National Vanguard http://nationalvanguard.org News. For us. For a change. Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:04:56 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Jewish Author Worried About Losing Control of the “Nazi Narrative” http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/jewish-author-worried-about-losing-control-of-the-nazi-narrative/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/jewish-author-worried-about-losing-control-of-the-nazi-narrative/#comments Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:50:51 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2811 1426299313516.cached In ‘Hi Hitler,’ historian Gavriel Rosenfeld argues that a variety of forces—some historical, some social—have dulled our awareness of the evils unique to Nazism.

THE GRATEFUL DEAD, Sarah Palin, Obamacare, Game of Thrones, the Facebook IPO, the iPad—these are just a few of the endless list of topics about which Hitler has ranted in the famous parodies of the film Downfall.

Images of Hitler have also become used as popular memes, with text like “Wehrmacht bitches at?” and “Jew mad? Get Führerious!” imposed over photographs of the former dictator. The use of one of history’s most notorious villains in such a lighthearted manner is one of a plethora of issues that set off alarms for the historian Gavriel D. Rosenfeld in his new book, Hi Hitler: How the Nazi Past is Being Normalized in . . . → Read More: Jewish Author Worried About Losing Control of the “Nazi Narrative”]]> 1426299313516.cached

In ‘Hi Hitler,’ historian Gavriel Rosenfeld argues that a variety of forces—some historical, some social—have dulled our awareness of the evils unique to Nazism.

THE GRATEFUL DEAD, Sarah Palin, Obamacare, Game of Thrones, the Facebook IPO, the iPad—these are just a few of the endless list of topics about which Hitler has ranted in the famous parodies of the film Downfall.

Images of Hitler have also become used as popular memes, with text like “Wehrmacht bitches at?” and “Jew mad? Get Führerious!” imposed over photographs of the former dictator. The use of one of history’s most notorious villains in such a lighthearted manner is one of a plethora of issues that set off alarms for the historian Gavriel D. Rosenfeld in his new book, Hi Hitler: How the Nazi Past is Being Normalized in Contemporary Culture.

Rosenfeld argues that in three major areas—academia, politics, and popular culture—the Nazis, Hitler, and the Holocaust have undergone a major process of normalization. This means that in our collective memory, that event and its perpetrators are less different, less of an abnormality in history, than previously agreed upon.

At first, Rosenfeld’s thesis seems to a merit a high dose of skepticism. While memes used by teens may treat the image of Hitler lightheartedly and while anti-Semitism has reared its head again in Europe, to the average person the Holocaust is still synonymous with the nadir of human depravity in the 20th century and its denial more associated with loons like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

And yet, on page after page, referencing books, speeches, movies, and essays, Rosenfeld inexorably builds a thoroughly convincing case that something has shifted in both academia and in politics—that the Holocaust’s heretofore unquestioned status as the great sin of the 20th century (and by association, the Nazis’ status as the century’s greatest villains) is now far from a consensus.

In the scholarly world and in the global sphere of politics, the views of the Holocaust and the Nazis have changed as people have modified their views on World War II, genocide, and the demise of the Soviet Union.

For a variety of reasons, the last two decades have witnessed a dramatic shift in how World War II is perceived and portrayed. Once unironically depicted as “the good war” in which the Allied powers triumphed over the evil Axis powers, the war now has a far murkier reputation.

Part of that shift occurred in the scholarly world. Niall Ferguson’s The War of the World, Giles MacDonogh’s After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation, Timothy Snyder’s Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin, Max Hasting’s All Hell Let Loose, Michael Bess’s Choices Under Fire: Moral Dimensions of World War II, Jacques Pauwel’s The Myth of the Good War: America in the Second World War, Patrick Buchanan’s Churchill, Hitler, and ‘The Unnecessary War,’ and Nicholson Baker’s Human Smoke—these are just some of the major books, some better received than others, that have challenged the notion of the “good war.”

For some of these authors, the decision by the U.S. and Great Britain to team up with the Soviet Union posed a far greater disaster for humanity than did the Nazis. For others, like Buchanan, writing in the shadow of the Iraq War, World War II’s legacy was one of intervention and a cult of Churchill. Others sought to show how the Allies’ methods of war were similar in brutality to the Axis. And they have sought to undermine Allied moral standing by pointing out that in the U.S. there were also serious racial issues of segregation, Jim Crow, Native American reservations, Japanese internment camps, and in the USSR, the starving of kulaks by Stalin.

Whatever the reason, efforts to chip away at “the good war’s” reputation also, in Rosenfeld’s eye, had the effect of somewhat normalizing the Nazis. If the Allies were not much better, the reasoning goes, then how bad really were the Nazis?

* * *

Read the full article at the Daily Beast

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/jewish-author-worried-about-losing-control-of-the-nazi-narrative/feed/ 1
Greeks Have ‘Devastating’ Lack of Awareness About the Holocaust, Study Finds http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/greeks-have-devastating-lack-of-awareness-about-the-holocaust-study-finds/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/greeks-have-devastating-lack-of-awareness-about-the-holocaust-study-finds/#comments Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:34:23 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2809 antisemitism-greece

EDITOR’S NOTE: Notice that the “study” was paid for by British, Canadian, and Romanian taxpayers, though it serves Jewish purposes: the continuing campaign to criminalize criticism of Jews, and institutionalize Jewish propaganda about their “unique” suffering. (Apparently the Greeks viewing themselves as victims is seen as an incursion on a Jewish monopoly.)

* * *

A SURVEY has found that a large number of Greeks have limited awareness of the Holocaust and even harbour antisemitic views, which can be attributed to a “profound sense of victimisation” according to the report’s authors. (ILLUSTRATION: A man walks past a graffiti dedicated to the Holocaust in the northern port city of Thessaloniki March 15, 2015.)

The survey, conducted by academics from the International Hellenic University, the University of Macedonia, and the University of Oxford, with . . . → Read More: Greeks Have ‘Devastating’ Lack of Awareness About the Holocaust, Study Finds]]> antisemitism-greece

EDITOR’S NOTE: Notice that the “study” was paid for by British, Canadian, and Romanian taxpayers, though it serves Jewish purposes: the continuing campaign to criminalize criticism of Jews, and institutionalize Jewish propaganda about their “unique” suffering. (Apparently the Greeks viewing themselves as victims is seen as an incursion on a Jewish monopoly.)

* * *

A SURVEY has found that a large number of Greeks have limited awareness of the Holocaust and even harbour antisemitic views, which can be attributed to a “profound sense of victimisation” according to the report’s authors. (ILLUSTRATION: A man walks past a graffiti dedicated to the Holocaust in the northern port city of Thessaloniki March 15, 2015.)

The survey, conducted by academics from the International Hellenic University, the University of Macedonia, and the University of Oxford, with funding from the British, Canadian and Romanian embassies in Athens, questioned 1045 Greeks over the age of 18. The survey was presented yesterday at the British ambassador’s residence in Athens under the title Perceptions about the Holocaust and Antisemitism in Greece.

Among the report’s most shocking findings was that 65% of all recipients agreed with the statement: “The Jews treat Palestinians in the same way they were treated by the Germans in WWII,” a result that one of report’s authors Dr Giorgos Antoniou, describes as “devastating”. Over 90% of the Greeks questioned believed that Jewish people hold too much power in international business and media.

Asked what the word ‘Holocaust’ brought to mind and presented with a choice of Auschwitz, the Greek persecutions at Distomo at the hands of the Nazis in 1944, the mass suicide of Souli women at Zalongo in 1803, the 1866 Ottoman raid at Arkadi, or ‘none of the above’, less than half of the respondents opted for Auschwitz.

While more than 90% of respondents agreed that subjects such as the 1922 Asia Minor disaster – the defeat of the Greek army in the Greco-Turkish war, in which tens of thousands died – and the 1946-49 Greek civil war, should be taught at school, less than 60% agreed that the Holocaust should be on the curriculum.

Under a third of respondents knew the correct number of Jews estimated to have perished during World War II – six million. 45% of recipients agreed with the statement that Jews exploit the memory of the Holocaust for their own interests.

“Some of the data we collected was devastating,” says Antoniou. “The Greeks love conspiracy theories, so we expected a high response to the question that Jewish people hold too much power. I would say that the close ties between conspiracy theories and antisemitism account for that.”

The reports concludes that the roots of these attitudes can be attributed to a sense of ‘victimisation’ among the Greeks, indicted by the fact that 70% of recipients agreed with the statement that Greeks have suffered worse genocides than the Jews.

“The Greeks feels like victims of history,” says Antoniou. “But that was still a surprise for us.”

“[The survey]  indicates that antisemitic attitudes and negative perceptions of the Holocaust are worryingly high among Greek public opinion and that they largely cross-cut classic partisan and ideological division lines,” the report concludes.

* * *

Source: Newsweek

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/greeks-have-devastating-lack-of-awareness-about-the-holocaust-study-finds/feed/ 0
Media Lampooning of White Fraternity, While Jewish Racism is Allowed: The Paradox of Zionism http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/media-lampooning-of-white-fraternity-while-jewish-racism-is-allowed-the-paradox-of-zionism/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/media-lampooning-of-white-fraternity-while-jewish-racism-is-allowed-the-paradox-of-zionism/#comments Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:40:22 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2799 Jew ToadAS BOTH “Gamer Gate” and the Sigma Alpha Epsilon media-created- “outrage” demonstrate: the system will not tolerate normal white men congregating on any level. Even though we are more fractured and under assault then ever in human history, they will not rest until they have uprooted every collection of us and filled it with the cultural Marxist garbage we are dropping out to avoid. To the powers that be, this kind of socializing, even if it’s as “harmless” as whites in a college gathering to party, could one day turn into a revolution.

This might seem petty, and it is, but they’re also right. Who would’ve thought the few dozen men that congregated to casually drink beers and blow off steam about politics at the Munich Hofbrauhaus in the summer of 1920 would . . . → Read More: Media Lampooning of White Fraternity, While Jewish Racism is Allowed: The Paradox of Zionism]]> Jew ToadAS BOTH “Gamer Gate” and the Sigma Alpha Epsilon media-created- “outrage” demonstrate: the system will not tolerate normal white men congregating on any level. Even though we are more fractured and under assault then ever in human history, they will not rest until they have uprooted every collection of us and filled it with the cultural Marxist garbage we are dropping out to avoid. To the powers that be, this kind of socializing, even if it’s as “harmless” as whites in a college gathering to party, could one day turn into a revolution.

This might seem petty, and it is, but they’re also right. Who would’ve thought the few dozen men that congregated to casually drink beers and blow off steam about politics at the Munich Hofbrauhaus in the summer of 1920 would one day come to power and make the world’s omnipotent banking houses in New York and London tremble. Don’t underestimate what we’re capable of, because your enemies sure don’t.

Jews Demand America’s Largest Majority White Fraternity Keep “Diversifying”

Amidst an incredibly disproportionate commotion created by the Zionist media, the plutocrat David L. Boren violated the law by expelling students for practicing First Amendment liberties protected on the campus of the public University of Oklahoma. This illegal act has hardly (USA Today is the notable exception) been covered from a critical perspective in major national media outlets. Instead, the hate-mongerers and witch-hunters expelled from the bowels of a handful of America’s elite, disproportionately Jewish universities are lauding Boren and demanding further action against majority white fraternities nationwide, as the Washington Post’s anti-white journalist Alyssa Rosenberg has suggested.

The Anti-Defamation League threw in its dreidel of hate and cheered President Boren’s excessively brutal decision almost as loudly as they cheer their slaughter of Palestinian infants and refugees in Gaza.

Who Controls SAE?

What is perhaps most shocking of all is how quickly the leadership of the fraternity has thrown its own “brothers” under the bus, not even putting up a token defense of its members from this illegal expulsion. As soon as the video was released, the President, a South African Jew named Bradley Cohen, disbanded the University of Oklahoma chapter and vowed to unconditionally cooperate with “authorities” looking to ruin the lives of a couple of kids for doing nothing wrong. Cohen has, together with possible Jew Blaine Ayers, put a plan into motion to create a Stasi-like hotline to punish politically incorrect speech by SAE members in private, for example.

If you are familiar with the social dynamics inside of a fraternity, you’ll realize how this completely violates the spirit of the “Greek” quasi-Masonic system and creates intense distrust in what is supposed to be a tight-knit community of brothers. Fraternities are notorious for refusing to cooperate with law enforcement against their own brothers for actual serious crimes, so this would be a shocking about-face were it not for the Zionist double-standard.

Cohen and Ayers have additionally vowed to make SAE more racially “diverse”, create a fake office bestowed with executive power titled “Director of Diversity and Inclusion,” and purge local chapter leaders it deems not “racially sensitive” enough. This will be a significant revolution in how American fraternities are structured, and  all other white majority groups will certainly follow suit to avoid media circuses and illegal persecutions such as the one that has enveloped a 9 second video with 2-3 people singing a song with “the n-word”.  Did I mention that Sigma Alpha Epsilon is America’s largest fraternity?

Bogus Controversy To Suit Ulterior Motives

There is no evidence whatsoever that SAE excludes non-whites, as entities such as Alyssa Rosenberg assert. In fact, since Cohen’s ascension in the mid-2000‘s, different SAE “rushes” have gone out of their way to recruit non-whites. Featuring nothing but “colorful” people bouncing basketballs, set to mind-numbing rap music (which uses the word “Nigga” a number of times), and of course a quick snapshot of a blonde woman interviewer looking at one of these athletes in awe makes it clear who the frat’s higher ups are trying to appeal to.

Over 20% of SAE is non-white, and judging from pictures of their chapters across the country, they reflect the demographics of the campuses they operate on. At UCI in California, where Asians are a major part of the student body, the SAE chapter strongly shows this trend.

But that’s not good enough for the Zionist power. Instead, they are exercising their privilege and using their flamethrowers on freely associating whites in what, in their paranoid minds, aren’t just a bunch of dumb college kids looking for friends to get drunk with; the world through Woody Allen glasses conversely sees bunkers of potential Western racial life occasionally peeking out of the trench; something inherently threatening to Jewish interests, even if they cynically claim they’re sticking up for blacks.

Jewish Frat LogoAlpha Epsilon Pi, a Jewish Fraternity Benefitting from a Zionist Double-Standard

While the Southern (as the media constantly reminds us) white Gentile roots of SAE have been subject to “reform” and its traditions eradicated by infiltrated Jewish leaders in the last few years, Alpha Epsilon Pi has never and will never have a Gentile President or an office for racial diversity. Compare the open racial pride, seriousness, healthiness, and Jewish identitarian message of AEPi’s  recruitment video and contrast it with the crass rootlessness and ugliness of what Jews have to offer the Gentiles in the SAE video posted earlier. Once again, race-based nationalism is encouraged for Jews, while the same tribe demands the opposite for white Gentiles. This phenomenon is called Zionism.

AEPi makes it clear who is welcome in their fraternity and who isn’t with a concise description beneath the video:

“We are the guardians of the Jewish identity. We are our brother’s keeper. We are Alpha Epsilon Pi.”

On their website, they extrapolate:

Perhaps of greater importance, Alpha Epsilon Pi develops leadership for the future of the American Jewish community. Tomorrow’s Jewish leaders are in our chapters today. These are the young men who must be counted upon to support Jewish causes and to prepare to be one of tomorrow’s Jewish leaders, so that they may aid themselves, their family, their community, and their people. Those students who enter the mainstream of non-Jewish life on the campus are far more likely to assimilate and to forsake their heritage. Working together with the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life/International Hillel, Alpha Epsilon Pi can play a vital role in helping reverse the growing trend among our young people to abandon Judaism at this critical time.

Unlike SAE, there are no Asians in AEPi’s UC Irvine chapter.

Alyssa Rosenberg’s article demanding more integration in fraternities mentioned majority white ones, and even black ones (even openly Afrocentrist fraternities like Alpha Phi Alpha have token white members), …while also mentioning AEPi — not as equally culpable, but as victims and leaders in “progress” towards multiculturalism!  She cites a short-lived program in the 1960’s where a tiny minority of negroes were pledged in, such as New Jersey Judge John E. Wallace, in order to produce a propaganda point for the Jewish-led “civil rights” revolution that would “lead the way” in racial integration.

Curiously enough, this “tolerance” appears to have quickly evaporated once American Jewry succeeded in legislating forced race-mixing of unwilling parties. After their point was made at the end of the 1960’s, when racially exclusive fraternity clauses were all overturned by mandate, you’ll find virtually no blacks or non-whites in their pictures. Looking through photos of AEPi chapters across the country, you see exclusively Jewish faces. Here is a picture of the AEPi chapter at Rutgers University, the second-most “diverse” campus in the United States:

rutger-aepi

Compare that with the utterly incoherent racial motley crew of the “racist” SAE at Rutgers, this hodge-podge makes any real prospect of genuine, life-long brotherhood impossible:

rutger-sae

Now, I’m sure a crafty Jew would try and argue that it’s an “ethnic” thing, rather than a targeted denial to the right of Western people (and others) to associate with and befriend whoever they want. I have seen Leftists apologize for Jewish racism and Zionist hypocrisy by saying Italians and Irish and other white ethnic groups are allowed to organize based on the same grounds. This would be a lie, if proposed.  Take a look at Alpha Phi Delta, which was founded as an Italian-American fraternity (Il Circolo Italiano), but today counts a number of non-white and Jewish members:

st-joes-expansion

The reason for this is non-Jewish white fraternities always arouse suspicion and media-created hysteria, so quotas on “people of color” are generally created, even in small Catholic schools like St Josephs University where  there are many Italians and very few blacks and Jews. In other words, an Italian-American who wishes to share his culture with like-minded and like-blooded people will potentially have his place taken or access less resources so Jews and blacks who have nothing to do with the frat can have a space for no logical reason.

Alpha Epsilon Pi Jews Have Connections That Matter

While white SAE fratboys get whipped in public for occasionally waving Confederate flags and saying “the n word” in a joking way among themselves, Jewish fraternities have predictably been involved in far worse.

In 2010, the Columbia branch of Jewish racist APEi used its frathouse as a major drug den on the prestigious Ivy League campus. Harrison David, a wealthy and privileged Jewish thug, was identified as the central player and drug lord overseeing gentile and non-white “mules” from other frats and raking in tens of thousands of dollars selling cocaine, ecstacy, pills, and LSD. The NYPD arrested him in a sting operation and he was facing years in prison for a laundry list of felonies.

Columbia University responded to the serious crime of disseminating hard drugs on their campus and bringing a black eye to their school’s prestigious reputation by … suspending the Jewish fraternity for 2 semesters. Unlike Boren’s immediate and civil rights violating expulsion of 2 students for doing nothing illegal, Columbia University merely suspended Mr David.  The controversy placed no responsibility on the fraternity, and blew over everywhere except a few New York newspapers within a few days.

What happened next was a strange coincidence. Detective Richard Palase, a Gentile NYPD detective who led the investigation against the APEi drug ring, was suddenly arrested by the FBI for running a gambling ring in Staten Island during the build-up to Harrison David’s trial. This arrest caused a massive blow to the case, as he was a key witness who had purchased the drugs at the Jewish frathouse, and eventually David was offered 3 years of supervised release rather than 3 years in prison.

It’s possible that the timing of Palase’s arrest was nothing but a coincidence. But with a racist, exclusive, and secretive Fraternity that counts names such as Mark Zuckerberg, Alan Dershowitz, and an impossibly long list of political and financial movers and shakers, is it really far-fetched to believe an APEi member  in the federal government gave his drug-dealing brother a hand at a white cop’s expense?

Unlike Bradley Cohen and the multi-racial Sigma Alpha Epsilon goys he betrays and dismantles with impunity, Alpha Epsilon Pi are allowed the right to enjoy real brotherhood.

* * *

Source: Traditionalist Youth Network

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/media-lampooning-of-white-fraternity-while-jewish-racism-is-allowed-the-paradox-of-zionism/feed/ 0
Diversity Police Investigate White Genocide Flyers in Brampton, Canada http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/diversity-police-investigate-white-genocide-flyers-in-brampton-canada/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/diversity-police-investigate-white-genocide-flyers-in-brampton-canada/#comments Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:16:11 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2797 White Genocide Flyer

YES, literally the diversity police!

Diversity police are up in arms after 1,000 homes in the city of Brampton received flyers which said the dwindling “European” population was a result of “White Genocide“.

Freedom is a European concept, and it shows — if you think the Canada of today will be the Canada of tomorrow, think again.” the flyer says

They’ll ask you why you didn’t stand on guard.

According to Brampton Guardian, the local police force’s ‘Diversity Relations Unit’ are investigating the flyers to see if they can be charged as a ‘Hate crime’.

Other flyers with similar content have been distributed around Brampton in the past year, and while they too were investigated for ‘hate crimes’, they were judged to be free speech.

Despite the numerous laws in places like Canada and . . . → Read More: Diversity Police Investigate White Genocide Flyers in Brampton, Canada]]> White Genocide Flyer

YES, literally the diversity police!

Diversity police are up in arms after 1,000 homes in the city of Brampton received flyers which said the dwindling “European” population was a result of “White Genocide“.

Freedom is a European concept, and it shows — if you think the Canada of today will be the Canada of tomorrow, think again.” the flyer says

They’ll ask you why you didn’t stand on guard.

According to Brampton Guardian, the local police force’s ‘Diversity Relations Unit’ are investigating the flyers to see if they can be charged as a ‘Hate crime’.

Other flyers with similar content have been distributed around Brampton in the past year, and while they too were investigated for ‘hate crimes’, they were judged to be free speech.

Despite the numerous laws in places like Canada and Europe which prohibit real freedom of speech, we can still talk about White genocide.

In 1959, Brampton was 99% White. 70.1% White in 1996. 43% White by 2006. As of 2011, it is 32.9% White.

This was not done by accident. Canada’s borders were opened up by influential anti-Whites who had decided that the majority White population needed to be gotten rid of.

Nor is this exclusive to Canada — White genocide is happening across many majority White countries today, and this is exactly what anti-Whites want.

When they target White areas, they say that they want “diversity”. But they ignore non-White countries and areas.

“Diversity” is White genocide.

* * *

Source: White Genocide Project

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/diversity-police-investigate-white-genocide-flyers-in-brampton-canada/feed/ 0
Yet Another Swastika at George Washington University http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/yet-another-swastika-at-george-washington-university/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/yet-another-swastika-at-george-washington-university/#comments Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:54:00 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2783 imrs imrs-01

This one (as in many such incidents) was posted by a Jewish student.

A SWASTIKA was posted on the bulletin board of a Jewish fraternity in a George Washington University dorm on Monday, leading upset students to immediately report it to police. (ILLUSTRATION: George Washington University)

The symbol — recognized as an emblem of hate from Nazi Germany — apparently came from an internal source: A member of the fraternity, who is Jewish, admitted that he posted it there. The student said that he brought it back from a spring break trip to India, according to university officials.

Though known in Western cultures as a sign of hatred and anti-semitism since the Nazis co-opted it during the early part of the 20th century, the swastika is an . . . → Read More: Yet Another Swastika at George Washington University]]> imrs imrs-01

This one (as in many such incidents) was posted by a Jewish student.

A SWASTIKA was posted on the bulletin board of a Jewish fraternity in a George Washington University dorm on Monday, leading upset students to immediately report it to police. (ILLUSTRATION: George Washington University)

The symbol — recognized as an emblem of hate from Nazi Germany — apparently came from an internal source: A member of the fraternity, who is Jewish, admitted that he posted it there. The student said that he brought it back from a spring break trip to India, according to university officials.

Though known in Western cultures as a sign of hatred and anti-semitism since the Nazis co-opted it during the early part of the 20th century, the swastika is an ancient symbol still commonly used — and considered sacred — in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, denoting auspiciousness.

hindu-s

Hindu religious men from the Swaminarayan Gadi Sansthan Maninagar, give final touches to a huge piece of folk art, a Rangoli, ahead of Diwali in Ahmedabad on October 24, 2011. This traditional Rangoli is shaped like a swastika which Hinuds believe is a symbol of progress.

GW’s president, Steven Knapp, wrote in a message to the campus community that “while the student claims his act was not an expression of hatred, the university is referring the matter to the MPD for review by its Hate Crimes Unit.”

On Tuesday, the student was expelled from the fraternity by national leaders of Zeta Beta Tau.

“This type of behavior is unacceptable and is not tolerated by the brothers of this fraternity,” Nick Carr, president of the local chapter, said in a statement. “We are appalled by the actions taken by this undergraduate.”

Hillel Executive Director Yoni Kaiser-Blueth added, “The swastika is a symbol of hate and horror. It has no place here at The George Washington University.”

Last month, many GW students were alarmed when swastikas were written in a dorm on campus which houses a predominantly Jewish sorority.

[Read more about that incident here.]

Some complained that the university’s response was inadequate, and some national groups called on the university’s president to take stronger steps to eliminate hate speech. A letter to Steven Knapp read, in part:

“In the last year, more than 10 college and university campuses around the country have been defaced with swastikas, in each case causing particular distress to Jewish students.

“Therefore, we believe it is imperative for you to take the following steps to deter future acts of anti-Jewish bigotry and help protect Jewish students and all students on your campus:

“Publicly acknowledge that a swastika is an antisemitic symbol associated with genocide perpetrated against the Jewish people, and that the swastikas found inside the International House were particularly upsetting to Jewish students on your campus, who felt targeted for hatred and discrimination.”

The letter asked for a public affirmation that the university would investigate this and all similar incidents as hate crimes, and affirm a commitment to educating university staff including police officers to identify antisemitism.

It was signed by AMCHA Initiative; American Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists; Americans for Peace and Tolerance; Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law; Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA); David Horowitz Freedom Center; Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET); Institute for Black Solidarity with Israel; Iranian American Jewish Federation; Israeli-American Council (IAC); National Conference on Jewish Affairs; Middle East Political and Information Network (MEPIN); Proclaiming Justice to the Nations; Scholars for Peace in the Middle East; StandWithUs; Students and Parents Against Campus Anti-Semitism; The Lawfare Project; Training and Education About the Middle East (T.E.A.M.); and the Zionist Organization of America.

Knapp told the campus community Monday that the incident from February would also be referred to D.C. police’s hate crimes unit. His statement went on to say:

“Since its adoption nearly a century ago as the symbol of the Nazi Party, the swastika has acquired an intrinsically anti-Semitic meaning, and therefore the act of posting it in a university residence hall is utterly unacceptable.

“Our entire community should be aware of the swastika’s association with genocide perpetrated against the Jewish people and should be concerned about the extremely harmful effects that displaying this symbol has on individuals and on the climate of our entire university community.

“The university will embark on a program of education to ensure that all members of our community understand the damage that symbols of hatred do to us all.”

EDITOR’S NOTE: The Washington Post has it wrong. This symbol of the spinning cosmos — from the atom to our DNA spirals to the galaxies themselves — is a spiritual symbol not only the East, but to Europeans as well.

* * *

Source: The Washington Post

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/yet-another-swastika-at-george-washington-university/feed/ 1
Delivery of U.S. Weapons and Ammunition to ISIS: Iraqi Commander Wiretaps ISIS Communications with U.S. Military http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/delivery-of-u-s-weapons-and-ammunition-to-isis-iraqi-commander-wiretaps-isis-communications-with-u-s-military/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/delivery-of-u-s-weapons-and-ammunition-to-isis-iraqi-commander-wiretaps-isis-communications-with-u-s-military/#comments Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:29:53 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2781 ISIS Map

A commander of Iraq’s popular forces disclosed that wiretapping of ISIL’s communications has confirmed the reports that the US planes have been airdropping food and arms supplies for the Takfiri terrorists.

“THE WIRETAPPED ISIL communications by Iraqi popular forces have revealed that the US planes have been dropping weapons and foodstuff for the Takfiri terrorist group,” Commander of Iraq’s Ali Akbar Battalion told FNA on Wednesday. (ILLUSTRATION: ISIS militants control a de facto Islamic sharia-law state between Iraq and Syria. Dark red indicates areas controlled by the Islamic State; light red indicates areas the organization claims but does not control.)

He noted that tapping on ISIL disclosed the terrorist group’s regular contacts with the US army, and said,

“They exchanged sentences like if they would have a share of the ammunition dropped near (Spiker Military . . . → Read More: Delivery of U.S. Weapons and Ammunition to ISIS: Iraqi Commander Wiretaps ISIS Communications with U.S. Military]]> ISIS Map

A commander of Iraq’s popular forces disclosed that wiretapping of ISIL’s communications has confirmed the reports that the US planes have been airdropping food and arms supplies for the Takfiri terrorists.

“THE WIRETAPPED ISIL communications by Iraqi popular forces have revealed that the US planes have been dropping weapons and foodstuff for the Takfiri terrorist group,” Commander of Iraq’s Ali Akbar Battalion told FNA on Wednesday. (ILLUSTRATION: ISIS militants control a de facto Islamic sharia-law state between Iraq and Syria. Dark red indicates areas controlled by the Islamic State; light red indicates areas the organization claims but does not control.)

He noted that tapping on ISIL disclosed the terrorist group’s regular contacts with the US army, and said,

“They exchanged sentences like if they would have a share of the ammunition dropped near (Spiker Military Base) or responses such as ‘you will also receive your share’.”

“The US forces by dropping weapons and ammunition for ISIL, specially in Yassreb, Al-Ramadi and near Spiker Base in Hay al-Qadessiya have provided a lot of help to the ISIL,” he added.

Many similar reports by Iraqi officials and forces have surfaced in the last few months.

In February, an Iraqi provincial official lashed out at the western countries and their regional allies for supporting Takfiri terrorists in Iraq, revealing that the US airplanes still continue to airdrop weapons and foodstuff for the ISIL terrorists.

“The US planes have dropped weapons for the ISIL terrorists in the areas under ISIL control and even in those areas that have been recently liberated from the ISIL control to encourage the terrorists to return to those places,” Coordinator of Iraqi popular forces Jafar al-Jaberi told FNA.

He noted that eyewitnesses in Al-Havijeh of Kirkuk province had witnessed the US airplanes dropping several suspicious parcels for ISIL terrorists in the province.

“Two coalition planes were also seen above the town of Al-Khas in Diyala and they carried the Takfiri terrorists to the region that has recently been liberated from the ISIL control,” Al-Jaberi said.

Meantime, Head of Iraqi Parliament’s National Security and Defense Committee Hakem al-Zameli also disclosed that the anti-ISIL coalition’s planes have dropped weapons and foodstuff for the ISIL in Salahuddin, Al-Anbar and Diyala provinces.

In January, al-Zameli underlined that  the coalition is the main cause of ISIL’s survival in Iraq.

“There are proofs and evidence for the US-led coalition’s military aid to ISIL terrorists through air (dropped cargoes),” he told FNA at the time.

He noted that the members of his committee have already proved that the US planes have dropped advanced weaponry, including anti-aircraft weapons, for the ISIL, and that it has set up an investigation committee to probe into the matter.

“The US drops weapons for the ISIL on the excuse of not knowing about the whereabouts of the ISIL positions and it is trying to distort the reality with its allegations.

He noted that the committee had collected the data and the evidence provided by eyewitnesses, including Iraqi army officers and the popular forces, and said, “These documents are given to the investigation committee … and the necessary measures will be taken to protect the Iraqi airspace.”

Also in January, another senior Iraqi legislator reiterated that the US-led coalition is the main cause of ISIL’s survival in Iraq.

“The international coalition is only an excuse for protecting the ISIL and helping the terrorist group with equipment and weapons,” Jome Divan, who is member of the al-Sadr bloc in the Iraqi parliament, said.

He said the coalition’s support for the ISIL is now evident to everyone, and continued, “The coalition has not targeted ISIL’s main positions in Iraq.”

In Late December, Iraqi Parliamentary Security and Defense Commission MP disclosed that a US plane supplied the ISIL terrorist organization with arms and ammunition in Salahuddin province.

MP Majid al-Gharawi stated that the available information pointed out that US planes are supplying ISIL organization, not only in Salahuddin province, but also other provinces, Iraq TradeLink reported.

He added that the US and the international coalition are “not serious in fighting against the ISIL organization, because they have the technological power to determine the presence of ISIL gunmen and destroy them in one month”.

Gharawi added that “the US is trying to expand the time of the war against the ISIL to get guarantees from the Iraqi government to have its bases in Mosul and Anbar provinces.”

Salahuddin security commission also disclosed that “unknown planes threw arms and ammunition to the ISIL gunmen Southeast of Tikrit city”.

Also in Late December, a senior Iraqi lawmaker raised doubts about the seriousness of the anti-ISIL coalition led by the US, and said that the terrorist group still received aids dropped by unidentified aircraft.

“The international coalition is not serious about air strikes on ISIL terrorists and is even seeking to take out the popular (voluntary) forces from the battlefield against the Takfiris so that the problem with ISIL remains unsolved in the near future,” Nahlah al-Hababi told FNA.

“The ISIL terrorists are still receiving aids from unidentified fighter jets in Iraq and Syria,” she added.

Hababi said that the coalition’s precise airstrikes are launched only in those areas where the Kurdish Pishmarga forces are present, while military strikes in other regions are not so much precise.

In late December, the US-led coalition dropped aids to the Takfiri militants in an area North of Baghdad.

Field sources in Iraq told al-Manar that the international coalition airplanes dropped aids to the terrorist militants in Balad, an area which lies in Salahuddin province North of Baghdad.

In October, a high-ranking Iranian commander also slammed the US for providing aid supplies to ISIL, adding that the US claims that the weapons were mistakenly airdropped to ISIL were untrue.

“The US and the so-called anti-ISIL coalition claim that they have launched a campaign against this terrorist and criminal group — while supplying them with weapons, food and medicine in Jalawla region (a town in Diyala Governorate, Iraq). This explicitly displays the falsity of the coalition’s and the US’ claims,” Deputy Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Brigadier General Massoud Jazayeri said.

The US claimed that it had airdropped weapons and medical aid to Kurdish fighters confronting the ISIL in Kobani, near the Turkish border in Northern Syria.

The US Defense Department said that it had airdropped 28 bundles of weapons and supplies, but one of them did not make it into the hands of the Kurdish fighters.

Video footage later showed that some of the weapons that the US airdropped were taken by ISIL militants.

The Iranian commander insisted that the US had the necessary intelligence about ISIL’s deployment in the region and that their claims to have mistakenly airdropped weapons to them are as unlikely as they are untrue.

* * *

Source: Global Research

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/delivery-of-u-s-weapons-and-ammunition-to-isis-iraqi-commander-wiretaps-isis-communications-with-u-s-military/feed/ 1
African Immigrant Doctor Accused of Molesting Over 31 Patients http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/african-immigrant-doctor-accused-of-molesting-over-31-patients/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/african-immigrant-doctor-accused-of-molesting-over-31-patients/#comments Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:00:32 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2773 africanimmigrantdoctorControlled media call him “Charlotte, North Carolina doctor”

by James Fulford

BELOW are some of the headlines in the story of Dr. Fidelis Edosomwan (pictured), alleged sex criminal:

NC. doctor accused of sexually assaulting 31 people CMPD: Charlotte doctor faces 16 sex offense charges CMPD: 31 victims claim doctor sexually assaulted them North Carolina Doctor Accused of Sexually Abusing 31 Patients Police: Charlotte doctor accused in sexual assault of 31 patients NC doctor accused of sexually assaulting patients to appear before … Local doctor charged with sexual assault to appear before judge

I’ll give you some details from the New York Daily News version:

North Carolina doctor accused of sexually assaulting at least 31 people, cops say, By David Boroff, New York Daily News, March 20, 2015:

A . . . → Read More: African Immigrant Doctor Accused of Molesting Over 31 Patients]]> africanimmigrantdoctorControlled media call him “Charlotte, North Carolina doctor”

by James Fulford

BELOW are some of the headlines in the story of Dr. Fidelis Edosomwan (pictured), alleged sex criminal:

I’ll give you some details from the New York Daily News version:

North Carolina doctor accused of sexually assaulting at least 31 people, cops say, By David Boroff, New York Daily News, March 20, 2015:

A North Carolina doctor sexually assaulted at least 31 people, authorities say.

Dr. Fidelis Edosomwan turned himself into police on Thursday after he was charged with 16 counts of sexual battery and 16 counts of sex offense.

The Charlotte doctor had been busted in late January for the sexual assault of two patients.

According to the initial arrest warrants obtained by WBTV, Dr. Edosomwan exposed his private parts during the examinations of the victims. He also “lifted the (second) victim’s shirt and bra and then rubbed her breast during a medical exam without the victim’s consent,” according to the warrants. [More]

Now, what I want to know is, why do they think of Dr. Edosomwan (full name Dr. Fidelis Iguodala Uwensuyi-Edosomwan) as a “North Carolina” doctor, a “Charlotte” doctor, or if you’re a local Charlotte news provider, a “local” doctor? Is he, in fact, an American doctor at all?

The answer is of course not. Dr. Edosomwan is an African doctor, who happens to be practicing in America.

Although he did his Residency in Internal Medicine at “historically black” Howard University, his original training as a doctor was at the University of Benin Faculty of Medicine, Class of 1987. [Dr. Fidelis Uwensuyi-Edosomwan, Internist in Charlotte, NC ; US News Doctor Finder, no date]

That makes him an “African doctor”, a “Beninese doctor”, or an “immigrant doctor” for headline purposes, doesn’t it? Well, no.

You see, while I can find out that Dr. Edosomwan hails from Benin with the click of a mouse, none of the MSM sources have that information. A Google search for “Edosomwan and Benin” turns up none of the over 3000 stories about Fidelis Edosomwan in the news, it only shows news about other Edosomwans in Benin, where it must be a fairly common name.

So if I can find that out with the click of a mouse, what’s the Daily News’s excuse? Their computers don’t have mice?

* * *

Source: VDARE

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/african-immigrant-doctor-accused-of-molesting-over-31-patients/feed/ 0
Huff Post: Ethnic Minorities Deserve Safe Spaces Without White People http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/ethnic-minorities-deserve-safe-spaces-without-white-people/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/ethnic-minorities-deserve-safe-spaces-without-white-people/#comments Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:00:58 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2770 2015-03-16-Ryerson-Racialized-CollectiveIN CANADA, Ryerson University, touted as being a school of journalism, made headlines last week when non-White students formed the “Racialized Students’ Collective” on campus and then refused to allow two White students from attending one of their meetings. As one would expect, media criticism of the affair has been slight to non-existent, reinforcing the double standard that “racism” and “hate” are the exclusive province of White people. (ILLUSTRATION: Members of the “Racialized Students’ Collective”)

In a blog written by Aeman Ansari for the Canadian Huffington Post, we read the following:

Last week The Ryersonian reported on an incident that involved two first-year journalism students who were turned away from an event organized by Racialized Students’ Collective because they are white. Since then there has been a lot of commentary on . . . → Read More: Huff Post: Ethnic Minorities Deserve Safe Spaces Without White People]]> 2015-03-16-Ryerson-Racialized-CollectiveIN CANADA, Ryerson University, touted as being a school of journalism, made headlines last week when non-White students formed the “Racialized Students’ Collective” on campus and then refused to allow two White students from attending one of their meetings. As one would expect, media criticism of the affair has been slight to non-existent, reinforcing the double standard that “racism” and “hate” are the exclusive province of White people. (ILLUSTRATION: Members of the “Racialized Students’ Collective”)

In a blog written by Aeman Ansari for the Canadian Huffington Post, we read the following:

Last week The Ryersonian reported on an incident that involved two first-year journalism students who were turned away from an event organized by Racialized Students’ Collective because they are white. Since then there has been a lot of commentary on the piece and a lot of debate — a lot of the criticism is valid…

I am a person of colour and a journalist and so there are two conflicting voices inside my head. But in this case one voice, that of a person of colour, is louder and my conscience does not allow me to be impartial. I have to take a side

…However, the point to note is not that two white students were asked to leave the event, but rather that this was a safe space and that we as a newsroom, as a campus and as a society are not as knowledgeable as we should be about what these spaces mean.

It’s not just important, but it’s essential, for marginalized groups to have safe spaces on campus to engage with people who understand what they go through. Though this group is funded by Ryerson’s student union, it works to serve a particular group and a particular purpose. Many students at Ryerson have encountered racism in their life that is impossible to forget and many are exposed to discrimination on a daily basis. This group and these sort of events allow people of colour to lay bare their experiences and to collectively combat this societal ailment. These spaces are rare places in the world not controlled by individuals who have power, who have privilege.

These spaces, which are forums where minority groups are protected from mainstream stereotypes and marginalization, are crucial to resistance of oppression and we, as a school and as a society, need to respect them…

The two students who tried to enter the RSC meeting said that they were embarrassed when they were asked to leave and that the group was being counterproductive in sectioning themselves off. Similarly, some of the comments on the piece written about these students speaks to the idea that excluding certain people from these events, this dialogue, is encouraging racial tension. Their embarrassment isn’t as important as the other issues involved here.

Racialized-students-club-story-300x200-300x194

Not wanted: Trevor Hewitt and Julia Knope

Segregation was imposed on people of colour by people of privilege, not the other way around. The very fact that individuals organizing to help each other get through social barriers and injustices are being attacked and questioned for their peaceful assembly is proof that they were right to exclude those students…

The presence of any kind of privilege puts unnecessary pressure on the people of colour to defend any anger or frustrations they have, to fear the outcome of sharing their stories. The attendees are trying to move forward by supporting each other and they should not have to defend themselves, they should not fear the consequences of raising their voices…

The West has a history of oppressing people of colour: from Africans who were enslaved and brought to the New World, to native people whose land was stolen by Europeans. This kind of oppression is still witnessed today, in the way the black community is treated in the United States, in the state of African nations trying to recover from the collapse of the previous colonial rule, and in the continuing struggles of indigenous peoples.

White people may experience occasional and unacceptable prejudice, but not racism. They do not experience the systemic racism that makes it hard for them to find jobs, housing, health care and justice in the legal system.

Racism is not personal, it is structural. Unlike the arena of mainstream media, the educational system, religious institutions and judicial systems that reinforce hurtful stereotypes, these spaces remind the oppressed that they are human, that they deserve respect.

* * *

Source: Huffington Post Canada

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/ethnic-minorities-deserve-safe-spaces-without-white-people/feed/ 2
Leader of Greek Far-Right Golden Dawn Freed From Jail Before Trial http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/leader-of-greek-far-right-golden-dawn-freed-from-jail-before-trial/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/leader-of-greek-far-right-golden-dawn-freed-from-jail-before-trial/#comments Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:39:21 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2757 wpid-image-40

The leaders of Golden Dawn, Nikos Michaloliakos and Giannis Lagos, have defied their corrupt government every step of the way and were finally released. They were unconstitutionally imprisoned since September, 2013.

THE LEADER of Greece’s far-right Golden Dawn party was released from prison on Friday and placed under house arrest as an 18-month limit on pre-trial detention expired.

Golden Dawn leader Nikos Mihaloliakos and a more than a dozen party members were arrested on charges of founding and participating in a criminal group following the killing of an anti-fascism rapper in 2013 by a party supporter.

The killing sparked nationwide protests and prompted a government-led crackdown on the fiercely anti-immigrant party, which entered parliament for the first time in 2012 by tapping into voter anger at Greece’s economic crisis.

Senior party members are among the 70 . . . → Read More: Leader of Greek Far-Right Golden Dawn Freed From Jail Before Trial]]> wpid-image-40

The leaders of Golden Dawn, Nikos Michaloliakos and Giannis Lagos, have defied their corrupt government every step of the way and were finally released. They were unconstitutionally imprisoned since September, 2013.

THE LEADER of Greece’s far-right Golden Dawn party was released from prison on Friday and placed under house arrest as an 18-month limit on pre-trial detention expired.

Golden Dawn leader Nikos Mihaloliakos and a more than a dozen party members were arrested on charges of founding and participating in a criminal group following the killing of an anti-fascism rapper in 2013 by a party supporter.

The killing sparked nationwide protests and prompted a government-led crackdown on the fiercely anti-immigrant party, which entered parliament for the first time in 2012 by tapping into voter anger at Greece’s economic crisis.

Senior party members are among the 70 people due to go on trial on April 20, and face up to 20 years in prison if found guilty.

Mihaloliakos and senior lawmaker Yannis Lagos were both freed from Athens’s high-security prison on Friday under the detention limit. Another senior lawmaker, Christos Pappas, is due to be released in the coming week.

In a statement issued on its website after the release of the two defendants, Golden Dawn denounced their detention as “illegal and unconstitutional.

“Golden Dawn did not buckle during the 18-month imprisonment of its leadership … Golden Dawn will never buckle,” it said.

Mihaloliakos will be placed under house arrest, while Lagos will be banned from taking part in public gatherings. Both are forbidden to leave Greece, court officials said.

The party denies the allegations against it and says it was the victim of a politically motivated witch-hunt.

Among those due to go on trial are all the 16 lawmakers Golden Dawn had in the previous parliament.

Thirteen of them, including Mihaloliakos, were re-elected to parliament on Jan. 25, along with four new members, making Golden Dawn the joint third largest party in the assembly.

* * *

Source: Reuters

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/leader-of-greek-far-right-golden-dawn-freed-from-jail-before-trial/feed/ 0
Frankfurt is in Flames http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/frankfurt-is-in-flames/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/frankfurt-is-in-flames/#comments Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:11:33 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2750 blockupy_0

Anger against bankers — as yet unfocused against Jews, and mostly leftist in origin — explodes as new European Central Bank building is opened (explanation of banking fraud here).

GERMAN POLICE have arrested 350 people, as thousands of protesters descended on Frankfurt today to demonstrate against capitalism and austerity measures. (ILLUSTRATION: A policeman stops a ‘Blockupy’ anti-capitalist protester near the European Central Bank (ECB) building before the official opening of its new headquarters in Frankfurt March 18, 2015.)

10,000 protesters took to the streets but as clashes with police intensified, violence erupted leading to hundreds being detained. German police have said that 14 officers and 21 demonstrators have been hurt, while 16 people have been charged with disturbing the peace or arson.

The organisers behind the protest, Blockupy, an . . . → Read More: Frankfurt is in Flames]]> blockupy_0

Anger against bankers — as yet unfocused against Jews, and mostly leftist in origin — explodes as new European Central Bank building is opened (explanation of banking fraud here).

GERMAN POLICE have arrested 350 people, as thousands of protesters descended on Frankfurt today to demonstrate against capitalism and austerity measures. (ILLUSTRATION: A policeman stops a ‘Blockupy’ anti-capitalist protester near the European Central Bank (ECB) building before the official opening of its new headquarters in Frankfurt March 18, 2015.)

10,000 protesters took to the streets but as clashes with police intensified, violence erupted leading to hundreds being detained. German police have said that 14 officers and 21 demonstrators have been hurt, while 16 people have been charged with disturbing the peace or arson.

The organisers behind the protest, Blockupy, an alliance of 90 activists groups including the second-largest German labor union, Ver.di, and Syriza, the ruling political party in Greece, focused their protests on the opening ceremony of the new headquarters of the European Central Bank in Frankfurt.

The European Central Bank is one of Greece’s main creditors, part of the so-called troika supervising the Greek bailout programme, along with the International Monetary Fund and European Commission.

As thousands of protesters took to the streets this morning they were met by a similar number of security forces. Local schools were closed and trams stopped running in anticipation of the day’s events.

Several police cars and bins were set on fire and pictures showed thick plumes of brown smoke over the Frankfurt skyline this morning. Police deployed water canon and pepper spray, and footage appeared to show some officers beating protesters.

According to the Blockupy Twitter feed, protesters scaled a skyscraper near to the new ECB headquarters to unfurl a banner, reading ‘capitalism kills’ in German.

The group have pinpointed Germany as their worst offender in terms of implementing austerity measures, and warned that the protests will spread across the continent. “We think that Germany is the main country pushing for austerity, and that the German government is the main hardliner within the European Union,” a spokesperson for Blockupy says. “The protests are widening and will grow stronger all over Europe, particularly in the southern countries and in Spain.”

The group are holding a meeting within the next few weeks to plan their next protest, but say they will definitely be present at the next “important political moment”.

“This is an expression of anger,” says Sol Trumbo Vila, who facilitates the international coordination of Blockupy. “There is anger at the way in which European policies are affecting European citizens.”

A spokesperson for Blockupy confirmed that there has been some Greek participation in the protests, with around 100 Greek protesters in total, although the main international protesters came from Italy, France, Belgium, Netherlands and Austria.

0,,18322225_303,00

Even from a distance, observers saw an “unusual day” in Germany’s financial capital.

“We are glad that we were able to gather this movement today,” Trumbo Vila continues. “The turnout was very positive. Unfortunately some tactics were deployed today that were not part of the Blockupy consensus,” he says, referring to the acts of violence perpetrated by a minority of protesters.

But Trumbo Vila also condemned the police. “There has been a strong determination to suppress the protests,” he says.

Trumbo Vila says that Blockupy is campaigning against what the movement describes as “the EU crisis regime”, austerity measures, and the cost of the new ECB building, which totalled €1.3bn (£930m). “A party was held, but we believe there is nothing to celebrate, that is why we chose to mobilise,” says Trumbo Vila.

ECB president Mario Draghi defended the bank, saying at the inauguration of the new building: “As an EU institution that has played a central role throughout the crisis, the ECB has become a focal point for those frustrated with this situation. This may not be a fair charge — our action has been aimed precisely at cushioning the shocks suffered by the economy.”

0,,18322273_303,00

Fourteen police officers and 21 anti-capitalist protesters were wounded in the first street battles in the early hours in the well-heeled western city of Frankfurt. Police initially arrested 19 people.

“Eurozone’s problems haven’t gone away at all,” says George Barda, a social justice campaigner for Occupy, a group loosely affiliated with Blockupy. “We have a major problem with huge concentrations of wealth and power in a small minority of people, which is having a negative effect on people’s lives and making economies unstable. More unequal societies are more unstable.The point about austerity is that it’s the path to catastrophe.”

* * *

Source: Newsweek

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/frankfurt-is-in-flames/feed/ 0
Police Departments Hiring Immigrants as Officers http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/police-departments-hiring-immigrants-as-officers/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/police-departments-hiring-immigrants-as-officers/#comments Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:56:50 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2748 Immigrant Cops

LAW ENFORCEMENT agencies struggling to fill their ranks or connect with their increasingly diverse populations are turning to immigrants to fill the gap. (ILLUSTRATION: Border officers in California. California has been in the forefront of hiring non-White officers.)

Most agencies in the country require officers or deputies to be U.S. citizens, but some are allowing immigrants who are legally in the country to wear the badge. From Hawaii to Vermont, agencies are allowing green-card holders and legal immigrants with work permits to join their ranks.

At a time when 25,000 non-U.S. citizens are serving in the U.S. military, some feel it’s time for more police and sheriff departments to do the same. That’s why the Nashville Police Department is joining other departments to push the state legislature to change a law that bars non-citizens . . . → Read More: Police Departments Hiring Immigrants as Officers]]> Immigrant Cops

LAW ENFORCEMENT agencies struggling to fill their ranks or connect with their increasingly diverse populations are turning to immigrants to fill the gap. (ILLUSTRATION: Border officers in California. California has been in the forefront of hiring non-White officers.)

Most agencies in the country require officers or deputies to be U.S. citizens, but some are allowing immigrants who are legally in the country to wear the badge. From Hawaii to Vermont, agencies are allowing green-card holders and legal immigrants with work permits to join their ranks.

At a time when 25,000 non-U.S. citizens are serving in the U.S. military, some feel it’s time for more police and sheriff departments to do the same. That’s why the Nashville Police Department is joining other departments to push the state legislature to change a law that bars non-citizens from becoming law enforcement officers.

Department spokesman Don Aaron said they want immigrants who have been honorably discharged from the military to be eligible for service.

“Persons who have given of themselves in the service to this country potentially have much to offer Tennesseans,” he said. “We feel that … would benefit both the country and this city.”

…With more immigrants moving to places far from the southern border or away from traditional immigrant magnets like New York City or Miami, agency leaders say it’s important to have a more diverse police force to communicate with those immigrants and understand their culture. Bruce Bovat, deputy chief of operations in Burlington, said their immigrant officers help the agency be more “reflective of the community we serve.”

Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, said he has no problems with green-card holders becoming police officers because they’ve made a long-term commitment to the country and have undergone extensive background checks. But he worries about the security risks associated with allowing any immigrant with a work permit to become an officer, especially considering that the Obama administration has given hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants work permits.

“We’re handing over a gun and a badge to somebody whose background we don’t really know a lot about,” Krikorian said.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said any immigrant authorized to work in the U.S. has already undergone a thorough background check and will undergo even more screening in the police application process.

“The security risk is a straw man,” he said. “This is about people who have gone through criminal background checks, who are meeting the very high standards that we set as a country to stay here and who only want to serve and protect their communities.”

 

Meanwhile, the consequences of hiring non-Americans as “law enforcers” recently came into sharp focus in Los Angeles. — Ed

* * *

Source: USA Today

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/police-departments-hiring-immigrants-as-officers/feed/ 1
Even White Racists Have Freedom of Speech — But Only If They Use It http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/even-white-racists-have-freedom-of-speech-but-only-if-they-use-it/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/even-white-racists-have-freedom-of-speech-but-only-if-they-use-it/#comments Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:43:49 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2745 David Boren

by Hadding Scott

A WEEK AGO there was news about the University of Oklahoma’s chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity, because of a video showing members of the fraternity singing a chant that was derogatory of Blacks. This occurred off-campus, on a chartered bus. An anonymous person made a video-recording of the chant and gave it to Unheard, a Black campus organization (formed in response to the recent sensationalist propaganda about events in Ferguson, Missouri), predictably provoking a ruckus, since the agitation over events in Ferguson and the consequent Black yearning for vengeance have yet to subside. Unheard happens to be favored by the university’s president, former U.S. Senator David L. Boren (pictured), whose legislative record includes initiatives unfavorable to White people.

Early reporting indicated that Boren was not certain that students . . . → Read More: Even White Racists Have Freedom of Speech — But Only If They Use It]]> David Boren

by Hadding Scott

A WEEK AGO there was news about the University of Oklahoma’s chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity, because of a video showing members of the fraternity singing a chant that was derogatory of Blacks. This occurred off-campus, on a chartered bus. An anonymous person made a video-recording of the chant and gave it to Unheard, a Black campus organization (formed in response to the recent sensationalist propaganda about events in Ferguson, Missouri), predictably provoking a ruckus, since the agitation over events in Ferguson and the consequent Black yearning for vengeance have yet to subside. Unheard happens to be favored by the university’s president, former U.S. Senator David L. Boren (pictured), whose legislative record includes initiatives unfavorable to White people.

Early reporting indicated that Boren was not certain that students involved in the racist chant could legally be expelled from the university, but advisors were suggesting that it might be possible under the Civil Rights Act. Boren did announce on 10 March the expulsion of Levi Pettit and Parker Rice, the two students who led the chant, using verbiage carefully crafted to resonate with the Civil Rights Act (alleging that the two had created a “hostile educational environment”), but the general consensus seems to be that under the Constitution of the United States what Boren has done is not legal at all.

Eugene Volokh, a professor of law at UCLA, wrote in an essay for the Washington Post:

First, racist speech is constitutionally protected, just as is expression of other contemptible ideas; and universities may not discipline students based on their speech. That has been the unanimous view of courts that have considered campus speech codes and other campus speech restrictions — see here for some citations. The same, of course, is true for fraternity speech, racist or otherwise; see Iota Xi Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity v. George Mason University (4th Cir. 1993). [Washington Post, 10 March 2015]

Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a professor of law at the University of Tennessee, adds:

Though some ignorant people argue that “hate speech” is unprotected under the First Amendment, that is not the law and never has been. Nor should it be. The test of our commitment to free expression, after all, isn’t our willingness to tolerate speech that everyone likes. If you only support free speech for ideas you agree with, you’re a hack. If you only support free speech for ideas that everyone agrees with, you’re a coward. And if poisonous hateful speech could be banned, communists and the Westboro Baptist Church wouldn’t have won so many First Amendment cases.

Boren’s behavior was not only illegal — and clearly so — it was also a betrayal of the duty of fairness that he, as a university president, owes to every student enrolled in his university. [USA Today, 17 March 2015]

So, where is the outraged response from the aggrieved? Where are the White protestors getting in Boren’s piggish face with all the legally protected free speech that he is trying to suppress? Where is the White free-speech movement?

Moreover, why aren’t the students that Boren says he expelled dragging him and the university into federal court? They are not poor. One of them is from a family that lives in a $650,000 home in the same wealthy Dallas suburb where former president George W. Bush lives.

I think that the answer to this question suggests itself if one considers the typical motive for joining a fraternity like Sigma Alpha Epsilon, and the nature of such an organization.

Students join Sigma Alpha Epsilon not for any idealistic reason, but because they want outward success and wealth. They want that social capital described by Robert Putnam that facilitates career-advancement. Bloomberg News stated a year ago that this particular fraternity was “renowned as a Wall Street pipeline,” with members including “hedge fund managers David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital and Paul Tudor Jones of Tudor Investment Corp,” and “Texas oilman-turned-investor T. Boone Pickens.”

You might notice that there are some Jewish names among SAE’s prominent members. In addition to Einhorn, there is the current national president of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Bradley Cohen. It means that however much SAE’s members may enjoy expressions of anti-Black sentiment among themselves, they are not pro-White — since Jews are not White and do not care about the White race, and could be expected to block any serious pro-White tendency in the organization.

Cohen condemned the expression of anti-Black sentiment by members of Oklahoma’s chapter of his organization as some “cancer” that had developed just recently. He knows better than that. In newspaper-archives, I found “racist” controversies like this, relating to various fraternities — especially Sigma Alpha Epsilon — going back more than three decades. In fact, there was such a controversy when Cohen was the president of the SAE chapter at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in 1987, when members of his chapter responded to a recently established federal holiday by staging an off-campus “Martin Luther Coon” party.

Dean of Students Paul Ginsberg, whose office is investigating the incident, said the university could do little to punish the students for an off-campus party. “Our role would be educational, not punitive,” he said. If such a party were held at a fraternity house, the fraternity would be suspended from campus activities, Ginsberg said. …

Cohen said he was irritated by the accusations against fraternities. He said the Greek system was becoming a scapegoat for larger issues of racism at the university. “Obviously, it bothers me very much, because it makes us look like quite a racist establishment,” Cohen said. “We don’t deserve that by any means.” [The Milwaukee Journal, 7 May 1987]

Cohen’s response then as now has been to practice deception, denying racism in the organization, while supporting the view that racism is disreputable. Thus, expressions of disdain for Blacks are kept as a kind of naughty little secret within the fraternity, while White members of the fraternity maintain absolute passivity, or worse, as they observe members of their race outside of the fraternity being corrupted, misled, and oppressed.

Lest anyone assume that someone with such a clearly Jewish name as Cohen couldn’t possibly approve belittlement of Blacks, let it be noted that at the same university just 18 months after the “Martin Luther Coon” party, Zeta Beta Tau, a Jewish fraternity — likely friends of Cohen’s — stirred controversy by holding a “slave auction” with members of the fraternity wearing blackface (Milwaukee Sentinel, 26 October 1988). Jews (at least in many cases) have no special love for Blacks, but pretend that they do, and it seems that initiates to some college fraternities are taught to pretend the same way, looking out for their particular interests while being false toward the rest of the world.

Just how far this kind of dissimulation can go, even among non-Jews, became evident in a case from 1991 involving a fraternity at the University of Idaho, which in some ways parallels the recent case of Sigma Alpha Epsilon at Oklahoma:

Delta Tau Delta chapter President Leonard Plaster publicly apologized for the booklet, which had explicit sexual references to several women on campus as well as references to “niggers” and “spics.” … “We now see very clearly the problem with making these statements, even if they are not public, and they certainly do not reflect our members’ attitudes.”

“I’m appalled by the content, and I’m amazed by their hypocrisy,” said Bruce Pitman, dean of student advisory services.” The fraternity had recently participated in a national campaign condemning sexual harassment, racism, and human rights violations. [AP, 7 May 1991, my emphasis]

There is an indication that the SAE members at Oklahoma also were extreme hypocrites about race. This was stated in a rant by one of the university’s Black football-players, Eric Striker, who complained that members of the fraternity would hug the Black football-players and pretend to love them. Striker subsequently apologized under pressure, but I don’t believe that he should have apologized. I also do not approve of the fratboys’ dishonest double dealing. When they show false friendship to Black football-players, it is not only those Blacks that are being deceived.

In response to the controversy over the fraternity’s racist chant and Pres. Boren’s over-the-top reaction to it, someone has pointed out that one of the University’s Black football-players, Joe Mixon, who had horribly beaten his White girlfriend, smashing bones in her face, received less punishment from the university for breaking a girl’s bones than the frat boys received for singing a Politically Incorrect song.

Quite right. That is certainly a double standard, in terms of tolerating uncivilized behavior. But I would maintain that the frat boys are doing the greater harm — to White people — not with their racist chant but with their hypocrisy. If they really are hugging Black athletes and pretending that they love them — not only suppressing but inverting their real racial views for public consumption — then they are contributing to an atmosphere where White girls are more likely to think that dating a Negro is acceptable. These frat boys, for all their racist chanting and “Martin Luther Coon” parties among themselves, in the rest of the world are no help at all. In fact, they are part of the problem.

It’s not just frat boys either. Since the 1960s, when racial equality became the dominant cant of the United States, glaring hypocrisy has become the key to success. Consequently it’s the White American bourgeoisie in general that behaves this way. You can hear it for example in Sean Hannity, who has expressed emphatic approval of the expulsion of two students for singing a racist song, the Constitution be damned. He also recently expressed his commitment to the idea that all humans have the same potential — science be damned. This cowardly careerism is killing the White race.

So, that seems to be the explanation for what, so far, seems to be a sheep-like submission to not only anti-White but blatantly illegal actions by the president of the University of Oklahoma.

It is really important not to let David L. Boren get away with this. One of the biggest problems that White people have is that we fail to speak up when we should, and a major reason why we do not speak up is that we are not sure just how far our rights extend. The fact that even White racists have freedom of speech must be demonstrated through action. If the cowardly well-to-do White members of Sigma Alpha Epsilon will not openly stand up for their race, nor even for their individual rights, then somebody else, somewhere, sometime, will have to do it, because freedom of speech has to be used in order to be preserved. If the two students expelled by David L. Boren seem guilty, it is only because they are acting guilty by failing to stand up for their rights.

To be unjustly punished for exercising a Constitutional right is not a disgrace; it is a badge of honor. The same could be said if the speech involved explicit assertions of White interests. If I were a student at that university, I would not be able to endure what is going on there without saying something. I would not be amusing myself by singing naughty songs in private for which I would have to act guilty if I got caught. I would be looking at ways to make a lot of noise on that campus so that White people will know that they don’t have to feel intimidated.

* * *

Source: The Occidental Observer

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/even-white-racists-have-freedom-of-speech-but-only-if-they-use-it/feed/ 3
L’Affaire Stavisky http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/laffaire-stavisky/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/laffaire-stavisky/#comments Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:30:02 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2684 5-Alexandre-Stavisky-scandales-politiques-443x620How Jewish swindlers — whose techniques seem quite familiar today — set the stage for the collapse of France

HOW MUCH damage does minority racism do as it encourages the Majority to keep its mouselike feet on the treadmill; fork over a disproportionate share of taxes; or battle in the overseas wars? No foundation endowed research group has yet investigated this question. The query is particularly relevant in a public relations culture like that of the United States, upon whose power Western civilization depends, and through whose living rooms streams an incessant, endless torrent of minority propaganda, encouraged by Majority mindlessness. Such an outpouring has never been witnessed on a similar scale in history. Graphically, audibly, tirelessly, daily, at all hours, the minority racist makes his appearance, alternately complaining, accusing, plotting, sleuthing, whining, gloating, . . . → Read More: L’Affaire Stavisky]]> 5-Alexandre-Stavisky-scandales-politiques-443x620How Jewish swindlers — whose techniques seem quite familiar today — set the stage for the collapse of France

HOW MUCH damage does minority racism do as it encourages the Majority to keep its mouselike feet on the treadmill; fork over a disproportionate share of taxes; or battle in the overseas wars? No foundation endowed research group has yet investigated this question. The query is particularly relevant in a public relations culture like that of the United States, upon whose power Western civilization depends, and through whose living rooms streams an incessant, endless torrent of minority propaganda, encouraged by Majority mindlessness. Such an outpouring has never been witnessed on a similar scale in history. Graphically, audibly, tirelessly, daily, at all hours, the minority racist makes his appearance, alternately complaining, accusing, plotting, sleuthing, whining, gloating, demanding, inserting and twisting his ideological dagger, as he attacks the Majority in a thousand different ways. (ILLUSTRATION: Serge Alexandre “Sacha” Stavisky)

What effect does such a Niagara of sustained, hyperthyroid sophistry and palpable razzmatazz have on a population group which is relied upon to defend the political viewpoint that makes such a spectacle possible? Perhaps a brief review of the events leading up to the ridiculously easy overthrow of “democratic” France in 1940 will provide some useful information.

In the decade prior to 1939, the year that France declared war on National Socialist Germany, the French publicity media, consisting largely of eight and twelve-page newspapers, reflected a customary and historical indifference to the country’s political well-being. Everyone wanted a reduction in unemployment, but no government ever tried to eliminate it or effectively to reduce it. Grasping, money-hungry politicians, lacking any nationalist drive, seemed to acquire virtually all key government positions. None ever displayed any inspirational leadership qualities or organizational talent of the de Gaulle type, but all labored hard at infusing themselves with charisma. Nonetheless, the patient French citizenry plugged onward, working diligently, paying its taxes, serving in the army, and trying to save a little money. But a pervading malaise had spread through France, beginning in the fateful year of 1933, when Adolf Hitler assumed leadership of the German state. This was the general atmosphere in which an unending series of financial scandals, usually with heavy minority overtones, fell upon the hapless Third Republic.

Louis L. Klotz

Louis L. Klotz

The media repeatedly reported cabinet ministers and deputies enmeshed in shady deals with swindlers. Corruption seemed to become an integral part of every French administration. The turpitude of both press and government came to be accepted as chronic. The dual causes celebres of Louis L. Klotz and Marthe Hanau did not help things. The former, Clemenceau’s Minister of Justice, had been seized by the gendarmes for passing rubber checks. Madame Hanau had made the headlines through her associations with dishonest politicians and peculations amounting to millions of francs. Her swindles had involved the cooperation of cabinet ministers, deputies, senators and the Foreign Office. Her money was used to pervert the press in general and even to buy one newspaper, which was then employed to lure tens of thousands of dupes to hand over their savings to her “enterprises.” How could the average Frenchman suspect anything when the Premier, the Foreign Minister, the Minister of Education, and the Cardinal Archbishop of Paris eagerly assisted her? The Hanau scandals dragged on for seven years, as the Madame ducked in and out of jail and her convictions were mysteriously and continuously delayed.

Marthe Hanau

Marthe Hanau

Then there was Monsieur Oustric, also a corrupter of high-level Parisian politicians, a shady banker who specialized in high-grading penny stocks. When the Oustric octopus disintegrated, and the sheep had been sheared, the Minister of Justice harrumphed and blandly blocked any inquiry, ably aided by the French Ambassador to Rome. Both later proved to be in Oustric’s pocket. These shabby deals were accompanied by smaller scandals too numerous to mention. Frenchmen, dedicated to liberty, equality and fraternity as they might be, began to wonder if rioting and mayhem might help. Peaceful demonstrations by the mulcted gulls seemed to avail nothing.

Albert Oustric

Albert Oustric

The climax, however, was yet to come. Against this background of rascally politicians and financial con men appeared in 1934 a master minority mountebank and charlatan above and beyond the standard model, holding the most starched, most dignified and most highly placed circles on his leash. This was Serge Alexandre (“Sacha”) Stavisky. A furtive network of suborned officials and compromised financiers, extending throughout the foci of French monetary power, had been initially and somewhat anonymously revealed by a raid on a Bayonne pawnshop that was floating fraudulent bonds. This small police action had the effect of disturbing an enormous antheap. Emerging into the light, blinking, came Stavisky, the king ant. As his multitudinous, political connections were blared forth in the French press, the stodgy population began to vibrate with rage. Stavisky had been born in Kiev, Russia, of Jewish parents, and was brought to Paris at the turn of the century. Over a long career of confidence games, forgery, pandering, scalping and smuggling, alternated with run-ofthe-mill stealing, he gradually rose to the ownership of a prominent newspaper and, accompanied by dazzling midinettes, became the darling of the haute monde. Slowly but surely he added one politician after the other to his string, not excluding the Sûreté General, the French secret police.

A pair of Stavisky's booking photographs

A pair of Stavisky’s booking photographs

Stavisky published two newspapers, one feeding its readers the liberal line, the other conservatism. Forty-five complaints of swindling were leveled at him, forty-five times they were ignored. One of his trials was postponed nineteen times. During the postponements, Stavisky’s fraudulent enterprises garnered many more millions, a favorite ploy being the continued issuance of municipal bonds, which were secured by either stolen or fake jewels. He would then discount the bonds at a legitimate bank, the proceeds being used to found another Stavisky corporation. In 1933 a confederate grabbed by the police confessed that Stavisky’s bunco network had made off with 239,000,000 francs’ worth of bonds from Bayonne alone. Stavisky’s newspapers, apparently at ideological loggerheads, were not so in reality. The authentic ideology was the acquisition of both leftist and rightist suckers for the furtherance of Stavisky’s “projects.” Presently the Minister of the Colonies himself was unveiled as one of Sacha’s minions in the financial rape of insurance companies. George Bonnet’s name (he was the proper, conservative Minister of Finance) popped up when his aide turned out to be a Stavisky collaborator.

As the scandals reached new highs of infamy, and as the French public was subjected to new evidence of the widespread nature of Stavisky’s machinations, he mysteriously vanished. Simultaneously it was discovered that the Sûreté General had secretly furnished him with a spurious passport, obviously hoping he would flee abroad. At this juncture the French government appeared to be coming apart. Panic seized various departments. The French national police, unable to arrest Stavisky, and having failed to spirit him out of the country, had apparently cornered him in his house. Mentally baffled, the Sûreté began smashing about somewhat in the manner of a frustrated gorilla ordered by a research team of psychiatrists to make stacks of little blocks. The police plaintively announced that at the very moment they were breaking down Stavisky’s door, he committed suicide! No one who had not been committed to an insane asylum ever believed that story.

At the cracking point, the French people gathered in cynical, angry throngs in the Paris streets — and started to rampage. On one night after another in January 1934, destructive, cursing mobs assaulted the Palais Bourbon and struggled, by the thousands with police. Fascist and Communist groups were embarrassed to find themselves battling side by side in a common purpose. In the midst of the rioting, the news came of another big minority scandal. The Minister of Justice was involved in the Sacazan bankruptcy swindle. To further inflame the citizenry, several Paris newspapers falsely reported that another minority, in this case, Senegalese Negro troops, were about to be marched in to “mow down” the demonstrators.

One particular mob, of unusual determination and numbering 10,000, made twenty crazed assaults on a bridge over the Seine, with a loss of six dead. On February 6, 1934, a furious Parisian crowd of remarkably large dimensions, estimated at over 40,000, headed for the ministries in an apocalyptic rumble. This time sixteen rioters were killed and 655 injured. Then, as a finishing touch a minority magistrate, Dr. Albert Prince, who had been active in keeping Stavisky out of jail, was first drugged, then tied to a railway track and then horribly maimed and killed by four passing trains. State investigators with straight faces adjudged the act a suicide.

These events transpired while National Socialist Germany was arming next door to France on a round-the-clock schedule. As an aftermath of the disorders, some members of the military hierarchy began to talk openly of getting rid of the Republic. French voters, however, mistakenly thought they had a solution. Moving starkly forward as a one-man national rescue team strode the leader of the Socialist party, Leon Blum. In July 1934, Blum signed a “pact” between his Socialist party and the Communists calling for a “Popular Front” against French Fascism, although some observers wondered just what the Fascists had to do with the government corruption. In April 1936, after two more years of intensive German rearmament on the other side of the Rhine, Blum was the victim of a racial assault by disgruntled French rightists, who beat and kicked him ferociously after dragging him from his limousine. In May 1936, the Popular Front’s election victory swept Blum into power as premier. By way of celebration, union leaders called a series of paralyzing strikes throughout France, beginning at aircraft factories and moving into the automobile industries.

Xavier Vallat

Xavier Vallat

On the joyous occasion of opening the first session of the new Chamber, Leon Blum found himself confronted with the worst wave of anti-Jewish feeling in France since the Dreyfus Affair. The rightist Xavier Vallat taunted the new premier mercilessly in the Chamber of Deputies:

XAVIER VALLAT: Your arrival in office . . . is incontestably a historic date. For the first time this ancient Gallic-Roman Country will be governed …

HERRIOT (the Speaker): Be careful what you say, M. Vallat!

XAVIER VALLAT: By a Jew. I have to say aloud what everyone is thinking silently — that to govern this peasant nation which is France it is better to have someone whose origins, no matter how modest, spring from the womb of our soil than to have a subtle Talmudist.

Vallat then told the Chamber that the country would now be run by a ” small Jewish coterie.”

The attack on Blum was followed by a fusillade of public verbal tirades. Henri Beraud named thirty-two Jews who had just been given prominent posts in the ministries. Pertinax, the influential press commentator, stated that Blum unnecessarily courted anti-Jewishness by surrounding himself in the Premier’s office by “ten, if not more, Jews.” The newspaper of L’Action Française screamed “Le Juif au Pouvoir!” Andre Gide, the Nobel laureate, asserted: ” … Blum considers the Jewish race superior, as called upon to dominate … that it is his duty to work for its triumph.”

Leon Blum

Leon Blum

Blum’s contribution to France’s welfare ended with a bitterly quarreling, bankrupt country a year later, when he resigned. The social gains of the Popular Front were immediately wiped out by economic setbacks. Blum’s personal prestige suffered a fatal blow from a peculiar incident. A particularly savage riot broke out in the Paris suburb of Clichy between a rightist group and Blum’s Popular Fronters. In the melee, the police killed five rioters and wounded 150. One of the wounded was Blum’s head of cabinet, Blumel, who had rushed to the scene to help restore order. Blum, surprised by the news while at the opera, sped to the riot in a silk top hat, white tie and tails. The sight of Blum tippy-toeing through the blood-spattered, body-littered riot zone in this getup proved to be too much for anybody of whatever political persuasion.

The foregoing is a brief rundown of the psychological and political condition of France just prior to its declaration of war on Germany in September 1939.

How can a scholar observing this period in France believe that this condition had no effect on the will of the French army, particularly at the vital command levels? We know that the French fighting men of 1914-18 were among the toughest in history. Yet twenty-two years later, in 1940, 135 French divisions crumpled almost instantly at the first German onslaught.

The vital question for Americans now is to determine whether a somewhat similar situation can arise as our largely alien rulers push us into new and larger Middle Eastern wars and a possible confrontation with a resurgent Russia, while our country is literally crawling with latter-day Staviskys and Blums.

* * *

Based on an article in Instauration magazine for August 1976

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/laffaire-stavisky/feed/ 1
Are We The Kurds Of The Future? http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/are-we-the-kurds-of-the-future/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/are-we-the-kurds-of-the-future/#comments Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:00:27 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2706 contemporarykurdistanmap2005

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LET US consider for a moment the Kurds, that nation — or, in other words, that people — without a land in the Middle East. The status of the Kurds, who are currently the subjects and pawns of the Iraqis, the Turks, the Iranians, and others, is of vital interest to White people worldwide — and not for the reasons you might think. (ILLUSTRATION: Contemporary use of Kurdistan refers to four parts of a greater Kurdistan, which include parts of southeastern Turkey, northern Syria, northern Iraq, and western Iran. The Kurdish people currently do not have a nation of their own, although Kurdish nationalists have continuously sought autonomous regions within the four nations they dwell in.)

The Kurds speak an Indo-European language, and an examination of their physical features shows . . . → Read More: Are We The Kurds Of The Future?]]> contemporarykurdistanmap2005

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LET US consider for a moment the Kurds, that nation — or, in other words, that people — without a land in the Middle East. The status of the Kurds, who are currently the subjects and pawns of the Iraqis, the Turks, the Iranians, and others, is of vital interest to White people worldwide — and not for the reasons you might think. (ILLUSTRATION: Contemporary use of Kurdistan refers to four parts of a greater Kurdistan, which include parts of southeastern Turkey, northern Syria, northern Iraq, and western Iran. The Kurdish people currently do not have a nation of their own, although Kurdish nationalists have continuously sought autonomous regions within the four nations they dwell in.)

The Kurds speak an Indo-European language, and an examination of their physical features shows in an instant that they carry a significant percentage of European genes, though racial mixture has touched them as it has most Caucasian peoples on the continent of Asia.

What concerns us today is not their racial or linguistic heritage, however. What concerns us about the Kurds is the fact that they are a people without a country.

They are culturally, linguistically, and physically distinct from neighboring peoples. They have their own language; they have an historic territory; and — most important of all — they think of themselves as a separate and distinct people. In my view, they certainly deserve self-determination: they deserve their own country.

But the Kurds have no government of their own. Their homeland is ruled by overlapping multicultural states dominated by other peoples. In the part of Kurdistan owned by Turkey, they are essentially powerless against the Turks. In the part of Kurdistan owned by Iraq, they are under the thumb of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. In the part of Kurdistan lying within the borders of Iran, the Iranian state determines their destiny — and so on.

Do you think that Kurdish people have much influence in the running of the multicultural societies they are forced to share? Do you imagine that Kurdish parents have much say in how their children are educated in Iranian schools? Is it likely that Kurdish points of view are fairly presented — or presented at all — in the Iraqi or Turkish media? Do these multicultural states put their armies and air forces at the disposal of the Kurds to protect Kurdish interests?

Of course not! The military forces of several of these multicultural states are noted for their attacks on Kurds who had the temerity to demand freedom and self-determination. In fact, our “ally” Turkey, through which U.S. aid to the Kurds flows, has already leveled over 2,000 Kurdish villages in what is frankly termed a “depopulation program.”

My point in bringing them up is this: When we look at the Kurds’ present, we are looking at Whites’ future. We are the Kurds of the future.

In every White nation, and especially the United States, White people are suicidally giving up control of their homelands, the homelands their ancestors died to procure for us.

We are agreeing to the insane concept of “one biped, one vote,” while simultaneously importing millions of our natural enemies. We are even inciting them into a frenzied hatred of us.

In the United States, we have rejected the idea implicit in the republic of the founders, the idea that this government was set up to insure the freedom and independence of a particular people, the people of European descent in North America and their posterity. In its place we have accepted the Jewish idea that the purpose of this country is to supply the bellies, bank accounts, and sex urges of the greatest possible number of human beings that can squeeze between the Rio Grande and the 49th parallel.

Such a perversion of the idea of our nation may make a few of us richer temporarily. It may momentarily assuage the feelings of guilt inculcated in White people by the Jewish-controlled media corporations with their billions of dollars. It may somewhat appease the savages within our gates and buy a few more years of illusory peace.

But Nature is impossible to fool, and her laws cannot be broken. If you think you can break Nature’s laws, you will soon find that they can — and will — break you.

Nature defines nations, not as legal fictions or geographic expressions, but as living biological entities, as extended families. Nations are people bound together by a common history, culture, destiny, and — most importantly of all — by common descent and biological kinship.

When the separate Black nation on American soil was declared to be joined to the White American nation after the Jewish-inspired and Communist-supported “civil rights” revolution, that declaration had no more effect on reality than the declaration of Charles Manson that he was Jesus Christ had on Biblical scholarship.

We continued to have two nations, Black and White, to which have now been added countless other nations imported by our enemies, living under the same government: a government which cannot serve the interests of either people since, by definition, those interests will seldom be identical.

Such a situation serves best that peculiar people whose members always have been a tiny minority in whatever lands they have inhabited and who, perhaps reflexively or instinctively, so often work to undermine homogeneity. They labor assiduously to exchange rule by a vital majority for balance-of-power politics easily influenced by a committed and wealthy minority group.

We have voluntarily submitted our nation to rule by others. While we blabbered the mindless platitudes about “fairness” and “equality” that our enemies put in our mouths, we voluntarily put ourselves in the same situation as the Kurds.

We have become a people without a country. We have become a nation without a government of our own. We have become the Kurds of the future, a people whose destiny is in the hands of our deadliest enemies.

This truth is evidenced in a thousand different ways. We are legally forbidden to favor our own people in hiring, education, and the disbursement of tax money. We are forbidden, on pain of being fired or ostracized, to make public statements in support of the survival of White Americans. We are told not to note that White Americans are being oppressed and vilified. We are told not to call attention to the ways in which the Old White America was superior to the new multiracial feeding and breeding zone which has supplanted it.

Do White Americans have any politicians in Washington explicitly standing up for our interests and concerns? How absurd. Of course not! The criminals currently belonging to the gang calling itself “the Congress of the United States” owe loyalty only to the multiracial system that pays them so handsomely. They would rather have a limb amputated than admit they represent the interests of White people.

Are White Americans able to control the education of their children, ensuring that our traditional values, our unique history, and the stories of our heroes are transmitted to the next generation of our people? To even ask such a question is forbidden in the New World Order. Schools teach our children that “diversity” and cohabitation with non-Whites are moral ideals; that Communist enemies of White America like “Martin Luther” King are heroes; and that not only is there no difference between the races, but that races do not exist. Furthermore, the establishment of schools for White children would most likely be met with the most ferocious legal and media assault imaginable.

Do White Americans control our media of entertainment and information? Except for the Internet, which our enemies do not yet control, all major media in America are dedicated apostles of our national disappearance and our racial extinction. To pretend otherwise would be laughable if it were not fatal. Who are the media preparing us to hate next, after the Iraqis? White separatists in camouflage uniforms, carrying guns and criticizing Jews, are the new heavies in prime-time dramas. This is very revealing of exactly who is running the brain-washing transmitters, and it is a chilling reminder of who may be terminated next in a so-called “surgical strike.”

Are the military forces and police agencies of the United States at the disposal of White Americans for the advancement and protection of our people and our interests? What did these armed agencies do to protect the interests of White separatist Randy Weaver? What did these armed forces do when a few European nations had the temerity to stand up for the interests of the European race sixty years ago? What would “our” armed forces have done if Rhodesia and South Africa had stiffened their spines and fought back instead of surrendering to the New World Order? No, these armed forces are no more in our hands than the armed forces of Turkey and Iraq are in the hands of the Kurds.

Unless Whites regain control of our destiny, we are the Kurds of the future. And the future will be here before you know it.

* * *

From American Dissident Voices, 1996

Source: National Alliance

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/are-we-the-kurds-of-the-future/feed/ 2
Urban Law 101: Adventures with Black Clients http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/urban-law-101-adventures-with-black-clients/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/urban-law-101-adventures-with-black-clients/#comments Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:30:38 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2725 Black Line-UpMy black clients eventually destroyed all my preconceived notions about race.

by Donald Williamson

I GREW UP in a suburb of a large northern city, and had no real contact with blacks until I became a lawyer. After I got my law degree I naively looked forward to a rewarding legal career. Little did I realize that 25 years later I would be a self-employed attorney doing domestic and civil litigation for a clientele that is overwhelmingly black. I didn’t plan it that way. I just wanted to do a lot of work in the courtroom, and the best offer I got out of law school was with a small firm that specialized in bankruptcy. Most of its clients were black. Several years later, I set up an independent practice and many of my . . . → Read More: Urban Law 101: Adventures with Black Clients]]> Black Line-UpMy black clients eventually destroyed all my preconceived notions about race.

by Donald Williamson

I GREW UP in a suburb of a large northern city, and had no real contact with blacks until I became a lawyer. After I got my law degree I naively looked forward to a rewarding legal career. Little did I realize that 25 years later I would be a self-employed attorney doing domestic and civil litigation for a clientele that is overwhelmingly black. I didn’t plan it that way. I just wanted to do a lot of work in the courtroom, and the best offer I got out of law school was with a small firm that specialized in bankruptcy. Most of its clients were black. Several years later, I set up an independent practice and many of my former clients came to me for domestic work.

Most people do not realize this, but outside the world of corporate or securities law, in any big city the legal profession is to a large degree fueled by the pathologies of blacks and other Third-World people. Of course, whites hire lawyers, but in any city, especially one with a good-sized black population, most of the people who need lawyers are black. In this respect, lawyers are like police officers or social workers — they rarely deal with ordinary white people. To a large degree, I became racially conscious because of my black clients, who eventually destroyed all my preconceived notions about race. My awakening did not come from one or even a few incidents, but from the accumulation of thousands upon thousands of small interactions.

Day after day my clients continue to amaze me. There is no racial education quite so thorough and convincing as spending time with blacks, and my clients are far from being the poorest and least competent blacks. They are not indigent criminals for whom I am a court-appointed lawyer. They are people who can afford (or think they can afford) a lawyer to get a divorce, contest a custody judgment, beat a traffic ticket, etc. Some are government employees who make $60 to $70 thousand a year, yet even this group is vastly different from whites.

They Don’t Know

One of the most striking things about my black clients is the things they do not know. Many blacks, for example, do not know their own telephone numbers. They may think they do but they don’t, and the problem has gotten worse with the proliferation of cell phones. At least a third of the numbers they leave with my receptionist or on my answering machine are wrong numbers. Often, a potential client will call several times, each time leaving a variation of the same phone number. I keep calling until they get it right. At first I thought I was taking down the numbers incorrectly, but now I know better. With caller ID, it is clear when what the client says does not match the digital display. Some callers don’t even leave a number. About a quarter of the messages blacks leave do not include either a name or a number. Needless to say, many calls are not returned.

More than a handful of blacks who have come to my office do not even know their own home address (they move often). Many cannot tell me their own spouse’s names. Now I know to tell clients ahead of time that they will need this sort of information when they come in. Otherwise, if I ask for someone’s address he may look hurt and say, “If I’d known you were going to ask me that I would have come prepared.”

Many black men know their children’s names but do not know how to spell them. With the proliferation of unusual names among blacks, I can only guess at how they are spelled. One client who told me he couldn’t spell his children’s names said I would need an encyclopedia to look them up. Many men have admitted to me they are not even sure how to pronounce their children’s names. Black women, on the other hand, often become incensed if you mispronounce the very unusual names they have given their children.

The most unusual name I ever came across was Iisszzttadda. I have never met a person, white or black, who could pronounce it correctly. To my surprise the name is pronounced, “I seize the day.” Iisszzttadda had siblings named Raheem, Utopian, Desiorme, Sid-Timothy, Kizzma, and Larilaril. I have occasionally asked clients the reasons for such unusual names, but the most common answer is “I don’t know. It just sounded good.” This is the answer I got from a mother who named her child Latrine. (See the Appendix to this article for actual names of blacks I have encountered in my practice.) I once had a client in my office who did not know his own name. He had been called by his nickname for so long he couldn’t remember his given name. This is not as shocking as it sounds. Some black names, like Phe-anjoy or Quithreaun or JyesahJhnai, are so odd, it would be no surprise if they were never used and eventually forgotten.

Names are not the only things blacks do not know. Once when I was filling out a form for a female client I asked if she knew how old her husband was. She told me she didn’t know. I asked her the next question on the form, which was her husband’s birth date. Amazingly, she knew it — and was genuinely surprised when I told her she could figure out her husband’s age from his birth date.

When potential clients call for the first time, often the hardest part is to figure out why they are calling. Usually they begin in the middle of the story. If you let them, they will go on and on, and say nothing. Clients may call about papers they got in the mail, but never have the papers in front of them. They may call for information, but never have a pen or pencil ready to take it down. I have learned to ask direct questions: “What is your name?” “What is the problem?” If a client cannot tell me in three minutes or less what the problem is, I tell him to come to my office and bring a small retainer fee. That way at least I will have to listen to their ramblings only if they are prepared to pay.

Blacks with whom I have already spoken seem to think I should know instantly who they are when they telephone. After I get on the line, a typical conversation may go like this:

  • “Who am I speaking to?”
  • “I am your client.”
  • “I have many clients, can you tell me which one?”
  • “I am your divorce client.”
  • “Can you tell me your name?”
  • “Rufus.”
  • “Rufus, can you tell me your last name?”

The conversation may go on for some time before I finally figure out who is calling.

I do not take personal injury or product liability cases, but blacks are always asking about bringing suits of this kind: “My vacuum cleaner broke. Can you help me?”

No Apologies

Most of my clients who are not black either show up on time for appointments or call if they must reschedule. Amazing as this may seem, only about five percent of my black clients show up on time, and by that I mean within an hour of the appointed time. Only one in five show up on the appointed day. A few trickle in a day or two later. Most just never show up. Missing an appointment never embarrasses black people. They call repeatedly for new appointments, making four, five or even six appointments and then miss them all. I had one client who called more than 50 times before he finally came to my office. Rarely do I ever get a call from a black client canceling an appointment.

When I first started out as a lawyer I would call clients in advance to remind them of their appointments. They thanked me, but it made them no more likely to show up. Also, I used to call clients and potential clients who missed appointments, and try to have them reschedule. This did very little good. The most common response was, “Why are you calling me?” and it was never their fault that they didn’t show up. They had many different excuses, but I never heard, “I forgot,” or “I’m sorry I didn’t make it.”

Since appointments mean so little to my clients, I decide each day when I am available, and tell everyone to show up at the same time. On Saturday afternoons I can have as many as twenty appointments for the same time. Usually it is not a problem because few show up and even fewer show up on time. Only once in the last 20 years did everyone show up.

They Don’t Remember

Many of my clients are unable to explain even the most basic facts. Often they must take the witness stand, and no matter how many times we have gone over the testimony in advance, I can be surprised by what they say. Some are simply lying and get tangled up in their lies, but most have such low IQs, they cannot describe even the simplest things. Often they seem to say the first thing that pops into their heads. When they are questioned further they cannot remember what they said previously.

I once had a client whose wife was suing him for child support. In discussions before trial he told me he had two children from a previous marriage. This was favorable for him because it meant he would probably owe his current wife less money. At trial, his wife testified that my client had no children outside of their marriage. When I asked him on the stand how many children he had before he married his current wife, he said he had none. Later I asked him why he had answered that way, when he told me before that he had two other children. “Did I say that?” he asked. I never found out which version was true.

Many of my clients have a hard time following simple directions. Once I appeared in traffic court with a client. In lieu of a conviction he was to see a traffic safety movie. The courtroom was on the second floor of the courthouse, and the traffic safety movie was shown on the first floor. The client was to come back to the courtroom with proof — which would be given him on the first floor — that he watched the movie. Both the judge and I explained this to the client. At the designated hour my client did not come back to the courtroom. Later that afternoon I got a call from the judge, who told me my client had completely misunderstood the instructions. He went to the nearest commercial movie house, saw a movie, and brought back his movie ticket stub.

Long ago I stopped asking my clients why they did something. It is not worth the effort. Most don’t know. The ones who know usually cannot give a coherent answer. Even if they can give a coherent answer, it usually changes every time you ask.

For example, one of my black divorce clients tried to hide assets from his spouse — this is not uncommon. Through discovery it came to light that he had secretly bought a piece of property after the divorce had begun. He put his wife’s name on the title, a very odd thing to do, since he was trying to hide the property from her. I made the mistake of asking him why he did that. True to my previous experiences, he could not give an answer that made sense.

Clients sometimes tell me they knew they were being cheated, but signed the papers anyway. I have given up asking why they signed, because I know I will not get an intelligible answer.

They Don’t Make Sense

My clients make mistakes in written and spoken English that are often comical. One client in a criminal case told me he was telling the truth, and was willing to take a “polyester test” to prove it. Another told me he desperately wanted to see me, and needed an appointment “between Tuesday and Wednesday.” One who bounced a check told me the problem was “insignificant funds” in his account. I have had clients who have “profiteering” plans at work, want an “uncontestable” divorce (or a “detested” divorce, or an “untested” divorce), had “insects” (incest) in the family, need an “annoyment” (annulment), want a free “flirtation” (consultation), ask about my “container” (retainer), want to “consultate” about a divorce, or had to meet with “media people” (mediation counselors). One man told me, “I own a car but it is not mine,” and one who was accused of indecent exposure insisted, “I didn’t take my stuff out of my pants.”

It took me some time to understand certain kinds of black slang. Within the first month of my independent practice a man called to ask if I could “put a suitcase on a cat.” After much inquiry I realized he wanted to know if I could file a law suit against someone. Within the week I got another call asking if I “did luggage.” Since I now knew about suitcases, I said yes, I do luggage. I pride myself on doing good work for my clients, but I cannot remember even once being thanked or complimented by a black client. They do not observe even the most common courtesies. Also, with rare exceptions, blacks will never admit they made a mistake. When things go wrong, as they inevitably do, it is always someone else’s fault. The most common excuse blacks give is, “They are putting me through the changes.” I have yet to figure out exactly what that means.

Most people tell lies because they think a lie will help them. I have come to the conclusion that most of my clients cannot distinguish between a plausible lie and a wild fairy tale. They are convinced people will believe anything they say. Clients often tell me some fantastic story I cannot possibly defend in court. If I tell them what they are saying is unbelievable the usual reaction is anger and screaming. Typically, they will add, “I’m paying you. You have to believe what I say.”

Sometimes, despite my warnings, clients will get on the stand and tell obvious, outright lies. The judge may interrupt the testimony and tell me to go outside with my client to “get your story straight.” They are not going to sit in court and listen to fairy tales. I take my client outside and tell him he has got to tell the truth, or at least say something believable. My client then starts screaming. “Why are you talking to me this way? You’re supposed to be on my side.”

I once had a client testify about his assets in a divorce case, in which the court was to determine whether he should pay his estranged wife temporary support. My client was a store-front preacher, and testified that he lived in the marital residence with his wife, though in separate quarters. His wife testified that he was out living with his “ho.” My client went on and on about how this was impossible because he was a Man of God. I thought he was lying. The judge ruled that if my client was living with his wife he should share household expenses, which he was not currently paying. At this point, my client realized there was a cost to pretending to be a Man of God living with his lawful wife, and changed his tune. “Judge why are you believing me?” he said. “Believe my wife. I am nothing but an old lying nigger.” No one in the courtroom could stop laughing.

Outside Kids

“Outside kid” cases are one of my specialties. For those not in the know, blacks call any child born out of wedlock an outside kid. Black men are good at making children but not at supporting them, and this can be a terrible burden under laws written with white people in mind.

In my state, the parent who does not have custody — almost always the father — pays a percentage of net income to the parent with custody — almost always the mother. The mother gets 20 percent of the father’s net income for the first child, 25 percent for two children, and up to 50 percent for five or more children. What if a man has children by several women? Each mother gets 20 percent for the first child, so a man with five children by five different women is supposed to be paying 100 percent of his income in child support. I once had a client who had 12 different children by 10 different women. Theoretically, he owed 250 percent of his income. These laws simply don’t make sense for blacks. Judges have to decide each case as best they can.

Not surprisingly, the average black client will not pay child support unless it is deducted from his paycheck. Many refuse to work, or leave a job to avoid paying. Job turnover is very high among blacks, and the court system has a hard time keeping up with them. Some blacks quit on purpose, and move to another job so as to keep one step ahead of the collections.

Whenever I ask a potential client whether he has paid court-ordered child support he will almost invariably answer with one or more of the following: “I always helps my kids.” “I gives the mother money whenever she asks.” “I am always there for my kids.” “I buys my kids whatever they needs.” It almost always turns out they have paid no support, haven’t seen their children in years, and at best may have paid for some basketball shoes.

Cadillacs > Children

Children do not always seem to have the same importance for blacks that they do for whites. I was in bankruptcy court once waiting for my client’s case to be called. A black debtor — not my client — was before the judge trying to convince him to approve his bankruptcy repayment plan. The judge told him he could not afford both his Cadillac and his children, and had to give up one or the other. The debtor immediately said he could not give up his car, and therefore the judge would have to take his kids. The judge threw up his hands and walked off the bench. On another occasion, the same bankruptcy judge told a black debtor he could not afford both his Cadillac and his house. The debtor replied, “You can live in your car but you can’t drive your house. Take my house.” This was many years ago and tastes in cars may have changed, but I learned how important Cadillacs were to blacks.

In one respect my job is very different from that of a policeman or social worker: I have to make sure I am paid. I try to get paid in full before I agree to represent a client. If I am not paid in full before the case is over I know I will never get any more money. Clients have a hard time understanding they are paying for an attorney’s time. Invariably, if a client drops a case before it is over he asks for a full refund. Their reasoning goes something like this: “I paid for a divorce and I didn’t get one, so I should get all my money back.”

Once I sued a client who didn’t pay me. I finally garnished his wages and was paid in full. About six months later he called to ask me to take his next case. I told him I didn’t want a client that doesn’t pay his bills. He became indignant. He said I got all my money, so what did I have to complain about.

To hear my clients tell it, banks are constantly “messing” with their checking accounts. At least that is what they tell me when their checks bounce. Most of my clients do not have checking accounts, and pay cash. The ones who do have accounts have no idea how much money is in them. Many clients have written me checks on accounts that were closed.

They Act Like Children

Black clients yell and scream at me every day; I have learned that this is normal. They are like young children who don’t get their way. I usually ignore these outbursts, though screaming back at them is usually more effective. I have been threatened with physical violence only twice, and once I had to call the police to escort a client out of my office.

My experience is hardly unique. Most of the lawyers I know have practices similar to mine. Most lawyers therefore are racial realists even if they do not admit it openly. Their actions and comments are no different from mine. People who have daily contact with minorities, who know first-hand that there are racial differences, are likely to be the best prospects for any movement that promotes racial consciousness. They don’t like dealing with blacks, but that is simply part of the business. If they can’t take it anymore they get into some other line of work.

One lawyer I know moved to the country so he would have white clients. He had lived in the big city all his life, but was willing to pull up all his roots to get a different clientele.

Recently the supreme court in my state ruled that a lawyer can be disciplined for communications that racially denigrate litigants. For that reason I cannot write this article under my own name, much as I would like to. I must hide behind a pseudonym for fear of falling victim to our politically-correct supreme court.

* * *

Appendix

Some Names of Blacks Encountered in my Practice:

Aaja (pronounced Asia), Acacia, Ajeenah, Akai, Aquanita, Aryan White, Baleria, Barbertha, Callie (pronounced Kelly), CaAndi, Chetiqua, Cloteal, Curly Top, Darhies, Dayphine, Debrasharme, Derecio, Dertiteriesa, Dikueria and Dikuria (twins), Dildree, Dishon, Dovanna, Duanita, Dyiamond, Dwendolyn, Effillyne, Elizabeth Taylor, Endrissa, Equandolyn, Esaw, Everage, Floyce, Franshawn, Ghia, Godzilla Pimp, Ivier, Jartavious, JyesahJhnai, Keithen, Kentnilla, Lafondra, La,poo (yes, contains comma), Latronia, Lemonjello and Orangejello (twins), L’Tonya, Machoda, Nau-Quia, Mayima, Minute, Miquel, Nethel, Omnipotence, Ondra (pronounced Andre), Ozro, Padraic, Pecola, Phe-anjoy, Precious Unique, Queen Esther, Quithreaun, Rincesetta, Sanja, Saranus, Shanieja, Sharicus, Shiquipa, SiJourna’i, Silquia, Sinetra, Summer Love, Termicka, Tequilla, Timphanie, Tryphenia, Tywana, Tzaddi and Tzavvi (twins), Ulheric, Undlia, Undrea (pronounced Andre), Wsam, Xiomara, XL, Yaw, Yuvodka Sharice, Wilida, Zaquan, Zufan, Zyneene.

* * *

Source: John Bryant

 

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/urban-law-101-adventures-with-black-clients/feed/ 5
The Moral Responsibility to Discriminate http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/the-moral-responsibility-to-discriminate/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/the-moral-responsibility-to-discriminate/#comments Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:00:15 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2701 51-8UuwBZ4LThe destructive ideas injected into our people by the media are like HIV injected into the cells of a healthy body.

by Steven E. Romer

RECENTLY, the concept of “Memes” has become popular in academic circles. This is the idea that information has a sort of detached life of its own—using our fertile brains and learning abilities to develop into lasting entities in their own right. Our intellects are a sort of environment for these developing information organization patterns. One example given in the books about this topic is religion. In this example, religion is seen as a self-sustaining meme which survives and perpetuates itself like an organism would, partly because of the dynamic it sets up in requiring faith as a virtue. This is a basic thumbnail to introduce the idea – I . . . → Read More: The Moral Responsibility to Discriminate]]> 51-8UuwBZ4LThe destructive ideas injected into our people by the media are like HIV injected into the cells of a healthy body.

by Steven E. Romer

RECENTLY, the concept of “Memes” has become popular in academic circles. This is the idea that information has a sort of detached life of its own—using our fertile brains and learning abilities to develop into lasting entities in their own right. Our intellects are a sort of environment for these developing information organization patterns. One example given in the books about this topic is religion. In this example, religion is seen as a self-sustaining meme which survives and perpetuates itself like an organism would, partly because of the dynamic it sets up in requiring faith as a virtue. This is a basic thumbnail to introduce the idea – I do recommend reading further.

The most important thing about memes is that they can clearly show us the power of ideas in shaping our worldviews — and in our divine pattern being taken over by contagious and destructive foreign ideas. One issue I have with the idea of memes is that I don’t think the concept is understood well. A good book on memes is The Meme Machine by Susan Blackmore. She is a friend of mine and a student of Richard Dawkins, who originally came up with the idea. I learned evolution from another student of Richard Dawkins named Matt Ridley while I was in graduate school, which gave me some further insight on the matter. Also informative is Promethean Fire which discusses gene/culture interactions. It is a complex concept – excellent as a focus for conceptualizing these Jewish/racial issues. Here is an example:

The European soul is like a sort of DNA within each individual sharing European descent. We have common goals, desires, morals, and ideals which have been tooled into our genetic character by our environment and our resolve (punishing/executing liars, thieves, etc.), and which we have tooled into our cultures naturally because of this.

Our external cultures are manifestations of this inner life – this way of conceptualizing things. Our memes are always partially rooted in our emotional makeup. The cultures we build are like bodies — many individuals bound together into a super-organism sharing long-term goals. This constitutes our body — our nation. This analogy of our people as a singular body is extremely useful in conceptualizing our modern racial realities.

A Jew is exactly like a virus.

Specifically, they are exactly like the AIDS virus. They attack our immune systems. They open us up to a host of other illnesses well beyond the direct things they do. They set up Rube Goldberg-like cascades of events which lead to our destruction from every angle.

They want us to race-mix to further decrease our higher/elite ability to see them as death-dealing invaders, pushing into our symphony of Western European-based culture. This removes our immune response. Seeing them and what they do to us is an immune response. Vision keeps us safe from dangers — even intellectual ones from the abstract and invisible world of memes.

Race-mixing also causes us to lose sight of the focus and continuity of our symphony — our basic motivation to build civilizations. Our body which was beginning to stand up in our cathedrals, our cities, within our symphony, and in our science is beginning to be dissolved. Here is an important distinction: there are good and bad memes just like there are good and bad kinds of DNA (i.e., cellular versus viral DNA). The virus is the perpetrator, the purveyor of destruction. The DNA it uses is the meme (the instructions for the cell, fitting its Ribonucleic acid pattern of information).

In this natural analogy:

CELL = the individual European mind — working like a symphony (body) with others for higher things.

LIES = destructive information not in the long-term best interest of the cell or its brethren or their higher purposes, which they have been building like the slow construction of a cathedral within.

TRUTH = the life-blood of the European mind (inventors of science) and vision; where we have been trying to steer our cultures for ages. All good things like real Justice, and even long-term survival, are based on unbiased truth.

GOOD MEMES = are truthful (as much as they can be — given the capacity of the mind) and increase our ability to overcome obstacles to further growth, harmony, and inquiry. In a cell, this is the amassed knowledge represented by the billion-year perfection of the cellular DNA. Through this divine molecule, we have come to know the universe and brought it out of darkness in our eyes.

BAD MEMES = are formed around the deceptive facade of truth –- so they fit the “lock” of the cell to get it to operate according to the new “information.” In a cell, this is the foreign viral DNA containing the chemical style but not the actual substance of the cell’s normal “wisdom of ages” from evolution. The purposes of the viral DNA are not the same as those deep within the heart of every healthy uninfected cell…

AIDS = a type of virus directly attacking the immune system to allow every type of invader access to the resources of the cells of the body.

VIRUS = a selfish wielder of information. An unthinking entity taking advantage of the concentration of resources in a body of cells working in symphony for higher things – weakening and destroying that harmony. A virus does not work according to higher principles, it does not see, or care about, what the bodily cells see or care about via their DNA and position within the organism.

BODY = the society of cells working, largely unaware, in the divine higher pattern of information and meaning (brains) of a body which keeps and protects the cells from invaders and almost miraculously amasses resources and creatively solves problems.

A virus tricks or lies in a manner of speaking — the virus attaches to a cell and forcibly injects what can be conceived of as plausible lies which commandeer the cell’s resources and machinery to reproduce and spread the viral DNA instead of its own. The information from the false DNA looks fine to the machinery of the cell, but is definitely not in its best interests. Additionally, it is immoral for the unthinking cell to operate according to these “principles” from the virus, which only appear to be the billion-year-old ‘manna’ of the cell’s creator, but which are actually instructions for stealing from — and eventually, killing — the cell. It is immoral, therefore, for the cell not to discriminate, because it thereby reproduces and furthers the aims of the deadly lies of the foreign DNA.

Jews do exactly that, to us.

To make another analogy, the Jew’s prototypical superhero in this scenario (rather than being concerned about truth and justice) would be a sort of “AIDS virus man” – able to bamboozle, introduce all sorts of diseases, and single-handedly destroy the defenses of a body.

This is heaven for a virus: lying, killing, stealing… Here in the USA, we see this in the control of our “instruction” media – the press. By their control, in documented fashion (see Kevin MacDonald’s and David Duke’s books), they give us all sorts of information (forcibly) that is very bad for our long-term interests. They leave most people alone, but come out in force to get anyone who opposes them, any that seek to defend themselves – like the actual immune-system heroes of 20th century Germany, which they caused us to destroy. They put a stop to the viral destruction for a time, and fought for the divine pattern in our civilizations. Sure, they used harsh measures — bodies get fevers in the same vein — which themselves can threaten us. But it must be done. Very few can withstand the Jews’ onslaught. Very few can see clearly enough. Relatively few cells are immune cells. Eugenics, to increase those who can see, is one of our only hopes.

What makes the Jews truly evil in an objective sense is that they are no blind virus uncaringly entering the beautiful symphony of cells known as a body. When they attack the people who want to read the universe in science, who are capable of knowing the creator, who seek to understand what the creator is saying truthfully in nature, they do so in an intellectual sense. They see clearly what we love and what motivates us, and they have strong emotions about it. They are not the same emotions we would have. You could say they hate what we love, fiercely and deeply, because it keeps them from living the way they are built to live.

If they did not see, they could not build the intricate and devastating meme-weapons based on our emotional makeup that they do in fact build — such as Communism. The idea of not putting greed first is something that resonates deeply with us at some level. They parlayed these sorts of emotions (against greed), meant for higher things when organized and harnessed by true, fearless, unselfish leaders (see my book), into a great scythe reaping the heads of our best and brightest like a selfish whore calling for the head of John the Baptist.

Everywhere, they are the engine of our doom — the hand of the destroyer wreaking havoc with the delicate timing and instruments of our divine symphony. Jewish Boasian anthropology should never have come on the scene — it sowed discordant and destructive notes among us and that section of our symphony which would have helped us to survive and reach new heights is not there now. We are not making the beautiful music anymore. Instead, we have the cacophony of a disaster unto death.

They keep us from reaching our divine escape velocity in the vehicle of our civilization. We are going to miss our meeting with the creator; we will not be ready to make the leap; they are destroying the souls of the whole world. We must stop them, despite their claims that they are cells like us, sowing DNA just like us, or even that they are somehow “chosen” or divine in some way…

A single space flight needs millions working in a concerted effort. It is very difficult to do these things, but relatively easy to destroy them. The words of Jews damage the booster rockets, and can cause our spaceship to explode. Not all wrong moves end in disaster, but one wrong move is all it takes for disaster to occur. We are very very ill with the Jewish virus, many of our best people are hopelessly infected – just like they were during the Communist revolution in Russia. No matter how intelligent you are, you cannot fight ignorance with good arguments because they fall on infertile ground. They do not see. They are blind, lost in the wilderness of alien memes.

When Communism sought to equalize our nations, it also beheaded them automatically. Not all body cells are equal. The Jews know this. They want an international Bastille day. Communists may have had some valid issues, but Jews parlayed this into destructive paths. Cells must operate, they are compelled to – built to – just give them the wrong instructions and let them run with it.

In World War II we fought ourselves, we fought for Communism, and every nation of our civilization lost – the frothing viral (Jew) hordes on one side and our immune system (Germans and other Europeans) on the other. This is just like a body infected with a virus — where Rosie the riveter was not unlike an infected cell in a body, spawning more destruction unknowingly, thinking she was doing the right thing.

Anyway, the idea of disease/memes is a useful tool but let’s not forget that there are good memes and bad memes – each of which should be defined by its effects on future generations and those generations’ ability to discern truth.

Can you imagine a world where we have enough of the truth-seekers and their supporters that viruses/lies do not have a chance? This would be the “kingdom of Heaven” on Earth, quite literally… Instead, the Jews are destroying us permanently this time — the disease is everywhere. We need a medical miracle.

What we have with the points brought up by William Pierce is actual wisdom. Truths. These are bits of the old code we should be following because they can open our eyes to greater issues. Decisions based on these ideas will offer us a greater future. What I am saying here is that we have the right, the duty, and the moral responsibility to reverse our destruction. We are unequivocally in the right. Read my book and I truly believe you will get a shot of divine power to continue with our cause and its aims… I originally began to write it about evolution and the brain, and my eyes began opening while writing it over a span of ten years.

What we need is to see our mortality, and to see what immortal things are at stake across the generations.

I used to be liberal, but I saw these ideas falling away like the dead husks of forgotten viruses as I learned and grew. Now I am not conservative, either. I am something else, I am for the life force above all. Nothing else, no other issue, even matters. No contrived stories, no verbal levers can unseat a soul aligned with the pole of this universal magnet. The whole is greater. I do not hate, I love. Get people to see that and we will rise from our deathbed, we will have our miracle. We will turn every cell into an immune cell, we will all see the glory of the truths written into nature. We will be rooted in the Earth, strongly reaching for the sun of our destiny.

Get people to see that, and we have won.

* * *

Mr. Romer is a behavioral neuroscientist and is the author of The Textbook of the Universe: The Genetic Ascent to God.

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/the-moral-responsibility-to-discriminate/feed/ 0
What It Will Take http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/what-it-will-take/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/what-it-will-take/#comments Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:32:33 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2656 16098652425_8cb800a586

The final acts of Robert Mathews and their portent for the White resistance

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE LONGEST-RUNNING national news story of recent months certainly must be the one about the Aryan Resistance Movement, also named in various news accounts as the White American Bastion, the Silent Brotherhood, and the Order. (ILLUSTRATION: Robert Mathews challenging an “anti-racist” protester.)

Newspapers have reported, week after week, on multimillion-dollar armored-car robberies and a counterfeiting operation intended to finance a violent overthrow of the U.S. government, fiery shootouts between White revolutionaries and SWAT teams of Federal police agents, an assassination of a Jewish radio commentator and alleged “hit lists” of government officials to be killed, and massive FBI manhunts for surviving members of a group that is said to have involved no more than 40 members. Interest in . . . → Read More: What It Will Take]]> 16098652425_8cb800a586

The final acts of Robert Mathews and their portent for the White resistance

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE LONGEST-RUNNING national news story of recent months certainly must be the one about the Aryan Resistance Movement, also named in various news accounts as the White American Bastion, the Silent Brotherhood, and the Order. (ILLUSTRATION: Robert Mathews challenging an “anti-racist” protester.)

Newspapers have reported, week after week, on multimillion-dollar armored-car robberies and a counterfeiting operation intended to finance a violent overthrow of the U.S. government, fiery shootouts between White revolutionaries and SWAT teams of Federal police agents, an assassination of a Jewish radio commentator and alleged “hit lists” of government officials to be killed, and massive FBI manhunts for surviving members of a group that is said to have involved no more than 40 members. Interest in the Aryan Resistance Movement (ARM) on the part of the television networks and the nationally circulated print media seems still to be growing.

The fascination this story holds for the minions of the controlled media may be due to any of several features. First, there is the sheer scale and relative professionalism of the thing. Previous instances of direct action by “White extremists” have been on the order of three or four Ku Klux Klansmen tanking up on beer and then firing a shotgun from a pickup truck as they sped through a Black neighborhood. By way of contrast, in just one armored-car hijacking (in Ukiah, California) 17 members of ARM, operating with military precision, riddled a Brink’s truck with automatic-rifle fire and made off with $3.6 million in cash. The group recruited two Brink’s branch managers and were preparing to clean out the main Brink’s vaults in San Francisco, where as much as $50 million in cash is kept, when an informer betrayed them. By that time ARM had accumulated a million-dollar arsenal of military weapons, including machine guns, hand grenades, and night-vision sights for their automatic rifles, as well as high-tech communications equipment and a huge store of explosives.

Then there is the scope of ARM’s aims. Violent White resistance in the past nearly always has been strictly local in character, and largely unplanned: ad hoc opposition to a forced busing program, to the destruction of a White neighborhood by a Federal race-mixing decree, or to public activity by an anti-White group. A notable example of the last was the 1979 shootout between Klan members and Black and Jewish members of the Communist Workers’ Party, in Greensboro, North Carolina, in which five Communists were killed.

ARM, on the other hand, set its sights on a full-scale armed revolution, ending with the purification of the U.S. population and the institution of a race-based, authoritarian government. It recruited its activists throughout the country, and it carried out its strikes in half-a-dozen states. Whether or not these strikes were ill-advised, whether or not the recruiting tactics were well thought out, even the question of the feasibility of any type of armed action against the U.S. government under the conditions which now prevail — these questions are beside the point. The fact is that because of ARM, White resistance in America will never again be the same. The stakes have been raised substantially, and a new level of action has been set, which will be the baseline for future efforts.

But ARM is unique in more ways than the magnitude of its plans and the spectacular nature of its operations. There has been an element of do-or-die heroism, of fanaticism and determination, and of idealistic motivation in the group which causes the heart to swell and the blood to pump more strongly in some observers — and which causes cold shivers in others. The gentlemen of the press belong almost entirely to the latter group, but even in this deracinated rabble there are a few who still are able to recognize heroism when they see it, and who cannot help but feel a twinge of the White man’s natural response to it. Thus, some of the early Washington-state newspaper stories of the death of the group’s leader, Robert Mathews, after his single-handed standoff against 100 secret policemen — especially those stories which quoted from his last testament, a moving document indeed, written just two days before — lacked the sneering, spiteful tone of later, nationally-distributed news stories.

The real portent of the ARM saga, in fact, lies in the character of Mathews. He hardly fit the controlled media’s stereotyped image of the White activist — that of the deranged “hater” or the cowardly braggart. He was a man who had no time or inclination to hate or brag. He was an intensely earnest man, a passionate man, with strong convictions about what was right and what was wrong, but he also was a very private man, who believed in leaving others alone as long as they left him alone.

In the little town of Metaline Falls, Washington, where he spent the last decade building a small farm on land he cleared from the forest and providing for his wife and son, he was known as a “straight arrow”: always friendly and helpful, but never nosy; a hard, steady worker; a non-drinker and non-smoker.

That is not to say that Mathews was oblivious to what was going on elsewhere in the world. He had a voracious interest in both current events and history, and he spent much of his spare time in serious reading. He wanted to understand his race’s past, so that he could make some sense out of the chaotic present and gain some hint of what the future might hold.

As his understanding grew, so did his concern — and so also did, to use his own words, “a suppressed emotion buried deep within my soul, that of racial pride and consciousness.” He viewed with increasing alarm the darkening of America by an unchecked horde of non-White immigrants, the insidious inculcation of non-White values into young Americans by a degenerate educational system and alien-controlled entertainment media, the treasonous subservience of the nation’s political leaders to a bloodthirsty band of gangsters in the Middle East.

“By the time my son had arrived,” he wrote in his last testament, “I realized that White America — indeed my entire race — was headed for oblivion, unless White men rose and turned the tide. The more I came to love my son, the more I realized that, unless things changed radically, by the time he was my age he would be a stranger in his own land, a blond-haired, blue-eyed Aryan in a country populated mainly by Mexicans, mulattoes, Blacks, and Asians. His future was growing darker by the day.”

This realization that his nation and the future of his son were being destroyed before his eyes tormented Mathews. What distressed him even more, however, was the pusillanimous acceptance by his fellow Americans of the evils overtaking the country. Earlier he had written: “A great sickness has overcome us. Why do our people do nothing? What madness is this?”

He contrasted the selfish and cowardly behavior of most White Americans today with their heroism of an earlier era, and with the heroism of their European forebears. “Were the men of the Alamo only a myth?” he asked.

The more he agonized over these questions, the more clearly Mathews saw his own responsibility. Finally, his conscience would let him wait no longer. “I have no choice,” he wrote. “I must stand up like a White man and do battle.”

And he did.

He took up arms against the enemies of his race, knowing that he had virtually no chance of defeating them, or even of surviving more than a few skirmishes against their overwhelmingly greater resources. “Even so,” he acknowledged, “I have no fear. For the reality of life is death, and the worst the enemy can do to me is shorten my tour of duty in this world. I will leave knowing my family and friends love me and support me. I will leave knowing that I have made the ultimate sacrifice to secure the future of my children.”

He held to his resolve to do or die, until the end. On November 24, 1984, he and a companion were surprised in a Portland, Oregon motel by some two dozen Federal police agents, after an informer had betrayed him. His companion surrendered, but Mathews shot his way out of the trap in a blaze of gunfire. The following month he and a half-dozen associates were surrounded in their headquarters building on Whidbey Island, Washington, by a task force of more than 100 heavily armed secret policemen.

One or two of the revolutionaries slipped through the police lines and escaped. Of the others, all except Mathews surrendered. For 34 hours he exchanged gunfire with Federal agents, single-handedly repulsing two waves of agents who attempted to storm the headquarters. He used a machine gun to drive off an FBI attack helicopter. After the FBI succeeded in setting fire to the building with magnesium flares, Mathews continued firing through the smoke and flames. He died when tons of stored munitions exploded and demolished the building.

What Robert Mathews did will remain incomprehensible to many White Americans. How can your average “yuppy,” steeped in the values of the “me” generation, understand Mathews’ concern for the type of world his son would inherit?

How can the clever lawyer in his $500 suit, accustomed to figuring all the angles before making a move, fathom the soul of someone who knew that he must act, regardless of the personal consequences, because it was his responsibility as a man to do so?

How can America’s soft, feminized, materialistic masses have any idea of the thinking of a man who made a deliberate choice to die, when he might have lived — to die fearlessly and defiantly — solely so his death could set an example for other fearless and defiant fighters who would follow him in the years and decades to come?

No, many Americans will not understand. But some will. And they will also understand that in the final showdown there will be no other way but Bob Mathews’ way.

No combination of clever lawyers, yuppies, and Joe Sixpacks will ever beat the Jews. Money will not beat them. Brains alone will not beat them. Votes will not beat them. But blood will, eventually.

The Jews know how to deal with materialists, who think the way they do. They have long experience at outmaneuvering clever schemers and outspending well-heeled opponents. They are past masters of intimidation and bribery. They will always whip those who try to fight them on the Jews’ own terms.

But how will the Jews cope with the man who does not fear them and is willing, even glad, to give his life in order to hurt them? What will they do when a hundred good men rise up to take Bob Mathews’ place? Where will they find enough secret police to protect them?

It is a hard truth to face, but America has gone far beyond the point where its problems might have been overcome bloodlessly or with relatively little sacrifice. The evil which has spread across the land can still be destroyed, but only by men like Robert Mathews — only when enough such men have been awakened and have said to themselves, as he did: “I have no choice. I must stand up like a White man and do battle.”

* * *

From National Vanguard magazine, Issue No. 103, January-February 1985

* * *

APPENDIX

The band Dresden dedicated their song, “To Robert Mathews in Valhalla,” to Mathews and his life. It may be downloaded or streamed by clicking the link below. The lyrics follow the link.

Listen: 'To Robert Mathews in Valhalla' by Dresden

We’re on the march today to Whidbey Island;
We’ve found a reason to live today, on Whidbey Island.
Maybe, now we know just why this young man had to die;
He saw the gleaming dawn; he asked the question.
We follow him where he’s led, O Northern Bastion.
We’ll never live a lie; our people must not die.
We’ve built our fire tonight on Whidbey Island.
The flames they will rise and rise from Whidbey Island.
And then the world will know, how from a spark the flames will grow,
O Whidbey Island.

Source: National Alliance

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/what-it-will-take/feed/ 0
Northwest Migration http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/northwest-migration/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/northwest-migration/#comments Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:30:59 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=2734 Washington and Idaho MapLet’s build White communities-within-communities where we live right now.

by Dean Darcy

LET’S HOPE thousands of true White people move to the Northwest and form a political power base. The fantasy of White migration to found a Homeland has been advocated for years, but, thus far, it remains just another warm favorite for Sunday fantasies. It may have been more successful if it had been put forth more specifically as the Inland Northwest.

Four years ago my girlfriend and I moved from Tampa, the Big Guava, to Boise, the Big Potato, looking for Valhalla. Two years later we moved back to Tampa, having decided we would rather live with them than with White people who are so hell-bent on turning such a great place into LA North.

And it is a great place. . . . → Read More: Northwest Migration]]> Washington and Idaho MapLet’s build White communities-within-communities where we live right now.

by Dean Darcy

LET’S HOPE thousands of true White people move to the Northwest and form a political power base. The fantasy of White migration to found a Homeland has been advocated for years, but, thus far, it remains just another warm favorite for Sunday fantasies. It may have been more successful if it had been put forth more specifically as the Inland Northwest.

Four years ago my girlfriend and I moved from Tampa, the Big Guava, to Boise, the Big Potato, looking for Valhalla. Two years later we moved back to Tampa, having decided we would rather live with them than with White people who are so hell-bent on turning such a great place into LA North.

And it is a great place. People who move there for the wilderness and outdoor recreation love it. There is more Wilderness Area in Idaho than in any state except Alaska. There is more navigable white water than in any other state — over 3,400 miles — and some of the best mountain biking, rock climbing, snow sports, big game hunting and fishing in the world. There are wilderness airfields that you can only get to by air because they are so far into the roadless River of No Return Wilderness Area. They don’t have control towers or sometimes even buildings, just a grassy level place in the mountains. There are mountain lakes that no one has ever fished that have only been seen from the air. It is an outdoors man’s paradise — which is another way of saying a White man’s paradise, since we are practically the only ones who really appreciate nature and can survive out there.

The federal government owns 65% of Idaho, mostly Wilderness Area and National Forest. However, most of the locals hate the federal government and want to take control away from the feds so they can develop (read: destroy) the very thing that makes Idaho unique. This may be why there are a lot more White environmentalists than White racialists up there. And the Enviros don’t play around; they’ll monkey wrench something, then call the media the next day and claim responsibility. Only White people fight to save the environment.

The Enviros are also at odds with the cowboys who are still trying to raise cattle out in the Owyhee southwest of Boise. The Owyhee is one of the least populated areas in the U.S. It covers parts of Idaho, Nevada, and Oregon. It is also where trapper Claude Dallas shot a couple of Fish and Game officers in 1981. It is mostly desert, and, like much of the West, has been cowburnt since the 1890s.

Because Idaho has had a few famous racialists and was once featured on the cover of Time magazine as the “Great Hate State,” many people associate Idaho with ‘racism.’ Actually Idaho — more so than most other places — is drowning in Political Correctness. Blacks are less than one half of one percent of the population of Idaho, but Boise helps support a Black History Museum. Jews are less than one half of one percent of the population, yet Boise has an Anne Frank Human Rights Memorial. Mexicans are about eight percent of the population, and a few years ago the state passed a minimum wage bill for farm workers. Boise has an annual “Gay Pride Parade.” The media, politicians, schools, and churches are falling all over themselves trying to increase “diversity.”

Local employers are also doing their part. Micron, one of the worlds biggest producers of semiconductors, is headquartered in Boise where they maintain a staff of attorneys to help imported workers gain U.S. citizenship. Micron started out in Boise, and now has facilities around the world. Like other large corporations, they prefer to import foreigners rather than hire local people.

About 20 years ago, people from California started moving to cities in the Northwest, like Boise, and caused the price of real estate to double. As a result, Boise natives hate anyone from out of state. Because they have been portrayed (unfortunately, incorrectly) as racialists, they hate anyone who is not ashamed to be White. The people there would resist Homelanders more than people elsewhere would.

Still, a White Living Space in the Great Northwest is no more wack than the Libertarians trying to get twenty thousand of their people to move to Vermont. Or the Civil War Two scenario of America breaking up along ethnic lines. Or the attitude of some survivalists who say; let the muds have the cities and we’ll take the millions of acres of Wilderness Areas, National Forests, National Parks, etc. But don’t think you can survive in the mountains out there year round. Those mountains are an ice-shackled no man’s land about four months out of the year.

Soon after my girl and I arrived, Boise went on the air with its first public access television station. Starting the first week the new station was broadcasting, I was on the air with our racialist message, including some National Alliance videos. I added contact information at the end of each video. There was almost no response.

I soon came to the conclusion that I don’t want to live anywhere that doesn’t have monthly National Alliance meetings. Being part of a group of like-minded individuals is therapeutic. I feel sorry for anyone who can’t attend Local Unit meetings; they are race-affirming.

Spokespersons for the Northwest-flocking idea sometimes try to project guilt to White people by saying America is the way it is because White people are “stupid, lazy, cowards.” As if the government, the media, the Jews, Blacks, and immigrants had nothing to do with it. It’s all our fault. These spokespersons sometimes come across as hostile and aggrieved, but after years of lonely disappointment proposing a solution that no one wants, it is understandable that their rejection and utter failure would leave them bitter.

The Inland Northwest has very few jobs, and very few racially aware people. If you want to be around other racially enlightened people and be active in your resistance to the slow death of the America that once was, stay where you are and do what you can. Maybe someday enough people will move up there to have an impact on local politics. Yeah, maybe someday. Meanwhile, there are a thousand or more things you can do right where you are.

* * *

Source: National Alliance

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/northwest-migration/feed/ 0