National Vanguard http://nationalvanguard.org News. For us. For a change. Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:00:55 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Jewish Aggression, part 2 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-2/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-2/#comments Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:00:55 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1642 Putin_crimea

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 16, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

RIGHT NOW the Jewish power structure is very worried about Russia. In order to weaken Russia, and eventually install a pro-Jewish government there, the Jewish/US axis has engineered a coup d’etat in Ukraine.

Russians have historically been among the most Jew-aware people on Earth. A century ago the Imperial Russian government set many restrictions on Jewish activity there to prevent the exploitation of its citizens. When that government was overthrown and Russia was converted into the Soviet Union by the Jewish-dominated Bolsheviks in 1917, a period of overt Jewish rule took place in which millions . . . → Read More: Jewish Aggression, part 2]]> Putin_crimea

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 16, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

RIGHT NOW the Jewish power structure is very worried about Russia. In order to weaken Russia, and eventually install a pro-Jewish government there, the Jewish/US axis has engineered a coup d’etat in Ukraine.

Russians have historically been among the most Jew-aware people on Earth. A century ago the Imperial Russian government set many restrictions on Jewish activity there to prevent the exploitation of its citizens. When that government was overthrown and Russia was converted into the Soviet Union by the Jewish-dominated Bolsheviks in 1917, a period of overt Jewish rule took place in which millions of the best men and women in Russia were killed, imprisoned, and had their property stolen. Under Communism, “anti-Semitism” was a capital offense. (ILLUSTRATION: Faced with a Jewish-led coup on Russia’s border, Vladimir Putin took steps to annex Crimea and supports the resistance to the new Jewish puppet regime in Ukraine.)

When a non-Jew, Stalin, evidently an even more vicious player of power politics than his Jewish “comrades,” took control, he distrusted the tribally-focused Jews and proceeded to systematically reduce their power, killing quite a few of them in the process. When faced with the German invasion in 1942, and realizing that more than a few Russians and Ukrainians (Ukraine was then a part of the Soviet Union) were welcoming the Germans as liberators, Stalin ditched much of the Communist party line and embraced Russian nationalism. As a result the post-war Soviet Union became less and less Jewish-controlled and more and more under the control of Russian nationalists. Despite still paying lip service to Marxism, by the 1960s Russian leaders were openly opposed to Zionism, and Jews, no longer favored, were queuing up by the thousands to leave the country. By the late Soviet period, we had the then-premier of the USSR, Leonid Brezhnev, telling the British representative at a leadership summit “Prime Minister, the only important question facing us is: Will the white race survive?”

Fast forward to the late 1980s. The fall of Communism brought the Jewish oligarchs back in droves as they successfully schemed to obtain the factories, infrastructure, and natural resources of Russia for pennies on the dollar — much of which wealth they then looted and sent out of the country. This theft of the Russian people’s property caused an economic collapse and widespread suffering — and a large percentage of the Russian leadership and rank-and-file knew exactly who was responsible.

Enter Vladimir Putin. In 2000, after ousting the corrupt US/Jewish puppet Boris Yeltsin, Putin called a meeting between himself the almost entirely Jewish oligarchs, the billionaires who then dominated Russia just as other Jewish billionaires now dominate the West. As National Vanguard writer Justin Cowgill puts it:

“…Vladimir Putin gathered the 18 most powerful businessmen in Russia for an unprecedented discussion. This was the beginning of Putin’s campaign to undermine and reduce the power of a group of men who had made titanic fortunes from reforms designed to pave the way for a transformation of the Soviet planned economy into a free market economy. Russian President Vladimir Putin was rewriting the rules again. In no uncertain terms, Putin told Russia’s wealthiest that the jig was up, and he denounced them as creators of a corrupt state.

“A very small number of people — known now as the oligarchs— were able to concentrate a very large portion of the Russian people’s wealth into their hands through backroom deals and insider connections. Some who read this essay might condemn me because I point out the Jewish identity of the majority of these oligarchs. My reason for doing so is not to be unfair to Jews or to increase hostile feelings towards them. The reason is the simple fact that their Jewishness is a factor and must be taken into consideration when dealing with Russian politics. In Russia, everyone is aware of the Jewish identity of these men, and the acts of the Jewish oligarchs themselves have done quite a bit to increase anti-Jewish feelings there. The oligarchs themselves recognize this, as do many Russian Jews, who blame the oligarchs for giving Jews a bad name. In my opinion, it is much better to be honest about it than try to pretend that this factor doesn’t exist.”

Vladimir Putin, whatever he may believe personally, is forced by political necessity to praise the “heroic Soviet soldiers” who “saved the Motherland from Hitler.” Russia has quite as many “my country is always right” patriots as does America, where the fighters in the “good war” (which wasn’t good at all) must be praised in Politically Correct terms by all politicians or those politicians will face political suicide. Putin therefore presents himself as (and may even believe himself to be) an “anti-Fascist” even while he pursues essentially nationalist policies, simply because those are the policies that are objectively good for Russia, even going so far as to decry the low White birthrate and implement laws designed to increase it.

Though Putin speaks highly of Jews and disparagingly of anti-Semitism, though he keeps some pet Jews (with no trace of real power) in his circles, and though he has outlawed “extremism” as a versatile way of cementing his rule, he nevertheless has overthrown the Jewish oligarchs and taken away their power and much of their ill-gotten wealth. And in the last few years, every time the US/Israeli warmongers were attempting to start another war in the Middle East — first in Iran and then in Syria — Vladimir Putin checkmated them. For these things, the Jews cannot forgive him. They are very worried about a resurgent, nuclear-armed, and Jew-aware Russia — and any alliances she may build in an increasingly Jew-aware world.

So the Jewish power structure is most anxious that Russia be surrounded, its government overthrown, and a new “democracy” installed there. It is in pursuit of this goal that the Jews’ surrogate, the regime in Washington, is welcoming eastern European states into NATO, building missile bases there, and has now fomented a coup d’etat in Ukraine.

Since late last year, the Jewish power structure, through its puppet, the United States, was trying to overthrow the legitimate elected government of Ukraine, which had taken a position of moderate and positive engagement with Russia. Hundreds of millions of US taxpayer dollars were expended to recruit a group of supposedly “right wing fascist” mercenaries, who were carefully watched at all times by Jewish and US intelligence operatives, since they were not entirely trusted. These groups were politically and philosophically descended from the Ukrainians who joined the German forces in World War 2 to liberate their country from Communism. The understanding of the members of these groups ranged from full awareness that the Jews were responsible for the historical starvation and enslavement of Ukrainians — to jingoistic petty nationalists who blamed everything on “Russians.” Frustrated by political impotence and long-fooled by American anti-Communist rhetoric, they were ripe for exploitation. These mercenaries were provided with weapons and other military hardware. They provided much of the “muscle” for the overthrow of Ukraine’s president Viktor Yanukovych last February.

As pointed out by writer David Sims: As soon as the US-backed revolution succeeded, Jews began to be appointed to top government positions all over Ukraine. The new prime minister, Arseniy Petrovych Yatsenyuk, was Jewish. When Yatsenyuk‘s political coalition collapsed, he stepped down, but his successor, Volodymyr Borysovych Groysman, is also a Jew — as confirmed by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Even a number of provinces in Ukraine suddenly acquired Jewish governors — in a country that is 0.02 per cent. Jewish. That’s 500 Ukrainians for each Jew. What are the mathematical chances that so many governors and two successive prime ministers would be Jews, if this were not a Jewish coup?

The new government in Ukraine immediately sent all of Ukraine’s gold stocks to the Federal Reserve Bank in New York City — robbing the Ukrainian people of their wealth just as the Jewish oligarchs and their puppet Yeltsin did to Russia.

The revolutionary government then immediately made arrangements for military “aid and cooperation” with the regime in Washington — and took out large loans from the Jewish banking system to pay for military and other operations. The coup leaders then instituted new taxes on the Ukrainians to “pay back” these fictitious loans — plus interest. They then flagrantly stole about half of the pension funds of the now-impoverished Ukrainian people. You can be sure that soon, “foreign investors” (read: Jewish billionaires) will be allowed to establish newspapers and television networks in Ukraine and will tell the hapless Ukrainians how lucky they are to be able to go into debt and welcome millions of new immigrants from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.

Russia knows that, beyond the purpose of enslaving Ukraine, this coup has a deeper purpose: to encircle and conquer Russia. In response, the citizens of mostly-Russian Crimea have broken away from Ukraine and joined the Russian Federation. All over Ukraine, resistance fighters supported by Russia are battling for independence from the Jewish-led illegal government in Kiev. Ukraine has now become a stage for a racial and political drama of world-changing import.

The naive nationalists in Ukraine were fooled. They were tricked into fighting the wrong enemy. They were fooled by promises of support from their real enemy — the regime in Washington. They were fooled because they were petty nationalists, not racial-nationalists. I pray that some of them are racial-nationalists now. They were fooled — not unlike the way their grandfathers were fooled into thinking that the Russian foot soldiers who enforced the Jews’ orders to starve Ukraine were the real enemy. They didn’t see the big picture. The big picture of Jewish power ranged against the freedom and self-determination of all peoples — and against the very survival of our race itself. That’s the reality of what’s happening in Ukraine — that’s the reality of what’s happening all around the world today, from Cleveland to Gaza to Stockholm to Vladivostok: the Jewish war against our freedom, against our future, and against our very existence. And showing our people that reality is our highest duty.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-2/feed/ 5
Jewish Aggression, part 1 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-1/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-1/#comments Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:00:17 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1641 APTOPIX Mideast Israel Palestinians

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 9, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THERE ARE now two major atrocities being carried out by the Jews at present — I mean real war crimes, real people being killed, along with the usual intelligence agency disinformation and media lies to keep the populace supporting the killing and pointed at the wrong enemy. The Jewish power structure has this sort of thing down to a science now and they’re very good at it — but, once you see the pattern, you’re cured; you’ll see it every time. I’m talking about the Jewish coup in Ukraine and the . . . → Read More: Jewish Aggression, part 1]]> APTOPIX Mideast Israel Palestinians

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 9, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THERE ARE now two major atrocities being carried out by the Jews at present — I mean real war crimes, real people being killed, along with the usual intelligence agency disinformation and media lies to keep the populace supporting the killing and pointed at the wrong enemy. The Jewish power structure has this sort of thing down to a science now and they’re very good at it — but, once you see the pattern, you’re cured; you’ll see it every time. I’m talking about the Jewish coup in Ukraine and the resistance against it, which I talked about earlier this year — and got some bloody Hell for — and the current massacre of Palestinians in Gaza which I talked about last week. (ILLUSTRATION: An Israeli bomb targets the civilian population of Gaza.)

In Gaza, the Jews are carrying out an open campaign of murdering civilians regardless of age or sex, blowing up schools, bombing apartment buildings, and cutting off food and medical supplies, using the latest powerful high-tech weapons given to them by the regime in Washington. These weapons are capable of not only huge destructive potential, but they are also capable of hitting their targets with a high degree of precision — which proves that the Jewish state’s consistent, ongoing use of them to kill schoolchildren, women, and innocent civilians guilty of nothing more than being Gentiles in Palestine, is deliberate.

The death toll there in the last month is now approaching 2,000, almost all of them Palestinian civilians. Hamas, on the other hand, uses its tiny scrap metal rockets, smaller than some fireworks, primarily against the Israeli military.

In the US media, largely owned or controlled by Jews, the slaughter in Gaza is presented to the boobs as “Israel defending itself” against “Hamas terrorism.” The killing of innocents by Israel is downplayed as “collateral losses” or never mentioned at all. In publications intended for a primarily Jewish readership, though, it’s a different story. Last week, The Times of Israel published a piece by Yochanan Gordon about Gaza titled “When Genocide is Permissible.” He puts it in the form of a question  — “If political leaders and military experts determine that the only way to achieve its goal of sustaining quiet is through genocide is it then permissible to achieve those responsible goals?” — but it is clear that, to Yochanan Gordon and a substantial ruling majority of Jews, the answer to that question is “yes.” The very title of his piece — which has now been yanked off line — screams that fact. Gordon and the Jewish leadership and many of the Jewish rank and file know exactly what they’re doing.

Make no mistake — genocide is in the offing. The Palestinians are an obstacle to Jewish goals in the Middle East. And they are nearly totally powerless, unarmed, and vulnerable. They have no state, no government of their own. They’re under Israeli control. They live in what amounts to an ever-shrinking open-air concentration camp. They’re like a beagle puppy with its throat bared, being ripped to shreds by a timber wolf.

Look at the map I’ll include in the text version of this broadcast — look at the ever-shrinking territory in which Palestinians are allowed to live for graphic proof of what I’m saying.

palestine-israel-map

Some people write me and ask: “Why should we care about what Israel is doing to Gaza? Aren’t Gazans ruled by Hamas, and aren’t they mostly Muslims and Arabs and therefore part of the problem, invading White countries and sponsoring acts of terror? Shouldn’t we just give Israel a ‘high five’ and hope they kill them all? Why should we care?”

There are several important reasons we should care:

1. The world, including growing parts of Europe, but especially the non-White world, is very aware of Jewish power, Jewish intentions, and the fact that the Jews rule over the Western world with the help of their Washington regime bully boys. There’s going to be a reckoning one day for this, and it’s important that we be on the right side of that reckoning. America’s bought-off European “allies” are more and more reluctant to toe the Jewish line and Russia is out-and-out sabotaging it (though talking as though it were not). This vector leads to a near-term future situation of the US and Israel versus everybody else. White Americans need to lead the charge away from that toxic death-trap, and telling the truth about the genocide of Palestinians moves us in that direction.

2. Awareness of the real nature of the Jewish mentality, and its dramatic contrast with the European mentality — with our mentality — is necessary for any understanding of the Jewish Question and the real issues that we face as a people. The fact that Jews projected their own hyper-hateful mentality and blood-lust onto White people, especially Germans and White Americans, calling us bigots, racists, killers, et cetera in their propaganda, is very telling. Seeing what the Jews are actually doing, right now, before our eyes in Gaza — and seeing how they brazenly lie about what they are doing in their media — has the potential to awaken more people in a single month than all the revisionist writings about World War 2 have in a decade.

3. It is in our interest to one day have a modus vivendi with the non-European world that includes mutual respect, thorough separation and self-determination, and cooperation to ensure that the parasitic race never gains a foothold in any nation again. That modus vivendi will not be based on the phony “multiracial democracy” paradigm that currently fuels Jewish power. There is no point in alienating those who will be part of making that new vision a reality — and there is no point in supporting the Jewish power structure that is literally killing us.

4. It is in our people’s nature to be kind and gracious to others — including even members of other species, to say nothing of other races, who have been harmed. This is especially true when the harm has been a result, at least partially, of our own acts or failures — and our failure to reject the Jewish parasitic organism, and our abject subservience to it, are egregious flaws which have grievously harmed millions of people. As long as such gestures do not imperil our survival or progress, we should honor our inner nature. There is wisdom in it.

5. The invasion of White living space, both here and in Europe, by the overwhelmingly non-White and culturally incompatible Muslims must be stopped and then reversed. This migration is fueled in large degree by the wars for Israel which the West has been waging in the Middle East, the corrupt puppet governments the Washington regime has set up there, and the depradations of the Zionist entity itself. It is within our power to stop these destructive wars and to end all American funding of Israel, without which the Zionist project would probably be doomed. Absent bombs falling on their cities, and absent the perpetual threat of CIA/Mossad coups or military intervention, it will be much easier to relocate Muslims to their home countries. The sooner we ditch Israel, the better this will work.

6. Accepting the reality of the Muslim threat to European civilization, it is quite insane to keep the immigration gates open to them while at the same time supporting the mass killing of the Muslims who are minding their own business and staying in their homelands. Our policy should be the exact reverse of what it is — no wars for Israel, no support for Israel’s genocidal acts, and zero tolerance for Muslims (or any non-Whites) who invade our nations. The Jews themselves engineered the opening of our borders, and part of the reason for that was to make their enemies, the Muslims of the Middle East, into our enemies too. In this way they could more easily get Americans and Europeans to make war on Muslims and destabilize and weaken Israel’s Middle Eastern enemies — while at the same time advancing the Jewish agenda of fewer and fewer White people in this world.

In short, opposing Israel’s massacre in Gaza is consistent with our best interests — and supporting it only strengthens those who are killing us and makes new enemies for us by the millions.

How close are we to total isolation — to the “US and Israel versus everybody else on Earth” paradigm? Very close. I told you last week about the recent UN vote to investigate Israel for war crimes violations in Gaza — only the US and Israel voted “no.” In 2008, the vote for another such resolution went 179 to 2, with only the US and Israel opposed. In 2013, another similar vote went 165 to 6 — with a few US-dependent island nations in Micronesia being the only backers of the Washington/Tel-Aviv axis. This pattern has been repeated hundreds of times, and it’s evident in places besides the UN too. Although under heavy Jewish pressure, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have exposed and protested the abuses of the Jewish state. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a group of nations striving to be independent of any major power bloc, has condemned Israel’s genocidal campaign against Palestinians in no uncertain terms and called for a boycott of the Jewish state. And the Non-Aligned Movement consists of 120 member nations comprising some 55 per cent. of the Earth’s population. Take away Jewish control of the US and Israel will become totally isolated — and able to be defanged. By spreading the truth about Gaza — and about the Jewish-led genocidal campaign against White people — we hasten the day of the defanging, and make it more likely to be a thorough one. It’s a joyful task.

So, for example, in 2008, the vote for one such resolution went 179 to 2, the whole world (always including Iran) in favor, and only the US and Israel opposed.In 2013, one vote went 165 to 6, – See more at: http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-solution-to-israel-palestine.html#sthash.Vof5ller.dpuf
So, for example, in 2008, the vote for one such resolution went 179 to 2, the whole world (always including Iran) in favor, and only the US and Israel opposed.In 2013, one vote went 165 to 6, – See more at: http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-solution-to-israel-palestine.html#sthash.Vof5ller.dpuf
So, for example, in 2008, the vote for one such resolution went 179 to 2, the whole world (always including Iran) in favor, and only the US and Israel opposed.In 2013, one vote went 165 to 6, – See more at: http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-solution-to-israel-palestine.html#sthash.Vof5ller.dpuf

The reason Jews have been expelled from dozens of countries throughout history is not because of some mysterious and contagious mental disease called “anti-Semitism,” a kind of “hate” that needs to be routed out so that decent people can live peacefully. No. Jews have been expelled from over 100 countries according to the historical record. When two former friends snub you, it may be something about them that’s the reason. But when 100 former friends snub you, the reason is something about you. Jews have made themselves unwanted for centuries by their own behavior — by corrupting leaders and officials, by their fraudulent “loans” to governments and citizens which draw off the wealth of the people into Jewish hands, by their perversion of the legal system, by their nepotism and favoritism.

In the last century, the Jewish power structure has metastasized and multiplied all of these crimes a hundredfold through their newly-gained control of the media of information, education, and entertainment. They have proceeded to use their unprecedented new power in the most arrogant and hateful ways imaginable — to literally wipe out anyone who opposes them. After 1945, they evidently decided that White people were to be exterminated wherever they lived on Earth, and have worked assiduously toward that goal, until today it is hardly concealed anymore. Around the same time, they realized the Zionist dream of a Jewish state, and began the process of driving out and extirpating the Palestinians whose land they had stolen.

Due to these egregious Jewish acts of hate and genocide, and also due to the free flow of information sparked by the rise of the Internet and alternative media outside of Jewish control, there is now a growing global awareness of Jewish power and its toxic effects on all societies. As this awareness grows, there will soon be no new hunting grounds for the parasitic power structure to infect when the world — not just one nation anymore — says “Enough!”

In my next program in this series on Jewish aggression, I’ll detail how the conflict in Ukraine is really a battle between the US/Jewish power structure and Russia. Be with me then.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/jewish-aggression-part-1/feed/ 2
The Gaza Holocaust http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-gaza-holocaust/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-gaza-holocaust/#comments Sat, 02 Aug 2014 12:00:56 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1637 Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of "Palestinian rockets."

Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of “Palestinian rockets.”

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 2, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

A HOLOCAUST — a word which means consumption and destruction by fire — and which also means a sacrifice, in this case a human sacrifice — is now taking place in Gaza. Matan Vilnai, Israel’s deputy defense minister and former Israeli general, used that very term . . . → Read More: The Gaza Holocaust]]> Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of "Palestinian rockets."

Jews laugh, eat, and drink as they view the bombing of Gaza from a nearby hill. Clearly, they have no fear of “Palestinian rockets.”

American Dissident Voices broadcast of August 2, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

A HOLOCAUST — a word which means consumption and destruction by fire — and which also means a sacrifice, in this case a human sacrifice — is now taking place in Gaza. Matan Vilnai, Israel’s deputy defense minister and former Israeli general, used that very term when he let the truth slip out in 2008 and warned us that the continued resistance of Palestinians to the Israeli blockade of Gaza would bring “a bigger Holocaust” upon that troubled land. And now, six years later, that threat is being carried out with a vengeance.

Gaza is a tiny strip of land, 25 miles long and about 5 miles across, squeezed between the sea, Egypt, and Israel, and almost surrounded by the Jewish state. It is home to almost 2 million people, mostly Semitic Muslims, but with various religions and races, including Whites, among them. Many of these people are refugees pushed out of Jewish-controlled areas into this tiny enclave, now with their backs to the sea and nowhere else to go. It is one of the most densely-populated areas on Earth. They have been under a brutal Israeli blockade for years, and the US-paid Egyptians block them at that border too.

With minuscule exceptions, Palestinians cannot travel freely and are trapped in their tiny, shrinking enclaves. Gaza is totally blockaded, just like the few remaining Palestinians in the West Bank. These areas are often called Palestinian ghettos, but they more closely resemble concentration camps. The Jewish state is gradually taking over even the tiny slices of land they did not steal in 1948 and 1967. They are hemmed in by armed goons, barbed wire, endless “checkpoints,” and walls of steel and concrete that make the Berlin Wall look like a kid’s sand castle. Their access to their loved ones, to hospitals and sources of food and water, is being destroyed and their homes are being bulldozed to make room for Jewish “settlers” — and now their bodies are being blown into bloody pulp and they are being burned alive in a real holocaust before our very eyes.

In just the last few weeks, the Jewish state, using high-tech drones, missiles, and bombs — all of them provided by the Washington regime, all of them paid for by you — has slaughtered over 1500 men, women, and children in Gaza, about 85 per cent. of them civilians. (In constrast, in the same time period, 63 Jewish soldiers were killed — and two civilians. Clearly Hamas is targeting Israeli troops — and Israel is targeting Palestinian civilians.) By the time you read or hear these words, the death toll will be even higher. The Jews have killed — in just the last few weeks — nearly one in every thousand Gazans. That’s the equivalent of 250,000 Americans being killed relative to our population, about five times the number we lost in the entire two-decade-long Vietnam War. In just one month! It’s the equivalent of one hundred 9/11 attacks.

Israel’s ostensible reasons for launching this holocaust are 1) the three Jewish teenagers supposedly killed last month by Hamas, a group which constitutes the elected government of Gaza, and 2) the rockets launched by militants in Gaza into Israel. The first reason was shown to be untrue when it was revealed that a rogue Palestinian group known to regularly act contrary to Hamas policies was involved. Such groups are also known to be heavily monitored and infiltrated by Israeli intelligence, causing some commentators to suspect an Israeli false flag operation, sacrificing their own children in an effort to build public support for the long-planned massacre of Gazans. Whatever the case may be, it’s clear that the Hamas government had nothing to do with the deaths. As to the second reason — the rockets launched periodically by militants into Israel from Gaza — no one denies that they exist. But Gazans have been fighting back against severe oppression, including decades of outright Israeli military occupation, for many years. Their “rockets” are small weapons — about four and a half inches in diameter — and even Israeli Defense Minister Director-General Yaakov Toran said in 2005 that they “are more a psychological than physical threat.” In fact, so few Israelis have been killed by these low-tech fireworks-style “rockets” that Israeli propagandists have had to inflate the death toll by including nearby heart attack deaths in the casualty figures.

Israel is not only lobbing US-made phosphorus firebombs into civilian neighborhoods and apartment buildings, but they are also targeting schools. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) operates some 170 schools in Gaza, and many of these are now also being used as shelters for some of the 117,000 Gazans made homeless by the Israeli attacks. These UN schools alone have been bombed on six different occasions, with several schools being destroyed.

One Israeli goal is to force the almost 2 million Palestinians in Gaza even further toward the sea — creating a no-man’s land that shrinks the already-tiny Gaza strip by 40 per cent., forcing tens of thousands of people out of their homes to create a 1.8-mile “buffer zone” along the entire border. That’s a lot of territory when you consider that Gaza is less than four miles wide along much of its length. This bloody campaign to drive people from their homes and businesses, destroying their lives and killing any who resist, is an openly-announced goal of the Israeli regime.

The US Congress has already passed an “emergency aid package” to give Israel additional hundreds of millions of dollars (in addition to the billions they already receive from the US each year) to help the Jewish state slaughter more innocents, and Senator Harry Reid is reportedly working on another bill to give the Jewish state even more “emergency help.”

It’s eerie watching the Israeli bombs fall on Gaza via the live, unedited feed from Russia Today (RT). (There are other live feeds as well; sometimes the RT feed is used for other purposes, but most of the time lately it has been focused on Gaza.) As the cameraman pans and zooms, you see a very realistic high-definition picture that fills your screen of a very crowded city going on about the business of life — while random destruction is meted out to apartment buildings, homes, offices, and city streets — and the high fidelity sound being transmitted lets you hear the deep impact of the firebombs and other weapons of mass destruction being unleashed on that peaceful city.

In the written version of this program, I’ll provide some video recordings from these news sources so you can see for yourself what I saw. As you can see, the Israelis have targeted ambulances carrying the wounded (and hospitals), and murdered an unarmed man who was merely looking for his loved ones — or their remains — among the rubble of their homes:

And the attacks of the Israelis on these civilian targets are wildly disproportionate to any force the Palestinians have ever used against the Israeli military:

Right now, 167,000 men, women, and children are homeless in Gaza. Electric power is off for over 90 per cent. of the people there. Food and perishable medical supplies are spoiling and running out and the blockade and the attacks makes resupply difficult.

Hamas has a few largely ineffective weapons. But the vast majority of the Palestinians are unarmed. Their response to the savage firebombing of their homes and neighborhoods is to run away — to hug their surviving family members — and to cry. Far different from the image of the “masked terrorists” the Jewish-controlled media in the US and Britain vend to us 24 hours a day.Fox News has even been so brazen as to show video of people fleeing in terror from incoming Israeli missiles, with the subsequent carnage and dead, mutilated bodies — while the voice-over from the Fox anchor or anchorette tells us about “Hamas rockets,” giving the viewer the completely false impression that he is seeing Israeli victims and Palestinian attackers — a complete inversion of reality.

In Israel, Jews have taken to bringing lawn chairs and refreshments to high vantage points overlooking Gaza and laughing and cheering as Israeli firebombs and missiles and tanks kill the hated Palestinians and their children in their homes, schools, and hospitals below. One of these Jews, who speaks in the video I’ll embed below, states that bombing Palestinians is “the only solution” and that the entire city should be wiped out. This is a truly sick, deranged, and mentally ill people.

The strange mentality of the Jews has a long history, and can be seen in the genocidal ravings that make up a large part of their “holy book,” the Torah, from which I excerpt this passage:

“When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy…You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…”

The Torah — which Christians call the “Old Testament” — is full of such bloody insanity.

And what did the US Senate — and the US House — do in response to the horrific slaughter in Gaza? They appropriated hundreds of millions of dollars to help fund it. And they passed two resolutions heartily approving of it. And these resolutions passed unanimously. Reflect on that fact for a moment, and then tell me you still think there is hope for any kind of meaningful change from the political system as it exists in this country.

But there is hope. All over the world, millions of people are awakening to the destructive acts and agenda of the Jewish power structure. Faced with the holocaust in Gaza, the UN overwhelming passed a resolution calling for an investigation of Israel’s acts as war crimes. Only one nation voted against the resolution — the United States of America. Even America’s coerced “allies” in Europe, beholden to the same power structure, would not dare face their own people if they voted against it, and merely abstained. In the Third World, the educated classes have known for decades the toxic nature of Jewish power, and in Europe, ravaged by the Jewish money power, resistance is building and Jew-aware parties are taking seats in government. The outrageous, genocidal behavior of the Jewish state and of Jewish institutions worldwide is providing an education to all who see it with open eyes. Right now relatively few Americans have their eyes open, but, with the rise of alternative media, that is changing.

It isn’t only the Palestinians who have lost the right to exist. So have we. So have all nations who come under the thumb of the US/Israel/banking/media complex, which destroys every nation that it touches with its poisoned claws. And millions upon millions are awakening to that fact, as the Jewish establishment well knows.

To those of you who are hearing my voice for the first time, investigate for yourself — find out what is really happening in Gaza — and then come back here and find out what is being done by the same gang to our people — and to all the peoples of the West. To those of you who already know the truth of what I’m saying, spread the word far and wide and awaken all those who are still capable of independent thought. There is no better use of your life and your time. To those of you having a moment of cognitive dissonance because you’re hearing an alleged “White racist” championing the Palestinians’ right to exist, I say: Open your mind. Understand this: There are two basic ways to organize the world. One is the coercive way, the way of empire and oligarchy, which always involves one people or a plutocracy ruling over a multiracial, multicultural empire from which no one is allowed to secede. The other way is the way of nationalism, self-determination, and freedom, under which every people which considers itself to be a people is able to live under its own government. Allowing the Jewish oligarchs to continue to rule over us will eventually kill us as dead as the bombed-out people of Gaza. It will terminate forever our genetic and cultural heritage. And we must do whatever is necessary to prevent that from happening. That is the purpose of the National Alliance.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/08/the-gaza-holocaust/feed/ 3
Casting Off the Chains http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/casting-off-the-chains/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/casting-off-the-chains/#comments Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:00:25 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1626 OnwardAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of July 26, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

We are held down by an irrational concentration on the botched and the stupid. Conscious upward evolution has the potential to liberate us in every realm of life.

by Kevin Alfred Strom (pictured, right, in a recent meeting with National Alliance director Will Williams)

A FRIEND OF MINE has a wife who is dying of cancer. While she was undergoing cancer surgery, she suffered a severe stroke. It’s a tragedy on many levels. Not only is her life impaired by the ravages of chemotherapy, but the stroke has partially paralyzed her and made it difficult for her to communicate. . . . → Read More: Casting Off the Chains]]> OnwardAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of July 26, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

We are held down by an irrational concentration on the botched and the stupid. Conscious upward evolution has the potential to liberate us in every realm of life.

by Kevin Alfred Strom (pictured, right, in a recent meeting with National Alliance director Will Williams)

A FRIEND OF MINE has a wife who is dying of cancer. While she was undergoing cancer surgery, she suffered a severe stroke. It’s a tragedy on many levels. Not only is her life impaired by the ravages of chemotherapy, but the stroke has partially paralyzed her and made it difficult for her to communicate. But the greatest tragedy of all is that her husband can find no one who will provide her with the therapies she needs.

My friend is a professional engineer and has been a close student of medical innovations and life extension therapies for many decades. He knows more than many physicians do about the latest life-saving techniques. He knew that his wife needed hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and needed it fast, after her stroke. He knew that Vitamin C infusion therapy had no bad side effects — unlike big-Pharma’s drugs — and very promising results in studies involving patients with the same kind of cancer as his wife. And he had medical power of attorney and so he should have been in complete charge of the treatments given to his beloved one.

But he could get none of the treatments he wanted for her. Not at the hospital where she was staying. Not at any of the hospitals in his state. And in her condition, long distance travel was not an option. Not only could he not get the treatments he knew she needed or could benefit from, but she was given drugs and treatments against his express wishes (some of them with terrible side effects and a very bad track record for results). Then, to top it all off, the doctors (at least one of the leading figures being a Jew) conspired to rend asunder the trust between man and wife and get her, while in a very confused state of mind, to reject her husband’s help and advice and nullify her medical power of attorney — a neat trick which rendered my friend helpless while the medical establishment packed her off to a hospice after selling her a lot of inappropriate drugs at absurdly high cartel prices.

I am sure that some of you know the reason this happened. The reason the government regulators, the medical establishment, the insurance companies, and Big Pharma have such a hammerlock on what therapies we’re allowed to have is because we “have to be protected” from quack doctors and quack cures. Once the government and the megacorporations and the lawyers get hold of those powers, of course, money and corruption come into play and there’s a lot more going on than protecting the gullible.

But the reason I brought up this tragic example of our lack of medical freedom is to show you how much we’re losing by catering, always catering to and basing decisions on, the needs of the lowest, stupidest, and least capable among us. Because some people are incapable of making intelligent decisions about their health care, and would gladly fork over their life savings to snake oil salesmen, all of us must have all of our decisions made for us by bureaucrats, legislators, and insurance executives, and none of us have freedom to choose our own treatment anymore, even in matters of life and death. We are bound by chains, even the best and most well-informed among us,  basically because stupid people need chains to keep them from killing themselves. Innovation is stifled. New ideas take decades to get to the people who need them, many of whom don’t live that long as a result. Brilliant minds who can’t stand red tape and bureaucracy leave — or never enter — the field.

Now probably, at this stage of our evolution, we need some kind of regulation to keep wicked liars from becoming millionaires by telling the rubes that they can cure cancer with holy water or the like. I’m not arguing that we don’t. What I am arguing is that the lives and the liberty of the best among us — those who would never fall for the snake oil salesmen — would be greatly enhanced if we could operate under a different set of rules. And I am arguing that we have too many rubes. And I am especially arguing that our stage of evolution isn’t high enough. Imagine if we were more evolved. Imagine if everyone in our society were as intelligent and well-informed — and of as good character — as my engineer friend. What a different world it would be.

There are many other areas in our society where the best among us are held in chains because of the presence of the inferior — including inferior races. Look at education. Because we’ve accepted the false notions that “we’re all equal” and that everyone is entitled to a college education, we’ve dumbed down admission requirements to the point where huge numbers of university freshman have to take remedial courses in reading and basic mathematics. Our high schools, afraid to fail Blacks and Mestizos or be accused of “discrimination” and losing their federal funding, graduate increasingly ignorant and even illiterate students. It’s been shown that many of today’s university seniors have difficulty passing high school tests from 50 or 75 years ago. In such an environment, what happens to the best students? They languish, they are bored, they’re ignored, and never receive the attention and encouragement that they need. This is increasingly true as the current equalitarian policy-makers gut programs for gifted and advanced students. And huge numbers of today’s teachers are themselves products of a dumbed-down “Afiirmative Action” education system. What could they possibly offer our best young minds? Less than nothing. Is it any surprise that so many of our best young people end up alienated, anti-social, and self-destructive?

Now imagine a world in which the very best and greatest teachers you ever had in high school and college were the norm. Imagine a world in which the all the students were at least what we would call “gifted” now. Imagine a world without Blacks and Mestizos in our schools and everything that implies. Imagine every class able to teach the most advanced concepts at a pace suitable for our best young minds — and imagine every graduate having truly mastered the body of knowledge that currently exists in every basic field and standing ready to add to that body of knowledge, instead of struggling to pronounce words of more than two syllables and unable to give the answer to 4= 2 + x.

Look at the insane number of laws that have proliferated in our society. America has gone from a bastion of freedom and liberty in which a man was free to speak or act in any way as long as he didn’t harm the race, the nation, or his neighbors — to the most oppressively over-regulated society this side of Hoxha’s Albania. You can’t turn around without bumping into some law or regulation you have to obey. Consider just one of our larger law libraries in this sad country, consisting of several huge rooms, crowded with shelves and with the shelves stuffed full of books, each of which contains hundreds or thousands of pages of tiny type. I ask you: Is it possible in one hundred lifetimes to even read all of the laws we are supposed to obey? Be honest. That’s crazy. It’s insane. I doubt that there is any one man who has even read, much less carefully considered and understood, all of the tax laws alone in this country. Yet the regime can send you to prison for “breaking” them, and “ignorance of the law is no excuse.”

It’s been estimated that each of us unwittingly commits three felonies a day. Laws as many as these have to be selectively enforced, or they cannot be enforced at all, so having so many laws gives the lie to the old claim that America is “a nation of laws, not of men.” (Meaning that you cannot be prosecuted because a rich man or an official doesn’t like you.) But, boy oh boy, that certainly is not true today. When anyone, upon investigation, can be found to have broken several obscure laws this week alone, then anyone the oligarchs or officials don’t like can be put in chains whenever they so choose.

And the plain fact of the matter is that the excuse for most of these laws is that people can’t be trusted to do right. They do stupid things. They do immoral things. They must be watched. They must do everything they are told to do. And they must not do anything that are not told to do. It’s easy to get the mob to clamor for protection. When you live in a society consisting of people of high character and intelligence, however, far fewer laws are needed. You are freed from so many dangers, therefore you can be freed of so many chains.

The answer, as I said before, is better people. More highly-evolved people. And the science of ensuring that each generation is better than the one that preceded it — the only way to the better world I’ve been talking about — is called eugenics. It means “of good birth.” The basic problems are the presence of alien, and less-evolved, races in our society; and the fact that, under current social conditions, the worst specimens of our own race tend on average to have the most children, and the best tend to have the fewest. The society the National Alliance intends to build would be racially based, like any healthy society, and so the other races would have their own societies and would not be present in our living space. And we would have a positive, healthy, and Nature-based eugenics program to ensure that each succeeding generation would be of higher evolutionary grade, of higher racial quality, than the one before.

Far from being “evil,” eugenics is actually the most beneficial and humane discipline ever devised by the mind of man. In fact, eugenics is the only viable long-term solution to all our social problems. As I said on this program in 1993, eugenics is the only way to a better world. Science has shown us that genetic structure is by far the greatest determinant of intelligence, character, and behavior. Unfortunately, those with the best genetic inheritance tend to have the fewest children — and those with the lowest intelligence, lowest potential, and worst character tend to have the most children. This leads to a genetic deterioration of the race that gets worse with each passing generation. No amount of education, no laws, and no increase in the power of the police or of the state can counter this degeneration.

Eugenics is simply the idea that we should humanely use our social policies to encourage as much as possible the birth of children with good genetic qualities and to discourage as much as possible the birth of children with poor genetic qualities. Some of this could be done with the more advanced techniques of modern reproductive science, such as allowing surrogate mothers to carry genius-level children in large numbers or encouraging the voluntary use of egg banks and sperm banks to propagate the best children that our race can possibly produce.

But most eugenics would be simple and basic and just good common sense: We should not be subsidizing the birth of ever more 70-IQ underclass gangbangers through welfare payments to crack whore mothers and the like. We White Americans must build a White society, so, unlike today, none of the births in our living space will be of future Crips and Bloods. And, even among our own race, the welfare system and the tax system should be reorganized to discourage in every possible way the birth of those with poor genetic inheritance. This could be done by linking the perennial underclass’s benefits — and mitigation of criminal sentencing — to sterilization or emigration.

And there could be endless variations on the theme of tax deductions, tax credits, and interest-free loans extended to families of good genetic inheritance to encourage them to give the priceless gift of their children — most of whom will grow up into highly-evolved creative problem-solvers — to our society. How can that be “evil”?

It’s not evil. It’s really the ultimate good. After a few generations of eugenics — after a few generations of ten times the number of problem-solvers and culture-creators being born, and a tenth of the number of problem-makers and culture destroyers being born, we would have a very different nation indeed. And a very different world. An infinitely better world.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/casting-off-the-chains/feed/ 3
New William Pierce Video: Out of the Darkness http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/new-william-pierce-video-out-of-the-darkness/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/new-william-pierce-video-out-of-the-darkness/#comments Thu, 24 Jul 2014 02:52:48 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1624

by Dr. William L. Pierce National Alliance General Convention, 1983; recorded and transcribed by Kevin Alfred Strom; video by Aryan Legacy

TWO THOUSAND years ago the poet Ovid wrote that night is a sadder time than day. I know that’s always been true for me. When discouraging thoughts come, it’s usually at night.

Actually, I’m pretty cheerful most of the time. But it used to be that, occasionally, when I was working alone in the National Office late at night, a black thought would come into my mind — always the same thought. It was that there’s not enough time to do what I must do. It was that something will happen to me before the Alliance is strong . . . → Read More: New William Pierce Video: Out of the Darkness]]>

by Dr. William L. Pierce
National Alliance General Convention, 1983; recorded and transcribed by Kevin Alfred Strom; video by Aryan Legacy

TWO THOUSAND years ago the poet Ovid wrote that night is a sadder time than day. I know that’s always been true for me. When discouraging thoughts come, it’s usually at night.

Actually, I’m pretty cheerful most of the time. But it used to be that, occasionally, when I was working alone in the National Office late at night, a black thought would come into my mind — always the same thought. It was that there’s not enough time to do what I must do. It was that something will happen to me before the Alliance is strong enough to survive and continue growing without me.

Then a feeling of desperation would come over me and I would have to fight off an almost overpowering urge to do whatever I could to speed things up — to go back to the quick and dirty methods that I had tried in past years. Now, I didn’t yield to that urge because I had already found out the hard way that the quick and dirty methods don’t yield lasting results. I knew that we had only one shot at winning this war we’re in, and it has to be a good shot. We can’t miss. We can’t build something that is flimsy or false. We have to do it exactly right, or it won’t work. But doing it right sometimes seems painfully slow. And it would be futile, self-defeating, if in my care to do it right I didn’t get enough of it done so that others could carry on before I was overtaken by disease, or by an accident, or even by an assassin.

Now, in a sense, this black thought which used to creep up on me late at night, was the thought of death, the fear of death. We’re all mortal. We all know that we have to die — though no one wants to. The way we’ve dealt with this fear of death in the past has been to identify ourselves with something immortal, to think of ourselves as part of something in which we can continue to live after our bodies are gone. Patriots have identified themselves with their countries — often so strongly that they were almost eager to die in order to advance the interests of their fatherland: the land of their forefathers. It was easier to be patriotic, of course, when our country still belonged to us, when we were able to associate a particular village, or farmstead, with our ancestors for several generations back; when the graves of our fathers, and grandfathers, and great great great grandfathers, were around us — and so were their works: the fields that they had cleared, the buildings that they had built, the trophies they gathered in their lifetimes, the records they left behind them. We could easily fit ourselves into the pattern of generations and centuries, and be content in the knowledge that our own works, and trophies, and records, would also be preserved, and would become part of the lives of our descendants. We would fight anyone who threatened that pattern. We would die in order to preserve it, so that we wouldn’t be forgotten, so that we would always have a little niche in the memory of all the generations which were to come.

Today the whole pattern has been smashed to bits and ground into the mud. We’ve lost our roots, our sense of belonging, our connection with the past and with the future. We can’t count on being remembered. In fact, if current trends continue for a few more years, and Martin Luther King’s dream of “full equality” is realized, then our grandchildren won’t even know who their fathers are, much less their grandfathers. So patriotism provides little comfort for mortals these days.

And it’s no wonder that many people are searching for something else, besides their countries, to identify with. For me that something has long been the whole universe. My life is part of its life and I know that the larger life of the evolving universe will go on no matter what. That’s my religion, or part of it. But it’s a rather impersonal religion, and on dark, lonely nights at the office, it does not by itself provide enough comfort to keep dark moods away. There is in all of us, I believe, a need for a more personal identification with something immortal. We need more than merely the knowledge that each of us is a momentarily glowing spark of individual consciousness in a conscious cosmos — a cosmos which, even as its overall brightness grows, witnesses the winking on and then out again of billions of individual sparks.

We need, in addition to that, the knowledge that we as individuals make a difference. We need the knowledge that we can make a mark on the world through our own efforts, and that the mark we make will last. We need to know that our personal contribution to the life of the universe will be remembered after we are gone — that others will add to it and help it grow — so that ten generations from now, or even a hundred generations, the record will still be there. There will be someone then who will be able to say: Back during the great struggle, ages ago, when the race nearly perished, there were a few men and women who were on the right side; a few who did what had to be done; a few who made the difference; and even today, centuries later, we remember their names and their works.

That’s the sort of knowledge which is able to overcome the fear of death, the sort of knowledge which gives each of us a personal connection to the infinite. It’s true that the self-consciously evolving cosmos, of which I am a part, is the ultimate reality. But it’s also true that the Alliance provides my personal connection with that ultimate reality. The Alliance is the means by which I, and many others, can make individual contributions to the future. The Alliance not only magnifies our efforts — gives us leverage that we wouldn’t have if we were working on our own — but it also provides a safe repository for our contributions, makes them into lasting contributions. And as it keeps them from being washed away in the growing tide of chaos on the outside, it keeps them in place long enough for another member to add his own contribution on top of ours, and then for another to build on top of both, and so on.

For example, if one of our members writes a book which is a valuable contribution to our overall effort — say, member William Simpson and his Which Way Western Man? — then he doesn’t have to worry that it will immediately disappear into oblivion when he dies, or is no longer able to promote it himself. He knows that even after he is gone, the Alliance will remain to continue distributing his book, continue reprinting it, magnifying its effect, until another member is able to build on that work with a book of his own, which advances the Cause still further.

That, of course, is the theory. The trouble is it has been a pretty shaky theory in the past, primarily because far too much was dependent on a single individual: me. Who could be sure whether I would last from one month to the next? Who could know whether or not all of the hard work, and money, and time, he was putting into the Alliance would be wasted? Because I might, at any minute, give up and announce that I was tired of butting my head against the wall, and that would be the end of it.

From my own viewpoint things were a little different, but still not particularly encouraging. I knew that I wouldn’t give up, but I could see others giving up all around me. It seemed that every time we would manage to struggle ahead a step, we would slide three quarters of a step back again. And I knew that we were not strong enough to keep going at all if I quit, which meant that I had to hang on and keep on pushing things forward until we reached a critical point where I could stand aside and things would keep moving without me, because there would be the right people, ready and able to take over all of my responsibilities. My concern was that nothing must happen to me before we reached that point. From a purely selfish standpoint, I didn’t want my spark to wink out without making a difference, and the black thought that kept coming to me late at night was that I was losing the race, that I couldn’t reach that critical point soon enough.

It was never a matter of quitting. I never worried that all of my hard work was being wasted in the sense that I could have been spending my time more enjoyably. From the time I started, there was only one thing that I could do — even if there were no hope at all of winning. I couldn’t stop even if I had wanted to. Nevertheless, whether I was working willingly or unwillingly, the occasional late-night feeling that it was all for nothing was quite distressing.

Fortunately, daylight generally had the effect of dispelling my gloom, and so I was able to present a cheerful face to the world. Now, the only reason that I’m making this confession to you is that my black thoughts are a thing of the past. If I still had them, I certainly wouldn’t tell you about them. But the fact is that I have not been gloomy about our prospects for at least the last year– and I still work late, alone, in the National Office at night. What’s made the difference is the results of our recruiting during the past year.

For the task that the Alliance must accomplish, quality is everything. In the last year we have been winning commitments from people who have what it takes to get the job done. Attendance at our convention this year may be up only forty per cent. over last year, but the number of people in the Alliance who have what it takes has doubled. We’re finally getting the good ones now substantially faster than we’re losing them — and, really, we’ve just started.

For years, we were bogged down in the childishness — the make believe — the buffoonery — the stupidity — of the right wing. That’s no one’s fault but my own, of course — because I knew nothing else but the right wing approach. I really thought that populism, an appeal to the dispossessed, an appeal to the so-called White masses, was the way to proceed, the way to gain strength.

And I was often in despair, when I finally realized that it wasn’t; when I saw how few people we were winning in whom I could have any confidence at all. Changing our approach was difficult. It meant breaking some bad habits that we had acquired. It meant alienating a certain clientele that we had attracted, whose continued support I was then convinced that we really needed.

But we did change. And, within the first six months, I could begin to see a real improvement. The right wing kooks stopped coming around, and in their place came people that I could be proud of — people in whom I could have confidence. That’s when the late night despair disappeared.

We have a long, a difficult, and a dangerous road ahead of us yet. There will be many casualties along the way. We’ll make more mistakes, certainly, and we’ll have to correct ourselves many times. We may yet be overwhelmed by the enemy, or we may be too slow and be overtaken by circumstances — but I’m now convinced that we can reach our goal.

I can foresee the time now when it will no longer make any difference what happens to me, because there will be others who will keep the spark glowing, and will make it grow brighter and brighter with each passing year. I foresee immortality for all of those who have nourished the spark and who will nourish it in the future. I see more people — like you who are here with me tonight — joining our Cause every month, and every week. I foresee a growth, and a strength, and a capability for the Alliance, much greater than we have ever known before. I foresee it not in the distant future any longer, but in the time immediately ahead of us, as you go forth tomorrow and recruit for our Cause other men and women like yourselves. Thank you.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/new-william-pierce-video-out-of-the-darkness/feed/ 0
Newly-Released Speeches by William L. Pierce http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/newly-released-speeches-by-william-l-pierce/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/newly-released-speeches-by-william-l-pierce/#comments Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:17:52 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1622 William Luther Pierceby Michael Olanich

IN REMEMBRANCE of Dr. William Pierce (pictured), founder of the National Alliance, on the 12th anniversary of his death, I have made available for streaming and download two (never before released in the digital domain) National Alliance lectures by Dr. Pierce from 1976.

The first is Fundamentals for Victory, recorded on October 24th, 1976, of which Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: “In this speech, Dr. Pierce explains why the strategy for success of the Alliance must be uncompromising. He disposes of the idea that we, like certain well-known mailing list operators, should pretend to be “conservative” or “populist” and take an ad hoc, issue-oriented approach in our publications and pronouncements…. . . . → Read More: Newly-Released Speeches by William L. Pierce]]> William Luther Pierceby Michael Olanich

IN REMEMBRANCE of Dr. William Pierce (pictured), founder of the National Alliance, on the 12th anniversary of his death, I have made available for streaming and download two (never before released in the digital domain) National Alliance lectures by Dr. Pierce from 1976.

The first is Fundamentals for Victory, recorded on October 24th, 1976, of which Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: “In this speech, Dr. Pierce explains why the strategy for success of the Alliance must be uncompromising. He disposes of the idea that we, like certain well-known mailing list operators, should pretend to be “conservative” or “populist” and take an ad hoc, issue-oriented approach in our publications and pronouncements…. [B]y using the wrong approach, we will attract the wrong kind of people.”

The second is Change versus Progress, delivered on December 5th, 1976. Mr. Strom tells us that in this wide-ranging talk, “Dr. Pierce explores the impact of societal change…. We live in an era when technological progress is being increasingly offset by the declining quality of an alienated, rootless, multiracial population. By becoming a true racial and spiritual community… the National Alliance can become a working model for the new White society to come.”

Simply click on a link to stream a speech; right click to download and save it.

Fundamentals for Victory Change versus Progress

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/newly-released-speeches-by-william-l-pierce/feed/ 1
William Pierce: Cosmotheism’s Hard Way http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/william-pierce-cosmotheisms-hard-way/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/william-pierce-cosmotheisms-hard-way/#comments Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:00:12 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1618 spiral-galaxy

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 19, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

This week marks 12 years since the death of my teacher, mentor, and friend William Pierce. It’s a time to reflect on his legacy — and our responsibility. This program is partly based on my 2013 appreciation of Dr. Pierce, Tomorrow’s Religion, which I composed before restarting American Dissident Voices and which, in updated form, deserves to be a part of the ADV legacy. In today’s program I will be contrasting Dr. Pierce’s “hard way” — his Cosmotheist way — of building a new White community with the “quick fix” issue-oriented approach of other race-based . . . → Read More: William Pierce: Cosmotheism’s Hard Way]]> spiral-galaxy

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 19, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

This week marks 12 years since the death of my teacher, mentor, and friend William Pierce. It’s a time to reflect on his legacy — and our responsibility. This program is partly based on my 2013 appreciation of Dr. Pierce, Tomorrow’s Religion, which I composed before restarting American Dissident Voices and which, in updated form, deserves to be a part of the ADV legacy. In today’s program I will be contrasting Dr. Pierce’s “hard way” — his Cosmotheist way — of building a new White community with the “quick fix” issue-oriented approach of other race-based groups, who don’t seek to fundamentally change society’s basic assumptions and beliefs.

* * *

WILLIAM LUTHER PIERCE, even a dozen years after his death, has proven impossible to ignore. Despite his decade-long absence, he is inspiring an ever-growing number of White men and women who are rediscovering his ideas, talking about them, republishing his works, and beginning new institutions that will embody his ideals — the newly-revived National Alliance and this radio program among them.

William Pierce transformed the White resistance, turning us away from hopelessly outdated and sterile conservatism; away from the insanity of “preserving” an old order which didn’t even exist anymore; away from the madness of reforming an enemy-designed System; away from the delusion that we, with our race’s ever-dwindling percentage of an ever more befuddled population, can vote our way out of extinction; and turning us toward secession, revolution, and an entirely new society.

The Jewish power structure and its adjuncts, the media and governmental establishments of the West, still invoke his name. Though he was a gentle man, many are the books and articles issued by the controlled media which still paint him as a kind of “terrorist mastermind” whose influence apparently transcends even the grave. Merely mentioning the author of the Turner Diaries and Hunter, novels in which the secret police and other collaborators with our race’s enemies receive swift and certain justice, is enough to stir fear and open wallets among the wealthy donors to Jewish organizations. And corrupt prosecutors (and those who pay them off and whisper in their ears) still find it profitable to brandish a “link” between an accused party and the terrible Pierce, who dared to dream of a world cleansed of their kind.

But as stirring as was his clarion call to racial loyalty, as striking as was his ability to synthesize and explain complex ideas, as impressive as was his talent for organizing independent-thinking Whites, and as great as was his love for his people and his dedication to their future, it is not for these things that he will primarily be remembered.

I believe that William L. Pierce will be known, beyond all his other accomplishments, as the founder of  a new religion. And not just a religion, but the religion of the future, a religion which will supplant all others. Cosmotheism will prevail because it is the inevitable truth toward which all other streams of knowledge are converging. And Cosmotheism will prevail because it will be the religion of a new people who, as a result of following its precepts, will branch off from the rest of humanity — even from the race from which they sprang — and form a new race, ultimately a new species, compared to which the others will be but unconscious beings. The religious ideas of the left-behind races, including those of the unconscious Whites, will mean as little to Higher Men as the “Hallelujahs!” of Black preachers — or the chatterings of hamsters — mean to us.

* * *

William Luther Pierce

William Luther Pierce

Like other religions, Cosmotheism posits certain fundamental truths about the nature of the Universe and our purpose in it. But unlike the Semitic religions, and many others, Cosmotheism has no truck with “revelation” or infallible, immutable scriptures before which all must bow. Our reason and our everyday and scientific observations of the Universe, far from being denied, are regarded as essential and are embraced, for it is only by understanding what is to the maximum extent possible that we can understand who we are and what we must do.

A revealed religion says to us essentially that there is a perfect, hitherto unknown and secret knowledge — God’s knowledge — of reality, of life, and of our purpose on Earth. And this secret knowledge has been revealed to a select few who have written it down to “save” or guide all those who will accept and follow it. This knowledge and the moral commands derived from it are perfect and unchangeable. They are static. Any new doctrine, any fact, any idea which contradicts the holy revelations is evil and must be rejected. Not only are the scriptures of revealed religions static, so also is the putative Universe they claim to know.

In contrast, Cosmotheism is a natural religion. Cosmotheists do not deny reality. Cosmotheists do not reject what objective science has uncovered because it contradicts something a goat-herder or rabbi wrote down a few centuries ago, nor do we reject newly-discovered facts when we would be required to revise our own beliefs as a result of accepting them. Cosmotheists do not deny what is in front of their eyes and they do not suppress or twist their own reason.

And Cosmotheists know that the idea of a static, unchangeable Universe is a childish illusion. Cosmotheists see, acknowledge, and embrace the fact that we are evolving — that all life is evolving — and that the Universe as a whole is evolving, as it always has been since its unknowable beginning, and as it always will be until the final conflict of life with entropy is upon us. In fact, Cosmotheists acknowledge that an understanding of ourselves and other living beings is impossible without accepting and understanding evolution. The past and present of that evolution are revealed to us, not on ancient parchments or miraculous golden plates, but through the means of our senses — and through the rigorous logical and empirical tests our best minds have devised to approach, more closely with each passing year, a knowledge of what is.

The science writer Don Kaiser shows a mature understanding, almost a Cosmotheist understanding, of the ever-evolving, non-static nature of life  when he writes in his “Life Is Evolution” that “The sole charcteristic that ultimately distinguishes living from non-living matter is classical Darwinian evolution. Life is simply matter that evolves. …Evolution is the sole feature that differentiates living matter from non-living matter. …Given the fact that all life forms die, how do they persist through time and changing environments? Every environment harboring life forms must change, simply because of their existence, so evolution is the only way life forms can persist through time. Not only did Charles Darwin discover what makes life possible despite the fact that all life forms eventually die, he unwittingly discovered the sole feature that distinguishes living from non-living matter. Charles Darwin defined life. Life is Evolution.” (emphasis mine)

To the Cosmotheist, Nature is God. And science, logic, observation, reason, and the deepest stirrings of our race-soul are the means of apprehending God — not the ravings of ancient Semitic cutthroats, carpet-dealers, and con men (or the poetry and verses they stole from their more accomplished neighbors).

Mathematics, physics, and genetics are the real words of God. Mathematical principles may be misunderstood for a time, but they cannot be faked as scripture can, nor for long can they be maliciously revised for political advantage — and they are eminently verifiable. So also with the laws of evolution and biology, physics and cosmology.

"Nature is God. Physics, mathematics, and genetics are God’s real words." - Kevin Alfred Strom

“Nature is God. Physics, mathematics, and genetics are God’s real words.” – Kevin Alfred Strom

Cosmotheism asserts that we are matter and energy become conscious — and, more than that, that we are the Universe become conscious, that we are Nature become conscious of itself and all that that implies. It further shows us that we have reached a radically new stage in the evolution of the Universe — as significant, perhaps, as the evolution of non-living matter into living beings — as significant as the first rise of consciousness itself –  as significant as the faltering steps of the first amphibians on the surface of the Earth. This new stage has come only recently, when European man first grasped the concept of evolution, and discovered the principles of genetics and heredity. It is the stage of conscious evolution — of the ability of living beings to direct, and vastly accelerate, the future course of their own evolution.

From unconscious matter to the first stirrings of consciousness in primitive animals, from the partial consciousness of the higher animals and in lower Man, to the ever-increasing consciousness of European man encompassing his discovery of the principles of science, genetics, and evolution itself, to the infinite consciousness that is possible for us as we make the choice to follow the upward path of conscious evolution — that is the path of Cosmotheism, and that is path the Life Force must inevitably take if life is to extend beyond the paltry lifespan of our birth planet.

* * *

cosmotheism_books

To the best of my knowledge, it was the ABC television affiliate in Washington, DC, WJLA, which first made the claim in 1987 that Cosmotheism was nothing but a “tax dodge.” The accusation was picked up more recently by Mark Pitcavage of the “Southern Poverty Law Center,” an anti-White Jewish group. Note well who is trying to prevent us from seizing the reigns of our own evolutionary destiny, precisely who it is who would, as a friend of mine puts it, “block us from climbing the genetic spiral staircase of light toward the universal purpose of the Cosmos.”

George Bernard Shaw by William Strang (1907)

George Bernard Shaw by William Strang (1907)

Robert S. Griffin, in his biography of Dr. Pierce, The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds, gives insight into George Bernard Shaw’s play, Man and Superman, its central character, Don Juan, and its influence on Cosmotheism, which Dr. Pierce acknowledged:

“As Don Juan speaks of it, Life is an entity unto itself, a separate being of sorts. According to Don Juan, Life, or the Life Force, this entity, this being, has monumentally important purposes: to become aware of itself and understand itself, and to realize itself, that is to say, become the finest version of what it truly is. He refers to Life’s ‘continual effort not only to maintain itself, but to achieve higher and higher organization and completer self-consciousness.’

“Don Juan refers to the full achievement of these ends as the attainment of ‘godhead.’ As Don Juan sees it, in all likelihood godhead won’t come without a mighty struggle. Life faces extremely formidable enemies: ‘the forces of Death and Degeneration.’

Nietzsche's idea of the Overman as expressed in his Thus Spoke Zarathustra was also a deep influence on Cosmotheism.

Nietzsche’s idea of the Overman as expressed in his Thus Spoke Zarathustra was also a deep influence on Cosmotheism.

“Life’s central impulse is to move toward the creation of a superior kind of human being, Don Juan asserts. That is what Life, at its core, is about. Here Don Juan is expressing an evolutionary, Darwinian idea, the concept of man evolving into something higher, more advanced than he is now. Life as Don Juan perceives it is the force that seeks to bring about ‘higher and higher individuals, the ideal individual being, omnipotent, omniscient, infallible, and withal completely, unilludedly self-conscious: in short, a god.’ Don Juan brings race into it as he affirms the ‘great central purpose of breeding the race; ay, breeding it to heights now deemed superhuman; that purpose which is now hidden in a mephistic cloud of love and romance and prudery and fastidiousness, will break through into clear sunlight….’”

As I said in my introduction to the online version of the first Cosmotheist publication, Dr. Pierce’s The Path: “By the standards of a more childish and innocent time, Dr. Pierce might be adjudged an atheist, and by those who call themselves ‘atheists’ today — the narrow egoists of the Rand cult and its derivatives, and the sentimental Christians-without-Christ who constitute the ‘Secular Humanist’ and Marxian reformations of the gospel — he could not even be understood, so limited is their vision. …In the drama of the evolution of life from non-living matter, and of higher and more conscious beings from lower forms of life, William Pierce sees a path of purpose and destiny for us.” That path is the path of conscious evolution.

Charles Darwin opened the door to a full realization of a constantly-evolving universe.

Charles Darwin opened the door to a full realization of a constantly-evolving universe.

To the earnest and intelligent seeker after truth and meaning — and there are many such today among the young men and women of our race, dissatisfied with conventional religion and materialist ideologies like capitalism and communism — finding Cosmotheism is like finding an oasis in Death Valley, or Epictetus in the midst of Bedlam. For our best young people, for whom the truths of biology and physics speak ten thousand times louder than any dusty “holy book,” the path delineated by Cosmotheism is almost self-evident. And Cosmotheism is a fit religion for heroes. Its truths provide the only possible moral framework for doing what must be done to claim White living space and build a new society.

A scholar of my acquaintance once expressed it well: “The multiple gene patterns that bring creativity, curiosity, exploration, and imagination into being are intensified in people of European blood. All history testifies to that fact. But we must kick down the worm-eaten, rotting door of the old ethno-religious Judeo-Christian European-Semite hybrid symbiosis if we are ever to cross over to conscious evolution and seize the reigns of our own evolutionary destiny, and fulfill the meaning and purpose of life and the Cosmos.” The 21st century, he says, will be deeply influenced by Cosmotheism and will be the century of “the human genetic revolution and the singularity that marks our first step beyond Man.”

Cosmotheism teaches, and I believe, that we have no greater moral duty than to ensure that the race most fit, by its high intelligence and unique creativity, to ascend to conscious evolution and beyond — the race which can advance that evolution both farthest and soonest, and is thus more likely to avoid devolution, dead ends, cosmic catastrophe, and a lifeless Universe — the race which discovered the evolutionary and Cosmotheist principles — our race, the White race — is the one which takes that step.

* * *

One fault admitted by William Pierce was his occasional temptation to find a “quick fix” to our people’s problems, to build up the Alliance’s numbers by welcoming those with a very incomplete understanding of our plight and our purpose — and those with powerful attachments to fundamentally opposed ideologies, like Christianity — into our ranks. In the early years of his political efforts, he thought a populist appeal, based on current issues of the day, might have brought enough White Americans to his side to succeed. In those days, those issues might have been school busing for racial integration, or Communist infiltration of our campuses. Today’s populist issues might include Obama’s subversive background, the current health care scam, and our uncontrolled border. And, indeed, Dr. Pierce did talk about such issues, even in his later years, and we do still talk about such issues today.

But his acknowledged mistake was in thinking that bringing together people who agreed with us on such issues was enough to build our organization and usher in the new world we dream of. Even bringing together those Whites who agree with us that our race deserves to survive is not enough. More than once in his career, Dr. Pierce tried a populist, issue-oriented, “big tent” approach. He accepted as associates and even leaders individualists whose main problem with multiracialism was that it interfered with their money-making and free enjoyment of life. And he accepted Christians whose main problem with the Jewish agenda was that it contradicted scripture, or who believed that our race were the “true Hebrews” and that the Old Testament was written for us. And he found that giving responsible leadership positions to those whose deepest allegiance is to individualism or to the Bible is a formula for disaster. Not only do such people revert to the arms of those other communities, abandoning the Alliance when the going gets tough, but they influence others within our community, diverting their path and clouding their understanding of who we are and what we want.

In his last years, William Pierce entertained the hope that the purchase of Resistance Records could bring an influx of new blood into the Alliance, and that the Alliance could influence the “White Power” music scene into becoming something more than an excuse for petty violence, drunkenness, and visceral dislike of non-Whites. This too verged on a “quick fix.” Dr. Pierce’s condemnation of the anti-social tendencies in that “scene” wasn’t enough to prevent the scene from influencing the Alliance much more than the Alliance influenced the scene. And it set the stage for the conversion of the Alliance into a “big tent” pro-White organization when Dr. Pierce died.

The National Alliance changed dramatically. It went from being a highly competent elite group dedicated to bringing about a revolution in philosophy, in religion, and in the fundamental basis of society — dedicated to bringing about an entirely new stage in human evolution; and instead became at best a poorly-run group of well-meaning incompetents whose only unifying principle was a vague idea that White is right. And since the supply of such groups vastly exceeds the demand, membership collapsed. Soon the organization existed in name only — and eventually ceased to exist at all.

But the real National Alliance never disappeared. The men and women with a fire in their souls, with a deep understanding of who we are and what must be, never lost faith. We are rebuilding now, without compromise; with  no interest whatever in the quick fix or the big tent. We base our actions on a strict adherence to fundamental principles and our understanding of our race’s mission in the Universe. Our “hard way” is the only way forward. And, in the final analysis, I do not believe our “hard way” will always be quite as hard as it seems now. There are millions of men and women of our race who know that something is wrong, that our people deserve to survive; who know that the philosophies of Liberalism and fundamentalism are both horribly wrong. They love Nature and abhor its destruction. They know science and know at least the basics of our ever-evolving Universe. They are social and community-minded; they are the opposite of anti-social. These people are ready for Cosmotheism. Our new religion has the potential to catch fire like no religion in history. For the first time, a substantial portion of our people have reached a stage of knowledge and consciousness sufficient to understand our truth; to grasp the real meaning of our lives and of the Universe.

If you are one of us, you know who you are. Join your hands with ours and build that new world in the only possible way it can be built.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

* * *

Appendix: Texts relevant to Cosmotheism:

Cosmotheism: The Path

Cosmotheism: On Living Things

Cosmotheism: On Society

On Christianity

Out of the Darkness

Cosmotheism: Wave of the Future

Don Kaiser’s “Life is Evolution,” The American Mercury, May 8, 2011

Intimations of Cosmotheism: Wagner and Shaw — A Synthesis (by Sir Oswald Mosley)

Intimations of Cosmotheism: Aviation, the Cosmos, and the Future of Man (by Charles Lindbergh)

The Moral Imperative of Our Future Evolution (by John H. Campbell)

Charles Galton Darwin, Eugenics Advocate

Toward the Stars

I Remember Dr. Pierce

308 Radio Broadcasts of William Pierce (some have Cosmotheist themes)

The Meaning of Cosmotheism by Wayne Macleod

The Cosmotheism Trilogy as preserved on archive.org

The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds by Robert S. Griffin (biography of William Pierce)

 

Audio files of Dr. Pierce and others on Cosmotheism and related concepts (some are excerpts):

Our Cause Human Dignity: A Racial Ethic Out of the Darkness Truth Embodied in a Living Community Community Action Community Survival In the Service of a Mighty Purpose (Robert S. Griffin) The Life Force (Robert S. Griffin) The Life Force Explained (Robert S. Griffin) To Serve the Life Force (Robert S. Griffin)

Some of these recordings courtesy of Solar General and JR Books Online.

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/william-pierce-cosmotheisms-hard-way/feed/ 1
Cosmic Catastrophe http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/cosmic-catastrophe/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/cosmic-catastrophe/#comments Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:00:16 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1614 cosmic_catastrophe

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 12, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHAT I WILL tell you today is both reality and metaphor. Our world is in danger from cosmic catastrophe — and we need better minds and better men to save ourselves. And one cosmic catastrophe is already here.

* * *

The Earth is regularly struck by objects from space.

Some of these objects are large enough to cause massive destruction, dwarfing that of even a full-scale nuclear war. A few of these events have come agonizingly close to wiping out all life on Earth, and did in fact cause the extinction of thousands of species . . . → Read More: Cosmic Catastrophe]]> cosmic_catastrophe

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 12, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHAT I WILL tell you today is both reality and metaphor. Our world is in danger from cosmic catastrophe — and we need better minds and better men to save ourselves. And one cosmic catastrophe is already here.

* * *

The Earth is regularly struck by objects from space.

Some of these objects are large enough to cause massive destruction, dwarfing that of even a full-scale nuclear war. A few of these events have come agonizingly close to wiping out all life on Earth, and did in fact cause the extinction of thousands of species — including the dominant life forms of those times.

I mention these facts only to give you a single example of why creative intelligence — the kind of intelligence possessed in the highest degree by European man, and the kind of intelligence we are breeding out of ourselves by importing and mixing with more primitive races — is of such absolutely vital importance.

As recently as 1908 an object from space impacted our world. It exploded over Russian Siberia, coming ominously close to striking the Earth. Even exploding in the air as it did, it flattened 1,200 square miles of forest, with huge old-growth trees — 60 million of them — broken off instantly like matchsticks. Near the center, trees and animals were vaporized or instantly incinerated. This event, called the Tunguska Event, is believed to have been caused by a very small asteroid, thought to be a mere 60 yards across. It exploded three to four miles in the air.

The fireball did more than flatten trees. Even though the area was sparsely populated, it damaged buildings and smashed people to the ground hundreds of miles away. Even 300 miles from the center of the event, witnesses reported hearing “deafening bangs” and seeing a huge fiery cloud. Some witnesses described “a column of bluish light, nearly as bright as the Sun.” Dust from the event brightened the night sky in London, England for 48 hours — with enough light to read by, according to some accounts. The New York Times of July 3, 1908 reported “remarkable lights” being “observed in the northern heavens on Tuesday and Wednesday nights.”

The asteroid’s impact with the Earth’s atmosphere alone created a superheated wind that destroyed everything in its path.

Now imagine if the Tunguska Event had happened over New York City or Paris instead of Siberia. Nickolai Vasiliev of the Russian Academy of Sciences, has said that “Had such a cosmic body exploded over Europe instead of the desolate region of Siberia, the number of human victims would have been 500,000 or more, not to mention the ensuing ecological catastrophe. [Several] years ago an asteroid of probably several hundred yards diameter passed Earth at a distance of only 700,000 kilometers. On an astronomical scale that is very close. The Tunguska episode marks the only event in the history of civilized man when Earth has collided with a truly large celestial object, although innumerable such collisions have occurred in the geological past. And many more are bound to occur.”

Imagine if the asteroid had been 60 miles across instead of 60 yards: three million times the mass of the Tunguska asteroid. Imagine if it had been made of slightly more durable material and had actually struck the Earth.

But we really don’t need to imagine these or even more extreme scenarios. They have actually happened, as recent scientific studies have shown in frightening detail.

It’s only in the last fifteen years or so that scientists have known that a massive Earth impact from space, probably an asteroid, occurred 65 million years ago, causing the extinction of the dinosaurs and the rise of mammals, which eventually led to human life. Scientists have discovered a huge crater in Mexico which confirms what was once only a tenuous theory. And to clinch it they’ve found heavy concentrations of iridium — an asteroid “signature” — in soil layers dated to that time at sites all over the globe, exactly what one would expect from such a huge blast, which would result in a world-circling cloud of ejected material that would persist for many years, changing the climate to a years-long winter and forever changing the course of life on this planet.

The Chicxulub crater, as it is called, in the Yucatan peninsula was caused by an asteroid estimated to have been 6 miles across.

And recently it was announced that a much larger crater has been confirmed in Wilkes Land in Antarctica — a crater some 300 miles across, the size of Ohio — which evidently was responsible for an earlier die-off, the Permian-Triassic extinction of 251 million years ago, when almost all animal life on Earth was wiped out, the greatest mass extinction in history. The object which made the Wilkes Land crater is believed to have been some 30 miles across.

There are some 500,000 asteroids with diameters in excess of 1 kilometer — and they are constantly colliding with one another and being sent off into erratic orbits. According to the B612 Foundation, a group of researchers and scientists which includes former astronaut Russell Schweickart as its chairman, Earth is swimming in a virtual “swarm” of Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), any one of which could trigger devastation to Earth in the event of an impact. The goal of the foundation is to develop the means to deflect asteroids into new, non-collision courses.

Schweickart tells us there are several givens: “1) Earth is infrequently hit by asteroids that cross our orbit while circling the sun; 2) The consequences of such impacts range from the equivalent of a 15-megaton explosion to a civilization-ending gigaton event; and 3) For the first time in the history of humankind, we have the technology to prevent such occurrences from happening in the future — if we are properly prepared.”

Now I am not trying to be sensationalistic here and convince you that a major impact will happen tomorrow. No one knows when the next such disaster will strike, and no one knows what its size may be. But I am trying to make an important point.

According to Dr. Christopher Chyba of Princeton University and science writer Robert Britt, Earth’s biosphere is likely “regularly disrupted, every 100 million years or so, by giant impacts that would render human life impossible….”

Chyba added at a news conference at NASA Headquarters, “A biosphere only has a certain amount of time to develop a technical intelligence which is capable of realizing that there is an impact hazard, cataloging that hazard and… avoiding the next impact.”

“Bottom line,” according to Britt: “Only a civilization smart enough to spot the hazard and mitigate it can survive.”

And Earth impacts are just one threat. There are many other scenarios which would potentially leave the Earth unlivable. Shouldn’t we have a backup plan for that possibility, so our genes will survive even if Earth does not? Interstellar space travel may one day be our only option.

According to Geoffery A. Landis, of NASA’s Glenn Research Center, “The Earth itself is not entirely a safe place. It would be a good thing for our survival if we lived on more than one planet.”

Only the intelligence that brought us understanding of our place in the universe can save us when zero hour comes — and I am not just talking about impacts from space. Pandemics, nanotechnology warfare launched by an enemy, climate change and other environmental disasters, and a thousand other potential threats loom in the unknown future. Only the intelligence that brought us European science can even detect the presence of such threats before it is too late, to say nothing of fighting them. The creative intelligence that characterizes our race above all others is very likely indispensable for finding solutions to these kinds of disasters, disasters that would forever wipe out lesser creatures.

But the intelligence and creativity that characterize European man are themselves under threat.

The superstition, promoted by Jewish supremacists, of “racial equality” is leading the nations of the West to literally exterminate themselves through replacement of their founding race with the teeming masses of the Third World, whose response to a cosmic threat would be a shrug of the shoulders while they concentrate on debauchery, fornication, and mindless violence below the animal level — many of whom would attribute the disaster to “evil spirits” and attempt to mitigate it with Voodoo chants or Santeria sacrifices for the brief remainder of their miserable lives.

And the peoples of the West themselves, with failing educational institutions and with religions under the thumb of Jewish supremacists and Jewish myths, are increasingly losing their grip on scientific knowledge and on reality itself, as they descend to an understanding the world thousands of years behind the times. Increasingly, instead of seeing the world as it is seen by the best minds of our civilization, our people see it through the lens of a school system that fails to teach them how to find France and Russia on a map, but does teach them about the roots of “hip-hop” and “White racism” — or they see it through the lens of so-called “scripture” — the writings of primitive and malicious Semitic desert nomads whose knowledge of the Universe was essentially zero.

So we’re dumbing ourselves down with a dysfunctional school system and superstitions which militate against rational thought. And we’re dumbing ourselves down biologically, too, through some of the most tragic results of these superstitions: open borders and racial mixing. We import and mix with tens of millions of Mestizos from Central America with an average IQ of around 80 and almost no geniuses — and we import and mix with Africans with average IQs in the 60s and 70s, the retarded range by our standards, and almost no people who are even moderately bright. And so much of our national wealth and energy and effort is soaked up by dealing with the horrible social costs of having these primitives among us — wasted wealth and energy and effort and time that one day may make the difference between life and death for us.

Look at how we are allocating our resources.

The B612 Foundation gets no government money. The biggest spender on the study of potential Earth impact objects is NASA — and they spend only 4 million dollars on it in a year: less than one fiftieth of the amount spent on the wars for Israel in the Middle East in a single day. The total number of people monitoring Near Earth Objects (most of them amateurs), is, according to Astronomer David Morrison of NASA’s Ames Research Center, equivalent to one or two shifts of employees in a single McDonald’s restaurant.

Compare this with the huge and growing infrastructure devoted to making sure that our rapidly-multiplying underclass is housed and fed and entertained. Compare it with the huge amount of national wealth — and the very lives of intelligent, creative White men and women — which are being thrown away every day making the Middle East safe for Israel.

I told you earlier that my message today is both reality and metaphor. Our world is in danger from cosmic catastrophe — and we need better minds and better men to protect ourselves. All true. But we are experiencing a catastrophe of cosmic proportions right here, right now. A parasitic subspecies of man which resembles us in externals but possessing a unique and alien mentality has captured and replaced our race’s leadership and taken over our means of communication. It has implanted memes in our culture and in our minds that are disrupting our reproductive behavior and causing us to commit racial suicide — and which are also causing us to serve and feed and fight for the parasite instead of for ourselves.

As I said, I mention the subject of inevitable space-borne catastrophe as but a single example of the challenges we will face that will require the best minds that our race can produce for their solution. The next challenge may be different: a new virus ten times more tenacious and deadly than AIDS, a superhurricane that makes Katrina look like an April shower, a doomsday weapon developed by China or Israel that holds all civilization hostage, a sudden change in the Gulf Stream triggering catastrophic climate change with no comet or asteroid needed — who knows what may come? The issue which screams for our attention is not only are we going to be ready when disaster strikes? – but also what are we doing to ourselves? — how are we ourselves changing, and do those changes militate for our survival or against it when zero hour comes?

When that hour comes, will we as a race and as a civilization stand poised with our best minds in control of an advanced technology able to literally change the fate of star systems — so that our genetic patterns will live on and advance forever, whatever the cosmic challenge?

Or will we be mired in the genes of the jungle, ruled — despite the presence of a few high-IQ Whites — by the needs and desires of the primitives among us, and stand helpless holding our TV remotes, our fast food wrappers, and our “holy books” — unable to do anything to alter the onrushing death of our world?

The choice is ours, ladies and gentlemen. The choice is ours.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/cosmic-catastrophe/feed/ 4
Lack-of-Independence Day http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/lack-of-independence-day/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/lack-of-independence-day/#comments Sat, 05 Jul 2014 12:00:15 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1610 jefferson_American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 5, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY. I’m a positive person, and there is hope, so I kept the “happy” in there — even though there’s a lot to be unhappy about this Fourth of July; mainly three things: our people’s loss of independence; our failure to understand what “independence” is; and — worst of all — our failure to even know who we are. (ILLUSTRATION: Thomas Jefferson, a firm believer in racial separation.)

Probably, we should rename this day “Lack-of-Independence Day.”

So many of our people don’t realize they lost their independence and freedom long, long ago.

The official celebration . . . → Read More: Lack-of-Independence Day]]> jefferson_American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 5, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY. I’m a positive person, and there is hope, so I kept the “happy” in there — even though there’s a lot to be unhappy about this Fourth of July; mainly three things: our people’s loss of independence; our failure to understand what “independence” is; and — worst of all — our failure to even know who we are. (ILLUSTRATION: Thomas Jefferson, a firm believer in racial separation.)

Probably, we should rename this day “Lack-of-Independence Day.”

So many of our people don’t realize they lost their independence and freedom long, long ago.

The official celebration in my city is nothing but a rah-rah session for the regime’s military, with nary a mention of freedom, self-determination, or liberty.

If the blankos do mention freedom, it’s like a murmur coming from the mouth of an undead corpse. It’s a reference to some imagined quality (possessed equally, of course, by red, brown, black, and white “Amurricans”) the meaning and nature of which has been forgotten in the mists of time. Such “freedom” doesn’t exist anyway, since all the undead can do is make mouth sounds they don’t understand in a futile effort to simulate human life.

I assume that my listeners are among the living, however.

So get out those made-in-China fireworks and whoop it up, if you want to. I don’t care if you do or you don’t. I know your children probably like fireworks. But don’t ever forget what this day stands for. One Hell of a lot of people suffered and died for the independence the foolish and the stupid have thrown away. Spend one hour studying and thinking about what independence really means, one hour out of 24. And share what you learn with your children. Let’s start now.

Let’s start with a principle to remember: Any people which accepts multiracial “democracy” soon loses the ability to control its government. Soon it is no longer their government. And then they are slaves, without independence. The very definition of independence and freedom is having living space which is for your people and your people alone, and living under a government which is answerable to your people and your people alone. Anything else is slavery. And slavery is what we have now.

Every few years, the satraps still calling themselves the U.S. Congress try to outdo themselves in racial abasement during the renewal of the 1965 “Voting Rights Act.” The Voting Rights Act, signed by President Lyndon Johnson, was one of many anti-White and anti-American initiatives that took place that year: 1965 was also the year our borders were opened, our pro-White immigration laws were scrapped, and the people’s silver was brazenly stolen, for example.

The purpose of the Voting Rights Act was to dismantle every state and local law — such as literacy tests — that tended to favor White voters. Certain counties — and even whole states — had to submit every voter registration or district boundary change to the federal government in Washington before it could be approved. In some areas, the federal Department of Justice moved in and controlled everything, shouldering local officials aside. How did the Act determine which areas “needed” federal control and which didn’t? One of the sections of that law is “a requirement that any state or county with a history of favoring White interests get pre-approval from the U.S. Justice Department or a federal court before they change their election laws or procedures.”

That’s right. Federal control kicks in if the multiracialist bureaucrats decide that a state or county has “a history of favoring White interests.” If officials favor non-White interests, no problem. If they favor Blacks or Mestizos or even illegals — no problem. But if the bureaucrats decide they’ve ever favored Whites or favor Whites now, that must be stopped. It’s easy to see where this Act has led and will continue to lead: Voter registration rules must be written and district boundaries must be drawn — and every other jot and tittle of regulation must be crafted — to increase non-White representation and decrease that of Whites. It’s a one-way ratchet, dispossessing White people of representation. As we published the last time this “Act” came up for renewal:

‘The Voting Rights Act was aimed at thwarting the efforts of Whites to protect their race’s interests in states that had large Black minorities. As different, and in many ways unequal, races, Whites and Blacks have necessarily diverging interests, making racial conflict inevitable in any society in which both races live in large numbers.

‘This antagonism was created by the granting of citizenship to former slaves following the Civil War, and was foreseen years earlier by Thomas Jefferson, who anticipated the sort of conflicts that would result from attempts to equalize the races, of which the Voting Rights Act is but one of many examples.

‘A member of the American Colonization Society, Jefferson advocated the colonization of freed slaves outside of the United States. To the objections of the egalitarians of his time, he replied in words that now seem hauntingly prophetic.

‘”It will probably be asked,” Jefferson wrote, “Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state, and thus save the expense of supplying, by importation of white settlers, the vacancies they will leave? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions, which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.”

‘Almost 50 years have now passed since Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law. In that period of time, the U.S. Congress has perversely favored the interests of the Black race at the expense of the interests of the race of most of its members. Jewish domination of the means by which information is disseminated to the American people — a development never envisioned by Jefferson — has made many of them afraid to do otherwise.

‘This fear has been the decisive factor in Black ascendancy over the past two generations, which has necessarily taken place at White expense. The “convulsions” that Jefferson predicted have not yet ended, and America’s present demographic trends are such that if her leaders do not soon begin to heed his words, the race in whose extermination they will end will be ours.’

What Jefferson wanted — and what the pre-”Voting Rights Act” laws tried to secure for us — was independence. White Americans fought hard for independence. Independence as a people. A people with a shared ancestry, shared history, shared language, and shared culture. (White Americans are every bit as much a people as Frenchmen or Britons or Palestinians or any other people you care to name. And it’s not place of residence that makes you a member of a people. If that were true, a mouse in a stable would be a horse. And Mexican Mestizos would be Americans. It’s all the things I mentioned, but mainly it’s your ancestry that makes you what you are and which determines the content of your culture.)

White Americans fought hard for independence from the British Empire in the Revolutionary War. We wanted to make our own decisions. We wanted those decisions to be made based on what was good for us, not what was good for a far-away dynasty (which, by the way, utilized lots of non-White labor and also countenanced the virtual slavery of White people). Everybody knows we celebrate that independence on July 4th.

But those men who imposed literacy tests and other measures in the South to keep the fecund non-White mob from controlling the political process were also working to keep decision-making power in the hands of our people. So were Jefferson and the other Founders of the American Republic when they made sure that only Whites were counted as citizens — and that only Whites could become citizens, too. They didn’t hand out ballots to Amerindian tribesmen. They didn’t hand over citizenship rights and political power to Africans. They didn’t open the border to aliens and stand there, offering them jobs — and green cards — and taxpayer’s money — and amnesty for breaking our laws — and even the right to change our laws. No. That would have been absurd. That would have been the diametric opposite of what the Founders had been fighting for. That would have been giving up our independence. That would have been giving up our right as a people to have our own government just for us — a government by White Americans, for White Americans, and of White Americans. That is the essence of independence. That is the essence of what the Founders created when they created America. That is the essence of what our soldiers died for. That is the essence of what made America great.

The Founding Fathers were White separatists almost to a man, and the Republic they founded was, albeit imperfectly, a White separatist nation until the subverters really took control in the 1960s.

The subverters used their radio and television networks and newspapers and publishing houses to convince us that not giving away our nation to non-Whites — that not giving away our independence and self-government — was “hate” and “evil.” But wanting one’s own people to have its own government and its own nation — and wanting one’s own people to survive — does not necessarily entail “hate” of other peoples or other races. Why should it?

The truth is that racial hatred is greatly increased by the forced association inherent in a multiracial society, as the crime columns and editorials our newspapers amply show. They are filled with the hatred, convulsions, and intellectual dishonesty inherent in multiracialism every single day.

Where the races have their freedom and independence there is very little hatred involved. Do the Danes hate the Japanese? Do the Guatemalan Indians hate the Bushmen of South Africa? I don’t think so. But drop 1,000,000 Danes into Osaka — or 500,000 Bushmen into Quetzaltenango — and I think you’d see some real problems.

The author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, was a lifelong racial separatist who not only did not want integration, but actually wanted Africans to be relocated to another continent entirely.

Those who control the media are desperate to revise Jefferson so that they won’t have to eject him from the American pantheon, though The Atlantic floated the idea (proposed by tired old establishment warhorse Conor Cruise O’Brien) that Jefferson be evicted from his place of honor in American history because Jefferson’s philosophy is incompatible with “multiracial democracy.” And so it is!

O’Brien states “It follows that there can be no room for a cult of Thomas Jefferson in the civil religion of an effectively multiracial America — that is, an America in which nonwhite Americans have a significant and increasing say. Once the facts are known, Jefferson is of necessity abhorrent to people who would not be in America at all if he could have had his way.” And WorldNet Daily conservative “star” Richard Grenier said in the Washington Times that Jefferson was comparable to Heinrich Himmler, and declared that the Jefferson Memorial should be demolished stone by stone.

Throughout his public life, Jefferson held true to his concept of humane racial separation which he summed up in his Notes on the State of Virginia (1781, Query XIV):

“Among the Romans emancipation required but one effort. The slave, when made free, might mix with, without staining the blood of his master. But with us a second is necessary, unknown to history. When freed, he is to be removed beyond the reach of mixture.”

Removed beyond the reach of mixture! And, it goes without saying, granted his own independence in a distant land for the express purpose of preserving our independence. No wonder the multiracialists who have taken over conservatism want Jefferson’s memorial torn down brick by brick. If you’re near Washington, I suggest you lay a laurel there this week.

But multiracialists, some of them malicious and some of them “equality” lunatics — and greedy businessmen who wanted cheap labor — prevented the repatriation idea from ever really getting anywhere. The millions of freed slaves and their descendants stayed in America (and are now being supplemented by even more non-White “cheap labor” invaders).

Some of the old Anglo elite treated their own people like garbage, and continue to do so — particularly in their enthusiastic (or pretendedly enthusiastic) embrace of the “new-money” Jews’ multiracial imperative.

The “colonization,” as the relocations of freed slaves were then called, began in the early 19th century, under the sponsorship of many prominent men — men like Francis Scott Key and many of the Founders themselves. Their efforts were enough to create Liberia and its capital city, named for one of the backers, James Monroe. But they never really made a dent in the African population of the United States, probably because too many people would have to stop getting rich if the old apple-cart was upset. Another effort of the Founders to keep America White was their Naturalization Act of 1790 — in effect until the 1950s — which mandated that only Whites could become citizens of the United States.

The media — or, more properly, the Jewish establishment which controls them — are far more passionately multiracialist than the old-money elite, who were divided on the issue. That part of the old elite which wanted multiracialism wanted it only as a way to get rich. The new Jewish elite uses multiracialism, including the college-educated dupes who “believe” in it, as a way to destroy all obstacles to their complete power over the Earth — and the genocide by amalgamation of the European race is one of their most ardent desires.

Some of the old-money elite probably had convinced themselves that any harm to the race caused by their importation of stoop labor was far-off, minimal, and correctable. But the new elite has made a religion out of multiracialism, a religion in which actions which tend toward racial preservation are defined as “evil,” and actions which tend to racial destruction are defined as “good.”

No people with such an inverted “morality” will long survive on Earth.

People who throw away their own independence and freedom lose the ability to control their government. And soon it is no longer their government any more. It becomes just an association of self-interested liars who extract the highest price possible for whatever betrayal they can get away with and still retain the favor of the media. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how nations fall.

I love my people. I don’t want to see America die. I don’t want to see European civilization die. I don’t want to see the uniquely noble and beautiful race which brought us everything from grey-eyed Athena to the Saturn V rocket go extinct. That’s wrong, if anything is wrong.

And don’t kid yourself — that’s where we are headed, at a little more than 10 per cent. of the Earth’s population and falling fast, and with the elite purposely importing hundreds of millions of non-Europeans into our homelands and using their media to promote a fallacious “morality” in which opposing our genocide is somehow “evil.”

If the spotted owl deserves a territory of its own where its survival as a genetic type is assured, then so does the European race.

It is clear to me that Blacks, Mestizos, Asians, and others, not being as soft in the brain on this topic as the befuddled Whites, identify openly with their respective races, and form organizations almost without number to advance their interests (a fact which is easily verifiable by a glance at the Encyclopedia of Associations). When Whites do this, in most countries in the West, they are vilified by the billionaire media elites, when they are not actually arrested or killed.

But White men and women, even those who are as liberal as you can get without actually being off your rocker, keep moving away from the Brown Tide.

You can find them all over rural, still mostly White, America. They are refugees from what used to be California, or the horrorscapes of our former industrial cities. They will sometimes tell you in cautious, looking-over-the-shoulder tones, about how “crime” or “crowding” made their former homes “unlivable.” A very few will dispense with the code words, but most cannot.

They are obeying their feelings, deep feelings among the men and women of our race, feelings that call for open space and green fields and splashing water, and the piping sounds and bright faces of White children playing in the glen; not unlike the scenes that must have filled the countryside while the Parthenon was being raised on a hill in Hellas long ago.

Our people instinctively want freedom and independence. We want — and we desperately need — a place for ourselves, a place where the government belongs to us and us alone, a place where our children can be safe and where no other group’s interests will come before their interests, a place where the power is in our own hands, a place where our culture, our science, our music, our art, our dreams will be allowed to live and develop as Nature intended, without deformation or interference from others. On this Independence Day, please share these ideas with your family and friends. Maybe soon you will write to me and share your concerns and and help us awaken others. We need to support each other. We need our own media that never stop broadcasting the message that we want our independence back. That’s what we’re working for every day at the National Alliance.

We White Americans stand at a threshold. We are still the overwhelming majority in this country. But we’re falling fast. We have a very brief window of opportunity in which we can get our independence back and restore our freedom. That window of opportunity is called your life, because you’re living right now. And I’m living right now. Let’s get together and do something positive — right now.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/07/lack-of-independence-day/feed/ 0
Homeless Jack on Taking the Path http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/homeless-jack-on-taking-the-path/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/homeless-jack-on-taking-the-path/#comments Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:16:51 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1607 fylfot03by H. Millard

“LOOK, MAN, a lot flows from the basic principle in Arman’s Teachings about what we call Code A. And, understanding what he teaches about Code A helps us sort out lots of things about morals and values and how we should live our lives.

“Now, I follow Arman’s Teachings as best I can. Others can as well, but they’re not forced on anyone. In fact, we believe that one must come easily to the Teachings as an indication that such a person may have the right parts inside. You know that so-called White racist gene? Well, we believe in it. We say it is a survival gene or genes or . . . → Read More: Homeless Jack on Taking the Path]]> fylfot03by H. Millard

“LOOK, MAN, a lot flows from the basic principle in Arman’s Teachings about what we call Code A. And, understanding what he teaches about Code A helps us sort out lots of things about morals and values and how we should live our lives.

“Now, I follow Arman’s Teachings as best I can. Others can as well, but they’re not forced on anyone. In fact, we believe that one must come easily to the Teachings as an indication that such a person may have the right parts inside. You know that so-called White racist gene? Well, we believe in it. We say it is a survival gene or genes or is somehow part of our DNA code, but that it is dormant in many of us and weaker in some and stronger in some others. Not only do we not run from this concept of a racist gene, we embrace it. We love it as a beneficial mutation and we want to expand it.

“But I’m getting ahead of myself, man. First things first. We believe that our purpose in living is to make more like ourselves and to will our own evolution into a new species incapable of bearing children with other humans. We believe that by following the Teachings, we can cause beneficial mutations and changes in Code A that will lead us ever upward to specieshood. Some other religious philosophies try to obtain enlightenment, or closeness with God, or other higher states, through various methods. Many of them fail because they don’t understand or their believers don’t have the right internal parts — Code A. Anyway, our goal — as conscious believers — is specieshood. Enlightenment and higher consciousness will come as we progress physically and spiritually toward this goal.

“Now, just to refresh your memory, so I don’t confuse you: We call our White genotype Code A. Yeah, it’s the DNA code, or recipe to make a White person. All of us Whites get it in one way only. We must have a White mother and a White father. There’s no other way to get it, man. One White breeding with any kind of non-White cannot produce a child with Code A. That’s why miscegenation is evil. Just to be clear, man. It takes two White parents to produce a truly White child who is our kind with both our physical and our spirit Essence. Miscegenation is bedroom genocide. It destroys your family’s essential Whiteness.

“The two White parents give us the 46 chromosomes and the 3.1 billion combos of the four nucleic acids abbreviated as A, T, C, G and the 20,000 or so genes that make us White people. And, Code A exists within all the cells of our bodies where there is DNA. Code A is us, and we are it. It is what makes us. It spins us out as the people we are in our everyday world. Without it, we would not be. With it, we can become more.

“Because of our belief in the utmost importance of Code A and the further belief that we must protect it, improve it, and expand it, and because the way we do this is by living long, righteous lives so we can have the maximum number of children who carry Code A, we say that things such as miscegenation, homosexuality, celibacy, family planning, birth control, abortions, putting off having children, suicide, taking risks with our lives that might lead to our early death, going to war for false causes, irresponsible and dangerous acts of bravery for any reason other than to help Code A, mixing with those who are not our kind — and anything else that might stop us from protecting, improving, and expanding the particular version of Code A that each of us as individuals carries — are evil.

“You get that, right, man? We live to expand Code A and to also try to help it evolve, which means we evolve. And, we believe we can help do this by the things we believe and the way we live. You see, we believe that we, as our normal selves in our normal world, can influence Code A inside of us to improve it. We call our way of helping our evolution “method living” — which is somewhat like method acting. That is, we try to be what we wish to become. We try to act the part of the “next man.” And, we do this by everything we do. It affects how we dress, our haircuts, our food, and everything else in our lives. This helps us move to evolving into a new species incapable of mating with other humans and to be the next model man who will eventually and naturally replace earlier models just as new cars replace older models.

“You see, man, the person we see in the mirror, you and I and other Whites — are the carriers of Code A. Code A is what must survive. Our importance as the person we see in the mirror is that we are the way Code A expands and evolves. Nature screams out to every type of organism: Make more like yourself! Too many of us Whites aren’t listening and we do not follow this very basic and important command and we substitute false and inauthentic things for what is most important. We are all going to die, man. Our bodies are going to wear out. But, if we have had many children who survive us, they will carry on and we will be part of them. This is our basic purpose in being alive and it is the basic purpose of every living thing: to make more like yourself — to make more like our kind.

“And, we also say this basic principle about Code A guides us in our idea of morals and marriage. You see, we are also individualistic in our beliefs and in this context this informs us that we are not born as couples. We are born as individuals, and as individuals, male and female, we have different natural laws that control our breeding. A male can impregnate many women each and every day, but a female is out of the baby making business for nine months while a new one of us is growing inside her. Why should the man also be out of the baby making business? It makes no natural sense for a people who want to expand their kind.

“We are also particularists. Our religious rules and religious laws are for us alone. We don’t care what other peoples do. They can have abortions all day long for all we care. They can commit suicide. They can practice birth control. They are not our kind and we believe in non-interference. We have our destiny and they have theirs. We do not make the mistake of trying to mix these different destinies as many non-believers in the present Dark Age are doing.

“So, you read all these words and you wonder what concrete things can I do: Here’s the answer. Separate from non-Whites as best as you can. Mix as little as possible with them. Have as many White children as possible. Bear a sacred symbol next to your skin (six-armed fylfot with curved arms and a central hub — the hub turns counter clockwise and the arms follow and it looks sort of like a spinning galaxy — is preferred by Arman). Pray a short prayer like this in the morning: ‘Thank you Lord for letting me have another day to do your work.’ And, in the evening say something like: ‘Thank you Lord for having let me do your work today.’ Yes, you should say those prayers or something similar twice a day even if you don’t believe. They help focus your mind and keep you on track. Remember, Arman’s Teachings involve method living, and this prayer stuff is part of it. But, you may say that you’re an atheist, and you don’t feel right about praying. Well, just understand that in our system we believe that there was a First Cause that started existence. We don’t know what that First Cause really was, and while some of us believe it was something like a cloud of consciousness and intelligence with no physical brain as we know such things and may have something to do with subatomic particles, waves, forces or energies, it is perfectly okay in this system to not believe that and to believe it was just the natural workings of Nature and had no intelligence or consciousness. Hell, man, I even go back and forth in my own mind about the nature of the First Cause and I sometimes wonder if there was no First Cause and existence always existed. You should also dress in functional, comfortable, dark clothing. In our system, if this has not already been made clear, we must try to have as many children of our kind as possible, and all forms of relationships that accomplish this are perfectly okay in this faith.

“There’s nothing to join, man, and you don’t have to send money to anyone to take our path. Just believe. You are an individual and you have the right to believe or to not believe. You are as empowered to take this path as I am, and we’re all going through our lives as best we can while learning more about the ways of existence as we go. Some of us think Arman has the answers to the big questions, and those answers can be found scattered in these essays. I’ll tell you some more things about how to take this path in future essays. To some of us this is a religion. To others a philosophy. It doesn’t matter how you view it. You are a free and sovereign individual equal to anyone else who follows this path.

“You can choose to believe as we do, and if you decide later that you don’t believe, so be it. You’re a free individual and you have the absolute right to choose your path in this life of yours that belongs only to you. You were born alone, and you’ll die alone. Make the most of what is in between. And, don’t forget this: Your life is your own. Be happy. If this system makes you happy, follow it. If it doesn’t, don’t.”

(© 2013 H. Millard)

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics; all in Millard’s edgy style. They lead up to Homeless Jack’s Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Click here to buy. ISBN: 0-595-32646-3
Roaming the Wastelands ROAMING THE WASTELANDS- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9) H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235. “A fun–and sobering–thing to read” – Alamance Independent
The Outsider THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/homeless-jack-on-taking-the-path/feed/ 2
Asylum America, part 2: Getting Out http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-2-getting-out/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-2-getting-out/#comments Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:00:04 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1600 galaxies

American Dissident Voices broadcast of June 28, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LONGFELLOW WAS QUOTING a proverb known to the ancients when he had Prometheus say “Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.” And that certainly applies to America and the West today. But not all of us are mad. How can we escape the asylum?

The blankos (the thoughtless, nearly brainless self-hating Whites raised in the last few generations) will surely bring great suffering upon themselves as they commit racial suicide, suffering on a scale that has never been seen before in this country. We see inklings of it in the injuries and deaths of . . . → Read More: Asylum America, part 2: Getting Out]]> galaxies

American Dissident Voices broadcast of June 28, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LONGFELLOW WAS QUOTING a proverb known to the ancients when he had Prometheus say “Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.” And that certainly applies to America and the West today. But not all of us are mad. How can we escape the asylum?

The blankos (the thoughtless, nearly brainless self-hating Whites raised in the last few generations) will surely bring great suffering upon themselves as they commit racial suicide, suffering on a scale that has never been seen before in this country. We see inklings of it in the injuries and deaths of uncounted White men and women, many of them elderly, in the “knockout game” “played” by Blacks to prove themselves to the other members of their feral packs, a “game” in which the goal is to knock out or kill a random White person with a single punch, a deadly “game” which the controlled media ignore almost as much as they ignore Black flash mobs and Mexican and Muslim gangs that prey on White women.

I assure you, the decline is just beginning. It’s a long way from Peoria to Mogadishu in terms of culture, but not as long as you think in terms of time. The problem is that our fate is tied to that of the blankos. When they suffer and die, we and our loved ones will too. We’re glued to the morons. We need to unglue ourselves.

Madness is thinking that we can make Africans and Mestizos and Middle Easterners “equal” to us by importing them by the millions and giving them a large part of our wealth and our nation.

Madness is thinking that the decline we’re experiencing in morals, in education, and in economics isn’t related to the racial change taking place.

Madness is thinking that adding 30 million Third World invaders to anything could possibly improve that thing.

Madness is thinking that, for the hundredth time, if only we elect “conservatives” or Republicans we can solve our racial problems and reverse our decline — when it was the leader and icon of conservatives and Republicans, Ronald Reagan, for God’s sake, who signed the first illegal alien amnesty bill and authorized the holiday for the Communist degenerate King — when it was this party, supposedly based on cutting the federal monster down to size, that has not only not cut it down at all but instead presided over the greatest increase in the Washington regime’s size and power ever seen in our history. People who can’t wake up to that are people who simply can’t wake up. We need to leave them behind. We need to stop associating with them, lest their madness infect us and our families.

Madness is thinking that there’s any hope in electoral politics at all — when, not only are the two parties offered us utterly worthless, but Whites are hopelessly ideologically divided and now represent only 60 per cent. of the electorate at best — when the major cities, with their control over electoral votes, are already dominated by non-Whites — when over half of all births are now of non-Whites.

Madness is willingly sending your child to join the regime’s military, and virtually worshipping that military — the military of a regime that is dedicated to killing you, to exterminating you and your kind — the military which never fights to defend America’s borders and interests, but fights without end amen to defend Israel’s interests and the borders of the puppet states the regime has set up in the Middle East — the military which soon, I predict, will be fighting once again against White people or any people who dare to have a government not supervised by Jews.

Madness is thinking that these insane wars can be stopped by supporting the Democratic party — when that party is in bed with Israel just as much as the Republicans — when that party shamelessly campaigned on an anti-war platform and then, once in power, escalated the wars just as the oligarchs wanted them to — when that party openly engages in spying and surveillance and CIA drone murders and kill lists — for God’s sake, kill lists! — just as much or more than the Republicans did.

Madness is thinking that a return to Christianity can save us — when no two sects, and there are hundreds of sects, can agree on just what Christianity stands for — especially when almost all of these sects are suicidal when it comes to race — when the religion itself was founded by Jews, evolved from Jewish culture and thought, and consists in part of a virtual worship of Jews as “God’s chosen people.”

Madness is racially-conscious White people arguing over obscure Hebrew verses written two thousand years ago — and believing that what these desert bandits and goat-herders wrote somehow proves that we come from some Semitic “seedline” or other, when science has known for a century that our ancestors were already in Europe 50,000 years ago and more.

Madness, madness, madness. Utter madness.

We need to separate ourselves from the madmen.

How can we do that? There are probably many tens of thousands of racially aware White people in North America who are fully cognizant of our plight and who are  immune to insane belief systems. There are probably ten times as many who know our race is in danger, but little else, and who are still quite capable of rational thought and action, are immune to religious delusion, and who could and would  join our ranks if 1) they were educated and influenced by us to a sufficient degree, and 2) if we were perceived as having some chance of success.

If we are to survive, we must first reach this elite group, and form an organic community with the best among them. Our first task will be to set out our principles, beliefs, and plan of action and make it known to every potential member of our community, and do this so effectively that as many as possible within our race’s real elite will see the truth in our warnings of danger, our principles, our knowledge, and our plan, and will be willing to throw in their lot with us and add their strength to ours.

We must be selective in building this community: We cannot make the mistake again of welcoming those who bring weaknesses instead of strength.

We must make this community self-sustaining, and by that I mean not only self-sustaining in the economic sense, though it must surely be that, but self-sustaining over time as well: Our members must raise their children in our beliefs, teach them who they truly are, teach them their place in the cosmos, and teach them the meaning and purpose of their lives — so that a sufficient number of them will remain with our community as the generations pass. For our race is like the waves of the ocean, rushing onward forever, and we are the individual water droplets that make up that wave. We rise and then fall again into dormancy in our brief moment of life, but the waves rush on without end. As the droplets descend to the depths of the Earth, or evaporate into the air, new droplets constantly rise and add themselves to the wave, and the motion of the sea never ends. So are the generations of men. If we fail to raise up our children rightly, for even a single generation, we are done for. We are perilously close to that point in this current generation, and our aim must be to correct that grievous error.

Only when this community is of sufficient strength should we begin to attempt to influence and lead the White masses. Attempting to do so at this time would not only fail, but it would sap energy from our current necessary tasks.

No known organic community that spans the generations has ever existed which did not have some form of spirituality as its basis. Man is a transitional creature between the lower animals and Higher Man. We have achieved reason, so for us instincts are not enough. We question everything we see, and even everything we feel. We analyze. Yet our limited reason, even the reason of our best men, is also not enough. To overcome fear, to inspire great works, to unify otherwise selfish and individualistic people, to overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles and the pain and tragedies of life, men must have faith that their efforts are part of something far larger than themselves.

Our race has reached a threshold both terrifying and magnificent. It is a threshold that, understood rightly, can harmonize faith and reason and remake the world.

This threshold is terrifying in that all our old beliefs and old religions, despite the faith and best efforts of their adherents, lie smashed upon the ground in a million pieces. No one respects the faith that evolved into sublime philosophy — the Classical belief system that began with Eos and Apollo and Aphrodite, and the souls who created them — more than I do. But everyone knows that those deities are not real and will not save us. It was the otherwise destructive myth of Christ which inspired the men who fought at Tours and Vienna against the Semitic hordes. And it is impossible not to stand in awe of Gothic cathedrals and choirs of angelic White children singing Latinate hymns to God. But despite the fact that we remade Christianity in our image, and a beautiful image it often was, at its core was a seed of hate and destruction, a Jewish seed, in both the murderous Old Testament and the self-denying New. And, even if it did not have those terrible flaws, the simple fact is that the best minds of our race, the ones we must bring into our community, can no longer take it seriously.

The threshold we are crossing is magnificent in that our reason and our science have opened the vistas of reality to us just enough to allow us to glimpse a part of our real purpose and destiny. William Luther Pierce took the threads of thought of Bruno, of Shaw, of Nietzsche, of Crick and Watson, and of Darwin, and showed us that our race is part of an ever-evolving Whole, and that the Whole is evolving toward higher and higher levels of consciousness. He showed us that our race is in the vanguard of this evolving consciousness; that increasing our understanding, and our power to defend ourselves and evolve further upward, is, so far as any man can see at this time, the true purpose of our lives. He taught us that nothing is more important than this, and that the fate of the Universe literally depends upon what we do today.

This new faith, Cosmotheism, is a faith that can inspire and unite the best men and women beneath its banner. It is, I believe, the faith that will lead us to the stars. We in the National Alliance may have had many setbacks, from the strong-arm tactics of the regime to our own stupid mistakes in allowing ourselves to be infected with a “big tent” philosophy which allowed those without understanding to drag us downward. There are only a few hundreds of the truly faithful and truly aware among us today, and not all of us who ought to be united are united yet.

But be of good cheer. Cosmotheism is not only a faith, a way of approaching God, but it is also a test. If the blankos and the morons were vampires, then Cosmotheism would be a shining golden crucifix. The very people we do not want in our new community will misunderstand, fear, and flee Cosmotheism. They will stay away from us entirely, and that is a good thing. Cosmotheism will unify and inspire the best, and excise the worst.

We have faith — and we have good reason — to believe we are on the right path. We are just beginning, but that does not discourage us. We have suffered setbacks, but that has only made us stronger, wiser, and more determined. If you would like to help us build this organic community of the aware and of the worthy, if you would like to have a part in this, the greatest and most important effort of our time, write to me today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right, and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-2-getting-out/feed/ 0
Asylum America, part 1: The Crazy and the Doomed http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-1-the-crazy-and-the-doomed/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-1-the-crazy-and-the-doomed/#comments Sat, 21 Jun 2014 12:00:57 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1598 pound-ezraAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of June 21, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE GREAT POET EZRA Pound (pictured), when newly arrived in Italy in 1958, after 13 years of hellish false imprisonment in US mental hospitals, was asked by a reporter what it was like being released from an insane asylum in America. Pound replied that he had never been released from an insane asylum in America, adding that such a thing was impossible — because, he said, “All America is an insane asylum.” When he finally walked out the door of St. Elizabeth’s into the Washington, DC sunshine, he was just walking from a . . . → Read More: Asylum America, part 1: The Crazy and the Doomed]]> pound-ezraAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of June 21, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE GREAT POET EZRA Pound (pictured), when newly arrived in Italy in 1958, after 13 years of hellish false imprisonment in US mental hospitals, was asked by a reporter what it was like being released from an insane asylum in America. Pound replied that he had never been released from an insane asylum in America, adding that such a thing was impossible — because, he said, “All America is an insane asylum.” When he finally walked out the door of St. Elizabeth’s into the Washington, DC sunshine, he was just walking from a relatively small mental ward into a much larger and even more dangerous one. To his credit, he kept on going until he was well clear of the striped rag and the nutcases who still wave it.

I was just two years old when Pound said that, and it wasn’t until many years later that I or anyone I knew had even the faintest inkling of just how right Pound was — of just how crazy things were getting in America. It’s actually worse than being in a mental hospital, because 1) at least in a mental hospital they’re trying to cure you, not make you crazier; and 2) because America is also like a sinking ship. America as a nation is going down just as surely as the Titanic was going down once she hit the iceberg, but with one big difference: The crew and passengers of the Titanic were not, so far as I am aware, insane. The captain didn’t steer full speed ahead to collide with as many additional icebergs as possible. The crew didn’t argue with the fleeing passengers, trying to convince them that air and seawater were “equal” and that it was “evil” to breathe the one and refuse to breathe the other.

On today’s program I’ll sketch the plight of the sane in crazyland USA, and in future programs I’ll talk about escape from this sinking asylum.

The asylum’s attendants: Ms. Chosen makes a point

Let me tell you about the time I first came face-to-face with the Opponent — by which I mean organized, agenda-driven Jewish groups — as an adult. It’s one of the things that brought me to sanity.

In 1978 I was a broadcast engineer working at a major-market radio station in the Washington, DC area, WEAM. Being a bit naive and a bit adventurous at the age of 22, I had volunteered, in addition to my engineering duties, to be the “public service director” of the station, a non-paid position which primarily consisted of selecting and rewriting the Public Service Announcements, also called “PSAs,” which the station aired without charge for non-profit groups. You know the sort of thing; the American Legion is having a Veteran’s Day dinner; the local church youth group is holding a fun fair to raise money; and the electric power council wants to remind you not to drop AC appliances into the tub while you’re bathing — and the like.

One of the groups which was always trying to get free air time was Planned Parenthood. I never used any of their announcements, all of which I put directly in the trash.

There were three main reasons. One was that the station’s owners had told me not to give free air time to any group which was highly controversial and likely to offend advertisers or listeners. And Planned Parenthood — being a major provider of abortions — was quite controversial. Secondly, even though I wasn’t yet fully racially and politically aware at that point in my life (hey, I even gave the giant “Jewish Community Center” in suburban Maryland some free plugs), I found the entire concept of young women wanting convenience abortions to be repugnant. And thirdly, Planned Parenthood was very aggressive in trying to force me to air their PSAs, and I don’t respond well to the hard sell. I didn’t engage them. I just ignored them.

When the hard sell via the mail and the telephone fell flat, the management at Planned Parenthood must have decided that talking to Kevin Strom was an exercise in futility, so they called up my boss, WEAM’s general manager, Harry Averill, who passed the buck again to me after agreeing that a representative from Planned Parenthood could come to the station and try to convince me in person that their announcements should be aired.

And what a representative she was! Hugely obese with short, black, kinky hair and light but sallow skin, convex facial features that screamed Chosenite (though I didn’t know it at the time), she had a certain something about her poorly groomed, mannish, scurfy self that radiated aggressive lesbianism. She looked like a somewhat less gracile version of Bella Abzug on a bad hair day.

After applying significant G-forces to my only office chair, Ms. Chosen tried every trick in the book to wheedle or cajole me into airing their announcements. She began with obviously insincere compliments, not a good idea with me since my first instinct is to never trust a phony. Nevertheless, I was polite. She went on and on about the tragedies of teenage pregnancy, the need to reduce the population and increase the “quality of life” through family planning, and other such boilerplate. I actually had to draw her out on her group’s, and her, more controversial stances. And draw her out I did — to my horror. As she prated nasally on about feminism and the terrible oppression of women in the Bad Old America, about the evils of early marriage and pregnancy, about how we must become more “open” to homosexuality and other “alternative” sexualities, and as she became more and more passionate in response to my questions, I began to realize something. I began to realize that this woman, or creature, was motivated, deep down motivated, by a seething, boiling hatred of normal, healthy sexuality.

I had a “eureka moment,” though I kept it to myself. Ms. Chosen, I saw with sudden clarity, hated everything about the traditional White family and traditional sexual roles. And I sensed her real, though unstated, problem: She truly hated the fact that healthy young White American women liked White men and wanted to have their babies. Basically, it was as simple, and as terrifying, as that. At 22, I didn’t know enough to identify her as Jewish or part of any Jewish power structure. And I probably wouldn’t have couched my insights in racial terms then — though, like almost all Americans of those times, when I said or thought the words “traditional family,” in my mind I saw a White family. But I knew this — I knew that she hated what I instinctively saw as sacred. My instincts were sound, and my awakening was just beginning.

I had never sensed anything like that hatred before. I had never imagined that something like that could exist. But it did. And, as I became more politically aware in the coming years, I was to see such hatred — often, coming out of such strange, distorted, “not us” physiognomies, too — again and again.

Driving the lemmings insane

Ms. Chosen and her kind, I now realize, are the creators of Asylum America, with White Americans their victims and inmates. Jews may be a little crazy themselves with their over-the-top aggressiveness, with their “everybody hates us” paranoia-as-identity, and with their deeply conflicted simultaneous hatred and worship of themselves, but the Jews in positions of power know exactly what they’re doing to us.

They teach us that race doesn’t exist, but no one is more racially-conscious than they. It was a Jew, Disraeli, who said that “race is all — it is the key to history.” The whole basis of Jewish existence is maintaining their separateness and uniqueness in a hostile world of other races and peoples, almost all of whom, they seem to believe, are just a few steps short of tossing them into ovens.

They teach us that it is the ultimate in evil for Whites to ever have a racially-based state or racially-conscious leadership — witness their hatred of National Socialist Germany and their demonization of any form of racial-nationalism in any White nation, from the Old America’s race-based citizenship and immigration laws to Jobbik in Hungary and the Golden Dawn in Greece and Vladimir Putin’s very mild form of nationalism in Russia. Yet ancestry — race — is the very definition of citizenship in their nation, Israel. They want racial-nationalism and self-determination for themselves. And they want to deny racial-nationalism and self-determination to us, their host peoples.

They teach us that homosexual sex is great, sex with Blacks and other non-Whites is great, sex with effective contraception is great — but if you slip up and, horror of horrors, conceive a White child — freely-available abortion is great, too. But in their own communities, the Chosenites are very concerned with their group’s biological, racial survival and they rail against intermarriage between Jews and other races. In Israel, they’ve erected legal barriers to intermarriage, just like the legal barriers to interracial marriage they fought against and finally got repealed here in the US back in the 1960s. Racial-nationalism for them; racial suicide for us.

In short, the Jews create endless “intellectual” and pseudo-scientific justifications for disrupting our normal mating and child-bearing behavior, with the end result being that every single White nation including ours now has a below-replacement birthrate, with that of most European nations now being below the level from which no society in history has ever been able to recover, some even below the level from which it is mathematically impossible to recover. Meanwhile, they have driven our people insane with their lies, their social pressure, and their relentless propaganda — to the point that our demographic death spiral is considered to be a non-issue by the lemmings and trendies among us. Not only is it a non-issue, it’s a forbidden issue: Bring it up and be prepared to be attacked as a “racist.”

The issues that agitate the lemmings are the issues that have been chosen for them by the Chosen: The slightest verbal offense against a homosexual or non-White is grounds for hysteria, dismissal, disgrace, and dispossession — to question the wisdom of mutilating one’s body into a sick parody of that of the opposite sex is to be the crassest of bigots — to doubt that Jamal and Shaniqua are the exact equals of ourselves is to be “evil,” even though their massive and inescapable inequality is right before our eyes — to doubt that the enemies of the Jewish state are our enemies, too, “terrorists” who only deserve to be slaughtered on sight and against whom it is our perpetual duty to send our sons and daughters to be killed in endless Middle Eastern wars, is to become in the eyes of the lemmings a demon incarnate, an “anti-Semite.” They have truly driven our people insane, and intimidated the still-sane fraction into silence.

It’s as I’ve told you earlier: I believe that the Opponent is driven by a deep-down moral code that is never stated openly, but is nonetheless very real: Whatever brings more White children into the world is evil; whatever prevents White children from coming into the world is good. Understand that, and you understand everything that is being done to us. I first came face-to-face with that hate-driven, genocidal agenda in my office in Arlington those many years ago.

Race: totally invisible?

Just a few months later, I had another experience at WEAM that convinced me that our society was literally going mad. Harry Averill, who was fairly well-known as a pioneer of “Top 40″ radio in the 1960 and 70s, was, as I’ve mentioned, the general manager of the station.

One Summer day, a half-hour or so after meeting in his office with a Black employee named Mel, Averill busied himself at his desk for a few minutes and then walked into the reception area and called to his secretary.

“Vera,” he asked her in a loud voice that could be heard in all the adjacent offices, “can you tell me please, is Mel Black or White? I can’t remember.”

Of course, this was a blatantly transparent ploy to show how “non-racist” he was. He didn’t even notice Mel’s race! Or so he wanted us to believe.

Now, I don’t think very many people would be fooled by that. But it is indicative of the mentality that Averill (correctly) imputed to most of his listeners.

They have internalized an inverted — actually insane — moral system under which disregarding race is a high moral good. When they inevitably fail to “live up to” that “ideal” of denying the reality of race, when they do actually notice that the races are different, when they have “forbidden” feelings of preference or liking for their own race, they actually feel guilty. And when they feel guilty, they tend to compensate in other ways — perhaps by spitting venom at, or even charging with moral or legal crimes, those who do openly take notice of the facts that the races aren’t equal and that Jews aren’t angels; or perhaps by adopting Kenyans; or by some other evil or folly.

So it’s not always that they don’t notice the facts of racial inequality, or even the looming extinction of their own people, the proof of which is all around them. It’s that they have deeply absorbed an essentially religious ethos that tells them — in what sounds like their own still, small voice — that it is wrong to notice or be concerned about such things. That’s the power of mental conditioning begun in childhood. And that’s what all of us have experienced in post-1945 America.

In 1978 I was 22 and still ignorant of many of the principles and forces that make the world what it is. But I had just come face to face with the reality-denying madness infecting most of my fellow Americans — and the seething hatred of those who brought that madness upon us.

On my next program, I’ll talk about how those of us who are still sane might escape from the asylum.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right, and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/asylum-america-part-1-the-crazy-and-the-doomed/feed/ 1
Background to Treason, part 2 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/background-to-treason-part-2/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/background-to-treason-part-2/#comments Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:49:50 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1586 jewishimmigration

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 2: From the Balfour Declaration to the Roosevelt Era [1]

by Dr. William L. Pierce

IN PRESENTING HIS PLAN to use an anticipated war among the Gentile nations for the furtherance of Jewish goals, Theodor Herzl had announced at the first meeting of the Zionist Congress, in August 1897: “After the great European war is ended, the peace conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time.”[2] (ILLUSTRATION: Jewish immigration, nearly all of it from Eastern Europe, swelled the number of Jews in the United States by a factor of 10 in the four decades between 1890 and 1930, establishing a power . . . → Read More: Background to Treason, part 2]]> jewishimmigration

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 2: From the Balfour Declaration to the Roosevelt Era [1]

by Dr. William L. Pierce

IN PRESENTING HIS PLAN to use an anticipated war among the Gentile nations for the furtherance of Jewish goals, Theodor Herzl had announced at the first meeting of the Zionist Congress, in August 1897: “After the great European war is ended, the peace conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time.”[2] (ILLUSTRATION: Jewish immigration, nearly all of it from Eastern Europe, swelled the number of Jews in the United States by a factor of 10 in the four decades between 1890 and 1930, establishing a power base for the realization of Zionist schemes. In some years during this period more than half of all the immigrants to the United States were Jews, as are these men and a woman being checked by medical examiners at New York’s Ellis Island entry station. Note the Hebrew eye chart on the wall at the left. Alarmed patriots urged legislation to halt the alien flood, but the politicians had already been bought.)

When the Paris Peace Conference finally did assemble, on January 18, 1919, the Jews were more than ready: they had stacked the conference in their favor more thoroughly than any riverboat gambler had ever stacked a deck of cards. All the delegates of the Allied powers — especially those of Great Britain and the United States — had been approached beforehand, many of them repeatedly, and been harangued, badgered, bribed, threatened, and coaxed to support the Zionists’ demand that Palestine be taken from Turkey and given to them.

Jews also had taken a hand in the preparation of background material used for briefing the delegates on the historical, political, and economic facts relevant to their deliberations. Thus, a set of recommendations prepared by the “Intelligence Section” of the U.S. delegation to the conference suggested that “the Jews be invited to return to Palestine and settle there” and that future policy should be “to recognize Palestine as a Jewish state as soon as it is a Jewish state in fact.”[3]

BERNARD BARUCH

BERNARD BARUCH

Finally, most of the top Zionist leaders converged on Paris, so that they could follow the proceedings at the conference closely and do any personal arm twisting needed to keep the delegates in line. Louis Brandeis was in and out; his protégé Felix Frankfurter was there whenever he was not; Chaim Weizmann commuted between London and Paris; Rabbi Stephen Wise came from New York; and Bernard Baruch, a wealthy Wall Street commodities speculator who had come to have as strong an influence on President Wilson as that exercised by Brandeis, was an official delegate of the U.S. government.[4]

A few of the Allied political leaders undoubtedly had a sympathy for the Zionist position based on their childhood inculcation with Sunday School tales of the “chosen people” and the “promised land.” During the first years of this century such beliefs were still fairly common among otherwise intelligent and sophisticated men in America and Britain. This apparently was the case with British Prime Minister Lloyd George, for example, who was known to lecture his colleagues in Parliament on the Old Testament from time to time.

EUGENE MEYER

EUGENE MEYER

Biblical superstitions were not what the Jews were counting on, however. Money and political influence, the latter exercised through their growing control of the press, were their principal arguments in persuading the delegates to give them what they wanted. Their influence was strongest among the British and the Americans, with their virtual domination of the weak and confused Woodrow Wilson being their trump card.

Rabbi Wise has related a conversation he had with Wilson while the conference was in session: “‘Mr. President,’ I said, ‘world Jewry counts upon you in its hour of need and hope.’ Placing his hand on my shoulder, he quietly and firmly said, ‘Have no fear, Palestine will be yours.’” [5]

wise-rabbi-stephen-samuel

RABBI STEPHEN WISE

Such a commitment to the Jews was, of course, completely contradictory to Wilson’s loudly and widely professed principle of “self-determination for all peoples,” since the Palestine he proposed to give to the Jews already was inhabited by a people hoping for their own self-determination. The truth of the matter is that Wilson seems to have been much more concerned with the rhetorical impact of his famous “Fourteen Points,” which enumerated the principles he asserted would govern America’s policy at the peace conference and which he had announced to the world on January 8, 1918, than with their actual meaning.

He had an abundance of lawyerly cleverness with words, and he was brimful of all the latest liberal platitudes about the desirability of “peace without victory” and making “the world safe for democracy,” but he seems to have had little understanding of, and less concern for, the realities of the situation to which his Fourteen Points — and his “Four Principles” (announced February 11, 1918), “Four Ends” (July 4, 1918), and “Five Particulars” (September 27, 1918) — supposedly were addressed.

The very first of the Fourteen Points, for example, called for an end to all secret diplomatic negotiations and demanded that “diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view.” One can only wonder what the man had been smoking when he came up with that idea, so contrary to common sense and human nature is it. Indeed, Wilson himself became so conspicuous in ignoring his own injunction the following year, when he carried on most of his peace negotiations in Paris behind closed doors, that Robert Lansing, his secretary of state, had to warn him about the bad impression this secrecy was making on the public.

ParisPeaceConference

ECONOMIC section of the American delegation to the Paris Peace Conference: Bernard Baruch is seated second from the right. Standing third from the right is “Colonel” Edward Mandel House.

The sixth of Wilson’s Fourteen Points, calling for all nations to adopt a hands-off policy toward the Bolsheviks in Russia, who were then in the process of taking over that country and liquidating their “class enemies” in the most brutal fashion, bears the unmistakable imprint of Brandeis and Baruch. The Allies were concerned about the Bolsheviks for two reasons: first, because they sapped Russia’s ability to continue fighting Germany (the Bolsheviks, in fact, made a separate peace with Germany in March 1918 and put up no effective resistance to the continued German presence in Russia thereafter); and second, because they were afraid that Bolshevism might spread to their own countries if it were permitted to succeed in Russia. These concerns had led to a limited amount of Allied military help for the White (i.e., anti-Bolshevik) Russian forces. Wilson, who had welcomed the revolution in Russia from the start,[6] strenuously opposed this help, and, despite the pleas of the Allies, refused to send more than a token U.S. military force to Russia, where its role was limited to observation.

If one did not know better, one might attribute Wilson’s insistence on non-interference with the Bolsheviks to an almost incredible degree of naiveté; he was, after all, the woolliest-minded of democracy mongers, and if he really believed that the purpose of America’s involvement in the First World War was to make the world safe for democracy, then it is conceivable that he may also have believed that the success of the Bolsheviks in Russia would be a gain “for freedom in the world, for justice, and for peace.” But, of course, he really believed neither of those things. He took America into the war, because the people who supported him and flattered him, who touted him in their newspapers as a “champion of the people” and guided his political career for him, told him to. And he sabotaged the Allied move to aid the White Russians against the Bolsheviks, because the same people told him to do that too.

The historians who still excuse Wilson’s stand on the Bolsheviks as mere liberal woolly-mindedness (many liberals shared Wilson’s optimistic views on the Bolshevik Revolution at the time) are belied by an abundance of documentary evidence. The United States had diplomatic personnel in Russia who kept the secretary of state back in Washington closely informed of what was happening there, and the American military observers who had been sent to Russia as a sop to the Allies also submitted copious reports. The message that came back to Washington from every American source in Russia was the same: most of the Bolsheviks were not members of the “great, generous Russian people” but were Jews; they were opposed by most Russians; they were ruining Russia and destroying the best of her people; and they were a menace to the world which ought to be stamped out immediately.

The National Archives in Washington contain an abundance of State Department and War Department reports with this message. Many of the State Department reports have long since been gathered up, reprinted in bound volumes, and made available to the public; those which have not can still be located relatively easily by any diligent researcher.

Two weeks before Wilson read his war message to Congress and nearly 10 months before he announced the Fourteen Points, information had been sent to Washington indicating who was behind the budding revolution in Russia, then in its “Provisional Government” phase. On March 19, 1917, U.S. Ambassador David Rowland Francis sent a telegram from Moscow to Secretary of State Robert Lansing. In it he said: “Immeasurably important to the Jews that revolution succeed. If Jews make such advances, however, great discretion should be exercised lest revolution assume a phase which would arouse opposition… [of] anti-Semitics [sic] who are numerous here.” [7]

On May 2, 1918, the U.S. consul general in Moscow sent a telegram to Lansing which reported: “…Jews predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population which tends to regard oncoming Germans as deliverers…. German, Ukraine troops closing in actively on Bryansk which is Red Army staff headquarters but Red Army lacking in discipline and morale, flees before enemy without fighting and plunders local population which is prepared [to] welcome Germans as deliverers….” [8]

THE FOLLOWING MILITARY INTELLIGENCE report of March 1, 1919, photographically reproduced below, by U.S. Army Captain Montgomery Schuyler is typical, rather than exceptional, of the accounts of Bolshevik activity which were received in Washington from American diplomatic, commercial, and military observers in Russia in the years 1917-1919. Note the reference in the third paragraph to orders not to interfere in local affairs. President Wilson had grudgingly permitted a few American military personnel to be sent into revolution-torn Russia at Allied insistence, but they were under orders not to help the White Russians or to hinder the Bolsheviks. Wilson made a great pretense of humanitarianism and of concern for freedom and human rights, but the documentary record proves him a fraud.

He justified the U.S. intervention in the First World War on the basis of making the world “safe for democracy,” destroying the “autocratic power” of the German government, and giving the German people “self-determination.” Why, then, did he insist on non-intervention in Russia, when it was quite clear that the Bolsheviks were establishing a regime a thousand times more obnoxious to any humanitarian — or even to a genuine liberal — than that of the German Kaiser? Furthermore, a determined Allied effort in Russia could have put down the Bolsheviks at a relatively small cost in lives, while Wilson’s policy of intervention against Germany resulted in the deaths of three million more combatants, including 115,000 Americans, and a vastly greater destruction of Europe’s cultural heritage, by prolonging the First World War nearly two years.

Every major foreign-policy move Wilson made — taking America into the war, blocking Allied intervention against the Bolsheviks, backing a British mandate over Palestine — forced him to repudiate some lofty principle or other he had proclaimed earlier, but every move also served the purposes of his Jewish advisers and boosters. Woodrow Wilson willingly sacrificed the lives of millions of his own people in order to please these unspeakably evil men and retain their support. (The full text of this report is included in the Appendix at the end of this article.)

schuylerletterpage1fullschuylerletterpage2fullschuylerletterpage3full

On July 5, 1918, Lansing received a lengthy telegram from the U.S. consul in Vladivostok, John Kenneth Caldwell. It contained a report by an American commercial representative who had traveled throughout Russia during the preceding 13 months, and it described in detail the suffering of the Russian people at the hands of the Bolsheviks whom Wilson was so anxious to protect: “…Bolsheviks in every city I have resided are simply robbing, murdering, and burning. Practically every business is ruined…. Fifty per cent of Soviet government in each town consists of Jews of worst type, many of whom are anarchists…. The great mass of Russian people prefer even German tyranny to Bolshevik terrorism. I suggest careful consideration Ally [sic] intervention….” [9]

On October 5, 1918, a dispatch was sent to Washington from the U.S. Embassy in London. It contained an eyewitness report written by a Dutch diplomat who had recently returned from Petrograd (formerly St. Petersburg, now Leningrad). After describing some of the mass arrests, starvation, and massacres being inflicted on the Russian people by the Bolsheviks, the report concluded: “The foregoing report will indicate the extremely critical nature of the present situation. The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other governments to the fact that if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once the civilization of the whole world will be threatened…. I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless as above stated Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. The only manner in which this danger could be averted would be collective action on the part of all powers.” [10]

LeninMay1920

“IMMEASURABLY IMPORTANT to the Jews that revolution succeed”: that was the most important message from revolution-torn Russia in determining Woodrow Wilson’s policy of non-interference with the Bolsheviks. In his message to Congress calling for war against Germany, Wilson praised the overthrow of Czarist rule by the “great, generous Russian people.” In fact, however, Wilson, in connivance with his Jewish advisers, helped a tiny, alien minority fasten a new tyranny immeasurably worse that Czarism on the Russian people. Above, Lenin, who was at most one-fourth Russian, harangues a communist mob in May 1920. Below him on the steps of the platform are Jewish commissars Trotsky and Kamenev, who were rivals for the number-two spot in the Bolshevik hierarchy.

On November 12, 1918, the American legation in Copenhagen forwarded to Washington a report by an American bank official, R.R. Stevens, the representative in Russia of the National City Bank of New York, who had just finished an extended journey in Bolshevik territory. Stevens repeated what every other observer had stressed: “It is very important to note that from the smallest districts up to the very head the government is composed almost entirely of Jews….” He described the suffering and death of the Russian people under the Bolsheviks, and then he, too, called for intervention: “All humanity cries out against it; all humanity should rise and demand a decent government where every man and all classes should have a right to exist…. The only solution which can be made of the Russian problem is international intervention on humanitarian grounds, backed by whatever military force is required.”

None of this had the least effect on Wilson. He refused to criticize the horror in Russia in any way, and he continued to insist that the Bolsheviks be left free to work their will on the prostrate Russian people without interference from the West, which was exactly the way the Jews wanted things to stay — in Russia, that is. In Palestine, on the other hand, they very much wanted Western intervention, and again Wilson was their compliant tool.

The 12th of Wilson’s Fourteen Points asserted that the “nationalities which are now under Turkish rule should be assured an undoubted security of life and an absolutely unmolested opportunity of autonomous development.” That promise of autonomy was a continuation of the war propaganda begun by the British to win the support of the peoples of the Middle East for the Allied side. It had worked well, causing Arab uprisings against the Turks and delivering much of the eastern Mediterranean area into British hands.

Wilson’s promise meant no more than the earlier British promises, however, in the face of Jewish demands. Arab autonomy was the last thing the Jews wanted. The Zionist leaders at the peace conference did not even want Jewish autonomy, in fact, because that would have left them with many responsibilities they were unwilling to accept — including the responsibility for defending themselves from the Palestinians whose land they wanted.

The Zionist plan was for Turkish rule over Palestine to be replaced by British rule; the Jews would then be given free rein to begin occupying the land and building up all the infrastructure of a Jewish state, while the British would maintain law and order, keep the buses running, deliver the mail, and protect the Jews from the inevitable wrath of the Palestinians. When the Jews had become strong enough, they would take over de jure rule from the British. That was the way Weizmann spelled it out for Lansing and for Lloyd George in Paris. [11]

And that was largely the way things finally came out at the peace conference. To be sure, the Jews did not get quite everything they demanded — but they demanded a great deal. The territory they wanted Britain to administer for them as a future Jewish state included not only all of Palestine, but also a third of Lebanon; the entire East Bank of the Jordan, right up to the outskirts of Amman; and sizable chunks of Egypt and Syria as well.[12] Jehovah, it seems, had promised all of that to them.

When it became clear that the Palestine Mandate would actually comprise only about half of the territory the Jews were claiming, Brandeis was brazen enough to send a telegram to the conference importuning the “Christian nations” to keep their “solemn promise to Israel” by enlarging the Mandate.[13] Until 1922, when the League of Nations formally approved the Palestine Mandate, specifically excluding the East Bank (Transjordan) from the territory covered, the Jews still thought they might get most of the land they coveted.

The Jews also did not approve of an inter-Allied commission of inquiry, the so-called King-Crane Commission, whose task was to determine the wishes of the inhabitants of the proposed Mandate and report back to the peace conference. They urged Wilson to hurry up with the signing of the treaty, before the commission could give its report.

When that report finally was presented, in August 1919, it opposed Jewish aims right down the line. It concluded that subjecting the inhabitants of Palestine “to unlimited Jewish immigration, and to steady financial and social pressure to surrender the land, would be a gross violation of the principle [of self-determination]….”[14] By that time, however, the treaty had been signed at Versailles (on June 28), and Wilson had returned to America to receive the cheers of the crowds, his crusade for the right of “self-determination for all peoples” conveniently forgotten.

A great deal could be written about events in Palestine subsequent to the signing of the Versailles Treaty: about Jewish immigration and the taking over of the land, about conflict with the Palestinians, and about Jewish chicanery in dealing with their British protectors. This is not a history of Zionism per se, however, but an account of the way in which the Jews, using Zionism as a unifying and organizing principle, gained control of the government of the United States and then used that control to advance their own ends, to the incalculably great detriment of the American and European peoples. Therefore, events in Palestine will be sketched only in broad outline, and the focus will remain on Jewish activity in America and Europe.

As was demonstrated in the first article of this series, the Jews built their bridgehead in America during the 35 years from about 1880 to the First World War, carrying out during the latter half of that period a specific plan to gain and use political influence in the United States. Their plan involved three elements: a general buildup of numbers, financial resources, and media control; finding a proper tool through which they could work their will; and then bringing all of their strength into play at a decisive moment — namely, at the peace conference following the long-anticipated war between the goyim.

The plan, as far as it went, worked quite well. Not only did the Jews get most of what they wanted at the peace conference, but the strength they had developed in finance and the media could now be used for other purposes. Woodrow Wilson was of no use to them after the peace conference (he suffered a complete breakdown in September 1919, which left him an invalid until his death in 1924), but the singularly vulgar form of democracy which had emerged in America by the first part of this century was ideally suited for bringing to the fore new men whom they could control as completely as they had controlled Wilson.

Thus, as the 1920s dawned, everything seemed rosy for the Jews. At the same time that Jewish immigrants were pouring into Palestine to begin building a new world Jewish headquarters there, they were consolidating their grip on the two largest White nations in the world, the United States and Russia.

Then things began going wrong for them. In Russia, after Lenin’s death in 1924, the foremost Jewish Bolshevik, Trotsky (Lev Davidovich Bronstein), lost a power struggle against a faction which, although mostly Jewish also, was headed by a non-Jew, Stalin (Iosif Vissarionvich Dzhugashvili). At the end of the decade Jews still filled nearly every top post in the Soviet power structure, but the viciousness and thoroughness with which Stalin had waged his fight against Trotsky and the latter’s followers had frightened many of the more far-sighted Jews, and they were filled with uneasy forebodings about their future in the Soviet Union.

In the next decade those forebodings were realized, as Stalin launched a massive purge of the Bolshevik power structure, sending whole armies of Jewish commissars to their deaths in prison cellars and slave-labor camps. The fact that many of the prison wardens and camp commissars in the 1930′s were still Jewish was only a slight comfort, because a new generation of Gentile commissars was clearly on the rise, and the days of Jewish power in the Soviet Union were numbered.

Growing Jewish power in the United States also brought a reaction in the 1920s which made many Jews uneasy. Automaker Henry Ford was not the only influential Gentile who was busily alerting his fellow Americans to the Jewish danger. The major book-publishing firms, unlike the newspapers, were still free of Jewish control, and dozens of writers were producing books, for popular and semi-popular readerships, which attempted to awaken a sense of racial consciousness and racial solidarity among the White masses and the White leadership elite alike. [15]

It was in Palestine, though, that the Jews’ schemes seemed most in danger by the end of the decade. They had, for one thing, overestimated the power of the British government to protect Jewish immigrants from the wrath of the Palestinians who were being dispossessed. There were repeated outbreaks of violence between Jews and Palestinians during the 1920s, beginning with disturbances in March and April 1920 which took 13 Jewish lives.

On July 1, 1920, the British government ended its military rule in the mandated territory and set up a civilian administration there, headed by a High Commissioner for Palestine. He was Herbert Samuel, a member of a wealthy Jewish banking family and an outspoken Zionist.

Ten months later, during a communist May Day demonstration organized by recent Jewish immigrants from Russia, the Jews suffered their first major setback in Palestine. Moslem Palestinians, enraged by the Jews’ attempts to disseminate communist propaganda among them, killed 47 Jews, many of them Bolshevik demonstrators.

Samuel’s police in turn killed 48 Palestinians. No amount of repressive police action was able to pacify the Palestinians or make the Jews feel completely safe after that, however, and Jewish immigration statistics reflected this. After an initial influx of Zionist immigrants had raised the Jewish proportion in the population of Palestine from 8.1 per cent in 1918 to 16.6 per cent by 1926, the balance remained virtually static through the end of the decade.

In 1927 the number of Jews actually declined: the 2,713 immigrants were fewer than half of the 5,071 Jews who packed up and left Palestine. By 1930 the Jews still made up less than a sixth of the population. It was clear that the Zionist scheme for converting Palestine into a Jewish state was in serious trouble.

The Zionists had never contemplated that all of the world’s Jews, or even a majority of them, would move to Palestine, of course. Who would milk and fleece the goyim if that happened? The scheme was to maintain and even expand all of the existing Jewish colonies among the Gentile nations, in order that the Jews might continue to exercise their influence and collect their tribute there. But they also wanted an all-Jewish headquarters state, where there would be no prying Gentile eyes and to which all the Jews of the world could look for leadership.

The problem was that life was too good among the Gentiles. Why should Shlomo or David leave his plush sinecure in the Soviet bureaucracy and take up life on a Palestinian kibbutz, where he actually would be expected to work with his hands? Why should Israel and Sarah sell their nice, safe pawnshop in Brooklyn and face infuriated Palestinian mobs in Jaffa or Jerusalem?

During the first few years after the First World War the Zionist zealots who actually wanted to live in Palestine were joined by large numbers of Jews who had been displaced by the war and were willing to accept any haven. Later the only immigrants were the zealots, and there just weren’t enough of them. If the Zionists wanted a Jewish Palestine, they were going to have to find a way to shake many more Jews loose from their soft lives in Europe, America, and elsewhere and persuade them that they would be safer and more prosperous in Palestine than where they were. Perhaps another war would do the trick.

VLADIMIR JABOTINSKI

VLADIMIR JABOTINSKY

Another development during the 1920′s which helped to turn the thinking of Zionist leaders toward the benefits which Jews might be able to reap from another major war among the goyim was the rise of Revisionism. In April 1925 Vladimir Jabotinsky (1880-1940), a Soviet Zionist, founded the Revisionist Party. His aim was to persuade his fellow Jews to break with the policies of gradualism and compromise to which he felt the Zionist establishment had succumbed and which had led to stagnation in the takeover of Palestine; he wanted a return to the militant, uncompromising, political Zionism of Herzl.

Jabotinsky was furious with those Jews who were so concerned with world opinion that they paid lip service to the statements in the Balfour Declaration and in the subsequent League of Nations Mandate for Palestine which called for the protection of the rights of the Palestinian people. Had not the Jews’ god told them that the earth and all in it were created solely for the sake of the Jewish people? Had not he ordered them to exterminate without mercy everyone who stood between them and their rightful dominion over the earth? Why, then, should they not arm themselves and begin killing Palestinians immediately? That was the way to solve the Arab problem! [16]

Bloodthirsty as he was, Jabotinsky was also a cunning strategist, and he was just as willing to sacrifice Jews to his ultimate goal of Jewish rule as he was to kill the enemies of the Jews. When he was unable to make his views prevail among the Zionist majority in 1925, he set about deliberately exacerbating the hostility between Jewish immigrants and Arabs in Palestine. His efforts came to fruition in August 1929, in a series of race riots which resulted in the deaths of 133 Jews and 116 Palestinians, the bloodiest confrontation yet.

The bloodshed may not have been good for Jewish immigration immediately, but it did wonders for Jewish consciousness and militance. Jabotinsky and his followers organized and trained groups of armed Jewish thugs, whose role was as much provocation of the Palestinians as it was defense of the Jews. From these groups came the dreaded Irgun, specializing in assassinations and terrorist bombings from 1931 until September 1948. In 1943 the leadership of the Irgun fell to a young Zionist lawyer from Poland, Menachem Begin, under whose guidance the organization committed atrocities of such shocking sadism and bloodthirstiness that even many of his fellow Jews were embarrassed.

Jabotinsky was Begin’s spiritual father. He was a man of wider vision than Begin, however, and the scope of his activities extended far beyond Palestine. He recognized that two things were essential to Zionist success: The flow of Jewish immigrants to Palestine must be greatly increased, and the Jews of the diaspora must maintain their race consciousness and their solidarity, lest they lose the political influence they were able to wield over Gentile governments despite their small numbers. Both of these things required that the Jews of the diaspora not be permitted to be too comfortable. They must be kept on edge, militantly self-conscious and separated from their Gentile hosts by a barrier of fear and hatred.

Thus, as early as 1919-1921 he was in contact with the great Ukrainian patriot Simon Petlyura, who was organizing an anti-Bolshevik resistance in the Ukraine — and killing all the Jews he could get his hands on. Later Jabotinsky was a great admirer of Benito Mussolini and his Fascist movement.

Jabotinsky thought a man like Petlyura ultimately better for the Jews than Trotsky, because the former helped them maintain their Jewish consciousness and separateness — even if at the expense of a few Jewish lives — whereas Bolshevik policies would lead to assimilation and loss of Jewish identity. While Mussolini’s Fascists aroused a sense of ethnic consciousness in their fellow Italians — and a great feeling of unease in the Jews of Italy — Jabotinsky’s agents capitalized on this unease by organizing Italy’s young Jews into armed self-defense groups, part of his Betar movement. Throughout the 1930s the Revisionists resorted to assassinations and other provocations to fuel the growing anti-Jewish feeling in Europe, all the while urging the increasingly worried masses of Jews to organize for their own protection — and to go to Palestine.

From 1933 on, however, it was the establishment Zionists much more than the Revisionists who led the campaign for a new world war. Even without any prompting from Jabotinsky they were thoroughly frightened of what was taking place in Europe, especially in Germany, where Adolf Hitler, their sworn enemy, had become chancellor on January 30, 1933. [17]

Thirty-three days later their own man took office as president of the United States. Franklin Roosevelt differed in many ways from Woodrow Wilson. Although both seemed to have been born with large doses of lawyerly guile and glibness in their makeups, Wilson was essentially a weak, foolish, vain, and impractical man who was utterly dependent on his Jewish advisers throughout his career, while Roosevelt was strong, self-confident rather than vain, and utterly “street wise” in the sort of political maneuvering which eventually took him to the White House.

Roosevelt made much use of Jewish advisers — indeed, he was surrounded by even more of them that Wilson had been — but it was a matter of choice, not necessity. Wilson would have been helpless in the political arena without his Jews. Roosevelt probably could have managed well enough without them, but he was a man of great ambition and no principles, and he knew the power they wielded.

By 1933 that power was much greater than it had been when Wilson became President. For two more decades the Jews had been working on their takeover of Main Street, U.S.A., while they consolidated their earlier beachhead on Wall Street. Most significant of all, however, was their growing control of the news and entertainment media in America.

David Sarnoff, a Jewish immigrant from Russia, had become president of the Radio Corporation of America in January 1930. He was also chairman of the board of directors of its subsidiary, the National Broadcasting Company. Another Jew, William S. Paley, had been the president of the competing Columbia Broadcasting System since 1928. And just a few weeks after Roosevelt was inaugurated, Bernard Baruch’s old partner on the War Industries Board, Eugene Meyer (who was also appointed head of the War Finance Corporation by President Wilson), purchased the Washington Post at a bankruptcy auction in the District of Columbia for a trifling $825,000.

Motion pictures were becoming an influential medium of persuasion, especially after the introduction of sound in 1926, and Hollywood was already solidly Jewish by 1933: there were the Warner brothers (Albert, Harry, Jack, and Sam) of Warner Brothers, Harry Cohn of Columbia Pictures, Adolph Zukor of Paramount Pictures, Samuel Goldwyn (born Goldfish) and Louis B. Mayer of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, William Fox (born Fuchs) of Twentieth Century Fox, and many, many others, from chairmen of the boards on down to the directors and scriptwriters.

And so it went — in business, in finance, in the media, and increasingly in politics too. The Jews were already powerful in the Democratic Party in Wilson’s time, mostly behind the scenes. By 1933 they were coming out front, at least in those areas of their strongest influence: in that year Jews took over the governorships of two of the nation’s most populous states, New York (Herbert H. Lehman) and Illinois (Henry Horner).

What made this infiltration of America’s power centers possible for such a small minority — and made it enormously more effective after it had occurred — was Jewish organization and Jewish solidarity.

Many other groups of immigrants to America — Irishmen, Germans, Poles, Italians — felt a certain sense of solidarity with their own kind during the first few years after their arrival, especially those who settled in large cities among other immigrants of the same nativity, and they formed numerous ethnic organizations, mostly churches and cultural associations, but also political clubs. Even today in the large cities of the Northeast one finds such organizations. In nearly all cases, however, they exercise only a local influence.

More important, they lack any unifying principle. A Gaelic Society in South Boston or a Pulaski Club in a Polish neighborhood of Philadelphia may contribute to a sense of ethnic solidarity in the community, but neither has any millennial purpose; neither attempts to nourish ancient ambitions to despoil non-Irish or non-Polish citizens or to gain hegemony over them; neither preaches the “chosenness” of its members, rubs salt into the memory of imagined wrongs, and plots vengeance on the world; neither demands an exclusive loyalty or inspires a zeal to advance the interests of fellow Irishmen or fellow Poles at all costs. Belonging to such a group may or may not be of some benefit to one’s business or political ambitions, but the benefit, if any, is seldom decisive.

With the Jews it is altogether different. They are by far the most highly organized of ethnic groups. Every Jewish neighborhood in America has not only a synagogue, but also a staggering array of Jewish business, cultural, recreational, fraternal, youth, women’s, philanthropic, and political organizations.

Furthermore, each of these local Jewish groups is part of an international network, with hardly an individual Jew anywhere not tied into it, regardless of his particular circumstances, sympathies, and interests. If an earthquake in India leaves six Jewish families there homeless today, a relief fund for those six families will be on the agendas of thousands of local chapters of Jewish philanthropic societies all over America tomorrow; if a prominent Jewish racketeer is arrested by the police in Chicago, 16 different Jewish legal defense organizations in New York will know about it before he is even fingerprinted and photographed in the Chicago precinct station; if a tipsy Congressman is overheard making a less-than-adulatory remark about Jews at a Washington cocktail party, the Jewish War Veterans, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Congress, and 44 other national Jewish organizations will have angry letters denouncing him on the editorial pages of every major newspaper in the country the next morning, while the members of all 11 synagogues in his congressional district will be knocking on doors to collect signatures on a recall petition.

And, unlike nearly all non-Jewish organizations, every Jewish organization is wholly, enthusiastically, aggressively, self-righteously — often hysterically — ethnocentric. Beside this Jewish racism, those of the Mafia, the Black Muslims, and the Ku Klux Klan seem anemic. For the Jews are both more exclusive and more ruthless than the Sicilians in advancing their own kind, infinitely cleverer than the Blacks, and simultaneously more brazen and more subtle than most White racists.

Of all the causes which may be advanced to explain the unique Jewish solidarity, perhaps the most basic is the Jewish religion. Although it has, unfortunately, spawned religions which make claims to universality, Judaism itself is an entirely particularistic tribal religion, the central idea of which is an exclusive covenant between a materialistic, predatory people and their tribal god. It is short on theology and very long on tribal legend, chest-thumping self-glorification, and rules for racial survival in a hostile, race-mixing world. It is strictly a them-vs.-us religion, which draws the sharpest possible line between the Jews and everyone else.[18]

Another aspect of the Jews’ xenophobic attitude, which is held even by non-religious Jews, is a uniquely intense preoccupation with alleged past injuries done them by other peoples: Egyptians, Philistines, Persians, Romans…; it is a very long list. Many other peoples nurse historic grievances — Armenians and Greeks against Turks, Blacks against Arabs and Whites, Koreans against Japanese, Irishmen against Englishmen, Southerners against Yankees — but only the Jews cherish their “persecution” to such an extent that it has been elevated to one of the determining features of their world view. They virtually define themselves in terms of their enemies, past and present. What would the Jews be today if they did not have the “Holocaust” of a generation ago to wail about? One can hardly imagine it.

In addition, there almost certainly must be genetic factors involved in such a deeply ingrained and persistent sense of tribal solidarity. Whatever its causes, it has always given the Jews a unique strength and made them a unique danger to other peoples.

Zionism added a new dimension to the danger, because it fired the imagination of the Jews, stimulated whatever latent idealism and spirit of sacrifice remained in an almost wholly materialistic race, and provided a common goal toward which they could direct their considerable energies. Although the Jewish colonization of Palestine was not going according to schedule in 1933, the Zionist idea was still very much alive among Jews in America; making them a more unified — and, therefore, more potent — political force than ever before.

Even then it was something which few dared to mention in public, but no knowledgeable politician remained unaware of the Jews’ power to help or hinder his career. Had the American people been blessed with a man of principle and responsibility, a patriot with a sense of racial consciousness and destiny, as a leader at that time, then, strong as the Jews were, he could have broken their power.

The Germans gained such a leader in 1933. But the Americans, mired in the democratic system for which Woodrow Wilson had made the world safe, got Franklin Roosevelt. Thus was the stage set for the Zionists’ realization of their dream.

From National Vanguard magazine (March, 1983)

transcribed by Michael Olanich

Next time: Zionist Planning for a New War, and its Aftermath.

Notes:

1 – This is the second article of a multi-part series. The first article, covering the period from biblical times to the First World War, appeared in National Vanguard No. 91.

2 – For the context of Herzl’s announcement, see National Vanguard No. 91, p. 12.

3 – My Diary at the Conference of Paris, David Hunter Miller (New York, 1924), v. IV, pp. 254-267. A more recent work, covering not only the Paris Peace Conference but the entire period from 1914 to 1948, is The Palestine Diary, Robert John and Sami Hadawi (New York, 1970). This latter work is probably the most valuable single source available in English today on the Zionist intrigues which led to the dispossession of the Palestinian people and the formation of the state of Israel.

4 – Bernard M. Baruch (1870-1965), of mixed Sephardic and Ashkenazic ancestry, began his career as a runner for a Wall Street broker. Then he began peddling stocks on the side and giving advice on buying and selling. He bought a seat on the New York Stock Exchange in 1898, and by 1910 he had amassed an enormous fortune through speculation. He always seemed to know before anyone else when a stock was ready to soar or plunge. President Wilson appointed him chairman of the War Industries Board in 1918, making him virtually an economic czar of the United States during the last phase of the First World War.

Serving under Baruch on the War Industries Board was another self-made Jewish stock speculator, Eugene Meyer, later to become owner of the Washington Post (and father of the present owner, Katherine Meyer Graham).

5 – Challenging Years, Stephen S. Wise (New York, 1949), p. 197. Wise (1874-1949), who was born in Hungary, came to the United States in 1875, in the vanguard of the Jewish invasion force. He became the leader of one of the largest Jewish congregations in New York City and exerted great influence in the Democratic Party political machine there. He attended the second Zionist Congress in 1898 in Basle, and in the same year he became one of the principal founders of the Zionist Organization of America. During the First World War he organized the American Jewish Congress and became its first president. Later he promoted the World Jewish Congress and was president of that organization also.

Although Wise shared with Brandeis and Baruch the task of guiding Wilson during the post-World War I peace negotiations, his greatest and most destructive role came during the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. From 1933 until his death he exerted a powerful influence over the policies of the U.S. government, and he was one of the foremost promoters of the anti-German propaganda which led the United States into the Second World War.

6 – In Wilson’s address to the Congress on April 2, 1917, calling for a U.S. declaration of war against Germany, he had referred to the recent outbreak of revolution in Russia thus:

“Does not every American feel that assurance has been added to our hope for the future peace of the world by the wonderful and heartening [sic!] things that have been happening within the last few weeks in Russia? Russia was known by those who knew it best to have been always in fact democratic at heart, in all the vital habits of her thought, in all the intimate relationships of her people that spoke their natural instinct, their habitual attitude toward life. The autocracy that crowned the summit of her political structure, long as it had stood and terrible as was the reality of its power, was not in fact Russian in origin, character, or purpose; and now it has been shaken off and the great, generous Russian people have been added in all their naive majesty and might to the forces that are fighting for freedom in the world, for justice, and for peace. Here is a fit partner for a League of Honor.”

The effect of the revolution was, of course, exactly opposite to that predicted by Wilson: instead of adding Russia to the Allied forces (Czarist Russia was already one of the Allies), it took Russia out of the war.

7 – Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 1918, Russia (Washington, 1931) v. 1, p. 7.

8 – Ibid., v. I, p. 518.

9 – Ibid., v. II, pp. 239-241.

10 – Ibid., v. I, pp. 674-679.

11 – Memoirs of the Peace Conference, David Lloyd George (New Haven, 1939), p. 748.

12 – Palestine Diary, v. I, pp. 123-125.

13 – Ibid., pp. 142-143.

14 – Ibid., p. 139.

15 – Henry Ford spent millions of dollars during the First World War in a vain effort to keep America from becoming involved. During this effort he became aware of the Jews’ role in fomenting the war. After it was over he purchased a newspaper, the Dearborn Independent, and over the next few years published hundreds of documented articles exposing the Jews’ destructive activities. Many of these articles were later reprinted in four bound volumes titled The International Jew, which were widely distributed during the 1920s.

Lothrop Stoddard’s books on race and politics, especially The Rising Tide of Color (1920) and Revolt against Civilization (1922), also sold in the hundreds of thousands of copies.

Another writer whose books (The Passing of the Great Race, published in 1916, was his best) were very influential during the 1920s was Madison Grant, then the chairman of the New York Zoological Society.

16 – “But of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.”

“But thou shalt utterly destroy them — namely, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites — as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee….” (Deuteronomy 20:16-17.)

17 – In his personal political testament Adolf Hitler described his decision to devote his life to the fight to liberate his people from the Jews and Jewish influences. The decision was made in November 1918, when Hitler was lying in a German military hospital, blinded by a British poison-gas attack. There the 29-year-old corporal, who had spent four years fighting in the trenches and had received Germany’s highest decoration for bravery, heard of the mutinies and strikes organized throughout Germany by the Bolsheviks, crippling the German government and paralyzing the war effort.

Then news of the Kaiser’s abdication and the German surrender reached him. In Hitler’s own words:

“The more I tried to achieve clarity on the monstrous event in this hour, the more the shame of indignation and disgrace burned my brow. What was all the pain in my eyes compared to his misery?

“There followed terrible days and even worse nights — I knew that all was lost. Only fools, liars, and criminals could hope in the mercy of the enemy. In these nights hatred grew in me, hatred for those responsible for this deed.

“In the days that followed, my own fate became known to me….

“Kaiser Wilhelm II was the first German emperor to hold out a conciliatory hand to the leaders of Marxism, without suspecting that scoundrels have no honor. While they still held the imperial hand in theirs, their other hand was reaching for the dagger.

“There is no making pacts with Jews; there can only be the hard: either-or.

“I, for my part, decided to go into politics.” (Mein Kampf, v. I, ch. 7.)

A little over 14 years later Hitler became Germany’s chancellor.

18 – See “What Is a Jew,” National Vanguard No. 90, pp. 3-7.

APPENDIX:

Capt. Schuyler’s letter:

[handwritten across top of page:] 383.9 Mil. Int. Report, Schuyler

In reply please
refer to No _______

[stamped]

DECLASSIFIED
DoD Dlr. 5200.9 Sept . 27, 1958
NWR by [signature] Date 8-17-60

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

WAR DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN EXPEDITIONARY FORCES. SIBERIA .
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF
INTELLIGENCE SECTION

My dear Colonel Barrows :                                                                                                                                                             March 1, 1919.

I have just received your letter of January 29th, forwarded by Baron Hoven of General Romanovsky’s staff, who has just arrived in Omsk, I was of course much interested in your news, as I had been unable to find anything about the movements of our officers or as to myself.

I was afraid that I should be stranded in Omsk for some little time even if the others got away and although I want to get home just as soon as possible for urgent personal business reasons, I realize that I am of more use here than possibly anywhere else. This work, however, is so familiar to me as this is the fifth revolution I have watched in the pains of birth, that I must confess it has lost its charm of novelty.

I have not attempted to write you anything concerning the situation here in Omsk as I have felt that conditions here were so fluid that  what I wrote would be valueless when received by you. Lieutenant Cushing is preparing a sort of weekly report which he will send in in his own name and which will suffice for us both for the present. My telegrams have been perhaps more numerous than you desired and some of the subjects mentioned may not interest our expedition in the least.  This I was aware of when sending them, but I felt it was better to err on the side of fullness than the other way. I am strictly obeying my orders to keep out of local affairs and avoid giving advice, but I must say that it is very hard not to jump in and manage this government entirely.

The problems which the Omsk government has to face are not at all intrinsically different from those which prevail in every movement of the kind known to history, but the besetting problem in this instance is that Admiral Kolchak has to work with the materials available for his purposes, namely the Russian people of today, who are so thoroughly disorganized and lifeless as a result of the last three years , that they are unable even to think for themselves far less govern themselves.

In the first place, the coup of Admiral Kolchak’s friends whereby he assumed the role of Supreme Governor was absolutely necessary if the whole of Siberia was not to fall ripe into the hands of the Bolsheviks. That visionary set of impractical theorists with whom I spent an evening in a railroad car at a Manchurian station — Messrs Avksentiev [former Minister of Interior in the Kerensky Cabinet] and company — were far worse than out and out anarchists, for they were weak dreamers who could not even maintain the ordinary police security necessary to life in any community. Crime was rife in the streets of Omsk, murders and hold ups were of nightly occurrence in this city on the [?] streets and the Bolshevik city governments throughout Siberia were running things their own way just as they are in Vladivostok today.

It is of course difficult to legalize Admiral Kolchak’s position, in fact it is impossible, for while it was done by the decree of the so called government of the time, it was simply a coup d’etat. His status however is as good according to Russian law as that of any of the revolutionary governments which preceded him.

In the beginning and of necessity his acts for the restoration of order were autocratic; he depended on the support of the army and the officers especially, and he put down local disorder with a high hand…

[page 2]

Ever since then however, he has shown himself in so far as he could safely do so, more and more liberal, and I have no hesitation is saying that I firmly believe that his own opinions and frame of mind are far more liberal than the outside world gives him credit for. He is unfortunate in this that he has had to depend upon the mailed fist to maintain his position and to keep his government from being overridden by the Bolshevik elements which are numerous in every city in Siberia.

It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United, States, but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty. (I do not mean the use of the word liberty which has been so widespread in the United States since the war began, but the real word spelt the same way), and the real Russian realizes this and suspects that Americans think as do the loathsome specimens with whom he now comes in contact. I have heard all sorts of estimates as to the real proportion of Bolsheviks to that of the population of Siberia and I think the most accurate is that of General Ivanov-Rinov who estimates it as two per cent. There is hardly a peasant this side of the Urals who has the slightest interest in the Bolshevik or his doings except in so far as it concerns the loss of his own property and, in fact, his point of view is very much like that of our own respectable farmers, when confronted with the I [?] ideal.

Unfortunately, a few of our people in the United States, especially those with good lungs, seem to think that the Bolsheviks are as deserving of a hearing as any real political party with us. This is what the Russian cannot understand and I must say that without being thought one sided, I should not hesitate to shoot without trial if I had the power, any persons who admitted for one moment that they were Bolsheviks. I would just as soon see a mad dog running about a lot of children.

You will think I am hot about this matter but it is, I feel sure, one which is going to bring great trouble on the United States when the judgment of history shall be recorded on the part we have played . It is very largely our fault that Bolshevism has spread as it has and I do not believe we will be found guiltless of the thousands of lives uselessly and cruelly sacrificed in wild orgies of bloodshed to establish an autocratic and despotic rule of principles which have been rejected by every generation of mankind which has dabbled with them.

There have been times during the past month when I have been  afraid that the Kolchak government would not last until the next morning. I have had I suspect, the closest connection with the leaders here of any foreigner in Omsk and my sources of information are so many and so varied that I am pretty sure to hear the different points of view on every imaginable question. The announcement of the Princes’s Island conference with Bolsheviks came as a clap of thunder to the government, in fact it so took the wind out of their sails, that I believe they would have thrown up the government and run away if it had not been for [page 3] timely and cool headed advice which they received. Then the news became more widely known there was a fairly strong reactionary movement started by Cossack officers and adherents of the old regime. This was discovered and allowed to die a natural death with very good results. With the failure of the Princes Island conference, the government began to get back a little of the strength it had lost and today I believe it will hold on for some time,. provided it does not get another series of hard knocks from the Allies or the United States.

The very clever and most unscrupulous Japanese propaganda which has been carried on here is one of the most interesting I have ever seen carried out by that country. The way the Japanese took over Korea and we made a scrap of paper of our solemn treaty with that poor little miserable people was child’s play to the present methods of procedure in regard to K_x Siberia. Admiral Kolchak hates the Japanese, the latter naturally are not unaware of that feeling and cordially reciprocate it and the combination of their propaganda with that of the Bolsheviks in the United States and elsewhere is very powerful. I can understand how people who know nothing of our foreign relations or of the Russian people can be carried off their feet by it, but how responsible men can listen to it I do not know. If the feelings of the Russian people are to be consulted and the future of their own country is to be in their hands, there will be no Bolshevik future for this land. They have submitted to it first, from the very good reason that they did not know how to go about fighting it and second, because it came at the psychological moment when the morale of the people had been so shaken that they were ready to endure anything in order to be allowed to be let alone.

The scheme now being worked out for a popular assembly for all parts of Siberia will, I am sure, be of service and even if only partially successful — and I do not see at present how it can be more — will do much towards proving the sincerity of Kolchak in his promises.

Please do not get the idea that I am enthusiastically in favor of the present government, that I consider it ideal or even good, for it is not; but I do consider that it has already united more varied and more numerous elements of the Russian people than any other government which might take its place would do. The question of the moment is not an ideal government but one that will last for the next few weeks and will restore order enough so that any elections may have a fair chance of being carried out without force and fraud and graft.

Personally, I am fairly comfortable here; Cushing and I have each a room requisitioned by the government and it will be impossible to carry out the recommendations made by the Adjutant in a recent telegram because there are no rooms to be had and we have had applications for two months already. With kind regards to all friends,

I am, Very sincerely yours,

[signed:]
Montgomery Schuyler

Captain, USA

Lt. Col. Barrows,  Vladivostok

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/background-to-treason-part-2/feed/ 1
Sins Against Life http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/sins-against-life/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/sins-against-life/#comments Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:00:50 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1585 face_000083x_cropAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of June 14, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom (pictured)

WHAT IS A SIN? Webster says a sin is “a transgression against divine law.” Most churches in this country would define any breach of the Old Testament’s Ten Commandments as a sin, including the commandment that tells us to recognize the Hebrew tribal god, Yahweh, as the only god. This makes, by definition, every single one of our ancestors — from 100,000 years ago to just 1700 years ago — into unrepentant, irredeemable “sinners.”

The definition of “transgression against divine law” varies depending on what the particular religion or philosophy considers to be “divine law.” . . . → Read More: Sins Against Life]]> face_000083x_cropAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of June 14, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom (pictured)

WHAT IS A SIN? Webster says a sin is “a transgression against divine law.” Most churches in this country would define any breach of the Old Testament’s Ten Commandments as a sin, including the commandment that tells us to recognize the Hebrew tribal god, Yahweh, as the only god. This makes, by definition, every single one of our ancestors — from 100,000 years ago to just 1700 years ago — into unrepentant, irredeemable “sinners.”

The definition of “transgression against divine law” varies depending on what the particular religion or philosophy considers to be “divine law.” If the Old Testament is divine law, then mixing linen and cotton in your outfit this morning is a sin (Leviticus 19:19; “You are not to wear clothing made from two different kinds of material“). If the New Testament is divine law, then it is a sin not to give a thief even more of your possessions than he had planned to steal from you in the first place (Matthew 5:40; Luke 6:29: “If someone takes your coat, offer your shirt also“).

I think most honest people, Christians included, would agree that these are pretty bizarre guides to what is or is not sinful — to what should or should not be done in life. Some Biblical scholars think that the two-fabric prohibition is a remnant of an ancient Jewish decree designed to discourage Jews from fraternizing with some putative tribe of non-Jews who wore such clothing — but nobody really knows for sure. Giving a thief even more than he asked for, like the immediately prior exhortation to “resist not evil,” is not only in direct contradiction with other passages from the same holy book, but it is a sure-fire formula for the triumph of thievery and any other evil you could name. (And that sure reminds me of the mass of evil that we find ourselves in today in the formerly White, nominally Christian West.)

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam — and most other faiths — are revealed religions. They are based on the idea that somewhere, somehow, God chose a man or a few men and handed them stone tablets or golden plates with divine truths and laws inscribed upon them (or “inspired” them to write them on parchment scrolls). And these truths and these laws are unchangeable, eternal, valid for all time. Thus divine law was revealed to a few men, and those men revealed them to the rest of us, who’d better accept them or be damned. Little or no reasoning is involved, except perhaps contorted reasoning designed to justify the holy book. The evidence of science is mostly irrelevant, to be accepted or rejected precisely to the extent that it confirms or disproves holy writ.

History shows us that these holy books are usually compiled many lifetimes after the events they purport to describe and that they incorporate passages lifted wholesale from other cultures and religions, are edited, translated, re-edited, and censored or altered for political reasons, before they reach their final status as inviolate and “holy.” Thus we have the wildly contradictory collections of mysticism and primitivism called the Torah, the Bible, and the Koran. The words of holy writ make such little sense, we need a priesthood to explain them to us.

(This is very handy for the priests and ministers of the various sects, since they can cherry-pick from the confused mass of scriptures to make almost any kind of point they want; witness the conservative churches’ use of certain Bible verses to condemn homosexuality, for example, while the more liberal sects select other verses to prove that we should do the exact opposite. And witness also many churches’ scriptural support for racial separation and integrity a century or more ago — and those same churches’ scripture-based condemnation of “racism” and support for miscegenation today.)

If you haven’t been raised in one of these revealed faiths, imprinted from the age of three onwards with the “sanctity” and “truth” of your particular brand of holy writ, you can easily see that this is a very dysfunctional and bizarre way of arriving at any kind of truth — or any guide to action, to what is or is not sin. Intelligent aliens studying us from a distance and looking at the aforementioned scriptural debate on homosexuality, for example, would surely judge us an insane species.

Do you seriously believe that God, the Creator of the Universe, would choose such a method of communicating truth to us? Do you actually maintain that the scribblings of these Hebrew bandits and goat-herders, complete with burning bushes and golden hemorrhoids, is a useful guide as to what we should or should or should not do? To see intelligent, sensitive White men and women arguing over morality based on whether or not it agrees with this tangled collection of immoral nonsense is a truly pathetic and profoundly saddening sight. It is a dead end from which we must escape to survive.

Both the religious and the irreligious present us with a false dichotomy, and they are both wrong. They tell us that we must accept the Bible, or nothing. It’s just that the religious insist we accept the Bible as a guide to truth and action, and the irreligious insist that we accept nothing except “do what thou wilt.”

I suspect that a huge contingent in the atheist camp consists of people who are simply libertines, who have never given more than a moment’s thought to philosophy or truth and who are primarily motivated by a desire to escape all morality, and to engage in unlimited perverted and/or promiscuous sex and to ingest recreational drugs at will and with untrammeled abandon. They favor the “nothing” alternative. They don’t want any stinking morality at all, and the Bible is easy to debunk, so they love the false dichotomy of “the Bible or nothing.”

And I also suspect that a substantial contingent in the Christian camp consists of people who know very well that there never were any burning bushes or magic loaves and fishes, but who are simply repelled, as I am, by the personally and socially destructive ways of the libertines. And they see no way to oppose them but through the Bible. They too favor the false dichotomy of “the Bible or nothing,” because they see it as uniting all the opponents of “nothing,” all the opponents of “do what thou wilt,” all the moral forces, in the cause of good. They fail to see the fatal flaw in basing one’s guide to action, one’s definition of sin, on confused ravings that our deepest thinkers, some of our most inherently moral men and women, cannot possibly take seriously.

But we need not choose between the nothingness of the libertine atheists and the confused scriptures of the revealed religions. There is a third way.

Cosmotheism is not a revealed religion. It is instead a natural religion, in that it rejects all of the claimed supernatural and unverifiable communications between a putative deity and man which find their way onto shining golden plates or ancient scrolls, instead having its basis in the realities of Nature that our eyes — and the investigations of science — have confirmed. In the drama of the evolution of life from non-living matter, and of higher and more conscious beings from lower forms of life, we Cosmotheists see a path of purpose and destiny for us.

To Cosmotheists, the whole of the Universe is the Creator, and the Creator reveals truth to us through the very structure of the Universe itself. The real word of God is not Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers, nor even Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John — no. No indeed. The real word of God is mathematics, physics, and genetics. These are “words” which cannot be faked or mistranslated. Unlike the ever-shifting words of man-made books and priestly interpretations, the structure of the Universe and the laws of Nature, especially the laws governing evolution, are beyond priestly or political machinations. They were there since the beginning of time, awaiting the moment when we had evolved enough to find and understand them. These laws are truly eternal, truly divine, and few things are more immoral and disgusting than twisting them or suppressing them so that we can hold on to an unworthy ancient book that was never even ours to begin with.

For Cosmotheists, nothing is more evident than that the Universe is ever-evolving toward higher and higher levels of consciousness. From the emergence of galaxies, stars and solar systems from undifferentiated matter; from the first DNA molecule that could reproduce itself to the infinitely more complex paramecium and the giant Redwood trees of the California forest, to the minds and souls of Leonardo da Vinci, Edgar Poe, Pythagoras, Pierce, and beyond — consciousness, self-knowledge, and the purposeful organization of matter and spirit, are all increasing through time. The law of entropy says that the Universe is winding down, ultimately back toward undifferentiated matter. The law of life and evolution, however, shows that a new force — one that now holds in its hands the power of conscious evolution — has entered the field: the force of conscious life. And this new force may well be that which sets Universes themselves in motion and gives them birth.

From these truths and realizations we can determine our purpose, and our definitions of virtue and sin.

The evolution of the European race — the only Earthly beings to break the bonds of Earth and set themselves and their works on the faces of other worlds, the race which led all the discoveries of not only the outer Cosmos of the stars but the inner cosmos of the cell, the atom, and its constituent parts — our evolution is an important step in the development of the consciousness of the Universe and the discovery of all that is yet to be discovered. It is a sin that defines all the other sins, an evil of unimaginable proportions, to set us back on our path.

Therefore no single sin is greater than the mixing of our blood with other races, for it is the erasure of tens of thousands of years of the divergent evolution that has made us what we are and what we are yet to become.

Therefore it is a sin to preach doctrines that encourage us to be childless in a competitive human world, to reduce our birthrate below replacement levels, and to cede our living space to other races.

Therefore it is a sin to publicly encourage homosexuality or other forms of sexual expression that do not lead to the entry of new members of our race, the entry of new White souls, into the Universe — for we are mortal — we live only a few decades at best — and if we are able and worthy we must take part in the creation and nurturing of our replacements.

Therefore it is a sin to construct a society — be it called Marxist or capitalist — which bases itself primarily on the accumulation and distribution of money and goods by classes or individuals, and not upon the security and continued upward evolution of the race as a whole.

Therefore it is a sin to say that a woman raped by a non-White may not cleanse the product of that unholy assault on her, and on our race, from her body — but it is even more a sin to teach Woman that her “most sacred right” is to slay her own healthy White child in the womb, and facilitate such unspeakable sickness through science and law.

Therefore it is a sin for our people to be led by anyone not a member of our own race, and it is also a sin for our people to be led by anyone not absolutely devoted to the cause our race’s survival and upward progress.

Therefore it is a sin for our people’s media of art, drama, news, information, and entertainment to be controlled by any alien group, especially an alien group which works for our destruction.

And, dear listener, it is therefore also a sin for any member of our race who knows these things to do nothing about them.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right, and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/sins-against-life/feed/ 7
Background to Treason, part 1 http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/background-to-treason-part-1/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/background-to-treason-part-1/#comments Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:14:23 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1574 dore_jordan

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 1: From the Exodus to the Balfour Declaration

by Dr. William L. Pierce

ALL THE TURMOIL and hatred and killing in the Middle East, some 6,000 miles from home, seems a distant problem to most Americans, who are much more concerned with economic woes or street crime or non-White immigrants. Yet, there is a much closer connection between the problems at home and that distant one than is generally realized. It behooves every responsible and thoughtful American to understand the background of his government’s policies and actions in the Middle East, for only when he does can he understand fully what must be . . . → Read More: Background to Treason, part 1]]> dore_jordan

A Brief History of U.S. Policy in the Middle East, Part 1: From the Exodus to the Balfour Declaration

by Dr. William L. Pierce

ALL THE TURMOIL and hatred and killing in the Middle East, some 6,000 miles from home, seems a distant problem to most Americans, who are much more concerned with economic woes or street crime or non-White immigrants. Yet, there is a much closer connection between the problems at home and that distant one than is generally realized. It behooves every responsible and thoughtful American to understand the background of his government’s policies and actions in the Middle East, for only when he does can he understand fully what must be done to set things right at home. (ILLUSTRATION: Israelites cross the Jordan River into Canaan in the 12th century B.C. to begin conquering and settling the land their descendants claim was promised to them by their tribal god. The Indo-European Philistines were there first, however.)

The ostensible cause of the present conflict in the Middle East lies in the opposing claims of Jews and Palestinians to the same piece of land, universally called Palestine until 1948 and now referred to variously as Palestine, Israel and the Occupied Territories, or Greater Israel.

Both claims go back some 3,200 years. The Philistines (whence the name Palestine), a presumably Indo-European people, began invading the eastern Mediterranean region from the northwest around the middle of the 13th century B.C.[1]

They established settlements in the coastal plain northeast of the Sinai, from the Gaza Strip to the site of modern Tel Aviv-Jaffa, conquering the native Canaanites in the process.

In the eighth year of the reign of Ramses III, 1190 B.C., a new wave of Philistines arrived from the northwest and invaded Egypt. After fierce fighting the Egyptians repulsed the invaders (whom they called, along with other invaders from the Aegean, “the Peoples of the Sea”), and the bulk of these Philistines then joined the earlier arrivals in Canaan. There they formed a Palestinian confederation of fortified cities, including Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Gath, and Ekron.

Shortly after the first wave of Philistines had settled in Canaan, a people of altogether different character and origins arrived in the land. They were a band of Semites who also had been expelled from Egypt (with as much loot as they could carry, according to the account in the Book of Exodus), but who had spent several decades in the Sinai peninsula and in Trans-Jordan before entering Canaan. They called themselves Israelites, after an eponymous tribal ancestor (the Biblical Jacob, later renamed Israel, grandson of Abraham).

The Israelites seized the hill country to the east of the Philistines, exterminating many of the Canaanites already there. They apparently encountered other groups of Semites, related to themselves, who had entered Canaan during or before the sojourn of the Israelites in Egypt. According to the Biblical tradition, the ancestors of the Israelites had first crossed the Jordan from the east perhaps 150 years (six generations) prior to the Israelite conquest, but had been essentially seasonal guests of the Canaanites at that time, living in tents and grazing their flocks on whichever side of the Jordan offered the best grass.

Their ultimate origins were among the nomadic tribes of herdsmen and traders who had been roaming the Arabian peninsula for thousands of years. Beginning about 1200 B.C., however, with the Israelite invasion, these wandering Semites entered into a new, more settled mode of existence. For the next 200 years there was intermittent warfare and continuous hatred between the Philistines of the coastal plain and the Israelites and their kinsmen of the hill country.

The Philistines were by far the more culturally advanced of the two races, being expert iron smelters and ironsmiths, while their Israelite opponents were still living in the Bronze Age. Unfortunately, however, it is the highly biased Semitic account of the conflict which has come down to us, and it is for that reason that “Philistine” is often used unthinkingly as a term of opprobrium today.

The Philistines were also better warriors than the Israelites, and a Philistine hegemony was soon established over much of the area of Canaan which had been seized by the Israelites. It was not until the reign of King David, in the 10th century, that the Israelites regained their independence and formed a united Jewish state. Even so, however, they were never able to conquer all of the coastal cities; Ashkelon remained under Philistine rule until the Assyrian conquest of the entire region in the eighth century, which also brought an end to Jewish independence.

There are two salient points worth remembering from this early period. The first is that the Jews of today, even assuming that they are the descendants of the early Israelites (and only the Sephardic Jews, not the Ashkenazim,[2] may even advance a claim to such descent), have no historical precedence over the descendants of the Philistines. The nomadic relatives of the Israelites may have grazed their flocks from time to time in Canaan a century before the Philistines arrived, but the Philistines conquered the land and established permanent settlements there before the Israelites did.

GERMANIC knights storm Jerusalem in 1099. The short-lived conquest of Palestine hardly repaid the loss in European blood, and every Western intervention since then has ill served Western interests.

GERMANIC knights storm Jerusalem in 1099. The short-lived conquest of Palestine hardly repaid the loss in European blood, and every Western intervention since then has ill served Western interests.

The second point is that the Philistines, not the Israelites, were our people, and it is, therefore, the Palestinian claim to the land which should carry more weight with us.

We should not conclude from this, however, that the Palestinians of today are closely related to us. Although there are still traces of White ancestry to be found even today among the Palestinians, so many other racial elements have entered the picture in the last 30 centuries that the claim of today’s Palestinians to descent from the Philistines is approximately as tenuous as the claim of the Sephardim to descent from the ancient Israelites.

Both the Jews and the Philistines intermarried to some extent with the native Canaanites, although the highly xenophobic Jews were much more inclined to slaughter them than to marry them. Later there was mixing between Philistines and Jews.

Then the region was overrun by one wave of conquerors after another: Assyrians, Egyptians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, and Turks. The Jews were twice deported en masse from Palestine, first in the eighth century B.C. by the Assyrians and then in the sixth century by the Babylonians.

The Romans had incessant difficulties with the Jews after their conquest of Palestine in the first century B.C., finding them the most subversive and insurrectionary of all their subjects. Finally, in the second century A.D., the Romans deported thousands of Jews and barred Jerusalem and large sections of Palestine to Jewish habitation.

In the seventh century the Arabs, fired by Islamic zeal, conquered Palestine, and still more racial mixing took place. The language of the land became Arabic and its faith Islam.

BLOND PALESTINIAN (above) is 10-year-old Lara al-Ghoush. The photograph was taken at the 1981 funeral of her parents, who had just been murdered by Lebanese Christians working for the Israelis. The Palestinians, like the Jews, are a racially mixed people, but there are still a number of unmixed Whites among them. After the initial Philistine settlement, there were several further infusions of European blood: from the Romans, who established a colony in Jerusalem in the first century, after expelling the Jews; from the German Crusaders, who founded several kingdoms in Palestine during the Middle Ages; and from later European settlers, who continued to colonize the area as late as the last century, primarily for Christian reasons.

BLOND PALESTINIAN (above) is 10-year-old Lara al-Ghoush. The photograph was taken at the 1981 funeral of her parents, who had just been murdered by Lebanese Christians working for the Israelis. The Palestinians, like the Jews, are a racially mixed people, but there are still a number of unmixed Whites among them. After the initial Philistine settlement, there were several further infusions of European blood: from the Romans, who established a colony in Jerusalem in the first century, after expelling the Jews; from the German Crusaders, who founded several kingdoms in Palestine during the Middle Ages; and from later European settlers, who continued to colonize the area as late as the last century, primarily for Christian reasons.

Four centuries later the Seljuk Turks became master of the Middle East. Then European Crusaders seized parts of Palestine from the Turks at the beginning of the 12th century, starting a seesaw struggle which lasted more than two centuries and ended with a Turkish Mamluk victory. Palestine then remained under the rule of one or another brand of Mamluk until early in the 16th century, and after that, until 1917, under the rule of the Ottoman Turks.

From Roman times until modern times Jews were a tiny minority of the population of Palestine. Turkish census figures show the Jews making up about 3 per cent of the population in the late 1800s.

The middle of the 19th century saw a growing restlessness in the Jews of eastern and central Europe. The Industrial Revolution and all the changes in trade, transportation, and life-styles that came with it had broken up old patterns and created new opportunities, and the Jews began reorganizing themselves to take advantage of these.

They created two new movements: one, preaching internationalism and class warfare was directed primarily toward the Gentiles. It was Communism, and its principal founder was the Jew Karl Marx.

The other, directed toward the Jews only, preached Jewish nationalism and solidarity. It was Zionism, and one of its first proponents was Moses Hess, a close associate and friend of Marx. Hess’s book Rome and Jerusalem, published in 1862, was one of the seminal documents of the Zionist movement.

The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husayni (1893-1974), who was both the spiritual and political leader of Palestine's Moslems from 1921 until the mid-1940's, had red-blond hair and blue eyes. A strong opponent of the Zionists, he is shown below conferring with Adolf Hitler in Berlin in 1941.

The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husayni (1893-1974), who was both the spiritual and political leader of Palestine’s Moslems from 1921 until the mid-1940s, had red-blond hair and blue eyes. A strong opponent of the Zionists, he is shown below conferring with Adolf Hitler in Berlin in 1941.

The Zionists wanted to establish an exclusively Jewish national state, from which they could direct the activities of the Jews spread throughout the Gentile world — and eventually direct the Gentile world itself. Toward this end groups of Jews from Europe began buying up land in Palestine and establishing Jewish colonies there in the 1870s and 1880s.

This colonization activity inevitably provoked the fear and resentment of the Palestinians, and in response the Turkish administrators took measures to limit the activities of the Zionists in Palestine. The Jews countered by seeking political allies among the Gentiles in England and Europe and looking for ways to bring pressure against the Turks.

THEODOR HERZL

THEODOR HERZL

To coordinate their moves they organized a Zionist Congress, which held its first meeting in August 1897, in Basle, Switzerland. The leading figure at the first Zionist Congress was Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), whose book Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State), published in Vienna the year before, contained a cogent summary of the Zionist position.

According to Herzl: “Every nation in whose midst Jews live is, either covertly or openly, anti-Semitic…. Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among the nations; indeed, it is bound to increase, because the causes of its growth continue to exist and cannot be removed.”

He saw this anti-Semitism, which arose naturally wherever the Jewish presence made itself felt, as a blessing, because it kept the Jews conscious of their unique status, prevented their assimilation, and united them in their efforts to overcome their Gentile hosts: “… [T]hus united, we suddenly discover our strength….When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.”

Even before the Zionist Congress met, Herzl had been attempting to persuade the Turks to give the Jews free rein in Palestine. First he tried blackmail, hinting that he and his fellow Jews, by using their influence, could either silence or intensify the agitation against Turkey then being carried on in various European capitals by Armenian expatriates, who had their own grievances.

Moses Hess

MOSES HESS

When the blackmail didn’t work, Herzl’s thoughts turned to war. He told his fellow Zionists at Basle that they might be able to achieve control of Palestine through a European war, if they played their cards right: “It may be that Turkey will refuse or will be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now a question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations…. The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the peace conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time.”[3]

The other Zionist leaders fell in with Herzl’s war plans — which, it is well to note, were proclaimed to world Jewry 17 years before the actual outbreak of the war. As it turned out, the Jews were able to use the war just as they had hoped: from it they finagled a promise by the government of Great Britain to secure Palestine for them.

This promise, the so-called “Balfour Declaration,” has an especially interesting history, for it not only throws light on the crucial period during which the Jews first secured the control over the foreign policy of the United States which they still wield — that is, the period during which the American people lost their sovereignty, unknowingly yielding to an alien minority in their midst the power to choose which nations would be America’s friends and which her foes; to decide when there would be peace and when war, and how each war would be waged, whether to win or lose or draw — but it also brilliantly illuminates the general modus operandi which the Jews, spread out as they are among many nations, have long used in playing off one nation against another in order to attain their own ends.

It would hardly be possible to relate here every Zionist move in the 20 years between Herzl’s speech to the first Zionist Congress and the British government’s offer of Palestine to the Jews, even if all the moves were known. It must suffice, in laying the background, to mention a few key developments which made the Balfour Declaration possible.

First, the years immediately following the first Zionist Congress saw an enormous influx of Jews into the United States. Although U.S. immigration statistics prior to 1899 do not reveal the race or religion of immigrants, we know that in 1897 the total Jewish population of the United States was approximately 800,000 — and nearly half of those had arrived in the preceding decade. By 1914 the number had more than tripled, to some 2 1/2 million. The majority of the new immigrants came from Russia, where the Zionist movement was especially strong.

This tidal wave of Jewish immigrants made itself felt very soon in the economic and political life of the United States. Jewish ambition and energy, not to mention a predilection for those endeavors yielding quick gain, resulted in a phenomenally rapid growth in the financial power wielded by Jews in the country, and this power was put to immediate use in acquiring a political influence disproportionate to their numbers. Already in 1896, the year before Herzl’s speech, the New York Times fell into Jewish hands, with its purchase by Adolph Ochs. Thirteen years before that Joseph Pulitzer, the Jewish father of yellow journalism, had purchased the New York World. And in the years between 1897 and 1917 the Jews continued their acquisitions, building a very strong bridgehead in the news media for furthering their long-range goals.

Just as the Palestinians had reacted to the Jewish colonization of Palestine, so did White Americans react to the Jewish colonization of America. The politicians responded with their typical timidity and ambiguity to White demands for a halt to the flood of Jews. In 1897 the U.S. Congress enacted a law requiring proof of literacy before immigrants could be admitted to the United States. The law would have kept out most of the Jews from Russia and other parts of eastern Europe then pouring into the country, but it never had a chance to accomplish its aim, because President Cleveland vetoed it.

As the growing Jewish presence became more obnoxious to Americans, the pressure on the reluctant politicians to do something grew. Jewish political influence had also grown apace, however, and the Jews were able to counter every effort at legislation intended to keep them out of the country. President Taft vetoed another immigrant-literacy law early in 1913, just before leaving office, and President Wilson did the same thing in 1914.

The second major development leading to the Zionists’ triumph in 1917 was the election of Woodrow Wilson to the Presidency in 1912, and then his reelection in 1916. Wilson was entirely their man. From the time he took office in 1913 until he left it in 1921, he made hardly a decision without consulting his counselor and confidante, Louis Dembitz Brandeis.

Wilson was an ineffectual man, who, after failing to make a career for himself as a lawyer, retreated to the academy, teaching political science first at Bryn Mawr, then at Wesleyan, and finally at Princeton. He was also less than brilliant as an academician, but he possessed a rhetorical flair which he used to promote a hodgepodge of confused, liberal notions, thereby gaining for himself the backing of the liberal element among the Princeton faculty, who eventually boosted him into Princeton presidency. He was never very strong, and he suffered several major breakdowns, even in the relatively sheltered life of a professor.

Louis Brandeis (1856-1941), an enormously wealthy and successful Boston lawyer, was the son of Jewish immigrants from Bohemia. He was also the leader of the Zionist movement in the United States. In 1912 he headed the group which invited Nahum Sokolow, the Zionist leader from Russia, to speak in the United States. In 1914 he organized and became the chairman of the Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs. But his Zionist leadership was something kept between himself and his fellow Jewish nationalists.

LOUIS D. BRANDEIS

LOUIS D. BRANDEIS

To the American public and the Democratic Party’s politicians he was a very clever advocate of “democracy,” who was involved in a number of celebrated legal cases on behalf of labor unions. His left-wing admirers in the press nicknamed him “the people’s lawyer.”

Wilson had also achieved something of a reputation as a champion of equality and democracy when, as president of Princeton University, he became embroiled in a fight to abolish Princeton’s exclusive student eating clubs, which he regarded as elitist and undemocratic. The ruckus caused by Wilson’s opposition to the eating clubs brought him to the attention of New Jersey’s Democratic Party political bosses, and they chose him as their gubernatorial candidate in 1910. They also introduced him to Brandeis, who took the weak, vain, professorial Wilson firmly in hand and guided him in all political matters (and many private matters as well) thereafter.

When Wilson became President he immediately offered Brandeis a position in his Cabinet, but the clever Jew chose instead to remain in the background, where his influence over Wilson would not become compromised by public scrutiny. Indeed, Brandeis was very wise in this decision, because when he did accept an appointment to the Supreme Court from Wilson in 1916, there was a great deal of public opposition.

Nevertheless, Brandeis became the first Jew to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, and he did so without giving up his informal post as counsel to the President and general political “fixer,” as recent research has revealed.[4]

WOODROW WILSON

WOODROW WILSON

The third development which was essential to Zionist aims was the war itself and the impasse it had reached in the autumn of 1916. We dare not become involved in a history of the First World War here, but the main points relevant to our following of the Zionist trail are these: The principal antagonists were Britain and Germany. One of the many countries fighting on the British side was Imperial Russia. One of the several countries on the German side was Turkey. In the west the antagonists were stalemated, facing each other in opposing trenches which stretched across the continent from north to south and unable to gain very much ground on either side without enormous losses.

The German Verdun campaign of 1916, the longest and bloodiest “battle” in the history of warfare, had failed to achieve any significant advantage for the Germans, and it was to cost them and their French opponents half a million casualties each before it finally petered out. The Franco-British Somme offensive, which followed the ebb of the German offensive at Verdun — and which cost the British 19,000 dead on the first day — proved equally inconclusive.

On the eastern front the Russian Brusilov offensive cost the Czar a million men and left him so weakened that the Germans thereafter held the advantage.

At sea German submarines were claiming an increasing toll on British shipping, and Britain was feeling the strain. The only hope British leaders could see for ending the stalemate was to bring America into the war. Otherwise, to continue the war would bankrupt them; they would be obliged to accept a compromise peace, without achieving their aim of crushing Germany as an industrial-commercial rival. The public sentiment in America was strongly against intervention in the war, and Wilson won reelection in November by campaigning as a pacifist. His campaign slogan was, “He kept us out of war.”

Thus was the stage set. Now enter the Zionists.

The Jews had three principal aims: First, to break the Turkish hold on Palestine. Second, to obtain from whichever power replaced Turkey in Palestine the concessions they had been unable to obtain from the Turks. Third, to destroy Russia, an object of special hatred to them.

Until the fall of 1916 it was the third of these aims which manifested itself most noticeably in the Jews’ policy. It is well to remember that it had been Rus warriors, under Sviatoslav the Great, who in 965 had utterly smashed the Khazar Empire, and the Ashkenazic Jews, who made up virtually all of the Zionist leadership, had long memories. Even today Jews celebrate annually their triumphs over enemies thousands of years ago.

Furthermore, a parallel Jewish movement, Bolshevism, had made great strides in Russia, and Jews throughout the world, of whatever persuasion, wanted to see the Russians weakened to the point that the Bolsheviks could seize the nation. It was with this purpose in mind that Jacob Schiff, America’s richest Jew, financed Trotsky and his fellow Jewish Bolsheviks to the tune of $25 million. Later, after the downfall of Russia, Schiff opened his coffers to the Zionists.

Toward the end of 1916, however, it was clear that Russia was in terminal condition. Although she still had vast armies in the field and even vaster reserves of manpower at home, from a strategic viewpoint Russia was whipped, and the Germans were already beginning to withdraw troops from the eastern front in order to bolster their strength in the west.

A good share of the credit for the Russian collapse belonged to the Bolsheviks, who were working furiously to undermine morale in the trenches and in the factories. They spread pacifist and defeatist leaflets among the troops and carried on in Russia’s cities much as they did more than 50 years later in America’s cities during the Vietnam war.

Until this point then, it had behooved the Jews to back Germany, and they did. Ultimately, however, their plan called for Germany — or, at least, Germany’s ally Turkey — to lose. So it was that in October 1916 the Jews made their offer to the British government: We will bring America into the war, if you will take Palestine away from the Turks and give it to us.

The story of this offer, its acceptance by the British government, and its aftermath has been told in several places and hinted at in many. Not in any of the “approved” history texts dealing with the First World War which are used today in American colleges and universities, of course, or in any “popular” treatments of the war to be found in newsstand paperbacks, but the interested reader can nevertheless find a number of unimpeachable, firsthand accounts, if he is willing to dig a bit in a large library. For example, Malcolm Thomson, the biographer of David Lloyd George, Britain’s wartime prime minister, writes on pages 273-274 of David Lloyd George, the Official Biography (London 1949):

…In the autumn of 1916, when the question of strengthening sympathy with the Allied cause was growing acute, an Armenian Jew, James A. Malcolm, who was giving expert help and advice to the Government about Middle Eastern matters, approached [Foreign Office Undersecretary Sir Mark] Sykes and urged that the Allies should capture the sympathies of American Jewry — at that time tending to favour Germany — by a declaration of support for the Zionist cause. Sykes saw the possibilities of the suggestion, and laid it before Lord Milner, who took it up with the Cabinet….

…Secret assurances were given to the Zionist leaders through Sykes that the British government would support their cause if the consent of their Allies could be obtained. A message to this effect was sent to Justice Brandeis, the American Zionist, who was a close friend of President Wilson, and the help of leading Zionists in all the Allied countries was mobilized.

Samuel Landman, secretary to Zionist leaders Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow in 1916, and later general secretary of the World Zionist Organization, narrates the events from firsthand knowledge in his booklet Great Britain, the Jews, and Palestine (London, 1936). On pages 4-5 he writes:

During the critical days of 1916 and of the impending defection of Russia, Jewry, as a whole, was against the Czarist regime and had hopes that Germany, if victorious, would in certain circumstances give them Palestine. Several attempts to bring America into the War on the side of the Allies by influencing influential Jewish opinion were made and had failed. Mr. James A. Malcolm, who was already aware of German pre-war efforts to secure a foothold in Palestine through the Zionist Jews and of the abortive Anglo-French demarches at Washington and New York; and knew that Mr. Woodrow Wilson, for good and sufficient reasons, always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist (Mr. Justice Brandeis, of the U.S. Supreme Court); and was in close touch with Mr. Greenberg, Editor of the Jewish Chronicle (London); and knew that several important Zionist Jewish leaders had already gravitated to London from the Continent on the qui vive awaiting events; and appreciated and realised the depth and strength of Jewish national aspirations; spontaneously took the initiative, to convince first of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under Secretary to the War Cabinet, and afterwards Monsieur Georges Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and Monsieur Gout of the Quai d’Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was to secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews, by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilise the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists, having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret “gentleman’s” agreement of 1916 made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence and/or approval of the Arabs and of the British, American, French and other Allied Governments, and not merely a voluntary altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable illwill [sic] would represent or rather misrepresent….

An interesting account of the negotiations carried on in London and Paris, and subsequent developments, has already appeared in the Jewish press and need not be repeated here in detail, except to recall that immediately after the “gentleman’s” agreement between Sir Mark Sykes, authorised by the War Cabinet, and the Zionist leaders, cable facilities through the War Office, the Foreign Office and British Embassies, Legations, etc., were given to the latter to communicate the glad tidings to their friends and organisations in America and elsewhere, and the change in official and public opinion as reflected in the American press in favour of joining the Allies in the War, was as gratifying as it was surprisingly rapid.

Landman tells the same story in other places: for example, in a lengthy letter titled “The Origin of the Balfour Declaration” published in the Jewish Chronicle (London, February 7, 1936; page 33).

A much more detailed account of the negotiations between the Jews and the British government in October 1916 is in Two Studies in Virtue (London, 1953), a biography of Sir Mark Sykes by his son, Christopher Sykes, who drew extensively on his father’s diaries and letters of the period. A few paragraphs excerpted here from pages 180-188 of that book suggest the essentials:

…One day in October of 1916 a certain Mr. James Malcolm came to visit Mark Sykes…. Sykes…[said] that he could see no end to the war. In France there was a military deadlock. At sea the power of the [German] submarine was growing; on land that of the Russian armies failing…. A decisive victory, or indeed a victory of any kind, seemed impossible without American participation on an enormous scale, and of that he saw little likelihood…. At this Mr. Malcolm took occasion to harangue his friend on the principles which should govern British foreign policy regarding the Jewish world…. He proceeded to tell him about Zionism….

Mr. Malcolm… then told Sykes of a very curious and powerful influence which Zionists could exert. One of President Wilson’s closest advisers and friends was Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a Jew…. It was believed… that Wilson was attached to Brandeis by ties of peculiar hardness…. It followed that… a Zionist policy was in truth the way to capture American sympathy [for the Allies]….

… [Malcolm then said:] “The question is, do you want the help of the Jews of the United States? The only way you can get that help is by offering Palestine to the Zionists.” …

… [After the British had agreed to the Zionist terms, the leader of the Zionist delegation, Nahum] Sokolow made a simple request, namely that the Zionist Committee should have facilities for communications abroad. He pointed out that since they were an international body this was especially needful to them, and he suggested that they should be granted governmental privileges, since they could thus attain their object while subjecting themselves to the needs of secrecy and censorship….

The next morning… [Sokolow] got what he asked for: it was agreed that the War Office and the Foreign Office would send Zionist letters and telegrams by way of [British] Embassies…. The news was given out to Jewish communities all over the world that in return for certain services the British Government would… satisfy the Jewish longing for Palestine….

A more general account is given by Professor H.W.V. Temperley in his six-volume work, A History of the Peace Conference of Paris (London, 1924). Of the Balfour Declaration he writes (vol. vi, pp. 173-174): “That it is in purpose a definite contract between the British Government and Jewry represented by the Zionists is beyond question. In spirit it is a pledge that in return for services to be rendered by Jewry the British Government would ‘use their best endeavours’ to assure the execution of a certain definite policy in Palestine.”

As Samuel Landman notes above, once the deal had been struck and the word sent out to American Jews, “the change in official and public opinion as reflected in the American press in favor of joining the Allies in the war was… surprisingly rapid.” President Wilson, without blushing or skipping a beat, changed his tune from “I kept us out of war” to “We must destroy German militarism in order to make the world safe for democracy.”

A detailed examination of the chicanery used by the “American” press and President to coax a reluctant nation into sending its sons off to die in Flanders’ fields and a thousand other foreign places, in order that, unknown to them, the Jews could satisfy their side of their deal with the British government, would take us far beyond the scope of this article. The various pretexts used for abandoning neutrality — such as Germany’s submarine blockade of Britain and the so-called “Zimmermann telegram” — are treated exhaustively in the “approved” textbooks on the war (although they are treated with utmost seriousness rather than as pretexts).

In brief, it was a matter of Wilson’s talking peace, even sending his personal factotum, “Colonel” Edward Mandell House, on supposed peace missions to the various belligerents, while actually seizing every opportunity to fan the flames of war. The scheme was to present an appearance to the public of his being forced, much against his will, to go to war in order to defend America’s honor. Because the war provided plenty of real opportunities for international “incidents” to occur, especially when Wilson took pains to see that Americans would be in harm’s way as often as possible, it was not overly difficult to generate the desired impression in the public mind.

For example, when a German submarine sank the British ship Laconia on February 25, 1917, with the loss of three Americans who were aboard, Wilson and the press put on a great show of moral outrage at this act of German “barbarism,” treating it as an intolerable affront to American sovereignty. It was a matter of exaggerating incidents which could have been ignored — or avoided altogether — if Wilson really had wanted to preserve American neutrality. The German submarine blockade of Britain was milked for all it was worth to generate anti-German sentiment among the American people, while the far more ruthless British blockade of Germany was quietly ignored. Wilson connived to assure that the former would yield pretexts for intervention, while he took measures to prevent American ships and citizens from running afoul of the latter. [5]

In any event, it is clear that Mr. Ochs’s investment in the New York Times yielded a handsome dividend to world Jewry, as did Mr. Brandeis’ years of patient counsel to the fawningly grateful and ever more dependent Woodrow Wilson.

The British formalized their intention to satisfy their side of the deal with the Jews by issuing the Balfour Declaration, which was in the form of a letter, dated November 2, 1917, from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to “Lord” Lionel Rothschild, who was recognized as the leader of the Jewish community in Britain. The brief document merely stated a resolution which had been approved by the British Cabinet: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

The last provision, added at Jewish insistence, reveals the Zionists’ intention that Jews everywhere should be uniquely favored by being permitted to enjoy the citizenship, with full rights and privileges, of both the Gentile country in which they happen to reside at the moment and of their “national home” in Israel.

The reservation about not prejudicing the “civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine” was, under subsequent Jewish pressure, eventually ignored.

ARTHUR JAMES BALFOUR

ARTHUR JAMES BALFOUR

The Balfour Declaration provides an especially interesting example of the hypocritical cant which has characterized the statesmanship of both of the great English-speaking powers during the 20th century. Pious concern for the rights of the non-Jews in Palestine is expressed in a document which, in effect, is a promise by the British government to secure for the Jews land which belonged neither to it nor to the Jews. How did Mr. Balfour imagine that his government could accomplish that dubious feat without prejudicing the rights of the current owners of the land, who were in no mood to give it up willingly?

One is reminded of the British government’s claim in September 1939 that it was declaring war on Germany in order to protect the freedom of its ally Poland, which had been invaded by Germany — a claim which conveniently overlooked the fact that the Soviet Union had also invaded Poland. In 1945 the same British government, its earlier expression of concern for Polish freedom buried under a bushel of new cant about democracy and peace, obligingly agreed to its ally becoming an unwilling vassal of the Soviet Union.

Nothing, however, can quite match the unabashed brazenness of the hypocrisy Woodrow Wilson displayed in engineering the entry of the United States into the First World War — unless it was that displayed a generation later by Franklin Roosevelt, when he too talked peace and plotted war, at the behest of the same people Wilson had served.

WILSON'S campaign propaganda for the 1916 election emphasized his stance of non-intervention in the war then raging in Europe. Most of the press and the public were also against intervention. Then, after Wilson's reelection -- and the British-Zionist deal, concluded just a few days before the election -- the press began a "surprisingly rapid" shift toward an interventionist stance. Wilson followed, calling for a declaration of war against Germany just five months after his reelection. Even before that, however, he and Brandeis had been planning war, and it was their secret assurances that the United States would be brought into the war that led British leaders to reject Germany's peace offer of December 12, 1916. If that offer had been accepted, the lives of some three million White soldiers -- including 115,000 Americans -- Which were consumed in 1917 and 1918 would have been spared. Furthermore, the Second World War, which grew out of the unjust conditions imposed on Germany after the Allied victory, would have been avoided. And if Russia could have had peace in December 1916, she probably would have had time to stamp out the Bolshevik virus being spread among her soldiers and workers by the Jews, and Communism would have suffered a setback from which it might never have recovered. All of the grim and bloody consequences of Wilson's switch in foreign policy stem from the Zionist influence in the U.S. news media and politics, which had been built up over the preceding two decades.

WILSON’S campaign propaganda for the 1916 election emphasized his stance of non-intervention in the war then raging in Europe. Most of the press and the public were also against intervention. Then, after Wilson’s reelection — and the British-Zionist deal, concluded just a few days before the election — the press began a “surprisingly rapid” shift toward an interventionist stance. Wilson followed, calling for a declaration of war against Germany just five months after his reelection. Even before that, however, he and Brandeis had been planning war, and it was their secret assurances that the United States would be brought into the war that led British leaders to reject Germany’s peace offer of December 12, 1916. If that offer had been accepted, the lives of some three million White soldiers — including 115,000 Americans — Which were consumed in 1917 and 1918 would have been spared. Furthermore, the Second World War, which grew out of the unjust conditions imposed on Germany after the Allied victory, would have been avoided. And if Russia could have had peace in December 1916, she probably would have had time to stamp out the Bolshevik virus being spread among her soldiers and workers by the Jews, and Communism would have suffered a setback from which it might never have recovered. All of the grim and bloody consequences of Wilson’s switch in foreign policy stem from the Zionist influence in the U.S. news media and politics, which had been built up over the preceding two decades.

Upon reflection, may we not conclude that lying cant is what should be expected of any government which has degenerated to the point that it consists mainly of lawyers? And is not that the kind of government which must inevitably devolve under a system which gives the franchise to the credulous and the gullible?

It is the historians and the teachers, however, who most deserve our scorn. Everyone expects lawyers to lie; word trickery is their stock-in-trade. No lawyer committed to the truth could hope to earn a living. But historical scholars are supposed to be different. They are supposed to be indifferent to popular myths, always seeking the reality which lies beneath the facile explanations of governments and politicians.

The explanation for the reluctance of modern historians to write about the Zionist role in the First World War is this: In the immediate postwar years, the Zionist responsibility for America’s entry into the war was a valid topic for historical investigation and discussion, with even the Zionists freely admitting their actions. After all, America and Britain had won the war, and Germany was down and out. How could the truth hurt anyone?

Then in 1933 Germany, under Adolf Hitler, began getting back on its feet. Suddenly any discussion of the truth about the Zionist role in the last war became “anti-Semitic.”

One man who was privy to every detail of that role was David Lloyd George. In 1938 the former British war secretary and prime minister wrote a two-volume book, The Truth about the Peace Treaties. In that book he described the way in which Jews all over the world — in Germany and Russia as well as in America — immediately switched from a pro-German to an anti-German stance after the deal between his government and the Zionists was made. He pointed out the fatal consequences this switch had for the German war effort. And on page 1140 he noted: “The Germans themselves know that to be the case, and the Jews in Germany are suffering today for the fidelity with which their brethren in Russia and in America discharged their obligations under the Zionist pledge to the Allies.”

Since the Second World War, any criticism of the Jews has been taboo, and even the historical scholars have feared to tread on ground where their discoveries might reveal the Jews in a a bad light. The consequences of this cowardice have been very costly indeed.

From National Vanguard magazine (December, 1982)

transcribed by Michael Olanich

Next time: From the Balfour Declaration to the Rosh Hashana Massacre.

Notes:

1 – The language of the Philistines has not been preserved, except in a few clay tablets bearing a script as yet untranslated but apparently related to the so-called Minoan A script. The preponderance of scholarly opinion is that the Philistine language was Indo-European and that the Philistines themselves entered the Aegean region as a part of the great Phrygian migration from the Indo-European heartland north of the Black Sea in the 13th century B.C. The Dorians, who invaded and conquered the Peloponnesus at that time and whose best known city was Sparta, may have been their traveling companions.

2 – The Ashkenazim are those Jews whose ancestry lies in eastern Europe. Racially they are partly European, partly Semitic (i.e., of the same racial stock as the Sephardim), and partly Turko-Mongol. Their origin was among the Khazars, a Turko-Mongol tribe which invaded southern Russia from Central Asia in the sixth century A.D. and adopted Judaism en masse in the eighth century.

The Sephardim are those Jews whose origin was in the Arabian peninsula. During and after Roman times they spread from Palestine throughout the Mediterranean basin, establishing an especially strong presence in the Iberian peninsula during the centuries of the Moorish occupation.

Some of the Jews expelled from Iberia at the end of the 15th century migrated to the Netherlands and to the New World, while most of them went to northern Africa or various Middle Eastern lands. Jews who had remained in northern Africa or the Middle East since Roman times are sometimes called Oriental Jews to distinguish them from the other Sephardim.

There has been a certain amount of mixing between the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim since the early Middle Ages, primarily through the extensive involvement of both groups in foreign commerce. Thus, both Ashkenazim and Sephardim share many genetic traits, despite their diverse origins. See The Genetics of the Jews, by A.E. Mourant, Ada C. Kopec, and Kazimiera Domaniewska-Sobczak (Clarendon Press, 1978).

Most of the Jews of the United States and Europe today are Ashkenazim, while the Sephardim slightly outnumber the former in Israel.

3 – American Jewish News (New York), March 7, 1919. A photographic reproduction of the pertinent sections from that publication and other Zionist documents may be found in Issue No. 48 of National Vanguard.

The reader should note that Herzl uses the expression “the nations,” both in this speech and in the excerpt quoted above from his book, as a code phrase: He gives it the same meaning it has in the Old Testament, as in, “…I have this day set thee over the nations… to root out and to pull down and to destroy…” (Jeremiah 1:10) That is, “the nations” means “the goyim.”

Harper’s Bible Dictionary (Madeleine S. Miller and J. Lane Miller, New York, 1959), has the entry: “nations, a term used by Hebrew writers for non-Israelites, outsiders, Gentiles, heathen.”

4 – The Brandeis-Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices, by Bruce Murphy (Oxford University Press, 1982). Murphy, a political science professor at Pennsylvania State University, discovered an extensive file of correspondence between Brandeis and a Jewish law professor at Harvard University, Felix Frankfurter (1882-1965). From the time of his appointment to the Supreme Court in 1916 until his retirement in 1939, Brandeis paid Frankfurter to serve as his messenger and errand boy, so that Brandeis could secretly maintain all of his political contacts behind the cloak of judicial impartiality.

5 – The chicanery involved in the way Wilson and the press dealt with the blockades the belligerents imposed on one another is revealed especially well in Colin Simpson’s excellent and thoroughly documented book The Lusitania (Boston, 1972). That book in turn refers the interested reader to a number of other valuable sources.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/background-to-treason-part-1/feed/ 0
The Cost http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/the-cost/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/the-cost/#comments Sat, 07 Jun 2014 12:00:30 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1569 white-atlas

American Dissident Voices broadcast of June 7, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HOW MUCH has it cost us to become subservient to the Jewish power structure? How much has it cost us to open our borders and embrace multiracialism, which we did largely at their insistence? How much has it cost us to see our once-shining cities gutted and turned into filthy ghettos? How much has it cost us to support the Jewish state of Israel? How much has it cost us to come under the financial tyranny of their banks and their debt-money system?

I usually don’t quantify our problems as White Americans in dollars and cents, but . . . → Read More: The Cost]]> white-atlas

American Dissident Voices broadcast of June 7, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HOW MUCH has it cost us to become subservient to the Jewish power structure? How much has it cost us to open our borders and embrace multiracialism, which we did largely at their insistence? How much has it cost us to see our once-shining cities gutted and turned into filthy ghettos? How much has it cost us to support the Jewish state of Israel? How much has it cost us to come under the financial tyranny of their banks and their debt-money system?

I usually don’t quantify our problems as White Americans in dollars and cents, but let’s make an exception today. Sometimes it’s valuable to look at things from an economic perspective, just to get a feeling for the enormity of the problem.

Let’s try to answer those questions in the most cautious and careful way we can.

The parasitic state

Since the founding of the state of Israel in 1948, the mainly-White taxpayers of the United States have funneled some 134 billion dollars in direct aid to the racial-nationalist Jewish state, while the Jewish minority has labored mightily and successfully to prevent us from having anything even faintly resembling racial-nationalism here or in any White nation. The 134 billion dollars — a figure from 1997, so the current total is much higher — does not include special favors such as huge “loans” which don’t have to be paid back, special tax status for private donations to Israel and Israeli causes, spending on “cooperative” military and intelligence projects, and the like. It doesn’t include the interest which we might have earned on this money had we not handed it over to the Jews, and it also is not inflation-adjusted for the microdollars we are forced to use in 2014 — and that single factor alone could easily double the total figure, since inflation of the money supply means that 1948 dollars really should be counted as ten or more dollars each, and 1975 dollars as five or more dollars each. So the figure of 134 billion is really very, very conservative.

Just as conservative is the figure of 70 billion dollars out-and-out given to Egypt since 1979. This also does not include inflation, special military projects, et cetera. Why should aid to Egypt be included? For the very simple reason that, as I’ve been saying for twenty years, the huge amount of money we give to Egypt is part of a “deal” under which we pay off the successively more corrupt Egyptian governments and in return they agree not to make war on Israel or try to get back any of the territory Israel took from them in 1967. Thus this aid to Egypt is a direct result of Jewish influence on the government of the United States. There is abundant proof of this, but perhaps the most direct confirmation comes from a secret cable sent from the US Embassy in Cairo in March 2009 that was recently made public by Wikileaks:

“President Mubarak and military leaders view our military assistance program as the cornerstone of our mil-mil [military to military] relationship and consider the USD 1.3 billion in annual FMF [Foreign Military Financing] as ‘untouchable compensation’ for making and maintaining peace with Israel.”

Wars for Israel

Just as certain as the fact that Egypt’s aid is really to benefit the Jewish state is the fact that the “war on terror” and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were fought to advance Israeli interests. The plans for these conflicts were laid long in advance by Jewish “neoconservative” groups seeking to increase Israeli hegemony over the Middle East, to weaken and destroy strong Arab and Muslim states there, and to have American soldiers do all the dying required to achieve those goals. The 9/11 attacks were used as an emotional weapon by these groups, with the strong  cooperation of the Jewish-controlled mass media, to induce Americans to support these wars, which began in 2001 and show no signs of ending, the longest conflicts by far in American history. Unless something radical happens soon, tomorrow’s teenagers will have known the “war on terror” their entire lives. It has become a permanent, ugly feature of the American landscape.

Measuring the costs of the Afghan and Iraq wars alone, we come up with a figure of 6 trillion dollars, which, to put it in perspective with the aid figures just cited, is the same as saying 6 thousand billion dollars. This does not count overt and covert incursions into Pakistan or other neighboring states, the secret but doubtlessly huge CIA budget for black operations and illegal missile strikes on non-belligerents in the region, and it does not at all include the gigantic costs for the erection of the domestic spying and “national security” establishment set up to “fight terror” and keep tabs on Israel’s enemies in the US, which also were justified as part of the “war on terror” in the aftermath of 9/11. So the 6 trillion dollar figure is also very, very conservative.

Multiracialism

One of the unique features of the Jewish power structure is its fanatical adoption of racial-nationalism — not all that different from its nemesis, National Socialism — for its own people in Israel, coupled with its equally fanatical opposition to racial-nationalism among Whites. The organized Jewish groups almost universally support Israel “as a Jewish [read: racial] state” while at the same time demonizing and, where possible, criminalizing the adoption or espousal of racial-nationalism among Whites. No greater power was brought to bear to forcibly integrate Blacks into American life (including our bedrooms) than that of organized Jewry. No group has been more vociferously in favor of opening our borders to invasion than have the Jewish groups. No greater force exists in academia than the entirely Jewish Frankfurt School and its descendants, pushing a philosophy of racial denigration, dehumanization, and genocide against Whites. And the Jewish-dominated media speak with one voice: White racial consciousness or preference of any kind is “racism” and an evil so terrible that it must be eliminated at any cost. Without these monumental Jewish efforts, it is quite likely that America today would be even Whiter than the more than 90 per cent. peak we achieved in the mid-1960s, just before our selective immigration laws were abandoned and the legal barriers to racial mixing were declared invalid without a vote.

So it is reasonable to place the cost of supporting the ever-increasing population of non-Whites on our list.

Since 1965, federal expenditures for welfare were 17 trillion dollars, and total expenditures were 24 trillion. The rate is increasing exponentially, and we are now spending over 1 trillion dollars per year. One often hears the canard that “most welfare recipients are White,” but this is not true. More than 60 per cent. of welfare recipients are non-White, even though non-Whites only account for somewhat under 40 per cent. of the US population, according to official US government statistics.

So, if we take the total figure of 24 trillion dollars in welfare, and assign only half of it to the cost of Jewish-sponsored multiracialism, we have 12 trillion dollars to add to our costs. This doesn’t count the interest we’ve had to pay on “borrowing” almost all of this money from the bankers, nor does it take into account inflation — which has been severe since 1965 — and it doesn’t factor in the interest and growth that would have been in our favor if that money had been invested instead of spent on Big Macs for Lakreesha and Jamal. It doesn’t factor in the heavy load placed by non-Whites on our criminal justice and health care systems. It doesn’t count the costs of the constant cycles of destruction, reconstruction, and repeated destruction in our inner cities. I could go on listing the things it doesn’t include. So this figure of 12 trillion dollars is extremely, almost unbelievably, conservative.

And what about the direct costs to White American families, literally millions of whom have had to flee those inner cities? Just the cost of moving — which often involves selling at a loss — and establishing a new home is huge. Consider Detroit, once a shining jewel of a city and home to a large and prosperous White population, and now an almost lawless and devastated Third World slum, one step above Mogadishu. If we estimate that the 1.1 million who have fled that city suffered just $150,000 each in losses and repurchase costs, surely an underestimate, we have a figure of 165 billion dollars for Detroit alone. Add in St. Louis, Philadelphia, Chicago, and Buffalo, and you easily have three times that figure. And that’s just the beginning of the cities where White flight became imperative. And I’m not even counting the dreams that were crushed because “Affirmative Action” kept White families from prospering as they should. I’m not even taking into account the losses from violence and crime. But let’s be ultra-cautious — almost ridiculously cautious — and just double the Detroit-alone relocation figures. The result is 330 billion dollars.

More in six years than in all prior US history

Everything I’ve enumerated so far adds up to 18.5 trillion dollars, more than the entire astronomical “national debt” of the United States. But I’ve saved the “best” for last.

Dwarfing all these horrific costs borne by White Americans because of the actions of the organized Jewish minority over the last half century, and dwarfing them even if we include the 4.5 trillion dollar costs of World Wars One and Two (our participation in which were both largely due to organized Jewish machinations), and happening not over a period of many decades but in just the last few years is the multi-trillion-dollar bailout of the predominantly Jewish banking system.

This “bailout” is an outright giveaway to a group of vultures so greedy that even the right to create money out of thin air couldn’t save them — a series of blatant payoffs, phony guaranteed “loans” which were really gifts, and even payoffs to foreign bankers — all happening while millions of healthy White American families were driven to the wall by unemployment and loan foreclosure.

The total cost, including payments from the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, for this bailout is 29.5 trillion dollars. With just the stroke of a pen and in just a few months’ time, we gave or “guaranteed” these vampires more than the entire cost of World War One, World War Two, and the entire US welfare establishment since 1965 combined.

The real cost is unimaginable

In calculating the costs we have borne as a people for the highly questionable privilege of being ruled by Jewish supremacists, I’ve been very conservative with my figures. And I don’t claim to be all-inclusive. I am sure that many other costs could be added. But nevertheless, the total cost for our servitude and degradation I have enumerated so far comes out to an astounding 48 trillion dollars — almost three times the current national debt of the United States and almost twice our gross domestic product.

Looked at on a more personal and understandable level, that is more than $240,000 for every single White man, woman, and child in the United States — about three quarters of a million dollars for every family of three.

How would our lives be different — how would America be different — if we had kept this wealth for ourselves? And not just the “dollars” — but the benefits that would have accrued if we had been able to invest this wealth in productive enterprise, and used the power of legitimate, compounding gains for us instead of against us as debt.

How many new scientific research laboratories might have been endowed? How many spaceports constructed? How many worlds explored? How many more brilliant students would have been educated? How many more amazing discoveries would have been made?

Today, our brightest students graduate already weighed down with crippling bank debt, unable in many cases to even dream of marrying and having children. The best of our kind are dying out. Would we be in this predicament if we had kept this wealth for ourselves — if the organized Jewish minority had never blessed our shores? How would life be for you and your family without debt, and with hundreds of thousands in productive wealth, free and clear, available for your use? Even if it was in the form of guarantees and interest-free credit? How much stronger would we be as a nation? How much better could we help the truly needy and unfortunate among us? How much better would we be able to protect our genetic and cultural heritage, and defend against invaders? How much more secure? And, above all, how much better could we provide for the only future we really have, our children and their children and so on into infinity?

What we have given up! Not just this wealth — but our entire future. Two generations and more of White Americans have been irresponsible fools. When the world’s wealthiest and most powerful ethnic group told them a transparently phony story of how poor and persecuted they were, they fell for it, and gave the keys to their homes and their treasure and their seats of power to the Jewish establishment, and now our children’s future — our entire race’s future — is in serious jeopardy.

If you are one of the few who can see the truth of what I am telling you — and you want to help awaken those who are capable of being awakened while there is still time — let me hear from you, today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right, and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/06/the-cost/feed/ 1
Your Conscience Will Not Rest http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/05/your-conscience-will-not-rest/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/05/your-conscience-will-not-rest/#comments Sat, 31 May 2014 12:00:52 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1566 boer_genocide

American Dissident Voices broadcast of May 31, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

CAN YOU REST secure in your bed while White people are being killed for being White? (ILLUSTRATION: A massive field of crosses commemorate the murdered White farmers of South Africa. How often has this issue been highlighted — or even mentioned — in the major media in the West?)

Can you tranquilly go to your job every day and serve the system happily in whatever way you serve it? When you get home, can you relax and switch on cable TV for a few thrills or laughs, then go to sleep in peace? Can you do all . . . → Read More: Your Conscience Will Not Rest]]> boer_genocide

American Dissident Voices broadcast of May 31, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

CAN YOU REST secure in your bed while White people are being killed for being White? (ILLUSTRATION: A massive field of crosses commemorate the murdered White farmers of South Africa. How often has this issue been highlighted — or even mentioned — in the major media in the West?)

Can you tranquilly go to your job every day and serve the system happily in whatever way you serve it? When you get home, can you relax and switch on cable TV for a few thrills or laughs, then go to sleep in peace? Can you do all that while White people — totally innocent White people, farmers, workers, men, women, the elderly, little schoolchildren, even babies — are being killed just because they’re White?

“Of course I can,” you say. “No such thing is happening. Whites being killed for being White? Total fantasy. I’ve never heard of such a thing. You’re a neo-nazi nutjob. Go away. Shut up. Don’t bother me. My favorite show comes on in five minutes.”

But if you say that, you’d be wrong. One hundred per cent. wrong. White people are being killed just for being White.

Look at South Africa. Behind the smiling, beatific portrayals of Saint Nelson Mandela we see on magazine covers — behind the rainbow graphics and the high school textbooks telling us how “democracy” now blesses that land once blighted by the wicked racial separatism called Apartheid — lurks a gigantic, unmistakable reality of chaos, destruction, disintegration, savagery, and murder of the innocent.

South Africa — once a rising, civilized First World nation and a leader in science and technology — has now become the AIDS capital and the rape capital of the world, where government leaders believe in superstitions and claim that HIV does not cause AIDS, where there is an orgy of infant rape by those who believe that such unspeakable acts can cure that incurable disease, where more than a quarter of the women say they’ve been raped and more than a third of the men admit they have committed rape, and where more than a third of rapes are rapes of children. You probably know nothing about those things, though they’re well-documented. And there’s much more that you haven’t been told.

Today let me tell you how, in the “new,” “democratic” South Africa, White people are being killed simply because they are White. Since the fall of Apartheid, more than 4,000 White farmers and their families have been murdered by Black gangs explicitly encouraged by the ANC government to seize the White farmers’ land. Since the fall of Apartheid, more than 60,000 Whites in total have been murdered by Blacks.

The ANC (“African National Congress”) rules South Africa, which is essentially a one-party state. The ANC commands support among the majority-Black population primarily because of its opposition to Whites. Though many have fled, some 4.6 million White people still live in South Africa. The recent leader of the ANC’s youth group, Julius Malema, recently reinstituted the singing of a song at his group’s conventions which includes the words “Shoot the Boers, kill the farmers” in its lyrics, one small indicator of the attitude of the government and the Black population toward Whites. “Boer” (which means “farmer”) and “settler” are words commonly used to mean Whites in South Africa.

Malema is now associated with a powerful ANC splinter group, the so-called “Economic Freedom Front,” in that country, some of whose slogans include “the honeymoon is over for White people in South Africa” and “a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate.” Malema has been described by Jacob Zuma, the leader of the ANC and the President of South Africa, as the “future leader” of South Africa.

Dr. Gregory Stanton is the chairman of Genocide Watch, an organization dedicated to observing societies around the world, and rating them based on an eight-point scale measuring the imminence or presence of genocide. Dr. Gregory is a liberal on race, and was in fact for many years an anti-Apartheid activist. Nevertheless, at a conference at the Transvaal Agricultural Union in Pretoria, South Africa, Dr. Gregory announced that South Africa’s Boers were in danger of genocide at level six on the eight-point scale; since then the rating has been varying between five and six. I should note that stage eight on Dr. Gregory’s scale is denial of genocide after extermination occurs, stage seven is the literal extermination of the targeted group, and stage six is actual preparation for extermination. Dr. Stanton notes that although Julius Malema was chastised by a South African court for his calls to murder Whites and forced to step down from the ANC, he still commands a large support base in the party and in fact, the President of South Africa and head of the ANC himself, Jacob Zuma, “sang ‘Shoot the Boer’ at the ANC Centenary Celebration event in January of 2012.”

A petition condemning this genocide on activism.org describes the horrors endured by its victims:

The victims of this… genocide [include] everyone from year-old babies to old age pensioners in their nineties. It is disgraceful enough that this genocide is happening, but prior to [their] murder, the vast majority of victims are gang-raped, tortured — often in front of their families — then in the final act of humiliation, their bodies are defiled. The crime scene photos… are gruesome and so explicit, I myself, will be haunted by those scenes for the rest of my life. Some of the barbaric, satanic scenes [from these] crime photos that spring to mind are those of a young woman, brutally gang-raped, then a broom inserted into her genitalia; another is a young woman, gang-raped, strung up by the ankles and then gutted like a fish, with her entrails hanging out. These are the most foul, diabolical crimes imaginable. There are also scenes of crime photos of young babies, tortured before death and elderly people gang-raped and sodomized, tortured and murdered in the most evil ways imaginable.

Multiply these farm murder horrors by 4,000 — multiply the racially-motivated murders of Whites by 60,000, and you will have some faint idea of what is really going on in the new “rainbow” South Africa.

Can you rest secure in your bed while the leaders of our government take no note of this ongoing genocide of Whites, and do nothing and even say nothing about it? The same Establishment that studiously ignores the ongoing murders of these isolated, innocent White families made one Hell of a lot of noise — and engineered economic boycotts and prodigious international pressure — when it was Whites who were allegedly oppressing Blacks in that country, even though no one claims that what was done under Apartheid even faintly resembled genocide.

Can you rest secure in your bed while the non-White owners of the major media deliberately hush up these horrific killings of White people? When Apartheid was in force, the major news and entertainment media, from magazines and newspapers to books, television, and film were loud, vehement, and relentless in their claims that the treatment of Blacks in South Africa was a crisis of world importance — a problem that “had to be solved” — a moral outrage that should have us all protesting and shouting from the housetops and boycotting and demanding sanctions until South Africa’s Blacks were allowed to rule there. And they succeeded in their campaign.

But now that conditions are worse in South Africa than they have ever been before — now that so-called “multiracial democracy” under the ANC has driven that country beyond the brink of chaos, poverty, crime, and epidemic disease for even the Blacks themselves — and now that White people are being openly murdered while the president of the country sings songs celebrating those murders — why, the Jewish-dominated media in America and the West are virtually silent. There is no outrage. There are no calls for boycotts or sanctions. No one in the media is even asking quietly that maybe, just maybe, the ANC should politely request that the murderous gangs and paramilitary units should stop murdering White people. No, not at all. In fact, the alien-controlled media do the exact opposite. The rise of the ANC is depicted in glowing, almost uniformly positive terms. And those who call attention to the ongoing genocide of Whites there are often depicted as “racists.”

Criticism of Zuma in the billionaire oligarchs’ media? For all practical purposes, it doesn’t exist. Calling for the killing of White people doesn’t prevent Zuma from travelling to the US, being invited to confer with representatives of the Wall Street vultures of the New York Stock Exchange — endorsing the killing of White people doesn’t prevent him from conferring with United Nations officials in New York, or from meeting with “business leaders” all over the country. It doesn’t prevent Zuma from being mentioned in a totally positive light by the US State Department. Zuma even received an honorary doctorate — in “Humane Letters,” no less — from Texas Southern University. If men of our own blood owned the media, I think there’d be a chance that Zuma would be called out for his despicable crimes. I think there’d be a chance that our people would be informed — and outraged — about the mass slaughter of our kin taking place right now in South Africa. I think that there would be a powerful call from the informed, educated public to use any force necessary to save the White people of South Africa.

But because we don’t own our own mass media, and because those who do own the major media in this country are quite happy to see White people dispossessed and slaughtered, there’s nothing. It’s not even one tenth or one one-hundredth of the outrage stoked by the media when cops used their nightsticks on Rodney King one night, or when Trayvon Martin was shot. It’s not even one millionth of that. Not one trillionth. It’s nothing. Sixty thousand White people killed, and the president of South Africa is singing about it, and there’s nothing. What does that tell you about the aliens who control our media and our government? What does that prove about their opinion of White people? And about their plans for us?

If a nationalist politician in Greece or Hungary just says something even mildly critical of Jews, it’s “anti-Semitism” and we never hear the end of it in the media — it’s grounds for outrage, and much more — for dismissal, for the crafting of new “anti-hate” laws, and even for criminal prosecution and imprisonment. But actually slaughter 60,000 White men, women, and children, with the president of the country and major figures from the government endorsing and even celebrating the slaughter in song, and it’s crickets chirping as far as the media oligarchs and the US government are concerned.

Can you rest secure in your bed while these men control almost all that we see and hear about the world?

Can you rest secure in your bed while these same billionaire aliens effectively write our laws?

This isn’t just a South African problem, though the suffering of Whites there and in Zimbabwe may be the greatest. The oligarchs have a plan for us. That plan unfolds in slightly different ways and at slightly different rates in Europe, in America, and in Australasia compared with how it’s unfolding in South Africa right now. But it’s the same plan.

Can you rest secure in your bed while you do nothing?

The National Alliance is looking for those of you who cannot rest — who cannot sit idly by while our people are slated for genocide, for disappearance from the Earth.

The National Alliance is looking for you — if you are one of those whose conscience will not rest until we have regained control of our own survival — our own destiny — once again.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/05/your-conscience-will-not-rest/feed/ 1
The Narrow Bridge http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/05/the-narrow-bridge/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/05/the-narrow-bridge/#comments Sat, 24 May 2014 12:00:11 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1560 DivinityAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of May 24, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHICH WAY will it be, Western Man? Will it be upward to a future of light, of undreamed-of advances, toward a pinnacle of civilization beyond anything we can imagine, toward a destiny in the stars? Or downward toward a Black abyss, an Afro-world of degradation, of drugged unconsciousness, of weak, undeveloped men on the road to extinction, of outrages upon our women and children?

Today I show you the path we are on now: I show you a White girl who believed her teachers and the churches and the controlled media, and who engaged in a sexual . . . → Read More: The Narrow Bridge]]> DivinityAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of May 24, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHICH WAY will it be, Western Man? Will it be upward to a future of light, of undreamed-of advances, toward a pinnacle of civilization beyond anything we can imagine, toward a destiny in the stars? Or downward toward a Black abyss, an Afro-world of degradation, of drugged unconsciousness, of weak, undeveloped men on the road to extinction, of outrages upon our women and children?

Today I show you the path we are on now: I show you a White girl who believed her teachers and the churches and the controlled media, and who engaged in a sexual relationship with a Black male — and paid for it with her life. Today I show you two White women walking the streets of once-White and once-safe Minneapolis, Minnesota who were stalked, then robbed and choked and stabbed by a Black assailant who is still at large, and major media remain silent on the race of the attacker. That is the downward path. That is the abyss.

Today I also show you another way, a better way: a way of upward evolution and advancement so revolutionary that it will make all human progress to date appear to be but the first note in the most marvelous symphony you have ever heard or imagined. Today I give you hope. Today I show you the upward path.

* * *

WE OF EUROPEAN RACE stand on a narrow bridge. Ahead of us, a slender, precarious path leads upward, ever more steeply, into brilliant light. It is no wider than a footstep. The slightest slip and we will fall into the infinitely deep abyss that lies on either side. One misstep means death. And we cannot retreat backwards. The way is blocked; we can never retreat, for that is to attempt to live in the past. The ocean of Time rises relentlessly beneath us. To retreat, or stand still, also brings death. We mount unto ever more giddying heights, or we die.

We have ascended far, so far that we can see only dimly the beginnings of our journey. For three billion years, and more, we have ascended the upward path of evolving Life. The sacrifices and struggles of our forebears in ages past, known and unknown, counted and uncounted, human and pre-human, have led us here. We are the survivors, the descendants of those who trod this path up to this point, before we were born, and who did not fail to advance.

And on this dangerously narrow bridge to the Divine, to that which is beyond Man — on this slender, dangerous upward path — we have lost our balance. Our feet are slipping, and we are one moment away from falling from the heights to the depths — from boundless Life, unimaginable power, and an infinite future, to degradation, death, and disappearance forever from this Universe. We have one second. One second to right ourselves and stop the fall which has already begun. One second before we plunge into the maw of the Eternal Unknown, and die utterly forgotten, non-existent, as if we and all our loved ones and all our ancestors had never lived at all.

If we fall, the abyss will claim us and we will die. But as we die, we will suffer. I give you the abyss:

* * *

Aaron Byers and Hannah Bickley

Aaron Byers and Hannah Bickley

Hannah Bickley was a Shelby, North Carolina high school senior about to graduate and who’d just gotten a job at Waffle House. A pretty White girl with an engaging smile who wanted to be a nurse so she could “help people,” Hannah was like many White girls these days who listen to the Black-oriented “pop music” produced by the Jewish music companies, who watch the Hollywood movies glorifying “masculine” Black men and demonizing “racist” White men, and who listen with innocent ears to the preachers and the teachers telling her over and over again that “racism” — that is, believing that the races are not equal, believing that our race deserves to survive, or believing that racial mixing is wrong — is one of the most “evil” things on this planet. Hannah Bickley listened — and she succumbed.

When she was sixteen she began “dating” an adult Black male — and member of the criminal Black gang called the “Bloods” — by the name of Aaron Byers. I have enough knowledge of the sick, seamy side of this world to know that a White girl “dating” such a creature has little in common with what dating means to most of my listeners. It’s usually not holding hands and getting to know each other; and not romance. White women recruited into the nether-world of Black gangbangers are not treated well. They are abused, they are purposely hooked on drugs, they are sexually used in the most sickening ways imaginable, they are “passed around” at crack houses while half conscious, beaten if they refuse, and treated like pieces of rotten meat — and, if they live long enough, they end up hating themselves so much that they often commit suicide.

At the age of 19, Aaron Byers had felony convictions on his record for a string of 14 gang-related break-ins and robberies. Hannah’s family tried to keep the two apart. Bickley’s uncle said “We did everything we could to try to get some separation between those two.” But it did no good. Byers was seen with Hannah again and again, even at her home. Then teenaged Hannah was caught in a drug bust along with Aaron Byers and she was only able to escape felony prosecution by agreeing to a court order forbidding her to associate with him. But that made no difference. Hannah Bickley had herself tattooed with Aaron Byers’ name. A neighbor of Bickley’s said Byers and Hannah Bickley were seen publicly “kissing and hugging on each other every time I saw them.” Then, almost one year into their “relationship” — just two weeks ago today — Aaron Byers shot and killed Hannah Bickley during a botched robbery attempt in which she was probably participating.

As we die, as we slip into the abyss, we will suffer.

Alex Maple, right, and her heroic roommate

Alex Maple, right, and her heroic roommate [photo: NBC]

Earlier this month, in what was formerly a near-idyllic city of beautiful, intelligent people and low crime — Minneapolis, Minnesota — two young White women, University of Minnesota roommates, were crossing the Hennepin Avenue bridge. I’ve been there myself. Alex Maple and her roommate passed by a heavy-set Black male dressed in dark-colored “sweats” going in the opposite direction. His image was caught on a surveillance video passing Alex and her friend, stopping for a moment, then turning around and following them. One minute later, the Black had grabbed Alex’s friend, wrapping his arm around her chest and putting a knife to her throat, demanding all their cash. They handed over their money. But the cash wasn’t enough; the Black wanted more. He stabbed Maple’s friend in the back, puncturing her lung.

The Black then turned on Alex Maple, stabbing her in the arm and severing her brachial artery. She bled profusely. A passerby frightened the Black and, apparently fearing discovery or capture, he fled. Alex’s roommate saved her life, despite the fact that she had been stabbed and had a punctured lung herself, by ripping off her shirt and using it as a tourniquet to stop the bleeding. Unlike some victims of Black crime, both women survived the attack and are recovering in the hospital. Alex Maple suffered nerve damage in addition to her severed artery and, according to her family, is now “having trouble moving her fingers.”

The Black attacker has not been caught. A full description, widely disseminated to the public, might help find him and stop him from attacking again. But, with one single exception that I have found, the largely Jewish-controlled media in Minneapolis have not even uttered the word “Black” in connection with this crime. And, needless to say, the national news media, dominated by the same Tribe, have not seen fit to publicize this crime at all.

The media corporations, in their local stories, had no problem describing the area where the attack took place in great detail. Despite a string of robberies of smart phones in the area — despite an alleyway attack and a sandwich shop robbery in just the last few weeks very close to the spot where Alex Maple almost died, the media had no trouble describing the neighborhood as “good” and “safe.” I guess the standards for “safe” have changed a lot in Minneapolis since I was there.

When the races are reversed — when a White man or woman attacks a Black — the media’s reaction is quite different. If a White man or woman even dares to say an insulting synonym for “Negro” in a public place, it is grounds for a shrieking media frenzy centered on race, sometimes of national proportions, lasting for weeks, and culminating in a public call that he or she be dismissed and stripped of property, honors, and reputation. But the near-death ordeal of Alex Maple and her roommate at the hands of a Black attacker? Barely a breath of a mention of the race of the attacker. Because he is Black. Because his victims are White. Mentioning his race might give White people the wrong idea.

But the good news is that a growing number of White people already have the “wrong ideas.” By “wrong ideas” I mean the right ideas. The idea that the media lie about race. The idea that the races are very different. The idea that multiracialism is killing us.

In the comments areas of the Web sites of these media outlets — at least the ones who haven’t recently closed or censored their comments sections — we sometimes get to see what the people really think. And awareness is growing. It’s heartening to see remarks on the Hennepin Avenue attack such as these:

On a site where, like most, no description of the race of attacker was given, a commenter remarked: “Description of the perp? Or can we make an educated guess?”

Another, even more ironic: “Huh… I wonder what ethnicity the perpetrator was? I guess we may never know.”

Another: “[The police] said a ‘heavy-set black male.’ I suppose now someone will complain because police said the man’s color. Wasn’t there a complaint about that a while back because it is racial profiling when police say the color.”

Another commenter: “Enjoying that diversity yet?”

And another: “…New York City Bloods …gang members cut random people with razor blade and call it a ‘Buck Fifty’ meaning a cut that requires 150 stitches. All the more reason to get a conceal carry license. Or at least carry a knife. …Black people should be given a choice, prison or live in an enclosed area, like in the movie Escape from New York. This would ease the overcrowded prisons and let them be responsible for their murderous behavior.”

Another: “Please understand, please be tolerant. He was just trying to turn his life around… LOL!”

More comments:

“Shocking, they don’t even state the truth that the thing that did this is a fat black male. How dare they not give all the information that they know? Blacks are getting sicker and prey on non-blacks. They will kill for no reason.”

“It’s called an ethnic conflict model, the elite want racial conflict at the bottom in order to make the top more secure. All immigration to Minnesota should have been halted years ago. Why Are Minnesota and Sweden targeted for ethnic genocide by importing thousands of Somalis? Anti-racist is just a codeword for anti-white.”

Followed by: “It would certainly seem that way. I agree with you.”

“How long will humans sit back passively while wild jungle beasts wage a one-sided genocide on whites? War on Terror? The terrorists are the savages infesting every U.S. city. The War is here and now.”

“I’ve been in Minneapolis, and truth be told… it’s nationally known as “Murderapolis” for a reason. Although no one was murdered, it certainly was intended. Avoid this city, unless you’re carrying, at all costs. My friend since childhood, for instance, lived in a ‘safe’ part of the city, and on the sidewalk in front of his home, a person was shot in plain view ‘execution style.’ Not. Even. Joking.”

Even: “Avoid The Groid…”

“Move on folks, nothing new here. Black male involved in a stabbing.”

On the killing of Hannah Bickley by her Black “boyfriend,” the commenters were almost as frank: “Yes, what can you say? The Velcro hair people.” And “What have these thugs contributed to society that makes them so elite that other races have to watch their every word so as to not offend them?”

There is an awakening. Growing numbers of our people are aware of the racial problem, and more and more of them refuse to censor themselves any longer. Many controlled media sites have closed their comments sections for that very reason.

Our duty is to show them the solution, and the solution is not to fantasize about “restoring the Constitution” or returning to the past and a “business as usual” White America circa 1965. Neither of those things is ever going to happen. The solution is recognizing the enemy, he whose money and power forced multiracialism on America and the West. The solution is knowing who we are. The solution is organizing ourselves in a racially conscious biological and spiritual community. More than anything else, the solution is taking the upward path of evolution once again.

* * *

At about the same time that Alex Maple was bleeding on the streets of Minneapolis and Hannah Bickley was being outraged and then killed, White scientists at Galactic Suite Design in Europe were designing what may become the first private robotic vehicle to explore the surface of another world. Other White scientists were, almost at that same moment, discovering, detecting, and decoding primordial gravitational waves, actual signals from the very beginning of time. It’s a very different world in the places where selection for intelligence and ability rule. In Europe, America, and throughout the formerly White world, such selective environments are still very, very White indeed. And full of amazing accomplishment. Thoughtful minds on the bloody streets are starting to wonder why our whole society can’t be selective too, as it once was.

And, as our feet stumble and some of us fall bloodied into the abyss, other White minds are unlocking the secrets of the genetic code that makes us what we are, and ultimately gives us more power to ascend that upward path than any generation that has come before.

Because now the narrow bridge — the narrow upward path — we have been climbing turns sharply upward. Now we have the power to direct our own evolution. Now we have the power not only to stop our fall into the abyss, but to achieve, in a few centuries, what took blind Nature a million years or more to do. Now stand before us high lands we have never seen before, and achievements so startling and knowledge so extensive that all of our advancement so far — since the dawn of humankind — is in comparison just a first baby step.

That is what the White people who are just beginning their awakening, just beginning to glimpse the abyss need to know. They need not only to see the abyss below. They need to see the light above. And teaching that truth — and refusing to compromise it — is the mission and the duty of the National Alliance.

The real word of God is not ancient Hebrew scriptures. Pythagoras was right. William Pierce was right. The real word of God is mathematics, physics, and genetics. And the greatest of these is genetics. The double spiral of our DNA is the stairway to the stars.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/05/the-narrow-bridge/feed/ 0