National Vanguard http://nationalvanguard.org News. For us. For a change. Tue, 18 Nov 2014 02:50:39 +0000 en-US hourly 1 The Roots of Decadence http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-roots-of-decadence/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-roots-of-decadence/#comments Tue, 18 Nov 2014 02:50:39 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1835 William-Pierce----Eternal-Struggle_forest_path

by Dr. William L. Pierce

DURING THE recent Apollo 17 lunar expedition, publicists and politicians repeatedly emphasized that it was the “last” manned expedition to the moon. There would be no more lunar exploration, because the expeditions were too expensive and the money was needed instead to “improve the quality of life” for Americans.

It was pointed out that huge expenditures for the space program could no longer be justified when millions of Americans were living in “poverty.” One columnist estimated that the money spent by NASA just for the equipment left on the moon by the various Apollo expeditions ($500 million) could have bought a large-screen color TV set for each of one million “underprivileged” (Black) families.

 Troubling Questions

The political decision to halt Western man’s greatest venture of exploration and discovery — a . . . → Read More: The Roots of Decadence]]> William-Pierce----Eternal-Struggle_forest_path

by Dr. William L. Pierce

DURING THE recent Apollo 17 lunar expedition, publicists and politicians repeatedly emphasized that it was the “last” manned expedition to the moon. There would be no more lunar exploration, because the expeditions were too expensive and the money was needed instead to “improve the quality of life” for Americans.

It was pointed out that huge expenditures for the space program could no longer be justified when millions of Americans were living in “poverty.” One columnist estimated that the money spent by NASA just for the equipment left on the moon by the various Apollo expeditions ($500 million) could have bought a large-screen color TV set for each of one million “underprivileged” (Black) families.

 Troubling Questions

The political decision to halt Western man’s greatest venture of exploration and discovery — a decision seemingly concurred in by a substantial portion of the American electorate — and turn instead to more social welfare programs raises some deep and troubling questions for thoughtful Americans.

What is progress? Was Neil Armstrong’s first step onto the lunar surface progress, or is it a color TV set in every “underprivileged” home?

Is it possible that the two things are incompatible in some fundamental way?

Can a people aspire to both luxury and greatness?

 Affluent Decay

Hasn’t our pampered way of life in America softened us a great deal and sapped our will? If that is so, how do we reconcile continued material prosperity with continued toughness and fitness in a hostile and demanding world?

This dilemma is something fairly new to Americans, and it is tied directly to our current lifestyle.

In the not-so-distant past, when nearly all our people lived on farms or in villages, the dilemma did not exist. The principal concern then was not prosperity but survival, and this ever-present necessity provided the frame in which people’s attitudes were formed and decisions made.

A population for whom survival was a principal concern was not necessarily one living in wretched poverty, with famine and starvation imminent. In most times hard work, intelligently directed, kept famine at a safe distance.

 Close to Nature

Nevertheless, men lived closer to Nature and were more mindful of her eternal laws. The cycle of birth, struggle, and death was something everyone recognized and accepted not only as inevitable but as right.

A boy or girl growing up on a farm had daily tasks to perform — not make-work, but chores necessary to the overall operation of the farm — almost from the time he or she could walk. Likewise, the son of the village miller or smith, or the daughter of the butcher or candler, became from the earliest age an essential cog in the family economic machinery. The child did not work for an “allowance” to be spent on toys and entertainment, but as a member of the family team in its struggle for survival.

 Vigilance, Genius, and Toil

Even though in his later years a boy might leave the farm to learn a trade or go to sea or join the army — or, perhaps, if he had the intellect and the inclination, study at a university — his outlook on life and his conduct were still determined to a significant extent by the experiences of childhood.

These experiences were continually reinforced by those of manhood, which taught him that, even though Nature could be bountiful and the world filled with wonderful opportunities, the bounties and the opportunities had to be earned. They were not given to man as a gift from Providence but had to be wrested from adversity through man’s vigilance and genius and toil.

 Reward of Inefficiency

Each man and each woman, in order to get from today to tomorrow, remained aware of the responsibility that rested on his or her shoulders for the successful outcome of that passage. Lest anyone forget, there were always abundant examples, even in the best of times, of the lot which fell to those whose inefficiency or defects of character exceeded the norm by too great a margin: They perished.

Thus, the lifestyle of a people largely rural and agricultural led naturally to certain elements of their outlook and character: parsimony in the expenditure of resources and wealth, self-reliance, an uncomplaining acceptance of the necessity of lifelong hard work, the ability to face hardship with equanimity, the patience and perseverance which were essential ingredients of that craftsmanship whose decline is often lamented today, and a realistic attitude toward some of the less pleasant aspects of the human condition — such as death.

The painting titled "L 'homme a la houe" by Jean-Francois Millet that inspired Edwin Markham to write his poem titled "The Man with a Hoe."

The painting L’homme a la houe by Jean-Francois Millet that inspired Edwin Markham to write his poem The Man with a Hoe

 And a Will to Conquer

Our ancestors seldom, despite the worst ravages of war and famine, fitted the poet Edwin Markham’s pitiful image of the empty-faced man with the hoe, however. They toiled and sweated and suffered and died, but no one ever blew out the light within their brains.

In Africa, in Asia, around the Mediterranean basin perhaps, a stolid and stunned peasantry may have been the rule through long periods of history, but our northern European ancestors were never brothers to the ox. The fire of adventure, of conquest, of upward striving always burned in them — not despite the hardships of their lives, but because of them.

 Spirit Burnished by Hardship

They were the Vikings, the Crusaders, the bold warriors who swept down from the north to build the great civilizations of Greece and Rome, and then again, when those civilizations had become senescent, swept them away and raised on their rubble the Western civilization which now, in its turn, topples toward ruin.

The essence of their lives was struggle. The northern climate they endured was rigorous, and it continually and harshly tested their fitness. At the same time it caused their inner fires to burn more intensely than those of their southern neighbors.

A "Viking Warrior" depicted by the Swedish artist Axil Linus.

Viking Warrior by the Swedish artist Axil Linus

 Western Cataclysm

Then came that great cataclysm in the history of the West, the Industrial Revolution, which brought about a profound change in the lifestyle of our people. In the brief period of 200 years we became an urban-industrial race, giving up almost entirely the rural-agricultural life we had lived for millennia.

In absolute numbers, we spurted ahead enormously; we left the land and concentrated ourselves in urban areas containing our facilities for industrial production; our productivity soared — and with it our per capita consumption.

 Privacy, Independence Lost

As our social interdependence became more complex we lost certain aspects of our individual freedom, but our increased productivity and specialization greatly enlarged our freedom of choice in other areas. Gone were the freedom of the village common, most of the opportunities for privacy and solitude, the ready access to unfenced forest and meadow where a man could work things out between himself and Nature in the manner he chose. In their place came all the laws, rules, regulations, restrictions, ordinances, form-filling, record-keeping, and permit-applying with which an impersonal government bureaucracy hems and hedges the lives of modern men and women.

 Greater Efficiency

But with the more complex form of social organization came other things: increased efficiency in the production and distribution of food, clothing, tools, and other goods; a new realm of career activities, distinct from those of the farm-village economy; a partial independence of the cycles and quirks of Nature.

One man could, with less effort, produce as much food in a day’s time as ten of his predecessors. If he did not choose to be a food producer, he could be an airline pilot, a physicist, a bridge designer, a draftsman, or an astronaut (until the recent cancellation of the space program).

He could turn darkness into daylight if it suited his purpose and moderate the heat of summer, the cold of winter, or the ravages of flood and drought far more effectively than previously.

 New Horizons

Western man did not conquer Nature, nor can he ever, but, by learning a little of how Nature works and applying that knowledge, he opened new possibilities for his continued, upward progress.

The great misfortune of our age is that that progress is not being realized.

Instead, our values have been transformed by the new lifestyle which the Industrial Revolution brought. Comfort, convenience, and consumption became the ends to which we turned our new power.

 What Is a “Good Life”?

The man whose personal wealth once would have consisted of the clothes on his back, a good musket, an ax, and perhaps a few other hand tools now owns two almost-new automobiles (air conditioned), two television sets (one color), a stereo, a fiberglass powerboat on a trailer in the driveway, a full freezer in the basement, an expensive set of golf clubs, an electric wristwatch, and a pocketful of credit cards. Furthermore, he has 200 shares of AT&T and a big life insurance policy, because he wants his kids to have a “good life” too.

The current American definition of the good life includes economic and physical security, freedom from worry, short working hours at a non-strenuous occupation after four years of vacation at a country-club-called-university, plenty of leisure time, enough income to afford not only time-and-labor-saving conveniences and appliances but also an abundance of other consumer goods and hobby items. It is in terms of these things that we define our “standard of living” and compare ourselves with the other nations of the world.

 Avoiding Pain

That this is so should be neither shocking nor surprising. What could be a more natural development than a people, having learned how to work more efficiently, so that their labor yields more than previously, rewarding themselves by increasing their level of consumption or exerting themselves less or both?

It is in the nature of man to avoid pain and seek pleasure.

 Western Achievements

Westerners — people of European, or Aryan, race — are rightfully proud of the great achievements their genius and labor have brought about in science, technology, and social organization: the harnessing of Nature’s energy sources; the creation of a multitude of useful synthetic materials; the development of mass, high-speed, worldwide transportation systems; the conquest or control of many of the diseases and physical handicaps which once scourged mankind; the evolution of industrial mass-production techniques; the invention of nearly instantaneous methods of long-distance communication and their development into mass-communication networks.

 Worse than Pollution

These achievements have their concomitant drawbacks, of course, which are widely recognized. But there is also another drawback which is not generally recognized and which is far more serious in its long-range effects than the others — even than environmental pollution, which, being recognized, can be controlled.

In one word it is decadence. Just as the struggle for survival leads, through Nature’s process of biological selection and elimination, to fitness of a species, so also does the struggle of a people for their daily bread lead, on a timescale of decades instead of millions of years, to their social and moral fitness to survive in a world of eternal conflict and competition with other peoples.

 Meeting Challenges

Struggle is the driving force, in the biological realm, for upward evolution; in the realm of human affairs it is the driving force for all true progress.

When a people are freed from the burden of struggle they inevitably begin to lose their fitness, their toughness, their ability to meet and overcome difficult challenges which they may face at some later time.

 Dilemma of Progress and Decay

Therein lies a real dilemma for us. Through struggle come strength, material and moral progress, and greatness; but from material progress also comes relief from struggle, and from this relief come relaxation of vigilance and determination, softening of moral fiber, erosion of will, loss of the capacity for self-sacrifice and self-denial, loosening of social bonds, national decay, and eventual extinction.

Every people who have made their mark on history have been trapped in this cycle. They have struggled; they have risen; they have attained greatness; they have decayed and passed away.

Decadence; just one of many magazines distributed throughout America today that promote and encourage racial mixing

Decadence: just one of many magazines distributed throughout America today that promote and encourage racial mixing

 Racial Corruption

The customary explanation for the decay is a biological one: a people, having grown powerful and expanded beyond their ancestral boundaries, subject weaker races to servitude. Inevitably, racial mixing takes place, and the half-breed descendants of the masters and their slaves have neither the will or the capacity to maintain the empire or the culture established by the dominant race.

Thus passed Greece and Rome and many another great power. Sic transit gloria.

 Incomplete Explanation

But this explanation is, in most cases, an incomplete one. Certainly, racial mixing eventually results in the physical disappearance of the empire-builders.

This is not the cause of their decay (at least, not the initial cause), however, but only a consequence. Racial mixing hastens and makes irreversible the final dissolution, but that mixing does not take place until decay has already set in.

While the master people still have their moral strength they do not interbreed with their slaves — or, at least, the products of such limited interbreeding as there is themselves become slaves, and so the dominant race is not weakened by the absorption of mixed offspring.

 Two Sad Cases

We have before us two perfect examples today: the British and the Americans.

The British Empire has already crumbled to dust, yet the British people have only within the last few years entered into the final phase of their decay — large-scale racial integration with their former subject peoples.

When they allowed their corrupt leaders to seal the fate of their empire more than three decades ago by leading them into a catastrophic world war contrary to their interests they had not even embarked on the racial insanity that now finds their industrial centers swarming with millions of Pakistanis and West Indian Negroes.

A hundred years hence, if they remain on their present course, they will be a nation of mongrels with no hope of a return to greatness. But one cannot blame their fall on racial mongrelization.

A "celebration" of Remembrance Day in egalitarian Britain.

A “celebration” of Remembrance Day in multiracial Britain

An analysis of the situation in America leads us to the same conclusions. We lost our national will to survive years before we unleashed upon ourselves the present racial horror which is devouring us.

As long as we were tough and strong and proud, we could laugh in the faces of those sly ones who tried to tell us that our slaves, or former slaves, were our “equals.”

But now, look what a century of soft living and conspicuous consumption has done to us! It relaxed us just enough so that the fungus of liberalism, that manifestation of Western man’s death-wish, could take root in our souls.

We have not yet plunged into the final abyss of mongrelization; there is still a slim possibility of halting the decay. But, having halted it, what shall we do?

Can an affluent people, accustomed to luxury and shielded from the rigors of existence which once stiffened the backbones of their ancestors, deliberately deny themselves that luxury and affluence in order to toughen themselves up again?

We would not be wise to bet on it. Recognizing the dilemma of decadence and doing something about it are two different things.

It would clearly be better for America if we maintained a more Spartan lifestyle than we do; it would also be better for the next generation of Americans if we did not try to provide so many “advantages” for our children.

But we cannot simply dismantle our technological civilization and return to the land for the sake of our moral health. We clearly will not do that, nor should we, for obvious reasons.

That is not the upward path we seek; instead it would simply put us at the mercy of those races to whom we have taught the secrets of our Western technology.

 Where the Evil Lies

And it is important for us to note here that, although the decadence of today is a consequence of the urban industrial lifestyle introduced with the Industrial Revolution, it is not the technology resulting from the Industrial Revolution which is the root of the evil but the social changes accompanying that revolution and, more so, the new system of materialistic values which brought on those changes.

In 1770 most of the great technological advances of the Industrial Revolution were yet to come, but the acquisitive materialistic attitude of mind was already becoming dominant and with it came the great social upheavals which that attitude demanded. Thus, in that year Oliver Goldsmith penned the words of lament in his poem, The Deserted Village, which tell us how far the process of decay had already gone in England two centuries ago:

Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey,
Where wealth accumulates and men decay:
Princes and lords may flourish, or may fade;
A breath can make them, as a breath has made;
But a bold peasantry, their country’s pride,
When once destroyed can never be supplied.

A time there was, ere England’s griefs began,
When every rood of ground maintained its man;
For him light labour spread her wholesome store,
Just gave what life required, but gave no more:
His blest companions, innocence and health;
And his best riches, ignorance of wealth.

But times are altered; trade’s unfeeling train
Usurp the land and dispossess the swain . . .

“Trade’s unfeeling train” — those whom Brooks Adams, in his Law of Civilization and Decay, has called “economic men,” as opposed to those they dispossessed, the “spiritual men” — found the new lifestyle more congenial to them than the old. They worked to make that lifestyle universal, and they succeeded — although they cannot be justly accused of having foreseen or wanted the decadence which has been its yield.

Painting of Oliver Goldsmith by Sir Joshua Reynolds (1769).

Painting of Oliver Goldsmith by Sir Joshua Reynolds (1769)

To the economic man progress is strictly a material thing. It means increasing the average standard of living of the world’s population.

The economic man dreams of the day when everyone can enjoy the lifestyle of a millionaire playboy or playgirl, with no worries, no work, every luxury at his fingertips, every whim capable of indulgence. When every Puerto Rican and Hottentot has reached this state there can be no more “progress,” for we will have attained a state of perfection.

 A Different View of Progress

To the spiritual man progress is upward movement on man’s unending path from the subhuman to godhood. Austerity is more a way-condition on that path than opulence, pain than comfort, self-denial than self-indulgence.

Above all, struggle rather than relaxation is the prerequisite for each upward step.

There is in each of us something of economic man and something of spiritual man. The balance varies from one individual to another, just as it varies from people to people.

 Shifting the Balance

In Western man that balance was on the spiritual side during our rise to greatness. Now it has shifted strongly to the economic side, and we must succeed in reshifting the balance if we are to survive.

We are faced with a very complex and difficult problem — a problem which no people before us has solved successfully. Nevertheless, we remain convinced that Western man has the capacity to overcome even this obstacle and regain the upward path he trod for millennia.

In order to do this we must have two revolutions: one of the flesh and one of the spirit. Without the second the first will lose its meaning and become transitory.

 Cleansing Fire

With the cleansing fire of total revolution — spiritual and physical — we must wipe out the false set of values now guiding the course of our people.

We must once again put greatness ahead of prosperity, fitness ahead of comfort, duty ahead of indulgence, honor ahead of security.

When we have done this, regardless of the cost in blood and gold, we can then do anything else to which we set our will.

 * * *

From Attack! No. 17, 1973 transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-roots-of-decadence/feed/ 0
The Jewish Problem http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-jewish-problem/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-jewish-problem/#comments Sun, 16 Nov 2014 15:45:18 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1824 LIFE cartoon about Jewish immigrationby Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR THE LAST three decades there has been, in this land of free speech and a free press, an almost universally observed taboo on one topic of overwhelming importance: the Jewish question. Until about the last year or two, in fact, it was hardly permissible to even hint at the existence of such an issue, much less to discuss it openly. (ILLUSTRATION: This anti-Jewish-immigration cartoon from Life magazine, October 5, 1911, gives a striking reminder of how the media have changed after falling under Jewish control. The caption reads “These pills may make me grow, mother, but the more I take the worse I feel.”)

Now the subject has been broached, not by our own people — for whom it has the most crucial importance — . . . → Read More: The Jewish Problem]]> LIFE cartoon about Jewish immigrationby Dr. William L. Pierce

FOR THE LAST three decades there has been, in this land of free speech and a free press, an almost universally observed taboo on one topic of overwhelming importance: the Jewish question. Until about the last year or two, in fact, it was hardly permissible to even hint at the existence of such an issue, much less to discuss it openly. (ILLUSTRATION: This anti-Jewish-immigration cartoon from Life magazine, October 5, 1911, gives a striking reminder of how the media have changed after falling under Jewish control. The caption reads “These pills may make me grow, mother, but the more I take the worse I feel.”)

Now the subject has been broached, not by our own people — for whom it has the most crucial importance — but, interestingly enough, by the Jews themselves, who successfully imposed the taboo on it in the first place.

One cannot pick up a major newspaper today without reading about “the Jewish vote” in the recent Presidential election, or which candidate got the most “Jewish money,” or which senators are blocking further Russian trade agreements until the Russians make more concessions on “the Jewish issue,” and so on.

 Growing Anti-Semitism

The Jewish question is phrased in the sharpest terms by the most Jewish of the Jews: the professional Zionists. They talk compulsively, almost hysterically, of rising anti-Jewish feeling in America, of “genocide” in Russia, of growing anti-Semitism in Italy and elsewhere, of the need to protect Jewish interests everywhere. And, contrary to past practice, they talk about these things publicly, where everyone can hear: in newspapers and national magazines, in open campus lectures, with placards in street demonstrations.

Books are in general circulation today, written either by Jews or philo-Semites, which come closer to a frank discussion of the Jewish question than would have been imaginable a few years ago. Even some motion pictures and television programs have ventured onto this formerly forbidden ground.

 Deliberate Deceit

All this is not to say that the American people are being given an honest treatment of the Jewish question. There remains more deliberate deceit on this topic than perhaps any other except the Black-White racial issue. But what a revolutionary change from the time when the very existence of the issue itself was denied!

Very recently it was not even permissible to speak publicly of Jews as a distinct racial-cultural-national group, a people with peculiar interests and characteristics distinguishing them from other peoples with different interests and characteristics. One could only speak of “Americans of the Jewish faith,” “a person who happens to belong to the Jewish religion,” and similar euphemisms. Americans were so thoroughly brainwashed that the mere use of the word “Jew” in public caused embarrassment and discomfort.

 Pressures Building

Now that is changing, and it is a good thing. It is not entirely clear why the taboo is being lifted, however. With a little effort the lid probably could have been kept on the subject for another decade, maybe longer, before internal pressures blew it wide open.

One reason may have been that the Blacks simply wouldn’t keep their mouths shut. Less disciplined than the White goyim, they kept spilling the beans.

Negro civil rights militants resented having to be told by their Jewish “advisers” and financiers what their every move was to be. Nor did they fail to gain the impression that they were being “used” by the Jews: that Jewish money and brains were not being poured into the civil rights movement out of any love for Blacks but in order to disrupt White society for the Jews’ own ends.

 “Jew Devils”

And if Black slum-dwellers had not already noticed who it was who collected their rents every month and took what money they had left in exorbitant finance charges, there were plenty of Black nationalist leaders ready to point it out to them. In the Black Muslim theology, “Jew devils” roast in a pit noticeably hotter than that reserved for ordinary “White devils.”

White liberals have been conditioned to dismiss as “racism” any criticism of Jews emanating from other Whites. Every four-letter word coming from the mouth of one of the pampered new breed of Negro “intellectuals,” however, is pounced on like a pearl of wisdom.

 Conditioning Backfires

Gutter-level hate-screeds directed at Whites — trash literature such as Eldridge Cleaver’s Soul on Ice, which has been made required reading for millions of White high school and university students by neo-liberal teachers — are accepted as good, noble, and true by Gentile liberal and Jew alike. So, when the same breed of Blacks began expressing their feelings toward Jews, White liberals were obliged to take them seriously. One might say the Jews are hoist on their own petard.

 Jews as a Group

It would be unfair to give Black militants all the credit for forcing the Jews to reopen the Jewish question, however. Ever since the Jews so thoroughly trounced the Arabs in the “Six Day War” of 1967 (using American weaponry), they seem to have thrown discretion to the winds. They are so proud of themselves for that bloody bit of banditry that they can’t stop boasting about it. It is a triumph which belongs to all Jews everywhere, they feel: to Jews as a group. And it is as a group that they have been talking of themselves ever since.

A map depicting the territories gained by the Israeli's in six days during The Six Day War in June, 1967. The Israelis attacked Egypt first, initially claiming that it was actually Egypt who attacked them first. The area that Israel held more than doubled, as well as placing themselves in control of more than 1 million Palestinians.

A map depicting the territories gained by Israel in the Six Day War in June, 1967. The Israelis attacked Egypt first, initially claiming that it was Egypt who attacked them first. The area that Israel held more than doubled, putting them in control of more than 1 million Palestinians.

 

“Just a Coincidence”

This is a development of some importance. Before, if one violated the taboo by, say, grumbling about the Jewish monopoly control of America’s information media, one would immediately be put down by the nearest liberal with a little lecture about all those Jews in television and the publishing industry being just a coincidence; about the fact that it might just as well have been Baptists controlling the media if they had worked as hard at it and were as good businessmen as the Jews; about the necessity of judging each Jewish TV mogul as an individual rather than as a Jew.

And if one spoke of “organized Jewry” or hinted of a “Jewish conspiracy,” one was instantly consigned to the outer darkness, along with the little old ladies in tennis shoes who see a communist spy under every bed. Nowadays, Golda Meir can talk about “the organized Jewish world” and be quoted by UPI without anyone batting an eyelash.

 Something Other Than Americans

So, however it has come about, we have the Jewish question with us today: the general acceptance (even if only implicit) of the fact that Jews are something other than Americans with a different religion; that they are Jews first and Americans (or Canadians, or what have you) only second or third; that they form a coherent group; that they have group interests, Jewish interests; and that those interests are quite often, if not always, at variance with the interests of just about everyone else.

When we couple this fact with the fact that Jews have worked their way in to positions where they control the vital nerve centers of the Western world: public information, education, finance, domestic politics, foreign policy . . . the Jewish question becomes a very real Jewish Problem.

 Myths about the Problem

The way in which the American people solve this problem will depend on their understanding of it. At present that understanding is badly clouded, and all the forces of the System are intent on keeping it that way, through the propagation of a set of myths. A few of these myths are:

  • The Jewish problem has its roots in Gentile bigotry. If it were not for anti-Semitism and the threat it poses to the Jewish people, there would be no Jewish problem. Jews would simply be another ethnic element of the population of any country where they live, just as the Pennsylvania “Dutch” (Germans), Minnesota Swedes, or Boston Irish are ethnic elements of the U.S. population, each with its own peculiarities but without any particular “problem” (e.g., a “Swedish problem”).
  • Anti-Semitism is always a manifestation of either religious intolerance or economic envy. That is, Christian bigots hate Jews because their religion is different, and bigots in general hate Jews because they are successful.
  • Jews are a “persecuted” people with a tragic history. For thousands of years other peoples have bullied them, massacred them, selected them as “scapegoats” — all through no fault of their own. At present Arab terrorists are persecuting them in the Middle East and the Soviet government is persecuting them in Russia. The persecution they most like to talk about, however, is the one they recently underwent at the hands of the Germans: the “holocaust” of World War II. Because of the “holocaust” and other persecutions, the Jews are especially deserving of our sympathy and consideration.
  • Jews are a “liberal” people: tolerant, pacifist, equalitarian, open minded, champions of freedom and justice. Their “tragic history” and the suffering they have undergone have given them these liberal traits.
  • Jews are a specially gifted, artistic race. This is easily seen to be so by the way Jews dominate virtually all cultural fields in America today. There are more Jewish sculptors, painters, novelists, poets, composers, editors, and directors than those belonging to any other ethnic group, WASPs included. In line with this, Jews tend to be more sensitive and intellectual, on the average, than persons of European race.

 A Glimpse Behind the Façade

Many and weighty volumes have already been written debunking or supporting these myths. Here we have no room to explore them all. We can only present the briefest of suggestions to the reader that perhaps there is another way of looking at them than the “official” way presented by the System.

A book published by Harry Ostrer in 2012 which admits that the Jews are a separate race and that understanding their genetic history is crucial to understanding the Jewish identity.

A book published by Harry Ostrer in 2012 which admits that the Jews are a separate race and that understanding their genetic history is crucial to understanding the Jewish identity.

Consider the first myth: namely, that Gentile bigotry is the cause of the problem. It is particularly rewarding to explore this myth together with Myth No. 3, that of a tragic history of thousands of years of persecution.

From the time of the ancient Pharaohs, nearly 4,000 years ago, to the present, everyone — Egyptians, Assyrians, Persians, Medes, Romans, Spaniards, Anglo-Saxons, Cossacks, Poles, Russians, Germans, Arabs — has persecuted and massacred the poor Jews. That’s quite an array of various breeds of bigoted goyim.

 Everybody Bigoted Except Jews?

About the only conclusion the official myth allows us to draw from this is that bigotry is a universal characteristic of non-Jewish peoples! Furthermore, this bigotry has remained Jew-specific over an immense period of time and among peoples with widely varying cultures.

From the time when the ancient Egyptians booted Moses and his tribe out of Egypt, to the expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290, Germany in 1298, France in 1306, Austria in 1421, Spain in 1492, Portugal in 1496, and so on, to the present day, no one seems to have been able to get along with the Jews for very long. “Persecution” has been the inevitable result.

 Is “Persecution” Myth a Racket?

Of course, history is a continuous record of different peoples not getting along with one another: French vs. English, English vs. Spanish, French vs. Germans, Irish vs. English, Poles vs. Russians, and so on. But the English do not consider themselves “persecuted.” Nor do the French, the Germans, or any of the other peoples mentioned. Only with the Jews is it “persecution.”

Yet, the universal antagonism between the Jews and their various neighbors down through the millennia is undeniable. Could it be — is it remotely possible — that the reason for this lies with the Jews themselves rather than with all their antagonists?

 “His Blood Be on Us and on Our Children”

Certainly the myth that the trouble lies with Christian intolerance of “Christ killers” does not hold water. Moslems, atheists, and pagans have had as little use for Jews as the most retribution-minded Christians.

Tacitus, the pagan historian, wrote of the Jews: “When the Assyrians, and after them the Medes and the Persians, were masters of the oriental world, the Jews were deemed the most contemptible of all the nations then held in subjection.” And Tacitus’ other references to the Jews reveal that he and his fellow Romans shared that contempt, thus giving us four peoples in this one example, with four different religions, unanimous in their verdict on the Jews.

Gaius Cornelius Tacitus, the Roman historian.

Gaius Cornelius Tacitus, the Roman historian

 Venom of the Talmud

If that is due to religious bigotry, perhaps the bigotry is the Jews’ rather than all the others. This was the conclusion reached by the great Martin Luther, at any rate, who taught himself to read the Hebrew of the Talmud, the basic religious work of Judaism, and was horrified by the venomous outpouring of hatred against all non-Jewish peoples (goyim) he found there.

That leaves the “envy” myth. It is best considered together with the notion that the Jews are especially gifted and talented, and that these special talents have led to their spectacular degree of success, relative to non-Jews.

 Masters of Degeneracy

Let us immediately recognize that Jews, as a whole, do possess certain talents to a larger degree than other peoples. No Gentile writer, for example, could have produced a novel quite like Philip Roth’s The Breast or Portnoy’s Complaint. No Gentile composer could have treated a sacred theme with quite the same grandiose vulgarity as Leonard Bernstein did his Mass. No Gentile producer could have churned out such an appalling box-office success as Joseph Papp’s (Papirofsky) Hair.

 Kosher Culture

Almost as notable as the proliferation of noisy, flashy Jewish cultural “successes” is the absence of first-rate non-Jewish achievement in the artistic-literary-musical-theatrical field. Where are our late 20th century American Shakespeares, Beethovens, Wagners, Miltons, or Brueghels? There are none in sight.

There are a number of competent Gentile artistic and literary technicians still competing with the Jews, as well as a multitude of hacks, but the balance is shifting steadily toward a totally kosher cultural establishment.

 Stifled Soul

Transcendent artistic genius flowers only under certain favorable conditions. These conditions are those which allow latent genius to freely give expression to some aspect of the racial-cultural soul of a people. These conditions are notably lacking in America today.

Without a lengthy elaboration of why they are lacking, a brief and homely excerpt from a recently published and very illuminating book on the Jewish question, Professor Ernest van den Haag’s The Jewish Mystique, may serve to suggest that Jewish domination of the Gentile cultural establishment is one of the principal reasons.

 Different Outlook

Van den Haag correctly observes that “persons whose outlook and sensibility differ radically from what is current, or acceptable, within the establishment are unlikely to be understood by establishment members. They are automatically relegated beyond the pale. For them to be heard, published, read, understood, or appreciated according to their merits becomes very difficult.”

Then he quotes for us the complaint of one Gentile writer:

“‘When I was a screen-writer for one of the major studios,’ says a former toiler in the vineyards dominated by another Jewish cultural establishment, ‘we were talking one day about how a mother would react to finding out her son had cheated in school. When it came my turn to speak, I said what I had to say. The head of the studio looked at me and said, “Mr. O’Connor, no mother would react that way.” I told him that I had cheated in school, and that was exactly how my mother had reacted. There was an embarrassed silence for a moment, and then the studio head went on as if I hadn’t spoken. My mother had slapped me around a little bit, and then sternly told me to go to the priest to ask God’s forgiveness. The response they expected was that the mother would weep a little and take the poor, wounded boy to her breast. That’s how they wrote it, and for a moment there, they made me feel as if my mother wasn’t a member of the human race.’”

 Alien Atmosphere

In other creative fields — science, for example — kosherization has advanced far less than in script-writing, but it is, nevertheless, advancing. No doors are slammed in the faces of talented Gentiles yet, but there is already an alien atmosphere which many sensitive Gentiles find uncongenial.

Perhaps it is in the business-professional world that the pattern is clearest. In most areas — retail trade, banking, dentistry, and law are examples — Gentiles are still in strong contention, although the Jewish element is gaining in influence and degree of domination.

In these areas Gentiles are highly conscious of their Jewish competitors, and whenever this consciousness manifests itself in an anti-Semitic manner the “envy” myth is immediately invoked to explain the anti-Semitism.

 Organized Takeover

There are other areas, however, where Gentiles are no longer in contention. Whole industries and professions have been literally taken over by the Jews.

The garment industry; the wholesale news distribution industry, which supplies magazines and paperbacks to newsstands; the motion-picture industry; and a score of others are almost totally Jewish in ownership and management. Psychiatry is, for all practical purposes, a Jewish profession.

A Gentile who attempts to trespass on one of these kosher preserves finds practically insurmountable obstacles in his path. He is immediately made to feel that it is he, not the Jews, who is an alien. He does not speak the same language, he does not know the customs, he does not belong.

Perhaps, then, we ought to consider that when a Gentile retail merchant, say, makes an unkind remark about his Jewish competitors he is motivated by something besides envy. Perhaps he has a faint, subliminal premonition of the situation the Gentile garment manufacturer of half a century ago found himself in as his Jewish colleagues slowly but surely forced him to the wall.

And we might also ask ourselves: Is it “talent” which is solely responsible for this burgeoning Jewish success — or is it also something else?

 Jews and Liberalism

Finally, let us look at Jewish “liberalism.” It is certainly true that Jews have been overwhelmingly prominent in virtually every “liberal” manifestation of the past 200 years, from the great liberal bloodletting of the French Revolution through the bolshevization of the Russian people and the building of the Negro rights movement in America.

Jewish university students were more numerous among the “freedom riders” of a decade ago than any other ethnic group.

Jewish students and Jewish lawyers, in the role of “pacifists,” have been the backbone of the home-front sabotage effort against the U.S. armed forces throughout the war in Vietnam.

Jewesses have been in the van of the crusade for women’s “liberation” since the inception of that rather unnatural movement.

In general, any group, movement, or political organization in America today agitating for “peace,” “equality,” “freedom,” or “justice” can be counted on to have a disproportionately large number of Jews among its adherents.

But are Jews really “liberals” — or is “liberalism” merely a useful mask for them to wear in their dealings with other peoples? For an answer, look at the Jews where they feel no need for a mask: occupied Palestine.

In America, Jews, through their control of the media of mass propaganda, have succeeded in making millions of White people feel guilty because our ancestors dispossessed the Indians and exploited Black slaves. Do the Jewish masters of Palestine, or their fellow Zionists in America, feel guilty because they have massacred, plundered, and dispossessed the Palestinians?

In America, Jews have been among the shrillest critics of our prisons and the staunchest supporters of prison rioters, such as those at Attica. What, then, is their excuse for the ghastly torture chambers and concentration camps they operate in Palestine in order to keep their restless Arab subjects in line?

Camp 1391, a prison in Israel which supposedly holds the most dangerous and high-risk inmates in the country. That fact that it existed wasn't discovered until 1993, by accident, and has been airbrushed out of aerial photos. Inmates have reported being lied to about where they were, being raped by men and/or sticks, and solitary confinement in rarely cleaned and almost pitch black cells.

Camp 1391, a prison in Israel which supposedly holds the most dangerous and high-risk inmates in the country. That fact that it existed wasn’t discovered until 1993, by accident, and it has been airbrushed out of aerial photos. Inmates have reported being lied to about where they were and being raped by men and/or sticks. Solitary confinement in rarely cleaned and almost pitch black cells is common.

 Goyim Not Equal

In America, Jews preach “equality” for all peoples, religions, and races. Why, then, are Jews the only first-class citizens in Israel?

In America, Jews have been predominantly “pacifist” and anti-militarist (except during World War II!). How do they reconcile this with their enthusiastic support of military aggression in the Middle East?

In America, Jews have been the most vehement denouncers of “McCarthyism” and other forms of “witch-hunting.” People who made the “mistake” of joining the Communist Party 20 or 30 years ago should not be penalized for that mistake today, they say. Why, then, do they maintain in Tel Aviv massive files of dossiers on former German National Socialists and direct a worldwide effort to harass them, hound them from their jobs, smear them in the press, even kidnap and murder them? That is, why do they preach to us forgiveness of our sworn enemies while they preach vengeance against theirs?

There is no mistaking the reality of liberalism, or, more correctly, neo-liberalism. Millions of Americans are genuinely infected with it. It is a virus which is ravaging our people and destroying our nation.

And there is no mistaking the fact that Jews are bearers of this virus. But a little observation and reflection suggest that the disease itself strikes only men of the West and that Jews have a natural immunity to it.

 Executing the Solution

As already mentioned, the Jewish problem is one of great complexity and subtlety, and one can hardly hope to explore it, much less present any very confident solution, in a page or two. Nevertheless, it is a problem which must be faced and solved. The future of our race and our nation depend upon our finding — and executing — the correct solution to it in the very near future.

The only way we can hope to find that correct solution is first to clear away the smokescreens and lies which have been propagated solely to hide it from us.

The reader with the independence of mind and strength of character to question the official myths must not stop here. He must take upon himself the responsibility of fully informing himself, so that he can intelligently discharge his obligations as a patriot and a member of his Western racial community.

Information on the Jewish problem is available from a number of sources. Some of them are Professor Parkinson’s East and West, William Walsh’s Isabella the Crusader, and Dietrich Eckart’s fascinating Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin; on the relationship of the problem to communism are Frank Britton’s Behind Communism, Mr. Bacu’s The Anti-Humans, James Burnham’s Web of Subversion, and Louis Marschalko’s The World Conquerors; on its relationship to capitalism are Professor Sombart’s The Jews and Modern Capitalism and A. K. Chesterton’s The New Unhappy Lords; on the relevance of the problem to present-day America are Wilmot Robertson’s excellent The Dispossessed Majority and Hank Messick’s Lansky. And there are many others.

Read them, and then act!

* * *

From Attack! No. 16, 1972 transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-jewish-problem/feed/ 0
Jewish Weakness http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/jewish-weakness/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/jewish-weakness/#comments Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:00:26 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1828 jewish_faces

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 15, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I CONFESS to a slight distaste in so often writing and speaking on the subject of the Jews. They are a most unpleasant race, on the whole; their religion is base and primitive and unworthy even of analysis; their ethnocentrism is little more than crude hatred for all other peoples; their sexuality is by turns both insanely repressive and grossly degenerate; their admittedly high average intelligence can most charitably be described as predatory; and, though there are exceptions who are probably hybrids, those who look most characteristically Jewish are, frankly, repulsive. If they had confined themselves to some small spot in the Levant, selling their rags, telling fortunes, and swindling the locals, I doubt I should . . . → Read More: Jewish Weakness]]> jewish_faces

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 15, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I CONFESS to a slight distaste in so often writing and speaking on the subject of the Jews. They are a most unpleasant race, on the whole; their religion is base and primitive and unworthy even of analysis; their ethnocentrism is little more than crude hatred for all other peoples; their sexuality is by turns both insanely repressive and grossly degenerate; their admittedly high average intelligence can most charitably be described as predatory; and, though there are exceptions who are probably hybrids, those who look most characteristically Jewish are, frankly, repulsive. If they had confined themselves to some small spot in the Levant, selling their rags, telling fortunes, and swindling the locals, I doubt I should notice them much at all. I’d no more likely be discussing them on American Dissident Voices than discussing the tribes of Bahrain or Yemen. (ILLUSTRATION: Jews. There is such a thing as a Jewish appearance, which is proof that race-formation has taken place. [photo credit: Incog Man])

But, through a series of extraordinary events, the Jews developed a nomadic and parasitic mode of life and  have forced themselves on us, have largely replaced our own ruling class, have tricked our people out of much of their wealth, have snookered us into dying in their wars, and are intentionally and with malice aforethought pursuing policies that will certainly lead to our extinction. The fact that these same policies will also likely lead to their own extinction is small solace, so I — and you, if you are a thoughtful man or woman — so we are forced to notice them, understand them, and defend ourselves against them.

Who are these people? And why do they do the things they do to us? The answer can be found in Jewish genes and Jewish memes.

Jewish genes have always been less than “pure,” and today they are less so than ever. And Jewish memes — the myths that define them, such as the “chosen people” myth — have only imperfectly guided this very mixed group’s evolution in a “Jewish direction.”

There have always been those Jews, probably those the least Jewish in biological terms, who have fallen away and ceased overtly being Jews.

I am not referring here to the Marranos or secret Jews who, to preserve themselves and their wealth and positions in society, faked a “conversion” to Christianity centuries ago — but maintained their Jewish identity and even rituals in secret. (Sometimes these families forgot — or feigned to forget — their Jewish identities: A man of my acquaintance knew a family of Spanish origins, nominally Catholics, who “had a family tradition” of, every Passover, placing black cloth over the crucifixes and other Christian symbols in their home. They professed not to know the origin of the practice.)

I am thinking, for example, of a man in the Washington, DC area who, despite having, as far as he knew, entirely Jewish ancestry and a Jewish upbringing, always thought of himself as a White man. He abandoned Judaism and, when he became aware of the threats to White survival posed by the policies of the Jewish power structure, he opposed those policies and supported — with total sincerity, as far as I could see — efforts by Whites to regain control of our destiny. He’s still doing so to this day.

I am thinking of the young Jewish man who wrote to the National Alliance in the mid-1990s looking for support for a plan to force Jews to return a substantial percentage of the wealth they had taken from our society at large. Despite his abandonment of the Jewish religion and power structure, he was looking out, he said, for the long-term interests of both host and parasite: He believed that his plan would prevent the otherwise-inevitable bloodshed that would occur when Whites discovered how they had been bled nearly to death by the Jewish minority.

One thinks of Benjamin Harrison Freedman, a wealthy Jew (the attending physician at whose birth in 1890 was none other than Bernard Baruch’s father) who was at the center of the Jewish handlers who controlled Woodrow Wilson — in Freedman’s words, “like a poodle on a string.” Freedman became so disgusted by the manipulation and lies — and by the death and destruction that resulted from the nefarious acts of the Jewish power structure — that he defected from it and devoted the rest of his life, until his death in 1984, to exposing its crimes. I’ve taken a prominent role in preventing Freedman’s works from being shoved down the memory hole.

One also thinks of Schlomo Sand, an Israeli academic who recently penned the book How I Stopped Being a Jew. Sand is an interesting case. Fully Jewish by religious standards — his mother was a Jew — he is half-Jewish genetically, with a non-Jewish father, presumably European, judging by his looks and the fact that he was born in Austria. Sand, a leftist and “anti-racist,” is repelled not only by Zionist atrocities but also by the biological ethnocentrism of many Jews, which he denies has any basis in fact.

Sand can help us start to understand this strange people who have attached themselves to us. In an earlier book, The Invention of the Jewish People, Sand argues that a huge proportion of today’s Jews are descendents of disparate groups of converts to Judaism, with little genetic affinity and therefore no legitimate biological claim to peoplehood — and certainly no legitimate claim to possession of Palestine. And Sand certainly has a point: One need only look successively at a Russian Jew, a Yemeni Jew, and an Ethiopian Jew to know that the Jews, if a race at all, are a very mixed one.

Jewish author Jon Entine, author of Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People, takes nearly the opposite view, bringing together many genetic studies of Jews to prove his point. Entine states that, prior to the middle of the 20th century, Jewish intermarriage with non-Jews was an astonishingly low 0.5 per cent. And he emphasizes that Jews, whatever their origins, are more closely related to each other than to their host populations, adding that more than 75 per cent. of Jews can trace some of their ancestry to the Middle East (which means that about a quarter of them can’t). He also brings up the fact that Ashkenazi Jews, who form 80 per cent. of world Jewry, have inherited nearly 50 per cent. of their mitochondrial DNA from White European women. Entine theorizes that the ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews spread out from the Middle East into Italy in Roman times and into the rest of Europe from there. Proto-Ashkenazi populations were small and, at first, males seeking new opportunities travelled to new lands in very small numbers, taking White women as wives in many cases. Entine doesn’t know whether or not these European women were “converted” to Judaism or not, but he notes that Judaism once proselytized — though it would eventually cease doing so for all practical purposes. There were times, including quite recent times, when the rate of intermarriage for Jews fell to a very low level — but this early proto-Ashkenazi period clearly was not one of them.

The Biblical scholar Thomas L. Thompson, in his book The Mythic Past, proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Jews’ own tales about their origins found in their Torah (what Christians call the Old Testament), while psychologically revealing, have no historical basis. He states “There is no evidence of a United Monarchy, no evidence of a capital in Jerusalem or of any coherent, unified political force that dominated western Palestine, let alone an empire of the size the legends describe. We do not have evidence for the existence of kings named Saul, David, or Solomon; nor do we have evidence for any temple at Jerusalem in this early period.” Thompson concludes that the traditional Jewish narrative was partly borrowed and partly concocted by agitators attempting to religiously and politically unite disparate Semitic tribes who had been displaced by the misfortunes of war and empire in the Middle East during the last few centuries BC. This confirms some of the key contentions of Schlomo Sand.

Thus we see that the memes of Jewish peoplehood began with lies — and it is my contention that these memes, these lies, have had a race-formation effect on those who adopted them, and that this race-formation effect has continued to operate even after the incorporation of non-Semitic genes into the Jewish gene pool.

Although Jewish organizations preach integration and racial equality for White Americans, and despite the fact of their own quite mixed background, Jews themselves are among the most racially exclusive peoples on Earth. They have their own special schools for their children where non-Jews are not permitted, they have their own media of newspapers and magazines intended for Jewish consumption only in which they rail against the evils of intermarriage with non-Jews and promote the idea that they are a special chosen race, decreed by God to be holier than all others and therefore deserving of special treatment from the rest of us. Why this seeming contradiction? Why is it “integration” and conquest by Third World immigration for us, and racial exclusiveness and superiority for them?

The answer can be found in the Jews’ special mode of life. Living as they always have as a tiny minority among other peoples, allowing general intermarriage would quickly have resulted in the disappearance of the Jews as a distinct people. Their genes containing those qualities that mark them as distinctly Jewish would have been completely swamped by mixture with the genes of their more numerous host peoples. If they were to survive, they needed a religion and a moral code which discouraged mixture with non-Jews. They needed a theology which exalted them above other peoples. They created exactly that in their myth of the Chosen People. And it has served them well.

But, you might object, there has been intermarriage. Yes, indeed there has, and to such an extent that many Jews today whose ancestors have spent countless generations among the peoples of Europe look, at least to an untrained eye, as White as any European. But nevertheless despite and in some ways because of this intermixture, the Chosen People myth has been and still is a powerful force which has preserved the essence of Jewish uniqueness. To understand how this seeming contradiction can be so, you have to understand the basic scientific fact that behavioral tendencies, character, and personality are largely genetic, and are passed on from generation to generation with mathematical precision according to the characteristics of the parents, and their parents, and so on back into the mists of time.

The essence of Jewishness is not in their distinctive appearance, which some Jews have largely lost over the centuries, nor in their peculiar modes of dress or diet or expression which many non-religious Jews have abandoned anyway without in any way relinquishing their Jewishness. No, the essence of Jewishness is the special “us versus them” mentality which is formalized in their Chosen People myth and which was necessary for their survival as a tiny group among the teeming masses of Egypt, Babylon, Rome, and America.

The key is this: In the first place, early Jews were those Semites to whom the ethnocentric and genocidal memes of what we now call the Old Testament were attractive. So even at the very earliest period at which Jews appear, we have a select, distinct, and peculiar group. Then, for thousands of years, the Jews were subjected to a rigorous process of genetic selection.

Those Jews in whom this “us versus them” mentality, this intense ethnocentrism or “racism,” was weak or absent, were the most likely to intermarry and the least likely to raise their offspring as Jews or induce their spouse to undergo the difficult and officially discouraged conversion process. Thus the genetic material of these less racist Jews was lost to Jewry. Thus, over the centuries, those Jews who remained in the fold were those who possessed these special mental qualities to a greater degree, and these qualities became intensified over the years since only those who possessed them to the highest degree were the progenitors of the following generations of the people who called themselves Jews.

The fact that there has been a definitely observable drift of White genetic material into the gene pool of European and American Jews does not substantially change the situation as I have illustrated it. When intermarriage occurred despite the opposition of the conservative and religious elements, and the offspring were raised as Jews, a similar selection process took place among them. Those to whom the Chosen People Myth and the attitudes and practices that accompany it were incongenial or repugnant escaped into the wider Gentile world, and did not contribute their genes to the Jewish people. Those who had inherited the special mentality that characterizes the Jewish mode of life became part of the Jewish people, and the parents of Jewish children, even though they often brought with them such non-Jewish characteristics as straight fine hair, light coloration, and straight or upturned noses. Looking at this situation from a purely biological perspective, this acquiring of some of the physical characteristics of their host peoples might have been a survival advantage to the Jews, since it blurred the distinction between themselves and their hosts, at least to the hosts, and the Gentile’s consciousness of their foreignness had always been a danger to them. In fact, it was and still remains their greatest fear. They call it “anti-Semitism.” The term is really a poor one, since it is never applied toward those who dislike Arabs, who are relatively pure Semites, but always to those who criticize Jews, who today are only partly Semitic and who have themselves probably killed more Semites than any other people.

This fear of our recognition of their foreignness is natural. To the nations which have expelled or fought them over the centuries, and the list is a long one, including Egypt, Rome, Spain, England, France, Russia, Germany, and many others, the reason was the resentment of the peoples of those lands when these peculiar foreigners became rich and powerful and had the ears of the political leaders, while the rightful owners of the land felt dispossessed of their birthright. This process has occurred many times throughout history and it is occurring again in the United States of America right now.

The Jews perceive any reaction against their presence in the host nations as persecution, and from their point of view perhaps it is persecution, since our reaction is against the only way of life they know, that of a parasite attached to a host. Our interests are irreconcilable.

To protect themselves from any reaction from the host population, the Jews promote the doctrine that there is no difference among the races, although among themselves they cherish the doctrine of not only the superiority but the actual divinity of their race.

Jews desire  to erase any feelings of racial identity among their hosts, and to that end they have done two things. On the one hand, they have used their money and their influence to change the composition of our society through the immigration of myriads of aliens of every race, culture, and description. A cosmopolitan society, in which nearly every other person is an alien of some type, is a society in which the differentness of the Jew is well obscured. In addition, they have used their money and their influence to change the moral climate in this country. Traditionally, America was “Eurocentric” exactly as the multiculturalists claim. Our traditions, our way of doing things, our values, our art and literature and architecture — and our genetic heritage which ultimately determines all of those things — were all European. Interracial sex and homosexuality were punishable crimes in almost every state of the union. But today, our politicians and our talking heads of the media preach exactly the opposite, and Jewish groups like the Anti-Defamation League are pushing for so-called “hate crime” laws to make it a crime to recognize racial differences or to criticize in any way the conversion of America into a Third World country. Never forget that the pattern for such laws was set in the Jewish-dominated early Soviet Union, where the punishment for “anti-Semitism” was often the Gulag or death.

The Jewish power structure does these things because they believe that they are necessary for the survival of the nation/state/people/race/ and religion of the Jews. We deem these things destructive and as an arrow aimed at our people’s heart. They deem them necessary. Between these two positions no compromise is possible.

But there is hope; actually a great deal of hope.

Although the rate of Jewish intermarriage may have been 0.5 per cent. within the lifetimes of my older listeners (if Jon Entine is right), the situation has radically changed today, with intermarriage figures hovering around the 50 per cent. mark. No people can survive such an onslaught for long, intelligent genes and powerful memes notwithstanding. Though we are threatened, demographically Whites stand in a much better position than Jews today. The “falling away” from Jewish identity I spoke about earlier is going to accelerate.

And, as I’ve shown on previous programs, despite their prodigious talent for undermining and controlling other people’s nations, awareness of Jewish power is on the rise worldwide. Jews are nothing if not extreme, and reaction to Jewish excesses, often including expulsion of the Jews, has traditionally followed Jewish domination and their usual over-the-top lording it over their subject peoples. It’s happened in numerous countries, time after time. The difference is that today the venue for Jewish exploitation and overt and covert rule is not just France or England or Palestine, but half or more of the civilized world. It is a global phenomenon and the burgeoning reaction to it is also global. There will be nowhere to “disappear to” this time. It’s probably true that “the 1%” is 99% Jewish, but that’s a lot less of an advantage when everyone knows it. We National Alliance members are in the forefront of building that awareness. Join us.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/jewish-weakness/feed/ 5
Subversion in South Africa http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/subversion-in-south-africa/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/subversion-in-south-africa/#comments Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:46:48 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1822 Kill the Boerby Dr. William L. Pierce

THE AMERICAN press in recent months has carried a number of reports of protests by South African students against their government’s policy of racial separation, or apartheid. “White Students Rebelling Against Government Discrimination,” the Reuters reports shriek, followed by vivid accounts of truncheon-wielding policemen wading into crowds of peacefully protesting students and brutally cracking skulls left and right. One news story told of policemen chasing students from the University of Cape Town who sought refuge in St. George’s Cathedral, battering them senseless, and dragging them out, leaving pools of blood among the pews. (ILLUSTRATION: Since the fall of apartheid in 1994, South Africa has increasingly become a locus of slaughter, rape, torture, poverty, and Black-on-White genocide — with near-zero coverage from the mass media.)

Editorial . . . → Read More: Subversion in South Africa]]> Kill the Boerby Dr. William L. Pierce

THE AMERICAN press in recent months has carried a number of reports of protests by South African students against their government’s policy of racial separation, or apartheid. “White Students Rebelling Against Government Discrimination,” the Reuters reports shriek, followed by vivid accounts of truncheon-wielding policemen wading into crowds of peacefully protesting students and brutally cracking skulls left and right. One news story told of policemen chasing students from the University of Cape Town who sought refuge in St. George’s Cathedral, battering them senseless, and dragging them out, leaving pools of blood among the pews. (ILLUSTRATION: Since the fall of apartheid in 1994, South Africa has increasingly become a locus of slaughter, rape, torture, poverty, and Black-on-White genocide — with near-zero coverage from the mass media.)

Editorial comment accompanying these reports creates the impression that the idealistic, fair-minded young people of South Africa abhor the racial policies of their backward and repressive government and are striving to bring about an end to apartheid and establish Black-White equality.

As is often the case with press coverage of domestic issues, all in South Africa is not quite as the newspapers would lead us to believe.

In order to understand the true state of affairs in South Africa it is first necessary to recognize that there are three distinct “White” communities in that country: Afrikaans-speakers (Boers), English-speaking Gentiles, and Jews (who also speak English).

The Boers, as the country’s largest White community, are politically dominant and are represented principally through the National Party. They were the original settlers of South Africa and have a strong sense of racial identity and racial pride. They have been able to prevent, to a substantial extent, the subversion of their institutions by alien elements.

The English-speaking Gentiles are a mixed bag. The majority of them also have a sense of racial pride and support their government’s policy of apartheid. But they have lost control of their institutions. Like their English-speaking kinsmen around the world, they have been infected with neo-liberalism. They are brainwashed by their newspapers and in their schools and churches. A minority have fallen into decadence and become enemies of their people.

The Jews are the real worm in the South African apple. Flocking to South Africa after the discovery of gold and diamonds there, they concentrated in the largest cities and had soon staked their claim to a lion’s share of the economic action.

One enormously rich Jew, Harry Oppenheimer, has managed to acquire almost complete control over the South African diamond, gold, and uranium mining industries. Other Jews took over banks, English-language newspapers, and industries not already in billionaire Oppenheimer’s pocket.

Jews have grown to number more than 15 percent of the population of Johannesburg, South Africa’s largest city, and they completely dominate the financial and mercantile life there. Since the English population is much more urbanized than the Afrikaner population, many of whom remain farmers, it is principally the English who have been affected by the Jewish presence.

A Jewess, Helen Suzman, heads South Africa’s neo-liberal Progressive Party and is the only representative of that party in the parliament. There she regularly releases tirades against the entire structure of apartheid, including the laws against miscegenation. The Oppenheimer press gives extensive coverage to her views.

It is in the universities, however, that the Jewish spirit really manifests itself. As in America, all Jews of college age are students, so that they constitute a numerically strong and well-organized radical element at several of the major South African universities. The student protestors whose demonstrations have been recently reported in the American press were more than 50 percent Jewish (although this interesting statistic was omitted from the press reports).

Likewise, when police broke up a communist ring a few years ago which had been supplying arms to Black revolutionary groups and attempting to foment a rebellion against White rule in South Africa, all the ringleaders were found to be either Jewish students or Jewish professors.

Thus, despite misleading indications to the contrary, the Whites of South Africa remain one of the most racially self-conscious and spiritually healthy White populations on the planet. Because they have failed to curb a viciously destructive group of aliens in their midst, however, they are in the beginning stages of dissolution and decadence. And, because of their minority status in a sea of hostile Blacks, decadence is a luxury which the Whites of South Africa cannot afford.

* * *

From Attack! No. 16, 1972, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/subversion-in-south-africa/feed/ 0
The Greatest Commission http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-greatest-commission/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-greatest-commission/#comments Sat, 08 Nov 2014 13:00:50 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1817 William-Luther-Pierce---Our-Purpose3

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 8, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE UPWARD path beckons. Will Williams, the Director and now Chairman of the National Alliance, is taking that path.

Along with others, Will saw that the Alliance had taken the wrong, downward direction after the death of its founder, William Pierce. Though he considered legal action to counter the decline, ultimately he chose other means. Rather than seek to use the force of a hostile System to correct these problems, always a terrible gamble — and probable waste of extremely valuable time and resources — he found a better way to lead. He led by doing. He led by example. And he never assumed that those who genuinely care about our race’s future were “the enemy,” no . . . → Read More: The Greatest Commission]]> William-Luther-Pierce---Our-Purpose3

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 8, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE UPWARD path beckons. Will Williams, the Director and now Chairman of the National Alliance, is taking that path.

Along with others, Will saw that the Alliance had taken the wrong, downward direction after the death of its founder, William Pierce. Though he considered legal action to counter the decline, ultimately he chose other means. Rather than seek to use the force of a hostile System to correct these problems, always a terrible gamble — and probable waste of extremely valuable time and resources — he found a better way to lead. He led by doing. He led by example. And he never assumed that those who genuinely care about our race’s future were “the enemy,” no matter what our differences in strategy.

Together with a few stalwart souls, he re-instituted the National Alliance as soon as its (now former) leadership disestablished it as a membership organization. He brought together a great-hearted few — both long-term associates of William Pierce and new men and women inspired by Dr. Pierce’s vision — and started an online community for them called White Biocentrism. Almost one year ago, he made it possible for American Dissident Voices to be on the air again. And with openness, frankness, and firmness — but without viciousness, rancor, or egotism — he began to speak the simple truth: There is a place — in fact, a need — for an uncompromising vanguard of White men and women for whom the survival and progress of our race is not only a sacred cause, but for whom it is the purpose of Life, Nature, and the Universe itself.

Will Williams inspired us, brought us together, and — even as he strongly criticized them — brought conciliation with those who were taking a very different path. The result is that he has now been named the new Chairman of the National Alliance corporation itself, and has taken on the great responsibility of revitalizing it — of uniting and leading those of us who believe in the only Cause that really matters — and of harboring and deploying our resources so we can accomplish our short-term and long-term goals with the greatest effectiveness. He has borne up strongly — as I have also been forced to do — under heavy attacks, both misguided and malicious. He has shown maturity of judgement, magnanimity in victory, and amazing perseverance. He deserves our support.

Those who were using the legal process to bring about change have achieved their goals. The National Alliance is ascending the upward path once again. It is time to close ranks.

We have important work to do. And we face many challenges and implacable enemies. Now is not the time to be attacking those who are working for our people’s future, whether those attacks are in print or online or in the System’s courts. Now is the time to reach out to all who believe in William Pierce’s vision and treat them as comrades — and, not only as comrades, but as the most important and valuable people on Earth. We will need each other in order to do what we need to do.

Now is the time to be reaching out to our people — now is the time to find young White men and women who can be, who will be, the future leaders of the entirely new society we must build. Now is the time to fill the minds and souls of these competent, honest, free-thinking, true-hearted sons and daughters of our race with the ideals that will inspire them — and their children and their children’s children — to ascend the upward path for the next thousand years and more. And for those who are already imbued with these ideals, it is our responsibility to lay out a realistic plan to bring those ideals to power.

There is nothing more important we can do with our time and our wealth. As William Pierce put it, “Our purpose is the Creator’s purpose.”

pierce_stamp_2006

Graphic created by Kevin Alfred Strom in 2006

Rejecting the “big tent” approach of “uniting all pro-Whites,” Dr. Pierce spoke of spiritual things:

“We don’t hope to make revolutionary idealists out of the egoistic and materialistic masses, but we do hope to awaken and inspire and recruit that minority of our people in which the Divine Spark already burns brightly enough to illuminate their souls and their minds so that they can grasp our Truth. And the way to do that is to present our Truth to them as purely and as plainly and as clearly as we possibly can—not to dress it in a conservative disguise, which leads only to confusion.

“We want everyone to know that we understand that what’s really important is not whether we can elect a government which won’t try to impose racial quotas on us or whether we can achieve domestic tranquility but whether the Truth that is in the race-soul of our people shall overcome the alien falsehoods which rule us now, so that that Truth can guide us once again to the upward Path, to the Path of the Creator’s Self-Realization, and so that we can once again become agents of the Universal Will — except this time fully conscious agents — and resume our never-ending ascent toward our ordained Destiny.”

That, according to William Pierce, is the fundamental basis of the National Alliance. Those who disagree with these fundamental principles place themselves outside of the Alliance — whether they know it or not.

Dr. Pierce wasn’t concerned about attracting a majority of Whites to our cause. At the first convention of the Alliance he stated: “Our task is not to persuade a numerical majority of the American population that we are right but rather to build the numerical minority of those whose values coincide with ours into a majority of will and determination.”

If you care about our race’s survival, but you believe that Dr. Pierce’s fundamentally spiritual path is the wrong path, then go your own way and I will wish you well.

I will not sue you. I will not attack you or use the ADL’s — or the other Jewish groups’ —  or the regime in Washington’s — smears against you to attack you. I will not try and get a System court to seize your private membership records and take the risk of making them public. I will not do these things even if you claim, in complete contradiction of the facts, to be the “true heirs” of William Pierce while sounding more like Gerald L.K. Smith. Go your own way and help to awaken White people to their peril — I truly wish you success beyond your wildest dreams.

But if you believe that our way — Dr. Pierce’s thoroughly revolutionary way — the way of a total transformation of all our values, beginning with the idea that our race is ordained to be the stepping-stone to higher man — if you believe that that way is the right way, the only way forward — the only exit from the labyrinth — then listen to the words of National Alliance Director, and now Chairman, William White Williams:

My new direction for our Alliance will look more like the old direction: the scrupulously honest Cosmotheist direction that attracted me and so many others to Dr. Pierce’s teachings and program… It is that foundation upon which we will continue to build as long as I’m Chairman. Do not look to me to compromise on Dr. Pierce’s perfectly sound Cosmotheist world view, his philosophy — his religion, if you will.

Our American Dissident Voices radio show is back! The Alliance’s Media Director, Kevin Alfred Strom, relaunched the National Alliance weekly broadcasts on December 28, 2013 — the 22nd anniversary of of the very first ADV show back in 1991 when Dr. Pierce’s only staffers on the mountain were myself and Kevin. Kevin has hit the mark each Saturday morning since the relaunch with professionally produced, top-rank original content like we old-timers have come to expect from him.  We’ll continue expanding our ADV outreach as well as getting back into publishing. Expect a long-awaited  issue of National Vanguard magazine to be published soon. Until we get our traditional natall.com and natvan.com sites up and revised to our satisfaction, check out this year’s archived ADV shows at nationalvanguard.org….

[W]ith the help of former Alliance staffer Hadding Scott… we launched a blog in June of 2011 that is dedicated to transcribing older, pre-Internet articles by Dr. William Pierce so they can be shared electronically or printed out. For those of you with computers there are presently more than 130 of these mostly pre-1995 writings archived here: http://williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com/

 I’m undaunted by those who point out that 99% of our people reject the National Alliance  message. Dr. Pierce figured just two or three percent of our people share our preservationist, biocentric values, so, by holding to our sound hard-line ideology we’ll be reaching out to those millions of responsible, racially conscious men and women that Dr. Pierce valued as Alliance members and supporters. It is from among those people who share our values that we’ll shape the vanguard with which to build and lead our “majority of will and determination.”

If that stirs your heart and resonates in your race-soul, then join us. Add your strength to ours. And make history.

In the Christian tradition there is a call to action called the Great Commission. It is to spread the idea of salvation and eternal life to all the world. Many idealists have spent their lives following that commission, though it is unworthy of our greatest souls. We have a Greater Commission, in harmony with Nature and therefore in harmony with God.

We know that the only eternal life is the future evolution and life of our people’s potentially immortal DNA — its continuation into the infinite future. We know that the origin and meaning of morality is to be found in doing whatever is necessary to ensure that continued life, the ascent to higher consciousness of the double helix that brought us into being. We know that our truth is the truth for which our race’s greatest thinkers, from Pythagoras to Darwin, have been seeking for millennia.

We know that all our decisions — from what we will do with today’s 24 hours, to how we shall structure our future society and its laws, to how we shall choose a mate or educate our sons and daughters, to how we shall spread our sacred seed among the stars — must be based on that morality and that morality alone. We know that becoming closer to God requires rejecting the spurious “holy books” written by grasping or ignorant men, and embracing the scientific truths — the real words of God — that our best minds and our Faustian spirit have uncovered. We know that becoming closer to God really means facilitating our further upward evolution so that future generations are literally closer to God than we, just as we are closer to God than the one-celled creatures who preceded us.

We of the National Alliance, as Dr. Pierce said, are the only adults in a world of children. We alone know the answers and the solutions that can stop our decline and looming extinction — and bring into being an infinitely greater world for our children and great-grandchildren. If you, too, are among those who know, then this, the greatest commission of all time, is your commission too.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-greatest-commission/feed/ 0
On Goals http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/on-goals/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/on-goals/#comments Fri, 07 Nov 2014 01:31:08 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1801 wlp_rune_digital_painting_by_kevin_alfred_strom

by Dr. William L. Pierce (pictured)

IT IS WORTHWHILE, every so often, to review in our minds just where it is that we are headed and how we plan to get there. It may help to keep us from wandering off course — from forgetting, in the day-to-day bustle of events, what it’s all about.

Then, too, circumstances change, and if our work is to remain meaningful and to continue carrying us forward we must constantly re-evaluate our strategy and our tactics in the light of new conditions. Otherwise, it is all too easy to slip into the lazy habit of saying and doing the same things we have learned to say and do in the past, while failing to continually keep in mind how these things relate to both our short-term and our . . . → Read More: On Goals]]> wlp_rune_digital_painting_by_kevin_alfred_strom

by Dr. William L. Pierce (pictured)

IT IS WORTHWHILE, every so often, to review in our minds just where it is that we are headed and how we plan to get there. It may help to keep us from wandering off course — from forgetting, in the day-to-day bustle of events, what it’s all about.

Then, too, circumstances change, and if our work is to remain meaningful and to continue carrying us forward we must constantly re-evaluate our strategy and our tactics in the light of new conditions. Otherwise, it is all too easy to slip into the lazy habit of saying and doing the same things we have learned to say and do in the past, while failing to continually keep in mind how these things relate to both our short-term and our long-term goals.

Goals and Purpose

What are our goals? This is a tricky question, in that it has no unique answer. Short-term goals blend into mid-range goals, which become long-term goals, in a step-by-step progression, and they are all different.

Our purpose, our raison d’être, is to promote the security and welfare of Western man and his civilization. In a sense this is a dual purpose, one part biological and one part cultural, but they are closely interdependent.

Racial Survival

Biologically, our concern is to ensure the physical survival of our people by reducing or eliminating both external and internal threats to such survival.

The principal external threat is that of military aggression, and it exists because of the growing military capabilities of various non-Western peoples and the growing failure of will in the West.

The principal internal threat is miscegenation — an inevitable consequence of the multiracial policies now in effect in America, as well as in certain other Western nations.

Beyond these immediate threats, our biological concerns extend to everything which affects the physical health and the racial quality of our people: such things as contamination of our natural environment and dysgenic breeding patterns.

Race and Culture

In addition to preserving a biologically healthy and pure race — or, rather, intimately bound together with this — is our concern for the preservation and the advancement of Western culture.

Painting by Wolfgang Willrich entitled "Family", 1934.

Painting by Wolfgang Willrich entitled Family, 1934.

Because a people’s culture is a reflection of their racial character, it is obvious that no culture can be maintained unless its biological basis has first been secured. But it is equally true that when a people’s culture succumbs to illness, then their racial constitution also loses its resistance to infection. The two things — racial health and cultural health — are inseparable in a multiracial world.

Culture binds together the members of a racially homogeneous community by providing them with a common heritage and a common viewpoint: a common set of values and a common understanding of the world. Today that heritage is being abandoned, those values perverted, that understanding clouded.

Stepping Stones to the Future

Our long-range goals are easiest to state, in a general way. They are the implementation of our purpose: the carrying out of all measures aimed at promoting the racial and cultural welfare of our people, destroying our enemies, and securing our future.

From this it is clear that our mid-range goal must be obtaining the means to reach our long-term goals. Our mid-range goal is power: political power, police power, military power, economic power — the power of the State.

Our short-term goals are stepping stones on the way to our mid-range goal: achieving new levels in recruiting, new limits in activism, new records in the quantity and effectiveness of our propaganda materials.

An Incorrect Strategy

This may seem obvious, but it is not: There are quite different ways of defining goals.

For example, there are people who believe that the proper way to proceed is to make a list of all the major changes they want to bring about in the world, assign priorities, and then begin working full bore to bring about their first priority, whether it be the repeal of the federal income tax or the resettlement of all Negroes in Africa.

The next goal will be the next item on their list, and so on — except, of course, that the whole program is certain to remain bogged down well short of item number one.

Total Approach Required

Nevertheless, this approach has a strong appeal for many, who are able to convince themselves that theirs is a very clever strategy: by concentrating all their energies on one problem at a time they think they have the best chance of accomplishing something.

What has not dawned on them is that all the problems they intend to solve, one by one, are simply different aspects of one large problem. It can no more be solved in a piecemeal fashion than a man infected with a deadly virus can be cured by first curing his right leg, then his left leg, then an arm, and so on.

The only way we can solve any of our problems — the only way we can bring about any of the changes we want — is by solving all of them.

First Things First

Thus we do not work directly at this time to reach ultimate goals: to regain control of our information media, to eliminate Zionist subversion, to prevent miscegenation.

Instead, we concentrate our energies on building our strength, on organizing, on recruiting, on disseminating our ideas, on breaking the chains whenever and wherever we can that bind our compatriots’ minds, and showing them a new way of looking at the world.

This very work of sowing ideas and recruiting means, of course, that we must constantly write about, talk about, and otherwise call attention to our ultimate goals. People do not join a revolutionary movement simply for the sake of helping it grow.

Striking a Response

This does not contradict what we said a few lines above. When we talk about mid-range and long-range goals such as smashing the System and building a new order based on racial idealism, we do it for the sake of attracting into our ranks persons in whom those things strike a responsive chord. That is, we always keep in mind that our immediate goals are all concerned with building our movement, and that until all these immediate goals have been reached we cannot realistically contemplate the actual achievement of longer-range goals.

Burn Anti-Western Films

That this distinction is not mere academic hair-splitting may be shown by a hypothetical example. Imagine that two groups each have as a goal the elimination of perverted and anti-Western motion pictures from America and that each group takes the direct approach of blowing up or burning down motion-picture houses which show such pictures.

If one of the groups regards the aforementioned goal as direct and immediate, while the other regards it as a long-range goal which can be achieved only as one part of a comprehensive program requiring a great deal of preparation beforehand, then the two groups will likely go about their activities very differently.

One Down — 10,000 to Go

When the one group dynamites its first theater, it can count one down and 10,000 to go. It will probably want to keep its identity secret, in order to minimize legal difficulties as it proceeds with its campaign.

The other group understands that the demolition of one theatre — or 100 theatres — can have symbolic significance only, at a time when the group does not have the strength to maintain its demolition operation to a successful conclusion — a conclusion which would inevitably require warring down the combined forces of the entire System.

Getting Credit

Since it recognizes the symbolic value of its activism, it must be willing to accept the responsibility for it — otherwise it is largely meaningless. Thus the demolition must be combined with parades, picketing, and propaganda, so that the public will not only be able to guess who did it, but understand why.

In the first case lighting a fuse simply means destroying — temporarily — one ten-thousandth of the System’s capacity to corrupt and brainwash Americans via motion pictures. In the second case it means creating a graphic and dynamic demonstration for the public; it means generating an issue and polarizing the community; it means awakening hope for a better future; it means winning over more brave and action-minded men and women to a movement working toward a permanent solution, not only to the motion-picture problem but also to the most fundamental causes of that problem.

Apathy, Brainwashing

So we let the people know about our long-term goals while we work toward our short-range goals. But that is not enough.

What does it mean to the average citizen if we tell him our purpose is to promote the security and welfare of Western man? It has probably never even occurred to him that those things need promoting.

Suppose we tell him one of our goals is to end Zionist control of America‘s foreign policy? The chances are he doesn’t even know what a Zionist is, or believes it is someone being persecuted by the Soviet government for wanting to go to Israel.

And if we say that we want to drive the alien brainwashers out of our mass media and our schools; the culture distorters out of our churches, our concert halls, and our art galleries; the traitors out of our government — he will think we are crazy.

Gut Issues

He has not thought about these things, because they have never been mentioned on his TV or in his daily newspaper, and he does not understand them. Worse, even if we could hold his attention long enough to explain everything to him, in most cases it would do little good.

Men act on the things they feel in their bellies far more readily than on ideas in their heads. Hate and hunger and fear will move them — but the need to preserve the race? That is too abstract, not immediate enough for most of them. It is too easy a thing to rationalize away.

A revolutionary mass movement is worthless without its idealism, its long-range program, its spiritual goals — but it also needs immediate, gut issues.

Not All Fat and Happy

The System politicians pre-empt as many gut issues as they can: crime in the streets, school busing, inflation. They use these issues to manipulate the electorate by pretending to have solutions.

But there are other gut issues which, by their very nature, the System cannot pre-empt. And there are plenty of citizens who are not just fat and happy slobs who think only about their beer, their cars, their TVs, and their sex lives. There are millions of moderately worried, moderately responsible, moderately idealistic young people who can be made to respond to gut issues of the sort the System prefers not to mention.

Ramsey Clark and Portnoy

These are the people to whom we primarily direct our message: people who have the vague, uneasy feeling that America is in serious trouble — that there must be something fundamentally wrong with a society in which Ramsey Clark can be the Attorney General and in which a major box-office attraction (Portnoy’s Complaint) can be based on a Jew’s compulsive masturbation, photographed in living color.

Few will have thought it out or analyzed their feeling, and one of the principal tasks of our propaganda is to formulate for them, in clear and simple terms, the specific criticisms for which they are still groping.

Organizing Targets

At the same time our organizing effort must continually direct itself toward specific, immediate goals suitable for recruiting and mobilizing these people. It must be kept in mind, however, that these organizing goals are in a different class than our step-by-step objectives mentioned earlier. Their purpose is to involve potential recruits in activism with a gut appeal, activism that does not require the capacity for organic thinking or an understanding of our ultimate goals.

And that is the only purpose of such goals, or, to use a different term, organizing targets; i.e., they are means rather than ends. Nevertheless, they are vital, and they must be chosen wisely, so that those enlisted into their service can eventually come to understand fully our other goals.

An excellent example of an organizing target is the Western Guard’s current campaign against the large-scale immigration of Asians into Canada. This is a target easily understood by a substantial portion of White Canadians, who thoroughly resent the Trudeau regime’s plan to import thousands of the colored aliens now leaving Uganda.

Even Canadians whose racial feeling does not go much beyond a concern for job security or neighborhood safety and who would regard with indifference an idealistic call to fight for our long-term goals are responding to the Western Guard’s “White Canada” appeal in the face of the present threat. Once involved, they can gradually be taught a new outlook and come to fully understand the meaning of Western solidarity.

* * *

From Attack! No. 15, 1972 transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/on-goals/feed/ 0
Portnoy’s Complaint: A Goyische View http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/portnoys-complaint-a-goyische-view/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/portnoys-complaint-a-goyische-view/#comments Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:44:17 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1798 Portnoy's Complaint Posterby Dr. William L. Pierce

ATTACK! CERTAINLY does not want to establish a reputation as a pander for the skin-flick trade, but we are going out on a limb just once and recommending that all our readers see the movie Portnoy’s Complaint.

Actually there’s very little skin to be seen in this flick, although it is decidedly pornographic. The peg on which the film is hung is a young Jew’s problem with masturbation. (ILLUSTRATION: A Portnoy’s Complaint poster from 1972)

Fixation on Genitalia

If the viewer can stomach the peculiarly Jewish fixation on genitalia and human excretory functions which pervades the film, there is a reward for him: namely, a fleeting glimpse at the traditional Jewish attitude toward Gentiles — or the goyim, as Portnoy and his family would say.

The nationally syndicated film reviewer, Rex Reed, reacted to . . . → Read More: Portnoy’s Complaint: A Goyische View]]> Portnoy's Complaint Posterby Dr. William L. Pierce

ATTACK! CERTAINLY does not want to establish a reputation as a pander for the skin-flick trade, but we are going out on a limb just once and recommending that all our readers see the movie Portnoy’s Complaint.

Actually there’s very little skin to be seen in this flick, although it is decidedly pornographic. The peg on which the film is hung is a young Jew’s problem with masturbation. (ILLUSTRATION: A Portnoy’s Complaint poster from 1972)

Fixation on Genitalia

If the viewer can stomach the peculiarly Jewish fixation on genitalia and human excretory functions which pervades the film, there is a reward for him: namely, a fleeting glimpse at the traditional Jewish attitude toward Gentiles — or the goyim, as Portnoy and his family would say.

The nationally syndicated film reviewer, Rex Reed, reacted to Portnoy’s Complaint with the indiscreet statement: “This film will make many people think Hitler was right about the Jews.”

Talmudic Prejudice

For example, there are disparaging remarks which Portnoy’s parents repeatedly utter about Gentiles: “goyische crooks” and the like. The viewer, of course, is supposed to believe that is only because they are old-fashioned, religious Jews, who have been brought up on the Talmud and can’t help themselves. Young Portnoy, in contrast, is a “liberated” Jew, who has no truck with the anti-Gentilism of his parents — almost.

The careful observer will see the true attitude of the “liberated” Jew more subtly — and, presumably, unconsciously — expressed by the Jews who created this sickening film and the book on which it is based, in their diverse portrayals of two of its characters: the empty-headed, degraded Gentile girl, or “shiksa,” Mary Jane, and the upright, self-confident Jewish girl, Naomi.

Joys of Yiddish

This word “shiksa,” used several times during the film, tells a story of its own. It is one of those Yiddish words, like “schlemiel” or “schmuck,” formerly used only by Jews out of earshot of the nearest Gentile, which today are openly flaunted in mixed company — and have even become part of the vocabulary of “avant-garde” Gentiles.

Some Yiddish words stem from Hebrew; most, like “schmuck,” have German roots. A particularly interesting feature of Yiddish words is that a great many of them have double meanings. “Schmuck,” for example, means “ornament” or “decoration” to a German; to a Jew it means “penis.”

A Piece of Meat

“Shiksa” has a Hebrew root which means “abomination,” “something unclean” — specifically, a piece of “unclean” (non-kosher) meat, like a pork chop or a slice of ham.

The use of the same word to designate a Gentile girl and a piece of “unclean” meat may seem to many only a harmless, private Jewish joke. It’s no joke, though.

Consider the more commonly used Yiddish word, goy (plural: goyim), meaning “Gentile.” It comes directly from the Hebrew, where it has two meanings: (non-Jewish) “people” or (non-Jewish) “nation” — and “cattle.”

It is interesting to browse through the Old Testament, substituting “goyim” for “nation” wherever that word appears. For instance, “The goyim who refuse to serve you (Israel) shall perish; yea, those goyim shall be utterly wasted” (Isaiah 60:12). It brings home a little more clearly the burning hatred, the bottomless contempt of Jew for Gentile — a hatred and contempt which stretch from the time of Isaiah to the present.

Not for Goyische Eyes

Usually Jews have kept these feelings carefully concealed, although one would think the Old Testament sufficiently explicit to give the game away. The Talmud is much more explicit — so much so that it is scrupulously guarded from prying Gentile eyes. Thick-witted, good-natured brutes though they be, even Gentiles might take offense at the blatant expression of hatred in the Talmud.

It is all the more curious, then, that in the past few years the Jewish Establishment has so recklessly let its guard down. Why a picture like Portnoy’s Complaint when there are so many other sick (and safe) topics they could have used for a porno-film?

A documentary paperback reveals Jewish hatred and vengefulness against Germans expressed through Talmudic ritual murder. None of the hundreds of American GIs who witnessed the scene in May 1945 will ever forget the little park in the Berlin suburb of Lichterfelde where the corpses of 30 German children between the ages of three and nine were found hanging upside down from trees by cords strung through their heel tendons. Their throats had been slashed and Hebrew letters daubed on their naked bodies with blood. News of the horrible atrocity, which had been committed by Soviet Jewish troops, was suppressed and Army news photographers’ film confiscated, on orders from Eisenhower’s HQ.

A documentary paperback reveals Jewish hatred and vengefulness against Germans expressed through Talmudic ritual murder. None of the hundreds of American GIs who witnessed the scene in May 1945 will ever forget the little park in the Berlin suburb of Lichterfelde where the corpses of 30 German children between the ages of three and nine were found hanging upside down from trees by cords strung through their heel tendons. Their throats had been slashed and Hebrew letters daubed on their naked bodies with blood. News of the horrible atrocity, which had been committed by Soviet Jewish troops, was suppressed and Army news photographers’ film confiscated, on orders from Eisenhower’s HQ.

Ritual Murder

And why have they let the book Gehlen: Germany’s Master Spy go on sale as a paperback at newsstands all over America, when that book reveals (on page 133) that the Jewess, Hilde Benjamin, chief justice of the postwar Soviet regime in East Germany, delivered all her thousands of death sentences according to the Jewish tradition for ritual murder of a Gentile, with Talmud, candle, and all?

 We Don’t Count

Why the increasing tendency in the mass media to rub our noses in the private little world of Jewish humor, Jewish perversion, and Jewish folkways — almost as if the media existed for their benefit alone, and we just didn’t count?

Has their contempt made them careless?

Not really. During the next few months a million or so goyische “cattle” will pay their $3 apiece to see Portnoy’s Complaint, and 99 percent of them will laugh at all the places they’re supposed to laugh, think only what they’re supposed to think, and walk out when it’s all over no more aware of what’s going on in the world — and no more caring — than when they walked in.

But Portnoy and his tribe had better watch out for that last one percent.

* * *

From Attack! No. 14, 1972 transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/portnoys-complaint-a-goyische-view/feed/ 0
The Rape of Germany http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-rape-of-germany-2/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-rape-of-germany-2/#comments Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:26:29 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1788 Raped German Women.jpgby Thomas Goodrich

TRAUMATIC as first encounters were, when the Soviet shock troops moved off many Germans would concur that the experience had not been as bad as feared. While rapes had occurred and while many German men of military age had been marched east or shot on the spot, the front line soldier was more concerned with fighting and survival than with loot, rape, and revenge. Not so with those who followed. In numerous instances, before Red combat officers and men pushed on they turned to the helpless civilians with stone-like faces: “The Mongols are coming. . . . Very bad men. You go quick. Go quick.” (ILLUSTRATION: Raped German women)

Composed largely of Mongols, Kazakhs, Kalmuks, and other Asians, as well as convicts and Jewish commissars, these men . . . → Read More: The Rape of Germany]]> Raped German Women.jpgby Thomas Goodrich

TRAUMATIC as first encounters were, when the Soviet shock troops moved off many Germans would concur that the experience had not been as bad as feared. While rapes had occurred and while many German men of military age had been marched east or shot on the spot, the front line soldier was more concerned with fighting and survival than with loot, rape, and revenge. Not so with those who followed. In numerous instances, before Red combat officers and men pushed on they turned to the helpless civilians with stone-like faces: “The Mongols are coming. . . . Very bad men. You go quick. Go quick.” (ILLUSTRATION: Raped German women)

Composed largely of Mongols, Kazakhs, Kalmuks, and other Asians, as well as convicts and Jewish commissars, these men who formed the second wave of troops were regarded, even by their own comrades, as utterly merciless. Terrified by the news, many Germans did attempt to flee and move in the wake of the first Soviet wave. Most, however, found themselves trapped and could do little more than hide young girls and once again pray that their worst fears were unfounded. After a wait of sometimes days, but normally only hours, the dreaded second wave arrived. There were no preliminaries. Unlike storm troops, who cautiously entered towns and villages and slipped nervously from door to door, the rear echelons burst noisily into communities atop trucks, tanks or peasant carts crammed high with loot. Often wildly drunk, many wore a bizarre array of stolen clothes and gaudy jewelry. Adding to the chaos were herds of bellowing cattle and sheep.

“It was almost like a scene from the Middle Ages — a migration, no less,” said one stunned observer.

Soon after the “carnival columns” halted in a German town, hell on earth was unleashed. “It seemed as though the devil himself had come. . . ,” a witness from Silesia wrote. “The ‘Mongol barbarism of the Asiatic plains’ had come not in a propaganda phrase but in the flesh.”

While flames shot up from different corners of the towns and gunfire erupted as citizens were murdered in the streets, the invaders soon began kicking in doors to homes, shops, and churches.

“[A] whole horde of Asiatic-looking fellows appeared and started searching the cellar… ,” recalled one priest. “The place was a dreadful sight by the time they had finished. The room was already full of smoke and I begged one of the Russians to let us out. . . . Were they going to let us be burnt to death? After a while, however, a more civilized-looking Russian appeared and I repeated my request. He led us out to . . . the courtyard of the convent. The noise was deafening — the raucous shouts of the Russians, the crackling of the flames, the crashing of beams and brickwork.”

Many horrified Germans tried to greet with a smile their strange visitors. Revealed one woman from a boarding house in Berbitz:

“As a precaution, the landlord, Mr. Grebmann, had lined the vestibule with liquor bottles in the naive hope that his house might thereby be spared from ransacking. To the succeeding troop of slant-eyed Mongolians, the tenants brought their jewelry and watches. Hysterical, Mrs. Friedel embraced one of the greasy Kirgis and drank with him from the same bottle, and the elderly Mr. Grebmann patted them familiarly on the back. . . . One of the Mongolians held up my Tom’s tall leather boots triumphantly, the other one put my rings into his pants pocket. . . . Scarcely had this second detachment left the house and we were beginning to breathe freely, when fists once more thundered at the door: thus it kept up the whole day. The house doors were not permitted to be locked any more. Each took what he wanted either in a more or less harmless or in a malicious way. Soon we and the Russians were wading knee-deep in thrown-around clothing, laundry and bits of smashed dishes . . . As soon as a new detachment of Russians entered the house noisily, we squatted trembling about the round table in Grebmann’s living room. One of the soldiers sat at the table with us with pistol disengaged and demanded schnapps or vodka, while the others rummaged around the house. . . . [N]o one dared to speak. We women sat with downcast eyes and lowered head. Someone had told us never to look a Russian in the eye, otherwise we would be lost . . . Before long the inside of the house looked as if a band of robbers had lived there. . . . The fellows had cut the beds up into little pieces, slit open the upholstered chairs, thrown furniture around; had slashed pictures, despoiled books, cracked eggs against the wall; had poured liqueur over the rugs, torn curtains down, and scattered the entire contents of all the closets and drawers all over. One of the most painful shocks for me was to see how two of the ruffians with their heavy boots kicked the chest in which I had my beautiful porcelain wrapped in tissue paper and cotton wadding. They were all treasured pieces. . . . My most beautiful piece . . . was used by one of them as a toilet.”

As a rule, the Soviets generally sought out gold and jewelry first, with an especial eye for “uri,” or wristwatches. It was not unusual to see Red troops laden with necklaces and gold chains or sporting as many as a dozen watches on each arm. When the people had been plucked clean of valuables, interest usually turned to liquor. In their mad quest for “wodka,” soldiers greedily imbibed everything from fine wines and champagne to rubbing alcohol and perfume. Red troops, observed one woman, were “crazy for anything even smelling of alcohol.”

And then. . . .

“Rape was a word that [had] occurred again and again in [our] conversation,” admitted Lali Horstmann. “It was an expression which caused no pang of fear in our times for its meaning was purely figurative — ‘to be ravished’ belonged to the realm of lyrical poetry. Now its original sense was terrifyingly restored and brought us face to face with a new peril.”

“Suddenly the door of the room we were in was opened and some soldiers entered,” a frightened boy recalled as he sat with a group of women huddled in a dark room. “One or two matches were struck and I saw that there were about eight Russians in the room who were obviously looking for women.”

The child continues:

“As I crouched there in my corner I saw one of the Russians coming towards me. The match he held in his hand went out. I felt, rather than saw, a hand reach out towards me. I had a fur cap on my head, and suddenly I felt fingers tracing curl-like movements on my temple. For a brief moment I did not know what to make of this, but the next instant, when a loud ‘No’ resounded through the room, I thanked God with all my heart that I was not a woman or a girl. Meanwhile the beasts had spotted their victims and shared them out. Then they suddenly started shooting at random. But it was dark in the room and no one could see where the shots were being fired or who was hit. I heard wails and groans and voices calling out to me to help, but there was nothing I could do. Right next to me poor defenseless women were being ravished in the presence of their children.”

Merely because a female had been raped once was no guarantee she would not be assaulted again and again. “Many of the girls were raped as often as ten times a night, and even more,” said a witness from Neustadt.

“There was never a moment’s peace either by day or at night,” added another victim:

“The Russians were coming and going the whole time and they kept eyeing us greedily. The nights were dreadful because we were never safe for a moment. The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women. The youngest victim in the row houses where we lived was ten years of age and the oldest one was over seventy. . . . I am sure that wild and hungry animals would not have behaved any differently.”

Wrote a girl from Posen who desperately clung to a cousin for safety:

“When we were lying in bed at night we kept hearing steps coming up the stairs. . . . They beat on the door with their rifle-butts, until it was opened. Without any consideration for my mother and aunt, who had to get out of bed, we were raped by the Russians, who always held a machine pistol in one hand. They lay in bed with their dirty boots on, until the next lot came. As there was no light, everything was done by pocket torches, and we did not even know what the beasts looked like.”

Like hunted prey leading predators from their young, some mothers instinctively sacrificed themselves. Recorded one little girl, ten-year-old Mignon Fries:

“[S]he told us in a stern voice to go outside to play and under no circumstances to come back in. No matter what we heard, until she herself would come for us, no matter how long it took. Fearfully we looked at her even though we didn’t know exactly what we were afraid of. . . . We went outside and stood around for awhile not knowing what to do, just listening to the noise in the apartment. My mother had just closed all the windows but we could still hear the soldiers talking, laughing and shouting. Then the music started and before long the soldiers were singing. . . .
The day gave way to evening, it got rather chilly and still we were outside and the ‘party’ got noisier. Every once in a while a soldier would open a window and throw an empty vodka bottle outside. Sometimes the music would stop for a while, but the singing and shouting continued. As it got later and later we became very hungry and cold, but having been raised in an atmosphere of strict obedience we didn’t dare go back in the house against our mother’s orders and just huddled against the wall of the shed in the garden trying to keep each other warm. . . . The music and the singing broke off as suddenly as it had started. . . . Within minutes it was all over and all the soldiers left the house. . . .  But it was a long time before our mother finally came out to get us. She was very pale and hugged both of us very tightly for a long time and we could feel her body shaking.”

If front-line troops had displayed unpredictability regarding rape, the second wave did not. “All of us, without exception, suffered the same,” revealed one victim.

“And to make matters worse,” added a witness from Neisse, “these atrocities were not committed secretly or in hidden corners but in public, in churches, on the streets, and on the squares. . . .  Mothers were raped in the presence of their children, girls were raped in front of their brothers.”

“They . . . raped women and girls . . . in ditches and by the wayside, and as a rule not once but several times,” echoed another viewer. “Sometimes a whole bunch of soldiers would seize hold of one woman and all rape her.”

For those Germans who had naively imagined that they might “win over” the Soviets with kindness and courtesy, they now understood, too late, that Nazi propaganda had in this instance grossly understated the threat, rather than exaggerated it. “[T]he atrocity reports in the newspapers were harmless, compared to reality,” one incredulous victim revealed. While many upright Russian officers courageously stepped in and risked their own lives to stop the murders and rapes, their efforts were little more than a drop of water to a forest fire.

“[A]ll of us knew very well that if the girls were German they could be raped and then shot,” admitted Alexander Solzhenitsyn. “This was almost a combat distinction.”

“There will be no mercy — for no one . . . ,” ran one Soviet general’s order to his men. “It is pointless to ask our troops to exercise mercy.”

“Kill them all, men, old men, children and the women, after you have amused yourself with them! . . . ,” urged Jewish propagandist, Ilya Ehrenberg, in his flaming leaflets that showered down on the Red Army from airplanes. “Kill. Nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the yet unborn. . . . Break the racial pride of the German women. Take her as your legitimate booty. Kill, you brave soldiers of the victorious Soviet Army.”

Springing from house to house and victim to victim “like wild beasts,” the drunken horde was determined to embrace such words as the above at their literal worst.

“When the Russians eventually tired of looting, robbing, murdering, and ill-treating the women and girls, they set fire to a considerable part of the village and razed it to the ground,” said a survivor of Schoenwald, the small community that had dismissed rumors of Russian ruthlessness and opted to welcome them instead.

Much like Schoenwald, one town after another was swiftly enveloped by the howling red storm . . . with the same results.

“And as we were then hauled out of the cellar,” recalled a woman who, along with her mother and grandmother had been raped repeatedly, “and as they stood there with their machine guns, my mother said, ‘Well, now we’ll probably be shot.’ And I said, ‘It’s all the same to me.’ It really was all the same to me. You can imagine Asian cruelty. . . . ‘Frau, come,’ that was the slogan. ‘Frau, come.’ And I was so furious, because I’d had it up to here. . . . [H]e had me in such a clinch I couldn’t free myself, with my elbow I hit him in the pit of his stomach. That definitely hurt him, and he yelled, ‘You, I shoot.’ And he was brandishing this kind of machine gun around my nose and then I said, ‘Then shoot.’ Yelled it, yelled it just like he did. ‘Then shoot.'”

Though this woman miraculously lived, many who offered even token resistance did not. Wrote a witness from Bauschdorf:

“Emilie Ertelt . . . wanted to protect her fifteen-year old daughter, who had been raped sixteen times on one and the same day. Holding a lighted candle in her hand, Mrs. Ertelt, and all those present in the room began to pray for her daughter. . . .[F]our shots were suddenly fired at us. After a few moments some more Russians appeared and started shooting at Mrs. Ertelt, wounding her in the head. The blood streamed down her face, and the nuns who were present went to her assistance and bandaged her head. Soon afterwards another Russian appeared, a brutal-looking fellow . . . and fired a shot at close range. Mrs. Ertelt was killed instantaneously.”

Surrounded by Soviets, flight was simply not a sane option for females — and yet, some tried. One young teacher from Kriescht ran terror-stricken into the nearby woods. The woman was soon found, however, and, according to a chronicler, “They drove her out on the road stark naked, and many soldiers used her one after the other. She reached her village crawling on hands and knees along the ditch, through mud and snow.”

Another group of females found temporary haven in a woodland barn near Schoeneiche. But again, the refuge was swiftly discovered. Remembered one who was there:

“They burst in, drunk with vodka and with victory, looking for women. When they saw only older women and children hiding behind a pile of carpets, they must have suspected that somewhere younger bodies were being concealed, and they started to ram their bayonets into the carpets. Here and there first and then systematically. . . . Nobody knows how many young girls were killed instantly that night. Eventually, the muffled cries of anguish and pain gave the hiding places away, and the victors started unrolling their prey. They chased those girls that had remained unhurt through the barn. . . . By then the barn looked like a battle field with wounded women on the floor right next to screaming and fighting victims forced to endure repeated and violent acts of rape.”

Faced by relentless assaults, with flight out of the question, females tried a variety of stratagems to save themselves. “Some of us tried to make ourselves as unattractive as possible by rouging the tips of our noses, putting gray powder on our upper lips to look like mustaches, and combing out our hair wildly,” revealed Lali Horstmann. Others placed pillows under their dresses and hobbled with sticks to appear like hunchbacks. One crazed woman, clad in an alluring night gown, left her door open purposely to attract soldiers to where she was lying in bed, in the hope of finding a protector. “Two Russians, who had entered for a moment stood speechless. Then both spat in disgust, using a coarse word, shocked to the core by a woman who could offer herself to them. They went on to the room next door, from where soon came cries for help from the girl’s grandmother, aged sixty-nine. Her valiant defense of her honor had made her more attractive than the pretty, too willing girl.” Regarding “willing” women such as the above as “unclean,” Red troops were as likely as not to kill on the spot such individuals.

Many frantic females mistakenly assumed a house of God would provide protection. In fact, churches were usually the rapists’ first stop. Agonized a priest from Neisse:

BookCoverImage.jpg“The girls, women and nuns were raped incessantly for hours on end, the soldiers standing in queues, the officers at the head of the queues, in front of their victims. During the first night many of the nuns and women were raped as many as fifty times. Some of the nuns who resisted with all their strength were shot, others were ill-treated in a dreadful manner until they were too exhausted to offer any resistance. The Russians knocked them down, kicked them, beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their revolvers and rifles, until they finally collapsed and in this unconscious condition became the helpless victims of brutish passion, which was so inhuman as to be inconceivable. The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, homes for the aged, and other such institutions. Even nuns who were seventy and eighty years old and were ill and bedridden were raped and ill-treated by these barbarians.”

Those women pregnant, on their menstrual cycle, or enduring diarrhea, suffered like all the rest. Nothing, it seemed — not age, ailment or ugliness — could repel the Red rapist. Even death was no defense.

“I  . . . saw some twenty Red Army men standing in line before the corpse of a woman certainly beyond sixty years of age who had been raped to death,” one sickened witness recorded. “They were shouting and laughing and waiting for their satisfaction over her dead body.” As this viewer went on to add, and as numerous examples attest, such ghoulish depravities were not isolated events.

(from Hellstorm—The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947, by Thomas Goodrich)

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/the-rape-of-germany-2/feed/ 7
Homeless Jack on Saint Hitler http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/homeless-jack-on-saint-hitler/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/homeless-jack-on-saint-hitler/#comments Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:48:16 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1811 Hitler_colorized_02by H. Millard

WHY WAS Hitler a saint?

What do you think, man, is that a fair question? Haven’t I just set up the premise and the conclusion that Hitler was a saint? Doesn’t it sound as though I just assume that everyone knows he was a saint?

I started this essay with that question because the other day I picked up a book (the title of the book doesn’t matter) and I thought it was supposed to be an objective investigation of Hitler’s values and ethics. See, I’m always interested in values and ethics, because I think we Whites are on the wrong track with universal values and ethics and we need to adopt particularistic values and ethics; meaning we have to start looking out for ourselves alone and not worry about those unlike . . . → Read More: Homeless Jack on Saint Hitler]]> Hitler_colorized_02by H. Millard

WHY WAS Hitler a saint?

What do you think, man, is that a fair question? Haven’t I just set up the premise and the conclusion that Hitler was a saint? Doesn’t it sound as though I just assume that everyone knows he was a saint?

I started this essay with that question because the other day I picked up a book (the title of the book doesn’t matter) and I thought it was supposed to be an objective investigation of Hitler’s values and ethics. See, I’m always interested in values and ethics, because I think we Whites are on the wrong track with universal values and ethics and we need to adopt particularistic values and ethics; meaning we have to start looking out for ourselves alone and not worry about those unlike us. In fact I think every single White should always stay out of the business of non-Whites. Don’t help them. Don’t interfere. Let them live or die as nature and luck would have it. The world to me is White vs. non-White. I always ask: “Is this good for Whites?” If it is, it is good and it is moral. If it isn’t, then it is bad and it is immoral.

Well, anyway, in the very first sentence of the book — in the first four words — the author sets the premise and his conclusion by asking: “Why was Hitler evil?” Then in the next few paragraphs he uses the word “evil” several more times either in front of Hitler’s name or to describe him.

What a stupid way to start such a book. It might have been acceptable to start with something like: “Why do some people say Hitler was evil? Then, the author could go on to define what he means by “evil,” and talk specifically about what type of people say Hitler was evil and why they might say it, and then develop his thesis. Instead, he just assumes that everyone will accept his biased opinion that Hitler was evil and then instead of offering a fair look at Saint Hitler’s values and ethics he just cherry picks various things that fit his prejudice and ignores things that don’t fit. Such a biased value judgment in a book that is supposed to be making a non-emotional and rational investigation of something is absurd and is hardly an unemotional and intellectual look at the subject. It’s just propaganda.

Exactly what is “evil”? The author doesn’t define it. So I will. The simple definition is that evil means “morally bad.” Now there are other definitions, but I don’t want to waste time on an etymological analysis of the term, so I’ll just stick with morally bad. But I will also offer the following definition of “moral”: of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior.

Was it morally bad for Saint Hitler to want to save White people? Nope. Was it morally bad for Saint Hitler to want to consciously help evolution go in the best direction so White people become smarter, healthier, and less prone to diseases and afflictions and live longer, happier, more fulfilled lives? Nope. What about the war and all that? That was thrust upon him. He was simply trying to protect Germans who were living in lands that were once part of Germany or adjacent to it and which had large ethnic German populations. And, of course, there were the Communists who wanted war as part of their plan for world domination.

I want to tell you this , man — I think at some time in the future, and it may not be that far off, millions of Whites are going to realize that what Saint Hitler was really about was saving White people from extinction and that he wanted us to evolve ever higher. When all the anti-White propaganda dies, and it will, Whites really may come to think of Hitler as a saint and a savior who was fighting the forces of evil and darkness that were, and which still are, trying to destroy us as a distinct and unique people. Yes, these forces are playing at White genocide. These dark forces won a temporary victory against good in the skirmish that was WWII. And, it really was just a skirmish in the long view of history. Although haters try to paint Saint Hitler as just being for Germans, he was really for all Whites. He was Pan-Whiteist or Pan-Aryanist (they mean the same thing).

And, I think Whites will come to realize that Saint Hitler was ahead of his time and was trying to save all Whites from all the attacks on White people by non-Whites. Today, even some of the lowest consciousness Whites can see the war on White people that is raging in every formerly all-White (but now mixed) nations.

So, is it evil to help White people survive? Of course not. And, is it evil to want us to improve? Nope. Is it evil that Saint Hitler was concerned about White people and not other peoples? Nope. Shouldn’t we take care of ourselves and those most like us? Yup. Isn’t that the moral thing to do? Yes. In fact, we Whites have got to get rid of this false universal outlook on humans that lumps us all together as though we’re all the same. That way lies our genocide and extinction. Such a belief is anti-nature, anti-evolution and anti-White. We Whites have to start realizing that we are a different kind of human and we have to want to not only save our differences but increase them. We must diverge more from other types of humans. That is our highest possible destiny, but it requires that we avoid any gene flow from other types of humans in order for the fundamental forces of evolution to work.

Even though evolution never stops and it works whether we know it or not, we are thinking beings — and we now know how much of evolution works. With such knowledge, we are commanded to take charge of our evolution or risk devolution. Having this knowledge puts the responsibility squarely on our shoulders. We can’t ignore it, once we know it. It is a heavy responsibility but it is our responsibility as White people. We must will ourselves forward along an evolutionary trajectory that is best for us alone. We have no responsibility to other kinds of humans. They are our eternal enemies in the gene wars, even if many of our kind and their kind don’t realize it. The gene wars are eternal and they are automatic. They don’t require evil intent. They don’t require any intent at all. Non-Whites can be nice people, they can be friendly, they can be attractive. They can have all good things about them, but it doesn’t matter. In the gene wars, it is an endless battle between different genotypes to be the most numerous type and the dominant type. Good and evil have no part in the discussion on this level. These are terms made up by humans and they do not exist in nature. They are relative. We use them as they relate to our kind and other kinds. We shouldn’t even try to save other peoples, man. They have their destinies and we have ours and we shouldn’t mix or blend them. If we save them, we’re just helping our enemies in the gene wars. It’s nuts. We save them so they can wipe us out. That makes no logical or moral sense at all. That is evil relative to us.

Our highest destiny is to continue along an exclusively White path biologically, intellectually, spiritually. and genetically so that we separate more from other humans and make the next great leap in evolution to full specieshood when we will no longer be able to bear children with non-White humans. That is our nirvana, our enlightenment, and the higher state that we seek, man. It is more than just sitting around cross legged and humming or trying to empty our minds — it is a real and physical change that we will experience and it will be accompanied by a spiritual change as surely as the scent of roses comes from the physical DNA of roses.

Now, not all of our kind will make it, man. I don’t know how many of us will, but those of us who do will be the mothers and fathers of the new species. Arman says we’re going to go through a bottleneck and many of our kind will go extinct — that means many of our family lines will die out — but those of us who get through it will be the progenitors of a new species. And, those few new ones will breed like crazy and they will become a huge population of the New Whites — the ones above our present corrupted and weak-seed Whites. Eventually, because this is the way evolution works, the new ones will prove to be better adapted than earlier humans to every niche habitable by humans and they will replace other forms of humans who do not have these adaptations and who will not be able to compete with us. This is how evolution always works — usually blindly — but with us it will be consciously.

Arman says our new ones will look pretty much the same as the best of us now look and he points to ancient Greek and Roman statues as to what he means. He says that most of our changes will be internal and the most important one will be our inability to bear children with other types of humans. This is important because it will stop gene flow and increase the speed of our evolution even more. Remember, evolution never stops.

Arman says that in this big leap we will take into full specieshood, we will be more intelligent, more cunning, more sure of ourselves, healthier, and have more intuition. He also says that we will live longer and have greater reproductive success because of a higher birthrate than others. He says our skulls will change and be longer and taller to accommodate more brain matter, and that this longer shape of our skulls will be necessary for our women to pass our babies through their birth canals safely since their birth canals and hips won’t change enough to accommodate extremely bulbous skulls. He says that we will be able to walk right by earlier humans on the street and not generally be seen as different. He does say that we will be Whiter and have a different (not unpleasant) odor to us than earlier humans but the odor will usually only be sensed by dogs and other animals with a heightened sense of smell. If our DNA goes through an analysis, it will also show that we are a different species.

Back to Saint Hitler, the Savior of White people. I say again that he actually foresaw or anticipated the war against Whites that is going on in the world today and tried to head it off. He may not have seen it in all of its permutations, but I think he saw the trajectory of it from his position back then.

Look at the mass miscegenation. Look at the attacks and murders of White people in every formerly all-White land. Look at the mass immigration of non-Whites to formerly all-White lands. Look at the war that is being waged against White people by non-White people and look at how weak-seed Whites are actually helping dig the graves of their fellow Whites. We are under attack, man. Look at our present low birthrate and look at all the things that work to keep our births down: homosexuality, birth control, abortions, late marriage, celibacy, early deaths, suicide, putting material things over having children, and more. There are forces trying to wipe us Whites out, man, and they have lots of tools to do it.

Saint Hitler saw it coming and tried to stop it. And, those who hate White people have been misleading people about him and his movement ever since. One of the ways they do this is by trying to lump all humans together, so we Whites won’t see ourselves as the different type that we actually are, and so we will thus take the part of non-Whites against our own White interests. The apathetic White masses are told to not trust their eyes when they notice that different races look different. They are told not to trust statistics that show different races have different abilities. They are constantly told that race doesn’t exist. Well, in this last regard, the reality is that the so-called major races of humans not only exist, but they are more than races, they are subspecies that are further divided down into races. Thus, there is a White subspecies and we have White races within our subspecies, albeit with blurred lines, but generally corresponding to some of our ancient nations. But all non-Jewish Whites are closely related. We are all brothers and sisters and cousins, man. We shouldn’t try to distinguish one group of non-Jewish Whites from another; because we face an external enemy, an enemy that wants to wipe out all non-Jewish Whites, every last one of us.

Look at how the haters of Whites are trying to censor everything about Saint Hitler, man. They are banning books. They are arresting people who tell the truth. They are persecuting people who simply question historical events in the WWII era. It’s nuts that more Whites don’t realize what is going on and demand it be stopped. We are free people, man. We have a natural right to question, to think, to convey our thoughts to others. No one has the right to censor us if we are not calling for harm to ourselves or others. But the haters of White people know that once we shake off the present conditioning and realize who and what we are, and that we have a destiny that is one with our DNA — and once we start living consciously and intentionally with this destiny in our minds and hearts — the next time we try to save the planet and our kind, there will be no stopping us.

You know the story of the lion raised by sheep who thought he was a sheep and acted like a sheep until another lion told him who and what he was, don’t you man? Well that lion that thought he was a sheep is us right now. I’m telling you that we are lions — not sheep.

Another way that we are being attacked is through bedroom genocide: miscegenation. It corrupts our White DNA code and turns us into non-Whites. It is assimilation, absorption, and extinction. The haters of Whites are using constant PR methods to try to convince us to jump in bed with non-Whites.

See man, we Whites have a right to exist as Whites. We have a right to self-determination as Whites. We have a right to be truly White and to love ourselves for being White. We have a right to love Whiteness. We have a right to our own self-identification and self-determination.

Look, don’t take my word for any of this, and I’m not going to turn this into a book-length study, because if you read unbiased books about Hitler and the Nazis and their philosophy and connect up the dots, you’ll learn for yourself what Saint Hitler was all about. He believed in evolution and he wanted Whites to evolve ever higher. Saint Hitler knew that all non-Jewish Whites are related. We are one distinct and unique people by birth no matter what White nationality we are born into.

We don’t need Jews and other non-Whites or even weak-seed self-hating Whites who are White on the outside but non-White on the inside telling us what is right and moral and ethical. We don’t need them butting into our affairs and ways. They should butt out. And, we should also practice non-interference in the affairs of those unlike us and be indifferent to them. They should be almost invisible to us. Those who are not our kind should mind their own business and we’ll mind ours. We don’t want to mix with them. We don’t want their diversity. We don’t want their multiculturalism. We have a higher calling and a higher duty. We are following our highest possible destiny which is to evolve along a White trajectory. I believe that If we don’t follow our highest trajectory — our True Path — that humankind will go extinct. It will only survive if we Whites survive. We are the new humankind aborning. We are the new model human, man. We are the future species of humans and we’re now living in one of those transition periods where the old model humans still exist at the same time as us — at least for a time. In a few thousand years when future humans look back, they’ll see that our divergence from other forms of humans made us the one line that led to all future humans while the other forms of humans alive in our present day went extinct. That is the future if we do the right things today to save humankind for extinction. We have a heavy burden on us, man. We are selected for this responsibility of saving humankind through us and one can believe that we are selected by God or one can believe we are selected by nature, and it doesn’t really matter one way or the other to me which of these you believe. I know in my heart that we have this by revelation, man, and it is true.

If Saint Hitler knew as much about evolution and DNA as we know now, he might have handled things differently. For example, instead of sending troops to secure lands full of Germans, he might have just stayed within the borders of Germany and worked to increase the population of Germans to the maximum. Then, when the seams were busting, Germans could simply walk across borders and take over other nations in a democratic manner by becoming citizens of those nations and voting themselves into power. However, in the long view of history, it won’t matter. We are the new humans. We are the future — if we make it so by living consciously and intentionally with our survival, our expansion, and our evolution constantly in mind.

(© 2014 H. Millard)

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics; all in Millard’s edgy style. They lead up to Homeless Jack’s Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Click here to buy. ISBN: 0-595-32646-3
Roaming the Wastelands ROAMING THE WASTELANDS- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9) H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235. “A fun–and sobering–thing to read” – Alamance Independent
The Outsider THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/homeless-jack-on-saint-hitler/feed/ 1
“A Fate Worse Than Death” http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/a-fate-worse-than-death-2/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/a-fate-worse-than-death-2/#comments Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:54:21 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1792 catherine_german_2.jpgby Thomas Goodrich

THE LITTLE BOTTLE lay on the sand. Nearby, waves lapped softly against the beach. How long the bottle had been lying there no one knows. Whether it was the tide or a storm that placed it, we do not know that either. This much we do know: At some point, someone walking along the sand spotted the bottle and instead of breaking it or hurling it back out to sea, they stooped to pick it up. We also know that when the finder uncorked the bottle he discovered that a note was folded inside. After fishing out the note and reading the words on the paper, whoever held it must have been dumb-struck. Finally, we also know that soon after the finder read the note and recovered from his shock, . . . → Read More: “A Fate Worse Than Death”]]> catherine_german_2.jpgby Thomas Goodrich

THE LITTLE BOTTLE lay on the sand. Nearby, waves lapped softly against the beach. How long the bottle had been lying there no one knows. Whether it was the tide or a storm that placed it, we do not know that either. This much we do know: At some point, someone walking along the sand spotted the bottle and instead of breaking it or hurling it back out to sea, they stooped to pick it up. We also know that when the finder uncorked the bottle he discovered that a note was folded inside. After fishing out the note and reading the words on the paper, whoever held it must have been dumb-struck. Finally, we also know that soon after the finder read the note and recovered from his shock, word quickly spread.

Thus ended one of the most remarkable journeys ever recorded.

The little bottle’s story began somewhere on the high and dry plains of northwest Texas or eastern New Mexico, hundreds of miles from where it was found. Here, at a camp of the Southern Cheyenne Indians, a ragged and frightened young white woman secretly brought out her hidden treasure — a bottle, a cork, a pencil, a piece of paper — then nervously scratched out a note, a desperate plea for help. The girl quickly folded the paper into the bottle, corked the end tightly, then tossed it into the headwaters of the Brazos River. In this arid region, the Brazos during the best of times is a mere trickle of water; at worst, it is just a sandy draw. Nevertheless, this bottle and the tiny trickle that floated it were the best, and perhaps last, hope for freedom that the young woman would know.

Several months earlier, in September, 1874, Catherine German (pictured) and her family had been moving up the Smoky Hill River in western Kansas with everything they owned in the back of a covered wagon. The Germans, originally from Georgia, were bound for Colorado and a fresh start. Just moments after breaking camp that morning, the family was surprised by Indians. Within minutes the wagon was in flames, the mother, father, and two children were dead and scalped, and four daughters — Catherine, aged 17, Sophia, 12, and little Julia and Addie, aged 7 and 5 respectively — were carried off into captivity.

texas_map.jpgCatherine’s story is not a pretty one to relate. There are no Harlequin Romance endings here; no Dances With Wolves Hollywood nonsense; no silly sentimentality. Catherine was raped repeatedly during her captivity, as was her sister, Sophia; both were traded back and forth from one brave to the next; both were transformed into tribal prostitutes, their worth measured in horses. Each time the frail young women were forced to fetch wood or water for their respective lodges, each trembled in fear, for each could expect to be raped as many as six times per trip.

Hence, Catherine’s desperate attempt one day with her little bottle along the Brazos. Pathetic as her gesture was, it was all she had. Over the next several months, as her prayer drifted slowly down a shallow stream, this hope was the only thought that kept the young woman going. When all else had been stripped from her — her virtue, her freedom, her dignity — Catherine at least had her little star of hope.

Finally, after five months of captivity, the band holding Catherine and Sophia at last returned to their reservation and surrendered the girls. Along with the two younger children, who earlier had been rescued during a thundering cavalry charge, the two shattered girls tried to pick up the broken pieces of their lives.

Unbeknownst to Catherine, throughout her captivity, during all the rapes and beatings, during the freezing nights and terrifying days, the little bottle that she had secretly tossed into a trickle of water on the high plains had, despite snags and shoals and rocks and floods, continued its slow journey down a winding river.

Four months after Catherine’s rescue, the Ellsworth (Kansas) Reporter picked up an article from a Houston, Texas, newspaper. The startled editor then informed his readers:

Strange to say, after having traveled eight hundred or one thousand miles along the devious windings and changing current . . . a bottle . . . was picked up on the beach of the Gulf of Mexico near the mouth of the Brazos River, in which upon examination, was a written account of the capture of. . . .

Thus ended an incredible journey. After the message was uncorked and read, it can only be hoped that the reader saved the little bottle and today, passed from one generation to the next, it sits atop some bookshelf, an antique, curious and pretty . . . if nothing more.

Although the details surrounding Catherine’s rescue are a bit unusual, the conditions of her captivity are not. During the research for my book, Scalp Dance—Indian Warfare on the High Plains, 1865-1879, I had a chance to study at random the ordeals of some dozen young women captured by Indians, including Catherine German and her sisters. With little variation, the accounts told the same sad story — rape, enslavement, brutality, beatings, abuse. For good reason I named their chapter in the book, “A Fate Worse Than Death.”

Such accounts, of course, fly in the face of all we have been told — or not told — about life among the wild Indians of North America. Despite the attempts of Jewish Hollywood and academia to convince us that the lot of a captive white woman was really not such a bad thing, perhaps a bit rough in some spots, but overall a satisfying, even pleasant experience, nothing, I repeat, nothing, could be further from the truth.

Unlike the Hollywood version of captivity and unlike the silly day-dreaming moonshine of modern Romance writers, not one woman that I studied grew so enamored with her “natural” life among the Indians that, when the time came, she actually chose to remain among them. Nor, I might add, did even one woman fall madly, hopelessly in love with her red rapist. Quite the opposite. For those white females who somehow survived captivity and who were something other than “raving maniacs” upon their release, many begged to see their captors killed on the spot. When she realized that indeed her captivity was over and her cruel captor was now a prisoner, one young woman tried desperately to snatch a pistol from a white soldier’s belt to blow out the brains of the monster who had tormented her for so many months.

Based upon the accounts of the women I studied, here is a rough rule of thumb of what you might expect were you a young white woman captured by Indians of the High Plains:

1) After witnessing the murder and mutilation of your loved ones, your clothes are ripped from your body; immediate and violent gang rape and sodomy commence by however many warriors are present, for however long they choose.

2) If you have crying children, these are often instantly killed by a sharp blow from a war club or by swinging them against rocks and dashing out their brains. Little children are also commonly scalped.

3) With a rope around your neck you are then led back to the Indian camp in your stunned condition, naked, bruised, barefoot, and bleeding from the vagina. When you fall from exhaustion, hunger or thirst, you are whipped mercilessly to your feet with rawhide or rope.

4) Once in the village you undergo a howl of taunts from the old people; women and children ridicule you and lash you with switches. Even the hordes of dogs seem against you as they snap, snarl and bite your legs

5) You are claimed by a powerful man, perhaps a chief, and, in addition to his own sexual demands, you become his personal prostitute; you are traded among the men of the village for valuables, including horses. Just because you are owned by one man does not shield you from the rape of others.

6) Beatings and back breaking work are piled upon you by increasingly cruel and jealous squaws. Grooves are worn into your shoulders from the straps of heavy loads; long lacerations from beatings refuse to heal and remain open wounds.

7) Abuse takes its toll and you age and gray rapidly during the months, or years, of slavery. You are filthy. You are infested with fleas and lice.

8) At night, after another day of sex-on-demand and back-breaking work, you dream of rescue . . . or death, whichever comes first; you dream of bugle notes sounding the charge as the U.S. Cavalry arrives to save you. Alas, little do you realize that should you hear those beautiful notes they will signal both your rescue and your death since Indians commonly kill their captives at the first sign of trouble.

9) If somehow you do manage to survive and are eventually rescued, you have a half-breed child in tow, you are pregnant again, you are emaciated, you are broken, you are sick, you are diseased, you look twenty years older than your actual age, you are mentally unhinged, you will never be normal again.

Don’t look for Hollywood and Stephen Spielberg to depict the events described above with any degree of accuracy any time soon. Their mission, their agenda, their racial imperative these past fifty years has been the hammering home of white guilt to white audiences by pounding in the idea that the white race has been the curse on the world; that in addition to all the other crimes committed against man and nature over the ages, whites were also guilty of ruthlessly destroying one of the most peaceful and pastoral cultures ever to grace the earth — that of the gentle and deeply philosophical societies of the North American Indian tribes.

Many moderns, perhaps most, willingly buy into white guilt and other such Jewish rot, but those who actually lived through the period knew better. Catherine German certainly did.

(Thomas Goodrich is a professional writer living in Florida. Tom’s Scalp Dance—Indian Warfare on the High Plains, 1865-1879 was a main selection of the History Book Club as well as a featured choice of the Doubleday Book Club. Scalp Dance is available in paperback or kindle from Amazon.com, or through Tom himself via Paypal at mtgoodrich@aol.com – $25, postage included)

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/a-fate-worse-than-death-2/feed/ 0
Man and Technology http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/man-and-technology/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/man-and-technology/#comments Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:57:13 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1780 Albatross Chick

by Dr. William L. Pierce

TECHNOLOGY has come somewhat into bad odor among many of today’s young people. Sensitive souls who find themselves out of tune with the gaudy, gimmicky, and artificial world of 20th-century America often place the blame for this dissonance on the technology which has made all the gimmicks possible. This attitude is revealed, for example, by the pejorative use of the term “plastic.” (ILLUSTRATION: An albatross chick found on the beach of Midway Atoll that never grew to adulthood. Its parents accidentally fed it bits of plastic from the Pacific Ocean, and essentially choked it to death).

DDT and Big Brother

Hostility toward technology also often finds expression among those genuinely and deeply concerned about wildlife and the beauties and virtues of our vanishing wilderness. DDT and mercury . . . → Read More: Man and Technology]]> Albatross Chick

by Dr. William L. Pierce

TECHNOLOGY has come somewhat into bad odor among many of today’s young people. Sensitive souls who find themselves out of tune with the gaudy, gimmicky, and artificial world of 20th-century America often place the blame for this dissonance on the technology which has made all the gimmicks possible. This attitude is revealed, for example, by the pejorative use of the term “plastic.” (ILLUSTRATION: An albatross chick found on the beach of Midway Atoll that never grew to adulthood. Its parents accidentally fed it bits of plastic from the Pacific Ocean, and essentially choked it to death).

DDT and Big Brother

Hostility toward technology also often finds expression among those genuinely and deeply concerned about wildlife and the beauties and virtues of our vanishing wilderness. DDT and mercury pollution, oil spills, smog, the mind-shattering racket of jet aircraft and diesel trucks, the chemical adulteration of foodstuffs, the unsettling thought that Big Brother may be electronically eavesdropping on our most intimate and personal affairs, the Niagara of household detergent wastes which are killing our lakes and streams — all these things are blamed on modern technology to which they are, undeniably, related.

And, because of blame so directed, solutions are being proposed which are no solutions at all. They are based on the reasoning that since technology is being used to destroy our environment, our culture, our peace of mind, and our former relationship with Nature — all unarguably evil consequences — technology is itself a bad thing and we ought to try to get along without it.

Back to Nature

Although a relatively small minority of the population has come to such a drastic conclusion, the number is growing, as manifested by the increasing proliferation of “back-to-Nature” style communes. Such developments are, in fact, encouraging, insofar as they indicate a healthy regard for the preservation of our natural environment and of man’s proper relationship to the rest of Nature. But they are also dangerous when they inspire a misevaluation of the root of today’s technological problems and lead to the misbelief that these problems can be eliminated by eliminating the technology of which they are consequences.

Paradise Lost

Adam, no doubt, wished that he and Eve could remain in Eden by unlearning the fatal knowledge imbibed with the forbidden apples. And we have all experienced the nostalgia for childhood days — the desire to escape the responsibilities and worries of adulthood by returning, somehow, to the innocence of the past.

But life and human history and the evolution of Nature are one-way streets. There is no turning back. With each nibble we take of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, we lose a little more of our innocence.

What we must understand is that that loss is utterly and absolutely irrevocable and that we must, therefore, stop longing for the simplicity of childhood and instead learn how to make the best of our adulthood.

Facing the Facts

The essence of adulthood is responsibility. As adults we cannot solve our problems by wishful or romantic thinking or by embracing impossible solutions.

We find unacceptable the pollution of the environment which is a consequence of our technological civilization. Very well. But we certainly cannot eliminate the pollution by abolishing technological civilization.

A few of us, of course, can turn our backs on everyone else and run off into the woods. But the rest of society cannot do that, and the few escapees will find their personal solution transitory.

One in 1,000

Consider: If we, as a people, eschewed all technology — even that inherent in agriculture, which is one of the most ecologically catastrophic of man’s technologies — our land might eventually support an equilibrium population of one in every thousand now living.

If we compromised by accepting the level of technology we had 200 years ago, sustaining ourselves with horse-drawn plows forged by the village blacksmith, North America, might, at the limit, support a population one-quarter its present size.

Precarious Existence

That would give us a much more desirable population density than we presently have, but without the chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and other mixed blessings of modern technology even a population of sixty million would face a very precarious existence, subject to decimation or worse whenever a potato blight or the like came along.

There is an inescapable relationship between technological level and maximum possible population density. Without those thundering diesel trucks clogging the roads and polluting the air — and hauling countless tons of refrigerated foodstuffs daily — the populaces of all our jam-packed cities would quickly starve to death.

Everyone Grew His Own

There is a similar dependence of man’s freedom of choice on the level of his technology. Two centuries ago nearly everyone farmed, not because of the joys of the bucolic life but because, without those smoke-belching steel plants and those smelly oil refineries producing the steel for tractors and combines and the fuel to run them, when the farmer had finished feeding his own family he had very little of his crop left to sell to the non-farmer.

Pitchforks vs. Tanks

If we, nevertheless, decided to dispense with most of the technology which the last 200 years have brought and, having reduced our population by one means or another to a suitable level, take up an 18th-century-style rural existence (which, despite its shortcomings, has many attractive features) we would immediately find our plans foiled by an army of invasion from some country which had not renounced the evils of technology and could, therefore, quite successfully overcome our slingshots and pitchforks with their more modern weaponry.

Nixon’s Folly

In the same way, regardless how horrendous we find modern, technological warfare, we simply do not have the option of returning to slings and arrows. Even so tentative a step as the unilateral destruction of chemical and biological warfare materials and the renunciation of further study in such areas is enormously foolhardy. The hard truth is that we are living in a highly competitive world, and any single participant in the game of life who deliberately imposes a competitive handicap on himself is toying with self-destruction.

Dilemma of the Sorcerer’s Apprentice

Not only is it not reasonable, once a new invention has been introduced, to withdraw that invention and expect the world to return to its prior state, but it is not feasible to artificially halt the more-or-less continuous process of technological innovation. Human nature being what it is, technological development is the inevitable companion of the progress of human knowledge.

Shall we expect that all men, everywhere, once the knowledge of how to make an electric light bulb — or an antibiotic or a machine gun — has been disseminated, should refrain from applying that knowledge?

Theocratic Solution

Or shall we, in order to retain what shreds of innocence we may have left, seek to prevent the further progress of human knowledge? There have been times in our history when that approach was actually taken. It is perhaps the only reasonable approach if one wants to maintain a theocratic form of society. But that is not an acceptable solution for Western man.

And yet we are not really faced with a dilemma. Technology is inevitable. The present, unhappy consequences of technology are not.

Hansel and Gretel

We can never again have a non-technological, Hansel-and-Gretel sort of world, in which young men ride forth into forest and field to slay dragons and seek their fortunes. That, in a way, is very sad. But neither must we stoically accept the polluted, unnatural hideousness which technology and urbanization have brought about.

Let us rebel! But let us first understand why we are rebelling and what it is against which we are rebelling.

Culture Distortion

It is not technology — or human knowledge — which lies at the root of our unhappiness, but particular manifestations of technology: the particular forms in which our scientific knowledge has been actualized. Those objectionable forms are themselves the consequence of alien attitudes toward technology which have governed the course of development it has taken in recent years.

Materialistic America

People today — educated as well as ignorant, wealthy “limousine liberals” as well as the hourly paid factory worker — think of technology, just as they think of life, in typically materialistic terms.

The importance of technology to them is that it has increased their standard of living. It has made their work easier. It has allowed them more leisure and amusements, from fiberglass cabin cruisers and self-propelled garden tractors to 8-track cartridge players and color television.

The Jewish Outlook

It has made their lives longer and removed much of the pain and struggle of living. And that’s all they think about it — pain vs. pleasure, inconvenience vs. convenience, struggle vs. leisure, period.

This unrelieved materialism is not inherent in Western man’s world view. It is imposed. It is alien, oriental. It is Jewish.

Levantine man’s outlook comprises only the moment — he is the inventor of the “now generation.” Western man’s soul encompasses the infinite — the endless past and the endless future.

The European Space Agency's Rosetta Spacecraft ready for simulation testing in 2004, an example of underutilized technology in the United States. The spacecraft is currently preparing for its dropping of a lander on a comet, after spending 10 years in space. The first of its kind, it may answer some questions that key to the understanding of our own evolution: how the solar system formed, did comets bring organic matter and/or water to Earth?

The European Space Agency’s Rosetta spacecraft ready for simulation testing in 2004, an example of underutilized technology. The spacecraft is currently preparing for its dropping of a lander on a comet, after spending ten years in space. The first of its kind, it may answer some questions that are key to the understanding of our own evolution: how the solar system formed; whether comets brought organic matter or water to Earth.

A new technological advance means to the oriental the possibility of increasing the GNP or, perhaps, shortening the work week. To the man of Western blood it offers the possibility of climbing to a new and higher plane of existence.

More Plastic

Technology in the hands of the one means more plastic, neon, and chrome. In the hands of the other it means new opportunities to master the profane and comprehend the sublime.

To the one it offers the chance to extort more wealth from an already pillaged Nature: a new way of converting a virgin forest into plastic hair curlers or padded dashboards — at a profit. To the other it offers new tools — new muscles, new hands, new legs, new eyes — which enable him to accomplish feats otherwise impossible: to explore regions of his universe otherwise inaccessible, to consider options otherwise unavailable, to know the otherwise unknowable; it gives him new power, not to exploit or subdue or contravene Nature, but to fulfill Nature’s innermost purpose; her upward striving.

Struggle: Essence of Life

The real importance of technology to Western man is not that it removes struggle from his life but that it provides him with new means, hopefully better means, for carrying on a never-ending struggle.

To the Levantine mind, struggle is something to be avoided, and the rewards of life are the bodily pleasures which technology makes possible and wealth can procure.

To the truly Western mind struggle is the essence of man’s life. Western man has a mission, and he must struggle all the years of his life — all the generations of his race — to further that mission. The billion years’ struggle up from the primeval slime was as inevitable and necessary for him as the endless struggle toward godhood which still lies ahead.

Purge Needed

We have lost our innocence and we have not yet gained wisdom, yet, still, we can see what we must do. That is not to renounce struggle, or the technological means of struggle we have developed — which would be to renounce life itself — but to purge the Western world of the alien ideology and the alien values which have perverted the ends to which our scientific knowledge has been applied.

Then we can redirect our energies, reshape our technology, and use it to help us climb out of the present pigsty of degeneracy and materialism and pollution and find our way once again to the upward path.

Harmony with Nature

And, with care, we can continue to develop and refine our technology as we remain on that upward path. At the same time, we can live in harmony with our inner selves — our Western race-soul — and with the rest of Nature.

The way upward is not difficult to see. It is within our reach. We need only develop a unified will to move in the right direction.

The first step will be to remove from our midst those whose natural inclination is to convert forests into hair curlers.

The second step will be to accept the necessity of a continent-wide coordination and regulation of all matters affecting the modification of our natural environment.

It must become no longer possible for a cartel of real estate developers, whatever their motives, to make the independent decision to call out the bulldozers and transform a thousand acres of meadowland into supermarket parking lots. Or for a power company to arbitrarily dam mountain streams in order to sell more electricity to local industries. Or for the citizens of any community to continue pouring their filth into the nearest river in order to avoid the taxes necessary for total sewage purification.

That will be a big step.

Improving Man

The biggest step, however, will be the retransvaluation of our values, through an educational process extending over generations, if necessary.

Children in a British classroom in the 1940s

We must learn to value quality above quantity in all things, beginning with man himself.

We must learn to relegate economic considerations to their proper place, instead of allowing them to be the determining factor in all decisions. We can, in fact, change the coefficients in the economic equation so that the economic criterion comes much more nearly into accord with more fundamental criteria.

Planned Obsolescence

The argument that a pollution-free industrial process is “too expensive” will no longer be a justification for pollution, just as the argument that “consumer demand” requires a myriad of models of everything made, all with incompatible components, will have much less weight. Planned obsolescence and subsidized waste will become intolerable.

We must reorient our thinking so that convenience may not play so large a role in our judgments of things as now. We must understand that a hardy and robust people is a greater good than a comfortable people.

Thinking Organically

Most difficult of all, we must learn to think organically: that is, to view each minor or major aspect of our lives in relation to the whole life of the individual, of the community, and of the race — not only as it affects the present but as it is linked to the past and as it bears on the future.

When we have learned to think this way we will be able to appreciate the very necessary role — not just the desirable or expedient or utilitarian role — which technology can fill in the furtherance of Nature’s purpose.

Coming of the Lightning

Without technological means the great bulk of mankind must remain, in essence, beasts of burden, drones in the human ant-heap. That condition of existence, requiring a certain type of man, imposes inevitable bounds on man’s evolutionary development.

But technology, properly harnessed, can remove the condition of general servitude and, thereby, liberate our race for the possibility of a continuous higher breeding.

* * *

From Attack! No. 12, 1972 transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/man-and-technology/feed/ 0
A New Western Prehistory http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/a-new-western-prehistory/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/a-new-western-prehistory/#comments Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:10:33 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1778 Megalith Mapby Dr. William L. Pierce

GENERATIONS of American and European schoolchildren have been taught about the “cradle of civilization” in the Middle East, from which cultural innovations supposedly spread out to other lands, eventually illuminating even the darkest corners of barbarian Europe. (ILLUSTRATION: A map of Europe depicting the spread of megalithic structures across the continent)

The Egyptian pyramids are cited as examples of the first spark of creative engineering applied to the erection of massive stone architecture — a spark which cast a dim light northward and westward, leading to later engineering achievements in Europe.

Likewise, the ceramics and metallurgical skills of ancient Mesopotamia are held up as the models which were supposedly later copied by the benighted peoples of Europe.

Now, recent scientific work has invalidated the entire scheme of European prehistory based on . . . → Read More: A New Western Prehistory]]> Megalith Mapby Dr. William L. Pierce

GENERATIONS of American and European schoolchildren have been taught about the “cradle of civilization” in the Middle East, from which cultural innovations supposedly spread out to other lands, eventually illuminating even the darkest corners of barbarian Europe. (ILLUSTRATION: A map of Europe depicting the spread of megalithic structures across the continent)

The Egyptian pyramids are cited as examples of the first spark of creative engineering applied to the erection of massive stone architecture — a spark which cast a dim light northward and westward, leading to later engineering achievements in Europe.

Likewise, the ceramics and metallurgical skills of ancient Mesopotamia are held up as the models which were supposedly later copied by the benighted peoples of Europe.

Now, recent scientific work has invalidated the entire scheme of European prehistory based on the notion of ex oriente lux — light from the east. The exciting new findings, which have revolutionized the fields of archaeology and prehistory within the last year, are discussed in an article in the October 1971 issue of Scientific American.

In essence, the new development has been a painstaking recalibration of the timescale used for dating prehistoric sites. A careful comparison of dates established by tree-ring counts and the radioactive carbon-14 method has revealed that carbon-14 dates for European prehistoric sites are late by as much as 1,000 years.

When sites have been updated according to the new timescale, it has been discovered that a number of European cultural innovations which formerly were considered to have been derived from analogous developments in the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East actually predate the earliest known examples of such developments in the so-called “cradle of civilization.”

Thus, we now find that the Bronze Age in Europe — specifically in the Danube basin — came before the corresponding metallurgical skills were known in the eastern Mediterranean.

And, according to Scientific American: “Now it is clear that megalithic chamber tombs were being built in Brittany earlier than 4000 B.C., a millennium before monumental funerary architecture first appears in the eastern Mediterranean and 1,500 years before the raising of the pyramids. The origins of these European burial customs and monuments have to be sought not in the Near East but in Europe itself.”

The implications of all this are truly earthshaking. Although the author in Scientific American is careful to deny any “racist” conclusions which might be drawn, he does admit: “The central moral is inescapable. In the past we have completely undervalued the originality and the creativity of the inhabitants of prehistoric Europe. It was a mistake, as we now can see, always to seek in the Near East an explanation for the changes taking place in Europe.”

One can go much further. Although Europeans, because of their completely different lifestyle and mental makeup, did not begin living in cities until long after other races to the east had urbanized themselves, the technological and cultural innovations which were prerequisites for city life were nevertheless developed by Europeans themselves, and not imported from extra-European sources — and, in many cases, they were developed by Europeans first, and then exported to the more “civilized” peoples.

So we come closer to a recognition of the truth expressed by a great student of mankind nearly 50 years ago. He wrote: “Everything we admire on this earth today — science and art, technology and inventions — is only the creative product of a few peoples and, perhaps, originally of one race. On them depends the existence of this whole culture. If they perish, the beauty of this earth will sink into the grave with them.”

* * *

From Attack! No. 7, 1971

transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/a-new-western-prehistory/feed/ 0
Do the Right Thing http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/do-the-right-thing/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/do-the-right-thing/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2014 12:00:19 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1782 kas_www_2014_24984

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 1, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LATER ON TODAY’s program I’ll be bringing you important news about the future of the National Alliance. But first let’s talk about race and “racism” — about doing the right thing in life — about why we’re here on planet Earth, and why the National Alliance exists in the first place.

* * *

THE WORD “racism” has been turned into a synonym for evil. But if racism only means having racial feelings — a feeling of kinship with your racial brothers and sisters, a feeling of understanding and belonging, a feeling of being part of a culture, a part of something bigger than ourselves — then perhaps we need another word. That feeling of kinship, . . . → Read More: Do the Right Thing]]> kas_www_2014_24984

American Dissident Voices broadcast of November 1, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LATER ON TODAY’s program I’ll be bringing you important news about the future of the National Alliance. But first let’s talk about race and “racism” — about doing the right thing in life — about why we’re here on planet Earth, and why the National Alliance exists in the first place.

* * *

THE WORD “racism” has been turned into a synonym for evil. But if racism only means having racial feelings — a feeling of kinship with your racial brothers and sisters, a feeling of understanding and belonging, a feeling of being part of a culture, a part of something bigger than ourselves — then perhaps we need another word. That feeling of kinship, which some prefer to call racialism or racial loyalty, has no connection to the “hate” or persecution or enslavement that have come to be associated with the term. (In fact, there’s evidence that the word “racism” was coined specifically to demonize Whites who want to continue to exist.)

Racial feelings are inborn in us. They are good and natural. And it is one of this century’s most horrible deceptions to paint them as somehow “wrong.” If you want to call our normal racial feelings “racism,” then so be it. For the sake of argument, we’ll call those feelings “racism” for the moment. (ILLUSTRATION: Will Williams, right, and Kevin Alfred Strom)

As long as there are races there will be racism. It is inborn, has an evolutionary purpose and survival value, and is even present in non-human species. Racial feelings are about as likely to disappear as are sexual feelings.

Actually, racism is good and necessary for the continued branching off of new types of human beings from the existing stocks. Evolution is made possible by such branching, and racial feelings are an important part of what keeps the branches apart. At some point, Homo sapiens sapiens refused to breed with the sub-men around him.

Mallards and wood ducks can interbreed, and may even do so under certain freak conditions. But the mentality of these birds, even when they live in the same territory, makes them shun the other type. The branches, once one, are now separate for all time.

Most Whites — even most liberal Whites — instinctively choose Whites as neighbors, school mates, and life mates. This is good and natural and really has nothing at all to do with the emotion of hate. Evolution, branching, and separation have brought about all the wonderful diversity of creation that we see around us. It is Nature’s way. It is God’s way. And virtually all of natural history is testament to the natural preference of species, subspecies, and races to cleave to their own kind.

It is only by acknowledging the wisdom of our racial feelings that the wonderful qualities of our race can be preserved. Our society once protected (admittedly in an imperfect way) the gene pool that produced Da Vinci, Aristotle, Mozart, Beethoven, and the builders of the Saturn V rocket. It does not do so any longer. The multiculturalists and multiracialists are in the ascendant in the West and promulgate a moral paradigm in which defense of our gene pool is evil (“racist”). This, in my view, is destructive, even genocidal. We in the National Alliance take the precisely opposite view: The protection of our racial uniqueness and furtherance of our racial progress should be the fundamental purposes of our society; the racial integrity that our nations once stood for implicitly should be made explicit and enshrined as our highest law.

White Americans — and Whites around the world — are, in increasing numbers, beginning to see themselves (again) as a people with a common history and common interests and values. Whites instinctively feel a kinship that they do not feel with Semites, Africans, Asians, or Australoids. They inwardly respond to Beethoven as they cannot respond to the call from the Minaret or the beat of African drums. They are inspired by the Gothic spires of Germany and Spain, the Parthenon, the Pantheon, and the Arch of Titus; but the Wailing Wall, the altars of the Incas, and the cryptic tribal art on the walls of the New York subway system, fascinating though they may be, remain alien.

The fact that other races see us as one people, and at times attack us as one people, aids this process of rising racial consciousness. European Americans are awakening, and we are starting to take charge of our own destiny again.

Such is the way that peoples and nations are formed. Such is the way of Nature. And the screams from the ivory towers of the academic elite will not stop this process.

One of the latest hysterical screams from the academic left is the claim that the White race simply does not exist, that there is no such thing and never has been. A large number of degreed whores of Academe say so — but then they also think that Jackson Pollack can be taken seriously.

There is a political agenda behind the “there is no such thing as the White race” malarkey, and it exposes itself every time the obvious corollary is stated: If there is no such thing as the White race, then there is no collective responsibility for the real and imagined sins it committed against the equally imaginary African, Amerind, and other races which stand impatiently in the handout lines for what’s left of the tax money after the bureaucrats have taken their cut.

No more affirmative action — races do not exist! No more “Holocaust” reparations — races do not exist! No more “diversity” training — races do not exist! Oh, that would never do. It is only the White race which does not — cannot — exist. It cannot exist, because if its existence were admitted, then the genocide which is now being practiced against it would become immediately obvious. And even a few honest liberals might pale at that and spoil the whole show.

The multiracialists have painted themselves into a corner. What to do? Probably just mumble that the “oppressed” groups are “peoples,” “nations,” or something of the sort. And they will hope that Whites never wake from their stupor and coalesce into a “people” just as conscious of its interests and destiny as, say, the Jews.

What a different world that would be. If it is illegitimate morally and untenable scientifically for Whites to organize on the basis of a perceived common race or ethnicity (or even to claim that their race exists), then surely the same would hold true for Jews and Blacks.

Perhaps one day “liberal” true believers will wake up and discover that nothing exists. That is the end of the road for their mode of thinking. The verb “to be” is anathema to them. The thought that there might be an absolute reality outside themselves, a reality which is what it is regardless of their wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees is as intolerable to them as it is to a two-year-old. Believe it or not, they have even developed a language (called “e-prime”) — a version of English which eschews completely the verb “to be.”

“Liberals” are very suggestible, and are really the victims of, not the originators of, the “race does not exist, but some races must be favored” swindle. It is convenient to demonize and dehumanize people that you are going to commit genocide upon. And it is easier to commit genocide when you convince your henchmen that the victims really don’t exist. That is what the “White race does not exist” con is really all about. It is a warrant for genocide.

Another lie which the academic elite rams down the throats of our children on a daily basis is that their technique of genocide — racial mixing — is really good for us because it brings “hybrid vigor.”

Hybrid vigor refers to exceptional growth which sometimes manifests itself when scientists cross or hybridize strains of plants or animals experimentally. Hybrid vigor signifies nothing in terms of the human genius needed to create and sustain a civilization. Where it exists, such as in corn or apple trees, it usually peters out after a few generations.

A far more important concept in the crossing of human races is “regression to the mean.” This means that even if you mate a Negro genius with a White person the offspring are, on average, likely to exhibit Negroid characteristics more typical of the average Negro, and not necessarily of that particular Black genius, and this is even more true of succeeding generations.

Regression to the mean in the case of interbreeding with Africans means regression to the African mean, with Asians to the Asian mean. Neither holds out promise of raising the level of the extreme upper part of our bell curve — rather the opposite. The other races have mixed with Europeans, and everywhere the results are, to say the least, unimpressive. They have nothing to offer us.

Some advocates of racial mixing point to areas where the other races are superior to Whites: Blacks in athletic ability, Asians in social unity, etc. But we cannot (yet) select such characteristics, especially when you are talking about random interbreeding as advocated by liberals and Communists. In the long run you will get random combinations of the different characteristics, most of which will not be superior. You will get regression to the mean. For such a questionable experiment, you would destroy one of Nature’s creatures? Would you force bald eagles and fish eagles to mate? Lions and tigers?

The European race has all the diversity it needs for health and further evolutionary development. It is a moral and environmental crime of the highest order to destroy it by breaking down all its defenses against interbreeding.

The academic whores and shills who call for genocide are always prating about how we can’t say for sure how much of our intelligence and our civilization is genetically determined and how much is caused by environment. (They used to say that it was all environmental, but the evidence is too contrary, so they’ve given up on that score.)

But I say to them — even you admit that you don’t know that our unmatched civilization is not the result of our genetic makeup. If it is, and you obliterate that unique genetic code, do you realize the enormity of what you have done?

Whites should be allowed to re-erect their traditional barriers against mating and social contact with non-Whites in order to preserve our kind. Anything else is genocide.

I can hear the academic genocide-justifiers coming out of their holes and whispering to our young people — “There is only one race — the human race. We are all one species.”

There is a great deal of debate on species boundaries. The question has been raised: Should the races be treated as separate species, or just subspecies of the same species? They certainly vary enough for subspecies classification. After all, some species of mammals differ so little that a human observer cannot tell them apart. (Two species of Siberian hamsters come to mind. Among these two species a scent, discernible only to the hamsters and laboratory  instruments, is the main difference and the means by which the female chooses a mate of the correct species.) The position that there are no subspecies among men — that they do not even exist — is indeed a novel one. It would imply that the Australoid, the Capoid, and the European, each developing separately for at least one hundred thousand years and possessing startling physical differences, are not only the same species but must be defined as the same subspecies. No one can scientifically defend such a thesis.

I cannot speak for anyone else, but in my eyes the European race, imperfect as it may be, is a race of light and beauty. It is the race of Shelley and Keats and Poe and Shakespeare, the race of the Parthenon and Chartres Cathedral and Stonehenge, the race of Mozart and Beethoven and Liszt and Brahms, the race of Vermeer and Raphael and Rossetti, the race of Caesar and Alexander and Washington and Jefferson, the race of Ford and Marconi and Goddard and Von Braun and Shockley.

And our race is threatened. Nowhere is our birthrate above replacement level. Everywhere our borders have been opened and the new elite teaches our children that intermarriage is good and desirable. Everywhere the new elite teaches our children that to defend our genetic heritage is the very definition of evil.

The end result, if trends continue, will be genocide. The end result will be death for the uniquely beautiful, intelligent, and creative people called by the name of the goddess Europa.

The moral imperative of all life is to strive for the survival of one’s kind. Don’t let the real haters — the real killers — the real monsters — trick you into believing that our race’s survival is “wrong” or unimportant. Nothing is more important. Nothing is more right. Our survival is essential. And now that you know that, I expect each and every one of you to do the right thing.

(an updated radio version of Mr. Strom’s classic essay, Facing Racial Realities)

* * *

There is great progress this week as we build White community. Will Williams, the Director of the National Alliance, has just been named chairman of the still-existing (though moribund) National Alliance corporation, with its headquarters in West Virginia, as well as of National Vanguard Books and the Cosmotheist Community Church. As we gain strength over the coming months, these entities will be moribund no longer. Putting personal and tactical differences aside, and seeking concord instead of lawyer-enriching conflict, Director Williams has advanced our White community immeasurably.

This development is of great practical and spiritual significance, and I’ll be talking more about it on these airwaves soon. Suffice it to say today that the land that Dr. Pierce purchased in the beautiful hills of West Virginia is now ours, once again under the control of those who were and are loyal to the mission that he laid out for us. The precious historical archives and records, both digital and paper, of the works and correspondence of Dr. Pierce and many others are now ours in the physical and every other sense of the word, once again under the control of men and women loyal to that mission. The record of a quarter century of my own life’s work is now once again in our possession — as are the art works and personal possessions that Dr. Pierce loved.  The invaluable research and historical library, consisting of thousands of books and periodicals, many of them rare and many of them containing notes and commentaries added by Dr. Pierce, are now once again in the service of our racial community. The clouded hills that Dr. Pierce loved are now ours to ascend once again.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/11/do-the-right-thing/feed/ 12
Hannah Graham: Our Nightmare World http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/hannah-graham-our-nightmare-world/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/hannah-graham-our-nightmare-world/#comments Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:00:58 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1775 Harrington_Graham_Matthew

American Dissident Voices broadcast of October 25, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE BODY OF Hannah Graham has just been found. Or, should I say, her skeletal remains have just been found — found just a few hundred yards away from a park where I and my children would often explore the woods near Charlottesville, Virginia. She has been missing since the night of September 13. She was discovered after a local man reported that twenty to thirty vultures were roosting and circling near an abandoned house in the rural area just south of the city. Eighteen days later the police responded to the tip and, near a creek behind the home, found what was left of Hannah — her bones and her slacks and, apparently, nothing else. . . . → Read More: Hannah Graham: Our Nightmare World]]> Harrington_Graham_Matthew

American Dissident Voices broadcast of October 25, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE BODY OF Hannah Graham has just been found. Or, should I say, her skeletal remains have just been found — found just a few hundred yards away from a park where I and my children would often explore the woods near Charlottesville, Virginia. She has been missing since the night of September 13. She was discovered after a local man reported that twenty to thirty vultures were roosting and circling near an abandoned house in the rural area just south of the city. Eighteen days later the police responded to the tip and, near a creek behind the home, found what was left of Hannah — her bones and her slacks and, apparently, nothing else. (ILLUSTRATION: Jesse Matthew and two sex-murder victims, Morgan Harrington and Hannah Graham)

Hannah Graham was a young White woman, an 18-year-old college student in Charlottesville — safe, intellectual, liberal, cultured, “upscale” Charlottesville, which I called my home town for many years. Hannah was studying for a career in “global public health” at the University of Virginia. She was last seen in the company of a 6’2″, dreadlocked, 32-year-old obese Black male named Jesse Matthew, who was walking with her on the oh-so-genteel and pleasant Downtown Mall, a pedestrianized street filled with expensive shops, restaurants, and taverns. He was walking with his arm around her. After her encounter with Matthew, she was never heard from again.

The timeline of the events preceding Hannah’s murder — and, doubtlessly, rape — have been pieced together through witnesses and security camera videos. Jesse Matthew saw Hannah walking alone in the opposite direction from him on the Mall at about 1 AM. She’d recently left a party and may have been a little tipsy, and evidently confused. Several security cameras had caught her wandering and changing direction — and she would soon text a friend and say she was lost. The video shows that Matthew waited a few moments and then crossed to the other side of the street, switched directions, and began following her.

Just a few seconds later,  another nearby security camera captured Jesse Matthew walking right next to Hannah, just to her right, and keeping pace with her.

A witness reports that, at about the same time, he saw a Black male matching Matthew’s description walk up to Hannah and throw his arm around her. A Charlottesville journalist, Coy Barefoot, asked one of Matthew’s friends, Dave Johnson, if Matthews knew Hannah. He answered: “No, not at all, not at all… He never mentioned her. I don’t think he knew her. In fact, I’m fairly certain of it, because he walked up and threw his arm around her. That’s what he did to women when he was hitting on them. If he threw his arm around a woman like that, that was not usually a sign that he knew her. That was a sign that he didn’t. If Hannah knew him, she wouldn’t let him put his arm around her.”

Less than an hour before “picking up” Hannah, this beloved African-American equal had been at the Tempo bar, where he accosted another woman, a 25-year-old who later stated “He kept trying to put his hands on my legs, above and below the knee. He’d been way too aggressive all night, putting his arm around me, picking me up, putting his hands on my legs. I looked at him and told him to keep his hands off of me.” A few blocks away earlier in the evening, Jesse Matthew attacked a man in the Blue Light Grill, completely unprovoked, and wrenched his body so hard that he pulled his hamstring, leaving him injured and limping for days. Then, according to Barefoot: “In the first few seconds of meeting two women for the first time, he yanked them up off the ground and threw them over his shoulders and laughed…. He continued to follow both these women, at the Blue Light and later at the Tempo restaurant, putting his arm around them, his face uncomfortably close to theirs, touching their backs, their hair, their faces, their legs — until one of them cursed at him to stop. After one of the women slipped off the boots she was wearing, [Matthew] unexpectedly pulled off her socks, saying he wanted to see her toes. A friend of [his] for over nine years described him as a ‘prowler,’ clarifying his use of the word by adding, ‘which is not to say he was looking for a victim, but looking for a girl who’s already compromised a little bit, maybe improve his chances.'”

At the Tempo Bar, not long before he guided his victim there, Jesse Matthew continued his aggression, this time against a British woman there with her husband. According to a bar employee, Abby, “I was talking to this woman and her husband. I was talking with her about her hair, it was really short and pretty. I remember them because they had British accents. At one point, I remember he [Matthew] was dancing around outside, and he bumped into this British lady pretty hard, just as a way of getting her attention. He was kind of grabby with her, and asked her for a cigarette. Her husband was standing right there.”

Jesse Matthew guided young Hannah to the Tempo Bar and ordered two drinks. They were seen leaving together by Abby, who said “It was a typical, crowded Friday night. I guess it was about 1:40 or closer to 1:45. I remember because it was definitely after last call. He came out the side door. I saw him come walking by and I thought, there’s that obnoxious guy from before. I noticed he had his arm around a girl [later identified as Hannah]. She was wearing a crop top. When I saw her that night I remember thinking, she’s really drunk. She couldn’t walk well. She was slouched into him, leaning against him, like she was having difficulty standing up. He was talking to her, and his right arm was around her, not over her shoulder, not at the waist, but around her back and holding her right arm. He was holding her close, like he was almost holding her up. They walked away together up the street towards the Mall.” And that’s the last time anyone — except Jesse Matthew — saw Hannah Graham alive.

What were the last moments of Hannah Graham’s life like? I want you to imagine them. I want you to imagine her final lesson in racial equality. We know she was taken to a wooded, abandoned home site, just four miles from where Jesse Matthew grew up — and about the same distance from the place, also south of Charlottesville, where the body of another raped and murdered White girl, 20-year-old Morgan Harrington, was found five years ago. DNA evidence has now linked Matthew with Morgan Harrington’s sex killing too. We know most of Hannah’s clothing was removed and disposed of.

And we now know more of Jesse Matthew’s past: In 2009, Matthew followed a driver he thought had cut him off in traffic, then punched the man in face and stole his cell phone — and then, perhaps in fear of the consequences of his impulsive behavior, drove him to the hospital. A few years earlier, he was accused of sexual assault at Liberty University in Lynchburg, though ultimately charges were not pressed by the victim. Less than a year after that, he was accused of sexual assault again, this time at Christopher Newport University, where he was a football player.

Matthew, after his arrest in Graham’s case, now faces additional charges relating to a 2005 sexual assault and vicious attack on a 26-year-old woman in Fairfax County, Virginia. The woman was dragged into a wooded area, raped, and beaten while walking home from the grocery store on a Saturday night — Matthew is charged with abduction, rape — and attempted capital murder — in this case. Authorities say the same forensic evidence that connects Matthew to the 2009 sex murder of Morgan Harrington is linked by DNA to this 2005 rape and attempted killing.

Morgan Harrington was last seen alive at a concert in Charlottesville in October 2009. Three other girls, aged 17 to 19, have also disappeared mysteriously from the Charlottesville area in recent years, and investigators are looking at these cases anew now that Jesse Matthew has been arrested.

It will be difficult for Jesse Matthew’s defenders to put over the tired excuses that he was a victim of “poverty” or “the gang lifestyle.” For Jesse Matthew is almost a poster boy for multiracialism. He was gainfully employed as an operating room technician at the University of Virginia Hospital. He attended university. He was described as “very religious.” He was a volunteer football coach at a private Christian high school. His mother states she intentionally raised him in the country, far from gang influences and the “bad crowd” of the city. Yet, if this poster boy is as guilty as the evidence indicates he is, the familiar wooded roads that wind through the pleasant forests and farms south of Charlottesville became the dumping ground for the dead and savaged bodies of his victims, just as their bodies themselves were also the dumping grounds for his filthy and alien seed. It is evident that Jesse Matthew — like many Blacks — has a severe problem with controlling his impulses, and his impulses led him to aggressively pursue and attack who knows how many young women and girls, many of them White.

More serious than Matthew’s impulse control is the fact that, in our current multiracialist society, Matthew and others like him — and even young White people — are taught that Blacks have a perfect right to put their arms around, fondle, pursue, “date,” and have sexual relations with White girls. No witness in “enlightened” Charlottesville said he or she saw anything wrong in Jesse Matthew going after Hannah Graham, literally holding her up and walking her in the streets and into bars and plying her with drinks she was too young to consume. Nobody saw this as a red flag, at least not one important enough to risk the charge of “racism” and do something about it. No one offered to help her. When one man saw Graham’s confused wanderings after midnight, he started to follow her in case she needed help. But when he saw the huge Black male approach Graham and take her in hand, the witness was “relieved” to see that she was “with someone” and turned away.

That is disgusting and tragic, but not half so disgusting and tragic as the fact that Hannah Graham, and uncounted other White victims like her, are taught from their earliest school days that Blacks are our equals, that interracial sex and marriage are normal and even praiseworthy, and that “racism” is the ultimate sin. When such a girl is approached by a Black, all the ideas about race that the media and her schools and almost certainly her church have taught her conflict with — and often defeat — her natural inclination to be repulsed and get away. And, if she shows a bit of reluctance, even Blacks know that little Sue or Mary or Hannah will likely change her mind if asked “Wassamatta, don’ you like Black people? — are you racist?” And, if she’s still a little reluctant even after that bit of psychological manipulation — or maybe even if she isn’t — there’s always the Hannah Graham treatment.

Statistics show us that what happened to Morgan Harrington and Hannah Graham is not just an isolated case.  According to a study published in The  American Journal of Public Health, White women who marry Black men are 1,242% more likely to be murdered by their “husbands” than White women who marry within their own race. (A.J.P.H., May 1989, Table 3, p. 596, Risk Factors) White males also greatly increase their chance of being killed if they marry a Black partner. And there are also many other risks besides outright murder — Black men who identify as heterosexual are over 14 times more likely to be diagnosed with AIDS than heterosexual White men. The CDC has also found that Black men with AIDS are also more likely to be undiagnosed than infected White men. According to the 2004 CDC National Vital Statistics Report, AIDS is the single leading cause of death for Black women aged 25-34. White females who have relations with Blacks increase their chances of contracting HIV by a large factor. Even if these White women don’t consent to sex with Blacks, merely being in social situations with them is risky: Black males rape White women more often than they rape Black women, and Blacks overall rape at a rate between 4.4 and 11 times higher than Whites. And Blacks commit interracial rape at a rate at least 70 times that of Whites. It’s all there in the official statistics — statistics that, for some reason, never seem to be in the headlines or nightly news stories on the Jewish-controlled media, despite the fact that tens of thousands of White women at least are victims every year.

Teresa Sullivan, the president of the University of Virginia, which Hannah Graham attended, spoke of the tragedy recently after Hannah’s remains were discovered. She invoked the name of Thomas Jefferson, who founded the school in the early 19th century. But Sullivan — who favors aggressively spending millions of dollars to attract more Blacks to her school — while mentioning Jefferson’s desire that UVA’s students fulfill “destinies of high promise,” failed to mention Jefferson’s multiple writings and admonitions against racial mixing with Blacks, nor his express desire that they be removed from our nation entirely, preferably to another continent altogether.

Many organizations have sprung up in recent years, founded to protect women from rape, using such names as “Take Back the Night” and “Save the Next Girl” — and all of them, I hope, have the best of intentions and offer some sound advice for women’s safety in the dangerous place America has become. But none of them dare break the taboo of mentioning the truth about rape, race, and murder. None of them warn White women of the dangers they face from Blacks. Some ideologues brazenly use these campaigns to further alienate White women from White men, exactly the opposite of what should be done.

The National Alliance has been warning of these dangers — and presenting the only possible solution to them — for 44 years. I am proud to have been there for 32 of those years. Hear this and hear it well: Things will continue to get worse and worse for our women and children as long as we accept the lies of racial equality. As the White birthrate trends toward zero, as the importation of Third Worlders continues, and as Black and other non-White birthrates continue to be high, the White percentage of the population will dwindle rapidly. Any rational hope of regaining control of the political process was lost decades ago and it will be at absolute zero tomorrow. We’ve got important tasks to perform if we want to survive and save our sons and daughters from certain misery, death, and extinction. Some portion of our people must secede from the insane asylum / prison complex called “The United States of America” and begin to build a new society — a society whose very basis, both secular and spiritual, will be the survival and progress of our race. In that society, we, and we alone, will hold political power. In that society, we and we alone will control the resources and the wealth. In that society, we and we alone will control the education of our children and the mass media of news and entertainment. In that society, we will secure living space for our people to thrive and raise healthy children, generation after generation — and that living space will be ours alone. Only thus can we end the nightmare-world we are heading for today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/hannah-graham-our-nightmare-world/feed/ 2
Ali’s Wisdom http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/alis-wisdom/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/alis-wisdom/#comments Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:33:40 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1770 Screen Shot 2014-10-20 at 9.08.47 PMby Dr. William L. Pierce

IN THIS era of falsehood and corruption, it is refreshing to hear a little simple wisdom on racial matters from a well-known public figure. It is embarrassing, however, that that wisdom should have to come from a Black rather than someone of our own race (ILLUSTRATION: Muhammad Ali).

In a recent interview published by Playboy magazine, Muhammad Ali, the Black heavyweight-champion boxer, who is a devotee of the Black Muslim religion, made the following comments:

“…If I could be President of the U.S. tomorrow… or be in an all-black country of 25,000,000 Negroes and my job would be to put garbage in the truck, I’d be a garbage man. And if that included not just me but also my children and all my seed from . . . → Read More: Ali’s Wisdom]]> Screen Shot 2014-10-20 at 9.08.47 PMby Dr. William L. Pierce

IN THIS era of falsehood and corruption, it is refreshing to hear a little simple wisdom on racial matters from a well-known public figure. It is embarrassing, however, that that wisdom should have to come from a Black rather than someone of our own race (ILLUSTRATION: Muhammad Ali).

In a recent interview published by Playboy magazine, Muhammad Ali, the Black heavyweight-champion boxer, who is a devotee of the Black Muslim religion, made the following comments:

“…If I could be President of the U.S. tomorrow… or be in an all-black country of 25,000,000 Negroes and my job would be to put garbage in the truck, I’d be a garbage man. And if that included not just me but also my children and all my seed from now till forever, I’d still rather have the lowest job in a black society than the highest in a white society. If we get our own country, I’d empty trash ahead of being President of the U.S…..

“Before I was a Muslim, I had one white girlfriend for two days, that’s all. I wasn’t no Muslim then, but I just felt it wasn’t right… Black men with white women just don’t feel right. They may think it’s all right and that they’re in love, but you see ‘em walking on the street and they’re ashamed — they be duckin’ and they be cold. They’re not proud. Once you get a knowledge of yourself you see how stupid that is….

“Man, I was in Chicago a couple of months ago and saw a white fella take a black woman into a motel room. He stayed with her two or three hours and then walked out — and a bunch of brothers saw it and didn’t even say nothin’. They should have thrown rocks at his car or kicked down the door while he was in there screwing her — do something to let him know you don’t like it. How can you be a man when another man can come get your woman or your daughter or your sister — and take her to a room and screw her — and, nigger, you don’t even protest?…

“A black man should be killed if he’s messing with a white woman…. Raping, patting, abusing, showing our women disrespect — a (White) man should die for that…. We will kill you, and the brothers who don’t kill you will get their behinds whipped and probably get killed themselves if they let it happen and don’t do nothin’ about it.”

In response to a question from his interviewer as to what should be done about a Black Muslim woman who goes out with a White man, Ali answered: “Then she dies. Kill her too.”

And, although Ali didn’t say it, the same should apply to the White woman who betrays her race. Kill her too!

* * *

From Attack! No. 45, 1976

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/alis-wisdom/feed/ 2
The Ten-Foot-High Wall http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/the-ten-foot-high-wall/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/the-ten-foot-high-wall/#comments Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:00:55 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1761 adl-hate8American Dissident Voices broadcast of October 18, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LAST YEAR, the vice president of the illegal regime, Joe Biden, stated at the 100th anniversary meeting of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (or ADL) in Washington DC: “…I mean this sincerely: You have become America’s conscience. You have become the conscience of this country, no matter what the issue. You have been a pillar of the Jewish community, but you reach out and you have reached out your embrace for all communities.” Biden added that the ADL has been by his side, guiding him, through “nearly every legislative battle and at every phase” of his career. From the integration of Blacks into our society, from the opening of the borders to a fatal flood-tide of non-White . . . → Read More: The Ten-Foot-High Wall]]> adl-hate8American Dissident Voices broadcast of October 18, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LAST YEAR, the vice president of the illegal regime, Joe Biden, stated at the 100th anniversary meeting of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (or ADL) in Washington DC: “…I mean this sincerely: You have become America’s conscience. You have become the conscience of this country, no matter what the issue. You have been a pillar of the Jewish community, but you reach out and you have reached out your embrace for all communities.” Biden added that the ADL has been by his side, guiding him, through “nearly every legislative battle and at every phase” of his career. From the integration of Blacks into our society, from the opening of the borders to a fatal flood-tide of non-White immigration, from the demonization and criminalization of freedom of association through so-called “civil rights” and “affirmative action” laws, and to the promotion and normalization of homosexuality and other perversions, Biden said the ADL has been his guiding light. Biden continued to gush at the DC meeting, which was moderated by NPR talking head Cokie Roberts, saying that the ADL was “the most influential, the most listened to, the most respected organization in this town.”

“Influential”? Certainly, with its connections to the Jewish elite that run the mass media in America, the ADL can terminate the career of any politician with little more than a few telephone calls, and, in a few days or weeks, exposés of the politician’s sure-to-be-sordid past will be all over the front pages and the network newscasts. Submit to the influence of the ADL (and the allied organizations of the Jewish power structure, like AIPAC), and the dirt will remain hidden in their files, though ready at any moment for dispersal. One can only imagine how the rise of the surveillance state, with all its alphabet agencies, honeycombed with ADL informants, which collect all our emails, text messages, and telephone calls — and those of every politician too, natch — has facilitated this “influence.”

“Most listened to?” Absolutely. If you’re a politician, and you fail to listen to the instructions of your “guiding light,” who has been “at your side” for your entire political career — well, just try it and see what happens. There are plenty of smarmy, smiling, good-looking lawyers just waiting to take your place with the right application of campaign funds, media promotion of him and defamation of you, and Jewish ad agency “magic.” You’re replaceable, pal. Better listen up, and listen good.

“Respected”? Sure, in the same sense that the mafia is respected. You “respect” those who stand ready, willing, and able to destroy your life whenever they so choose. And this isn’t just a metaphor on my part: The ADL has real organized crime connections. In other articles and programs I’ve documented the fact that the ADL has fronted for, has direct links with, and has accepted large sums of money from such underworld figures as Moe Dalitz and Meyer Lansky, and close associates and family members of these crime bosses have served as ADL officials.

At the same time that Biden was abasing himself by pushing his snout into the filthy orifices of his overlords, ADL operatives were working on a very significant project which has recently come to light.

In September, the ADL spearheaded a meeting in California along with a  “British” group calling itself the Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism. The Jewish Chronicle reports in an article entitled “Web giants unite to fight online hate” that a “game changing” agreement was reached between the ADL and Internet firms Twitter, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft to “take steps” to stop “the proliferation of racist and abusive comments” and to “force racism and hatred from the Web.” Under this agreement, these companies promise “tougher sanctions against those who post abusive messages.” These firms already routinely censor, block, and ban users who criticize Israel or Jewish power — so one has to wonder just what these “game changing” “tougher sanctions” will entail. The social media giants promised the Jewish groups that they would devise “proactive strategies” to deal with the “problem” under the constant guidance of the ADL, referred to as “a leading anti-Semitism watchdog” and which has been designated the “co-convenor” of the project.

Most likely, the unstated goals of the group go far beyond just censoring comments — a logical next step is to get providers of Web space to delete blogs and sites which organized Jews don’t like, something the ADL and allied groups have been working on without much success for years. The truth is that the ADL and organized Jewry are desperate. Worldwide, there is a confluence of Left and Right, of White and non-White, of religious and non-religious, of First World and Third World, which recognizes and criticizes Jewish and Zionist power. The false picture of reality that the billionaires’ media could impose on the minds of men is fracturing with the rise of the ‘Net and alternative media. This censorship initiative is the result.

The Jewish groups’ failure to keep the truth hidden is also evident on YouTube, even though YouTube is owned by Jewish-run Google. If you can stand five minutes of slimy self-praise, look at this ADL-produced and -posted video, “100 Years of Fighting Hate”:

The whole basis of the millions upon millions of dollars that YouTube produces for its owners is allowing free video uploads and free commenting on those uploads. Take that away, and the millions stop flowing in. Another basis for YouTube’s success is its automatically-generated links to “recommended videos” related to the subject matter of the video you just watched.

No one has bothered to comment yet on the ADL’s “100 Years of Fighting Hate” video — and only 100 people (!) have watched it — but comments on race-related and Jewish-related videos on YouTube indicate a rising awareness of the dangers of Jewish power, with the Jew-wise commenters almost always a significant presence and sometimes even in the majority. This is true of comments sections all over the Web, not just on YouTube. Something is happening — a new consciousness of the dangers of Jewish power is emerging. Hence the latest censorship initiative from the ADL. This rising consciousness is made quite obvious in the automatically-generated “related videos” that pop up in the window after the initial “Fighting Hate” video is over: My friends and I tried it in several browsers and several computers, logged in and not logged in. Every time, nine out of ten of the “related videos” were critical of Jews and Jewish power. The videos being uploaded on this subject are overwhelmingly from those on our side of the Jewish question.

The ADL (and related Jewish groups like the SPLC) may have hundreds of millions worth of wealthy donors behind them — they may have bought politicians and corrupt secret police at their disposal — but they are nevertheless losing the battle for control of our minds. Even if the ADL’s censorship drive succeeds, the extent of their success will be to erect a ten-foot-high, twenty-foot-wide wall to hide the roaring tsunami of Jew-awareness that is sweeping over the world. Remember that. The ADL and the controlled media try to make us feel alone and isolated. They try to give us the impression that racial consciousness and awareness of Jewish power are very rare. They want to make us think that almost everyone agrees with them, and that we are lonely, hysterical misfits. But the worldwide  reality is close to the opposite of that. Their machinery of illusion is failing now, and will fail even more obviously in the near future.

adl-dark-side(By the way, it’s also interesting that a Google Images search for “ADL” comes up not only with the logotypes of the Jewish group and its auxiliaries, but both of the ADL graphics I created for the National Alliance — which are included in the text version of this broadcast — also come up on the first page of results, a sure indication of their popularity and relevance. Along the same lines, a simple Google search for “anthrax attacks” or “anthrax mystery” brings up Robert Pate’s superb article “The Anthrax Mystery: Solved” — which characterizes the attacks as a Jewish operation — in the first page of results and has done so for many years.)

One Internet commenter, who goes by the name of Jay, states on unz.com: “Mainstream media sites will already delete and block comment messages that are simply critical of Israel. They don’t have to be racist, homophobic, or threatening. Mine have been deleted MANY times. Some, like the Wall Street Journal, may not delete as much, but they will tinker with the number of thumbs-up. I’ve seen posts of mine get maybe 50-60 likes, then later the post will magically have only two likes. Amazing, isn’t it? I’ve been blocked and deleted from the LA Times, Boston Globe, Washington Post, CNN, ABC, you name it. The ADL, by the way, was founded in honor of convicted child rapist and murderer Leo Frank, who was convicted in Atlanta in 1913… his death sentence was later commuted by a crooked Georgia governor who took Jewish money. Frank was taken from jail and lynched (the only Jew ever lynched in American history) in 1915. The official narrative has Frank portrayed as a victim of anti-Semitism of course. He got a fair trial, and 1913 Georgia would have much preferred to have nailed the initial black suspect of the crime, but the evidence was not there….”

The Frank case is the ADL's pet cause.

The Frank case is the ADL’s pet cause.

The Leo Frank case is yet another example of the failure of the ADL and the Jewish power structure in general to control the narrative. The Frank case is very instructive — and very important to the ADL, since it was the Frank case that caused the ADL to be founded in 1913.

The soon-to-be-retired head of the ADL, Abraham Foxman, committed his own “hate crime” hoax in 2005 when he wrote the ADL’s official spin on the case, entitled “Lessons of the Leo Frank Case Still Relevant.” (Interestingly, the ADL has blocked archive.org from archiving that piece.) In that editorial, Foxman states: “The murder of Mary Phagan was the catalyst for one of the most virulent anti-Semitic episodes in American history.”

Foxman’s spin is that the arrest and conviction of Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan were part of a “virulent” “anti-Semitic episode,” even though there is not the slightest scintilla of evidence that the South was particularly anti-Jewish then or now. In fact, numerous Jewish sources document the fact that the American South is and has been one of the most pro-Jewish areas in the entire world. Foxman is a liar and he knows it.

Foxman went on to say: “His trial was a spectacle; threats, intimidation, and a boisterous crowd outside chanting ‘kill the Jew’ and ‘hang the Jew’ could easily be heard through the courtroom’s open windows.” These alleged “anti-Semitic” mobs intimidating the jury were never reported at the time, not even by pro-Leo-Frank newspapers. In fact, the jurors in the Frank case specifically stated they heard no mobs, no threats, and were not intimidated in any way. Frank’s own lawyers made no complaints or even mention of these supposed Jew-hating crowds during the trial — even a single instance of which would have been grounds for an immediate mistrial. The first intimation of these alleged mobs was many months after the trial when Frank’s legal team and Jewish advocacy groups were straining to find some pretext for yet another appeal. Foxman is a liar and he knows it.

Out-and-out fraud from the ADL

Out-and-out fraud from the ADL

Leo Frank's gravestone: his wife refused to be buried by his sade

Leo Frank’s gravestone: his wife refused to be buried by his side

Foxman then says: “Frank, a northern Jew, was arrested, indicted and tried for Phagan’s murder without evidence.”

Absurd. There is a mountain of evidence that shows Frank to be the murderer of Mary Phagan — enough for the coroner’s jury, enough for the grand jury, enough for several judges, enough for the trial jury, enough for the Georgia court of appeals, and enough for the Supreme Court of the United States. Foxman is a liar and he knows it.

As I said back in April:

Mr. Foxman’s “convicted …without evidence” claim is completely ridiculous, and the scholars, researchers, and publishers who have labored for years to bring the true evidence of this case to light are showing the world just how paper-thin the Jewish groups’ false version of events really is….

And this effort is succeeding: The major search engines now return many results from sites telling the righteous truth about the Frank case, from Metapedia’s articles to the huge Leo Frank Case and Trial Research Library, to the encyclopedic series on the case by Bradford L. Huie in The American Mercury, and many, many others, including pieces we’ve published on National Vanguard. The really heartening thing is that these independent media are often standing as high or higher than the Jewish groups’ own sites in terms of search rank, and therefore relevance and readership.

The statue of Tom Watson which has been removed from the steps of the Georgia state capitol

The statue of Tom Watson which has been removed from the steps of the Georgia state capitol

Tom Watson was a popular Georgia writer and political leader who spoke the truth about the Leo Frank case, and especially about the multi-million-dollar Jewish campaign after his conviction to exonerate him and vilify the people of Georgia as “anti-Semites.” In November, the ADL succeeded in getting the statue of Watson taken off the steps of the state capitol building.

The ADL may crow about their success in lobbying the Georgia legislature to get Tom Watson’s statue removed. They can, for now, distort our history in their media and suppress our heritage with their bought and intimidated  lawmakers. But they are not crowing about the hard work of a tireless woman and editorial team who recently republished all of Watson’s magazine articles on the Frank case — and a more powerful piece of work on the subject I have never seen.

And such Jewish “success” is a two-edged sword. Many will now read Watson’s words, understand them, and and deeply resent what the ADL has done. And they will also begin to understand just what the ADL is.

Honest men and women, and truth-seeking researchers, are being affected by our truth-telling as we approach the 100th anniversary of Frank’s death.

Working together, a relatively small group of men and women, many of whom are personally known to me, have managed to outdo and outflank the ADL and other Jewish supremacist groups on the their own turf, their own search and news and other sites, and on an issue that is extremely important to the organized Jews both practically and symbolically. We are making a difference. And we can make history. Join with us today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

 

* * *

For further reading:

Tom Watson’s Magazine, 1915

DOWNLOAD ALL WATSON’S MAGAZINE ARTICLES ABOUT THE FRANK CASE AS A SINGLE .ZIP FILE (or click the individual articles below)

Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian and Watson’s Magazine: Watson’s Magazine, January 1915, Watson’s Magazine, March 1915; Watson’s Magazine, August 1915, Watson’s Magazine, September 1915, and Watson’s Magazine, October of 1915. (Available here on www.Archive.org). Tom Watson’s best work on the Leo M. Frank case was published in September 1915. Watson’s five works written collectively on the Leo M. Frank topic, provide logical arguments confirming the guilt of Leo M. Frank with superb reasoning.

These five works are absolutely required reading for anyone interested in the Leo M. Frank Case. Tom Watson’s magazine publications surged from 30,000 to 100,000 copies, when it was announced he would be writing on the Leo Frank case. These magazines are extremely rare and very difficult to find. However they have been scanned and are available on archive.org.

1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

The best articulation of the August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession does not come from Hugh M. Dorsey or Frank Arthur Hooper, but Tom Watson in his Watson’s Magazine August and September 1915 issues.

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/the-ten-foot-high-wall/feed/ 5
Vector of Death: Ebola and Africa http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/vector-of-death-ebola-and-africa/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/vector-of-death-ebola-and-africa/#comments Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:00:55 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1735 ebola_map_20141010

American Dissident Voices broadcast of October 11, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LIKE AIDS, EBOLA comes to us from Africa. And Africa — specifically, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia — is now undergoing the worst recorded outbreak of Ebola in all known history, greater than all other outbreaks combined. Some 4,ooo have died there, and the World Health Organization (WHO) informs us that “Ebola is now entrenched in the capital cities of all three worst-affected countries and is accelerating in almost all settings.” In other words, containment has failed. There are some 9,000 believed to be infected — but, remember, this is Africa. The number infected but not known and/or not seeking treatment is probably much larger.

WHO’s deputy head Bruce Aylward stated that the situation was notably worse . . . → Read More: Vector of Death: Ebola and Africa]]> ebola_map_20141010

American Dissident Voices broadcast of October 11, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LIKE AIDS, EBOLA comes to us from Africa. And Africa — specifically, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia — is now undergoing the worst recorded outbreak of Ebola in all known history, greater than all other outbreaks combined. Some 4,ooo have died there, and the World Health Organization (WHO) informs us that “Ebola is now entrenched in the capital cities of all three worst-affected countries and is accelerating in almost all settings.” In other words, containment has failed. There are some 9,000 believed to be infected — but, remember, this is Africa. The number infected but not known and/or not seeking treatment is probably much larger.

WHO’s deputy head Bruce Aylward stated that the situation was notably worse than it was 13 days ago, saying “The disease is entrenched in the capitals, 70% of the people affected are definitely dying from this disease, and it is accelerating….”

As with AIDS, if you contract Ebola, the prognosis is dim. The fatality rate in earlier, milder outbreaks was between 40 and 90 per cent., so it’s not as invariably fatal as AIDS — but death is much swifter, usually taking just weeks instead of years. And it’s a horrible death: massive hemorrhaging occurs as the virus attacks your blood vessels and nervous system, with massive multiple organ failures occurring all at once. And there’s very little medical science can do to help you: There’s no proven vaccine, no cure, and all the new treatments being given — in the rare cases when they are given at all — are classed as experimental and have had essentially no impact on the death rate. Mostly the HAZMAT-suited medical personnel provide isolation and hydration, and little else.  The outbreak began early this year, but fully 40 per cent. of the deaths have been in the last three weeks. According to the futurist Ole Peter Galaasen of Plausible Futures newsletter, a worst-case scenario would result in one million cases by year’s end.

And the new outbreak of Ebola is not restricted to Africa this time: It has come to America and Europe as well. Look at the map I posted at the beginning of the text version of this broadcast. It’s probably too early to draw conclusions, but this infection map is very suggestive: The only places outside of Africa with current cases of Ebola infection are Western Europe and the United States — the very places where the Jewish power structure has imposed policies of open borders and engineered the importation of millions of Africans into formerly White nations. In Eastern Europe, where there is greater degree of racial integrity and less human traffic to and from Africa — no reported cases so far. In Asia — too sane to tolerate mass African immigration and not under Jewish pressure to blend itself out of existence — no reported cases. In South America — rife with its own racial problems but mostly free of African migrants — also no cases.

Sub-Saharan Africa is a sinkhole of savagery, filth, violence, and disease — and involvement with it has been a bane to our people and our civilization. Many millions of Africans get a large portion of the protein in their diet from what is called “bushmeat“: Porcupines, wild dogs, bats, and many other species of wildlife — even primates — are killed by Blacks and then their bodies are eaten, or sold to be eaten, under the most unsanitary conditions imaginable. These dead bodies are often eaten only partially cooked or uncooked, and little or no effort is made to prevent contact with raw blood from the corpses. It has been proven that bushmeat is a major source of Ebola infection.

Recent studies have shown that HIV/AIDS was first passed to African humans from gorillas and chimpanzees in the form of SIV (Simian Immunodeficiency Virus), probably from the handling of simian bushmeat — though sexual transmission cannot be ruled out. And you probably didn’t know that fully 2.3 per cent. of the general population of Cameroon is infected or has been infected with SIV, with infection reaching 17.5 per cent. in some areas. Over decades, SIV eventually mutated into HIV. Africans with relatives in Haiti brought AIDS to that Caribbean nation, and Western homosexual “sex tourism” to “no holds barred” Africa and Haiti brought the deadly disease to the homosexual community in America and Europe, where it has of course spread into the non-perverted portion of the population as well — though filthy homosexual and Congoid sex practices, along with a probable African predisposition to the disease, make infection rates in those groups notably higher than in the White population at large.

As with HIV, one can contract Ebola through contact with the body fluids of any infected person, including ingesting particles from their sneezes and coughs, kissing them or otherwise coming into contact with their saliva, having sexual intercourse with them, touching their clothing if it contains particles of blood, sweat, or waste, or by shaking hands, hugging, or otherwise touching their injured, bleeding, or sweating skin if you have even tiny, invisible lesions on your own.

The mulatto president of the regime in Washington, Barack Obama, in a recent televised speech, emphasized that “You cannot get [Ebola] through casual contact like sitting next to someone on a bus.” Yet the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), in a bulletin for aid workers published around the same time as Obama’s speech, paints quite a different picture, urging those who suspect they may have the disease to “Limit your contact with other people when you travel to the doctor; avoid public transportation…. Do not travel anywhere except to the doctor’s office or hospital…. If you get symptoms of Ebola, it is important to stay apart from other people and call your doctor right away…. Controlled movement requires people to notify the public health authority about their intended travel for 21 days after their last known potential Ebola virus exposure…. These individuals should not travel by commercial conveyances (e.g. airplane, ship, long-distance bus, or train). Local use of public transportation (e.g. taxi, bus) by asymptomatic individuals should be discussed with the public health authority.”

The CDC bulletin also advises that a person can contract the disease if he or she “spends a long amount of time within three feet (one meter) of a person who is sick with Ebola.” The CDC’s recommended precautions to avoid becoming infected with Ebola “includes wearing a mask over your mouth and nose, waterproof gloves, a gown (to protect clothing), and eye protection (goggles or a face shield – corrective glasses are not enough).” And by now we’ve all seen the HAZMAT “space suits” that intelligent health care workers insist upon wearing when dealing with Ebola patients. Meanwhile, Fetchit tells us that sitting right next to an Ebola victim on a bus, wearing no protective clothing whatsoever, is perfectly fine and dandy.

The “missionary work” of Christians and the other efforts to bring Western medicine and agricultural science to sub-Saharan Africans are partly to blame for the perilous situation in which both we and the hapless Africans find ourselves. Africans were primitive and savage, but for millennia they existed in small numbers and in balance with their environment. But meddling “liberals” and Christians insisted that they were “equal” to us and, through the application of Western technology and techniques, brought down their natural death rate so their populations burgeoned beyond all expectations. Small hunter-gatherer communities were converted into overpopulated urban nightmare-scapes and the environment was devastated. Our policy should have been to leave these primitive peoples alone to seek out their own ways and their own futures and their own balance with Nature. We should have left them behind, just as our ancestors left Homo erectus behind long before the dawn of recorded history. All we did when we engaged with them and “helped” them was destroy their traditional culture, exchange misery on a small scale for misery on a gigantic scale — and endanger our own future for no benefit whatsoever.

After centuries of engagement, Africa is still irremediably savage, filthy, and primitive. A fairly intelligent and well-meaning Ghanian woman, Elizabeth Ohene, made the point when she described the progress her country has made in fighting Ebola to the BBC: “…we are in the middle of what health officials are calling a staggering outbreak of cholera in our capital city, Accra. The last figures I saw put the cholera fatality cases at more than 40 dead and 3,100 people having been infected. …The mayor of Accra has announced that sites have now been found for waste disposal and mounds of rubbish that had been on the streets for months are being removed. …The last census figures show that more than half the population of this country do not have toilets in their homes. …We love funerals; we love dead bodies and we have elaborate mortuary rituals. Maybe the current crisis would force us to reconsider these practices? Do we really have to continue keeping dead bodies for weeks and months and even years as we prepare to give ‘befitting burials’?”

In Africa, superstition, ignorance, and hatred of Whites makes the lives of local and Western medical workers very hazardous at times, and progress against the disease difficult. According to a report from NBC, “a Red Cross team was attacked while collecting bodies believed to be infected with Ebola in southeastern Guinea, the latest in a string of assaults that are hindering efforts to control West Africa’s current outbreak. One Red Cross worker is recovering after being wounded in in the neck in Tuesday’s attack … Family members of the dead initially set upon the six volunteers and vandalized their cars…. Eventually a crowd gathered and headed to the regional health office, where they threw rocks at the building. The attack is the most recent in a series that have plagued teams working to bury bodies, provide information about Ebola and disinfect public places. The most shocking to date was the abduction and killing last week of a team of several health officials and journalists in Guinea who were educating people on how to avoid contracting Ebola.” The primitives apparently believe that the workers who are trying to help them are really infecting them and therefore must be attacked and killed or driven out.

In Third-Worldlized America things are better, but not much. In Texas, where Patient Zero recently died, the supposed “HAZMAT cleanup crew” sent to disinfect the apartment complex where the victim lived was nothing but a rag-tag T-shirted group of apparent illegal immigrants with garden hoses, with no protective equipment in sight, spraying and splattering the vomit from the now-dead Ebola victim all over the place and running it down the community’s storm drains. The family of Patient Zero is supposedly “quarantined,” but photographs show Negro delivery boys walking right up to their apartment’s open door and handing them grocery bags full of supplies — again, with no guards or even the most elementary protective gear visible anywhere.

more-dallas-hazmat

"HAZMAT cleanup crew" hard at work cleaning up Patient Zero's bodily fluids at his apartment complex. This is not Monrovia, Liberia. It is Dallas, Texas.

“HAZMAT cleanup crew” members hard at work dealing with Patient Zero’s bodily fluids at his apartment complex. This is not Monrovia, Liberia. It is Dallas, Texas.

Strict quarantine measures are in evidence as supplies are delivered to Patient Zero's "quarantined" family in Dallas.

Strict protective measures are in evidence as supplies are delivered to Patient Zero’s “quarantined” family in Dallas.

The Blacks in Africa are, to a large degree, mentally incapable of doing what needs to be done to contain this disease. But worse yet are White Westerners — who are morally incapable of doing what needs to be done: totally sealing the borders — nay, the very oceans and atmosphere themselves — against travel from sub-Saharan Africa until Nature has restored some semblance of balance there again and the epidemic has burnt itself out. Everyone knows there is an up to 21-day asymptomatic period following Ebola infection, so current efforts to screen travellers for signs of fever or flu-like symptoms will not be effective. Allowing continued immigration from Africa, and sending thousands of troops and medical workers there, sure to return, when we know that, even with extreme measures like HAZMAT gear, some ten per cent. of medical workers end up infected, is a formula for total disaster.

But the false “morality” promoted by the Jewish media and the Christian churches — the “morality” that tells us that the races are equal and that any preference for the survival of our own race is sinful and evil — won’t permit us to do what must be done. What must be done is, to them, “racist” and therefore beyond the pale of morally acceptable behavior. The only actions which these morally defective individuals can endorse in this situation is even more engagement with Africa and Africans, thousands of troops and health care workers sent there, some of whom will come home infected. And, going by their twisted “morality,” there is no good reason why infected Africans themselves should not come to the West to take advantage of the better care available here, as, I assure you, many of them are already doing, simply lying about having had contact with infected persons on the laughably ineffective self-assessment forms that pass for protective measures now.

* * *

There is something entering our bloodstreams from Africa which is far more dangerous than HIV or Ebola, however.

Are you skeptical of GMOs — genetically modified organisms — being sold to us as food? Do you take the time, trouble, and expense to find natural, Nature-evolved foods for yourself and your family? Even if you don’t, how would you feel about someone who proposed genetically modifying your children? I don’t mean taking out a known gene sequence that causes a disease and replacing it with the natural sequence that ought to be there. I mean purposely scrambling the genes, more or less randomly, that make your children what they are: changing the genes so that they no longer look like you or even appear to be related to you — altering their genes so that they not only look different, but appear to be of a whole different subspecies than you — and modifying your children’s genes so that they no longer think or act or communicate like they do now. Would you be for that, or against it?

Well, that’s exactly what we’re doing by mixing the races. We’re genetically modifying our children and grandchildren. And we’re not doing it to eliminate diseases or birth defects by restoring what’s natural to their gene sequences. No. We’re taking the gene patterns of primitive human subspecies that our kind diverged from 50 or 100 thousand years ago, and mixing them with our genes in our children and grandchildren. We’re breeding out — destroying forever — the unique characteristics that make us what we are; that make us uniquely capable of creating and sustaining advanced civilizations and ultimately spreading our civilization to the stars.

And we’re not just randomly genetically modifying our children and grandchildren; it’s worse than that. We’re replacing the gene-patterns that took hundreds of thousands of years to evolve with patterns from the lowest-achieving, lowest intelligence, and most primitive and brutal strains of human beings currently extant on planet Earth. We’re destroying ourselves, throwing away the gene structure that makes us what we are. We’re throwing away 100,000 years of evolution. We’re facilitating our extinction, double time. We’re throwing away all the sacrifices of our ancestors, known and unknown, and all the slow upward progress that the Life Force has made since we became human. We’re destroying our posterity and all the generations to come. By allowing — and even encouraging — the ingress of genes from other human subspecies, we’re genetically modifying our own children. And what is mixed to a sufficient degree can never be unmixed. And what is extinct can never be brought back to life.

Yes, the pathways of infection from the Third World must be closed off, for the safety and security of our kind and our posterity. But far more dangerous than even Ebola or AIDS, far more dangerous than any bacterial or viral infection, is the ingress of the genes of other human subspecies into our genome that is currently being allowed and promoted by the Jewish power structure.

A true morality — a Cosmotheist morality — would have us radically change our laws and our behavior in such a way as to make our own survival as a race our highest priority. “Helping” our racial enemies and competitors, lavishing them with our wealth (stolen from our own future generations), and opening the gates of our nations and the doorways of our daughters’ bedrooms to them would cease to be “moral priorities” and would become capital crimes. Close off the pathways of infection; close off the pathways of genetic destruction; and give all our energy and all our wealth and all our efforts to making the next generation of our own race the strongest, greatest, most advanced, and invincible generation ever seen on Earth.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to do right and fear no one.

Listen to the broadcast

 

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/vector-of-death-ebola-and-africa/feed/ 6
Jews, the USSR, and Communism http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/jews-the-ussr-and-communism/ http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/jews-the-ussr-and-communism/#comments Sat, 11 Oct 2014 02:28:27 +0000 http://nationalvanguard.org/?p=1727 Jew of Russiaby Dr. William L. Pierce

IT IS AN ARTICLE of faith among the members of the so-called “radical right” that the Soviet Union today is as firmly under the thumb of a ruling minority of Jewish commissars as it was in the years immediately after the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. (ILLUSTRATION: Jew of Russia)

All the wails by world Jewry about “Soviet anti-Semitism,” just as the lukewarm Soviet backing of Israel’s Arab opponents, are seen as pure subterfuge aimed at deceiving the Gentile West as to the true state of affairs behind the Iron Curtain.

It is, on the other hand, an article of faith among nearly everyone else — from “responsible conservatives” to the AFL-CIO’s George Meany to those who take their ideological cues from the New York Times or the Washington Post . . . → Read More: Jews, the USSR, and Communism]]> Jew of Russiaby Dr. William L. Pierce

IT IS AN ARTICLE of faith among the members of the so-called “radical right” that the Soviet Union today is as firmly under the thumb of a ruling minority of Jewish commissars as it was in the years immediately after the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. (ILLUSTRATION: Jew of Russia)

All the wails by world Jewry about “Soviet anti-Semitism,” just as the lukewarm Soviet backing of Israel’s Arab opponents, are seen as pure subterfuge aimed at deceiving the Gentile West as to the true state of affairs behind the Iron Curtain.

It is, on the other hand, an article of faith among nearly everyone else — from “responsible conservatives” to the AFL-CIO’s George Meany to those who take their ideological cues from the New York Times or the Washington Post — that the Soviet Union is run by fanatical anti-Semites who single out Soviet citizens of the Jewish faith for especially harsh persecution.

To question the first article of faith is to lay oneself open to the suspicion of being in cahoots with the Jews, while to question the second is to bring down on one’s head the immediate charge of being an anti-Semite.

The fact is that neither article of faith has any correspondence with reality, as we shall see in what follows. Before we can understand the true situation of the Jews in the Soviet Union today, however, we must understand how that situation has developed and changed during the last few decades. Indeed, it will be helpful for us to look much further back than that.

The Jews of Eastern Europe trace their origins to two principal sources. One of these sources — and by far the more important one for the Jews of Russia — was a Tatar tribe, the Khazars, who moved from Asia into the area north and northwest of the Caspian Sea in the second century. In the eighth century the Khazars converted en masse to Judaism, after their king, Bulan, came under the influence of a traveling Jewish merchant.

Two centuries later the Khazar kingdom was destroyed by Varangian warriors from Scandinavia, who established their hegemony over the Slavic peoples of Russia, Poland, and the Ukraine, but communities of Khazar Jews had already entrenched themselves solidly throughout this area.

The other source was the Jews repeatedly expelled from virtually every country of Western Europe throughout the Middle Ages. During the various expulsions (from England in 1290, from Germany in 1298 and numerous subsequent occasions, from France in 1306, from Austria in 1421, from Spain in 1492, from Portugal in 1497, etc.) the evicted Jews filtered in to other countries which, for the moment, would have them. One of those countries was Poland, which in those days comprised a vast territory including much of the Ukraine and western Russia.

The incoming trickle of part-Semitic Jews from the west amalgamated with the non-Semitic Khazar Jews already in Poland, with the Khazar element predominating. Thus, when Russia annexed huge sections of Poland in the 18th century, she also acquired a substantial infestation of these racially mixed Polish Jews.

Both Jewish elements were racially, culturally, and spiritually alien to the Gentile Russians, and a deep-seated hostility between Jews and Russians was established from the time they first came in contact. Relations between the two races were not helped by the tendency of the Jews to monopolize trade, to ingratiate themselves with the nobility at the expense of the peasantry, and, in general, to soak up all the available money of the country.

Remembering that prior to the 18th century much of what is now Russia was Poland, we can get an idea of Jew-Gentile relations there from the Jewish historian Abram Sachar’s widely read History of the Jews. Sachar writes:

“…All through the twelfth century Jews (in Poland) prospered as merchants, traders, and tax-farmers. Many of them were in charge of the mints, and the Polish coins sometimes bore the names of the princes in Hebrew characters! After… the middle of the thirteenth century… the Jews… became the only commercial class in a country of landlords and peasants.”

Four hundred years later, in the 17th century, “Jews continued to serve the nobles as tax-collectors, tax-farmers, financiers, and particularly stewards and overseers of their estates. But these positions, while adding to their power, increased popular animosity. The peasants, who were being exploited by the nobles, hated the tools of tyranny more than tyranny itself.”

Universal Jewish Encyclopedia reveals virtual monopoly Jews established in the professions in Russia, holding seven-eighths of all professional positions. This was at a time when they were crying to the world about how the tsars were "oppressing" them!

Universal Jewish Encyclopedia reveals virtual monopoly Jews established in the professions in Russia, holding seven-eighths of all professional positions. This was at a time when they were crying to the world about how the tsars were “oppressing” them!

Indeed, the Russian peasantry hated the Jews so intensely that, for the sake of keeping down public unrest, the tsars strictly limited the area of the country within which Jews were allowed to settle. That area, the Pale of Settlement, comprised much of western Russia and was the scene of nearly continuous conflict between its Jewish and its Russian inhabitants.

Throughout the 19th century a series of tsars attempted to alleviate Russia’s festering Jewish problem by assimilating the Jews into the mainstream of Russian society. The Jews, however, bitterly resisted every effort to “Russianize” them. They refused to work on the land or to engage in manual labor, and they continued to use two languages: Russian for doing business with Gentiles, and Yiddish for talking to one another.

The efforts of the tsars — notably Alexander I (1801-1825), Nicholas I (1825-1855), and Alexander II (1855-1881) — did have two important effects, however. One of these effects was a great increase in revolutionary activity among Russia’s Jews. One conspiracy after another was hatched against the Russian government, leading to numerous public disturbances and assassination attempts. In 1881 one of these conspiracies culminated in the successful assassination of Tsar Alexander II.

By the end of the 19th century, virtually every Jew in Russia was committed to one or the other — or both — of two far-reaching movements intended to upset the existing order and replace it with one more congenial to Jews. These movements were Marxism and Zionism.

The other effect of the tsars’ efforts — which included compulsory schooling for Jews — was that the Jews began extending their range of activities to include the professions (medicine, law, teaching) as well as commerce. In accord with their usual practice, they attempted to monopolize these new fields of endeavor for themselves, and they very nearly succeeded. The Russian census of 1897 revealed that Jews occupied seven out of every eight professional positions. This insured a passionate anti-Semitism on the part of the small but growing number of middle-class Russians, who found their sons elbowed out of the admission lines to Russia’s medical and law schools by Jews.

As the 20th century dawned, Russia found herself saddled with approximately half of the world’s Jews — nearly seven million of them — all bitterly opposed to the government and in turn bitterly hated by the great masses of Russian people among whom they lived. The Russian secret police — the Okhrana — made strenuous efforts to halt Jewish subversive moves, but the Jews used their connections with Jews outside Russia to great advantage in this regard. As just one example, Iskra (which means “spark”), the newspaper of the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party, which later became the Communist Party, was edited and printed by Jews in Munich, Germany, and then smuggled into Russia. Other Jews from Russia carried on their revolutionary activities in Switzerland, the Netherlands, the United States, and other places beyond the reach of the tsars’ police.

Prior to 1900 nearly all the adherents of the various Marxist revolutionary factions in Russia were Jews. Because of the strong hostility which existed between the Jews and the Russian population, the overwhelming Jewishness of the revolutionary movement constituted a major obstacle to the spread of Marxism among Russian workers. With the delegates to the various Marxist congresses which were held between 1900 and 1907 more often addressing their audiences in Yiddish than in Russian, it is easy to understand why not many Russians were attracted to the movement.

The grave diggers of Russia were overwhelmingly Jewish. This 1917 photograph of a meeting of communist leaders in Petrograd (previously St. Petersburg, now Leningrad) is typical, with four of the five top communists seated at the table known to be Jews. They are, from left to right: Moses Uritsky, Petrograd Cheka boss; Lev Trotsky (Bronstein), later Red Army commissar; Yakov Sverdlov, second president of the "Soviet Republic"; and Grigori Zinoviev (Apfelbaum), president of the Petrograd Soviet. The ethnic affiliation of the fifth man at the table is unknown.

The grave diggers of Russia were overwhelmingly Jewish. This 1917 photograph of a meeting of communist leaders in Petrograd (previously St. Petersburg, now Leningrad) is typical, with four of the five top communists seated at the table known to be Jews. They are, from left to right: Moses Uritsky, Petrograd Cheka boss; Lev Trotsky (Bronstein), later Red Army commissar; Yakov Sverdlov, second president of the “Soviet Republic”; and Grigori Zinoviev (Apfelbaum), president of the Petrograd Soviet. The ethnic affiliation of the fifth man at the table is unknown.

After the events of 1905, which included a great deal of popular unrest stemming from Russia’s humiliating defeat in the Russo-Japanese War, a conscious effort was made to bridge the gap between Jewish Marxists and their potential Russian recruits by promoting those few Russian Marxists already in the revolutionary ranks to leading positions. One who benefited some years later from this effort was Josef Djugashvili (actually not a Russian, but a Georgian), a young man unknown outside communist ranks even as late as 1917, but who would later be known to the world as Josef Stalin.

V.I. Lenin, the infamous "Russian" revolutionary, had at most one Russian grandparent.

V.I. Lenin, the infamous “Russian” revolutionary, had at most one Russian grandparent.

A much more important Marxist than Stalin in the early years was another man generally regarded as a Russian, although he was actually one-quarter Jewish, at least one-quarter Kalmuck (Mongol), one-quarter German, and at most one-quarter Russian, with his Kalmuck heritage showing up most strongly in his face. His name was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, but he is much better known by his underground pseudonym, “Lenin.”

A number of competent historians have recorded the struggles between the various Marxist factions in Russia and between the Marxists and the Russian government which led to the eventual triumph of Lenin’s Bolshevik faction over all his competitors and, finally, over the government. No attempt will be made here even to summarize these struggles. Frank L. Britton’s little booklet, Behind Communism, is recommended to the reader who wants to delve further into this interesting subject.

Despite the efforts to “Russianize” the Communist Party, both before and after the 1917 revolution, the leadership cadres remained overwhelmingly Jewish until the late 1930s. One organ of the Soviet regime in particular which was notoriously non-Russian was the secret police, known by a sequence of acronyms and initials which soon came to strike terror into the heart of every Russian: Cheka, GPU, OGPU, NKVD, NKGB, MGB, KGB.

The masses of the Russian people, in fact, were so much outsiders to the various Marxist factions squabbling over the corpse of tsarist Russia that the greatest danger faced by the early Bolshevik commissars was a bullet in the back from another Jew — not from a Russian. Thus, Moses Uritsky, the bloodthirsty Cheka boss of Petrograd, was murdered on August 30, 1918, by the Jew Kanegiesser, a member of the Social Revolutionary faction. And on the same day Lenin was critically wounded by bullets fired at him by Fanny Kaplan, another Social Revolutionary — and a member of a long line of Jewesses who have turned to political assassination, the latest in this line being Sara Kahn (usually identified in the controlled news media by her pseudonym, “Sara Jane Moore”).

This old clipping from the B'nai B'rith Messenger, a Jewish newspaper, reveals something which very few Americans realize: the very close relationship between the Gentile rulers of the Soviet Union and the Jews. Not only were Khrushchev and "half the members of the Presidium" married to Jewesses, but also Khrushchev's successor, Leonid Brezhnev. And in the past this relationship was even closer. Lenin's wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya, was a Jewess, and Stalin was married for a time to Rosa Kaganovich, the sister of one of the USSR's most powerful Jewish commissars. Furthermore, Stalin's daughter Svetlana, now in the United States, was once married to Mikhail Kaganovich, her step-mother's newphew.

This old clipping from the B’nai B’rith Messenger, a Jewish newspaper, reveals something which very few Americans realize: the very close relationship between the Gentile rulers of the Soviet Union and the Jews. Not only were Khrushchev and “half the members of the Presidium” married to Jewesses, but also Khrushchev’s successor, Leonid Brezhnev. And in the past this relationship was even closer. Lenin’s wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya, was a Jewess, and Stalin was married for a time to Rosa Kaganovich, the sister of one of the USSR’s most powerful Jewish commissars. Furthermore, Stalin’s daughter Svetlana, now in the United States, was once married to Mikhail Kaganovich, her step-mother’s nephew.

Lenin recovered from Fanny Kaplan’s bullets, but he died on January 21, 1924, from a stroke, following a long illness. During Lenin’s last years the most powerful communist in Russia was easily Lev Trotsky (born Bronstein), the Jewish commissar of the Red Army.

Trotsky ‘s chief rival was to be Stalin, who became General Secretary of the Communist Party in March 1922. Stalin was a cleverer political infighter than Trotsky. In order to bring down Trotsky he allied himself with Jewish Politburo members Lev Kamenev (born Rosenfeld) and Grigori Zinoviev (born Apfelbaum). Within a year after Lenin ‘s death the Stalin-Kamenev-Zinoviev triumvirate had successfully outflanked Trotsky.

And, although Zinoviev outranked Stalin at the time of Lenin’s death, it did not take Stalin but a few months after he and his allies had undermined Trotsky’s position for him to gain the upper hand over both Kamenev and Zinoviev. By 1927 Stalin had emerged as the virtual dictator of the Soviet Union.

Stalin’s rise to supremacy did not go undisputed, however. Even after 1927 various individuals and coalitions of communists made the fatal mistake of attempting to unseat him. Stalin was able to maintain and consolidate his power only because he possessed extraordinary skill in the cut-throat game of conspiracy and counter-conspiracy which raged in the Communist Party hierarchy for more than a decade after the revolution. In cunning, ruthlessness, suspiciousness, and deviousness he was a match for any Jew in Russia.

The attitudes and patterns of thought formed during the early years of vicious infighting stayed with Stalin all his life. He never lost the feeling that he was surrounded by enemies who were conspiring against him, and until his death he continued to employ the divide-and-rule tactics which enabled him to claw his way to the top.

The series of arrests and show trials of the late 1930s, known as “the Great Terror,” were primarily a manifestation of Stalin’s paranoia. During the years of the Great Terror Stalin more-or-less continuously purged and repurged the Communist Party, destroying in the process all enemies, both real and imaginary, and liquidating all factions, actual or potential, which might conceivably challenge his rule.

It is true that during the years 1937-1939 a great many Jewish communists were killed, and that when the smoke had cleared there were fewer Jews and more Russians in the upper ranks of the party than before. Stalin’s purges can in no way be interpreted as an anti-Semitic move, however. Jewish party members were liquidated, not because they were Jews, but because every party official was regarded as a potential threat by Stalin. More often than not the secret police official who fired the fatal bullet into the back of the Jewish victim’s head in the cellars of the NKVD was himself a Jew.

Both these military intelligence reports are in the U.S. National Archives in Washington. They were written by Captain Montgomery Schuyler, U.S. Army. The first was sent from Omsk on March 1, 1918, and the second from Vladivostok on June 9, 1919. Both describe the civil war then raging between the Russians and the Jewish-led Bolsheviks, in which the Bolsheviks carried out terrible massacres of Russian civilians and prisoners of war. Such information was carefully suppressed by the U.S. news media. Schuyler, like all other U.S. observers then in Russia, was appalled by the idea of the whole Russian nation falling into the hands of a vicious and sadistic gang of greasy Jewish cutthroats.

Both these military intelligence reports are in the U.S. National Archives in Washington. They were written by Captain Montgomery Schuyler, U.S. Army. The first was sent from Omsk on March 1, 1918, and the second from Vladivostok on June 9, 1919. Both describe the civil war then raging between the Russians and the Jewish-led Bolsheviks, in which the Bolsheviks carried out terrible massacres of Russian civilians and prisoners of war. Such information was carefully suppressed by the U.S. news media. Schuyler, like all other U.S. observers then in Russia, was appalled by the idea of the whole Russian nation falling into the hands of a vicious and sadistic gang of greasy Jewish cutthroats.

And Russians also were killed in droves during the purges — in far greater numbers, in fact, than Jews. And, although the liquidation of so many high-ranking officials brought a flux of non-Jews up from the lower ranks of the hierarchy as replacements, Jews still remained by far the largest ethnic group in the Soviet power structure at the outbreak of World War II.

When Hitler launched his blitzkrieg attack on the Soviet Union in June 1941, determined to stamp out the menace of Jewish Marxism once and for all, Stalin’s worries turned in a new direction. The Jews, not only in Russia but everywhere, had suddenly become his most important allies in the death struggle with Hitler.

Jacob Schiff, described here on pages 1018-1019 of New York's Jewish Communal Register for 1917-1918, was one of the wealthiest Jewish capitalists in America. He headed the powerful Wall Street banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb. Yet Schiff, after first bankrolling the Japanese against the Russians in 1904, gave Trotsky and other Jewish communists $25 million to launch the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. And some Americans still believe that there is a fundamental antithesis between Jewish capitalism and Jewish communism!

Jacob Schiff, described here on pages 1018-1019 of New York’s Jewish Communal Register for 1917-1918, was one of the wealthiest Jewish capitalists in America. He headed the powerful Wall Street banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb. Yet Schiff, after first bankrolling the Japanese against the Russians in 1904, gave Trotsky and other Jewish communists $25 million to launch the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. And some Americans still believe that there is a fundamental antithesis between Jewish capitalism and Jewish communism!

As soon as the Germans invaded the Soviet Union Stalin could count on the moral backing of Jewry everywhere. More importantly, with their enormous power of the press and of the purse, they could insure him the material support of the United States government.

The behavior of the Jews in the USSR in the early days of the war caused him considerable worry, however. As the Germans advanced, tens of thousands of Russia’s Jews loaded their suitcases with currency and headed for the Far Eastern provinces, where they immediately went into business as black marketeers. This had a very bad effect on the morale of the Russian masses, who were being exhorted to sacrifice everything in the fight against the fascist invaders.

Stalin kept the problem in check by having a few hundred Jewish currency speculators and black market dealers publicly shot, but he could hardly afford to take any stronger measures against them, or the Jews in America and Britain might simply call off the war, and he would be left alone to deal with Hitler.

World War II convinced Stalin of one thing: he could never again feel safe against external enemies with the Soviet bureaucracy in the grip of a people who had no fundamental loyalty to Russia, like the pharaoh who “knew not Joseph,” he asked himself whether it might not happen that “when there falleth out any war” — a war against a philo-Semitic power instead of an anti-Semitic one next time, perhaps — Russia’s Jews would “join also unto our enemies.” He began taking steps to remedy this dangerous situation as soon as the war was over.

Acting with great discretion at first, Stalin started weeding Jews out of the upper levels of the Soviet hierarchy. It was necessary to proceed slowly for two reasons.

First, Jewish communists in the United States, Canada, and Britain were still funneling very valuable atomic and military secrets to him. Like U.S. atom-spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Jews everywhere still regarded the Soviet Union as a Jewish paradise.

Second, Soviet society was utterly dependent upon its Jewish managers and technocrats for its continued functioning. For three decades Jews had virtually monopolized the bureaucracy and the professions, and it was necessary to train a new generation of Russians to replace them.

After the Zionist seizure of Palestine in 1948 — which was immediately given an official blessing by the Soviet Union — Stalin greatly accelerated his weeding-out program. Zionism — loyalty to a foreign power — was equivalent to treason, and every Jew, whether he professed loyalty to Israel or not, was regarded as at least a potential Zionist.

During the last days of World War !, when the Bolsheviks were taking over Russia, U.S. diplomatic and military officials in Russia sent many reports back to Washington. Both the above telegrams are in the U.S. National Archives. The upper one, State Department document 861.00/1757, was sent on May 2, 1918, by the U.S. consul general in Moscow, Summers. The lower one, State Department document 861.00/2205, was sent from Vladivostok on July 5, 1918, by U.S consul Caldwell. Both describe the predominance of Jews among the Bolsheviks.

During the last days of World War 1, when the Bolsheviks were taking over Russia, U.S. diplomatic and military officials in Russia sent many reports back to Washington. Both the above telegrams are in the U.S. National Archives. The upper one, State Department document 861.00/1757, was sent on May 2, 1918, by the U.S. consul general in Moscow, Summers. The lower one, State Department document 861.00/2205, was sent from Vladivostok on July 5, 1918, by U.S consul Caldwell. Both describe the predominance of Jews among the Bolsheviks.

Between 1948 and 1953, Stalin’s changed attitude toward the Jews filtered down to the Russian masses. On the law books anti-Semitism was still equivalent to anti-Sovietism — an equivalence established by Lenin’s infamous edict of August 9, 1918 — and, as revealed by Solzhenitsyn in his First Circle, an ordinary Russian could still be given a 10-year sentence at hard labor for casually using the word “zheed” (kike) — but, at least, one was no longer shot for such an offense, as was the case before the war. A few bold Russians defied the law, and poems, short stories, and a few pamphlets began circulating surreptitiously, which reflected, for the first time in 30 years, the deep-smoldering resentment of the people against the Jews.

In Romania, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and other Soviet satellites Stalin’s program was also underway. The Soviet-puppet governments which had been installed in these countries in the wake of their “liberation” by the Red Army were almost completely “kosher.” Now the Jewish party bosses and commissars — Ana Pauker in Romania, Rudolf Slansky in Czechoslovakia, Matyas Rakosi in Hungary — were being summarily deposed and replaced by Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, etc.

The Senate Judiciary Committee issued the above report in 1965. Its purpose was to show that the Jews are being "discriminated against" by the Soviet government, but in doing so it inadvertently revealed that the Jews had formerly constituted more than 40 per cent of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR! The extract is from page 63 of the report.

The Senate Judiciary Committee issued the above report in 1965. Its purpose was to show that the Jews are being “discriminated against” by the Soviet government, but in doing so it inadvertently revealed that the Jews had formerly constituted more than 40 per cent of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR! The extract is from page 63 of the report.

It was in this period — the period of the “Cold War” — that Jews began their public wailing about “Soviet anti-Semitism.” In fact, there is a fundamental connection between Stalin’s weeding-out program and the onset of the Cold War. It was the postwar recognition by the Jewish masters of America’s mass media that their fortunes had changed in the USSR that led to a deliberate effort on their part to shift American public opinion and governmental policy away from the pro-Soviet stance which they themselves had generated during World War II. But that is another story in itself.

Stalin died on March 5, 1953. There are persistent rumors that his death came just on the eve of a planned roundup of all the remaining Jews in the Soviet Union — and that it was Stalin’s plan for this “final solution” of Russia’s Jewish problem which led to his death by poison at the hands of one of his associates or doctors. At this time we have no way of knowing the truth of the matter. We do know, however, that Stalin’s program to Russify the upper ranks of the Soviet bureaucracy had been largely accomplished by the time of his death.

With Stalin dead the Jews of Russia were out of any danger of being abandoned by the Soviet government to the wrath of the Russian people. During the period of “de-Stalinization” which followed, most of Stalin’s measures against the Jews were relaxed. But the government was not handed back over to the Jews. Russian communists were in the saddle now, and they intended to stay there.

And thus it has continued to the present. And the Jews in the United States and other Western countries maintain their nonstop serenade of the Gentile public with tales of woe and persecution in the USSR.

Undoubtedly, many Jews actually believe they are being persecuted by the Soviet government. After all, are they not God’s “chosen people,” who by right should rule over the Russians? Is it not “persecution” to deny them this right?

Jews have been wailing for 25 years about how they are being "persecuted" in Russia — just as they were "persecuted" in Germany before that, and in Poland, and in Romania, and in Hungary, and in Spain, and...This race of professional martyrs regards any Gentile resistance to Jewish efforts to take over a country as "persecution." And there always seem to be plenty of gullible Gentiles in other countries to believe them.

Jews have been wailing for 25 years about how they are being “persecuted” in Russia — just as they were “persecuted” in Germany before that, and in Poland, and in Romania, and in Hungary, and in Spain, and… This race of professional martyrs regards any Gentile resistance to Jewish efforts to take over a country as “persecution.” And there always seem to be plenty of gullible Gentiles in other countries to believe them.

In any event, believed by the Jews or not, this serenade is largely believed by their gullible Gentile audience, and it serves as a very useful means of maintaining the pressure of Western public opinion against the Soviet government. As long as the Soviets are dependent upon trade with the West, they are obliged to tread lightly where Soviet Jews are concerned.

Thus, Henry Kissinger’s policy of detente (rather, partial detente, the prospect of detente), which is facetiously attacked by many American Jews and their Gentile henchmen (Senator Jackson, for example) actually serves the Jews very well. It insures that their present position in the Soviet Union will not deteriorate further, as it did under Stalin. And what is that position today?

Jews, who today account for just under one per cent (0.9) of the total population of the Soviet Union, occupy approximately the same percentage (0.8) of senior party and government positions in that country.

But Jews constitute 1.9 per cent of all students and 5.5 per cent of all faculty members at Soviet institutions of higher education. They account for 7 per cent of all Soviet scientists. They hold 14 per cent of the doctoral degrees in the Soviet Union. And they make up more than 20 per cent of the highly paid members of the performing arts, entertainment, and mass communications professions. These figures (except the last) are from the May 1974 issue of Commentary, a magazine published by the American Jewish Committee, which is in the forefront of those organizations lamenting the “persecution” of Soviet Jews.

persecution_of_jewsThe truth is that Jews are not now and never have been persecuted by a communist government. They constitute a privileged minority in the Soviet Union today, a minority which holds a higher percentage of soft jobs and enjoys a higher standard of living than any other ethnic group — including Russians — and which is the only minority which has been allowed to emigrate.

It is also true that Jews in the Soviet Union are not as privileged a group today as they were before World War II. But Stalin did not persecute Jews when he curtailed some of their privileges; he simply set out to correct the gross inequity which existed in the Soviet Union between the power wielded by Jews and that wielded by Russians and other ethnic groups. It is this long-overdue correction which the Jews of the world so indignantly refer to as “persecution.”

Today’s Soviet leaders are not passionate men, not idealistic men, not religious men. They are not the sort of men burning with a sense of justice, with a craving to right old wrongs and settle old scores. They are not the sort of men, in short, to persecute Jews, for what is the profit in that?

They are cold-blooded businessmen-gangsters, not basically unlike the sort we are familiar with in this country. They do what is necessary to protect their power, but they do not waste their time and energy on such trifles as justice.

But the day may come when the Russian masses will rise up and throw off the communist yoke which was put on their necks nearly 60 years ago. If that day does come, then the Jews will really have something to scream about.

* * *

From Attack! No. 43, 1976

transcribed by Vanessa Neubauer from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

FacebookTumblrShare

]]> http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/10/jews-the-ussr-and-communism/feed/ 0