much as possible the birth of children with good genetic qualities and to discourage as much as possible the birth of children with poor genetic qualities. Some of this could be done with the more advanced techniques of modern reproductive science, such as allowing surrogate mothers to carry genius-level children in large numbers or encouraging the voluntary use of egg banks and sperm banks to propagate the best children that our race can possibly produce.

But most eugenics would be simple and basic and just good common sense: We should not be subsidizing the birth of ever more 70-IQ underclass gangbangers through welfare payments to crack whore mothers and the like. We White Americans must build a White society, so, unlike today, none of the births in our living space will be of future Crips and Bloods. And, even among our own race, the welfare system and the tax system should be reorganized to discourage in every possible way the birth of those with poor genetic inheritance. This could be done by linking the perennial underclass’s benefits — and mitigation of criminal sentencing — to sterilization or emigration.

And there could be endless variations on the theme of tax deductions, tax credits, and interest-free loans extended to families of good genetic inheritance to encourage them to give the priceless gift of their children — most of whom will grow up into highly-evolved creative problem-solvers — to our society. How can that be “evil”?

It’s not evil. It’s really the ultimate good. After a few generations of eugenics — after a few generations of ten times the number of problem-solvers and culture-creators being born, and a tenth of the number of problem-makers and culture destroyers being born, we would have a very different nation indeed. And a very different world. An infinitely better world.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/casting-off-the-chains/feed/ 3
New William Pierce Video: Out of the Darkness http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/new-william-pierce-video-out-of-the-darkness/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/new-william-pierce-video-out-of-the-darkness/#comments Thu, 24 Jul 2014 02:52:48 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1624

by Dr. William L. Pierce National Alliance General Convention, 1983; recorded and transcribed by Kevin Alfred Strom; video by Aryan Legacy

TWO THOUSAND years ago the poet Ovid wrote that night is a sadder time than day. I know that’s always been true for me. When discouraging thoughts come, it’s usually at night.

Actually, I’m pretty cheerful most of the time. But it used to be that, occasionally, when I was working alone in the National Office late at night, a black thought would come into my mind — always the same thought. It was that there’s not enough time to do what I must do. It was that something will happen to me before the Alliance is strong enough to survive and continue growing without me.

Then a feeling of desperation would come over me and I would have . . . → Read More: New William Pierce Video: Out of the Darkness]]>

by Dr. William L. Pierce
National Alliance General Convention, 1983; recorded and transcribed by Kevin Alfred Strom; video by Aryan Legacy

TWO THOUSAND years ago the poet Ovid wrote that night is a sadder time than day. I know that’s always been true for me. When discouraging thoughts come, it’s usually at night.

Actually, I’m pretty cheerful most of the time. But it used to be that, occasionally, when I was working alone in the National Office late at night, a black thought would come into my mind — always the same thought. It was that there’s not enough time to do what I must do. It was that something will happen to me before the Alliance is strong enough to survive and continue growing without me.

Then a feeling of desperation would come over me and I would have to fight off an almost overpowering urge to do whatever I could to speed things up — to go back to the quick and dirty methods that I had tried in past years. Now, I didn’t yield to that urge because I had already found out the hard way that the quick and dirty methods don’t yield lasting results. I knew that we had only one shot at winning this war we’re in, and it has to be a good shot. We can’t miss. We can’t build something that is flimsy or false. We have to do it exactly right, or it won’t work. But doing it right sometimes seems painfully slow. And it would be futile, self-defeating, if in my care to do it right I didn’t get enough of it done so that others could carry on before I was overtaken by disease, or by an accident, or even by an assassin.

Now, in a sense, this black thought which used to creep up on me late at night, was the thought of death, the fear of death. We’re all mortal. We all know that we have to die — though no one wants to. The way we’ve dealt with this fear of death in the past has been to identify ourselves with something immortal, to think of ourselves as part of something in which we can continue to live after our bodies are gone. Patriots have identified themselves with their countries — often so strongly that they were almost eager to die in order to advance the interests of their fatherland: the land of their forefathers. It was easier to be patriotic, of course, when our country still belonged to us, when we were able to associate a particular village, or farmstead, with our ancestors for several generations back; when the graves of our fathers, and grandfathers, and great great great grandfathers, were around us — and so were their works: the fields that they had cleared, the buildings that they had built, the trophies they gathered in their lifetimes, the records they left behind them. We could easily fit ourselves into the pattern of generations and centuries, and be content in the knowledge that our own works, and trophies, and records, would also be preserved, and would become part of the lives of our descendants. We would fight anyone who threatened that pattern. We would die in order to preserve it, so that we wouldn’t be forgotten, so that we would always have a little niche in the memory of all the generations which were to come.

Today the whole pattern has been smashed to bits and ground into the mud. We’ve lost our roots, our sense of belonging, our connection with the past and with the future. We can’t count on being remembered. In fact, if current trends continue for a few more years, and Martin Luther King’s dream of “full equality” is realized, then our grandchildren won’t even know who their fathers are, much less their grandfathers. So patriotism provides little comfort for mortals these days.

And it’s no wonder that many people are searching for something else, besides their countries, to identify with. For me that something has long been the whole universe. My life is part of its life and I know that the larger life of the evolving universe will go on no matter what. That’s my religion, or part of it. But it’s a rather impersonal religion, and on dark, lonely nights at the office, it does not by itself provide enough comfort to keep dark moods away. There is in all of us, I believe, a need for a more personal identification with something immortal. We need more than merely the knowledge that each of us is a momentarily glowing spark of individual consciousness in a conscious cosmos — a cosmos which, even as its overall brightness grows, witnesses the winking on and then out again of billions of individual sparks.

We need, in addition to that, the knowledge that we as individuals make a difference. We need the knowledge that we can make a mark on the world through our own efforts, and that the mark we make will last. We need to know that our personal contribution to the life of the universe will be remembered after we are gone — that others will add to it and help it grow — so that ten generations from now, or even a hundred generations, the record will still be there. There will be someone then who will be able to say: Back during the great struggle, ages ago, when the race nearly perished, there were a few men and women who were on the right side; a few who did what had to be done; a few who made the difference; and even today, centuries later, we remember their names and their works.

That’s the sort of knowledge which is able to overcome the fear of death, the sort of knowledge which gives each of us a personal connection to the infinite. It’s true that the self-consciously evolving cosmos, of which I am a part, is the ultimate reality. But it’s also true that the Alliance provides my personal connection with that ultimate reality. The Alliance is the means by which I, and many others, can make individual contributions to the future. The Alliance not only magnifies our efforts — gives us leverage that we wouldn’t have if we were working on our own — but it also provides a safe repository for our contributions, makes them into lasting contributions. And as it keeps them from being washed away in the growing tide of chaos on the outside, it keeps them in place long enough for another member to add his own contribution on top of ours, and then for another to build on top of both, and so on.

For example, if one of our members writes a book which is a valuable contribution to our overall effort — say, member William Simpson and his Which Way Western Man? — then he doesn’t have to worry that it will immediately disappear into oblivion when he dies, or is no longer able to promote it himself. He knows that even after he is gone, the Alliance will remain to continue distributing his book, continue reprinting it, magnifying its effect, until another member is able to build on that work with a book of his own, which advances the Cause still further.

That, of course, is the theory. The trouble is it has been a pretty shaky theory in the past, primarily because far too much was dependent on a single individual: me. Who could be sure whether I would last from one month to the next? Who could know whether or not all of the hard work, and money, and time, he was putting into the Alliance would be wasted? Because I might, at any minute, give up and announce that I was tired of butting my head against the wall, and that would be the end of it.

From my own viewpoint things were a little different, but still not particularly encouraging. I knew that I wouldn’t give up, but I could see others giving up all around me. It seemed that every time we would manage to struggle ahead a step, we would slide three quarters of a step back again. And I knew that we were not strong enough to keep going at all if I quit, which meant that I had to hang on and keep on pushing things forward until we reached a critical point where I could stand aside and things would keep moving without me, because there would be the right people, ready and able to take over all of my responsibilities. My concern was that nothing must happen to me before we reached that point. From a purely selfish standpoint, I didn’t want my spark to wink out without making a difference, and the black thought that kept coming to me late at night was that I was losing the race, that I couldn’t reach that critical point soon enough.

It was never a matter of quitting. I never worried that all of my hard work was being wasted in the sense that I could have been spending my time more enjoyably. From the time I started, there was only one thing that I could do — even if there were no hope at all of winning. I couldn’t stop even if I had wanted to. Nevertheless, whether I was working willingly or unwillingly, the occasional late-night feeling that it was all for nothing was quite distressing.

Fortunately, daylight generally had the effect of dispelling my gloom, and so I was able to present a cheerful face to the world. Now, the only reason that I’m making this confession to you is that my black thoughts are a thing of the past. If I still had them, I certainly wouldn’t tell you about them. But the fact is that I have not been gloomy about our prospects for at least the last year– and I still work late, alone, in the National Office at night. What’s made the difference is the results of our recruiting during the past year.

For the task that the Alliance must accomplish, quality is everything. In the last year we have been winning commitments from people who have what it takes to get the job done. Attendance at our convention this year may be up only forty per cent. over last year, but the number of people in the Alliance who have what it takes has doubled. We’re finally getting the good ones now substantially faster than we’re losing them — and, really, we’ve just started.

For years, we were bogged down in the childishness — the make believe — the buffoonery — the stupidity — of the right wing. That’s no one’s fault but my own, of course — because I knew nothing else but the right wing approach. I really thought that populism, an appeal to the dispossessed, an appeal to the so-called White masses, was the way to proceed, the way to gain strength.

And I was often in despair, when I finally realized that it wasn’t; when I saw how few people we were winning in whom I could have any confidence at all. Changing our approach was difficult. It meant breaking some bad habits that we had acquired. It meant alienating a certain clientele that we had attracted, whose continued support I was then convinced that we really needed.

But we did change. And, within the first six months, I could begin to see a real improvement. The right wing kooks stopped coming around, and in their place came people that I could be proud of — people in whom I could have confidence. That’s when the late night despair disappeared.

We have a long, a difficult, and a dangerous road ahead of us yet. There will be many casualties along the way. We’ll make more mistakes, certainly, and we’ll have to correct ourselves many times. We may yet be overwhelmed by the enemy, or we may be too slow and be overtaken by circumstances — but I’m now convinced that we can reach our goal.

I can foresee the time now when it will no longer make any difference what happens to me, because there will be others who will keep the spark glowing, and will make it grow brighter and brighter with each passing year. I foresee immortality for all of those who have nourished the spark and who will nourish it in the future. I see more people — like you who are here with me tonight — joining our Cause every month, and every week. I foresee a growth, and a strength, and a capability for the Alliance, much greater than we have ever known before. I foresee it not in the distant future any longer, but in the time immediately ahead of us, as you go forth tomorrow and recruit for our Cause other men and women like yourselves. Thank you.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/new-william-pierce-video-out-of-the-darkness/feed/ 0
Newly-Released Speeches by William L. Pierce http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/newly-released-speeches-by-william-l-pierce/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/newly-released-speeches-by-william-l-pierce/#comments Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:17:52 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1622 William Luther Pierceby Michael Olanich

IN REMEMBRANCE of Dr. William Pierce (pictured), founder of the National Alliance, on the 12th anniversary of his death, I have made available for streaming and download two (never before released in the digital domain) National Alliance lectures by Dr. Pierce from 1976.

The first is Fundamentals for Victory, recorded on October 24th, 1976, of which Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: “In this speech, Dr. Pierce explains why the strategy for success of the Alliance must be uncompromising. He disposes of the idea that we, like certain well-known mailing list operators, should pretend to be “conservative” or “populist” and take an ad hoc, issue-oriented approach in our publications and pronouncements…. [B]y using the wrong approach, we will attract the wrong kind of people.”

The second is Change versus Progress, delivered on . . . → Read More: Newly-Released Speeches by William L. Pierce]]> William Luther Pierceby Michael Olanich

IN REMEMBRANCE of Dr. William Pierce (pictured), founder of the National Alliance, on the 12th anniversary of his death, I have made available for streaming and download two (never before released in the digital domain) National Alliance lectures by Dr. Pierce from 1976.

The first is Fundamentals for Victory, recorded on October 24th, 1976, of which Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: “In this speech, Dr. Pierce explains why the strategy for success of the Alliance must be uncompromising. He disposes of the idea that we, like certain well-known mailing list operators, should pretend to be “conservative” or “populist” and take an ad hoc, issue-oriented approach in our publications and pronouncements…. [B]y using the wrong approach, we will attract the wrong kind of people.”

The second is Change versus Progress, delivered on December 5th, 1976. Mr. Strom tells us that in this wide-ranging talk, “Dr. Pierce explores the impact of societal change…. We live in an era when technological progress is being increasingly offset by the declining quality of an alienated, rootless, multiracial population. By becoming a true racial and spiritual community… the National Alliance can become a working model for the new White society to come.”

Simply click on a link to stream a speech; right click to download and save it.

Fundamentals for Victory Change versus Progress

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/newly-released-speeches-by-william-l-pierce/feed/ 1
William Pierce: Cosmotheism’s Hard Way http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/william-pierce-cosmotheisms-hard-way/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/william-pierce-cosmotheisms-hard-way/#comments Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:00:12 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1618 spiral-galaxy

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 19, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

This week marks 12 years since the death of my teacher, mentor, and friend William Pierce. It’s a time to reflect on his legacy — and our responsibility. This program is partly based on my 2013 appreciation of Dr. Pierce, Tomorrow’s Religion, which I composed before restarting American Dissident Voices and which, in updated form, deserves to be a part of the ADV legacy. In today’s program I will be contrasting Dr. Pierce’s “hard way” — his Cosmotheist way — of building a new White community with the “quick fix” issue-oriented approach of other race-based groups, who don’t seek to fundamentally change society’s basic assumptions and beliefs.

* * *

WILLIAM LUTHER PIERCE, even a . . . → Read More: William Pierce: Cosmotheism’s Hard Way]]> spiral-galaxy

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 19, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

This week marks 12 years since the death of my teacher, mentor, and friend William Pierce. It’s a time to reflect on his legacy — and our responsibility. This program is partly based on my 2013 appreciation of Dr. Pierce, Tomorrow’s Religion, which I composed before restarting American Dissident Voices and which, in updated form, deserves to be a part of the ADV legacy. In today’s program I will be contrasting Dr. Pierce’s “hard way” — his Cosmotheist way — of building a new White community with the “quick fix” issue-oriented approach of other race-based groups, who don’t seek to fundamentally change society’s basic assumptions and beliefs.

* * *

WILLIAM LUTHER PIERCE, even a dozen years after his death, has proven impossible to ignore. Despite his decade-long absence, he is inspiring an ever-growing number of White men and women who are rediscovering his ideas, talking about them, republishing his works, and beginning new institutions that will embody his ideals — the newly-revived National Alliance and this radio program among them.

William Pierce transformed the White resistance, turning us away from hopelessly outdated and sterile conservatism; away from the insanity of “preserving” an old order which didn’t even exist anymore; away from the madness of reforming an enemy-designed System; away from the delusion that we, with our race’s ever-dwindling percentage of an ever more befuddled population, can vote our way out of extinction; and turning us toward secession, revolution, and an entirely new society.

The Jewish power structure and its adjuncts, the media and governmental establishments of the West, still invoke his name. Though he was a gentle man, many are the books and articles issued by the controlled media which still paint him as a kind of “terrorist mastermind” whose influence apparently transcends even the grave. Merely mentioning the author of the Turner Diaries and Hunter, novels in which the secret police and other collaborators with our race’s enemies receive swift and certain justice, is enough to stir fear and open wallets among the wealthy donors to Jewish organizations. And corrupt prosecutors (and those who pay them off and whisper in their ears) still find it profitable to brandish a “link” between an accused party and the terrible Pierce, who dared to dream of a world cleansed of their kind.

But as stirring as was his clarion call to racial loyalty, as striking as was his ability to synthesize and explain complex ideas, as impressive as was his talent for organizing independent-thinking Whites, and as great as was his love for his people and his dedication to their future, it is not for these things that he will primarily be remembered.

I believe that William L. Pierce will be known, beyond all his other accomplishments, as the founder of  a new religion. And not just a religion, but the religion of the future, a religion which will supplant all others. Cosmotheism will prevail because it is the inevitable truth toward which all other streams of knowledge are converging. And Cosmotheism will prevail because it will be the religion of a new people who, as a result of following its precepts, will branch off from the rest of humanity — even from the race from which they sprang — and form a new race, ultimately a new species, compared to which the others will be but unconscious beings. The religious ideas of the left-behind races, including those of the unconscious Whites, will mean as little to Higher Men as the “Hallelujahs!” of Black preachers — or the chatterings of hamsters — mean to us.

* * *

William Luther Pierce

William Luther Pierce

Like other religions, Cosmotheism posits certain fundamental truths about the nature of the Universe and our purpose in it. But unlike the Semitic religions, and many others, Cosmotheism has no truck with “revelation” or infallible, immutable scriptures before which all must bow. Our reason and our everyday and scientific observations of the Universe, far from being denied, are regarded as essential and are embraced, for it is only by understanding what is to the maximum extent possible that we can understand who we are and what we must do.

A revealed religion says to us essentially that there is a perfect, hitherto unknown and secret knowledge — God’s knowledge — of reality, of life, and of our purpose on Earth. And this secret knowledge has been revealed to a select few who have written it down to “save” or guide all those who will accept and follow it. This knowledge and the moral commands derived from it are perfect and unchangeable. They are static. Any new doctrine, any fact, any idea which contradicts the holy revelations is evil and must be rejected. Not only are the scriptures of revealed religions static, so also is the putative Universe they claim to know.

In contrast, Cosmotheism is a natural religion. Cosmotheists do not deny reality. Cosmotheists do not reject what objective science has uncovered because it contradicts something a goat-herder or rabbi wrote down a few centuries ago, nor do we reject newly-discovered facts when we would be required to revise our own beliefs as a result of accepting them. Cosmotheists do not deny what is in front of their eyes and they do not suppress or twist their own reason.

And Cosmotheists know that the idea of a static, unchangeable Universe is a childish illusion. Cosmotheists see, acknowledge, and embrace the fact that we are evolving — that all life is evolving — and that the Universe as a whole is evolving, as it always has been since its unknowable beginning, and as it always will be until the final conflict of life with entropy is upon us. In fact, Cosmotheists acknowledge that an understanding of ourselves and other living beings is impossible without accepting and understanding evolution. The past and present of that evolution are revealed to us, not on ancient parchments or miraculous golden plates, but through the means of our senses — and through the rigorous logical and empirical tests our best minds have devised to approach, more closely with each passing year, a knowledge of what is.

The science writer Don Kaiser shows a mature understanding, almost a Cosmotheist understanding, of the ever-evolving, non-static nature of life  when he writes in his “Life Is Evolution” that “The sole charcteristic that ultimately distinguishes living from non-living matter is classical Darwinian evolution. Life is simply matter that evolves. …Evolution is the sole feature that differentiates living matter from non-living matter. …Given the fact that all life forms die, how do they persist through time and changing environments? Every environment harboring life forms must change, simply because of their existence, so evolution is the only way life forms can persist through time. Not only did Charles Darwin discover what makes life possible despite the fact that all life forms eventually die, he unwittingly discovered the sole feature that distinguishes living from non-living matter. Charles Darwin defined life. Life is Evolution.” (emphasis mine)

To the Cosmotheist, Nature is God. And science, logic, observation, reason, and the deepest stirrings of our race-soul are the means of apprehending God — not the ravings of ancient Semitic cutthroats, carpet-dealers, and con men (or the poetry and verses they stole from their more accomplished neighbors).

Mathematics, physics, and genetics are the real words of God. Mathematical principles may be misunderstood for a time, but they cannot be faked as scripture can, nor for long can they be maliciously revised for political advantage — and they are eminently verifiable. So also with the laws of evolution and biology, physics and cosmology.

"Nature is God. Physics, mathematics, and genetics are God’s real words." - Kevin Alfred Strom

“Nature is God. Physics, mathematics, and genetics are God’s real words.” – Kevin Alfred Strom

Cosmotheism asserts that we are matter and energy become conscious — and, more than that, that we are the Universe become conscious, that we are Nature become conscious of itself and all that that implies. It further shows us that we have reached a radically new stage in the evolution of the Universe — as significant, perhaps, as the evolution of non-living matter into living beings — as significant as the first rise of consciousness itself –  as significant as the faltering steps of the first amphibians on the surface of the Earth. This new stage has come only recently, when European man first grasped the concept of evolution, and discovered the principles of genetics and heredity. It is the stage of conscious evolution — of the ability of living beings to direct, and vastly accelerate, the future course of their own evolution.

From unconscious matter to the first stirrings of consciousness in primitive animals, from the partial consciousness of the higher animals and in lower Man, to the ever-increasing consciousness of European man encompassing his discovery of the principles of science, genetics, and evolution itself, to the infinite consciousness that is possible for us as we make the choice to follow the upward path of conscious evolution — that is the path of Cosmotheism, and that is path the Life Force must inevitably take if life is to extend beyond the paltry lifespan of our birth planet.

* * *

cosmotheism_books

To the best of my knowledge, it was the ABC television affiliate in Washington, DC, WJLA, which first made the claim in 1987 that Cosmotheism was nothing but a “tax dodge.” The accusation was picked up more recently by Mark Pitcavage of the “Southern Poverty Law Center,” an anti-White Jewish group. Note well who is trying to prevent us from seizing the reigns of our own evolutionary destiny, precisely who it is who would, as a friend of mine puts it, “block us from climbing the genetic spiral staircase of light toward the universal purpose of the Cosmos.”

George Bernard Shaw by William Strang (1907)

George Bernard Shaw by William Strang (1907)

Robert S. Griffin, in his biography of Dr. Pierce, The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds, gives insight into George Bernard Shaw’s play, Man and Superman, its central character, Don Juan, and its influence on Cosmotheism, which Dr. Pierce acknowledged:

“As Don Juan speaks of it, Life is an entity unto itself, a separate being of sorts. According to Don Juan, Life, or the Life Force, this entity, this being, has monumentally important purposes: to become aware of itself and understand itself, and to realize itself, that is to say, become the finest version of what it truly is. He refers to Life’s ‘continual effort not only to maintain itself, but to achieve higher and higher organization and completer self-consciousness.’

“Don Juan refers to the full achievement of these ends as the attainment of ‘godhead.’ As Don Juan sees it, in all likelihood godhead won’t come without a mighty struggle. Life faces extremely formidable enemies: ‘the forces of Death and Degeneration.’

Nietzsche's idea of the Overman as expressed in his Thus Spoke Zarathustra was also a deep influence on Cosmotheism.

Nietzsche’s idea of the Overman as expressed in his Thus Spoke Zarathustra was also a deep influence on Cosmotheism.

“Life’s central impulse is to move toward the creation of a superior kind of human being, Don Juan asserts. That is what Life, at its core, is about. Here Don Juan is expressing an evolutionary, Darwinian idea, the concept of man evolving into something higher, more advanced than he is now. Life as Don Juan perceives it is the force that seeks to bring about ‘higher and higher individuals, the ideal individual being, omnipotent, omniscient, infallible, and withal completely, unilludedly self-conscious: in short, a god.’ Don Juan brings race into it as he affirms the ‘great central purpose of breeding the race; ay, breeding it to heights now deemed superhuman; that purpose which is now hidden in a mephistic cloud of love and romance and prudery and fastidiousness, will break through into clear sunlight….’”

As I said in my introduction to the online version of the first Cosmotheist publication, Dr. Pierce’s The Path: “By the standards of a more childish and innocent time, Dr. Pierce might be adjudged an atheist, and by those who call themselves ‘atheists’ today — the narrow egoists of the Rand cult and its derivatives, and the sentimental Christians-without-Christ who constitute the ‘Secular Humanist’ and Marxian reformations of the gospel — he could not even be understood, so limited is their vision. …In the drama of the evolution of life from non-living matter, and of higher and more conscious beings from lower forms of life, William Pierce sees a path of purpose and destiny for us.” That path is the path of conscious evolution.

Charles Darwin opened the door to a full realization of a constantly-evolving universe.

Charles Darwin opened the door to a full realization of a constantly-evolving universe.

To the earnest and intelligent seeker after truth and meaning — and there are many such today among the young men and women of our race, dissatisfied with conventional religion and materialist ideologies like capitalism and communism — finding Cosmotheism is like finding an oasis in Death Valley, or Epictetus in the midst of Bedlam. For our best young people, for whom the truths of biology and physics speak ten thousand times louder than any dusty “holy book,” the path delineated by Cosmotheism is almost self-evident. And Cosmotheism is a fit religion for heroes. Its truths provide the only possible moral framework for doing what must be done to claim White living space and build a new society.

A scholar of my acquaintance once expressed it well: “The multiple gene patterns that bring creativity, curiosity, exploration, and imagination into being are intensified in people of European blood. All history testifies to that fact. But we must kick down the worm-eaten, rotting door of the old ethno-religious Judeo-Christian European-Semite hybrid symbiosis if we are ever to cross over to conscious evolution and seize the reigns of our own evolutionary destiny, and fulfill the meaning and purpose of life and the Cosmos.” The 21st century, he says, will be deeply influenced by Cosmotheism and will be the century of “the human genetic revolution and the singularity that marks our first step beyond Man.”

Cosmotheism teaches, and I believe, that we have no greater moral duty than to ensure that the race most fit, by its high intelligence and unique creativity, to ascend to conscious evolution and beyond — the race which can advance that evolution both farthest and soonest, and is thus more likely to avoid devolution, dead ends, cosmic catastrophe, and a lifeless Universe — the race which discovered the evolutionary and Cosmotheist principles — our race, the White race — is the one which takes that step.

* * *

One fault admitted by William Pierce was his occasional temptation to find a “quick fix” to our people’s problems, to build up the Alliance’s numbers by welcoming those with a very incomplete understanding of our plight and our purpose — and those with powerful attachments to fundamentally opposed ideologies, like Christianity — into our ranks. In the early years of his political efforts, he thought a populist appeal, based on current issues of the day, might have brought enough White Americans to his side to succeed. In those days, those issues might have been school busing for racial integration, or Communist infiltration of our campuses. Today’s populist issues might include Obama’s subversive background, the current health care scam, and our uncontrolled border. And, indeed, Dr. Pierce did talk about such issues, even in his later years, and we do still talk about such issues today.

But his acknowledged mistake was in thinking that bringing together people who agreed with us on such issues was enough to build our organization and usher in the new world we dream of. Even bringing together those Whites who agree with us that our race deserves to survive is not enough. More than once in his career, Dr. Pierce tried a populist, issue-oriented, “big tent” approach. He accepted as associates and even leaders individualists whose main problem with multiracialism was that it interfered with their money-making and free enjoyment of life. And he accepted Christians whose main problem with the Jewish agenda was that it contradicted scripture, or who believed that our race were the “true Hebrews” and that the Old Testament was written for us. And he found that giving responsible leadership positions to those whose deepest allegiance is to individualism or to the Bible is a formula for disaster. Not only do such people revert to the arms of those other communities, abandoning the Alliance when the going gets tough, but they influence others within our community, diverting their path and clouding their understanding of who we are and what we want.

In his last years, William Pierce entertained the hope that the purchase of Resistance Records could bring an influx of new blood into the Alliance, and that the Alliance could influence the “White Power” music scene into becoming something more than an excuse for petty violence, drunkenness, and visceral dislike of non-Whites. This too verged on a “quick fix.” Dr. Pierce’s condemnation of the anti-social tendencies in that “scene” wasn’t enough to prevent the scene from influencing the Alliance much more than the Alliance influenced the scene. And it set the stage for the conversion of the Alliance into a “big tent” pro-White organization when Dr. Pierce died.

The National Alliance changed dramatically. It went from being a highly competent elite group dedicated to bringing about a revolution in philosophy, in religion, and in the fundamental basis of society — dedicated to bringing about an entirely new stage in human evolution; and instead became at best a poorly-run group of well-meaning incompetents whose only unifying principle was a vague idea that White is right. And since the supply of such groups vastly exceeds the demand, membership collapsed. Soon the organization existed in name only — and eventually ceased to exist at all.

But the real National Alliance never disappeared. The men and women with a fire in their souls, with a deep understanding of who we are and what must be, never lost faith. We are rebuilding now, without compromise; with  no interest whatever in the quick fix or the big tent. We base our actions on a strict adherence to fundamental principles and our understanding of our race’s mission in the Universe. Our “hard way” is the only way forward. And, in the final analysis, I do not believe our “hard way” will always be quite as hard as it seems now. There are millions of men and women of our race who know that something is wrong, that our people deserve to survive; who know that the philosophies of Liberalism and fundamentalism are both horribly wrong. They love Nature and abhor its destruction. They know science and know at least the basics of our ever-evolving Universe. They are social and community-minded; they are the opposite of anti-social. These people are ready for Cosmotheism. Our new religion has the potential to catch fire like no religion in history. For the first time, a substantial portion of our people have reached a stage of knowledge and consciousness sufficient to understand our truth; to grasp the real meaning of our lives and of the Universe.

If you are one of us, you know who you are. Join your hands with ours and build that new world in the only possible way it can be built.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

* * *

Appendix: Texts relevant to Cosmotheism:

Cosmotheism: The Path

Cosmotheism: On Living Things

Cosmotheism: On Society

On Christianity

Out of the Darkness

Cosmotheism: Wave of the Future

Don Kaiser’s “Life is Evolution,” The American Mercury, May 8, 2011

Intimations of Cosmotheism: Wagner and Shaw — A Synthesis (by Sir Oswald Mosley)

Intimations of Cosmotheism: Aviation, the Cosmos, and the Future of Man (by Charles Lindbergh)

The Moral Imperative of Our Future Evolution (by John H. Campbell)

Charles Galton Darwin, Eugenics Advocate

Toward the Stars

I Remember Dr. Pierce

308 Radio Broadcasts of William Pierce (some have Cosmotheist themes)

The Meaning of Cosmotheism by Wayne Macleod

The Cosmotheism Trilogy as preserved on archive.org

The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds by Robert S. Griffin (biography of William Pierce)

 

Audio files of Dr. Pierce and others on Cosmotheism and related concepts (some are excerpts):

Our Cause Human Dignity: A Racial Ethic Out of the Darkness Truth Embodied in a Living Community Community Action Community Survival In the Service of a Mighty Purpose (Robert S. Griffin) The Life Force (Robert S. Griffin) The Life Force Explained (Robert S. Griffin) To Serve the Life Force (Robert S. Griffin)

Some of these recordings courtesy of Solar General and JR Books Online.

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/william-pierce-cosmotheisms-hard-way/feed/ 2
Cosmic Catastrophe http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/cosmic-catastrophe/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/cosmic-catastrophe/#comments Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:00:16 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1614 cosmic_catastrophe

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 12, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHAT I WILL tell you today is both reality and metaphor. Our world is in danger from cosmic catastrophe — and we need better minds and better men to save ourselves. And one cosmic catastrophe is already here.

* * *

The Earth is regularly struck by objects from space.

Some of these objects are large enough to cause massive destruction, dwarfing that of even a full-scale nuclear war. A few of these events have come agonizingly close to wiping out all life on Earth, and did in fact cause the extinction of thousands of species — including the dominant life forms of those times.

I mention these facts only to give you a single example of . . . → Read More: Cosmic Catastrophe]]> cosmic_catastrophe

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 12, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHAT I WILL tell you today is both reality and metaphor. Our world is in danger from cosmic catastrophe — and we need better minds and better men to save ourselves. And one cosmic catastrophe is already here.

* * *

The Earth is regularly struck by objects from space.

Some of these objects are large enough to cause massive destruction, dwarfing that of even a full-scale nuclear war. A few of these events have come agonizingly close to wiping out all life on Earth, and did in fact cause the extinction of thousands of species — including the dominant life forms of those times.

I mention these facts only to give you a single example of why creative intelligence — the kind of intelligence possessed in the highest degree by European man, and the kind of intelligence we are breeding out of ourselves by importing and mixing with more primitive races — is of such absolutely vital importance.

As recently as 1908 an object from space impacted our world. It exploded over Russian Siberia, coming ominously close to striking the Earth. Even exploding in the air as it did, it flattened 1,200 square miles of forest, with huge old-growth trees — 60 million of them — broken off instantly like matchsticks. Near the center, trees and animals were vaporized or instantly incinerated. This event, called the Tunguska Event, is believed to have been caused by a very small asteroid, thought to be a mere 60 yards across. It exploded three to four miles in the air.

The fireball did more than flatten trees. Even though the area was sparsely populated, it damaged buildings and smashed people to the ground hundreds of miles away. Even 300 miles from the center of the event, witnesses reported hearing “deafening bangs” and seeing a huge fiery cloud. Some witnesses described “a column of bluish light, nearly as bright as the Sun.” Dust from the event brightened the night sky in London, England for 48 hours — with enough light to read by, according to some accounts. The New York Times of July 3, 1908 reported “remarkable lights” being “observed in the northern heavens on Tuesday and Wednesday nights.”

The asteroid’s impact with the Earth’s atmosphere alone created a superheated wind that destroyed everything in its path.

Now imagine if the Tunguska Event had happened over New York City or Paris instead of Siberia. Nickolai Vasiliev of the Russian Academy of Sciences, has said that “Had such a cosmic body exploded over Europe instead of the desolate region of Siberia, the number of human victims would have been 500,000 or more, not to mention the ensuing ecological catastrophe. [Several] years ago an asteroid of probably several hundred yards diameter passed Earth at a distance of only 700,000 kilometers. On an astronomical scale that is very close. The Tunguska episode marks the only event in the history of civilized man when Earth has collided with a truly large celestial object, although innumerable such collisions have occurred in the geological past. And many more are bound to occur.”

Imagine if the asteroid had been 60 miles across instead of 60 yards: three million times the mass of the Tunguska asteroid. Imagine if it had been made of slightly more durable material and had actually struck the Earth.

But we really don’t need to imagine these or even more extreme scenarios. They have actually happened, as recent scientific studies have shown in frightening detail.

It’s only in the last fifteen years or so that scientists have known that a massive Earth impact from space, probably an asteroid, occurred 65 million years ago, causing the extinction of the dinosaurs and the rise of mammals, which eventually led to human life. Scientists have discovered a huge crater in Mexico which confirms what was once only a tenuous theory. And to clinch it they’ve found heavy concentrations of iridium — an asteroid “signature” — in soil layers dated to that time at sites all over the globe, exactly what one would expect from such a huge blast, which would result in a world-circling cloud of ejected material that would persist for many years, changing the climate to a years-long winter and forever changing the course of life on this planet.

The Chicxulub crater, as it is called, in the Yucatan peninsula was caused by an asteroid estimated to have been 6 miles across.

And recently it was announced that a much larger crater has been confirmed in Wilkes Land in Antarctica — a crater some 300 miles across, the size of Ohio — which evidently was responsible for an earlier die-off, the Permian-Triassic extinction of 251 million years ago, when almost all animal life on Earth was wiped out, the greatest mass extinction in history. The object which made the Wilkes Land crater is believed to have been some 30 miles across.

There are some 500,000 asteroids with diameters in excess of 1 kilometer — and they are constantly colliding with one another and being sent off into erratic orbits. According to the B612 Foundation, a group of researchers and scientists which includes former astronaut Russell Schweickart as its chairman, Earth is swimming in a virtual “swarm” of Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), any one of which could trigger devastation to Earth in the event of an impact. The goal of the foundation is to develop the means to deflect asteroids into new, non-collision courses.

Schweickart tells us there are several givens: “1) Earth is infrequently hit by asteroids that cross our orbit while circling the sun; 2) The consequences of such impacts range from the equivalent of a 15-megaton explosion to a civilization-ending gigaton event; and 3) For the first time in the history of humankind, we have the technology to prevent such occurrences from happening in the future — if we are properly prepared.”

Now I am not trying to be sensationalistic here and convince you that a major impact will happen tomorrow. No one knows when the next such disaster will strike, and no one knows what its size may be. But I am trying to make an important point.

According to Dr. Christopher Chyba of Princeton University and science writer Robert Britt, Earth’s biosphere is likely “regularly disrupted, every 100 million years or so, by giant impacts that would render human life impossible….”

Chyba added at a news conference at NASA Headquarters, “A biosphere only has a certain amount of time to develop a technical intelligence which is capable of realizing that there is an impact hazard, cataloging that hazard and… avoiding the next impact.”

“Bottom line,” according to Britt: “Only a civilization smart enough to spot the hazard and mitigate it can survive.”

And Earth impacts are just one threat. There are many other scenarios which would potentially leave the Earth unlivable. Shouldn’t we have a backup plan for that possibility, so our genes will survive even if Earth does not? Interstellar space travel may one day be our only option.

According to Geoffery A. Landis, of NASA’s Glenn Research Center, “The Earth itself is not entirely a safe place. It would be a good thing for our survival if we lived on more than one planet.”

Only the intelligence that brought us understanding of our place in the universe can save us when zero hour comes — and I am not just talking about impacts from space. Pandemics, nanotechnology warfare launched by an enemy, climate change and other environmental disasters, and a thousand other potential threats loom in the unknown future. Only the intelligence that brought us European science can even detect the presence of such threats before it is too late, to say nothing of fighting them. The creative intelligence that characterizes our race above all others is very likely indispensable for finding solutions to these kinds of disasters, disasters that would forever wipe out lesser creatures.

But the intelligence and creativity that characterize European man are themselves under threat.

The superstition, promoted by Jewish supremacists, of “racial equality” is leading the nations of the West to literally exterminate themselves through replacement of their founding race with the teeming masses of the Third World, whose response to a cosmic threat would be a shrug of the shoulders while they concentrate on debauchery, fornication, and mindless violence below the animal level — many of whom would attribute the disaster to “evil spirits” and attempt to mitigate it with Voodoo chants or Santeria sacrifices for the brief remainder of their miserable lives.

And the peoples of the West themselves, with failing educational institutions and with religions under the thumb of Jewish supremacists and Jewish myths, are increasingly losing their grip on scientific knowledge and on reality itself, as they descend to an understanding the world thousands of years behind the times. Increasingly, instead of seeing the world as it is seen by the best minds of our civilization, our people see it through the lens of a school system that fails to teach them how to find France and Russia on a map, but does teach them about the roots of “hip-hop” and “White racism” — or they see it through the lens of so-called “scripture” — the writings of primitive and malicious Semitic desert nomads whose knowledge of the Universe was essentially zero.

So we’re dumbing ourselves down with a dysfunctional school system and superstitions which militate against rational thought. And we’re dumbing ourselves down biologically, too, through some of the most tragic results of these superstitions: open borders and racial mixing. We import and mix with tens of millions of Mestizos from Central America with an average IQ of around 80 and almost no geniuses — and we import and mix with Africans with average IQs in the 60s and 70s, the retarded range by our standards, and almost no people who are even moderately bright. And so much of our national wealth and energy and effort is soaked up by dealing with the horrible social costs of having these primitives among us — wasted wealth and energy and effort and time that one day may make the difference between life and death for us.

Look at how we are allocating our resources.

The B612 Foundation gets no government money. The biggest spender on the study of potential Earth impact objects is NASA — and they spend only 4 million dollars on it in a year: less than one fiftieth of the amount spent on the wars for Israel in the Middle East in a single day. The total number of people monitoring Near Earth Objects (most of them amateurs), is, according to Astronomer David Morrison of NASA’s Ames Research Center, equivalent to one or two shifts of employees in a single McDonald’s restaurant.

Compare this with the huge and growing infrastructure devoted to making sure that our rapidly-multiplying underclass is housed and fed and entertained. Compare it with the huge amount of national wealth — and the very lives of intelligent, creative White men and women — which are being thrown away every day making the Middle East safe for Israel.

I told you earlier that my message today is both reality and metaphor. Our world is in danger from cosmic catastrophe — and we need better minds and better men to protect ourselves. All true. But we are experiencing a catastrophe of cosmic proportions right here, right now. A parasitic subspecies of man which resembles us in externals but possessing a unique and alien mentality has captured and replaced our race’s leadership and taken over our means of communication. It has implanted memes in our culture and in our minds that are disrupting our reproductive behavior and causing us to commit racial suicide — and which are also causing us to serve and feed and fight for the parasite instead of for ourselves.

As I said, I mention the subject of inevitable space-borne catastrophe as but a single example of the challenges we will face that will require the best minds that our race can produce for their solution. The next challenge may be different: a new virus ten times more tenacious and deadly than AIDS, a superhurricane that makes Katrina look like an April shower, a doomsday weapon developed by China or Israel that holds all civilization hostage, a sudden change in the Gulf Stream triggering catastrophic climate change with no comet or asteroid needed — who knows what may come? The issue which screams for our attention is not only are we going to be ready when disaster strikes? – but also what are we doing to ourselves? — how are we ourselves changing, and do those changes militate for our survival or against it when zero hour comes?

When that hour comes, will we as a race and as a civilization stand poised with our best minds in control of an advanced technology able to literally change the fate of star systems — so that our genetic patterns will live on and advance forever, whatever the cosmic challenge?

Or will we be mired in the genes of the jungle, ruled — despite the presence of a few high-IQ Whites — by the needs and desires of the primitives among us, and stand helpless holding our TV remotes, our fast food wrappers, and our “holy books” — unable to do anything to alter the onrushing death of our world?

The choice is ours, ladies and gentlemen. The choice is ours.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/cosmic-catastrophe/feed/ 4
Lack-of-Independence Day http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/lack-of-independence-day/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/lack-of-independence-day/#comments Sat, 05 Jul 2014 12:00:15 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1610 jefferson_American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 5, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY. I’m a positive person, and there is hope, so I kept the “happy” in there — even though there’s a lot to be unhappy about this Fourth of July; mainly three things: our people’s loss of independence; our failure to understand what “independence” is; and — worst of all — our failure to even know who we are. (ILLUSTRATION: Thomas Jefferson, a firm believer in racial separation.)

Probably, we should rename this day “Lack-of-Independence Day.”

So many of our people don’t realize they lost their independence and freedom long, long ago.

The official celebration in my city is nothing but a rah-rah session for the regime’s military, with nary a mention of freedom, self-determination, . . . → Read More: Lack-of-Independence Day]]> jefferson_American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 5, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY. I’m a positive person, and there is hope, so I kept the “happy” in there — even though there’s a lot to be unhappy about this Fourth of July; mainly three things: our people’s loss of independence; our failure to understand what “independence” is; and — worst of all — our failure to even know who we are. (ILLUSTRATION: Thomas Jefferson, a firm believer in racial separation.)

Probably, we should rename this day “Lack-of-Independence Day.”

So many of our people don’t realize they lost their independence and freedom long, long ago.

The official celebration in my city is nothing but a rah-rah session for the regime’s military, with nary a mention of freedom, self-determination, or liberty.

If the blankos do mention freedom, it’s like a murmur coming from the mouth of an undead corpse. It’s a reference to some imagined quality (possessed equally, of course, by red, brown, black, and white “Amurricans”) the meaning and nature of which has been forgotten in the mists of time. Such “freedom” doesn’t exist anyway, since all the undead can do is make mouth sounds they don’t understand in a futile effort to simulate human life.

I assume that my listeners are among the living, however.

So get out those made-in-China fireworks and whoop it up, if you want to. I don’t care if you do or you don’t. I know your children probably like fireworks. But don’t ever forget what this day stands for. One Hell of a lot of people suffered and died for the independence the foolish and the stupid have thrown away. Spend one hour studying and thinking about what independence really means, one hour out of 24. And share what you learn with your children. Let’s start now.

Let’s start with a principle to remember: Any people which accepts multiracial “democracy” soon loses the ability to control its government. Soon it is no longer their government. And then they are slaves, without independence. The very definition of independence and freedom is having living space which is for your people and your people alone, and living under a government which is answerable to your people and your people alone. Anything else is slavery. And slavery is what we have now.

Every few years, the satraps still calling themselves the U.S. Congress try to outdo themselves in racial abasement during the renewal of the 1965 “Voting Rights Act.” The Voting Rights Act, signed by President Lyndon Johnson, was one of many anti-White and anti-American initiatives that took place that year: 1965 was also the year our borders were opened, our pro-White immigration laws were scrapped, and the people’s silver was brazenly stolen, for example.

The purpose of the Voting Rights Act was to dismantle every state and local law — such as literacy tests — that tended to favor White voters. Certain counties — and even whole states — had to submit every voter registration or district boundary change to the federal government in Washington before it could be approved. In some areas, the federal Department of Justice moved in and controlled everything, shouldering local officials aside. How did the Act determine which areas “needed” federal control and which didn’t? One of the sections of that law is “a requirement that any state or county with a history of favoring White interests get pre-approval from the U.S. Justice Department or a federal court before they change their election laws or procedures.”

That’s right. Federal control kicks in if the multiracialist bureaucrats decide that a state or county has “a history of favoring White interests.” If officials favor non-White interests, no problem. If they favor Blacks or Mestizos or even illegals — no problem. But if the bureaucrats decide they’ve ever favored Whites or favor Whites now, that must be stopped. It’s easy to see where this Act has led and will continue to lead: Voter registration rules must be written and district boundaries must be drawn — and every other jot and tittle of regulation must be crafted — to increase non-White representation and decrease that of Whites. It’s a one-way ratchet, dispossessing White people of representation. As we published the last time this “Act” came up for renewal:

‘The Voting Rights Act was aimed at thwarting the efforts of Whites to protect their race’s interests in states that had large Black minorities. As different, and in many ways unequal, races, Whites and Blacks have necessarily diverging interests, making racial conflict inevitable in any society in which both races live in large numbers.

‘This antagonism was created by the granting of citizenship to former slaves following the Civil War, and was foreseen years earlier by Thomas Jefferson, who anticipated the sort of conflicts that would result from attempts to equalize the races, of which the Voting Rights Act is but one of many examples.

‘A member of the American Colonization Society, Jefferson advocated the colonization of freed slaves outside of the United States. To the objections of the egalitarians of his time, he replied in words that now seem hauntingly prophetic.

‘”It will probably be asked,” Jefferson wrote, “Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state, and thus save the expense of supplying, by importation of white settlers, the vacancies they will leave? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions, which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.”

‘Almost 50 years have now passed since Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law. In that period of time, the U.S. Congress has perversely favored the interests of the Black race at the expense of the interests of the race of most of its members. Jewish domination of the means by which information is disseminated to the American people — a development never envisioned by Jefferson — has made many of them afraid to do otherwise.

‘This fear has been the decisive factor in Black ascendancy over the past two generations, which has necessarily taken place at White expense. The “convulsions” that Jefferson predicted have not yet ended, and America’s present demographic trends are such that if her leaders do not soon begin to heed his words, the race in whose extermination they will end will be ours.’

What Jefferson wanted — and what the pre-”Voting Rights Act” laws tried to secure for us — was independence. White Americans fought hard for independence. Independence as a people. A people with a shared ancestry, shared history, shared language, and shared culture. (White Americans are every bit as much a people as Frenchmen or Britons or Palestinians or any other people you care to name. And it’s not place of residence that makes you a member of a people. If that were true, a mouse in a stable would be a horse. And Mexican Mestizos would be Americans. It’s all the things I mentioned, but mainly it’s your ancestry that makes you what you are and which determines the content of your culture.)

White Americans fought hard for independence from the British Empire in the Revolutionary War. We wanted to make our own decisions. We wanted those decisions to be made based on what was good for us, not what was good for a far-away dynasty (which, by the way, utilized lots of non-White labor and also countenanced the virtual slavery of White people). Everybody knows we celebrate that independence on July 4th.

But those men who imposed literacy tests and other measures in the South to keep the fecund non-White mob from controlling the political process were also working to keep decision-making power in the hands of our people. So were Jefferson and the other Founders of the American Republic when they made sure that only Whites were counted as citizens — and that only Whites could become citizens, too. They didn’t hand out ballots to Amerindian tribesmen. They didn’t hand over citizenship rights and political power to Africans. They didn’t open the border to aliens and stand there, offering them jobs — and green cards — and taxpayer’s money — and amnesty for breaking our laws — and even the right to change our laws. No. That would have been absurd. That would have been the diametric opposite of what the Founders had been fighting for. That would have been giving up our independence. That would have been giving up our right as a people to have our own government just for us — a government by White Americans, for White Americans, and of White Americans. That is the essence of independence. That is the essence of what the Founders created when they created America. That is the essence of what our soldiers died for. That is the essence of what made America great.

The Founding Fathers were White separatists almost to a man, and the Republic they founded was, albeit imperfectly, a White separatist nation until the subverters really took control in the 1960s.

The subverters used their radio and television networks and newspapers and publishing houses to convince us that not giving away our nation to non-Whites — that not giving away our independence and self-government — was “hate” and “evil.” But wanting one’s own people to have its own government and its own nation — and wanting one’s own people to survive — does not necessarily entail “hate” of other peoples or other races. Why should it?

The truth is that racial hatred is greatly increased by the forced association inherent in a multiracial society, as the crime columns and editorials our newspapers amply show. They are filled with the hatred, convulsions, and intellectual dishonesty inherent in multiracialism every single day.

Where the races have their freedom and independence there is very little hatred involved. Do the Danes hate the Japanese? Do the Guatemalan Indians hate the Bushmen of South Africa? I don’t think so. But drop 1,000,000 Danes into Osaka — or 500,000 Bushmen into Quetzaltenango — and I think you’d see some real problems.

The author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, was a lifelong racial separatist who not only did not want integration, but actually wanted Africans to be relocated to another continent entirely.

Those who control the media are desperate to revise Jefferson so that they won’t have to eject him from the American pantheon, though The Atlantic floated the idea (proposed by tired old establishment warhorse Conor Cruise O’Brien) that Jefferson be evicted from his place of honor in American history because Jefferson’s philosophy is incompatible with “multiracial democracy.” And so it is!

O’Brien states “It follows that there can be no room for a cult of Thomas Jefferson in the civil religion of an effectively multiracial America — that is, an America in which nonwhite Americans have a significant and increasing say. Once the facts are known, Jefferson is of necessity abhorrent to people who would not be in America at all if he could have had his way.” And WorldNet Daily conservative “star” Richard Grenier said in the Washington Times that Jefferson was comparable to Heinrich Himmler, and declared that the Jefferson Memorial should be demolished stone by stone.

Throughout his public life, Jefferson held true to his concept of humane racial separation which he summed up in his Notes on the State of Virginia (1781, Query XIV):

“Among the Romans emancipation required but one effort. The slave, when made free, might mix with, without staining the blood of his master. But with us a second is necessary, unknown to history. When freed, he is to be removed beyond the reach of mixture.”

Removed beyond the reach of mixture! And, it goes without saying, granted his own independence in a distant land for the express purpose of preserving our independence. No wonder the multiracialists who have taken over conservatism want Jefferson’s memorial torn down brick by brick. If you’re near Washington, I suggest you lay a laurel there this week.

But multiracialists, some of them malicious and some of them “equality” lunatics — and greedy businessmen who wanted cheap labor — prevented the repatriation idea from ever really getting anywhere. The millions of freed slaves and their descendants stayed in America (and are now being supplemented by even more non-White “cheap labor” invaders).

Some of the old Anglo elite treated their own people like garbage, and continue to do so — particularly in their enthusiastic (or pretendedly enthusiastic) embrace of the “new-money” Jews’ multiracial imperative.

The “colonization,” as the relocations of freed slaves were then called, began in the early 19th century, under the sponsorship of many prominent men — men like Francis Scott Key and many of the Founders themselves. Their efforts were enough to create Liberia and its capital city, named for one of the backers, James Monroe. But they never really made a dent in the African population of the United States, probably because too many people would have to stop getting rich if the old apple-cart was upset. Another effort of the Founders to keep America White was their Naturalization Act of 1790 — in effect until the 1950s — which mandated that only Whites could become citizens of the United States.

The media — or, more properly, the Jewish establishment which controls them — are far more passionately multiracialist than the old-money elite, who were divided on the issue. That part of the old elite which wanted multiracialism wanted it only as a way to get rich. The new Jewish elite uses multiracialism, including the college-educated dupes who “believe” in it, as a way to destroy all obstacles to their complete power over the Earth — and the genocide by amalgamation of the European race is one of their most ardent desires.

Some of the old-money elite probably had convinced themselves that any harm to the race caused by their importation of stoop labor was far-off, minimal, and correctable. But the new elite has made a religion out of multiracialism, a religion in which actions which tend toward racial preservation are defined as “evil,” and actions which tend to racial destruction are defined as “good.”

No people with such an inverted “morality” will long survive on Earth.

People who throw away their own independence and freedom lose the ability to control their government. And soon it is no longer their government any more. It becomes just an association of self-interested liars who extract the highest price possible for whatever betrayal they can get away with and still retain the favor of the media. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how nations fall.

I love my people. I don’t want to see America die. I don’t want to see European civilization die. I don’t want to see the uniquely noble and beautiful race which brought us everything from grey-eyed Athena to the Saturn V rocket go extinct. That’s wrong, if anything is wrong.

And don’t kid yourself — that’s where we are headed, at a little more than 10 per cent. of the Earth’s population and falling fast, and with the elite purposely importing hundreds of millions of non-Europeans into our homelands and using their media to promote a fallacious “morality” in which opposing our genocide is somehow “evil.”

If the spotted owl deserves a territory of its own where its survival as a genetic type is assured, then so does the European race.

It is clear to me that Blacks, Mestizos, Asians, and others, not being as soft in the brain on this topic as the befuddled Whites, identify openly with their respective races, and form organizations almost without number to advance their interests (a fact which is easily verifiable by a glance at the Encyclopedia of Associations). When Whites do this, in most countries in the West, they are vilified by the billionaire media elites, when they are not actually arrested or killed.

But White men and women, even those who are as liberal as you can get without actually being off your rocker, keep moving away from the Brown Tide.

You can find them all over rural, still mostly White, America. They are refugees from what used to be California, or the horrorscapes of our former industrial cities. They will sometimes tell you in cautious, looking-over-the-shoulder tones, about how “crime” or “crowding” made their former homes “unlivable.” A very few will dispense with the code words, but most cannot.

They are obeying their feelings, deep feelings among the men and women of our race, feelings that call for open space and green fields and splashing water, and the piping sounds and bright faces of White children playing in the glen; not unlike the scenes that must have filled the countryside while the Parthenon was being raised on a hill in Hellas long ago.

Our people instinctively want freedom and independence. We want — and we desperately need — a place for ourselves, a place where the government belongs to us and us alone, a place where our children can be safe and where no other group’s interests will come before their interests, a place where the power is in our own hands, a place where our culture, our science, our music, our art, our dreams will be allowed to live and develop as Nature intended, without deformation or interference from others. On this Independence Day, please share these ideas with your family and friends. Maybe soon you will write to me and share your concerns and and help us awaken others. We need to support each other. We need our own media that never stop broadcasting the message that we want our independence back. That’s what we’re working for every day at the National Alliance.

We White Americans stand at a threshold. We are still the overwhelming majority in this country. But we’re falling fast. We have a very brief window of opportunity in which we can get our independence back and restore our freedom. That window of opportunity is called your life, because you’re living right now. And I’m living right now. Let’s get together and do something positive — right now.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/lack-of-independence-day/feed/ 0
Homeless Jack on Taking the Path http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/homeless-jack-on-taking-the-path/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/homeless-jack-on-taking-the-path/#comments Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:16:51 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1607 fylfot03by H. Millard

“LOOK, MAN, a lot flows from the basic principle in Arman’s Teachings about what we call Code A. And, understanding what he teaches about Code A helps us sort out lots of things about morals and values and how we should live our lives.

“Now, I follow Arman’s Teachings as best I can. Others can as well, but they’re not forced on anyone. In fact, we believe that one must come easily to the Teachings as an indication that such a person may have the right parts inside. You know that so-called White racist gene? Well, we believe in it. We say it is a survival gene or genes or is somehow part of our DNA code, but that it is dormant in many of us and weaker in some . . . → Read More: Homeless Jack on Taking the Path]]> fylfot03by H. Millard

“LOOK, MAN, a lot flows from the basic principle in Arman’s Teachings about what we call Code A. And, understanding what he teaches about Code A helps us sort out lots of things about morals and values and how we should live our lives.

“Now, I follow Arman’s Teachings as best I can. Others can as well, but they’re not forced on anyone. In fact, we believe that one must come easily to the Teachings as an indication that such a person may have the right parts inside. You know that so-called White racist gene? Well, we believe in it. We say it is a survival gene or genes or is somehow part of our DNA code, but that it is dormant in many of us and weaker in some and stronger in some others. Not only do we not run from this concept of a racist gene, we embrace it. We love it as a beneficial mutation and we want to expand it.

“But I’m getting ahead of myself, man. First things first. We believe that our purpose in living is to make more like ourselves and to will our own evolution into a new species incapable of bearing children with other humans. We believe that by following the Teachings, we can cause beneficial mutations and changes in Code A that will lead us ever upward to specieshood. Some other religious philosophies try to obtain enlightenment, or closeness with God, or other higher states, through various methods. Many of them fail because they don’t understand or their believers don’t have the right internal parts — Code A. Anyway, our goal — as conscious believers — is specieshood. Enlightenment and higher consciousness will come as we progress physically and spiritually toward this goal.

“Now, just to refresh your memory, so I don’t confuse you: We call our White genotype Code A. Yeah, it’s the DNA code, or recipe to make a White person. All of us Whites get it in one way only. We must have a White mother and a White father. There’s no other way to get it, man. One White breeding with any kind of non-White cannot produce a child with Code A. That’s why miscegenation is evil. Just to be clear, man. It takes two White parents to produce a truly White child who is our kind with both our physical and our spirit Essence. Miscegenation is bedroom genocide. It destroys your family’s essential Whiteness.

“The two White parents give us the 46 chromosomes and the 3.1 billion combos of the four nucleic acids abbreviated as A, T, C, G and the 20,000 or so genes that make us White people. And, Code A exists within all the cells of our bodies where there is DNA. Code A is us, and we are it. It is what makes us. It spins us out as the people we are in our everyday world. Without it, we would not be. With it, we can become more.

“Because of our belief in the utmost importance of Code A and the further belief that we must protect it, improve it, and expand it, and because the way we do this is by living long, righteous lives so we can have the maximum number of children who carry Code A, we say that things such as miscegenation, homosexuality, celibacy, family planning, birth control, abortions, putting off having children, suicide, taking risks with our lives that might lead to our early death, going to war for false causes, irresponsible and dangerous acts of bravery for any reason other than to help Code A, mixing with those who are not our kind — and anything else that might stop us from protecting, improving, and expanding the particular version of Code A that each of us as individuals carries — are evil.

“You get that, right, man? We live to expand Code A and to also try to help it evolve, which means we evolve. And, we believe we can help do this by the things we believe and the way we live. You see, we believe that we, as our normal selves in our normal world, can influence Code A inside of us to improve it. We call our way of helping our evolution “method living” — which is somewhat like method acting. That is, we try to be what we wish to become. We try to act the part of the “next man.” And, we do this by everything we do. It affects how we dress, our haircuts, our food, and everything else in our lives. This helps us move to evolving into a new species incapable of mating with other humans and to be the next model man who will eventually and naturally replace earlier models just as new cars replace older models.

“You see, man, the person we see in the mirror, you and I and other Whites — are the carriers of Code A. Code A is what must survive. Our importance as the person we see in the mirror is that we are the way Code A expands and evolves. Nature screams out to every type of organism: Make more like yourself! Too many of us Whites aren’t listening and we do not follow this very basic and important command and we substitute false and inauthentic things for what is most important. We are all going to die, man. Our bodies are going to wear out. But, if we have had many children who survive us, they will carry on and we will be part of them. This is our basic purpose in being alive and it is the basic purpose of every living thing: to make more like yourself — to make more like our kind.

“And, we also say this basic principle about Code A guides us in our idea of morals and marriage. You see, we are also individualistic in our beliefs and in this context this informs us that we are not born as couples. We are born as individuals, and as individuals, male and female, we have different natural laws that control our breeding. A male can impregnate many women each and every day, but a female is out of the baby making business for nine months while a new one of us is growing inside her. Why should the man also be out of the baby making business? It makes no natural sense for a people who want to expand their kind.

“We are also particularists. Our religious rules and religious laws are for us alone. We don’t care what other peoples do. They can have abortions all day long for all we care. They can commit suicide. They can practice birth control. They are not our kind and we believe in non-interference. We have our destiny and they have theirs. We do not make the mistake of trying to mix these different destinies as many non-believers in the present Dark Age are doing.

“So, you read all these words and you wonder what concrete things can I do: Here’s the answer. Separate from non-Whites as best as you can. Mix as little as possible with them. Have as many White children as possible. Bear a sacred symbol next to your skin (six-armed fylfot with curved arms and a central hub — the hub turns counter clockwise and the arms follow and it looks sort of like a spinning galaxy — is preferred by Arman). Pray a short prayer like this in the morning: ‘Thank you Lord for letting me have another day to do your work.’ And, in the evening say something like: ‘Thank you Lord for having let me do your work today.’ Yes, you should say those prayers or something similar twice a day even if you don’t believe. They help focus your mind and keep you on track. Remember, Arman’s Teachings involve method living, and this prayer stuff is part of it. But, you may say that you’re an atheist, and you don’t feel right about praying. Well, just understand that in our system we believe that there was a First Cause that started existence. We don’t know what that First Cause really was, and while some of us believe it was something like a cloud of consciousness and intelligence with no physical brain as we know such things and may have something to do with subatomic particles, waves, forces or energies, it is perfectly okay in this system to not believe that and to believe it was just the natural workings of Nature and had no intelligence or consciousness. Hell, man, I even go back and forth in my own mind about the nature of the First Cause and I sometimes wonder if there was no First Cause and existence always existed. You should also dress in functional, comfortable, dark clothing. In our system, if this has not already been made clear, we must try to have as many children of our kind as possible, and all forms of relationships that accomplish this are perfectly okay in this faith.

“There’s nothing to join, man, and you don’t have to send money to anyone to take our path. Just believe. You are an individual and you have the right to believe or to not believe. You are as empowered to take this path as I am, and we’re all going through our lives as best we can while learning more about the ways of existence as we go. Some of us think Arman has the answers to the big questions, and those answers can be found scattered in these essays. I’ll tell you some more things about how to take this path in future essays. To some of us this is a religion. To others a philosophy. It doesn’t matter how you view it. You are a free and sovereign individual equal to anyone else who follows this path.

“You can choose to believe as we do, and if you decide later that you don’t believe, so be it. You’re a free individual and you have the absolute right to choose your path in this life of yours that belongs only to you. You were born alone, and you’ll die alone. Make the most of what is in between. And, don’t forget this: Your life is your own. Be happy. If this system makes you happy, follow it. If it doesn’t, don’t.”

(© 2013 H. Millard)

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics; all in Millard’s edgy style. They lead up to Homeless Jack’s Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Click here to buy. ISBN: 0-595-32646-3
Roaming the Wastelands ROAMING THE WASTELANDS- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9) H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235. “A fun–and sobering–thing to read” – Alamance Independent
The Outsider THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/homeless-jack-on-taking-the-path/feed/ 2
Asylum America, part 2: Getting Out http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-2-getting-out/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-2-getting-out/#comments Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:00:04 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1600 galaxies

American Dissident Voices broadcast of June 28, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LONGFELLOW WAS QUOTING a proverb known to the ancients when he had Prometheus say “Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.” And that certainly applies to America and the West today. But not all of us are mad. How can we escape the asylum?

The blankos (the thoughtless, nearly brainless self-hating Whites raised in the last few generations) will surely bring great suffering upon themselves as they commit racial suicide, suffering on a scale that has never been seen before in this country. We see inklings of it in the injuries and deaths of uncounted White men and women, many of them elderly, in the “knockout game” “played” by Blacks to prove themselves to . . . → Read More: Asylum America, part 2: Getting Out]]> galaxies

American Dissident Voices broadcast of June 28, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LONGFELLOW WAS QUOTING a proverb known to the ancients when he had Prometheus say “Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.” And that certainly applies to America and the West today. But not all of us are mad. How can we escape the asylum?

The blankos (the thoughtless, nearly brainless self-hating Whites raised in the last few generations) will surely bring great suffering upon themselves as they commit racial suicide, suffering on a scale that has never been seen before in this country. We see inklings of it in the injuries and deaths of uncounted White men and women, many of them elderly, in the “knockout game” “played” by Blacks to prove themselves to the other members of their feral packs, a “game” in which the goal is to knock out or kill a random White person with a single punch, a deadly “game” which the controlled media ignore almost as much as they ignore Black flash mobs and Mexican and Muslim gangs that prey on White women.

I assure you, the decline is just beginning. It’s a long way from Peoria to Mogadishu in terms of culture, but not as long as you think in terms of time. The problem is that our fate is tied to that of the blankos. When they suffer and die, we and our loved ones will too. We’re glued to the morons. We need to unglue ourselves.

Madness is thinking that we can make Africans and Mestizos and Middle Easterners “equal” to us by importing them by the millions and giving them a large part of our wealth and our nation.

Madness is thinking that the decline we’re experiencing in morals, in education, and in economics isn’t related to the racial change taking place.

Madness is thinking that adding 30 million Third World invaders to anything could possibly improve that thing.

Madness is thinking that, for the hundredth time, if only we elect “conservatives” or Republicans we can solve our racial problems and reverse our decline — when it was the leader and icon of conservatives and Republicans, Ronald Reagan, for God’s sake, who signed the first illegal alien amnesty bill and authorized the holiday for the Communist degenerate King — when it was this party, supposedly based on cutting the federal monster down to size, that has not only not cut it down at all but instead presided over the greatest increase in the Washington regime’s size and power ever seen in our history. People who can’t wake up to that are people who simply can’t wake up. We need to leave them behind. We need to stop associating with them, lest their madness infect us and our families.

Madness is thinking that there’s any hope in electoral politics at all — when, not only are the two parties offered us utterly worthless, but Whites are hopelessly ideologically divided and now represent only 60 per cent. of the electorate at best — when the major cities, with their control over electoral votes, are already dominated by non-Whites — when over half of all births are now of non-Whites.

Madness is willingly sending your child to join the regime’s military, and virtually worshipping that military — the military of a regime that is dedicated to killing you, to exterminating you and your kind — the military which never fights to defend America’s borders and interests, but fights without end amen to defend Israel’s interests and the borders of the puppet states the regime has set up in the Middle East — the military which soon, I predict, will be fighting once again against White people or any people who dare to have a government not supervised by Jews.

Madness is thinking that these insane wars can be stopped by supporting the Democratic party — when that party is in bed with Israel just as much as the Republicans — when that party shamelessly campaigned on an anti-war platform and then, once in power, escalated the wars just as the oligarchs wanted them to — when that party openly engages in spying and surveillance and CIA drone murders and kill lists — for God’s sake, kill lists! — just as much or more than the Republicans did.

Madness is thinking that a return to Christianity can save us — when no two sects, and there are hundreds of sects, can agree on just what Christianity stands for — especially when almost all of these sects are suicidal when it comes to race — when the religion itself was founded by Jews, evolved from Jewish culture and thought, and consists in part of a virtual worship of Jews as “God’s chosen people.”

Madness is racially-conscious White people arguing over obscure Hebrew verses written two thousand years ago — and believing that what these desert bandits and goat-herders wrote somehow proves that we come from some Semitic “seedline” or other, when science has known for a century that our ancestors were already in Europe 50,000 years ago and more.

Madness, madness, madness. Utter madness.

We need to separate ourselves from the madmen.

How can we do that? There are probably many tens of thousands of racially aware White people in North America who are fully cognizant of our plight and who are  immune to insane belief systems. There are probably ten times as many who know our race is in danger, but little else, and who are still quite capable of rational thought and action, are immune to religious delusion, and who could and would  join our ranks if 1) they were educated and influenced by us to a sufficient degree, and 2) if we were perceived as having some chance of success.

If we are to survive, we must first reach this elite group, and form an organic community with the best among them. Our first task will be to set out our principles, beliefs, and plan of action and make it known to every potential member of our community, and do this so effectively that as many as possible within our race’s real elite will see the truth in our warnings of danger, our principles, our knowledge, and our plan, and will be willing to throw in their lot with us and add their strength to ours.

We must be selective in building this community: We cannot make the mistake again of welcoming those who bring weaknesses instead of strength.

We must make this community self-sustaining, and by that I mean not only self-sustaining in the economic sense, though it must surely be that, but self-sustaining over time as well: Our members must raise their children in our beliefs, teach them who they truly are, teach them their place in the cosmos, and teach them the meaning and purpose of their lives — so that a sufficient number of them will remain with our community as the generations pass. For our race is like the waves of the ocean, rushing onward forever, and we are the individual water droplets that make up that wave. We rise and then fall again into dormancy in our brief moment of life, but the waves rush on without end. As the droplets descend to the depths of the Earth, or evaporate into the air, new droplets constantly rise and add themselves to the wave, and the motion of the sea never ends. So are the generations of men. If we fail to raise up our children rightly, for even a single generation, we are done for. We are perilously close to that point in this current generation, and our aim must be to correct that grievous error.

Only when this community is of sufficient strength should we begin to attempt to influence and lead the White masses. Attempting to do so at this time would not only fail, but it would sap energy from our current necessary tasks.

No known organic community that spans the generations has ever existed which did not have some form of spirituality as its basis. Man is a transitional creature between the lower animals and Higher Man. We have achieved reason, so for us instincts are not enough. We question everything we see, and even everything we feel. We analyze. Yet our limited reason, even the reason of our best men, is also not enough. To overcome fear, to inspire great works, to unify otherwise selfish and individualistic people, to overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles and the pain and tragedies of life, men must have faith that their efforts are part of something far larger than themselves.

Our race has reached a threshold both terrifying and magnificent. It is a threshold that, understood rightly, can harmonize faith and reason and remake the world.

This threshold is terrifying in that all our old beliefs and old religions, despite the faith and best efforts of their adherents, lie smashed upon the ground in a million pieces. No one respects the faith that evolved into sublime philosophy — the Classical belief system that began with Eos and Apollo and Aphrodite, and the souls who created them — more than I do. But everyone knows that those deities are not real and will not save us. It was the otherwise destructive myth of Christ which inspired the men who fought at Tours and Vienna against the Semitic hordes. And it is impossible not to stand in awe of Gothic cathedrals and choirs of angelic White children singing Latinate hymns to God. But despite the fact that we remade Christianity in our image, and a beautiful image it often was, at its core was a seed of hate and destruction, a Jewish seed, in both the murderous Old Testament and the self-denying New. And, even if it did not have those terrible flaws, the simple fact is that the best minds of our race, the ones we must bring into our community, can no longer take it seriously.

The threshold we are crossing is magnificent in that our reason and our science have opened the vistas of reality to us just enough to allow us to glimpse a part of our real purpose and destiny. William Luther Pierce took the threads of thought of Bruno, of Shaw, of Nietzsche, of Crick and Watson, and of Darwin, and showed us that our race is part of an ever-evolving Whole, and that the Whole is evolving toward higher and higher levels of consciousness. He showed us that our race is in the vanguard of this evolving consciousness; that increasing our understanding, and our power to defend ourselves and evolve further upward, is, so far as any man can see at this time, the true purpose of our lives. He taught us that nothing is more important than this, and that the fate of the Universe literally depends upon what we do today.

This new faith, Cosmotheism, is a faith that can inspire and unite the best men and women beneath its banner. It is, I believe, the faith that will lead us to the stars. We in the National Alliance may have had many setbacks, from the strong-arm tactics of the regime to our own stupid mistakes in allowing ourselves to be infected with a “big tent” philosophy which allowed those without understanding to drag us downward. There are only a few hundreds of the truly faithful and truly aware among us today, and not all of us who ought to be united are united yet.

But be of good cheer. Cosmotheism is not only a faith, a way of approaching God, but it is also a test. If the blankos and the morons were vampires, then Cosmotheism would be a shining golden crucifix. The very people we do not want in our new community will misunderstand, fear, and flee Cosmotheism. They will stay away from us entirely, and that is a good thing. Cosmotheism will unify and inspire the best, and excise the worst.

We have faith — and we have good reason — to believe we are on the right path. We are just beginning, but that does not discourage us. We have suffered setbacks, but that has only made us stronger, wiser, and more determined. If you would like to help us build this organic community of the aware and of the worthy, if you would like to have a part in this, the greatest and most important effort of our time, write to me today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right, and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-2-getting-out/feed/ 0