National Vanguard

Rosa Parks Enshrined at National Cathedral

admin — Tue, 08 May 2012 21:59:30 +0000

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE GROTESQUE pockmarked figure on the right is not a gargoyle, but it is carved into the walls of a cathedral — the so-called National Cathedral in Washington, DC to be precise.

It is a quasi-religious icon portraying one of the regime’s secular saints, Rosa Parks, a Communist operative whose purpose was to create a moral basis for multiracialism and for the attempted genocide of White people in America. The (Episcopal) cathedral is preparing to dedicate the carving on Thursday in what NBC calls a “section of the church devoted to human rights” with a “ceremony of evening prayer songs.”

Parks isn’t the only one portrayed as a saintlike being in the National Cathedral. As I reported many years ago, a bust of the sexual degenerate “Martin Luther” King also adorns this house of God, as does an hilariously cartoonish, almost mock-serious statue of Eleanor Roosevelt, another figure of reverence in the multiracialist pantheon. NBC tells us that “the carving of Parks will join others on the cathedral’s Human Rights Porch that celebrates those who struggled to bring equality and social justice to all people.”

Amateurish icon of Eleanor Roosevelt, managing to look somewhat less than saintlike, at Washington, DC's National Cathedral

NBC also gives us the shorthand version of the tale we are all supposed to believe about this avatar of The Pure and Good: “Parks’ refusal to give up her Montgomery, Ala., bus seat to a white passenger in 1955 is often cited as the start of the movement against segregation.”

Parks herself tried to make it appear that her act was one of individual moral choice and courage when she said, “When I made that decision, I knew that I had the strength of my ancestors with me.”

There’s a lot more to it, though, that we are not told. And Parks’ actions were anything but spontaneous, as investigator Jeff Hook reveals:

“At the time of Parks’ arrest, standing by with bail money was her attorney, Clifford Durr, who entered a plea of ‘not guilty’ on her behalf. Photo-ops had been arranged.

“Durr was a close associate of Jessica Mitford, an official of the Communist Party. In 1949, he joined the communist front National Lawyers Guild.

“He subsequently became President of the Guild. Later, Durr opened a law practice in Washington, D.C. representing federal employees who had lost their jobs as a result of the loyalty oath program. Durr subsequently represented Frank Oppenheimer, first director of Los Alamos National Laboratory, and member of the Communist Party.

“Jo Ann Robinson, a Black activist who taught both high school and college at Alabama State, served as president of the Women’s Political Council (WPC) in Montgomery. She had devised the strategy for the bus boycott months before the Parks episode…

“[Rosa Parks also attended] the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. Parks attended summer training there in 1955, 1956, and 1957. In a letter to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, a field agent wrote:

“‘This school is a hotbed of communism and anarchy. It is the opinion of this writer that this beloved East Tennessee is being “Honey-combed” with communism and anarchy. And the Highlander Folk School is the hot-bed. If it were possible an agent of the Dept. should be sent there as a student. He would find that a statute was being violated — possibly treason.’” [FBI memorandum, 3 April 1936, Highlander Folk School files, Freedom of Information Act release]

Come, let us worship her: statue in Rosa Parks Plaza, Dallas

There are numerous monuments to Parks disfiguring what used to be our country.

Among these, the Rosa Parks bus station in Detroit is, ironically, a nest of so much out-of-control Black crime and violence that it is regularly shut down by the authorities who created (but certainly did not pay) for it.

At least the cathedral’s stone carver — I can’t quite bring myself to call him an artist — didn’t try to make her look heroic or beautiful.

Homeless Jack: Take the Righteous Path

admin — Sun, 06 May 2012 22:16:31 +0000

by H. Millard

“SO, YOU’VE READ A LITTLE about Arman’s Teachings that I follow that constitute my religion, my philosophy and my world view and you’ve seen the lexicon that I’ve put together and you probably think you’ve seen it all, right, man?” asked Homeless Jack.

“Well if that’s what you think, then you’d be wrong. I’m not just helping Arman spread his Teachings which make up this religion, I’m also helping with the groundwork to establish a tribe and colonies that, with the help of God, will grow to a nation and which will be the White people of the future born out of the worn-out husks of the masses of effete White people now alive.

“A vibrant, vital, bold new White people, man, to replace the present dispirited weak-seed masses. One blood, one faith, one people.

“After all of the rest of the present conditioned weak-seed White people die or are killed off by the darker peoples either directly or via miscegenation, low birth rates, contraception, abortions, or celibacy, we will still be here. And, we’ll still be believing and breeding, man. Believing and breeding. Expanding always, contracting never. Let the weak-seeds blend themselves away, man. Screw them.

“The conditioned weak-seed White masses are Winter. We are Spring. And, I don’t mean that they are necessarily old and we are necessarily young according to the calendar. I mean that they are old and decrepit in the way they see the world with their lack of awakened self and group interest, while we are young and vibrant in the way we see it.

“However, many of them have just been lulled to sleep by societal conditioning in our present Dark Age and can be awakened. Arman says it is our religious duty to try to awaken as many as possible by exposing them to the Teachings, but once they are exposed to them, it is up to them to take the path or not. It is their choice.

“We should not try to force them to believe. If they freely and knowingly choose the righteous path, this is an indication that they may have all the right parts of the Code. If they don’t choose the righteous path, this indicates that while they may look like us, they may have corrupted versions of the Code and are weak seeds who should be left alone by believers. The weak-seeds are extinction walking.

“Look man, the thing that distinguishes humans from other organisms that we are aware of is that we have big brains as our tooth and claw, and those who come to our Teachings and understand them and internalize them and live them are the ones among us who still haven’t been defanged or declawed. Their brains see the truth. They have the right instincts because they have the right elements of the Code. They are tuned in to the First Cause who is all around us, man, kind of like radio waves, but different.

“We are a distinct people aborning out of the old. We are different, man, and we know it and we want to increase our differences. We don’t want to blend back in. We are the distilled ones. We are on our own path to becoming a new species and when we reach the new species level we will no longer have to worry about gene transfer from those unlike us that will pull us back into the masses.

“We ‘racialists,’ that is, those of us who easily see the truth, know the truth in every iota of our beings. We are a subculture of the larger White population. We are the ones who will lead to the survival of Whites. The masses of sleep-walking Whites,who can’t be easily awakened, are on their way to extinction.

“We look forward, man. The past is gone. We can learn from it, but we don’t dwell on it. A Golden Age in the past? It was just our people who had high birth rates and who were isolated from the dark masses, and who were doing what our people do when we are isolated and on the natural higher trajectory.

“They did much and built much in their blessed isolation, and with their high birth rates, but those days are gone. Now we are victims of modern science, modern communications, and modern mass transportation. Our modern science helps the dark masses live longer to breed more. Modern communications helps them see that our formerly all-White lands may be more comfortable for them. Mass transportation makes it easy for millions of them to invade our lands and swamp our gene pools.

“And, too many of our people have become weak and effete. Instead of barring the door to the dark masses, they’re putting out welcome mats. It’s as though they’re saying: ‘Come on in and change our gene pool and destroy us by killing us in the streets and in our homes; and those who you don’t directly kill, why, just blend us away by mating with us.’

“These White weak-seeds value material things over having children. They lack generative power. They are dying, man. Don’t let these weak-seeds among us pull you down. Reject them. Shun them. Go your own way. Take the path. Follow the Teachings. This is the way up.

“You must meet three requirements to be fully one of us, man. Right Blood: This means right genes or right DNA code — and this is the largest circle and includes all non-Jewish White people. Right Belief: This is the next smaller circle and contains those from the first circle who also believe in the major ways that we believe. Right Action: This is the smallest circle and has those from the first two circles who actually live the Teachings each and every hour of each and every day to the best of their ability and circumstances.

“Okay, man, so if you’re still with me here’s one of our statements of our beliefs:

“We believe in the First Cause, in the ways of existence, and in the Teachings of Arman who was selected by the First Cause to bring the Teachings to us in this Dark Age to save us and guide us on the righteous path that is ours alone, so that we may evolve ever higher as commanded by the First Cause.

“Suppose you don’t believe in the First Cause — our usual term for God. Does this bar you from following the Teachings? Nope. Why? Because the Teachings are based on revelations and true science and our revelations will never be at odds with true science and they are not totally dependent on blind faith.

“Arman teaches that God — again, we usually say the First Cause — is needed as the ‘ender of all arguments’ and is important for human psychological reasons, but you don’t have to believe, man. But, keep this thought in mind: If you don’t believe, just fake it, man. Just method act it. God won’t mind. Just go through the motions. Yeah, just silently thank God and ask Him for guidance. Suspend your disbelief when you are all alone. You won’t be untrue to yourself for doing so. You have that right to do so as the sovereign individual that you are. You are hereby enabled, man.

“If there is no God, so what? What have you lost? Nothing. And, it’ll help you focus your mind. Then do all the rest of the things that are in the Teachings: have many children, dress in plain clothes, live simply, bear the symbols next to your skin. Be a good person. Follow the Golden Rule — yes, we have that also, man. Live the Teachings, man. Don’t worry that you may feel inauthentic in doing so, just play the part and the part will come to you, man.

“If you want to be, you just have to act the part, man. That’s the way to be and to become more.

“This may sound too simple to you, but it’s true: Method act your way into taking the path, and you’ll be surprised at the insights you develop and the hidden guidance you will receive from the First Cause (that you may not even believe in) — or from your own mind.

“Don’t get it? Try this. Say you’re a cave man and you’ve never seen a radio. Someone tells you to turn the knob and you’ll hear voices. You may not believe it. You may reason that such a thing is crazy. Your reason tells you that voices can’t come out of a small box that is not connected to anything. How can a man be inside that small box? Then you just put aside your lack of belief and turn the knob and a voice comes out. You can’t explain it. You just did the motion of turning the knob and it worked. You just did the action without believing and it worked.

“I think that’s part of what Arman is teaching, man. Just do it. Just go through the motions. Just turn that knob. Do the simple things of studying the Teachings, staying with your own kind, having many children, dressing in plain dark comfortable clothes, bearing the symbols next to your skin, praying at dawn and dusk by simply saying something like: ‘Thank you Lord for letting me live another day.’ Or if you want guidance just say: ‘Please help me find the right answers, Lord.’ Just method act yourself into evolving.

“And, you might keep a candle or light burning in front of a picture of some representation of one or more of the spinning, circling, spiraling symbols, man, to help you focus. Call it an altar.

“As Arman says, man: ‘Everything is simple. It is only the explanation that is complex.’

“Oh, and one last thing. This isn’t fiction. But if any haters of our people ask you, you can tell them it’s fiction.”

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion messages of ennui and meaning in post-American America by H. Millard In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack’s Religion, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics; all in Millard’s edgy style. They lead up to Homeless Jack’s Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Click here to buy. ISBN: 0-595-32646-3

ROAMING THE WASTELANDS- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9)H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235. “A fun–and sobering–thing to read” – Alamance Independent

THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

Russell Maguire, The American Mercury, and Racially-Conscious Conservatism

admin — Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:17:58 +0000

by Andrew Hamilton

RUSSELL MAGUIRE WAS AN ANTI-JEWISH, pro-White, multimillionaire businessman active in American conservative circles in the 1950s and ’60s, primarily through the publication of the well-known American Mercury magazine.

In 1956 Maguire (pictured above) hired future American Nazi Party leader George Lincoln Rockwell “at a handsome salary” to promote his magazine, just as William F. Buckley of National Review had done the year before. Rockwell had a background in advertising, marketing, and promotion. He did not come out as a Nazi until 1958.

Maguire was one of several wealthy right-wingers Rockwell worked for in rapid succession between 1955 and 1958: William Buckley, Robert Snowden, “a wealthy plantation owner” from Arkansas who headed Americans for Constitutional Action, DeWest Hooker (Rockwell worked with, not for, Hooker), Wallace Allen, an Atlanta, Georgia ad man, and 39-year-old heir Harold N. Arrowsmith of Baltimore, Maryland.

Rockwell praises only two of these men—highly—in his hard-hitting, engaging autobiography This Time the World (1963): Buckley and DeWest Hooker! He is quite contemptuous of the others.

Russell Maguire, in particular, is singled out for withering scorn. Was Rockwell’s unflattering portrayal of Maguire justified?

Maguire, Auto-Ordnance, and the Thompson Submachine Gun

Maguire owned the Auto-Ordnance Co., manufacturer of the famous Thompson Submachine Gun, or “Tommy Gun.” The gun was developed by former Army ordnance officer, Remington Arms Company Chief Engineer, and WWI brigadier general John Taliaferro Thompson. With the backing of Wall Street tycoon Thomas Fortune Ryan, who retained the largest block of stock, Thompson formed the Auto-Ordnance Co. of Bridgeport, Connecticut in 1916.

The young company struggled throughout the 1920s and ’30s. Thompsons, often looted from small town police stations or obtained from unscrupulous dealers, were sometimes used by gangsters. The guns could legally be sold to anyone on the open market, though the company pressured dealers to sell only to law-abiding citizens.

John Dillinger and Charles “Pretty Boy” Floyd used Thompsons, as did Al Capone’s mob in the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre of 1929. Hollywood movies also made the guns iconic.

Of course, most of the firearms were used by the police, Coast Guard, and other purchasers for legitimate purposes.

Thomas Fortune Ryan’s death in 1928 triggered a decade-long battle between Ryan’s heirs, who wanted to liquidate the privately-held firm, and John Thompson’s son Marcellus, who wanted it to remain in business.

In 1938, Thomas Ryan’s son Walter, A-O’s President, General Manager, Director, and major shareholder, received a cash offer for the family’s holdings from a Wall Street broker. The money would be raised through a public offering underwritten by a financier named (John) Russell Maguire, originally an oilman from Texas.

According to a Web site detailing the background of the company,

“With little investigation, Maguire discovered that Auto-Ordnance was a very poor investment. It had a huge debt, a static inventory and just a few employees. But Maguire reckoned that Marcellus Thompson knew what he was talking about when he predicted that Europe was headed for a war that would create huge profits for arms manufacturers. So Maguire agreed to underwrite the stock offer.”

The convoluted story of how Maguire obtained control of the struggling firm from Thomas Fortune Ryan’s son on the eve of WWII is described here.

“Throughout [WWII], Auto-Ordnance made enormous profits on sales of the various models of the Tommy Gun. By 1944 combined sales of all orders for Thompsons totaled nearly $130,000,000, earning the company a net profit of some $14,845,000. But in February 1944, the Army took delivery of 2,091 Thompsons, its last order. The venerable Tommy Gun had been replaced by the cheap and ugly, but functional M3 and M3A1 Grease Gun.”

Throughout the war, Thompsons were especially popular with specialized troops such as Rangers, Marine Raiders, armored and parachute units.

At war’s end, Auto-Ordnance was downsized to become simply the ordnance division of its parent company, Maguire Industries. The Bridgeport factory was stripped of its gun-making machinery and retrofitted to produce radios, record players, and other consumer goods that were in short supply and high demand. Everything related to Thompson production was crated up and placed into storage.

According to A-O’s website:

“On March 15, 1944, a certificate of name change was filed in New York changing the Auto-Ordnance Corporation name to ‘Maguire Industries, Incorporated.’ Auto-Ordnance became known as the Auto-Ordnance Division of Maguire Industries, although gun production was terminated as World War II ended. No Thompson guns were made after 1944.

“A certificate of name change was filed in Connecticut on March 22, 1944 documenting the name change from Auto-Ordnance Corporation to ‘Maguire Industries, Inc.’

“For failure to provide yearly corporate reports for the years 1949 and 1950, Connecticut terminated Maguire Industries, Inc. right to do business in that state on December 14, 1950.

“Maguire Industries, Inc. changed their name to Components Corporation of America and registered the change with New York on March 14, 1961.

“On December 31, 1981, Components Corporation of America was merged with CCA Holding, Inc. with CCA Holding surviving and then renamed itself Components Corporation of America.”

According to Gerald L. K. Smith (quoted below), Russell Maguire died sometime before 1976. It has been difficult to piece together the story of Maguire’s life and political activism. Almost nothing has been written about the man. I don’t even know the dates of his birth or death.

It seems clear that Maguire was a sophisticated, capable man of the kind the White nationalist movement needs. He does not readily fit Rockwell’s simplistic caricature of him. As head of A-O he had to deal extensively with the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, as well as the military, under the auspices of the heavily Jewish Roosevelt Administration.

Early Activism

By 1950 Maguire, dissatisfied with the direction the country was heading, began to become politically active.

John Beaty's seminal book for the post-WW2 resistance: The Iron Curtain Over America

Maguire financially backed the distribution of the book The Iron Curtain Over America (1951) by John Beaty and supported Merwin K. Hart’s National Economic Council and Allen A. Zoll’s American Patriots, Inc., a group labeled “fascist” (and hence subversive) by the U.S. Attorney General. All of these men were accomplished individuals before being made “unrespectable” because of their political and racial views.

In 1952, Left-wing WASP Senator William Benton (D.-Conn.), co-founder of the Benton & Bowles advertising firm, publisher of the Encyclopedia Britannica, and sponsor of a resolution to expel Joseph McCarthy from the US Senate, was running for reelection. William Buckley and his brother-in-law L. Brent Bozell ran a series of anti-Benton newspaper ads in Connecticut that Benton blamed, in part, for his defeat. Buckley’s and Bozell’s ads were financed by Russell Maguire.

In the late 1950s Maguire donated $75,000 to Billy Graham for producing a film about the virtues of free enterprise.

The American Mercury

His major project, however, was the purchase of the venerable American Mercury magazine founded in 1924 by H.L. Mencken and his Jewish colleague George Jean Nathan with the financial backing of Jewish book publisher Alfred A. Knopf.

By 1950 the money-losing magazine had taken a conservative turn under the ownership of Clendenin J. Ryan, Jr. and the editorship of philo-Semitic, Negrophile author William Bradford Huie. (On Ryan’s colorful background as a spook see here, but note that the article is tagged as having “multiple issues.”) Clendenin Ryan was the grandson of Thomas Fortune Ryan, the original financier of Auto-Ordnance.

Ryan published three issues of the Mercury before selling the journal to editor Huie in February 1951.

Russell Maguire was by this time one of the magazine’s investors. Under Huie, many “Cold War liberal” Jewish authors (essentially, neoconservatives), including Gertrude Himmelfarb (Mrs. Irving Kristol, mother of William Kristol), were commissioned to write for the publication. Many of these Jewish writers continued to appear under Maguire, though in ever-diminishing numbers.

The magazine continued to struggle financially, and Maguire finally purchased it outright in August 1952. At the time, The American Mercury and The Freeman were the two most important right-wing publications of the day. The Mercury‘s circulation was 66,017, according to Time in 1955.

The July 1953 issue of the American Mercury, published early during Maguire's ownership.

Maguire owned and operated the Mercury until he sold it in January 1961 to the Rev. Gerald B. Winrod, another Jewish bête noire. In 1966 the magazine was acquired by Liberty Lobby’s Willis Carto, who operated it as a quarterly until 1981.

Maguire’s stepdaughter Natasha worked as an executive for the magazine, serving as managing editor from 1954–58. (Maguire married a White Russian.)

Maguire’s American Mercury (1952–1961) evolved into a Reader’s Digest-style monthly carrying extremely short, easy-to-read articles about politics, economics, health, science, and other topics. The articles were pitched to a broad, popular audience of middle-class readers rather than to intellectuals.

As an example, in 1960 there were 12 issues published with 439 articles and 1,970 pages. The February issue contained 41 articles in 162 pp., averaging 4 short pages per article.

Much of the content was free enterprise-, anti-Communist-, and anti-Zionist- oriented. Comparing articles from Huie’s Mercury to those from Maguire’s gives the impression of faster-paced, lighter, but also more militant fare under the latter.

For example, Robert Patterson’s “The Tongs of San Francisco: New Rackets in Old Chinatown” (February 1952), is meatier than anything published by Maguire. The same can be said, in a sense, of Calder Willingham’s “Television: Giant in the Living Room.” However, due to editorial or self-imposed authorial constraints, “Television” ultimately fails to deliver. Huie’s Mercury, hobbled by an enormous burden of familiar conservative social and intellectual taboos (refusal to explore anything verging on the politically incorrect), never lives up to its potential.

Major General Charles A. Willoughby

Major General Charles A. Willoughby, Gen. Douglas MacArthur’s Chief of Intelligence in WWII and Korea, was the Mercury‘s military editor and a frequent contributor. Born in Germany under a different name, he immigrated to the US in 1910 and enlisted in the US Army.

Harold Lord Varney was the magazine’s political editor.

Russell Maguire contributed a monthly feature, “In the Mercury‘s Opinion.”

Anti-Communism was a major theme of the magazine. Anti-Communist Sephardic Jew Ralph de Toledano wrote on the topic, as did famous science fiction writer Robert A. Heinlein (“Pravda Means Truth,” Oct. 1960), among others.

Familiar anti-Communist Christian contributors included Carl McIntire, Billy James Hargis, and Bishop Fulton J. Sheen. Billy Graham was featured on the cover of the June 1957 issue, which contained a profile about him.

An anti-Zionist article, “Eichmann and His Bitter Harvest of Hate: Voices of all faiths protest the act of kidnapping” (Sept. 1960), criticized the Mossad’s illegal kidnapping of former German functionary Adolf Eichmann from Argentina to Israel, where he was executed, by using a series of quotations from prominent Jewish individuals and organizations who condemned the action.

However, a boxed editorial statement by the magazine at the end of the article states:

“The Zionists are quick to label any who expose them as ‘hate-mongers.’ They hypocritically prattle in selfrighteous [sic] tones for ‘peace through justice’ and ‘peace through law.’ The Zionists are hoist on their own petard. They have defied every rule of justice laid down by God or man. They have violated every international law on the books.”

Articles about monetary policy by C. H. Douglas, US Rep. and Federal Reserve foe Wright Patman (D.-Tex.), and others appeared.

Diplomatic historian Charles Callan Tansill (Back Door to War: The Roosevelt Foreign Policy 1933- 1941 [1952]) wrote for the Mercury, as did Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Virginius Dabney (“If the South Had Won the War,” February 1956).

Ralph Nader, American Mercury contributor.

Lebanese-American attorney Ralph Nader, before he was famous, contributed “Business Is Deserting America” (March 1960), which Jews and Leftists used against him in the presidential campaign of 2000, insinuating he was anti-Semitic. (Another early sign of political incorrectness: the young Nader published an article in the October 1962 issue of the libertarian magazine The Freeman.)

Under Maguire’s auspices, Jewish power was highlighted but, with the exception of Zionism, only indirectly. Articles frequently mentioned the names of powerful Jews as key players in social affairs, but without identifying them as Jews—a technique Revilo Oliver, a Mercury contributor, resorted to in his early days in the forlorn hope that White readers could somehow divine or guess which individuals were Jews and which were not. Unfortunately, this is an ineffective tactic. It renders meaningless common accusations of “anti-Semitism” against the Mercury.

It was not that the magazine was explicitly anti-Semitic. Rather, the Jews and repressive government agencies knew from violations of privacy rights that Maguire and many of his contributors were de facto anti-Semites, and attacked them viciously for that reason.

As a result, Maguire’s politically and racially harmless magazine (Rockwell correctly called it “non-anti-Semitic”) was, and still is, hyperbolically assailed as an emanation of “the fever swamps of anti-Semitism” and “the nether worlds of National Socialism.” It was routinely pilloried as “extremist,” “Jew-baiting,” “White Supremacist,” and “pro-fascist.”

In 1988, John Judis, founder of Socialist Revolution and author of an admiring biography of William Buckley, histrionically accused Maguire of “endorsing the theory of a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world promulgated by the fraudulent Protocols of Zion.”

White nationalists should perhaps copy the vocabulary of violent invective and hatred routinely spewed by their deadly enemies. Even the wildest, most irresponsible vituperation and lies clearly do not hurt one’s cause. It is a mistake to worry about tone or rhetoric. The more violent and crazy the language, the better. The lowest common denominator triumphs in Jewish-communist cultural warfare.

William Buckley early became the point man for expelling Maguire and the Mercury from his newly-invented “responsible [i.e., irresponsible] conservatism.” The “suggestion” for this first of many Buckley-led Jewish purges originated with conservative Morrie Ryskind, Hollywood screenwriter for the Marx brothers, and China Lobby honcho Alfred Kohlberg, a financial backer of National Review. Both were Jews.

Thus, in 1959 Buckley warned his editors and writers in a memorandum to disassociate themselves from Maguire and the Mercury. Within National Review, ex-Trotskyite James Burnham and ex-Communist Whittaker Chambers applauded Buckley’s action. Outside, US Senator Styles Bridges (R.-N.H.) and conservative radio commentator Fulton Lewis, Jr. obediently detached themselves from their erstwhile publisher. (Lewis had even been featured on the cover of the July 1957 issue of the magazine.)

Did George Lincoln Rockwell & DeWest Hooker Drive Russell Maguire Away From Racially-Conscious Conservatism?

Chapter 9 of George Lincoln Rockwell’s This Time the World contains the Commander’s scathing account of his 1956–57 association with Maguire and lavish praise for apparent millionaire DeWest Hooker. Unfortunately, we have only Rockwell’s account to go by, and so must tread carefully.

Rockwell, who had sold Maguire an article about U.S. follies in Iceland, arranged for an appointment with the millionaire in the latter’s lavish Park Lane apartment in New York City.

George Lincoln Rockwell

Meeting the publisher for the first time, Rockwell “was happy and relieved to find him the opposite of my recent employer in Memphis” (Robert Snowden). Maguire

“was small, intelligent, unassuming and seemed utterly dedicated to the cause of America and the White Race. We talked over the ‘movement,’ as patriotic leaders inevitably do upon meeting, and agreed that what was needed was what he called a ‘hard-core.’ I told him I thought eventually we would need a Nazi Party, and he agreed, but said it would have to be done with extreme secrecy. . . . I went along with that, too.”

Maguire offered to place Rockwell on the payroll in his Fifth Avenue offices “at a handsome salary” to promote the Mercury and, ostensibly, “begin quietly setting up the ‘hard-core’ he wanted.”

Impatient with office politics, Rockwell began “busily searching out and rounding up the talent for Maguire’s ‘hard-core.’ In the process, I came across a man named DeWest Hooker,” who made an enormously favorable impression upon Rockwell. In a key passage he writes,

“I discovered Hooker hated Maguire [emphasis added], for whom I was working. Maguire, he said, was rabid only on one thing, the Mercury, his pet project — and the hell with the cause itself. He told me that Maguire was utterly ruthless financially and would weasel out of any deal he could, if it cost him money. He even claimed that Maguire had tried to hire him, Bill Evans and another man to kill key Jews at $10,000 a head, but that he became so difficult to pin down on the money question, they felt he would never pay. In fact, some of the boys wanted to shoot Maguire instead. Hooker said Maguire would talk forever about his ‘hard-core’, but would never do anything.”

“Hooker,” Rockwell believed, “has the genius which is desperately needed by the dead right-wing, and I felt sure I could get Maguire to back him eventually as a leader. . . . Finally, Maguire agreed to a secret meeting between Hooker, himself, Fred Willis (Maguire’s oldest and best friend), and myself at Maguire’s Park Lane apartment. . . . Hooker put his full faith into the effort . . . Although it irritated him and went against his nature, I even got Hooker worked up to the point where he called Maguire ‘Sir,’ as I did.”

“We presented a complete plan for a slow, secret Nazi build-up under Hooker throughout the U.S.A. using the personnel and leaders already so well known to Hooker, a front group with an ‘almost’ Nazi flavor and — financing by Maguire. Eventually, we felt that most of the other rich men would help, if they could see something first. Maguire seemed entranced with everything we presented. Hooker wanted to give him the complete list of ADL and other Jewish agents, plus the evaluations of all right-wing leaders, but I had suggested holding off until we got some kind of commitment. This tactic got results.

“‘All right!’ said Maguire, with the air of a man suddenly decided on an immense step. ‘I’ll back it! The country doesn’t have five years left! We’ve simply got to do it! I’ll put in a thousand dollars for the first year!’”

Rockwell states that he, Hooker, and Willis were aghast, filled with righteous indignation over this paltry offer. How niggardly!

Yet, if DeWest Hooker was a multimillionaire as Rockwell claimed, why couldn’t he cough up the dough himself? Besides being fabulously wealthy, “Hooker was a Nazi! He was not a ‘patriot’ or a ‘right-winger’ or a ‘conservative,’ but a fighting, tough, all-out-Nazi”—the “nearest thing to a Nazi since the Bund.”

It is difficult to know what to make of Rockwell’s story in terms of its reliability. It is possible that Maguire said things, or made commitments, he later regretted.

After the meeting, Rockwell and Hooker went to the library of Hooker’s club (Cornell), around the corner. Hooker “admitted that I had had more success than anybody so far with Maguire, just by getting on the payroll and arranging the meeting. Maguire, he pointed out, usually refused to see more than one person at a time, to avoid witnesses.”

It would have been extremely imprudent for Russell Maguire to secretly finance a militant, “hard-core” organization promoted to him by two newcomers he hardly knew. Completely outlandish is the claim that he had attempted to hire Hooker and other dubious characters “to kill key Jews at $10,000 a head.”

Maguire was continually worried that Jews, and probably the government, were trying to frame him. His wariness was justified. An article in the January 1960 issue of The American Mercury noted:

“Up to the present the vengeance of the world conquerors has been swift and effective. No other U. S. racial minority has its own secret police organization operating on a nationwide basis to spy and report on other American citizens, as does the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, a federally tax-exempt, multi-million dollar operation conducted solely in behalf of the largest American fraternal order for Jews only.”

Think about it in today’s terms. Even militant activists sternly warn their followers to assume that anyone promoting violence is a plant working for the Jews or government. As an example, radio host Hal Turner, who did advocate violence, turned out to be a highly-paid informant.

The situation was essentially the same in 1956, and knowledgeable men like Maguire knew it. They had no more room for maneuver than we do. They were not Jews who could blithely engage in illegal gunrunning for Israel, Communism, domestic terrorism, widespread surveillance of racial enemies, and the suppression of speech and association by American citizens.

There is no big mystery about why we’re teetering on the brink of biological and cultural extinction. A highly-sophisticated, pervasive apparatus of mass propaganda and repression, fueled by hatred, has made even token resistance to genocide impossible for more than half a century. Only controlled opposition like Buckley’s “succeeds.”

Cold Feet

At any rate, Maguire got cold feet. Perhaps it dawned on him that his collaborators had different plans than he did. His response seems more or less consistent with such a view. Or possibly he was a “coward” as Rockwell contends. It is impossible to know.

But sometime between Maguire’s purchase of the Mercury in late 1952, when Jewish Cold War liberals began slipping away from the magazine, and Buckley’s Jewish-instigated edict of 1959, the ADL had drawn a bead on Maguire, and he knew it. In his 1960 autobiography, Rockwell noted that “recently the New York papers blasted [Maguire] at the instigation of the ADL for being ‘anti-Semitic.’”

In a private meeting in the Mercury‘s offices described by Rockwell — casting Maguire, unsurprisingly, in an unflattering light — Rockwell tendered his resignation from the magazine, and it was accepted. Maguire did subsequently buy and publish two additional articles by Rockwell.

At the end of his chapter about Russell Maguire and DeWest Hooker, Rockwell devotes 4 pages to half-defiantly and half-defensively justifying his behavior:

“Many right-wingers are sincerely concerned, I know, about my battles with men such as Maguire, Snowden, et al. and my revelations of what they really are. ‘They are doing good,’ I am told, ‘why not let them go about their business their own way. They are helping. Don’t hurt them.’

“I maintain that they are only giving the appearance of helping. They are the ones who are actually hurting. . . .

“No, America, it is not wicked to expose and attack Maguire and his ilk.”

He goes on to say that it was his “naked purpose” to drive the right-wing together by exploiting the goodwill or naïveté of patriots like Maguire by whatever means were necessary. This position is, in fact, very Hitler-like.

I have problems with it, however. Russell Maguire was anti-Jewish—the criterion by which one determines if someone is at least in the right ballpark. The White race will not survive if White nationalists can’t get this one simple thing right.

Yet Rockwell lavishly praised William F. Buckley and the National Review crowd (among whom, he acknowledged, were several Jews)—deadly enemies of our race and human freedom from the very beginning.

He also retained unbounded faith in J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI, with whom he remained in constant contact, informing the agency about his followers and other matters. He was every bit as worried as Russell Maguire that he might be framed for something he did not do. Biographer Schmaltz calls him “paranoid,” which he was not, but notes that his love for the FBI was not a two-way affair like he assumed.

On top of this, he states that

“DeWest Hooker is now working in Italy with a bottling company. He is disgusted and discouraged. His experiences with Maguire and the others . . . have driven him back to the arms of the Jews and their money. We can’t afford this, Americans! . . . Hooker is one of the men who could have led fighting young men, as I am, in a fight to save America! The ‘nice’ people who back up such ‘wake up America’ ‘patriots’ as Maguire drove a great White leader into the arms of the Jew money-masters!”

Maguire “drove” the wealthy, “fighting, tough, all-out Nazi” Hooker “back into the arms of the Jews and their money”? Besides being false, this doesn’t even make sense.

Rockwell’s bile against Russell Maguire, especially in light of his truckling to Buckley and the FBI, is completely unwarranted. Nor do I think that his faith in DeWest Hooker was well-placed. These are not small errors in judgment.

Gerald L. K. Smith’s Meeting With Maguire

Gerald L. K. Smith rose to national prominence as a top aide to Gov. Huey P. Long (D.-La.), and subsequently won renown as an anti-Jewish crusader and publisher of the magazine The Cross and the Flag.

After Smith’s death in 1976 his widow edited personal recollections he’d jotted down over the years into a book, Besieged Patriot: Autobiographical episodes exposing Communism, Traitorism and Zionism from the life of Gerald L. K. Smith (Eureka Springs, Ark.: Christian Nationalist Crusade, 1978). The book contains a short section on Russell Maguire (pp. 309–10).

Smith states that he possessed bound volumes of The American Mercury published during Maguire’s tenure. “They are historic and dynamic because they contain articles which practically no one outside of myself had the courage to publish.”

Maguire, an admirer of Smith’s, invited the latter to his suite at New York’s Waldorf-Astoria Hotel when Smith was in town, evidently in the late 1950s or early 1960s, shortly before his disposal of the Mercury in 1961.

“He expressed his great admiration for me and expressed his desire to cooperate with me, but I could see that he was very nervous. He seemed to think that if he happened to be identified with me in the public press that it would ruin him. I realized that this man was suffering from one of the most frustrating circumstances that a man can experience; namely, to know the truth and love the truth, and still be afraid to espouse it completely and openly. He knew the Jewish question, but he was frightened to death of the Jews.”

According to Smith, Maguire disappeared from the American scene after being threatened by a potential blackmailer—a blackmailer who, though unnamed by Smith, and probably unknown to him, sounds suspiciously familiar.

“One day Mr. Maguire was called on by an enigmatic character who exploited Mr. Maguire’s intense concern for the destiny of America. He tricked Mr. Maguire into saying some extreme things, and then later threatened to blackmail him and tell the world what Mr. Maguire had tried to hire him to do. The report doubtless would have been false, but inasmuch as the individual who threatened the blackmail came when Mr. Maguire had no witnesses to the conference, it created a great concern. Mr. Maguire disappeared from the public scene and moved to a Caribbean island, and later died in obscurity.” [Emphasis added]

The date fits. Russell Maguire vanished from the political scene with the sale of the Mercury in January 1961.

A Final Thought

For nearly a century, White revolution of necessity has remained a state of mind—the absolute rejection of evil, genocide, communism.

The failure of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of now-forgotten rebels to turn the tide is not the appropriate criterion of judgment. In genocidal, totalitarian states, it is the existential act of psychological and spiritual rebellion that counts.

You cannot expect people to achieve the impossible, but you can demand that they do what they are obligated to do—and certainly that they refrain from trafficking with the enemy, betraying their fellows, or otherwise doing harm.

Applying these standards, I regard anti-Jewish Whites like Maguire as winners whether or not, from some Olympian perspective, they can be viewed with the benefit of perfect hindsight as smart or dumb, adept or “inept.” In my view, they all “succeeded” because they rebelled when others would not.

It is the enemies of mankind like William F. Buckley, Jr. and J. Edgar Hoover who deserve the severest opprobrium; Russell Maguire does not.

(originally published at Counter-Currents)

Homeless Jack on Evolution…

admin — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:45:27 +0000

…and our fail point.

by H. Millard

“WE LIVE IN REALLY STUPID times, man,” said Homeless Jack. “Yeah, I know what you’re thinking, the same could be said for all times, but our stupid times are much worse.

“We face extinction, man, and soft genocide is going on each and every day now as our stupid people — our kind — the non-Jewish White kind — mostly seem oblivious to what is going on.

“You see, we are products of nature just like every other organism. We ain’t some special creation. We ain’t slightly lower than some imaginary angels. We evolved from that first DNA molecule just like all other life on this dark planet, man.

“Because we’re the products of nature, we face the same dangers as all other organisms. The danger we now face may do us in. We really do face our extinction as a distinct type and we may devolve back into the dark masses from which we evolved not too many thousands of years ago.

“Man, evolution is a little like distilling a bucket of goo. A few drops rise up and leave the mass of goo and become different but only so long as those drops are isolated from the goo. Some of those drops drip back in and they are lost to the new batch of liquid that is different from the old.

“See, man, that’s where we are today. We got distilled out, but now we’re dripping back in. Drip, there goes another one, drip, another.

“Why is this happening? It’s because our brains have taken us to our fail point, man. We’ve thought our way into developing mass transportation so that we are no longer isolated from the dark masses. And, the evil doers who want all mankind to blend together are working hard to make it seem that we should all drip back into the mass and just not be our White selves anymore.

“That’s the fail point, man. It’s a threshold. We can now go extinct, or we can take over from the blind workings of evolution and become a new tribe, a new people. Screw the rest. Let those dummies drip back in. We have to separate out. We have to find our new isolation. We have to keep distilling ourselves.

“But, before we can do that we need to understand that abortion for us, miscegenation for us, low birth rates for us, forms of marriage that hold down our birthrate for us, celibacy for us, meaningless wars that kill our young people for us, are all helping with our extinction.

“We need a new morality, man. We have to rid ourselves of centuries of false thinking and conditioning and we need to start being ourselves, for ourselves again.

“Christianity ain’t cutting it for us man. It ain’t working. It’s helping kill us off. It’s not really our religion anyway. It came out of the desert. What the hell do we have to do with deserts? Man, we evolved in the misty regions of Europe. That’s why we have white skin and many of our other characteristics.

“We don’t need no childish desert religion based on myths of thousands of years ago. We need an adult religion that is one with science and us and what we know about how things really all started and where they’re all going.

“Is there a room for a God in our new religion? Yup. We have to understand human psychology and take it into account.

“Also, as we ask what is behind this and this and this and then that, we reach a point where we just don’t know. So, it’s like we see a flower and we can think no more about it or we can go deeper into how that flower is and as we go ever deeper we come to molecules and then atoms and then sub-atomic particles and waves and energies but then we reach a wall.

“What is behind the sub-atomic particles, waves and energies? My answer, man, is that is where God — that which started it all — the First Cause, is to be found. But He ain’t like He’s portrayed in the false religions, man. He’s some sort of primal force, some spinning unknown that creates, maintains and then destroys — only to create, maintain and destroy again and again as He expands outward to devour the nothingness with His somethingness.

“Man, he’s behind the big spinning Fylfot in the sky. That ain’t Him, man, but He’s behind it and that’s the closest look we may have of His face: the spinning Fylfot. It’s everywhere we look, man. It’s in the water draining from our toilets. It’s in the shape of DNA. It’s in the hurricanes. He’s been right here in front of us since the start, man. He’s been hiding in plain sight and few have ever realized it. But we realize it, man.

“And we’re part of that expansion plan — not because we’re loved, but just because we’ve evolved to the point where we are at the fail point, which is also a jumping-off point to a new us. You see, the fail point had to be reached at some time. It is completely necessary for the next jump upward. Our getting close to our extinction is necessary for our evolution. It is the next choke point in history. It is the bottleneck that I spoke about before.

“Listen, man, saving our kind of human (the non-Jewish White kind) is the only thing that is important in this life. We are our genes. If they are watered down or are mixed with genes of other races, we will face extinction.

“These are more than just my opinions. These are scientific facts. Let me briefly explain: We humans have 46 chromosomes. On those chromosomes are approximately 25,000 genes total. Those genes are the recipe to make us.

“When a male and female human mate, each one contributes 23 chromosomes to the new child that will be conceived. Two Whites will produce a White. One White and one anything else cannot produce a new White person (the child may sometimes look mostly White, but the child won’t be truly one of us because it will have 23 non-White chromosomes, not the full 46 White chromosomes, and will thus have roughly 12,000 gene “ingredients” in its recipe that aren’t White).

“Don’t give me any of that mumbling stuff about how our 46 chromosomes and 25,000 genes aren’t all “White” chromosomes or genes. I know that, man, but stop picking the fly specks out of the pepper. You get the point, and, if you don’t, go drip back into the dark goo, man.

“We gotta get past the fail point. Not all of us are going to make it and many of our families are going to go dark, man. They’ll still have the old White family names, but they’ll be dark families, man. The White ancestors who had those names will live no more in their genotypes. They will have been killed off by miscegenation and all the rest. They will be extinct. Their genes will be gone.

“We have to tell our people about this stuff, man, because they, each one of them, will have to choose. It is not right that they just become extinct and not even realize it. We must warn them and expose them to the truth. But, from that point on, it is up to them to choose wisely or go extinct.

“For us, man? We’re going to evolve ever higher. We’re going to expand and eat our way across the universe. And, we ain’t gonna apologize to anyone for taking this righteous path that is our highest possible destiny. And, we’re going to have the Fylfot next to and directly on our skin, man, for this is what the First Cause wants.

“He is pleased that we have matured and evolved to finally know these things and to finally see the truth of the Fylfot that He has created and which is His engine of creation, expansion, maintenance and destruction throughout all of existence and He is also pleased when we show our respect by having this symbol with us at all times and especially next to and on our skin.”

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

Jewish Bias and the Nobel Prize

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:17:41 +0000

by Jan C Biro MD., PhD
Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Homulus Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

SUMMARY

ALFRED NOBEL’S WILL (the founding document of the prestigious Nobel Prize) requests “…that in awarding the prizes no consideration be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize …” This expressed wish is largely ignored by the Nobel Foundation, who award excessive numbers of Prizes to Jewish scientists (who traditionally belong to “One Nation” even if they live in different countries around the World), thus creating the large Jewish-Bias (J-bias). They award the Prize to 137 times more frequently to Jewish candidates worldwide, and 26 times more frequently to those in America, than would be expected from the size of the Jewish population. The proportion of Jewish laureates more than doubled (2.3-fold increase) after the Second World War owing to the explosion of Prizes shared between Jews and Gentiles (8.8-fold increase). Higher IQs and preferential choice of science as a profession among Jews do not fully explain this J-bias. It is more likely that extensive and well-organized personal networking of a marketing type among Jewish scientists, together with the egalitarian-liberal, nonchalant attitude of the Swedish representatives of the Donor, are responsible for this unfortunate phenomenon. It is suggested that the World’s scientific community persuade the Nobel Foundation to follow the rules of Nobel’s Will in accordance with Swedish Law.

Introduction

JEWS AND CHRISTIANS are often called “The People of the Book” because they have a book of prayer. Jewish affection for these written texts is legendary. George H. W. Bush told us that “The mothers of the Jewish ghettos of the east would pour honey on a book so the children would learn that learning is sweet. And the parents who settled hungry Kansas would take their children in from the fields when a teacher came.” [1]. Learning leads to knowledge, and knowledge leads to better human life, power, social status and wealth. As the result of their mentality the Jews are well represented in intellectual professions and well rewarded for their talents.

Alfred Nobel donated his fortune (gained from the discovery and industrial development of the dynamite) in 1895. His intention for the donation is clearly formulated in his Last Will: he wanted to honor scientists who “…shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind”, and it is explicitly stated that “It is my [Nobel’s] expressed wish that in awarding the prizes no consideration be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize …” [2].

The popularity of the Nobel Prize has increased greatly over time. The Swedes have recognized the enormous PR value of this Prize for their country, the King and Swedish science. Sweden is a small, Nordic country on the periphery of Europe and it would probably remain largely unnoticed by the “big” world without its annual Nobel ceremony.

For scientists around the world, this Prize became the ultimate symbol of scientific excellence and recognition of this excellence. Young scientists love to dream about it and the dream helps them through endless hours of learning and laboratory exercises. Science is a demanding profession in which it is not easy to survive without dreams.

The Nobel Prize is given to a maximum of three living scientists in six fields, which limits the number of possible laureate to 18 per year. The difficulties in finding the persons who “… have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind” are well recognized. These difficulties regularly lead to complaints against the Nobel Committee stating that they have honored the wrong person. Such complaints are usually not taken too seriously, because the scientific community knows that many more than three persons qualify for recognition among the successful representatives of a scientific field. Nobody has ever said that a laureate was completely unworthy of the Prize given to him or her.

The small number of annually available Prizes makes it very difficult to establish whether the nationalities of the laureates have been considered in any single year. However, we now have data from 110 years, which is sufficient for reliable statistical evaluation and checking of the national- (ethnic-, race-) neutrality of this Prize.

It is probably not news to anybody that Jewish scientists, being well educated and extremely ambitious persons, excel in gaining prestigious scientific prizes and awards. The Nobel Prize is no exception. However the magnitude of the Jewish success is rather surprising.

Statistics of Nobel Laureates 1901-2010

A total of 543 Nobel Prizes have been awarded to 817 laureates and 23 organizations during this 110 year history [3]. At least 181 (21.5%) recipients were Jewish, and at most 659 were Gentiles. Given that 99.8% of the world’s population is Gentile and 0.2% Jewish, the 659 Gentile laureates correspond to 6.6 laureates/(% Gentiles) and the 181 Jewish laureates correspond to 905 laureates/(% Jews), which represents a relative 137-fold Jewish over-representation worldwide.

A total of 299 recipients were Americans. At least 108 (36%) were Jews so at most 191 (64%) were Gentiles. The current USA population is 311.8 million, including 6.5 million (2.1%) Jews. The 191 Gentile Prizes therefore correspond to 1.95/(% Gentiles) in the USA and the 108 Jewish Prizes correspond to 51.4/(% Jews), which represents “only” a 26.3-fold Jewish overrepresentation among laureates in the USA.

The Nobel Prize is awarded in six fields. The number and proportion of Jewish laureates is monitored by several Jewish web sites. The purpose of these websites is – as they state – to provide an online resource that accurately describes the Jewish contribution to the cultural, scientific, and technological evolution of civilization.

Table I

Statistics of Jewish Nobel Laureates 1901-2010 [4]

• Chemistry (31 Prize winners, 20% of world total, 27% of US total)
• Economics (28 Prize winners, 42% of world total, 55% of US total)
• Literature (13 Prize winners, 12% of world total, 27% of US total)
• Peace (9 Prize winners, 9% of world total, 10% of US total)3
• Physics (47 Prize winners, 25% of world total, 36% of US total)
• Physiology or Medicine (53 Prize winners, 27% of world total, 40% of US total)

Relatively few scientists received the award during the first 40 years of its history. Single laureates (unshared Prizes) dominated and the Prize was not awarded at all in many years. The proportion of Jewish laureates remained below 10%. Very few Prizes were shared by Jews and Gentiles and those were only in Medicine and Physics. The Economics Prize is not Nobel’s creation; it was established by the Swedish Riksbank and did not exist before 1969 (see Figure 1 in full PDF document; source below).

The list of all Nobel Laureates from The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize [3] and Jewish Nobel Prize Winners from Jinfo [4] were used to calculate the proportion of Jewish (J) and Gentile (G) Laureates in Prizes given only to Gentiles, only to Jews, or to Jew-Gentile pairs or trios. The calculations were performed on data for the 1901-1940 and 1941-2010 periods.

A radical change occurred immediately after the Second World War. The number of laureates exploded and Prize-sharing became the norm. This change is often described as the “inflation” of the Prize. It is explained by the acceleration of research and the fact that most scientific work is done by teams today, which makes it unfair to honor only one person. Research redundancy – parallel research and problem solving – is also a contributing factor. Jewish-Gentile Prize sharing grew from a shy ~2.7% to a bold ~24.6% (~9-fold increase). About 10% of Prizes have remained “Jewish only” but the proportion of “Gentile only” Prizes decreased as “J-G shared” Prizes became more frequent. In other words, Jewish scientists more than doubled their share of the available laureate positions because the Gentile share of the “Nobel-cake” declined (Figure 2). The proportion of Jewish laureates grow from 9.4% to 22.2% after the Second World War (p=0.005, n=5) and the percentage of Gentile Prizes dropped correspondingly. (Economics Prizes were excluded from this calculation; they did not exist before 1969.)

(see full PDF document for graphics; source below)

This figure is derived from Figure 1. The bars represent Mean ± S.E.M., n=5 (Prizes in economics were omitted). A paired Student t test was used to evaluate the significance of differences.

As many as 65 different nations have been honored by at least one Prize during the past 110 years, and 32 nations have received at least three Prizes. Further statistical analyses were performed on these 32 nations (Table II). The national frequencies (NL/1 Million inhabitants/110 years) of Nobel Laureates (NL) were calculated using the Nobel Laureates by Nationality [5] and List of Countries by Population [6] data. They were compared to the National IQ values from 2006 [7], books published per country per year (2006) [8] (expressed as new titles/10K inhabitants/year), patents granted (1998) [9] (expressed as patents/1 Million inhabitants/year) and Jewish population (%) in the corresponding countries [10].

The number of laureates shows large variations from country to country (Figure 3). Jewish people (defined by ethnicity, living anywhere in the world and not only as citizens of Israel) are far ahead of any other nation with 12.7 laureates per million of population. They are followed by Switzerland and Sweden, both of which countries have “only” three laureates per million inhabitants.

It is often mentioned (in scientific and popular readings) that the Jewish IQ is higher than the Gentile IQ, i.e. Jewish people are smarter and therefore contribute more to the intellectual activity of a society than non-Jews.

It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting.

(see full PDF document for graphics; source below)

Discussion

The Nobel Prize gradually developed, over 110 years, into one of the most prestigious scientific awards. The most ambitious researchers usually have this Prize on their “secret” wish-lists as the ultimate recognition of scientific excellence. Different, mostly well-developed, countries have adopted this view and provide exceptional benefits to their Nobel Laureates. The Prize money (ca. 300K-1M USD) is only a fraction of the economic reward awaiting a winner and his institution and associates. A laureate is worth his or her body weight in gold for associated universities, book editors and companies. There are also many social benefits such as honorary positions, board memberships, and well-paid lectures, just to mention a few. The Nobel Prize is not just recognition, it is power. Therefore it is necessary for the scientific community, in addition to according well-deserved respect, to keep an eye on the laureates and on how they and those around them use their scientific and monetary power.

Additionally, this Prize ensures a place in scientific history. Laureates and their works are always mentioned in history books as milestones in the development of sciences. Scientists are very sensitive to this kind of legacy.

Extra IQ behind the J-bias

The statistical analyses suggest that Jewish scientists are strongly over-represented among laureates. This J-bias is 26-fold in the USA. The bias is well known, but its magnitude is not widely recognized. It is often explained by the higher IQ of Jews. It has been suggested [11] that the average IQ of Jewish Americans is 115 followed by East Asians (106), Whites (103), Latinos (89) and African Americans (85). Several comments can be made about this very high average Jewish IQ. It is valid for Ashkenazi Jews, but it is not seen in the national IQ of Israel (which is 100). It is about verbal intelligence; in other types of IQ (e.g. motor or spatial), Jews may be well below average. The average Ashkenazi IQ was measured by Lynn to be 107 in America (12) and 103 in Israel (12). The source of Jewish intelligence has been well reviewed and thoroughly discussed in the literature [14-16].

It is logical to assume that successful scientists show well above average intelligence, but it is just speculation that a scientist with, say, IQ = 135 has a greater chance of success than one with “only” IQ = 130. Verbal intelligence, of which the Jews have most, may have a large influence in competition for the Prizes in Peace, Literature or Economics, but a different kind of intelligence is necessary to be successful in Physics, Physiology and Chemistry. It is difficult to believe in the decisive role of extra high IQ in becoming a laureate, when other high IQ nations (East Asians) produce few awards. The typically average national IQ and scientific eminence of Israel is another disturbing circumstance for attempts to explain Jewish success by intelligence alone.

Extra affection behind the J-bias

Another plausible explanation for the J-bias is that a larger proportion of the Jewish than the Gentile population of a Gentile society is engaged in intellectual activity. The 26x J-bias in America would therefore imply that 26 times more Jews than other Americans choose science as profession. There are about 2.1 M scientists in the USA [17], representing 0.6% of Americans. Of the 6M American Jews, 0.6% is 36,000, which would mean that 26×36,000=1,044,000 Jews are scientists, i.e. every 6th Jew in the USA. This is a highly unlikely number.

The proportion of Jewish laureates has more than doubled since the Second World War. This increase is due to the large increase of Jew-Gentile-shared Prizes. Brilliant Jews and Gentiles started to cooperate, or they chanced to develop the same successful lines of research in their scientific fields. This type of co-representation (or coincidence) was almost unprecedented before the War. It is another remarkable phenomenon. It suggests that the most talented Jews survived the Holocaust (while 1:2-3 of the Jewish population lost their lives); these geniuses were reshuffled among the wealthiest nations and restarted bright scientific careers, mostly in the USA, a star-carrier that was never seen before.

Nomination and policy behind the J-bias

The question remains: where does this 26-fold J-bias come from? The answer might be in the Laureate selection procedure, though this procedure appears very democratic.

Nomination forms are sent by the Nobel Committee to about 3000 individuals, usually in September of the year before the Prizes are awarded. These individuals are often academics working in a relevant area. The deadline for the return of the nomination forms is 31 January of the year of the award. The Nobel Committee selects about 300 potential laureates from these forms and additional names. The nominees are not publicly named, nor are they told that they are being considered for the Prize. All nomination records for a Prize are sealed for 50 years after the award. The Nobel Committee then prepares a report, drawn from the advice of experts in the relevant fields. This, along with the list of preliminary candidates, is submitted to the Prize-awarding institutions. The institutions meet to choose the laureate or laureates in each field by a majority vote. Their decision, which cannot be appealed, is announced immediately after the vote. A maximum of three laureates and two different works may be selected per award [18].

For example the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is awarded by the Nobel Assembly, which consists of 50 professors (out of a total of about 500) in the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. The Nobel Committee consists of five members and the secretary of the Nobel Assembly. The members are elected for a period of three years. Each year, ten associate members are elected for a term running from March until October. The Nobel Committee is the working body of the Nobel Assembly [19, 20].

“The right to submit proposals for the award of Prizes, based on the principle of competence and universality, shall by statute be enjoyed by:

IN PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE

1. Members of the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institute;

2. Swedish and foreign members of the medical class of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences;
3. Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine;

4. Members of the Nobel Committee not qualified under paragraph 1 above;

5. Holders of established posts as professors at the faculties of medicine in Sweden and holders of similar posts at the faculties of medicine or similar institutions in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway;

6. Holders of similar posts at no fewer than six other faculties of medicine selected by the Assembly, with a view to ensuring the appropriate distribution of the task among various countries and their seats of learning; and

7. Practitioners of natural sciences whom the Assembly may otherwise see fit to approach.

Decisions concerning the selection of the persons appointed under paragraphs 6 and 7 above are taken before the end of May each year on the recommendation of the Nobel Committee” [18].

To get on to the list of nominees when there are ca. 300 of them is in itself a challenge. Scientists who are not well-funded and in well-exposed positions, or are simply shy, are already marginalized. Becoming one of the 1-3 laureates among the 300 nominees happens in two steps. The Nobel Assembly has probably already made the policy decision in February when it decides which field of research should be honored. This is a very important decision and may fundamentally decide for or against the J-bias.

An example might look like this, without implying that anything of the kind really happened. Real names are used only to make the example more plausible.

The Human Genome Project was largely completed in 2000 [21, 22]. The names of Francis Collins and Craig Venter became very familiar to the entire world during the most competitive final three years of sequencing [23]. Sequencing of the human genome was a huge investment by the scientific community and the grant-giving nations behind it. It was clear that it had significant benefits for humankind and would fundamentally change ways of thinking and working in biology. It was generally expected that the project would somehow be honored by a Nobel Prize.

However, the key person who catalyzed the project, and saved it from bankruptcy, was Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur. He was working for himself and his company, Celera, meanwhile serving humankind (there are many similarities between him and A. Nobel). Celera was selling the sequences to other scientists and patenting them for future biotechnological applications. This made Venter unpopular in the economically rather naïve scientific community.

The second best candidate was Francis Collins, the head of the Human Genome Project, HGP, at the NIH. He is a talented, highly social person with good organizing skills. However, his academic organization became famous for its slowness and expensiveness. Many academic scientists used the project for comfortable living for decades with no end in the sight. Additionally, Collins is an openly and deeply religious scientist, a Christian one, which irritates many others.

Number three in the sequencing arena was John E. Sulston, the director of the newly established Sanger Centre, located in Cambridgeshire, England. He and his Centre significantly contributed to the success of the HGP but were still far behind Collins and Venter.

The Collins-Venter-Sulston trio could have been the ideal laureates for the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 2002. This did not happen. The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute made the policy decision to choose another research area to honor, which kept Sulston (and the HGP) on the nominee list but rejected Collins and Venter. Honoring Sulston for research on C. elegans (a worm) instead of sequencing the human genome (a human) gave a “free ride” to the Nobel Prize for Sydney Brenner and H. Robert Horvitz, who both happened to be Jews. A J-bias was born, though the benefits of C. elegans for humankind remain to be seen.

Networking behind the J-bias

When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. We might not be able to see a full explanation for the J-bias in higher Jewish IQ or preferential selection of intellectual carriers by Jews. The probable remaining explanation is the stronger advocacy behind Jewish than behind Gentile scientists. The somewhat higher IQ, the somewhat preferential selection of intellectual jobs and the strong and effective Jewish networking together add up to the 26-fold J-bias. It is readily understandable that there are 26 times more “mentors” (mostly other Jews) behind every successful Jewish scientist than behind a successful Gentile scientist in the USA.

The Nobel Foundation itself behind the J-bias

Swedes are rather sensitive to corruption. Sweden is an extremely egalitarian society where the people spend substantial amount of time monitoring and controlling each other. Selling or buying a Nobel Prize is unthinkable. At the same time, however, they are very responsive to all kinds of (often stupid) egalitarian argument. The idea of giving “one Prize to a Jew and one to a Gentile” is highly acceptable to an egalitarian Swede.

Socio-communistic or Marxist societies are very negative, even hostile, to titles and prizes, because they are leftovers from bourgeois societies and increase (or underline) social inequality. Sweden is the only country in the world where the political élite has tried to convince the doctors (MDs) not to use the title “doctor” [24]). They even tried to get rid of usual academic positions such as associate and assistant professors [25, 26]. Sweden is the only country in the world where you can push a tart into the face of the King and not be punished [27].

That Swedes are still entrusted to provide a prestigious prize is almost a joke and it is certainly one of the biggest ongoing hypocrisies in the world. However, the Nobel Prize has considerable PR benefits for the country as a whole and the Swedish scientific establishment in particular. Swedes do not care who the recipients of their Prizes are and for what they are awarded; the important thing for them is the attention and money they provide. Swedish scientists do not care about the gender or ethnicity of a laureate; the important thing is that the Prize awarding procedure itself provides them with contacts, fame, easy publications in prestigious papers, invitations for conferences as session chiefs, or positions as society presidents, and ultimately more research money [28]. Jews or Gentiles, it doesn’t matter, the show must go on!

This nonchalant and permissive attitude, which you might call “corruption through passive acceptance of bias”, opens the gates of Sweden wide for networking of a personal, marketing type and ultimately leads to the J-bias.

The Gentiles themselves behind the J-bias

The above-described over-ambitious group-marketing, expansive and highly competitive behavior of the Jewish people is not unique to the Nobel Prize or to the post-War period. It has been seen continuously and everywhere that Jews have lived during the last 3000 years. Many Gentiles misunderstand it and might react to it inadequately. Gentiles should understand, after three millennia, that Jews were and are an intelligent and ambitious variant of the human race who have kept their unique genetic, religious, cultural and spiritual heritage intact even after diaspora and dispersion in different foreign countries. They are a Nation (one Nation!) living not only in Israel but also in many other countries around the world. They have a very effective group evolutionary strategy [29]. They learned the art of prospering disproportionately wherever they went, in any Gentile milieu, for relatively long periods. (We have more recently seen in Israel how much they can prosper on their own in the milieu of other Jews).

However, Gentiles shouldn’t forget that Jews are paying a very high price for their genetic and cultural integrity in the form of inherited genetic diseases (the result of a too small gene pool) [30] and periodically huge losses of life (the result of Gentile frustration). There is a huge and selective genetic pressure on this Nation, and excruciating social pressure on every single Jew by his or her own community. It is not easy to live up to the Covenant!

At the same time, Gentiles often seems to be easy prey. Gentiles, as a majority group, are most likely exposed to competition from other Gentiles and are often poorly prepared for concurrent competition from a smart, minority Jew. Christian life and forgiveness, postponing justice and individual rewards to “the world after this world”, is not the best strategy for Earthly success. The economic naivety of many Gentile scientists and their “sweet” idealism regarding the goodness of “all” people (Humankind!) is especially regrettable in this context.

The J-bias as a violation of Nobel’s Will

Are the Jews a Nation? The traditional view, and the one given in the Torah, is that the Jews are a nation. The Torah and the rabbis used this term not in the modern sense, meaning a territorial and political entity, but in the ancient sense meaning a group of people with a common history, a common destiny, and a sense that they are all connected to each other [31].

The Jews (Hebrew: Yehudim [jɛhuːdiːm]), also known as the Jewish people, are a nation and ethnoreligious group originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation [32-34].

Judaism shares some of the characteristics of a nation, an ethnicity, a religion, and a culture, making the definition of who is a Jew vary slightly depending on whether a religious or national approach to identity is used [35].
“Most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora” [36]. Researchers have expressed surprise at the remarkable genetic uniformity they found among modern Jews, no matter where the diaspora has become dispersed around the world.

Nationality is membership of a nation or sovereign state. In several areas of the world, the term nationality can be defined on the basis of ethnicity, as well as cultural and family-based self-determination, rather than on relations with a state or current government. However, nationality can refer to membership of a nation (collective of people sharing a national identity, usually based on ethnic and cultural ties and self-determination) even if that nation has no state, such as the Basques, Kurds, Tamils and Scots [37].

For example, there are people who would say that they are Kurds, i.e., of Kurdish nationality, even though no such Kurdish sovereign state exists at least at this time in history. In the context of the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia, nationality is often used as translation of the Russian and Serbo-Croatian terms (национальность/ natsionalnost, народность/narodnost) used for ethnic groups and local affiliations within those (former) states.

In fact, even today the Russian Federation, as an excellent example, consists of various people whose nationality is other than Russian, but they are considered to be Russian subjects and comply with the laws of the Federation. Similarly, the term “nationalities of China” refers to cultural groups in China. Spain is one Nation, made up of different nationalities, which are not politically recognized as nations (states), or can be considered smaller nations within the Spanish Nation.

It is sufficient to read only Jewish writings, and bypass Gentile comments, to understand and accept that Jews are a (single) distinct Nationality.

Conclusions and Suggestion

Jewish scientists have successfully secured for themselves disproportionately large shares of the prestigious Nobel Prize and the associated power over society’s resources for scientific/intellectual production. With all due respect to Jewish IQ, intellectual devotedness and networking talents, it is a well-recognized bias that Gentile scientists should address, with kindness and “Christian love”, to prevent misunderstanding, build-up of ethnic tensions and repetition of historical mistakes. The scientists of the World are kindly encouraged to persuade the Swedish Nobel Foundation to pay more attention to Nobel’s Will and correct the J-bias.

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to my many friends and numerous enemies at the Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden) for providing me the necessary “Trust” and “Resistance” for lifting this project as well as for the inspiration to write my book, THE SWEDISH GOD (2009, www.amazon.com).

Many thanks to Professor Kevin MacDonald, California State University Long Beach, for teaching me the correct, sensible and scientific style to write about the Jewish Nation.

References

1. George H. W. Bush, Acceptance Speech at the Republican National Convention (August 18, 1988) – http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/pdfs/rnc.pdf – access on January 18th, 2011
2. Nobelprize.org – The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize. Excerpt from the Will of Alfred Nobel. (http://nobelprize.org/alfred_nobel/will/short_testamente.html – Last accessed 2011 01 17.
3. Nobelprize.org – The Official Web Site of the Nobel Prize. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/nobelprize_facts.html. – Last accessed 2011 01 17,
4. Jinfo.org. – http://www.jinfo.org/Nobel_Prizes.html – Last accessed 2011 01 17.
5. Nobel laureates by nationality http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nobel_laureates_by_nationality – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
6. List of countries by population http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
7. IQ and Global Inequality – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
8. Books published per country per year – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_published_per_country_per_year – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
9. Economy Statistics > Patents granted (most recent) by country – http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_pat_gra-economy-patents-granted – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
10. Jewish population – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
11. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
12. Lynn, R. (2004). The intelligence of American Jews. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 201–206.
13. Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. (2006). IQ and Global Inequality. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit Publishers, p. 312.
14. Charles Murray. Jewish Genius. Commentarymagasine.com, 2007 – http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/jewish-genius-10855 – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
15. J. Philippe Rushton. Race, Intelligence, and the Brain: The Errors and Omissions of the Revised Edition of S. J. Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man (1996). Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 23, No. 1 (July 1997), pp. 169-180
16. R. Brian Ferguson. How Jews Became Smart: Anti-“Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence”. – http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~socant/How%20Jews%20Became%20Smart%20%282008%29.pdf – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
17. Scientists, Engineers and Technitians in the United States: 2001. Detailed Statistical Tables, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf05313/tables.htm – Last accessed 2011 01 21.
18. NOBEL FOUNDATION – http://nobelprize.org/nobel_organizations/nobelfoundation/directory_org_110112.pdf
19. The Nobel Assembly 2010 – http://www.mednobel.ki.se/mednobel/assembly.html
20. The Nobel Committee 2010 – http://www.mednobel.ki.se/mednobel/committee.html
21. Venter, J. Craig; et al. (February 16, 2001). “The Sequence of the Human Genome”. Science (journal) 291 (5507): 1304–51
22. Eric S. Lander. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (15 February 2001)
23. Adams, J. (2008) Sequencing human genome: the contributions of Francis Collins and Craig Venter. Nature Education 1(1)
24. Lars-Ake Pellborn – CEO of The Swedish Society of Medicine in Stockholm, Sweden, – personal communication, 2001.
25. Court Case T 27-04, Solna Tingsratt, Solna, Sweden, 2004.
26. Court Case T 3688-07, Solna Tingsratt, Solna, Sweden, 2007.
27. Swedish king in tart attack – BBC News. 6 September, 2001. – http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1529270.stm -
28. Biro JC. The Swedish God. 2009, www.amazon.com
29. K. McDonald. A People that shall Dwell Alone – Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, with Diaspora People. Writers Club Press. San Jose, 2002.
30. Ashkenazi Jewish Genetic Disease, Jewish Virtual Library. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Health/genetics.html
31. Judaism 101. What is Judaism? http://www.jewfaq.org/judaism.htm -
32. “The Jewish Problem: How To Solve It,” U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, “Jews are a distinctive nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station or shade of belief, is necessarily a member” (April 25, 1915), University of Louisville Louis D. Brandeis School of Law, http://www.law.louisville.edu/library/collections/brandeis/node/234 Retrieved on June 15, 2009
33. Palmer, Henry, A History of the Jewish Nation (1875), D. Lothrop & Co., Retrieved on June 15, 2009
34. “The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 7: Berlin Years,” U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, “The Jewish Nation is a living fact” (June 21, 1921), Princeton University Press,
35. Weiner, Rebecca (2007). “Who is a Jew?”. Jewish Virtual Library. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/whojew1.html. Retrieved 2007-10-06.
36. Hammer, Mf; Redd, Aj; Wood, Et; Bonner, Mr; Jarjanazi, H; Karafet, T; Santachiara-Benerecetti, S; Oppenheim, A; Jobling, Ma, Jenkins, T; Ostrer, H; Bonne-Tamir, B (Jun 2000). “Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes.” (Free full text). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (12): 6769–74. – http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10801975.
37. Nationality. Wikipedia. – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationality – Last accessed 2011 01 21.

http://www.janbiro.com/THE_JEWISH_BIAS_OF_THE_NOBEL_PRIZE.pdf

Artist Helnwein Reprints Sylvia Plath Article

Correspondents — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:35:39 +0000

by Ann Hendon

THE AUSTRIAN-BORN ARTIST Gottfried Helnwein (pictured) republished the National Vanguard article “Sylvia Plath: Stasis in Darkness” on his Helnwein-Theater Web site in response to NV Editor Kevin Alfred Strom’s use of a Helnwein painting to illustrate the Plath piece.

In the caption for the image, Strom said “Like Sylvia Plath, artist Gottfried Helnwein has a near-schizoid attitude toward Germany’s National Socialists, producing images of that period ranging from the truly horrible to those bordering on an eerie reverence. Here his work Epiphany I, Adoration of the Magi (1996), in which the central female figure has a Plath-like intensity.”

These two sentences — along with a large version of the painting — were highlighted by the Helnwein-Theater site, but no commentary was offered and the National Vanguard article was reproduced in full.

Helnwein himself was a student at Vienna’s Academy of Fine Arts, the same school that once refused Adolf Hitler’s application. “That was probably their biggest mistake,” says Helnwein. “Better a bad painter than a very good dictator.”

Gottfried Helnwein - Modern Sleep 3

Helnwein often highlights the terrible consequences of World War 2 on children in his work, and cites the unreal atmosphere and euphemistic language of postwar Austria — where the official position conveniently switched to posing as “Germany’s first victim” as soon as the war was lost — as a formative influence.

His images of children physically injured and ravaged mentally by war are at times shocking and always haunting and unforgettable. His Modern Sleep 3, shown here, seems to be saying that we and our children are inured and asleep to our own society’s terrors, just as the children of pre-World War 2 Europe were to theirs.

He says that children today are still victims: “When I see how kids grow up, how they are neglected and mistreated, how they get polluted with drugs, junk food, insane television and bad schools, it’s terrible, and dangerous, because they are our future. Children are sacred — we need to protect, support and encourage them. Anybody who abuses a child — I don’t believe in the death penalty — but definitely they should be locked away, maybe in a labor camp. There’s no excuse for a crime like that. I don’t care what justifications psychologists come up with. You don’t touch a kid.”

I asked Kevin Alfred Strom why he chose the Helnwein Epiphany as an illustration for Vic Olvir’s essay on doomed poetess Sylvia Plath. “I was told by a few correspondents that that was a stretch — that the picture had nothing to do with Plath,” he replied. “Now I never said it was connected to Plath — but there is a parallel between the way Helnwein and Plath viewed that period. Both are saying something, and perhaps seeing something, that neither modern society nor NS enthusiasts want to know.”

While it’s clear Helnwein is no advocate of National Socialism and relentlessly points out its real and imputed flaws, one gets the impression that he also is trying to say something about the moral emptiness and callousness-dressed-as-humanitarianism that now infects the Western world. Perhaps his republication of our article is part of that. Then again, perhaps it’s an act of Art, and therefore not subject to the rigidity of explanation — even in the artist’s own mind.

Gottfried Helnwein - The Disasters of War 3

None Dare Call It White Genocide

Christian Miller — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:23:02 +0000

by Christian Miller

THE OVERARCHING goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake — this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, and sometimes explicit in law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations have had overwhelmingly White populations for the vast preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations?

Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration. This observation is mostly accurate. However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.
Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. A heavily elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide.

Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations. Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties — society “without race” by homogeneous default. Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race — White genocide.

To bolster the credibility of the latter position, put the shoe on the other foot. Assume for the sake of argument that in a stunning reversal, political correctness now dictates that Africans are “racist oppressors.” Africans disproportionately enjoy material niceties, unfairly subjugate other races, and an invisible “African privilege” pervades the air which mysteriously oppresses all other races. In this hypothetical world, “institutional racism” means that Africans are predisposed to success and worldly gain from birth, as a result of current political power relationships. Now, follow the usual prescription for healing with plans for coercive diversity and watch the fireworks begin!

The continent of Africa can solve “the race problem” by a massive influx of non-Africans. These non-Africans will assimilate and interbreed with Africans over time. The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties — society without race by homogeneous default. Everyone will hold hands in unity, hatred will be a thing of the past, and racial oppression will no longer be an option.

A sharp mind quickly realizes that this “solution to the race problem” in the African example is actually the Final Solution for Africans. That is, the systematic eradication of the African people — African genocide. No rational Black man would agree with such a genocidal campaign. No reasonable Black man would stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans. No race deserves genocide. Every race has the right to exist biologically, ethnically, and culturally.

International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race goes, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The present immigration and political policies of many traditionally White nations, especially the United States, are in violation of part (c) and possibly part (d). White nations have been subverted to conditions that heavily favor non-White immigration, restrict White birthrates, and encourage and support non-White birthrates, and are thus calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the White race. There are many quotations of politicians, professors, and pundits advocating this very point — the end of the White race. Genocide is not always an act of traditional murder. The United Nations Convention on Genocide covers violent genocide with parts (a) and (b). However, the remaining definitions cover indirect and incremental methods to clarify that any form of genocide is punishable under international law.

The United States employed an explicitly pro-White immigration policy for the entirety of its two centuries of existence — until the treasonous 1965 Immigration Act, which reversed the previous safeguards and subverted American immigration policy so it would henceforth discriminate against White Europeans. Prior to the 1965 Act, American immigration policy favored White European immigration for the explicit purpose of maintaining the racial status quo of the American population. The behind-the-scenes architects of the 1965 Act realized that overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration would inevitably reduce the White American population over time. The political front men of the 1965 Act, such as Ted Kennedy, falsely assured the American public that the new immigration policy would not upset the racial balance of America. In 1965, America was approximately 90 per cent. White. Just a few generations later, America is now about 65 per cent. White. In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country.

Illegal aliens create further demographic chaos, as White Americans are crowded out and out-bred by millions of Mestizo illegal aliens from Central and South America. Despite overwhelming public desire to seal the border and to deport and deny entry to illegal aliens, the federal government has willfully ignored its mandate to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic. Non-White legal immigrants and tens of millions of Mestizo illegal alien invaders will dispossess the White American majority in the next few decades. White Americans will become a minority in their own nation much faster than they would by legal immigration alone, even under the 1965 Act.

Overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration and millions of non-White illegal aliens are inherently destructive to the White American population. Welfare and social benefit policies financially reward the generally poorer non-White groups for having large numbers of children. Preferential hiring policies set aside jobs for non-Whites. Lax enforcement of employment law allows non-Whites to undercut the wages of White people. One appalling aspect of these trends is that most of these policies, such as welfare, food stamps, and free emergency medical care, are predominantly financed by Whites. White American taxpayers labor under conditions calculated to bring about their genocide as the progressive income tax discourages the most productive White Americans from having children.
Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers face the greatest disincentives to having large families. Instead, they work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers. The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens and their “anchor babies” that will produce an ever-increasing number of welfare recipients and future criminals.

The White American population dwindles while the non-White populations exponentially increase, further straining the welfare system, crowding prison cells, diluting educational standards, and destroying formerly safe White neighborhoods. White Americans face incremental genocide by design, which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend. Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions. The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle — which makes it all the more dangerous.

To deny White citizens of White nations the right to preserve themselves — biologically, ethnically, and culturally — is a true example of racism and hatred. Genocide is never acceptable. What can be more “racist” than the systematic eradication of an entire race? White Americans need not be ashamed of identifying on a racial basis, as every other race in America has a political license to do so. La Raza, the League of United Latino American Citizens, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith are all bound by racial or ethnic ties.

White Americans are now approaching minority status in the nation their forefathers fought for and built from the ground up. If current birthrates continue, White Americans will be a tiny minority group in a few generations, in a completely unsustainable position. They will likely be unable to survive. White Americans must be free to object to the current policy of White genocide — and without being shouted down as “racists,” a term which is little more than a political tool to silence White advocacy.

If the denunciation of genocide rests upon the assumption that all races have the right to exist, why must the White citizens of traditionally White nations accept White genocide with open arms? It is defamatory and dishonest to slander any White person who objects to massive inflows of non-White immigration as a “racist.”

White people and White nations seem to be uniquely burdened with the “responsibility” of lethal self-sacrifice on a genocidal scale. The term “racist” is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence a person who wishes to protect his or her race from extinction — a person who opposes genocide.

White Americans must be free to describe racial injustices committed against White people. Introduce the term “anti-White” to mainstream political discourse in the only way possible — by starting with private conversation. The mainstream media attempts to mold public opinion, but when there is an seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure. Demand an end to anti-White policies and White genocide.

White Americans have the same claims to identity, organization, advocacy, and existence as any other group in America. Take a principled, adamant, and vocal stand against White genocide. Talk to neighbors and inform friends. Write letters to editors, television producers, media figures, and especially politicians. Let the muffled White voice clear its throat and speak up clearly and forcefully after decades of silence. Turn the tables and take back the moral high ground. The truth is dangerous, which is precisely why slurs like “racist” are currently used to shout down reasonable opposition to White genocide. Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack.

Anyone who opposes a return to traditional American immigration policies is supporting White genocide. Anyone who supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens is enabling White genocide. The current American immigration policy discriminates against White Europeans and is bringing about White genocide. There is nothing more “racist” than genocide, because it is the destruction of an entire race. If someone shouts “racist!” in a petty attempt to silence debate, explain that a real racist is someone who wants to commit genocide against the entire White race. Stop White genocide — one conversation, one talking point, one letter, one complaint, one comment, one remark, and one person at a time. Stay on a consistent message against White genocide. The future of the White race, if there will be one, depends on you.

Demjanjuk Trial Evidence Faked

Chris Rossetti — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:58:11 +0000

by Chris Rossetti

AN FBI REPORT kept secret for 25 years said the Soviet Union “quite likely fabricated” evidence central to the prosecution of John Demjanjuk (pictured) – a revelation that could help the the retired Ohio auto worker’s defenders against charges that he is guilty of “Nazi war crimes.”

The newly declassified FBI field office report casts doubt on the authenticity of a “Nazi” ID card that is the key piece of evidence in allegations that Demjanjuk served as a guard at the Sobibor death camp in occupied Poland.

Throughout three decades of U.S. hearings, an extradition, a death sentence followed by acquittal in Israel, a deportation and a trial in Munich, Germany, the arguments have relied heavily on the photo ID from an SS training camp that indicates Demjanjuk was sent to Sobibor.

Claims that the card and other evidence against Demjanjuk are Soviet forgeries have repeatedly been made by Demjanjuk’s defense attorneys. However, the FBI report provides the first known confirmation that American investigators had similar doubts.

“Justice is ill-served in the prosecution of an American citizen on evidence which is not only normally inadmissible in a court of law, but based on evidence and allegations quite likely fabricated by the KGB,” the FBI’s Cleveland field office said in the 1985 report, four years after the Soviets had shown U.S. investigators the card.

It was the height of the Cold War at the time, and the ID card from the Trawniki training camp had not been as closely examined by Western experts as it has been today. Since then it has been scrutinized and validated by courts in the U.S., Israel and Germany – though experts at the recent trial left room for doubt, with one conceding that a counterfeiter with the right materials could have forged the card and other documents.

The FBI agents argued that the Soviets had an interest in faking the documents as part of a campaign to smear anti-Communist emigres. Those conclusions contradict the findings of another branch of the Department of Justice, the heavily Zionist-influenced “Office of Special Investigations,” or OSI, which was central in making the allegations against Demjanjuk.

The FBI report was discovered by researchers for the Associated Press (AP) at the National Archives in College Park, Md., among case files that were declassified after the Ukrainian-born Demjanjuk was deported from the U.S. in May 2009 to face trial in Germany.

A New Aryan Prehistory

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:43:45 +0000

Are the sources and scholars revered among White nationalists now woefully out of date when it comes to our own people’s earliest times? Sure to be controversial, this essay asks us: Was there a Golden Age when women were predominant and inter-Aryan war virtually unknown?

by Day Brown (pictured)

AS KNOWLEDGEABLE as Professor Oliver, Nietzsche, and so many scholars are from an age when education was at a much higher level, in the intervening years shovels, forensics, magnetometers, dendrochronology, DNA, and even computer analysis of sources reveals that Aryans predate the late Bronze Age mythic war band era by several millennia. We can’t really come to understand our ancestry without examination of a large body of work that’s accumulated in the last 30 years, especially since the fall of the Iron Curtain opened up access to Western research of a huge corpus of knowledge unearthed by Russian and other Eastern Bloc scientists.

To begin with, we, more than any other race, are Neanderthal hybrids [Or, perhaps, merely more closely related to the early common ancestor of both us and the Neanderthals. -- Ed.]. Gooch, Neanderthal Legacy, has some daft ideas, but his outline of the facts written in the bones is right on, and is now verified by the Neanderthal (HNS) DNA.

To find out why the HNS disappeared, just show a midwife the much more robust skeleton — and pelvis. A pelvis which cracks open a Cro Magnon pelvis to facilitate birth. Then too, whenever you hybridize, you expect lots of fertile males, but few females because their reproductive system is so complex. So, if Aryans were hybrids, you’d expect fewer mtDNA lines.

Sykes, in The Seven Daughters of Eve, reports Europe has only seven mtDNA lines. (There are scores of such lines among Semites and over 140 so far found in Africa.) Then, too, he says they lived in Europe between 50,000 BP and 10,000 years ago. I note that 50kya, only Neanderthals were living in Europe.

Scholars looking over the Aryan languages found many words related to fresh-water bodies and life forms, but none for the marine environment. This was confusing, because the dendochronology shows Aryan timber frame construction has been going on in SE Europe for 8,000 years, with a vast mercantile empire from the salt mines at Hallstaat and Salzburg down the Danube to the world’s first plank-hulled fishing fleet.

Everything points to the west end of the Black Sea except the Aryan language, which, according to computer analysis of the vocabulary, only refers to fresh water. “Did the Proto-Indo-European Priesthood Commit Treason in the Era of PIE Unity?” by Oswald and Ballantine is another masterpiece of scholarship. (This despite the oxymoronic “Indo-”: Aryan was never spoken in India, but one form, a proto-Sanskrit, was introduced by late Bronze Age warriors and the commercial Brahman elite.)

Looking through the record and noting the rate at which language evolves, they see some great catastrophe in the middle sixth millennium BC. I’ve not been able to locate the software, but they calculated there was a remarkable series of total solar eclipses between 5500-5600 BC. Since then (1988), Ryan and Pitman explained some of the basis for the myths of the period in their Noah’s Flood. If you pull up bottom cores from the Black Sea, you find that under the marine mud, there’s a layer of land grasses preserved by the anaerobic conditions — a layer having C-14 dates of around 5600 BC. They say the post-Ice-Age sea levels were rising, and then spilled over to open up the Bosporus, with a force 100 times greater than Niagara — filling the then-freshwater Euxine lake with salt water, and also causing a well known Aryan diaspora taking their freshwater nomenclature with them.

Naturally, many sought higher ground in or near the Transylvanians, where they found Chalcocite, a very pretty mineral — fool’s gold is one form, but other iridescent types of green, slate, and yellow exist. One other thing we find they took with them is female leadership.

J.P. Mallory, for one, in his In Search of the Indo-Europeans, p. 123, reports but one word for “authority”: raj as in raja, regime, regina, oregon, (Skt., Eng., Lat., Grk.), which, it turns out, is “a female tribal leader of great wisdom and mana.” Who — no doubt — loved the new jewelry. But then, some fell in the fire. The lovely color is because this copper ore is contaminated with arsenic, which lowers its melting point to 900 degrees F, the lowest forging temp of all the bronzes to produce the toughest bronze.

So, what does practically every culture do when it can first forge metal? — Create arrowheads, spearheads, swords, daggers, armor, and the like. But not here. Bronze woodworking tools, garden and farming tools, grain sickles, belt buckles, broaches, clasps, hair pieces, jewelry. But no weapons.

They didn’t need weapons; they had social skills and organization we don’t see later. They didn’t have marriage, either. Men who don’t own women, don’t fight over them — much less go to war to increase the size of a king’s harem. And they also didn’t have kings. Women were free to select sperm donors on the basis of intelligence and character. Men in power have never been that fussy.

In fact, the only eugenics program in all history that worked — and everyone knows how well — was that of Sparta. Which was run by the women.

This, more than anything else, produced a golden age of peace and unprecedented technological achievement. In addition to bronze we see dolls, doll furniture, and doll houses — with chimneys. The Gradesnica Platter shows 7,000-year-old writing; then there’s polychrome pottery, figures wearing tailored clothes, and, to judge from the etymology, woven of linen, wool, and hemp. The reason sails are made of canvas is they made them from cannabis.

Many would not believe the Aryans could have lived in peace 7,000 years ago. Goodison and Morris, in Ancient Goddesses, note the controversy on the flyleaf and set their goal to open a virgin tel. They went down through 4,000 years of occupation — and didn’t find any signs of warfare.

The Anarch Sharpens His Sword

admin — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:19:51 +0000

by Alyssa Kaltenbrunner

IF BEHAVIOR THAT IS ADMIRED is the path to power, as quoteth the anonymous Beowulf bard, then I can think of no paragraph more worthy of summing up modern man as that of this from Weininger:

“For the great politician is not only a speculator and millionaire, but also a pop singer; he is not only a great chess player, but also a great actor; he is not only a despot, but also a toady; he not only prostitutes others, but is himself a great prostitute. The politician, the warleader who never ‘lowered himself’ does not exist. After all, his descents are famous; they are his sexual acts. The proper tribune also belongs in the gutter. The complementary relationship with the mob is a downright part of a politician’s constitution. In fact, he can only use the rabble; with the others, the individuals, he makes a quick end, if he is unwise; or, if he is as smart as Napoleon, he pretends to value them, so as to render them harmless.”

The age of the lie is conversely the age of the prostitute. The men of power in the age of gold are those who bend over and touch their toes, those who shower without curtains, those who simply couldn’t make it in Hollywood and decided to become politicians instead.

The noble one is cast out for his honesty, for his forthrightness, and for his clarity of vision and purpose. He looks down on the whore but awaits the day where what is bent will be made straight again, and his courage lies in simple laughter and action. They will never understand your sense of humor.

Let us examine who is the anarch, according to Junger:

“Although I am an anarch, I am not anti-authoritarian. Quite the opposite: I need authority, although I do not believe in it. My critical faculties are sharpened by the absence of the credibility that I ask for. As a historian, I know what can be offered.”

The anarch is the opposite of the anarchist and both only appear as contradictions to those who cannot read in between the lines:

The anarch pays his own way; the anarchist is a sponge.

The anarch seeks truth; the anarchist is a walking lie.

The anarch controls himself; the anarchist seeks disorder outside of his internal disorder.

The anarch seeks Being; the anarchist revels in Becoming.

The anarch desires a master; the anarchist bows low to the most enslaved creatures.

The anarch achieves true freedom; the anarchist is the most vile slave.

The anarch attracts; the anarchist repels.

The anarch builds; the anarchist levels.

The anarch is virile; the anarchist is sterile.

The anarch sharpens his sword; the anarchist throws bombs.

To lower oneself is to vote, to beg, and to compromise with those who seek to destroy you. To bow down to ‘the will of the people,’ that is, to kill Socrates, to murder Christ, and to piss on the Mona Lisa so that one may ride the waves of mass hysteria into a free meal.

To heighten oneself is to offer your own hide for something higher than biological necessity; to reach higher peaks, and to risk life and limb in order to erect monuments for a God that lives through one’s own Deeds.

This, I say, is the anarch.

Homeless Jack’s Lexicon

admin — Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:16:57 +0000

by H. Millard

“I KNOW YOU’RE trying to figure out more about this religion of mine, man,” said Homeless Jack, “so here’s a basic lexicon that may help you get it. I got this from Arman.

“And, you probably want to know how many believers there are in addition to Arman. Well, all I know is, I believe. One is enough. You see, that ‘one’ principle is also part of our beliefs, our kind of human is like the first point that started all of existence. It all starts with One.

“We are a branching off, and each one of us is another possible branching if we have as many children as possible in our image.”

Abiogenesis–The theory that life can arise from non-living matter.

Adaptation–The process whereby an organism becomes better suited to its environment.

General adaptations are those that fit an organism for life in broad environmental zones, as opposed to ‘special adaptations’ which are specializations for a particular way of life. Organisms with broad general adaptations often survive while those with special adaptations become extinct when changes occur in the environment.

Absorption–Armanist religious concept that holds that living organisms can absorb parts of the code of other organisms as well as from so-called non-living things. Works with natural selection. Often seen as mimicry.

Allele–One of a series of different forms of a gene.

Arman–The Teacher. Receiver and promulgator of the revelations and divine inspiration.

Armanism–one of the names used for this belief system.

Basic Impulse or just Impulse–The inherent “desire” to be and to be more.

Blenders–Those who promote the blending of all races, religions and nations into a sort of plain wrap human being that we call the Tan Everyman. Blenders do not like human differences, but sometimes push “diversity;” not because they actually want human diversity, but because they see this as a step to blending. The idea of the Blenders is to keep all lands where humans live from being exclusively of one race, one religion and one nation. One way they try to do this is by encouraging the mass immigration of peoples who are far different from the natives in those lands, to those lands.

Then, over time, the Blenders expect the “rough edges” and “extremes” of racial types, religious beliefs and nationalistic tendencies in those lands to disappear by blending in with the mass at the center of the bell curve.

The ultimate goal of Blenders is to have one universal race, one universal religion, one universal nation that is worldwide. “Blenders” is our word for them. They do not call themselves this.

Blending–In nature, the majority of any type of life will be clustered around the center of the bell curve in characteristics for that type of life. This is natural. In humans, we not only see this as the blind workings of nature, but we also see some humans trying to increase the mass near the center while eliminating the different versions that are in a minority. This is an attempt to remove the “rough edges” of different races, religions and nations and have them all become part of a sort of plain wrap world where conformity in all ways is the norm. Some well meaning, but misinformed, people believe this is the way to have a peaceful planet. Unfortunately for those pushing this idea, it won’t work — because the spinning of existence will always cause change and differences. And, all life, whether it is aware of this or not, will continue to struggle to be and to be more. Life is competition. Life is struggle. Differences are what move us forward. Without differences there would be no evolution.

Blue eyes–A recent evolutionary development, probably emerged within the last 10,000 years according to recent research.

Bottleneck–There have been recurring bottlenecks on Earth. These have been times when most living things died off (think dinosaurs, for example), and only a few types, for whatever reason, survived and got through the bottleneck to replenish the Earth. The coming great die-off of Homo sapiens will not be complete. Many with Code A will be saved because of their right blood, right belief and right actions and they’ll survive and get through to the other side of the bottleneck and become a new species. In other words, they will have the right DNA combination (the correct mutations) and other factors that will immunize them to what is to come — or which will, in some way that we are unaware of, protect them. White skin is an absolute necessity according to the revelations. Why? We can only guess.

Cause and effect–We live in a cause and effect universe. Effects have causes. Things always happen because something causes them to happen.

Chromosomes–DNA is organized into chromosomes. Humans have 46 chromosomes. The chromosomes are of different sizes. Chromosome number 1, for example, which is the largest human chromosome, has about 220 million base pairs. A male and female each contribute 23 chromosomes to a new child. Because Whites are a later evolutionary development, their genes are less fixed and are more fragile than genes in other humans. This means most genes for White characteristics are recessive and will not be expressed if a White bears children with a non-White. It thus takes two Whites–a White male and a White female–to produce a White child.

Code, The–That which is within everything in existence that makes it what it is. In life that we are aware of, the code is in the form of DNA. The code is the same on the most basic levels of existence and then is changed and modified to make all that exists. It is also this way within life and within human beings. It is programmed to spread and expand into every possible niche.

Code A–Our term for the specific code that makes non-Jewish European-descended White people as we are. Believers will sometimes just say “The Code,” and by this they usually mean Code A.

Comfort–All living things seek comfort. The comfort sought may be psychological or physical. The desire for psychological comfort can override the desire for physical comfort and can be used for good or bad. Nietzsche thought humans had a “will to power.” We think he was wrong. We believe there is a “will to comfort,” found in humans and all living organisms, and the will to power is just a subset of the psychological desire for comfort found in some individuals.

Competition–A natural and desirable part of existence.

Correspondence–As above, so below. As below, so above. There are links unseen between things on the surface that appear to have little or no connection, and there are “buttons” that can be pushed with proper symbols and rites.

Cosmic Balancing–Similar to the concept of karma.

Cosmic evolution–the study of universal change and the assembly and composition of energy, matter and life. This is at the heart of our beliefs; the evolution of everything. Human evolution is just a small part of this, but since we are humans, we give it a lot of attention. We understand, however, that we are not unique or special except for the fact that, as far as we know, we are the only organisms on Earth who can think the abstract thoughts about this and other things, and we are the only organisms on Earth — again as far as we know — who can take an active and conscious part in determining the direction of our future evolution. The same basic forces at work in cosmic evolution are also at work in the evolution of life. Understand the very small, and you’ll understand the very large. Understand the very large, and you’ll understand the very small.

Here are the general steps of Cosmic Evolution:

• The emergence of the first “point” of energy and forces in the absolute nothing

• The spinning evolution of the energy and forces into vibrations, elementary particles and atoms

• The spinning evolution of atoms into galaxies, stars, planets, etc.

• The spinning evolution of star material into mineral elements

• The spinning evolution of those mineral elements into the molecular building blocks of life

• The spinning evolution of those molecules into life forms

• The spinning evolution of advanced life forms into intelligence

• The spinning evolution of intelligent life into higher consciousness

Deadenders–Those who do not reproduce their kind or who reproduce too few so that their code does not survive into the next generation.

Deme–A local population of one species that share a distinct gene pool. When isolated from other demes of the same species they can become a distinct subspecies or species.

Dissimulation, Religious–Religiously sanctioned act of lying or otherwise doing whatever is necessary to prevent persecution for one’s beliefs and faith.

Divine Inspiration–The Teachings are the product of revelation and divine inspiration. Believers should also seek divine inspiration in their daily lives by praying to be guided in doing the right things.

DNA–Deoxyribonucleic acid is made up of four bases: Adenine, Thymine, Cytosine, Guanine that are usually abbreviated A,T,C,G. DNA is organized into units called chromosomes. Humans have 46 chromosomes. A child receives 23 chromosomes from his or her mother and 23 from his or her father. Great emphasis is put on DNA, genes, genotypes, phenotypes and similar concepts in this belief system, as DNA is considered to contain the essential person, and to be that which is to be improved and which moves forward. Our individual bodies are constructed by the DNA and our DNA can survive our individual bodies. All life is built from the inside out by the DNA spiral. The DNA spiral looks like a twisted ladder.

All DNA is the same. It is the order that is important. Very minor changes in the sequence or order of the DNA can have major effects. This is often misunderstood or misrepresented by blenders who want everyone to think that all humans are the same except for different paint jobs. They’re not. To say all humans are 99% the same may sound as though we’re all the same, but when you consider we’re talking about 3.1 billion letters of DNA, 1% difference can be major. Here are some other comparisons that you’ve probably seen. The actual percentages shown here might be slightly different from what you’ve read, because the percentages and counts are often updated as new information is learned. Chimps and humans are about 96% the same (the old figure was 98.5%). Slugs and humans are about 70% the same. Daffodils and humans are about 35% the same. Bananas and humans are about 50% the same. This last comparison is often cited this way: Although humans and bananas are 50% the same, this doesn’t mean that a human is half banana. Keep that in mind when you hear blenders say that all humans are the same because they share 99% the same DNA with other humans. It is the differences that are important, and minor differences often produce major results. DNA is the almost robotic molecule of life. It works automatically and never stops working in tinkering with life to try to expand itself into all of existence and to find the best carriers of itself.

Dominant–(1)The primary type of any organism in an area. All life “tries” to be dominant. (2) In genetics, the form of a gene that is expressed in the characteristics of an organism. Generally, many of the characteristics of White people are recessive and require both a White male and a White female to produce a White child.

Drift, genetic–Random fluctuations of gene combinations that are often neutral and nonadaptive, but which may become fixed in a small population even though they do not appear to offer any survival advantage.

Drogh–Our religious term for ground of existence or the field. It is where matter comes into existence from vibrations.

Enlightenment–Awakened to the true nature of reality. It is more than just an intellectual understanding, but may include that, and is a quiet but exalted or ecstatic glowing feeling of oneness with the First Cause that words can’t describe. One who is truly enlightened will see patterns and truths that others miss and will see the universe in a back yard.

Essence—The core of everything in existence. Used with a capital “E” to refer to the Essence of the indigenous peoples of Europe both still in Europe and in the European diaspora. With the capital “E” it is similar in meaning to DNA, genotype, phenotype and Code A.

Evolution—The gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form. We accept this as a reality. However, we believe that evolution on Earth is just part of Cosmic Evolution. As far as evolution on Earth goes, we do not believe that Darwinian evolution has all the answers of evolution. Darwin got much right, but there is more. Much more. Note that evolution and Darwin are not synonyms. Darwin posited what he believed about evolution, but there are other evolutionary views that seek to answer some of the questions that Darwin couldn’t answer. For example, Darwin’s idea of gradual evolution never satisfactorily accounted for the emergence of completely new types beyond the species level. Enter punctuated equilibrium and similar theories. Evolution is all about differences in living things, and evolution usually requires isolation to work. Evolution is a branching off as nature tinkers with the DNA code and shuffles the letters of DNA in different ways. The differences “stick” if there is isolation–either geographic or reproductive–and if the changes offer a survival advantage (note–some changes do not offer survival advantages but also stick, perhaps because of pleiotropic factors) so those with the differences do not blend back in with those they branched off from. Remember also that Darwin lived and died before DNA was discovered. In addition to changes caused by adaptation and natural selection, all life on Earth is constantly bombarded by various types of cosmic rays and other forces that can cause some of the letters of DNA to be knocked out of place and which can cause mutations. Nature works on a trial and error basis. It tries something, and if it works it keeps it. If it doesn’t work it doesn’t keep it. Evolution doesn’t take place when gene pools reach equilibrium, because evolution means change.

Exogenesis–Hypothesis that life on Earth came from elsewhere. Similar to panspermia but more limited in its scope.

Expand always; contract never–Armanists believe this is a command that is within everything in existence and that anything or any living things that disobey this command will become extinct. Humans of one type expand and change the frequency of genes in the gene pool by becoming more numerous than other types of humans, primarily by having higher fertility rates than other humans. Those who produce the most children who live to produce their own children in great numbers will eventually replace other types of humans who do not breed as fast or in such quantity.

External Signs (or characteristics)–the genetically determined way we look. Phenotype.

Extreme Individualism–An error in thinking that causes one to not see that one is part of a group of like beings and the product of a group genotype.

Fail Point–The paradoxical threshold of evolution where humans now find themselves. By evolving big brains,we have reached this point where we are able to stop the evolutionary process of natural selection for the best qualities. The weak and the strong can both survive under such conditions and pass on their codes. This puts the best adapted and least adapted on an equal footing in the chance for survival and in expanding their codes. Believers seek to get past the fail point and to cross the threshold to move higher.

Faith–Faith is important for a number of reasons including the fact that the brain can cause physical effects that can be beneficial.

False ideas–humans have many false ideas in their humancentric ideologies and beliefs, and these false ideas often block the path and must be identified and corrected. The major false idea in this age, one which leads to many subsets of other false ideas, is that all humans are the same. This idea is anti-nature and anti-evolution. Our view, to be clear, is not that there are superior or inferior humans, but that there are many, many differences. Humans have evolved and adapted for certain environments and as a result of these adaptations and resultant gene changes, they have acquired other secondary changes.

Field, The–Also known as the ground of existence and Drogh. Behind everything.

First Cause, The–That which created something out of absolute nothing. Used interchangeably with “God.” The Ultimate. The Source of all of existence.

Flow, The–The great spinning river of existence in which the Earth bobs along like a very tiny piece of dust as a little zoo of a planet.

Free will–We believe that human free will is not as free as many people believe and that our actions, in a very broad sense, are more gene-directed than many people want to believe. However, there is a level of free will that is important, even though it is difficult to ever know whether we are acting because of our genetic programs or because of free will.

Frequency dependent selection–the fitness of a phenotype is dependent on its frequency relative to other phenotypes in a given population. Blenders try to change the frequency of genes in a population via immigration in order to change the population.

Gene–a portion of DNA that carries the code for some action or characteristic of the living organism. Humans have somewhere between 20-30,000 genes. The exact number has not been determined. They are the program within us. Genes “want” to survive and struggle to be expressed. We are their way to do this. Competition and struggle are natural and exist throughout all of existence. This competition and struggle is inherent in existence itself. Note that a gene is not an actual thing, but a location on a strand of DNA. We often say: Genes Are Us.

Gene fixation–one variant of a particular gene (allele) remains the only one in a population. A partial but incomplete example of the process may be easily seen in Finland which is considered the blondest nation on Earth. That is, the allele for blond hair is almost the only allele in the population, and if gene flow were completely stopped, the allele for blond hair would become fixed in the population.

Gene Flow–The transfer of alleles of genes from one population to another. Gene flow stops divergence and prevents the emergence of new species from the old species. New species develop when the gene flow is stopped. The major way gene flow is stopped is by physical separation and isolation. Gene flow causes homogenization or blending.

Genetic Drift–A mechanism for evolutionary change resulting from the random fluctuations of gene frequencies in small, isolated populations.

Genetic homeostasis–the tendency of a population to maintain a constant genetic composition.

Genetic Isolation–The absence of gene flow between populations as a result of geographic separation or other mechanisms that prevent gene flow.

Genocide–Actual genocide is the killing off of genes by any cause. Legal genocide is defined by the U.N. We accept both actual and legal genocide as realities. Whites are victims of genocide by both definitions.

Genotype–Your internal blueprint or code. All the letters of DNA in their particular arrangement that makes you, uniquely you. A descriptor for genome which is the actual, physical DNA molecules.

Gens–Latin for clan, race, nation, people, tribe.

God–Unknowable. The First Cause. The Source. That which did the impossible and created itself and everything else from nothing. We see the something that was created in the nothing as an invisible, spinning, spiraling and expanding skein of existence that underlies all of existence. No human form. Sometimes used as synonym for nature or creator or similar terms. When you peel back everything to a time before there was anything, you are left with a mystery of what started existence and you are left with this concept. The necessary end of all arguments. One contra theory holds that there was never a time when there was absolutely nothing.

Although, as a thing easily said, we often speak of the “big bang” as the start of existence, our reason tells us that something was already in existence at that time–perhaps subatomic particles or waves–so the first cause must have been before the big bang.

God gene–Is an hypothesis that some humans inherit genes that predispose them to spirituality. Gene VMAT2 is thought to be involved. This gene doesn’t directly cause one to be spiritual, but causes certain chemical changes in the brain that are interpreted as spirituality. The importance for us in this faith, even if the hypothesis is proven wrong, is the indication it gives of the increasing recognition that genes cause various attitudes and behaviors as well as the physical characteristics that we see, such as eye color and skin color. We believe that there is a gene variation that may draw some people to our beliefs while others will not be so drawn because they lack the particular allele for this, and just cannot fully understand the teachings on a deep level. Teachers will point to the well known example of color blindness in which some people with certain gene variations can’t distinguish between the colors red and green. No matter how hard those with this gene variation try, they just can’t see the difference. No one would call them dumb. It’s just a difference in genes. So it is with many of our beliefs. Some people simply won’t get it.

Golden Rule–Treat all others as you want to be treated and treat all others as they treat you.

Great Die-Off or Mass Extinction–Arman had a vision of a time when most humans would die off and only believers would be spared to get through the bottleneck.

Ground of Existence (also Field or Drogh)–Thousands of years ago people began realizing that our everyday objects were made up of ever smaller objects called atoms. Then they realized that atoms were made of even smaller objects. Today, it is recognized that subatomic particles, which can also be subatomic waves, may be what underlies everything in existence and that all of reality is built up from them. Subatomic waves may be the source of matter. Some religions, sensing this reality, posit the notion that everything is thus illusion. We reject that notion. We do sometimes indicate that everything we know in our universe is a projection of the subatomic particles/waves but this idea of “projection” is far different from other uses of the term, most notably in the way a film is projected. In our use of the term, we see the subatomic particles/waves spinning into reality that which they are the essence of. The unseen skein.

Homo Armanius–The next man. The new model human. We are the ones before his emergence and he will only emerge from us and no others.

Ideal–Of every thing in existence there is an ideal. Finding the ideal in our kind is important so that it can be reached and then can be overcome to move ever higher. The Ideal for living conditions for believers would be for them to have their own land free of all discordant elements so that they could pursue their evolutionary and highest destiny exclusively among their own people. This Ideal Land is something to be sought, prayed for and worked for so that the people may truly be free.

Imagery, Religious–Fylfots, circles, spirals, spinning, turning, bramble bushes, natural forests, rivers, oceans.

Impulse, The–The inbuilt need or desire in existence to be and to be more and to expand always.

Internal Signs (or characteristics)–the way we are that can’t easily be seen. Our intelligence, personality, etc. that are genetically determined.

Isolation–Physical or reproductive isolation are usually required for speciation to occur.

King of the Senses–In humans, the king of the senses is eyesight. We can reason to this conclusion by starting with the fact that the purpose of all life is to make more like itself and in humans nature has tied the libido to sight. As the king of the senses, sight is also tied into our survival instincts. We generally sense danger by seeing it and we can usually know who is us, and who is not us by sight.

We also believe that we must not deny our senses and that we have them for a reason–to help us survive to breed. We believe that we must feed our senses by being active, and it is by being active that we move higher.

Lamarckism–Theory that an organism can pass on characteristics that it acquires in its lifetime to its offspring. Largely discredited. However, we believe that the basic ideas behind the theory (but with modern terms) are valid but have not yet been proven. We believe that living organisms (maybe just some and maybe just under certain conditions) do pick up “essences” of various other living organisms and even so-called non-living things and forces in the environment that cause changes to the genetic code under some circumstances and that some of these changes can be passed on to offspring when the conditions are right. The methods of picking up these essences are open to speculation. It may be from viruses or bacteria injecting the essences into our DNA or it may be something different. We believe that there is a sort of chameleon effect or plasticity with life that is different from, but works with natural selection. We point to certain insects that mimic the twigs or leaves upon which they live as examples of this absorption of the essence of other things into the genes.

Law of Inertia–An object at rest will remain at rest and an object in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by another force.

Living universe–The idea that the universe and all that is in it is not dead. In our definition, it is not alive either, as we usually define the term, but is all connected via subatomic particles and subatomic waves (or by currently unknown forces) in a skein or field that we do not fully understand, such that the universe, or parts of it, responds automatically by receiving sensory input from everything in existence. A simple analogy might be to think of a stove made of iron. When the stove is heated up, the iron automatically changes because of the heat. In the universe, it’s as though everything that exists is wired to the underlying and unseen First Cause. Another analogy is a spider web. The spider picks up vibrations if any part of the web is moved even slightly. This is how the spider finds prey.

Meditation–We reject the idea that sitting still for hours on end and depriving the senses of stimulation is beneficial for believers and will lead to any deeper understanding of existence. Our meditation is usually from a few minutes up to an hour of quiet reflection while viewing a proper focus object and while quietly asking for guidance from above. Sometimes, in some believers, longer times may be helpful. We also believe that we must not deny our senses to gain a deeper understanding, but actually bathe our senses in things of the senses. Thus, we believe that we must be physically moving and taking in sights, sounds and smells–that we must experience things–to gain fuller understanding. Walks in woods, fields, mountains, deserts and even in cities help us understand, if one does this consciously and actively. Our brains need the input let in by our senses. We must live consciously and always observing the patterns all around us and we must learn from everything.

Method acting–We believe that one of the ways to improve, advance and help our evolution is to imitate certain ideals and to act the part of the ideals in all ways possible. We see this as being similar to method acting. A method actor will try to become the character he plays, and will often try to do this by doing everything in the same way as the character; which can include eating the same food, using the same toothpaste, using the same soap, living in the same place and wearing the same socks and underwear, of a real person being portrayed. By taking on the outward aspects of the character, the method actor tries to evoke the inward aspects. Everything we do or experience is registered in our subconscious mind by our senses and causes changes in the way we perceive the world and the way the world perceives us and how we act and react to various stimuli. See also Absorption.

Miscegenation–mating outside the genotype. Forbidden by the First Cause as a great sin or wrong against the First Cause.

Mutagen–is an agent or substance that can bring about a permanent alteration to the physical composition of a DNA gene such that the genetic message is changed.

Mutation–A Mutation occurs when a DNA gene is damaged or changed in such a way as to alter the genetic message carried by that gene. Random mutations are sort of nature’s wild cards to change life to survive by throwing in random changes that might or might not stick. They are happening all the time. Most are minor and go unnoticed. Some are detrimental to the organism. There are also mutations of chromosomes and these have much greater effects.

Natural Law–Naturally occurring principles of existence that channel existence toward evolution. Natural law is built into the structure of existence. Humans must deduce natural law correctly, and these teachings provide help.

Natural Rights–Those rights that you have just because you are here. They are yours because of your birth. No other men or groups of men or government can legally grant them to you or take them away from you. They are yours. Among these natural rights are your right to your existence, your right to reproduce as you wish, your right to associate with or not associate with anyone of your choosing for any reason of your choosing, your freedom, self-determination, self-governance, self-identification, your right to believe as you wish and to tell others of your beliefs, your right to pursue your personal happiness as you alone see fit so long as you do not harm others.

Natural Selection–The process in nature by which the organisms best adapted to their environment tend to survive and pass on their genetic characteristics to succeeding generations while those less adapted tend to be eliminated. Survival of the fittest in the struggle to be and to be more. Natural selection brings about evolutionary change by favoring differential reproduction of genes. This changes the gene frequency from one generation to the next. Natural selection does not cause genetic change, but once there is change it encourages some genes instead of others. Natural selection requires genetic variation, differential reproduction and heritable characteristics.

We believe that natural selection is often being overridden in modern society due to birth control, abortions and miscegenation and that this artificial state of affairs is blocking or destroying the best evolutionary path for many of our European indigenous people still in Europe and in the European diaspora.

Nature–The word “nature” as we use it means far more than the narrow meaning it is usually given. In our use it means all of existence and sometimes it means God. So, when believers say they study nature for clues to answers to the big questions, they don’t just mean they’re going on nature walks (but that could be part of it). They mean they’re looking at subatomic particles and subatomic waves, galaxies, birds, flowers, physics, psychology and everything else that is in existence.

Notus–Literally “Not Us.” Not our people.

Numinous feeling–Filled with an overwhelming sense of wonder and awe at being in the presence of the divine. We find this most easily just before dawn and just before dusk, during storms and in forests and other places away from civilization.

Only one path–This is the one genuine path for us that leads to true higher states. It requires, among other things, physical evolution. This is one of the main differences between this belief system and others. We believe the core of our being is our unique physical DNA code that we carry and which has spun us into existence. It is an absolute prerequisite that one must have to take the next step up. It is the code that must survive and expand and we are a means to that end as it is a means to our end. However, this is not to be seen as though we are merely robots carrying a real something inside of us that pulls our strings and orders us about. We are one. We are its outer aspect and it is our inner aspect. It is within every cell of our body.We would not exist as the beings we are except for it, and it cannot survive and evolve except for us. It is our essence.

Order is important–DNA is composed of just four basic chemicals (A,T,C,G) yet those four chemicals when shuffled in different ways produce all the variety of life that we are aware of. This tells us that it is not the difference in the chemicals of DNA that is important (because there are none) but the way they are arranged. Change the order just a little and you have a fly or a mouse or an ape or a man or a tree. And, the emphasis here is on change the order just a little. It doesn’t take much. A few letters changed and one has white skin or non-white skin, straight hair or curly hair.

Our Kind–Those with Code A.

Ourselves–Those with Code A.

Our Way for Ourselves Alone (OWFOA)–Another name for this religion, philosophy, world view.

Panspermia–Hypothesis that “seeds” of life exist all over the universe and that some of these seeds caused life on Earth as well as elsewhere.

People, The–When used by believers it usually means either believers or those who may not yet be believers but who share our 46 chromosomes. Synonym for Believers.

Phenotype–That which is built by the genotype. The way you look. The outward manifestation of the inner code.

Placebo God–Human psychology requires an ender of all arguments and something that is bigger and anchored and which gives meaning to man’s short life. Our blessing and our curse is our large brain. It lets us think about existence and meaning and discover the laws of existence; this is both the blessing and the curse. Belief, if it is real, acts upon our minds and our minds act upon our bodies in real and physical ways by releasing various chemicals that can help or hinder us on the path. If one does not believe in God; then one should learn to do so.

Pleiotropy–Genes have more than one effect. For example, when an attempt was made to domesticate foxes by breeding them for the quality of dog-like tameness, the foxes also automatically developed other dog-like qualities such as floppy ears, turned up tails, and patched coats of different colors. The changes weren’t expected, but they had the added benefit of allowing people to see the “content of the character” of the changed foxes. The outward reflected the inward. In other words, in the case of the foxes, it wasn’t possible to breed for certain personality traits without also changing the exterior appearance of the foxes. The same effect works in humans. Change skin from black to white and you change much more than just skin color.

Prayer–At dawn and dusk.

Primary Command, The–The primary command for all life, including human life, is to survive as long as possible to make as many more like itself as physically possible. This is less about the survival of the individual and more about the survival of the DNA code that is passed on to offspring. Some falsely believe that the primary command for organisms is an instinct for self-preservation. While at the level of the whole organism, this may appear true, it must be understood that it is the code within that seeks survival and which wants the whole organism to survive in order to expand and spread the particular version of the code within. Living organisms, including humans, that do not breed in their image, are evolutionary dead ends whose code will never move higher.

Proper living–Living as long as possible to protect and expand the code by having as many children in the image of the people as possible. Everything else in our lives is secondary to this. We are told that the evolution of our kind will only come by having vast numbers of us filling all lands. We know also that it is not the individuals who are important, but the Code. The individuals carry the Code and they are the way it is expanded.

Punctuated equilibrium–The theory that species have little change for long periods (stasis) and then experience rapid and major changes.

Pure Lands–The lands that God has commanded believers to take, purify and hold forever for the people alone, where believers can live free from outside influences, discordant forces and gene transfer, and where they can practice their faith without persecution and in peace and in which they can continue to evolve along the righteous path.

Purity–The actual purity of DNA, and ritual purity.

Race–Race is to humans what variety is to plants and breed is to dogs, horses and other animals. It is also often used as a synonym for subspecies. It is a reality, although blenders try to deny it in order to break down barriers to blending. When populations appear to be different in their genetic characteristics and are readily recognized as being different then they are called races or subspecies.

Radio example–One of our favorite ways to explain some of our concepts is to use a radio as an example. Radio waves are all around us, but unless you have a radio with all the right parts, along with a power source, and unless that radio is tuned into the right frequency, you won’t pick up any sounds. Remove just one of many very tiny but essential parts of that radio, and it won’t work. The radio has to be “born”with those parts. It can’t acquire them, and no amount of praying or living right or doing various ritual things will change that. In humans, the right parts are genes and the order of the genes and all things relating to DNA.

Recessive genes–Most “White” genes are recessive. This means that if a White person has children with a non-White person, the children will favor the non-White person in most characteristics. It takes two White people to produce a truly White child.

Revelation–The First Cause has revealed His Will to and through Arman, The Teacher.

Sacred Symbols–Representations of the true nature of God and existence. Circles, spirals, fylfots. Believers have such symbols near or on their skin. They have a mystical but real correspondence. Believers generally prefer a rounded arm version of the fylfot. Some prefer two arms, some prefer three arms, some prefer four arms, some prefer five or six arms. The essential part of the fylfot is not the arms, but the spinning center or axis. The arms are always trailing the spin, not leading it. In nature, they are the result of the spinning center. When viewed from the side, over time, the spinning fylfot looks like a tornado or a strand of DNA or many of the other things we observe in nature. The fylfot as a religious symbol must be with believers at all times. Indicates constant expansion. Symbols should touch the skin. May be put on the skin with scars, tattoos, brands, rings, amulets.

Self-identification, self-determination, self-reliance, self-government,self-improvement, self-perfection–are considered important.

Self-organization– Ability of a system to spontaneously arrange its components or elements in a purposeful (non-random) manner, under appropriate conditions but without the help of an external agency.

Sen, The–Another name for strong believers.

Sensory Input–Sensory input is important in rituals and for creating a sense of awe. Thus, when praying one must be surrounded by the proper stimuli.

Single point mutation–a mutation that involves a single nucleotide. For example, sickle-cell disease is a single point mutation in which GAG is changed to GTG.

Ser, The–The flow of existence.

Source, The–Another name for God.

Speciation–The evolutionary formation of a new species, often by the division of a single species into two or more genetically distinct ones, usually by isolation that prevents gene flow. Speciation happens rapidly in small isolated populations.

Speciation has been demonstrated to be possible in as few as eight generations in Drosophila (fruit flies). It can also be caused by selective breeding as is done in animal husbandry.

Spiral–One of the Sacred Symbols in all its forms. All of existence is dependent on the constant spinning, turning, twirling, spiraling. It is this constant spinning movement that shuffles all that exists and is why the only constant is change. The spiral is seen in distant galaxies, in storms, in water draining from a sink, in the way trees grow, in DNA, and in all of existence if you know how to look. If the spinning stopped, existence would stop. The spiral is the result of spinning with the addition of time. Ancient peoples often used spiral symbols, but did not then understand the ubiquitousness of the spinning or its necessity to existence. There is a mystery about such symbols and a teacher has said that they form an actual and real link to much that is seen and unseen. A teacher has said that there are other symbols that seek to dampen the effects of these symbols for good, and these other symbols often have something of a cat’s cradle appearance with straight lines and sharp angles.

Standing Stones and rings of stones–With chiseled symbols, these are links.

Struggle, The–The First Cause’s struggle to be and to be more. It continues the struggle to this day. The struggle against nothingness is part of all existence and it continues by the spinning that brings light and heat to an otherwise dark and cold nothingness. Even humans must struggle to exist and to be and to be more. To not struggle is to fall back into the masses of humanity and not evolve toward the first light and the First Cause. It takes no effort and no struggle to be dark and cold. It does take constant effort and constant struggle to be light and warm.

Survival advantage–A genetic change from the norm that gives organisms a “leg up” on other organisms in the same habitat or environment. Often involves minor changes that have long term effects.

Survival of the fittest–Natural selection conceived of as a struggle for life in which only those organisms best adapted to existing conditions are able to survive and reproduce. We know that all organisms now alive are the fittest of their types, just by their being alive today. However, if they don’t reproduce in their image to go forward into the next generation, they will be defined retroactively as not being the fittest. Organisms must reproduce to be the fittest.

Survival strategies–All organisms have built-in genetic survival strategies that have evolved to allow the organism’s genes to be passed on to the next generation. If the survival strategy is a good one, then the organism’s genotype will survive. In thinking of survival strategies, it must be remembered that the individual is not especially important. It is getting the genotype–the code–to survive and be passed on to expand the particular code carried by the organism.

Teacher, The–Arman. Receiver and promulgator of the revelations and divine inspiration.

Ultimate truth–to be sought.

Unfit–Organisms or populations of organisms that are not adapted to prevailing conditions or which do not produce offspring in sufficient numbers to maintain their contribution to the gene pool of the next generation.

White skin–A mutation that occurred in Europe to adapt the people there so their skin would let in more of the dim European sunlight to produce more Vitamin D than darker skin colors. It gave a survival advantage to those with the mutation, in that with more Vitamin D, those with the mutation didn’t get the bone softening disease rickets, and lived longer to produce more children who also carried the mutation. In time, the white skin mutation spread throughout Europe.Scientists now believe that a tiny mutation in gene slc24a5, located on the long leg of chromosome 15 at position 21.1, started in the few people who left Africa and headed into Europe about 20,000 to 50,000 years ago, was a major reason for the emergence of white skin.

Willed Evolution–Causing the evolution of one’s line by right belief and the right actions that naturally flow from the right beliefs.

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

Memorial Day: Why They Died

admin — Mon, 30 May 2011 12:42:26 +0000

Americans should never again be asked to die in wars fought against our own interests; a veteran’s group leader agrees.

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I THINK THAT MOST Americans have forgotten what Memorial Day is all about. It is now usually thought of as “Memorial Day Weekend,” and like so many holidays today, the actual date of its observance is shifted each year for the maximum convenience of holiday bathers and boozers and the commercial establishments that serve them.

Talk to Americans about Memorial Day and you are likely to receive comments on the sales to be had at the car lots and appliance emporia. If you ask them what the holiday is really supposed to mean, half of them would answer that it signifies the first day of summer. Even those who well know that Memorial Day is meant to honor the soldiers who died in America’s service for the most part do not understand why those soldiers had to die. If you only knew, ladies and gentlemen, if you only knew you would not be partying and picnicking on this most terrible and somber of days. You would be weeping for our nation, and if you had any guts at all you would be working every day of your life to make her free again. There is so much that you do not know.

Revolutionary War

Let us honor the dead of the Revolutionary War. They fought against a tyrannical government, which gave Americans very little voice in government policies, and which taxed them oppressively, though not as oppressively as the productive segment of American society is taxed today.

Today, we may not be taxed to support a King and a few dozen idle courtiers, but instead we are taxed to support the violent and degenerate lifestyle and ever-increasing breeding of an underclass which can be called American only in the geographic sense. If this process is carried on long enough, the descendants and kindred of the men who fought our Revolutionary War will become extinct in the land called America.

Is this what those men died for? They fought — they died — so that their people could be free. If we must work the first five months out of the year to support the destruction of our culture and our people, if we must smilingly tolerate the invasion of our nation on our southern border and in every port city, then are we truly free? Are we not squandering the blood of our forefathers? Remember, the patriots of 1776 were called the “extremists” of their day.

War of 1812

And remember that the royal tyrant called himself the “legitimate government” in those days. When Washington and Jefferson and the other “extremists” were successful, the tyrant was not pleased. Like the tyrants of our day, he thirsted for the blood of men who wanted only to be free. In the War of 1812, as in Waco 1993, fire was his weapon of choice and the rebel capital of the time, Washington, DC, was burned. For three years Americans died in this little-remembered war. Remember those who died for our people’s freedom.

Indian Wars

The authors of the Constitution never dreamed that non-Europeans would be considered citizens. Had you suggested to them that Africans or Indians be called Americans because a number of them happened to be inside our borders, they would have called you insane. But in the last few decades, what our founding fathers would have called insanity has now become public policy. I ask you now to remember the dead who fought against Mexico in the Texas War of Independence and in the Mexican War.

I ask you to remember those who died in the Indian Wars, to secure safety for their families on the frontier. What do you think they were fighting for? Multiculturalism? Open borders? Affirmative action? My friends, if they were alive today they would fight again against all of those things, against the Third World invasion that we are not allowed to call an invasion.

Just a few miles west of my home in Charlottesville, Virginia is the charming city of Lewisburg, West Virginia. It was named for General Andrew Lewis, who was the man who finally defeated the Indians around these parts over 200 years ago. On the other side of that state, in Point Pleasant, just across the river from Ohio, is an imposing monument to General Lewis, who, the inscription states, in defeating the Indians at the Battle of Point Pleasant, struck a decisive blow in the battle between “the forces of civilization and the forces of savagery on this continent.” How long will it be before the forces of Political Correctness consign that inscription to the trash heap?

If you listen to my words today and then do nothing, then you are giving your permission for the trashing of our heritage and history. You are spitting on the graves of General Lewis and all those who fought and died to secure your very existence.

War Between the States

The Civil War is perhaps the most terrible conflict in American history. One hundred forty years later, we have still not recovered from it. Its divisions still split our people apart along political and geographic lines. The legacy of slavery and abolitionism lives on in our intractable racial problems which fill our newspapers from front to back every day. The legacy of Federal tyranny that made war on those states who only wanted their freedom and independence is still very much with us today, in Ruby Ridge, in Waco, and in the army of carpetbagger-like bureaucrats who fence us in on every side with regulations determining who we can hire, associate with, and soon, it seems, what we can say or write or believe.

The greatest loss from that war, however, was the final and perhaps fatal loss of that most precious possession of our nation — the genetic inheritance of our best men. Truly, we may never recover from it. A far greater proportion of the American population was slaughtered in the Civil War than in any war before or since. The bravest and the best were cut down in their prime, and the maternity wards in following years were filled with a greater percentage of the offspring of shirkers, cowards, and deserters. We will never know what America might be like today had those nearly 400,000 young men not died in that insanely suicidal conflict.

World War I

As we turn our eyes toward the twentieth century, we see a new kind of war emerge. It is a kind of war fought not for American purposes, be they good or bad, wise or mistaken. It is a kind of war fought by Americans, to be sure, but not for America in any sense. It is a kind of war fought for foreign interests, interests which are often diametrically opposed to American interests, but which are “sold” to the American sheep by lying propaganda so that the sheep will docilely allow their lambs to go the slaughter.

Every war America has fought for the last 100 years conforms to this description. If your car is adorned with an “I support our troops” sticker, what does it mean? Does it mean that you were fooled? Or does it mean what National Vanguard supporters say it means? — that is, support our troops, bring them home from the Zionist slaughter in the Middle East and station them on the Mexican border.

At least you are alive. The 116,000 American dead in World War I are not. Nor are the over 400,000 who died in World War II, the 54,000 who died in Korea, the 58,000 who died in Vietnam, nor the growing thousands who have died imposing the New World Order in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Somalia, or Haiti.

There was no reason for America to enter World War I. America was manipulated into that war by Zionist interests who manufactured phony atrocity stories and even the entirely fictional sinking of an American ship to stampede their American cattle into rescuing the British Empire, which in payment was to procure Palestine for the Zionists for the future establishment of a Jewish state. President Wilson, because of sexual blackmail by these same interests, danced like a marionette on a string and signed a death warrant for the American boys who died in those stinking trenches. Remember those boys today. Remember also the political heirs of Wilson and the Zionists and the power which we still foolishly allow them to wield in America today.

World War II

Franklin Roosevelt and his successors have also danced on the same stage with the same stringpullers behind the curtains. With his administration came the organized Jewish interests, the Communists and the pro-Communists, the accession to state power of America’s enemies, a power which, although briefly challenged by Joseph McCarthy, they have never relinquished. The Roosevelt administration marks the beginning of what we know so well today: a federal government which regards ordinary White Americans as its enemy.

World War II was a war between the forces that created Communism on the one side, and Western Civilization on the other. When it started in Europe, Americans were solidly against entering the war, having learned a terrible lesson in World War I.

If you woke up tomorrow and found your next-door neighbor was fighting a battle with a drug gang that was trying to kill every home-owner and take over every house in your neighborhood, would you join with your neighbor or would you join with the drug gang? Would you join with your neighbor even if he had had some property disputes with other neighbors, and you thought him wrong? Would you join with your neighbor even if he had some peculiar beliefs about the way to run his household that you didn’t necessarily approve of?

By allowing the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, of which attack the Roosevelt government knew in advance, and by insuring the greatest loss of life possible by not warning the American commanders there, the aliens who came to power with Roosevelt were able to trick the American people into fighting on the side of my hypothetical drug gang, on the side of an ideology openly dedicated to the downfall of America: on the side of Soviet Communism. If there is truth in the doctrine of the survival of the human soul after death, those 405,000 betrayed men are not resting in peace. They were told they were fighting for American freedom, but that was a lie. They didn’t know it, but they were fighting to impose the tyranny of Communism on our blood kindred of Eastern Europe, even as a not dissimilar yoke of tyranny was beginning to be imposed in our land. Let us remember them. And let us remember who it is who is responsible for their deaths.

Korean War/Vietnam

Let us remember the Americans who died in Korea and Vietnam. Over 110,000 died in those wars which gained precisely nothing for America. How many died because traitors in high places in Washington would not allow them to defeat the Communist enemy? How many died because traitors in high places in Washington were trading with and aiding that enemy, providing money and materiel for an international conspiracy that was killing young Americans every day? How many died because they believed the lying bags of garbage in Washington who assured them that they were sincerely trying to “fight Communism”?

U.S.S. Liberty

Let us remember the U.S.S. Liberty, where 205 American sailors and officers were wounded or killed by an Israeli attacking force of aircraft gunners, torpedo boats, and napalm in June 1967. And, let us never forget the government and the controlled media which covered up that atrocity, the full truth of which is only now being revealed to the American people.

Let us also remember the young Americans who never came home from Haiti, from Somalia, from Afghanistan, from Iraq. They enlisted in our military believing that they were defenders of America, but cynical politicians and politician-owners sent them to defend Israel’s interests in the Middle East, and to enforce the dictates of a world government the very concept of which is antithetical to our American Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

The Greatest Sacrifice

They gave not only their lives. Giving your life is often called “the ultimate sacrifice.” As great as that is, there is another and greater sacrifice. When they died, the children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren they never had died with them. And so on into infinity. That is the ultimate sacrifice.

What a terrible loss that is! For these brave warriors who died for America, who died fighting America’s enemies, and in some wars (particularly in this century) tragically died fighting for America’s enemies, were for the most part the best men that America possessed. They loved America, they did not hate her. They would not have wanted to change her into what she has become today. They were the great-hearted, not the small-minded. They gave everything, they asked for nothing. They were the strong, not the weak. They were the brave, not the slick. Their children would have inherited the qualities we need most in America today.

I can see their faces now before me. Millions upon millions of men and women and children who were never born because of the wars fought for America and against America. Whole generations of our people — what contributions might they have made? Their fathers died for us, so we shall never know. We shall never meet them. But in some sense they stand before us today, they stand proud and tall in our conscience — those who fell and the unborn descendants of those who fell at Lexington and Concord, at Yorktown, at Gettysburg, at the Alamo, at Little Big Horn, of those who fell in Flanders Fields and at Iwo Jima, of those whose lives ended in the wretched sands of the Middle East or whose bodies were dragged through the streets of Somalia or Haiti.

Today, I am asking every one of you to rededicate yourselves to the principles and ideals that made America great, the principles and ideals that so many sacrificed their lives for. They did not sacrifice their lives so that American soldiers could be mercenaries for the neocons.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that their descendants would be afraid to walk at night in the cities of America.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that a powerful foreign interest group could milk ten billion dollars every year from docile American cattle to support the state of Israel.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that this powerful foreign interest group could own a large part of this country including nearly all of its major media.

They did not sacrifice their lives so that Mexico could take one third — or will it be two thirds? — of America.

So much has happened that you do not understand, that the controlled media and the schools have simply kept from you. Before Americans have even the slightest chance of retaking their country and making her free once again, they must educate themselves. They must understand how their nation has been stolen from them. They must understand how it happened and who is responsible.

Ladies and gentlemen, no nation can survive unless its young men are willing to die to preserve it. But what a squandering of lives, what a permanent impoverishment of our nation have we suffered at the hands of those who would cynically manipulate our patriotism so that we would be the cannon fodder for their wars, while they sit safely in their counting-houses and lie-factories in New York City and Los Angeles.

How long will you let them keep killing our sons? The longer we wait, the more difficult it will be to speak out against our secret rulers.

Today and every day let us remember those who died for America and the generations who are yet to come.

* * *

Now that was the end of my speech. Unlike Ronald Reagan, who they say gave the same speech hundreds of times over several decades (something inspiring about making America a “shining city on a hill,” though his actual policies resulted in making America more like a running sewer in a garbage dump), I almost never repeat my words. But this is an exception. This is not the first time this speech has been delivered. Though I updated it for 2005, this address is based on a broadcast I made ten years earlier.

But today is not the second time this speech has been made. It is the third time.

Just a few days ago, at the annual Memorial Day ceremony in Coopersburg, Pennsylvania, this very speech — the very words I just spoke to you — were delivered to the assembled crowd by James Calhoun, the Commander of the city’s Veterans of Foreign Wars. This was just reported by New York’s Newsday and by the Allentown papers.

The reaction was swift and vicious. Mr. Calhoun, a 17-year Army veteran and community leader, was immediately fired from his public sector job. It looks likely he’ll be forced to resign as VFW Commander. His own pastor, from a local Lutheran church, denounced his speech, making the ludicrous claim that it was “a recruitment speech for the KKK.”

Calhoun said “The message I was trying to convey was that America gets involved with conflicts that aren’t in the interest of the American people, and many service members have to die because of it.” Which is quite reasonable. But he very quickly began backpedaling and apologizing.

When his pastor “confronted him,” Calhoun reportedly had tears in his eyes. He then claimed he hadn’t even read the speech beforehand. “I realized after the speech I had made a mistake,” he said after some audience members called him a “racist” and a “bigot.” “It was a huge mistake and it snowballed into a bad effect and cost me my job,” he added.

Now does anyone here believe that Mr. Calhoun — or anyone — could deliver a 3,000-word speech by mistake? Or that a man of normal intelligence who can speak cogently could not understand the meaning of his own words as he was speaking them?

I believe that the likeliest explanation is that Mr. Calhoun knew exactly what he was doing, and simply lost his nerve when the pressure was applied by the Usual Suspects. I frankly think we should write and offer him help and support, for he has suffered grievously for speaking the truth.

The way the Usual Suspects felt about it may be gauged by the words of one Ginger Nadel, who said that when she heard the speech “my ears were ringing and I thought the top of my head was going to blow off.”

based on a speech given by Mr. Strom in 2005

A New People Born Out of the Old

admin — Mon, 09 May 2011 00:52:47 +0000

by H. Millard

HOMELESS JACK SAID, “People in my faith know that we are the new Whites — a new people born out of the old — we are born anew after we have awakened to the truth. We are born anew by choice and we have brought ourselves anew into this world from the rotted and empty husks of our corrupted forbears and those still living among us who walk through life in a sleep-like state.

“Each form of life has its own path that is different from others. That also goes for different kinds of humans, man.

“But it’s a little more complicated than that, because there is not just one path for each form of life, but many. In the first instance, these paths are largely determined by the genetic code that has made the life form. But there are choices made daily and there are accidents of fate that cause paths to change.

“Most people blindly take paths without even knowing that they are taking them and that there are others that they could have taken or can take. They are not conscious.

“We, on the other hand, have selected our path from the many that are possible for us. It is a path toward greater consciousness and it is achieved via our DNA and the changes that we can help bring to it by following this faith.

“Organisms are programmed out of the box. Certain parts of the program kick in at different ages and when triggered by certain events and circumstances.

“That is why our way works. We seek to change the environment internally and externally to trigger certain parts of the program that might otherwise only be triggered by accident and then be lost because of a lack of awareness of the change.

“By triggering the right parts of our code, our bodies will secrete hormones and other substances in certain ways to cause additional changes.This will move us higher and open us up to the mutations that we need to move from our present status as a subspecies to being a full species no longer capable of breeding with other kinds of humans.

“You see, man, you and I and all the millions of our people ain’t worth nothin’ unless we breed and breed right.

“Ain’t you fed up with the self-indulgent jerks among us who are concerned about ‘finding themselves’ or who say stupid things like they don’t want children because it would affect the ‘quality of life’ of these sad sack childless ones. Their lives? Their petty little meaningless lives? Screw them. They’re weak seeds, man, at least many of them are. Others are just misinformed or have been conditioned to believe wrong things.

“Look, our purpose is to be a link in the chain. We are to expand always and contract never. That means we are to have as many children as possible during our lives, in our image, and we’re to do it even if we have to break the false laws, rules and mores of our corrupt society.

“Our laws are from the First Cause, man. They can never be wrong. Human-made laws that conflict with these natural laws from the First Cause are wrong at best, and evil in many cases. Our laws are natural laws. We didn’t make them up. We discovered them and in some cases the First Cause revealed them to us.

“We can either follow man or follow the First Cause. That’s the choice, man. It’s very simple and it’s very clear. There’s no reason to be confused or befuddled.

“But, this ain’t so much about us as individuals as it is about the Code that we carry. That Code inside us, man, that’s the real us. That’s what survives the death of our bodies. That’s what goes forward if we have many children, but only if we have them with our kind and with no other kinds.

“This is my faith man. It is for Ourselves Alone and for no others. We’re the only ones who have the right DNA Code to take this path. But we need to choose to take it.”

* * *

“Millard is an original. His books aren’t like your typical fiction. If you don’t know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche…”

THE OUTSIDER – (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9) H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is available at Amazon.com by clicking on the this link or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

When the Fix is In

admin — Sun, 08 May 2011 19:57:56 +0000

by Charles Fuller
via Free Edgar Steele

EVIDENCE THAT COULD HAVE exonerated Ed Steele was withheld from the jury by the judge. In a pre-trial hearing on the admissibility of evidence, two audio experts testified that the FBI recordings contained numerous audio signatures (aberrations) that strongly indicated the recordings might have been tampered with. One expert, Bennett Walsh, a former New York City detective with years of experience with audio recordings, said flatly the recordings were tampered with.

The other expert, George Papcun, PhD (pictured), an internationally known expert with solid scientific credentials, said there was an unusually high number of electronic transients and other discrepancies which could indicate tampering with the recordings. His reputation is bolstered by his knowledge of “voice morphing,” a technology that allows the creation of synthetic speech from digital “voice prints” of the person whose speech they seek to duplicate. It allows the “cloning” of a person’s voice, and the ability to have the subject “say” whatever the counterfeiters wish.

According to Robert McAllister, counsel for the defense, arrangements were made to fly Dr. Papcun by private aircraft from a vacation in the south Pacific to Boise to testify on May 4, the last day of the trial. According to McAllister it was possible for him to arrive at the courthouse by 9:00 AM.

However, McAllister reported that the judge ruled that Dr. Papcun would only be allowed to testify if he was in the court room by 8:30 AM. This information can be verified by McAllister.

Ed Steele was denied his right to call witnesses critical to his defense. Is this a demonstration of a “fair trial,” or is it a lynching? The answer should be obvious to any thinking person.

Read the original posting at Free Edgar Steele

Cyndi Steele Vows to Fight On

admin — Thu, 05 May 2011 21:14:32 +0000

UPDATE: In case it is removed from the Web, this powerfully moving video has been archived here:

http://nationalvanguard.org/wp-content/uploads/cyndi-steele-video-interview-20110505.zip

by Kevin Alfred Strom

AN EMOTIONALLY DEVASTATED Cyndi Steele vowed to fight on with an appeal to a higher court after her husband, free speech attorney Edgar J. Steele, was convicted earlier today of plotting to kill her. Mrs. Steele spoke of her pride in and love for her husband, stating that she and her legal team have absolute proof that the FBI tapes used to convict him are faked, but that her evidence was not allowed in court in what many are viewing as a rigged trial.

Promising to fight and speak out “until my last breath,” Mrs. Steele called for an end to political prosecutions, saying that no one in America is safe now.

Judge Excludes Experts; Jury Convicts Steele

admin — Thu, 05 May 2011 20:00:00 +0000

by Kevin Alfred Strom

IN A TRAGIC MISCARRIAGE of justice, a federal jury — which was denied the right to hear two experts’ testimony that the alleged FBI recordings of Edgar J. Steele were faked, with over 300 suspicious edits inserted — has convicted the courageous free speech attorney and writer on all four counts related to an alleged murder-for-hire of his wife, Cyndi Steele, and mother-in-law.

None of the alleged victims believe the FBI allegations, instead pointing to the admitted Idaho Pipe Bomber, Larry Fairfax — and his government handlers — as the real source of the plot. Fairfax, who allowed a lethal bomb to remain on Cyndi Steele’s car for weeks without telling her, was given a sweetheart deal by prosecutors and no serious charges were brought against him.

It is hoped that the outrageous behavior of the judge in this case — who refused to allow even a few days’ delay to let an expert witness travel from the South Pacific to testify for the defense, and also refused to permit the expert to testify via video conference, even though a prosecution witness was freely allowed to do so — will be the basis of a strong appeal.

The judge in question — Lynn Winmill — exhibited an almost unbelievable coldness toward the lives of the real victims, Edgar Steele and his family, when he stated that even a two-day delay to allow the audio expert to travel to the United States was unacceptable — saying of the brief delay only that “procrastination on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine.”

Cyndi Steele — who was allowed to hear the doctored recordings early on in the framing of her husband in hopes that she would be deceived by them — has long stated that the audio quality on the recordings changes abruptly and dramatically whenever her husband begins to discuss the alleged plot. When she heard the alleged recordings played back in court, however, she was in for a further shock.

As she puts it: “What is even more outrageous now is that the tapes that they played for the jury in the courtroom this week have been altered, because they are not the same recordings the FBI played for me on June 12, 2010, nor the tapes sent to the attorneys that I again listened to on March 7th. It is as if they used the info from the reports of our experts to make the changes to cover up the falsified tapes our experts analyzed.”

May the powers that created the universe — and our people — quickly bring these perjurers and criminals operating under color of law, who have falsely convicted this noble man, to justice; to true justice. And may it happen in our lifetimes.

In the words of Edgar J. Steele: “New America. An idea whose time has come.”

Edgar Steele Tapes Are a Fraud

Chris Rossetti — Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:36:53 +0000

by Cyndi Steele

IN AN EFFORT to find justice and because we eschew oppression, we now have the absolute proof that the US government, for whatever reason, has fabricated its case against Edgar J. Steele, a First Amendment Idaho Lawyer. Steele (pictured) has been defending the falsely accused; many for free. If we do not turn this around now, this trend will impact our children and grandchildren.

In spite of the efforts of Edgar Steele’s new defense attorney, Robert T. McAllister, of Colorado, to get some time to prepare a defense, Judge B. Lynn Winmill of the Idaho Federal District Court is insisting that the Steele Case, based on false charges of murder-for-hire of his wife, Cyndi Steele, go to a jury trial in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho next Monday, March 7, 2011. Cyndi Steele was the victim of a real attempted murder-by-pipe-bomb last June. She has looked at the government’s evidence and proclaimed that her husband is innocent and sees that the entire government case is fabricated. New evidence, just discovered, reveals that the government recordings of Mr. Steele’s voice supposedly hiring a hitman, were fabricated. Even though this is fraud, there is a question whether the judge will permit a defense expert to testify in order to prove it!

The reason for this message is because Edgar J. Steele is facing the trial of his life. At age 65, any sentence is a death sentence. He and his wife Cyndi have three adult children and one grandchild who love him very much and he loves them. Most important, though, is that Edgar J. Steele in innocent.

Former Chief Criminal Prosecuting Attorney (in both N. District of Illinois and Colorado) turned defense attorney McAllister began his representation of Edgar Steele on February 7, 2011, so he has been involved as the attorney for Edgar for less than a month. The government, as is their regular practice, is withholding critical evidence which, by law, should have been shown to the defendant months ago; this is a law violation by the government. There is no one to prosecute when the government breaks the law (see the 201 cases of innocent people falsely charged in USA Today article of September 23, 2010 by Brad Heath). We saw the US government withholding evidence in the David Hinkson case in 2005, resulting in a 43-year prison sentence, an LDS person who is meek and mild, a scientist and inventor who literally never harmed anyone in his life and never had so much as a parking ticket before he was attacked by the US government.

Well, they’re at it again; the US government fraud on the innocent is in full swing, like a shark feeding frenzy. The FBI and US Attorney’s Office in Idaho are seeking to bring down another innocent person, Edgar Steele, and send him to prison, because he is an advocate for the US Constitution and individual rights.

What is interesting is that, in the Edgar Steele case, the government is following the same pattern it used in the David Hinkson case (which pattern reads like the KGB play book of dirty tricks against anyone who does not buy into the politically correct agenda). As it turns out, in thousands of other cases, the government has manufactured evidence by using the FBI to create a crime.

Though we have absolute proof that the audio tapes presented by the government as evidence in the Edgar Steele case are frauds, specific things need to happen in order for Edgar J. Steele to receive the justice: 1) the judge must allow the defense to present to the jury evidence that the tapes were fabricated; and 2) the jury must have the opportunity to see the US government has fabricated this case against Edgar J. Steele.

Our own freedom is at stake, for if they can fabricate a case out of whole cloth against the Edgar Steeles of this world, they can do it to you and me and our loved ones; it will only be a matter of time.

Edgar Steele Case: Prosecution Grasping at Straws

admin — Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:45:47 +0000

by Cyndi Steele

THE EDGAR STEELE DEFENSE FUND, an Idaho non-profit corporation wishes to address a recent prosecution motion which effectively asks for an all-expense paid trip to Ukraine, claiming it is related to Mr. Steele’s case.

Once again, the prosecution has it wrong. In pursuing the Ukrainian connection to my husband, First Amendment lawyer Edgar Steele (pictured), the government is grasping at straws because there is no motive for the alleged murder-for-hire. The government knows that, as my husband’s legal assistant, I was fully aware that the Ukrainian woman was suspected to be a part of a “Russian-Bride” scam which cheated one of his clients out of thousands of dollars. By communicating with this woman, my husband was working a case to bring down the people involved in stealing from Americans. Now, instead of doing her job, Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) Traci Whelan, is seeking an all expense trip abroad and has turned this into a Media-Op.

When my husband was first arrested, the FBI claimed his “motive” was to cash in on our life insurance proceeds. When I told them that we had canceled our life insurance years ago, the FBI claimed my husband had a private investigator following me who supposedly had pictures of me with a “boyfriend.” Oops, the FBI lied again. There was no private investigator, no pictures and no boyfriend. Now the government is using my husband’s investigation of a human trafficking ring to claim he had a girlfriend. This is just another example of the FBI using fraud to prosecute the innocent. As we all have learned from recent reports, the government has prosecuted thousands of innocent people on fabricated evidence over the past 14 years.

In response to AUSA Traci Whelan’s comment: “If the defendant could not control his actions and that is why he hired a hit man, what is to stop that from happening again?” First, my husband was weak from four surgeries and the prescription drugs taken during his recovery, so he didn’t see Larry Fairfax taking advantage of him. Second, he did not hire Larry Fairfax or anyone to be a hit man. And, third, AUSA Whelan well knows that Larry Fairfax is a liar because he lied to the FBI by not disclosing that he had attached a bomb to my car in June when he promised to “come forward” with all his criminal activity. AUSA Whelan has seen the theft report and knows that Fairfax stole $45,000 in silver savings from my husband and me. AUSA Whelan also knows that Fairfax was covering up his theft by blaming my husband in a supposed murder-for-hire scam. AUSA Whelan even told my attorney and me that Fairfax had confessed he was trying to “scam” us. So what does it take to get AUSA Whelan to do her job? She has the real criminal and she knows who his accomplices are but she will not properly charge either with the serious crimes committed by them, thus allowing them to continually put my life and the public in danger.

I’m standing up for my husband because he is innocent. It was the FBI that was tampering with my testimony, trying to persuade me to accept one of their many versions of this case. But I took the time to look at the evidence, without accepting anyone else’s perspective, in order to make up my own mind. After I looked, I realized that it was the FBI who knew there was a bomb on my car many days before I found it attached to my muffler on June 15th. Did the government say anything to me or do anything to warn the public? No!

The same day I found the bomb, a US Marshal told me that the government was not going to provide me any protection. This was the official word!!! At that point, the government supposedly didn’t know who had put the bomb on my car; because, supposedly, Larry Fairfax had not come forward with that information yet. But, all the same, I was being denied protection.

At that time, I told the government that I was worried about this bomb coming from some hate group because my family has had numerous death threats over the years. The FBI knew about these threats and ignored them even though the calls were traced back to the phone lines of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League). Now this same government that refused to protect me is going to give Larry Fairfax, who attempted to murder me, a soft plea deal of an 18 month sentence. The government also refuses to arrest or charge the Fairfax accomplices with their crimes. Since I am the victim of an attempted murder by Fairfax and his gang, I want to know what will it take to get the government to do its job?

Donations of any size for the defense of Mr. Steele are greatly appreciated and are still being accepted by the Edgar Steele Defense Fund. More information can be obtained at www.free-edgar-steele.com, or checks and money orders can be mailed to the Edgar Steele Defense Fund at P.O. 1255, Sagle, Idaho 83860. For further information call Robert Magnuson at 509-290-7466.