National Vanguard

Homeless Jack on Evolution…

admin — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:45:27 +0000

…and our fail point.

by H. Millard

“WE LIVE IN REALLY STUPID times, man,” said Homeless Jack. “Yeah, I know what you’re thinking, the same could be said for all times, but our stupid times are much worse.

“We face extinction, man, and soft genocide is going on each and every day now as our stupid people — our kind — the non-Jewish White kind — mostly seem oblivious to what is going on.

“You see, we are products of nature just like every other organism. We ain’t some special creation. We ain’t slightly lower than some imaginary angels. We evolved from that first DNA molecule just like all other life on this dark planet, man.

“Because we’re the products of nature, we face the same dangers as all other organisms. The danger we now face may do us in. We really do face our extinction as a distinct type and we may devolve back into the dark masses from which we evolved not too many thousands of years ago.

“Man, evolution is a little like distilling a bucket of goo. A few drops rise up and leave the mass of goo and become different but only so long as those drops are isolated from the goo. Some of those drops drip back in and they are lost to the new batch of liquid that is different from the old.

“See, man, that’s where we are today. We got distilled out, but now we’re dripping back in. Drip, there goes another one, drip, another.

“Why is this happening? It’s because our brains have taken us to our fail point, man. We’ve thought our way into developing mass transportation so that we are no longer isolated from the dark masses. And, the evil doers who want all mankind to blend together are working hard to make it seem that we should all drip back into the mass and just not be our White selves anymore.

“That’s the fail point, man. It’s a threshold. We can now go extinct, or we can take over from the blind workings of evolution and become a new tribe, a new people. Screw the rest. Let those dummies drip back in. We have to separate out. We have to find our new isolation. We have to keep distilling ourselves.

“But, before we can do that we need to understand that abortion for us, miscegenation for us, low birth rates for us, forms of marriage that hold down our birthrate for us, celibacy for us, meaningless wars that kill our young people for us, are all helping with our extinction.

“We need a new morality, man. We have to rid ourselves of centuries of false thinking and conditioning and we need to start being ourselves, for ourselves again.

“Christianity ain’t cutting it for us man. It ain’t working. It’s helping kill us off. It’s not really our religion anyway. It came out of the desert. What the hell do we have to do with deserts? Man, we evolved in the misty regions of Europe. That’s why we have white skin and many of our other characteristics.

“We don’t need no childish desert religion based on myths of thousands of years ago. We need an adult religion that is one with science and us and what we know about how things really all started and where they’re all going.

“Is there a room for a God in our new religion? Yup. We have to understand human psychology and take it into account.

“Also, as we ask what is behind this and this and this and then that, we reach a point where we just don’t know. So, it’s like we see a flower and we can think no more about it or we can go deeper into how that flower is and as we go ever deeper we come to molecules and then atoms and then sub-atomic particles and waves and energies but then we reach a wall.

“What is behind the sub-atomic particles, waves and energies? My answer, man, is that is where God — that which started it all — the First Cause, is to be found. But He ain’t like He’s portrayed in the false religions, man. He’s some sort of primal force, some spinning unknown that creates, maintains and then destroys — only to create, maintain and destroy again and again as He expands outward to devour the nothingness with His somethingness.

“Man, he’s behind the big spinning Fylfot in the sky. That ain’t Him, man, but He’s behind it and that’s the closest look we may have of His face: the spinning Fylfot. It’s everywhere we look, man. It’s in the water draining from our toilets. It’s in the shape of DNA. It’s in the hurricanes. He’s been right here in front of us since the start, man. He’s been hiding in plain sight and few have ever realized it. But we realize it, man.

“And we’re part of that expansion plan — not because we’re loved, but just because we’ve evolved to the point where we are at the fail point, which is also a jumping-off point to a new us. You see, the fail point had to be reached at some time. It is completely necessary for the next jump upward. Our getting close to our extinction is necessary for our evolution. It is the next choke point in history. It is the bottleneck that I spoke about before.

“Listen, man, saving our kind of human (the non-Jewish White kind) is the only thing that is important in this life. We are our genes. If they are watered down or are mixed with genes of other races, we will face extinction.

“These are more than just my opinions. These are scientific facts. Let me briefly explain: We humans have 46 chromosomes. On those chromosomes are approximately 25,000 genes total. Those genes are the recipe to make us.

“When a male and female human mate, each one contributes 23 chromosomes to the new child that will be conceived. Two Whites will produce a White. One White and one anything else cannot produce a new White person (the child may sometimes look mostly White, but the child won’t be truly one of us because it will have 23 non-White chromosomes, not the full 46 White chromosomes, and will thus have roughly 12,000 gene “ingredients” in its recipe that aren’t White).

“Don’t give me any of that mumbling stuff about how our 46 chromosomes and 25,000 genes aren’t all “White” chromosomes or genes. I know that, man, but stop picking the fly specks out of the pepper. You get the point, and, if you don’t, go drip back into the dark goo, man.

“We gotta get past the fail point. Not all of us are going to make it and many of our families are going to go dark, man. They’ll still have the old White family names, but they’ll be dark families, man. The White ancestors who had those names will live no more in their genotypes. They will have been killed off by miscegenation and all the rest. They will be extinct. Their genes will be gone.

“We have to tell our people about this stuff, man, because they, each one of them, will have to choose. It is not right that they just become extinct and not even realize it. We must warn them and expose them to the truth. But, from that point on, it is up to them to choose wisely or go extinct.

“For us, man? We’re going to evolve ever higher. We’re going to expand and eat our way across the universe. And, we ain’t gonna apologize to anyone for taking this righteous path that is our highest possible destiny. And, we’re going to have the Fylfot next to and directly on our skin, man, for this is what the First Cause wants.

“He is pleased that we have matured and evolved to finally know these things and to finally see the truth of the Fylfot that He has created and which is His engine of creation, expansion, maintenance and destruction throughout all of existence and He is also pleased when we show our respect by having this symbol with us at all times and especially next to and on our skin.”

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics; all in Millard’s edgy style. They lead up to Homeless Jack’s Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Click here to buy. ISBN: 0-595-32646-3

ROAMING THE WASTELANDS- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9)H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235. “A fun–and sobering–thing to read” – Alamance Independent

THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

Jewish Bias and the Nobel Prize

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:17:41 +0000

by Jan C Biro MD., PhD
Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Homulus Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

SUMMARY

ALFRED NOBEL’S WILL (the founding document of the prestigious Nobel Prize) requests “…that in awarding the prizes no consideration be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize …” This expressed wish is largely ignored by the Nobel Foundation, who award excessive numbers of Prizes to Jewish scientists (who traditionally belong to “One Nation” even if they live in different countries around the World), thus creating the large Jewish-Bias (J-bias). They award the Prize to 137 times more frequently to Jewish candidates worldwide, and 26 times more frequently to those in America, than would be expected from the size of the Jewish population. The proportion of Jewish laureates more than doubled (2.3-fold increase) after the Second World War owing to the explosion of Prizes shared between Jews and Gentiles (8.8-fold increase). Higher IQs and preferential choice of science as a profession among Jews do not fully explain this J-bias. It is more likely that extensive and well-organized personal networking of a marketing type among Jewish scientists, together with the egalitarian-liberal, nonchalant attitude of the Swedish representatives of the Donor, are responsible for this unfortunate phenomenon. It is suggested that the World’s scientific community persuade the Nobel Foundation to follow the rules of Nobel’s Will in accordance with Swedish Law.

Introduction

JEWS AND CHRISTIANS are often called “The People of the Book” because they have a book of prayer. Jewish affection for these written texts is legendary. George H. W. Bush told us that “The mothers of the Jewish ghettos of the east would pour honey on a book so the children would learn that learning is sweet. And the parents who settled hungry Kansas would take their children in from the fields when a teacher came.” [1]. Learning leads to knowledge, and knowledge leads to better human life, power, social status and wealth. As the result of their mentality the Jews are well represented in intellectual professions and well rewarded for their talents.

Alfred Nobel donated his fortune (gained from the discovery and industrial development of the dynamite) in 1895. His intention for the donation is clearly formulated in his Last Will: he wanted to honor scientists who “…shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind”, and it is explicitly stated that “It is my [Nobel’s] expressed wish that in awarding the prizes no consideration be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize …” [2].

The popularity of the Nobel Prize has increased greatly over time. The Swedes have recognized the enormous PR value of this Prize for their country, the King and Swedish science. Sweden is a small, Nordic country on the periphery of Europe and it would probably remain largely unnoticed by the “big” world without its annual Nobel ceremony.

For scientists around the world, this Prize became the ultimate symbol of scientific excellence and recognition of this excellence. Young scientists love to dream about it and the dream helps them through endless hours of learning and laboratory exercises. Science is a demanding profession in which it is not easy to survive without dreams.

The Nobel Prize is given to a maximum of three living scientists in six fields, which limits the number of possible laureate to 18 per year. The difficulties in finding the persons who “… have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind” are well recognized. These difficulties regularly lead to complaints against the Nobel Committee stating that they have honored the wrong person. Such complaints are usually not taken too seriously, because the scientific community knows that many more than three persons qualify for recognition among the successful representatives of a scientific field. Nobody has ever said that a laureate was completely unworthy of the Prize given to him or her.

The small number of annually available Prizes makes it very difficult to establish whether the nationalities of the laureates have been considered in any single year. However, we now have data from 110 years, which is sufficient for reliable statistical evaluation and checking of the national- (ethnic-, race-) neutrality of this Prize.

It is probably not news to anybody that Jewish scientists, being well educated and extremely ambitious persons, excel in gaining prestigious scientific prizes and awards. The Nobel Prize is no exception. However the magnitude of the Jewish success is rather surprising.

Statistics of Nobel Laureates 1901-2010

A total of 543 Nobel Prizes have been awarded to 817 laureates and 23 organizations during this 110 year history [3]. At least 181 (21.5%) recipients were Jewish, and at most 659 were Gentiles. Given that 99.8% of the world’s population is Gentile and 0.2% Jewish, the 659 Gentile laureates correspond to 6.6 laureates/(% Gentiles) and the 181 Jewish laureates correspond to 905 laureates/(% Jews), which represents a relative 137-fold Jewish over-representation worldwide.

A total of 299 recipients were Americans. At least 108 (36%) were Jews so at most 191 (64%) were Gentiles. The current USA population is 311.8 million, including 6.5 million (2.1%) Jews. The 191 Gentile Prizes therefore correspond to 1.95/(% Gentiles) in the USA and the 108 Jewish Prizes correspond to 51.4/(% Jews), which represents “only” a 26.3-fold Jewish overrepresentation among laureates in the USA.

The Nobel Prize is awarded in six fields. The number and proportion of Jewish laureates is monitored by several Jewish web sites. The purpose of these websites is – as they state – to provide an online resource that accurately describes the Jewish contribution to the cultural, scientific, and technological evolution of civilization.

Table I

Statistics of Jewish Nobel Laureates 1901-2010 [4]

• Chemistry (31 Prize winners, 20% of world total, 27% of US total)
• Economics (28 Prize winners, 42% of world total, 55% of US total)
• Literature (13 Prize winners, 12% of world total, 27% of US total)
• Peace (9 Prize winners, 9% of world total, 10% of US total)3
• Physics (47 Prize winners, 25% of world total, 36% of US total)
• Physiology or Medicine (53 Prize winners, 27% of world total, 40% of US total)

Relatively few scientists received the award during the first 40 years of its history. Single laureates (unshared Prizes) dominated and the Prize was not awarded at all in many years. The proportion of Jewish laureates remained below 10%. Very few Prizes were shared by Jews and Gentiles and those were only in Medicine and Physics. The Economics Prize is not Nobel’s creation; it was established by the Swedish Riksbank and did not exist before 1969 (see Figure 1 in full PDF document; source below).

The list of all Nobel Laureates from The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize [3] and Jewish Nobel Prize Winners from Jinfo [4] were used to calculate the proportion of Jewish (J) and Gentile (G) Laureates in Prizes given only to Gentiles, only to Jews, or to Jew-Gentile pairs or trios. The calculations were performed on data for the 1901-1940 and 1941-2010 periods.

A radical change occurred immediately after the Second World War. The number of laureates exploded and Prize-sharing became the norm. This change is often described as the “inflation” of the Prize. It is explained by the acceleration of research and the fact that most scientific work is done by teams today, which makes it unfair to honor only one person. Research redundancy – parallel research and problem solving – is also a contributing factor. Jewish-Gentile Prize sharing grew from a shy ~2.7% to a bold ~24.6% (~9-fold increase). About 10% of Prizes have remained “Jewish only” but the proportion of “Gentile only” Prizes decreased as “J-G shared” Prizes became more frequent. In other words, Jewish scientists more than doubled their share of the available laureate positions because the Gentile share of the “Nobel-cake” declined (Figure 2). The proportion of Jewish laureates grow from 9.4% to 22.2% after the Second World War (p=0.005, n=5) and the percentage of Gentile Prizes dropped correspondingly. (Economics Prizes were excluded from this calculation; they did not exist before 1969.)

(see full PDF document for graphics; source below)

This figure is derived from Figure 1. The bars represent Mean ± S.E.M., n=5 (Prizes in economics were omitted). A paired Student t test was used to evaluate the significance of differences.

As many as 65 different nations have been honored by at least one Prize during the past 110 years, and 32 nations have received at least three Prizes. Further statistical analyses were performed on these 32 nations (Table II). The national frequencies (NL/1 Million inhabitants/110 years) of Nobel Laureates (NL) were calculated using the Nobel Laureates by Nationality [5] and List of Countries by Population [6] data. They were compared to the National IQ values from 2006 [7], books published per country per year (2006) [8] (expressed as new titles/10K inhabitants/year), patents granted (1998) [9] (expressed as patents/1 Million inhabitants/year) and Jewish population (%) in the corresponding countries [10].

The number of laureates shows large variations from country to country (Figure 3). Jewish people (defined by ethnicity, living anywhere in the world and not only as citizens of Israel) are far ahead of any other nation with 12.7 laureates per million of population. They are followed by Switzerland and Sweden, both of which countries have “only” three laureates per million inhabitants.

It is often mentioned (in scientific and popular readings) that the Jewish IQ is higher than the Gentile IQ, i.e. Jewish people are smarter and therefore contribute more to the intellectual activity of a society than non-Jews.

It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting.

(see full PDF document for graphics; source below)

Discussion

The Nobel Prize gradually developed, over 110 years, into one of the most prestigious scientific awards. The most ambitious researchers usually have this Prize on their “secret” wish-lists as the ultimate recognition of scientific excellence. Different, mostly well-developed, countries have adopted this view and provide exceptional benefits to their Nobel Laureates. The Prize money (ca. 300K-1M USD) is only a fraction of the economic reward awaiting a winner and his institution and associates. A laureate is worth his or her body weight in gold for associated universities, book editors and companies. There are also many social benefits such as honorary positions, board memberships, and well-paid lectures, just to mention a few. The Nobel Prize is not just recognition, it is power. Therefore it is necessary for the scientific community, in addition to according well-deserved respect, to keep an eye on the laureates and on how they and those around them use their scientific and monetary power.

Additionally, this Prize ensures a place in scientific history. Laureates and their works are always mentioned in history books as milestones in the development of sciences. Scientists are very sensitive to this kind of legacy.

Extra IQ behind the J-bias

The statistical analyses suggest that Jewish scientists are strongly over-represented among laureates. This J-bias is 26-fold in the USA. The bias is well known, but its magnitude is not widely recognized. It is often explained by the higher IQ of Jews. It has been suggested [11] that the average IQ of Jewish Americans is 115 followed by East Asians (106), Whites (103), Latinos (89) and African Americans (85). Several comments can be made about this very high average Jewish IQ. It is valid for Ashkenazi Jews, but it is not seen in the national IQ of Israel (which is 100). It is about verbal intelligence; in other types of IQ (e.g. motor or spatial), Jews may be well below average. The average Ashkenazi IQ was measured by Lynn to be 107 in America (12) and 103 in Israel (12). The source of Jewish intelligence has been well reviewed and thoroughly discussed in the literature [14-16].

It is logical to assume that successful scientists show well above average intelligence, but it is just speculation that a scientist with, say, IQ = 135 has a greater chance of success than one with “only” IQ = 130. Verbal intelligence, of which the Jews have most, may have a large influence in competition for the Prizes in Peace, Literature or Economics, but a different kind of intelligence is necessary to be successful in Physics, Physiology and Chemistry. It is difficult to believe in the decisive role of extra high IQ in becoming a laureate, when other high IQ nations (East Asians) produce few awards. The typically average national IQ and scientific eminence of Israel is another disturbing circumstance for attempts to explain Jewish success by intelligence alone.

Extra affection behind the J-bias

Another plausible explanation for the J-bias is that a larger proportion of the Jewish than the Gentile population of a Gentile society is engaged in intellectual activity. The 26x J-bias in America would therefore imply that 26 times more Jews than other Americans choose science as profession. There are about 2.1 M scientists in the USA [17], representing 0.6% of Americans. Of the 6M American Jews, 0.6% is 36,000, which would mean that 26×36,000=1,044,000 Jews are scientists, i.e. every 6th Jew in the USA. This is a highly unlikely number.

The proportion of Jewish laureates has more than doubled since the Second World War. This increase is due to the large increase of Jew-Gentile-shared Prizes. Brilliant Jews and Gentiles started to cooperate, or they chanced to develop the same successful lines of research in their scientific fields. This type of co-representation (or coincidence) was almost unprecedented before the War. It is another remarkable phenomenon. It suggests that the most talented Jews survived the Holocaust (while 1:2-3 of the Jewish population lost their lives); these geniuses were reshuffled among the wealthiest nations and restarted bright scientific careers, mostly in the USA, a star-carrier that was never seen before.

Nomination and policy behind the J-bias

The question remains: where does this 26-fold J-bias come from? The answer might be in the Laureate selection procedure, though this procedure appears very democratic.

Nomination forms are sent by the Nobel Committee to about 3000 individuals, usually in September of the year before the Prizes are awarded. These individuals are often academics working in a relevant area. The deadline for the return of the nomination forms is 31 January of the year of the award. The Nobel Committee selects about 300 potential laureates from these forms and additional names. The nominees are not publicly named, nor are they told that they are being considered for the Prize. All nomination records for a Prize are sealed for 50 years after the award. The Nobel Committee then prepares a report, drawn from the advice of experts in the relevant fields. This, along with the list of preliminary candidates, is submitted to the Prize-awarding institutions. The institutions meet to choose the laureate or laureates in each field by a majority vote. Their decision, which cannot be appealed, is announced immediately after the vote. A maximum of three laureates and two different works may be selected per award [18].

For example the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is awarded by the Nobel Assembly, which consists of 50 professors (out of a total of about 500) in the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. The Nobel Committee consists of five members and the secretary of the Nobel Assembly. The members are elected for a period of three years. Each year, ten associate members are elected for a term running from March until October. The Nobel Committee is the working body of the Nobel Assembly [19, 20].

“The right to submit proposals for the award of Prizes, based on the principle of competence and universality, shall by statute be enjoyed by:

IN PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE

1. Members of the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institute;

2. Swedish and foreign members of the medical class of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences;
3. Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine;

4. Members of the Nobel Committee not qualified under paragraph 1 above;

5. Holders of established posts as professors at the faculties of medicine in Sweden and holders of similar posts at the faculties of medicine or similar institutions in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway;

6. Holders of similar posts at no fewer than six other faculties of medicine selected by the Assembly, with a view to ensuring the appropriate distribution of the task among various countries and their seats of learning; and

7. Practitioners of natural sciences whom the Assembly may otherwise see fit to approach.

Decisions concerning the selection of the persons appointed under paragraphs 6 and 7 above are taken before the end of May each year on the recommendation of the Nobel Committee” [18].

To get on to the list of nominees when there are ca. 300 of them is in itself a challenge. Scientists who are not well-funded and in well-exposed positions, or are simply shy, are already marginalized. Becoming one of the 1-3 laureates among the 300 nominees happens in two steps. The Nobel Assembly has probably already made the policy decision in February when it decides which field of research should be honored. This is a very important decision and may fundamentally decide for or against the J-bias.

An example might look like this, without implying that anything of the kind really happened. Real names are used only to make the example more plausible.

The Human Genome Project was largely completed in 2000 [21, 22]. The names of Francis Collins and Craig Venter became very familiar to the entire world during the most competitive final three years of sequencing [23]. Sequencing of the human genome was a huge investment by the scientific community and the grant-giving nations behind it. It was clear that it had significant benefits for humankind and would fundamentally change ways of thinking and working in biology. It was generally expected that the project would somehow be honored by a Nobel Prize.

However, the key person who catalyzed the project, and saved it from bankruptcy, was Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur. He was working for himself and his company, Celera, meanwhile serving humankind (there are many similarities between him and A. Nobel). Celera was selling the sequences to other scientists and patenting them for future biotechnological applications. This made Venter unpopular in the economically rather naïve scientific community.

The second best candidate was Francis Collins, the head of the Human Genome Project, HGP, at the NIH. He is a talented, highly social person with good organizing skills. However, his academic organization became famous for its slowness and expensiveness. Many academic scientists used the project for comfortable living for decades with no end in the sight. Additionally, Collins is an openly and deeply religious scientist, a Christian one, which irritates many others.

Number three in the sequencing arena was John E. Sulston, the director of the newly established Sanger Centre, located in Cambridgeshire, England. He and his Centre significantly contributed to the success of the HGP but were still far behind Collins and Venter.

The Collins-Venter-Sulston trio could have been the ideal laureates for the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 2002. This did not happen. The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute made the policy decision to choose another research area to honor, which kept Sulston (and the HGP) on the nominee list but rejected Collins and Venter. Honoring Sulston for research on C. elegans (a worm) instead of sequencing the human genome (a human) gave a “free ride” to the Nobel Prize for Sydney Brenner and H. Robert Horvitz, who both happened to be Jews. A J-bias was born, though the benefits of C. elegans for humankind remain to be seen.

Networking behind the J-bias

When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. We might not be able to see a full explanation for the J-bias in higher Jewish IQ or preferential selection of intellectual carriers by Jews. The probable remaining explanation is the stronger advocacy behind Jewish than behind Gentile scientists. The somewhat higher IQ, the somewhat preferential selection of intellectual jobs and the strong and effective Jewish networking together add up to the 26-fold J-bias. It is readily understandable that there are 26 times more “mentors” (mostly other Jews) behind every successful Jewish scientist than behind a successful Gentile scientist in the USA.

The Nobel Foundation itself behind the J-bias

Swedes are rather sensitive to corruption. Sweden is an extremely egalitarian society where the people spend substantial amount of time monitoring and controlling each other. Selling or buying a Nobel Prize is unthinkable. At the same time, however, they are very responsive to all kinds of (often stupid) egalitarian argument. The idea of giving “one Prize to a Jew and one to a Gentile” is highly acceptable to an egalitarian Swede.

Socio-communistic or Marxist societies are very negative, even hostile, to titles and prizes, because they are leftovers from bourgeois societies and increase (or underline) social inequality. Sweden is the only country in the world where the political élite has tried to convince the doctors (MDs) not to use the title “doctor” [24]). They even tried to get rid of usual academic positions such as associate and assistant professors [25, 26]. Sweden is the only country in the world where you can push a tart into the face of the King and not be punished [27].

That Swedes are still entrusted to provide a prestigious prize is almost a joke and it is certainly one of the biggest ongoing hypocrisies in the world. However, the Nobel Prize has considerable PR benefits for the country as a whole and the Swedish scientific establishment in particular. Swedes do not care who the recipients of their Prizes are and for what they are awarded; the important thing for them is the attention and money they provide. Swedish scientists do not care about the gender or ethnicity of a laureate; the important thing is that the Prize awarding procedure itself provides them with contacts, fame, easy publications in prestigious papers, invitations for conferences as session chiefs, or positions as society presidents, and ultimately more research money [28]. Jews or Gentiles, it doesn’t matter, the show must go on!

This nonchalant and permissive attitude, which you might call “corruption through passive acceptance of bias”, opens the gates of Sweden wide for networking of a personal, marketing type and ultimately leads to the J-bias.

The Gentiles themselves behind the J-bias

The above-described over-ambitious group-marketing, expansive and highly competitive behavior of the Jewish people is not unique to the Nobel Prize or to the post-War period. It has been seen continuously and everywhere that Jews have lived during the last 3000 years. Many Gentiles misunderstand it and might react to it inadequately. Gentiles should understand, after three millennia, that Jews were and are an intelligent and ambitious variant of the human race who have kept their unique genetic, religious, cultural and spiritual heritage intact even after diaspora and dispersion in different foreign countries. They are a Nation (one Nation!) living not only in Israel but also in many other countries around the world. They have a very effective group evolutionary strategy [29]. They learned the art of prospering disproportionately wherever they went, in any Gentile milieu, for relatively long periods. (We have more recently seen in Israel how much they can prosper on their own in the milieu of other Jews).

However, Gentiles shouldn’t forget that Jews are paying a very high price for their genetic and cultural integrity in the form of inherited genetic diseases (the result of a too small gene pool) [30] and periodically huge losses of life (the result of Gentile frustration). There is a huge and selective genetic pressure on this Nation, and excruciating social pressure on every single Jew by his or her own community. It is not easy to live up to the Covenant!

At the same time, Gentiles often seems to be easy prey. Gentiles, as a majority group, are most likely exposed to competition from other Gentiles and are often poorly prepared for concurrent competition from a smart, minority Jew. Christian life and forgiveness, postponing justice and individual rewards to “the world after this world”, is not the best strategy for Earthly success. The economic naivety of many Gentile scientists and their “sweet” idealism regarding the goodness of “all” people (Humankind!) is especially regrettable in this context.

The J-bias as a violation of Nobel’s Will

Are the Jews a Nation? The traditional view, and the one given in the Torah, is that the Jews are a nation. The Torah and the rabbis used this term not in the modern sense, meaning a territorial and political entity, but in the ancient sense meaning a group of people with a common history, a common destiny, and a sense that they are all connected to each other [31].

The Jews (Hebrew: Yehudim [jɛhuːdiːm]), also known as the Jewish people, are a nation and ethnoreligious group originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation [32-34].

Judaism shares some of the characteristics of a nation, an ethnicity, a religion, and a culture, making the definition of who is a Jew vary slightly depending on whether a religious or national approach to identity is used [35].
“Most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora” [36]. Researchers have expressed surprise at the remarkable genetic uniformity they found among modern Jews, no matter where the diaspora has become dispersed around the world.

Nationality is membership of a nation or sovereign state. In several areas of the world, the term nationality can be defined on the basis of ethnicity, as well as cultural and family-based self-determination, rather than on relations with a state or current government. However, nationality can refer to membership of a nation (collective of people sharing a national identity, usually based on ethnic and cultural ties and self-determination) even if that nation has no state, such as the Basques, Kurds, Tamils and Scots [37].

For example, there are people who would say that they are Kurds, i.e., of Kurdish nationality, even though no such Kurdish sovereign state exists at least at this time in history. In the context of the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia, nationality is often used as translation of the Russian and Serbo-Croatian terms (национальность/ natsionalnost, народность/narodnost) used for ethnic groups and local affiliations within those (former) states.

In fact, even today the Russian Federation, as an excellent example, consists of various people whose nationality is other than Russian, but they are considered to be Russian subjects and comply with the laws of the Federation. Similarly, the term “nationalities of China” refers to cultural groups in China. Spain is one Nation, made up of different nationalities, which are not politically recognized as nations (states), or can be considered smaller nations within the Spanish Nation.

It is sufficient to read only Jewish writings, and bypass Gentile comments, to understand and accept that Jews are a (single) distinct Nationality.

Conclusions and Suggestion

Jewish scientists have successfully secured for themselves disproportionately large shares of the prestigious Nobel Prize and the associated power over society’s resources for scientific/intellectual production. With all due respect to Jewish IQ, intellectual devotedness and networking talents, it is a well-recognized bias that Gentile scientists should address, with kindness and “Christian love”, to prevent misunderstanding, build-up of ethnic tensions and repetition of historical mistakes. The scientists of the World are kindly encouraged to persuade the Swedish Nobel Foundation to pay more attention to Nobel’s Will and correct the J-bias.

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to my many friends and numerous enemies at the Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden) for providing me the necessary “Trust” and “Resistance” for lifting this project as well as for the inspiration to write my book, THE SWEDISH GOD (2009, www.amazon.com).

Many thanks to Professor Kevin MacDonald, California State University Long Beach, for teaching me the correct, sensible and scientific style to write about the Jewish Nation.

References

1. George H. W. Bush, Acceptance Speech at the Republican National Convention (August 18, 1988) – http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/pdfs/rnc.pdf – access on January 18th, 2011
2. Nobelprize.org – The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize. Excerpt from the Will of Alfred Nobel. (http://nobelprize.org/alfred_nobel/will/short_testamente.html – Last accessed 2011 01 17.
3. Nobelprize.org – The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/nobelprize_facts.html. – Last accessed 2011 01 17,
4. Jinfo.org. – http://www.jinfo.org/Nobel_Prizes.html – Last accessed 2011 01 17.
5. Nobel laureates by nationality http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nobel_laureates_by_nationality – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
6. List of countries by population http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
7. IQ and Global Inequality – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
8. Books published per country per year – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_published_per_country_per_year – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
9. Economy Statistics > Patents granted (most recent) by country – http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_pat_gra-economy-patents-granted – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
10. Jewish population – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
11. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
12. Lynn, R. (2004). The intelligence of American Jews. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 201–206.
13. Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. (2006). IQ and Global Inequality. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit Publishers, p. 312.
14. Charles Murray. Jewish Genius. Commentarymagasine.com, 2007 – http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/jewish-genius-10855 – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
15. J. Philippe Rushton. Race, Intelligence, and the Brain: The Errors and Omissions of the Revised Edition of S. J. Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man (1996). Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 23, No. 1 (July 1997), pp. 169-180
16. R. Brian Ferguson. How Jews Became Smart: Anti-“Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence”. – http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~socant/How%20Jews%20Became%20Smart%20%282008%29.pdf – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
17. Scientists, Engineers and Technitians in the United States: 2001. Detailed Statistical Tables, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf05313/tables.htm – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
18. NOBEL FOUNDATION – http://nobelprize.org/nobel_organizations/nobelfoundation/directory_org_110112.pdf
19. The Nobel Assembly 2010 – http://www.mednobel.ki.se/mednobel/assembly.html
20. The Nobel Committee 2010 – http://www.mednobel.ki.se/mednobel/committee.html
21. Venter, J. Craig; et al. (February 16, 2001). “The Sequence of the Human Genome”. Science (journal) 291 (5507): 1304–51
22. Eric S. Lander. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (15 February 2001)
23. Adams, J. (2008) Sequencing human genome: the contributions of Francis Collins and Craig Venter. Nature Education 1(1)
24. Lars-Ake Pellborn – CEO of The Swedish Society of Medicine in Stockholm, Sweden, – personal communication, 2001.
25. Court Case T 27-04, Solna Tingsratt, Solna, Sweden, 2004.
26. Court Case T 3688-07, Solna Tingsratt, Solna, Sweden, 2007.
27. Swedish king in tart attack – BBC News. 6 September, 2001. – http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1529270.stm -
28. Biro JC. The Swedish God. 2009, www.amazon.com
29. K. McDonald. A People that shall Dwell Alone – Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, with Diaspora People. Writers Club Press. San Jose, 2002.
30. Ashkenazi Jewish Genetic Disease, Jewish Virtual Library. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Health/genetics.html
31. Judaism 101. What is Judaism? http://www.jewfaq.org/judaism.htm -
32. “The Jewish Problem: How To Solve It,” U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, “Jews are a distinctive nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station or shade of belief, is necessarily a member” (April 25, 1915), University of Louisville Louis D. Brandeis School of Law, http://www.law.louisville.edu/library/collections/brandeis/node/234 Retrieved on June 15, 2009
33. Palmer, Henry, A History of the Jewish Nation (1875), D. Lothrop & Co., Retrieved on June 15, 2009
34. “The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 7: Berlin Years,” U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, “The Jewish Nation is a living fact” (June 21, 1921), Princeton University Press,
35. Weiner, Rebecca (2007). “Who is a Jew?”. Jewish Virtual Library. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/whojew1.html. Retrieved 2007-10-06.
36. Hammer, Mf; Redd, Aj; Wood, Et; Bonner, Mr; Jarjanazi, H; Karafet, T; Santachiara-Benerecetti, S; Oppenheim, A; Jobling, Ma, Jenkins, T; Ostrer, H; Bonne-Tamir, B (Jun 2000). “Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes.” (Free full text). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (12): 6769–74. – http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10801975.
37. Nationality. Wikipedia. – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationality – Last accessed 2011 01 21.

http://www.janbiro.com/THE_JEWISH_BIAS_OF_THE_NOBEL_PRIZE.pdf

Artist Helnwein Reprints Sylvia Plath Article

Correspondents — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:35:39 +0000

by Ann Hendon

THE AUSTRIAN-BORN ARTIST Gottfried Helnwein (pictured) republished the National Vanguard article “Sylvia Plath: Stasis in Darkness” on his Helnwein-Theater Web site in response to NV Editor Kevin Alfred Strom’s use of a Helnwein painting to illustrate the Plath piece.

In the caption for the image, Strom said “Like Sylvia Plath, artist Gottfried Helnwein has a near-schizoid attitude toward Germany’s National Socialists, producing images of that period ranging from the truly horrible to those bordering on an eerie reverence. Here his work Epiphany I, Adoration of the Magi (1996), in which the central female figure has a Plath-like intensity.”

These two sentences — along with a large version of the painting — were highlighted by the Helnwein-Theater site, but no commentary was offered and the National Vanguard article was reproduced in full.

Helnwein himself was a student at Vienna’s Academy of Fine Arts, the same school that once refused Adolf Hitler’s application. “That was probably their biggest mistake,” says Helnwein. “Better a bad painter than a very good dictator.”

Gottfried Helnwein - Modern Sleep 3

Helnwein often highlights the terrible consequences of World War 2 on children in his work, and cites the unreal atmosphere and euphemistic language of postwar Austria — where the official position conveniently switched to posing as “Germany’s first victim” as soon as the war was lost — as a formative influence.

His images of children physically injured and ravaged mentally by war are at times shocking and always haunting and unforgettable. His Modern Sleep 3, shown here, seems to be saying that we and our children are inured and asleep to our own society’s terrors, just as the children of pre-World War 2 Europe were to theirs.

He says that children today are still victims: “When I see how kids grow up, how they are neglected and mistreated, how they get polluted with drugs, junk food, insane television and bad schools, it’s terrible, and dangerous, because they are our future. Children are sacred — we need to protect, support and encourage them. Anybody who abuses a child — I don’t believe in the death penalty — but definitely they should be locked away, maybe in a labor camp. There’s no excuse for a crime like that. I don’t care what justifications psychologists come up with. You don’t touch a kid.”

I asked Kevin Alfred Strom why he chose the Helnwein Epiphany as an illustration for Vic Olvir’s essay on doomed poetess Sylvia Plath. “I was told by a few correspondents that that was a stretch — that the picture had nothing to do with Plath,” he replied. “Now I never said it was connected to Plath — but there is a parallel between the way Helnwein and Plath viewed that period. Both are saying something, and perhaps seeing something, that neither modern society nor NS enthusiasts want to know.”

While it’s clear Helnwein is no advocate of National Socialism and relentlessly points out its real and imputed flaws, one gets the impression that he also is trying to say something about the moral emptiness and callousness-dressed-as-humanitarianism that now infects the Western world. Perhaps his republication of our article is part of that. Then again, perhaps it’s an act of Art, and therefore not subject to the rigidity of explanation — even in the artist’s own mind.

Gottfried Helnwein - The Disasters of War 3

None Dare Call It White Genocide

Christian Miller — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:23:02 +0000

by Christian Miller

THE OVERARCHING goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake — this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, and sometimes explicit in law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations have had overwhelmingly White populations for the vast preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations?

Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration. This observation is mostly accurate. However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.
Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. A heavily elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide.

Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations. Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties — society “without race” by homogeneous default. Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race — White genocide.

To bolster the credibility of the latter position, put the shoe on the other foot. Assume for the sake of argument that in a stunning reversal, political correctness now dictates that Africans are “racist oppressors.” Africans disproportionately enjoy material niceties, unfairly subjugate other races, and an invisible “African privilege” pervades the air which mysteriously oppresses all other races. In this hypothetical world, “institutional racism” means that Africans are predisposed to success and worldly gain from birth, as a result of current political power relationships. Now, follow the usual prescription for healing with plans for coercive diversity and watch the fireworks begin!

The continent of Africa can solve “the race problem” by a massive influx of non-Africans. These non-Africans will assimilate and interbreed with Africans over time. The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties — society without race by homogeneous default. Everyone will hold hands in unity, hatred will be a thing of the past, and racial oppression will no longer be an option.

A sharp mind quickly realizes that this “solution to the race problem” in the African example is actually the Final Solution for Africans. That is, the systematic eradication of the African people — African genocide. No rational Black man would agree with such a genocidal campaign. No reasonable Black man would stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans. No race deserves genocide. Every race has the right to exist biologically, ethnically, and culturally.

International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race goes, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The present immigration and political policies of many traditionally White nations, especially the United States, are in violation of part (c) and possibly part (d). White nations have been subverted to conditions that heavily favor non-White immigration, restrict White birthrates, and encourage and support non-White birthrates, and are thus calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the White race. There are many quotations of politicians, professors, and pundits advocating this very point — the end of the White race. Genocide is not always an act of traditional murder. The United Nations Convention on Genocide covers violent genocide with parts (a) and (b). However, the remaining definitions cover indirect and incremental methods to clarify that any form of genocide is punishable under international law.

The United States employed an explicitly pro-White immigration policy for the entirety of its two centuries of existence — until the treasonous 1965 Immigration Act, which reversed the previous safeguards and subverted American immigration policy so it would henceforth discriminate against White Europeans. Prior to the 1965 Act, American immigration policy favored White European immigration for the explicit purpose of maintaining the racial status quo of the American population. The behind-the-scenes architects of the 1965 Act realized that overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration would inevitably reduce the White American population over time. The political front men of the 1965 Act, such as Ted Kennedy, falsely assured the American public that the new immigration policy would not upset the racial balance of America. In 1965, America was approximately 90 per cent. White. Just a few generations later, America is now about 65 per cent. White. In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country.

Illegal aliens create further demographic chaos, as White Americans are crowded out and out-bred by millions of Mestizo illegal aliens from Central and South America. Despite overwhelming public desire to seal the border and to deport and deny entry to illegal aliens, the federal government has willfully ignored its mandate to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic. Non-White legal immigrants and tens of millions of Mestizo illegal alien invaders will dispossess the White American majority in the next few decades. White Americans will become a minority in their own nation much faster than they would by legal immigration alone, even under the 1965 Act.

Overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration and millions of non-White illegal aliens are inherently destructive to the White American population. Welfare and social benefit policies financially reward the generally poorer non-White groups for having large numbers of children. Preferential hiring policies set aside jobs for non-Whites. Lax enforcement of employment law allows non-Whites to undercut the wages of White people. One appalling aspect of these trends is that most of these policies, such as welfare, food stamps, and free emergency medical care, are predominantly financed by Whites. White American taxpayers labor under conditions calculated to bring about their genocide as the progressive income tax discourages the most productive White Americans from having children.
Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers face the greatest disincentives to having large families. Instead, they work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers. The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens and their “anchor babies” that will produce an ever-increasing number of welfare recipients and future criminals.

The White American population dwindles while the non-White populations exponentially increase, further straining the welfare system, crowding prison cells, diluting educational standards, and destroying formerly safe White neighborhoods. White Americans face incremental genocide by design, which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend. Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions. The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle — which makes it all the more dangerous.

To deny White citizens of White nations the right to preserve themselves — biologically, ethnically, and culturally — is a true example of racism and hatred. Genocide is never acceptable. What can be more “racist” than the systematic eradication of an entire race? White Americans need not be ashamed of identifying on a racial basis, as every other race in America has a political license to do so. La Raza, the League of United Latino American Citizens, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith are all bound by racial or ethnic ties.

White Americans are now approaching minority status in the nation their forefathers fought for and built from the ground up. If current birthrates continue, White Americans will be a tiny minority group in a few generations, in a completely unsustainable position. They will likely be unable to survive. White Americans must be free to object to the current policy of White genocide — and without being shouted down as “racists,” a term which is little more than a political tool to silence White advocacy.

If the denunciation of genocide rests upon the assumption that all races have the right to exist, why must the White citizens of traditionally White nations accept White genocide with open arms? It is defamatory and dishonest to slander any White person who objects to massive inflows of non-White immigration as a “racist.”

White people and White nations seem to be uniquely burdened with the “responsibility” of lethal self-sacrifice on a genocidal scale. The term “racist” is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence a person who wishes to protect his or her race from extinction — a person who opposes genocide.

White Americans must be free to describe racial injustices committed against White people. Introduce the term “anti-White” to mainstream political discourse in the only way possible — by starting with private conversation. The mainstream media attempts to mold public opinion, but when there is an seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure. Demand an end to anti-White policies and White genocide.

White Americans have the same claims to identity, organization, advocacy, and existence as any other group in America. Take a principled, adamant, and vocal stand against White genocide. Talk to neighbors and inform friends. Write letters to editors, television producers, media figures, and especially politicians. Let the muffled White voice clear its throat and speak up clearly and forcefully after decades of silence. Turn the tables and take back the moral high ground. The truth is dangerous, which is precisely why slurs like “racist” are currently used to shout down reasonable opposition to White genocide. Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack.

Anyone who opposes a return to traditional American immigration policies is supporting White genocide. Anyone who supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens is enabling White genocide. The current American immigration policy discriminates against White Europeans and is bringing about White genocide. There is nothing more “racist” than genocide, because it is the destruction of an entire race. If someone shouts “racist!” in a petty attempt to silence debate, explain that a real racist is someone who wants to commit genocide against the entire White race. Stop White genocide — one conversation, one talking point, one letter, one complaint, one comment, one remark, and one person at a time. Stay on a consistent message against White genocide. The future of the White race, if there will be one, depends on you.

Demjanjuk Trial Evidence Faked

Chris Rossetti — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:58:11 +0000

by Chris Rossetti

AN FBI REPORT kept secret for 25 years said the Soviet Union “quite likely fabricated” evidence central to the prosecution of John Demjanjuk (pictured) – a revelation that could help the the retired Ohio auto worker’s defenders against charges that he is guilty of “Nazi war crimes.”

The newly declassified FBI field office report casts doubt on the authenticity of a “Nazi” ID card that is the key piece of evidence in allegations that Demjanjuk served as a guard at the Sobibor death camp in occupied Poland.

Throughout three decades of U.S. hearings, an extradition, a death sentence followed by acquittal in Israel, a deportation and a trial in Munich, Germany, the arguments have relied heavily on the photo ID from an SS training camp that indicates Demjanjuk was sent to Sobibor.

Claims that the card and other evidence against Demjanjuk are Soviet forgeries have repeatedly been made by Demjanjuk’s defense attorneys. However, the FBI report provides the first known confirmation that American investigators had similar doubts.

“Justice is ill-served in the prosecution of an American citizen on evidence which is not only normally inadmissible in a court of law, but based on evidence and allegations quite likely fabricated by the KGB,” the FBI’s Cleveland field office said in the 1985 report, four years after the Soviets had shown U.S. investigators the card.

It was the height of the Cold War at the time, and the ID card from the Trawniki training camp had not been as closely examined by Western experts as it has been today. Since then it has been scrutinized and validated by courts in the U.S., Israel and Germany – though experts at the recent trial left room for doubt, with one conceding that a counterfeiter with the right materials could have forged the card and other documents.

The FBI agents argued that the Soviets had an interest in faking the documents as part of a campaign to smear anti-Communist emigres. Those conclusions contradict the findings of another branch of the Department of Justice, the heavily Zionist-influenced “Office of Special Investigations,” or OSI, which was central in making the allegations against Demjanjuk.

The FBI report was discovered by researchers for the Associated Press (AP) at the National Archives in College Park, Md., among case files that were declassified after the Ukrainian-born Demjanjuk was deported from the U.S. in May 2009 to face trial in Germany.

A New Aryan Prehistory

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:43:45 +0000

Are the sources and scholars revered among White nationalists now woefully out of date when it comes to our own people’s earliest times? Sure to be controversial, this essay asks us: Was there a Golden Age when women were predominant and inter-Aryan war virtually unknown?

by Day Brown (pictured)

AS KNOWLEDGEABLE as Professor Oliver, Nietzsche, and so many scholars are from an age when education was at a much higher level, in the intervening years shovels, forensics, magnetometers, dendrochronology, DNA, and even computer analysis of sources reveals that Aryans predate the late Bronze Age mythic war band era by several millennia. We can’t really come to understand our ancestry without examination of a large body of work that’s accumulated in the last 30 years, especially since the fall of the Iron Curtain opened up access to Western research of a huge corpus of knowledge unearthed by Russian and other Eastern Bloc scientists.

To begin with, we, more than any other race, are Neanderthal hybrids [Or, perhaps, merely more closely related to the early common ancestor of both us and the Neanderthals. -- Ed.]. Gooch, Neanderthal Legacy, has some daft ideas, but his outline of the facts written in the bones is right on, and is now verified by the Neanderthal (HNS) DNA.

To find out why the HNS disappeared, just show a midwife the much more robust skeleton — and pelvis. A pelvis which cracks open a Cro Magnon pelvis to facilitate birth. Then too, whenever you hybridize, you expect lots of fertile males, but few females because their reproductive system is so complex. So, if Aryans were hybrids, you’d expect fewer mtDNA lines.

Sykes, in The Seven Daughters of Eve, reports Europe has only seven mtDNA lines. (There are scores of such lines among Semites and over 140 so far found in Africa.) Then, too, he says they lived in Europe between 50,000 BP and 10,000 years ago. I note that 50kya, only Neanderthals were living in Europe.

Scholars looking over the Aryan languages found many words related to fresh-water bodies and life forms, but none for the marine environment. This was confusing, because the dendochronology shows Aryan timber frame construction has been going on in SE Europe for 8,000 years, with a vast mercantile empire from the salt mines at Hallstaat and Salzburg down the Danube to the world’s first plank-hulled fishing fleet.

Everything points to the west end of the Black Sea except the Aryan language, which, according to computer analysis of the vocabulary, only refers to fresh water. “Did the Proto-Indo-European Priesthood Commit Treason in the Era of PIE Unity?” by Oswald and Ballantine is another masterpiece of scholarship. (This despite the oxymoronic “Indo-”: Aryan was never spoken in India, but one form, a proto-Sanskrit, was introduced by late Bronze Age warriors and the commercial Brahman elite.)

Looking through the record and noting the rate at which language evolves, they see some great catastrophe in the middle sixth millennium BC. I’ve not been able to locate the software, but they calculated there was a remarkable series of total solar eclipses between 5500-5600 BC. Since then (1988), Ryan and Pitman explained some of the basis for the myths of the period in their Noah’s Flood. If you pull up bottom cores from the Black Sea, you find that under the marine mud, there’s a layer of land grasses preserved by the anaerobic conditions — a layer having C-14 dates of around 5600 BC. They say the post-Ice-Age sea levels were rising, and then spilled over to open up the Bosporus, with a force 100 times greater than Niagara — filling the then-freshwater Euxine lake with salt water, and also causing a well known Aryan diaspora taking their freshwater nomenclature with them.

Naturally, many sought higher ground in or near the Transylvanians, where they found Chalcocite, a very pretty mineral — fool’s gold is one form, but other iridescent types of green, slate, and yellow exist. One other thing we find they took with them is female leadership.

J.P. Mallory, for one, in his In Search of the Indo-Europeans, p. 123, reports but one word for “authority”: raj as in raja, regime, regina, oregon, (Skt., Eng., Lat., Grk.), which, it turns out, is “a female tribal leader of great wisdom and mana.” Who — no doubt — loved the new jewelry. But then, some fell in the fire. The lovely color is because this copper ore is contaminated with arsenic, which lowers its melting point to 900 degrees F, the lowest forging temp of all the bronzes to produce the toughest bronze.

So, what does practically every culture do when it can first forge metal? — Create arrowheads, spearheads, swords, daggers, armor, and the like. But not here. Bronze woodworking tools, garden and farming tools, grain sickles, belt buckles, broaches, clasps, hair pieces, jewelry. But no weapons.

They didn’t need weapons; they had social skills and organization we don’t see later. They didn’t have marriage, either. Men who don’t own women, don’t fight over them — much less go to war to increase the size of a king’s harem. And they also didn’t have kings. Women were free to select sperm donors on the basis of intelligence and character. Men in power have never been that fussy.

In fact, the only eugenics program in all history that worked — and everyone knows how well — was that of Sparta. Which was run by the women.

This, more than anything else, produced a golden age of peace and unprecedented technological achievement. In addition to bronze we see dolls, doll furniture, and doll houses — with chimneys. The Gradesnica Platter shows 7,000-year-old writing; then there’s polychrome pottery, figures wearing tailored clothes, and, to judge from the etymology, woven of linen, wool, and hemp. The reason sails are made of canvas is they made them from cannabis.

Many would not believe the Aryans could have lived in peace 7,000 years ago. Goodison and Morris, in Ancient Goddesses, note the controversy on the flyleaf and set their goal to open a virgin tel. They went down through 4,000 years of occupation — and didn’t find any signs of warfare.

The Anarch Sharpens His Sword

admin — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:19:51 +0000

by Alyssa Kaltenbrunner

IF BEHAVIOR THAT IS ADMIRED is the path to power, as quoteth the anonymous Beowulf bard, then I can think of no paragraph more worthy of summing up modern man as that of this from Weininger:

“For the great politician is not only a speculator and millionaire, but also a pop singer; he is not only a great chess player, but also a great actor; he is not only a despot, but also a toady; he not only prostitutes others, but is himself a great prostitute. The politician, the warleader who never ‘lowered himself’ does not exist. After all, his descents are famous; they are his sexual acts. The proper tribune also belongs in the gutter. The complementary relationship with the mob is a downright part of a politician’s constitution. In fact, he can only use the rabble; with the others, the individuals, he makes a quick end, if he is unwise; or, if he is as smart as Napoleon, he pretends to value them, so as to render them harmless.”

The age of the lie is conversely the age of the prostitute. The men of power in the age of gold are those who bend over and touch their toes, those who shower without curtains, those who simply couldn’t make it in Hollywood and decided to become politicians instead.

The noble one is cast out for his honesty, for his forthrightness, and for his clarity of vision and purpose. He looks down on the whore but awaits the day where what is bent will be made straight again, and his courage lies in simple laughter and action. They will never understand your sense of humor.

Let us examine who is the anarch, according to Junger:

“Although I am an anarch, I am not anti-authoritarian. Quite the opposite: I need authority, although I do not believe in it. My critical faculties are sharpened by the absence of the credibility that I ask for. As a historian, I know what can be offered.”

The anarch is the opposite of the anarchist and both only appear as contradictions to those who cannot read in between the lines:

The anarch pays his own way; the anarchist is a sponge.

The anarch seeks truth; the anarchist is a walking lie.

The anarch controls himself; the anarchist seeks disorder outside of his internal disorder.

The anarch seeks Being; the anarchist revels in Becoming.

The anarch desires a master; the anarchist bows low to the most enslaved creatures.

The anarch achieves true freedom; the anarchist is the most vile slave.

The anarch attracts; the anarchist repels.

The anarch builds; the anarchist levels.

The anarch is virile; the anarchist is sterile.

The anarch sharpens his sword; the anarchist throws bombs.

To lower oneself is to vote, to beg, and to compromise with those who seek to destroy you. To bow down to ‘the will of the people,’ that is, to kill Socrates, to murder Christ, and to piss on the Mona Lisa so that one may ride the waves of mass hysteria into a free meal.

To heighten oneself is to offer your own hide for something higher than biological necessity; to reach higher peaks, and to risk life and limb in order to erect monuments for a God that lives through one’s own Deeds.

This, I say, is the anarch.

Homeless Jack’s Lexicon

admin — Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:16:57 +0000

by H. Millard

“I KNOW YOU’RE trying to figure out more about this religion of mine, man,” said Homeless Jack, “so here’s a basic lexicon that may help you get it. I got this from Arman.

“And, you probably want to know how many believers there are in addition to Arman. Well, all I know is, I believe. One is enough. You see, that ‘one’ principle is also part of our beliefs, our kind of human is like the first point that started all of existence. It all starts with One.

“We are a branching off, and each one of us is another possible branching if we have as many children as possible in our image.”

Abiogenesis–The theory that life can arise from non-living matter.

Adaptation–The process whereby an organism becomes better suited to its environment.

General adaptations are those that fit an organism for life in broad environmental zones, as opposed to ‘special adaptations’ which are specializations for a particular way of life. Organisms with broad general adaptations often survive while those with special adaptations become extinct when changes occur in the environment.

Absorption–Armanist religious concept that holds that living organisms can absorb parts of the code of other organisms as well as from so-called non-living things. Works with natural selection. Often seen as mimicry.

Allele–One of a series of different forms of a gene.

Arman–The Teacher. Receiver and promulgator of the revelations and divine inspiration.

Armanism–one of the names used for this belief system.

Basic Impulse or just Impulse–The inherent “desire” to be and to be more.

Blenders–Those who promote the blending of all races, religions and nations into a sort of plain wrap human being that we call the Tan Everyman. Blenders do not like human differences, but sometimes push “diversity;” not because they actually want human diversity, but because they see this as a step to blending. The idea of the Blenders is to keep all lands where humans live from being exclusively of one race, one religion and one nation. One way they try to do this is by encouraging the mass immigration of peoples who are far different from the natives in those lands, to those lands.

Then, over time, the Blenders expect the “rough edges” and “extremes” of racial types, religious beliefs and nationalistic tendencies in those lands to disappear by blending in with the mass at the center of the bell curve.

The ultimate goal of Blenders is to have one universal race, one universal religion, one universal nation that is worldwide. “Blenders” is our word for them. They do not call themselves this.

Blending–In nature, the majority of any type of life will be clustered around the center of the bell curve in characteristics for that type of life. This is natural. In humans, we not only see this as the blind workings of nature, but we also see some humans trying to increase the mass near the center while eliminating the different versions that are in a minority. This is an attempt to remove the “rough edges” of different races, religions and nations and have them all become part of a sort of plain wrap world where conformity in all ways is the norm. Some well meaning, but misinformed, people believe this is the way to have a peaceful planet. Unfortunately for those pushing this idea, it won’t work — because the spinning of existence will always cause change and differences. And, all life, whether it is aware of this or not, will continue to struggle to be and to be more. Life is competition. Life is struggle. Differences are what move us forward. Without differences there would be no evolution.

Blue eyes–A recent evolutionary development, probably emerged within the last 10,000 years according to recent research.

Bottleneck–There have been recurring bottlenecks on Earth. These have been times when most living things died off (think dinosaurs, for example), and only a few types, for whatever reason, survived and got through the bottleneck to replenish the Earth. The coming great die-off of Homo sapiens will not be complete. Many with Code A will be saved because of their right blood, right belief and right actions and they’ll survive and get through to the other side of the bottleneck and become a new species. In other words, they will have the right DNA combination (the correct mutations) and other factors that will immunize them to what is to come — or which will, in some way that we are unaware of, protect them. White skin is an absolute necessity according to the revelations. Why? We can only guess.

Cause and effect–We live in a cause and effect universe. Effects have causes. Things always happen because something causes them to happen.

Chromosomes–DNA is organized into chromosomes. Humans have 46 chromosomes. The chromosomes are of different sizes. Chromosome number 1, for example, which is the largest human chromosome, has about 220 million base pairs. A male and female each contribute 23 chromosomes to a new child. Because Whites are a later evolutionary development, their genes are less fixed and are more fragile than genes in other humans. This means most genes for White characteristics are recessive and will not be expressed if a White bears children with a non-White. It thus takes two Whites–a White male and a White female–to produce a White child.

Code, The–That which is within everything in existence that makes it what it is. In life that we are aware of, the code is in the form of DNA. The code is the same on the most basic levels of existence and then is changed and modified to make all that exists. It is also this way within life and within human beings. It is programmed to spread and expand into every possible niche.

Code A–Our term for the specific code that makes non-Jewish European-descended White people as we are. Believers will sometimes just say “The Code,” and by this they usually mean Code A.

Comfort–All living things seek comfort. The comfort sought may be psychological or physical. The desire for psychological comfort can override the desire for physical comfort and can be used for good or bad. Nietzsche thought humans had a “will to power.” We think he was wrong. We believe there is a “will to comfort,” found in humans and all living organisms, and the will to power is just a subset of the psychological desire for comfort found in some individuals.

Competition–A natural and desirable part of existence.

Correspondence–As above, so below. As below, so above. There are links unseen between things on the surface that appear to have little or no connection, and there are “buttons” that can be pushed with proper symbols and rites.

Cosmic Balancing–Similar to the concept of karma.

Cosmic evolution–the study of universal change and the assembly and composition of energy, matter and life. This is at the heart of our beliefs; the evolution of everything. Human evolution is just a small part of this, but since we are humans, we give it a lot of attention. We understand, however, that we are not unique or special except for the fact that, as far as we know, we are the only organisms on Earth who can think the abstract thoughts about this and other things, and we are the only organisms on Earth — again as far as we know — who can take an active and conscious part in determining the direction of our future evolution. The same basic forces at work in cosmic evolution are also at work in the evolution of life. Understand the very small, and you’ll understand the very large. Understand the very large, and you’ll understand the very small.

Here are the general steps of Cosmic Evolution:

• The emergence of the first “point” of energy and forces in the absolute nothing

• The spinning evolution of the energy and forces into vibrations, elementary particles and atoms

• The spinning evolution of atoms into galaxies, stars, planets, etc.

• The spinning evolution of star material into mineral elements

• The spinning evolution of those mineral elements into the molecular building blocks of life

• The spinning evolution of those molecules into life forms

• The spinning evolution of advanced life forms into intelligence

• The spinning evolution of intelligent life into higher consciousness

Deadenders–Those who do not reproduce their kind or who reproduce too few so that their code does not survive into the next generation.

Deme–A local population of one species that share a distinct gene pool. When isolated from other demes of the same species they can become a distinct subspecies or species.

Dissimulation, Religious–Religiously sanctioned act of lying or otherwise doing whatever is necessary to prevent persecution for one’s beliefs and faith.

Divine Inspiration–The Teachings are the product of revelation and divine inspiration. Believers should also seek divine inspiration in their daily lives by praying to be guided in doing the right things.

DNA–Deoxyribonucleic acid is made up of four bases: Adenine, Thymine, Cytosine, Guanine that are usually abbreviated A,T,C,G. DNA is organized into units called chromosomes. Humans have 46 chromosomes. A child receives 23 chromosomes from his or her mother and 23 from his or her father. Great emphasis is put on DNA, genes, genotypes, phenotypes and similar concepts in this belief system, as DNA is considered to contain the essential person, and to be that which is to be improved and which moves forward. Our individual bodies are constructed by the DNA and our DNA can survive our individual bodies. All life is built from the inside out by the DNA spiral. The DNA spiral looks like a twisted ladder.

All DNA is the same. It is the order that is important. Very minor changes in the sequence or order of the DNA can have major effects. This is often misunderstood or misrepresented by blenders who want everyone to think that all humans are the same except for different paint jobs. They’re not. To say all humans are 99% the same may sound as though we’re all the same, but when you consider we’re talking about 3.1 billion letters of DNA, 1% difference can be major. Here are some other comparisons that you’ve probably seen. The actual percentages shown here might be slightly different from what you’ve read, because the percentages and counts are often updated as new information is learned. Chimps and humans are about 96% the same (the old figure was 98.5%). Slugs and humans are about 70% the same. Daffodils and humans are about 35% the same. Bananas and humans are about 50% the same. This last comparison is often cited this way: Although humans and bananas are 50% the same, this doesn’t mean that a human is half banana. Keep that in mind when you hear blenders say that all humans are the same because they share 99% the same DNA with other humans. It is the differences that are important, and minor differences often produce major results. DNA is the almost robotic molecule of life. It works automatically and never stops working in tinkering with life to try to expand itself into all of existence and to find the best carriers of itself.

Dominant–(1)The primary type of any organism in an area. All life “tries” to be dominant. (2) In genetics, the form of a gene that is expressed in the characteristics of an organism. Generally, many of the characteristics of White people are recessive and require both a White male and a White female to produce a White child.

Drift, genetic–Random fluctuations of gene combinations that are often neutral and nonadaptive, but which may become fixed in a small population even though they do not appear to offer any survival advantage.

Drogh–Our religious term for ground of existence or the field. It is where matter comes into existence from vibrations.

Enlightenment–Awakened to the true nature of reality. It is more than just an intellectual understanding, but may include that, and is a quiet but exalted or ecstatic glowing feeling of oneness with the First Cause that words can’t describe. One who is truly enlightened will see patterns and truths that others miss and will see the universe in a back yard.

Essence—The core of everything in existence. Used with a capital “E” to refer to the Essence of the indigenous peoples of Europe both still in Europe and in the European diaspora. With the capital “E” it is similar in meaning to DNA, genotype, phenotype and Code A.

Evolution—The gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form. We accept this as a reality. However, we believe that evolution on Earth is just part of Cosmic Evolution. As far as evolution on Earth goes, we do not believe that Darwinian evolution has all the answers of evolution. Darwin got much right, but there is more. Much more. Note that evolution and Darwin are not synonyms. Darwin posited what he believed about evolution, but there are other evolutionary views that seek to answer some of the questions that Darwin couldn’t answer. For example, Darwin’s idea of gradual evolution never satisfactorily accounted for the emergence of completely new types beyond the species level. Enter punctuated equilibrium and similar theories. Evolution is all about differences in living things, and evolution usually requires isolation to work. Evolution is a branching off as nature tinkers with the DNA code and shuffles the letters of DNA in different ways. The differences “stick” if there is isolation–either geographic or reproductive–and if the changes offer a survival advantage (note–some changes do not offer survival advantages but also stick, perhaps because of pleiotropic factors) so those with the differences do not blend back in with those they branched off from. Remember also that Darwin lived and died before DNA was discovered. In addition to changes caused by adaptation and natural selection, all life on Earth is constantly bombarded by various types of cosmic rays and other forces that can cause some of the letters of DNA to be knocked out of place and which can cause mutations. Nature works on a trial and error basis. It tries something, and if it works it keeps it. If it doesn’t work it doesn’t keep it. Evolution doesn’t take place when gene pools reach equilibrium, because evolution means change.

Exogenesis–Hypothesis that life on Earth came from elsewhere. Similar to panspermia but more limited in its scope.

Expand always; contract never–Armanists believe this is a command that is within everything in existence and that anything or any living things that disobey this command will become extinct. Humans of one type expand and change the frequency of genes in the gene pool by becoming more numerous than other types of humans, primarily by having higher fertility rates than other humans. Those who produce the most children who live to produce their own children in great numbers will eventually replace other types of humans who do not breed as fast or in such quantity.

External Signs (or characteristics)–the genetically determined way we look. Phenotype.

Extreme Individualism–An error in thinking that causes one to not see that one is part of a group of like beings and the product of a group genotype.

Fail Point–The paradoxical threshold of evolution where humans now find themselves. By evolving big brains,we have reached this point where we are able to stop the evolutionary process of natural selection for the best qualities. The weak and the strong can both survive under such conditions and pass on their codes. This puts the best adapted and least adapted on an equal footing in the chance for survival and in expanding their codes. Believers seek to get past the fail point and to cross the threshold to move higher.

Faith–Faith is important for a number of reasons including the fact that the brain can cause physical effects that can be beneficial.

False ideas–humans have many false ideas in their humancentric ideologies and beliefs, and these false ideas often block the path and must be identified and corrected. The major false idea in this age, one which leads to many subsets of other false ideas, is that all humans are the same. This idea is anti-nature and anti-evolution. Our view, to be clear, is not that there are superior or inferior humans, but that there are many, many differences. Humans have evolved and adapted for certain environments and as a result of these adaptations and resultant gene changes, they have acquired other secondary changes.

Field, The–Also known as the ground of existence and Drogh. Behind everything.

First Cause, The–That which created something out of absolute nothing. Used interchangeably with “God.” The Ultimate. The Source of all of existence.

Flow, The–The great spinning river of existence in which the Earth bobs along like a very tiny piece of dust as a little zoo of a planet.

Free will–We believe that human free will is not as free as many people believe and that our actions, in a very broad sense, are more gene-directed than many people want to believe. However, there is a level of free will that is important, even though it is difficult to ever know whether we are acting because of our genetic programs or because of free will.

Frequency dependent selection–the fitness of a phenotype is dependent on its frequency relative to other phenotypes in a given population. Blenders try to change the frequency of genes in a population via immigration in order to change the population.

Gene–a portion of DNA that carries the code for some action or characteristic of the living organism. Humans have somewhere between 20-30,000 genes. The exact number has not been determined. They are the program within us. Genes “want” to survive and struggle to be expressed. We are their way to do this. Competition and struggle are natural and exist throughout all of existence. This competition and struggle is inherent in existence itself. Note that a gene is not an actual thing, but a location on a strand of DNA. We often say: Genes Are Us.

Gene fixation–one variant of a particular gene (allele) remains the only one in a population. A partial but incomplete example of the process may be easily seen in Finland which is considered the blondest nation on Earth. That is, the allele for blond hair is almost the only allele in the population, and if gene flow were completely stopped, the allele for blond hair would become fixed in the population.

Gene Flow–The transfer of alleles of genes from one population to another. Gene flow stops divergence and prevents the emergence of new species from the old species. New species develop when the gene flow is stopped. The major way gene flow is stopped is by physical separation and isolation. Gene flow causes homogenization or blending.

Genetic Drift–A mechanism for evolutionary change resulting from the random fluctuations of gene frequencies in small, isolated populations.

Genetic homeostasis–the tendency of a population to maintain a constant genetic composition.

Genetic Isolation–The absence of gene flow between populations as a result of geographic separation or other mechanisms that prevent gene flow.

Genocide–Actual genocide is the killing off of genes by any cause. Legal genocide is defined by the U.N. We accept both actual and legal genocide as realities. Whites are victims of genocide by both definitions.

Genotype–Your internal blueprint or code. All the letters of DNA in their particular arrangement that makes you, uniquely you. A descriptor for genome which is the actual, physical DNA molecules.

Gens–Latin for clan, race, nation, people, tribe.

God–Unknowable. The First Cause. The Source. That which did the impossible and created itself and everything else from nothing. We see the something that was created in the nothing as an invisible, spinning, spiraling and expanding skein of existence that underlies all of existence. No human form. Sometimes used as synonym for nature or creator or similar terms. When you peel back everything to a time before there was anything, you are left with a mystery of what started existence and you are left with this concept. The necessary end of all arguments. One contra theory holds that there was never a time when there was absolutely nothing.

Although, as a thing easily said, we often speak of the “big bang” as the start of existence, our reason tells us that something was already in existence at that time–perhaps subatomic particles or waves–so the first cause must have been before the big bang.

God gene–Is an hypothesis that some humans inherit genes that predispose them to spirituality. Gene VMAT2 is thought to be involved. This gene doesn’t directly cause one to be spiritual, but causes certain chemical changes in the brain that are interpreted as spirituality. The importance for us in this faith, even if the hypothesis is proven wrong, is the indication it gives of the increasing recognition that genes cause various attitudes and behaviors as well as the physical characteristics that we see, such as eye color and skin color. We believe that there is a gene variation that may draw some people to our beliefs while others will not be so drawn because they lack the particular allele for this, and just cannot fully understand the teachings on a deep level. Teachers will point to the well known example of color blindness in which some people with certain gene variations can’t distinguish between the colors red and green. No matter how hard those with this gene variation try, they just can’t see the difference. No one would call them dumb. It’s just a difference in genes. So it is with many of our beliefs. Some people simply won’t get it.

Golden Rule–Treat all others as you want to be treated and treat all others as they treat you.

Great Die-Off or Mass Extinction–Arman had a vision of a time when most humans would die off and only believers would be spared to get through the bottleneck.

Ground of Existence (also Field or Drogh)–Thousands of years ago people began realizing that our everyday objects were made up of ever smaller objects called atoms. Then they realized that atoms were made of even smaller objects. Today, it is recognized that subatomic particles, which can also be subatomic waves, may be what underlies everything in existence and that all of reality is built up from them. Subatomic waves may be the source of matter. Some religions, sensing this reality, posit the notion that everything is thus illusion. We reject that notion. We do sometimes indicate that everything we know in our universe is a projection of the subatomic particles/waves but this idea of “projection” is far different from other uses of the term, most notably in the way a film is projected. In our use of the term, we see the subatomic particles/waves spinning into reality that which they are the essence of. The unseen skein.

Homo Armanius–The next man. The new model human. We are the ones before his emergence and he will only emerge from us and no others.

Ideal–Of every thing in existence there is an ideal. Finding the ideal in our kind is important so that it can be reached and then can be overcome to move ever higher. The Ideal for living conditions for believers would be for them to have their own land free of all discordant elements so that they could pursue their evolutionary and highest destiny exclusively among their own people. This Ideal Land is something to be sought, prayed for and worked for so that the people may truly be free.

Imagery, Religious–Fylfots, circles, spirals, spinning, turning, bramble bushes, natural forests, rivers, oceans.

Impulse, The–The inbuilt need or desire in existence to be and to be more and to expand always.

Internal Signs (or characteristics)–the way we are that can’t easily be seen. Our intelligence, personality, etc. that are genetically determined.

Isolation–Physical or reproductive isolation are usually required for speciation to occur.

King of the Senses–In humans, the king of the senses is eyesight. We can reason to this conclusion by starting with the fact that the purpose of all life is to make more like itself and in humans nature has tied the libido to sight. As the king of the senses, sight is also tied into our survival instincts. We generally sense danger by seeing it and we can usually know who is us, and who is not us by sight.

We also believe that we must not deny our senses and that we have them for a reason–to help us survive to breed. We believe that we must feed our senses by being active, and it is by being active that we move higher.

Lamarckism–Theory that an organism can pass on characteristics that it acquires in its lifetime to its offspring. Largely discredited. However, we believe that the basic ideas behind the theory (but with modern terms) are valid but have not yet been proven. We believe that living organisms (maybe just some and maybe just under certain conditions) do pick up “essences” of various other living organisms and even so-called non-living things and forces in the environment that cause changes to the genetic code under some circumstances and that some of these changes can be passed on to offspring when the conditions are right. The methods of picking up these essences are open to speculation. It may be from viruses or bacteria injecting the essences into our DNA or it may be something different. We believe that there is a sort of chameleon effect or plasticity with life that is different from, but works with natural selection. We point to certain insects that mimic the twigs or leaves upon which they live as examples of this absorption of the essence of other things into the genes.

Law of Inertia–An object at rest will remain at rest and an object in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by another force.

Living universe–The idea that the universe and all that is in it is not dead. In our definition, it is not alive either, as we usually define the term, but is all connected via subatomic particles and subatomic waves (or by currently unknown forces) in a skein or field that we do not fully understand, such that the universe, or parts of it, responds automatically by receiving sensory input from everything in existence. A simple analogy might be to think of a stove made of iron. When the stove is heated up, the iron automatically changes because of the heat. In the universe, it’s as though everything that exists is wired to the underlying and unseen First Cause. Another analogy is a spider web. The spider picks up vibrations if any part of the web is moved even slightly. This is how the spider finds prey.

Meditation–We reject the idea that sitting still for hours on end and depriving the senses of stimulation is beneficial for believers and will lead to any deeper understanding of existence. Our meditation is usually from a few minutes up to an hour of quiet reflection while viewing a proper focus object and while quietly asking for guidance from above. Sometimes, in some believers, longer times may be helpful. We also believe that we must not deny our senses to gain a deeper understanding, but actually bathe our senses in things of the senses. Thus, we believe that we must be physically moving and taking in sights, sounds and smells–that we must experience things–to gain fuller understanding. Walks in woods, fields, mountains, deserts and even in cities help us understand, if one does this consciously and actively. Our brains need the input let in by our senses. We must live consciously and always observing the patterns all around us and we must learn from everything.

Method acting–We believe that one of the ways to improve, advance and help our evolution is to imitate certain ideals and to act the part of the ideals in all ways possible. We see this as being similar to method acting. A method actor will try to become the character he plays, and will often try to do this by doing everything in the same way as the character; which can include eating the same food, using the same toothpaste, using the same soap, living in the same place and wearing the same socks and underwear, of a real person being portrayed. By taking on the outward aspects of the character, the method actor tries to evoke the inward aspects. Everything we do or experience is registered in our subconscious mind by our senses and causes changes in the way we perceive the world and the way the world perceives us and how we act and react to various stimuli. See also Absorption.

Miscegenation–mating outside the genotype. Forbidden by the First Cause as a great sin or wrong against the First Cause.

Mutagen–is an agent or substance that can bring about a permanent alteration to the physical composition of a DNA gene such that the genetic message is changed.

Mutation–A Mutation occurs when a DNA gene is damaged or changed in such a way as to alter the genetic message carried by that gene. Random mutations are sort of nature’s wild cards to change life to survive by throwing in random changes that might or might not stick. They are happening all the time. Most are minor and go unnoticed. Some are detrimental to the organism. There are also mutations of chromosomes and these have much greater effects.

Natural Law–Naturally occurring principles of existence that channel existence toward evolution. Natural law is built into the structure of existence. Humans must deduce natural law correctly, and these teachings provide help.

Natural Rights–Those rights that you have just because you are here. They are yours because of your birth. No other men or groups of men or government can legally grant them to you or take them away from you. They are yours. Among these natural rights are your right to your existence, your right to reproduce as you wish, your right to associate with or not associate with anyone of your choosing for any reason of your choosing, your freedom, self-determination, self-governance, self-identification, your right to believe as you wish and to tell others of your beliefs, your right to pursue your personal happiness as you alone see fit so long as you do not harm others.

Natural Selection–The process in nature by which the organisms best adapted to their environment tend to survive and pass on their genetic characteristics to succeeding generations while those less adapted tend to be eliminated. Survival of the fittest in the struggle to be and to be more. Natural selection brings about evolutionary change by favoring differential reproduction of genes. This changes the gene frequency from one generation to the next. Natural selection does not cause genetic change, but once there is change it encourages some genes instead of others. Natural selection requires genetic variation, differential reproduction and heritable characteristics.

We believe that natural selection is often being overridden in modern society due to birth control, abortions and miscegenation and that this artificial state of affairs is blocking or destroying the best evolutionary path for many of our European indigenous people still in Europe and in the European diaspora.

Nature–The word “nature” as we use it means far more than the narrow meaning it is usually given. In our use it means all of existence and sometimes it means God. So, when believers say they study nature for clues to answers to the big questions, they don’t just mean they’re going on nature walks (but that could be part of it). They mean they’re looking at subatomic particles and subatomic waves, galaxies, birds, flowers, physics, psychology and everything else that is in existence.

Notus–Literally “Not Us.” Not our people.

Numinous feeling–Filled with an overwhelming sense of wonder and awe at being in the presence of the divine. We find this most easily just before dawn and just before dusk, during storms and in forests and other places away from civilization.

Only one path–This is the one genuine path for us that leads to true higher states. It requires, among other things, physical evolution. This is one of the main differences between this belief system and others. We believe the core of our being is our unique physical DNA code that we carry and which has spun us into existence. It is an absolute prerequisite that one must have to take the next step up. It is the code that must survive and expand and we are a means to that end as it is a means to our end. However, this is not to be seen as though we are merely robots carrying a real something inside of us that pulls our strings and orders us about. We are one. We are its outer aspect and it is our inner aspect. It is within every cell of our body.We would not exist as the beings we are except for it, and it cannot survive and evolve except for us. It is our essence.

Order is important–DNA is composed of just four basic chemicals (A,T,C,G) yet those four chemicals when shuffled in different ways produce all the variety of life that we are aware of. This tells us that it is not the difference in the chemicals of DNA that is important (because there are none) but the way they are arranged. Change the order just a little and you have a fly or a mouse or an ape or a man or a tree. And, the emphasis here is on change the order just a little. It doesn’t take much. A few letters changed and one has white skin or non-white skin, straight hair or curly hair.

Our Kind–Those with Code A.

Ourselves–Those with Code A.

Our Way for Ourselves Alone (OWFOA)–Another name for this religion, philosophy, world view.

Panspermia–Hypothesis that “seeds” of life exist all over the universe and that some of these seeds caused life on Earth as well as elsewhere.

People, The–When used by believers it usually means either believers or those who may not yet be believers but who share our 46 chromosomes. Synonym for Believers.

Phenotype–That which is built by the genotype. The way you look. The outward manifestation of the inner code.

Placebo God–Human psychology requires an ender of all arguments and something that is bigger and anchored and which gives meaning to man’s short life. Our blessing and our curse is our large brain. It lets us think about existence and meaning and discover the laws of existence; this is both the blessing and the curse. Belief, if it is real, acts upon our minds and our minds act upon our bodies in real and physical ways by releasing various chemicals that can help or hinder us on the path. If one does not believe in God; then one should learn to do so.

Pleiotropy–Genes have more than one effect. For example, when an attempt was made to domesticate foxes by breeding them for the quality of dog-like tameness, the foxes also automatically developed other dog-like qualities such as floppy ears, turned up tails, and patched coats of different colors. The changes weren’t expected, but they had the added benefit of allowing people to see the “content of the character” of the changed foxes. The outward reflected the inward. In other words, in the case of the foxes, it wasn’t possible to breed for certain personality traits without also changing the exterior appearance of the foxes. The same effect works in humans. Change skin from black to white and you change much more than just skin color.

Prayer–At dawn and dusk.

Primary Command, The–The primary command for all life, including human life, is to survive as long as possible to make as many more like itself as physically possible. This is less about the survival of the individual and more about the survival of the DNA code that is passed on to offspring. Some falsely believe that the primary command for organisms is an instinct for self-preservation. While at the level of the whole organism, this may appear true, it must be understood that it is the code within that seeks survival and which wants the whole organism to survive in order to expand and spread the particular version of the code within. Living organisms, including humans, that do not breed in their image, are evolutionary dead ends whose code will never move higher.

Proper living–Living as long as possible to protect and expand the code by having as many children in the image of the people as possible. Everything else in our lives is secondary to this. We are told that the evolution of our kind will only come by having vast numbers of us filling all lands. We know also that it is not the individuals who are important, but the Code. The individuals carry the Code and they are the way it is expanded.

Punctuated equilibrium–The theory that species have little change for long periods (stasis) and then experience rapid and major changes.

Pure Lands–The lands that God has commanded believers to take, purify and hold forever for the people alone, where believers can live free from outside influences, discordant forces and gene transfer, and where they can practice their faith without persecution and in peace and in which they can continue to evolve along the righteous path.

Purity–The actual purity of DNA, and ritual purity.

Race–Race is to humans what variety is to plants and breed is to dogs, horses and other animals. It is also often used as a synonym for subspecies. It is a reality, although blenders try to deny it in order to break down barriers to blending. When populations appear to be different in their genetic characteristics and are readily recognized as being different then they are called races or subspecies.

Radio example–One of our favorite ways to explain some of our concepts is to use a radio as an example. Radio waves are all around us, but unless you have a radio with all the right parts, along with a power source, and unless that radio is tuned into the right frequency, you won’t pick up any sounds. Remove just one of many very tiny but essential parts of that radio, and it won’t work. The radio has to be “born”with those parts. It can’t acquire them, and no amount of praying or living right or doing various ritual things will change that. In humans, the right parts are genes and the order of the genes and all things relating to DNA.

Recessive genes–Most “White” genes are recessive. This means that if a White person has children with a non-White person, the children will favor the non-White person in most characteristics. It takes two White people to produce a truly White child.

Revelation–The First Cause has revealed His Will to and through Arman, The Teacher.

Sacred Symbols–Representations of the true nature of God and existence. Circles, spirals, fylfots. Believers have such symbols near or on their skin. They have a mystical but real correspondence. Believers generally prefer a rounded arm version of the fylfot. Some prefer two arms, some prefer three arms, some prefer four arms, some prefer five or six arms. The essential part of the fylfot is not the arms, but the spinning center or axis. The arms are always trailing the spin, not leading it. In nature, they are the result of the spinning center. When viewed from the side, over time, the spinning fylfot looks like a tornado or a strand of DNA or many of the other things we observe in nature. The fylfot as a religious symbol must be with believers at all times. Indicates constant expansion. Symbols should touch the skin. May be put on the skin with scars, tattoos, brands, rings, amulets.

Self-identification, self-determination, self-reliance, self-government,self-improvement, self-perfection–are considered important.

Self-organization– Ability of a system to spontaneously arrange its components or elements in a purposeful (non-random) manner, under appropriate conditions but without the help of an external agency.

Sen, The–Another name for strong believers.

Sensory Input–Sensory input is important in rituals and for creating a sense of awe. Thus, when praying one must be surrounded by the proper stimuli.

Single point mutation–a mutation that involves a single nucleotide. For example, sickle-cell disease is a single point mutation in which GAG is changed to GTG.

Ser, The–The flow of existence.

Source, The–Another name for God.

Speciation–The evolutionary formation of a new species, often by the division of a single species into two or more genetically distinct ones, usually by isolation that prevents gene flow. Speciation happens rapidly in small isolated populations.

Speciation has been demonstrated to be possible in as few as eight generations in Drosophila (fruit flies). It can also be caused by selective breeding as is done in animal husbandry.

Spiral–One of the Sacred Symbols in all its forms. All of existence is dependent on the constant spinning, turning, twirling, spiraling. It is this constant spinning movement that shuffles all that exists and is why the only constant is change. The spiral is seen in distant galaxies, in storms, in water draining from a sink, in the way trees grow, in DNA, and in all of existence if you know how to look. If the spinning stopped, existence would stop. The spiral is the result of spinning with the addition of time. Ancient peoples often used spiral symbols, but did not then understand the ubiquitousness of the spinning or its necessity to existence. There is a mystery about such symbols and a teacher has said that they form an actual and real link to much that is seen and unseen. A teacher has said that there are other symbols that seek to dampen the effects of these symbols for good, and these other symbols often have something of a cat’s cradle appearance with straight lines and sharp angles.

Standing Stones and rings of stones–With chiseled symbols, these are links.

Struggle, The–The First Cause’s struggle to be and to be more. It continues the struggle to this day. The struggle against nothingness is part of all existence and it continues by the spinning that brings light and heat to an otherwise dark and cold nothingness. Even humans must struggle to exist and to be and to be more. To not struggle is to fall back into the masses of humanity and not evolve toward the first light and the First Cause. It takes no effort and no struggle to be dark and cold. It does take constant effort and constant struggle to be light and warm.

Survival advantage–A genetic change from the norm that gives organisms a “leg up” on other organisms in the same habitat or environment. Often involves minor changes that have long term effects.

Survival of the fittest–Natural selection conceived of as a struggle for life in which only those organisms best adapted to existing conditions are able to survive and reproduce. We know that all organisms now alive are the fittest of their types, just by their being alive today. However, if they don’t reproduce in their image to go forward into the next generation, they will be defined retroactively as not being the fittest. Organisms must reproduce to be the fittest.

Survival strategies–All organisms have built-in genetic survival strategies that have evolved to allow the organism’s genes to be passed on to the next generation. If the survival strategy is a good one, then the organism’s genotype will survive. In thinking of survival strategies, it must be remembered that the individual is not especially important. It is getting the genotype–the code–to survive and be passed on to expand the particular code carried by the organism.

Teacher, The–Arman. Receiver and promulgator of the revelations and divine inspiration.

Ultimate truth–to be sought.

Unfit–Organisms or populations of organisms that are not adapted to prevailing conditions or which do not produce offspring in sufficient numbers to maintain their contribution to the gene pool of the next generation.

White skin–A mutation that occurred in Europe to adapt the people there so their skin would let in more of the dim European sunlight to produce more Vitamin D than darker skin colors. It gave a survival advantage to those with the mutation, in that with more Vitamin D, those with the mutation didn’t get the bone softening disease rickets, and lived longer to produce more children who also carried the mutation. In time, the white skin mutation spread throughout Europe.Scientists now believe that a tiny mutation in gene slc24a5, located on the long leg of chromosome 15 at position 21.1, started in the few people who left Africa and headed into Europe about 20,000 to 50,000 years ago, was a major reason for the emergence of white skin.

Willed Evolution–Causing the evolution of one’s line by right belief and the right actions that naturally flow from the right beliefs.

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

Memorial Day: Why They Died

admin — Mon, 30 May 2011 12:42:26 +0000

Americans should never again be asked to die in wars fought against our own interests; a veteran’s group leader agrees.

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I THINK THAT MOST Americans have forgotten what Memorial Day is all about. It is now usually thought of as “Memorial Day Weekend,” and like so many holidays today, the actual date of its observance is shifted each year for the maximum convenience of holiday bathers and boozers and the commercial establishments that serve them.

Talk to Americans about Memorial Day and you are likely to receive comments on the sales to be had at the car lots and appliance emporia. If you ask them what the holiday is really supposed to mean, half of them would answer that it signifies the first day of summer. Even those who well know that Memorial Day is meant to honor the soldiers who died in America’s service for the most part do not understand why those soldiers had to die. If you only knew, ladies and gentlemen, if you only knew you would not be partying and picnicking on this most terrible and somber of days. You would be weeping for our nation, and if you had any guts at all you would be working every day of your life to make her free again. There is so much that you do not know.

Revolutionary War

Let us honor the dead of the Revolutionary War. They fought against a tyrannical government, which gave Americans very little voice in government policies, and which taxed them oppressively, though not as oppressively as the productive segment of American society is taxed today.

Today, we may not be taxed to support a King and a few dozen idle courtiers, but instead we are taxed to support the violent and degenerate lifestyle and ever-increasing breeding of an underclass which can be called American only in the geographic sense. If this process is carried on long enough, the descendants and kindred of the men who fought our Revolutionary War will become extinct in the land called America.

Is this what those men died for? They fought — they died — so that their people could be free. If we must work the first five months out of the year to support the destruction of our culture and our people, if we must smilingly tolerate the invasion of our nation on our southern border and in every port city, then are we truly free? Are we not squandering the blood of our forefathers? Remember, the patriots of 1776 were called the “extremists” of their day.

War of 1812

And remember that the royal tyrant called himself the “legitimate government” in those days. When Washington and Jefferson and the other “extremists” were successful, the tyrant was not pleased. Like the tyrants of our day, he thirsted for the blood of men who wanted only to be free. In the War of 1812, as in Waco 1993, fire was his weapon of choice and the rebel capital of the time, Washington, DC, was burned. For three years Americans died in this little-remembered war. Remember those who died for our people’s freedom.

Indian Wars

The authors of the Constitution never dreamed that non-Europeans would be considered citizens. Had you suggested to them that Africans or Indians be called Americans because a number of them happened to be inside our borders, they would have called you insane. But in the last few decades, what our founding fathers would have called insanity has now become public policy. I ask you now to remember the dead who fought against Mexico in the Texas War of Independence and in the Mexican War.

I ask you to remember those who died in the Indian Wars, to secure safety for their families on the frontier. What do you think they were fighting for? Multiculturalism? Open borders? Affirmative action? My friends, if they were alive today they would fight again against all of those things, against the Third World invasion that we are not allowed to call an invasion.

Just a few miles west of my home in Charlottesville, Virginia is the charming city of Lewisburg, West Virginia. It was named for General Andrew Lewis, who was the man who finally defeated the Indians around these parts over 200 years ago. On the other side of that state, in Point Pleasant, just across the river from Ohio, is an imposing monument to General Lewis, who, the inscription states, in defeating the Indians at the Battle of Point Pleasant, struck a decisive blow in the battle between “the forces of civilization and the forces of savagery on this continent.” How long will it be before the forces of Political Correctness consign that inscription to the trash heap?

If you listen to my words today and then do nothing, then you are giving your permission for the trashing of our heritage and history. You are spitting on the graves of General Lewis and all those who fought and died to secure your very existence.

War Between the States

The Civil War is perhaps the most terrible conflict in American history. One hundred forty years later, we have still not recovered from it. Its divisions still split our people apart along political and geographic lines. The legacy of slavery and abolitionism lives on in our intractable racial problems which fill our newspapers from front to back every day. The legacy of Federal tyranny that made war on those states who only wanted their freedom and independence is still very much with us today, in Ruby Ridge, in Waco, and in the army of carpetbagger-like bureaucrats who fence us in on every side with regulations determining who we can hire, associate with, and soon, it seems, what we can say or write or believe.

The greatest loss from that war, however, was the final and perhaps fatal loss of that most precious possession of our nation — the genetic inheritance of our best men. Truly, we may never recover from it. A far greater proportion of the American population was slaughtered in the Civil War than in any war before or since. The bravest and the best were cut down in their prime, and the maternity wards in following years were filled with a greater percentage of the offspring of shirkers, cowards, and deserters. We will never know what America might be like today had those nearly 400,000 young men not died in that insanely suicidal conflict.

World War I

As we turn our eyes toward the twentieth century, we see a new kind of war emerge. It is a kind of war fought not for American purposes, be they good or bad, wise or mistaken. It is a kind of war fought by Americans, to be sure, but not for America in any sense. It is a kind of war fought for foreign interests, interests which are often diametrically opposed to American interests, but which are “sold” to the American sheep by lying propaganda so that the sheep will docilely allow their lambs to go the slaughter.

Every war America has fought for the last 100 years conforms to this description. If your car is adorned with an “I support our troops” sticker, what does it mean? Does it mean that you were fooled? Or does it mean what National Vanguard supporters say it means? — that is, support our troops, bring them home from the Zionist slaughter in the Middle East and station them on the Mexican border.

At least you are alive. The 116,000 American dead in World War I are not. Nor are the over 400,000 who died in World War II, the 54,000 who died in Korea, the 58,000 who died in Vietnam, nor the growing thousands who have died imposing the New World Order in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Somalia, or Haiti.

There was no reason for America to enter World War I. America was manipulated into that war by Zionist interests who manufactured phony atrocity stories and even the entirely fictional sinking of an American ship to stampede their American cattle into rescuing the British Empire, which in payment was to procure Palestine for the Zionists for the future establishment of a Jewish state. President Wilson, because of sexual blackmail by these same interests, danced like a marionette on a string and signed a death warrant for the American boys who died in those stinking trenches. Remember those boys today. Remember also the political heirs of Wilson and the Zionists and the power which we still foolishly allow them to wield in America today.

World War II

Franklin Roosevelt and his successors have also danced on the same stage with the same stringpullers behind the curtains. With his administration came the organized Jewish interests, the Communists and the pro-Communists, the accession to state power of America’s enemies, a power which, although briefly challenged by Joseph McCarthy, they have never relinquished. The Roosevelt administration marks the beginning of what we know so well today: a federal government which regards ordinary White Americans as its enemy.

World War II was a war between the forces that created Communism on the one side, and Western Civilization on the other. When it started in Europe, Americans were solidly against entering the war, having learned a terrible lesson in World War I.

If you woke up tomorrow and found your next-door neighbor was fighting a battle with a drug gang that was trying to kill every home-owner and take over every house in your neighborhood, would you join with your neighbor or would you join with the drug gang? Would you join with your neighbor even if he had had some property disputes with other neighbors, and you thought him wrong? Would you join with your neighbor even if he had some peculiar beliefs about the way to run his household that you didn’t necessarily approve of?

By allowing the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, of which attack the Roosevelt government knew in advance, and by insuring the greatest loss of life possible by not warning the American commanders there, the aliens who came to power with Roosevelt were able to trick the American people into fighting on the side of my hypothetical drug gang, on the side of an ideology openly dedicated to the downfall of America: on the side of Soviet Communism. If there is truth in the doctrine of the survival of the human soul after death, those 405,000 betrayed men are not resting in peace. They were told they were fighting for American freedom, but that was a lie. They didn’t know it, but they were fighting to impose the tyranny of Communism on our blood kindred of Eastern Europe, even as a not dissimilar yoke of tyranny was beginning to be imposed in our land. Let us remember them. And let us remember who it is who is responsible for their deaths.

Korean War/Vietnam

Let us remember the Americans who died in Korea and Vietnam. Over 110,000 died in those wars which gained precisely nothing for America. How many died because traitors in high places in Washington would not allow them to defeat the Communist enemy? How many died because traitors in high places in Washington were trading with and aiding that enemy, providing money and materiel for an international conspiracy that was killing young Americans every day? How many died because they believed the lying bags of garbage in Washington who assured them that they were sincerely trying to “fight Communism”?

U.S.S. Liberty

Let us remember the U.S.S. Liberty, where 205 American sailors and officers were wounded or killed by an Israeli attacking force of aircraft gunners, torpedo boats, and napalm in June 1967. And, let us never forget the government and the controlled media which covered up that atrocity, the full truth of which is only now being revealed to the American people.

Let us also remember the young Americans who never came home from Haiti, from Somalia, from Afghanistan, from Iraq. They enlisted in our military believing that they were defenders of America, but cynical politicians and politician-owners sent them to defend Israel’s interests in the Middle East, and to enforce the dictates of a world government the very concept of which is antithetical to our American Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

The Greatest Sacrifice

They gave not only their lives. Giving your life is often called “the ultimate sacrifice.” As great as that is, there is another and greater sacrifice. When they died, the children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren they never had died with them. And so on into infinity. That is the ultimate sacrifice.

What a terrible loss that is! For these brave warriors who died for America, who died fighting America’s enemies, and in some wars (particularly in this century) tragically died fighting for America’s enemies, were for the most part the best men that America possessed. They loved America, they did not hate her. They would not have wanted to change her into what she has become today. They were the great-hearted, not the small-minded. They gave everything, they asked for nothing. They were the strong, not the weak. They were the brave, not the slick. Their children would have inherited the qualities we need most in America today.

I can see their faces now before me. Millions upon millions of men and women and children who were never born because of the wars fought for America and against America. Whole generations of our people — what contributions might they have made? Their fathers died for us, so we shall never know. We shall never meet them. But in some sense they stand before us today, they stand proud and tall in our conscience — those who fell and the unborn descendants of those who fell at Lexington and Concord, at Yorktown, at Gettysburg, at the Alamo, at Little Big Horn, of those who fell in Flanders Fields and at Iwo Jima, of those whose lives ended in the wretched sands of the Middle East or whose bodies were dragged through the streets of Somalia or Haiti.

Today, I am asking every one of you to rededicate yourselves to the principles and ideals that made America great, the principles and ideals that so many sacrificed their lives for. They did not sacrifice their lives so that American soldiers could be mercenaries for the neocons.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that their descendants would be afraid to walk at night in the cities of America.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that a powerful foreign interest group could milk ten billion dollars every year from docile American cattle to support the state of Israel.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that this powerful foreign interest group could own a large part of this country including nearly all of its major media.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that Mexico could take one third — or will it be two thirds? — of America.

So much has happened that you do not understand, that the controlled media and the schools have simply kept from you. Before Americans have even the slightest chance of retaking their country and making her free once again, they must educate themselves. They must understand how their nation has been stolen from them. They must understand how it happened and who is responsible.

Ladies and gentlemen, no nation can survive unless its young men are willing to die to preserve it. But what a squandering of lives, what a permanent impoverishment of our nation have we suffered at the hands of those who would cynically manipulate our patriotism so that we would be the cannon fodder for their wars, while they sit safely in their counting-houses and lie-factories in New York City and Los Angeles.

How long will you let them keep killing our sons? The longer we wait, the more difficult it will be to speak out against our secret rulers.

Today and every day let us remember those who died for America and the generations who are yet to come.

* * *

Now that was the end of my speech. Unlike Ronald Reagan, who they say gave the same speech hundreds of times over several decades (something inspiring about making America a “shining city on a hill,” though his actual policies resulted in making America more like a running sewer in a garbage dump), I almost never repeat my words. But this is an exception. This is not the first time this speech has been delivered. Though I updated it for 2005, this address is based on a broadcast I made ten years earlier.

But today is not the second time this speech has been made. It is the third time.

Just a few days ago, at the annual Memorial Day ceremony in Coopersburg, Pennsylvania, this very speech — the very words I just spoke to you — were delivered to the assembled crowd by James Calhoun, the Commander of the city’s Veterans of Foreign Wars. This was just reported by New York’s Newsday and by the Allentown papers.

The reaction was swift and vicious. Mr. Calhoun, a 17-year Army veteran and community leader, was immediately fired from his public sector job. It looks likely he’ll be forced to resign as VFW Commander. His own pastor, from a local Lutheran church, denounced his speech, making the ludicrous claim that it was “a recruitment speech for the KKK.”

Calhoun said “The message I was trying to convey was that America gets involved with conflicts that aren’t in the interest of the American people, and many service members have to die because of it.” Which is quite reasonable. But he very quickly began backpedaling and apologizing.

When his pastor “confronted him,” Calhoun reportedly had tears in his eyes. He then claimed he hadn’t even read the speech beforehand. “I realized after the speech I had made a mistake,” he said after some audience members called him a “racist” and a “bigot.” “It was a huge mistake and it snowballed into a bad effect and cost me my job,” he added.

Now does anyone here believe that Mr. Calhoun — or anyone — could deliver a 3,000-word speech by mistake? Or that a man of normal intelligence who can speak cogently could not understand the meaning of his own words as he was speaking them?

I believe that the likeliest explanation is that Mr. Calhoun knew exactly what he was doing, and simply lost his nerve when the pressure was applied by the Usual Suspects. I frankly think we should write and offer him help and support, for he has suffered grievously for speaking the truth.

The way the Usual Suspects felt about it may be gauged by the words of one Ginger Nadel, who said that when she heard the speech “my ears were ringing and I thought the top of my head was going to blow off.”

based on a speech given by Mr. Strom in 2005

A New People Born Out of the Old

admin — Mon, 09 May 2011 00:52:47 +0000

by H. Millard

HOMELESS JACK SAID, “People in my faith know that we are the new Whites — a new people born out of the old — we are born anew after we have awakened to the truth. We are born anew by choice and we have brought ourselves anew into this world from the rotted and empty husks of our corrupted forbears and those still living among us who walk through life in a sleep-like state.

“Each form of life has its own path that is different from others. That also goes for different kinds of humans, man.

“But it’s a little more complicated than that, because there is not just one path for each form of life, but many. In the first instance, these paths are largely determined by the genetic code that has made the life form. But there are choices made daily and there are accidents of fate that cause paths to change.

“Most people blindly take paths without even knowing that they are taking them and that there are others that they could have taken or can take. They are not conscious.

“We, on the other hand, have selected our path from the many that are possible for us. It is a path toward greater consciousness and it is achieved via our DNA and the changes that we can help bring to it by following this faith.

“Organisms are programmed out of the box. Certain parts of the program kick in at different ages and when triggered by certain events and circumstances.

“That is why our way works. We seek to change the environment internally and externally to trigger certain parts of the program that might otherwise only be triggered by accident and then be lost because of a lack of awareness of the change.

“By triggering the right parts of our code, our bodies will secrete hormones and other substances in certain ways to cause additional changes.This will move us higher and open us up to the mutations that we need to move from our present status as a subspecies to being a full species no longer capable of breeding with other kinds of humans.

“You see, man, you and I and all the millions of our people ain’t worth nothin’ unless we breed and breed right.

“Ain’t you fed up with the self-indulgent jerks among us who are concerned about ‘finding themselves’ or who say stupid things like they don’t want children because it would affect the ‘quality of life’ of these sad sack childless ones. Their lives? Their petty little meaningless lives? Screw them. They’re weak seeds, man, at least many of them are. Others are just misinformed or have been conditioned to believe wrong things.

“Look, our purpose is to be a link in the chain. We are to expand always and contract never. That means we are to have as many children as possible during our lives, in our image, and we’re to do it even if we have to break the false laws, rules and mores of our corrupt society.

“Our laws are from the First Cause, man. They can never be wrong. Human-made laws that conflict with these natural laws from the First Cause are wrong at best, and evil in many cases. Our laws are natural laws. We didn’t make them up. We discovered them and in some cases the First Cause revealed them to us.

“We can either follow man or follow the First Cause. That’s the choice, man. It’s very simple and it’s very clear. There’s no reason to be confused or befuddled.

“But, this ain’t so much about us as individuals as it is about the Code that we carry. That Code inside us, man, that’s the real us. That’s what survives the death of our bodies. That’s what goes forward if we have many children, but only if we have them with our kind and with no other kinds.

“This is my faith man. It is for Ourselves Alone and for no others. We’re the only ones who have the right DNA Code to take this path. But we need to choose to take it.”

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

When the Fix is In

admin — Sun, 08 May 2011 19:57:56 +0000

by Charles Fuller
via Free Edgar Steele

EVIDENCE THAT COULD HAVE exonerated Ed Steele was withheld from the jury by the judge. In a pre-trial hearing on the admissibility of evidence, two audio experts testified that the FBI recordings contained numerous audio signatures (aberrations) that strongly indicated the recordings might have been tampered with. One expert, Bennett Walsh, a former New York City detective with years of experience with audio recordings, said flatly the recordings were tampered with.

The other expert, George Papcun, PhD (pictured), an internationally known expert with solid scientific credentials, said there was an unusually high number of electronic transients and other discrepancies which could indicate tampering with the recordings. His reputation is bolstered by his knowledge of “voice morphing,” a technology that allows the creation of synthetic speech from digital “voice prints” of the person whose speech they seek to duplicate. It allows the “cloning” of a person’s voice, and the ability to have the subject “say” whatever the counterfeiters wish.

According to Robert McAllister, counsel for the defense, arrangements were made to fly Dr. Papcun by private aircraft from a vacation in the south Pacific to Boise to testify on May 4, the last day of the trial. According to McAllister it was possible for him to arrive at the courthouse by 9:00 AM.

However, McAllister reported that the judge ruled that Dr. Papcun would only be allowed to testify if he was in the court room by 8:30 AM. This information can be verified by McAllister.

Ed Steele was denied his right to call witnesses critical to his defense. Is this a demonstration of a “fair trial,” or is it a lynching? The answer should be obvious to any thinking person.

Read the original posting at Free Edgar Steele

Cyndi Steele Vows to Fight On

admin — Thu, 05 May 2011 21:14:32 +0000

UPDATE: In case it is removed from the Web, this powerfully moving video has been archived here:

http://nationalvanguard.org/wp-content/uploads/cyndi-steele-video-interview-20110505.zip

by Kevin Alfred Strom

AN EMOTIONALLY DEVASTATED Cyndi Steele vowed to fight on with an appeal to a higher court after her husband, free speech attorney Edgar J. Steele, was convicted earlier today of plotting to kill her. Mrs. Steele spoke of her pride in and love for her husband, stating that she and her legal team have absolute proof that the FBI tapes used to convict him are faked, but that her evidence was not allowed in court in what many are viewing as a rigged trial.

Promising to fight and speak out “until my last breath,” Mrs. Steele called for an end to political prosecutions, saying that no one in America is safe now.

Judge Excludes Experts; Jury Convicts Steele

admin — Thu, 05 May 2011 20:00:00 +0000

by Kevin Alfred Strom

IN A TRAGIC MISCARRIAGE of justice, a federal jury — which was denied the right to hear two experts’ testimony that the alleged FBI recordings of Edgar J. Steele were faked, with over 300 suspicious edits inserted — has convicted the courageous free speech attorney and writer on all four counts related to an alleged murder-for-hire of his wife, Cyndi Steele, and mother-in-law.

None of the alleged victims believe the FBI allegations, instead pointing to the admitted Idaho Pipe Bomber, Larry Fairfax — and his government handlers — as the real source of the plot. Fairfax, who allowed a lethal bomb to remain on Cyndi Steele’s car for weeks without telling her, was given a sweetheart deal by prosecutors and no serious charges were brought against him.

It is hoped that the outrageous behavior of the judge in this case — who refused to allow even a few days’ delay to let an expert witness travel from the South Pacific to testify for the defense, and also refused to permit the expert to testify via video conference, even though a prosecution witness was freely allowed to do so — will be the basis of a strong appeal.

The judge in question — Lynn Winmill — exhibited an almost unbelievable coldness toward the lives of the real victims, Edgar Steele and his family, when he stated that even a two-day delay to allow the audio expert to travel to the United States was unacceptable — saying of the brief delay only that “procrastination on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine.”

Cyndi Steele — who was allowed to hear the doctored recordings early on in the framing of her husband in hopes that she would be deceived by them — has long stated that the audio quality on the recordings changes abruptly and dramatically whenever her husband begins to discuss the alleged plot. When she heard the alleged recordings played back in court, however, she was in for a further shock.

As she puts it: “What is even more outrageous now is that the tapes that they played for the jury in the courtroom this week have been altered, because they are not the same recordings the FBI played for me on June 12, 2010, nor the tapes sent to the attorneys that I again listened to on March 7th. It is as if they used the info from the reports of our experts to make the changes to cover up the falsified tapes our experts analyzed.”

May the powers that created the universe — and our people — quickly bring these perjurers and criminals operating under color of law, who have falsely convicted this noble man, to justice; to true justice. And may it happen in our lifetimes.

In the words of Edgar J. Steele: “New America. An idea whose time has come.”

Edgar Steele Tapes Are a Fraud

Chris Rossetti — Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:36:53 +0000

by Cyndi Steele

IN AN EFFORT to find justice and because we eschew oppression, we now have the absolute proof that the US government, for whatever reason, has fabricated its case against Edgar J. Steele, a First Amendment Idaho Lawyer. Steele (pictured) has been defending the falsely accused; many for free. If we do not turn this around now, this trend will impact our children and grandchildren.

In spite of the efforts of Edgar Steele’s new defense attorney, Robert T. McAllister, of Colorado, to get some time to prepare a defense, Judge B. Lynn Winmill of the Idaho Federal District Court is insisting that the Steele Case, based on false charges of murder-for-hire of his wife, Cyndi Steele, go to a jury trial in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho next Monday, March 7, 2011. Cyndi Steele was the victim of a real attempted murder-by-pipe-bomb last June. She has looked at the government’s evidence and proclaimed that her husband is innocent and sees that the entire government case is fabricated. New evidence, just discovered, reveals that the government recordings of Mr. Steele’s voice supposedly hiring a hitman, were fabricated. Even though this is fraud, there is a question whether the judge will permit a defense expert to testify in order to prove it!

The reason for this message is because Edgar J. Steele is facing the trial of his life. At age 65, any sentence is a death sentence. He and his wife Cyndi have three adult children and one grandchild who love him very much and he loves them. Most important, though, is that Edgar J. Steele in innocent.

Former Chief Criminal Prosecuting Attorney (in both N. District of Illinois and Colorado) turned defense attorney McAllister began his representation of Edgar Steele on February 7, 2011, so he has been involved as the attorney for Edgar for less than a month. The government, as is their regular practice, is withholding critical evidence which, by law, should have been shown to the defendant months ago; this is a law violation by the government. There is no one to prosecute when the government breaks the law (see the 201 cases of innocent people falsely charged in USA Today article of September 23, 2010 by Brad Heath). We saw the US government withholding evidence in the David Hinkson case in 2005, resulting in a 43-year prison sentence, an LDS person who is meek and mild, a scientist and inventor who literally never harmed anyone in his life and never had so much as a parking ticket before he was attacked by the US government.

Well, they’re at it again; the US government fraud on the innocent is in full swing, like a shark feeding frenzy. The FBI and US Attorney’s Office in Idaho are seeking to bring down another innocent person, Edgar Steele, and send him to prison, because he is an advocate for the US Constitution and individual rights.

What is interesting is that, in the Edgar Steele case, the government is following the same pattern it used in the David Hinkson case (which pattern reads like the KGB play book of dirty tricks against anyone who does not buy into the politically correct agenda). As it turns out, in thousands of other cases, the government has manufactured evidence by using the FBI to create a crime.

Though we have absolute proof that the audio tapes presented by the government as evidence in the Edgar Steele case are frauds, specific things need to happen in order for Edgar J. Steele to receive the justice: 1) the judge must allow the defense to present to the jury evidence that the tapes were fabricated; and 2) the jury must have the opportunity to see the US government has fabricated this case against Edgar J. Steele.

Our own freedom is at stake, for if they can fabricate a case out of whole cloth against the Edgar Steeles of this world, they can do it to you and me and our loved ones; it will only be a matter of time.

Edgar Steele Case: Prosecution Grasping at Straws

admin — Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:45:47 +0000

by Cyndi Steele

THE EDGAR STEELE DEFENSE FUND, an Idaho non-profit corporation wishes to address a recent prosecution motion which effectively asks for an all-expense paid trip to Ukraine, claiming it is related to Mr. Steele’s case.

Once again, the prosecution has it wrong. In pursuing the Ukrainian connection to my husband, First Amendment lawyer Edgar Steele (pictured), the government is grasping at straws because there is no motive for the alleged murder-for-hire. The government knows that, as my husband’s legal assistant, I was fully aware that the Ukrainian woman was suspected to be a part of a “Russian-Bride” scam which cheated one of his clients out of thousands of dollars. By communicating with this woman, my husband was working a case to bring down the people involved in stealing from Americans. Now, instead of doing her job, Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) Traci Whelan, is seeking an all expense trip abroad and has turned this into a Media-Op.

When my husband was first arrested, the FBI claimed his “motive” was to cash in on our life insurance proceeds. When I told them that we had canceled our life insurance years ago, the FBI claimed my husband had a private investigator following me who supposedly had pictures of me with a “boyfriend.” Oops, the FBI lied again. There was no private investigator, no pictures and no boyfriend. Now the government is using my husband’s investigation of a human trafficking ring to claim he had a girlfriend. This is just another example of the FBI using fraud to prosecute the innocent. As we all have learned from recent reports, the government has prosecuted thousands of innocent people on fabricated evidence over the past 14 years.

In response to AUSA Traci Whelan’s comment: “If the defendant could not control his actions and that is why he hired a hit man, what is to stop that from happening again?” First, my husband was weak from four surgeries and the prescription drugs taken during his recovery, so he didn’t see Larry Fairfax taking advantage of him. Second, he did not hire Larry Fairfax or anyone to be a hit man. And, third, AUSA Whelan well knows that Larry Fairfax is a liar because he lied to the FBI by not disclosing that he had attached a bomb to my car in June when he promised to “come forward” with all his criminal activity. AUSA Whelan has seen the theft report and knows that Fairfax stole $45,000 in silver savings from my husband and me. AUSA Whelan also knows that Fairfax was covering up his theft by blaming my husband in a supposed murder-for-hire scam. AUSA Whelan even told my attorney and me that Fairfax had confessed he was trying to “scam” us. So what does it take to get AUSA Whelan to do her job? She has the real criminal and she knows who his accomplices are but she will not properly charge either with the serious crimes committed by them, thus allowing them to continually put my life and the public in danger.

I’m standing up for my husband because he is innocent. It was the FBI that was tampering with my testimony, trying to persuade me to accept one of their many versions of this case. But I took the time to look at the evidence, without accepting anyone else’s perspective, in order to make up my own mind. After I looked, I realized that it was the FBI who knew there was a bomb on my car many days before I found it attached to my muffler on June 15th. Did the government say anything to me or do anything to warn the public? No!

The same day I found the bomb, a US Marshal told me that the government was not going to provide me any protection. This was the official word!!! At that point, the government supposedly didn’t know who had put the bomb on my car; because, supposedly, Larry Fairfax had not come forward with that information yet. But, all the same, I was being denied protection.

At that time, I told the government that I was worried about this bomb coming from some hate group because my family has had numerous death threats over the years. The FBI knew about these threats and ignored them even though the calls were traced back to the phone lines of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League). Now this same government that refused to protect me is going to give Larry Fairfax, who attempted to murder me, a soft plea deal of an 18 month sentence. The government also refuses to arrest or charge the Fairfax accomplices with their crimes. Since I am the victim of an attempted murder by Fairfax and his gang, I want to know what will it take to get the government to do its job?

Donations of any size for the defense of Mr. Steele are greatly appreciated and are still being accepted by the Edgar Steele Defense Fund. More information can be obtained at www.free-edgar-steele.com, or checks and money orders can be mailed to the Edgar Steele Defense Fund at P.O. 1255, Sagle, Idaho 83860. For further information call Robert Magnuson at 509-290-7466.

Martin Luther King Broadcast Causes Controversy

admin — Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:42:49 +0000

School board member and radio station manager attacked by ADL, receives death threats for MLK commentary

by Kevin Alfred Strom

A GUEST EDITORIAL — based largely on my exposé of Martin Luther King — has been airing on Greeley, Colorado’s KELS-FM twice daily in the days leading up to the federal MLK holiday, and the sparks are flying as the Usual Suspects try to get the truth off the air — and punish the man responsible for the broadcast.

Brett Reese (pictured), who is a school board member and director of the local school district, runs Greeley’s KELS 104.7. He says he regularly broadcasts guest editorials from listeners if their facts check out. And, he adds, in this case the facts did check out when he looked into them: “Martin Luther King, Junior” is an assumed name; King had numerous and intimate connections to high-level agents of the Communist Party; King misappropriated funds contributed to his “religious” charity and spent them on prostitutes and drunken orgies; and King was a plagiarist who cheated to obtain his PhD. You can listen to the editorial by clicking the link below.

KELS 20110107 Martin Luther King

Reese says he’s not a White supremacist (and, of course, neither am I nor are most of the people so accused by the media) and actually admires King’s “civil rights movement,” but believes there are issues with the character of King that make it necessary to question the uncritical adulation and reverence he is accorded today. Reese adds, “I was taught growing up that Martin Luther King Jr. was a hero of history and to question his motivation or integrity was near sacrilege. I support the idea of being able to talk about historical facts. If these facts are out there, then we should be able to talk about them. There should not be a taboo on an honest discussion of history.”

When other school board members expressed their disapproval of the broadcasts and said he shouldn’t be making them, Reese responded: “Just because I am on the school board does not mean I have to accept Martin Luther King Jr. or any figure of history as above reproach or question. Asking a school board member to take an oath of blind allegiance and then check his brain at the door may be the root of the problems in our district today.” Reese did agree to moderate some of the language in the editorial, but said it will continue to run.

The ADL's Scott Levin

The Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which has links to Meyer Lansky’s organized crime syndicate and which once gave their “Torch of Liberty” award to mob boss Moe Dalitz, has attacked Reese and demanded that the guest editorials cease: “The reckless and irresponsible spread of such misleading vitriol only heightens the divisions in our communities….” said ADL Regional Director Scott L. Levin (also a “Torch of Liberty” recipient), adding “We call upon Mr. Reese to desist from his divisive public broadcasts….” Immediately after the ADL’s attacks on him, Reese began receiving death threats that he considered credible. Reese has broadcast the critical MLK editorial for three years running around the MLK holiday, but never received death threats until the ADL, whose “phone tree” notification of Jewish activists is well known, publicized him in the last few days.

Because of the death threats, Mr. Reese has reluctantly decided to attend future school board meetings armed: “Because of the recent school board shooting (in Florida) and the recent death threats, I have to,” he stated to the Greeley Tribune. (Apparently the Tribune itself is fearful of the implications of this story, since they state on their Web site — at the bottom of every article on this subject — “Due to the sensitive nature of this story, the commenting feature has been disabled.”)

Clayborne Carson, the founding director of the “Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute” at Stanford University and the editor of King’s papers, admitted, according to the Tribune, that “many of the claims in the broadcast have been substantiated,” but added that many historical figures are flawed: “The significant thing about King is he did great work as part of a great movement. If you disagree with that, then there is discussion. The thing about plagiarism, yeah we know he plagiarized some academic papers, but how does that relate to the fact that he was one of the great orators of history?”

Although the MLK critique specifically states that opposing viewpoints are welcome, Reese says that in three years not one has been submitted, with opponents preferring to force the guest editorial off the air rather than engage in open debate. But KELS listeners are a different story. Reese says “It was new information to many of our listeners. It promoted discussions within our listening community and we had listeners call and thank us for airing it.”

The Reese MLK Controversy

School board member receives death threats

Radio station criticizes Martin Luther King

Commissary to the Gentiles

admin — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:53:27 +0000

The Jewish writer Marcus Eli Ravage played the “irony card” to his intellectual White readers in 1928, but the real irony was that most of his readers missed it, thinking that this piece was a clever “plea for tolerance” for the “people of the book” — instead of the gloating it really was.

reprinted from The Century Magazine, February 1928

by Marcus Eli Ravage

YOU CHRISTIANS WORRY and complain about the Jew’s influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a menace to your orderly development; it confuses your impulses; it defeats your purposes; it muddles up your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what the remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize.

That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did you when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. Suppose, we say trembling, you should wake up to the fact that your religion, your education, your morals, your social, governmental and legal systems are fundamentally of our making! And then you specify, and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion-picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Goi, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes.

We cannot make it out. Either you do not know or you have not the courage to charge us with those deeds for which there is at least a shadow of evidence and which an intelligent judge and jury could examine without impatience. Why bandy about unconvincing trifles when you might so easily indict us for serious and provable offences? Why throw up to us a patent and a clumsy forgery such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion when you might as well confront us with the Revelation of St. John? Why talk about Marx and Trotski when you have Jesus of Nazereth and Paul of Tarsus to confound us with?

You call us subverters, agitators, revolution-mongers. It is the truth, and I cower at your discovery. It could be shown with only the slightest straining and juggling of the facts that we have been at the bottom of all the major revolutions in your history. We undoubtedly had a sizeable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the bourgeois democratic revolutions of the century before the last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. But do you point your accusing finger at us and charge us with these heinous and recorded crimes? Not at all. You fantastically lay at our door the recent Great War and the upheaval in Russia, which have done not only the most injury to the Jews themselves but which a school-boy could have foreseen would have that result.

But even these plots and revolutions are as nothing compared with the great conspiracy which we engineered at the beginning of this era and which was destined to make the creed of a Jewish sect the religion of the Western world. The Reformation was not designed in malice purely. It squared us with an ancient enemy and restored our Bible to its place of honour in Christendom. The Republican revolutions of the Eighteenth Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They benefited us, but they did you no harm. On the contrary, they prospered and expanded you. You owe your pre-eminence in the world to them. But the upheaval which brought Christianity into Europe was — or at least may easily be shown to have been — planned and executed by Jews as an act revenge against a great Gentile state. And when you talk about Jewish conspiracies I cannot for the world understand why you do not mention the destruction of Rome and the whole civilization of antiquity concentrated under her banners, at the hands of Jewish Christianity.

It is unbelievable, but you Christians do not seem to know where your religion came from, nor how, nor why. Your historians, with one great exception, do not tell you. The documents in these cases, which are part of your Bible, you chant over but do not read. We have done our work too thoroughly; you believe our propaganda too implicitly. The coming of Christianity is to you not an ordinary historical event growing out of other events of the time, it is the fulfillment of a divine Jewish prophecy — with suitable amendments of your own. It did not, as you see it, destroy a great Gentile civilization and a great Gentile empire with which Jewry was at war; it did not plunge mankind into barbarism and darkness for a thousand years; it came to bring salvation to the Gentile world!

Yet here, if ever, was a great subversive movement, hatched in Palestine, spread by Jewish agitators, financed by Jewish money, taught in Jewish pamphlets and broadsides, at a time when Jewry and Rome were in a death struggle, and ending in the collapse of the great Gentile empire. You do not even see it, though an intelligent child, unfuddled by theological magic, could tell you what it is all about after a hasty reading of the simple record. And then you go on prattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?

And mind you, no less an authority than Gibbon long ago tried to enlighten you. It is now a century and a half since The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire let the cat out of the bag. Gibbon, not being a parson dabbling in history, did not try to account for the end of a great era by inventing fatuous nonsense about the vice and degradation of Rome, about the decay of morals and faith in an empire which was at that very time in the midst of its most glorious creative period. How could he? He was living in the Augustan Age in London which — in spite of nearly two thousand years since the coming of Christian salvation — was as good a replica of Augustan Rome in the matter of refined lewdness as the foggy islanders could make it. No, Gibbons was a race-conscious Gentile and an admirer of the culture of the pagan West, as well as an historian with brains and eyes. Therefore he had no difficulty laying his finger on the malady that had rotted and wasted away the noble edifice of antique civilization. He put Christianity down — the law which went forth from Zion and the word of God from Jerusalem — as the central cause of the decline and fall of Rome and all she represented.

So far so good. But Gibbon did not go far enough. He was born and died, you see, a century before the invention of scientific anti-Semitism. He left wholly out of account the element of deliberation. He saw an alien creed sweeping out of the East and overwhelming the fair lands of the West. It never occurred to him that the whole scheme of salvation was dedicated. Yet the facts are as plain as you please.

Let me in very brief recount the tale, unembroidered by miracle, prophecy or magic.

For a good perspective, I shall have to go back a space. The action conveniently falls into four parts, rising to a climax in the third. The time, when the first curtain rises, is roughly 65 B.C. Dramatis personae are, minor parts aside, Judea and Rome. Judea is a tiny kingdom off the Eastern Mediterranean. For five centuries it has been hardly more than a geographical expression. Again and again it has been overrun and destroyed and its population carried into exile or slavery by its powerful neighbours. Nominally independent, it is now as unstable as ever and on the edge of civil war. The empire of the West, with her nucleus in the City Republic of Rome, while not yet mistress of the world, is speedily heading that way . She is acknowledged the one great military power of the time as well as the heir of Greece and the centre of civilization.

Up to the present the two states have had little or no contact with one another. Then without solicitation on her part Rome was suddenly asked to take a hand in Judean affairs. A dispute had arisen between two brothers over the succession to the petty throne, and the Roman general Pompey, who happened to be in Damascus winding up bigger matters, was called upon to arbitrate between the claimants. With the simple directness of a republican soldier, Pompey exiled one of the brothers, tossed the chief priesthood to his rival, and abolished the kingly dignity altogether. Not to put too fine a point on it, Pompey’s mediation amounted in effect to making Judea a Roman dependency. The Jews, not unnaturally, objected; and Rome, to conciliate them and to conform to local prejudice, restored the royal office. She appointed, that is, a king of her own choosing. He was the son of an excise-man, an Idumean by race, named Herod. But the Jews were not placated, and continued making trouble. Rome thought it very ungrateful of them.

All this is merely a prelude, and is introduced into the action to make clear what follows. Jewish discontent grew to disaffection and open revolt when their Gentile masters began importing into Jerusalem the blessings of Western culture. Graven images, athletic games, Greek drama, and gladiatorial shows were not to the Jewish taste. The pious resented them as an offence in the nostrils of Jehovah, even though the resident officials patiently explained they were meant for the entertainment and edification of the non-Jewish garrison. The Judeans resisted with especial strenuousness the advent of the efficient Roman tax-gatherer. Above all, they wanted back a king of their own royal line.

Among the masses the rebellion took the form of a revival of the old belief in a Messiah, a divinely appointed saviour who was to redeem his people from the foreign yoke and make Judea supreme among the nations. Claimants to the mission were not wanting. In Galilee, one Judas led a rather formidable insurrection, which enlisted much popular support. John, called the Baptist, operated in the Jordan country. He was followed by another north-country man, Jesus of Nazareth. All three were masters of the technique of couching incendiary political sedition in harmless theological phrases. All three used the same signal of revolt — “the time is at hand.” And all three were speedily apprehended and executed, both Galileans by crucifixion.

Personal qualities aside, Jesus of Nazareth was, like his predecessors, a political agitator engaged in liberating his country from the foreign oppressor. There is even considerable evidence that he entertained an ambition to become king of an independent Judea. He claimed, or his biographers later claimed for him, descent from the ancient royal line of David. But his paternity is somewhat confused. The same writers who traced the origin of his mother’s husband back to the psalmist-king also pictured Jesus as the son of Jehovah, and admitted that Joseph was not his father.

It seems, however, that Jesus before long realized the hopelessness of his political mission and turned his oratorical gifts and his great popularity with the masses in quite another direction. He began preaching a primitive form of populism, socialism and pacifism. The effect of this change in his program was to gain him the hostility of the substantial, propertied classes, the priests and patriots generally, and to reduce his following to the poor, labouring mass and the slaves.

After his death these lowly disciples formed themselves into a communistic brotherhood. A sermon their late leader had once delivered upon a hillside summed up for them the essence of his teachings, and they made it their rule of life. It was a philosophy calculated to appeal profoundly to humble people. It comforted those who suffered here on earth with promised rewards beyond the grave. It made virtues of the necessities of the weak. Men without hope in the future were admonished to take no thought for the morrow. Men too helpless to resent insult or injury were taught to resist not evil. Men condemned to lifelong drudgery and indigence were assured of the dignity of labour and of poverty. The meek, the despised, the disinherited, the downtrodden, were — in the hereafter — to be the elect and favoured of God. The worldly, the ambitious, the rich and powerful, were to be denied admission to heaven.

The upshot, then, of Jesus’ mission was a new sect in Judea. It was neither the first nor the last. Judea, like modern America, was a fertile soil for strange creeds. The Ebionim — the paupers, as they called themselves — did not regard their beliefs as a new religion. Jews they had been born, and Jews they remained. The teachings of their master were rather in nature of a social philosophy, an ethic of conduct, a way of life. To modern Christians, who never tire of asking why the Jews did not accept Jesus and his teachings, I can only answer that for a long time none but the Jews did. To be surprised that the whole Jewish people did not turn Ebionim is about as intelligent as to expect all Americans to join the Unitarians or the Baptists or the Christian Scientists.

In ordinary times little attention would been paid to the ragged brotherhood. Slaves and labourers for the most part, their meekness might even have been encouraged by the soldier class. But with the country in the midst of a struggle with a foreign foe, the unworldly philosophy took on a dangerous aspect. It was a creed of disillusion, resignation and defeat. It threatened to undermine the morale of the nation’s fighting men in time of war. This blessing of the peacemakers, this turning of the other cheek, this non-resistance, this love your enemy, looked like a deliberate attempt to paralyse the national will in a crisis and assure victory to the foe.

So it is not surprising that the Jewish authorities began persecuting the Ebionim. Their meetings were invaded and dispersed, their leaders were clapped into jail, their doctrines were proscribed. It looked for a while as if the sect would be speedily wiped out. Then, unexpected, the curtain rose on act three, and events took a sudden new turn.

Perhaps the bitterest foe of the sectaries was one Saul, a maker of tents. A native of Tarsus and thus a man of some education in Greek culture, he despised the new teachings for their unworldliness and their remoteness from life. A patriotic Jew, he dreaded their effect on the national cause. A travelled man, versed in several languages, he was ideally suited for the task of going about among the scattered Jewish communities to counteract the spread of their socialistic, pacifistic doctrines. The leaders in Jerusalem appointed him chief persecutor to the Ebionim.

He was on his way to Damascus one day to arrest a group of the sectaries when a novel idea came to him. In the quaint phrase of the Book of Acts he saw a vision. He saw, as a matter of fact, two. He perceived, to begin with, how utterly hopeless were the chances of little Judea winning out in an armed conflict against the greatest military power in the world. Second, and more important, it came to him that the vagabond creed which he had been repressing might be forged into an irresistible weapon against the formidable foe. Pacifism, non-resistance, resignation, love, were dangerous teachings at home. Spread among the enemy’s legions, they might break down their discipline and thus yet bring victory to Jerusalem. Saul, in a word, was probably the first man to see the possibilities of conducting war by propaganda.

He journeyed on to Damascus, and there, to the amazement alike of his friends and of those he had gone to suppress, he announced his conversion to the faith and applied for admission to the brotherhood. On his return to Jerusalem he laid his new strategy before the startled Elders of Zion. After much debate and searching of souls, it was adopted. More resistance was offered by the leaders of the Ebionim of the capital. They were mistrustful of his motives, and they feared that his proposal to strip the faith of its ancient Jewish observances and practices, so as to make it acceptable to Gentiles, would fill the fraternity with alien half- converts, and dilute its strength. But in the end he won them over, too. And so Saul, the fiercest persecutor of Jesus’ followers, became Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles. And so, incidentally, began the spread into the pagan lands of the West an entirely new Oriental religion.

Unfortunately for Paul’s plan, the new strategy worked much too well. His revamped and rather alluring theology made converts faster than he had dared hope, or than he even wished. His idea, it should be kept in mind, was at this stage purely defensive. He had as yet no thought of evangelizing the world; he only hoped to discourage the enemy. With that accomplished, and the Roman garrisons out of Palestine, he was prepared to call a truce. But the slaves and oppressed of the Empire, the wretched conscripts, and the starving proletariat of the capital itself, found as much solace in the adapted Pauline version of the creed as the poor Jews before them had found in the original teachings of their crucified master. The result of this unforeseen success was to open the enemy’s eyes to what was going on. Disturbing reports of insubordination among the troops began pouring into Rome from the army chiefs in Palestine and elsewhere. Instead of giving the imperial authorities pause, the new tactics only stiffened their determination. Rome swooped down upon Jerusalem with fire and sword, and after a fierce siege which lasted four years, she destroyed the nest of the agitation (70 A.D.). At least she thought she had destroyed it.

The historians of the time leave us in no doubt as to the aims of Rome. They tell us that Nero sent Vespasian and his son Titus with definite and explicit orders to annihilate Palestine and Christianity together. To the Romans, Christianity meant nothing more than Judaism militant, anyhow, an interpretation which does not seem far from the facts. As to Nero’s wish, he had at least half of it realized for him. Palestine was so thoroughly annihilated that it has remained a political ruin to this day. But Christianity was not so easily destroyed.

Indeed, it was only after the fall of Jerusalem that Paul’s program developed to the full. Hitherto, as I have said, his tactic had been merely to frighten off the conqueror, in the manner of Moses plaguing the Pharaohs. He had gone along cautiously and hesitantly, taking care not to arouse the powerful foe. He was willing to dangle his novel weapon before the foe’s nose, and let him feel its edge, but he shrank from thrusting it in full force. Now that the worst had happened and Judea had nothing further to lose, he flung scruples to the wind and carried the war into the enemy’s country. The goal now was nothing less than to humble Rome as she had humbled Jerusalem, to wipe her off the map as she had wiped out Judea.

If Paul’s own writings fail to convince you of this interpretation of his activities, I invite your attention to his more candid associate John. Where Paul, operating within the shadow of the imperial palace and half the time a prisoner in Roman jails, is obliged to deal in parable and veiled hints, John, addressing himself to disaffected Asiatics, can afford the luxury of plain speaking. At any rate, his pamphlet entitled “Revelation” is, in truth, a revelation of what the whole astonishing business is about.

Rome, fancifully called Babylon, is minutely described in the language of sputtering hate, as the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth, as the woman drunken with the blood of the saints (Christians and Jews), as the oppressor of “peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues” and — to remove all doubt of her identity — as “that great city which reigned over the Kings of the earth.” An Angel triumphantly cries, “Babylon the great is fallen.” Then follows an orgiastic picture of ruin. Commerce and industry and maritime trade are at an end. Art and music and “the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride” are silenced. The gentle Christian conquerors wallow in blood up to the bridles of their horses. “Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.”

And what is the end and purpose of all this chaos and devastation? John is not too reticent to tell us. For he closes his pious prophecy with a vision of the glories of the new — that is, the restored — Jerusalem: not any allegorical fantasy, I pray you, but literally Jerusalem, the capital of a great reunited kingdom of “the twelve tribes of the children of Israel.”

Could any one ask for anything plainer?

Of course, no civilization could forever hold out against this kind of assault . By the year 200 the efforts of Paul and John and their successors had made such headway among all classes of Roman society that Christianity had become the dominant cult throughout the empire. Meantime, as Paul had shrewdly foreseen, Roman morale and discipline had quite broken down, so that more and more the imperial legions, once the terror of the world and the backbone of Western culture, went down to defeat before barbarian invaders. In the year 326 the emperor Constantine, hoping to check the insidious malady, submitted to conversion and proclaimed Christianity the official religion. It was too late. After him the emperor Julian tried to resort once more to suppression. But neither resistance nor concession were of any use. The Roman body politic had become thoroughly worm-eaten with Palestinian propaganda. Paul had triumphed.

This at least is how, were I an anti-Semite in search of a credible sample of subversive Jewish conspiracy, I would interpret the advent of a modified Jewish creed into the Western world.

Jewish Truth (and Jewish Jokes)

admin — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:00:30 +0000

How they gain money, sympathy, and reverence

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THIS ARTICLE is a kind of vaccine, an inoculation if you will, against the lies that permeate the airwaves these days, and against the mindset which has allowed these lies to flourish and infect Americans. To a very large extent these lies are Jewish lies, though the mouth that utters them may belong to a Hannity or a Limbaugh instead of a Jew. But the lies of the Jewish establishment, the international Jewish nation-within-nations, all possess a certain formula or pattern, and it is that pattern that I will teach you to recognize so that these Jewish lies will no longer have any effect on you. In fact, after learning the techniques for identifying these lies, you will find yourself laughing at the absurdity and preposterousness of most of them, and your reason and common sense, which the liars suppress by their insidious techniques, will come to the fore and you will no longer be able to take seriously the fictions that hypnotize so many Americans now. You will smile with wry amusement as the victims genuflect and open their wallets and tear ducts, and you will smile with joy as you spread the cure among your family members and countrymen.

It’s true that during wartime or times of active hostility all nations — all governments — will lie. Sometimes they will lie to their own people in order to keep them fighting. They will lie to the enemy in order to deceive him. They will lie to the enemy in order to better destroy or to kill him. But there is one nation, one people, which behaves as though a state of war perpetually exists between itself and all other nations of the Earth. There is a nation that regards as its eternal enemies all other peoples of this planet, and whose attitude toward even its nominal allies and greatest benefactors is one of total mistrust to the extent that it continually deceives them. It is a nation which even has a special name for all outsiders, for all Gentiles, for all goyim, for all non-Jews.

In their own religious writings, Jews even boast of their superiority over the goyim, which they compare to cattle. Cattle, of course, must be herded, and one of the best ways to herd them is to convince them that they ought to go in the direction that their owners desire. Force can be used as a last resort, of course, but if one can convince the dumb brutes that the slaughterhouse is really paradise, then they’ll gallop over there with much less trouble.

Jewish humor seems universal in this decadent age. It is Jewish humor that dominates our mass media. But there is another Jewish humor, a Jewish humor not intended for gentile eyes, which is found in sources intended to be read only by Jews. In these private jokes, recurrent themes are the intellectual superiority of the Jew, the gullibility of White people and how easily we can be fooled by Jewish deception. As such, Jewish humor is very revealing. One such joke runs as follows:

On a train in czarist Russia, a Jew is eating a whitefish, wrapped in paper. A Gentile, sitting across the aisle, begins to taunt him with various anti-Semitic epithets. Finally, he asks the Jew, “What makes you Jews so smart?” “All right,” replies the Jew, “I guess I’ll have to tell you. It’s because we eat the head of the whitefish.” “Well, if that’s the secret,” says the Gentile, “then I can be as smart as you are.” “That’s right,” says the Jew, “And in fact, I happen to have an extra whitefish head with me. You can have it for five kopecks.” The Gentile pays for the fish head and begins to eat. An hour later the train stops at a station for a few minutes. The Gentile leaves the train and comes back. “Listen, Jew,” he says, “You sold me that whitefish head for five kopecks. But I just saw a whole whitefish at the market for three kopecks.” “See,” replies the Jew, “You’re getting smarter already.”

Jewish psychoanalyst Theodore Reik, in his book Jewish Wit which deals with subliminal psychological meanings of Jewish humor, admits the existence of this Jewish contempt for the easily-fooled non-Jew when he notes:

All kinds of deception and cunning, of fraud and trickery, devised and committed by Jews, either to get money or to avoid paying money, are exposed and candidly revealed by Jewish jokes. (Jewish Wit, Theodore Reik; New York: Gamut Press, 1962, p. 6.)

Of course, Reik and the Jewish joke-tellers are wrong if they limit the extent of Jewish lies to tricks that get them money. Far more important than a few kopecks or a few million dollars are the Jewish lies which garner them sympathy and reverence. Yes, I said reverence. For the key to understanding the most dangerous Jewish lies is this: Jews lie to gain sympathy and reverence — the ideas that they want to plant in our minds are that Jews are terribly persecuted and that Jews are especially holy.

To someone whose eyes are open, the constantly-repeated mantra that the Jews are a persecuted people, a tiny powerless minority deserving of our help and deepest sympathy, is an insanely absurd idea. In reality, the Jews are undoubtedly the richest and most powerful ethnic group on this planet. They are probably the fourth largest nuclear power on Earth via their “home base,” Israel, and through their extremely influential positions in the media and financial institutions of the West, they have effective control of our political system and the armed might of the most powerful nations in the world — particularly via their control of the one remaining superpower, the United States. In the West, virtually no news is broadcast, virtually no feature film is made, virtually no newspaper article is printed which has not first passed the gauntlet of Jewish approval.

Despite this massive power, the Jews paradoxically portray themselves as “persecuted,” and a large percentage of their efforts is concentrated on maintaining that impression among their subjects.

In the last half-century, the Jews have concentrated on telling lies about how much they were oppressed and how many of them died in the Second World War, and stories of their sufferings at the hands of the Germans in that war are omnipresent in their periodicals and on their television networks. The essayist Joseph Sobran once opined that the New York Times should change its name to Holocaust Update.

Ask a schoolchild or your neighbor how many Americans or Frenchmen died in the Second World War, and your answer will be a blank stare or a shrug of the shoulders. But ask about how many Jews died, and the magical number “six million” will spring to the lips of even the dullest. The media bosses have done their job very well. The Jews’ catch phrase about what they refer to as The Holocaust is “never forgive — never forget” and of course it is they who will never forgive Europeans for the unspeakable crime of wanting nations without Jewish supervisors; and it is we who must never forget the lesson that to question the Jews’ right to own our television networks and control our financial and political system is morally equivalent to — and literally leads to — throwing innocent Jewish grandmothers into gas chambers. Do you see how the idea that the richest and most powerful clan on Earth is somehow poor and oppressed checkmates any opposition and gives that clan even more power?

But one weakness that the Jews have is that very contempt for our intelligence — their faith in our infinite gullibility. This weakness leads the Jews to be careless in their lies at times. And that carelessness opens the door to doubt and to reason. This Jewish carelessness causes them to lie in hilariously absurd and contradictory ways. Let’s look at one such lie, one of their “Holocaust” lies which they told during the Second World War. As you will see, they can’t keep their story straight.

In Zurich in 1944, a Jew named Stefan Szende published a book entitled Der letzte Jude aus Polen (which was translated into English under the title The Promise Hitler Kept), published by Roy Publishers in New York. I quote Szende’s claims regarding Jewish deaths at the Belzec concentration camp:

The trains coming into Belzec loaded with Jews were driven into a tunnel in the underground premises of the execution building…. Everything was taken away from them. The goods seized in this way were carefully sorted out, listed and ticketed and subsequently used for the benefit of the master race. It was to spare the staff at Belzec this tremendous task, which, of course, hindered them in their real job, that later on all Jews were sent to Belzec naked.When trainloads of naked Jews arrived they were herded into a great hall capable of holding several thousand people. This hall had no windows and its floor was of metal. Once the Jews were all inside, the floor of this hall sank like a lift into a great tank of water which lay below it until the Jews were up to their waists in water. Then a powerful electrical current was sent into the metal flooring and within a few seconds all the Jews, thousands at a time, were dead.

The metal flooring then rose again and the water drained away. The corpses of the slaughtered Jews were now heaped all over the floor. A different current was then switched on and the metal flooring rapidly became red hot, so that the corpses were incinerated as in a crematorium and only ash was left.

The floor was then tipped up and the ashes slid out into prepared receptacles. The smoke of the process was carried away by great factory chimneys.

That was the whole procedure. As soon as it was completed, it could start up again. New batches of Jews were constantly being driven into the tunnels. The individual trains brought between 3,000 and 5,000 Jews at a time, and there were days on which the Belzec line saw between twenty and thirty such trains arrive.”

Now, electrical engineers will be amazed at a “powerful electrical current” that does not obey the normal laws of physics, but then, since Jews don’t lie, we must believe that the evil Germans did develop it and use their amazing discovery — only at Belzec — in a gigantic facility which was never found or seen by anyone.

Funeral directors will be intrigued by the other magical “electrical current” created by the Germans which can incinerate not just one body (a process which can take over two hours even in the most modern crematoria) but thousands of bodies in a few moments.

And students of demography must also note with amazement the numbers cited by the honorable and inerrant Jews — if there were 4,000 Jews per train, and only fifteen trains per day arriving at Belzec during the years claimed, 1942 to 1945, then that is 60,000 Jews per day or 21,900,000 Jews per year, a total of 65,700,000 Jews killed. That means that at the Belzec concentration camp alone, four times the number of Jews were killed than existed in the entire Earth at that time. Even if you assume that only a third as many trains arrived as claimed, and that the Germans took holidays off, that still leaves you with the fact that the Germans at Belzec killed more Jews than existed in the world, leaving, apparently, no one to be persecuted at Auschwitz or anywhere else.

Now I have no desire to lampoon anyone who has lost a loved one, or to claim that there weren’t innocent dead of all races in that slaughter called Word War II. But you have to admit, after reading Stefan Szende with a mind not clogged with superstitions about the Jews’ veracity and holiness, that the Jews’ claims of special persecution begin to ring a little hollow.

By the way, may I remind you that in some nations of the West, it is actually illegal to doubt Jewish lies like these and one can be fined and imprisoned for doing so. That brings to mind the maxim that I stated several years ago:

If you want to know the identity of the real rulers of your society, merely ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?

There is historical precedent for these kinds of lies as well. The Jews always have their “enemy of the moment.” For a time this enemy was the Germans, and they lied and agitated the other nations of the West to hate and attack Germany, and they were successful. (At one time it was our racial cousins and cultural forebears, the Romans, who were the focus of Jewish hatred, which resulted in the most absurd “holocaust” propaganda ever created, as I detailed in “Holocaust Tales: A Prototype?”.)

More recently, they have resorted to similar lies to induce Americans to attack Libya, Iraq, Serbia, and Afghanistan. Now the war drums are sounding again, and the Jewish lies are proliferating as they attempt to get us to hate — and attack — Iran. And many cynical American politicians follow their lead and, along with Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News, agitate the ignorant yahoos who think they are being “patriotic” by killing anyone that the Jews tell them to kill. This pattern repeats again and again throughout history. Now that we know how to recognize that pattern, we are one step closer to preventing the next repetition.