National Vanguard http://nationalvanguard.org News. For us. For a change. Sat, 29 Aug 2015 21:30:26 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Survivalism: Response to Racial Chaos http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/survivalism-response-to-racial-chaos/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/survivalism-response-to-racial-chaos/#comments Sat, 29 Aug 2015 21:30:26 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4938 18survivalist-superJumbo

by Dr. William L. Pierce

introduced and with an afterword by Kevin Alfred Strom May, 1993

WHAT IS one element that binds together those recent victims of government terrorism, the “Branch Davidians” and Randy Weaver; which also binds together such victims of government murder squads as Gordon Kahl and John Singer? It certainly isn’t their religious or philosophical ideas, which are all quite different. I say that quite apart from these people’s involvement in various social or political “movements,” they are united by a common feeling that the current political and economic establishment can no longer be relied upon to protect or provide for its citizens. In other words, these people were or are “survivalists.” You may be surprised to find out that more and more Americans are coming to similar conclusions, are losing the feeling of . . . → Read More: Survivalism: Response to Racial Chaos]]> 18survivalist-superJumbo

by Dr. William L. Pierce

introduced and with an afterword by Kevin Alfred Strom
May, 1993

WHAT IS one element that binds together those recent victims of government terrorism, the “Branch Davidians” and Randy Weaver; which also binds together such victims of government murder squads as Gordon Kahl and John Singer? It certainly isn’t their religious or philosophical ideas, which are all quite different. I say that quite apart from these people’s involvement in various social or political “movements,” they are united by a common feeling that the current political and economic establishment can no longer be relied upon to protect or provide for its citizens. In other words, these people were or are “survivalists.” You may be surprised to find out that more and more Americans are coming to similar conclusions, are losing the feeling of trust they once had in a government that more and more of us are perceiving as being “out of control.” Let’s take a close look at this phenomenon, next, on American Dissident Voices.

* * *

There’s an interesting psycho-social syndrome which has been quietly growing in America for the past several decades, which has finally caught the attention of the establishment and the controlled mass media: it is “survivalism.”

Actually, that term covers a fairly wide range of phenomena. The end of the survivalist spectrum usually seized on by the media, and usually presented in a very distorted way, is the “grab your guns and head for the hills” end, because it lends itself most easily to a sensationalistic treatment.

At the other end of the survivalist spectrum are the timid folks who wouldn’t dream of grabbing a gun, under any circumstances, and are far too citified to survive in the hills anyway, but who have quietly laid in a two-year supply of dehydrated foods. And there are all sorts of offshoots of this attitude: for example, the retired couple who have made up their minds to sell the family home and move into a condominium, but who are only looking at ads for places which offer a high wall all around with electronically controlled gates, closed circuit TV surveillance, and an armed security patrol on the grounds. Or they may be looking at small-town or rural real estate instead, on grounds of the personal safety to be found in the parts of this country most resembling the Old America.

Of course, many people are attracted by real estate advertisements which stress security features, simply because they are aware of the rising crime statistics and want to feel secure in their own homes. Perhaps they shouldn’t be classified as full-blown survivalists, any more than the fellow who keeps a sock full of gold coins hidden under his mattress — just in case.

For many, however, it goes deeper than that. Among the real estate customers looking for impregnable security are a few — a growing few — who feel a sick fear in the pit of their stomachs, the consequence not only of the soaring burglary statistics but also of the conviction that burglaries will keep on increasing, year after year, and that the police and the government will never again be able to offer any real protection to law-abiding citizens.

These few have concluded that, if they want to be safe in their homes, they’re going to have to ensure their own safety. They know they can’t count on the police or the government for their protection any longer. These people are survivalists.

And among those who are laying in a long-term supply of dehydrated food or converting part of each paycheck into gold coins, there are also a growing few who are convinced that some day — they don’t know exactly when, but some day in the next few years — they’re actually going to have to eat their dehydrated larder, because the supermarket shelves will have been stripped bare by angry mobs, or they’re going to need those gold coins to purchase the necessities of life, because Federal Reserve notes will be worthless. These people, too, are survivalists of a sort.

There is one element which is common to the entire survivalist spectrum. It is a loss of faith in the System.

There has always been a certain amount of paranoia in the population, a certain number of people who deeply distrust the government and are sure that something awful is bound to happen soon. The survivalist syndrome is much more than that, however. It is today affecting probably millions of ordinary Americans, not just right-wing gun nuts or conspiracy cranks. More and more perfectly normal people are simply looking very carefully at what is going on around them in America, and the sight is raising the hairs on the backs of their necks.

They are schoolteachers and truck drivers and physicians and government clerks who have to work in America’s cities alongside hostile gangs and undisciplined minorities who are noticeably more numerous and noticeably more aggressive with each passing year, and they have said — possibly only to themselves — “My God, things can’t continue to go on this way!”

Having also observed that their government not only is not doing anything to stem the Third World flood into this country but is leaving no stone unturned in its efforts to increase it, they don’t waste their time writing letters to their Congressmen. (That’s a little bit like a European villager writing to Genghis Khan asking him to do something about the rape and pillage problem!) Instead many of them begin thinking seriously about the relative merits of rifles or shotguns for defense of their homes and families against the likes of the Los Angeles rioters.

Even some liberals are beginning to take note of what the policies they have mindlessly advocated for the past 50 years have done to the world, and it scares the Hell out of them. Although they would never admit it to the other liberals they rub elbows and snort coke with at fashionable cocktail parties in Washington and New York, a few of them have also been quietly laying plans for a quick getaway when the day of reckoning comes.

My older listeners may well remember the fallout shelter debate of the 1950’s: the Cold War era when the government was at least dabbling in civil defense preparations, and many citizens were taking the idea of a nuclear attack by the Soviet Union quite seriously. Cellars were stocked, Geiger counters were purchased, and much hand-wringing was wasted on the ethical problem of the grasshopper and the ant. Many of the so-called “ants” — those who had prepared and stocked fallout shelters for their families — indicated that they would not hesitate to shoot any improvident, grasshopper-type neighbors who came pounding on the doors of their shelters after an attack alert. Predictably, the media pundits were horrified and were very much on the side of the grasshoppers.

Some of the “ants” of that era might properly be considered survivalists, but the majority of them were by no means alienated from the System. Many, in fact, were political conservatives who liked things the way they were and thought of the System as a bulwark against Communism and chaos. That was before JFK, LBJ, the opening of our borders, and the “civil rights” revolution, of course.

Today, the all-out survivalist usually looks at the government as a primary threat to his survival. Far from wanting to keep things as they are, he finds conditions increasingly intolerable. He is intelligent enough, or has good enough instincts, to realize that the policies the U.S. government has been following for the last few decades are inevitably leading to disaster. He finds himself in a surrealistic, almost nightmare situation, in which he sees the people all around him blithely marching to their own destruction.

He does not know whether he is the only sane person in a world gone mad, but he does know that he does not intend to be destroyed along with everyone else, if he can help it. He has become totally alienated from the suicide-bent society in which he lives, and he is looking desperately for a way to get off the boat and far enough away from it so he won’t be sucked under when it goes down.

So, one can recognize three distinguishing traits in the survivalist: a sturdy sense of personal identity, which allows him to think independently and choose a course separate from that of the herd; a strong will to survive; and alienation from the present society and the System which rules it. In addition, many survivalists have a fourth trait: an intuitive, spiritual rejection of modern society which goes beyond mere political alienation.

This last trait — which many who don’t call themselves “survivalists” also share — manifests itself in various ways. In some it is expressed as a desire to “get back to Nature;” in others it takes the more negative form of hostility to modern technology. It is based on a feeling or intuition that the modern, urban-industrial “produce and consume” lifestyle is unnatural and unhealthy, as well as personally unsatisfying and even repugnant.

Thus, one finds among survivalists many with unusual dietary notions and a prejudice in favor of natural foods; a strong interest in useful, pioneer-type arts and crafts; and a tendency to distrust the medical profession with all its drugs and technology.

These attitudes are partially related to the survivalist’s own interest in becoming more self-sufficient. But they are also an expression of a deep-seated — even subconscious — feeling having more to do with instinctive behavior patterns than with rational thought about modern technology. At root, it is not the jet engine, the computer, or “designer drugs” which the “back-to-nature” streak in the survivalist is rebelling against; rather it is the laws, regulations, customs, and constraints of our faceless mass society that rub him the wrong way.

For tools — even very complex tools — are not unnatural to Western man, who has been a tool maker and a tool innovator for a much longer time than he has been man. What is unnatural is the way in which our creative instinct, our fighting instinct, our adventurous instinct, our mating instinct, and our territorial instinct have all been more or less frustrated by modern society.

Who is to blame for this? To a great extent, we have made our society a prison for ourselves. We have grown in knowledge and techniques far faster than we have grown in the wisdom necessary to best make use of that knowledge. We have concentrated too much on the short-term, economic, consequences of our decisions — and all too often, we have ignored the long-term, national and biological consequences of those decisions. In addition, our refusal to face the unpleasant fact that aliens and traitors have seized effective control of many of our nation’s institutions has led us down a path that can only be described as suicidal. What nation that wants to survive allows an invasion of millions of aliens to cross its borders without a shot being fired? What nation that wants to survive promotes monstrosities like the North American Free Trade Agreement which promises only to equalize the living standards of American and Mexican workers while enriching a few financiers and schemers in New York, London, and Tel Aviv? What nation that wants to survive teaches its children that their own culture is evil and oppressive and that they must accept government-mandated multiculturalism? America’s enemies and our own sense of apathy and refusal to face unpleasant facts have put us on this road to national suicide, this road to non-survival.

Looking at it in that way, it becomes clear that those few American patriots who dare to speak out against these evils are survivalists, too, in a way. They want their nation and its people to survive, regardless of how they have arranged their personal affairs.

The fully developed survivalist syndrome might be personified by a man who is convinced that very hard times are ahead for Western civilization; who believes that with a little ingenuity and luck — and a lot of determination, hard work, and careful planning — he can personally avoid those hard times and survive physically while the blood runs ankle deep in America’s cities; and who really won’t be sorry to see the blood start running (whether he’ll admit it or not), because he is alienated from the present System, feels threatened by it, and is looking forward to being rid of it.

In real life, of course, there are many survivalists who don’t go so far in their actions or their thinking, who are not so “fully developed.” Even among those that are, there are still relatively few who have carried their survivalism beyond the hobbying and daydreaming stage: a study of the lore, a stash of weapons, tools, and food, an occasional visit to a still-undeveloped home site in the mountains. Their survivalism is mostly a mental life preserver, something that helps them alleviate the sense of drowning in the chaos that modern America is becoming.

Nevertheless, it is reassuring to see the survivalist phenomenon growing by leaps and bounds from year to year, just as it is reassuring to see the booming growth of the “underground economy.” Both are direct consequences of the growing loss of faith in the System by people from every socioeconomic level. Both are hopeful signs that the days of America’s enemies are numbered.

What is less reassuring is the largely individualist approach to survivalism taken by most of those presently involved. Realistically, family-sized groups are entirely too small to weather what is coming. If and when governmental authority breaks down, new groupings will move to fill the political and power vacuum. We have already seen, in the wake of the Black violence in Los Angeles, governments negotiating with and acceding to the demands of, minority gangs that have become de facto governments in certain “no-go” areas of the city. Individuals and families, no matter how well prepared, would be no match for these or similar gangs of marauders, who would certainly spread well beyond the borders of our major cities during any major breakdown of the food supply network.

An intelligent approach to survivalism would recognize, that while individual efforts and skills are important, it is vital for patriotic Americans to survive as a group and that for such survival, in-depth organization will be necessary.

We now know, after seeing what has happened to Randy Weaver and his family, who clearly broke no real laws and who clearly had harmed no one, and after seeing what has happened to the Branch Davidians, who, despite many dubious after-the-fact accusations, also clearly were innocent of any serious lawbreaking, that the government, for reasons of its own or at the behest of anti-American forces within the government, is willing to use massive force against those seen as maintaining an existence or a set of beliefs independent of the System. This should be a lesson to all patriots. Firstly, it should disabuse you of the illusion that the government is always on the side of right. Unfortunately, many government agencies are clearly in the hands of those who hate our country and everything it stands for, and others are simply out of control, willing to do anything to hang on to their power and privileges. Putting your trust in such a system is clearly not in your personal best interest or in the best interests of our nation. Secondly, it should make you think very seriously about the strategy for national and personal survival which is most likely to succeed.

* * *

I suggest that decent White Americans ought to organize for their self-interest and survival, as we have a right to do and which many other groups have done. Since we are not motivated by hate or by a desire to do harm to others, and since we still constitute the great (though shrinking) majority in this country, I suggest that if we organize in sufficient numbers, the lies of the controlled media about us will have little effect. Our resources, both in terms of skills and money, will probably be second to none once we are more united. We will develop our own media outlets, to present our point of view to all our fellow Americans, of which this radio program is just a bare beginning. We will abandon the public school systems, which are corrupting our children with One World, multiracial, and homosexual propaganda; and we will begin educating them ourselves: first, at home with resources from the children’s section of our National Vanguard Books catalog, and ultimately in our own educational institutions. We will help each other and patronize each other’s businesses. We will form a social, national, and racial colossus so large that the system will fear to suppress us, just as they fear to suppress other racially-organized interest groups.

The first phase of this rational program for racial, national, and personal survival is the educational phase. No people can survive on planet Earth unless they have a clear sense of who they are, where they came from, and where they are going. It is precisely these vital areas of knowledge that the enemies of America are denying us. Through control of the mass media and the educational bureaucracy, the haters of America have sought to destroy our history, our traditions, and our folkways. They have sought to make us historyless, faceless serfs in their “New World Order.” It’s not only the independence and freedom of White Americans that these schemers seek to destroy, of course. Many in other racial communities will be victims, too. But it is the spirit and intelligence of we Americans that they fear the most. That is why they work overtime trying to convince us to hate our own traditions and values, to denigrate our European heritage, to abort our babies in the womb, to accept homosexuality and racial mixing, etc., etc., etc. The good news is that more and more Americans are waking up to their plan.

* * *

Source: National Alliance

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/survivalism-response-to-racial-chaos/feed/ 0
The Making of Presidents http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/the-making-of-presidents/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/the-making-of-presidents/#comments Sat, 29 Aug 2015 21:00:27 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5020 lech-walesa0_1_1467669aby Revilo P. Oliver

ONE SEES from time to time in the press muted reports that all is not well in Poland. There have even been photographs of shipyards and factories that have been closed since the beatitude of “democracy” was bestowed on that unhappy land. One has to infer that the Americans’ magic nostrum, “free elections,” plus massive largesse exacted from the taxpaying animals in the United States and huge “loans” from international bankers to augment the forty billion dollars on which they are now collecting usury from the Poles, have not produced felicity.

The press admits there is ever increasing discontent with the “democratic” regime, so it would appear that the Poles (as distinct from aliens in their midst) are ceasing to revere Lech Walesa (pictured), who holds in Poland a position, . . . → Read More: The Making of Presidents]]> lech-walesa0_1_1467669aby Revilo P. Oliver

ONE SEES from time to time in the press muted reports that all is not well in Poland. There have even been photographs of shipyards and factories that have been closed since the beatitude of “democracy” was bestowed on that unhappy land. One has to infer that the Americans’ magic nostrum, “free elections,” plus massive largesse exacted from the taxpaying animals in the United States and huge “loans” from international bankers to augment the forty billion dollars on which they are now collecting usury from the Poles, have not produced felicity.

The press admits there is ever increasing discontent with the “democratic” regime, so it would appear that the Poles (as distinct from aliens in their midst) are ceasing to revere Lech Walesa (pictured), who holds in Poland a position, that is, for all practical purposes, the equivalent of Lord Bushy’s in this country. I am told that letters from Poland indicate that Poles of all social strata are beginning to curse their erstwhile hero and savior, while his “Solidarity” party has dwindled to less than 20% of its former membership.

Walesa’s popularity was not restored by his recent announcement that Poland must purge herself of the awful sin of “anti-Semitism.” He was, of course, using the word in the catachrestic sense the Jews and their journalistic dogs have imposed on unthinking Americans. That nonsensical term for antipathy to Yids has become even more ridiculous, now that events in the Near and Middle East have made it obvious that God’s Race hate Semites almost as much as they hate Aryans. Walesa’s announcement, however, was only what was to be expected.

Americans should have had no illusions about Walesa from the first. Our poison-pen press tried to make him a hero, printed encomia of his “courage” in “confronting” the Soviet Monster, and extolled his “devotion” to “the workers” and “democracy.” It should have been obvious that if he had been really regarded as an adversary by the Judaeo-Communist rulers, Americans would never have heard of him: he would have disappeared before journalists learned how to spell his name.

It is a safe rule that anyone who is a pet of the American press must be in some way an enemy of the American people. And to make that application of the rule conclusive, we were treated to a photograph of David Rockefeller with his fatherly arm enfolding Walesa, whose stolidly puzzled expression showed that he was wondering what the hugging was all about.

Even with this caveat, however, Americans in general attribute to Walesa “outstanding” qualities of “leadership” and political sagacity. Even if they are cynical about his professed “ideals” and championship of the workers, they reason that it must have required something close to genius for a man to transport himself in a few years from a miserable two-room apartment, in which he lived with his wife and six children, to a palatial abode with flunkies to serve him and a virtually dictatorial dominion over forty million people.

That is what the average American would tell you, because he has not yet learned how presidents are manufactured.

I have received a copy of a Polish periodical in English entitled Common European Home (P.O. Box ? [number unstated], Rockville, Connecticut; 06060). The issue dated March-June 1990 contains an article that describes Walesa and his career as known to Poles who have been close to him.

Walesa is an ignorant man who has never read a book and admits that he detests reading. He cannot compose a coherent and grammatical letter, not even a short one. He is an intellectual nullity. He could never hold a responsible job, not even the lowest: he “could never have qualified as a doorman.”

“Impossible!” you say? After all, this man became the symbol of Polish resistance to Communism. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for “Peace” in 1983. He was the hero of the largest and most powerful non-governmental organization in Poland, the Committee to Defend the Workers, of which the leaders were all former Communists — at least they said they were “former.” But what is more, he was enthusiastically endorsed by educated and presumably patriotic men.

According to one of the authors of the composite article, “the Polish underground was the largest in the history of mankind,” if measured by the number and distribution of its publications. Typical, we are told, was “NOWA” (the meaning of the acronym is not stated). It was “an enterprise employing over 200 editors, an uncountable number of writers, printers, and bookkeepers. NOWA [also] produced audiotapes. It paid all its employees salaries above the commie norms.” Now, even if there is some magnification in his account, many of the editors and writers, at least, must have been men (and perhaps women) of some education and some knowledge of the world. But nevertheless, “Walesa became their long-awaited symbol.”

That will seem inexplicable until you learn that Walesa was a protege of a gang of seven influential Jews, (1) and that the many loud voices in Europe that insisted that Walesa was a blend of St. George (who slew the dragon) and St. Francis (who loved everybody, even birds) belonged to prominent Sheenies. Walesa, furthermore, was a pal of the Jewish weasel (in German and Yiddish, Wiesel), perhaps the most vociferous Holohoaxer, and he has filled his cabinet with members of the Holy Race.

(1. The writer names them: Adam Michnik (n‚ Szechter), Professor B. Geremek (n‚ Bujak), Professor Jan Lipski, Jacek Kuron, Jan Gross, Seweryn Blumsztejin, and Barbara Torunczyk. As censer-swingers, especially named are Merek Edelman, M.D., Andrejei Wajda (cinema director and mogul), and Yaclav Havel (Bohemian playwright).

Walesa, to be sure, has gained in stature since he became a “leader”: he weighed 139 pounds and now weighs about 200. But when he was in the United States to lecture the Congress in Washington, he snubbed ordinary Poles in this country, and duly reported to a meeting of eighty mighty Yids in the city that should be called New Jerusalem-on-the-Hudson. And, needless to say, Walesa has always been a puppet, doing and saying what his trainers commanded. He is, as the author concludes, “a stooge and a traitor to his own kind.”

Now you understand how it all happened, don’t you? And you have done more than learn about Walesa in Poland: you have learned how presidents are made in all nations that are blessed with “democracy,” especially those that belonged to Western civilization and our race.

Since we have been speaking of Poland, let us not forget Poland’s greatest poet, Count Zygmunt (= Sigismund) Krasinski (1812-1859), and his brilliant Undivine Comedy (Nieboska komedja) of which there is an English translation by Harrietta E. Kennedy and Zofia Uminska. (2)

(2. I have used a rare edition, printed in Warsaw for distribution in England. I have an impression that it was reprinted in England and then again, during the past thirty years or so, in a volume that also contained translations of some of Krasinski’s other works, but if so, I failed to record it in my notes. The Undivine Comedy was adapted by Earl Lytton (the first Viceroy of India and son of the Baron Bulwer-Lytton who wrote The Last Days of Pompei, etc.), who used the pseudonym Owen Meredith for his literary works, in his Orval, the Fool of Time (1868), but his adaptation is too free to be taken as a guide to the original.)

The principal theme of the dramatic poem is not political. Its tragedy is the tragedy of Nordic man, whose Faustian soul (to use the Spenglerian term) by its unique racial instinct seeks the infinite and the eternal, fatally combining its romantic aspirations, which can never be content with a world too petty and banal to contain his dreams, with a lucidity and implacably rational intellect that demands knowledge of reality at all costs, which has driven him to the bitter discovery that he is an insignificant animalcule perched on a particle of dust that revolves around a small and decaying star which is itself a mere particle in a universe too vast and too horrible for comprehension. (3)

(3. Have you ever wondered how life on earth would appear today if our race and the genetic strain in it represented by the ancient Greeks and then by the Germanic peoples had never existed? The only two other races capable of civilization are the Semites and the Mongolians, and one or both of them might eventually have discovered the Western Hemisphere and gone on to the necessary conclusion that the earth is a spheroid, but if they had, that sphere would now lie at the very center of a cozy little universe, surrounded by clouds and, not far above them, a brilliant orb that was certainly a great god, and, visible at night, vagrant sparks of light, probably lesser gods or angels appointed by the gods to survey the world and observe the conduct of men.)

In the third part of the poem, however, the protagonist becomes Count Henry, who with his loyal retainers goes to the aid of the aristocrats, who are besieged in the fortress of the Holy Trinity by a huge mob of proletarians, incited, armed, and subsidized by the Jews, who have long plotted to destroy Christianity and the Aryan civilization that it represented. (4) Under the command of Count Henry, the symbolically named castle is valiantly defended and several attacks are repulsed, but Count Henry has also to master the weaklings among the aristocrats, who foolishly imagine they can negotiate with the horde that the Jews have made ferocious and bloodthirsty. Supplies of food and armaments are eventually exhausted, and the Bloody Horde prevails. The castle is taken; Count Henry leaps to his death from the battlements; and the surviving members of the aristocracy are butchered by the exulting rabble. And the terminal scene of the tragedy ends when the leader of the revolution echoes the dying words of the Emperor Julian: Galilaee, vicisti.

(4. Krasinski’s perspicacity is shown by his protagonist’s perception that the real danger came from “baptized Jews,” i.e., Marranos, who feign conversion to the civilization of the people on whom they prey and whom they hate with an insatiable malevolence.)

* * *

Source: Liberty Bell magazine, September 1991

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/the-making-of-presidents/feed/ 0
Human Dignity: A Racial Ethic http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/human-dignity-a-racial-ethic/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/human-dignity-a-racial-ethic/#comments Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:30:45 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4914 human_dignity_william_pierce

A Cosmotheist lecture never before transcribed

by Dr. William L. Pierce

I WANT TO talk to you some more this evening about ethics and about behavior, in particular about the way in which we should behave. Last week we saw a couple of interesting films on man’s origins and on animal behavior, and let me remind you what I said after those films last week. Our pre-human ancestors were, as all the fossil evidence now indicates, predators, meat-eating apes, who hunted and killed with weapons, rather than tree-dwelling vegetarians. But this fact is no excuse for any kind of behavior now. Whether our ancestors 15 million years ago were aggressive meat eaters or whether they were timid, non-aggressive vegetarians, as the liberals so desperately want to believe, in a certain sense is irrelevant to . . . → Read More: Human Dignity: A Racial Ethic]]> human_dignity_william_pierce

A Cosmotheist lecture never before transcribed

by Dr. William L. Pierce

I WANT TO talk to you some more this evening about ethics and about behavior, in particular about the way in which we should behave. Last week we saw a couple of interesting films on man’s origins and on animal behavior, and let me remind you what I said after those films last week. Our pre-human ancestors were, as all the fossil evidence now indicates, predators, meat-eating apes, who hunted and killed with weapons, rather than tree-dwelling vegetarians. But this fact is no excuse for any kind of behavior now. Whether our ancestors 15 million years ago were aggressive meat eaters or whether they were timid, non-aggressive vegetarians, as the liberals so desperately want to believe, in a certain sense is irrelevant to what we should do today.

It’s good to know such things because it helps us to understand our true nature. But, they are no excuse for war or other violent behavior on the one hand, or for cowardly pacifism or disarmament on the other hand. What we should do now must be determined by one thing only, and that thing is our purpose, which is the Creator’s purpose, which is the Creator’s self-realization. In immediate, concrete, and specific terms, that means our guide to action must be our goal of assuring the survival of our race and promoting the progress of our race. Spiritual progress first — through the spreading of the consciousness of our truth among our people until it prevails over all opposition and all indifference. And then material progress, biological progress, for a return to the long-neglected upward breeding of our race.

At our last formal meeting two weeks ago, we derived from this goal some general rules or guiding principles for our behavior and in one instance, namely in the case of sex, we went further and drew some specific rules from a guiding principle. The guiding principle is that sex is the means by which the Creator seeks self realization through the evolutionary process, and that therefore the sex act is sacred. It is first and foremost an act of creation. Specifically, we have the positive obligation to select a racial and genetically sound mate and to engender healthy and racially pure children. And, we have negative obligations; first we may have no sex which defiles the race, because that is also the defilement of the Creator. Such sex is interracial sex and sex which brings unsound children into the world. Second, we may have no sex which symbolically defiles the Creator through the defiling sex as an act of creation; such sex is homosexuality and rape.

Needless to say, our sexual standards derived from this principle are quite different from the standards of those who follow the Jewish materialist line that “if it feels good it’s okay,” and they’re also different from the Puritan standard that if it feels good it must be sinful. A great deal more can be said about sexual ethics, but I want to talk about some other things too, about the specific ways in which our general ethical principles derived from our purpose should guide our behavior.

Remember that the reason for having rules of behavior in the first place is in order to get the job done better. Some of the rules that we must obey are concerned in a direct and physical way with our purpose — the rule against interracial sex, for example. And others are more symbolic than physical; they also serve our purpose, however, by affecting our consciousness. We briefly mentioned one such rule last time: a rule against drunkenness. Drunkenness is intolerable among our own members because it degrades us and robs us of our dignity. There is hardly anyone less dignified than someone who is intoxicated, whether by alcohol or with some other drug. Such a person is a figure of contempt and if he is one of our members, a representative of our truth, then he not only brings contempt by the public down on our truth but he robs himself of the self-respect which everyone must have in the highest degree if he is to rightfully consider himself a bearer of the ordained mission of our race and a fitting seeker of our destiny, which is Godhood.

So, symbolic behavior is important. It may not seem to be of really cosmic significance if someone gets drunk or not, but in a sense it is: Behavior is as important as the truth it represents. Of course, an individual or a whole community may not represent anything; it may not stand for anything beyond themselves. We don’t have to look far to find a community like that with hundreds of millions of individuals. But our community does stand for something, for a single great truth — and it must reflect that fact. An idea or a truth may exist in a mind somewhere, or it may be set down in a book buried in a library, but it only acquires significance when it becomes embodied in a living community. A community embodies a truth not just by individual members having it in the back of their minds, but by the behavior of the whole community continually reflecting it — by having the truth mold and shape the community.

If a stranger comes into a community which truly embodies a spiritual idea he doesn’t have to discover the fact of that embodiment by having a member take him aside and explain it to him. He can see it all around: the way that members of the community act, and the way they conduct their daily lives — in other words, in their attitudes and their actions as well as their beliefs. An idea which is not embodied in a community in this way, which is not reflected in the behavior and attitudes of the community but which only exists in the mind or on paper is a sterile idea; it has no vitality, no real significance. That’s why no religion worth mentioning has ever existed in an idea alone, in a theology or a cosmology alone — but always in an idea coupled to continuing action. The idea determines the form of the action and the action in turn reflects the content of the idea.

Although it may seem a bit artificial to separate this action into two different types, it’s customary to do so: The two types are what we call ethical action, or behavior derived from an ethic; and ritual or symbolic action, which simply reflects in a more formal way than ethical action does the content of the governing idea. Both types of action are essential to the vitality of the idea. An example of ethical behavior is the conduct of one’s sex life in accord to the principles we derived earlier. An example of ritual action is the recitation of our affirmation at each of our meetings. Another example is the wearing of our Life Rune, but, as I just said, the separation of these types of behavior is artificial and it is better to view any action as having two aspects, an ethical aspect and a symbolic aspect. In some cases the ethical aspect is predominant and in other cases the symbolic aspect, but I think it’s important to view nearly every action, nearly everything we do, as having both these aspects.

I want to elaborate on that. We have a goal-oriented ethic. Our standards of conduct are all directed towards our purpose, whether it’s a sexual standard with an immediate biological object in mind — or whether it’s the application of the golden rule to our social relations with each other, which has the simple object of minimizing social friction and increasing our efficiency and our solidarity as a goal-oriented community. But the single most important factor in maintaining and building our community is consciousness. An ever-present awareness and understanding of our identity and our mission. And the entire purpose of symbolic behavior or ritual behavior is to build and maintain this consciousness. So that symbolic behavior is as surely aimed at our goal as is ethical behavior. Not only what we do should be determined in a more or less direct way by our purpose, but also how we do it. The way in which we go about it is symbolically significant — and therefore also important.

Though we hear a lot these days about human dignity from the television commentator or the Washington Post editorial writer, that’s just a code phrase for reminding us that since Blacks belong to the same species we do, they are the same as we are in every respect. They have “human dignity” just like we do. Now it’s too bad that the concept of human dignity has been abused and misused in this way. It’s too bad that it’s been degraded to serve as a phony excuse for most of the insanity, or at least much of the insanity, which afflicts our society today. Like so many other things it is used perversely to destroy the very thing that it’s supposed to represent. Nevertheless, human dignity is a very important thing, once we realize that it has nothing to do with racial equality or with a bigger welfare budget or with job quotas or with changing the name of the Boy Scouts because a certain minority group finds the word “boy” offensive. No, we human beings do not have dignity bestowed on us by any civil rights laws — or by having more money to spend — or by being able to elbow our way into any club or school — or by being able to marry anyone’s sister. And we are certainly not born with any type of automatic dignity. Just watching the everyday behavior of most of the people around us should convince us of that.

We acquire human dignity and we acquire it only to the extent that we behave in a way that reflects the fact that we are of the Creator; only to the extent that the spark of divine consciousness inside us illuminates and guides our lives. Human dignity expressed in our behavior and our manner symbolizes what we are and what our purpose and our destiny are.

Let’s illustrate that with some examples. It’s easy to think of negative examples: A drunk, even though he may be solemn or even pompous, is without human dignity — and so is a person who has no consciousness or pride of race.

It’s no mere coincidence that during the same period in which the government, media, and the schools have done so much to eradicate consciousness of race and to destroy racial pride, we have seen politicians reach new depths in undignified behavior — and have also seen the American public vastly increase its consumption of every sort of drug and intoxicant. And we’ve seen them do other things too, such as abandoning their traditional dance styles which at least used to have a little bit of dignity about them and replacing them with African styles which have no dignity at all.

History provides us with a number of positive examples also: Among the ancient Greeks, the Spartans were foremost among the upholders of human dignity, and by that I mean real human dignity, not what passes for it on TV today. The Spartans were also the most racially conscious of the Greeks. The English historian Edward Gibbon tells us that after King Leonidas and his 300 Spartans, who fought to the last man defending the pass of Thermopylae against the Persian army in 480 BC, all the Greeks were very impressed with their heroism — all except the other Spartans. They didn’t consider the action of Leonidas and his men exceptional at all: What they did at Thermopylae was their duty and every Spartan would have behaved in exactly the same way if he had been at Thermopylae instead. The Spartans were, first and foremost, conscious of who they were and what they represented. They were a warrior elite who had come down from the north and subjugated the racially inferior people who vastly outnumbered them.

This Spartan consciousness is what lay behind the famous Spartan self-discipline. It determined every aspect of their behavior throughout their lives. The Athenians may have been more cultured but the Spartans had more human dignity — and as long as they maintained that dignity they prevailed over their enemies, including the Athenians. For us, just as for the Spartans, consciousness is the prerequisite for human dignity. But, in order to achieve that dignity, we need not only consciousness but also self-discipline, so that our behavior reflects at all times what we are and what we are striving to become. Consciousness leads to human dignity — and human dignity in turn serves to continually reinforce that consciousness.

* * *

Source: transcribed by Daniel S. Forrest, author of Suprahumanism

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/human-dignity-a-racial-ethic/feed/ 0
A Forgery Of Our Own http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/a-forgery-of-our-own/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/a-forgery-of-our-own/#comments Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:00:07 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5018 ascension-of-jesusby Revilo P. Oliver (Liberty Bell, September 1991)

IN THE Liberty Bell for September 1990, my attention was particularly caught by Nicholas Carter’s italicized statement about the early history of Christianity: “we simply do not know what happened during the first hundred years or so.” That reminded me of a project that occurred to me a decade ago, a literary exercise that I might have undertaken, had I been fifty years younger.

I thought that it would be not only amusing but highly instructive to concoct a forgery–not a forgery really intended to deceive, although it could be used as a hoax to embarrass and exasperate our enemies. The forgery would be produced as the most concise and expeditious way of stating an historical problem and offering a plausible explanation of it.

It would purport . . . → Read More: A Forgery Of Our Own]]> ascension-of-jesusby Revilo P. Oliver (Liberty Bell, September 1991)

IN THE Liberty Bell for September 1990, my attention was particularly caught by Nicholas Carter’s italicized statement about the early history of Christianity: “we simply do not know what happened during the first hundred years or so.” That reminded me of a project that occurred to me a decade ago, a literary exercise that I might have undertaken, had I been fifty years younger.

I thought that it would be not only amusing but highly instructive to concoct a forgery–not a forgery really intended to deceive, although it could be used as a hoax to embarrass and exasperate our enemies. The forgery would be produced as the most concise and expeditious way of stating an historical problem and offering a plausible explanation of it.

It would purport to have been written in, let’s say, A.D. 137 and to be the text of a discourse by the famous Rabbi Aqiba. The text should be written in Greek as a necessary precaution against inadvertent anachronisms. The forger would not have to undergo the repugnant labor of learning the Jews’ vulgar dialect of Greek, as could be done with the aid of the grammars of H. St.-John Thackery for the Septuagint (1) and of A.T. Robertson for the “New Testament,” with recourse to the relevant lexica. It would suffice to write a simple classical Greek, such as that of Xenophon, adding a few of the Jews’ special terms for things peculiar to their cult (e.g., ‘christ’).

(1. Unfortunately never completed, but the published part is adequate to give a general understanding of the dialect’s peculiarities that do not reappear in the “New Testament,” for which Robertson will be a sure guide.)

The result would not be glaringly implausible. Some Jews, notably Philo Judaeus, wrote a quite respectable Greek, and it is likely that Aqiba could have done likewise. And it would not be unreasonable to suppose that he, when addressing a conclave of rabbis, summoned perhaps from all over the Oecumene, would have spoken in Greek, just as in our own century Jews in their international conferences use German or English, not Yiddish or the artificial language called Modern Hebrew. (2)

(2. As a matter of fact, even Simon ben Kosiba used Greek in corresponding with his followers, only inserting a few words in Aramaic for matters he wished to keep secret.)

We can assume that by 137 Aqiba would have recovered from his bitter disappointment at the failure and death of Christ Simon ben Kosiba and his apostles, Jesus ben Galgouda, and others. The epiphany of Simon, whom Aqiba had specifically and enthusiastically saluted as his race’s long-awaited christ, had begun so joyously and auspiciously! Thousands of the stupid Greeks and Romans had been caught off their guard and delightfully tortured and killed, with old Yahweh presumably beaming approval at the fun his Chosen were having with civilized men and women. But alas! righteousness was not to endure. The Roman legions moved in, and old Yahweh skedaddled, leaving his darlings to perish after a desperate resistance.

The Romans were foolishly merciful in dealing with the predatory race–Aqiba, despite his faith in the new christ, prudently absented himself from Bethar, where the Zealots made their last stand, and although the involvement of so prominent a man in the revolt must have been generally known, it seems that no effort was made to arrest him–but nevertheless the failure in 135, after the failures in 69 and 117, must have made clear to intelligent Jews that old Yahweh was not an ally on whom one could count, no matter what he said boastfully when there was no danger.

We are to imagine Aqiba, who was a highly intelligent Jew and had moved in the best society of the stupid goyim, (3) as discussing with the rabbis of his faction a situation that clearly demanded a new strategy for destroying civilization and the hated Aryan race, which gave God’s People so much trouble. Conspiratorial revolts had failed with disaster to most participants. Further violence would be suicidal, now that it was clear that old Yahweh would run when the going became hard, and it might even make the goyim, for all their fatuous indulgence toward aliens, realize at last that only a radical solution, eradication, would free them from the blight old Yahweh had put upon them.

(3. According the Epiphanius (Panarion; late Fourth Century), he was a distant kinsman of the Emperor Hadrian. That is not impossible, but the genealogy of Hadrian and of Vibia Sabina (through whom the relationship could have come) cannot be reconstructed.)

Aqiba then expounds a new strategy. He would say the following in substance, but, of course, with oratorical and ethologic embellishments:

O woeful day! My brethren, you see how our Christ, in whose advent I sincerely believed, went kaput! We must try another method, if we are to succeed.

Since nothing can withstand the Roman legions, the hated race must be attacked spiritually by poisoning their minds with superstitions that will further our purposes. This calls for a grandiose hoax, comparable to the letter to Aristeas at the beginning of our Septuagint, but on a far greater scale.

In the past two centuries there have been quite a number of crazed goetae and agitators who tried to become christs, but, unlike the late and lamented Simon ben Kosiba, never attracted the attention of the goyim, who will therefore known nothing about them to contradict whatever we say in our hoax. They are vaguely remembered in folk-tales, especially among Essenes and other impractical sects, so the one we choose will not be entirely imaginary. Perhaps one of the Jesuses in the past century would do.

We can thus concoct a galimatias of drivel about love, peace, and the like, which will attract sentimental and thoughtless goyim, spice it with wonder-stories about miracles, make it subtly suggest that civilization is evil and that the dregs of their society are superior to men of culture and intelligence, incite those dregs to revolt against reason and even reality, and attach the new cult firmly to our race by making its founder an incarnate god like Dionysus, but a son or our Yahweh instead of their Zeus.

We all know how easy it is for a clever Jew to bribe a venal goy without the stupid animal’s knowing how he is being used. We can hire dogs to make converts among the mongrel proletariat and eventually even among brainless members of the upper class who are looking for novelties to make them noticeable. And we can foster the poisonous superstition secretly, while pretending to fear and denounce it.

The last point is very important: it will protect us if the hoax doesn’t work and the ruling goyim are brighter that we believe, and, even more important, it will make our poison acceptable to both uneducated goyim, who dislike us instinctively, and to intelligent ones, who understand us: they can be made to imagine that our hoax can be used against us. That will be a private joke that should keep us laughing for centuries.

Perhaps something could be made of the similarity between christus and Chrestus, the terrorist agitator who excited the horde of our people in Rome to outbreaks in the reign of Claudius, and whose followers, in the time of Claudius’s megalomaniac successor, tried to burn Rome to the ground and partly succeeded. That would automatically enlist the rabble of our race in spiritual, instead of physical, attack on the accursed Aryans, and make then industrious in spreading the poison rapidly. Furthermore, an identification of the two would disguise the novelty of our hoax and make it seem to be at least as old as the time of Claudius. The dates of our christ should be set accordingly.

We should continue to exploit our great advantage, the propensity to monotheism among animals that exalt theory above observation of reality. The Stoics’ animus mundi is vaporous and remote, and will not satisfy the common people, who want gods they can picture in their imaginations and with whom they can communicate. By claiming that our god, so like the gods of civilized nations in many ways, is the theorists’ only god, and then making him the father of the christ we will fashion to our specifications, we will acquire some sympathetic tolerance from goyim who know better, but like to have “ideals.”

With so much of a preamble, Aqiba would discuss with this confederates the elements to be incorporated into the stories about a christ for goyim and the need to introduce internal contradictions to make the sect attractive to persons of many diverse tendencies, who, when shown what was pleasing to them, would not think to look for its opposite. And it would be necessary, above all, to keep the new religion firmly anchored to the Holy Book that describes Jews as their god’s Chosen Race, to which stupid converts could be made to believe they acquire a spiritual affinity.

I hope some young man will take up the project, which will force him to study and ponder the extant evidence and to infer from it with great care what was the probable development of Christianity before it makes its first historical appearance, around 150 or a little later.

* * *

Source: revilo-oliver.com

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/a-forgery-of-our-own/feed/ 0
Leo Frank: Guilty of Murder, part 3 http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/leo-frank-guilty-of-murder-part-3/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/leo-frank-guilty-of-murder-part-3/#comments Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:55:48 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4991 frank_guilty_Atlanta_JournalAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of August 29, 2015

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

IT WAS a century ago this month that Leo Frank, the president of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith, met his death. His arrest and eventual conviction and execution for the grisly sex murder of little Mary Phagan set off a huge national campaign by the Jewish power structure, in which unheard-of sums were spent to reverse the verdict of the jury, which found Frank guilty of murder. The central theme of this Jewish campaign was that Frank was a “victim of anti-Semitism” and that the charges against him were baseless. An entire literature has grown up around these claims, it has infected the academy and, through distorted media accounts, colored the average reader’s perception of the case. We . . . → Read More: Leo Frank: Guilty of Murder, part 3]]> frank_guilty_Atlanta_JournalAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of August 29, 2015

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

IT WAS a century ago this month that Leo Frank, the president of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith, met his death. His arrest and eventual conviction and execution for the grisly sex murder of little Mary Phagan set off a huge national campaign by the Jewish power structure, in which unheard-of sums were spent to reverse the verdict of the jury, which found Frank guilty of murder. The central theme of this Jewish campaign was that Frank was a “victim of anti-Semitism” and that the charges against him were baseless. An entire literature has grown up around these claims, it has infected the academy and, through distorted media accounts, colored the average reader’s perception of the case. We of the National Alliance aim to correct that perception: Leo Frank was found guilty, and his guilt is the only reasonable explanation of the facts of the case.

The Jews are losing control of the Leo Frank narrative, as search results and the public comments on the controlled media’s articles clearly show. Today we conclude our series on the Frank case with part 3 of the new audio book by Vanessa Neubauer, based on the series published in the American Mercury by Bradford L. Huie. We now offer you “100 Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty,” part 3. I give you Miss Vanessa Neubauer:

* * *

78. Several witnesses — for both the prosecution and the defense — testified that they saw Jim Conley sitting, doing nothing, in the dark recesses of the lobby of the National Pencil Company on the morning of the murder. Does this fit the contention of the prosecution that Frank requested Conley’s presence on that day, as he had on others, so Conley could be a lookout while Frank was “chatting” with a teenage girl? Or does it make more sense to believe that Conley really believed he could get away with loafing on company property without permission all morning? Did black janitors in 1913 also have the right to make their own working hours, even on a holiday when there would have been little call for their services — and then, after showing up for “work,” not work at all?

79. Does it really make sense that the somewhat literate and fairly intelligent Jim Conley, a black man in the extremely race-conscious and white-dominated Atlanta of 1913, where lynch law often reigned supreme, actually thought he could get away with attacking and killing a white girl just a few feet away from the unlocked front door of the factory where he worked, in the highest-traffic area of the building? And does it make sense that he would do so for $1.20 — Mary Phagan’s entire pay — as the defense alleged? If Conley was plotting to rob someone, does it make sense that he would choose such a place to do so — or choose from a pool of potential victims considerably poorer than he was?

80. The fatal Saturday was a holiday. Jim Conley had been paid his $6.05 salary the evening before. By his standards, he had plenty of money — and it would have been very hard to drink it down very much on Friday, at a nickel a pint in those days. Conley was a man who liked his beer and billiards, and the town was wide open for that kind of fun all day. Why was he there at the factory, then? He certainly wouldn’t have wanted to be there, doing apparently nothing for hours on end. He also ran the risk of being disciplined if he was loafing there without permission. He was manifestly not sweeping, his ostensible job, on that day — he was just sitting, watching. The only reasonable explanation is that his boss, Leo Frank, had asked him to be there for that very purpose.

81. The relationship of Leo Frank and the National Pencil Company to Jim Conley was a strange one. Why was Jim Conley’s sweeper’s salary much higher — $6.05 versus $4.05 — than the average of the white employees, many of whom were skilled machine operators? Could it be that Conley served a very important but secret purpose for Leo Frank, exactly as the prosecution alleged? Could he have had knowledge that could potentially hurt Leo Frank, justifying Frank granting him special privileges?

82. According to a female National Pencil Company employee, Jim Conley was once caught “sprinkling” (urinating) on the pencils, surely a very serious offense. But Conley was never fired. (Trial Testimony of Herbert George Schiff, Brief of Evidence, Leo Frank Trial, August, 1913) Again, could it be that James Conley served a very important but secret purpose for Leo Frank, and could he have possessed knowledge that could damage Frank?

83. According to fellow employee Gordon Bailey (Leo Frank trial, Brief of Evidence, August, 1913) Jim Conley was not always required to punch the time clock. Why would the “Negro sweeper,” as they called him, surely the lowest-ranking employee in the pencil factory hierarchy, be given such an unprecedented privilege by Leo M. Frank? Why was Jim Conley the only person out of the 170 factory employees who didn’t have to punch the time clock — unless Jim Conley was more than meets the eye?

84. In 1983, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL), along with other Jewish groups, spearheaded a campaign to get the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles to issue a posthumous pardon to Leo Frank, basing their case largely on the 1982 statement of Alonzo Mann. The Board found that Mann’s statement added no new evidence to the case. They also noted that Governor Slaton in his 1915 commutation decision had already considered that the elevator may not have been used to move Mary Phagan’s body, but nevertheless he upheld Frank’s conviction. The ADL’s petition was denied and Leo Frank’s guilty verdict was affirmed.

85. The ADL and other Jewish groups filed again in 1986 for Leo Frank to be pardoned by the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. This time the Jewish groups claimed that, because the state of Georgia had failed to prevent the lynching of Leo Frank after his sentence was commuted by Governor Slaton, Leo Frank’s rights had been violated and he should be pardoned on that basis alone. A great deal of pressure was applied to the Board via sensational stories, editorials, and even fictionalized accounts in the media. With this far more limited claim — that Frank was not protected from lynching as he ought to have been — the Board was compelled to agree. But the Board would not and did not exonerate Leo Frank of his guilt for the strangulation death of Mary Anne Phagan on April 26, 1913. His conviction for her murder still stands.

86. Lucille Selig Frank, Leo Frank’s wife, is known as a fiercely loyal spouse who passionately defended her husband against charges both criminal and moral, and stood by his side during his trial and appeals. There are some indications, however, that she may have early on during the Mary Phagan case believed that her husband had not been entirely faithful and had in fact killed Mary Phagan, probably believing it to be accidental. Long after her husband’s death, she may have returned to those views.

Mrs. Leo Frank in 1913: Is it conceivable that her 29-year-old husband, surrounded every working day by over 150 young women and teenage girls, was unfaithful?

Mrs. Leo Frank in 1913: Is it conceivable that her 29-year-old husband, surrounded every working day by over 150 young women and teenage girls, was unfaithful?

State’s Exhibit J at Leo Frank’s trial consisted of an affidavit by Minola McKnight, the Frank’s black cook. Mrs. McKnight first came to the attention of the authorities when her husband told police that his wife had heard some startling revelations while working at the Frank residence the evening of the murder — namely, that Leo Frank had drunkenly and remorsefully admitted to his wife that he and a girl “had been caught” at the factory, that he “didn’t know why he would murder” her, and that he asked his wife Lucille to get him a pistol so he could kill himself.

These are Minola McKnight’s own words from the affidavit: “Sunday, Miss Lucille said to Mrs. Selig that Mr. Frank didn’t rest so good Saturday night; she said he was drunk and wouldn’t let her sleep with him… Miss Lucille  said Sunday that Mr. Frank told her Saturday night that he was in trouble, and that he didn’t know the reason why he would murder, and he told his wife to get his pistol and let him kill himself… When I left home to go to the solicitor general’s office, they told me to mind how I talked. They pay me $3.50 a week, but last week they paid me $4.00, and one week she paid me $6.50. Up to the time of the murder I was getting $3.50 a week and the week right after the murder I don’t remember how much she paid me, and the next week they paid me $3.50, and the next week they paid me $6.50, and the next week they paid me $4.00 and the next week they paid me $4.00. One week, I don’t remember which one, Mrs. Selig gave me $5, but it wasn’t for my work, and they didn’t tell me what it was for, she just said, ‘Here is $5, Minola.’ I understood that it was a tip for me to keep quiet. They would tell me to mind how I talked and Miss Lucille gave me a hat.”

(Leo Frank admitted that he bought a box of chocolates for his wife on the way home on the evening of the day of the murder.) Minola McKnight would tell a different story after she was back in the Frank household, however. She then repudiated her affidavit and said police had coerced it from her. But neither she nor anyone else has given a credible motive for Minola’s husband to have lied.

After Leo Frank’s arrest, Lucille did not visit her husband for some thirteen days, after which she began her loyal and indomitable defense of him. What made her wait? Leo Frank’s explanation was that Lucille had to be “physically restrained” because she wanted so badly to be locked up with him in jail. Judge for yourself the credibility of this explanation against that offered in State’s Exhibit J.

Lucille Frank died in 1957, and in her will she specifically directed that she be cremated and thus not buried next to, or with, her first and only husband, Leo Frank — even though a plot had already been provided for her next to him.

87. Leonard Dinnerstein is an author who has made almost his entire career writing about anti-Semitism, with a special concentration on proving that Leo Frank was a victim of anti-Semitism. His book, The Leo Frank Case, is promoted as a canonical work — and is one of the main sources for the claims that 2) anti-Semitism was pervasive in 1913 Georgia and 2) that anti-Semitism was the major factor in the prosecution and conviction of Frank.

Both of these claims are hoaxes, as shown by Elliot Dashfield writing in The American Mercury: “Dinnerstein makes his now-famous claim that mobs of anti-Semitic Southerners, outside the courtroom where Frank was on trial, were shouting into the open windows ‘Crack the Jew’s neck!’ and ‘Lynch him!’ and that members of the crowd were making open death threats against the jury, saying that the jurors would be lynched if they didn’t vote to hang ‘the damn sheeny.’

“But not one of the three major Atlanta newspapers, who had teams of journalists documenting feint-by-feint all the events in the courtroom, large and small, and who also had teams of reporters with the crowds outside, ever reported these alleged vociferous death threats. And certainly such a newsworthy event could not be ignored by highly competitive newsmen eager to sell papers and advance their careers. Do you actually believe that the reporters who gave us such meticulously detailed accounts of this Trial of the Century, even writing about the seating arrangements in the courtroom, the songs sung outside the building by folk singers, and the changeover of court stenographers in relays, would leave out all mention or notice of a murderous mob making death threats to the jury?

“During the two years of Leo Frank’s appeals, none of these alleged anti-Semitic death threats were ever reported by Frank’s own defense team. There is not a word of them in the 3,000 pages of official Leo Frank trial and appeal records – and all this despite the fact that Reuben Arnold [Frank’s attorney] made the claim during his closing arguments that Leo Frank was tried only because he was a Jew… Yet, thanks to Leonard Dinnerstein, this fictional episode has entered the consciousness of Americans of all stations as ‘history’ – as one of the pivotal facts of the Frank case.”

88. In his book attempting to exonerate Frank, Leonard Dinnerstein knowingly repeats the preposterous 1964 hoax perpetrated by “hack writer and self-promoter Pierre van Paassen” (Dashfield, The American Mercury, October 2012):

“Van Paassen claimed that there were in existence in 1922 X-ray photographs at the Fulton County Courthouse, taken in 1913, of Leo Frank’s teeth, and also X-ray photographs of bite marks on Mary Phagan’s neck and shoulder – and that anti-Semites had suppressed this evidence. Van Paassen further alleged – and Dinnerstein repeated – that the dimensions of Frank’s teeth did not match the ‘bite marks,’ thereby exonerating Frank… Since Dinnerstein is such a lofty academic scholar and professor, perhaps he simply forgot to ask a current freshman in medical school if it was even possible to X-ray bite marks on skin in 1913 – or necessary in 2012, for that matter – because it’s not. In 1913, X-ray technology was in its infancy and never used in any criminal case until many years after Leo Frank was hanged.” Furthermore, there is no hint anywhere in the massive official records of the Leo Frank trial and appeals of any “bite marks.” If Leo Frank is manifestly and truly innocent, why do his supporters have to engage in such outrages against truth?

89. Far from being a region rife with hatred for Jews, the South in general and Atlanta in particular were regarded by Jews as a haven and as a place nearly free from the anti-Semitism they suffered in other parts of the nation and the world. Even today, and even after Jewish-gentile relations there were strained by the Frank case and by Jewish support for the civil rights revolution, the Christians who form most of the population of the South are stoutly pro-Jewish. The South is the center of Christian Zionism and American support for the Jewish state of Israel.

90. Harry Golden wrote in the American Jewish Committee’s magazine Commentary that early “Bonds for Israel” salesmen would purposely seek out Southern Christians, since they were almost all passionately pro-Jewish and pro-Israel. When Southerners were asked about their reasons for supporting Zionism, Golden said that a typical Southerner’s response was “It’s in the book!” — meaning, of course, the Bible. This attitude had deep roots and certainly did not materialize in 1948.

91. The writer Scott Aaron gives insight into Southern attitudes toward Jews when he says: “In the race-conscious South of 1913, Jews were considered white. In fact, in the newspapers of Atlanta before, during, and after the trial of Leo Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan, Frank was referred to as a ‘white man’ on innumerable occasions by reporters, witnesses, African-Americans, fellow Jews, pro-Frank partisans, and anti-Frank polemicists. Jews, furthermore, were not known for violent acts or crimes, nor feared as violators of white women. If anything, they were seen as an unusually industrious, intelligent, and law-abiding segment of society, even if they were a bit peculiar in their religious views.

“Marriage between Jews and Christians might have raised a few eyebrows in both communities – just as did intermarriage between members of widely different Christian denominations – but it was far from unknown, and such couples were not ostracized. In fact, Leo Frank’s own brother-in-law, Mr. Ursenbach, with whom he canceled an appointment to see a baseball game on the day Mary Phagan was killed, was a Christian.

“If there was prejudice against Leo Frank in 1913 Atlanta, it was almost certainly not because he was a Jew. He was, however, a capitalist, a business owner, a manager, an employer of child labor, and a Northerner with an Ivy League education. He also came to be known during the course of the trial as sexually profligate. These facts probably did count against him.”

92. Aaron also cites a study funded and published by a Jewish group: “John Higham, in his ‘Social Discrmination Against Jews 1830 – 1930,’ a work commissioned by the American Jewish Committee, called the South ‘historically the section least inclined to ostracize Jews,’ and drew attention to the ‘striking Southern situation’ of almost no discrimination against Jews there. True, Jewish-Gentile relations had somewhat declined there by the mid-twentieth century, and the massive campaign during the Frank appeals to paint his prosecution, and the South generally, as anti-Semitic — and the eventual creation of the Anti-Defamation League in the wake of Frank’s death — played their part in this change…

“But the aftermath of the Frank trial had no part, of course, in the attitudes of the people of Atlanta on the day Mary Phagan was murdered. All things considered, the South in general and Atlanta in particular seem to have been, if anything, safe havens for Jews where they might escape from the anti-Semitism that was rampant around the beginning of the last century.”

93. Southern attitudes toward Jews can be further gauged by the fact that, during the Civil War, Southerners made a Jew their Secretary of the Treasury: Judah P. Benjamin was the first Jewish appointee to any Cabinet position in any North American government. Benjamin also served as Attorney General, Secretary of State, and Secretary of War for the Confederate States of America. He was so highly regarded that his portrait graced the paper money of the South. Meanwhile, around the same time, Northern general Ulysses S. Grant issued an order physically expelling all Jews from the parts of the South under his control, even demanding that they leave a huge multi-state area “within 24 hours.”

The claim that a pervasive and vicious anti-Semitism was the real reason for the prosecution and conviction of Leo Frank is an absurd lie and a fantastic misrepresentation of history. Nevertheless, it is now the stuff of innumerable works of alleged scholarship, drama, and fiction, and is viewed by naive students who are exposed to such works as the central “truth” of the case. If Leo Frank were innocent, why would his supporters have to fabricate such blatant impostures and engage in emotional blackmail on a colossal scale?

94. Researcher Allen Koenigsberg states that some of the most intriguing and important parts of Minola McKnight’s sworn affidavits have, for some reason or other, been completely omitted from the current literature on the Frank case:

“One of the most intriguing circumstances in the pre-trial development of this case involved a document signed by the black cook in the Frank/Selig household (Minola McKnight). Frank’s attorneys would long argue that it was coerced by the police as a result of ‘third degree methods.’ Since 1913, it has never been shown in its entirety, and we are glad to present it here [ http://www.leofrankcase.com/ ]. Also unmentioned in the last nine decades is the sequence of events that led up to its appearance. Minola would make three affidavits in all (May 3rd, June 2nd and 3rd), but her overnight incarceration was specifically caused by her husband Albert’s statement made on May 26, and notarized on June 2nd [ also at http://www.leofrankcase.com/ ]. This description of events has never been cited, with only an oblique reference in the Samuels’ Night Fell on Georgia (1956).

“The most striking sentence (and odd omission) is shown here for the first time: ‘Mrs. Frank had a quarrel with Mr. Frank the Saturday morning of the murder she asked Mr. Frank to kiss her good bye and she said he was saving his kisses for _______ and would not kiss her.‘ Readers may wish to consider its authenticity, as new light is shed on why Leo Frank ‘so thoughtfully’ bought his wife a box of chocolates from Jacobs’ Pharmacy just before returning home at 6:30 PM on April 26th.” (LeoFrankCase.Com, Retrieved 2012).

95. Much has been made of the fact that Jim Conley’s attorney, William M. Smith, eventually believing his own client to be guilty, made an analysis of the language used by Conley on the stand and, comparing it to the language used in the death notes, concluded that the real author of the notes was Conley. Therefore, Smith’s theory went, the notes had not been dictated by Leo Frank as Conley had testified. Many greeted this “revelation” with well-deserved derision. Few believed that Frank would have insisted that Conley copy his language exactly, word for word (though Hugh Dorsey made the mistake of suggesting this was so in his closing arguments). In fact, the death notes would serve their intended purpose — to place blame for the murder on a black man — much more effectively by being written in the natural language of an authentic speaker of Southern black dialect, and surely that is a fact that no intelligent murderer would fail to see and act upon.

Jewish writer Harry Golden

Jewish writer Harry Golden

96. In his book, A Little Girl Is Dead, writer Harry Golden, though not incapable of objective journalism (for example, he once reported that Southerners had unusually favorable attitudes to Jews), may have perpetrated the most outrageous hoax in the Frank case. Golden claimed that Jim Conley had made a deathbed confession to the murder of Mary Phagan. But famed pro-Frank researcher and author Steve Oney (very charitably) says of Golden that this was “wishful thinking.”

Oney went to great lengths to follow up on Golden’s claim: “Over the last few years legal aides have rifled through microfilm files in libraries across the South searching for news of Conley’s confession. They have found nothing.” (Oney, “The Lynching of Leo Frank,” Esquire, September 1985)

97. It seems unlikely that Hugh Dorsey was motivated by anti-Semitism in his prosecution of Leo Frank, considering that a partner in his law firm was Jewish. It’s preposterous to even have to ask the question, but if Dorsey hated Jews enough to send one to the gallows as an innocent man, why would he tolerate — and proudly claim, as he did at trial — such a close association with a Jewish man? And, if Dorsey was guilty of such vicious malice against Jews, why would his partner continue the association himself? (Closing arguments of Hugh Dorsey, Leo Frank trial)

98. Why did the Leo Frank defense team, consisting of some of the most skilled attorneys in the state, refuse to cross-examine 20 young women and girls who testified that Frank had a bad moral character? Under Georgia law, the prosecution was only allowed to use these witnesses’ testimony to enter the general fact that Frank’s character was bad. Under cross-examination, though, the defense could have forced the girls and women to give specific reasons and relate specific incidents that supported their opinion, and trip them up if they could. Why, then, did they not do so? The only reasonable answer: They knew Leo Frank’s character, and they did not dare allow any specifics to go before the jury.

99. One of the most bizarre hoaxes in the Phagan case was that surrounding insurance salesman W.H. Mincey. On the afternoon of the murder, Mincey claimed that Jim Conley, on the public streets of Atlanta and with no prompting — and for no apparent reason whatever — confessed to murdering a girl that very day.

According to the contemporary book The Frank Case, p. 66: “Mincey asserted that late in the afternoon he was at the corner of Electric avenue and Carter streets, near the home of Conley, when he approached the black, asking that he take an insurance policy. The negro told him, he said, to go along, that he was in trouble. Asked what his trouble was, Mincey swore that Conley replied he had killed a girl. ‘You are Jack the ripper, are you?’ said Mincey. ‘No,’ he says Conley replied, ‘I killed a white girl and you better go along or I will kill you.'”

That this tale could be accepted by any man in possession of his reason is doubtful, but nevertheless the Frank defense team seriously asserted in court their intention to call Mincey as a witness. They withdrew him, however, after the prosecution was said to have discovered Mincey’s problematic relationship with the truth and had 25 witnesses prepared to impeach him — and furthermore intended to produce copies of several books Mincey had written on the subject of “mind reading.”

100. Mary Phagan’s grand-niece, Mary Phagan Kean, relates in her book The Murder of Little Mary Phagan that her grandfather William Joshua Phagan, Jr. (Mary Phagan’s brother) confronted Jim Conley in private in 1934, and was ultimately convinced that the former factory sweeper was telling the truth. At times so emotionally moved that he could barely hold back tears, William Phagan finally told Conley that he believed him — and said that, if he had thought he was lying, “I’d kill you myself.” After the intense meeting was over, Jim Conley and Mary Phagan’s brother went out for a drink.

In truth, there are more — far more — than 100 reasons to believe that Leo Frank was guilty of murdering Mary Phagan. There are far more than 100 reasons to believe that the claim of widespread “Southern anti-Semitism,” virtually promoted as gospel today, is a complete and malicious fraud. There are far more than 100 reasons to believe that Frank’s defenders have used perjury, fraud, and outright hoaxes to impose their view of the case on an unsuspecting public.

I urge each and every one of you to read the original source materials I have catalogued in the Appendix which follows this article. Only by seeing what the jury saw — by reading what the people of Atlanta read as events unfolded — uncensored and without the nuance and spin of modern authors who are, with but a very few exceptions, uniformly dedicated to one side — can you truly understand the tragedy of little Mary Phagan and the whirlwind her death unleashed.

In my opinion, the most horrible imposture, the real injustice, in the Frank case as it stands today is that millions of trusting men and women, children and students, all across the world have been forcefully imprinted, by a relentless multimillion-dollar media campaign, with the idea that Leo Frank  — the monster who almost certainly abused and strangled bright and beautiful Mary Anne Phagan to death — is the “real victim” in this case.

* * *

You’ve been listening to Vanessa Neubauer’s new audio book, based on the American Mercury‘s series “100 Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty.”

The Leo Frank affair remains significant 100 years later. It’s important for us to understand just how weak and insupportable the Jewish propaganda is about this case. It’s important for the memory of Mary Phagan and the peace of mind of her family to know that her real killer was justly convicted. It’s important to understand how the world’s wealthiest and most powerful ethnic group — the Jews — tried to make Southern Whites feel guilty about an “anti-Semitism” that never existed. It’s important to understand that this same Jewish power structure has gone on to inculcate guilt in all White men and women for their supposed part in slavery and “racism” — with “evidence” just as thin, just as preposterous. And it’s very, very important to understand that with some dedication and courage and work, we can defeat these media liars in their own arena and change the minds of millions of people.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at Whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. You can join and support us by visiting natall.com — or write to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast ]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/leo-frank-guilty-of-murder-part-3/feed/ 2
Elon Musk’s Hyperloop to Start Construction in 2016 http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/elon-musks-hyperloop-to-start-construction-in-2016/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/elon-musks-hyperloop-to-start-construction-in-2016/#comments Sat, 29 Aug 2015 05:58:13 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5012 55d73306c361887d268b456b

REMEMBER the hyperloop – the futuristic transportation system that’s faster than an airplane that no one thought possible just years ago? Well, the visionary Elon Musk’s idea just got a new lease on life: we could see construction as early as 2016. (ILLUSTRATION: Hyperloop passenger capsule version cutaway with passengers onboard. © teslamotors.com)

A public opening of the five-mile test track in Quay Valley, California is slated for 2018.

Now, Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HTT) wants to prove they can shoulder the load that comes with creating something straight out of science fiction, and made the announcement on Thursday. The company will partner up with engineering-design firm AECOM, as well as the Swiss company Oerlikon, which specializes in vacuums – a technology that is key to the idea. The . . . → Read More: Elon Musk’s Hyperloop to Start Construction in 2016]]> 55d73306c361887d268b456b

REMEMBER the hyperloop – the futuristic transportation system that’s faster than an airplane that no one thought possible just years ago? Well, the visionary Elon Musk’s idea just got a new lease on life: we could see construction as early as 2016. (ILLUSTRATION: Hyperloop passenger capsule version cutaway with passengers onboard. © teslamotors.com)

A public opening of the five-mile test track in Quay Valley, California is slated for 2018.

Now, Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HTT) wants to prove they can shoulder the load that comes with creating something straight out of science fiction, and made the announcement on Thursday. The company will partner up with engineering-design firm AECOM, as well as the Swiss company Oerlikon, which specializes in vacuums – a technology that is key to the idea. The last piece of the puzzle is architectural firm Hodgetts + Fung.

CM5RdcaWsAAlyNN

Elon Musk’s Hyperloop is actually getting kinda serious, with construction to begin in 2016 http://wrd.cm/1UVXgz6

HTT has only revealed news of the partnership to Tech Insider on Thursday, although the alliance has been on for a while. Genius, Elon Musk’s Space X, as well as Boeing is lending engineers to the task as well (it was actually Musk’s idea to begin with).

Some confusion may arise as to what a hyperloop is. Not so long ago, people were introduced to the idea of tube transport travelling in a complete vacuum – the pneumatic tube: something that could get you from eastern to western Russia in a matter of hours. But alas, a perfect vacuum remains as elusive as ever. However, as Musk put it exactly two years ago in 2013, above-ground transportation in a near-vacuum, and with extremely low air pressure inside the tubes, is indeed a possibility. He then basically suggested others take up the task.

55d73334c46188a50d8b4570

Hyperloop passenger transport capsule conceptual design rendering.

His presentation of the Hyperloop concept, which came along with futuristic renderings of sleek aluminum passenger pods, would travel in an enclosed environment shielded by steel tubes, mounted on pylons 50 to 100 yards apart, at speeds surpassing that of commercial jet liners. That means that the capsules would be moving faster than 500 mph. A trip from San Francisco to Los Angeles would take you about 30 minutes.

Now, Dirk Ahlborn, CEO of Hyperloop Transportation Technologies, has a serious message for all the naysayers, regarding the partnership reveal: “It’s a validation of the fact that our model works… It’s the next step,” he told Wired.

HTT’s creation in 2013 coincided with Musk’s report, but also owes itself to a mixture of crowd-funding and crowd-sourcing platforms under the flag of JumpStartFund – a startup that brings together engineers willing to basically work for free in exchange for stock options. And it’s not like it’s a walk in the park: the five-mile test track they’re building in Quay Valley, California, is going to cost $100 million.

Two years later, the company announces it now has 400 “team members.” Ahlborn now tells the Insider that the company is in the process of acquiring all the necessary permits to begin selecting builders for its vision.

CM74h4pUsAAcenx

Dirk Alhborn’s Hyperloop gets a little closer to reality http://engt.co/1LnjZ2K

“We have everything basically figured out for Quay Valley, but we are still trying to continuously develop new ways of making things better or more economical. The timing always varies a little bit, but we are making steady progress, and, for now, we are still in our timeline and everything looks good,” the chief told the Insider.

“What we are doing has never been done before, so that is a very big challenge. Over the next couple of months, we are going to reveal some things we have been working on for quite some time,” Ahlborn added.

The participants are no small players either: Oerlikon is so good at what it does that it was one of the contractors that helped build the Large Hadron Collider. The company has been in the vacuum business for a century.

As Wired learned from the company’s head of business development, Carl Brockmeyer – “I don’t think the construction hurdles are significant compared to other technologies that are already out there”.

“From a technical point of view, it’s not a challenge. We are used to much higher and harsher applications.”

CM3cMWtWgAAdJ5p

New details released on @SpaceX @Hyperloop pod competition. http://tx.ag/eVkgZI5

The tough part, according to Brockmeyer, is keeping within budget and energy constraints, which will be colossal; six of the company’s specialists are currently engaged in simulating the conditions required to bring the tube down to near-zero pressure. The final costs associated with that are still unknown.

Also, while Musk himself won’t be on the project, his company Space X is hosting a competition next year for the best capsule, with participants working individually or in groups, and over 1,200 engineers have already shown interest in participating. Before August runs out, Space X will post additional details about the competition.

* * *

Source: RT

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/elon-musks-hyperloop-to-start-construction-in-2016/feed/ 1
Hillary Clinton Moves Left on Every Issue — Except Israel http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/hillary-clinton-moves-left-on-every-issue-except-israel/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/hillary-clinton-moves-left-on-every-issue-except-israel/#comments Sat, 29 Aug 2015 03:20:15 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5010 21e7958767e2854c6270dc6ec8c6b33398cf4d0e

Republicans, Democrats, liberals, conservatives — all have their Jewish “donors” and controllers; all are dedicated to our death. The only way out is an explicitly White society.

FROM IMMIGRATION to campaign finance reform to criminal justice, Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy is clear: Move to Barack Obama’s left, to energize liberal voters. Except on Israel, where she’s moving to Barack Obama’s right, to energize hawkish donors. (ILLUSTRATION: Then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton laughs as she meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, September 27, 2012.)

The latest example is a just-released letter about her opposition to the movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel (BDS). Among the most significant things about the letter is one of the people to whom it’s addressed: Haim Saban. (Hillary sent similar letters to at least . . . → Read More: Hillary Clinton Moves Left on Every Issue — Except Israel]]> 21e7958767e2854c6270dc6ec8c6b33398cf4d0e

Republicans, Democrats, liberals, conservatives — all have their Jewish “donors” and controllers; all are dedicated to our death. The only way out is an explicitly White society.

FROM IMMIGRATION to campaign finance reform to criminal justice, Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy is clear: Move to Barack Obama’s left, to energize liberal voters. Except on Israel, where she’s moving to Barack Obama’s right, to energize hawkish donors. (ILLUSTRATION: Then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton laughs as she meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, September 27, 2012.)

The latest example is a just-released letter about her opposition to the movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel (BDS). Among the most significant things about the letter is one of the people to whom it’s addressed: Haim Saban. (Hillary sent similar letters to at least two other Jewish organizational officials, Malcolm Hoenlein and Jack Rosen). Saban is neither an expert on the Middle East nor on Jewish law or culture. He’s a guy who writes large checks. These days, if Joseph Ber Soleveitchik or Abraham Joshua Heschel wanted to correspond with a presidential candidate, they’d first be asked to donate to his Super PAC.

And Saban isn’t just any mega-donor. He’s a mega-donor who thinks Barack Obama has been bad for Israel. As Connie Bruck reported a few years ago in The New Yorker, Saban was so suspicious of Obama’s views on Iran in 2008 that he considered backing John McCain. Saban’s preferred approach: “I would bomb the daylight out of these sons of bitches.” Not surprisingly, one Saban advisor told Bruck, “I don’t think Haim feels particularly positive about Bibi’s performance. But he certainly isn’t happy about Obama’s.”

Reading Hillary’s letter in light of its recipient, a few things become clear. First, don’t expect her to express much concern for Palestinians. In his campaign book, “The Audacity of Hope,” Obama emphasized the common humanity of Palestinians and Israeli Jews. “Traveling through Israel and the West Bank,” he wrote. “I talked to Jews who’d lost parents in the Holocaust and brothers in suicide bombings; I heard Palestinians talk of the indignities of checkpoints and reminisce about the land they had lost. I flew by helicopter across the line separating the two peoples and found myself unable to distinguish Jewish towns from Arab towns, all of them like fragile outposts against the green and stony hills.”

Compare that to Hillary’s letter. Yes, she reaffirms her support for two states. But only because “Israel’s long-term security and future as a Jewish state depends on having two states for two peoples.” Not because Palestinians have legitimate grievances or aspirations. And Hillary reaffirms that support in a letter to Saban, a man who, like her, supports Palestinian statehood because it preserves Israel’s Jewish majority but has so little regard for Palestinians that at an event last November, he endorsed Sheldon Adelson’s contention that they are an “invented people.”

Second, Hillary isn’t serious about combatting BDS. In her letter, she asks Saban’s “advice on how we can work together — across party lines and with a diverse array of voices” to oppose BDS. But Saban has already publicly offered that advice, and it’s disastrous. Last month, he co-sponsored an anti-BDS Summit with Adelson whose “diverse array of voices” ranged from establishment Jewish groups that defend Israeli policy in the West Bank to right-wing Jewish groups that muse about whether Barack Obama is Muslim.

Left out were those American Jewish organizations, like J Street and Americans for Peace Now, which think Israel’s undemocratic control of millions of stateless Palestinians constitutes a moral problem. Left out, in other words, were the only American Jewish groups that enjoy any credibility among the progressives to whom the BDS movement appeals. If Hillary really wanted to combat BDS — as opposed to raising money by pretending to combat it — Saban is among the last people whose advice she’d seek.

Thirdly, and most intriguingly, Hillary is signaling that she may oppose Obama if he backs a two-state resolution at the UN this fall. In her letter, she goes out of her way to equate the BDS movement with Palestinian initiatives at the UN. “We’ve seen this sort of attack before at the UN and elsewhere,” writes Hillary. “As senator and secretary of state, I saw how crucial it is for America to defend Israel at every turn. I have opposed dozens of anti-Israel resolutions at the UN … And I made sure the United States blocked Palestinian attempts at the UN to unilaterally declare statehood.”

Made sure. The implication is that left to their own devices, others in the Obama administration might not have come to Israel’s aid. It all adds up to a hint that if the White House backs a two-state resolution at the Security Council this fall, the woman who says America must “defend Israel at every turn” at the UN will make her opposition known.

But if Hillary really wants to stop the growth of BDS, she should be thrilled by the prospect of a two-state resolution at the UN. The “outcome [to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict] can only be achieved through direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians,” she writes. “It cannot be imposed from the outside or by unilateral actions.” This is nonsense. An outcome is being imposed, every day, by Israel’s unilateral expropriation of land in the West Bank, much of it owned by individual Palestinians, which Israel then doles out to Jewish settlers, thus making a viable Palestinian state harder and harder to achieve.

The only way to prevent this Israeli unilateralism is through solutions “imposed from the outside.” That’s what Bill Clinton recognized in 2000 when he outlined his famous parameters for a two-state deal. Those parameters didn’t substitute for direct negotiations but they provided a framework — which Clinton bluntly told the two parties they could not amend — which gave negotiations a greater chance of success.

That’s even more necessary today. How can direct negotiations possibly succeed when Benjamin Netanyahu has explicitly and repeatedly said that he doesn’t support a Palestinian state anytime soon, and doesn’t support one near the 1967 lines ever? The only way to make direct negotiations meaningful is to force Netanyahu, or some Israeli successor, back into the paradigm outlined by Bill Clinton and the Arab Peace Initiative, the paradigm that in 2007 and 2008 guided the productive talks between Mahmoud Abbas and Ehud Olmert.

Unless that framework is “imposed from the outside,” people morally opposed to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank will see no hope for ending it without BDS. And they will gradually embrace the movement, even though it goes beyond the two-state solution to question the legitimacy of Israel as a Jewish state within any borders.

The Obama administration, by signaling that it may support such a UN framework this fall, is pursuing the best alternative to BDS that exists today. If Hillary helps torpedo that UN initiative, Haim Saban should look forward to more letters from her about BDS in the future. Because the Democratic presidential frontrunner will have done her part to help it grow.

* * *

Source: Haaretz

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/hillary-clinton-moves-left-on-every-issue-except-israel/feed/ 0
University Teaches Students that White People Can’t be Oppressed http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/university-teaches-students-that-white-people-cant-be-oppressed/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/university-teaches-students-that-white-people-cant-be-oppressed/#comments Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:00:55 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4987 KvSEUSM

AN instructional guide apparently in use at Northeastern University in Boston is teaching the school’s residential assistants that it is impossible for white people or men to be oppressed.

“In order to have the experience of being oppressed one must belong to an oppressed category,” the guide, titled “The Umbrella of Oppression,” says. “Men cannot be oppressed as men, just as whites cannot be oppressed as whites.”

The guide was posted to the university’s Resident Assistant Resource Link portal, and was revealed to the wider public when a screenshot of it was posted to the popular news aggregator Reddit on its TumblrInAction page.

After its blunt declaration that whites and men can’t be oppressed, the guide then reiterates itself to ram the point home.

“For a male to experience oppression, they would also need to be . . . → Read More: University Teaches Students that White People Can’t be Oppressed]]> KvSEUSM

AN instructional guide apparently in use at Northeastern University in Boston is teaching the school’s residential assistants that it is impossible for white people or men to be oppressed.

“In order to have the experience of being oppressed one must belong to an oppressed category,” the guide, titled “The Umbrella of Oppression,” says. “Men cannot be oppressed as men, just as whites cannot be oppressed as whites.”

The guide was posted to the university’s Resident Assistant Resource Link portal, and was revealed to the wider public when a screenshot of it was posted to the popular news aggregator Reddit on its TumblrInAction page.

After its blunt declaration that whites and men can’t be oppressed, the guide then reiterates itself to ram the point home.

“For a male to experience oppression, they would also need to be a person of color, gay, disabled, or in a lower social class. They cannot be simply because they are male.”

The guide then concludes with a handy image of the “umbrella of oppression,” visually showcasing the many types of pernicious oppression that can be seen in the dangerous world of the American university system:

The notion that racism and other discriminatory views are a one-way street is a common one in academia and certain other circles. Numerous articles have been written to promote the notion, for instance, that black people cannot be racist.

As noted by the website Campus Reform, Northeastern’s use of the guide isn’t exactly surprising. The school also has an LGBTQA resource center that warns about the “heterosexism” inherent in having M/F checkboxes on forms, and the school also has a lengthy response protocol for handling so-called “bias incidents.”

* * *

Source: Daily Caller

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/university-teaches-students-that-white-people-cant-be-oppressed/feed/ 0
German Girls Must Cover Arms and Legs to Appease Syrian “Refugees” http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/german-girls-must-cover-arms-and-legs-to-appease-syrian-refugees/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/german-girls-must-cover-arms-and-legs-to-appease-syrian-refugees/#comments Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:00:04 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4983 invaders-germany

SO MANY nonwhite invaders from the Middle East have entered Germany over the past few months that a school headmaster in Bavaria has been forced to ask female pupils to cover up their arms and legs — for their own protection against local Syrian “refugees.”

In a letter sent to parents, Martin Thalhammer, head of the Wilhelm-Diess-Gymnasium in the town of Pocking, Bavaria — which has a normal population of around 15,000 — female pupils have been asked to refrain from wearing “revealing clothes” because “refugee accommodation” has been set up next to the school’s gym.

elternbrief

Hundreds of Syrians have been housed in Pocking, part of a plan by the German government to cope with the 202,815 “asylum seekers” who invaded that country in . . . → Read More: German Girls Must Cover Arms and Legs to Appease Syrian “Refugees”]]> invaders-germany

SO MANY nonwhite invaders from the Middle East have entered Germany over the past few months that a school headmaster in Bavaria has been forced to ask female pupils to cover up their arms and legs — for their own protection against local Syrian “refugees.”

In a letter sent to parents, Martin Thalhammer, head of the Wilhelm-Diess-Gymnasium in the town of Pocking, Bavaria — which has a normal population of around 15,000 — female pupils have been asked to refrain from wearing “revealing clothes” because “refugee accommodation” has been set up next to the school’s gym.

elternbrief

Hundreds of Syrians have been housed in Pocking, part of a plan by the German government to cope with the 202,815 “asylum seekers” who invaded that country in 2014, and the expected 400,000 “asylum” applications anticipated this year.

brandenburg-invaders

The Wilhelm-Diess-Gymnasium headmaster’s letter warned the students against wearing immodest clothes, and announced that the school’s gym had been shut down — and the Physical Education (PE) classes normally held there moved to a neighboring primary school.

“The Syrian citizens are mainly Muslims and speak Arabic. The refugees are marked by their own culture. Because our school is directly next to where they are staying, modest clothing should be adhered to. Revealing tops or blouses, shorts or miniskirts could lead to misunderstandings.”

The “misunderstandings” to which the letter refers are, of course, sexual attacks upon the white girls, as has happened everywhere else where Third World males have been allowed free rein in European communities.

For example, in Sweden, the number of nonwhite rapes of white females has risen so dramatically that that nation has now been officially classified as the “Rape Capital of the West” and is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa.

The headmaster also informed parents about additional security measures.

“For the refugees, access to the school gardens and buildings is strictly forbidden. The same goes for the school grounds during the day. The number of teachers on duty during breaks has been increased,” he wrote.

Incredibly, Thalhammer then went on to threaten the white children in the letter: the pupils are told to refrain from “direct eyeballing, ogling or taking pictures,” and concluded with “Derogatory or racial remarks cannot be tolerated in any way.”

According to Die Welt newspaper, Thalhammer’s letter was “not favorably received by some parents, but a local politician, who did not want to be named, told that newspaper that the move was “absolutely necessary.”

“When Muslim teenage boys go to open air swimming pools, they are overwhelmed when they see girls in bikinis,” he said. “These boys, who come from a culture where it is frowned upon for women to show naked skin, follow girls and bother them without realizing. Obviously this is concerning for us,” he said.

* * *

Source: New Observer

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/german-girls-must-cover-arms-and-legs-to-appease-syrian-refugees/feed/ 1
When it Comes to Jewish Ties, No GOP Candidate Trumps Trump http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/when-it-comes-to-jewish-ties-no-gop-candidate-trumps-trump/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/when-it-comes-to-jewish-ties-no-gop-candidate-trumps-trump/#comments Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:54:28 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5008 Top-Polling GOP Candidates Participate In First Republican Presidential Debate

Despite his stance on immigration, Donald Trump is just as heavily influenced by the Jewish elites as any other presidential candidate running in 2016.

AMONG THE expansive field of 2016 Republican presidential candidates on display in the party’s first debates, Donald Trump may be the most closely connected to the Jewish people. (ILLUSTRATION: Donald Trump participating in the first Republican presidential debate for the 2016 race, at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Aug. 6, 2015.)

Trump is from New York, works in professions saturated with Jews and long has been a vocal supporter of Israel. His daughter and two grandchildren are Jewish, the executive vice president of his organization is Jewish — and Trump certainly has chutzpah.

But you won’t find Jewish donors of influence in Trump’s . . . → Read More: When it Comes to Jewish Ties, No GOP Candidate Trumps Trump]]> Top-Polling GOP Candidates Participate In First Republican Presidential Debate

Despite his stance on immigration, Donald Trump is just as heavily influenced by the Jewish elites as any other presidential candidate running in 2016.

AMONG THE expansive field of 2016 Republican presidential candidates on display in the party’s first debates, Donald Trump may be the most closely connected to the Jewish people. (ILLUSTRATION: Donald Trump participating in the first Republican presidential debate for the 2016 race, at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Aug. 6, 2015.)

Trump is from New York, works in professions saturated with Jews and long has been a vocal supporter of Israel. His daughter and two grandchildren are Jewish, the executive vice president of his organization is Jewish — and Trump certainly has chutzpah.

But you won’t find Jewish donors of influence in Trump’s network of associates: The billionaire’s campaign is self-financed, not donor-funded. Forbes estimates Trump’s net worth at about $4 billion; Trump says he’s worth $10 billion.

As the main attraction of the Republican debate on Thursday night, Trump’s trademark chutzpah was on sharp display. Asked about past references to women he dislikes as “fat pigs,” “slobs” and “disgusting animals,” Trump said he has no time for political correctness. He bragged about how Hillary Clinton dared not miss his most recent wedding because he donated to her campaign. And he refused to rule out running as a third-party candidate should someone else win the Republican nomination.

Given his myriad Jewish associations, Trump is not an unfamiliar face in Jewish circles. He has served as a grand marshal at New York’s annual Salute to Israel Parade. After Hurricane Katrina, he was among a group of celebrities who decorated Jewish federation tzedakah boxes to be auctioned off to support hurricane disaster relief. And in February, he was honored with an award at the annual gala for the Algemeiner, a hawkishly pro-Israel Jewish news organization.

“I have a Jewish daughter. This wasn’t in the plan, but I’m very glad it happened,” Trump said at the event in Manhattan. On Israel, he said, “We love Israel. We will fight for Israel 100 percent, 1,000 percent. It will be there forever.”

Before the 2013 Israeli election, Trump recorded a video message endorsing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“You truly have a great prime minister in Benjamin Netanyahu. He’s a winner, he’s highly respected, he’s highly thought of by all,” Trump said in the 30-second spot. “Vote for Benjamin – terrific guy, terrific leader, great for Israel.”

By the same token, Trump has made clear that he believes President Barack Obama is bad for Israel and has questioned how American Jews could support the president.

“I have many Jewish friends that support Obama and I say, ‘Why?’ and they can’t explain why. They support him, they give him money, they give him campaign contributions,” Trump told radio host Michael Savage in February. “This is the worst enemy of Israel.”

Trump at times has dabbled in Israeli real estate. About a decade ago he bought a site in the Tel Aviv metropolitan area with plans to build Israel’s tallest building, to be called Trump Plaza Tower. He later sold the Ramat Gan property to an Israeli firm before its development. In 2012, Trump met with Israel’s tourism minister to discuss possible investments in real estate and tourism, according to the Israeli news website Ynet.

Trump’s closest Jewish association is with his daughter Ivanka’s family. Ivanka Trump, a fashion designer and celebrity in her own right, converted to Judaism before marrying Jared Kushner, the son of New York Jewish real estate mogul Charles Kushner.

She studied for her Orthodox conversion with Rabbi Haskel Lookstein of Manhattan’s Kehilath Jeshurun synagogue and the Ramaz School, and Lookstein officiated at her wedding. Trump and Kushner are members of Lookstein’s Orthodox synagogue and are Shabbat observant. They have two children.

Donald Trump is Presbyterian. He has said he goes to church on Christmas, Easter and special occasions.

When it comes to The Trump Organization, Trump’s right-hand man is a Jewish lawyer, Michael Cohen, who also serves as a top campaign aide. Cohen ignited controversy last week by suggesting that spousal rape doesn’t count as rape. He later apologized, saying his remarks were “inarticulate.”

Trump, of course, doesn’t shy away from controversy himself. Just since announcing his candidacy in June, he has called illegal Mexican immigrants rapists, disparaged Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., for being captured in the Vietnam War and publicly disclosed the private mobile phone number of Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., also a presidential candidate, at a campaign rally.

Then there was Thursday’s Republican debate. Following his verbal fireworks on stage, he doubled down on Twitter, saying, “I really enjoyed the debate tonight even though the @FoxNews trio, especially @megynkelly, was not very good or professional!” Apparently he was referring to Kelly’s question about Trump’s comments on women.

Trump’s record suggests he is far from a Republican ideologue. He has given money both to Democratic and Republican candidates, including Republican primary rivals and Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee for president. Trump at varying times has supported liberal policies like abortion rights as well as Tea Party causes like strict immigration restrictions. In the debate, he stood by his past support for single-payer health care, saying that he thought it worked well in Canada and could have worked in the past in the United States.

Overall, Trump doesn’t appear to have very many fixed policy positions. Unlike the other Republican candidates, he has no policy section on his campaign website.

When Ivanka Trump introduced her father at the Algemeiner dinner six months ago, she said, “He has used his voice often and loudly in support of Israel, in support of developments within Israel, in support of security for Israel and in support of the idea of the Israeli democracy.”

One thing is certain of Donald Trump: As long as he stays in this campaign, he will continue to use his voice often and loudly.

* * *

Source: JTA

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/when-it-comes-to-jewish-ties-no-gop-candidate-trumps-trump/feed/ 1
Senior Russian Lawmaker Seeks Ban on Windows 10 in State Agencies http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/senior-russian-lawmaker-seeks-ban-on-windows-10-in-state-agencies/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/senior-russian-lawmaker-seeks-ban-on-windows-10-in-state-agencies/#comments Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:45:29 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5006 55d71f40c3618899468b459d

THE STATE DUMA’S vice speaker has asked the Russian government to ban the use of the Windows 10 OS among Russian civil servants over fears the American software may give access to classified information and Russian officials’ personal data.

In his letter to Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, MP Nikolai Levichev of the center-left Fair Russia party said the service agreement signed by any Windows 10 users allows Microsoft to access all passwords, password prompts and other information used for data protection. The US corporation also receives other types of data, from users’ contacts, their emails and even location.

Microsoft warns that the received information will be stored and processed in the United States or any other country for an indefinite period of time and transferred to US state . . . → Read More: Senior Russian Lawmaker Seeks Ban on Windows 10 in State Agencies]]> 55d71f40c3618899468b459d

THE STATE DUMA’S vice speaker has asked the Russian government to ban the use of the Windows 10 OS among Russian civil servants over fears the American software may give access to classified information and Russian officials’ personal data.

In his letter to Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, MP Nikolai Levichev of the center-left Fair Russia party said the service agreement signed by any Windows 10 users allows Microsoft to access all passwords, password prompts and other information used for data protection. The US corporation also receives other types of data, from users’ contacts, their emails and even location.

Microsoft warns that the received information will be stored and processed in the United States or any other country for an indefinite period of time and transferred to US state agencies.

Levichev has therefore asked Medvedev to consider a complete ban on the Windows 10 operating system in Russia’s bodies of state power, state-owned corporations, and state-sponsored scientific and research institutions. The MP has also sent a letter to the head of the Russian internet watchdog Roskomnadzor, Aleksander Zharov, asking whether Microsoft’s user service agreement contravenes Russian laws.

Senator Aleksander Volkov supported Levichev’s initiative in an interview with the Regnum news agency, adding that Russia needed its own protected software to replace Microsoft products.

Levichev’s letter echoes one sent to Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika by Communist Party MP Vadim Solovyov in August. Solovyov wrote that Russian laws stipulated the gathering and processing of personal information should only be conducted by companies included in the National Register of Personal Data Operators. Microsoft is not on that! The communist MP also feared use of the new OS in Russian state structures could end in leaks of classified information to foreign intelligence services. The Prosecutor General’s Office is yet to reply to the MP’s concerns.

Microsoft’s press service replied saying transfer of personal information is only possible with the user’s consent, and that it gave users access to a comprehensive suite of privacy settings.

In mid-2014, the Russian parliament passed a law obliging all internet companies to store the personal information of Russian citizens inside the country. In order to give foreign and domestic internet companies enough time to create data-storage facilities in Russia, the act won’t come into force until September 2016 at the earliest.

* * *

Source: RT

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/senior-russian-lawmaker-seeks-ban-on-windows-10-in-state-agencies/feed/ 0
Native Hawaiian Racial Nationalism and White Racial Nationalism http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/native-hawaiian-racial-nationalism-and-white-racial-nationalism/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/native-hawaiian-racial-nationalism-and-white-racial-nationalism/#comments Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:00:55 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4971 Hawaiians

by H. Millard

A RECENT Internet column on an American conservative site rails against a move to give Native Hawaiians a vote on their self-determination.

I disagree strongly with those who would deny the Native Hawaiians this right as a distinct people. Of course, my position is consistent with and rooted in my belief in racial nationalism, which, in my case, since I’m White, is particularized as White Nationalism.

In other words, I agree with the Native Hawaiians and with all distinct peoples who want to continue to exist and not be blended away, and to their right to practice self-determination.

You may prefer the term “assimilated,” to blended away, but the point is the same. The blending of genetically distinct people into a Tan Everyman is what the blenders want. They don’t want distinct races, . . . → Read More: Native Hawaiian Racial Nationalism and White Racial Nationalism]]> Hawaiians

by H. Millard

A RECENT Internet column on an American conservative site rails against a move to give Native Hawaiians a vote on their self-determination.

I disagree strongly with those who would deny the Native Hawaiians this right as a distinct people. Of course, my position is consistent with and rooted in my belief in racial nationalism, which, in my case, since I’m White, is particularized as White Nationalism.

In other words, I agree with the Native Hawaiians and with all distinct peoples who want to continue to exist and not be blended away, and to their right to practice self-determination.

You may prefer the term “assimilated,” to blended away, but the point is the same. The blending of genetically distinct people into a Tan Everyman is what the blenders want. They don’t want distinct races, distinct religions, or distinct nations.

White Nationalists, on the other hand, and non-Whites with similar beliefs (some Native Americans, for example), don’t want to be blended away. They want to stop the genocide of their people and continue to exist as pure as possible for who and what they are, and to have their own nations, their own cultures, and their own religious beliefs and they want to live among their own kind with no genetic, cultural, or religious distortions that occur when genetically different peoples are forced to live together.

White nations for Whites; Black nations for Blacks and so forth. And, blended nations for those who prefer to live that way. In other words, let people live as they want and not force either a blended or a nationalist ideology on anyone. Isn’t it obvious that forcing genetically different peoples together just doesn’t work?

For example, White police in Black communities bring in White sensibilities and genetically determined ways of acting and reacting and this leads to the shooting of many Blacks. Wouldn’t it be better to have Black cops in Black areas? The different races are not the same. Trying to pretend they are, is causing a lot of harm. Here, again, are two important and germane statements that are worth remembering:

“[T]he varieties of mankind are so different that similar differences found in any other animals would warrant their classification in different species, if not in different genera.” — Charles Darwin

“Living organisms must necessarily compete, for food, for mates and for living space, especially with other members of their own species [i.e. those they can breed with]. They must avoid predators and other dangers. For all these various reasons, some will leave more offspring than others, and it is the genetic characteristics of such preferred replicators which will be passed on preferentially to succeeding generations. This is the essence of natural selection.” — Francis Crick (Nobel laureate and co-discoverer of the shape of DNA) Emphasis added.

In other words, we Whites are competing with other “races” of humans for our survival and continued existence, just as the Neanderthals competed with modern humans. The Neanderthals lost their struggle for survival and existence because they didn’t make enough more of themselves and they interbred with modern humans and disappeared from history. Don’t let this happen to you or yours. The Native Hawaiians are also competing for their survival. Many, if not most, Native Hawaiians are now mixed race. Those who are pure race want to reverse this, and this is part of what is going on in Hawaii. If the pure Hawaiians are allowed to call the shots, and if things go as they want, it is possible that they’ll slowly breed out non-Hawaiian genes and at some future date become a pure race once again.

In thinking along these lines, it is important to look at the genetic struggle, not just from our everyday view of the world around us but also, and more importantly, from the DNA Code perspective. It is the DNA Code that is one with each of us and which is complete in every cell of our body that has a nucleus that must be protected from being wiped out. This DNA Code that makes us, is passed on to our children but only if we mate with our fellow Whites. If we miscegenate the DNA Code for Whiteness is corrupted and the White chain is broken and our family line begins turning non-White. I call this devolution — a return to an earlier type of human. It can even be a genetic return to Africa without ever going there physically.

I call this competition that is especially important within groups that can breed with each other, the  Gene Wars, and the Gene Wars are eternal and are being waged in all living things including in humans as the genes for one characteristic struggle for expression and expansion against genes for alternatives of those characteristics. When Whites miscegenate, they lose the gene wars. Their children and their family lines become non-White. This is their personal and their family’s suicidal genocide. To remain White we must be a separate people and we must isolate ourselves as best as possible from gene flow from non-Whites.

* * *

Source: Western Spring

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/native-hawaiian-racial-nationalism-and-white-racial-nationalism/feed/ 1
Jewish-Amerindian “Trans Woman” Appointed to White House Staff http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/jewish-amerindian-trans-woman-appointed-to-white-house-staff/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/jewish-amerindian-trans-woman-appointed-to-white-house-staff/#comments Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:53:00 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5003 Raffi-Freedman-Gurspan

EDITOR’S NOTE: “Raffi Freedman-Gurspan,” a male Lencan Amerindian from Honduras, was adopted by Massachusetts Jews, converted to Judaism, and subsequently decided to “transition to female.”

Freedman-Gurspan attended St. Olaf College in largely Scandinavian-American Northfield, Minnesota, studying Political Science, Norwegian, and Nordic Studies — graduating with a B.A. in Political Science and Norwegian. According to Wikipedia, “Freedman-Gurspan then went to Norway and joined the Faculty of Law at the University of Oslo where she studied International Human Rights Law and Gender Equality Studies.”

* * *

THE WHITE HOUSE for the first time has hired an openly transgender person as a member of its staff, LGBT advocates and the Obama administration announced Tuesday.

Raffi Freedman-Gurspan, who formerly served in trans advocacy as policy adviser for the National Center for Transgender Equality’s . . . → Read More: Jewish-Amerindian “Trans Woman” Appointed to White House Staff]]> Raffi-Freedman-Gurspan

EDITOR’S NOTE: “Raffi Freedman-Gurspan,” a male Lencan Amerindian from Honduras, was adopted by Massachusetts Jews, converted to Judaism, and subsequently decided to “transition to female.”

Freedman-Gurspan attended St. Olaf College in largely Scandinavian-American Northfield, Minnesota, studying Political Science, Norwegian, and Nordic Studies — graduating with a B.A. in Political Science and Norwegian. According to Wikipedia, “Freedman-Gurspan then went to Norway and joined the Faculty of Law at the University of Oslo where she studied International Human Rights Law and Gender Equality Studies.”

* * *

THE WHITE HOUSE for the first time has hired an openly transgender person as a member of its staff, LGBT advocates and the Obama administration announced Tuesday.

Raffi Freedman-Gurspan, who formerly served in trans advocacy as policy adviser for the National Center for Transgender Equality’s Racial & Economic Justice Initiative, has been appointed to a senior position in the White House Office of Presidential Personnel. She’s set to begin her new role as an outreach and recruitment director in the Presidential Personnel Office on Tuesday.

Valerie Jarrett, senior adviser to President Obama, welcomed the addition of Freedman-Gurspan to the White House in a statement to the Washington Blade.

“Raffi Freedman-Gurspan demonstrates the kind of leadership this administration champions,” Jarrett said. “Her commitment to bettering the lives of transgender Americans, particularly transgender people of color and those in poverty, reflects the values of this administration.”

According to the White House website, the Office of Presidential Personnel oversees the selection process for presidential appointments and works to recruit qualified candidates for service in departments and agencies across the government.

Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, said she’s “elated” about the addition of Freedman-Gurspan to the White House staff.

“That the first transgender appointee is a transgender woman of color is itself significant,” Keisling said. “And that the first White House transgender appointee is a friend is inspiring to me and to countless others who have been touched by Raffi’s advocacy.”

During her tenure at the National Center for Transgender Equality, Freedman-Gurspan focused on the experiences of transgender people of color and those living in poverty. Among her duties was advocacy on behalf of improving the conditions of transgender people in prison, addressing biased policing against transgender communities, limiting the use of detention for undocumented transgender immigrants and finding solutions to address violence against transgender communities of color.

Carl Sciortino, a gay former lawmaker in the Massachusetts State House and executive director of the AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts, called Freedman-Gurspan a “role model,” recalling her days working for the state legislature.

“Among her many contributions, she was instrumental in helping pass the Transgender Equal Rights Law,” Sciortino said. “I am proud to see her continue to lead by example, as she takes her voice and her passion to the White House. Her hiring is a symbol of progress for the transgender community, but without a doubt I know it will be her skill and hard work that will benefit many.”

The Obama administration has appointed openly transgender people into federal government positions before, but no appointee so far could be considered a White House staffer. For example, President Obama appointed Dylan Orr in 2009 as special assistant in the Labor Department’s Office of Disability Employment Policy, although he’s since left the government. Another openly trans Obama appointee is Amanda Simpson, who’s currently executive director of the U.S. Army Office of Energy Initiatives.

In June, Obama named Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, as another senior openly trans official by appointing him to the President’s Commission on White House Fellowships.

Aisha Moodie-Mills, CEO of the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund, also praised the appointment of Freedman-Gurspan to the White House.

“For the first time in history, a transgender American will serve the president as a member of the White House staff,” Moodie-Mills said. “We’re celebrating because this is an important milestone for the transgender community, but we’re also thrilled that Raffi Freedman-Gurspan, an incredibly smart, talented, and committed professional, will now be working for the American people.”

Wade Henderson, CEO of the Leadership Conference for Civil & Human Rights, said Freedman-Gurspan’s appointment represents “a remarkable step forward” for LGBT rights.

“As the old saying goes ‘if you’re not in the room, then you can’t possibly be at the table,’” Henderson said. “Our nation will be stronger with Freedman-Gurspan, an advocate from The Leadership Conference on Civil & Human Rights coalition, both in the room and at the table as the first openly transgender White House staffer.”

Diego Sanchez, policy director for PFLAG National, said the addition of Freedman-Gurspan to the White House is important for transgender people everywhere.

“As a governmental trailblazer myself, as the first openly trans senior staffer on Capitol Hill, I know that educating from the inside is key,” Sanchez said. “Raffi is another example of tremendous LGBTQ standouts chosen by this administration, and it is gratifying that more trans people, including her generation and the ones that will follow, can know that their gender identity is not a deterrent, but rather a benefit that complements their professional prowess.”

* * *

EDITOR’S NOTE: Interestingly, the Jewish press fully accepts the creature as Jewish; possibly seeing it as deserving such an honor for aiding in the weakening of the host population. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency writes:

A Jewish woman of color will be the first openly transgender person to serve in the White House.

Raffi Freedman-Gurspan, who was born in Honduras and raised in Brookline, Massachusetts, by Jewish parents, has been hired as an outreach and recruitment director in the White House Office of Presidential Personnel, the White House announced Tuesday.

Amanda-Simpson

“Amanda Simpson”

According to Keshet, a Jewish LGBT advocacy group, Freedman-Gurspan “was a powerful leader for trans inclusion” in her Brookline synagogue, Temple Beth Zion, “and mobilized faith leaders in the campaign to pass the Massachusetts Trans Equality Bill,” which went into effect in 2012. She also was active in the Jewish Student Union as an undergraduate at St. Olaf College in Minneapolis.

Freedman-Gurspan, 28, moved to Washington in 2014 to work with the National Center for Transgender Equality.

Although Freedman-Gurspan is the first transgender White House staffer, another Jewish woman, Amanda Simpson, is the first transgender individual to hold a position in the U.S. executive branch. Simpson was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2010 to the position of senior technical adviser in the Bureau of Industry and Security at the U.S. Department of Commerce.

* * *

Source: Jewish Telegraphic Agency and Washington Blade

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/jewish-amerindian-trans-woman-appointed-to-white-house-staff/feed/ 1
Chemi Shalev: American Jews Must Oppose Trump’s Immigration Policy http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/chemi-shalev-american-jews-must-oppose-trumps-immigration-policy/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/chemi-shalev-american-jews-must-oppose-trumps-immigration-policy/#comments Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:00:46 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4969 2154521549

by Kevin MacDonald

HAARETZ columnist, Chemi Shalev (pictured), complains that Jewish organizations have not been up in arms about Donald Trump’s proposed immigration policy. The reason Jewish organizations must act is because over 90 years ago the US passed an immigration restriction bill that shut off the flow of Eastern European Jews to America.

The basic logic here is that the 1924 Immigration Restriction Act was the Original Sin of White America. The attempt on the part of Americans to fashion their immigration policy to retain an ethnic status quo as of 1890 was so horrifically evil that Jewish organizations have a duty to once again bring all the pressure they can muster to allow in every last immigrant who wants to come to America. Needless to say, Israel’s immigration policy — clearly engineered to retain Jewish ethnic . . . → Read More: Chemi Shalev: American Jews Must Oppose Trump’s Immigration Policy]]> 2154521549

by Kevin MacDonald

HAARETZ columnist, Chemi Shalev (pictured), complains that Jewish organizations have not been up in arms about Donald Trump’s proposed immigration policy. The reason Jewish organizations must act is because over 90 years ago the US passed an immigration restriction bill that shut off the flow of Eastern European Jews to America.

The basic logic here is that the 1924 Immigration Restriction Act was the Original Sin of White America. The attempt on the part of Americans to fashion their immigration policy to retain an ethnic status quo as of 1890 was so horrifically evil that Jewish organizations have a duty to once again bring all the pressure they can muster to allow in every last immigrant who wants to come to America. Needless to say, Israel’s immigration policy — clearly engineered to retain Jewish ethnic dominance — is not at issue for Shalev.

I won’t dispute Shalev’s point that the main concern of White America in 1924 was the influx of Jews, but of course he fails to contextualize this concern properly. As I noted elsewhere, there was an

explicit concern about lack of assimilability. Although the bias toward Northern Europeans did indeed discriminate against Southern and Eastern Europeans, it was obvious from the debates that the main concern was Eastern European Jewish immigrants, large percentages of whom were radicals (see here, p. 271 ff) and none of whom identified with the people or culture of Christian, Northern European America. Support for immigration restriction was centered in rural America, particularly in the South and West; as John Higham noted, “Jews, as a result of their intellectual energy and economic resources, constituted an advance guard of the new peoples who had no feeling for the traditions of rural America” (Send These to Me: Immigrants in Urban America, rev. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984, 168–169). Lack of rapport with the traditional people and culture of America was apparent among the New York Intellectuals and among Jewish radicals who were entirely mainstream in the Jewish community. In the immigration debates of 1924 Representative Knud Wefald of Minnesota emphasized lack of sympathy with traditional American culture:

I for one am not afraid of the radical ideas that some might bring with them. Ideas you cannot keep out anyway, but the leadership of our intellectual life in many of its phases has come into the hands of these clever newcomers who have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals nor with those of northern Europe, who detect our weaknesses and pander to them and get wealthy through the disservices they render us.

Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories, they compose and dish out to us our jazz music, they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers. (Cong. Rec., April 12, 1924, 6272)

Thus a main concern in addition to the very large numbers of radicals among Jewish immigrants and the fact that sympathy for the far left was entirely mainstream within the Jewish community,  was that Jews were fast becoming an intellectual elite with very different attitudes than the traditional people of America. These concerns are more than justified given the subsequent history of the US, and particularly US immigration policy where Jewish organizations led the campaign culminating in the 1965 immigration law that ended the ethnic status quo legislated by the 1924 law and opened up immigration to all the peoples of the world.

Unlike the 1924 law, the 1965 immigration law was not at all in response to public outcry but to prolonged pressure that was organized, funded and led by the organized Jewish community; it also occurred in the context of the ascendancy of Jewish-dominated intellectual movements that undercut the intellectual basis for immigration restriction rooted in the legitimate ethnic interests of the traditional people of America (see herepassim).

Since 1965, the mainstream Jewish community has strongly supported increasing the numbers of immigrants, as for example in their support of the Schumer-Rubio immigration amnesty/surge immigration bill in 2013. During the public debate, Jewish organizations once again flogged the 1924 law as the epitome of evil.

The immigration policy advocated by Jewish organizations for the US has always had two main components:

  • Maximize the total number of immigrants; in the immediate aftermath of the passage of the 1965 law that removed the bias toward Western Europe, Jewish immigration activists switched to focus on maximizing total numbers. (See here, p. 291)
  • Promote the idea that immigrants not be chosen for their ability to make an economic contribution to the U.S. The assumption is that, apart from those who are “dangerous or a threat to national security,” all immigrants in whatever numbers have a positive impact on the society as a whole (see previous link, p. 277-278). Family reunification, which has been a bedrock Jewish attitude at least since the 1940s (see previous link, p. 277-278), is the basis of chain migration which has been one of the main reasons why numbers of immigrants has skyrocketed.

So that leaves us with Shalev’s concerns about the relative silence of Jewish organizations:

The U.S. might desperately need immigration reform but that does not excuse the deathly Jewish silence on Trump’s outrageous statements. … If one wants to be generous, one can ascribe the American Jewish muteness to other preoccupations, ranging from summer vacations to arguments over the Iran deal. Perhaps, like some Republican presidential hopefuls, they are simply afraid of the kind of verbal retribution that Trump might unleash if he is criticized. Others still might be motivated by the kind of deep seated hatred of Obama that has caused many Jews to hear, see or speak no evil of any of his potential adversaries.

The most disconcerting possibility, however, is that Jews are losing their historical support for immigration as a defining value of the American ethos; that they are no longer moved by the plea, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,” written by Emma Lazarus and engraved on the Statue of Liberty.

I rather doubt the latter reason is at all likely, and I won’t comment further on the glaring intellectual blind spot shown by Shalev where it’s morally okay for his people to have an ethnostate but anathema for European Americans.

However, it is interesting that Jewish organizations have remained relatively silent. As noted regarding the 2013 immigration debates, Jewish organizations were not at all shy about advocating the immigration amnesty/surge bill, finding their rationale in a supposed uniquely Jewish morality while making moral condemnations of its opponents.

It makes sense to suppose that since Jewish organizations are very publicly opposing Obama’s Iran deal, it might seem poor strategy to have Jewish organizations taking sides against Trump. One issue at a time. Also, there may well be a strand of Jewish thinking that any Republican would be relatively good for Israel given the unanimity of Republican opposition to the Iran deal. Still, I really can’t believe that Jewish activists would be bothered by a second Clinton presidency given her support among fanatical  Zionists like Haim Saban and her coterie of neocon foreign policy people.

Further, the immigration debate will be with us long after the vote on the Iran deal in September. Plenty enough time to pull out all the heavy artillery for the 2016 election. After all, lots of pundits are still predicting that Trump will be forgotten as a candidate in a few months. And from their point of view, the nomination and then resounding, often-predicted defeat of a Republican populist candidate would be cause for great rejoicing — a resounding defeat for the traditional people and culture of America.

Also, Trump’s policy statement has been roundly criticized in the mainstream media which has long reflected the views on immigration of the organized Jewish community. Here it would be silly not to mention Jews as media owners, media producers, and as able to expunge voices that violate the current racial zeitgeist (see here and here).

In a real sense, much of the mainstream media functions as a proxy for the views of the organized Jewish community; proxies have a similar effect but have the advantage of not calling attention to Jewish identities and interests. As Patrick Cleburne notes in a comment on the thousands that are expected to turn out for a Donald Trump rally in Mobile, Alabama:

 A couple more events like Mobile looks like being and we are going to be deluged with Nuremberg rally comparisons. No one who can stir up the Serfs like this is going to be trusted.

Implicit in this statement is that Jewish concerns about White people turning into Nazis dominate the mainstream media. And although the media’s comparisons will be with Nazi rallies, it will be their proxies in the media making the comparisons, not Jewish organizations — at least for the time being.

This calls attention to the fact that Jewish organizations would do well not to take a public stance on Trump simply because he has touched a public nerve. It’s one thing to ruin careers of people with relatively little power, but certainly Trump is not so easily dealt with given his celebrity status, his wealth, and what increasingly seems to be his political deftness. The weakness of Jewish power is that, despite Jewish influence on the media, it has typically opposed strong trends in traditional American culture (public presence of Christianitygun controlthe public culture of homosexuality) that remain popular with substantial percentages of the public despite Jewish media influence.

This is also true of immigration. Despite the tsunami of positive messages on immigration emanating from the mainstream media, Trump’s policies on immigration are clearly in sync with the views of most Americans. Jewish attitudes on immigration are certainly not deeply rooted in popular attitudes among White Americans. The anti-White revolution has been a top-down phenomenon which has occurred because fundamentally America is now an oligarchy, not a democracy. Trump’s populist appeal is a real threat to our new, hostile elite because it is fundamentally uncontrollable.

In addition, it is quite possible that another reason for the relative silence is that the aura of Jewish moral superiority that has been so important for Jewish success has been slipping noticeably lately. This has occurred particularly on the left with the success of the BDS movement because of the behavior of Israel toward the Palestinians, and anyone who is remotely familiar with Israel is quite aware of Jewish double standards and hypocrisy on immigration as a moral imperative.

The loss of the Jewish image of victimhood and moral superiority would indeed be a very large step in the right direction. If and when Jewish organizations feel that it would be counterproductive to issue statements supporting immigration, it would be a great sign that things really are changing. I rather doubt that we are there yet, but their aura of moral superiority has never been so vulnerable.

* * *

Source: Occidental Oberserver

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/chemi-shalev-american-jews-must-oppose-trumps-immigration-policy/feed/ 1
Jewish Politician in Germany Gregor Gysi: Native Germans are “Nazis” and Their Extinction is “Fortunate” http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/jewish-politician-in-germany-gregor-gysi-native-germans-are-nazis-and-their-extinction-is-fortunate/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/jewish-politician-in-germany-gregor-gysi-native-germans-are-nazis-and-their-extinction-is-fortunate/#comments Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:50:44 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=5002

GREGOR GYSI is the current leader of “The Left” party, currently the 3rd biggest party in Germany. The party was formed from parts of the Socialist Unity Part of Germany before the reunification.

In 2013 they received almost 4 million votes or 8.6% of all votes.

Germany currently has the lowest birth rate in the world, ranking in at 0.9 to 1.1 for the native population. This means ethnic Germans are soon to be a minority and, if trends do not change, are destined for extinction.

In the video above, released on his Facebook page regarding the protest “Live better without the Nazis,” Gysi tells Germans they are responsible for the refugees well-being “because of their history between 1933-1945.” He goes on to urge other European countries to accept more refugees and make immigration & asylum easier. Germany is . . . → Read More: Jewish Politician in Germany Gregor Gysi: Native Germans are “Nazis” and Their Extinction is “Fortunate”]]>

GREGOR GYSI is the current leader of “The Left” party, currently the 3rd biggest party in Germany. The party was formed from parts of the Socialist Unity Part of Germany before the reunification.

In 2013 they received almost 4 million votes or 8.6% of all votes.

Germany currently has the lowest birth rate in the world, ranking in at 0.9 to 1.1 for the native population. This means ethnic Germans are soon to be a minority and, if trends do not change, are destined for extinction.

In the video above, released on his Facebook page regarding the protest “Live better without the Nazis,” Gysi tells Germans they are responsible for the refugees well-being “because of their history between 1933-1945.” He goes on to urge other European countries to accept more refugees and make immigration & asylum easier. Germany is expected to take in 500,000 “refugees” this year, although this number will likely rise.

Finally, he calls the native Germans “Nazis,” ridicules them for having a birthrate below replacement level and is visibly happy about their extinction as he seems to have trouble suppressing his smile and joy.

He makes further remarks that Germany is dependent on immigration as the native population is dying too fast.

From an outside perspective this self-hatred of voters in Germany may seem absurd, but as this German observer explains:

Firstly, he is Jewish, so he does not identify as a German (or the declining native population he mentions). This enables him to ridicule the death of another people that is not his own.

Secondly, after the end of World War 2, the Allies forced the Germans to accept “a temporary constitution” called the “Grundgesetz.” The Bundesverfassungsgericht (constitution office) ruled last month that all actions against the German people since 1945 are in clear violation of international law. Germany is still, officially, under Allied occupation and we are not allowed our own constitution or government. When Obama paid a visit in 2009 at one of our many American military bases, he told his soldiers that “Germany is still under occupation and will continue to be so.”

Thirdly, two generations of severe brainwashing have made the Germans self loathing — they are either apathetic or happy about their own demise. There are conscious decisions to not have children. These reasons have many origins, some are found in other European countries and in America as well, but the main reason is choosing a career over having children. Germans feel guilt about “overpopulating” the world and producing “inherently evil, white, German” offspring because of the rise of feminism and glorification of homosexuality. Also, resignation [‘I don’t want to set a child into this mad future’] and white flight to other countries or multicultural ideologies which deliberately induce Germans into having children with non-whites so “racism” can finally die.

Censorship of the Internet and literature, arrests and prison time for “hate speech,” and suppression of all right wing parties and organizations as well as no consequences for crimes and terrorism of Leftist extremism make true opposition impossible. It was a big step for me to start uploading more political videos that had deeper content than making fun of overweight Americans as I fear persecution — if not now, then likely in the future.

The Germans have no feeling of pride in their heritage left — some natives consider Germany the source of all evil. Self-hatred and support of “Anti-fascist” (= read: Anti-German) movements at universities is common, so now the newest generation genuinely hates itself and everything it stands for.

This self-loathing is the reason a man like Gregor Gysi gets applauded for what he says while we are stunned in horror and confusion. He tells the German people exactly what they want to hear: specifically that they are evil; they are dying; and that they deserve to be eradicated and replaced.

* * *

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/jewish-politician-in-germany-gregor-gysi-native-germans-are-nazis-and-their-extinction-is-fortunate/feed/ 1
Florida: Multiracial Elementary Schools Become Violent Hells for Our Children http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/florida-multiracial-elementary-schools-become-violent-hells-for-our-children/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/florida-multiracial-elementary-schools-become-violent-hells-for-our-children/#comments Wed, 26 Aug 2015 22:00:32 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4942 lakewoodTraffic

One can easily read through the few shreds of code language still left in this establishment media report; the destruction of our once-safe schools is too obvious to hide now

SALIMAH BULLOCK started second grade at Campbell Park Elementary in the fall of 2013. She didn’t make it 10 minutes before a classmate punched her in the face. (ILLUSTRATION: Lakewood Elementary principal Cynthia Kidd talks with students.)

Every day after that brought new threats.

“They cursed at me, called me ugly and threatened to put their hands on me,” Salimah said.

Just months later, the 8-year-old got caught between two boys fighting.

She left school that day in an ambulance.

Salimah’s story speaks to a jarring reality: In Pinellas County’s most segregated elementary schools, violence has become a part of daily life.

A Tampa Bay Times investigation has found that incidents . . . → Read More: Florida: Multiracial Elementary Schools Become Violent Hells for Our Children]]> lakewoodTraffic

One can easily read through the few shreds of code language still left in this establishment media report; the destruction of our once-safe schools is too obvious to hide now

SALIMAH BULLOCK started second grade at Campbell Park Elementary in the fall of 2013. She didn’t make it 10 minutes before a classmate punched her in the face. (ILLUSTRATION: Lakewood Elementary principal Cynthia Kidd talks with students.)

Every day after that brought new threats.

“They cursed at me, called me ugly and threatened to put their hands on me,” Salimah said.

Just months later, the 8-year-old got caught between two boys fighting.

She left school that day in an ambulance.

Salimah’s story speaks to a jarring reality: In Pinellas County’s most segregated elementary schools, violence has become a part of daily life.

A Tampa Bay Times investigation has found that incidents of violence and disruption have soared as district leaders neglected programs meant to make the schools safer.

At Campbell Park, Fairmount Park, Lakewood, Maximo and Melrose, children like Salimah have been shoved, slapped, punched or kicked more than 7,500 times since 2010 — the equivalent of eight times a day, every day, for five years straight.

Times reporters spent a year taking an unprecedented look at safety in the five schools, reviewing hundreds of thousands of discipline records and police reports, and found:

■ Last year, there were more violent incidents at the five elementary schools than in all of the county’s 17 high schools combined

■ Incidents at the schools have more than doubled since 2010, even as other schools in Pinellas saw a drop in violence.

■ For years, district leaders gave the schools the same number of employees to handle eight times the amount of violence faced at other elementary schools. Teachers at the schools describe calling for help in their classrooms only to be ignored because no one was there to respond.

■ Teachers are overwhelmed. Many said they had little training and no idea how to get students under control. More than half the teachers at the schools requested transfers in 2014. Several have been taken away in ambulances after suffering panic attacks or being injured by their students.

■ Until recently, district officials under-reported serious incidents to a state clearinghouse that tracks dangers in the classroom — an apparent violation of state law that made the schools seem safer than they really were.

Violence went on a steep rise a year after the School Board abandoned integration in 2007.

That decision, coupled with years of neglect, transformed the schools into five of the worst in Florida, the Times reported in the first installment of this series.

It also concentrated the county’s poorest students in a small number of schools, leaving teachers and principals to be overwhelmed.

“I don’t know if the district really understands what the behaviors are there and how extreme they can get,” said Jenna Strickland, who taught kindergarten at Lakewood from 2008 to 2014. “The district doesn’t have any idea of what’s really going on at these schools.”

At Campbell Park, a second-grader threatened to kill and rape two girls while brandishing a kitchen knife he carried to school in his backpack.

At Fairmount Park, a 9-year-old hit a pair of kindergartners in the head with a souvenir baseball bat.

At Maximo, a group of kindergartners pinned a classmate down on the playground, pulled off her pants and fondled her.

On the day Salimah was hospitalized, there had already been more than 1,100 violent incidents at the schools in 2013-14. The experience left her mother, Tammy Bullock, so disturbed that she moved the family back to Philadelphia. She said she would rather take her chances in that city’s public school system than remain in St. Petersburg.

“I’ve never seen anything like this in my whole life,” Bullock said of Campbell Park. “It led me to believe that God didn’t want my family in Florida.”

In interviews with the Times, principals at the schools described dealing with alarming behavior.

“I do see an increase of kids doing things that you would not think happens in elementary schools,” said Lakewood principal Cynthia Kidd. “It’s hard to imagine, when you’re not here every day.”

They said hiring and keeping motivated teachers is a constant challenge and that training them in how to control their classrooms is critical.

“You can’t teach anything without classroom management,” said Campbell Park principal Robert Ovalle.

But the principals also said most students at their schools are safe. And they point to a recent decline in violent incidents as evidence that they’re on the right track.

Last year, teachers and principals at the schools wrote about 1,900 referrals for violent behavior, which includes fighting and striking another student. That’s down from more than 2,400 the year before. Maximo saw referrals drop from 1,068 to 254 in the same period.

In an interview with the Times, superintendent Mike Grego said he took stock of how schools were managing behavior when he was hired in 2012.

He said he discovered that the district lacked a plan to guide teachers in how to respond to behavior problems.

“It’s a prime example of trying something five, six, seven years ago and just letting it kind of, I’ll say, fizzle out, fade away,” Grego said.

Last year, Grego made improving the schools a “major focus,” adding staff and teacher training sessions.

“There’s been no lack of urgency in terms of the investment and the time and the staff development,” Grego said. “It is on our agenda on a regular basis.”

One former teacher was unconvinced.

Lovell Blue, who left Melrose last year, said School Board members feel little pressure to fix the problem.

When needy students are concentrated in the poorest neighborhoods, middle-class parents don’t have to confront the problems associated with poverty, Blue said.

“They don’t have to deal with these low-income black kids coming into their schools, bullying their kids,” said Blue, who is black and who also has taught at Lakewood and Campbell Park. “It’s not a problem for them anymore. They’re satisfied with how it is.”

A 10-year-old acknowledges his Miranda rights

A 10-year-old acknowledges his Miranda rights

Dangerous Places

Every year, the Pinellas County School District collects tens of thousands of records on misbehaving students.

Using public records laws, the Times obtained a database of more than 800,000 referrals written between 2009 and 2015. Then, in a first-of-its-kind review, Times reporters analyzed the records to compare the district’s elementary schools.

Teachers and administrators at the five schools wrote up students about 21,000 times in the past five years. More than 40 percent of the referrals were categorized by the district as violent incidents. Most of those were for students caught striking other students.

It is impossible to tell from school district records how violent the attacks were. Students and teachers say most incidents amount to minor scuffles, not bloody confrontations.

But in dozens of cases uncovered by the Times, students threatened to kill one another, committed sex assaults, drew blood, broke bones or sent one another to the hospital.

At Maximo in 2012, an 11-year-old repeatedly harassed a female classmate, telling her he wanted to have sex with her. Then he threatened to kill them both so they “could be married in hell,” according to a police report.

The next year, at the same school, a 10-year-old was slapped, punched, choked, body-slammed, stomped and kicked in the face in a cafeteria fight over a Lego action figure.

At Campbell Park in 2010, a second-grader took a 6-inch, serrated kitchen knife to school and told classmates he was going to stab a girl in the back because she liked another boy.

Seven-year-old Isabella Harris, left, witnessed fights in her first-grade classroom at Lakewood. Her father, Anthony Harris, says he was afraid to send his daughter to school. “Anything can happen there,” he said.

Seven-year-old Isabella Harris, left, witnessed fights in her first-grade classroom at Lakewood. Her father, Anthony Harris, says he was afraid to send his daughter to school. “Anything can happen there,” he said.

Teachers, too, are regularly punched, kicked, shoved and groped by elementary school students.

On a single day at Fairmount Park in 2009, two teachers were injured by students in separate incidents. The first teacher, a thin-framed 58-year-old woman, was slammed into a door. The second was beaten in the ankle with a heavy wooden doorstop.

Loretta Evans was hurt even worse than that.

A 50-year-old substitute at Campbell Park, Evans was trying to break up a fight between two girls in 2014 when one of them pushed her down a flight of stairs, she said. She was driven away in an ambulance and hospitalized for a torn thigh muscle.

“We had a very rough fifth-grade class,” Evans said, recalling her time at the school. “They were always pushing each other around.”

Evans finished the rest of the year using a walker, afraid every day of being attacked again. She hasn’t worked since.

A discipline referral for an 8-year-old at Melrose

A discipline referral for an 8-year-old at Melrose

Constant Stress

The effects of disruptive behavior and violence reach beyond just the children involved.

Classmates who cause no trouble lose out on valuable instruction time if teachers are constantly acting as disciplinarians.

Students who might otherwise behave in class start to pick up bad behaviors and become less likely to learn.

Decades of research have shown that misbehavior is contagious, said Marc Atkins, director of the Institute for Juvenile Research at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

If disruptive behavior becomes the norm, Atkins said, “You want to be a part of that group. You don’t want to be a victim.”

And a mounting body of evidence shows that a daily drumbeat of bullying creates high levels of stress, which can affect a student’s health and ability to concentrate, said Dr. Matthew Biel, director of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Georgetown University.

“Even if you’re not being beaten daily, if you have been beaten, or if you’re in an environment where that seems like it might be imminently possible, the effects that that has on you as a child are profound,” Biel said. “And the effects are biological. They impact physical health, mental health and the ability to learn.”

Kids like Allana Crawford have suffered amid the stress of going to Melrose.

Tormented by a handful of girls about her weight, her shoes, her family, how she wore her hair, the second-grader at Melrose saw her grades steadily slipping in 2014.

Allana Crawford was bullied by girls at Melrose Elementary, her mom says.

Allana Crawford was bullied by girls at Melrose Elementary, her mom says.

One day after school, the 7-year-old sought a way to make it end, said her mother, Candice Billingsley.

She stepped off the sidewalk into the car line and lay down on the asphalt. “I don’t want to live anymore,” she told a school employee.

That’s when Billingsley decided she had to get her daughter out.

Soon after, they got lucky: They were approved for subsidized housing in Largo.

The family moved to a neighborhood zoned for better schools. Allana ended up in C-rated Ridgecrest Elementary.

Today, the little girl is on the honor roll.

A discipline referral for a second-grader at Melrose

A discipline referral for a second-grader at Melrose

Basic Steps Not Taken

In 2007, School Board members approved sweeping changes to school attendance boundaries.

They decided to abandon decades of racial integration efforts in favor of neighborhood schools.

Ahead of the vote, parents, teachers and community leaders predicted schools would suffer in south St. Petersburg. The decision, they said, would concentrate the county’s neediest children at a handful of schools, where counselors and specialists would quickly be overwhelmed.

“We are getting ready to dump some problems into south county,” the board’s sole black member, Mary Brown, said before the vote. “We need more counselors. We’re going to need more social workers, more psychologists. Where’s the funding going to come from?”

In public meetings, the other board members and district leaders promised to send extra money and staff to the schools, even if it meant giving other schools less.

“We need to look at some of the educational initiatives and what we can do to serve students at our schools that are under-served or are struggling,” Peggy O’Shea said before voting for the plan. “And there are things we can do. There are things that are going on now, and there are things that we can plan to do in the future to assist that.”

School district leaders meet in July 2007 to discuss switching to a system of neighborhood schools.

School district leaders meet in July 2007 to discuss switching to a system of neighborhood schools.

Here’s what really happened: Until 2012, board members and district administrators left the schools with the same basic resources as they had before, even as discipline problems increased.

Many school districts across the nation have taken aggressive steps to curb disruptive behavior, including hiring security experts to draft safety plans at high-risk schools.

And though there is no single solution to fit every school, experts agree there are basic steps districts can take: train teachers to spot trouble and calm rowdy students; hire more counselors and behavior experts to respond to problems; and add security officers taught to build relationships with students.

In Pinellas, they gave the five schools the same staffing as other far less violent schools.

In 2013-14, more than 60 elementary schools started the year with the same number of guidance counselors as the five schools.

More than 25 schools started that year with one behavior specialist. That’s the same staffing as at Campbell Park, Maximo and Melrose and better than at Fairmount Park and Lakewood — which had none.

District leaders understaffed the five schools for years.

It wasn’t until last year that they added extra counselors and specialists. As part of a plan to improve the schools, Grego steered them social workers, psychologists, mental health therapists and “navigators” to connect families with help outside the district.

A police report spells out allegations against a second-grader at Campbell Park

A police report spells out allegations against a second-grader at Campbell Park

‘He Wants to Kill Us’

Lacking training and without extra support, teachers often make up solutions as they go along. Sometimes that leads to questionable decisions.

Elyse Mermelstein faced a daunting situation at Lakewood in November 2013, when a troubled new boy started in her first-grade class.

In his first week, the boy made a list of people he planned to kill and named Mermelstein at No. 8, she recalled.

“The first day, my kids came in in the morning saying, ‘He wants to kill us!’ ”

Mermelstein said. “They were crying and freaking out, rightfully.

“I asked the kid, point blank, ‘What’s going on?’ A lot of the kids were scared. I said, ‘Are you going to kill us?’ He said, ‘I don’t think I’m doing it now,’ ” Mermelstein said.

The next day, her students came to her again, “but this time they’re saying, ‘He’s got a gun!’ ” she said.

Not sure how to react, Mermelstein made the children sit by the door, apart from the boy with the kill list. Quietly, she told them that if he pulled a weapon, they needed to run from the room as fast as they could.

Then she moved to the other side of the classroom and, rather than call for help, talked to the boy until her classroom aide came on duty — about 45 minutes later.

After the aide ushered the boy to the office, school staff opened his bag and looked inside. He was carrying a toy gun.

Mermelstein’s classroom was equipped with an intercom call button that day, but she said she knew better than to push it.

“It often took 30 to 40 minutes to get the office to come and help,” Mermelstein said.

No classrooms in Pinellas County have panic buttons. But that’s changing, district officials said.

As part of a plan to update intercom and communications systems, 11 schools are getting emergency buttons that will alert principals, secretaries, resource officers and school police to problems in classrooms.

None of the schools in south St. Petersburg are in line for the upgrade.

Among the schools that did make the list: A-rated Ozona Elementary, where teachers last year wrote about 35 referrals for bad behavior.

The district is installing emergency call systems in schools based on the age of their intercom systems, officials said, not on how safe the schools are.

Campbell Park, Fairmount Park, Lakewood, Maximo and Melrose should get panic buttons within five years, they said.

A victim statement by a 10-year-old at Maximo

A victim statement by a 10-year-old at Maximo

Undercounting Incidents

Ten-year-old Myles Bradley was eating lunch in the cafeteria when the other student came at him swinging.

He slapped Myles in the face and put him in a chokehold. Dragged him out of his chair, threw him to the floor and punched him three times. Then he straightened up and started kicking Myles in the face. He was stomping Myles again and again when a cafeteria worker stepped in and pulled him away.

The attack was serious enough that the school principal called St. Petersburg police.

To the officer who drove to Maximo that day, Oct. 5, 2012, the incident was a battery. He forwarded the case against the young assailant to the state attorney’s office, records show.

maximoExteriorBut administrators required to record it in Florida’s mandatory incident reporting system coded it as a “campus crime” — a subsection of a discipline category called “other.”

It isn’t the only example of the district mishandling the reporting of school violence in the past 10 years.

Since 1995, Florida law has required districts to report basic information about serious incidents that occur on school grounds. The reports allow the state to keep tabs on violence and crime in schools.

But when Times reporters compared Pinellas County’s internal discipline records with numbers the district sent to the state, they found the district was under-reporting incidents in a way that made the five schools appear safer than they really were.

Of the thousands of discipline referrals issued at the schools over the past five years, the district determined that more than 550 met the standard required for reporting to the state, district records show.

But the district actually reported fewer than half that number.

For the school year that ended in spring of 2011, the district flagged 76 serious incidents at Melrose. It reported zero incidents to the state.

Lakewood reported three serious incidents to the state in 2009-10. The Times found seven noted in district records.

Campbell Park reported 12 incidents in 2011-12. The Times found 32.

In 2012-13, Fairmount Park reported 16 incidents. The Times found 41.

District spokeswoman Melanie Marquez Parra blamed the discrepancies on district employees who were using a computer program incorrectly.

The district updated the software in the 2013-14 school year, she said, and accuracy has improved.

The charging document in a case against an 8-year-old at Lakewood

The charging document in a case against an 8-year-old at Lakewood

Fix Left to Languish

When 7-year-olds threaten to rape and kill one another and 10-year-olds throw punches unprovoked, it’s almost always a sign of how tough they have it at home.

High-poverty neighborhoods like those in south St. Petersburg have higher rates of substance abuse and child neglect, which can lead to children who misbehave in extreme ways, said Jason Gold, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Institute for the Study of Child Development at Rutgers University.

Faced with children who molest one another and fight constantly, it’s not enough to call parents, hand out suspensions and hope for the best.

“They came to school wanting to fight, wanting to kill each other, every day,” said Blue, the former Melrose teacher. “I called the parents. They said they’d whip them or beat them or whatever. They would come back and act the same way.”

In 2007, the Pinellas County School District committed to a new way of improving student behavior and increasing safety.

Working with experts at the University of South Florida, the district would train teachers to identify children for help before their behavior got out of control.

Florida’s Positive Behavior Supports Project drew from nationally recognized best practices that have been embraced by districts across the country.

When the program is done right, teachers are happier, children are punished less harshly and they do better in school, Heather Peshak George, the program’s co-director, said in an interview with the Times.

But after signing on to the program, district officials let it languish.

A series of superintendents, including Clayton Wilcox and Julie Janssen, never put an administrator in charge full time.

Schools were left on their own, with no one to monitor how teachers were trained or whether they followed program outlines for helping students with behavior problems.

As teachers quit or retired, no one made sure their replacements learned to follow the program.

USF got so frustrated with the district in 2014 that project leaders called a tense meeting and threatened to pull support.

“You will get nothing until you build the infrastructure,” George told district officials then.

In response, Grego appointed a manager to oversee the program countywide.

By summer 2014, the district hadn’t offered training in positive behavior supports for at least five years. Since then, the district has held seven training sessions.

Those led to a dramatic drop in referrals for misbehavior, said Parra, the district spokeswoman.

Many teachers told the Times they had no idea how the program was supposed to work.

Rose Robbins taught in Melrose in the fall of 2013. She said the behavior program was talked about occasionally, but she never saw it in action.

“I can’t recall the meetings occurring. I think we talked about a few of the students, and how nothing had been done, and maybe getting them a psychological evaluation,” Robbins said.

Desperate to reduce behavior problems at his school in 2014, Campbell Park principal Robert Ovalle used $35,000 from the school’s own budget to hire trainers. He said he had no choice because so many of the roughly 40 teachers at his school were rookies.

Principal Robert Ovalle talks with fourth-graders at Campbell Park.

Principal Robert Ovalle talks with fourth-graders at Campbell Park.

“I hired 29 brand-new teachers out of college,” Ovalle said. “They take maybe one class on behavior and then most of these new teachers are getting jobs in schools like Campbell Park.

“That’s like taking one course and being expected to overhaul an engine.”

Referrals for violent incidents at the school dropped from about 500 in 2013-14 to about 300 in 2014-15, records show.

Other schools have had to rely on their own behavior plans, drawn up in isolation so that they vary wildly from one place to the next.

Fairmount Park’s 2013-14 plan encouraged teachers to give disruptive students the “evil eye” as a first strategy to combat misbehavior.

A witness statement written by a fourth-grader at Campbell Park

A witness statement written by a fourth-grader at Campbell Park

Fending for Themselves

The Times interviewed two dozen instructors who have worked in the five schools. Most described feeling helpless.

“Teachers would cry in front of students, in their classrooms,” said Jennifer Butkus, who taught journalism in Melrose and a nearby middle school between 2005 and 2013. “It was a concentration of behavior problems that made it very difficult for teachers to do their jobs, even veteran teachers.”

Some teachers suspended students repeatedly, only to have the children return to disrupt class again.

Others called police or had children committed to a mental health center under Florida’s Baker Act, which empowers police to detain anyone deemed a threat to themselves or others.

In 2013, a 6-year-old kindergartner at Fairmount Park was committed twice in two weeks for throwing temper tantrums, according to police reports.

In a few cases, teachers resorted to even more desperate measures.

On May 4, 2009, at Fairmount Park, a child with cerebral palsy began screaming and thrashing. Rather than deal with him herself, his instructor sent him to a classroom for disruptive kids run by teacher Jerilyn Brown.

Confronted with the still out-of-control boy, Brown called the front office for help about 10 a.m. Thirty minutes passed before any help arrived, according to district police reports.

When an assistant principal and a behavior specialist got to the classroom, they found the door barricaded from the inside with a heavy piece of furniture.

When they got inside, they found that Brown and her assistant had tied the disabled child to a wooden chair.

His nose was running and his face was covered in drool. Balled up tissue lay at his feet, unused.

Reached by the Times, Brown said she tied the boy down because he was flailing wildly and in danger of hurting himself. She said she only made the decision after calling repeatedly for help.

“I was afraid he was going to break an arm or something,” said Brown, who now is teaching at Kings Highway Elementary in Clearwater. “I did it to protect the child.”

School district police officers showed up about an hour later to investigate the incident. Assistant principal Nicole DiBenedetto told the officer that she had heard the call for help but was too busy dealing with other incidents to answer it.

The child’s first teacher, the one who sent the boy to Brown’s classroom, had little idea of how she was supposed to handle his behavior, police concluded. She said she didn’t bother to call the front office for help because “they either don’t show or don’t do anything,” according to district police reports.

A victim statement written by an 11-year-old at Campbell Park

A victim statement written by an 11-year-old at Campbell Park

Hard Choices

Many parents who send their children to the neighborhood elementary schools in south St. Petersburg are constantly anxious. They worry their children will be hurt. They worry the bad behavior will rub off on their kids.

Kaheima Williams hopes her son doesn’t get hurt again, like he did when a classmate swung a chair into his face at Campbell Park.

Karen Rarick prays that her daughter won’t again be groped by a classmate.

Alicia Davis wondered at the swear words her son came home saying as a kindergartner at Fairmount Park.

Ermarie Otero couldn’t sleep for worrying over her son.

Otero and her husband moved their family from Kissimmee to St. Petersburg three years ago to be close to All Children’s Hospital.

The plan was to send their younger child, who had suffered brain damage in a car crash, to regular therapy sessions while they enrolled their older child, Ivan, in public schools.

Ivan started third grade at Campbell Park in 2012.

Ivan draws in his bedroom.

Ivan draws in his bedroom.

Right away, kids from the neighborhood started picking on him, Otero said. The stories he brought home made his mother sick with worry until, on a Tuesday in April, she got the phone call she had been dreading: Ivan had been hurt in a fight.

According to police, he was eating lunch in the cafeteria when a classmate tried to slam his head into the table. Then the other boy punched him in the face repeatedly.

After that, Ivan’s grades slipped. The 11-year-old didn’t want to go to school anymore.

His mother said she felt torn between doing what was best for her disabled child and keeping her oldest child safe.

“I cried every day,” Otero said. “I even got dreams. One time I had a dream that somebody came with a knife and stabbed my son with it at the school.”

Wracked by anxiety, Otero and her husband faced an unthinkable choice at the end of the year: Move farther north where Ivan was assured a safer public school or remain in the south, where his brain-damaged brother could keep getting regular treatments.

They decided to move to Largo.

“It was hard,” Otero said. “I sacrificed some things to give the best to my other son.”

Now about to turn 14, Ivan goes to Clearwater Intermediate, where he is working to recover the grade level he lost.

For his brother, the drive from Largo means the disabled boy only gets a fraction of the therapy sessions he used to get. But Otero said she knows she made the right choice.

“I thank God,” she said, thinking of Ivan. “Because right now we are in a good position.”

Ivan with his brother, Derek

Ivan with his brother, Derek

* * *

Source: Tampa Bay Times

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/florida-multiracial-elementary-schools-become-violent-hells-for-our-children/feed/ 0
Myth is a Gateway to Action http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/myth-is-a-gateway-to-action/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/myth-is-a-gateway-to-action/#comments Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:00:04 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4940 1200x801_14428_Perseus_and_Medusa_2d_fantasy_illustration_medusa_mythology_warrior_picture_image_digital_art

MYTH IS a gateway to action.

Christmas is a gateway to gift-giving, putting up trees, and enjoying Christmas carols.

Thanksgiving is a gateway to gathering together with family in formal feast.

Halloween is a gateway to dressing up in costumes and trick-or-treating.

Easter prompts the action of egg-hunts, and femininity, when the ladies dress their best.

Valentine’s Day prompts the action of budding heterosexual unions.

“Myth is a Gateway to Action.”

It doesn’t matter whether a myth is “true or false.” What counts biologically is whether actions serve life or not. It doesn’t care what prompts them. This is why it is ridiculous for whites to fight over myths. Myths are tools and tools should serve us.

A myth that has biologically-serving action is good, despite its obscure or pre-historic origins. By looking at the actions that myths prompt, . . . → Read More: Myth is a Gateway to Action]]> 1200x801_14428_Perseus_and_Medusa_2d_fantasy_illustration_medusa_mythology_warrior_picture_image_digital_art

MYTH IS a gateway to action.

Christmas is a gateway to gift-giving, putting up trees, and enjoying Christmas carols.

Thanksgiving is a gateway to gathering together with family in formal feast.

Halloween is a gateway to dressing up in costumes and trick-or-treating.

Easter prompts the action of egg-hunts, and femininity, when the ladies dress their best.

Valentine’s Day prompts the action of budding heterosexual unions.

“Myth is a Gateway to Action.”

It doesn’t matter whether a myth is “true or false.” What counts biologically is whether actions serve life or not. It doesn’t care what prompts them. This is why it is ridiculous for whites to fight over myths. Myths are tools and tools should serve us.

A myth that has biologically-serving action is good, despite its obscure or pre-historic origins. By looking at the actions that myths prompt, we can better understand them, make use of ancient resources, and pick more appropriate fights in our battle for European survival. We can even construct new myths that suit our survival keeping in mind their desired actions matter, not their actual literal truth. That is the whole point: the biological function of myth.

If Chinese had a myth that eating the wombs and testicles of Jews resurrects and rejuvenates a tired tallywacker, there wouldn’t be Jews in China.  Communism and opium would have stayed out, sparing millions the ravages of Jews. Is this Myth of the Tallywacker so bad from a Chinese perspective? Not at all. Biologically, it is life-serving.

What if it was shared by Russians? Americans? And Jews themselves? The world would be Jew-free.

Bon-appetit.

“Nature Only Cares About What Action Serves Life.”

What counts is action, not true or false. This is why myths survive; or fall into disrepute, and are abandoned, modified, or displaced. You notice this among the modified money-making version of pop-Christianity over the traditional poverty-chasing one.

With this knowledge, we can create myths that prompt the actions we need today and use philosophy to deconstruct myths that prompt destruction. Were the right myths to be launched, they would spread like wildfire because people want to take action, but are paralyzed by incongruent myths. People are searching for options. Present mythologies weren’t made for a multi-race jet-age world and can’t protect us in such a world. “Love everyone. Jesus does. He’s a god with infinite power. Be just like him, even if, it costs you everything.” We are in a state of cultural retreat. We are measured by how many nails in our coffin we can take. That’s a culture of death.

Let’s turn that around:

There has been a long-standing dispute in Christianity over salvation by faith or works, meaning salvation by, work or no work. This is a false alternative created by a de-racinated death-focused ideology. This does not come up in life-focused racialism. The Aryan is the optimized white man.

Among Europeans, you are born a white European. However, you do have to work to be an Aryan. The Aryan elevates himself above satisfaction of the moment with a future outlook where he sees lasting elements of truth, honesty, justice. He restrains impulse and cruelty in himself. Europeans couldn’t survive if they lived in the moment and didn’t save enough to make it through the winter. The Aryan has a future-focus. Racial posterity matters. Although not forsaking biological satisfactions, as such, the noble soul has vision for these abstract elements because important things, like racial survival, matter. You can imagine Bill Clinton playing his fiddle in steerage, when he should have been steering the Titanic. Bush and Obama love golf. Do they care that Rome burns? We are not all in this together, if some burn what others save. Whites and Aryans are not on the same page.

“Reincarnation Allows Us to Create Some New and Interesting Race-Serving Myths.”

It doesn’t matter if reincarnation is true or not, if it saves Europe, biology will take it.

In Myth of the Spirit Tower non-Europeans who fall to its bottom reincarnate as rich white Europeans. What’s not to like?

If there is an invading population in Europe, seize the minarets, convert them to Spirit Towers, and reincarnate the invading aggressive hordes into good Europeans. You are helping them out. “Give them the chance to be re-born tall, blonde, and well-fed.”

What Third-Worlder wouldn’t take the leap of faith?

What good European wouldn’t offer a firm and friendly shoulder pat of encouragement to our Jew, Muslim, and African brothers? After all, what could be better than being born a white man!

The more people are sick of invasion and predation, the more the myth has power.

By hate or by compassion, the Spirit Tower is the Answer. “Their mosques are our Spirit Towers.” Does that empower Swedes, Danes, and Germans in the shadow of minarets and rapists centers? “That’s not a mosque. That’s a Spirit Tower.”

“By the Height of its Spirit Towers, Europe Survives.”

Me like the Spirit Tower.

John Templeton, a fund-manager billionaire, sought a unity between religion and science. He even put up a $1 million prize to find it. Through biology, race-serving myths provide that unity. Mythologists prompt actions. Philosophers prune them. When both aim to serve the race, there is unity between religion and science, myth and philosophy. That’s congruent culture. The concept that myth prompts health (racial and otherwise) is an “exceptional contribution to affirming life’s spiritual dimension, whether through insight, discovery, or practical works.”

“Anything Birthed by a Jew is a Jew. That’s Some Racial Purity.”

Whites should exploit the Jew vulnerability that anything birthed by a Jew is a Jew. Only white babies are white; that’s just the reality. What’s true of whites is true of all other races, Koreans, Japanese, Vietnamese, tribes in the Amazon, but not Jews. Only horses are horses, not mules. A mule is not a horse, but a mule can be a Jew. The Jew spins envy for racial purity into malice against racial purity. This is why the Jew is the anti-race. No matter his power and money, a Jew can never buy racial purity. So he fixates on it, and must destroy it. Even if he kills all white people, he still won’t have racial purity. His quest is a metaphysical dead end. The Jew should just give up. Until Jews see that, they are an existential threat to to all races. As stalkers of pure races, Jews peddle nihilism as a foreign policy.

The very existence of the Jew as the self-appointed master of all races who gets to breed us out of our purity is a declaration of war on all people. Of course, Jews have killed 500 million people in the last 1000 years (Jew-Islam 270 million, prolonging WWI spawning the Spanish flu 100 million, WWII and Jew-communism 200 million), directly and indirectly (which they don’t mind taking credit for). The Jew’s megalomania is an existential threat, a weapon of mass destruction. Communism and Cultural Marxism are myths designed to kill us. Myths are gateways to action. Jews are myth masters of nihilism.

“Our Weakness is Meekness.”

Philosophers must deconstruct the Jews and their hypocrisies; mythologists must produce counter-myths that empower us to act specifically against Jews.

We can see why Christianity was deconstructed after the Thirty Years’ War, which cost the lives of 8 million white Europeans. Were they fighting over the actions their version of Christianity prompted or the literal truth of their version? Regardless, the devastation wrought caused philosophers to push Christianity out of the public sphere, separate church and state, and make religion a private matter. This became the Enlightenment.

“To Grasp the Virtue of Race-Serving Myth Would Have Been True Enlightenment.”

Instead myth itself was damned. That left white Europeans without a guiding culture: art, music, architecture all declined in meaning, despite improved technological capability. We have movies with meaningless special effects.

Jews welcomed the notion that (Euro) religion and race is of no public concern. Soon communism, that overly-corrosive hyper-secularism and iconoclasm turned Cathedrals into road fill.

To give up on religion and race as a public concern is suicide, but it was only possible because Christian devastation forced the botched effort of de-fanging Christianity. The Semitic rage against all myths by The Myth unhinged the biological function of myths across the world.

Christians inherited this nihilist view of myth and race in society. The baby (race-serving action prompted by myths) went out with the bathwater (violence over literal truth and mass uniformity of conviction). As Christians took down their monuments, Jews and Muslims put up theirs, retaining a continuity of violence through communism and Islamic conquest. Today, Jews make Jewish “mosque-building” a public concern with publicly-funded Holohoax memorials which pawn off a con: that a pig pen is a slaughterhouse with survivors. There is money in this myth which is why it survives among Jews and why they defend it. Question the Holocaust and you are sent to the gas chamber.

“Christians Opened the Gates to a Jewish Takeover in the Botched Process of Pacifying Christianity.”

E. Michael Jones mentions the Catholic doctrine Sicut Judaeis which supposedly kept the Jews in line. Actually, it shackled and pacified Europeans, and let the Jews run wild.

“The bull forbade Christians (whites), on pain of excommunication, from forcing Jews to convert, from harming them, from taking their property, from disturbing the celebration of their festivals, and from interfering with their cemeteries.”

Isn’t this odd? Very odd.  The march of Christianity had no problem forcibly converting white Europeans, destroying their art, disturbing ancient celebrations, outlawing their festivals, and ransacking their cemeteries, but touch a hair on the head of a lice-ridden Jew and you are excommunicated.

Why don’t Jews get to have their souls saved by the (Roman) sword, like everyone else? Why did Jews get special privileges that no other group of natives anywhere, ever received, including Europeans? Is there a Jew beyond the curtain?

“Harm Jews. Get Sent to Hell.”

Touch a child’s privates. Get new digs in a new parish.

That’s Christianity.

If Christianity is on the rocks, what actions is it prompting? Exactly what we see and it’s wrong. An orgy of charity for non-Europeans is not race-serving. Gluttonous compassion makes our racial enemies fat, overpopulated, and arrogant. Pride in coddling Jews is a deadly sin. Very deadly.

Christians gave Jews the power of loan shark and slave master. Christianity. Good for the Jews. Sure some atheistic Jews take Christianity as a “truth” to deconstruct at the advanced stage of Christian capitulation, however, biologically, Jews never had more power and privilege than in a Christian world. Jews can only thrive among Christians because race-blind Christians can’t stop Jews, even when they are beating the war drums for communism. Christian authorities can’t say, “Jews cause communism. Stop the Jews to stop communism.”

Their meekness is their weakness.

With Christianity in their spiritual nest, lay Christians lost their own protective race-myth, which they have to rediscover, reconstruct, reinvent, or even invent for the first time. That’s part of a Racialist Renaissance. That is why you need to know the biological function of myth.

Sicut Judaie states:

“[The Jews] ought to suffer no prejudice. We, out of the meekness of Christian piety, and in keeping in the footprints of Our predecessors of happy memory, the Roman Pontiffs Calixtus, Eugene, Alexander, Clement, admit their petition, and We grant them the buckler of Our protection.”

The Church avowedly harbors Jews.

Out of meekness. No wonder the Jews took over. You’re handing them the keys. If you harbor Jews, you’ll harbor communism, Ebola, refugees, rapists, Islam, and cut-throats. With Christianity, people are spiritually flayed. The racial immune system is gone: no prejudice. The strong retreat and the cruel rule. We need a myth that is tough on Jews.

What paralyzed the monarchs while the clouds of communism gathered? Why couldn’t they slaughter the Jews, while they had the chance to save millions of their own from communist Jew butchers? Why couldn’t the czar save himself? Meekness. The masturbation to meekness must end. Meekness invites the slaughter of your race and family. Meekness is vile, reprobate, diseased, wicked, rancid, putrid; exactly what the Jew needs to get you.

We need WHITE SPINE.

To have a culture of life, we need a culture of strength, health, beauty, youth, excellence, wisdom, race, bold action, and victory.

Make me a Spirit Tower.

* * *

Source: Renegade Tribune

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/myth-is-a-gateway-to-action/feed/ 0
Zimbabwe Will Sell You Their Dollars at Five Trillion to One — But They’re Not Worth a Trillionth of That http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/zimbabwe-will-sell-you-their-dollars-at-five-trillion-to-one-but-theyre-not-worth-a-trillionth-of-that/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/zimbabwe-will-sell-you-their-dollars-at-five-trillion-to-one-but-theyre-not-worth-a-trillionth-of-that/#comments Wed, 26 Aug 2015 02:34:56 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=4999 913vHtbOdgL._SL1186_

Where else do you need to use scientific notation to write a check for a loaf of bread?

by David Sims

THE GOVERNMENT of Zimbabwe is selling 100 trillion Zimbabwe Dollar (ZML) banknotes on Amazon for about US $20 each.

Used as money, this note is not worth the paper that it is printed on. It is, in fact, more valuable as wallpaper or as cigarette rolling paper than as money. It would take three trillion of them (300 trillion trillion ZML) to equal the purchasing power of one US dollar. It is the most worthless currency in the world’s history. If you printed the 3e26 one-ZML notes needed to equal the value of one US dollar, their combined mass would be four times greater than the mass of the moon.

This is the . . . → Read More: Zimbabwe Will Sell You Their Dollars at Five Trillion to One — But They’re Not Worth a Trillionth of That]]> 913vHtbOdgL._SL1186_

Where else do you need to use scientific notation to write a check for a loaf of bread?

by David Sims

THE GOVERNMENT of Zimbabwe is selling 100 trillion Zimbabwe Dollar (ZML) banknotes on Amazon for about US $20 each.

Used as money, this note is not worth the paper that it is printed on. It is, in fact, more valuable as wallpaper or as cigarette rolling paper than as money. It would take three trillion of them (300 trillion trillion ZML) to equal the purchasing power of one US dollar. It is the most worthless currency in the world’s history. If you printed the 3e26 one-ZML notes needed to equal the value of one US dollar, their combined mass would be four times greater than the mass of the moon.

This is the highest denomination of banknote issued for the Fourth Zimbabwe Dollar (ZML), which appeared in February 2009, at which time a single Fourth Zimbabwe Dollar was equal to one trillion Third Zimbabwe Dollars (ZMR). A single Third Zimbabwe Dollar was equal to ten billion Second Zimbabwe Dollars (ZMN). And a single Second Zimbabwe Dollar was equal to 1000 of the First Zimbabwe Dollars (ZMD).

Zimbabwe’s government is hoping that you will think these notes are pretty enough that you will buy them for $20 each.

* * *

Source: David Sims

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/zimbabwe-will-sell-you-their-dollars-at-five-trillion-to-one-but-theyre-not-worth-a-trillionth-of-that/feed/ 1