National Vanguard http://nationalvanguard.org News. For us. For a change. Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:03:38 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Death in December http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/death-in-december/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/death-in-december/#comments Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:00:37 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1922 solstice_sunrise

American Dissident Voices broadcast of December 20, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

TWO WEEKS AGO — just as I was beginning my “Savage Africa” series on this program, and as if to prove my point — a young White woman in Mississippi, one of many like her across this country, lost her life on the altar of racial “equality.”  Jessica Chambers was a vivacious and energetic 19-year-old White woman from Courtland, a small town in Mississippi in Panola County that in recent years had seen an influx of “diversity”: Urban thugs had added to the already-large Black population, and the gang subculture that took hold embraced newer non-White immigrants too, including some non-Blacks — and even some Whites, especially White women. (ILLUSTRATION: Even as we enter a time . . . → Read More: Death in December]]> solstice_sunrise

American Dissident Voices broadcast of December 20, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

TWO WEEKS AGO — just as I was beginning my “Savage Africa” series on this program, and as if to prove my point — a young White woman in Mississippi, one of many like her across this country, lost her life on the altar of racial “equality.”  Jessica Chambers was a vivacious and energetic 19-year-old White woman from Courtland, a small town in Mississippi in Panola County that in recent years had seen an influx of “diversity”: Urban thugs had added to the already-large Black population, and the gang subculture that took hold embraced newer non-White immigrants too, including some non-Blacks — and even some Whites, especially White women. (ILLUSTRATION: Even as we enter a time of Winter for our people, the Solstice signals a reversal of direction and the promise of a new Spring.)

Jessica was like many White teenagers today. Her life was saturated with mass media — music, television, teen magazines, major Internet sites — which glamorized Blacks, especially Black males, as the ultimate in power, masculinity, and desirability. Her history classes in school, and the “history” she gleaned from the media, taught her that Blacks have been mistreated and oppressed by White people, and were therefore especially deserving and worthy. She was told in church that it was morally wrong to discriminate against or dislike Blacks. She was imbued with the idea that to reject them or judge them or their behavior negatively was a grave social wrong — and that it was a positive, even noble, moral good to accept them, associate with them, and yes, give her young body sexually to them. And this she did, with enthusiasm.

jessica-chambers-convo-5-bryan

Jessica at 17

Images taken by Jessica and her friends and posted to social media sites have surfaced showing her in the company and embrace of Black males, and it didn’t take much further investigation to discover these Blacks were linked with gangs, drugs, and crime. Postings on social media indicate that young Jessica had been for years involved with Black men, beginning in her mid-teens if not earlier. One picture, taken when she was in high school, shows her being kissed by a Black male, Bryan Rudd.

Evidence has come out showing that in recent months she went through a drug rehab program and was trying to distance herself from at least one Black male who had hooked her on narcotics and possibly get out of the Black gang “scene” where she had been a fixture since since long before she became an adult. A letter she wrote to her niece while in rehab has been released in which she talks about getting away recently from an unworthy male, possibly not Rudd but, according to those who knew her, also Black.

jessica-chambers-invest-bryan-ruddBut, if the uncensored reports of her friends are correct, a former Black “boyfriend” — and possibly his fellow gang members — apparently couldn’t take “no” for an answer. On the evening of December 6, Jessica told her parents that she was going out to get some gas and a bite to eat and clean out her car. She went to the only convenience store and gas station in her town of 500, the social hub of the community and run by a Muslim immigrant himself closely tied to Black gangsters, and bought about $14 worth of gas, more than twice her usual purchase. The word on the street in Courtland is that someone choked Jessica there about a week before she died. Surveillance video shows her outside pumping her gas and perhaps being spoken to by someone off camera, while another camera captured her paying for her gas and also a boisterous group of young Black males congregating together inside the store at the same time. Jessica was still wearing her pajama pants from her nap earlier in the day, probably indicating she didn’t intend to be out long. One Black witness says Jessica was invited to a party taking place that night, and that she did change her plans and attend.

A Facebook posting by the apparently Muslim 19-year-old convenience store operator, Ali Alsanai, who was friends with Jessica and who denies any gang involvement. Here he brags about buying a $5,000 watch with cash at the age of 15.

A Facebook posting by the apparently Muslim 19-year-old convenience store operator, Ali Alsanai, who was friends with Jessica and who denies any gang involvement. Here he brags about buying a $5,000 watch with cash at the age of 16.

ali-alsanai-facebook

Click for a high-resolution image of Facebook postings by “non-gang-member” Alsanai, who is currently being protected by the FBI and who was recently cleared by prosecutors of any direct involvement in Jessica Chambers’ murder.

If she did go to the party, it couldn’t have been for long. About 90 minutes later, her car was seen burning off to the side of the road a few miles away, and Jessica herself was on fire. She was still barely alive, although firemen called to the scene said that every part of her body was severely burnt except the soles of her feet. Before she died, she managed to blurt out the name or names — reports vary — of her attacker(s). It’s widely known in the community — though never mentioned in the controlled media, and definitely never mentioned by the local police or prosecutor — that one name was that of one of her Black “boyfriends,” widely reported to be “Eric” or “Derrick.” It’s a miracle that she was even able to speak before she died, because, according to first responders at the scene, gasoline or another similar accelerant was poured down her throat and sprayed up her nose just before she was set on fire.

Most interestingly, just days before Jessica’s murder, an IQ-challenged Black woman from Courtland calling herself “Teapooh” on Facebook posted a call to burn and rape White children: “Somebody need to rape all his kids in front of him then sit [sic] the house on fire an watch them burn….i bet he was a white man.” “Teapooh,” according to locals, is actually Teanna Rudd, the wife or live-in girlfriend of Brejuan Byers, a man who can be seen on surveillance video filling a gas can at the convenience store just a few feet away from Jessica Chambers while she put gas in her car. Teanna Rudd was sharing her statement — which, by the way, was an angry response to a hoax video that she apparently didn’t know was a hoax, called “Cop shoots 1-year-old Black baby, mistakes pacifier for gun” — she was sharing her call to burn White children with Sandy Rudd, who is Bryan Rudd’s aunt: the same Bryan Rudd who was Jessica Chambers’ former Black “boyfriend.” And get this: this video was posted to Facebook by someone using the name Derrick Jaxn  — the same first name as Jessica’s last word, uttered to a first responder while she was burning to death. And it was posted one day before Jessica died.

According to one witness, he last place Jessica Chabers was seen alive was a "party" at "Bo Bo Grind's Hangout," shown here from a Twitter posting.

According to one witness, the last place Jessica Chambers was seen alive was a party at “Bo Bo Grind’s Hangout,” shown here from a Twitter posting.

Despite the fact that social media are alive and buzzing with facts about the racial aspects of Jessica’s murder — and Jessica’s life — watching the Jewish-controlled “mainstream” media you’d get the impression that no one has even mentioned race, and that the local White honor students are just as much suspects as are the Negro gang-bangers with whom Jessica had been degrading herself until recently. They did deign to mention Bryan Rudd, one of Jessica’s Black “boyfriends” when she was in high school — but only to make it clear that he was no longer a suspect, since he had moved to Iowa some time ago. (When he was considered a possible suspect, they kept his name and pictures out of view.) The closest the controlled media have come to hinting at the real dynamics of this murder was when a local television reporter stated that people on the street weren’t saying much to reporters, because they personally knew the person or persons they strongly suspected — and that those persons knew them, too.

The local prosecutor, John Champion, acts like a man overshadowed by fear. Spooked, perhaps, by the vicious response of local Blacks (and possibly Black gang leaders) when he failed to prosecute a recent hit-and-run killing of a Black man by local teens as a “hate crime” — or spooked, perhaps, by federal government intervention in that case and/or this one, about which we haven’t been told — Champion carefully navigates the “minefield” of race and gangs by trying hard never to mention them. On December 9th, he said “No, we don’t have gangs.” But two days ago, after social and alternative media had made the truth painfully obvious, he switched to “Well, we certainly have a gang problem in this county, just like there are in all the other counties…” One wonders who really rules Panola County — the constituted authorities, or the Black gangs with their intimidation, their violence, and their ever-growing stacks of $100 bills. One wonders if certain suspects are “off limits,” despite Champion’s assurances that nothing is “off the table” in his investigation. One also wonders just whose investigation this really is, since Champion admits that the regime’s ATF and FBI have moved in.

John Champion

John Champion

One agency of the regime in Washington that regularly intervenes in racially “sensitive” cases like this one — and like the insurrection in Ferguson, Missouri — is the Community Relations Service (or CRS), a little-known division of Washington’s “Justice Department” under Eric Holder no less than the FBI or the JTTF. The word on social media is that CRS is on the scene in Mississippi already, though they keep their activities secret. From their own Web site, we learn:

The Community Relations Service is the Department’s ‘Peacemaker’ for community conflicts and tensions arising from differences of race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion and disability… the Agency works with all parties, including State and local units of government, private and public organizations, civil rights groups, and local community leaders…. CRS assists communities in developing local mechanisms and community capacity to prevent tension and violent hate crimes from occurring in the future…. CRS works in all 50 states and the U.S. territories, and in communities large and small, rural, urban and suburban….

CRS’ highly skilled conflict resolution specialists — called conciliators — have helped resolve thousands of cases involving excessive use of force incidents, hate crimes, demonstrations, changing community demographics, and many other emotionally charged issues…. They are required by law to conduct their activities in confidence and without publicity…. Since CRS’ activities are federally funded, conciliators are able to offer services without cost. Conciliators deploy to communities nationwide from 14 regional offices…

In other words, the regime’s CRS comes into a situation like that in Panola County, Mississippi, and works to make sure that neither prosecutors nor reporters nor victim’s family members utter the words “Black boyfriend,” “Black gangs,” “Black-on-White crime,” “interracial crime,” or even hint at the extreme vulnerability of young White women who get involved with Blacks. And we pay for that criminal censorship, obfuscation, and misdirection. We pay for the preservation and protection of the multiracialist paradigm that is killing us.

According to researcher Angela Taylor, what happened to Jessica Chambers wasn’t unique. The following sixteen victims had one thing in common: They were all White and they were all set on fire by Blacks.

Robin and Mani Aldridge — Just last week, a beloved special needs teacher and her high school junior daughter from Charlottesville Virginia were beaten before they were burned in a house fire. Police arrested a black man named Gene Everett Washington and charged him with two counts of first-degree murder.

Michael Brewer – 15-year-old Michael from Miami had burns over 60% of his body after three black classmates poured alcohol on him and set him on fire. All three are serving time in prison.

Allen Goin — A 13-year-old from Kansas City, his two black teen attackers put him in a bear hug, poured gasoline on him and set him on fire saying, “This is what you get, white boy”.

Gabriela Penalba — A 23-year-old teacher in Knoxville Tennessee was set on fire by a 15-year-old black student. She briefly turned her back to the class when the student lit her hair and shirt ablaze.

Kathryn “Kit” Grazioli — Colorado Springs firefighters found Kit’s 87-year-old body burning on a trail after a nearby resident called to report the fire. Officers arrested a black 21-year-old, Marcus Smith, and charged him with 1st degree murder. Kit was a deacon at her church and loved by the community.

Jonathan Foster — In Houston, Mona Nelson, a black 44-year-old woman abducted and killed 12-year-old Jonathan with a blowtorch on Christmas Eve, later dumping his body in a ditch. She was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to life in prison. The story was getting mainstream media coverage until they arrested a black woman.

Kenneth Athey — Beaten with a hammer, stabbed, doused with chemicals and set on fire, 87-year-old Kenneth survived to testify against his black male attacker.

Luke Fleischman — a black teenager, who was prosecuted as an adult and sentenced to seven years for the hate crime, set the 18-year-old on fire who was sleeping on a bus in San Francisco.

Richard Michael Carter — Two black brothers were arrested for shooting and burning Richard, a father from South Carolina.

Flo “Violet” Parker –The 67-year-old homeless woman from California was set on fire by a black man as she slept on a bench.

Nancy Harris — The 76-year-old grandmother was killed when a black man set fire to her while she was working at a convenience mart. She was loved in her Texas hometown and known as Grandma to everyone.

Melinda McCormick — A black woman and two black men beat and burned Melinda to death.

Jimmy Sanders – Shot and burned after stopping to help two black men, Erik Ellis, 28, and Malcolm Melton, 22, with car trouble. “He didn’t answer his phone. I called about eight or nine times. About an hour after he wouldn’t answer I got really, really nervous and upset,” Betty Sanders said. Jimmy was 65 and also from Mississippi, where Jessica Chambers was just burned.

Raymond Vasholz — Raymond died after his black neighbor, Terrance Hale, attacked him and his wife and set fires. Elizabeth and Raymond were married 58 years.

Do you think that’s enough to be called an epidemic of Blacks setting Whites on fire? Do you think the controlled media will ever bother to mention it, or even mention the correlation of these horrific deaths of Whites?

In our last three American Dissident Voices programs, I’ve brought you the facts of Black savagery in Africa’s past — and America’s present. I’ve shown you that the regime in Washington has no desire to protect us from the escalating racial war on the very existence of White people — and in fact is the instrumentality of the organized Jewish groups which created that war in the first place. I’ve shown you that state and local authorities are intimidated and penned in to the point that they do nothing for hours upon hours as Blacks literally burn a city down, and they are afraid to even speak of the existence, to say nothing of the dangers, of Black gangs and interracial “relationships” even in the immediate aftermath of a White woman being burned alive in their own home town.

These “leaders” who do little or nothing for their people in our hour of need because they fear the media-men and the money-men are not really White men at all, but only empty shells. They are the Blankos, white ciphers, order-takers, pension-waiters, vessels of emptiness. They will not protect you. They cannot protect you.

In the coming cataclysm real White men and women will emerge who will sweep away the rotten old order and build something new in its place. A new set of values, a new morality will arise too, to replace the old. The “morality” of multiracial Political Correctness is the opposite of what is needed. The religious beliefs that led one of Jessica’s family members to call for the “forgiveness” of the killer are worse than useless too.

We at the National Alliance will continue to tell the truths that the Blankos and their masters keep from us. And we will teach the rising generation of our people the true morality and values which alone can ensure our existence and progress into the infinite future. I invite you to be a part of that.

On my next program, I will explore the biological realities behind the savagery and primitive nature of Africans, and the largely suppressed scientific facts which prove that they are far from “equal” and in fact should be categorized — at  the very least — as a separate subspecies.

* * *

This time of year, the Winter Solstice, is sacred to our people. It was considered sacred long before anyone formalized and systematized the deep feelings that we men and women of Europe had in our hearts about this season. There’s something special about the white crystalline snow, the snap in the air, the warm hearth, the bright and happy faces of children gathered round the fragrant pine tree, and the tear in the eye that we older folks get when we remember Yuletides past. Even on the eve of a long winter, the magic of this season gives us a feeling of the joy and infinite preciousness of life.

We of Europe are essentially People of the North — Venice, Italy is farther north than Minneapolis, Minnesota, for example. And it was the northern climate that shaped us in many ways over long ages of evolution. Europe is a place of dramatic seasonal changes (and, not coincidentally, so are many of the new homes that European man has staked out around the globe). And those seasonal changes were very important to our ancestors. They knew that they had to prepare for winter in summer’s time of plenty. Any tribe which did not have the discipline or foresight to do so would perish — and its genes would no longer form part of the European gene pool. Thus Nature’s hard lessons shaped us, upbred us, turned us from beings that could hardly be called human into beings that can contemplate the infinities of space and time and ponder the meaning of life. The seasons of Old Europe in fact, if we do not lose ourselves through racial mixing in the modern frontierless world we have built for ourselves, have given us the power to strike out into a new frontier beyond this Earth.

Besides increasing the size of our frontal lobes, the climate of our little peninsula shaped our souls in many other ways, and among other things gave us a special feeling for the seasons, which marked every aspect of our lives: the riot of sex and life reborn in the spring; the glory and plenty of summer; the harvest labors, majesty, and melancholy of autumn; and the bleak vastness and purity of winter.

But our ancestors were observant people, and learned early on to watch the skies for signs of the cycles of the Earth. And while it was quite obvious that winter was the time of shorter days, what was not perhaps so immediately obvious except to the observant was that the southward passage of the sun ceased and then reversed itself right at the beginning of winter, giving a sign — even before the coldest days began — that the longer and warmer days of spring were indeed on their way. This seeming paradox must have appeared as an almost magical event, a promise of life embedded in the nature of time and the universe itself.

As the retreating sun changed direction, it lost its apparent momentum and seemed to “stand still” in the sky, rising and setting at almost the same position for several days running until it picked up speed going in the other apparent direction — back towards the north, making the days in our hemisphere longer again. This “time of the Sun standing still” is called the Winter Solstice, “solstice” being a combination of the Latin words for “Sun” and “to stand” (motionless). Stonehenge was built on a British plain by one branch of our ancestors some 4,000 years ago to mark the seasons by its alignment with the Sun and other heavenly bodies.

So this is an appropriate season to reflect on the past, present, and future of our European race, the future of which is of prime concern to the National Alliance.

In many ways, we face an uncertain winter — not a literal winter, but a dark age — a wintertime for which we as a people are ill-prepared.

When we allowed the Jewish minority to take control of our news and entertainment media in the last century, we did not know that they had an agenda, an agenda that included our dispossession and ultimate extinction. We foolishly thought that they were just an odd variety of White folks and would quickly blend in with the rest of us, so the concentration of the mass media in their hands was of little consequence. We have paid with our fortunes and our lives for that mistake, and stand in great peril because of it.

When they want us to accept more immigrants to destroy our genetic uniqueness and murder us as a race, they turn on the virtual violins and appeal to our race’s instinctive kindness and sympathy for the downtrodden.

They falsely accuse racial realists and White people who love their race of being “haters” — but when they want us to kill their enemies for them in their Middle Eastern wars, they crank up the real hate propaganda, cook up false intelligence and scare stories about “weapons of mass destruction” that might streak from Tehran or Damascus to Peoria, and send our young people to die — and to slaughter whole generations of people who never meant us any harm, breeding millions of Osama bin Ladens in the process. The Jewish supremacists smile and even laugh when terrorists strike — and they fail to warn us even when they know it’s about to happen — because they know that such attacks alone can provide a believable backdrop for their lies about how we have to kill people in nations that threaten Israel — or that don’t want a government supervised by Jews.

So Americans die overseas in other people’s wars — while America herself dies, her borders undefended, as her founding race is rapidly replaced by Third Worlders who could never even dream of maintaining, much less building, the scientific and cultural edifice of the West. We’re bleeding from a thousand wounds and most of us don’t even know it.

White people form an ever-shrinking percentage of the Earth’s population, and the number of White women in their childbearing years is shrinking even faster, as easy abortion, contraception, miscegenation, and careerism have caused so many White women to terminate their family lines, causing a distinct, possibly terminal, aging of the White population that remains.

Everything depends on us. A future in which young White lovers will still love as only they can; where White scientists will discover and explore new worlds of inner and outer space that we can’t even imagine now; where the laughter and bright faces of White children will still exist; a future in which new Beethovens and Aristotles will still be born; where the greatest heights we have reached in the past will only be foothills of the peaks and mountain vistas to come — that is the world we can build if only we give our all and ensure that every White person hears our message and that every expression of our message is as perfect as we can make it. That’s what your donations to the National Alliance make possible.

So this is my Christmas card to you, my Solstice message, my Good Yule present: There is hope. Join with me, join with the members of the National Alliance who are already awakening others, and help build the unimaginably great future that only we can build and that we can surely build. Ring out the old — and ring in the new.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/death-in-december/feed/ 6
Background to Treason, part 4 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/background-to-treason-part-4/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/background-to-treason-part-4/#comments Wed, 17 Dec 2014 04:26:31 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1890 GermanyPerishFBCovers-copy-3

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 4: Teaching Americans to Hate and Kill the Jews’ Enemies [1]

By Dr. William L. Pierce

AMERICANS WHO did not actually live through the Second World War cannot imagine the pervasive atmosphere of hatred against Germans which the Jews managed to generate with their war propaganda. It began in 1933 — more than eight years before Pearl Harbor — with the aim of preparing the American people emotionally to wage war against Germany; it gained venom during the war years, inciting Americans to spare nothing in their effort to kill Germans; and it continued after the war, urging that no mercy be shown to the conquered. (ILLUSTRATION: Theodore Kaufman’s book spelled out Jewish plans for the destruction of the German people during . . . → Read More: Background to Treason, part 4]]> GermanyPerishFBCovers-copy-3

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 4: Teaching Americans to Hate and Kill the Jews’ Enemies [1]

By Dr. William L. Pierce

AMERICANS WHO did not actually live through the Second World War cannot imagine the pervasive atmosphere of hatred against Germans which the Jews managed to generate with their war propaganda. It began in 1933 — more than eight years before Pearl Harbor — with the aim of preparing the American people emotionally to wage war against Germany; it gained venom during the war years, inciting Americans to spare nothing in their effort to kill Germans; and it continued after the war, urging that no mercy be shown to the conquered. (ILLUSTRATION: Theodore Kaufman’s book spelled out Jewish plans for the destruction of the German people during the Second World War.)

Indeed, it continues to this day, in the never-ending stream of new “Holocaust” films and television features, as well as in the reruns of old war films. Nearly four decades after the end of the war the average American — especially one who spends much time before a television receiver — still has a mental image of Germans as arrogant, cruel, treacherous, and brutal — in a weak, contemptible sort of way, of course. While the Japanese have been rehabilitated in the controlled media, the Germans have not — because the latter, unlike the former, dared to raise their hands against the Jews.

During and immediately before the war, the anti-German propaganda was much more intense, vicious, and direct than it is now, however. A good example is a book by Theodore N. Kaufman, Germany Must Perish, which was widely distributed in the United States in the early 1940s.[2] It set the tone by urging that the United States not only go to war against Germany but adopt the national goal of exterminating the entire German people, down to the last man, woman, and child. It was published when Germany and the United States were still at peace, although to the author that is a mere technicality, and he writes as though the two nations were already locked in a death struggle. He begins:

Today’s war is not a war against Adolf Hitler.

Nor is it a war against the Nazis.

It is a war of peoples against peoples; of civilized peoples envisioning Light, against uncivilizable barbarians who cherish Darkness….

It is a struggle between the German nation and humanity….

This war is being waged by the German People. It is they who are responsible. It is they who must be made to pay for the war….

This time Germany has forced a TOTAL WAR upon the world.As a result, she must be prepared to pay a TOTAL PENALTY.

And there is one, and only one, such Total Penalty: Germany must perish forever!

In fact — not in fancy!

Kaufman then goes on to rationalize his argument and to convince readers that he is both a reasonable and a compassionate man. He even allows that there may be a few decent Germans among the wicked majority. But, he cautions, the German bloodlust comes “from the very depths of the German national soul,” and so even if we spare only innocent Germans from the current generation, they will inevitably give birth to a new generation of wicked Germans, who will unleash another murderous war on the world, and millions of innocent non-Germans will perish. Is it not those millions who deserve our sympathy, rather than a few Germans?

Theodore N. Kaufman

Theodore N. Kaufman

Kaufman gives his readers a few chapters of spurious German history sprinkled with doctored quotes from Friedrich Nietzsche and Heinrich von Treitschke to demonstrate the hopeless depravity of the Germans down through the ages and to prove that a single thought has always preoccupied the German mind: “to rule the world, or, failing that, to annihilate it! And so long as the German nation exists it intends, in one form or another, now or later, to bring about just such a catastrophe.”

He concludes, with feigned reluctance, that the only way to make the world safe is to kill all of the Germans. He states this conclusion, in different words, 30 or 40 times throughout the book, just so the densest goyische reader will get the message: “… [T]he goal of world-dominion must be removed from the reach of the German and the only way to accomplish that is to remove the German from the world!” “They are but beasts; they must be dealt with as such.” “There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism — and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind.” And so on.

Every few pages, between bouts of shrieking for the American goyim to go forth and slaughter the German goyim, this hate-crazed Jew stops jumping up and down and goes into a hand-wringing act, becoming for a moment a tender-hearted Jew whose basic goodness and humanitarianism rebel at the necessity of genocide. But only for a moment. It is a crude and transparent act, but not much cruder or more transparent than the television propaganda of the present.

Kaufman winds up his book with a few calculations. He figures that all the German soldiers who have not been killed in the fighting before their government surrenders unconditionally can be sterilized in less than a month by a team of 20,000 surgeons, each of whom will perform an average of 25 sterilizations per day. The civilian population can then be dealt with in a more leisurely manner, over a period of several months.

After everyone, male and female, has been sterilized, the publication of all printed materials in the German language will be forbidden; the Germans will then be divided up into slave-labor battalions and marched off to work for the democratic and communist victors, where they will be compelled to learn and use the language of their new masters; German land will be portioned out to the various Allies (Kaufman even provides a map to show who will get what); and, with a “normal death rate of 2 per cent per annum, German life will diminish at the rate of 1,500,000 yearly. Accordingly in the span of two generations that which cost millions of lives and centuries of useless effort, namely, the elimination of Germanism and its carriers, will have been an accomplished fact.”

And what about those Americans who do not share his enthusiasm for launching a genocidal crusade against the Germans? There were a number of such people in 1941, among them aviation hero Charles Lindbergh, who was traveling around the country and speaking on behalf of the America First Committee, doing his best to counter the poisonous propaganda of Kaufman and the other Jews.

Kaufman denounces these people as “spineless jellyfish” and “fifth columnists, who must, in war time, be summarily dispatched.”[3]

Kaufman’s bloodthirsty ravings have been worth quoting, because they are so explicit in their murderousness. Most Jewish propagandists were not as mathematically detailed in their call for the extermination of the Germans, but their writing dripped with exactly the same Semitic hatred. Ben Hecht was a Hollywood scriptwriter, one of the most successful of his tribe[4]. He had much more than the customary Jewish cleverness with words; he could even be subtle. But in 1944 Hecht wrote a book[5] about Germans, in which he said:

…[A] cancer flourishes in the body of the world and in its mind and soul and … the cancerous thing is Germany, Germanism, and Germans….

I am not interested in the Germans as musicians or scientists because you do not have to be a German to be either. To be a murderer, bold and gleeful, you have to be a German … I read in the fatness of their necks the mark of the murderer. I read in their watery eyes, their faded skins, their legs without feet, and their thick jaws, the fulfillment of a crime and the promise of another….

The German hates democracy because he does not like himself. He has only one political ideal. It is based on his fat neck, his watery eyes, and his faded skin…. He dreads initiative as if it were a pox and he blubbers like a lost child if called on to depend for himself. “Submission, conformity, whether public or private, are German virtues,” wrote Nietzsche. This backwardness, this underdevelopment of ego, make the Germans enemies, not only of the Jew, but of the form of life which Jewish egoism has helped create — democracy. Democracy is to the German a truly evil thing since it robs him of his profession as a servant….

He is a pure murderer. The thought of killing defenseless people brings a glow into his fat German neck….

It is by murder that the German reduces the world fleetingly to his own measure, appeases his lack of ego, makes his bid as an artist (a strong man) asserts his crudity over the finesse of human manners to which he is an unhappy stranger. Murder is his only escape from his damnable subservience. It is the only deed open to slaves. It is the only strength possible to the docile and frightened mind….

Unlike all other murderers, they are proud of their crimes. There are no eyes of others to stare them out of countenance. Around them are only German eyes, the eyes of German thinkers, philosophers, businessmen, leaders, scientists. The understanding of murder, the belief in murder, the need for murder are all in these eyes. Wherever the little German burgher looks as he wipes his hands of murder he sees only murderers like himself — a city, a country, a tribe, a nation, a history of murderers. He does not have to repudiate his crime. He does not have to shudder at its abnormality. He is normal….

The Germans outraged me because they are murderers, foul and wanton, and because they are fools such as gibber at a roadside, with spittle running from their mouths. They outraged me because they raised their little pig eyes to their betters and sought to grunt and claw their way to the mastery of men…

That this most clumsy and backward of all human tribes — this leaden-hearted German — should dare to pronounce judgment on his superiors, dare to outlaw from the world the name of Jew — a name that dwarfs him as the tree does the weed at its foot — is an outrageous thing…. It is an evil thing for the world that there remains in it a tribe that has only one dream — to cut the wings of others.

And so on, for 276 hate-filled, self-righteous pages — except that between his spells of commentary on the Germans’ fat necks, watery eyes, and penchant for murdering their betters, Hecht uses his script-writer’s imagination to work up various “Holocaust” scenarios. Here is an example:

The German governor of Warsaw was decorated and promoted to a general for thinking up the idea of the lime kiln freight cars. Each freight car was equipped with enough lime to eat up 200 Jews. By the time the freight cars arrived at the burial ditches, twenty thousand Jews were dead in them. In addition to being inexpensive and killing Jews, lime possessed another property than endeared it to the Germans discussing these matters at their desks. Lime hurt Jews more than bullets or even fire. It ate their faces off and removed their bellies slowly.[6]

Seven pages later Hecht reports that 7,000 Jews were murdered by Germans by being made to lie down on a road so that they could be “run over by heavy motor lorries (this money-saving device was thought up by a German general in Romania).”

Ultrazionist Hollywood script-writer Ben Hecht

Ultrazionist Hollywood scriptwriter Ben Hecht

Like Kaufman, Hecht expresses his conviction that the only way for the world to be safe is for there to be no Germans in it. The dust jacket of his book has a little jingle on it which he wrote, urging his goyische readers to “Buy War Bonds,” so that just such a German-free world can be brought about by means of TNT and phosphorus.

Realistically, books like Germany Must Perish, A Guide for the Bedevilled, and dozens of others in a similar vein probably played a relatively minor direct role in generating a genocidal fervor among ordinary Americans before and during the war. The average B-17 or B-24 pilot carpet-bombing residential areas in German cities, the P-47 or P-51 pilot strafing civilian refugee columns along German roads probably hadn’t read any of them. Instead he absorbed most of his Jewish hate propaganda through more popular media: motion pictures, radio broadcasts, and magazines.

But the books set the pattern and provided the rationale. Kaufman’s mass-sterilization scheme was widely quoted by more influential writers. The grotesque caricature of Germans developed in Hecht’s book was the model he and other Hollywood scriptwriters used in concocting their poisonous films. The “lime kiln freight cars” idea — and a thousand other “Holocaust” inventions — were picked up by the magazine writers and integrated into a whole mythology of German wickedness.

Gradually the threads from the 1930s were drawn together during the 1940s and woven into a fabric of hatred which was used to stifle the thinking of a people. It was only through this Jewish fabric that the average American was permitted to view the world during the 1940s.

And it was the grossly distorted vision thus produced which had American civilians singing along with the clever Jewish radio jingles about “hitting the Heinies” and “kicking the Krauts” at the beginning of the war and which made it seem quite all right for American GI’s to murder German POWs at the end. It was the public mind-set created by this fabric which emboldened Henry Morgenthau Jr. (1891-1967), President Franklin Roosevelt’s Secretary of the Treasury from 1934 to 1945 and one of his principal wartime advisers, to convert Kaufman’s genocidal hate-screed into an official U.S. government policy calling for the liquidation of the German nation.

Like Kaufman, Morgenthau called for dismembering Germany and forcing the German people into slave-labor battalions. He also demanded an end to all German-language publications and the closing of all German schools.

Instead of using forcible sterilization to eliminate the Germans as Kaufman urged, however, Morgenthau planned to accomplish the same thing through starvation. All Germany’s industries were to be dismantled completely; her mines — including coal mines — were to be sealed permanently; and her people were to be herded into an area about half the size of prewar Germany — essentially a large concentration camp — and isolated from the world. And then they were to be left to starve.

Morgenthau stipulated that the Allied armies of occupation were to give them no assistance whatever: “The Allied Military Government shall not assume responsibility for such economic problems as price controls, rationing, unemployment, production, reconstruction, distribution, consumption, housing or transportation, or take any measures designed to maintain or strengthen the German economy, except those which are essential to military operations. The responsibility for sustaining the German economy and people rests with the German people with such facilities as may be available under the circumstances.”[7]

Stripped of her mines, her factories, and nearly half of her farmland, and denied the food imports which had been a necessity even before the war, those “facilities” would be sufficient for Germany to maintain a population of perhaps 30 million persons at a bare subsistence level — which implied that 50 million must starve to death.

Morgenthau presented this policy — which came to be known as the “Morgenthau Plan” — at the 1944 Quebec Conference (September 11-16) between Roosevelt and Churchill. Even Churchill, one of the most irresponsible political leaders of modern times, was appalled by what he called “this cruel, un-Christian” plan.

History has no record of this little Jew’s response to having his scheme denounced as “un-Christian,” but it does note that the British prime minister was eventually persuaded to drop his objections when Morgenthau offered him a bribe in the form of a $6.5 billion loan from the U.S. Treasury.

Secretary of State Cordell Hull (1871-1955) and Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson (1867-1950), both of whom were intensely anti-German, also objected vehemently to the Morgenthau Plan. Stimson told Roosevelt that the Morgenthau Plan would reduce not only Germany but all of Europe to chaos. “It would be a crime against civilization itself,” he said.

Morgenthau was able to out-maneuver Stimson, however, by using Jews in the War Department as his secret agents. One of them in particular, Colonel David Marcus, kept Morgenthau informed of Stimson’s plans.

Another, Colonel Bernard Bernstein, on the SHAEF staff, intercepted the draft copy of the War Department directive (JCS 1067) to Elsenhower which specified the policies to be followed by the Allied occupation forces in Germany and sent a copy to Morgenthau. The latter immediately complained to Roosevelt that the Army was planning to be too soft on Germany. Eventually Morgenthau was able to force a revision of JCS 1067, so that the final version incorporated major features of his plan.

1258040926FDR_HenryMjr-380

Franklin Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau laughing it up in 1940

Hull was furious when he discovered that Morgenthau had persuaded Roosevelt to adopt the plan. In his memoirs Hull wrote of little Jew’s arrogant meddling generally and his eagerness to advance Jewish interests at the expense of American interests:

… Despite the fact that … [Morgenthau] was not at all fully or accurately informed on a number of questions of foreign policy with which he undertook to interfere, we found from his earliest days in the Government that he seldom lost an opportunity to take long steps across the line of State Department jurisdiction. Emotionally upset by Hitler’s rise and his persecution of the Jews, he often sought to induce the President to anticipate the State Department or act contrary to our better judgment. We sometimes found him conducting negotiations with foreign Governments which were the function of the State Department. His work in drawing up a catastrophic plan for the postwar treatment of Germany, and inducing the President to accept it without consulting with the State Department, was an outstanding instance of this interference.[8]

Later in his memoirs Hull described Morgenthau’s scheme as “a plan of blind vengeance.”[9] He went on to write of his personal reaction to it:

This whole development at Quebec, I believe, angered me as much as anything that had happened during my career as Secretary of State. If the Morgenthau plan leaked out, as it inevitably would — and shortly did — it might well mean a bitter-end German resistance that could cause the loss of thousands of American lives.[10]

American lives, of course, meant nothing to Morgenthau and his fellow Jews, nor were they concerned about the postwar reconstruction of Europe. Their primary concern was to maintain their control over Roosevelt and not let him be swayed by Hull and the other State Department “fascists” (as Morgenthau referred in his diaries to everyone who opposed his plan for Germany). In this they were were entirely successful.

Roosevelt had been worried in September and October 1944, during his campaign for a fourth term in the White House, that the American public might react unfavorably to the Morgenthau Plan and that his re-election might be endangered thereby. Because of this he had remained somewhat equivocal in his attitude. The controlled media, however, kept public opinion firmly in line, and after the election Roosevelt gave his full backing to the scheme. Morgenthau noted gleefully in his diary entry for March 20, 1945, that during a meeting with Roosevelt that day the President’s son-in-law, Major John Boettiger, who was also present, had objected to the Morgenthau Plan, saying. “You don’t want the Germans to starve,” and Roosevelt had answered, “Why not?”

Roosevelt died just three weeks later, and the new President, Harry Truman, who did not have quite as strong a stomach for Jews as his predecessor, put a quick end to Morgenthau’s meddling in non-Treasury matters. He dropped Morgenthau from his cabinet altogether in July 1945. Nevertheless, the Morgenthau Plan was not repudiated by the U.S. government until 1947, and meanwhile the Jews continued to push for its full implementation.

Few Americans were bold enough to buck the climate of hatred against Germany which the Jews had spent 12 years generating. What finally halted the punitive demolition of German factories, cutting down of German forests, flooding and sealing of German mines, and other moves intended to prevent permanently any German economic recovery was no awakening of White racial consciousness or rejection of Jewish hate propaganda, but American fear of Soviet expansion.[11]

The Germans were not the only victims of the Jews’ Second World War hate campaign, although they suffered the most from it. The Jews used the war to kill off their enemies wherever they could, and the moral climate of the war aided this purpose in two ways: first, it justified the most unspeakable crimes, so long as they were committed against “fascists,” German or otherwise; and it established the Jews as a special class of victims, who had already suffered so much, poor dears, that whatever they did henceforth was to be forgiven by the Gentiles.

beeld-289

Corpses of German SS elite troops murdered after their surrender to the U.S. Army, a few of the more than 300 German prisoners murdered at Dachau on April 29, 1945, by units of the U.S. Seventh Army. (See also National Vanguard No. 85, p. 12.) The Jews’ hatred of the SS, which was recruited from the most idealistic and racially healthy segments of the German population, was especially intense, and this hatred was reflected in propaganda which portrayed SS men as sadistic child-killers. This hate propaganda resulted in the murder of thousands of SS prisoners during and after the war.

In France American forces began displacing the German Army in the late summer of 1944. Wherever the Americans took over, horrible massacres of French civilians were carried out by the “Resistance” — massacres with which American troops were under orders from Washington not to interfere, and in which the news media displayed an amazing lack of interest. An English journalist who spent the war in France and was an eyewitness to many of the events he later described, wrote:[12]

There has never been, in the history of France, a bloodier period than that which followed the Liberation of 1944-1945. The massacres of 1944 were no less savage than the massacres of the Jacquerie, of St. Bartholomew, of the Revolutionary Terror, of the Commune; and they were certainly more numerous and on a wider scale….

It is estimated that 20,000 persons lost their lives under the reign of Terror; that 18,000 fell in the frightful butchery that followed the war and insurrection of 1870-1871. The American services put the figures of “summary executions” in France in the first months of the Liberation at 80,000. A former French minister [Adrien Tixier] later placed the figure at 105,000.

The armed gangs which committed these murders consisted not only of Jews, of course, but also of Gentiles: Communists, Gaullist reactionaries, and common criminals. But the propaganda which motivated them and which had been broadcast from French Algeria since its capitulation to the Allies in November 1942 was Jewish in inspiration. The policy of giving the murder gangs free rein was also Jewish, and it came directly from Washington. For as long as France was under the control of Allied troops, General Elsenhower was responsible for the maintenance of law and order there. But the only law under Eisenhower, from the time the German Wehrmacht withdrew until a new French government was established, was the law of Jewish vengeance.

And in Germany GI’s laughed as they watched starving German children rummage for scraps of food in the garbage behind U.S. Army mess halls — garbage which sometimes was laced with soap powder as a “joke.” The GI’s could purchase sexual favors from the mothers of those children for a chocolate bar or a can of condensed milk.

Morgenthau’s policies, rigorously enforced by Eisenhower, resulted in a German civilian population so malnourished that 92 out of every 100 German babies born in the summer of 1945 died within 10 days.

Jewish “commandos” in U.S. Army uniforms went on murder rampages in Berlin and other occupied cities. Equipped with captured lists of the home addresses of SS officers, National Socialist political leaders, writers, artists, and others who had participated in alerting pre-war Germany to the Jewish menace or in breaking the Jewish grip on German life, they went out night after night, unhindered by the military occupation authorities, to torture, rape, kill, and loot.

Even so, the barbarities which the hate-conditioned Americans perpetrated — or permitted others to perpetrate without interference — were almost civilized beside the atrocities committed on the Germans by America’s Soviet allies. More than two million German civilians were killed after the war, in 1945 and 1946, during the expulsion of the German population from the parts of Germany which Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill had agreed would be taken from her and given to other countries.[13]

Generals-Eisenhower-and-Patton

THE WORST AND THE BEST of the men who served the Jews as hired killers during the Second World War: Dwight David Eisenhower (right), the supreme commander of the Jewish forces (for that is what, in reality, the Western Allies were), was of German immigrant stock, but he had no imagination, limited intelligence, and a politician’s hypocrisy and lack of ideology, which made him an especially suitable instrument for the Jews’ purpose. He was willing to adopt without question any policy handed down to him from above, no matter how base or heinous, and he could maintain an air of affable self-righteousness while executing it. These qualities led to his being promoted over the heads of hundreds of more scrupulous officers; when the United States entered the war, he was only a colonel, and he had held that rank for only nine months. (The same qualities served the same masters after the war as well: It was Eisenhower who, as President, created the so-called “Warren Court” and launched the “civil rights” revolution by appointing Earl Warren to the Supreme Court and enforcing his decisions; who led America to deliberate defeat in Korea; and who, in effect brought Fidel Castro to power in Cuba by withdrawing U.S. Support from Batista.) While Eisenhower was essentially a politician, George Smith Patton Jr. (left) was a fighter. He unthinkingly accepted the Jews’ view of the war, and he did more than any other general among the Western Allies to defeat Germany’s armies. After the fighting was over and he was ordered to implement the Morgenthau Plan, however, he finally began to understand for whom the war had been fought and why, and he balked at serving the Jews further. Eisenhower then relieved Patton of his command.

Eventually, of course, the exigencies of international power politics — in particular, of the developing “Cold War” — thwarted those whose aim was the annihilation of the German people. But the Jews had nevertheless made great gains for themselves by the war — and the greatest of these was not the killing off of their enemies in Europe; it was what they had done to America.

In mobilizing America to crush Hitler for them, the Jews had been forced to marshal their own resources as never before. By the end of the war their control of American public opinion was virtually total. Through their news and entertainment media, the Jews could set fashion trends and change attitudes; they could introduce fads and shift mores; they could bring forth a great burst of public indignation against a new piece of legislation or a court ruling or a governmental policy, or they could squelch incipient opposition to it; they could make an idea or a man seem either noble or perfidious; they could fan the flames of war hysteria and jingoism, or they could promote pacifism; they could change embarrassing historical facts into “myths” and inconvenient documents into “forgeries”; or they could proclaim the most infamous lie as “truth” and get most of the people to swallow it whole.

The Jews had used this power to make Americans their accomplices in the greatest crime of which history has any record. And once they became accomplices, Americans thenceforth were obliged either to justify their collaboration with the Jews or to admit to murder.

Thus, while the Jews had had to work very hard to get Americans into the mood to commit genocide on their German kinsmen in the first place, after the war it was relatively easy to keep the same Americans convinced that their cause had been a good one. Not only were the Jews’ means of persuasion stronger, but Americans were readier than ever to be persuaded; they wanted to believe in the perfidy of the people they had killed and in the iniquity of the ideals and beliefs those people had held.

BTT - German girl raped

German girl in her teens, leaving a refugee train from the east in September 1945, has just been gang-raped by DP’s (displaced persons). Still in shock, she is being escorted from the Berlin train station by two adults — but no move has been made to arrest the rapists. Allied occupation forces permitted DP’s, many of them Jews, to roam freely in Germany and commit any depredations they wished against German civilians.

Americans were morally disarmed when Jews began pushing forward their programs of racial “equality,” feminism, homosexual “rights,” unrestricted immigration, and the rest of the postwar programs designed to break down what was left of Americans’ racial consciousness and sense of racial pride — all programs which Hitler clearly would have opposed, and which, therefore, no right-thinking American could.

And for the same reason it was easy for the Jews to sell the American people on their version of the “Holocaust”: the more blameless the Jews were and the more atrociously they had been victimized by the wicked Germans, the more justified the Americans had been in killing the Germans — and in sacrificing so many of their own lives doing it.

Americans have been so ready to swallow the “Holocaust” story, in fact, that even today nearly every American schoolchild can parrot back the answer “six million,” when asked how many Jews allegedly perished in the Second World War; but not one citizen in 100 knows how many Americans — their own fathers and grandfathers — died from saving the rest of the Jews from Hitler.

From National Vanguard magazine (August, 1983)

transcribed by Michael Olanich

Coming Next – Part V, Series Finale: The Jews use their control over America in the postwar era.

Notes:

1 – This is the fourth article in a five-part series on the subject. The first part, beginning with biblical times, appeared in the December 1982 issue of National Vanguard.

2 – Germany Must Perish, Theodore N. Kaufman, Argyle Press (Newark, NJ), 1941.

3 – It is unfortunate that Kaufman’s suggestion that anti-war activists be “summarily dispatched” was not acted on during the Vietnam war, when Jewish “fifth columnists” were organizing anti-American demonstrations on every American college campus!

The difference in the Jewish attitudes toward dissenters in the two wars is revealing: During the Second World War every Jew was a “patriot,” and anyone who did not want to kill Germans was subjected to such scorn by the controlled media that he was in danger of being killed himself, by a media-incited lynch mob. During the Vietnam war, where Jewish interests were not at stake, even those elements in the media which did not take an active stand against the war were overflowing with concern for the civil rights of those who did.

4 – Ben Hecht (1893-1964) wrote the scripts for 53 motion pictures between 1927 and 1964, including the books on which 23 of the films were based. He directed eight pictures and produced nine. Among his better-known films were Wuthering Heights (1939), Spellbound (1945), and Notorious (1946). He won Academy Awards for writing Underworld (1927) and The Scoundrel (1935).

5 – A Guide for the Bedeviled, Ben Hecht, Charles Scribner’s Sons (New York), 1944.

6 – Ibid., p. 142.

7 – Germany Is Our Problem: A Plan for Germany. Henry Morgenthau Jr., Harper & Brothers (New York), 1945, p. vii.

8 – The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, Macmillan Co. (New York), 1948, pp. 207-208.

9 – Ibid., p. 1606.

10 – Ibid., p. 1614

11 – One American who did challenge Jewish policies in postwar Germany was George S. Patton, who, after establishing a wartime reputation as the “fightingest” general in the U.S. Army, had become military governor of the larger portion of the U.S. occupation zone of Germany. Patton was appalled by the policies he was expected to apply against the Germans, and he spoke out repeatedly against the Morgenthau Plan.

His diaries, published in 1974 (The Patton Papers, Houghton Mifflin Co.), reveal his feelings. In September 1945, for example, when ordered to evict German families from their homes and turn the buildings over to Jews, Patton commented in his diary: “Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working.” The same month he wrote to his wife: “I am frankly opposed to this war-criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands, where many will be starved to death.” In another letter to his wife he wrote: “If what we are doing [to the Germans] is ‘Liberty, then give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.”

The controlled media began attacking Patton as “pro-Nazi” and set up a howl for his replacement by someone who would enforce the policies of the Morgenthau Plan. The U.S. commander-in-chief, General Dwight Eisenhower, already had political ambitions and he obliged the Jews by firing Patton.

12 – France: The Tragic Years, 1939-1947, Sisley Huddleston, Devin-Adair (New York), 1955, pp. 296, 299.

13 – The atrocities committed in territories not under American control might be considered irrelevant to the primary subject of this series — the history of the growth of Jewish influence on American policy — except that they were made possible by the overall American war policy. Because most of them occurred behind what later came to be known as “the Iron Curtain,” Western journalists and historians may offer the excuse that information about them has been restricted. Nevertheless, the information has long been available. There is, for example, the two-volume work by Juergen Thorwald, Es Begann an der Weichsel and Das Ende an der Elbe (a condensed English edition, published in 1951 by Pantheon Books, is titled Flight in the Winter), which describes in sickening detail the horrible fate of the German refugees fleeing the Red Army in 1945. Many of the gruesome atrocities committed on those who failed to flee are detailed in Johannes Kaps’s Tragedy of Silesia, 1945-46 (Christ Unterwegs, Munich, 1952).

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/background-to-treason-part-4/feed/ 0
The Essence of Judaism http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/the-essence-of-judaism/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/the-essence-of-judaism/#comments Wed, 17 Dec 2014 03:28:34 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1912 Judaism

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE JEWISH PROBLEM is as old as the Jewish race. Over three thousand years ago the Jews were formed as a racial and national community in Egypt. There the former slave Joseph had parlayed his talents for necromancy and grain-speculation into a virtual dictatorship at the side of the Pharaoh. “As for the people, he reduced them to serfdom from one end of the land to the other” (Genesis 47:21). Then Joseph threw open Egypt to his Jewish brethren: “You shall feed on the fat of the land” and “the best that the land of Egypt offers is yours” (Genesis 45:18, 20).

When a more national-minded Pharaoh turned the tables on the Jews they were forced to flee, but not before relieving the Egyptians of their gold and silver (Exodus 12:35–36). . . . → Read More: The Essence of Judaism]]> Judaism

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE JEWISH PROBLEM is as old as the Jewish race. Over three thousand years ago the Jews were formed as a racial and national community in Egypt. There the former slave Joseph had parlayed his talents for necromancy and grain-speculation into a virtual dictatorship at the side of the Pharaoh. “As for the people, he reduced them to serfdom from one end of the land to the other” (Genesis 47:21). Then Joseph threw open Egypt to his Jewish brethren: “You shall feed on the fat of the land” and “the best that the land of Egypt offers is yours” (Genesis 45:18, 20).

When a more national-minded Pharaoh turned the tables on the Jews they were forced to flee, but not before relieving the Egyptians of their gold and silver (Exodus 12:35–36). And so the pattern of Jewish history was set: from outcasts to fellow-citizens, then trusted advisers, and finally, ruthless masters. Then follow the persecutions, pogroms, and expulsions which have won for the Jews so much undeserved sympathy.

The great mass of American Whites seems indifferent to the Jewish question. This is not to say that Americans are unmindful of the Jews — far from it. The Jews are presently more prominent in American life than they have ever been before, and they feel less need to dissimulate and disguise the outward traits which have traditionally brought upon them suspicion and dislike. A name change or a nose job is no longer the prerequisite for social and political acceptance by Gentiles. On the contrary, to qualify as unprejudiced in today’s America, non-Jews must appear amenable to Jewish jokes, Yiddish slang, kosher hotdogs, and Israel bonds.

Doubtless this increased visibility of Jews and Jewish characteristics is a good thing, for in the long run White Americans cannot fail to be struck by the alien nature of the Jew. Unfortunately, in the non-White racial chaos which disfigures present-day America the fact that the Jews are just as alien to Western society as are Negroes and Orientals tends to be lost on all too many men and women of our race.

One important factor in the general ignorance of the Jewish problem is a widespread misconception as to the nature of the Jewish religion. Most Americans seem to think of Jews primarily as adherents of Judaism, the religion of the Old Testament. For these Americans, Jewish radicals with their beards and bombs, Jewish businessmen with their sharp practices, or Jewish Zionists with their questionable loyalties are fair game. But the pious Jew of the synagogue, head bowed in prayer to the tribal god of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, is a figure all too often accorded tolerance and even respect.

America’s — and the world’s — Jewish problem makes it a necessity that we understand the Jews and Judaism thoroughly. If it is recognized that the destructive phenomena which accompany the Jewish presence in non-Jewish societies — Marxism, Freudianism, Zionism, and so on — spring from the Hebrew race-soul and are of a piece with the writings and rituals of that quintessential manifestation of the Jewish soul, Judaism, a great deal of confusion about the nature of the Jewish problem will be eliminated.

What, indeed, is Judaism? In the first place, Judaism is a system of beliefs and practices which are profoundly alien to the spirit of our race. Most Westerners will have some notion of the alienness of Judaism through a superficial acquaintance with the various trappings of Jewish ritual: prayer shawls and phylacteries; morbid, Levantine chants; the obligatory yarmulkas; and so forth. The guttural sounds and mysterious script of Hebrew will strike most Americans as strange, as will the physiognomies and modes of dress of Judaism’s more tradition-bound adherents. Yet even these indications of Jewish differentness are only symbolic of the profoundly anti-Western essence of Judaism.

Contemporary Israelis immersed in the study of the Talmud, the most authoritative collection of Jewish religious law. Blasphemous references to Jesus in the Talmud, now cheerfully acknowledged by Jews, have not been a bone of contention in "ecumenical" discussions in which Jews and their fifth-columnists in the Christian clergy have attempted to tailor traditional Christian theology and liturgy to Jewish desires.

Contemporary Israelis immersed in the study of the Talmud, the most authoritative collection of Jewish religious law. Blasphemous references to Jesus in the Talmud, now cheerfully acknowledged by Jews, have not been a bone of contention in “ecumenical” discussions in which Jews and their fifth-columnists in the Christian clergy have attempted to tailor traditional Christian theology and liturgy to Jewish desires.

Although the translations of the Old Testament into Western tongues are not without evidences of Judaism’s alien essence, it is perhaps understandable that they should have been so well received in the West. The Old Testament took on an altogether different tone in the Latin of St. Jerome, the German of Martin Luther, and the English of the King James Version. Not infrequently, these translations differed even in meaning from the original Hebrew and Aramaic. Thus, the injunction to “love thy race-kin” in the Hebrew became “love thy neighbor” in Western Bibles.

The same impulses which led European painters and sculptors to depict Biblical personages with Nordic rather than Semitic features led Western Christians to ascribe their own mentality and behavior to Old Testament figures. As one Jewish writer, Susan Taubes, observed, “The Old Testament has had the benefit of the most sublime spiritualization through centuries of Christian interpretation.” In fact, Jews have reacted to this Western tendency with a certain bitter humor. As a Jewish character in a story by contemporary Jewish writer Cynthia Ozick puts it, “Please remember that when a goy from Columbus, Ohio, says ‘Elijah the Prophet,’ he is not talking about Eliohu hanovi! Eliohu is one of us, a folksmensh running around in second-hand clothes. Theirs is God knows what. The same biblical figure, with exactly the same history, once he puts on a name from King James, comes out a different person.”

The religion of the Jews arose among Semitic nomads in the Near East, on the desert fringes of what American Egyptologist James Breasted called the “fertile crescent.” This area was fertile in more than fruit and grain, for a bewildering and repellent array of orgiastic fertility cults sprouted and flourished there, often involving ritual masturbation and sodomy. Elements of these perverse rites inevitably found their way into the religious practices of the Jews.

The elaborate and bizarre nature of the circumcision rite, with its oral-genital contact, as practiced by Jews through the ages makes it clear that circumcision's limited hygienic advantages were not the controlling factor in its adoption by the Hebrews. Numerous sayings of the rabbis give proof of the exaggerated regard in which Jews have always held the rite. The Talmud boasts, "So great is circumcision that but for it the Holy One would not have created the universe." (Nashim: Nedarim)

The elaborate and bizarre nature of the circumcision rite, with its oral-genital contact, as practiced by Jews through the ages makes it clear that circumcision’s limited hygienic advantages were not the controlling factor in its adoption by the Hebrews. Numerous sayings of the rabbis give proof of the exaggerated regard in which Jews have always held the rite. The Talmud boasts, “So great is circumcision that but for it the Holy One would not have created the universe.” (Nashim: Nedarim)

Circumcision is one present-day vestige of these phallic fertility rites. According to the Hebrew Torah, it was instituted by Yahweh, the tribal god of the Jews, and is at the very core of his covenant with Abraham, the mythical progenitor of the Jews. During most of Israel’s independent political existence, under the kings succeeding David, the Hebrew religion was probably indistinguishable from those of the surrounding Semitic tribes. Temple prostitution, attended to by male “dog priests” as well as by female acolytes, flourished until King Josiah “pulled down the house of the sacred male prostitutes which was in the Temple of Yahweh and where the women wove clothes for Asherah” (II Kings 23:7).

The conviction has been growing among Biblical scholars unbiased by considerations of piety that the rigid strictures against unnatural sexual practices in the Old Testament and the conception of Yahweh as a pure, sexless desert god are an outgrowth of the situation of the Jews after the Babylonian exile (587–538 B.C.). In line with this view, the sexual ethics of post-exile Judaism grew out of the need for sexual self-discipline necessary to ensure national and racial survival in a period of dispersion. Regulations against homosexuality and birth-control inhibited any Jewish tendencies toward decline in population, while stringent prohibitions against racial intermarriage (still enforced in modern Israel) attempted to safeguard the Jews from assimilation.

That the prescriptions of Old Testament Judaic law on sexual matters are strictly functional, and, indeed, are in constant tension with normal Jewish predilections, is evident from later Jewish law. The Talmud, the most authoritative and influential source for Jewish law, is replete with sexual considerations of a nature repellent to Westerners. As Rabbi Adin Steinsalz, a contemporary Talmudic scholar admits, “After you have learned the right passages in the Talmud, you have learned about every perversion, in the greatest detail.”

The Talmud regards bestiality as no bar to matrimony. In the section of the Talmud entitled Yabmuth (59a), a woman who has copulated with a dog is pronounced fit for marriage to a Jewish priest. (A dog-priest, perhaps?) Children three years and one day old are considered suitable for intercourse (Yabmuth 57a). “Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen? Unnatural intercourse is permitted to a Jew” (Sanhedrin 58b). And so it goes, throughout the gigantic work of which Jewish law claims, “Yahweh himself studies the Talmud standing, he has such respect for that book” (Mechillah).

Modern writers have emphasized the vast differences between the Western ethic of courtly love and the purely pragmatic approach of contemporary Jews in matters romantic. Psychoanalyst Ernst van den Haag writes in The Jewish Mystique that love “as an esthetic exhilaration and a romantic feeling never made much of a dent on Jewish attitudes toward the body or toward the opposite sex. Love or ‘sweet suffering’ was too irrational. If you want her, get her . . .”

According to the American sociologist John Murray Cuddihy, Sigmund Freud, the Jew who “invented” psychoanalysis, sensed the organic relationship between Western concepts of love and other Western attitudes and institutions, and he was repelled by it. Our culture’s traditional romantic attitudes and customs have been grievously undermined by Freud’s and his Jewish followers’ insistence on the primacy of a sexuality divorced from reproduction and even from love. In the light of the Talmud, the sexual and excretory obsessions of modern Jewish writers and psychologists become more understandable.

An aspect of Judaism even more consistently emphasized in Jewish religious writings than the fascination with sex is the insistence on the Jews’ privileged status as a special people, a “chosen people.” No race, religious group, or nation has succeeded in institutionalizing the conception of its own superiority in its religious beliefs and practices to the extent the Jews have.

Each morning, every Orthodox Jew in the world thanks his god “who has not made me a goy, a slave, or a woman,” in the words of the prayer. (Goy is a particularly slighting Jewish name for non-Jews.) According to the Jewish conception, Yahweh, who saw fit to elevate the Jews above all the other nations, is not merely the tribal god of the “chosen” race, but the Lord of all creation. As they see it, their god is the God of the Gentiles, the God for the Jews.

It must be stressed that this theological notion, for the Jews, does not derive its importance from a heightened consciousness of an obligation to the Divinity. The meat of the doctrine, for Jews, is Israel’s sanctity, not God’s. Passages in the Old Testament referring to Israel’s divine election are customarily interpreted in an allegorical sense by Christians, who take them as presentiments of a beatitude and salvation accessible to all men. For believing Jews, however, lines such as, “For the nation and kingdom that refuses to serve you [Israel] shall perish, such nations shall be utterly ruined” (Isaiah 60:12). are justifications for a frenzied chauvinism.

The Talmudic literature abounds in legally binding characterizations and definitions of the status of the people of Israel. “Heaven and earth were created only for the sake of the Jewish people” (Vayikra Rabba 36). “You [the Jews] are human beings, but the nations of the world [goyim] are not human beings, but beasts” (Baba Mezia, 114b). “Yahweh created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night” (Midrasch Talpioth, 225-L).

To allow Jews to deceive non-Jews as to their beliefs and practices, Jewish law provides sanction for secretiveness, perjury, and conspiracy. The Talmud mandates that “Every goy who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it ought to die” (Sanhedrin 59a, Aboda Zara 8–6, Szagiga 13). The Kol Nidre (“all vows”) prayer, beloved of the Orthodox, condones violations of oaths and vows, whenever necessary or convenient. Jews who testify against other Jews before non-Jewish authorities are to be executed.

Prohibition against mesira, the cooperation of law-abiding Jews with Gentile authorities where Jewish criminals are involved, remains in force in Jewish law. The Talmud mandates death for moserim, or informers: “It is permitted to kill a Jewish informer everywhere!” (Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388). Rabbi Kahane’s condemnation is all the more vitriolic since the Jewish religion allows Jews to lie while under oath. The Kol Nidre, recited each year by observant Jews on the eve of Yom Kippur, sanctions oath-breaking: “All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day of reconciliation until the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all” (Schulchan Aruch, Edit. 1, 136). The clipping above is from the front page of the Jewish Press for December 24, 1976.

Prohibition against mesira, the cooperation of law-abiding Jews with Gentile authorities where Jewish criminals are involved, remains in force in Jewish law. The Talmud mandates death for moserim, or informers: “It is permitted to kill a Jewish informer everywhere!” (Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388). Rabbi Kahane’s condemnation is all the more vitriolic since the Jewish religion allows Jews to lie while under oath. The Kol Nidre, recited each year by observant Jews on the eve of Yom Kippur, sanctions oath-breaking: “All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day of reconciliation until the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all” (Schulchan Aruch, Edit. 1, 136). The clipping above is from the front page of the Jewish Press for December 24, 1976.

If one doubts that the attitudes inculcated in Jews by Judaism regulate Jewish conduct in the present, let him look to Israel. Since the Zionist seizure of Palestine 29 years ago, “the land flowing with milk and honey” has once again streamed with the blood of its rightful inhabitants, the Palestinians. While any blood-Jew on earth, Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, atheist, or whatever, has a right to citizenship and a life of luxury underwritten by the American taxpayer, the Arabs they have dispossessed huddle in squalid, disease-ridden refugee camps.

Interestingly enough, the letter of Jewish law is often neglected or even violated in Israel, at least in matters not pertaining to the determination of an individual’s membership in the Jewish people, still firmly in the hands of the rabbis. This indifference to the observance of every jot and tittle of the laws of the Sabbath is perfectly acceptable to the vast majority of the world’s religious Jews.

Besides, theologically-minded Jews have new worlds to conquer. Not satisfied with having created and maintained Judaism as a supple tool for the advancement of the Jewish race, they now seek to enlist Christianity in the same cause. If it was enough for Christian clergymen to pronounce the Jews innocent of Christ’s crucifixion ten years ago, now they must fully espouse the aims and policies of Israel in order to avoid the stigma of “anti-Semitism.” Ever on the lookout for new frontiers of effrontery, Jewish leaders are increasingly demanding that Christians incorporate the idea that the Jews are a “chosen people” in Christian theology!

The essence of Judaism should now be clear: it is not a religion or an expression of piety in the Western sense, but a codified, formalized program of Jewish self-promotion. In this regard perhaps it is fitting to let a Jew, Baruch Spinoza, have the last word: “Thus the love of the Hebrews for their country was not only patriotism but also piety and was cherished and nurtured by daily rites until, like their hatred of other nations, it was absolutely perverse (as it well might be, considering that they were a peculiar people and entirely apart from the rest). Such daily reprobation naturally gave rise to a lasting hatred, deeply implanted in the heart: for of all hatred, none is more deep and tenacious than that which springs from extreme devoutness or piety, and is itself cherished as pious.”

  * * *

From Attack! No. 52, 1977, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/the-essence-of-judaism/feed/ 0
Solzhenitsyn and the Liberals http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/solzhenitsyn-and-the-liberals/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/solzhenitsyn-and-the-liberals/#comments Wed, 17 Dec 2014 02:09:23 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1908 Alexander Solzhenitsynby Dr. William L. Pierce

WHEN ALEXANDER SOLZHENITSYN, the Russian dissident writer who was exiled by the Soviet government in February, recently shouted at a group of Western newsmen, “You are worse than the KGB (Soviet secret police, equivalent to our FBI),” they were understandably hurt. After all, had not the newsmen of the democratic West made a great folk-hero of Solzhenitsyn, praising him to the skies at every opportunity? Had they not publicized his books for years, leading to their widespread sales outside the Soviet Union — and to a Nobel Prize for Literature for him in 1970? (ILLUSTRATION: Alexander Solzhenitsyn: Henry Kissinger contemptuously described the red-headed Russian literary giant as “to the right of the czars.”)

 Khrushchev Goofed Too

Alas, the neo-liberal media masters of the West were finding to their . . . → Read More: Solzhenitsyn and the Liberals]]> Alexander Solzhenitsynby Dr. William L. Pierce

WHEN ALEXANDER SOLZHENITSYN, the Russian dissident writer who was exiled by the Soviet government in February, recently shouted at a group of Western newsmen, “You are worse than the KGB (Soviet secret police, equivalent to our FBI),” they were understandably hurt. After all, had not the newsmen of the democratic West made a great folk-hero of Solzhenitsyn, praising him to the skies at every opportunity? Had they not publicized his books for years, leading to their widespread sales outside the Soviet Union — and to a Nobel Prize for Literature for him in 1970? (ILLUSTRATION: Alexander Solzhenitsyn: Henry Kissinger contemptuously described the red-headed Russian literary giant as “to the right of the czars.”)

 Khrushchev Goofed Too

Alas, the neo-liberal media masters of the West were finding to their sorrow that they had misjudged their man as badly as the communist masters of the Kremlin had earlier.

Solzhenitsyn’s world renown as a writer began in 1962, when Nikita Khrushchev sponsored the Soviet publication of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, an autobiographical novel of Solzhenitsyn’s experiences as a prisoner in Stalin’s death camps. Khrushchev was promoting the de-Stalinization of the Soviet Union, and Solzhenitsyn’s criticism of Stalinism fitted the party line perfectly at that time.

Later, however, the Soviet leaders began to realize that Solzhenitsyn was opposed to a great deal more than just Stalin’s particular brand of communism. They tried to shut him up, but it was too late; they had already given him a reputation and an international audience, and Solzhenitsyn continued cranking out new books which blasted away at the very foundations of the Marxist-Leninist world view.

 Not a Jew

The shallow-minded liberals of the West seized on these books as props for their libertarian-democratic philosophy, as opposed to Kremlin authoritarianism. They mistakenly assumed that any Soviet dissident is automatically a neo-liberal — as, indeed, a whole platoon of dissident Jewish-intellectual contemporaries of Solzhenitsyn’s are.

One Day In the Life of IvanBut Solzhenitsyn is a genuine Russian, not a Jew. His world view comes from deep in his Russian soul, and it is as hostile to neo-liberalism as it is to Stalinism.

That fact was made manifest last month when Solzhenitsyn released a long letter he had written to the Kremlin bosses. He urged them, for the good of Russia, to turn away from the “dark, un-Russian whirlwind of Marxism,” as well as from the decadence of Western liberalism. (Marx, as also nearly all the other founders of communism, was both un-Russian and un-Western; he was a Jew.)

 A Warning to Brezhnev

He condemned the murderous regime which had sent uncounted millions of his countrymen to their deaths, and he called for rooting out and punishing Stalin’s fellow murderers who still hold positions in the Kremlin hierarchy. But more than that he warned Brezhnev & Co. not to let Russia fall victim to the democratic disease now ravaging the West.

How disillusioned Solzhenitsyn’s admirers in the media must have been to read of his disgust at the “democracy run riot” in America — and, in particular, his citing of America’s inability to cope with such termites in her timbers as Daniel Ellsberg and Ramsey Clark, both media idols! He also cited America’s political parties and labor unions, her hypocritical neo-liberal intellectuals and corrupt officials, all engaged in a squalid “conflict of interests, just interests, nothing higher.”

 Liberalism Morbid, Inconsistent

But his denunciation of Western liberalism contained analysis as well as invective. He looked at the core of the malignancy and saw that it had no ethical foundation. It could neither provide a basis for sustained resistance to tyranny nor could it long support any civilization.

It had no coherent metaphysical structure; it was a morbid and unnatural condition of society, a pollution in the stream of history. It was as irrational and inconsistent as it was weak.

 Maggots in an Apple

Solzhenitsyn had only scorn for the Western liberal’s belief in indefinite “progress” through industrialization: in a “growth” economy year after year, without limit. To him it was plain “that a dozen maggots can’t go on and on gnawing the same apple forever; that if the earth is a finite object, then its expanses and resources are finite also, and the endless, infinite progress dinned into our heads by the dreamers of the Enlightenment cannot be accomplished on it. . . . Economic growth is not only unnecessary but ruinous.”

He dreamed instead of a stable economy, of a limited population living close to the land and in harmony with Nature.

Horror of horrors, he even suggested striving for racially homogeneous communities by dividing the Soviet Union into several separate ethnic regions. That way White Russians and Oriental Kalmucks, for example, could preserve their own racial identities and pursue their own destinies.

 To Become an Unperson

The first reaction of media liberals to Solzhenitsyn’s letter and his comparison of them to the KGB was embarrassment and a few nervous giggles. As it dawned on them that he really meant what he said, they moved to undermine the public prestige their former praise had given him. Newsweek (owned by the Washington Post) called him a “holy fool” and referred to his views as “idiosyncratic in the extreme.”

Their next step will be to relegate him to the status of an “unperson” and cease to mention his name at all.

 Liberation Is Un-Western

If ordinary Americans can find anything at all to criticize in Solzhenitsyn’s views, it is his insistent reference to Western decadence, Western indiscipline, Western liberalism. Doesn’t he realize that liberalism (or, more correctly, the neo-liberalism which passes for traditional liberalism today) is as un-Western as Marxism is un-Russian, and for the same reason?

newsweek AlexanderIf neo-liberalism were a true expression of the Western soul, then there would indeed be no hope for the future. We could look forward only to increasing moral decadence and social chaos, accompanied by a more-or-less gradual racial mongrelization; until, having altogether lost the capacity for sustaining any semblance of civilization or even maintaining a national defense, we became a serf-nation under the heel of any better-disciplined race who found it worth their trouble to enslave us.

 Alien Apostles of Decadence

But the national madness which holds us in its grip today is not endemic. It is unnatural, alien.

The slack-jawed philosophy of Benjamin Spock (“If it feels good, do it”), which has been impressed upon a whole generation of Americans through ultra-permissive child-raising practices, is not Western in origin.

The hyper-individualism which urges each person to find his own “sexual preference” (i.e., homosexual, bisexual, or “straight”) without regard to social consequences, has no roots in Western tradition.

The ruling insanity of the racial-equality theorists, who steadfastly refuse to accept the plain evidence of everyday experience when it contradicts their babbling about universal human equality, flies directly in the face of a deep-grained Western objectivity.

We did not inherit from the American pioneers the feminine squeamishness which lies behind our present inability to make the hard decisions and implement the stern policies needed to bring a final solution to a myriad of economic, social, and racial problems. Nor did that soft-mindedness, that weakness of will, striving only to postpone difficult decisions until they must become stern indeed, come to us from our European forebears who built the mighty edifice of Western civilization.

Because the disease of the West is a parasitic growth which has fastened itself onto the West’s soul, and not an outgrowth of that soul itself, we can hope to cut it out and thereby cure ourselves, albeit with a great deal of pain and loss of blood — and greater the longer the surgery is delayed. We would feel an even greater admiration and sympathy for Solzhenitsyn if he had said that, instead of dismissing the West as being already in a terminal state.

For that matter, he did recognize the blood relationship between neo-liberalism and communism in pointing out that it was a “liberal” movement in Russia, culminating in an eight-month period of “people’s democracy” in 1917, which eroded the foundations of the old order and so prepared the ground for the ascendancy of Marxism.

The course of the disease in the West has been different than in Russia. Here liberalism has quite thoroughly obliterated all the old values, but then, instead of leading us promptly into communism, has lingered on and on.

Unfortunately, the West has probably suffered greater spiritual damage from its long cohabitation with communism’s pimping little sister than Russia has suffered from a half-century of communism itself.

Indeed, Solzhenitsyn may have had just that deep meaning in mind when he shouted to the Western newsmen, “You are worse than the KGB!”

 * * *

From Attack! No. 26, 1974, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/solzhenitsyn-and-the-liberals/feed/ 0
Hellfire and Brimstone http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/hellfire-and-brimstone/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/hellfire-and-brimstone/#comments Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:52:30 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1888 In the December 1982 issue of National Vanguard, a letter-writer asks Dr. Pierce whether an evolutionary morality, that is, a morality based on race, is capable of being embraced by our people. Christianity, after all, has the threat of eternal damnation of one’s soul if he or she does not believe. What punishment, if any, can a race-based morality provide to those of our people who’ve given up on the Christian faith? Dr. Pierce’s answer is provided below.

20100329160959-1_0

IN THE OCTOBER issue Dr. Pierce has, indeed, shown that his “A New Morality for Us” is more unequivocally on the side of our race than is Dennis Whiting’s “One Morality for All,” but one must wonder if his appeal to an “underlying purpose of all life” is less of a theological concept than Whiting’s . . . → Read More: Hellfire and Brimstone]]> In the December 1982 issue of National Vanguard, a letter-writer asks Dr. Pierce whether an evolutionary morality, that is, a morality based on race, is capable of being embraced by our people. Christianity, after all, has the threat of eternal damnation of one’s soul if he or she does not believe. What punishment, if any, can a race-based morality provide to those of our people who’ve given up on the Christian faith? Dr. Pierce’s answer is provided below.

20100329160959-1_0

IN THE OCTOBER issue Dr. Pierce has, indeed, shown that his “A New Morality for Us” is more unequivocally on the side of our race than is Dennis Whiting’s “One Morality for All,” but one must wonder if his appeal to an “underlying purpose of all life” is less of a theological concept than Whiting’s Christian deity. Most people of our race, after they have lost their Christian faith, are not ready to be bemused by any notion of evolutionary purpose; rather, they quickly devolve to the kind of mad-dog individualism, extolled by libertarians, which is as much to blame for failure to defend our race as is misplaced altruism.

Christianity, at least, was brutally blunt in its reason for commanding faith: Believe or your soul will endure eternal torments in hell. What threat (or promise, for that matter) can be presented to those who do not see why they should care about the fate of their race now or ten years from now, much less, say, a hundred years after their deaths?

— B.N.
Little Rock, AR

Editor’s Reply

Two interesting points are raised: To what extent has the Christian theology of punishment and reward been responsible for the moral behavior of Whites in the past, and how can a new morality be imposed without a similar theology?

It is true that a century ago, when the West was almost entirely Christian — and most Christians were White — a generally higher standard of personal conduct was met than today, when Christianity has lost both its status as a predominantly White religion and a substantial portion of its former White adherents.

It is also true that many of those who have shucked off the old Christian superstitions today are worse-behaved than their contemporaries who still adhere to Christianity. Everyone has observed those unlovely individuals who have used their liberation from Christianity as an excuse to “liberate” themselves from every moral restraint on their behavior and every responsibility to anyone but themselves. Most of these call themselves “libertarians” or “elitists,” but, unfortunately, some have attached themselves to our camp, where they clearly do not belong.

I do not believe that this problem is primarily one of theology, however. In the past, fear of fire and brimstone may have had some effect, but it was almost entirely restricted to ritual. That is, visions of hellfire may have helped church attendance a bit on Sunday morning and persuaded believers that it was important to memorize the Lord’s Prayer or to know when to genuflect. But it was not the principal determinant of their behavior.

Morality was much more strongly supported by social rather than by religious sanctions. A man felt it was important to keep his word because he wanted self-respect and the respect of his neighbors, not because he feared eternal damnation. Sexual behavior was more discreet for the same reason: A girl valued her virginity, not because she thought it would improve her chances on Judgment Day, but because she was concerned for her reputation in the community and her marriageability.

The same principle holds today: It is social custom and peer pressure, not Christian doctrine, which directly determine the morality of Christians; doctrine acts only indirectly.

As an example, consider the U.S. tobacco industry, which is centered in the Bible Belt. No Christian theologian can sincerely condone the production and sale of a habit-forming, carcinogenic drug, knowing that such activity condemns tens of thousands of other Christians to an agonizing death every year. Yet I would bet that close to half of the tobacco company executives who lobbied vigorously to keep cancer warnings off the cigarette packages they sell are churchgoing Christians. I know that most of the farmers who grow tobacco and sell it to the cigarette producers are.

These people, many of whom consider Playboy magazine sinful, go about their deadly business with apparently untroubled consciences. They do so because the community, primarily for economic reasons, tolerates it, and the churches, unwilling to buck long-established custom, have not explicitly condemned it. Fear of hellfire might keep a lot of them from spitting on a Bible or wearing hats in church, but not from earning a living in a way which is enormously harmful to the health of their fellow citizens.

One may condemn them for moral obtuseness, but that misses the point. Most men are and always have been morally obtuse.

The point is this: Morality suffers today, not because many Whites no longer believe in the heaven and hell of Christianity, but because the social order is crumbling under the impact of “pluralism.” A religion may supply the basic moral imperatives to a society, but it is the society itself which translates them into the behavior of ordinary men and women. If Western society were still racially and culturally homogeneous and the social order strong, people would guide their behavior according to the accepted social norms, whatever they happened to be, with or without the threat of hell.

Likewise, until a new social order is established which institutionalizes a race-based morality, many who pay lip service to such a morality will, in fact, not actually guide their lives by it, but instead will continue to live amorally. Once such a morality has been institutionalized, however, theology will play a relatively minor role in determining behavior.

In conclusion, religious doctrine is of fundamental importance in determining which values, beliefs, and behavioral norms become institutionalized in a society, but social instincts are much more important than any theology of reward and punishment in compelling men and women to lead moral lives.

* * *

From the December 1982 issue of National Vanguard magazine, transcribed by Michael Olanich, edited by Dr. William L. Pierce

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/hellfire-and-brimstone/feed/ 0
Savage Africa, part 2 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/savage-africa-part-2/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/savage-africa-part-2/#comments Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:00:53 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1863 Hinton_Rowan_HelperAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of December 13, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HINTON ROWAN HELPER (pictured) did a great service for our nation and our people when he collated and collected the relevant works of explorers, scientists, historians, and statesmen on the subject of Africans in their natural state and native habitat — for understanding the true nature of the African is literally of cosmic importance for the future of life on this planet. This is part two of our exploration of these important accounts. And let me repeat my warning of last week: Under no circumstances allow young children to listen to this program. The reality of what unrestrained Africans actually do is too horrible — far too horrible — for them to contemplate.

View of Women

We . . . → Read More: Savage Africa, part 2]]> Hinton_Rowan_HelperAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of December 13, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HINTON ROWAN HELPER (pictured) did a great service for our nation and our people when he collated and collected the relevant works of explorers, scientists, historians, and statesmen on the subject of Africans in their natural state and native habitat — for understanding the true nature of the African is literally of cosmic importance for the future of life on this planet. This is part two of our exploration of these important accounts. And let me repeat my warning of last week: Under no circumstances allow young children to listen to this program. The reality of what unrestrained Africans actually do is too horrible — far too horrible — for them to contemplate.

View of Women

We can see presaged the contrast between the romantic view of love typified by the higher type of Whites and the gangbanger/”ho” perspective of the Negro in this passage from over a century ago:

“A man pays goods or slaves for his wife, and regards her,  therefore, as a piece of merchandise. Young girls — even children in arms — are married to old men for political effect. The idea of love, as we understand it, seems unknown to the Africans. On the sea-shore a man will hire you his mother, wife, or sister, for the vilest uses, and the women are never averse if they can only obtain the wages of prostitution.” — Du Chaillu’s Equatorial Africa, page 75.

“A number of old women had been taken in the general slave hunt; these could not walk sufficiently fast to keep up with their victors during the return march; they had accordingly all been killed on the road, as being cumbersome. In every case they were killed by being beaten on the back of the neck with a club.” — Baker’s Great Basin of the Nile, page 405.

Behavior of Africans in war

“By degrees the warriors dropped in around their chieftain. A palaver-house, immediately in front of my quarters, was the general rendezvous ; and scarcely a bushman appeared without the body of some maimed and bleeding victim. The mangled but living captives were tumbled on a heap in the centre, and soon every avenue to the square was crowded with exulting savages. Rum was brought forth in abundance for the chiefs. Presently, slowly approaching from a distance, I heard the drums, horns, and war-bells; and, in less than fifteen minutes, a procession of women, whose naked limbs were smeared with chalk and ochre, poured into the palaver-house to join the beastly rites. Each of these devils was armed with a knife, and bore in her hand some cannibal trophy. Jen-Ken’s wife, — a corpulent wench of forty-five, — dragged along the ground, by a single limb, the slimy corpse of an infant ripped alive from its mother’s womb. As her eyes met those of her husband, the two fiends yelled forth a shout of mutual joy, while the lifeless babe was tossed in the air and caught as it descended on the point of a spear. Then came the refreshment, in the shape of rum, powder, and blood, which was quaffed by the brutes till they reeled off, with linked hands, in a wild dance around the pile of victims. As the women leaped and sang, the men applauded and encouraged. Soon the ring was broken, and, with a yell, each female leaped on the body of a wounded prisoner, and commenced the final sacrifice with the mockery of lascivious embraces. In my wanderings in African forests, I have often seen the tiger pounce upon its prey, and, with instinctive thirst, satiate its appetite for blood and abandon the drained corpse; but these African negresses were neither as decent nor as merciful as the beast of the wilderness. Their malignant pleasure seemed to consist in the invention of tortures, that would agonize but not slay. There was a devilish spell in the tragic scene that fascinated my eyes to the spot. A slow, lingering, tormenting mutilation was practised on the living, as well as on the dead; and, in every instance, the brutality of the women exceeded that of the men. I cannot picture the hellish joy with which they passed from body to body, digging out eyes, wrenching off lips, tearing the ears, and slicing the flesh from the quivering bones; while the queen of the harpies crept amid the butchery, gathering the brains from each severed skull as a dainty dish for the approaching feast!

“After the last victim yielded his life, it did not require long to kindle a fire, produce the requisite utensils, and fill the air with the odor of human flesh. Yet, before the various messes were half broiled, every mouth was tearing the delicate morsels with shouts of joy, denoting the combined satisfaction of revenge and appetite! In the midst of this appalling scene, I heard a fresh cry of exultation, as a pole was borne into the apartment, on which was impaled the living body of the conquered chieftain’s wife. A hole was quickly dug, the stave planted, and fagots supplied; but before a fire could be kindled, the wretched woman was dead, so that the barbarians were defeated in their hellish scheme of burning her alive. I do not know how long these brutalities lasted, for I remember very little after this last attempt, except that the bushmen packed in plaintain leaves whatever flesh was left from the orgy, to be conveyed to their friends in the forest. This was the first time it had been my lot to behold the most savage development of African nature under the stimulus of war. The butchery made me sick, dizzy, paralyzed. I sank on the earth benumbed with stupor; nor was I aroused till nightfall, when my Kroomen bore me to the conqueror’s town, and negotiated our redemption for the value of twenty slaves.”— Canot’s Twenty Years of an African Slaver, pages 384-386.

Buying and selling of human lives

“The reader must bear in mind that my observations apply chiefly to persons of free condition, who constitute, I suppose, not more than one-fourth part of the inhabitants at large; the other three-fourths are in a state of hopeless and hereditary slavery.”—Mungo Park’s 1st Journal, page 32.

“Large families are very often exposed to absolute want, and, as the parents have almost unlimited authority over their children, it frequently happens, in all parts of Africa, that some of the latter are sold to purchase provisions for the rest of the family.” — Mungo Park’s 1st Journal, page 216.

“Slaves in Africa are in proportion to the freemen of about three to one; but, although the number of individuals reduced to a state of bondage by the operation of the above causes, and the destruction created, both as regards life and property, is immense, the whole combined are but as a single grain of dust in the balance, when compared with the slavery, the destitution, and the desolation, that are daily entailed by the unceasing bloody struggles betwixt state and state. Towns and villages are then obliterated from the face of the earth; and thousands upon thousands of the population, of whatever age or sex, are hurried into hopeless captivity.”—Harris’s Adventures in Africa, page 314.

“Not even the appearance of affection exists between husband and wife, or between parents and children. So little do they care for their offspring, that many offered to sell me any of their sons or daughters as slaves. They are, to speak the truth, in point of parental affection, inferior to brutes.” — Duncan’s Africa, Vol. 1., page 79.

“Slavery exists on an immense scale in Adamawa, and there are many private individuals who have more than a thousand slaves. The only articles of export at present are slaves and ivory.”— Barth’s Africa, Vol. II., page 190.

“No better illustration could be given of the way in which the slave system has ingrafted itself upon the life and policy of these tribes than this, that, from the sea-shore to the farthest point in the interior which I was able to reach, the commercial unit of value is a slave. As we say dollar, as the English say pound sterling, so these Africans say slave. If a man is fined for an offence, he is mulcted in so many slaves. If he is bargaining for a wife, he contracts to give so many slaves for her. Perhaps he has no slaves; but he has ivory or trade-goods, and pays of these the value of so many slaves, — that is to say, as much ivory or ebony, or barwood, or the amount in trade-goods which would, in that precise place, buy so many slaves.” — Du Chaillu’s Equatorial Africa, page 380.

African justice

“Every death which occurs in the community is ascribed to witchcraft, and some one, consequently, is guilty of the wicked deed. The priesthood go to work to find out the guilty person. It may be a brother, a sister, a father, and, in a few extreme cases, even mothers have been accused of the unnatural deed of causing the death of their own offspring. There is, in fact, no effectual shield against the suspicion of it. Age, the ties of relationship, official prominence, and general benevolence of character, are alike unavailing. The priesthood, in consequence of the universal belief in the superstition, have unlimited scope for the indulgence of the most malicious feelings, and, in many cases, it is exercised with unsparing severity.” — Wilson’s Africa, page 223.

“The guilt having been affixed, after many absurd ceremonies, upon some unfortunate wretch, a report is made to the chief, who directs torture to be inflicted on him, for the purpose of eliciting confession. The usual method of torture is by the application of heated stones to the tenderest parts of the outstretched body, the hands and feet being first made fast to four stakes at equal distances, while myriads of ants are scattered over the agonized victim, whose skin is exposed to the painful gnawing of these swarming insects. It can be no matter of surprise that innocent persons, subjected to these terrible punishments, should be induced to confess the agency of which they have been accused, and instances are on record of many individuals, perfectly guiltless, who have admitted the crime rather than to undergo the fiery ordeal, through a natural dread of its horrors.”— Steadman’s Africa, Vol. I., page 37.

“Black magic is usually punished by the stake. In some parts of the country, the roadside shows, at every few miles, a heap or two of ashes, with a few calcined and blackened human bones mixed with bits of half-consumed charcoal, telling the tragedy that has been enacted there. The prospect cannot be contemplated without horror. Here and there, close to the larger circles where the father and mother have been burnt, a smaller heap shows that some wretched child has shared their terrible fate, lest, growing up, he should follow in his parents’ path.” — Burton’s Africa, page 92.

“At least seventy-five per cent. of the deaths in all the tribes are murders for supposed sorcery.” —Du Chaillu’s Equatorial Africa, page 386.

“The consequence of condemnation [of being guilty of making the chief fall ill through black magic] is certain and immediate death; the mode is chosen by the priest. Some are speared, others are beheaded or clubbed ; a common way is to bind the cranium between two stiff pieces of wood, which are gradually tightened by cords till the brain bursts out from the sutures. For women they practise a peculiarly horrible kind of impalement. These atrocities continue until the chief recovers — or dies.” — Burton’s Africa, page 300

Religion and medicine in Africa

“With the aid of slavery and black magic, they render their subjects’ lives as precarious as they well can ; no one, especially in old age, is safe from being burned at a day’s notice.” — Burton’s Africa, page 96.

“The child who cuts the two upper incisors before the lower, is either put to death, or is given away, or sold to the slave-merchant, under the impression that it will bring disease, calamity, and death into the household.” — Burton’s Africa, page 94.

“To become a witch-doctor of any importance, a person is required to be instructed by one previously well versed in the mysteries of the black art. He must begin his lessons by swallowing animal poison, be bitten by venomous reptiles, or have poison inoculated into his body. A cap, a handkerchief, or any sort of clothing worn by such a person until it has become perfectly saturated with filth, is considered the most infallible cure for all kinds of diseases, poisonous bites, etc. On emergencies, a corner of this treasure is washed, and the dirty water thus produced is given to the patient to drink.” — Andersson’s Africa, page 256

“On other portions of the coast their customs are more cruel about witchcraft than among the Greboes. Any one, once accused of witchcraft, is burnt most cruelly. In some places a slow fire is made, and four posts sunk into the ground, at certain distances, the person tied hands and feet to these posts, and suspended over the fire, thus being slowly burnt; sometimes they are left to die there; at other times they are taken down before death, cast into the bush, and left to perish miserably. No one must pity a witch. Sometimes they torture them in a different fashion: they are fastened down so that they cannot move, and then red-hot coals are placed on different parts of the body, and there left to eat into the flesh.” — Brittan’s Every-Day Life in Africa, page 344.

“In times of tribulation, the magician, if he ascertains a war is projected, by inspecting the blood and bones of a fowl which he has flayed for that purpose, flays a young child, and, having laid it lengthwise on a path, directs all the warriors, on proceeding to battle, to step over his sacrifice and insure themselves victory. Another of these extra barbarous devices takes place when a chief wishes to make war on his neighbor, by his calling in a magician to discover a propitious time for commencing. The doctor places a large earthen vessel, half full of water, over a fire, and over its mouth a grating of sticks, whereon he lays a small child and a fowl side by side, and covers them over with a second large earthen vessel, just like the first, only inverted, to keep the steam in, when he sets fire below, cooks for a certain period of time, and then looks to see if his victims are still living or dead, — when, should they be dead, the war must be deferred, but, otherwise, commenced at once.”— Spence’s Africa, page 21.

Thoughts of both African and European thinkers

“Observing the improved state of our manufactures, and our manifest superiority in the arts of civilized life, Harfa, the intelligent negro merchant, would sometimes appear pensive, and exclaim, with an involuntary sigh, ‘Fato fing inta feng” — black men are good for nothing.” — Mungo Park’s 1st Journal, page 259.

“At present, it appears to me that the prospects of the colored races of South Africa, taken on the broadest scale, are such as Christian philanthropy may weep over. I see no prospect of their preservation for any very lengthened period. The struggle may last for a considerable time. Missionary effort may not only save many of the souls of men, but help to defer the evil day of annihilation as to many of the aboriginal tribes. But annihilation is steadily advancing ; and nothing can arrest it without an entire change in the system of government, wherever British subjects come in contact with the native tribes.” — Freeman”s Missionary Travels in Africa, page 261.

Mr. Freeman and other missionaries like him were concerned about preventing the annihilation of the Africans brought about by Black ignorance, stupidity, and savagery. This they thought they could cure by teaching the Congoids our language, our customs, our religion, and a few rudiments of our culture. By making them put on clothes and say the right things about Jesus and the Constitution, and strongly lecturing them about rape, torture, and murder, they thought they could actually be converted to our mentality and way of life. In this they were aided in early years by slave traders and slave owners, who made money by fostering these illusions, and in later years by crazed egalitarians and Jews, who had their own reasons.

But the missionaries were wrong on two counts. One, the African’s primitivism is not due to their having the wrong religion, as events have shown — and the missionaries’ own religion is neither true nor ours to begin with. No, the Africans’ mentality and behavior, like the behavior and quality of all living things, is primarily determined by genetic inheritance. And two, the missionaries should not have given their time, their concern, or their lives to prevent Congoids from being  Congoids, even if that meant the end of them. No. Their concern should have been their own people. For the eternal law of Nature states that any living being which ceases to make the survival of its kind the ultimate value will soon perish from the Earth.

And, in the light of all we know — some of which I may have brought to light for you for the first time today — we know now above all other things that the  amalgamation with Africans, which our alien rulers are zealously pursuing, means death for us — and in the light of true morality that is the ultimate in evil.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/savage-africa-part-2/feed/ 2
America and the Third World http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/america-and-the-third-world/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/america-and-the-third-world/#comments Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:46:32 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1881 1955 UNICEF Christmas Card UNby Dr. William L. Pierce

ON WHAT considerations should a proper American foreign policy be based? That seems a sensible enough question, yet it is one which has been shunned by at least two generations of Federal “experts” and their media mouthpieces. (ILLUSTRATION: A 1955 UNICEF Christmas card depicting the flags of the countries in the United Nations organization)

The basic reason is a reluctance to bring into the open certain fundamental discrepancies between America’s national interests and the guiding philosophy behind the foreign policy pursued by neo-liberal planners in Washington.

The shambles which this policy has made of the world in the last 60 years, however, should be adequate proof of the unsuitability of its ideological basis and of the need for a new one.

 White World Community

The fundamental rule of . . . → Read More: America and the Third World]]> 1955 UNICEF Christmas Card UNby Dr. William L. Pierce

ON WHAT considerations should a proper American foreign policy be based? That seems a sensible enough question, yet it is one which has been shunned by at least two generations of Federal “experts” and their media mouthpieces. (ILLUSTRATION: A 1955 UNICEF Christmas card depicting the flags of the countries in the United Nations organization)

The basic reason is a reluctance to bring into the open certain fundamental discrepancies between America’s national interests and the guiding philosophy behind the foreign policy pursued by neo-liberal planners in Washington.

The shambles which this policy has made of the world in the last 60 years, however, should be adequate proof of the unsuitability of its ideological basis and of the need for a new one.

 White World Community

The fundamental rule of a new and proper American foreign policy must be the rule which should also be fundamental to domestic policy: Race is everything. The destiny of America is inextricably linked by ties of blood and culture to those of the other White nations of the world, whether in Africa, the Pacific, or Europe.

The one great goal toward which American foreign policy should strive is the development of a worldwide community, transcending the geographical nationalism of the present, in which all men and women of Western blood will be members. The replacement of a parochial outlook with White world solidarity and the final elimination of fratricidal war would be among the enormous benefits of such a development.

 Absurdity of Multiracialism

By the same rule, however, the travesty of a world community to which America’s spiritually handicapped leaders presently pay lip service — the United Nations Organization — is an absurdity. With no common racial and cultural basis, there can come no rational or consistent policy, no uniformity of purpose, from any multi-racial group, be it a single nation or an assembly of nations.

Despite the equalitarian mythology espoused by all U.N. delegates, those from the non-White nations, at least, are sufficiently race conscious that they form a coherent bloc which, even if it can agree on nothing else, is united in its hostility to all Westerners. It is difficult to imagine anything more tragically fatuous than America and the other White nations of the world competing with one another for the U.N. vote of Swaziland or Upper Volta.

 Racial Suicide

To suggest placing the destiny of the White race in such hands, to seriously consider submitting America in any way to the decisions of a body in which the vote of a Fiji Islander or a Botswanan counts as much as that of a Canadian or a German, is criminal lunacy. Yet that is exactly what America’s so-called leaders have already done, to a limited extent. Mr. Kissinger’s recent assurance that the Nixon administration will fully support the U.N. effort to starve White-ruled Rhodesia into submission by banning all trade between Rhodesia and the United States is only one example of this.

 No More Meddling

The policy of the West — and, in particular, of America — toward the so-called “third world” should be one of total non-involvement.

If Nigeria wants to industrialize herself, fine, let her try to do it — with neither American interference nor aid.

If the Tutsis decide to barbecue and eat all the Hutus in Burundi, that is their business.

And if the Arabs object to the Jews stealing their land, they can fight it out among themselves, without American troops, weapons, or referees.

 End Neo-Colonialism

The argument that if America doesn’t build a new dam or ball-bearing factory in Zambia the Russians will — and will thereby gain some unspecified advantage over us — is largely specious.

If the Russians want to try their hand at neo-colonialism — and that is the proper name for it — let them; there are very few instances where it can disadvantage us. In most cases the Russians, after carefully thinking over the pros and cons — and if there were no worry about the Americans rushing in and beating them out of something — would find it the better part of wisdom to forget about building a ball-bearing plant in Zambia and would leave the Zambians happily squatting in their own filth.

 Race Before Profit

Indeed, there still exist many places in the third world, perhaps even in Zambia, where Western know-how can turn a buck. And capitalists (of both the private and state, or communist, varieties) would scream bloody murder if they were no longer allowed to develop a market for their electric golf carts there — and import cheap labor therefrom in order to manufacture them.

Placing racial interests above economic interests, however, requires us to firmly rule out both these international capitalist activities in the long run — the latter immediately. There was a time when the capitalist argument for importing laborers of alien race, either free or slave, may have carried some weight, but that time is long past.

 Ship Them Back

The current practice in northern Europe — especially Germany — of allowing local capitalists to import hordes of alien workers to do the hard and dirty work that Western workers find beneath their dignity will prove the ruin of northern Europe if it is not halted.

The result of Germany bringing in alien workers from Turkey after World War Two. They were originally guest workers (Gastarbeiters), with the intention of having them leave when their contracts expired. This did not actually happen and recently, in the year 2000, the German government gave these foreigners citizenship.

The result of Germany bringing in alien workers from Turkey after World War Two: they were originally guest workers (Gastarbeiters), imported with the intention of having them leave when their contracts expired. This did not actually happen and in the year 2000 the German government gave these foreigners citizenship.

Likewise, South Africans would be well advised to keep the gates of their Bantustans closed by day as well as by night and learn to do themselves whatever work is necessary to their economy.

And the same lesson applies with particular urgency to America and her former slaves.

 No More Beads and Whisky

Trade and “development” are not the same thing, but they are inextricably linked. If America imports coconuts and rhinoceros hides from some “undeveloped” nation with an agricultural economy, that nation will usually expect American machinery — and American technologists to keep it running — in return. There was a time when glass beads and whisky would have been sufficient, but not any more.

The export of Western technology to the non-White world is probably the stupidest thing that we, as a race, have ever done. The original idea in the minds of our naive do-gooders was that we would simultaneously raise the non-Whites’ standard of living and save their souls — i.e., make dark-skinned Westerners of them. Instead we greatly increased the number and efficiency of our natural enemies while instilling in them an implacable hatred for us.

 Destroyed Souls

We also managed to destroy their souls, by uprooting them from their soil, obliterating their culture, making their native handicrafts obsolete, and catastrophically changing their lifestyle.

With the major increase of the non-white population increase in India comes the non-stop overflow of trash, with huge trash piles along roadways, in random fields and right outside apartments and housing developments.  The extent of these piles and the animals that roam through them is staggering.

With the major increase of the non-White population in India comes the non-stop overflow of trash, with huge trash piles along roadways, in random fields and right outside apartments and housing developments. The extent of these piles and the animals that roam through them is staggering.

Is India a better or happier place for having been “Westernized”? No one who has visited Bombay or Calcutta can think so. Western technology has simply made it possible for vastly more Indians per square mile to starve than was previously possible.

 Back to the Jungle

Much of the industrialization of the third world which has already taken place is reversible. With their supply of Western technicians and spare parts cut off, all Black African — and many other —nations would simply revert to their former jungle lifestyle within a few years.

Those few non-White nations where industrialization is not self-reversible will be a growing worry and danger for the West in the future. China is the outstanding example.

Trade with the third world must continue for the present, but the long-range goal of the West should be complete economic autonomy. There is no raw material which we cannot obtain from another White nation or eventually learn to do without.

Oil is the most immediately relevant example. If America manages to get through the current fuel crisis without irreparable damage, it may serve as a stimulus to achieve national autonomy in fuel. If so, the crisis will have been a good thing.

 Western Destiny

So let us look forward to a new American policy toward the third world, a policy which abjures all neo-colonialism and its attendant hypocrisies.

Let us look forward to the day when we no longer are tempted to resort to gunboat diplomacy to protect markets or sources of raw materials.

Let us pursue our own Western destiny without masses of aliens in our midst — and let us allow the peoples of the third world to do the same, in their own way and in their own time.

We may then find that many of the jealousies and sources of friction which have kept the White peoples of the world — including even the Russians — divided against one another will have disappeared.

 * * *

From Attack! No. 24, 1973, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/america-and-the-third-world/feed/ 0
Background to Treason, part 3 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/background-to-treason-part-3/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/background-to-treason-part-3/#comments Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:29:00 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1870 deak_1-032113

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 3: From 1933 to the Second World War [1]

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE ALMOST simultaneous accession to power, early in 1933, of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Roosevelt is one of the great ironies of history. (ILLUSTRATION: Franklin Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin enjoying a laugh at Tehran Conference, 1943)

The time called for strong White leadership. The largest White nation on earth was prostrate under the heel of a Jew-inspired and still largely Jew-staffed terror-regime of extraordinary virulence and expansionist propensity.[2] In the 14 years of its existence the Jewish-Bolshevik regime in the Soviet Union had murdered some 20 million Russians and Ukrainians. In 1932-33 alone 5 1/2 million anti-Bolshevik farmers and members of their families were exterminated in an artificial famine; while . . . → Read More: Background to Treason, part 3]]> deak_1-032113

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 3: From 1933 to the Second World War [1]

by Dr. William L. Pierce

THE ALMOST simultaneous accession to power, early in 1933, of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Roosevelt is one of the great ironies of history. (ILLUSTRATION: Franklin Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin enjoying a laugh at Tehran Conference, 1943)

The time called for strong White leadership. The largest White nation on earth was prostrate under the heel of a Jew-inspired and still largely Jew-staffed terror-regime of extraordinary virulence and expansionist propensity.[2] In the 14 years of its existence the Jewish-Bolshevik regime in the Soviet Union had murdered some 20 million Russians and Ukrainians. In 1932-33 alone 5 1/2 million anti-Bolshevik farmers and members of their families were exterminated in an artificial famine; while the commissars and the urban rabble on whom they depended for support dined well, armed Bolshevik gangs confiscated the crops and livestock of farmers who had resisted collectivization and left them to starve.[3]

Adolf Hitler pictured with young girl

Adolf Hitler pictured with young girl

From the beginning the Bolsheviks had sated their blood-lust by butchering the best of the Russians: the most intelligent, the most successful, the most resourceful, the most independent, the purest and most valuable racially. They had virtually decapitated the Russian nation, selectively killing off those most likely to oppose their own rule. And they had shown the same tendency wherever they had temporarily gained the upper hand, as in the Marxist regimes of Bela Kun in Hungary and Kurt Eisner in Bavaria.[4]

In the years since the end of the First World War the Jewish hold on the media of popular culture and public opinion, both in America and Europe, had tightened. During the same period the Jews had greatly increased their infiltration of educational institutions and the churches, labor unions and political parties. They were turning all of these institutions to their own purposes, leaving the host society less and less able to deal with its own problems and advance its own ends. And new problems were certainly brewing, not only in the Middle East, but also in Europe. In addition to the growing Bolshevik menace, there were other seeds of conflict which had been sown by the last war and by the disastrous treaty which followed it, and they were beginning to sprout.

A White champion was needed to crush Jewish Bolshevism wherever it had taken root; to extirpate the carriers of the Bolshevik virus; to free the news and entertainment media everywhere from Jewish control; to purge from the White consciousness the spiritual and cultural poison which already had been injected under that control; to raise from the dust the banner of White racial idealism and hold it aloft as a rallying standard for progressive Whites throughout the world; and to deal as ruthlessly as necessary with the vested interests, the mercenaries, and the spiritually corrupted, who would array themselves on the side of the Jews in opposing all of these things.

That was a tall order indeed, but in Germany’s new chancellor it was met. In breadth of vision and depth of understanding, in commitment to the task at hand, in ability to accomplish it, and in willingness to be ruthless when necessary, Hitler stood far above every other political leader of the time — indeed, of any time in the Modern Age. He was the man to free the race and lead it once again to the upward path.

He began in Germany: within months he had cleaned out the Communists, who had been on the verge of taking over the country during the administration of his democratic predecessors. The democrats had been at a loss as to how to cope with the Reds, but Hitler did such a thorough job on them that for the next 12 years the international Communist apparatus considered an undercover assignment to Germany tantamount to a death sentence.

Then he dealt with the Jews — not by putting them into gas chambers as the popular mythology has it, but by freeing the German press, the German film industry, German radio, and the German educational establishment from their control and influence. The Jews in Germany prior to 1933 had followed their age-old pattern: shunning the manual occupations and creative work generally, they had established a strong beachhead in trade; from there they had begun infiltrating the professions. By 1933 nearly half of the lawyers in Berlin were Jews (1879 Jews out of a total of 3890 lawyers), and disproportions of similar magnitude were being established in the medical and teaching professions.

It was in the professions offering an opportunity to influence public opinion and shift cultural norms that Jews had sought and gained the strongest hold, however. They owned or controlled Germany’s largest and most influential newspapers, such as the Berliner Tageblatt, the Vossische Zeitung, and the Frankfurter Zeitung. The Jewish Ullstein publishing conglomerate owned, in addition to the Vossische Zeitung, the Berliner Morgenpost (circulation 607,000), the Berliner Allgemeine Zeitung, B.Z. am Mittag, Das Tempo, the Montagspost, the Gruene Post (circulation 1,042,000), the Berliner Illustrierte Zeitung (circulation 1,603,000), and dozens of other newspapers and magazines.[5]

Hitler changed all of that in a radical way. Within a very short time after he took office, a Jew could no more determine what films Germans would see or what subjects German students would study than an Arab can do the same for Jews in Israel today. Jews in Germany could, of course, continue to write for one another, educate one another, and entertain one another; and they could still engage in those occupations and professions, including merchandising, which did not provide them the means to impose their own spirituality, morality, or ideology on the German people.

Such restrictions were intolerable to the Jews, however. For them it was the whole cake or nothing, and from the day Hitler took office they set their international machinery of disinformation and coercion into motion against the new Germany. One of their first moves was the imposition of an economic boycott. The word went out to Jewish leaders in every country: no German goods could be sold, no German vessels could be used for shipping, and no loans could be made to the German government or to German businessmen. Gentiles who refused to comply with the boycott were themselves to be boycotted.

The initial results were mixed: Germans retaliated by boycotting the large department stores in Germany, which were virtually a Jewish monopoly, taking their trade instead to the smaller shops owned by Germans; German businessmen who were engaged in international trade found that they could get by without foreign loans, if necessary, by turning to barter; and the boycott was far from airtight, with many international businessmen — including some prominent Jews — ignoring it altogether and continuing their trade and financial dealings with Germany as before.

To plug the leaks the World Jewish Economic Federation held an International Jewish Boycott Conference in Amsterdam in July 1933. Samuel Untermyer, a wealthy and prominent lawyer long active in Zionist affairs in the United States, presided. An Anti-Nazi League (ANL) was formed to coordinate the economic pressure on Germany, and Untermyer was chosen to head it.[6]

ANAL declared a total economic and political war against Germany, and the propaganda tactics it used in that war immediately manifested all of the viciousness and brazenness of which the Jews were capable. The lies about conditions in Germany and the actions of the German government which Untermyer and others began disseminating as early as the summer of 1933, at a time when Jews were free to come and go in Germany, to use their wealth as they wished, or to leave and take it with them, gave a foretaste of the mendacious "gas chamber" propaganda which was to come later.

ANL declared a total economic and political war against Germany, and the propaganda tactics it used in that war immediately manifested all of the viciousness and brazenness of which the Jews were capable. The lies about conditions in Germany and the actions of the German government which Untermyer and others began disseminating as early as the summer of 1933, at a time when Jews were free to come and go in Germany, to use their wealth as they wished, or to leave and take it with them, gave a foretaste of the mendacious “gas chamber” propaganda which was to come later.

Untermyer returned to New York on August 6 and announced the Jewish declaration of war against Germany in a radio speech that evening. The complete text of his speech appeared in the New York Times the following day. World Jewry’s war against Germany, said Untermyer, is a “holy war… a war that must be waged unremittingly until the black clouds of bigotry, race hatred, and fanaticism that have descended upon what was once Germany, but is now medieval Hitlerland, have been dispersed.” Germany, he asserted, had been “converted from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts.”

Samuel-Untermeyer

SAMUEL UNTERMYER: He has the distinction of being the father of both the Federal Reserve System and of the “Holocaust” myth — and of issuing world Jewry’s declaration of war against National Socialist Germany. His radio speech of August 6, 1933, provided a remarkable insight into the Jewish mentality and gave fair warning to all racially conscious Whites that the survival of the race would require a fight to the death against Jewry and all of those under Jewish influence or control.

The only Jews who were in any danger in Germany in 1933 were those who were active in Communist subversion or some other criminal activity. Those who minded their own business (admittedly, always a difficult matter for Jews) were not molested, but the Jews who had manned the Communist Party apparat were forced to flee or face the likelihood of the concentration camp. But Untermyer was hardly concerned with truth when he spoke of “the slaughter, starvation, and annihilation, by a country that has reverted to barbarism, of its own innocent and defenseless citizens without rhyme, reason, or excuse.”

He went on to claim that the Germans were herding the Jews of Germany into “vile concentration camps, starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become the only means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.”

Thus was born in Samuel Untermyer’s fertile imagination the lie which, with much added embroidery, was to emerge 12 years later as the full-blown “Holocaust” hoax. In his August 6 speech he hinted so clearly at this future invention that one can hardly fail to suspect that the Zionists were already banking on the sympathy to be milked from future claims of six million gassed and cremated Jews:

I have seen and talked with many of these terror-stricken refugees who have had the good fortune to escape over the border, though forced to leave their property behind them, and I want to say to you that nothing that has seeped through to you over the rigid censorship and lying propaganda that are at work to conceal and misrepresent the situation of the Jews in Germany begins to tell a fraction of the frightful story of fiendish torture, cruelty, and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women, and children, or the terrors worse than death in which they are living.

When the tale is told, as it will be some day… the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities will pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, and cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people who love and have shed their blood for their Fatherland, and to whom Germany owes in large part its prosperity and its great scientists, educators, lawyers, physicians, poets, musicians, diplomats, and philosophers, who are the backbone of its past cultural life.[7]

But why dwell longer upon this revolting picture of the ravages wrought by these ingrates and beasts of prey, animated by the loathsome motives of race hatred, bigotry, and envy. For the Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000[8] human souls from the tortures of hell, as we can with the aid of our Christian friends, if we have the will to act.

Well, no one has ever accused the Jews of being modest. Clever, yes; avaricious, yes; vindictive, yes; but not modest and not truthful. Nevertheless, Untermyer was quite forthright in stating the Jews’ aim. It was to “undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.” He also stated the Jews’ demands on “our Christian friends” plainly enough:

Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here. It is not sufficient that you buy no goods made in Germany. You must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods or who patronizes German ships or shipping. To our shame be it said that there are a few Jews among us, but fortunately only a few, so wanting in dignity and self-respect that they are willing to travel on German ships where they are despised and meet with the just contempt of the servants who wait on them and of their fellow passengers. Their names should be heralded far and wide. They are traitors to their race.

In conclusion, permit me again to thank you for this heartening reception and to assure you that, with your support and that of our millions of non-Jewish friends, we will drive the last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism that has dared raise its ugly head to slander, belie, and disgrace 20th-century civilization.[9]

Economic warfare is warfare, and a declaration of economic war is a declaration of war. Throughout history a deliberate act or policy by one nation intended to injure the economic welfare of another has been regarded as a casus belli, justifying a warlike response as surely as does a territorial invasion. The Jewish boycott policy was certainly deliberate, and it was certainly intended to injure Germany.

As ANL’s propaganda intensified and began to take hold, the boycott became more of a problem for Germany. The German response was remarkably restrained, however. Instead of lashing out at the Jews, Hitler’s government increased its effort to blunt the boycott by achieving economic autarchy.

Foreign journalists and writers were also invited to Germany, so that they could, by reporting the truth to their readers back home, counter the lies being spread by Untermyer and company. A few did this. H.G. Wells, for example, reported that Jews were not being mistreated in Germany and that impressions to the contrary in England, the United States, and elsewhere were entirely due to the “incessant propaganda of the world’s most charming but incurably nationalistic race.”

Several widely read periodicals, such as the National Geographic Magazine, also reported truthfully on conditions in Germany.[10] And, of course, the 1936 Olympic Games, which were held in Berlin, gave tens of thousands of American tourists and sports enthusiasts an opportunity to visit Germany and witness the truth for themselves.

Even some Jews found good in what Hitler was doing in Germany, although they would not praise him openly. They were mostly Zionists of the Jabotinsky stripe, who welcomed the barriers to cultural assimilation and intermarriage erected by the National Socialists. It would be good for their fellow Jews, they said to one another, to follow the German example and assert their own Jewish nationalism proudly and openly, instead of preaching internationalism to the Gentiles while practicing Jewish nationalism quietly among themselves; the Jews could only be accepted as equals when they dropped their deceitful approach to other peoples.

Jabotinsky.stamp

Ultrazionist hero Ze’ev Jabotinsky, born in Russia

The same Zionists also advocated the formation of Jewish gymnastic clubs to encourage physical fitness among young Jews, and they urged Jewish parents to steer their children toward careers in farming or handicrafts instead of the traditional law, trade, or finance. Needless to say, such Jews were a very small minority; most chimed in with Untermyer, spewing hate-inspired slander against all things German.

All Zionists, however, whether Revisionists or in the mainstream, and whether they secretly admired Hitler’s policies or not, realized that what was happening in Germany was necessary for the achievement of their goal of a Jewish Palestine. Hitler was making Germany a thoroughly inhospitable country for the Jews, forcing them to set up shop elsewhere. Jewish immigration to Palestine consequently skyrocketed, reaching a new record of 61,854 for the year 1935.

The Jews’ duplicity in their prewar anti-German propaganda is perhaps nowhere better revealed than in the fact that while they were wailing about the need to wage war “unremittingly” against “medieval Hitlerland” — a “sacred war,” in fact — the same Jews were busily committing sacrilege by breaking their own boycott against Germany. From 1933 through 1939 the Zionists secretly promoted a flourishing trade in agricultural equipment between Germany and the Jewish settlements in Palestine. Germany exported manufactured goods to Palestine — 37 million marks worth in 1937 alone — and was paid in Jewish gold.[11]

The same duplicity later was reflected in the efforts in 1941, in the midst of the war between Germany and Britain which had been provoked largely by Jews, of Jabotinsky’s Revisionists to negotiate an alliance with the Germans against the British forces in Palestine. These efforts, just like the trade between Germany and the Jews in Palestine, were strictly under the table, and they had no effect on the Jewish propaganda effort against Germany. They do illustrate the point, however, that Jewish leaders were playing a much more complex game than was evident to most observers in the 1930s and 1940s. They wanted to destroy Germany, which they regarded as a deadly threat to Jewish ambitions of world rule, but at the same time they welcomed the effects on their fellow Jews of German policies, and they were not averse to secret collaboration with the Germans whenever that seemed to offer some advantage.

For several years the average American was exposed to two contradictory sources of information about Germany. Unfortunately, the readers of the National Geographic Magazine were outnumbered by housewives who read nothing but movie magazines and men who read only the sports sections of their daily newspapers. And everyone listened to the radio and went to the movies, media which were already heavily Jewish in the 1930s.

Since voting was not restricted to citizens who were intelligent and well informed, and since the politicians could count, the Jewish propaganda against Germany very soon was echoed by ambitious Gentile legislators, bureaucrats, and office seekers. Publicity-hungry “celebrities,” Jew-worshiping Christian ministers, and leftist academics were not far behind them. All of these were sought out by the Jews and persuaded to lend their names to public statements denouncing Hitler, his government, German policies, and the German people. Thus, the lies and the hatred were given an aura of respectability.

poster

HATE PROPAGANDA for the Second World War was cleverly designed and mass-produced. The Jews had the full backing of the Roosevelt regime and all of the resources of the U.S. government at their disposal in inciting American hatred against the Germans. As soon as Roosevelt managed to get the United States into the war, posters such as these appeared in schools, factories, and offices everywhere. One common theme of Jewish war propaganda was that the Germans rounded up pretty girls in conquered territories and forced them to work in brothels (above, right). Actually, it was America’s communist ally, the Soviet Union, which was guilty of such behavior. Another propaganda theme was that the Germans drained the blood from children in captured towns, in order to use it for transfusions in military hospitals — and then they boiled the children’s corpses down into soap.

The Germans, unfortunately, were no match for the Jews in this propaganda war. Not only did the Jews have more powerful media under their control than those accessible to the Germans and their sympathizers, but the Jews were cleverer — and more brazen — in appealing to the gullibility of their audience. Whereas most Germans naively assumed that the truth must ultimately prevail and that the reckless extravagance of the Jews’ lies would trip them up, the Jews better understood the plebeian mentality of the average American. It was a mentality which was quite capable of absorbing the most improbable lie, if the lie were repeated often and loudly enough. And, once absorbed, the lie would become impervious to reason and to all contrary evidence.

Hitler, at least, was aware of this danger, and he had warned of it in 1925. The common people, he noted, lack the imagination of the Jews, just as they lack the Jews’ shamelessness:

Therefore… the masses more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. They will never invent a real whopper themselves, and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others. Even when presented with the facts they will doubt and waver and continue to accept parts of the lie. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick, a fact which all of the great virtuosos of lying know only too well and of which they make the most treacherous use.

The foremost connoisseurs of this fact regarding the possibilities in the use of falsehood and slander have always been the Jews….”[12]

The Jewish response to this warning was typical. Knowing that not one American in a hundred would have the gumption to find a copy of Mein Kampf and read for himself what Hitler actually had written, they brazenly turned Hitler’s words against him, charging that he had boasted in Mein Kampf that he, not the Jews, swayed the masses by telling them the biggest lies possible; therefore, Hitler was an admitted liar, and nothing that he or his sympathizers said was to be believed.

And, just as Hitler had warned, this whopper stuck. Even today one hears half-educated academics prattle knowingly about Hitler being the inventor and advocate of the “big lie” propaganda technique. Opening a copy of Mein Kampf to the place where Hitler warns of the Jewish use of this trick and rubbing such a savant’s nose on the page will not cure him of his folly; he has heard Hitler blamed so often that he simply cannot believe, even when presented with the evidence in black and white, that it is all a matter of Jewish deceit.

If Untermyer’s lies in August 1933 were outrageous, the lies the Jews and their collaborators subsequently told about Germany, after they had shifted their propaganda machine into high gear, surpassed all previous bounds of mendacity. They did not limit themselves to inventing spurious atrocity stories, spurious statistics, spurious statements attributed to Hitler and other German leaders, which were passed off as “news”; they also played expertly on the average American’s emotions and instincts with undisguised fiction. Anti-German novels, anti-German short stories, anti-German stage plays, anti-German comic strips, anti-German nightclub acts, anti-German posters, and anti-German motion pictures were all used effectively. The Jews, as born salesmen, realized instinctively that the opinions and attitudes of most people are formed at a very primitive, sub-rational level, where facts and reason are of little importance, and they made the most of their realization.

Despite their overwhelming propaganda superiority, the Jews continued to worry that their opponents might succeed in getting their act together and begin countering the Jewish influence on American public opinion effectively. To head off such a possibility the Jews did not hesitate to use raw, physical intimidation. In 1938, for example, they had a group of their Gentile stooges lend their names to a statement warning Americans of German descent not to show any signs of sympathy for Hitler’s programs in Germany or to help spread National Socialist ideas in the United States.

If pro-German propaganda is tolerated, the statement threatened, “it cannot fail to create a cyst in the body politic of the American people. It will result in setting apart a large group of inhabitants of the United States whose duty it would be to render primary allegiance to the ruler of a foreign power. Friction between this group and the rest of the American people might result in unrest and possible bloodshed.”[13]

One can easily imagine the screams of indignant outrage which would be heard from the same people who cooked up this statement, if a group of prominent politicians, academics, and church leaders had offered the far more plausible suggestion that the toleration of Zionist propaganda would induce Jews to render a primary allegiance to a foreign power, Israel, with the possible consequence that the rest of the American people would regard them as traitors and shed their blood.

The Roosevelt government also engaged in physical intimidation to silence the critics of the Jews. The Federal Bureau of Investigation harassed authors, editors, publishers, and lecturers who attempted to warn the American people that the Jews were brewing up a new war for their own ends. J. Edgar Hoover sent out his “black bag” squads to burglarize the homes and offices of law-abiding citizens and to steal their private papers and research materials, all without the slightest worry that the news media would cry “foul!,” as they did in the Vietnam era, when the shoe was on the other foot.

After Pearl Harbor three highly publicized mass trials of dissidents were staged in Washington by Roosevelt’s Justice Department in order to intimidate other opponents of the Jews’ war aims into silence. One of the 28 persons charged in the first of these show trials was Ralph Townsend, an independent newsman from San Francisco who had spent many years in the Far East and was thoroughly familiar with the international political and diplomatic situation. Townsend’s “crime” was the publication in January 1939, eight months before the outbreak of the war and nearly three years before America’s entry into it, of a 61-page booklet he wrote, The High Cost of Hate.

He had mailed thousands of copies of his booklet to legislators, educators, writers, and other influential persons, and he had sold tens of thousands of copies to the public. In it he argued persuasively that the intense Jewish propaganda campaign being waged against Germany and Japan was intended to provoke a war, that a war was not in the best interests of most Americans, and that the propagandists were liars. Townsend began his booklet thus:

What is behind the campaigns of organized hate in America now?

No nation is attacking the United States. No nation is menacing a single inch of territory over which the American flag flies. Every one of the important nations seems eager for friendly relations with us. Every nation in the world wants to trade with us.

Why, then, are our papers so full of hate toward others? …

Hatred of others is not natural among average Americans. The campaign to promote American hatred of other nations now is strictly a minority movement. There are among us people who have never become fully American… They are now trying to get America involved in their foreign quarrels.

To gather support for this minority aim they are conducting a tremendous publicity campaign to stir American hatred of nations they want us to fight.

Many of these alien-minded people are important advertisers. Newspaper and magazines depend on advertising revenue. Thus, many editors seek to please them by running hate campaigns against any and all nations which the alien-minded advertisers don’t like. They have deceived many sincere, loyal Americans. That is one of the influences — the main influence — behind the campaigns of hate and war talk in America now….

A powerful minority in America, well organized and well financed, wants us to fight three nations — Germany, Italy, and Japan….

Note that the majority of American editors, though they pretend peaceful ideals, are promoting this war hate drive in every way possible. Once enough hate is achieved the rest is easy.

The truth would not serve this war hate objective. Deception is being employed as abundantly now as in 1915-17….

Only two characteristics mark the three nations our papers want us to hate and fight. First, these three nations are strongly anti-red. Second, they manage their own money and resources, free from any international financial bondage….

To state the case briefly, our press hates every nation run strictly by its own people — where neither international Bolshevism nor international finance is allowed a grip….

Townsend went on to present a clear and persuasive analysis of the motivations of the hate-mongers, of the deceptions they were using, and of the harmful and dangerous effects of their hate on the American people. It is easy to understand why the Jews wanted to shut him up.

It was hardly necessary, however, to drag him to Washington in handcuffs and leg irons for a show trial; that was merely a bit of Jewish spite, akin to that manifested these days each time some elderly German who played a role in the last war is hounded to his death. For the sad fact was that, by the time President Roosevelt’s anti-Japanese policies had finally provoked the Pearl Harbor attack, the Jews were holding nearly all the cards.

Father Coughlin, the populist priest who regularly opposed Roosevelt and the Jews on his radio broadcasts, continued reaching large numbers of people until ordered by the Pope in 1942 to shut up. But most men who, like Bob Townsend, were attempting to alert the American people and counter the Jews’ war propaganda were effectively denied access to the mass media. They distributed pamphlets and leaflets, but the Jews, who controlled most radio broadcasting, virtually all of the cinema, and a substantial majority of the big-city daily press, swamped them.[14]

This Jewish control of the mass news and entertainment media was the most important single factor behind the U.S. entry into the Second World War. The story of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, of the warnings Roosevelt had that the attack was coming, and of the cover up afterward, so that the pretense could be maintained that the attack was a “surprise,” has been told elsewhere.[15] So has the story of the diplomatic and economic warfare which the Roosevelt government waged against Japan for five years before Pearl Harbor. All of those things are important — but the fact remains that Roosevelt could not have gotten away with his anti-Japanese campaign (without which there would have been no Pearl Harbor attack) if there had not been a concurrent propaganda campaign to justify it in the minds of the public.

Not only did the Jews wage a hate-propaganda campaign of unprecedented magnitude in the years 1933-1941, but they simultaneously strengthened and expanded their capability for waging future campaigns. What began with Samuel Untermyer’s half-hour tirade of lies over New York radio station WABC on August 6, 1933, had become by December 7, 1941, a non-stop flood of poison into the mind of every American. And the propaganda apparatus which enabled the Jews to send millions of Americans overseas, with hate in their hearts, to kill the Jews’ enemies in the years 1942-1945 was the same apparatus which, with the addition of the medium of television, enabled them to paralyze the will of Americans to resist the scrapping of their immigration laws and the racial mongrelization of their society in the postwar years.

From National Vanguard magazine (April, 1983)

transcribed by Michael Olanich

Coming Next, Part IV: Capitalizing on the “Holocaust.”

Notes:

1 – This is the third article of a series. Originally intended to be complete in two parts, it has expanded as research turned up additional relevant material, and it is now anticipated that it will consist of four articles [actually five — Ed.] altogether. The first, covering the period from biblical times to the First World War, appeared in the December 1982 issue of National Vanguard, and the second appeared in the March 1983 issue. This segment is from the April, 1983 issue.

2 – In 1933 approximately half of those in the higher leadership strata of the Soviet Union were Jews. (A study done in 1965 by the Legislative Reference Service of the Library of Congress determined the figure for 1939 with more precision: “Before World War II, 41.1 per cent of the deputies to the Supreme Soviet of the U.S.S.R. were Jewish …” [The Soviet Empire (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965), p.63.])

3 – This was a “Holocaust” — a real one — about which the controlled media remain as silent today as they did then, while they continue to serve up almost daily their Second World War gas-chamber tales about the mythical “six million.” The facts are known; Alexander Solzhenitsyn was not the first to write about the genocidal activities of the Bolsheviks or to reveal their Jewish roots and leadership during the 1930s. Yet Christian priests and Christian politicians and Christian educators collaborate today with the Jewish masters of the controlled media in the promotion of the Jews as a race of martyrs deserving the world’s sympathy. Hardly anything else illustrates as well as does this servile and hypocritical collaboration the moral decadence of the present leadership stratum of the West.

4 – Bela Kun (1886-1937) and Kurt Eisner (1867-1919) were both Jews, as were most of their lieutenants. Both seized the opportunity presented by the social and political chaos at the end of the First World War to organize short-lived Communist regimes.

Hungarian patriots rose against Kun in July 1919. He fled to the Soviet Union, while the Hungarians meted out hemp justice to his Jewish accomplices who were unable to get out of the country soon enough. He perished in 1937 in Stalin’s first purge of the Soviet Union.

Eisner was executed by a German patriot on February 21, 1919, in Munich, and the German Army subsequently dealt with Eisner’s followers in an appropriate way.

5 – Die Juden in Deutschland (Verlag Franz Eher Nachf., 1935).

6 – Samuel Untermyer (1858-1940) made his fortune as an organizer of corporate conglomerates and a manipulator of stocks before 1910. Then he switched sides and became a trustbuster, working closely with anti-business elements in the Congress. He was counsel to the Pujo Committee (1912-1913), a subcommittee of the House Committee on Banking and Currency, and he was responsible for much of the content of its report (issued on February 28, 1913), which paved the way for both a Federal income tax and the setting up of the Federal Reserve System. Untermyer was a strong advocate of both, and his behind-the-scenes efforts during 1913 led to the passage of the Owen-Glass Act on December 23, 1913. Woodrow Wilson later appointed him chairman of a commission to set income-tax and excess-profits-tax rates.

During the 1920s he was president of the Palestine Foundation Fund (for aiding the colonization of Palestine by Jews) and vice-president of the American Jewish Congress. In 1927 Untermyer handled the lawsuit (by Herman Bernstein) against automaker Henry Ford which frightened the latter into ceasing publication of his exposés of Jewish activities and withdrawing and destroying all available copies of his book, The International Jew.

7 – Untermyer refers to the British atrocity propaganda of the First World War. In order to drum up public enthusiasm for the war, British authorities and their helpers in the press invented and circulated outlandish stories of German bestiality. Lindley Fraser, a British economics professor who served as the BBC’s chief of psychological warfare during the Second World War, later wrote of the tricks pulled by his predecessors:

“The ‘Belgian Atrocities’ stories provide a curious and unsavoury chapter in the history of war propaganda…. What is not true, so far as later researches have been able to discover, is that the Germans were guilty of any of the horrifying atrocities freely attributed to them by their enemies and widely believed in Great Britain and among Allies and friendly neutrals. Priests used as clappers in cathedral bells, crucified prisoners of war, children with their hands cut off: these and many other stories were common gossip in the Western world and doubtless helped those people on the Allied side who already hated the Germans to hate them still more.

“Where did such stories originate? Some of them… were deliberately invented; thus shortly after the war a well-known British journalist claimed, with some pride, to have been the author of the story about the chopped-off hands.” (Propaganda [Oxford University Press, 1957], pp. 34-35).

Another well-known Briton who invented some of the “Belgian Atrocities” stories was historian Arnold J. Toynbee. He finished writing The German Terror in Belgium (George H. Doran Co., 1917) in March 1917, a few weeks before Woodrow Wilson’s call for war. The book was intended for American readers who still needed to be persuaded that the United States should enter the war against Germany.

8 – Untermyer’s figure is 20 per cent too large. There were 499,682 Jews living in Germany in 1933, according to the census taken that year. Before the outbreak of the Second World War six years later, Hitler had achieved the peaceful reunification of Austria (191,481 Jews in 1934) and the Sudetenland with Germany, but Jews had been emigrating in large numbers from all German territory, so that in 1939 there were only 240,000 Jews left in the Third Reich (including Austria and the Sudetenland), according to The American Jewish Year Book for 1940-41 (v.42, p.602). One can only wonder whether Untermyer’s somewhat inflated figure of 600,000 Jews in Germany in 1933 was later simply inflated again, by a factor of ten, to yield the famous 6,000,000 figure for the number of Jews supposedly done away with by Hitler.

9 – It is interesting to compare Untermyer’s lurid claim, in one breath, that the Germans were executing a “campaign for the extermination” of the Jews with his complaint, in the next breath, that some Jews were still in the habit of traveling on German ships and being waited on by German servants. It is true, as Untermyer notes, that Jews traveling on German ships, just as Jews remaining in Germany, were exposed to the “just contempt” of the German people, but as long as they obeyed German laws they were not harmed physically by anyone or persecuted by the authorities.

10 – See, for example, the article “Changing Berlin,” in the February 1937 issue of the National Geographic Magazine, which gives a comprehensive, lavishly illustrated, 47-page survey of life in the capital city of National Socialist Germany.

11 – See “The Third Reich and the Transfer Agreement,” by David Yisraeli, in the April 1971 issue of Journal of Contemporary History. A description of the related agreement worked out between the German government and Jewish leaders, so that all Jews wishing to leave Germany and settle in Palestine could take their wealth with them, is given in The Zionist Movement (Zionist Organization of America, New York, 1946), by Israel Cohen (pp. 210-211).

12 – Mein Kampf, v. I, chap. 10.

13 – The German Reich and Americans of German Origin, Oxford University Press, 1938. Among the worthies sponsoring this statement was Henry L. Stimson (1867-1950), later to become Roosevelt’s secretary of the War Department.

14 – Ralph Townsend told this editor that he had distributed 150,000 copies of The High Cost of Hate before Pearl Harbor. The Jewish-owned Washington Post alone reached that many people each day.

15 – See, for example, The Final Secret of Pearl Harbor, by Robert A. Theobald (Devin-Adair, 1954); and Infamy: Pearl Harbor and Its Aftermath, by John Toland (Doubleday, 1982).

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/background-to-treason-part-3/feed/ 0
Drugs and American Youth http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/drugs-and-american-youth/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/drugs-and-american-youth/#comments Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:12:08 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1868 An insightful commentary on the long-term damaging effects of alcohol and illegal drugs on our society.

alcohol_and_drugs_affect_33_of_youth_today_129_x

by Dr. William L. Pierce

TEN YEARS AGO the student who used illegal drugs was likely to be looked upon by his peers as both a criminal and a person with serious personal problems – as was more often than not the case.

Certainly, there were young, White drug users before 1960. But, outside a few communities, they were a rarity. Marijuana was almost as scarce on most university campuses as was heroin.

It is, in fact, quite difficult for today’s average undergraduate to imagine just how drastically student attitudes toward drugs have changed in the few short years during which drug usage has passed from a curiosity to a fact of everyday life.

Most Significant Development

Other things – . . . → Read More: Drugs and American Youth]]> An insightful commentary on the long-term damaging effects of alcohol and illegal drugs on our society.

alcohol_and_drugs_affect_33_of_youth_today_129_x

by Dr. William L. Pierce

TEN YEARS AGO the student who used illegal drugs was likely to be looked upon by his peers as both a criminal and a person with serious personal problems – as was more often than not the case.

Certainly, there were young, White drug users before 1960. But, outside a few communities, they were a rarity. Marijuana was almost as scarce on most university campuses as was heroin.

It is, in fact, quite difficult for today’s average undergraduate to imagine just how drastically student attitudes toward drugs have changed in the few short years during which drug usage has passed from a curiosity to a fact of everyday life.

Most Significant Development

Other things – attire, jargon, sexual attitudes – also underwent a fairly radical transformation during the 1960s. But the vast and sudden increase in the use of drugs by young people easily stands as the most significant social development, not only of the last decade but of our generation. If that statement sounds like an exaggeration now, it certainly will not a year from now, so rapidly is the phenomenon still developing.

The editor should confess at this point, other than a few puffs of pot to see what the stuff tastes like, he has never had any drug “experiences.” For that matter, he has never smoked tobacco and his alcoholic consumption is limited to an occasional beer.

Thus, he cannot write on some drug-related matters with the same sort of authority a member of Alcoholics Anonymous can boast of when warning others against demon rum, for example.

On the other hand, he is by no means a total outsider to the drug scene. He has many friends who use, or once used, pot regularly, just as he has many friends who use tobacco and alcohol.

Drugs a Social Evil

One of the four basic points of the NYA [National Youth Alliance, predecessor to the National Alliance — Ed.] program states our unequivocal opposition to illegal drugs and to those who promote their use. This opposition is by no means based on religious or “moral” considerations or on any sort of “conservative” foot-dragging where something new and different is concerned.

We oppose drug usage because it is harmful to human society in general and because, at this point in time, it presents a clear threat to the survival of our civilization. More inclusively, we feel that the widespread usage of any harmful, intoxicating, or debilitating substance is a social evil – and an indicator of social sickness.

Some substances are much more harmful than others, or harmful in different ways, and some types of usage of a given substance represent a greater social evil than other usages.

Tobacco and Alcohol

It may be useful to briefly discuss tobacco and alcohol before going on to the illegal drugs. There can be little doubt that tobacco causes the agonizing death of tens of thousands of Americans every year through lung cancer and emphysema alone. Tobacco is an extremely harmful substance to those individuals who smoke it.

Yet, from the racial or social viewpoint, tobacco is a relatively minor evil. Those whom its long-range effects strike down are nearly always well into middle age and have already sired or borne children. The race is neither harmed nor helped by their departure.

Furthermore, cigarettes do not play a really major or significant role in our society, despite their omnipresence. Although they are addictive, they are only slightly intoxicating, and our life mode and social institutions would change relatively little if we did away with them altogether – which is not a bad idea.

Alcohol is a different story. Its effect on our gene pool is certainly larger than that of tobacco, but still relatively minor. Its net racial effect is, if anything, beneficial, in that it tends to remove the least fit elements from the breeding population.

Its social impact, on the other hand, is vastly greater than tobacco’s. Alcoholism must be ranked among the major social problems of our day. It is extremely harmful, not just to the individuals and families it touches directly, but to society as a whole.

A Booze Tradition

And yet it is difficult to condemn alcohol itself as an unmitigated evil.

What could be more satisfying than a glass of cold beer on a hot summer evening?

Beer and wine have been an integral part of the life of the European peoples since prehistoric times, and there are so many rich and fine traditions associated with them that giving them up altogether would constitute a major cultural trauma.

With alcohol the trouble probably lies more in certain types of usage than in the nature of the substance itself. When alcoholic beverages are consumed strictly as food or refreshment, we can find little to criticize. They become socially harmful only when large numbers of people consume them for their intoxicating effect – when they become a means of escape from reality instead of a relaxing draught or a social lubricant.

Although we can certainly accept the abolition of alcohol if there proves no other way to curb its evil social effects, it would seem that the better approach is to set about building the sort of healthy society in which there will be far fewer people than at present who feel the need to escape into a bottle.

The Illegal Drugs

When we consider the illegal drugs – marijuana, hashish, LSD, cocaine, heroin… – we again must make distinctions and qualifications.

First, we can state without qualification that the strongly addicting drugs, of which heroin is the most important, have absolutely no place in our society under any conditions. The growing menace of the “hard” drugs must be countered effectively and soon.

Neither the weak half-measures presently being employed by U. S. law enforcers nor Britain’s welfare-state idiocy, which merely requires that drug users register with the government before receiving their narcotics dole from their neighborhood pharmacy, can cope with the problem.

Hang Pushers

The National Youth Alliance believes that a two-fold approach must be used. First, a steel-hard enforcement policy is required. Those who illegally manufacture, import, broker, transport, distribute, promote, or sell hard drugs or in any way collaborate with or aid those who do should be dealt with swiftly and ruthlessly. Publicly hanging these people, after summary trials, is too good for them, but it should suffice. And that is meant literally, not figuratively.

Second, just as in dealing with alcoholism, a long-term mending of the flaws in our society which cause so many people to turn to drugs is required.

Actually, these two phases of our approach to the drug problem must go hand in hand. Clearly the decrepit, liberal, corrupt, and gutless government with which America is now cursed will never adopt a really tough and effective enforcement policy.

Problem Grows Worse

Nixon and his predecessors have financed innumerable studies, issued solemn reports, made inspirational speeches, instituted new “get-tough” policies, announced sensational drug seizures – but all that is just so much sound and fury, signifying nothing. The hard reality remains that the drug menace continues growing year by year, day by day.

Can you imagine the present administration ordering the public hanging of even one heroin peddler – and even if the law allowed it and even after he had been duly convicted and that conviction had been upheld by every appellate court in the land? Unthinkable!

Prohibition as an Example

The problem of effective enforcement goes far beyond the liberal paralysis of our legislatures and courts, to whom the civil rights of the drug pushers are more sacred than the health and well-being of all the rest of society. The 13-year attempt by the United States government, between 1920 and 1933, to curtail the sale of alcoholic beverages serves as a cogent and concise illustration.

After prohibition legislation had been enacted, the government put a great deal of effort into its enforcement. And certainly the authorities did succeed in putting many a speakeasy out of business, breaking up many an illegal distillery, and putting a number of gangsters behind bars. But the government failed utterly in achieving the basic aim of prohibition, namely, the prevention of the consumption of alcohol and the corollary suppression of all alcohol’s attendant ills.

Official Corruption

A key element in this failure was the government’s inability to deal effectively with the organized criminals who controlled the immensely profitable liquor business. The gangs diverted millions of dollars of their illegal booze profits into the pockets of corrupt judges, police officials, mayors, governors, and Congressmen.

This massive bribery gave the gangs the protection they needed to carry on their business. Unless the government were prepared to thoroughly clean out its own stables at every level, from the ward and precinct headquarters on up – and it was not – it could not realistically hope to stamp out the prohibition-era gangs, thus breaking the backbone of the booze trade once and for all.

And we are faced with even worse official corruption today than in the 1920’s. It would be going too far afield from the central topic of this policy statement to explore all the ramifications of governmental corruption and its possible cures.

Without attempting to present a solution for that problem here, let us simply reiterate the two steps which, in one way or another, must be taken in order to eliminate the menace of hard drugs: (1) ruthless, even brutal extermination of the organized criminal apparatus of drug distribution and (2) a long-term rebuilding of our society on a sane, healthy, and natural basis.

The Pot Problem

Marijuana is really in a class by itself. All available evidence seems to indicate that its use does not result in physical addiction. Although experimental data on the long-term physiological effects of pot smoking are far from complete at this time, the smoke from marijuana does seem to be at least as rich in tar and other carcinogens as tobacco smoke.

It would be the sheerest folly, however, to rate pot as no worse than tobacco. The reason is that a substantial portion of the persons who smoke pot regularly do so in order to become intoxicated – to have a “high.”

Marijuana is the accepted means of escape from reality for the rapidly growing number of young, White Americans who have decided to drop out and turn on. A whole subculture based on the weed has sprung up in the last decade. And, in case you didn’t know, it’s another world, man!

Drano, Anyone?

Now, the NYA is not alarmed because we have a small minority of persons in our society who have self-destructive urges. If an individual wants to mess up his insides by drinking Sterno squeezings – or even Drano, for that matter – that’s his business. There’s very little danger that either Sterno or Drano will catch on.

But pot has caught on. It is no longer an individual problem, but society’s problem. It is a problem because it offers an escape, an easy out, for those who have taken a look at the world and found it so seriously wanting that they don’t want to become a part of it.

Human Garbage

There is, of course, plenty of plain human garbage – weaklings and rejects and anti-socials of every sort – among those who have joined the drug culture. But there are too many who are basically sound – and perhaps because of that very soundness have rejected an ugly, dirty, and senseless world with which they feel out of tune.

We need those people; America needs them; our race needs them. They should be even more highly motivated than most of the members of the “straight” culture to make the revolutionary changes in our world that must be made if we are to survive.

Withdrawing… escaping… dropping out may ease the pressure on the individual, but it will never get the problem solved – regardless of all the hostility and revolutionary rhetoric directed at the “pigs” and other straights.

Revolutions are made and civilizations are maintained by people with clear heads and the self-discipline to face problems squarely until they are solved, not by those who head for cloud nine whenever the going gets tough. So let’s get with it, man!

From Attack! No. 3, 1971, transcribed by Michael Olanich, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/drugs-and-american-youth/feed/ 0
Savage Africa, part 1 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/savage-africa-part-1/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/savage-africa-part-1/#comments Sat, 06 Dec 2014 13:00:31 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1861 zemir_begic_and_fiancee

American Dissident Voices broadcast of December 6, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LESS THAN A WEEK after Ferguson, Missouri was set to flames by lawless, savage Blacks — and law enforcement did essentially nothing about it — just a few miles away in St. Louis proper, a gang of Black “youths” beat a White man to death with a hammer, yelling “f*** White people” and “kill the White people” just before the attack. The victim was Zemir Begic (pictured, above, with his fiancée), a Bosnian who had recently moved from Iowa. When the Blacks swarmed his car, Begic exited the vehicle and was overpowered by the gang, who repeatedly smashed his face in with the hammer until he was dead. Two other Whites were attacked and survived, . . . → Read More: Savage Africa, part 1]]> zemir_begic_and_fiancee

American Dissident Voices broadcast of December 6, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LESS THAN A WEEK after Ferguson, Missouri was set to flames by lawless, savage Blacks — and law enforcement did essentially nothing about it — just a few miles away in St. Louis proper, a gang of Black “youths” beat a White man to death with a hammer, yelling “f*** White people” and “kill the White people” just before the attack. The victim was Zemir Begic (pictured, above, with his fiancée), a Bosnian who had recently moved from Iowa. When the Blacks swarmed his car, Begic exited the vehicle and was overpowered by the gang, who repeatedly smashed his face in with the hammer until he was dead. Two other Whites were attacked and survived, one of them a young woman who was defended by Begic.

It is to the eternal shame of St. Louis that their “politically correct” police chief, Sam Dotson, refused to consider this as a “hate crime,” saying that there was “no evidence to indicate the victim was chosen because he was Bosnian” — as if the Congoids perceived or cared about specific ethnicity — ignoring the glaringly obvious fact that the victim was chosen because he was White.

Who are these Africans who freely roam our neighborhoods? — who apparently hate us with a passion? Who are these people who burn our cities, take and rape our women, and kill us in the streets? Who are these people who are portrayed as “gentle giants” or “oppressed minorities” or “genius scientists” in the controlled media? Who are these beings whom our overlords have evidently chosen to be our neighbors, classmates, and bedmates? — who, they have obviously decided, we must mate with, merge with, and literally become?

Before we lost control of our media and our government — before the Jews established “politically correct” censorship over all aspects of our society — there were many scientists, explorers, historians, and statesmen who told us the truth about such things. Today, thanks to a National Alliance supporter, we’re going to tell you what these men found in Africa — what they knew — and what we are not supposed to find out today. I offer my thanks to that supporter who sent me a copy of an amazing book by the great American thinker Hinton Rowan Helper — The Negroes in Negroland — which is an amazing compendium of facts from the early White explorers who found the Africans as they were — before they were “oppressed” or their culture was changed by the White man. In this program and the next, I’ll be sharing what I found out about Africans in their natural habitat — and what these truths mean for our future. And I warn you: Do not allow young children to listen to this program. It is not appropriate for them.

Cannibalism was real and widespread

“The common food of the natives of Ansiko is men’s flesh, insomuch that their markets are provided with that, as ours in Europe with beef or mutton: all prisoners of war, unless they can sell them alive with greater advantage, otherwise, as we said, they fatten them for slaughter, and at last sell them to the butchers. To this savage barbarity they are so naturalized, that some slaves, whether as weary of their lives, or to show their love to their masters, will proffer themselves freely to be killed and eaten. But that which is most inhuman, and beyond the ferocity of beasts, is, that the father scruples not to eat his son, nor the son his father, nor one brother the other, but take them by force, devouring their flesh, the blood yet reeking hot between their teeth.”— Ogilby’s Africa, page 518.

“Whosoever dies, be the disease never so contagious, yet they eat the flesh immediately, as a festival dish.” — Ogilby’s Africa, page 518.

“Bello, the Governor of Sackatoo, said that whenever a person complained of sickness amongst the Yamyams, even though only a slight headache, they are killed instantly — for fear they should be lost by death, as they will not eat a person that has died by sickness; that the person falling sick is requested by some other family [who then eat him], and repaid [with another victim] when they had a sick relation; that universally when they went to war, the dead and wounded were always eaten; that the hearts were claimed by the head men; and that, on asking them why they eat human flesh, they said it was better than any other, and that the heart and breasts of a woman were the best part of the body.” —Denham and Clapperton’s Africa, Vol. IV, page 262.

“Many of Ibrahim’s party had been frequent witnesses to acts of cannibalism, during their residence among the Makkarikas. They described these cannibals as remarkably good people, but possessing a peculiar taste for dogs and human flesh. They accompanied the trading party in their razzias, and invariably ate the bodies of the slain. The traders complained that they were bad associates, as they insisted upon killing and eating the children which the party wished to secure as slaves; their custom was to catch a child by its ankles, and to dash its head against the ground; thus killed, they opened the abdomen, extracted the stomach and intestines; and tying the two ankles to the neck, they carried the body by slinging over the shoulder, and thus returned to camp, where they divided it by quartering, and boiling it in a large pot. . . . One of the slave girls attempted to escape, and her proprietor immediately fired at her with his musket, and she fell wounded; the ball had struck her in the side. The girl was remarkably fat, and from the wound a large lump  of yellow fat exuded. No sooner had she fallen than the Makkarikas rushed upon her in a crowd, and, seizing the fat, they tore it from the wound in handfuls, the girl being still alive, while the crowd were quarrelling for the disgusting prize. Others killed her with a lance, and at once divided her by cutting off the head, and splitting the body with their lances, used as knives, cutting longitudinally from between the legs along the spine to the neck.” — Baker’s Great Basin of the Nile, page 201.

“The butchers’ shops of the Anziques are filled with human flesh, instead of that of oxen or of sheep. For they eat the enemies whom they take in battle. They fatten, slay, and devour their slaves also, unless they think they shall get a good price for them. . . . There are indeed many cannibals, . . . but none such as these, since the others only eat their enemies; but these eat their own blood relations.” — African Explorations by Eduardo Lopez, quoted hy Huxley, in Man”s Place in Nature, page 55.

Horrifying cruelty

“Throughout the day I heard the horrid sound of the death drum, and was told in the evening that about twenty-five human victims had been sacrificed, some in the town, and some in the surrounding villages, the heads of those killed in the villages being brought into the town in baskets. …I learned that several more human victims had been immolated during the day, but could not ascertain the exact number. The most accurate account I could obtain was, that fifteen more had suffered; making a total of forty, in two days. . . . These poor victims were allowed to lie naked and exposed in the streets, until they began to decompose; and such is the callous state of mind in which the people live, that many were walking about among the putrefying bodies, smoking their pipes, with amazing indifference.”— Freeman’s Africa, pages 53 and 54.

“There is apparently in this people a physical delight in cruelty to beast as well as to man. The sight of suffering seems to bring them an enjoyment without which the world is tame. In almost all the towns on the Oil Rivers, you see dead or dying animals fastened in some agonizing position. Poultry is most common, because cheapest; they are tied by the legs, head downwards, or lashed round the body to a stake or a tree, where they remain till they fall in fragments. If a man be unwell, he hangs a live chicken round his throat, expecting that its pain will abstract him from his sufferings. Goats are lashed head downwards tightly to wooden pillars, and are allowed to die a lingering death; even the harmless tortoise cannot escape impalement…. At funerals numbers of goats and poultry are sacrificed for the benefit of the deceased, and the corpse is sprinkled with the warm blood. The headless trunks are laid upon the body, and if the fowls flap their wings, which they will do for some seconds after decapitation, it is a good omen for the dead man.” — Hutchinson’s Western Africa, Vol. II., page 283.

Smashing his own son for good fortune

Even more horrifying than what the Jews say Jehovah asked of Abraham is this occurrence: “Amarar called his soothsayer, and required him to name a propitious moment for the sally [to war]. The oracle retired to his den, and, after suitable incantations, declared that the effort should be made as soon as the hands of Amarar were stained in the blood of his own son. It is said that the prophet intended the victim to be a youthful son of Amarar, who had joined his mother’s family, and was then distant; but the impatient and superstitious savage, seeing a child of his own, two years old, at hand, when the oracle announced the decree, snatched the infant from his mother’s arms, threw it into a rice mortar, and, with a pestle, mashed it to death. The sacrifice over, a sortie was ordered. The infuriate and starving savages, roused by the oracle and inflamed by the bloody scene, rushed forth tumultuously. Amarar, armed with the pestle, still warm and reeking with his infant’s blood, was foremost in the onset. The besiegers gave way… and the soothsayer was rewarded with a slave for his barbarous prediction! At another time, Amarar was on the point of attacking a strongly fortified town, when doubts were intimated of success. Again the wizard was consulted, when the mysterious oracle declared that the chief “could not conquer till he returned once more to his mother”s womb”! That night Amarar committed the blackest of incests; but his party was repulsed, and the false prophet stoned to death.” — Canot’s Twenty Years of an African Slaver, page 333.

Thought and Literature Among the Africans

“There is not a single bookseller’s shop in either Eastern or Western Africa.” — Livingstone’s Africa, page 689.

“There is not a tincture of letters or of writing among all the aboriginal tribes of Africa. There is not a hieroglyphic or a symbol…. Oral communication forms the only channel by which thought can be transmitted from one country and one age to another. The lessons of time, the experience of ages, do not exist for the nations of this vast continent.” — Murray’s African Discoveries, page 233.

“Eastern and Central intertropical Africa also lacks antiquarian and historic interest; it has few traditions, no annals, and no ruins — the hoary remnants of past splendor so dear to the traveller and to the reader of travels. It contains not a single useful or ornamental work; a canal or a dam is, and has ever been, beyond the narrow bounds of its civilization.” — Burton’s Africa, page 88.

Morality and theology

“The Africans are all of them thieves. They have no sense of honor-in that respect. I have never yet had a negro servant (and I have had a great many) who did not rob me of some trifling article, whether he was pagan or Christian. . . . The Africans tell a lie more readily than they tell the truth. Falsehood, like petty larceny, is not recognized among them as a fault.” — Reader’s Savage Africa, page 447.

“The Austrian mission-station of St. Croix consists of about twenty grass huts on a patch of dry ground close to the river. The church is a small hut, but neatly arranged, Herr Morlang, chief of the establishment, acknowledged, with great feeling, that the mission was absolutely useless among such savages ; that he had worked with much zeal for many years, but that the natives were utterly impracticable. They were far below the brutes, as the latter show signs of affection to those who are kind to them; while the natives, on the contrary, are utterly obtuse to all feelings of gratitude. He described the people as lying and deceitful to a superlative degree; the more they receive the more they desire, but in return they will do nothing. Twenty or thirty of these disgusting, ash-smeared, stark-naked brutes, armed with clubs of hard wood brought to a point, were lying idly about the station. . . . Near by are the graves of several members of the mission, who have left their bones in this horrid land, while not one convert has been made from the mission of St. Croix.” — Baker’s Great Basin of the Nile, page 53.

“The most important and interesting portion of the last number of the ‘Journal of the Anthropological Society of London’ is the discussion before the Anthropological Society on the efforts of missionaries among savages — a discussion inaugurated by Mr. Winwood Reade, author of ‘Savage Africa,’ who stated, as the result of his observation in Equatorial Africa, that missionary efforts were total failures, even when directed by men eminently qualified for the task. So far from ‘professing Christians’ among negroes being better than the heathen, they were, if possible, worse. ‘ In plain words,’ said Mr. Reade, ‘ I found that every Christian negress was a prostitute, and that every Christian negro was a thief.'” — London Dispatch, July 16, 1865.

Perhaps we can learn about the impulsiveness and “deep sense of justice” of the African — quite relevant to recent events in Missouri — from this eyewitness account:

“The Bushman, who has lost his wife by elopement, walks out with his gun and shoots the first man whom he meets. He then proclaims that he has done this because a man has run away with his wife. The clansmen of the murdered man are enraged, not against the husband, —who has simply complied with a usage of society, —but because the duty of the avenger is now cast upon them. As the gay Lothario is out of their reach, they kill a man belonging to the next village; his friends retaliate on their unsuspecting neighbors; and so rolls on this ball of destruction till the whole country is on the alert.” — Reade’s Savage Africa, page 217.

Customs reveal psychology

“Before they sit down to eat meat in company, the Kaffirs are very careful to immerse their hands in fresh cow-dung, wiping them on the grass, which is considered the perfection of cleanliness. Except an occasional plunge in a river, they never wash themselves, and consequently their bodies are covered with vermin.” — Steedman’s Africa, Vol. I, page 265.

“The Africans pay no attention either to domestic or wild animals ; even the dog or horse, the two most sagacious of all the animal creation, excite in them no interest whatever. If not driven to it, they will suffer a horse to stand for days, tied up without food or water. In fact, in no case do they exhibit any feeling, either of regard or affection, to merit even a comparison with any of the lower animals, being also selfish in the extreme.” —Duncan’s Africa, Vol. I, page 90

“When a mother dies, whose infant is not able to shift for itself, it is, without any ceremony, buried alive with the corpse of its mother.” — Moffat’s Africa, page 48.

“The inhabitants were so covered with dirt, mixed with spots of very red paint, that it appeared probable none of them had had any part of their bodies washed since they were born.” — Campbell’s Africa, page 316.

“Smoke and grease are the African’s coat and small clothes; they contribute so much to his health and comfort that he is by no means anxious to get rid of them, and sooty lines depend from it like negro-stalactites.”— Burton’s Africa, page 253.

“On our return we saw a child, about eight years old, standing in the middle of the street weeping, and, being almost a skeleton, it attracted our attention. We inquired respecting its disease; when the women told us, the child was well enough, and that want of food had brought it into that state, —that the father and mother were poor, — that he had gone away with another woman, and was hunting in the south; that the mother was gone to the westward, searching for food. Neither the men, women, nor children present seemed by their countenances to express the least sympathy or feeling for this forsaken, starving child. They said, laughing, that we might take the child with us if we pleased. I am certain that the sight of this little girl in the streets of London would have excited pity in the hearts of thousands. We took the child to our wagons, desiring the people to inform its mother, when she returned, where she might find her. When some meat was given to the child, she devoured it with the voracity of a tiger.” — Campbell’s Africa, page 266.

“The morning before we set out, we accidentally stumbled across one of those acts of barbarism which chill the blood of a civilized man, though but slightly regarded by the negroes. I was hunting in the woods near the village, and saw sitting on a tree at some distance a pair of beautiful green pigeons, which I wanted much for my collection of birds. By dint of much exertion, I penetrated the jungle to the foot of the tree, and here a ghastly sight met my eyes. It was the corpse of a woman, young evidently, and with features once mild and good. She had been tied up here on some infernal accusation of witchcraft, and tortured. The torture consisted in lacerations of the flesh all over the body, and in the cuts red peppers had been rubbed. This is a common mode of tormenting with these people, and as devilish in ingenuity as anything could well be. Then the corpse was deserted. I could only hope the poor girl died of her wounds, and had not to wait for the slower process of agonized starvation to which such victims are left. Will the reader think hard of me that I felt it in my heart to go back to the village and shoot every man who had a hand in this monstrous barbarity?” —Du Chaillu’s Equatorial Africa, page 156.

Here in these factual and uncensored reports we have the same realities we see today — unbridled savagery on the part of Africans, whether in Missouri or Mali, and tender concern for the Africans’ “souls” and well-being on the part of sentimental Whites, who — in direct contradiction to the evidence before their very eyes — imagine that the same feelings and ideals they experience exist also in the mentalities of the Congoids.

We’ll continue this exploration next week on American Dissident Voices.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/savage-africa-part-1/feed/ 1
The Ideological Roots of Zionism http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/the-ideological-roots-of-zionism/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/the-ideological-roots-of-zionism/#comments Tue, 02 Dec 2014 22:25:15 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1855 The Indestructible JewsPaperback Reveals Astounding Zionist Mentality

by Dr. William L. Pierce

AN INTERESTING and important paperback hit the newsstands a couple of months ago. It is the New American Library (Signet) edition of Max Dimont’s 1971 book, The Indestructible Jews.

A quick skim of the book will convince the average reader that it is 482 pages of stark, raving madness. And it is 482 pages of stark, raving madness! But it is a revealing sort of madness that is well worth a careful, sober scrutiny by every American patriot (and by patriots of all lands) concerned about the menace of Zionism.

 “Thou Shalt Suck the Milk of the Gentiles”

Max Dimont is no closet Zionist. In his book he lets it all hang out. He boldly announces to the world what all Zionists believe but . . . → Read More: The Ideological Roots of Zionism]]> The Indestructible JewsPaperback Reveals Astounding Zionist Mentality

by Dr. William L. Pierce

AN INTERESTING and important paperback hit the newsstands a couple of months ago. It is the New American Library (Signet) edition of Max Dimont’s 1971 book, The Indestructible Jews.

A quick skim of the book will convince the average reader that it is 482 pages of stark, raving madness. And it is 482 pages of stark, raving madness! But it is a revealing sort of madness that is well worth a careful, sober scrutiny by every American patriot (and by patriots of all lands) concerned about the menace of Zionism.

 “Thou Shalt Suck the Milk of the Gentiles”

Max Dimont is no closet Zionist. In his book he lets it all hang out. He boldly announces to the world what all Zionists believe but most are too discreet to admit, namely, that the Jews are a master race, a people chosen by their tribal deity Yahweh to have dominion over the earth and all the people therein.

The Indestructible Jews contains so much bombast and chest-beating, braggadocio so extreme and ludicrous, that it simply takes one’s breath away — especially if one is not familiar with the Zionist mentality. To Dimont the Jews are the creators of all culture, the upholders of all human decency and morality, the innovators of all concepts of justice, the doers of all great feats, the thinkers of all profound thoughts, the bearers of all human nobility.

 Leonidas, the Friendly Pawnbroker?

As an example, in a chapter dealing with Greek civilization Dimont scoffs at the notion held by historians and archeologists that the Hellenes were a tall, fair, blue-eyed people from the North. Instead, he claims, they were squat, swarthy, wiry-haired Orientals, and Greek civilization had a Semitic rather than a Western basis: “Greek history did not begin with Aryans but with Semites . . .”

A few chapters further on, Dimont similarly snatches the Renaissance away from the West and hands it to the Jews: “Jewish intellectual activity preceded the Renaissance by 700 years precisely in those areas where it was to take root and flower. During those centuries the Jews were an intellectual elite . . . Would the Renaissance have flowered where it did, as it did, when it did, if the intellectual soil had not previously been seeded by the Jews?”

 Why They’re Not Popular

After bragging interminably about Jewish tolerance and fair-mindedness, Dimont displays views on other religions which are surprisingly uncharitable. He describes the old Teutonic gods, whose virtues were their honor, valor, and fidelity, as “a motley crew of illiterate, mead-swilling, lecherous murderers, whose chief pastimes were cheating, raping, and killing.”

Zeus “spent most of his time spawning a succession of bastards with other men’s wives” (here Dimont must have forgotten his claim that Zeus was really a Jew).

Dimont’s opinion of medieval Christianity can be summed up by his observation that “no decent woman dared set her foot in the Vatican for fear of being seduced.”

 Mongrelizers of Nations

Next to bragging, gloating over their enemies’ misfortunes seems to be the favorite Zionist pastime. Dimont recounts the persecutions the Jews faced in Gothic Spain during the 7th century. The Jewish response was to betray the Goths to the Moors by serving as spies and treacherously opening the city gates to the invading armies.

Dimont obviously relishes the Jewish revenge: “The Arab conquest of Spain in 711 had put an end to the forcible conversion of Jews to Christianity. . . . For some inexplicable reason the Moorish aristocrats of Spain had a penchant for blond Christian women . . . as blond Christian maidens fetched fancy prices in the slave markets, raids in Christian lands by Muslim private entrepreneurs became big business. Female captives were pedigreed like dogs. . . .”

 Hatred for Germans

Dimont’s gloating turns to foaming hatred when he comes to the modern Germans. No distortion of history is too gross or obscene for him to use in his condemnation of Germany for opposing the Jews.

Hitler, he claims, “seized the rule of Germany in a coup d’état.” National Socialism he dismisses as “secondary elaborations of racist pornography scribbled on the walls of Europe’s pissoirs. . . .” Hitler “gave medals to [those] . . . who . . . masturbated excitedly while watching through peepholes the agonizing deaths of children being asphyxiated with potassium cyanide fumes.” “Germans murdered Jews out of fear of their intellectual superiority.”

 Jewish Subjectivity

Then Dimont reveals the totally subjective nature of the Jewish hatred for Germany: “The supreme irony is that, but for his anti-Semitism, Hitler might have won the war. The very people whom he expelled or murdered could have brought him victory, for among those who fled Europe because they were Jews were Albert Einstein, Lise Meitner, Niels Bohr, and Edward Teller, the fathers of the atomic and hydrogen bombs.”

Thus, all Dimont’s anti-German vituperations, all his hatred, are based solely on the German rejection of the Jew, on the Germans’ insistence on finding their own destiny without Jewish “guidance.” Were it not for this rejection, Dimont hints, the Jews would have gladly helped Germany enslave the world and achieve all the other atrocious ambitions with which an overheated Jewish imagination has credited her.

 Only Jewish Interests Count

This attitude, that Jewish interests alone must be the determinants of Jewish policy, is basic to Zionism. It has been expressed in many forms by other Zionist writers.

Rabbi Meir Kahane who founded the Jewish Defense League in 1968. The group later became listed as a terrorist group by the FBI due to Kahane's plans for the manufacturing of explosives in 1971 and the group's subsequent involvement in numerous bombings and shootings in the United States including the fire-bombing of a U.S.-Soviet cultural exchange agency in 1972 as well as targeting Arab activists.

Rabbi Meir Kahane who founded the Jewish Defense League in 1968: The group later became listed as a terrorist group by the FBI due to Kahane’s plans for the manufacture of explosives in 1971 and the group’s subsequent targeting of Arab activists and involvement in numerous bombings and shootings in the United States, including the fire-bombing of a U.S.-Soviet cultural exchange agency in 1972.

Rabbi Meir Kahane, for example, who heads the Jewish Defense League, stated in the April 20, 1973, issue of The Jewish Press: “Jewish interests are the only standards for Jews, and these call for support of almost any politician who supports us.” Kahane then went on to say that no Jew, whether residing in the United States or the Soviet Union, must let any consideration other than Jewish interests influence his political decisions; that the Jew owes no loyalty to anyone but his fellow Jews; that everyone hates Jews and wants to kill them; that Jews must consequently work to keep their enemies (in this case, Russians and Americans) from ganging up on them; etc.

 Megalomaniacal Ranting

Now, one could always read as much megalomaniacal, paranoid ranting of this sort as one could stomach simply by turning to the semi-secret underworld of the Zionist press, i.e., those books and periodicals written by Jews strictly for Jewish consumption. A good example is the influential New York Zionist weekly tabloid just cited: The Jewish Press.

Although anyone with a dime can buy The Jewish Press — if he knows where to look for it — virtually no Gentiles do. If one accidentally runs across a discarded copy on a New York subway train, he will pass it off as being the journal of some nutty little Jewish religious sect.

 Kissinger and Ellsberg

Certainly it can have no relevance to the sophisticated and worldly Jews one reads about in the newspapers intended for Gentile consumption: Presidential-adviser Jews like Henry Kissinger and Leonard Garment; pacifist Jews like Daniel Ellsberg and Benjamin Spock; U.S. Senator Jews like Abraham Ribicoff and Jacob Javits; filthy-rich Jews like Max Palevsky and Bernie Cornfeld.

The Indestructible Jews is the condensation of all the vainglory and venom in a hundred issues of The Jewish Press — right out on the magazine rack at every airport newsstand, along with other paperbacks intended for mass consumption. It has even been given plugs in a number of mass-circulation newspapers. A blurb inside the cover, which describes the subject of the book as “the Jew in his proud and proper role as the bearer of culture and morality,” is from Joseph Pulitzer’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

 One and the Same

The interesting thing about Dimont’s book — or, rather, about its being published as a mass-circulation paperback — is that it pulls two previously separate Jewish worlds together: the exotic world of the nutty, hate-filled, Talmudic Jews like Rabbi Kahane, who read and write The Jewish Press, and the everyday world of the smooth, sophisticated Jews like Henry Kissinger, who wheel and deal and conduct our affairs of state for us. It pulls them together and makes us realize that they are one and the same world: the Jewish world.

 Cows and Cowboys

No book before The Indestructible Jews has made available to Gentiles such a clear picture of the dual nature of this Jewish world. Dimont’s semi-frank exposition of the unique Jewish national existence, partly in Zion and partly in the Diaspora, is fascinating.

Basically, he sees the world as a big cattle ranch, in which the Jews are the cowboys and everyone else — the goyim — are the cows (goyim has a double meaning in Hebrew: Gentiles — and cattle, or livestock). The cowboys out among the herds, keeping the cattle out of mischief and seeing that they get enough grass and water, are the Diaspora Jews, while those back at the ranch house, tending to the tackle, making plans for the autumn cattle drive, banking the proceeds from last year’s drive, and taking care of other headquarters matters, are the Zionists.

 Kissinger and Kahane Both Essential

Some cowboys prefer the life out on the open range, and others would rather spend their time in the ranch house, but the two groups of cowboys cooperate in the business of running the ranch. If all the cowboys were to leave the herd and hang around the ranch house all the time, the whole ranching enterprise would quickly go down the drain. Likewise, if there were no one back at the ranch house to hold down the fort.

Thus, both the Diaspora and Zion are essential elements in the Zionist scheme of things.

 A Progressive Ranch

The way Dimont describes it, the cowboys really have the cows’ best interest at heart and serve a vital function in operating a progressive ranch and keeping the herd healthy and contented. He really doesn’t believe the cows could survive without the cowboys.

Later, however, when he talks about the theory of history and the future prospects for the Jews, a better analogy than the cattle ranch is a dog infested by a colony of fleas.

Oswald Spengler laid out his theories on the cyclical nature of civilizations in his two-volume work, The Decline of the West. He states that the "High Cultures" of history are super life-forms that must pass through the more familiar human life cycle of birth-life-death.

Oswald Spengler laid out his theories on the cyclical nature of civilizations in his two-volume work, The Decline of the West. He states that the “High Cultures” of history are super life-forms that must pass through the more familiar human life cycle of birth-life-death.

Dimont’s theory of history is eclectic. From Spengler he adopts the notion of the cyclic nature of civilizations, but he also accepts Toynbee’s view that each new civilization which arises can achieve greater heights by utilizing the accomplishments of past civilizations.

The Jews Dimont regards as a unique element in the historical process, a continuous thread leading ever upward through the ages as other civilizations rise and fall.

 Parasites

Then, amazingly, he lapses into the nomenclature of parasitology in bringing out the Zionist view of “the Jewish manifest destiny.” He speaks of “host civilizations” and how the Jews have guided and steered each one during its rise, reaped the benefits of its accomplishments, and then moved on to a new host when the old one began faltering, much like a colony of intelligent fleas jumping to a new dog after they have sucked the old one dry.

The dogs come and go, but the flea colony always survives, growing fatter and wiser with each new dog it infests.

 Looking for a New Host

Western civilization is an old, dying dog, and the Jews are once again looking for a healthy puppy.

Dimont considers India and various other “developing” nations in Africa and South America, but China looks like the best prospect to him: “Ideologically, China could be a fertile civilization for a Diaspora center because the Chinese of today are even more Judaized than were the Puritans of Colonial America. . . . China’s religion is the economic doctrine of a Jew, Karl Marx. Her science is the theoretical physics of a Jew, Albert Einstein. Her psychology of man is that of a Jew, Sigmund Freud.”

 A Judaized World

Dimont does not see this dog-hopping process continuing indefinitely, however. He believes the Jews are now about ready to usher in a new act of the human drama.

He believes the flea colony has finally imbibed enough blood from their long succession of host-dogs that they can now bring about a final change in the scheme of things — a “final solution” of the Gentile problem. He sees a completely and, moreover, an openly — rather than covertly — Judaized world, in which universal Jewish dominance and leadership will be freely recognized: “This Judaization of the world that has imperceptibly coursed below the surface of history . . . is destined to surface . . .”

Patriots, take heed!

 * * *

From Attack! No. 21, 1973, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/the-ideological-roots-of-zionism/feed/ 2
The Death Funnel http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-death-funnel/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-death-funnel/#comments Sat, 29 Nov 2014 13:00:57 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1851 beauty_ferguson

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 29, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE STATIC crackled on the police radio last Monday night, as Ferguson, Missouri and surrounding areas burned, ravaged by Black rioters and looters. Just barely making it through the noise and the chaos, an officer’s voice could be heard: “We’re in a death funnel…” (ILLUSTRATION: An ironically inappropriate sign lies among the remains of a business after the latest Black riots in Ferguson, Missouri)

For hours the police had been told to stand down and do nothing. They did little more than watch as Black rioters broke windows, looted and destroyed innumerable businesses, and burned automobiles and buildings all through the city and beyond.

The Blacks were enraged that a grand jury had decided — after considering for . . . → Read More: The Death Funnel]]> beauty_ferguson

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 29, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE STATIC crackled on the police radio last Monday night, as Ferguson, Missouri and surrounding areas burned, ravaged by Black rioters and looters. Just barely making it through the noise and the chaos, an officer’s voice could be heard: “We’re in a death funnel…” (ILLUSTRATION: An ironically inappropriate sign lies among the remains of a business after the latest Black riots in Ferguson, Missouri)

For hours the police had been told to stand down and do nothing. They did little more than watch as Black rioters broke windows, looted and destroyed innumerable businesses, and burned automobiles and buildings all through the city and beyond.

The Blacks were enraged that a grand jury had decided — after considering for months and poring over a thousand pages of evidence — that there were no grounds to indict White police officer Darren Wilson after he killed a Black thug, Michael Brown, who had attacked him and attempted to kill him with his own gun. (Almost as soon as the announcement not to indict Wilson was made, Michael Brown’s stepfather, “peaceful protester” number one, screamed to the savage crowd “Burn the bitch down! Burn the bitch down!” And they did.)

Although support from the National Guard had been promised, they weren’t even in the city yet. Stationed in a nearby town, miles from the riots, they weren’t even watching, unless they were watching on television or the Internet. They had been held back by the governor after he conferred with federal officials.

The police never fired a shot, despite unbelievable provocation. They established their positions and sat tight — while building after building was purposely torched by the Blacks, the flames reaching high into the sky, almost from horizon to horizon — while hundreds of so-called “protesters” protested by breaking every piece of plate glass they could see and, whooping and hollering like lower primates, helping themselves to whatever cash and goods they could carry — while White men and women were abused and attacked simply because they were White — while police vehicles were overturned and set on fire in full view of officers.

Still the police did nothing except maintain their positions — and watch. This went on for some two hours of insane, rage-filled violence and destruction — until little was left of some blocks but chaos, rubble, and flaming ruins. Finally, some very brave firemen came into the riot zone to try and stop the rampant blazes from spreading even further. But, brave as they are, they could not stay to complete their mission: They were fired upon, again and again, by Black rioters. And when the firefighters were forced to leave, the rain of bullets did not stop. The Blacks had begun firing at at least one of the police positions.

That was when the message came through on the two-way radio: “We’re in a death funnel here…” Then and only then were the officers allowed to use smoke bombs and tear gas — no bullets whatsoever — to clear one small area near their location.

After about four hours, most of the rioters and looters had fled, though a few, who were probably those most fervently dedicated to “civil rights,” remained behind and continued to break windshields, loot, and set even more fires. It was only then that the police advanced, very slowly and in tight formation around their armored vehicles, encountering essentially no one as they cleared streets that were already almost clear.

It’s obvious that the National Guard were held back on orders — or strong pressure — from the regime in Washington. It’s obvious that the police were ordered to do nothing to impede or annoy the rioters. They made only 29 arrests in this entire Hell night, and never fired their weapons once. It was so obvious that the police were totally impotent that the animals laughed and cursed and mocked them as they literally kicked and stoned squad cars that passed next to them as they rioted. The troopers, stone-faced, sat inside and said and did absolutely nothing.

The grand jury’s verdict was withheld for hours and finally released about eight o’clock at night. Some have said that this was to encourage violence, but I doubt that. The reality is that authorities knew there would be violence whenever the announcement was made; just as the hundreds of business owners knew it too — and had boarded up and closed their businesses, some of them half a week before — just as the  officials at some 81 area schools knew the Blacks would riot and had cancelled classes days in advance. Yes, they knew the Blacks would riot. And they knew that it was “politically impossible” to do anything significant about it. They knew they would not dare, in an America dominated by Jewish media and with an Attorney General like Eric Holder, to fire a single bullet at a single savage. So they chose a time when most businesses would be closed and empty of employees to make their announcement.

But there were a few employees still on duty. One that you can see in one of the videos I’ll embed in the text version of this broadcast was a young White woman who, alone and unarmed, stands up to a gang of Black thugs determined to trash the pizza restaurant where she worked. And when she refused to give up — the  Blacks backed down and found another victim. An example of amazing bravery, one which puts the city police force to absolute shame.

The New York Times in the person of a certain Mr. Rosenthal editorialized on “the meaning of the Ferguson riots” for us — and he tells us that the shooting of Michael Brown “was the last straw in a long train of abuses” against Blacks in the St. Louis area who have “suffered daily” because the police there “systematically target poor and minority citizens for street and traffic stops.” Is that really the best you can come up with, Mr. Rosenthal? Traffic stops? I guess so.

He piously intones that “young black males in recent years were at a far greater risk — 21 times greater — of being shot dead by police than young white men.” He then adds, totally without evidence, that “These statistics reflect the fact that many police officers see black men as expendable figures on the urban landscape, not quite human beings.”

Mr. Rosenthal’s “21 times” figure ignores racial realities. He wants his readers to think that this is proof positive that White policemen are racist haters, killing Blacks almost for sport. He doesn’t tell his readers that even though Black males under 18 are only 1.8% of the US population, they commit over 34% of the forcible rapes — over 54% of the murder and non-negligent manslaughter — over 71% of the robberies — and over 47% of the aggravated assaults.

Mr. Rosenthal’s solution is for us to follow Barack Obama’s declaration made on the eve of the riots: More tolerance for Black behavior, more “understanding,” more “fairness” (as perceived by the rioters). But that solution is no solution at all. It’s just more of what we’ve been forced to do for the last fifty years. It, in fact, is the reason why we are where we are today.

What about the future? — the future we’ll be living soon — and the future our children will experience their entire lives? What happens when Mr. Rosenthal’s solutions and Barack Obama’s solutions come to pass? — when we achieve “greater fairess,” when we have more Black policemen, more Black police chiefs, more Black prosecutors, and more “tolerance” and “understanding” for Black thugs? When we morally and legally disarm White Americans by shutting them out of decision-making power in our cities and courtrooms? When we arrange it so that “civil rights” bureaucrats from Washington ensure that any White man — police officer or not — cannot ever use lethal force to defend himself against thugs or rioters, or face decades in a hellhole prison? When we literally disarm White Americans with “gun control” laws and prevent them from defending their businesses, homes, and families? When we take a “hands off” approach to Black criminality?

Do you think that doing those things will convert Ferguson and East Saint Louis and Oakland into Mayberry, RFD? Do you think those things will impede the feelings of rage and entitlement felt by these 70-IQ savages in the presence of a culture and a technological civilization they can never understand? No, decades of coddling them and supporting them and financing the breeding of the worst of them and educating them and mixing with them have done nothing — absolutely nothing — to slake their taste for destruction and violence. It’s worse than ever now. Did the “hands off” and “handout” strategy work in Ferguson this week?

Do you think the pious speeches about “unity” and “coming together” and “healing” do any good? We had just as many speeches about “healing” after the Black riots in the 60s — and then again after the Rodney King riots. Did they do any good then? Can you feel the love? I don’t think so. It’s not working. It can never work. It goes against Nature.

Continuing on that path, the “liberal” path, the Jewish path, will merely increase their numbers and their boldness in the face of our abject weakness. It will place our children in a death funnel every bit as deadly as the one the Ferguson Police found themselves in earlier this week — a death funnel from which they may not be able to escape.

What about the “law and order” approach? I’ve heard a lot of people tell me we need to “get tough” on rioters and looters. We need to give law enforcement more latitude and more power to deal with this problem, these people say. “Get out the water cannons and police dogs,” they say. Militarize the police even more than they have been already. Get more troop-carrier-type armored vehicles, machine guns, and drones — and use them! I admit that in the short term this would cut down on Black violence (and Mestizo violence too). In the short term it might be necessary. But at what cost? It wouldn’t cut down the Black and other Third World birthrate. We’d have to permanently station a half track with a dozen full-auto-armed stormtroopers  every couple of blocks to really bring things under control. And the area under such quasi-military occupation would grow every year. We’d have to give these troops shoot to kill orders. And we’d have to suspend the Constitution to give these police on steroids free reign to do what needs to be done with impunity. After seeing the rioters gleefully kicking and stoning passing police cars — turning them over — and setting them ablaze — just this week, I am convinced that only such an extreme approach could possibly work. But is this really how we want to live? Wouldn’t such an omnipresent, empowered police force be a danger to our freedom? Might it not be used against us by the powers that be? Wouldn’t we be giving up our traditional liberties and way of life just to avoid being assaulted or burned out by Blacks?

Do we really want to go down the road of more prisons — more police — and disappearing freedom and privacy in an increasingly Third World America? A Brazil-like police-state America might let us survive for a few decades longer than the Liberal approach, but it too is a death funnel. It too leads inexorably to our death — and long before our literal demographic death, it leads to the death of everything we hold dear.

Either path presented to us by the Liberals or the Conservatives leads ultimately to our death. The System as is it now constituted cannot protect you. No matter whether you elect the most multiracialist toadying Democrats or the “toughest” Fox News Republicans, the System cannot protect you.

The only answer is the one answer that the Jewish oligarchs will not let us consider: Racial separation. Let the Blacks be totally free of White policemen and White people’s laws. Let them be themselves. Let them be free of “White oppression.” But let us also be totally free from them.

Let them fend for themselves — let them farm and mine and generate electricity and build computers and whatever else they are able to do to make a living on this planet, just as other peoples do. And let them do all this apart — well apart — from us. If they succeed, and if they use whatever draconian police powers they need to get their underclass under control, more power to them. And if they fail, then let Nature take its course. They are not our wards and we are not responsible for them.

Because they are a lower, less-evolved form of life, yet are still able to corrupt our bloodline, they are a threat to our very existence. They are draining our resources. They are destroying our civilization. They are holding us down and diverting us from our sacred work of reaching upward toward the stars.

Just as our ancestors, the first true men, long ago separated themselves from the sub-men around them, so it is time for us to separate ourselves today. The future of Life in the universe depends upon it.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-death-funnel/feed/ 7
Not Within a Thousand Miles http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/not-within-a-thousand-miles/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/not-within-a-thousand-miles/#comments Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:00:39 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1845 _some_cosby_rape_accusers

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 22, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

BILL COSBY WAS for decades the poster boy for racial equality and harmony. Wise, funny, clever, and with good family values, he was the nation’s funny man whose humor crossed those terrible “racial lines.” He was the charming, harmless “Jello man.” He was the exponent of maturity and morality as the eminent Black physician and down-to-earth father on the “Cosby Show.” He was the suave, stylish, and sexy secret agent in TV’s “I Spy.” Especially endearing to Whites and the better class of American Blacks, he was a public critic of Black ignorance and bad behavior. He was promoted in the controlled media as “America’s Dad.” (ILLUSTRATION: A few of the women who say that Bill . . . → Read More: Not Within a Thousand Miles]]> _some_cosby_rape_accusers

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 22, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

BILL COSBY WAS for decades the poster boy for racial equality and harmony. Wise, funny, clever, and with good family values, he was the nation’s funny man whose humor crossed those terrible “racial lines.” He was the charming, harmless “Jello man.” He was the exponent of maturity and morality as the eminent Black physician and down-to-earth father on the “Cosby Show.” He was the suave, stylish, and sexy secret agent in TV’s “I Spy.” Especially endearing to Whites and the better class of American Blacks, he was a public critic of Black ignorance and bad behavior. He was promoted in the controlled media as “America’s Dad.” (ILLUSTRATION: A few of the women who say that Bill Cosby drugged, raped, and abused them)

But, in a behavioral and psychological parallel to genetic “regression to the mean,” Bill Cosby was a rapist — according to no fewer than 15 women who have come forward, many of whom have nothing to gain by the accusation. Based on the preponderance of the evidence, its massive quantity, and its revelation of a pattern of behavior that lasted for many decades, I believe what these women are saying. What I say today is based on my personal evaluation of their stories. They say that Bill Cosby not only raped them, but drugged them so they could not resist.  And his targets were almost exclusively White women. None of the major media are saying a word about that fact, though it is undeniable.

The motivation for these crimes is also a taboo topic. I’ll return to that very important question in a few moments.

“He Drugged and Raped Me”

When she was just 17, Barbara Bowman says she came face-to-face with the real Bill Cosby. She says “Cosby won my trust as a 17-year-old aspiring actress in 1985, brainwashed me into viewing him as a father figure, and then assaulted me multiple times. In one case, I blacked out after having dinner and one glass of wine at his New York City brownstone, where he had offered to mentor me and discuss the entertainment industry. When I came to, I was in my panties and a man’s t-shirt, and Cosby was looming over me. I’m certain now that he drugged and raped me…. The final incident was in Atlantic City, where we had traveled for an industry event. I was staying in a separate bedroom of Cosby’s hotel suite, but he pinned me down in his own bed while I screamed for help. I’ll never forget the clinking of his belt buckle as he struggled to pull his pants off.” In another incident, Bowman woke up from a drug-induced haze to find herself naked and bent over in a hotel room bathroom with Cosby partially clothed and towering behind her.

Bowman said that Bill Cosby knew she didn’t have a father — and he used that fact to manipulate her emotions. “By the time I was drugged and raped by him in New York, he’d already broken me down, brainwashed me and made me feel like there was something wrong with me if I resisted his sexual advances. Bill would say that he needed to guide me, and that I must trust him… I was drugged and raped by that man. He is a monster. He came at me like a monster…. Bill used to tell me that he was my father figure and that I needed to trust him as a father, 100 per cent. Then he’d drug me and attack me. I was too afraid to talk back.”

Former actress, music industry publicist and journalist Joan Tarshis recently stated:“I was 19 years old in autumn of 1969. I had flown to Los Angeles from New York to work on a monologue with Godfrey Cambridge. [Another Black comedian. — Ed.] …Cosby seemed to take a liking to me, and so I was invited back a few times. I was naturally flattered. I visited the set on my own and he once introduced me to Sidney Poitier as ‘Midget,’ his pet name for me because I was 5’3″.

“One day he asked me to stay after the shooting and work on some material with him. I was even more flattered and thought this would help move my writing career along. In his bungalow he made me a redeye [an alcoholic drink]… The next thing I remember was coming to on his couch while being undressed. Through the haze I thought I was being clever when I told him I had an infection and he would catch it and his wife would know he had sex with someone. But he just found another orifice to use….” Young Miss Tarshis was intimidated and shamed into telling no one and was pressured into seeing Cosby again.

“He sent a limo to pick me up and I was dropped off at the Sherry Netherland Hotel and went up to his suite. I remember noticing that his leather shaving kit was filled with bottles of pills, and thinking that this seemed odd. …He made me a redeye…” They went to a theatre to see one of his performances.

“[S]oon after, I remember feeling very, very stoned and asking his chauffeur to take me back to the car. I was having trouble standing up. The next thing I remember was waking up in his bed back at the Sherry, naked.”

“It took me about 20 years to admit this to anyone…. But during those years as I grew into adulthood, I watched Cosby be praised by everyone from Presidents to Oprah to the Jello Corporation. It all made me ill…”

“I Remember a Lot of Pain”

Former model Janice Dickinson says that Bill Cosby sexually assaulted her in 1982: At a dinner in Lake Tahoe, Cosby gave her a “pill and one glass of red wine.” Cosby told her that the pill was to help her with some cramps and stomach pain she was experiencing. “The next morning I woke up, and I wasn’t wearing my pajamas, and I remember before I passed out that I had been sexually assaulted by this man…  Before I woke up in the morning, the last thing I remember was Bill Cosby in a patchwork robe, dropping his robe and getting on top of me. And I remember a lot of pain. The next morning I remember waking up with my pajamas off and there was semen in between my legs.”

Dickinson’s is the latest of 15 separate allegations of rape and abuse leveled at Cosby by White women.

Andrea Constand filed a lawsuit against Cosby in 2004. The details of her story — “helping with her career”; drugging; then interracial rape — match the pattern of the others very closely.

Constand’s lawyers managed to find an amazing eleven more women who agreed to testify that Bill Cosby had sexually assaulted them — and remember, those eleven are merely the ones who dared to come forward and speak in open court. Unfortunately, Constand was paid off by the wealthy Cosby and the case never went to trial.

It’s Cold Medicine, Take It

Tamara Green, an attorney and former fashion model says that Bill Cosby drugged and forced himself on her. She was hired by Cosby to “help him open” a private Los Angeles nightclub, even though her only experience was doing cosmetic and Coca-Cola commercials. When she told him she had the flu one day, he persuaded her to come to lunch with him anyway. Cosby told the young, impressionable woman to take two pills he handed her, which he said were the cold medicine Contac. She states: “I sat down, and he gave me what he said was two pills of [an over-the-counter cold medicine]. I swallowed them, and 20 minutes later I felt terrific; 30 minutes later, I was face-down in my soup. He volunteered to take me home. And then, because I was so ill, he volunteered to undress me and put me to bed.”  Cosby then sexually assaulted her, but she fought back. “I started fighting him — I took a lamp and broke a window.” Green added that a young woman she knew, Page Young, was also raped by Cosby — and Young was so distraught over her drugging-rape at his hands that she was driven to kill herself.

Long-Standing Pattern

Given this pattern of behavior, repeated again and again — young White woman / offer to mentor or help her career / drugging / and rape while unconscious — it’s very likely that what we have heard so far is just the tip of the iceberg. What actually goes on in very Jewish, very pro-racemixing Hollywood is probably much worse than we can even imagine. It’s a very good thing for White people that “family values” interracial assimilationist icon Cosby has been outed and shown for what he really is. Every time something like this happens, a few thousand more people stop believing in the machinery of illusion and start looking for answers — start looking for the National Alliance.

In a live comedy album he released in1969, with a title (“It’s True! It’s True!”) that he probably wishes he hadn’t chosen, Cosby talks, laughs, and smirks about using a drug to get women to have sex with him. He starts out saying he heard about it when he was 13, but quickly switches to an anecdote showing he was still interested in obtaining the drug, “Spanish Fly,” as an adult while he was starring in “I Spy.” From the context it’s clear that the women he wants to drug are White European Spanish women. Hearing this monster giggling while he gets his mostly-White audience to laugh along with him at the “fun” idea of stripping women of their ability to say “no” is a sickening experience. Even at the age of 12 or 13 when I first heard this routine on an LP record at a friend’s house, I knew there was something profoundly sick about this man. I’ll put a link to the performance in the text version of this broadcast, or a simple search on YouTube for “Bill Cosby” and “Spanish Fly” will find it.

“The Story Went Nowhere”

Journalist Mark Ebner states that he had enough information in 2007 to “take Cosby down,” but the media bosses refused to publish his story because Cosby was such an icon of “civil rights” — that is to say, exposing his abuse and drugging and rape of White women would hurt the racial mixing propaganda narrative those same media were promoting: “Even more than Woody Allen, Bill Cosby was a beloved figure and civil-rights pioneer; hardened editors were horrified at the prospect of taking him down. I might as well have pitched a story about Martin Luther King, Jr. philandering with white women. The story went nowhere.” Well, Mr. Ebner, thank you for a very revealing insight — but the truth is, MLK did philander (and worse) with White women, but the media blackout on that is still in force.

It’s only because Hannibal Buress, a Black comedian who resents Cosby for his anti-ghetto-culture assimilationist position, brought up the rapes, that the story gained any traction in the media at all. Women’s activists bemoan the fact that the media only took the rape and assault stories seriously after “a man” brought them up, but they themselves fail to note that it was a Black man. Men, even published male writers, who weren’t Black — and the more than a dozen White women who were brave enough to go public with their stories — have been trying for years, in some cases decades, to get this story to the public. But it wasn’t permitted — until uncensorable social media went viral with it after Buress’s stand-up routine. Then they couldn’t ignore the story they’d been ignoring for years anymore. They were forced, reluctantly, to take down their false idol — or lose all credibility.

Make no mistake about it — the media bosses, who are almost all Jews, don’t like any story that might make White people realize they’re being harmed, being dispossessed, and being literally and figuratively raped by a power structure that is determined to exterminate them. So we see horrific torture-rapes and killings with White victims and non-White perpetrators — and the media carefully fail to mention, until forced by circumstances to do so, the race of the victims or the attackers or both. We see cases with Black victims, like Michael Brown’s and Rodney King’s, turned into worldwide sensations, triggering a public outrage so strong that a near-insurrection results — but cases of brutal savagery against Whites are carefully kept local, and reported as little as possible, and as sanitized as possible, in the national news.

Motivation

TIMEMagazineCoverBillCosbyAs I said, the real motivation for Cosby’s crimes is a totally taboo topic in the Jewish-controlled media. Think about it: Did Bill Cosby really have to drug and rape anyone to have sex? No. He was married to a cultured and shapely mulatto woman all through the period when these rapes took place, and she bore him children. And this was Hollywood in the anything-goes era of the Sexual Revolution. There were surely any number of ambitious starlets and high-price harlots of all races who would have given rich, famous Bill Cosby all the sex he could handle and more. And I don’t doubt he took advantage of that degeneracy.

But sex with a willing White woman was apparently not enough for Bill Cosby. If these accounts are true, and I believe they are, he wanted to rape White women, not just sexually possess them. He wanted to violate them against their will. Some of his victims describe times when they did remember his approaches to them and the sick intercourse he forced on them: One White woman was pinned to the bed by Cosby’s forearm — another was grabbed around the neck — another was forced to masturbate him — another, waiting in her dressing room just before an appearance on the Tonight show, had her head pushed into Cosby’s groin and his genitals into her mouth and forced to give him oral sex. And who knows how many women there were who have not yet come forward? Who knows what else happened while they were unconscious? All White women. All manipulated or forced or drugged. All taken against their will. Taken against their will because that’s the way Bill Cosby wanted it. It was exactly the way Bill Cosby wanted it.

Journalist Greg Kay tells us: “It is often argued that rape is not a sex crime, but a crime of violence or of power and control. However, interracial rape, while it encompasses all such motivations, is something more. Black-on-White rape is usually a violent political act – a form of terrorism – the ultimate statement of the Black Power Movement that has disguised itself under an innocuous-sounding banner called ‘civil rights.’ …being able to ‘take’ the woman or women of someone else and use the same for one’s own gratification …is the ultimate statement of superiority; and the utmost denigration of the male or group to whom the woman in question belongs, as well as the woman herself. That act demonstrates not only to the victim, but also to the kin of both the raped and the rapist, that the rapist has power.”

The Black writer (and darling of many a Jewish college professor) Eldridge Cleaver admitted as much: “Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the White man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women – and this point, I believe, was the most satisfying to me because I was very resentful. I was getting revenge.” There’s many a Bill Cosby and Eldridge Cleaver on the basketball courts of rapidly-browning America, I believe.

The Big Picture

Putting two different subspecies of the same species together in a confined area is usually fatal to one or the other or both. That’s what is being done to us in America and in Europe. Every White country currently under the control of the Jewish oligarchs is subject to the multiracial “experiment” — Mestizos, Arabs, Blacks and others are flooding across our borders, swelling their numbers, and being encouraged to mix and/or get their revenge upon us. Who opened the borders? Who commands the film and multimedia empires which glorify non-White males as partners for White females? The same tribe that elevated Bill Cosby to star status, groomed and used him to promote their racial-mixing agenda,  and empowered him to rape with impunity for almost 50 years, that’s who.

Sheldon Leonard

Sheldon Leonard

Sheldon Leonard is the man who decided that Americans “needed” a Black/White team to star in their next adventure show — and chose Cosby for the “I Spy” spot. Leonard carefully crafted an image of Cosby that would be acceptable to White viewers in general and attractive to White women. Cosby even described Leonard as “my last father,” a man who had made him what he is today.

Ed Weinberger

Ed Weinberger

Ed Weinberger was the lead creator of “The Cosby Show” and the brains behind the idea of re-shaping Americans’ attitudes towards Blacks, encouraging “integration” by portraying a Black family exemplifying all the virtues of middle class White Americans.

Both Leonard and Weinberger are Jews.

Bill Cosby is just the latest example of what is really a war on White women — and on all Whites — that is pursued through every possible avenue of defilement, denigration, and destruction — including interracial rape. As I said a few weeks ago in my program on Charlottesville’s Hannah Graham, “Black males rape White women more often than they rape Black women, and Blacks overall rape at a rate between 4.4 and 11 times higher than Whites. And Blacks commit interracial rape at a rate at least 70 times that of Whites. It’s all there in the official statistics — statistics that, for some reason, never seem to be in the headlines or nightly news stories on the Jewish-controlled media, despite the fact that tens of thousands of White women at least are victims every year.”

What value system can we give the next generation that will allow us to survive this onslaught? What moral code can we teach our children that will prevent them from being the next victims? The feminists and the System and even the churches just tell us that young women (they would almost never say “young White women”) need to be “more careful” or that “men” (they would almost never say “Black men”) “need to stop raping.” Safety courses and having young White men falsely told that they’re part of a “rape culture” is going to do less than nothing.

We need to teach our children that they are part of something greater than themselves; that their race has an unlimited destiny of greatness and that everything we do is a part of that; that the worst sin of all sins is to defile their genetic inheritance through racial mixing; that White men must stand up for and protect their infinitely precious women from the depredations of aliens; and that White women must understand that their most sacred purpose is to pass on our gene-patterns undimmed into the future. In a society imbued with values such as these, the monstrous Bill Cosby and his ilk would not be permitted within our borders, not within a thousand miles of any White girl or woman. And his handlers and creators and enablers would not be allowed to exist.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/not-within-a-thousand-miles/feed/ 3
The Roots of Decadence http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-roots-of-decadence/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-roots-of-decadence/#comments Tue, 18 Nov 2014 02:50:39 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1835 William-Pierce----Eternal-Struggle_forest_path

by Dr. William L. Pierce

DURING THE recent Apollo 17 lunar expedition, publicists and politicians repeatedly emphasized that it was the “last” manned expedition to the moon. There would be no more lunar exploration, because the expeditions were too expensive and the money was needed instead to “improve the quality of life” for Americans.

It was pointed out that huge expenditures for the space program could no longer be justified when millions of Americans were living in “poverty.” One columnist estimated that the money spent by NASA just for the equipment left on the moon by the various Apollo expeditions ($500 million) could have bought a large-screen color TV set for each of one million “underprivileged” (Black) families.

 Troubling Questions

The political decision to halt Western man’s greatest venture of exploration and discovery — a . . . → Read More: The Roots of Decadence]]> William-Pierce----Eternal-Struggle_forest_path

by Dr. William L. Pierce

DURING THE recent Apollo 17 lunar expedition, publicists and politicians repeatedly emphasized that it was the “last” manned expedition to the moon. There would be no more lunar exploration, because the expeditions were too expensive and the money was needed instead to “improve the quality of life” for Americans.

It was pointed out that huge expenditures for the space program could no longer be justified when millions of Americans were living in “poverty.” One columnist estimated that the money spent by NASA just for the equipment left on the moon by the various Apollo expeditions ($500 million) could have bought a large-screen color TV set for each of one million “underprivileged” (Black) families.

 Troubling Questions

The political decision to halt Western man’s greatest venture of exploration and discovery — a decision seemingly concurred in by a substantial portion of the American electorate — and turn instead to more social welfare programs raises some deep and troubling questions for thoughtful Americans.

What is progress? Was Neil Armstrong’s first step onto the lunar surface progress, or is it a color TV set in every “underprivileged” home?

Is it possible that the two things are incompatible in some fundamental way?

Can a people aspire to both luxury and greatness?

 Affluent Decay

Hasn’t our pampered way of life in America softened us a great deal and sapped our will? If that is so, how do we reconcile continued material prosperity with continued toughness and fitness in a hostile and demanding world?

This dilemma is something fairly new to Americans, and it is tied directly to our current lifestyle.

In the not-so-distant past, when nearly all our people lived on farms or in villages, the dilemma did not exist. The principal concern then was not prosperity but survival, and this ever-present necessity provided the frame in which people’s attitudes were formed and decisions made.

A population for whom survival was a principal concern was not necessarily one living in wretched poverty, with famine and starvation imminent. In most times hard work, intelligently directed, kept famine at a safe distance.

 Close to Nature

Nevertheless, men lived closer to Nature and were more mindful of her eternal laws. The cycle of birth, struggle, and death was something everyone recognized and accepted not only as inevitable but as right.

A boy or girl growing up on a farm had daily tasks to perform — not make-work, but chores necessary to the overall operation of the farm — almost from the time he or she could walk. Likewise, the son of the village miller or smith, or the daughter of the butcher or candler, became from the earliest age an essential cog in the family economic machinery. The child did not work for an “allowance” to be spent on toys and entertainment, but as a member of the family team in its struggle for survival.

 Vigilance, Genius, and Toil

Even though in his later years a boy might leave the farm to learn a trade or go to sea or join the army — or, perhaps, if he had the intellect and the inclination, study at a university — his outlook on life and his conduct were still determined to a significant extent by the experiences of childhood.

These experiences were continually reinforced by those of manhood, which taught him that, even though Nature could be bountiful and the world filled with wonderful opportunities, the bounties and the opportunities had to be earned. They were not given to man as a gift from Providence but had to be wrested from adversity through man’s vigilance and genius and toil.

 Reward of Inefficiency

Each man and each woman, in order to get from today to tomorrow, remained aware of the responsibility that rested on his or her shoulders for the successful outcome of that passage. Lest anyone forget, there were always abundant examples, even in the best of times, of the lot which fell to those whose inefficiency or defects of character exceeded the norm by too great a margin: They perished.

Thus, the lifestyle of a people largely rural and agricultural led naturally to certain elements of their outlook and character: parsimony in the expenditure of resources and wealth, self-reliance, an uncomplaining acceptance of the necessity of lifelong hard work, the ability to face hardship with equanimity, the patience and perseverance which were essential ingredients of that craftsmanship whose decline is often lamented today, and a realistic attitude toward some of the less pleasant aspects of the human condition — such as death.

The painting titled "L 'homme a la houe" by Jean-Francois Millet that inspired Edwin Markham to write his poem titled "The Man with a Hoe."

The painting L’homme a la houe by Jean-Francois Millet that inspired Edwin Markham to write his poem The Man with a Hoe

 And a Will to Conquer

Our ancestors seldom, despite the worst ravages of war and famine, fitted the poet Edwin Markham’s pitiful image of the empty-faced man with the hoe, however. They toiled and sweated and suffered and died, but no one ever blew out the light within their brains.

In Africa, in Asia, around the Mediterranean basin perhaps, a stolid and stunned peasantry may have been the rule through long periods of history, but our northern European ancestors were never brothers to the ox. The fire of adventure, of conquest, of upward striving always burned in them — not despite the hardships of their lives, but because of them.

 Spirit Burnished by Hardship

They were the Vikings, the Crusaders, the bold warriors who swept down from the north to build the great civilizations of Greece and Rome, and then again, when those civilizations had become senescent, swept them away and raised on their rubble the Western civilization which now, in its turn, topples toward ruin.

The essence of their lives was struggle. The northern climate they endured was rigorous, and it continually and harshly tested their fitness. At the same time it caused their inner fires to burn more intensely than those of their southern neighbors.

A "Viking Warrior" depicted by the Swedish artist Axil Linus.

Viking Warrior by the Swedish artist Axil Linus

 Western Cataclysm

Then came that great cataclysm in the history of the West, the Industrial Revolution, which brought about a profound change in the lifestyle of our people. In the brief period of 200 years we became an urban-industrial race, giving up almost entirely the rural-agricultural life we had lived for millennia.

In absolute numbers, we spurted ahead enormously; we left the land and concentrated ourselves in urban areas containing our facilities for industrial production; our productivity soared — and with it our per capita consumption.

 Privacy, Independence Lost

As our social interdependence became more complex we lost certain aspects of our individual freedom, but our increased productivity and specialization greatly enlarged our freedom of choice in other areas. Gone were the freedom of the village common, most of the opportunities for privacy and solitude, the ready access to unfenced forest and meadow where a man could work things out between himself and Nature in the manner he chose. In their place came all the laws, rules, regulations, restrictions, ordinances, form-filling, record-keeping, and permit-applying with which an impersonal government bureaucracy hems and hedges the lives of modern men and women.

 Greater Efficiency

But with the more complex form of social organization came other things: increased efficiency in the production and distribution of food, clothing, tools, and other goods; a new realm of career activities, distinct from those of the farm-village economy; a partial independence of the cycles and quirks of Nature.

One man could, with less effort, produce as much food in a day’s time as ten of his predecessors. If he did not choose to be a food producer, he could be an airline pilot, a physicist, a bridge designer, a draftsman, or an astronaut (until the recent cancellation of the space program).

He could turn darkness into daylight if it suited his purpose and moderate the heat of summer, the cold of winter, or the ravages of flood and drought far more effectively than previously.

 New Horizons

Western man did not conquer Nature, nor can he ever, but, by learning a little of how Nature works and applying that knowledge, he opened new possibilities for his continued, upward progress.

The great misfortune of our age is that that progress is not being realized.

Instead, our values have been transformed by the new lifestyle which the Industrial Revolution brought. Comfort, convenience, and consumption became the ends to which we turned our new power.

 What Is a “Good Life”?

The man whose personal wealth once would have consisted of the clothes on his back, a good musket, an ax, and perhaps a few other hand tools now owns two almost-new automobiles (air conditioned), two television sets (one color), a stereo, a fiberglass powerboat on a trailer in the driveway, a full freezer in the basement, an expensive set of golf clubs, an electric wristwatch, and a pocketful of credit cards. Furthermore, he has 200 shares of AT&T and a big life insurance policy, because he wants his kids to have a “good life” too.

The current American definition of the good life includes economic and physical security, freedom from worry, short working hours at a non-strenuous occupation after four years of vacation at a country-club-called-university, plenty of leisure time, enough income to afford not only time-and-labor-saving conveniences and appliances but also an abundance of other consumer goods and hobby items. It is in terms of these things that we define our “standard of living” and compare ourselves with the other nations of the world.

 Avoiding Pain

That this is so should be neither shocking nor surprising. What could be a more natural development than a people, having learned how to work more efficiently, so that their labor yields more than previously, rewarding themselves by increasing their level of consumption or exerting themselves less or both?

It is in the nature of man to avoid pain and seek pleasure.

 Western Achievements

Westerners — people of European, or Aryan, race — are rightfully proud of the great achievements their genius and labor have brought about in science, technology, and social organization: the harnessing of Nature’s energy sources; the creation of a multitude of useful synthetic materials; the development of mass, high-speed, worldwide transportation systems; the conquest or control of many of the diseases and physical handicaps which once scourged mankind; the evolution of industrial mass-production techniques; the invention of nearly instantaneous methods of long-distance communication and their development into mass-communication networks.

 Worse than Pollution

These achievements have their concomitant drawbacks, of course, which are widely recognized. But there is also another drawback which is not generally recognized and which is far more serious in its long-range effects than the others — even than environmental pollution, which, being recognized, can be controlled.

In one word it is decadence. Just as the struggle for survival leads, through Nature’s process of biological selection and elimination, to fitness of a species, so also does the struggle of a people for their daily bread lead, on a timescale of decades instead of millions of years, to their social and moral fitness to survive in a world of eternal conflict and competition with other peoples.

 Meeting Challenges

Struggle is the driving force, in the biological realm, for upward evolution; in the realm of human affairs it is the driving force for all true progress.

When a people are freed from the burden of struggle they inevitably begin to lose their fitness, their toughness, their ability to meet and overcome difficult challenges which they may face at some later time.

 Dilemma of Progress and Decay

Therein lies a real dilemma for us. Through struggle come strength, material and moral progress, and greatness; but from material progress also comes relief from struggle, and from this relief come relaxation of vigilance and determination, softening of moral fiber, erosion of will, loss of the capacity for self-sacrifice and self-denial, loosening of social bonds, national decay, and eventual extinction.

Every people who have made their mark on history have been trapped in this cycle. They have struggled; they have risen; they have attained greatness; they have decayed and passed away.

Decadence; just one of many magazines distributed throughout America today that promote and encourage racial mixing

Decadence: just one of many magazines distributed throughout America today that promote and encourage racial mixing

 Racial Corruption

The customary explanation for the decay is a biological one: a people, having grown powerful and expanded beyond their ancestral boundaries, subject weaker races to servitude. Inevitably, racial mixing takes place, and the half-breed descendants of the masters and their slaves have neither the will or the capacity to maintain the empire or the culture established by the dominant race.

Thus passed Greece and Rome and many another great power. Sic transit gloria.

 Incomplete Explanation

But this explanation is, in most cases, an incomplete one. Certainly, racial mixing eventually results in the physical disappearance of the empire-builders.

This is not the cause of their decay (at least, not the initial cause), however, but only a consequence. Racial mixing hastens and makes irreversible the final dissolution, but that mixing does not take place until decay has already set in.

While the master people still have their moral strength they do not interbreed with their slaves — or, at least, the products of such limited interbreeding as there is themselves become slaves, and so the dominant race is not weakened by the absorption of mixed offspring.

 Two Sad Cases

We have before us two perfect examples today: the British and the Americans.

The British Empire has already crumbled to dust, yet the British people have only within the last few years entered into the final phase of their decay — large-scale racial integration with their former subject peoples.

When they allowed their corrupt leaders to seal the fate of their empire more than three decades ago by leading them into a catastrophic world war contrary to their interests they had not even embarked on the racial insanity that now finds their industrial centers swarming with millions of Pakistanis and West Indian Negroes.

A hundred years hence, if they remain on their present course, they will be a nation of mongrels with no hope of a return to greatness. But one cannot blame their fall on racial mongrelization.

A "celebration" of Remembrance Day in egalitarian Britain.

A “celebration” of Remembrance Day in multiracial Britain

An analysis of the situation in America leads us to the same conclusions. We lost our national will to survive years before we unleashed upon ourselves the present racial horror which is devouring us.

As long as we were tough and strong and proud, we could laugh in the faces of those sly ones who tried to tell us that our slaves, or former slaves, were our “equals.”

But now, look what a century of soft living and conspicuous consumption has done to us! It relaxed us just enough so that the fungus of liberalism, that manifestation of Western man’s death-wish, could take root in our souls.

We have not yet plunged into the final abyss of mongrelization; there is still a slim possibility of halting the decay. But, having halted it, what shall we do?

Can an affluent people, accustomed to luxury and shielded from the rigors of existence which once stiffened the backbones of their ancestors, deliberately deny themselves that luxury and affluence in order to toughen themselves up again?

We would not be wise to bet on it. Recognizing the dilemma of decadence and doing something about it are two different things.

It would clearly be better for America if we maintained a more Spartan lifestyle than we do; it would also be better for the next generation of Americans if we did not try to provide so many “advantages” for our children.

But we cannot simply dismantle our technological civilization and return to the land for the sake of our moral health. We clearly will not do that, nor should we, for obvious reasons.

That is not the upward path we seek; instead it would simply put us at the mercy of those races to whom we have taught the secrets of our Western technology.

 Where the Evil Lies

And it is important for us to note here that, although the decadence of today is a consequence of the urban industrial lifestyle introduced with the Industrial Revolution, it is not the technology resulting from the Industrial Revolution which is the root of the evil but the social changes accompanying that revolution and, more so, the new system of materialistic values which brought on those changes.

In 1770 most of the great technological advances of the Industrial Revolution were yet to come, but the acquisitive materialistic attitude of mind was already becoming dominant and with it came the great social upheavals which that attitude demanded. Thus, in that year Oliver Goldsmith penned the words of lament in his poem, The Deserted Village, which tell us how far the process of decay had already gone in England two centuries ago:

Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey,
Where wealth accumulates and men decay:
Princes and lords may flourish, or may fade;
A breath can make them, as a breath has made;
But a bold peasantry, their country’s pride,
When once destroyed can never be supplied.

A time there was, ere England’s griefs began,
When every rood of ground maintained its man;
For him light labour spread her wholesome store,
Just gave what life required, but gave no more:
His blest companions, innocence and health;
And his best riches, ignorance of wealth.

But times are altered; trade’s unfeeling train
Usurp the land and dispossess the swain . . .

“Trade’s unfeeling train” — those whom Brooks Adams, in his Law of Civilization and Decay, has called “economic men,” as opposed to those they dispossessed, the “spiritual men” — found the new lifestyle more congenial to them than the old. They worked to make that lifestyle universal, and they succeeded — although they cannot be justly accused of having foreseen or wanted the decadence which has been its yield.

Painting of Oliver Goldsmith by Sir Joshua Reynolds (1769).

Painting of Oliver Goldsmith by Sir Joshua Reynolds (1769)

To the economic man progress is strictly a material thing. It means increasing the average standard of living of the world’s population.

The economic man dreams of the day when everyone can enjoy the lifestyle of a millionaire playboy or playgirl, with no worries, no work, every luxury at his fingertips, every whim capable of indulgence. When every Puerto Rican and Hottentot has reached this state there can be no more “progress,” for we will have attained a state of perfection.

 A Different View of Progress

To the spiritual man progress is upward movement on man’s unending path from the subhuman to godhood. Austerity is more a way-condition on that path than opulence, pain than comfort, self-denial than self-indulgence.

Above all, struggle rather than relaxation is the prerequisite for each upward step.

There is in each of us something of economic man and something of spiritual man. The balance varies from one individual to another, just as it varies from people to people.

 Shifting the Balance

In Western man that balance was on the spiritual side during our rise to greatness. Now it has shifted strongly to the economic side, and we must succeed in reshifting the balance if we are to survive.

We are faced with a very complex and difficult problem — a problem which no people before us has solved successfully. Nevertheless, we remain convinced that Western man has the capacity to overcome even this obstacle and regain the upward path he trod for millennia.

In order to do this we must have two revolutions: one of the flesh and one of the spirit. Without the second the first will lose its meaning and become transitory.

 Cleansing Fire

With the cleansing fire of total revolution — spiritual and physical — we must wipe out the false set of values now guiding the course of our people.

We must once again put greatness ahead of prosperity, fitness ahead of comfort, duty ahead of indulgence, honor ahead of security.

When we have done this, regardless of the cost in blood and gold, we can then do anything else to which we set our will.

 * * *

From Attack! No. 17, 1973 transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-roots-of-decadence/feed/ 4
The Jewish Problem http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-jewish-problem/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-jewish-problem/#comments Sun, 16 Nov 2014 15:45:18 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1824 LIFE cartoon about Jewish immigrationby Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR THE LAST three decades there has been, in this land of free speech and a free press, an almost universally observed taboo on one topic of overwhelming importance: the Jewish question. Until about the last year or two, in fact, it was hardly permissible to even hint at the existence of such an issue, much less to discuss it openly. (ILLUSTRATION: This anti-Jewish-immigration cartoon from Life magazine, October 5, 1911, gives a striking reminder of how the media have changed after falling under Jewish control. The caption reads “These pills may make me grow, mother, but the more I take the worse I feel.”)

Now the subject has been broached, not by our own people — for whom it has the most crucial importance — . . . → Read More: The Jewish Problem]]> LIFE cartoon about Jewish immigrationby Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR THE LAST three decades there has been, in this land of free speech and a free press, an almost universally observed taboo on one topic of overwhelming importance: the Jewish question. Until about the last year or two, in fact, it was hardly permissible to even hint at the existence of such an issue, much less to discuss it openly. (ILLUSTRATION: This anti-Jewish-immigration cartoon from Life magazine, October 5, 1911, gives a striking reminder of how the media have changed after falling under Jewish control. The caption reads “These pills may make me grow, mother, but the more I take the worse I feel.”)

Now the subject has been broached, not by our own people — for whom it has the most crucial importance — but, interestingly enough, by the Jews themselves, who successfully imposed the taboo on it in the first place.

One cannot pick up a major newspaper today without reading about “the Jewish vote” in the recent Presidential election, or which candidate got the most “Jewish money,” or which senators are blocking further Russian trade agreements until the Russians make more concessions on “the Jewish issue,” and so on.

 Growing Anti-Semitism

The Jewish question is phrased in the sharpest terms by the most Jewish of the Jews: the professional Zionists. They talk compulsively, almost hysterically, of rising anti-Jewish feeling in America, of “genocide” in Russia, of growing anti-Semitism in Italy and elsewhere, of the need to protect Jewish interests everywhere. And, contrary to past practice, they talk about these things publicly, where everyone can hear: in newspapers and national magazines, in open campus lectures, with placards in street demonstrations.

Books are in general circulation today, written either by Jews or philo-Semites, which come closer to a frank discussion of the Jewish question than would have been imaginable a few years ago. Even some motion pictures and television programs have ventured onto this formerly forbidden ground.

 Deliberate Deceit

All this is not to say that the American people are being given an honest treatment of the Jewish question. There remains more deliberate deceit on this topic than perhaps any other except the Black-White racial issue. But what a revolutionary change from the time when the very existence of the issue itself was denied!

Very recently it was not even permissible to speak publicly of Jews as a distinct racial-cultural-national group, a people with peculiar interests and characteristics distinguishing them from other peoples with different interests and characteristics. One could only speak of “Americans of the Jewish faith,” “a person who happens to belong to the Jewish religion,” and similar euphemisms. Americans were so thoroughly brainwashed that the mere use of the word “Jew” in public caused embarrassment and discomfort.

 Pressures Building

Now that is changing, and it is a good thing. It is not entirely clear why the taboo is being lifted, however. With a little effort the lid probably could have been kept on the subject for another decade, maybe longer, before internal pressures blew it wide open.

One reason may have been that the Blacks simply wouldn’t keep their mouths shut. Less disciplined than the White goyim, they kept spilling the beans.

Negro civil rights militants resented having to be told by their Jewish “advisers” and financiers what their every move was to be. Nor did they fail to gain the impression that they were being “used” by the Jews: that Jewish money and brains were not being poured into the civil rights movement out of any love for Blacks but in order to disrupt White society for the Jews’ own ends.

 “Jew Devils”

And if Black slum-dwellers had not already noticed who it was who collected their rents every month and took what money they had left in exorbitant finance charges, there were plenty of Black nationalist leaders ready to point it out to them. In the Black Muslim theology, “Jew devils” roast in a pit noticeably hotter than that reserved for ordinary “White devils.”

White liberals have been conditioned to dismiss as “racism” any criticism of Jews emanating from other Whites. Every four-letter word coming from the mouth of one of the pampered new breed of Negro “intellectuals,” however, is pounced on like a pearl of wisdom.

 Conditioning Backfires

Gutter-level hate-screeds directed at Whites — trash literature such as Eldridge Cleaver’s Soul on Ice, which has been made required reading for millions of White high school and university students by neo-liberal teachers — are accepted as good, noble, and true by Gentile liberal and Jew alike. So, when the same breed of Blacks began expressing their feelings toward Jews, White liberals were obliged to take them seriously. One might say the Jews are hoist on their own petard.

 Jews as a Group

It would be unfair to give Black militants all the credit for forcing the Jews to reopen the Jewish question, however. Ever since the Jews so thoroughly trounced the Arabs in the “Six Day War” of 1967 (using American weaponry), they seem to have thrown discretion to the winds. They are so proud of themselves for that bloody bit of banditry that they can’t stop boasting about it. It is a triumph which belongs to all Jews everywhere, they feel: to Jews as a group. And it is as a group that they have been talking of themselves ever since.

A map depicting the territories gained by the Israeli's in six days during The Six Day War in June, 1967. The Israelis attacked Egypt first, initially claiming that it was actually Egypt who attacked them first. The area that Israel held more than doubled, as well as placing themselves in control of more than 1 million Palestinians.

A map depicting the territories gained by Israel in the Six Day War in June, 1967. The Israelis attacked Egypt first, initially claiming that it was Egypt who attacked them first. The area that Israel held more than doubled, putting them in control of more than 1 million Palestinians.

 

“Just a Coincidence”

This is a development of some importance. Before, if one violated the taboo by, say, grumbling about the Jewish monopoly control of America’s information media, one would immediately be put down by the nearest liberal with a little lecture about all those Jews in television and the publishing industry being just a coincidence; about the fact that it might just as well have been Baptists controlling the media if they had worked as hard at it and were as good businessmen as the Jews; about the necessity of judging each Jewish TV mogul as an individual rather than as a Jew.

And if one spoke of “organized Jewry” or hinted of a “Jewish conspiracy,” one was instantly consigned to the outer darkness, along with the little old ladies in tennis shoes who see a communist spy under every bed. Nowadays, Golda Meir can talk about “the organized Jewish world” and be quoted by UPI without anyone batting an eyelash.

 Something Other Than Americans

So, however it has come about, we have the Jewish question with us today: the general acceptance (even if only implicit) of the fact that Jews are something other than Americans with a different religion; that they are Jews first and Americans (or Canadians, or what have you) only second or third; that they form a coherent group; that they have group interests, Jewish interests; and that those interests are quite often, if not always, at variance with the interests of just about everyone else.

When we couple this fact with the fact that Jews have worked their way in to positions where they control the vital nerve centers of the Western world: public information, education, finance, domestic politics, foreign policy . . . the Jewish question becomes a very real Jewish Problem.

 Myths about the Problem

The way in which the American people solve this problem will depend on their understanding of it. At present that understanding is badly clouded, and all the forces of the System are intent on keeping it that way, through the propagation of a set of myths. A few of these myths are:

  • The Jewish problem has its roots in Gentile bigotry. If it were not for anti-Semitism and the threat it poses to the Jewish people, there would be no Jewish problem. Jews would simply be another ethnic element of the population of any country where they live, just as the Pennsylvania “Dutch” (Germans), Minnesota Swedes, or Boston Irish are ethnic elements of the U.S. population, each with its own peculiarities but without any particular “problem” (e.g., a “Swedish problem”).
  • Anti-Semitism is always a manifestation of either religious intolerance or economic envy. That is, Christian bigots hate Jews because their religion is different, and bigots in general hate Jews because they are successful.
  • Jews are a “persecuted” people with a tragic history. For thousands of years other peoples have bullied them, massacred them, selected them as “scapegoats” — all through no fault of their own. At present Arab terrorists are persecuting them in the Middle East and the Soviet government is persecuting them in Russia. The persecution they most like to talk about, however, is the one they recently underwent at the hands of the Germans: the “holocaust” of World War II. Because of the “holocaust” and other persecutions, the Jews are especially deserving of our sympathy and consideration.
  • Jews are a “liberal” people: tolerant, pacifist, equalitarian, open minded, champions of freedom and justice. Their “tragic history” and the suffering they have undergone have given them these liberal traits.
  • Jews are a specially gifted, artistic race. This is easily seen to be so by the way Jews dominate virtually all cultural fields in America today. There are more Jewish sculptors, painters, novelists, poets, composers, editors, and directors than those belonging to any other ethnic group, WASPs included. In line with this, Jews tend to be more sensitive and intellectual, on the average, than persons of European race.

 A Glimpse Behind the Façade

Many and weighty volumes have already been written debunking or supporting these myths. Here we have no room to explore them all. We can only present the briefest of suggestions to the reader that perhaps there is another way of looking at them than the “official” way presented by the System.

A book published by Harry Ostrer in 2012 which admits that the Jews are a separate race and that understanding their genetic history is crucial to understanding the Jewish identity.

A book published by Harry Ostrer in 2012 which admits that the Jews are a separate race and that understanding their genetic history is crucial to understanding the Jewish identity.

Consider the first myth: namely, that Gentile bigotry is the cause of the problem. It is particularly rewarding to explore this myth together with Myth No. 3, that of a tragic history of thousands of years of persecution.

From the time of the ancient Pharaohs, nearly 4,000 years ago, to the present, everyone — Egyptians, Assyrians, Persians, Medes, Romans, Spaniards, Anglo-Saxons, Cossacks, Poles, Russians, Germans, Arabs — has persecuted and massacred the poor Jews. That’s quite an array of various breeds of bigoted goyim.

 Everybody Bigoted Except Jews?

About the only conclusion the official myth allows us to draw from this is that bigotry is a universal characteristic of non-Jewish peoples! Furthermore, this bigotry has remained Jew-specific over an immense period of time and among peoples with widely varying cultures.

From the time when the ancient Egyptians booted Moses and his tribe out of Egypt, to the expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290, Germany in 1298, France in 1306, Austria in 1421, Spain in 1492, Portugal in 1496, and so on, to the present day, no one seems to have been able to get along with the Jews for very long. “Persecution” has been the inevitable result.

 Is “Persecution” Myth a Racket?

Of course, history is a continuous record of different peoples not getting along with one another: French vs. English, English vs. Spanish, French vs. Germans, Irish vs. English, Poles vs. Russians, and so on. But the English do not consider themselves “persecuted.” Nor do the French, the Germans, or any of the other peoples mentioned. Only with the Jews is it “persecution.”

Yet, the universal antagonism between the Jews and their various neighbors down through the millennia is undeniable. Could it be — is it remotely possible — that the reason for this lies with the Jews themselves rather than with all their antagonists?

 “His Blood Be on Us and on Our Children”

Certainly the myth that the trouble lies with Christian intolerance of “Christ killers” does not hold water. Moslems, atheists, and pagans have had as little use for Jews as the most retribution-minded Christians.

Tacitus, the pagan historian, wrote of the Jews: “When the Assyrians, and after them the Medes and the Persians, were masters of the oriental world, the Jews were deemed the most contemptible of all the nations then held in subjection.” And Tacitus’ other references to the Jews reveal that he and his fellow Romans shared that contempt, thus giving us four peoples in this one example, with four different religions, unanimous in their verdict on the Jews.

Gaius Cornelius Tacitus, the Roman historian.

Gaius Cornelius Tacitus, the Roman historian

 Venom of the Talmud

If that is due to religious bigotry, perhaps the bigotry is the Jews’ rather than all the others. This was the conclusion reached by the great Martin Luther, at any rate, who taught himself to read the Hebrew of the Talmud, the basic religious work of Judaism, and was horrified by the venomous outpouring of hatred against all non-Jewish peoples (goyim) he found there.

That leaves the “envy” myth. It is best considered together with the notion that the Jews are especially gifted and talented, and that these special talents have led to their spectacular degree of success, relative to non-Jews.

 Masters of Degeneracy

Let us immediately recognize that Jews, as a whole, do possess certain talents to a larger degree than other peoples. No Gentile writer, for example, could have produced a novel quite like Philip Roth’s The Breast or Portnoy’s Complaint. No Gentile composer could have treated a sacred theme with quite the same grandiose vulgarity as Leonard Bernstein did his Mass. No Gentile producer could have churned out such an appalling box-office success as Joseph Papp’s (Papirofsky) Hair.

 Kosher Culture

Almost as notable as the proliferation of noisy, flashy Jewish cultural “successes” is the absence of first-rate non-Jewish achievement in the artistic-literary-musical-theatrical field. Where are our late 20th century American Shakespeares, Beethovens, Wagners, Miltons, or Brueghels? There are none in sight.

There are a number of competent Gentile artistic and literary technicians still competing with the Jews, as well as a multitude of hacks, but the balance is shifting steadily toward a totally kosher cultural establishment.

 Stifled Soul

Transcendent artistic genius flowers only under certain favorable conditions. These conditions are those which allow latent genius to freely give expression to some aspect of the racial-cultural soul of a people. These conditions are notably lacking in America today.

Without a lengthy elaboration of why they are lacking, a brief and homely excerpt from a recently published and very illuminating book on the Jewish question, Professor Ernest van den Haag’s The Jewish Mystique, may serve to suggest that Jewish domination of the Gentile cultural establishment is one of the principal reasons.

 Different Outlook

Van den Haag correctly observes that “persons whose outlook and sensibility differ radically from what is current, or acceptable, within the establishment are unlikely to be understood by establishment members. They are automatically relegated beyond the pale. For them to be heard, published, read, understood, or appreciated according to their merits becomes very difficult.”

Then he quotes for us the complaint of one Gentile writer:

“‘When I was a screen-writer for one of the major studios,’ says a former toiler in the vineyards dominated by another Jewish cultural establishment, ‘we were talking one day about how a mother would react to finding out her son had cheated in school. When it came my turn to speak, I said what I had to say. The head of the studio looked at me and said, “Mr. O’Connor, no mother would react that way.” I told him that I had cheated in school, and that was exactly how my mother had reacted. There was an embarrassed silence for a moment, and then the studio head went on as if I hadn’t spoken. My mother had slapped me around a little bit, and then sternly told me to go to the priest to ask God’s forgiveness. The response they expected was that the mother would weep a little and take the poor, wounded boy to her breast. That’s how they wrote it, and for a moment there, they made me feel as if my mother wasn’t a member of the human race.’”

 Alien Atmosphere

In other creative fields — science, for example — kosherization has advanced far less than in script-writing, but it is, nevertheless, advancing. No doors are slammed in the faces of talented Gentiles yet, but there is already an alien atmosphere which many sensitive Gentiles find uncongenial.

Perhaps it is in the business-professional world that the pattern is clearest. In most areas — retail trade, banking, dentistry, and law are examples — Gentiles are still in strong contention, although the Jewish element is gaining in influence and degree of domination.

In these areas Gentiles are highly conscious of their Jewish competitors, and whenever this consciousness manifests itself in an anti-Semitic manner the “envy” myth is immediately invoked to explain the anti-Semitism.

 Organized Takeover

There are other areas, however, where Gentiles are no longer in contention. Whole industries and professions have been literally taken over by the Jews.

The garment industry; the wholesale news distribution industry, which supplies magazines and paperbacks to newsstands; the motion-picture industry; and a score of others are almost totally Jewish in ownership and management. Psychiatry is, for all practical purposes, a Jewish profession.

A Gentile who attempts to trespass on one of these kosher preserves finds practically insurmountable obstacles in his path. He is immediately made to feel that it is he, not the Jews, who is an alien. He does not speak the same language, he does not know the customs, he does not belong.

Perhaps, then, we ought to consider that when a Gentile retail merchant, say, makes an unkind remark about his Jewish competitors he is motivated by something besides envy. Perhaps he has a faint, subliminal premonition of the situation the Gentile garment manufacturer of half a century ago found himself in as his Jewish colleagues slowly but surely forced him to the wall.

And we might also ask ourselves: Is it “talent” which is solely responsible for this burgeoning Jewish success — or is it also something else?

 Jews and Liberalism

Finally, let us look at Jewish “liberalism.” It is certainly true that Jews have been overwhelmingly prominent in virtually every “liberal” manifestation of the past 200 years, from the great liberal bloodletting of the French Revolution through the bolshevization of the Russian people and the building of the Negro rights movement in America.

Jewish university students were more numerous among the “freedom riders” of a decade ago than any other ethnic group.

Jewish students and Jewish lawyers, in the role of “pacifists,” have been the backbone of the home-front sabotage effort against the U.S. armed forces throughout the war in Vietnam.

Jewesses have been in the van of the crusade for women’s “liberation” since the inception of that rather unnatural movement.

In general, any group, movement, or political organization in America today agitating for “peace,” “equality,” “freedom,” or “justice” can be counted on to have a disproportionately large number of Jews among its adherents.

But are Jews really “liberals” — or is “liberalism” merely a useful mask for them to wear in their dealings with other peoples? For an answer, look at the Jews where they feel no need for a mask: occupied Palestine.

In America, Jews, through their control of the media of mass propaganda, have succeeded in making millions of White people feel guilty because our ancestors dispossessed the Indians and exploited Black slaves. Do the Jewish masters of Palestine, or their fellow Zionists in America, feel guilty because they have massacred, plundered, and dispossessed the Palestinians?

In America, Jews have been among the shrillest critics of our prisons and the staunchest supporters of prison rioters, such as those at Attica. What, then, is their excuse for the ghastly torture chambers and concentration camps they operate in Palestine in order to keep their restless Arab subjects in line?

Camp 1391, a prison in Israel which supposedly holds the most dangerous and high-risk inmates in the country. That fact that it existed wasn't discovered until 1993, by accident, and has been airbrushed out of aerial photos. Inmates have reported being lied to about where they were, being raped by men and/or sticks, and solitary confinement in rarely cleaned and almost pitch black cells.

Camp 1391, a prison in Israel which supposedly holds the most dangerous and high-risk inmates in the country. That fact that it existed wasn’t discovered until 1993, by accident, and it has been airbrushed out of aerial photos. Inmates have reported being lied to about where they were and being raped by men and/or sticks. Solitary confinement in rarely cleaned and almost pitch black cells is common.

 Goyim Not Equal

In America, Jews preach “equality” for all peoples, religions, and races. Why, then, are Jews the only first-class citizens in Israel?

In America, Jews have been predominantly “pacifist” and anti-militarist (except during World War II!). How do they reconcile this with their enthusiastic support of military aggression in the Middle East?

In America, Jews have been the most vehement denouncers of “McCarthyism” and other forms of “witch-hunting.” People who made the “mistake” of joining the Communist Party 20 or 30 years ago should not be penalized for that mistake today, they say. Why, then, do they maintain in Tel Aviv massive files of dossiers on former German National Socialists and direct a worldwide effort to harass them, hound them from their jobs, smear them in the press, even kidnap and murder them? That is, why do they preach to us forgiveness of our sworn enemies while they preach vengeance against theirs?

There is no mistaking the reality of liberalism, or, more correctly, neo-liberalism. Millions of Americans are genuinely infected with it. It is a virus which is ravaging our people and destroying our nation.

And there is no mistaking the fact that Jews are bearers of this virus. But a little observation and reflection suggest that the disease itself strikes only men of the West and that Jews have a natural immunity to it.

 Executing the Solution

As already mentioned, the Jewish problem is one of great complexity and subtlety, and one can hardly hope to explore it, much less present any very confident solution, in a page or two. Nevertheless, it is a problem which must be faced and solved. The future of our race and our nation depend upon our finding — and executing — the correct solution to it in the very near future.

The only way we can hope to find that correct solution is first to clear away the smokescreens and lies which have been propagated solely to hide it from us.

The reader with the independence of mind and strength of character to question the official myths must not stop here. He must take upon himself the responsibility of fully informing himself, so that he can intelligently discharge his obligations as a patriot and a member of his Western racial community.

Information on the Jewish problem is available from a number of sources. Some of them are Professor Parkinson’s East and West, William Walsh’s Isabella the Crusader, and Dietrich Eckart’s fascinating Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin; on the relationship of the problem to communism are Frank Britton’s Behind Communism, Mr. Bacu’s The Anti-Humans, James Burnham’s Web of Subversion, and Louis Marschalko’s The World Conquerors; on its relationship to capitalism are Professor Sombart’s The Jews and Modern Capitalism and A. K. Chesterton’s The New Unhappy Lords; on the relevance of the problem to present-day America are Wilmot Robertson’s excellent The Dispossessed Majority and Hank Messick’s Lansky. And there are many others.

Read them, and then act!

* * *

From Attack! No. 16, 1972 transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-jewish-problem/feed/ 2
Jewish Weakness http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/jewish-weakness/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/jewish-weakness/#comments Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:00:26 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1828 jewish_faces

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 15, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I CONFESS to a slight distaste in so often writing and speaking on the subject of the Jews. They are a most unpleasant race, on the whole; their religion is base and primitive and unworthy even of analysis; their ethnocentrism is little more than crude hatred for all other peoples; their sexuality is by turns both insanely repressive and grossly degenerate; their admittedly high average intelligence can most charitably be described as predatory; and, though there are exceptions who are probably hybrids, those who look most characteristically Jewish are, frankly, repulsive. If they had confined themselves to some small spot in the Levant, selling their rags, telling fortunes, and swindling the locals, I doubt I should . . . → Read More: Jewish Weakness]]> jewish_faces

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 15, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I CONFESS to a slight distaste in so often writing and speaking on the subject of the Jews. They are a most unpleasant race, on the whole; their religion is base and primitive and unworthy even of analysis; their ethnocentrism is little more than crude hatred for all other peoples; their sexuality is by turns both insanely repressive and grossly degenerate; their admittedly high average intelligence can most charitably be described as predatory; and, though there are exceptions who are probably hybrids, those who look most characteristically Jewish are, frankly, repulsive. If they had confined themselves to some small spot in the Levant, selling their rags, telling fortunes, and swindling the locals, I doubt I should notice them much at all. I’d no more likely be discussing them on American Dissident Voices than discussing the tribes of Bahrain or Yemen. (ILLUSTRATION: Jews. There is such a thing as a Jewish appearance, which is proof that race-formation has taken place. [photo credit: Incog Man])

But, through a series of extraordinary events, the Jews developed a nomadic and parasitic mode of life and  have forced themselves on us, have largely replaced our own ruling class, have tricked our people out of much of their wealth, have snookered us into dying in their wars, and are intentionally and with malice aforethought pursuing policies that will certainly lead to our extinction. The fact that these same policies will also likely lead to their own extinction is small solace, so I — and you, if you are a thoughtful man or woman — so we are forced to notice them, understand them, and defend ourselves against them.

Who are these people? And why do they do the things they do to us? The answer can be found in Jewish genes and Jewish memes.

Jewish genes have always been less than “pure,” and today they are less so than ever. And Jewish memes — the myths that define them, such as the “chosen people” myth — have only imperfectly guided this very mixed group’s evolution in a “Jewish direction.”

There have always been those Jews, probably those the least Jewish in biological terms, who have fallen away and ceased overtly being Jews.

I am not referring here to the Marranos or secret Jews who, to preserve themselves and their wealth and positions in society, faked a “conversion” to Christianity centuries ago — but maintained their Jewish identity and even rituals in secret. (Sometimes these families forgot — or feigned to forget — their Jewish identities: A man of my acquaintance knew a family of Spanish origins, nominally Catholics, who “had a family tradition” of, every Passover, placing black cloth over the crucifixes and other Christian symbols in their home. They professed not to know the origin of the practice.)

I am thinking, for example, of a man in the Washington, DC area who, despite having, as far as he knew, entirely Jewish ancestry and a Jewish upbringing, always thought of himself as a White man. He abandoned Judaism and, when he became aware of the threats to White survival posed by the policies of the Jewish power structure, he opposed those policies and supported — with total sincerity, as far as I could see — efforts by Whites to regain control of our destiny. He’s still doing so to this day.

I am thinking of the young Jewish man who wrote to the National Alliance in the mid-1990s looking for support for a plan to force Jews to return a substantial percentage of the wealth they had taken from our society at large. Despite his abandonment of the Jewish religion and power structure, he was looking out, he said, for the long-term interests of both host and parasite: He believed that his plan would prevent the otherwise-inevitable bloodshed that would occur when Whites discovered how they had been bled nearly to death by the Jewish minority.

One thinks of Benjamin Harrison Freedman, a wealthy Jew (the attending physician at whose birth in 1890 was none other than Bernard Baruch’s father) who was at the center of the Jewish handlers who controlled Woodrow Wilson — in Freedman’s words, “like a poodle on a string.” Freedman became so disgusted by the manipulation and lies — and by the death and destruction that resulted from the nefarious acts of the Jewish power structure — that he defected from it and devoted the rest of his life, until his death in 1984, to exposing its crimes. I’ve taken a prominent role in preventing Freedman’s works from being shoved down the memory hole.

One also thinks of Schlomo Sand, an Israeli academic who recently penned the book How I Stopped Being a Jew. Sand is an interesting case. Fully Jewish by religious standards — his mother was a Jew — he is half-Jewish genetically, with a non-Jewish father, presumably European, judging by his looks and the fact that he was born in Austria. Sand, a leftist and “anti-racist,” is repelled not only by Zionist atrocities but also by the biological ethnocentrism of many Jews, which he denies has any basis in fact.

Sand can help us start to understand this strange people who have attached themselves to us. In an earlier book, The Invention of the Jewish People, Sand argues that a huge proportion of today’s Jews are descendents of disparate groups of converts to Judaism, with little genetic affinity and therefore no legitimate biological claim to peoplehood — and certainly no legitimate claim to possession of Palestine. And Sand certainly has a point: One need only look successively at a Russian Jew, a Yemeni Jew, and an Ethiopian Jew to know that the Jews, if a race at all, are a very mixed one.

Jewish author Jon Entine, author of Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People, takes nearly the opposite view, bringing together many genetic studies of Jews to prove his point. Entine states that, prior to the middle of the 20th century, Jewish intermarriage with non-Jews was an astonishingly low 0.5 per cent. And he emphasizes that Jews, whatever their origins, are more closely related to each other than to their host populations, adding that more than 75 per cent. of Jews can trace some of their ancestry to the Middle East (which means that about a quarter of them can’t). He also brings up the fact that Ashkenazi Jews, who form 80 per cent. of world Jewry, have inherited nearly 50 per cent. of their mitochondrial DNA from White European women. Entine theorizes that the ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews spread out from the Middle East into Italy in Roman times and into the rest of Europe from there. Proto-Ashkenazi populations were small and, at first, males seeking new opportunities travelled to new lands in very small numbers, taking White women as wives in many cases. Entine doesn’t know whether or not these European women were “converted” to Judaism or not, but he notes that Judaism once proselytized — though it would eventually cease doing so for all practical purposes. There were times, including quite recent times, when the rate of intermarriage for Jews fell to a very low level — but this early proto-Ashkenazi period clearly was not one of them.

The Biblical scholar Thomas L. Thompson, in his book The Mythic Past, proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Jews’ own tales about their origins found in their Torah (what Christians call the Old Testament), while psychologically revealing, have no historical basis. He states “There is no evidence of a United Monarchy, no evidence of a capital in Jerusalem or of any coherent, unified political force that dominated western Palestine, let alone an empire of the size the legends describe. We do not have evidence for the existence of kings named Saul, David, or Solomon; nor do we have evidence for any temple at Jerusalem in this early period.” Thompson concludes that the traditional Jewish narrative was partly borrowed and partly concocted by agitators attempting to religiously and politically unite disparate Semitic tribes who had been displaced by the misfortunes of war and empire in the Middle East during the last few centuries BC. This confirms some of the key contentions of Schlomo Sand.

Thus we see that the memes of Jewish peoplehood began with lies — and it is my contention that these memes, these lies, have had a race-formation effect on those who adopted them, and that this race-formation effect has continued to operate even after the incorporation of non-Semitic genes into the Jewish gene pool.

Although Jewish organizations preach integration and racial equality for White Americans, and despite the fact of their own quite mixed background, Jews themselves are among the most racially exclusive peoples on Earth. They have their own special schools for their children where non-Jews are not permitted, they have their own media of newspapers and magazines intended for Jewish consumption only in which they rail against the evils of intermarriage with non-Jews and promote the idea that they are a special chosen race, decreed by God to be holier than all others and therefore deserving of special treatment from the rest of us. Why this seeming contradiction? Why is it “integration” and conquest by Third World immigration for us, and racial exclusiveness and superiority for them?

The answer can be found in the Jews’ special mode of life. Living as they always have as a tiny minority among other peoples, allowing general intermarriage would quickly have resulted in the disappearance of the Jews as a distinct people. Their genes containing those qualities that mark them as distinctly Jewish would have been completely swamped by mixture with the genes of their more numerous host peoples. If they were to survive, they needed a religion and a moral code which discouraged mixture with non-Jews. They needed a theology which exalted them above other peoples. They created exactly that in their myth of the Chosen People. And it has served them well.

But, you might object, there has been intermarriage. Yes, indeed there has, and to such an extent that many Jews today whose ancestors have spent countless generations among the peoples of Europe look, at least to an untrained eye, as White as any European. But nevertheless despite and in some ways because of this intermixture, the Chosen People myth has been and still is a powerful force which has preserved the essence of Jewish uniqueness. To understand how this seeming contradiction can be so, you have to understand the basic scientific fact that behavioral tendencies, character, and personality are largely genetic, and are passed on from generation to generation with mathematical precision according to the characteristics of the parents, and their parents, and so on back into the mists of time.

The essence of Jewishness is not in their distinctive appearance, which some Jews have largely lost over the centuries, nor in their peculiar modes of dress or diet or expression which many non-religious Jews have abandoned anyway without in any way relinquishing their Jewishness. No, the essence of Jewishness is the special “us versus them” mentality which is formalized in their Chosen People myth and which was necessary for their survival as a tiny group among the teeming masses of Egypt, Babylon, Rome, and America.

The key is this: In the first place, early Jews were those Semites to whom the ethnocentric and genocidal memes of what we now call the Old Testament were attractive. So even at the very earliest period at which Jews appear, we have a select, distinct, and peculiar group. Then, for thousands of years, the Jews were subjected to a rigorous process of genetic selection.

Those Jews in whom this “us versus them” mentality, this intense ethnocentrism or “racism,” was weak or absent, were the most likely to intermarry and the least likely to raise their offspring as Jews or induce their spouse to undergo the difficult and officially discouraged conversion process. Thus the genetic material of these less racist Jews was lost to Jewry. Thus, over the centuries, those Jews who remained in the fold were those who possessed these special mental qualities to a greater degree, and these qualities became intensified over the years since only those who possessed them to the highest degree were the progenitors of the following generations of the people who called themselves Jews.

The fact that there has been a definitely observable drift of White genetic material into the gene pool of European and American Jews does not substantially change the situation as I have illustrated it. When intermarriage occurred despite the opposition of the conservative and religious elements, and the offspring were raised as Jews, a similar selection process took place among them. Those to whom the Chosen People Myth and the attitudes and practices that accompany it were incongenial or repugnant escaped into the wider Gentile world, and did not contribute their genes to the Jewish people. Those who had inherited the special mentality that characterizes the Jewish mode of life became part of the Jewish people, and the parents of Jewish children, even though they often brought with them such non-Jewish characteristics as straight fine hair, light coloration, and straight or upturned noses. Looking at this situation from a purely biological perspective, this acquiring of some of the physical characteristics of their host peoples might have been a survival advantage to the Jews, since it blurred the distinction between themselves and their hosts, at least to the hosts, and the Gentile’s consciousness of their foreignness had always been a danger to them. In fact, it was and still remains their greatest fear. They call it “anti-Semitism.” The term is really a poor one, since it is never applied toward those who dislike Arabs, who are relatively pure Semites, but always to those who criticize Jews, who today are only partly Semitic and who have themselves probably killed more Semites than any other people.

This fear of our recognition of their foreignness is natural. To the nations which have expelled or fought them over the centuries, and the list is a long one, including Egypt, Rome, Spain, England, France, Russia, Germany, and many others, the reason was the resentment of the peoples of those lands when these peculiar foreigners became rich and powerful and had the ears of the political leaders, while the rightful owners of the land felt dispossessed of their birthright. This process has occurred many times throughout history and it is occurring again in the United States of America right now.

The Jews perceive any reaction against their presence in the host nations as persecution, and from their point of view perhaps it is persecution, since our reaction is against the only way of life they know, that of a parasite attached to a host. Our interests are irreconcilable.

To protect themselves from any reaction from the host population, the Jews promote the doctrine that there is no difference among the races, although among themselves they cherish the doctrine of not only the superiority but the actual divinity of their race.

Jews desire  to erase any feelings of racial identity among their hosts, and to that end they have done two things. On the one hand, they have used their money and their influence to change the composition of our society through the immigration of myriads of aliens of every race, culture, and description. A cosmopolitan society, in which nearly every other person is an alien of some type, is a society in which the differentness of the Jew is well obscured. In addition, they have used their money and their influence to change the moral climate in this country. Traditionally, America was “Eurocentric” exactly as the multiculturalists claim. Our traditions, our way of doing things, our values, our art and literature and architecture — and our genetic heritage which ultimately determines all of those things — were all European. Interracial sex and homosexuality were punishable crimes in almost every state of the union. But today, our politicians and our talking heads of the media preach exactly the opposite, and Jewish groups like the Anti-Defamation League are pushing for so-called “hate crime” laws to make it a crime to recognize racial differences or to criticize in any way the conversion of America into a Third World country. Never forget that the pattern for such laws was set in the Jewish-dominated early Soviet Union, where the punishment for “anti-Semitism” was often the Gulag or death.

The Jewish power structure does these things because they believe that they are necessary for the survival of the nation/state/people/race/ and religion of the Jews. We deem these things destructive and as an arrow aimed at our people’s heart. They deem them necessary. Between these two positions no compromise is possible.

But there is hope; actually a great deal of hope.

Although the rate of Jewish intermarriage may have been 0.5 per cent. within the lifetimes of my older listeners (if Jon Entine is right), the situation has radically changed today, with intermarriage figures hovering around the 50 per cent. mark. No people can survive such an onslaught for long, intelligent genes and powerful memes notwithstanding. Though we are threatened, demographically Whites stand in a much better position than Jews today. The “falling away” from Jewish identity I spoke about earlier is going to accelerate.

And, as I’ve shown on previous programs, despite their prodigious talent for undermining and controlling other people’s nations, awareness of Jewish power is on the rise worldwide. Jews are nothing if not extreme, and reaction to Jewish excesses, often including expulsion of the Jews, has traditionally followed Jewish domination and their usual over-the-top lording it over their subject peoples. It’s happened in numerous countries, time after time. The difference is that today the venue for Jewish exploitation and overt and covert rule is not just France or England or Palestine, but half or more of the civilized world. It is a global phenomenon and the burgeoning reaction to it is also global. There will be nowhere to “disappear to” this time. It’s probably true that “the 1%” is 99% Jewish, but that’s a lot less of an advantage when everyone knows it. We National Alliance members are in the forefront of building that awareness. Join us.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/jewish-weakness/feed/ 8
Subversion in South Africa http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/subversion-in-south-africa/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/subversion-in-south-africa/#comments Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:46:48 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1822 Kill the Boerby Dr. William L. Pierce

THE AMERICAN press in recent months has carried a number of reports of protests by South African students against their government’s policy of racial separation, or apartheid. “White Students Rebelling Against Government Discrimination,” the Reuters reports shriek, followed by vivid accounts of truncheon-wielding policemen wading into crowds of peacefully protesting students and brutally cracking skulls left and right. One news story told of policemen chasing students from the University of Cape Town who sought refuge in St. George’s Cathedral, battering them senseless, and dragging them out, leaving pools of blood among the pews. (ILLUSTRATION: Since the fall of apartheid in 1994, South Africa has increasingly become a locus of slaughter, rape, torture, poverty, and Black-on-White genocide — with near-zero coverage from the mass media.)

Editorial . . . → Read More: Subversion in South Africa]]> Kill the Boerby Dr. William L. Pierce

THE AMERICAN press in recent months has carried a number of reports of protests by South African students against their government’s policy of racial separation, or apartheid. “White Students Rebelling Against Government Discrimination,” the Reuters reports shriek, followed by vivid accounts of truncheon-wielding policemen wading into crowds of peacefully protesting students and brutally cracking skulls left and right. One news story told of policemen chasing students from the University of Cape Town who sought refuge in St. George’s Cathedral, battering them senseless, and dragging them out, leaving pools of blood among the pews. (ILLUSTRATION: Since the fall of apartheid in 1994, South Africa has increasingly become a locus of slaughter, rape, torture, poverty, and Black-on-White genocide — with near-zero coverage from the mass media.)

Editorial comment accompanying these reports creates the impression that the idealistic, fair-minded young people of South Africa abhor the racial policies of their backward and repressive government and are striving to bring about an end to apartheid and establish Black-White equality.

As is often the case with press coverage of domestic issues, all in South Africa is not quite as the newspapers would lead us to believe.

In order to understand the true state of affairs in South Africa it is first necessary to recognize that there are three distinct “White” communities in that country: Afrikaans-speakers (Boers), English-speaking Gentiles, and Jews (who also speak English).

The Boers, as the country’s largest White community, are politically dominant and are represented principally through the National Party. They were the original settlers of South Africa and have a strong sense of racial identity and racial pride. They have been able to prevent, to a substantial extent, the subversion of their institutions by alien elements.

The English-speaking Gentiles are a mixed bag. The majority of them also have a sense of racial pride and support their government’s policy of apartheid. But they have lost control of their institutions. Like their English-speaking kinsmen around the world, they have been infected with neo-liberalism. They are brainwashed by their newspapers and in their schools and churches. A minority have fallen into decadence and become enemies of their people.

The Jews are the real worm in the South African apple. Flocking to South Africa after the discovery of gold and diamonds there, they concentrated in the largest cities and had soon staked their claim to a lion’s share of the economic action.

One enormously rich Jew, Harry Oppenheimer, has managed to acquire almost complete control over the South African diamond, gold, and uranium mining industries. Other Jews took over banks, English-language newspapers, and industries not already in billionaire Oppenheimer’s pocket.

Jews have grown to number more than 15 percent of the population of Johannesburg, South Africa’s largest city, and they completely dominate the financial and mercantile life there. Since the English population is much more urbanized than the Afrikaner population, many of whom remain farmers, it is principally the English who have been affected by the Jewish presence.

A Jewess, Helen Suzman, heads South Africa’s neo-liberal Progressive Party and is the only representative of that party in the parliament. There she regularly releases tirades against the entire structure of apartheid, including the laws against miscegenation. The Oppenheimer press gives extensive coverage to her views.

It is in the universities, however, that the Jewish spirit really manifests itself. As in America, all Jews of college age are students, so that they constitute a numerically strong and well-organized radical element at several of the major South African universities. The student protestors whose demonstrations have been recently reported in the American press were more than 50 percent Jewish (although this interesting statistic was omitted from the press reports).

Likewise, when police broke up a communist ring a few years ago which had been supplying arms to Black revolutionary groups and attempting to foment a rebellion against White rule in South Africa, all the ringleaders were found to be either Jewish students or Jewish professors.

Thus, despite misleading indications to the contrary, the Whites of South Africa remain one of the most racially self-conscious and spiritually healthy White populations on the planet. Because they have failed to curb a viciously destructive group of aliens in their midst, however, they are in the beginning stages of dissolution and decadence. And, because of their minority status in a sea of hostile Blacks, decadence is a luxury which the Whites of South Africa cannot afford.

* * *

From Attack! No. 16, 1972, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/subversion-in-south-africa/feed/ 0
The Greatest Commission http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-greatest-commission/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-greatest-commission/#comments Sat, 08 Nov 2014 13:00:50 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1817 William-Luther-Pierce---Our-Purpose3

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 8, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE UPWARD path beckons. Will Williams, the Director and now Chairman of the National Alliance, is taking that path.

Along with others, Will saw that the Alliance had taken the wrong, downward direction after the death of its founder, William Pierce. Though he considered legal action to counter the decline, ultimately he chose other means. Rather than seek to use the force of a hostile System to correct these problems, always a terrible gamble — and probable waste of extremely valuable time and resources — he found a better way to lead. He led by doing. He led by example. And he never assumed that those who genuinely care about our race’s future were “the enemy,” no . . . → Read More: The Greatest Commission]]> William-Luther-Pierce---Our-Purpose3

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 8, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE UPWARD path beckons. Will Williams, the Director and now Chairman of the National Alliance, is taking that path.

Along with others, Will saw that the Alliance had taken the wrong, downward direction after the death of its founder, William Pierce. Though he considered legal action to counter the decline, ultimately he chose other means. Rather than seek to use the force of a hostile System to correct these problems, always a terrible gamble — and probable waste of extremely valuable time and resources — he found a better way to lead. He led by doing. He led by example. And he never assumed that those who genuinely care about our race’s future were “the enemy,” no matter what our differences in strategy.

Together with a few stalwart souls, he re-instituted the National Alliance as soon as its (now former) leadership disestablished it as a membership organization. He brought together a great-hearted few — both long-term associates of William Pierce and new men and women inspired by Dr. Pierce’s vision — and started an online community for them called White Biocentrism. Almost one year ago, he made it possible for American Dissident Voices to be on the air again. And with openness, frankness, and firmness — but without viciousness, rancor, or egotism — he began to speak the simple truth: There is a place — in fact, a need — for an uncompromising vanguard of White men and women for whom the survival and progress of our race is not only a sacred cause, but for whom it is the purpose of Life, Nature, and the Universe itself.

Will Williams inspired us, brought us together, and — even as he strongly criticized them — brought conciliation with those who were taking a very different path. The result is that he has now been named the new Chairman of the National Alliance corporation itself, and has taken on the great responsibility of revitalizing it — of uniting and leading those of us who believe in the only Cause that really matters — and of harboring and deploying our resources so we can accomplish our short-term and long-term goals with the greatest effectiveness. He has borne up strongly — as I have also been forced to do — under heavy attacks, both misguided and malicious. He has shown maturity of judgement, magnanimity in victory, and amazing perseverance. He deserves our support.

Those who were using the legal process to bring about change have achieved their goals. The National Alliance is ascending the upward path once again. It is time to close ranks.

We have important work to do. And we face many challenges and implacable enemies. Now is not the time to be attacking those who are working for our people’s future, whether those attacks are in print or online or in the System’s courts. Now is the time to reach out to all who believe in William Pierce’s vision and treat them as comrades — and, not only as comrades, but as the most important and valuable people on Earth. We will need each other in order to do what we need to do.

Now is the time to be reaching out to our people — now is the time to find young White men and women who can be, who will be, the future leaders of the entirely new society we must build. Now is the time to fill the minds and souls of these competent, honest, free-thinking, true-hearted sons and daughters of our race with the ideals that will inspire them — and their children and their children’s children — to ascend the upward path for the next thousand years and more. And for those who are already imbued with these ideals, it is our responsibility to lay out a realistic plan to bring those ideals to power.

There is nothing more important we can do with our time and our wealth. As William Pierce put it, “Our purpose is the Creator’s purpose.”

pierce_stamp_2006

Graphic created by Kevin Alfred Strom in 2006

Rejecting the “big tent” approach of “uniting all pro-Whites,” Dr. Pierce spoke of spiritual things:

“We don’t hope to make revolutionary idealists out of the egoistic and materialistic masses, but we do hope to awaken and inspire and recruit that minority of our people in which the Divine Spark already burns brightly enough to illuminate their souls and their minds so that they can grasp our Truth. And the way to do that is to present our Truth to them as purely and as plainly and as clearly as we possibly can—not to dress it in a conservative disguise, which leads only to confusion.

“We want everyone to know that we understand that what’s really important is not whether we can elect a government which won’t try to impose racial quotas on us or whether we can achieve domestic tranquility but whether the Truth that is in the race-soul of our people shall overcome the alien falsehoods which rule us now, so that that Truth can guide us once again to the upward Path, to the Path of the Creator’s Self-Realization, and so that we can once again become agents of the Universal Will — except this time fully conscious agents — and resume our never-ending ascent toward our ordained Destiny.”

That, according to William Pierce, is the fundamental basis of the National Alliance. Those who disagree with these fundamental principles place themselves outside of the Alliance — whether they know it or not.

Dr. Pierce wasn’t concerned about attracting a majority of Whites to our cause. At the first convention of the Alliance he stated: “Our task is not to persuade a numerical majority of the American population that we are right but rather to build the numerical minority of those whose values coincide with ours into a majority of will and determination.”

If you care about our race’s survival, but you believe that Dr. Pierce’s fundamentally spiritual path is the wrong path, then go your own way and I will wish you well.

I will not sue you. I will not attack you or use the ADL’s — or the other Jewish groups’ —  or the regime in Washington’s — smears against you to attack you. I will not try and get a System court to seize your private membership records and take the risk of making them public. I will not do these things even if you claim, in complete contradiction of the facts, to be the “true heirs” of William Pierce while sounding more like Gerald L.K. Smith. Go your own way and help to awaken White people to their peril — I truly wish you success beyond your wildest dreams.

But if you believe that our way — Dr. Pierce’s thoroughly revolutionary way — the way of a total transformation of all our values, beginning with the idea that our race is ordained to be the stepping-stone to higher man — if you believe that that way is the right way, the only way forward — the only exit from the labyrinth — then listen to the words of National Alliance Director, and now Chairman, William White Williams:

My new direction for our Alliance will look more like the old direction: the scrupulously honest Cosmotheist direction that attracted me and so many others to Dr. Pierce’s teachings and program… It is that foundation upon which we will continue to build as long as I’m Chairman. Do not look to me to compromise on Dr. Pierce’s perfectly sound Cosmotheist world view, his philosophy — his religion, if you will.

Our American Dissident Voices radio show is back! The Alliance’s Media Director, Kevin Alfred Strom, relaunched the National Alliance weekly broadcasts on December 28, 2013 — the 22nd anniversary of of the very first ADV show back in 1991 when Dr. Pierce’s only staffers on the mountain were myself and Kevin. Kevin has hit the mark each Saturday morning since the relaunch with professionally produced, top-rank original content like we old-timers have come to expect from him.  We’ll continue expanding our ADV outreach as well as getting back into publishing. Expect a long-awaited  issue of National Vanguard magazine to be published soon. Until we get our traditional natall.com and natvan.com sites up and revised to our satisfaction, check out this year’s archived ADV shows at nationalvanguard.org….

[W]ith the help of former Alliance staffer Hadding Scott… we launched a blog in June of 2011 that is dedicated to transcribing older, pre-Internet articles by Dr. William Pierce so they can be shared electronically or printed out. For those of you with computers there are presently more than 130 of these mostly pre-1995 writings archived here: http://williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com/

 I’m undaunted by those who point out that 99% of our people reject the National Alliance  message. Dr. Pierce figured just two or three percent of our people share our preservationist, biocentric values, so, by holding to our sound hard-line ideology we’ll be reaching out to those millions of responsible, racially conscious men and women that Dr. Pierce valued as Alliance members and supporters. It is from among those people who share our values that we’ll shape the vanguard with which to build and lead our “majority of will and determination.”

If that stirs your heart and resonates in your race-soul, then join us. Add your strength to ours. And make history.

In the Christian tradition there is a call to action called the Great Commission. It is to spread the idea of salvation and eternal life to all the world. Many idealists have spent their lives following that commission, though it is unworthy of our greatest souls. We have a Greater Commission, in harmony with Nature and therefore in harmony with God.

We know that the only eternal life is the future evolution and life of our people’s potentially immortal DNA — its continuation into the infinite future. We know that the origin and meaning of morality is to be found in doing whatever is necessary to ensure that continued life, the ascent to higher consciousness of the double helix that brought us into being. We know that our truth is the truth for which our race’s greatest thinkers, from Pythagoras to Darwin, have been seeking for millennia.

We know that all our decisions — from what we will do with today’s 24 hours, to how we shall structure our future society and its laws, to how we shall choose a mate or educate our sons and daughters, to how we shall spread our sacred seed among the stars — must be based on that morality and that morality alone. We know that becoming closer to God requires rejecting the spurious “holy books” written by grasping or ignorant men, and embracing the scientific truths — the real words of God — that our best minds and our Faustian spirit have uncovered. We know that becoming closer to God really means facilitating our further upward evolution so that future generations are literally closer to God than we, just as we are closer to God than the one-celled creatures who preceded us.

We of the National Alliance, as Dr. Pierce said, are the only adults in a world of children. We alone know the answers and the solutions that can stop our decline and looming extinction — and bring into being an infinitely greater world for our children and great-grandchildren. If you, too, are among those who know, then this, the greatest commission of all time, is your commission too.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-greatest-commission/feed/ 0