National Vanguard http://nationalvanguard.org News. For us. For a change. Sat, 13 Sep 2014 14:40:30 +0000 en-US hourly 1 The Unholy War http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-unholy-war/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-unholy-war/#comments Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:00:35 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1705 9-11_ny_smoke_flickr-9-11_photos_0

American Dissident Voices broadcast of September 13, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I AM WRITING this broadcast on September 11, 2014, the thirteenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Today would also have been the 81st birthday of Dr. William Pierce, the founder of the National Alliance. In 1994, Dr. Pierce suggested to us in the pages of National Vanguard that the Jewish “holy war” against non-Jewish Semites in the Middle East, oftentimes using Americans as cannon fodder, was heating up to the point that American workers ought to “stay out of tall buildings” like the World Trade Center — a remark which proved quite prescient seven years later.

Earlier today I spoke with a man who, totally frustrated by America’s decades-long involvement in Middle Eastern wars, and the terrorist . . . → Read More: The Unholy War]]> 9-11_ny_smoke_flickr-9-11_photos_0

American Dissident Voices broadcast of September 13, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I AM WRITING this broadcast on September 11, 2014, the thirteenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Today would also have been the 81st birthday of Dr. William Pierce, the founder of the National Alliance. In 1994, Dr. Pierce suggested to us in the pages of National Vanguard that the Jewish “holy war” against non-Jewish Semites in the Middle East, oftentimes using Americans as cannon fodder, was heating up to the point that American workers ought to “stay out of tall buildings” like the World Trade Center — a remark which proved quite prescient seven years later.

Earlier today I spoke with a man who, totally frustrated by America’s decades-long involvement in Middle Eastern wars, and the terrorist blowback that that entails — and faced with one of the Establishment’s pious “We Must Remember 9/11″ messages — blurted out “We can best remember by wiping out every single one of the damned Muslim vermin from the face of the Earth!”

I responded, saying “And making you think that is exactly why that act of terror was done.

“I do agree that non-White Muslim immigration should be stopped and then reversed. They are not compatible with our race or civilization. But the ones who stay in their home countries should be left alone, and the shameful murders of them, and invasions of their homelands, all done on behalf of Israel, should be stopped immediately.”

I also explained briefly that there was Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks — which were brought about, or at the very least allowed and encouraged to happen, with the express purpose of starting a new war — with the US on one side, and Israel’s perceived enemies on the other side.

My frustrated friend brushed my explanations aside, saying he didn’t give a damn about the Israelis either, and that as far as he was concerned we should use nuclear weapons to make the entire Middle East into a sheet of glass.

I understand his frustration and anger. Family members and friends of his have died in this apparently endless series of wars — the longest in our history with no end in sight. There are doubtless millions of Americans who feel the same way. But without even a basic understanding of how they have been tricked and manipulated into fighting someone else’s “holy war,” they are powerless to do anything about their abject servitude, servitude even unto death.

So listen — and gain some understanding.

The Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency, was shadowing the 9/11 terrorists — and likely encouraging and to some extent controlling them — and never warned the American people. Have you heard of the “Israeli Art Student” spy ring? Probably not, though it’s possibly the largest spy ring ever caught on American soil — some 200 agents in all. The spy ring was busted and many of its agents, who had been gathering information about American military, DEA, and other government sites and buildings, were captured. It was later disclosed that fully a third of the captured Israeli spies were living in the same Florida and New Jersey communities as the 9/11 hijackers — and five of them were living on the same street as Mohammed Atta in the months immediately preceding the attacks.

It’s important to emphasize that this is not some wild-eyed conspiracy theory: This is the kind of behavior that intelligence and secret police agencies engage in normally — it’s what they do. A huge percentage of “terror arrests” by the FBI, for example, involve government agents infiltrating groups of radical Muslims and then funding them, encouraging them, and steering them toward illegal acts, often involving weapons provided by the US government itself, which the hapless patsies are often paying the agents for when the handcuffs and camera shutters click simultaneously. At any given moment, not only the FBI and the CIA and MI5, but also, you may be sure, the Mossad have dozens or hundreds of partly-real, partly-phony radical groups they are “running.” These captured groups are not only under near-total surveillance but also under a significant degree of actual control. They are not only used to provide show trials to prove the agency is “fighting terror,” but can easily be used as patsies in the commission of violent or other illegal acts which the agency itself dares not commit but nevertheless wants to happen as a part of some broader plan.

On December 21st, 2001, investigative reporter Carl Cameron of the Fox News Channel filed a report on the detention of sixty Israeli spies by F.B.I. and other government investigators looking into the events of September 11th, some of whom were suspected of having prior knowledge of the attacks. According to the report, over 140 intelligence operatives for the Jewish state, many posing as “Israeli art students,” and some as street and mall kiosk vendors, had been detained earlier in the investigation, which began prior to September 11th. These 200 Israeli spies were considered to be just the tip of the iceberg of a “very aggressive” Israeli intelligence operation against the United States — one of the largest spy rings in American history. According to classified documents seen by Cameron, the “art students,” using the sale of original paintings at cut-rate prices as bait, penetrated military bases, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the F.B.I., and dozens of government facilities, secret installations, and even the private homes of law enforcement officers, intelligence personnel, and judges. In several cases it was proved that these supposed “art students” would be flown direct from Israel at large expense, rent a car upon landing in the US, and then drive directly to the home of a US government official, enter the home on the pretext of selling paintings — and then, when the bogus sales pitch was over, be observed leaving the neighborhood without knocking on the door of a single other resident in the neighborhood. In other numerous cases, the Israelis would be observed wandering around or entering classified government buildings, some so secret that they were excised from maps, were in isolated areas, and even without street addresses — buildings which even the locals didn’t know were actually secret government facilities.

Mr. Cameron quoted a senior official who said “Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It’s classified information,” and, with reference to the lack of any official public statements on this story, he said “Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying … is considered career suicide.”

After a complaint from the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC, the heavily Jewish management at Fox News killed the story, and visitors to the Fox Web site now get only a “this story no longer available” message when they try to access it. It’s been erased, even from their archives. Luckily, a few courageous reporters at the Florida Sun-Sentinel and the French newspaper Le Monde broke the blackout on the story.

Since that time, evidence has been accumulating that some in Israel knew in advance that the attacks were going to take place and did nothing to prevent them or warn the American victims. Odigo, an Israeli-American instant messaging firm, confirmed that two Israeli workers received messages warning them of the impending attacks on the World Trade Center two hours in advance of the attacks, before the planes took off. The company says that the employees told the company of the messages only after the attacks took place, at which time Odigo’s response was to communicate with Israeli security services. If the unknown informant was a Muslim, why were none of the hundreds of Muslims working at the World Trade Center warned? If the informant was not a Jew, why were Israeli workers chosen to receive the warning?

Some of the arrested Israeli spies were discovered to have been apparently closely following the accused 9/11 hijackers, including Mohammed Atta. More than a third of the Israeli agents were operating in Florida communities where ten of the nineteen hijacking suspects were living — and learning to fly. Five Israeli operatives even lived on the same street as Atta in Hollywood, Florida — the town where Atta and three other terror suspects lived for some time prior to the attacks, strengthening the presumption that Israel was shadowing the 9/11 conspirators and knew of their activities and plans. Knowing all this, Israel did nothing to warn Americans of the impending disaster, possibly calculating the tremendous propaganda value of the attacks in stampeding the American cattle to slaughter the Jews’ Semitic enemies in the Middle East, starting with the Taliban and escalating into a vaguely-defined “War on Terror,” with “terror” being defined as having or wanting a government free from Jewish supervision.

Not long after September 11th, the F.B.I. attitude toward the biggest spy scandal in decades changed abruptly. Suddenly, revelations about Israeli spying were more than just “career suicide” — they became a threat to the Middle East war plans of the Zionists. Just as suddenly, the suspects were no longer in any danger of being charged with espionage and we were told they were merely being held for “routine” visa and immigration irregularities. The sum total of their punishment: they were sent back to Israel. The man directly responsible for that decision: Michael Chertoff.

Chertoff has an interesting history — he is most famous as George Bush’s “Homeland Security” chief — but few know that he is a dual Israeli-US citizen and was once an attorney for Dr. Magdy Elamir, a Muslim suspect in a nuclear-medicine money-transfer fraud with direct family connections to al-Qaeda, and who was also suspected of funding terrorists. And even fewer know that Elamir — Chertoff’s former client — and his brother were also under terror investigation in 2001 by the US Department of Justice but were allowed to slide while Chertoff was Assistant Attorney General there. Chertoff’s job after 9/11 was to cover up and obfuscate as much as possible all evidence of Israeli involvement. It was under his orders that the investigation of the Art Student spies’ connection to the terror attacks was stopped and their charges were simply downgraded to “visa violations,” upon which they were simply returned to Israel.

Another, and even more suspicious, Israeli intelligence operation connected to the events of 9/11 involved the “dancing Israelis” and a false-front Israeli-owned “moving company” called Urban Moving Systems.

Just a few minutes after the first plane hit the World Trade Center, a New Jersey resident reported that she saw a group of men of “Middle Eastern appearance” observing the attack from a high vantage point laughing, dancing joyfully, giving each other “high fives” and lighting lighters like fans do at rock concerts. At one point they were reported to be standing atop their truck, which carried the logo of Urban Moving Systems. After they were captured, it turned out that all of them were Israelis working here illegally and “Urban Moving Systems” was an Israeli intelligence front, which had also received some $500,000 in US government loans for 2001 and 2001 only. Its owner, Dominik Suter, immediately fled to Israel and the contents of the dozen hard drives left in his office have been classified by the government.

These men were filming and taking pictures of the attack, and pictures removed from their camera by police — one of which shows a traffic helicopter whose timeline was known — proves that they began their vigil within minutes of the first plane’s impact, if not before. When they were stopped by police, they immediately assumed the stop had something to do with 9/11, and made statements to the effect that “We are Israelis. We are not your problem, the Palestinians are your problem.” Inside their truck were maps of the New York City metro area with certain buildings highlighted, including vantage points both north and south of the towers from which both the first and second impacts could be most easily observed and documented. Traces of explosives were detected in the van. Later a similar van filled with explosives was stopped before it could reach its evident target of the George Washington Bridge, while at the same time an anonymous telephone call alerted police to the existence of yet another white truck, this one, incredibly, with a painting of an airplane crashing into the Twin Towers on its side. According to reports, it was an “innocent moving truck” rented to a group of “ethnic Middle Easterners.”

Shortly thereafter another Israel-linked group was arrested in Tennessee attempting to obtain false ID there under the then-lax state drivers’ license laws, and one of the group had credentials issued September 5th giving him access to restricted maintenance areas of the World Trade Center.

Once again, under Michael Chertoff’s watch, all of these captured Israeli operatives were released to Israel after being charged with simple immigration violations.

Ladies and gentlemen, we stand on the brink of universal war. The ancient conflict between the Semites of the Middle East and the partly-Semitic Jews was brought to our shores on 9/11/01 in what the evidence suggests was an operation planned to involve the United States in a war against Israel’s enemies. The purpose of the operation was to enrage the American people so that we would support such a war. That war has been continuous and increasing since that date. It is not a war against a specific state or nation. It is not a war in which we as a people have any interest at all. And it is not really a war on terror, though it is a war of terror. It is simply an undeclared war to slaughter Israel’s enemies, in much the same manner that the Jews gleefully described the slaughters of their enemies in their Torah.

Directed by the Jewish power structure, we crushed Afghanistan and Iraq and installed puppet governments there. We did the same in Libya and are trying to do the same in Syria. We continue to murder countless thousands with our drones in the skies over several non-combatant nations. Because Russia opposes “our” war plans, the Jewish propaganda now sounds against that nation, possibly presaging an even more deadly conflict.

This is their war, not ours. Let the Jewish supremacists fight their own wars and protect their own borders. Let us instead direct our wealth and our energy and the lives of our young men toward protecting our own ramparts and those of European civilization itself, which very much need protecting. Let us also direct our energy toward gaining the understanding and ability to break the bonds of Earth and direct our own upward evolution. That should be our cause, not dying so the world’s richest tribe can lord it over some sand in the Middle East promised to them by their primitive, imaginary desert god. Redefine citizenship on a racial basis — as the Founding Fathers did — and exile both sides in this death-spiral war from our shores.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-unholy-war/feed/ 1
The Trouble With People http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-trouble-with-people/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-trouble-with-people/#comments Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:51:02 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1703 William Pierce medallion designed by Kevin Alfred Stromby Dr. William L. Pierce (pictured)

MANY OF our people who are attempting to recruit new members, or even to get a new person to come to one of our Sunday evening meetings have commented to me recently how very difficult it is. In the first place they find that people resist new ideas. Most people are pretty much in agreement with what their TV set has told them, and they don’t want to be told by someone else that their TV set has been lying to them.

That’s the largest category of people that we meet. But even those people who are wise to the lies of the controlled media are not easy to motivate. Some are afraid, even if they won’t admit it. They are . . . → Read More: The Trouble With People]]> William Pierce medallion designed by Kevin Alfred Stromby Dr. William L. Pierce (pictured)

MANY OF our people who are attempting to recruit new members, or even to get a new person to come to one of our Sunday evening meetings have commented to me recently how very difficult it is. In the first place they find that people resist new ideas. Most people are pretty much in agreement with what their TV set has told them, and they don’t want to be told by someone else that their TV set has been lying to them.

That’s the largest category of people that we meet. But even those people who are wise to the lies of the controlled media are not easy to motivate. Some are afraid, even if they won’t admit it. They are afraid to say or do anything, including joining the Alliance, which may cause Big Brother to retaliate against them in some way. They’re afraid they’ll be fired from their jobs, or that their tax returns will be audited, or that something else unpleasant may happen to them. And then there are the slobs who are just plain selfish or lazy and who just don’t care. They agree with us, they say, but they can’t become members because they need that three dollars a month for other things — beer, cigarettes, clothes, new records for the hi-fi, or what have you. Or they can’t come to a meeting because they ordinarily bowl on Sunday nights, or they have to get up at six o’clock the next morning, or it’s too far to drive, or they’d miss their favorite TV program — or something.

Now when we talk to people like this, day after day, and most of the people that we talk to are like this, they fall into one of the categories I’ve just described. When we talk to so many people like this, it’s easy to become disillusioned, discouraged, and cynical — or, what’s just as bad, to retreat into hobbyism.

Well it’s a good thing to become disillusioned, to get rid of false expectations — but it’s very bad to become discouraged, or to become cynical, or to become a hobbyist — and by that I mean a right-wing gossip who subscribes to everything, joins everything, and, although he really believes nothing, he makes a great game out of pretending.

The reason that so many of us start off with illusions of easy success is that we tend to judge others by our selves. We expect other people to react the same way that we do to something which is so obviously true and right and exciting.

I remember the first political magazine (National Socialist World — Ed.) I published ten years ago. I printed and mailed out three thousand copies to individuals, to libraries, news agencies, some prominent right-wing politicians, and others. I thought I was dropping a real bomb which would shake up the whole world. I really expected that I would receive long distance telephone calls from hundreds of excited people and that at least a thousand subscriptions would come pouring in. And I also expected that the enemy would immediately begin harassing me and attempting to silence me. And when almost nothing happened I just couldn’t understand it.

No long distance calls, no Jewish harassment, no signs that my magazine had inflicted a mortal wound on the System. What I did receive was a hundred and twenty or a hundred and thirty subscriptions — or about one response from every twenty five persons who received my magazine. People older and wiser than I told me that I had done quite well to get even that much response.

I had judged others by myself. I had expected the people who received my magazine to read it and then to exclaim, “Ah! Here is truth. Here is righteousness. Here is wisdom. Here is beauty. The man who has dared to publish this has real courage. He has identified the enemy. He has suggested that we fight the enemy and he has offered us a creed to serve as a basis for our fight and for building a new society. Wonderful! I’ll do everything I can to help him and to join him in any way that I can.”

At least I had expected a lot more than one out of 25, a lot more than the four per cent. response that I got, to react in that way. And actually my real response was a lot less than four per cent., probably closer to, say, one quarter of one per cent., because most of the four per cent. who did subscribe were certainly “hobbyists” — people who were not interested in really fighting the enemy or in building a new world but only in amusing and titillating themselves, only in pretending to do something from the safety and comfort of their easy chairs, only in having something new and interesting to gossip about with their fellow hobbyists.

I had expected the world, in other words, to be idealistic — and I had run head on against the hard fact that it is not. I had found out the hard way that most people are incapable of recognizing the truth even when their faces are rubbed in it and that furthermore they are not really interested in knowing the truth even if they recognize it. They would just as soon stay with the lies that they have gotten accustomed to and are comfortable with.

I discovered also that people are almost incredibly timid and that they are selfish and materialistic as well, and that their only real concern in life is in pleasing themselves and in being safe and comfortable. In other words what our late Secretary of State, Earl Butz, said about Negroes and got fired for it, is not only true of Blacks but it’s also true of most Whites as well. So I lost my illusions. But instead of becoming discouraged or cynical I tried to understand what had happened, and I think it’s important for all of us to understand so that we don’t continue laboring under false ideas and don’t become discouraged when our expectations are not met.

Before we start looking at the shortcomings of our fellow citizens that we must take into account in our recruiting efforts, though, let’s remind ourselves of one very positive and encouraging fact  — and that fact is that no matter how little people seem to be motivated by idealism, still the divine spark, the fire of God, is in them — because they are parts of the whole. No matter how much they are like the other animals on this Earth, like sheep, even like lumps of clay, they are still the highest embodiment of the Creator.

Men have dreamed great dreams and then worked and fought to make the dreams reality. Civilizations have been built. Mozart and Beethoven and Wagner did compose. Michelangelo and Leonardo and Rembrandt did paint. Shakespeare and Milton did write. Newton and Darwin did commune with the Creator and discover many of Nature’s mysteries. And great idealistic movements involving millions of people have arisen and transformed the whole world time after time.

So let’s always keep that in mind. Let us remember that no matter how much trouble we may have with people who will not or can not respond to our message in the way we would like them to, no matter what obstacles we must overcome, the force pushing us onward in our task is the eternal and irresistible Life Force symbolized by our rune. It’s the upward driving force of the Creator seeking self-completion and it cannot be stopped. The only question is whether we ourselves, you and I, will play a role in the things that are to come, or whether we won’t. Whether we’ll help the Life Force in the accomplishment of its task — or whether we’ll stand aside, or even get in the way.

So people are, we are, like many other parts of the Whole, animals — and animals are motivated primarily by instinct. They are programmed by the Creator to react in certain ways to certain situations. A dog or a rattlesnake or a tarantula or an eagle has relatively little to say about the way it will behave, the way it will conduct its life. Its instincts govern it — and the same is true of Man, with only a slight difference in degree.

Now men can reason and they can do idealistic or, let us say, unselfish things. But, as a matter of fact, so can many other animals. Anyone who’s ever owned a dog or a cat knows that they can reason — although not as finely as man. In the higher animals, at least dogs and cats and horses are capable of unselfish acts. Again, it’s a matter of degree — we’re all parts of one Whole, although we’re different parts.

We’ve made the mistake in the past of imagining that a great gulf separates Man from the rest of life, from the other animals. That Man is a reasoning, compassionate, idealistic creature — and that the other animals are not. Above all, we thought, Man reasons and the other animals don’t. Well now we’ve learned in the last few decades that the ability of non-human animals goes quite a bit beyond the sort of reasoning we can observe in our pet cats and dogs. Chimpanzees, for example, we know now, not only use tools but they also make tools. And they can be taught to communicate with men, using a language complete with rules of grammar, even though their vocal apparatus is not suited for human speech.

So the “great gulf” has disappeared and in its place we have a continuum, a continuously ascending hierarchy of life. The ability to reason and to do other things we once thought of as exclusively human is distributed along this continuum, and all we can say is that the ability becomes more pronounced, more refined, as we ascend through the various species toward Man, and then through the various races of Man, and finally through the various individuals who make up our own race. But just as we now must share our so-called human attribute of reason with other animals, so we share their attribute of instinct much more than we were formerly willing to admit. The fact is that although Man can reason, it’s instinct — inborn behavior which is pre-programmed by the Creator — which determines most of what we do on this Earth.

Some people, especially those who have been influenced by humanist ideas — that is, by the notion that human beings are somehow distinct and separate from the rest of the whole and are the possessors of something called “human dignity” which differentiates them from all other animals and also incidentally makes them all equal to each other regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, or sex — such people may find what I’ve said offensive. But that makes it no less true.

And it’s interesting to note that the principal propagandists for “human dignity” are the very ones who best understand the essentially instinctual basis of human behavior and who make the most use of that understanding. They are the skilled manipulators of mass behavior who use the news and entertainment media and all the techniques of Madison Avenue to assure that, on the average, we’ll think and vote and spend our money the way they want us to.

They manipulate our sexual instinct and our herd instinct, or instinct to conform to those around us, and our instinct for self-preservation — just about the same way that we use our knowledge of animal behavior to get our domesticated animals, our cattle, our sheep, our horses, to do what we want them to do. The only essential difference being that the Madison Avenue manipulators must use a considerably refined technique.

Consider, for example, herd instinct. That’s a simple name for a very complex phenomenon. It governs our behavior in many different ways, some of them quite obvious and direct, others much more subtle. It’s not reason but herd instinct which tells us to wear approximately the same type of clothes as the people around us; to read the same books; to cheer for the same team; to like the same music; and to pay lip service to approximately the same political, social, and religious ideas. A person doesn’t become a Baptist, or a Quaker, or a Catholic through a process of comparing these different sects and then making a rational decision as to which one is best — at least, 999 out of 1,000 people don’t do it that way. A person goes to the church he does because it’s the one the people around him, usually his immediate family, go to.

And herd instinct also plays a very important role in determining people’s attitudes towards things like racial integration and racial intermarriage. People will generally be for or against the things that their neighbors are for or against. Again, it’s not reason which determines their attitudes, not a calculated attempt to curry favor or to be popular by pretending to agree with one’s neighbors, at least not in the great majority of cases. One’s beliefs and attitudes genuinely change in order to stay in harmony with what one perceives to be the beliefs and attitudes of those around one — and it’s herd instinct which causes this change.

Now I don’t want to spend a lot of time tonight trying to analyze this phenomenon — it’s a complex and tricky subject with all sorts of complications. As just one example, people don’t usually remain among the same neighbors all their lives. They move from one part of the country to another to go away to school, to change jobs, and so on. And the attitudes acquired in one environment, that is among one particular group of neighbors, take a while to change when a person moves into a new environment, a new group of neighbors.

And since, because of all the moving around that we have today in this country, no environment, or at least very few environments, are really homogeneous anymore but instead consist of people from many different environments with, consequently, different attitudes, herd instinct has a little trouble in deciding just which shades of opinion to make a person conform to.

Furthermore there are often conflicting instincts at work simultaneously. Take racial integration, for example. We have on the one hand a natural xenophobia which tends to keep us from mixing with alien races — and on the other hand we have the influence of the manipulators using herd instinct to make us conform to their immediate projected goals of “integration” and forced equality. But despite the complexity of the instinctual control of our behavior we can make some general observations.

First, the dominant role of instinct in our lives is not, as the liberals would have us believe, something shameful, something to be overcome, something which, despite the fact that we share it with other animals, is somehow less than human. No, it’s simply the way things are — and, if we look at it the right way, then it’s pretty hard to criticize the Creator for it. If sex, for example, were a matter of reason instead of instinct, why then none of us would be here. Our race would be extinct, because long ago some nutty religion would have sprung up and declared sex “sinful” and told us that the only way to get into Heaven is to remain chaste. But no such religion has ever prevailed, though a number have tried, because our sexual instinct just wouldn’t stand for it. And to our xenophobia we also owe the very existence of our race. It’s what has kept us from mixing with non-White races long ago and, thereby, disappearing through the process of amalgamation. In fact, evolution could not take place at all if there were not an instinctive tendency of like to breed with like.

Our reason can easily be fooled — but our instincts, in general, are far, far wiser, far less fallible. When reason and instinct are in conflict it will generally be the instinct which is right. It’s our instincts which show us the way to the upward path — and our reason which must be used as a tool to help us in the direction pointed out to us by our instincts, rather than being used as a means of opposing these instincts.

But again we’re dealing with a complex and tricky subject and we have to be very careful about our conclusions. For instance, I just said that our instincts are usually right. But one of the ways in which we have been led astray has been through the artificial manipulation of those instincts. And in today’s unnatural society even we are obliged to buck some instincts — herd instincts for example — in our work to bring about certain changes which will allow a more natural play of our instincts and allow the Creator’s upward urge to again become predominant.

There is one firm and safe conclusion we can draw, however, and it’s this: Our efforts will be more effective — we’ll be more successful in recruiting new people — the more we are able to work with people’s instincts instead of against them. Now we are appealing to just one instinct. It’s the highest, the finest, the noblest instinct that we have — the Creator’s urge toward self-realization. But we cannot now also appeal to people’s cruder instincts, the instincts which, in most people, are the dominant ones. We cannot, at this time, offer people safety or popularity or wealth. All that we can offer them is an opportunity to make sacrifices, to undergo dangers and hardships, and to suffer social ostracism for the sake of the Creator’s purpose. And that means that our message will find a response only in a small minority of our people at this time. That makes things slow and difficult and often discouraging for us. But there’s no way around it — for a while yet.

The good aspect of this is that we’ll recruit only the spiritually best of our people — and those are the ones on whom we must build our foundation. But time is also important to us: We have two thresholds to cross which we discussed earlier, and we want to cross them as soon as we possibly can. And so we must be thinking now of the ways in which we can broaden our appeal in the future, and ways in which we can appeal to people’s other instincts in a natural and healthy way consistent with our purpose.

The most important of these ways is the building of a genuine organic community. When we have not just a collection of people paying their dues each month to the Alliance, but a real community of men and women and children living together, working together, and sacrificing together for our common purpose, our shared purpose — then we will have come a long way. And it need not be an especially large community. What’s more important than numbers is the sense of community, the feeling of community. When we have that then we can put our own herd instinct to work — and it will be a much more powerful, more compelling herd instinct than that which the enemy is now manipulating; because the enemy, in order to accomplish his destructive purpose, had first to set about breaking down and undermining the already-existing sense of community in America. Before he could begin employing herd instinct to promote racial mixing, he had to destroy the basis on which herd instinct had formerly opposed that mixing. He had to destroy White solidarity. He had to turn a national and racial community into an atomized mass of individuals, and that’s exactly what he’s done.

I doubt that anyone here feels a sense of belonging to Arlington, Virginia, say, as a community — or to Washington, or Falls Church, or Silver Spring, or wherever you happen to live. That disappeared years ago, decades ago, in America — and people miss it. There are, I’m sure, a few neighborhoods left in America, ethnic neighborhoods, racially homogeneous neighborhoods — South Boston, perhaps a few other places — but the seeds of their destruction have already been sown and are growing fast. And the same is true of nearly all the various Christian churches, all the other social entities which used to provide for people the feeling of community which their souls crave. And so it will be of enormous importance to us when we have in the Alliance a real community and can offer to soul-sick Americans the sense of security, of companionship, of moral reinforcement which only belonging to an organic community can provide.

That’s what we can look forward to and that’s what we must work for now. When we have it, then we’ll not be obliged so much to buck people’s instincts — and our recruiting efforts will certainly be much, much more effective. But for now we still have to do things the hard way — and it will be slow and difficult for a while yet, and all I can say to you is that we must continue building our own consciousness and thus our strength in the ways that I’ve told you about, and we must concentrate our efforts on person-to-person recruiting — each of us, every day, in the way that I talked to you about a couple of weeks ago. And then we will have a community, and we will cross our two thresholds, and our truth will prevail.

November 7, 1976

* * *

Listen to the audio recording of this speech: The Trouble With People by William Pierce

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-trouble-with-people/feed/ 0
America the Sleepwalker http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/america-the-sleepwalker/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/america-the-sleepwalker/#comments Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:00:22 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1701 wlp_closeup_podiumby Dr. William L. Pierce (pictured)

RECENTLY I was looking again at the picture of DC Mayor Walter Washington in the current ATTACK! Again I found it hard to believe. I know it is real, and yet it seems like something from a nightmare.

Here we are, the descendants of the fierce Celts, of the warlike Vikings, and the others–here we are, in the most powerful nation on earth, which our forefathers built form a wilderness they took away from non-White savages — and the capital city of this nation, our nation, is governed by a crew of Black comedians straight out of Amos ‘n’ Andy, by a gang which no self-respecting troop of baboons would tolerate as their leaders for an instant.

Besides the head clown, who has managed to reduce the . . . → Read More: America the Sleepwalker]]> wlp_closeup_podiumby Dr. William L. Pierce (pictured)

RECENTLY I was looking again at the picture of DC Mayor Walter Washington in the current ATTACK! Again I found it hard to believe. I know it is real, and yet it seems like something from a nightmare.

Here we are, the descendants of the fierce Celts, of the warlike Vikings, and the others–here we are, in the most powerful nation on earth, which our forefathers built form a wilderness they took away from non-White savages — and the capital city of this nation, our nation, is governed by a crew of Black comedians straight out of Amos ‘n’ Andy, by a gang which no self-respecting troop of baboons would tolerate as their leaders for an instant.

Besides the head clown, who has managed to reduce the fiscal situation in the capital to a state of total chaos, to an incomprehensible shambles which not even the best auditors in the country can figure out — and he’s done this with a subsidy of nearly a million dollars a day from the Congress — besides Mr. Washington, we have a city council whose vice-chairman was convicted in court last year of biting a White man on the back three times in public — biting him hard enough to draw blood — when the White man momentarily blocked his parking space outside City Hall. And we have another prominent council member whose offices were used as a temporary morgue by some of his own employees who had organized a Black version of Murder, Inc. They would kill people and then hid the corpses in the councilman’s offices until they found a better place to dump them.

This absolutely grotesque situation in the District of Columbia might be more believable if America had been invaded by Africa and had lost a war, if we were a conquered nation. But we aren’t. Mr. Washington and his friends are all the descendants of our slaves. A hundred years ago they were all hoeing cotton and saying, “Yassah, mastah.” We put Walter Washington in office. We mad the laws which allowed a Black city council to be elected. We are supplying the money which keeps the whole farce afloat — more or less. That’s what’s incredible. That’s what doesn’t seem real.

And I know I’m not the only one who feels that everything that’s happening these days is just a bad dream, which will go away when we wake up. We received an order last week for some of our “Who’s Behind Busing?” leaflets, and the fellow who ordered them sent along a letter asking us to verify the authenticity of the photograph which appears on the leaflets. The photo shows White federal troops using rifles with bayonets to push young White girls into a freshly integrated school in Little Rock, Arkansas, back during the Eisenhower period. The fellow who ordered the leaflets said some of his friends are claiming we faked the photo. They just can’t believe that the action the photo depicts actually happened.

I also remember that we got a number of comments from skeptics a couple of years ago when we printed a photograph on the front page of ATTACK! showing Nelson Rockefeller marching arm-in-arm in a New York City parade with a Black militant carrying a machete and wearing a helmet with the words “Mau Mau” painted on it. They thought that photo was a fake too. They couldn’t believe that the governor of the state of New York, an intelligent, cultivated White man, would parade arm-in-arm down the street with a Mau-Mau leader carrying a machete — just as some people can’t believe that a president of the United States, a White man and a military hero besides, would order Federal troops to jam White schoolgirls in the backs with bayonets to force them to go to school with Blacks. They can’t believe it. They say it didn’t happen, that we just made it up.

The more I think about it, the more I’m convinced there are a lot of people like that, probably a majority of the White people in this country. They see with their own eyes what’s going on around them every day, but they don’t believe it. It’s just a dream, not real.

I think that explains a lot of things — in particular, why there has been virtually no organized White resistance to the takeover of America.

There are some White people, of course, for whom the dream is not a nightmare at all, but a pleasant dream — one might almost say a wet dream. They are the sick ones, the ones who get a little thrill of excitement every time they read in the newspaper some new instance of the proud White man being humbled by his former slaves. They tremble in masochistic ecstasy at the thought of reducing, someday, the whole country — in fact, the whole White world, starting with Rhodesia and South Africa — to the status of Washington, DC, with Blacks being driven around in chauffeured limousines and holding press conferences in their air-conditioned offices, while the Whites work to support their Black rulers. In their twisted minds, that would be real justice. That would be true equality.

But the great majority of White people certainly aren’t like that. For them, just as for us, what’s happening is like a nightmare. The difference between them and us is that we know it’s real, and they believe it’s only a dream, only a nightmare, and that it’ll go away when they wake up. At least, that’s what they want to believe, because it excuses them from having to squarely face all sorts of nasty issues and make all sorts of unpleasant decisions.

I think there is real truth in this explanation of the way people are behaving. I’ve mentioned people questioning the reality of the photographic evidence we have presented to them of what’s going on in the world today. But all of us, I’m sure, have had the experience of arguing with people — not the sick ones, but just ordinary people — who clearly don’t want to face the truth about our present situation, who are determined to believe it’s all just a bad dream.

You collar a man on the street, and you say to him, “Listen, our news and entertainment media have been taken over by Jews and are being used as weapons to destroy America.” The chances are he’ll say, “Nonsense,” or, “I don’t believe it.” So you name the names for him, you show him clippings from the Jewish publications in which they brag about their control of Hollywood or of the TV networks, and he’ll look uncomfortable and say, “Well, so what? They are good businessmen. They worked hard to get where they are. This is a free country.”

If you try to tell him about the race situation instead you’ll get a similar reaction. You say to him, “Listen, the Blacks in this country and all the non-White immigrants who’re pouring in, they’re destroying everything our ancestors worked so hard to build up. They’re wrecking our armed forces, our government, our schools, our cities. They’re going to destroy not only our civilization but also our race if we don’t get rid of them soon.” And he’ll tell you you’re exaggerating. Things aren’t really that bad. And besides, Blacks are no worse than Whites. And so you give him the evidence. If you tell him about lower Black intelligence, he’ll parrot what he’s heard on TV about the intelligence tests being “culturally biased” against Blacks. If you talk about the Black crime rate, he’ll tell you it’s because they’re disadvantaged. No matter what argument you use, he’ll come up with a counter-argument — anything to avoid facing the facts and dealing with the problem.

It’s a bizarre situation. It’s quite plain that the public is suffering from much more than a severe case of misinformation. It’s quite clear that they have somehow convinced themselves that all the unpleasant things going on around them aren’t real and that they’ll never have to actually face up to them and do something about them.

It reminds me of a cartoon we once printed in ATTACK! An automobile with a little boy and his father is broken down beside the road in a pouring rainstorm. The hood is up, and the father is out in the rain, soaked to the skin, struggling without success to change a flat tire. The little boy, about five years old, has just asked the father a question, and the very wet, very exasperated father replies to him: “We can’t switch channels. This is real. This is life.”

That cartoon suggests something to us, and it is this: Perhaps we are trying too hard to tell people that America has engine trouble, that Western civilization has a flat tire, and that all sorts of troubles are raining down on our race. After all, they have eyes too. They should be able to see what’s happening as well as we can. Perhaps instead we need to try harder to convince people that no Big Daddy up in the sky is going to switch channels for them before things get too much worse. Perhaps we need to spend more of our time trying to wake people up to the fact that they cannot escape form the consequences of their foolishness, their cowardice, their selfishness, their laziness: that there is only one Reality, and they are part of it.

Perhaps instead of presenting people over and over again with Black IQ scores and crime statistics; instead of rubbing their noses in the bizarre antics of the DC city government; instead of quoting for them the chilling things the Jews are saying about Gentiles in their private publications — instead of presenting all these unpleasant facts, perhaps we should be thinking of ways to make people realize that this is life — their life — and that with life comes responsibility. Perhaps we should be trying harder to show people that they are not mere spectators at the sideshow of life, but that they all have a role to play themselves, they all have a Purpose.

Spectators at a sideshow — that sums up the attitude, the orientation, of most of those who are not sleepwalkers. And the common missing element, whether one is a sleepwalker who doesn’t believe that what he sees is real, or whether one is a spectator who believes it’s real but thinks it’s not his problem — the common missing element is the sense of responsibility which comes from an understanding and an acceptance of our great Truth, which is that there is but one Reality, and that Reality is the Whole, and we are of the Whole.

In plain language, that means that what those soldiers in Little Rock did to those schoolgirls on Eisenhower’s orders — they did to us; it was we who were betrayed by Rockefeller when he put his arm around the Mau Mau leader in New York; we are the ones who are being humiliated and made fools of every day that Blacks preside over and misgovern Washington, DC; and it is our future against which Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale and Andrew Young are conspiring when they demand that the White Rhodesians and the White South Africans turn over their countries to Blacks.

We may think we are only spectators, that all these things are only scenes in a dream, but that is not so. We are intimately involved in and responsible for these things. They do not happen by themselves; they happen because of what we do or because of what we fail to do. There is very little which happens in this world for which we are not responsible, either through our action or our inaction. And there is nothing in which we are not involved, nothing which does not affect us.

When a White schoolchild is beaten and robbed of his lunch money in Pittsburgh, we are involved: it is our flesh which suffers.

When a White girl in Seattle is persuaded to date a Black, we are involved: it is our blood which is defiled.

When the gang on Capitol Hill votes to give another squadron of F-16s to the Jews in the Middle East, we are involved: is our honor and our security which are undermined.

That’s true — but here are an awful lot of wise guys, an awful lot of smart alecs in the world today who’ll try to tell you it isn’t They’re the fellows who have taken to heart the “do your own thing” philosophy of alienation which is preached from the TV pulpit. They have learned that it’s still possible to make a fast buck these days, to wear the latest styles and drive the newest car, and, so far as they care, what happens to the kid in Pittsburgh is too bad — but it’s his tough luck, not theirs. And what the girl in Seattle does is nobody’s business but hers. And as for the gang on Capitol hill, well, that’s just the way it is in politics.

The wise guys think they aren’t involved in these things. What’s real to them is the money in their wallets — the rest is just a dream.

If a sleepwalker never had to wake up, that would be one thing. But there is an awakening coming, and the awakened sleepwalker is going to find himself in a very awkward situation. All the little problems — in Pittsburgh or Seattle or Washington — which he thought he could ignore or argue away because they weren’t real, because they didn’t involve him — by the time he finally realizes they are real, that he is involved, these problems will have grown and multiplied a million-fold. He will find himself in a world which has been made almost unlivable, a society which has been totally corrupted, an environment which has been irretrievably plundered, a racial milieu which has been irreversibly polluted. That is the danger in sleepwalking.

A few minutes ago I said there is a difference between us and most people, in that we know that the things happening around us are real and that they do involve us, while most people don’t. And yet a lot of us act as if we’re sleepwalking too. We say we know what’s going on and that we’re concerned about it, but all we’re willing to do about it is talk, and even then only to those we think will be sympathetic. We succumb to the temptation to play it safe.

When the Alliance asks people to get involved, to make a commitment, to participate in our program to reach other Americans, too often we hear in response the telltale sign of the sleepwalker: the excuse that one needs to think about it some more, or that one is in a sensitive position and has to be careful not to offend the government, or that one is too busy at the moment with one’s business or personal affairs or whatever.

All I can say to the people who make these excuses is — look again at this picture of the mayor of your nation’s capital. It’s real. It’s no dream. Whether you like it or not, you’re involved.

And if you wish someone could switch to another channel for you, I’ll tell you this: If there’s to be any channel-switching, we’ll have to do it ourselves. No one else will do it for us. And the only way we can do it is by working together, by participating actively in the Alliance’s program of education and recruitment.

May 22, 1977

* * *

Listen to the audio recording of this speech: America the Sleepwalker by William Pierce

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/america-the-sleepwalker/feed/ 0
William Pierce: America the Sleepwalker and The Trouble With People http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/william-pierce-america-the-sleepwalker-and-the-trouble-with-people/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/william-pierce-america-the-sleepwalker-and-the-trouble-with-people/#comments Fri, 12 Sep 2014 03:40:22 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1699 pierce

Two newly-digitized speeches by William L. Pierce released to commemorate his birth

by Michael Olanich

TODAY IS a day of remembrance. For most of us, it is a remembrance of the 3,000 people who perished needlessly in the terror attacks of 9/11/2001. We in the National Alliance remember this day for another reason as well: It is the birthday of perhaps the greatest American racial-nationalist of the 20th Century, William Pierce (pictured). To celebrate this day, we are officially publishing for the first time in digital form two important speeches by Dr. Pierce, America the Sleepwalker and The Trouble With People.

William Luther Pierce was a man of both great words and great acts. He lived a life worthy of the lines in the ancient Norse Havamal concerning “the fame of a dead man’s deeds.”

National . . . → Read More: William Pierce: America the Sleepwalker and The Trouble With People]]> pierce

Two newly-digitized speeches by William L. Pierce released to commemorate his birth

by Michael Olanich

TODAY IS a day of remembrance. For most of us, it is a remembrance of the 3,000 people who perished needlessly in the terror attacks of 9/11/2001. We in the National Alliance remember this day for another reason as well: It is the birthday of perhaps the greatest American racial-nationalist of the 20th Century, William Pierce (pictured). To celebrate this day, we are officially publishing for the first time in digital form two important speeches by Dr. Pierce, America the Sleepwalker and The Trouble With People.

William Luther Pierce was a man of both great words and great acts. He lived a life worthy of the lines in the ancient Norse Havamal concerning “the fame of a dead man’s deeds.”

National Alliance Media Director Kevin Alfred Strom says of these speeches, which he originally archived for Dr. Pierce in cassette form in the 1980s: “America the Sleepwalker was originally recorded at a National Alliance meeting in Arlington, Virginia on May 22, 1977. It serves as a wake-up call to Americans mired in materialism and in reality-denial, showing us that the plight in which we find ourselves is very real and may well be fatal, and that only our own awakening and strong action can save us. The Trouble With People, recorded on November 7, 1977, analyzes the true motivations of human action, reason and instinct, and shows a path to success in motivating and recruiting others to our cause.

“In these speeches, Dr. Pierce speaks again and again from a Cosmotheist perspective, giving the lie to those who claim that he was insincere in his religious beliefs. He emphasized, for example, ‘an understanding and an acceptance of our great Truth, which is that there is but one Reality, and that Reality is the Whole,’ and ‘the force pushing us onward in our task is the eternal and irresistible Life Force… It’s the upward driving force of the Creator seeking self-completion and it cannot be stopped.”

Below are the links to the audio version of the speeches; the transcribed text versions will be published tomorrow.

As I digitize and publish these speeches today, I remember and honor Dr. William Pierce.

America the Sleepwalker by William Pierce
The Trouble With People by William Pierce

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/william-pierce-america-the-sleepwalker-and-the-trouble-with-people/feed/ 0
William Pierce: Born September 11, 1933 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/william-pierce-born-september-11-1933/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/william-pierce-born-september-11-1933/#comments Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:31:36 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1697 William-Pierce-dual-portrait

by Kevin Alfred Strom

SEPTEMBER 11 is the day of William Luther Pierce’s birth. I remember him as my true friend, my most valued mentor, and my greatest teacher. He was a unique and gifted man who saw more clearly than almost all of his contemporaries the true nature of reality, the plight of our people, and the purpose of our lives in this Universe. We in the National Alliance remember his life on this day; we reflect on the truths he brought to light; and we renew once again our dedication to the only cause that really matters — the cause of the upward evolution of our race, which is the cause of Life itself.

The illustration presented here incorporates a newly-discovered and never-before-published hand-colored photograph of William Pierce as a very young . . . → Read More: William Pierce: Born September 11, 1933]]> William-Pierce-dual-portrait

by Kevin Alfred Strom

SEPTEMBER 11 is the day of William Luther Pierce’s birth. I remember him as my true friend, my most valued mentor, and my greatest teacher. He was a unique and gifted man who saw more clearly than almost all of his contemporaries the true nature of reality, the plight of our people, and the purpose of our lives in this Universe. We in the National Alliance remember his life on this day; we reflect on the truths he brought to light; and we renew once again our dedication to the only cause that really matters — the cause of the upward evolution of our race, which is the cause of Life itself.

The illustration presented here incorporates a newly-discovered and never-before-published hand-colored photograph of William Pierce as a very young boy, recently found in the National Alliance archives by the Alliance’s Director, Will Williams. I don’t think I am mistaken when I say that I see a surprising degree of the seriousness and strength of the man to come in the face of the child.

If our race survives this dark time, the name of William Luther Pierce will be remembered as one of the very few Great Ones who offered their strength, their wisdom, and their upward-lifting hands to our people, and showed us that the spiral staircase of our DNA itself is the only exit from the labyrinth of death, despair, and materialism in which we find ourselves today.

On this day, let us remember these words of William Pierce:

“We must reach out to our people. We must alert them. We must educate them. We must encourage them. We must inspire them. And here’s a beautiful, wonderful thing: When you reach out to other people to encourage them and inspire them, you yourself will be encouraged and inspired. When you find out how many other people there are who share our concerns, our feelings, our values, our sense of responsibility, you cannot help but be encouraged. Even the hatred that you encounter from some people — especially from people in the controlled media — will be encouraging. For you will understand that they would not hate us so much if they did not fear us. And the reason that they fear us is that deep inside them they know that what we say is true. So let’s get out there — all of us — and start looking for encouragement!”

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/william-pierce-born-september-11-1933/feed/ 0
Zionism II: Practice http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/zionism-ii-practice/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/zionism-ii-practice/#comments Thu, 11 Sep 2014 02:03:53 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1689 Arab Political Prisoners

Aggression, Torture, Mass Murder

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE TREATMENT of the Arab inhabitants of Palestine by the Jewish conquerors of that unfortunate country provides an excellent example of Zionism in practice. (ILLUSTRATION: Arab political prisoners stand at attention under barbed-wire nets, in one of dozens of Israeli concentration camps for Arab dissidents. Arabs, having virtually no political rights in Israel, are often imprisoned for indefinite periods without a trial. The only country in the world with more political prisoners than Israel is the Soviet Union.)

After Zionist political pressure had resulted in the United Nations resolution of November 29, 1947, calling for the partitioning of Palestine and the handing over of a large portion of Palestine to the Jews as a “homeland,” war broke out. The Jews quickly moved to seize . . . → Read More: Zionism II: Practice]]> Arab Political Prisoners

Aggression, Torture, Mass Murder

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE TREATMENT of the Arab inhabitants of Palestine by the Jewish conquerors of that unfortunate country provides an excellent example of Zionism in practice. (ILLUSTRATION: Arab political prisoners stand at attention under barbed-wire nets, in one of dozens of Israeli concentration camps for Arab dissidents. Arabs, having virtually no political rights in Israel, are often imprisoned for indefinite periods without a trial. The only country in the world with more political prisoners than Israel is the Soviet Union.)

After Zionist political pressure had resulted in the United Nations resolution of November 29, 1947, calling for the partitioning of Palestine and the handing over of a large portion of Palestine to the Jews as a “homeland,” war broke out. The Jews quickly moved to seize as much of the Arab portion of Palestine as they could, in addition to the portion awarded to them in the UN resolution.

In the Jewish land-grabbing campaign which followed, unrestrained terror was used to induce Palestinian villagers to flee their land, leaving it to be taken over by Jews. The occupants of entire Arab villages were massacred by the Jews for this purpose.

Dozens of Palestinian refugee children were killed when Israeli terror-fliers — in U.S. supplied F4 Phantom jets — bombed this refugee housing project in Lebanon last year.

Dozens of Palestinian refugee children were killed when Israeli terror-fliers — in U.S. supplied F4 Phantom jets — bombed this refugee housing project in Lebanon last year.

 

Jews consider the Palestinians whose land they stole a nuisance to be exterminated. Although the Zionist-controlled U.S. news media often give brief reports of the Israeli terror-bombing of the refugee camps and even show pictures of damaged buildings, they never let Americans see things like the Arab refugee children burned by napalm or the mutilated victims of Zionist murder squads.

Jews consider the Palestinians whose land they stole a nuisance to be exterminated. Although the Zionist-controlled U.S. news media often give brief reports of the Israeli terror-bombing of the refugee camps and even show pictures of damaged buildings, they never let Americans see things like the Arab refugee children burned by napalm or the mutilated victims of Zionist murder squads.

The Jewish terrorists invoked the Talmud to justify their atrocities against the Arabs. According to the teachings of the rabbis, they pointed out, “the earth was created only for the sake of the Jews,” (Vayikra Rabba 36). Therefore, it was permissible to slaughter the goyim (non-Jews) like the cattle they were, if the Jews might benefit thereby.

One of the more infamous instances of the application of this theory is the massacre at Deir Yassin. On the night of April 9-10, 1948, under the cover of a truce between Zionist and Arab forces in the area, Jewish terrorists occupied the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin and began systematically murdering all the Arab men, women, and children on whom they could lay their hands. Many of the victims were horribly mutilated by the sadistic Jews, and their corpses were afterward thrown down the village well to poison it. Altogether 254 Arabs were murdered in Deir Yassin that night.

Nazi concentration-camp victims? No, these are the corpses of Arab villagers butchered by Jewish terrorists at Deir Yassin.

Nazi concentration-camp victims? No, these are the corpses of Arab villagers butchered by Jewish terrorists at Deir Yassin.

When morning came the Jews rounded up more than 100 Arabs who had survived the massacre by hiding in cellars or to the surrounding orange groves.

These Arabs were tied together and taken to the Jewish quarter of Jerusalem, where they were forced to take part in a Jewish “victory parade.” As the roped Arab prisoners were led through the streets, Jewish mobs spit at them and showered them with stones — in a manner reminiscent of the way they had treated another prisoner more than 1,900 years ago, as he was being led to his execution.

The Arab survivors of Deir Yassin were not executed, however, but were turned loose and hastened on their way with a volley of small arms fire directed at their feet, so that they could spread the story of the massacre to other Arabs and terrify them into abandoning their land.

* * *

From Attack! No. 42, 1976

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/zionism-ii-practice/feed/ 0
The Murderers of Edgar Steele http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-murderers-of-edgar-steele/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-murderers-of-edgar-steele/#comments Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:00:21 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1686 victorville_fcc

American Dissident Voices broadcast of September 6, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THIS WEEK the murderous, filthy band of criminals and thugs that styles itself the federal government of the United States of America — and the even more evil and lawless entity that issues its marching orders — murdered a colleague of mine: the writer, activist, and “attorney for the damned,” Edgar Steele. (ILLUSTRATION: The Federal Correctional Complex in Victorville, California, where Edgar Steele was sent to die.)

Edgar J. Steele, who shared the podium with me on several occasions in New Orleans and Hillsboro, West Virginia and delivered some of the most moving words I have ever heard in defense of our race and nation, died in his cell, alone and in anguish; according to . . . → Read More: The Murderers of Edgar Steele]]> victorville_fcc

American Dissident Voices broadcast of September 6, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THIS WEEK the murderous, filthy band of criminals and thugs that styles itself the federal government of the United States of America — and the even more evil and lawless entity that issues its marching orders — murdered a colleague of mine: the writer, activist, and “attorney for the damned,” Edgar Steele. (ILLUSTRATION: The Federal Correctional Complex in Victorville, California, where Edgar Steele was sent to die.)

Edgar J. Steele, who shared the podium with me on several occasions in New Orleans and Hillsboro, West Virginia and delivered some of the most moving words I have ever heard in defense of our race and nation, died in his cell, alone and in anguish; according to his friends “drugged out of his mind” against his will; and callously denied the medical treatment he so desperately needed. One friend he had made in the hellhole that is the federal prison in Victorville, California, was conveniently sent away just before Mr. Steele was shot up with dope and killed. Since his nightmare existence in Victorville began, he was never allowed, not even once, to receive a visit from his loving and devoted wife Cyndi. From that day forward until his death on Thursday, he was denied the right to look into her eyes as they spoke, denied the touch of her hands, and denied her embrace — an act of unspeakable cruelty.

The Victorville complex has been described as a “roach motel” — the inmates go in alive, but they don’t come out that way — where “troublesome” prisoners are sent to be forgotten, never heard from again, and, in due time, die.  Edgar Steele himself called it the “Auschwitz of America” (Auschwitz was a WWII labor camp in Poland where many thousands died of typhus due to a near-total lack of medical and other supplies after Allied bombings of supply lines). It’s a place known to have, in Steele’s own words, a “high number of inmate deaths arising from other inmate murders” — and toxic drinking water. There are about 1300 inmates there — and six of them made the newspaper headlines by dying there in just the last 11 months, some violently, some because of lack of medical care. And those are just the ones who made it into the papers.

Edgar Steele was a man with a Menckenesque wit, razor-sharp logic, and the courage,  honesty, and philosophical integrity to stand up for right even when wrong was triumphing all around him. He was a successful lawyer and had much to lose by challenging the powers that be and breaking the “sacred” taboos of this dark time. He defended Pastor Richard Butler, whose Aryan Nations church was slated for destruction by Jewish groups. He defended those with little hope and less money who were being persecuted because they spoke some Politically Incorrect words that the tyranny has forbidden us to speak. His eyes were opened. A hater of no man, he saw the actions of the real haters in planning and executing the ongoing genocide of White people, and he spoke up boldly to awaken Americans to their danger. And he did not hesitate to name the driving force — Jewish power — behind that hatred. He spoke via radio, and began a popular Web site and email newsletter for his increasingly popular writings. He spoke at David Duke’s European-American conferences. He appeared at National Alliance events. He wrote a book — Defensive Racism — to communicate to Whites the extremity of their plight and the urgent need for corrective action.

In 2004, current National Alliance Director Will Williams sent Edgar Steele a collection of recordings of American Dissident Voices broadcasts by William Pierce, the founder of the Alliance. The following, in part, is Edgar Steele’s response to that gift, some of which was, sadly, prophetic of his own fate:

‘I spent this past weekend with Dr. William L. Pierce, founder of the National Alliance. In fact, he had an extended visit with my whole family.

‘…Mind you, I always found his writing to be cogent and to the point. However, his verbal delivery adds a dimension of clarity and persuasiveness that is not apparent in the written word. What Pierce had to say four and five years ago is even more compelling today. The issues are the same, but substantially worse. I can all but hear him talking about the need to drive a stake through the heart of today’s Bush Administration.

‘Always, Pierce spoke forcefully about taking back America and reversing the drive toward diversity and multiculturalism. More than anyone else, perhaps, Pierce spoke endlessly about the role of Jews in the ongoing destruction of America.

‘…Go [to nationalvanguard.org ] for a posting there just today about the ADL’s incredible demand that political dissenters on the Internet be punished: [The ADL declare] “Hate on the Internet cannot be entirely unregulated. Law enforcement officials… should actively police the web, preventing and punishing online… libel and defamation.”

‘”Hate” and “libel and defamation” are the code words used by the ADL when it speaks of the content of newsletters like the one you now are reading. If the ADL has its way, as it eventually will, I will be shut down and imprisoned for these irregular mutterings [emphasis ours -- Ed.] and you will hear nothing but the unadulterated party line and outright lies now fed you by the mainstream media and your “elected” representatives. This is the very sort of thing that people like Dr. Pierce and I have been fighting for years now. It is the silence of most Americans that makes it possible for such an exceedingly small minority to be regimenting us in this fashion.

‘I was privileged to be the first to speak at length in the new Pierce Memorial Hall in Hillsboro, West Virginia two months ago, during the NA’s semiannual Leadership Conference. It sounds hokey, but it seemed as though Dr. Pierce’s spirit was there with us. I certainly felt his presence as I stood in what should have been his place and spoke to his followers about individual initiative in the ever-growing police state of America.

‘…In deciding whether to support the current American regime, there is very little that one need remember:

‘Remember that Nazi “war criminals” were hanged, yet there were no founded allegations of torture by them. Contrast that with America’s official program of torture which was approved at the highest levels. And performed in your name.

‘Remember that the Nuremberg war crimes trials held that the most heinous of war crimes occurs when one country militarily invades another without provocation. Even America’s hand-picked 9-11 commission, chosen to whitewash the Administration, concluded there was no connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

‘Remember the nonstop lies that have come to us from Washington, DC in recent years.

‘Remember the economic abyss we now face.

‘Remember the race war that rages in American streets, a war which will only worsen as the tide of demographics relentlessly rolls over us.

‘Remember how our youth have been subverted, corrupted and destroyed at every turn by those to whom we entrusted our children.

‘Remember how our comrades continue to be picked up and imprisoned on the flimsiest of excuses.

‘Remember the countless fine young men and women who have been killed and maimed to advance the cause of Israel in Iraq and Afghanistan, while Israel merely stands by and continues to suck America dry, buying off her politicians with our own tax dollars.

‘The time has come to stand and be counted.

‘New America. An idea whose time has come.’

You can read Edgar Steele’s whole article on William Pierce at the White Biocentrism forum.

With a flair for making complex ideas easily understood — and entertaining his readers in the process — and moving them at a deep emotional level, and with a tractor-trailer load of credibility, Edgar Steele was making a difference. Someone in the post-9/11 hierarchy of our would-be  masters decided that Edgar Steele had to go; that Edgar Steele needed to be made an example of. And what they did to him far outstrips what they did to David Duke, to Chester Doles, or to me.

Edgar Steele was arrested in 2010 and convicted in 2011 of plotting to murder his wife, Cyndi, in order to collect a life insurance payoff and then run off with a supposed Ukrainian girlfriend. It was the strangest murder-for-hire prosecution in American history. To begin with, there could never have been any insurance payoff because the insurance in question had been cancelled. Second, even the alleged victim maintained from the very outset that her husband was innocent and that the evidence against him was a tissue of lies and impossible fabrications from beginning to end. Third, Cyndi Steele states she was well aware of Edgar Steele’s Ukrainian correspondence, so voluminous that it could never have been hidden from anyone living in the same home, which involved research for a book and had nothing to do with leaving Cyndi or “running away” with anyone.

The testimony against Mr. Steele came almost entirely from a ne’er-do-well handyman turned FBI asset named Larry Fairfax. According to Cyndi Steele, Larry Fairfax, possibly with the collusion of the FBI, stole a large quantity of silver that constituted part of the Steele family’s retirement savings. Fairfax, coached by the FBI, alleged at trial that he didn’t steal the silver, saying instead that it was paid to him by Edgar Steele in return for Fairfax planting a pipe bomb on Cyndi Steele’s car.

Third, FBI asset Fairfax didn’t just talk about planting a bomb on Cyndi Steele’s vehicle — he actually did plant such a bomb on her car, a live one that could easily have killed her and others if  an astute garage mechanic had not spotted it in time. Planting a live bomb that came within a millimeter of killing Cyndi Steele is an act that would hardly have been necessary if Fairfax was what he claimed to be: a reluctant pawn in Edgar Steele’s plot, righteously reporting all to the FBI. (Neither the FBI nor Fairfax ever warned Cyndi that she was in danger, by the way, as she blithely drove around, shuttling her family to the store and here and there, with instant bloody death right under the floorboards.) It seems to this writer far more likely that the FBI didn’t care if — or actually wanted — someone, or more than one, to end up dead. And those “someones” who would have ended up dead certainly included Edgar and Cyndi Steele. Their children were also likely to be killed by whoever was the real plotter. Looks like they got their dirty wish on Thursday. Larry Fairfax, admittedly working under FBI direction, is the only person who tried to kill Cyndi Steele — and no one knows that better than Cyndi Steele. And Larry Fairfax got a “sweetheart” deal in court and is a free man today.

At Edgar Steele’s farcical trial, the jury was not allowed to hear the most crucial defense evidence, as the sitting federal judge even disallowed evidence on the grounds that it might make the FBI and prosecutors “look bad.” For example, the FBI produced audio recordings of alleged conversations between Steele and Fairfax, in which Edgar Steele was supposedly offering to pay Fairfax to kill Cyndi. The Steele family hired two world-renowned audio experts to examine these recordings and they found an astonishing three hundred fifty anomalies indicating that the recordings had been tampered with through edits, splices, and deletions. The evidence was overwhelming that these recordings were outright frauds. Yet, again and again, in a barrage of nonsensical and contradictory rulings, both experts were utterly forbidden to speak a single word in front of the jury, leaving the jurors with the impression that neither Edgar Steele nor his defense team had any reason to doubt the FBI recordings or the tale they told about them. And there is strong evidence that Edgar Steele’s defense lawyer — a former federal prosecutor, and under the gun for his own crimes — threw the case to avoid prosecution himself.

Now that Edgar Steele is dead, the appeal he was planning — with an entirely new defense team — will never be heard. Neither, possibly, will the lawsuit against the lawyers who misrepresented him and participated in his outrageous railroading for a crime he did not commit. No jury will ever hear from the audio experts now. No jury will hear Cyndi Steele tell them why the claims made about her husband could not possibly be true. No jury will learn about the real would-be killer, Larry Fairfax, and his good friends at the FBI, and their good friends in the nice Jewish groups that are always ever-so-helpful to those paragons of “law enforcement” and their bank accounts.

And these murderers of Edgar Steele are no doubt wringing their blood-spattered hands with glee at the thought that no jury — and no one, ever — will hear the earnest and truthful and uplifting words of Edgar J. Steele again.

Well, they’d be wrong on those two counts.

We and many others are going to make sure that Edgar J. Steele’s words will be heard again and again for years to come. And you may be sure that in the New America, the real murderers will be put on trial, and a fully informed jury will hear all the evidence.

To honor the life and work of Edgar Steele, we’ll continue to promote his writings on National Vanguard and other National Alliance media like the White Biocentrism forum. His was a worthy life, and his works deserve to be read by the rising generations of young men and women who will one day free our people. Unlike others who have defamed or tried to exploit his name, we will not alter or add to his words.

Edgar J. Steele, in whatever part of timespace you may be, I hope you can hear my words and the words of the thousands of others whose lives you changed: Your life and your works will not be forgotten. Your love for your wife and family — and theirs for you — will not be forgotten. The identity of the liars who tore you from your children and your Cyndi will not be forgotten. The unspeakably filthy nature of their lies will not be forgotten. The identity of your murderers — in your last public statement, you said they “rhyme with ‘news'” — will not be forgotten. And the new nation — the New America — you helped to inspire will be born.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-murderers-of-edgar-steele/feed/ 0
Edgar Steele is Dead http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/edgar-steele-is-dead/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/edgar-steele-is-dead/#comments Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:18:16 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1685 Attorney Edgar J. SteeleGovernment murders Edgar Steele — can they get away with it?

by Edgar Steele Defense Fund and Cyndi Steele

TODAY, September 4, 2014, early afternoon, a California mortuary notified Mrs. Cyndi Steele that her husband Edgar was dead. At this time, specific circumstances regarding Mr. Steele’s death are being confirmed. The Free Edgar Steele web site and the Edgar Steele Defense Fund (ESDF) will release more information when available.

Mrs. Steele contacted the ESDF Board, saying she was utterly devastated by this information, and is furious that no Victorville representative contacted her in the last few days regarding his failing health and did not even call her regarding the death of her husband. It was cruel to allow the mortuary to make the call.

Based on the best knowledge at hand, the . . . → Read More: Edgar Steele is Dead]]> Attorney Edgar J. SteeleGovernment murders Edgar Steele — can they get away with it?

by Edgar Steele Defense Fund and Cyndi Steele

TODAY, September 4, 2014, early afternoon, a California mortuary notified Mrs. Cyndi Steele that her husband Edgar was dead. At this time, specific circumstances regarding Mr. Steele’s death are being confirmed. The Free Edgar Steele web site and the Edgar Steele Defense Fund (ESDF) will release more information when available.

Mrs. Steele contacted the ESDF Board, saying she was utterly devastated by this information, and is furious that no Victorville representative contacted her in the last few days regarding his failing health and did not even call her regarding the death of her husband. It was cruel to allow the mortuary to make the call.

Based on the best knowledge at hand, the following are the most likely causes of death: drug overdoses, persistently delayed, insufficient, improper medical treatment and medical neglect.  The federal government and Victorville Penitentiary bears responsibility for the lives of the inmates who reside there and has refused to be accountable for the decline in Edgar Steele’s health.

Some hours before Mrs. Steele was contacted by the mortuary, ESDF President Robert Magnuson received an email corroborating Ms. Steele’s concern for her husband’s health and safety that showed Mr. Steele’s health has been in a sharp decline for the past month, which fact was obscured, if not hidden by the federal government.

First, Mr. Steele was the victim of a false prosecution, then he was imprisoned in the most dangerous prison health in America. Then his wife was never allowed to visit him despite a court order allowing visitation. Then, his health was compromised because of  neglect, and finally, the reports came in that he had been drugged out of his mind earlier this week, which was the final blow that killed him. Call it anything else you like, but it is murder.

The facts of this tragic situation will be disclosed as the information is gathered.

Note by Cyndi Steele:

Following is the post I made today on my personal Facebook page and I share the below asking each of you to pay particular attention to the last statement in quotes:

I like how when you go to post on Facebook, the thing they ask is what is on your mind. I don’t think anyone really wants to know what is on my mind today, because it isn’t pretty and only the ones that know what my family and I have been through for the past four years will have an inkling of the heartbreak and devastation I have been hit with today.

My three children have lost their loving father and I have lost my husband, best friend and the love of my life. There is so much that is wrong with his death, but would take a novel to explain. What is sad is that even then there are people that won’t understand the heartbreak and devastation regarding my husband’s death; not only because of the fact that he has died, but for the reasons and circumstances that he had died and in the manner he died.

Anyway, that aside, I’m taking this time to say good bye Ed. I love you then, I love you now and I always will until the day I die and can be with you. Wherever you are, I can only pray that you know all this and can rest in peace.

For the reasons above, I leave you with this thought from an earlier post in hopes that you take it to heart and find a way to let everyone close and dear to your heart know how much you LOVE THEM.

“CHERISH EVERY MOMENT AND EVERY PERSON IN YOUR LIFE, BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHEN IT WILL BE THE LAST TIME YOU SEE SOMEONE.”

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/edgar-steele-is-dead/feed/ 4
The Oslo Syndrome and White Self-Haters http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-oslo-syndrome-and-white-self-haters/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-oslo-syndrome-and-white-self-haters/#comments Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:09:14 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1683 privilege

by H. Millard

THE OSLO SYNDROME is the name used by Jewish writer Kenneth Levin to specifically describe the psychology of Jews who hate Jews, but the concept applies to all groups as it is a basic human psychological phenomenon which is related both to the Stockholm syndrome and the Battered Child syndrome.

Essentially, what happens is that when a specific group of people is subjected to constant hatred, demonization, and abuse, some in the group will often have their spirits broken and be beaten down like whipped dogs, and they’ll lose self-esteem and group-esteem, and feel worthlessness and be full of despair.

These despairing individuals, with the Oslo syndrome, won’t blame those who are harming them, but will actually take the side of those harming them against others in their own group. Levin posits the . . . → Read More: The Oslo Syndrome and White Self-Haters]]> privilege

by H. Millard

THE OSLO SYNDROME is the name used by Jewish writer Kenneth Levin to specifically describe the psychology of Jews who hate Jews, but the concept applies to all groups as it is a basic human psychological phenomenon which is related both to the Stockholm syndrome and the Battered Child syndrome.

Essentially, what happens is that when a specific group of people is subjected to constant hatred, demonization, and abuse, some in the group will often have their spirits broken and be beaten down like whipped dogs, and they’ll lose self-esteem and group-esteem, and feel worthlessness and be full of despair.

These despairing individuals, with the Oslo syndrome, won’t blame those who are harming them, but will actually take the side of those harming them against others in their own group. Levin posits the notion that some Jews living among Palestinians and identifying with and taking the side of the Palestinians against their fellow Jews exhibit the Oslo syndrome. Now, given the poor way Israel treats the Palestinians one can certainly question Levin’s analysis that Jews hating Jews in this regard have the Oslo syndrome. Instead, the case can be made that such Jews simply understand right from wrong as these terms are used in a universal sense. Nevertheless, Levin’s larger and perhaps inadvertent point remains by extension that any adult individuals and groups of adult individuals — and not just Jews and Jewish groups — can have the same psychological symptoms often seen in children who are abused, or as Levin calls it, the Oslo syndrome..

Native Americans

We saw a similar phenomenon among American Indians, many of whom came to feel so worthless that they preferred to commit suicide rather than live as the worthless individuals they felt they were. In these cases, the psychological feelings of guilt, self-hate, and worthlessness were so great that to relieve these feelings — this very real, but unseen psychological pain — these individuals just ended their own lives. Others turned to alcohol. Still others just suffered silently and simply stopped trying to live full lives. In most cases Indians blamed themselves and other Indians for their problems.

Suicide to relieve the psychological pain and feelings of guilt and worthlessness

It is worth emphasizing that at the root of the Oslo syndrome are feelings of self-hate, worthlessness, and guilt and that some individuals will strike out against their own people to relieve these negative feelings, and their pressure release valve is this ritual suicide or self-abnegation. Others will take a more direct route and simply end their lives. Those who relieve their feelings of worthlessness and guilt by striking out at their own people and by embracing the bias against their people will often feel “virtuous” in doing so.

It is well said that those who commit suicide don’t want to end their lives, they just want to end their psychological pain. Suicide is one way. Erasing oneself with drugs or alcohol is another. Siding with the group that is attacking your group is still another way. And there are others. The underlying psychological principle here is one of trying to release the pent-up psychological pressure of these feelings of despair, self-hate, guilt and worthlessness.

Battered Child syndrome

The link to Battered Child syndrome is clear and throws light on the adult manifestation of such a syndrome. A child who is battered, either physically or psychologically, will often not see that the problem is not with himself or herself but with the parent or parent figure who has full control over the child and who is the abuser. The child internalizes the abuse, feels guilty, and blames himself or herself and believes that if only he or she acted better or was a better child, the parent or parent figure would stop abusing the child. In other words, the child believes he or she is always at fault and is worthless.

White self-haters

Whites who apologize for being White or who forgive non-White attackers often have the Oslo syndrome.

You’ve no doubt seen the stories of Whites forgiving Blacks who tried to kill them because they’re White and how these beaten-down Whites will often accept the Black bias against Whites. You’ve probably also read about White parents who forgive Blacks who kill the White children of the White parents — and these White parents then say they “understand” and sometimes even befriend the killers of their own White children. Such behaviors on the part of Whites are indicative of the Oslo syndrome.

Today, we see Whites attacked on many different levels in our society. There is a constant society-wide drumbeat demonizing Whites. We constantly hear, for example, that Whites haven’t earned what they have and that they only got it because of “White privilege” — or that except for White racism and hatred of Blacks, Blacks would be leading better lives. This is nothing less than psychological abuse of Whites similar to what we see in cases of child abuse. Whites are made to feel guilty for doing nothing more than being who and what they are by birth, yet any expressions of Whiteness or of their genetic identity or of feeling good about oneself are quickly denigrated as being signs of “racism” and White evil.

As with all psychological maladies, there is a continuum of self-hate and some of the symptoms and expressions of the Oslo syndrome in Whites are more subtle and may appear to the casual viewer as being virtuous. For example, when you see Whites who are hypersensitive to perceived insults to Blacks and who then attack their fellow Whites verbally or physically for their “racism,” you can be pretty sure you are seeing a person with the Oslo syndrome. The lives of such self-hating Whites are ones of self-abnegation.

And we see cases of some Whites not so much fearing that others will call them racist, but fearing that they may be secretly racist and as such they have let themselves down and that they must punish themselves. In fact, we can safely speculate that a lot of White suicides are from this feeling in some Whites that they have let themselves down or haven’t lived up to some societal, religious, or family standards regarding various norms including the societal demand that one not be a racist. So, instead of being racist, they obliterate themselves — or they live on and hate themselves, and relieve the pressure by transferring the hate to other Whites thereby proving to themselves that they are “good” people for attacking other Whites.

We’ll also see Whites trying to erase themselves and their kind by not having children, or by holding down the number of children they have, or by miscegenating and producing non-White children, or by adopting non-White children instead of White children. Hermann Goering’s great-niece says she had her tubes tied so she “would not pass on the blood of a monster.”

There are many ways this self-hate syndrome and similar self-hate neuroses can manifest themselves, but the goal for the individual is always to relieve that psychological pain of guilt for being White, and then to “make amends” for the “evil” — that you think you are born with because you are White — by somehow sacrificing yourself. Of course you can add in the Great White Mother and Great White Father complexes that I’ve written before as part of the subconscious motivations for adopting non-White children — and, usually, the Blacker the better. These folks wouldn’t want to adopt a Black baby that isn’t almost purple Black lest others not realize that the baby really is Black and that the adoptive White parents are truly “virtuous” and “righteous” individuals.

Staying mentally healthy and emotionally strong

So, what is a mentally healthy view of oneself? It is that you should be who you are born to be. Don’t ever apologize for being White. Don’t ever support non-Whites against Whites. Always remember that you have every right to be who and what you are. You have every right to identify as White and to feel good about yourself.

No one has a right to abuse you or insult you or attack you because you are White and if they do, you should not go hide in a corner but stand up for yourself in whatever way is appropriate, and which doesn’t put you in harm’s way. If remaining silent under the circumstances is the best choice for your survival and safety, then that’s what you should do. But, as you do so, never let the haters of Whites make you feel guilty and worthless for being White. You are exactly the opposite of that, just by being born White. You are an important person to yourself, your family, your ancestors and to all the rest of us Whites who are awake and aware. You are not alone. You are never alone. You are not the only one who feels as you do. There are millions of us.

Never let the haters of Whites make you feel isolated and out of sync with what is right and just. Your survival and the survival of our people — as proud White people who don’t want to be blended away genetically, spiritually, or culturally is never unjust or out of sync. You have a right to be yourself. You have a right to your genetic identity. This is your planet as much as it is anyone else’s and no one has any more rights to anything than you do. That dirt under foot? It is yours. That tree? It is yours. No one got deeds to anything on this planet from Nature, and your rights come from Nature and (if you to choose to so believe) from Nature’s God.

Develop the mental strength and self-esteem to withstand those who hate Whites. Stay White. Breed White. Live White. Never criticize other Whites who are also awake and aware. Never side with non-Whites against Whites. Do not hate yourself or your fellow Whites.

(© 2014 H. Millard)

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics; all in Millard’s edgy style. They lead up to Homeless Jack’s Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Click here to buy. ISBN: 0-595-32646-3
Roaming the Wastelands ROAMING THE WASTELANDS- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9) H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235. “A fun–and sobering–thing to read” – Alamance Independent
The Outsider THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/the-oslo-syndrome-and-white-self-haters/feed/ 0
What Is So Wrong With White People? http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/what-is-so-wrong-with-white-people/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/what-is-so-wrong-with-white-people/#comments Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:21:12 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1680 your_home_palAsk the wrong questions, and you’ll always get the wrong answers; more of the verbal tricks used to bully Whites.

by Alpin MacLaren

“WHAT IS SO WRONG with non-Whites?” asked the email. “Why can’t we have them in our country?” A poor mind-numbed sheep was totally confused by my writings, and naturally he asked a confused question. When you do not have the right questions, it is impossible to get the right answers.

Let’s take an example. You are sitting in your living room, reading the latest translation of Homer’s Odyssey, and all at once your front door opens. In walks a stranger, and he says, “Hello!” He then turns and makes his way toward your kitchen. After the shock wears off, you hit your feet and quickly follow him.

“Hey!” you shout. “What do . . . → Read More: What Is So Wrong With White People?]]> your_home_palAsk the wrong questions, and you’ll always get the wrong answers; more of the verbal tricks used to bully Whites.

by Alpin MacLaren

“WHAT IS SO WRONG with non-Whites?” asked the email. “Why can’t we have them in our country?” A poor mind-numbed sheep was totally confused by my writings, and naturally he asked a confused question. When you do not have the right questions, it is impossible to get the right answers.

Let’s take an example. You are sitting in your living room, reading the latest translation of Homer’s Odyssey, and all at once your front door opens. In walks a stranger, and he says, “Hello!” He then turns and makes his way toward your kitchen. After the shock wears off, you hit your feet and quickly follow him.

“Hey!” you shout. “What do you think you’re doing?”

“Why, I am making myself at home here,” he replies with a smile. “I don’t have anywhere else to go right now, and this house matches my taste: warm and comfortable.”

“Get the hell out of my house!” you loudly say. Your temper is rising and the tramp can see that your finger is pointing towards the door.

“Well, are we having a demonstration of intolerance here?” asks the stranger with mock shock. “What is the matter with you? I have as much right to have a home as you do, don’t I? Why do you deny me my basic right to shelter and food? Who do you think you are?” He opens up the refrigerator and rummages around for something that looks appetizing. “Hmmm! I just love apple pie,” he says as he pulls out the pie tin and starts to eat like pig from a tough.

This tramp is using the very same type of reasoning that my simpleton emailer was using. What is wrong with anyone owning a home? Nothing! What is wrong with non-Whites? Nothing! These questions are completely beside the point. They seem to be related to the topic, but in reality they are not related at all.

Americans have been going through this Alice Through the Looking Glass existence for nearly 50 years. The reason that that the intrusive stranger should be denied access to your home is not to stop him from having a home. That is a completely different issue. You were sitting in your living room reading a book, not doing a thing to stop the stranger from getting a job and buying or renting his own home. It is his responsibility to do so, not your responsibility to make sure that he does it. The real question is: Who has the right to determine access rights to your home? Do you, or do you not, have the right to keep strangers out of your house? The answers to these questions were the important ones, not the answers to the misdirecting questions asked by the stranger. If you cannot defend your own home against intrusion by strangers, then you have been denied your right to have your own home. Unfortunately, the sort of muddy, disconnected “logic” used by the tramp is used every day in the media and in the classrooms of our land.

As for non-Whites, the correct question is not the one put forward by the emailer. That question is inflammatory and meaningless. The real question, the one that is never asked but which demands to be asked is: What is so wrong with White people? And from that, there follow several related questions: What is wrong with having White nations? What is wrong with having White cities? What is wrong with having White neighborhoods? What is wrong with having White schools? These questions are the ones to which the brainwashed masses are never exposed. These are the questions from which all of the propaganda spewing forth from the media is designed to distract us.

When the nonsensical media drivel is pushed aside, one is left with cold reality. Someone is trying to terminate us as a people. Every effort is being made to completely eliminate all of the White areas in the world. The term “predominantly White” has now become a dirty term — it implies something “evil” is going on there. White people insisting on living with other White people are classified as dirty and mean-spirited. Each and every action that would help to preserve the White race has been neatly categorized as “hate,” “intolerant,” “non-inclusive” and/or “racist.” That could not have happened by accident, and it could not have happened through the actions of friendly-minded people. It could only have happened through the planned actions of enemies of our people. When someone makes an effort to mend the obviously flawed logic at work in our society today, he or she is attacked with extreme antagonism by the media and their minions. This shows that the illogic and misinformation about race was not simply a mistake that was made that can easily be corrected through reasonable discussion and compromise. Those who originally created the problem, are frantically working just as hard today to make sure that the problem is not fixed.

Anytime someone tries to make you feel guilty for trying to preserve your White race, White neighborhood, White school, or White heroes, remember that no friend would do such a thing. Only someone who is filled with hate against you and your people would suggest that exterminating the White race would somehow make things better. It is self-evident that destroying the White breeding grounds in Europe and North America will destroy the White race itself. All promotion of “diversity,” multiculturalism,” and “inclusion” is directed at preparing the minds of White people to accept ideas that are lethal to their race. It is absurd to call self-preservation “hate.” It ridiculous to say that it is “evil” to have White neighborhoods or White countries. Beyond merely being inane, these things are dangerous attacks upon our continued existence. If our people accept these terribly illogical ideas as being valid, they will be exterminated by them.

By giving up the right to our own sovereign lands, we give up our right to produce our own young, and our right to raise our own young in an environment that expresses only our own cultural heritage. Over time, this would crush the once-great White race into oblivion.

We have spent enough time — far too much, really — pursuing the answers to the wrong questions. It is time to start pursuing the answers to the right questions. In fact, that time is long overdue!

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/what-is-so-wrong-with-white-people/feed/ 1
My House Fell Down Today http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/my-house-fell-down-today/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/my-house-fell-down-today/#comments Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:05:36 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1678 DSCN16451-1024x768_crop…am I an isopterophobe?

by H. Millard

CALL ME Joe.

My house fell down today. Now I’m out on the street with my family. We’re not alone; all of my neighbors’ houses have also fallen down and we’re all out here wondering what we can do next. Our government has turned its back on us. Your house may be next, because all across America they’re falling down now and the government that is supposed to be of, by, and for the citizens of this nation is cheapening citizenship by putting the non-citizen house destroyers on the same level as citizens.

It all started when a couple of termites moved into my house. Oh, they had no right to come in, but they said they were just looking for better lives for themselves in my house. They . . . → Read More: My House Fell Down Today]]> DSCN16451-1024x768_crop…am I an isopterophobe?

by H. Millard

CALL ME Joe.

My house fell down today. Now I’m out on the street with my family. We’re not alone; all of my neighbors’ houses have also fallen down and we’re all out here wondering what we can do next. Our government has turned its back on us. Your house may be next, because all across America they’re falling down now and the government that is supposed to be of, by, and for the citizens of this nation is cheapening citizenship by putting the non-citizen house destroyers on the same level as citizens.

It all started when a couple of termites moved into my house. Oh, they had no right to come in, but they said they were just looking for better lives for themselves in my house. They also said they would have stayed where they were before but things weren’t so great there. Seems all the houses were falling down. Well, I’m a compassionate guy — so I let them in. Then, more came and more and more and more. Finally, when I decided I had to do something about them, they told me that if I tried to get rid of them Jesus wouldn’t like it and besides they had a right to be there because, well, they were living creatures just like me. And, one even told me “Su casa es mi casa.”

Just before my house collapsed, the termites were marching up and down the street screaming that I was a “speciesist” and that they had a right to be in my house “because we all bleed blood” or bodily fluids of some color or other, and because we’re all living things and God loves us all and God hates fences and borders. How they knew what God likes and doesn’t like is beyond me, but, hey, what the hell. I think they may have gotten the God talk from Hillary Clinton or the other liberals who all seem to have discovered God this week. And, by golly, it turns out that God is a liberal. Yup. He loves illegal aliens and gay marriages and abortions and politicians who bonk interns. The other guy, the Devil, well, he’s a conservative.

When I tried to point out to my neighbors that the termites were the cause of our houses starting to lean over, some of them chastised me and told me that I shouldn’t make such broad statements and that not all termites were a problem. Besides, the termites were just doing work that we wouldn’t do. Also, there might be other reasons for the houses leaning over. Instead of pointing fingers at our fellow living creatures, said my neighbors, we should simply prop up our houses. After all, we don’t want to be called isopterophobes. “You’re not an isopterophobe are you Joe?” asked one squinty-eyed neighbor who was standing there with his cardigan draped across his shoulders.

I argued that it wasn’t my responsibility to have to try to sort out the good termites from the bad termites and that, since they were all in my house illegally, they should all just leave and that it was absurd to have to prop up my house while not getting to the root of the problem. After all, it was my house. I paid for it by doing jobs that Americans wouldn’t do. Few listened to me.

So there you have it. That’s how my house fell down.

Meanwhile, the newspapers are saying that 500,000 illegal aliens and their supporters marched in Los Angeles recently to protest our laws. The only thing that this demonstrated is that when you look the other way as criminals are filling up a city, that eventually they’ll demand that your laws not be obeyed and that their unwritten laws be the new way things are to be done.

Go conduct a poll in any prison and ask the prisoners and the guards if all the prisoners should be let loose. Guess who will win the poll? You’ll probably also have some prisoners telling you that you should give them dignity because they’re human beings and that Jesus wants them to be let loose. If the President and Congress are influenced by the illegal alien advocates on our streets, there may be hope for the criminals in our prisons to also get their way. Hey, it’s all about who can shout the loudest and turn out to march and protest, right? We’re not a nation of laws. That’s an old-fashioned Father Knows Best concept.

California Senator Barbara Boxer is now saying, out of one side or her mouth, that our borders should be protected. But, out of the other side of her mouth she’s saying that once people are able to get into this country, we should educate and medicate them and treat them as though they’re not criminals. You know, because they’re just here for better lives and to work. So, if a burglar breaks into Boxer’s home and then does some lawful things while inside, we should forget about the initial crime? And, if a murderer helps old ladies cross the street, that should excuse his murders?

I guess I’m not very bright and maybe I’ve got this all wrong, but I just can’t see why citizens who have worked hard to make our homes, our neighborhoods and our nation nice should have to have it ruined by those who won’t play by our rules and who think they have a right to ruin what we’ve built. I mean, don’t we as citizens have certain rights to go along with the responsibilities the government asks us to shoulder? Aren’t we, as members of the club, the ones who our government should be listening to?

Isn’t a great country built from the ground up by citizens holding up their end of the bargain, playing by the rules, and by maintaining the fabric of society? What happens when millions don’t uphold the law — when millions flaunt the law — when millions don’t uphold their end of the bargain — when millions don’t play by the rules — when millions don’t maintain the fabric of society? Isn’t a nation, just as is the case with a single house, built on a strong foundation — one citizen or one brick at a time — and isn’t the whole endangered if that foundation doesn’t hold up the house?

The U.S. is becoming a lawless nation run by, or influenced by, criminals — to the detriment of law-abiding citizens. What we’re starting to see more and more clearly is that the U.S. today is becoming a far larger and newer version of Chicago in the ’20s, or Tombstone before Wyatt Earp. Corruption in government high and low, an underground economy, bribes, cheating, lying, a pervasive anti-social attitude and a belief that you should get whatever you can by whatever means you want and screw everyone else, are now a common part of post-American America.

The U.S. is truly at a crossroads. I know we’ve all heard that expression so many times before that it is easy to discount it now, but this really is one of those moments. The U.S. has been invaded by millions of non-citizens and they are destroying the American way of life. Citizens are being attacked and killed on the streets and in their homes by illegal aliens who then flee back to their own nations. Our government is doing virtually nothing to protect citizens.

There are so many illegal aliens here now that they aren’t even bothering to hide in the shadows as they demand that they be given rights like those of citizens. Rights? They’re illegal aliens. They’re non-citizens. They should be deported.

(© 2006 H. Millard)

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics; all in Millard’s edgy style. They lead up to Homeless Jack’s Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Click here to buy. ISBN: 0-595-32646-3
Roaming the Wastelands ROAMING THE WASTELANDS- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9) H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235. “A fun–and sobering–thing to read” – Alamance Independent
The Outsider THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/09/my-house-fell-down-today/feed/ 0
Conservatism: Witness the Witless http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/conservatism-witness-the-witless/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/conservatism-witness-the-witless/#comments Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:00:45 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1674 RPO-19690809a

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 30, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WITNESS THE WITLESS call of the White American conservative:

“Eugenics is an elitist plot to exterminate the Black race.”

“Abortion should be opposed because it is drastically limiting the number of Black births.”

“Martin Luther King was a Republican.”

“Democrats are the real racists. Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and he was a Republican.”

“Black people and Latinos and Muslims need sound money and the Constitution too!”

And the most witless of all: “It’s not about race! If Obama was White, I’d feel the same. It’s not about race! It’s about illegal immigrants breaking the law!” According to today’s conservatives, nothing is ever about race. They pride themselves on being more color-blind than the most fanatical liberal, more “anti-racist” than . . . → Read More: Conservatism: Witness the Witless]]> RPO-19690809a

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 30, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WITNESS THE WITLESS call of the White American conservative:

“Eugenics is an elitist plot to exterminate the Black race.”

“Abortion should be opposed because it is drastically limiting the number of Black births.”

“Martin Luther King was a Republican.”

“Democrats are the real racists. Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and he was a Republican.”

“Black people and Latinos and Muslims need sound money and the Constitution too!”

And the most witless of all: “It’s not about race! If Obama was White, I’d feel the same. It’s not about race! It’s about illegal immigrants breaking the law!” According to today’s conservatives, nothing is ever about race. They pride themselves on being more color-blind than the most fanatical liberal, more “anti-racist” than the most extreme multiracialist. (ILLUSTRATION: The eminent writer and classical scholar Revilo P. Oliver, once a leading conservative, abandoned conservatism when he realized it had failed in all its professed goals and had become an instrument of our enemies.)

The White race is threatened with extinction today, but conservatism — which once stood for racial integrity and the continued existence of our race — has switched sides and has now openly embraced multiracialism and White genocide.

Conservatives today are heavily fixated on avoiding being called “racists,” which is the political equivalent of the Mafia’s “kiss of death” for any movement which wants to be popular among the lemmings these days. And conservatives, despite the fact that demographics and Jewish media control have doomed their movement and stripped them of most of their power, need popularity to hold on to what income and sinecures they have left.

Almost all non-Whites in America, no matter how conservative some might be in personal habits or family traditions, cleave to the liberal line and the Democrat party — because the Democrats are the party of White dispossession, payoffs to the underclass, and wide open borders. There is no hope that these people can ever be brought to support American conservatism. The more tradition-minded Blacks have their churches. The more tradition-minded non-White immigrants have their Asian or Muslim or nationality- or race-based groups to fall back on. Their conservatism is based on conserving their culture and preserving their people. Both liberal universalism and the new universalist, non-racial conservatism are alien to them. True belief in “everyone-is-equal” universalism is limited almost exclusively to White folks, whom the more intelligent non-Whites probably, and rightly, regard as crazy.

Nevertheless conservatives try to out-liberal the liberals when it comes to race. They make sure that the very few Blacks or Mestizos who show up at conservative events are highlighted in their publications. They lionize the very mediocre Herman Cain to prove to us how “non-racist” they are.

Despite the fact that almost all American conservatives are White, the conservatives and Republicans would rather have a limb amputated than do anything to secure the continued existence of White people — or even admit that they represent White interests. They can get away with this because they know that White Americans have nowhere else to go politically. They take Whites for granted. They can keep all their White support by just being a little less anti-White than the liberals. And they can avoid being called “racist” by the Jewish media by taking the same tack — shouting “slow down a bit” at some of the more outrageous anti-White policies of the regime in Washington, but never taking effective action or even speaking out against White genocide — or telling us who’s responsible for it.

Conservatives try to position themselves as the “truly color blind” people, as opposed to the very race-conscious self-hating liberals and the “race hustlers” like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. The unstated assumption is that being “color blind” (meaning race blind) is a moral good — and being racially conscious is a moral evil.

What a change from the days when the great Revilo P. Oliver — an open partisan of Western man and his continued biological survival — was a leading light of conservatism, helping to found the John Birch Society and writing for conservative journals like National Review, American Opinion, and The American Mercury. By the 1960s, Oliver realized that, in his words, “conservatism was a cause not only lost but unworthy” — and in the years since then, with the takeover of the conservative movement by the Jewish-led neoconservatives, it has only gotten worse. In 1966, Oliver quit conservatism, and quit pulling the punches he was increasingly required to pull by conservative editors and leaders, and began speaking frankly and forthrightly about the existential plight of our race. By 1969, he was helping William Pierce found the National Youth Alliance, predecessor to the National Alliance, and telling all who would listen that only a radical affirmation that we were White — and that we intended to survive as Whites in this hostile world — could possibly save us. And he identified the Jewish power structure as our principal opponent and the primary engine of our destruction.

The conservative opposition to multiracialism back in the 1960s and 1970s has now totally collapsed as the Jewish neoconservatives, who are enthusiastic multiracialists, have taken over. But even the old-line traditional conservatives were doomed to fail. For fear of being called “racists” by the Jewish-owned mass media, even then they fought with one arm tied behind their backs. The old-line conservatives could argue against Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Acts, for example, on every ground but the most crucial one. They could say that many of the people pushing these forced association laws were Communists, and that was true. They could argue that forced association and ‘fair employment’ laws were unconstitutional, which was also true. They could point out the undoubtedly bad economic consequences of hiring unqualified non-Whites in our businesses and industries. But what they wouldn’t do and what they didn’t do was say, and I paraphrase Dr. Oliver:

“We are Americans, White people of Western civilization. Our values, and the great culture and science and wealth we have created, are ours and ours alone. Our survival depends on us keeping them for ourselves, and on keeping the land that sustains us, as our property and no one else’s. Furthermore, the very existence of that culture and that science depends on our continued existence, and we cannot risk losing what we are by mixing with other and incompatible races. All that we and our ancestors built depends on us — and we in turn depend on it for our sustenance and progress. No group of outsiders will be allowed to take our land or corrupt our blood, whether by force or by stealth, and any who attempt to do so will pay the ultimate penalty.”

But the conservatives didn’t take that position; they didn’t stand their ground. One can hardly call them ‘conservatives’ at all, since they absolutely failed to conserve. They gave up ground so fast that the conservatives’ position on matters of race is hardly distinguishable from that taken by radical multiracialists just 40 years ago, and in fact we now have soi-disant conservatives claiming to be the true intellectual heirs of the Black Communist agitator ‘Martin Luther’ King.

A better name for the conservatives would be the comfortable cowards. As long as they could move to a relatively safe suburb, smoke their imported cigars, puff themselves up with dogmatic 17th-century morality, engage in purposeless militarism and utterly empty patriotism to a flag and not a people, they were content. They like the comfortable reservation their enemies have allowed them in payment for their treason, and in their softness they fear a direct battle with those enemies. So they never fight one. They just keep on making deals (with people who are much better at making deals than they are) and selling out their children’s future, right to the end. Eventually, the children of those conservatives will be a tiny and hated minority, most of them unable to advance into even the third tier of the new elite, and will be forced to live cheek by jowl with the lowest peons of the Third World underclass that the billionaire Jewish elite is importing to our country. Whites are being pushed down to the proletarian level everywhere in North America.

One especially egregious example of how conservatives are given false hope and offered false solutions was brought out on this program several years ago by the writer Hadding Scott:

“For years the Republican party has tried to smooth over the differences within its coalition by deceiving the pro-White supporters of the party into thinking that their stake in the party is greater than it actually is. One especially clear example of how persons of pro-White sentiment are fooled is the Jewish ex-Marxist David Horowitz. Horowitz has written several books with titles like Hating Whitey, intended to be sold a White readership — White people who of course are starved for recognition of some of their problems such as anti-White crime and anti-White discrimination. Any White person who cares about his race and reads Horowitz carefully, however — which most people do not do — will be disappointed to learn that Horowitz the Jew has no interest whatsoever in preserving the White race. On the contrary, he complains that the more blatant anti-White policies actually backfired and have increased racial separatism. That is the kind of thing that worries Horowitz; he is not interested in the survival of the White race at all. But this fact is missed by many readers, who seem to regard his books simply as collections of useful anecdotes for complaining about how ‘unfair’ things are, a typical conservative playpen activity.”

Pretending to be the ‘true’ exponents of ‘fair’ multiracialism will not stop the importation of cheap labor and the proletarianization of the White worker. It will not prevent the ever-more-numerous members of the more favored non-White groups from pushing our children out of the best schools. It will not close the wide open sluices of non-White immigration into the West. It will not stop the rape and sexual slavery of our children and women by peoples with a very different understanding of their value than we have. It will not stop the rising tide of non-White crime and corruption. It will not stop the open pandering to non-White interest groups by our careerist politicians. It will not stop the academic establishment’s pushing of multiracialist values on our students. It will not change the anti-White alien control of our mass media. Accepting the multiracialist values promulgated by people who want to kill you, and meekly asking for ‘fairness’ from those people and their employees is not a formula for success. It is a formula for death.

To all of you good people who are supporting efforts based on that formula, I urgently ask you to reconsider. At this late hour, only an affirmation that we are White and that we must do whatever is necessary to ensure that our race survives can save us. White people have an absolute non-negotiable right to exist, to organize and govern ourselves, to have our own exclusive territories for our nations and peoples, and to keep the products of our labor for ourselves and our posterity. Only by taking that uncompromising stand, and backing it up with all the wealth and will and power we can muster, do we have a chance to provide for future generations of our people. Only by stopping our pretenses and halting our retreat do we have a chance of being worthy descendants of our ancestors.

That is the message of the men and women of the National Alliance. As our society descends into darkness, we must be building alternative structures of community and communication and racial and cultural preservation, structures which will survive this dark time and emerge into a brighter future of our own making. We need your help.

Stay a part of the more timid efforts if you like, but with a goal of radicalizing and enlightening your co-workers there. Tell the other Whites in these groups about the Alliance. Support the Alliance with all you can afford in time and energy. Give as much as you can to the cause of our children’s future. Use your influence and intelligence to add to our efforts — and make them better. Take a stand. The half-measures and pretending of the conservatives are really a kind of lie, and a rather weak and ineffectual lie at that. The National Alliance represents the uncompromised truth.

Conservatism, even at its best, before the takeover by the Jewish neocons, was always doomed to fail. It was always a defensive, rear-guard action. It had no new vision of its own, no real vision at all except stopping change and keeping what we once had — at which it failed miserably.

The National Alliance, in contrast, tells the rising generation of young Whites, without weasel words or evasion, that they will be the last generation of Whites unless radical action is taken now. We tell them  truthfully that they have been lied to their entire lives by the academy and by the media. We show them that they have been fed a false religion from birth, whether that religion was universalist Christianity or the secular liberal faith in “equality.” We tell them the truth that no one else will tell them — that they are the heirs and last living representatives of the race which first measured the stars and set foot on the surface of another world, and that the future of Life in the universe depends on what they do, right here and right now. And we give them a vision of the great future, the world of unimaginable new discoveries, power, and progress, that can be if we take control of our nation — and our evolutionary destiny — once again. Only such a vision can save us, only such a vision can inspire the actions and sacrifices necessary for victory, and only the Alliance is giving the new generation that vision. Please join us — today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/conservatism-witness-the-witless/feed/ 2
Zionism I: Theory http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/zionism-i-theory/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/zionism-i-theory/#comments Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:55:06 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1667 Israeli AmbassadorExclusiveness, Belief in Superiority, Hostility

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE RESOLUTION by the General Assembly of the United Nations on November 10, equating Zionism and racism, has provoked a torrent of response in the news media. Much of this response has been deliberately deceptive, and there consequently exists a state of confusion in the average citizen’s mind as to just what Zionism is and what its relationship is, if any, with racism. (ILLUSTRATION: Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Chaim Herzog, sneers at “goyim” in the UN General Assembly as he contemptuously tears up their resolution condemning Zionism. It is arrogant behavior like this which has earned the Jews the well-deserved hatred of all the other peoples of the world.)

The Jewish response to the UN action, has been to deny that Zionism is . . . → Read More: Zionism I: Theory]]> Israeli AmbassadorExclusiveness, Belief in Superiority, Hostility

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE RESOLUTION by the General Assembly of the United Nations on November 10, equating Zionism and racism, has provoked a torrent of response in the news media. Much of this response has been deliberately deceptive, and there consequently exists a state of confusion in the average citizen’s mind as to just what Zionism is and what its relationship is, if any, with racism. (ILLUSTRATION: Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Chaim Herzog, sneers at “goyim” in the UN General Assembly as he contemptuously tears up their resolution condemning Zionism. It is arrogant behavior like this which has earned the Jews the well-deserved hatred of all the other peoples of the world.)

The Jewish response to the UN action, has been to deny that Zionism is racism and to charge to the contrary that anti-Zionism is merely a thinly veiled anti-Semitism. Jews maintain that Zionism, with its call for an exclusive Jewish homeland comprising Palestine and portions of other Arab countries, cannot be separated from Judaism and the Jewish people. In the words of Chaim Herzog, Israeli ambassador to the UN:

“Zionism… is the modern expression of the ancient Jewish heritage. The Zionist ideal, as set out in the Bible, has been and is an integral part of the Jewish religion.”

The Jews are essentially correct in asserting that one cannot be against Zionism without also being against Jews. Even though many Jews do not participate actively in any of the numerous Zionist political organizations, it is an undeniable fact that Jews, non-religious as well as religious ones, are nearly unanimous in their support for the government of Israel and for the political goals of Zionism.

Those who oppose Zionism or who are totally indifferent to it are an utterly insignificant minority. As Israel’s leaders are fond of boasting, “The Six Day War (of June 1967, in which the Jews seized Egypt’s Sinai, Jordan’s West Bank, and Syria’s Golan in a surprise assault on their Arab neighbors) Zionized world Jewry.”

Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, the organ of the powerful American Jewish Committee, says essentially the same thing: “It has become clearer and clearer that something has happened to the Jews of America: they have all been converted to Zionism.”

But is Zionism equivalent to racism? Jews are the very image of wounded innocence as they hotly deny this. They correctly point out that Jews have been the instigators, the financiers, the propagandists, the generals, and, to a great extent, the soldiers in the war against racism, both in the United States and in other parts of the world.

As just one example, the most important organization in America seeking to bring about racial mixing between Blacks and Whites, the National Association far the Advancement of Colored People, has been an almost exclusively Jewish enterprise from its founding by Jews in 1910 until the death of its last Jewish president, Kivie Kaplan, last year. A Jewish lawyer, Jack Greenberg, still heads the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, which has instigated most of the moves toward court-enforced racial mixing in the last 25 years, including the original school-integration decision by the Supreme Court in 1954, from which all of today’s forced-busing orders have stemmed.

And the record of votes by Jewish legislators in the Congress and statements by Jewish spokesmen in the media is clear: they overwhelmingly favor all moves, including the racial busing of school children, which bring about increased racial mixing.

In other countries it is the same story. In South Africa, for example, the crumbling of the government’s policy of apartheid and the decision to abandon Rhodesia are the direct result of Jewish pressure. Harry Oppenheimer, the Jewish multibillionaire who controls the De Beers diamond mines, practically all of South Africa’s gold mines, her uranium industry, and a dozen other South African industries as well, has used his enormous wealth to buy control of many of the English-language news media in South Africa and has made substantial inroads into Afrikaans newspapers and magazines. He uses his media control to propagandize for Black-White “equality” and eventual Black rule for South Africa while simultaneously applying more direct pressures to government officials. He is supported in his efforts by South Africa’s very substantial Jewish community.

So, if nearly all Jews are Zionists and if nearly all Jews believe in racial mixing, how can Zionism be a form of racism?

In trying to answer this question, it is helpful to consider what a few prominent Zionists have had to say about Zionism. Moses Hess (1812-1875) is regarded as the real father of the modern, political form of Zionism. In his book Rome and Jerusalem, published in 1862, he wrote:

“We Jews shall always remain strangers among the goyim (Gentiles)… It is a fact that the Jewish religion is above all Jewish nationalism… Each and every Jew, whether he wishes it or not, is automatically, by virtue of his birth, bound in solidarity with his entire nation… One must be a Jew first and a human being second.”

Hess was more a Jewish nationalist than a Jewish racist — although he clearly did consider Jewishness to be a matter of birth rather than conviction. Other Zionists were much more explicit on this point. Louis Brandeis, a former U.S. Supreme Court justice and a leading Zionist, stated it succinctly: “Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or his shade of belief, is necessarily a member.”

The Zionist historian Simon Dubnow wrote in his book, The Foundation of National Judaism (published in 1906):

Assimilation is common treason against the banner and ideals of the Jewish people… But one can never ‘become’ a member of a natural group, such as a family, a tribe, or a nation. One may attain the rights or privileges of citizenship with a foreign nation, but cannot appropriate for himself its nationality too. To be sure, the emancipated Jew in France calls himself a Frenchman of Jewish faith. Would that mean, however, that he became a part of the French nation, confessing to the Jewish faith? Not at all. Because in order to be a member of the French nation one must be a Frenchman by birth, one must be able to trace his genealogy back to the Gauls, or to another race in close kinship with them, and finally one must also possess those characteristics which are the result of the historic evolution of the French nation. A Jew, on the other hand, even if he happened to be born in France and still lives there, in spite of all these, he remains a member of the Jewish nation, and whether he likes it or not, whether he is aware or unaware of it, he bears the seal of the historic evolution of the Jewish nation.

All three Zionists quoted above may be correctly regarded as racists, in that they reject the prevailing notion of the day that only the individual has any real significance and that it is wicked even to take into consideration the biological and cultural connections of the individual to a “natural group” (to use Dubnow ‘s term) of which he is a member.

It can be argued, nevertheless, that Jewish racism is at least a little different from the racism of most other peoples, in that it does place relatively less emphasis on purely biological connections and relatively more on other tribal connections: a shared culture, history, and attitude toward the non-Jewish world.

But this is to be expected in a people who exhibit as much biological diversity as the Jews do. They have absorbed physical traits from many of the other races among whom they have lived, until today, although most Jews still have many racial factors in common, they cannot be easily classified as a distinct race — and certainly not as a homogeneous race.

That which defines the Jews is only partly racial. They are also a partly national, partly religious, partly historical, partly cultural entity.

Indeed, because Jews are much more uniform psychically than physically, it is very difficult to decide whether they are more nearly a racial entity or a cultural entity. But that may be an irrelevant point. The fact is that Jews, now and always, have regarded themselves as a distinct, separate, and very special category of people — the “chosen people,” the “people of God,” and, as such, superior to all other peoples of the earth.

This idea that all Jews, whatever the country of their birth, are members of a single tribe, separate from and superior to all others, is the central theme of Zionism and of Judaism. Nahum Goldmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, touched on it when he said:

Diaspora Jewry (all Jews outside Palestine) has to overcome the conscious or subconscious fear of so-called double loyalty. It has to be convinced that it is fully justified in tying up its destiny with Israel’s. It has to have the courage to reject the idea that Jewish communities owe loyalty only to the states where they live.”

Dr. Goldmann expressed himself more clearly in addressing the Jews of Germany, before World War II, attempting to persuade them to emigrate to Palestine:

Judaism can have nothing in common with Germanism, if we go by the standards of race, history, and culture, and the Germans have the right to prevent the Jews from intruding into the affairs or their volk… The same demand I raise for the Jewish volk, as against the German… The Jews are divided into two categories, those who admit that they belong to a race distinguished by a history thousands of years old, and those who don’t. The latter are open to the charge of dishonesty.

Nahum Goldmann, top Zionist leader. He speaks openly of a "Jewish race" and urges Jews everywhere to be loyal only to Israel.

Nahum Goldmann, top Zionist leader. He speaks openly of a “Jewish race” and urges Jews everywhere to be loyal only to Israel.

If the racism expressed by Goldmann in the above statements were all there is to it, it would be hard to find fault with Zionism. Racism — the feeling of belonging to a “natural group,” of owing loyalty to that group, of wanting to preserve its identity and promote its welfare, of preferring to associate with members of that group rather than with aliens — is a universal, natural, and healthy condition of mankind. Indeed, it is a natural condition of all living things, in a sense, and they all owe their very existence to its universality.

But Zionism — whether one prefers to call it Jewish nationalism or Jewish racism — goes far beyond that. It is a distorted racism, a perverted and predominantly negative racism, expressing itself more in hostility toward other peoples than in positive aspirations for the Jewish people.

This has been true from the time of Moses, who instructed his fellow Jews to massacre without pity the Gentiles whose lands they wanted to seize, lest they later be inconvenienced by the survivors:

“But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you, then it shall come to pass that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes and thorns in your sides and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.'” (Numbers 33:55)

The advice was generally followed in the old days, and it is still followed today. Joshua, after capturing the city of Jericho and looting it of all its “silver and gold and vessels of brass and iron”… “utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox and sheep and ass, with the edge of the sword.”

And, more than 3,000 years later, the Haganah and the Irgun and the Stern Gang massacred the entire populations of Palestinian villages in order to terrify the other Arab inhabitants of Palestine into fleeing the country and leaving their homes and farms and businesses to be taken over by Jews.

This hostility toward other peoples, this extreme Jewish xenophobia and ethnocentricity, this contempt for everything not Jewish is revealed over and over again in the writings of Zionists, just as in their actions. It is a masochistic sort of racism, which glories and revels in the anti-Jewish hostility which it in turn provokes.

This clipping from the November 21, 1975, issue of the Jewish Press, which claims to have the largest circulation of any English-language weekly newspaper for Jews, complains that Gentiles are "infiltrating" into Israel posing as Jews, thus "desecrating" the Jewish state and religion. In the eyes of orthodox Jews, "goyim" (Gentiles) are mere cattle, not human beings.

This clipping from the November 21, 1975, issue of the Jewish Press, which claims to have the largest circulation of any English-language weekly newspaper for Jews, complains that Gentiles are “infiltrating” into Israel posing as Jews, thus “desecrating” the Jewish state and religion. In the eyes of orthodox Jews, “goyim” (Gentiles) are mere cattle, not human beings.

Theodor Herzl, the Zionist leader whose efforts were most essential to the founding of the state of Israel, wrote in his book The Jewish State (published in 1896):

Every nation in whose midst Jews live is, either covertly or openly, anti-Semitic… Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among the Gentiles… We are one people — our enemies have made us one in our despite… Distress binds us together, and, thus united, we suddenly discover our strength.

The Zionist Jakob Klatzkin (1882-1948) carried the idea further in his book Crisis and Decision, published in 1921, and addressed to the German people:

…We are not hyphenated Jews (i.e., German-Jews); we are Jews with no qualifications or reservations. We are simply aliens; we are a foreign people in your midst, and, we emphasize, we wish to stay that way. There is a wide gap between you and us, so wide that no bridge can be laid across. Your spirit is alien to us; your myths, legends, habits, customs, traditions and national heritage, your religious and national shrines, your Sundays and holidays… they are all alien to us. The history of your triumphs and defeats, your war songs and battle hymns, your heroes and their mighty deeds, your national ambitions and aspirations, they are all alien to us. The boundaries of your lands cannot restrict our movements, and your border clashes are not of our concern. Far over and above the frontiers and boundaries of your land stands our Jewish unity… Whosoever calls the foreign (Gentile) land a fatherland is a traitor to the Jewish people … A loyal Jew can never be other than a Jewish patriot… We recognize a national unity of diaspora Jews, no matter in which land they may reside. Therefore, no boundaries can restrain us in pursuing our own Jewish policy…

And the “American” Zionist, Samuel Untermyer, said in 1933: “Other races have come and gone. The Jew has survived. Persecution cannot crush him. The Jews are the aristocrats of the world.”

Such unbridled and reckless arrogance, stemming from the persistent Jewish notion that the children of Israel have been “chosen” to rule the world and must, therefore, remain aloof from the goyim, destined to be their slaves when the Messiah comes, has led to a great deal of friction between the Jews and their Gentile hosts throughout the ages. And yet even this negative and peculiarly Jewish form of racism could be tolerated, if that were all.

The Jews could all go off to the Middle East and finish butchering the Palestinians, or they could all settle on a large island by themselves somewhere, and they could then indulge their narcissist fantasies and their hatred of the rest of mankind to their hearts’ content, and we would not care.

But gathering the Jews of the world together in one place is not really part of the Zionist scheme. They want an exclusively Jewish homeland, all right, but they also want to maintain their death grip on the economies and the governments of the Gentile lands where they live as minorities. Zionism is built not only on the ideas of Jewish exclusiveness and Jewish superiority, but also on the idea of Jewish world dominion.

Not a world dominion achieved by force of Jewish arms or by any frontal assault on the hated goyische world, but a dominion brought about by infiltration and subversion, by the encouragement of weakness and decadence among the Gentiles, by the imperceptibly slow injection of a Jewish spiritual poison into the hearts and minds of the goyim, destroying their will to resist.

And therein we have the explanation of the seeming dilemma: Jews who have devoted all their talents and energies to combatting racism being themselves charged with racism by the world community. Yes, Jews are against racism — racism among the Gentiles, that is, because they want to destroy the unity of the Gentile nations. And, yes, Jews (or Zionists, if you prefer) are racists, because they, more than any other people, realize the necessity of maintaining their own unity.

Theodor Herzl, one of the "founding fathers" of Israel. He dreamed of an all-Jewish state from which the Gentile world would be ruled, in fulfillment of Jewish "prophecies."

Theodor Herzl, one of the “founding fathers” of Israel. He dreamed of an all-Jewish state from which the Gentile world would be ruled, in fulfillment of Jewish “prophecies.”

The condemnation by the United Nations of Zionism is, on the whole, a welcome move, but it nevertheless fails to face the issue as squarely as it should. The UN has condemned the Jews for their behavior in Palestine, for practicing both physical and cultural genocide against the Palestinian people. But that is only a negative form of the same racism which is practiced by all healthy peoples. What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians is what the Turks did to the Armenians, what the Serbs did to the Croats, what the American pioneers did to the Indians, what the Germans did to the Jews (although hardly to the tune of 6,000,000 as the Jews claim). It is the way of the world, even if, in our Western squeamishness, we would like to see more positive and fewer negative expressions of this natural and universal racism.

And so, in this regard, the Jews are at least justified in their claim that the UN condemnation of Zionist racism is hypocritical, because most of the members of the UN practice their own forms of racism. But if the UN were really an honest organization, it could have issued a denunciation of Zionism against which the Jews would have no defense.

The UN could have pointed out that Jewish racism is a unique evil — a unique danger to the world — not because the Jews want Palestine all to themselves or even because they aspire to world rule, but because of the truly unique ways in which the Jews go about implementing their Zionist designs.

Recognizing more clearly than any other people the importance of racism as a natural defense — as Nature’s way of maintaining racial integrity — the Jews deliberately go about neutralizing the racism of their intended victims, thus destroying their unity, their cohesiveness, and their will to resist. It is a tactic which has proven extraordinarily effective in the past, a tactic to which the Western peoples in particular have proven susceptible.

It is for this reason that the Germans, the one nation in modern times which developed a defense against Jewish racism, named the Jews “der Weltfeind” — the world enemy.

* * *

From Attack! No. 42, 1976

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/zionism-i-theory/feed/ 0
Unless We Cure Ourselves http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/unless-we-cure-ourselves/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/unless-we-cure-ourselves/#comments Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:56:48 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1661 The Camp of the Saintsby Nick Camerota

I BEGAN READING The Camp of the Saints after a long and tiring day. Although I promised myself only a few chapters before retiring, I remained in the grip of Jean Raspail’s forceful, apocalyptic narrative until dawn. I finished it in one sitting.

That was almost a month ago. Since then I’ve read several other books, all of which I could have reviewed with little or no difficulty. A few days ago I was drawn back to Raspail’s book and read it for the second time. Even now I am not confident I can review it properly. Nonetheless, something must be said about this book.

The Camp of the Saints first came to my attention a couple of years ago while I was traveling around Europe. Originally published . . . → Read More: Unless We Cure Ourselves]]> The Camp of the Saintsby Nick Camerota

I BEGAN READING The Camp of the Saints after a long and tiring day. Although I promised myself only a few chapters before retiring, I remained in the grip of Jean Raspail’s forceful, apocalyptic narrative until dawn. I finished it in one sitting.

That was almost a month ago. Since then I’ve read several other books, all of which I could have reviewed with little or no difficulty. A few days ago I was drawn back to Raspail’s book and read it for the second time. Even now I am not confident I can review it properly. Nonetheless, something must be said about this book.

The Camp of the Saints first came to my attention a couple of years ago while I was traveling around Europe. Originally published in 1973, this work sent violent shock waves through France which later reverberated across the entire continent.

Raspail’s story, set in some unspecified period in the future, might, in fact, spring to life some time soon. Briefly, The Camp of the Saints is the chronicle of nearly a million starving beings from India who have boarded ships and headed west. France, terminally sick with liberalism, falls to their unarmed invasion.

The average person may feel more than a few tugs of doubt when considering Raspail’s vision of the future but still might wish to read his book as “entertaining” fiction. There are other readers who simply don’t care for fictional works and will pass it up for that reason. However, both categories of readers should bear in mind that this controversial novel wasn’t written without considerable risk to the career of the author, who, as the recipient of the Jean-Walther literary prize and a columnist for Le Figaro, was well known to literate Europeans long before the appearance of The Camp of the Saints.

Indeed, Raspail takes his task very seriously. In the preface he points out that the idea of an invasion by the Third World, or some part of it, “is no wild-eyed dream.” He explains, “Even if the specific action (i.e., the invasion), symbolic as it is, may seem far-fetched, the fact remains that we are inevitably headed for something of the sort.” Raspail reminds the reader that by the year 2,000 the planet will be populated by seven billion people. Of that number only 900 million will be White.

The dust jacket of the American edition of The Camp of the Saints (published this summer) contains an arresting quote from President Boumedienne of Algeria. In an interview given in 1974, nearly two years after Raspail wrote the book, Boumedienne expressed the belief that “billions of human beings” might someday “leave the poor, southern part of the world to erupt into the relatively accessible spaces of the rich, northern hemisphere, looking for survival.” The way Raspail depicts said eruption causes him what public-relations types prefer to call “image problems.”

The reaction of the French media to the publication of Raspail’s book shouldn’t surprise regular readers of ATTACK! With rare exceptions, both the book and the author were denounced in the strongest imaginable language. Raspail became a full-blown “racist,” a moral monster, a champion of everything ugly, sick, and evil.

The media’s sharp response is no doubt due to the way they are treated by Raspail in the novel. For him, they are among the chief inner enemies of the nation. It is as a result of their urgings that France is ultimately swamped by invaders. Marxists, anarchists, homosexuals, overexcited university students, hippies, radical clergymen, one-worlders, racial equalitarians, and neo-liberal members of government also take a drubbing in this book. Black and Arab “guest workers” emerge as sinister national allies of the alien swell of humanity battering down France’s door.

The most disturbing thing about Raspail’s treatment of these anti-national characters, however, is that he draws many of their statements from real life. He culled actual editorials, speeches, pastoral letters, laws; his sampling constitutes a veritable treasure trove of neo-liberal ravings.

Evidence of the inner attitude of the media masters toward Raspail is also given by their reaction to another writer on racial matters. When Negro Communist Frantz Fanon, a hater of all things Western (with a highly cultivated rancor for the French, in particular), packaged his undisguised loathing in book form, he had no difficulty finding a publisher in France. In his Les Damnes de la Terre (now almost 15 years old), Fanon wrote: “For if the last shall be first, this will only come to pass after a murderous and decisive struggle… (for) when the native hears a speech about Western culture he pulls out his knife — or at least makes sure it is within his reach.”

Fanon also observed that the overthrow of the Western world “will be carried out with the indispensable help of the European peoples” who have also decided the White man should be stamped out. Enter, stage left, the lubricous French “philosopher,” Jean Paul Sartre, with the introduction to Fanon’s book. “Read Fanon,” he cries. “You will learn how their impulse to murder is the expression of the natives’ collective unconscious.” We are also told, “Fanon is the first since Engels to bring the processes of history into the clear light of day.”

“Make no mistake about it,” Sartre pants, “by this mad fury, by this bitterness of spleen, by their ever-present desire to kill us, by the permanent tensing of powerful muscles which are afraid to relax, they have become men… hatred, blind hatred, which is yet an abstraction, is their only wealth.”

When Fanon’s book made its debut in France there were few jeers or catcalls from the media. Instead it was hailed as a masterpiece by the decadent French intelligentsia. The message spread. In New York, the Jewish-owned Evergreen Publishing Company (longtime specialists in the porno trade) published the book in English under the title The Wretched of the Earth. It received generally favorable reviews and even a plug from a former president of the United Nations General Assembly.

And at cocktail parties throughout the Western world sensitive intellectuals shivered with delight at the prospect of being humiliated — or, better yet, savagely punished — for their “racism.” Sartre had, after all, noted that even “our worthiest souls contain racial prejudice.” Masochism and self-hatred are now very much in style for Westerners.

Is it any wonder that Jean Raspail (or anyone, for that matter) should write a novel telling us that Western man is on the verge of extinction? That we have been softened and corrupted by a sick and unnatural social philosophy concocted by our inner enemies? That we are losing the will to survive?

The signs are all around us. As this review goes to press the European administrators of the Spanish Sahara are facing a mini-version of Raspail’s apocalypse, and they are reacting just as he predicts the French will react when their time comes.

And as the storm clouds continue to gather and Western man moves closer to the abyss, the media still howl at Raspail and others who underscore the danger. The American edition of The Camp of the Saints was greeted by insult, disgust, and opprobrium. “Preposterous,” snapped the New York Times. “Looney,” screamed the International Herald Tribune. “Trash,” brayed Time magazine.

Read Raspail’s book and then look into the morning headlines and editorial sections of our leading newspapers. It shouldn’t be difficult to determine who is the enemy.

* * *

From Attack! No. 41, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

Camp of the Saints PDF

Camp of the Saints via archive.org

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/unless-we-cure-ourselves/feed/ 1
Tests Show Students Learning Less http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/tests-show-students-learning-less/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/tests-show-students-learning-less/#comments Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:40:26 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1658 RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN

by Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR the thirteenth straight year, graduating high school seniors in 1975 were dumber than those of the year before. Nearly one million college-bound seniors took the Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) offered by the College Entrance Examination Board this year, and their scores were the lowest which have been recorded since the SATs were first offered more than 20 years ago. The scores began dropping in 1963 and have fallen each year since then, with a particularly sharp decline this year.

(PHOTO: RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN still have the benefits of order and discipline in their classrooms, not to mention a greatly superior racial environment. The slack-jawed “do your own thing” philosophy of the U.S. advocates of race-mixing and permissiveness has been rejected by Soviet educators. They are training a generation . . . → Read More: Tests Show Students Learning Less]]> RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN

by Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR the thirteenth straight year, graduating high school seniors in 1975 were dumber than those of the year before. Nearly one million college-bound seniors took the Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) offered by the College Entrance Examination Board this year, and their scores were the lowest which have been recorded since the SATs were first offered more than 20 years ago. The scores began dropping in 1963 and have fallen each year since then, with a particularly sharp decline this year.

(PHOTO: RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN still have the benefits of order and discipline in their classrooms, not to mention a greatly superior racial environment. The slack-jawed “do your own thing” philosophy of the U.S. advocates of race-mixing and permissiveness has been rejected by Soviet educators. They are training a generation of disciplined, hard-working, self-confident men and women to take up the role of world leadership which America is letting slip from its grasp.)

The tests measure mathematical reasoning ability and “verbal skills” — i.e., the ability to understand written English — and College Board staffers who have been studying and analyzing the declining scores for the past few years are convinced the slump is not the result of technicalities in the tests.

“There is a decline in the verbal and mathematical reasoning ability among those who choose to take the SATs,” concluded Carol Halstead of the College Board. Other educators across the nation have been forced to the same conclusion.

“The verbal skills of students have gone down incredibly in the last 10 years,” said Dr. Shirley Kenny, head of the University of Maryland’s English department.

At the University of Wisconsin, where prospective journalism students are required to take a qualifying examination in English usage, the failure rate has increased from 25 per cent of those taking the exam in 1971 to 60 per cent this year. “Students are not convinced they need to know how to write,” said Wisconsin English Professor William Lenehan.

The same, sad story is told at the country’s prestige schools: “There has to be some truth in the statements that the writing experience of our students is not as rich as it used to be, ” said Donald Dickason, Cornell University’s dean of admissions. “Our students arc following the national trends, although at a slower rate.”

The sharp national decline in the ability of college-bound high school graduates to reason mathematically and to read and write can be explained in part by the increasing number of Negroes who are being recruited by U.S. colleges and universities, under pressure from the Federal government. As the percentage of Negro students taking the SATs has risen, the average scores have fallen. It is in the abstract mental processes tested by the SATs that Negroes suffer their most severe genetic shortcoming.

But the scores of White students have also been falling, and this can only be attributed to two things: growing alienation, which is affecting every segment of our society, and a declining habit of self-discipline among young people.

In a sense, however, both these factors are related to the racial factor. Alienation is the inevitable consequence of the destruction of a racially homogeneous environment, while the decline in self-discipline has followed the catastrophic disruption of external discipline in America’s racially mixed schools.

The ability for self-discipline — the most important and valuable ability an individual can acquire — is developed most readily in an orderly, disciplined environment. The disappearance of the latter — completely aside from racial considerations — is not unrelated, of course, to the rise of neo-liberalism as the dominant factor in the philosophy of the American educational “Establishment” in recent decades. The liberal instinctively abhors all authority, structure, form, order, discipline.

But the growing formlessness of school curricula and teaching methods is being accelerated by the influx of Blacks into formerly White schools. Since Negro children score lower on tests and fail courses more often than White children, the educators have decided that tests are “culturally biased” against Negroes and that course grades are “unfair.”

For a child, Black or White, to be given a grade lower than some other child is running the risk of damaging the child’s self-esteem, they reason. Thus grows the “fun-and games” approach to education.

Since Blacks simply are not equipped by Nature to cope with the abstract reasoning required to solve problems in algebra or prove theorems in geometry, educators have begun shifting away from the former stress on problem-solving, with its requirements for sufficient intelligence to acquire a rigorous mastery of subject matter. Instead, the emphasis is now being placed on such ill-defined qualities as student “originality” and “creativity.” Students are given a superficial overview of subject matter and misled into believing that they have mastered it.

School courses in the humanities are suffering a fate similar to the sciences. Since Black students find it hard to maintain much interest in history courses which deal almost exclusively with White Civilization, history is being de-emphasized for all students. Instead of being required to study the past, with its vital lessons for the present, students are allowed to enroll in “Modern Ceramics” or “Art Forms in the Cinema.” Needless to say, Black performance in such “fun” courses much more nearly equals White performance than in the older curriculum.

With the same result in mind, educators are looking for alternatives to the SATs. “If the skills demanded by these tests (SATs) are what it takes to get through college, then maybe it’s the colleges that ought to change,” says David Darland, an official of the neo-liberal National Education Association. And so a Federally subsidized program has recently developed a new set of tests — the National Assessment Tests (NAT) — which are claimed to be more “relevant” than the SATs.

The NATs have been designed to measure student mastery of such basic “life skills” as interpreting highway signs, giving correct change, telling time, understanding road maps, using telephone directories, and reading advertisements. Much to the disappointment of the NATs’ designers, however, the gap between Black and White performance on the new tests remains nearly as large as on the SATs. In 1974, for example, the NATs were given to 5,200 17-year-old high school juniors. Of these, 93.8 per cent of the Whites were able to achieve a passing score of 75 per cent, while only 62 per cent of the Blacks passed.

It seems clear that all such misguided efforts to establish educational “equality” between Blacks and Whites are doomed to failure by the unavoidable facts of biological inequality. The professed equalitarian goal of “a quality education for all children, regardless of race” is being exposed as a hypocritical sham, as its advocates continue to undermine the quality of education for all children.

The truly horrendous result of the destruction of America’s schools by racial mixing and permissiveness is that we are now raising a generation of White Americans who cannot compete in an increasingly dangerous and hostile world.

* * *

From Attack! No. 40, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/tests-show-students-learning-less/feed/ 0
The Law of the Land http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-law-of-the-land/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-law-of-the-land/#comments Tue, 26 Aug 2014 01:21:10 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1656 John McNaughton's "Wake Up America"

by Dr. William L. Pierce

A NAUSEATINGLY FAMILIAR spectacle of our times is one of our elected “leaders,” whether President Gerald Ford or Boston Mayor Kevin White, appearing on television and solemnly announcing that he is as opposed to the forced racial busing of school children as anyone, but that it is “the law of the land.” The implication, of course, is that “the law of the land” is something sacred, which every right thinking citizen must meekly accept and quietly obey.

(ILLUSTRATION: John McNaughton’s painting “Wake Up America”)

Now, it is true that the orders issued by any old man in a black robe who has been appointed to a Federal court by the politicians in Washington have the force of law, regardless of how outrageous or immoral or socially disruptive . . . → Read More: The Law of the Land]]> John McNaughton's "Wake Up America"

by Dr. William L. Pierce

A NAUSEATINGLY FAMILIAR spectacle of our times is one of our elected “leaders,” whether President Gerald Ford or Boston Mayor Kevin White, appearing on television and solemnly announcing that he is as opposed to the forced racial busing of school children as anyone, but that it is “the law of the land.” The implication, of course, is that “the law of the land” is something sacred, which every right thinking citizen must meekly accept and quietly obey.

(ILLUSTRATION: John McNaughton’s painting “Wake Up America”)

Now, it is true that the orders issued by any old man in a black robe who has been appointed to a Federal court by the politicians in Washington have the force of law, regardless of how outrageous or immoral or socially disruptive those orders may be — provided only that some other old man appointed to a higher Federal court by the politicians in Washington doesn’t overrule him. Under the present American system of government, Federal judges are the wielders of awesome power.

It is also true that Americans have a long and deeply rooted tradition of respect for law. All the peoples of northern Europe, from whom most White Americans are descended, have similar traditions of obedience to the legally constituted authorities. It is this tradition which is being invoked when the politicians urge us to do as the old men in the black robes order us, like it or not. Either we are law-abiding citizens, and we obey, or we are lawbreakers — criminals.

At least, that’s the way it used to be. But, alas, life is no longer so simple these days. Thirty years ago, in Nuremberg, Germany, we and our wartime allies donned black robes and ruled that there is a higher law than the laws written by Congresses, Parliaments, and Reichstags.

Every man, we ruled, is bound by this higher law. When it conflicts with written laws, then we must disobey those written laws. On the basis of our ruling at Nuremberg we then proceeded to hang by the neck until dead more than 5,000 law-abiding German soldiers and civilians. Their “crime” had been to faithfully obey the laws of their land.

More recently the precedents established at Nuremberg have been applied in this country — selectively, to be sure. For example, the members of our armed forces have been instructed that they must not obey “immoral” orders from their commanding officers, and they are subject to punishment if they do. On the other hand, if they guess wrong and refuse to obey a “moral” order, they will also be punished.

The situation is at least as confusing for civilians. They are taught in school that, as American citizens, they have certain inalienable rights and that those rights are set forth in the U.S. Constitution, the highest law of the land. When a citizen, who has noted that the Constitution assures him that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” is confronted with a myriad of Federal, state, and local laws which do, indeed, infringe that right, what is he to do? Many of those who reasoned that the Constitution has precedence and then acted accordingly are now reflecting on their error behind prison bars.

The same is true of those who reasoned, on Constitutional grounds, that the Federal government cannot legally compel them to rent a house they own to someone not of their own choosing, or to admit someone not of their own choosing into their lodge or craft guild or place of business, or to fill out a Form 1040 each April.

Actually, it shouldn’t be confusing at all. There is a very simple common denominator which resolves all these apparent contradictions. It is this: the concept of “a rule of laws, not of men” is a myth, a fiction maintained by America’s rulers to deceive those who are ruled.

The politicians and the media masters understand this. That is why they raised such a fuss a few years back when Mr. Nixon tried to put a couple of “conservative” judges on the Supreme Court, and it is why they were so disappointed when the secret wheelings and dealings of Mr. Johnson’s appointee to be Chief Justice, Abe Fortas, came to light and forced his resignation. They understand that it is not what the Constitution says that is important, but what the political appointees in black robes say it says.

Thus, the victorious democrats and communists did not hang Germans for obeying German laws or for disobeying the ex post facto laws passed at Nuremberg. We hanged them because they lost the war and were no longer capable of protecting themselves from our hatred and thirst for vengeance. We hanged them for the same reason we raped their women and gave half their country away, namely, because after the war we had guns and they didn’t.

It is for the same reason that the Internal Revenue Service never has to lose a moment’s sleep worrying about the involved Constitutional arguments of various tax protestors, so long as the IRS is on good terms with the various political appointees in black robes who sit in the tax courts. Simply stated, the Internal Revenue Service and its friends in the courts have more muscle than all the “tax strike” groups put together, and so it really doesn’t matter what the Constitution says.

That is why J. Stanley Pottinger, the smirking little Jew who heads the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, can strut arrogantly around Boston, ordering White children into Black schools and arresting any parents who raise a fuss about it.

He has an army of gunmen — armed Federal marshals — to protect him and to enforce his orders for him, and Boston’s White parents do not.

And that is why the politicians in Washington can calmly go ahead with their plans to send American “technicians” to the Middle East and to empty our treasury and strip our arsenals for the sake of the Israelis, despite the overwhelming opposition of the American people to these things. The people may not like it, but the politicians and the media masters, not the people, are the ones with the muscle.

And is it ever otherwise? Is it possible to govern a people by their informed consent, to have a legal system based on something other than superior force? The answer is “yes” — when certain conditions are met: when the written law — the acts passed by Congress and the rulings issued by judges — corresponds with the moral sense of the people, with their traditions, with their deepest feelings of what is right and proper; when it corresponds with the people’s common law, which is the set of unwritten rules which has evolved organically along with a people over the millennia, so that it is an integral part of that people’s cultural and spiritual heritage. Then — and only then — can it rightly be called “the law of the land,” to which every man owes obedience.

But these conditions do not prevail in America today, and so we do not have a “rule of law,” but a tyranny. Under the present System, whoever is in a position to give the orders to the largest number of hired gunmen is the man whose view of what is “legal” prevails. So long as no one with more hired gunmen opposes him, he can order children bused and private property confiscated and the right to bear arms infringed and the patrimony of the people turned over to an alien power.

But let us also remember this: to defy a tyrant, to refuse to obey his edicts, to kill him or his enforcement agents, while it may be “illegal,” is not contrary to the law of our land, in the truest sense of that phrase. Indeed, it is in harmony with that higher law to which we are all subject, the higher law under which obedience to tyrants and collaboration with their agents are themselves crimes.

* * *

From Attack! No. 40, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-law-of-the-land/feed/ 0
Two Minutes Hate http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/two-minutes-hate/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/two-minutes-hate/#comments Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:59:23 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1654 Race Relations Study

ILLUSTRATION: WASHINGTON POST story tells of Nathan Cohen decision compelling Federal workers to submit to sensitivity-training sessions. Applying many of the same techniques which were used to brainwash American POW’s in communist prison camps in Korea and Vietnam, Federal psychologists are able to control attitudes and opinions with a high degree of success. These techniques are also being used in high schools now to “adjust” White students to a multiracial environment.

by Dr. William L. Pierce

IN 1984, the well-known political horror-fantasy by George Orwell, it was called the Two Minutes Hate. At eleven o’clock each morning the workers in all government offices assembled in front of television screens for a sensitivity-training session in which they released their pent-up hostilities and became, thereby, better-adjusted subjects of Big Brother.

In 1975 they don’t call it . . . → Read More: Two Minutes Hate]]> Race Relations Study

ILLUSTRATION: WASHINGTON POST story tells of Nathan Cohen decision compelling Federal workers to submit to sensitivity-training sessions. Applying many of the same techniques which were used to brainwash American POW’s in communist prison camps in Korea and Vietnam, Federal psychologists are able to control attitudes and opinions with a high degree of success. These techniques are also being used in high schools now to “adjust” White students to a multiracial environment.

by Dr. William L. Pierce

IN 1984, the well-known political horror-fantasy by George Orwell, it was called the Two Minutes Hate. At eleven o’clock each morning the workers in all government offices assembled in front of television screens for a sensitivity-training session in which they released their pent-up hostilities and became, thereby, better-adjusted subjects of Big Brother.

In 1975 they don’t call it the Two Minutes Hate, but it amounts to exactly the same thing. Federal employees are increasingly being forced to submit to mind-bending group-therapy sessions designed to suppress “undesirable” attitudes — primarily attitudes toward members of racial-minority groups — and mold their psyches in directions deemed more suitable by the clever people who plan the therapy sessions.

Beginning (appropriately) in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and the now-defunct Office of Economic Opportunity a few years ago, the government’s sensitivity-training program is gradually being extended to other Federal agencies, both in Washington and in the boondocks.

Many government workers are complaining about this not-very-subtle program of thought control, but a recent decision in the case of an employee at the Watervliet (NY) Arsenal indicates that Big Brother is determined to press on.

Backed by his union, the American Federation of Government Employees, the Watervliet Arsenal employee argued that the government unjustly suspended him from his job without pay when he refused to attend sensitivity-training sessions which had been scheduled for workers at the arsenal.

A Federal labor arbitrator, Nathan Cohen, ruled against the union and the employee, saying the government has the right to enforce attendance and punish employees who do not go to the sessions. Cohen’s ruling will not halt all employee resistance to compulsory sensitivity training, but it will give the government an advantage in being able to threaten with dismissal all Federal workers who balk.

 The Federal thought-control program is most solidly established in the Department of Defense. Under Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger sensitivity training has been institutionalized in each of the armed services as a mandatory part of the training of all personnel.

Some of the “shock techniques” used in earlier military sensitivity-training sessions are primarily responsible for the notoriety the program has received. Stripped of all insignia of rank, officers and enlisted personnel, Black and White, male and female, were herded into classrooms and subjected to various experiences designed to rub their noses collectively in the filth of racemixing.

In some sessions Black instructors would scream obscenities at White participants and encourage them to reciprocate: “You White honky motherfucker, call me a nigger! Come on, you honky bastard, you’re thinking ‘nigger'; now say it! ” The idea was to bring latent racial hostility to the surface, so that it could be dissipated.

In one Navy program at Charleston, S.C., a Black instructor took a White female assistant to the front of the class and fondled and kissed her, after a series of obscene “bedroom” remarks. The Navy received such strenuous objections to this program that it was temporarily halted.

But Federal psychologists have found that they are able to achieve their purpose just as well with more subtle techniques. One “final exam” devised by the mind-controllers, for example, simply involves passing a soft drink around the sensitivity-training classroom. Anyone in the racially mixed group who declines to take a drink from the common bottle is considered to have flunked.

Herd instinct — the drive to conform to group standards — is very powerful, and Big Brother’s experts have learned how to manipulate it in such a way that they can modify the opinions and attitudes of their subjects. The basic method used is to strip the individual’s personality naked, to deprive him of his privacy, to make him bare his innermost thoughts and feelings—and then to apply overwhelming pressure to him to make those thoughts and feelings conform to those of the others in the group. In the context of the sensitivity-training class, to be non-conforming is equivalent to being anti-social.

And the method works. Only persons of extraordinarily strong will and personality are immune to its effects.

Unfortunately, employees of the Federal government are not the only persons being subjected to the new thought-control program; workers in some industrial plants with Federal contracts are also being required to attend therapy sessions. Worse, pilot programs have been established in a number of the nation’s high schools.

Whereas the program for adults aims primarily at keeping natural racial hostilities in check, the high school programs are more ambitious. Their purpose is to utterly destroy any sense of racial identity in young Whites, to nip in the bud any incipient feeling of racial pride and replace it instead with self-hatred and guilt. The sensitivity trainers want to produce a new generation of racially castrated Whites — raceless White zombies who will blend unobtrusively into the multi-racial future they are planning for America.

In most cases the high school programs have adopted formats rather similar to the adult program, except that they have taken full advantage of the greater impressionability of their participants. But the thought-controllers are always experimenting, attempting to improve their craft.

One of their newer inventions is a “White studies” course for the White minority at the mostly Black Berkeley (CA) High School. It is called “What Is White?”

As proudly reported in the June 30 issue of Newsweek, the course complements “Black studies” courses in which Black students are taught that the only reason their race has a record of failure and lack of achievement throughout history is that the wicked and greedy Whites have held them back. Berkeley’s new “White studies” course teaches young Whites that they must accept the guilt for White repression of non-White races and try to make it up to them.

“After exploring such topics as prejudice and white culture,” reports Newsweek, the White students “come around to the view that the white man’s burden of guilt for America’s imperfections is really an opportunity and that there is much whites can do to help because of their position in society.”

One student who took the course, 17-year-old Anthony Cody, said: “I feel better about being white now. The course gave me the ability to deal with it.”

When the time comes to settle scores in America, there will be no place in hell hot enough for the depraved creatures responsible for destroying the racial consciousness of these White boys and girls. Meanwhile, however, the thought-controllers are going ahead as fast as prudence allows, and the number of young people being subjected to their program is growing at an alarming rate.

Unless Americans who still have the capacity to think for themselves act soon, that capacity may be taken from them; certainly it will be taken from their children. Unless we upset Big Brother’s plans, 1984 may be here in less than nine years.

* * *

From Attack! No. 39, 1975

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/two-minutes-hate/feed/ 0
Falling Apart http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/falling-apart/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/falling-apart/#comments Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:00:05 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1648

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 23, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

AS WILLIAM PIERCE warned you in 1970, and as I’ve been warning you for decades, multiracial societies are not healthy societies. They inevitably rend themselves to bloody pieces, killing and torturing uncounted innocents along the way. The recent events in Ferguson, Missouri prove my point. It’s about time we heeded the warnings that the National Alliance — and Nature — are giving us, or our children will not have a future.

(ILLUSTRATION: In this video — made in the aftermath of the shooting of a Black man named Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson, a White policeman — a Black crowd shouts “Who do we want? Darren Wilson! How do we want him? Dead!”)

When huge, thuggish . . . → Read More: Falling Apart]]>

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 23, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

AS WILLIAM PIERCE warned you in 1970, and as I’ve been warning you for decades, multiracial societies are not healthy societies. They inevitably rend themselves to bloody pieces, killing and torturing uncounted innocents along the way. The recent events in Ferguson, Missouri prove my point. It’s about time we heeded the warnings that the National Alliance — and Nature — are giving us, or our children will not have a future.

(ILLUSTRATION: In this video — made in the aftermath of the shooting of a Black man named Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson, a White policeman — a Black crowd shouts “Who do we want? Darren Wilson! How do we want him? Dead!”)

When huge, thuggish Michael Brown, an aggressive 18-year-old Black male high on drugs and fresh from a convenience store robbery in which he physically tossed aside the store manager as if he were a toy, was stopped by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, he was ready to fight. Initially, Wilson just stopped to ask Brown and a companion to stop walking in the middle of the road, blocking traffic. If Brown were a rational human being, he would have peacefully and instantly complied no matter how much the order rankled him. Brown matched the description of the robber, though Wilson apparently didn’t know that at first. He had the stolen goods — cigars — on his person, and was apparently even brandishing them for all to see. To challenge an officer, even verbally, under such circumstances, was profoundly stupid. To physically scuffle with the officer over a non-issue like staying on the sidewalk, when unarmed and facing two armed men with a radio that could bring immediate backup, would have been insanely stupid even if he hadn’t just risked years in prison for a handful of smokes. But that’s exactly what he did. During the scuffle, in which Brown’s body was halfway inside the police car, Darren Wilson’s gun went off and Brown and his friend ran some distance off.

The accounts diverge at that point. Some say that Brown turned around and began to charge Officer Wilson, who felt in danger for his life. Others say that Brown was already injured and merely stumbled forward after turning around. But all agree that Darren Wilson then fired several rounds into Michael Brown, killing him. Photographs of the scene immediately after the killing show Brown face down, facing the police cruiser, with blood flowing from the front of his body only.

The killing of Michael Brown has set off days of protests, rioting, and looting by Blacks in the Ferguson area. Initially there was a military-style response from the police, complete with curfews,  gas attacks, armored vehicles, military-style assault gear, and the like. (Later, authorities instituted a “softer” approach, and even took a hands-off attitude toward looters, who were unmolested while they were filmed freely and gleefully “fighting the power” by breaking windows and stealing athletic shoes and electronics. A number of Blacks even questioned the wisdom of that police decision.)

The evidence suggests to me that Officer Darren Wilson’s belief — that he was about to be charged by an insane and violent thug whose goal was to wrest his gun away and use it against him — was a very reasonable belief. But exonerating Darren Wilson and the police in Missouri is not my goal. My goal is to show you reality — the reality that almost no one wants to face.

We are placing the police officer on the street in an almost impossible position. On the one hand, he is supposed to be totally “non-racist” and respect the civil rights of Blacks and other non-Whites with especial zeal, since they are the pampered pets of the multiracialist System that rules over us. We forbid him to take any notice of race in his enforcement efforts, lest he be guilty of “racial profiling.” Never mind that Blacks commit aggravated assault at 200 times the rate of Whites. Never mind that they commit interracial rape at tens of thousands of times the rate of Whites. He must never even allow the whiff of a suggestion that he uses such facts to find a perpetrator. On the other hand, no one knows more than a street-level policeman the impulsive, explosive, unreasoning, virtually insane violence-prone nature of a large number of low-IQ, high-testosterone young Black males. He knows that to err on the side of civil rights once a situation has escalated is to invite death. He knows that life is cheap on ghetto streets and that these thugs take each other’s lives by the dozens every month. He has a wife and kids and doesn’t want to die. He knows well the saying that it’s “better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.” If he’s smart and sufficiently corrupt, he knows to carry an untraceable “throwdown” gun at all times so he can claim his attacker was armed. He knows that fellow officers will often back up whatever story he tells, because they’re all part of the “Thin Blue Line,” risking their lives daily keeping order among the feral class. He knows that officers sometimes have to look out for each other — because no one else will if the System turns against them in a racially-charged case.

Street-level Blacks may have a low average IQ, but they are smarter than the average White lemming in a way, because they have figured all that out while most Whites have not. And they resent it, deeply. They see it as a war on young Black men, some 30 per cent. of whom are in trouble with the law in one way or another and who swell our jails and prisons by the millions.

Police departments may have lowered their standards so that more Blacks and other non-Whites can  enter their ranks, but they still do have at least some minimal requirements. And even these lowered standards and drop-dead easy tests still guarantee that White officers will usually outnumber non-White officers  — even in majority-Black communities like Ferguson, Missouri. And it’s a biological reality that no race takes well to being policed or ruled by another race. The protests in Ferguson are an expression of outrage against the killing of a single Black man by a White policeman, part of a pattern that seems obvious to the Blacks. But the shooting deaths of over 500 Blacks in Chicago, almost all of them killed by other Blacks — including 52 in a single weekend — pass with very little notice, to say nothing of protests or riots. Why the difference? I’d say it’s an unconscious biological drive to throw off the rule of your people by an alien tribe, in this case Whites. The killing of one of your own by an outsider you perceive as ruling over you is an outrage that eclipses even ten thousand “ordinary” murders. There’s one way in which Blacks are vastly superior to Whites. Their inborn racial consciousness is still strong, and they are not at all shy about expressing their outrage when they feel threatened, and striking back at their perceived oppressor. It’s about time that Whites started showing some outrage against the people who are killing them, and doing something intelligent about it.

The oligarchs, desperate to keep the forced multiracialist System in place so that White genocide and money-making can proceed as usual, have an answer to non-White crime — and that answer is the same answer they give to the alleged “terrorist” threat. First, they lie: They deny there is any racial dimension to the problem. Then they strip us of our ancient rights to privacy and freedom, give the police carte blanche to do almost anything to anybody, and spend billions militarizing the police forces across the nation, effectively turning America into an occupied country. They empower the corrupt and (justifiably) frightened officer to kill and get away with it even more than he did previously, fueling Black resentment and violence. The friendly officer on the corner is a quaint memory of the past. Today, even the law-abiding White folks fear and dread not only the police, but any contact whatsoever with the out-of-control “criminal justice system,” its jackbooted thugs, its corrupt courts, and its selectively-enforced labyrinth of laws that no one person could even read in a dozen lifetimes.

America is slowly becoming a prison camp writ large. We incarcerate more of our citizens than any nation on Earth, even more than the filthiest Third World dictatorships. And two huge symbiotic components of that equation are Black criminal behavior and police state tyranny, which seem to increase in lock step. What’s the answer to Black rage, Black “youth” unemployment (read: unemployability), and Black crime? More “education” and midnight basketball? Give me a break. More and more prisons, more and more laws, more and more “no knock” warrants, more and more militarized police on  every corner, more and more surveillance, more and more checkpoints and SWAT teams? Is that the way you want to live? Is that what you want for your children? And what about the things that go with that? What about more and more interracial sex and marriage? What about fewer and fewer White children to the point where our population plummets, we lose control to an even greater degree, and are at the mercy of those who hate us — and then it’s all over?

If we lived in a White society — and I remember the 90-plus per cent. White America of my youth — incidents like the Michael Brown killing would be almost unknown. Almost no White people are stupid enough to do all of the insane things Michael Brown did in just the last few minutes of his life. Almost no White youth ever has been crazy enough to challenge a police officer to the point of mortal combat with everything to lose and nothing to gain. But the African race has an average IQ between 70 and 80, and a huge percentage of them are below that range, literally in the retarded category by our standards. Impulsive and unreflective on average, they are dangerous, volatile, and unpredictable. Perhaps those traits, coupled with their high birthrate, conferred a survival advantage on the African savannah. Perhaps, given the freedom to naturally develop their own societies, in 100 years or centuries they would find their own uniquely African way of solving their serious social problems. I don’t claim to know. But I do know this: Their presence in our society is not compatible with our survival.

Many of them want their self-determination already. America’s founders were mostly of the opinion that Black slaves should be freed and then separated from us with 5,000 miles of ocean in between, and many American leaders since then, even including Abraham Lincoln, agreed. So the idea has a long and honorable tradition in this land.

There are some 38 million people of African descent in this country. The current national debt of the United States is 17 trillion dollars. If we paid each and every Black person in the United States $100,000 to return to Africa — that’s half a million dollars for a family of five, more than enough for a bountiful start there — it would only cost $3.8 trillion, less than a 23 per cent. increase. The national debt is now increasing at a rate of some $2.6 billion per day. At that rate, which we’re going to spend anyway, we could pay it all back in a little over four measly years. (And it would be even easier to separate from the Mestizo invaders, who are still withing walking distance of their home countries.) Wouldn’t it be an act of mercy and deep morality to give our children their own nation again? Doesn’t Nature teach us, as the ecologist Garret Hardin once said, that no two subspecies of the same species ever coexist peacefully in the same territory? Wouldn’t it be the ultimate act of wisdom and kindness to ourselves and others to separate what Nature has already separated by100,000 years of evolution?

The way America is going now is immoral and unsustainable. America is falling apart. There will be more riots. There will be more prisons, more laws, more killings by and of the police. Yes, they were able to put a temporary bandage on things in Ferguson by cutting out the local police and placing the Highway Patrol, led by a Black, temporarily in charge and having him sing hymns and denounce the local officers in Black churches and on television. But we are dealing with two peoples who simply do not want to live together — and, if they intend to survive, cannot live together — being forced to live together by the money-men who rule over us; the same money-men, members of the world’s wealthiest ethnic group, who are dispossessing us all with their mass immigration and usury con game. The only question is whether we will still be around when Nature reasserts herself and multiracial America disintegrates completely. We can make our survival more likely by doing everything we can now to build a new, racially healthy and racially conscious society, and hastening the day of the rotten System’s demise — hastening the day when we’ll sit in a position of strength at a negotiating table from which the money-men are excluded, and found a new nation in North America.

As much as we may sympathize with Darren Wilson in his moment of decision, we cannot cleave to a System that is committed to multiracialism and therefore incompatible with our survival. We cannot leave this to the police. The System and its police have abandoned us. From this day forward it’s all up to us.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/falling-apart/feed/ 0