EssaysNews

Overton Window Landslide: Jew “Michael Savage” Admits Israel Behind Syria War Push

by Hadding Scott

ON 6 April 2017 Michael Savage ( Weiner), a radio personality heard across the United States, gave an anti-war broadcast that began by observing, on the one-hundredth anniversary of the United States’ entry into the First World War, that Woodrow Wilson had been reelected in 1916 on the premise that he had kept the United States out of the European war and would continue to do so — but then was coaxed into war in spite of his original intentions, with disastrous results.

Obviously, this is a parable for what is happening with Trump.

He points out correctly that we really do not know who in Syria used sarin. He invokes “common sense” as an argument against assuming that Assad was responsible for the sarin-deaths. He states repeatedly that it makes no sense to blame Assad for the gassing.

Savage offers answers to two distinct but, in practice, intertwined questions. The two questions are, who wants war with Russia? and, who wants to destroy Syria?

Savage initially blames “the generals” and “the military-industrial complex” for wanting war. Then he blames “the progressives” and “the liberals.” He gets closer to the truth when he mentions “the Neocon ventriloquists in the media,” since Neoconservatism is a Jewish movement. He mentions Jeff Zucker and Wolf Blitzer. Blitzer at one time was an employee of AIPAC.

Who wants war with Russia? George Soros and the left, he says.

Savage points out that the ex-chief rabbi of Israel has compared the sarin-gassings to the Holocaust as a way of agitating for war. To answer the question of who wants Syria destroyed, Savage finally declares at the end of his first hour: “Israel benefits the most if Assad is gone.”

The constituencies for war against Russia and war against Syria are both Jewish.

He links the change in Trump’s policy to the reduction of conservative Catholic Steve Bannon’s status within the administration. “It seems to me that the liberals and the Neocons are prevailing, and they both have Trump’s ears.”

“Michael Savage”
* * *

Michael Savage has not always criticized his fellow Jews’ warmongering. In 2003 he was such a noteworthy warmonger that he was rewarded with a prime-time show on MSNBC, replacing Phil Donahue, after it was decided that MSNBC would line up with the rest of the news-media in supporting the war against Iraq. At some point, perhaps after witnessing the overthrow and brutal murder of Muammar Qadhafi, Michael Savage became a critic of Neoconservative warmongering, and has linked it to Israeli interests. He has been doing that at least since 2013.

The broadcast of 6 April 2017, however, marks a new level of frankness and clarity for Savage, in terms of declaring the responsibility of the Jewish State. He implies that he has held back in the past.

“But there is another element, and you know I am reluctant to say it, because of the fear I have, in saying what I am going to say to you, but I guess I’m past the point of holding back almost anything,” he says.

Let us hope that the so-called Alt Right will not be less clear and less bold than this Jewish talkshow-host in declaring that Jewish interests motivate these wars. Our people need to know this, so that they will recognize the pattern of lying and know what not to believe.

* * *

Source: National-Socialist Worldview

For Further Reading

Previous post

The US Justice System: Totally Corrupt, Criminal, and Out of Control

Next post

World War 2: Battling the People of the Lie, part 3

13 Comments

  1. April 7, 2017 at 11:21 pm — Reply

    He’s a Jew. Don’t trust a word he says. Simple as that.

    • April 8, 2017 at 10:16 am — Reply

      In this instance, I dare say, this particular Jew was telling the truth. Whatever his motive may be, Michael Savage is actually helping our people to become more aware of some Jewish deceptions and not to be misled. If the masses of our people became generally Jew-wise, the Jews would pose much less of a problem for us.

      In fact, Rush Limbaugh, who is not a Jew, has been much less truthful than Michael Savage in this matter. Limbaugh occasionally does some good in domestic matters (for example opposing abandonment of the GOP’s White base in favor of wooing Hispanics, as proposed by Charles Krauthammer) but he has always been a reckless booster of any war undertaken while a Republican is in the White House.

      In mass-media there is nobody that can be trusted all the time, Jew or not, well intentioned or not.

      • April 8, 2017 at 2:57 pm — Reply

        Jews only tell the truth so far as it is good for the Jews and serves their overall purpose. Otherwise, Jews are repulsed by the truth. To assume they’re doing us any favors by being honest in even the smallest sense is to let our guard down and expose ourselves to the delusion that “not all Jews are like that” and that some are actually on our side, which is exactly what these kinds of deceptions are designed to do. I’ve never seen a Jew telling the truth where he or she wasn’t telling us something we either didn’t already know or couldn’t obtain from a better, non-Jewish source. To play Good Jew/Bad Jew is lethal to our survival. To do so is to assume that one bacterium is less harmful than another in the same infection.

        • April 8, 2017 at 11:45 pm — Reply

          Okay now you admit that some Jews tell the truth sometimes. This is a change from your initial post.

        • April 13, 2017 at 10:02 am — Reply

          Ordinarily I would agree but, having listened to him for some time when he was still available on radio in my area, I was surprised that he routinely lambasted major Jewish politicians and their lackeys. He also directed his venom towards Jews on the Supreme Court, I’ve never heard any other broadcaster do this time and time again. I would not be surprised if this caused his removal from not only a popular time slot in a major area, (Boston), but from the station itself.

    • Jay
      April 10, 2017 at 3:49 pm — Reply

      Bobby Fischer (Jewish) said:

      “The holocaust was all BS.”

      “Work camps for Jews would be good since 90% don’t know that real work or that it’s good for you.”

      “Jews have been living like parasites off of others for the last 2-3,000 years, this must stop for their own good.”

      “All the Jewish leadership in America need to be arrested and killed, about 10,000 to 100,000. Then put the rest (tens of millions) into work camps until they understand what work is.” How long? “10, 20, how ever many years it takes, something like the red Chinese did on a mass scale.”

      I could go on, but you get the idea.

      Need turn down open aid, but watch the source, yes keep an eye on the source.

      • April 10, 2017 at 6:56 pm — Reply

        Some sites claim that Bobby Fischer was half Jewish. A few make the argument that he was fully Jewish. He himself denied being a Jew at all, writing to the Encyclopaedia Judaica:

        Gentlemen:

        Knowing what I do about Judaism, I was naturally distressed to see that you have erroneously featured me as a Jew in ENCYCLOPAEDIA JUDAICA. Please do not make this mistake again in any future editions of your voluminous, pseudo-authoritative publication. I am not today, nor have I ever been a Jew, and as a matter of fact, I am uncircumcised.

        I suggest rather than fraudulently misrepresenting me to be a Jew, and dishonestly abusing my name and reputation as a kind of advertising gimmick to improve the image of your religion (Judaism), you try to promote your religion on its own merits — if indeed it has any!

        In closing, I trust that I am not being unrealistically optimistic, in thanking you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

        Truly yours,
        Bobby Fischer

        What’s the biological truth about Fischer? I don’t know. But this is what is known. He certainly had a way with words!

        • Jay
          April 11, 2017 at 1:45 pm — Reply

          Interesting,
          I will have to look that up, because most whites who would have said what he said during the time period he said, would in all likelihood have ended up dead.
          Edgar Steele
          The Order members
          etc, etc…

      • Anthony Collins
        April 11, 2017 at 3:10 am — Reply

        There might be a few Jews who don’t identify themselves as Jews because they weren’t brought up as Jews, have been injured by their fellow Jews, or simply find the Jews and Jewishness repugnant. Bobby Fischer might have been one of them.

        One can be sure that some Jews are alienated from the Jewish community by the ill-treatment they have suffered from their fellow Jews. Jews who have been sexually abused by Jews, and who are prevented from taking action against their abusers by the Jewish community, may well be resentful towards the Jewish community. (The Talmudic penalty for informing on Jews to Gentile authorities is death.) Samuel Roth wrote his revealing work Jews Must Live after having been cheated too many times by Jews. Kevin MacDonald’s article “Is the Madoff Scandal Paradigmatic?” suggests that the Jewish swindler Bernard Madoff may have had a grudge against his fellow Jews and seen them as fair game:

        “Looking back, his childhood contemporaries have realized Madoff could well have come to resent his own people — that he had . . . an ‘inner need to screw the system.’

        “In the competitive, upwardly mobile Jewish society of Laurelton, Queens in the 1950s, the Madoff family did not command much respect. They were not prosperous, nor were they involved in a prestigious profession. Bernard himself won no academic laurels — Kirtzman quotes a middle school girlfriend recalling a poignant occasion with him sitting silently through a school lunch at which his circle were comparing and boasting about their report cards. He had nothing to boast about. Shortly afterwards she broke up with him: ‘I didn’t think he was smart enough.’

        “In fact, Madoff had a concrete reason to feel alienated — what Weinstein describes as his ‘beautiful blue eyes.’ These are not necessarily appreciated in Jewish circles — Graham recalls being curtly told they represented a fault in the bloodline when once asking a Jewish friend about her eye color. Weinstein reports Madoff’s grandmother disliked his High School girlfriend and future wife: ‘She thought she was a “shiksa” . . . because Ruth was blond and had blue eyes.’

        “There was no doubt about Ruth Alpern’s Jewishness . . . but Oppenheimer reports a school friend remembering of Ruth that a candy store proprietor was ‘shocked — shocked — to learn she wasn’t a gentile because of her goyish look.’ Ruth Alpern ‘looked like a shiksa. She did, absolutely . . . extremely shiksa looking.’

        “Madoff’s choice of such a partner may have said more about his attitude to his own community than his circle realized. Weinstein reports the Madoffs were not at all observant, and in fact frequently used Yom Kippur as a day to fly to their villa in France.

        “When the British tried to figure out what caused the socially elite and privileged Burgess/Maclean/Philby circle to damage their country so much by spying for the Soviet Union, they found that anguish about minor status blemishes could be argued to have triggered this murderous resentment. Being on the margin of a highly judgmental group can apparently cause extremely anti-social behavior.”

        http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/07/is-the-madoff-scandal-paradigmatic-2/

        Some Jews must find heavily Jewish environments insane and intolerable. Such Jews might paraphrase Jean-Paul Sartre: “Hell is other Jews.”

        In America’s Decline, Revilo P. Oliver wrote of “civilized Jews,” i.e., Jews whose behavior was hardly Jewish:

        “My generation thought of the Jews as pests rather than as an international race, and there were some Jews who were not Jews. Persons who have grown up since 1945 will find it difficult to understand what we, who grew up around 1930, then took for granted but now seems inconceivable.

        “In the 1920s and 1930s there were a few Jews — very few in comparison with the millions that were in the United States even before the great influx under Roosevelt — who seemed to be Americans or Europeans and, without trying to disguise their racial origins, seemed to have so little in common with the majority of their race that one did not think of them as Jews. They had the manners of gentlemen, had apparently assimilated the traditions, learning, and spirit of our culture, and had evidently lost the intense racial consciousness that is the prime characteristic of Jews. If they felt (and even today I find it hard to believe that they did) the Jews’ contempt for the stupid Aryans and the other races that their tribal god or their innate superiority have made their natural subjects, they concealed that sentiment perfectly, and, when the question arose, expressed a well-bred contempt for the ‘Kikes,’ the mass of crafty, industrious, instinctively dishonest, and naturally dirty aliens who were battening on our society and exploiting our Christian weakness, a foolish toleration of, and sympathy for, anything that whines.”

        “Civilized Jews never complained about ‘discrimination’ or ‘persecution’ (past or present) — it would have been preposterous if they had — and neither flaunted nor dissembled their race. They had (so far as one knew) no connection with synagogues or the other racial organizations of the Jews.”

        “There was a racial fact of which no one at the time seemed to appreciate the significance. With the exception of Sephardim who contracted marriages according to the aristocratic code of family alliances, none of the civilized Jews whom I knew was married to a Jewess. And, what is more important, while I knew or now remember nothing of the parents of many, of those whose parents I met or had been given some account, none, if memory serves me, was the son of a Jewess. Thus, although those men thought of themselves as Jews by race, according to the standards of the Jews, who obviously know much more about the hereditary transmission of racial traits than we do, they were not Jews at all.”

        “The civilized Jews were, of course, a tiny minority among the members of their race in this country. No one in his senses and not willfully obtuse could overlook the disastrous consequences of the policy that is epitomized by the inscription on the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor: it is verse written by a Jewess and purports to praise the United States, but what it really says is, ‘World’s garbage disposal: dump your human refuse here.'”

    • Diana
      April 12, 2017 at 6:12 pm — Reply

      I know its hard not to be bitter after Iraq and being fooled and pulled into their PNAC plan but I try to remember their are good Jews out there. Ones who will tell the truth and save lives. People like marine Alan Sabrowsky and we need these people. I can’t tell you how to feel about all of it and I know its terrible believe me. I had family in Iraq and my God son was killed in Iraq. I get what it is like to feel pure and absolute hatred towards neocon Jews but there are still good people who are Jews. Peace

  2. Anthony Collins
    April 9, 2017 at 9:55 pm — Reply

    There’s an old proverb, “Tell the truth and shame the devil.” Perhaps it might be said that when a devil tells the truth, he shames the goyim who do not do so.

    • April 13, 2017 at 3:55 pm — Reply

      Yes, that was my point. Why does Richard Spencer play down the role of Zionist Jews in fomenting these wars after even Michael Savage has spelled it out?

  3. Jay
    April 11, 2017 at 4:01 pm — Reply

    On another note,
    Most of the far sighted among us and even some of the Jews would prefer Trump come out and say this is a one off to slap Assad on the wrist or some such.
    Then later someone in the CIA will be exposed for feeding false flag info, which they have, and deceiving the President/American people.
    This will give President Trump public support to clean out the government and the intelligence agencies in total.

    Then for him to get back business here and help set the climate for a smooth transition to a relatively peaceful move far enough right, that we can put our people in openly.
    That way we avoid a lot of unneeded death on both sides, but if not then it will just happen anyway with a lot more bloodshed(sadly).
    On top of our people demanding the blood of those responsible(mob justice/no mercy).

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.