Essays

“Civil Rights” for Blacks Equals More Crime

A Jew pretends to be White while leading a Black “civil rights” demonstration in the 1960s

Introductory Note by David Sims: It’s interesting when the controlled media begin publishing articles about Black criminality that echo what White racial-nationalists have been saying consistently for the past 80 years — without giving us any credit for being right all along, of course. Probably the only reason this writer (Jason Riley) was allowed to publish his essay in the Washington Times is because he’s Black himself.

The real lesson to learn about race from the history of the United States in the 20th century is that Black misbehavior is not a reaction to “racism” in its early half — but is instead a consequence of “civil rights” and the expansion of freedom for Blacks, which they consistently and continually abused during its late half.

Here, in part, is what Jason Riley had to say:

* * *

Crime began rising precipitously in the 1960s after the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Earl Warren, started tilting the scales in favor of the criminals. Some 63 percent of respondents to a Gallup poll taken in 1968 judged the Warren Court, in place from 1953 to 1969, too lenient on crime; but Warren’s jurisprudence was sup­ported wholeheartedly by the liberal intellectuals of that era, as well as by politicians who wanted to shift blame for criminal behavior away from the criminals. Popular books of the time, like Karl Menninger’s The Crime of Punishment, argued that “law and order” was an “inflammatory” term with racial overtones. “What it really means,” said Menninger, “is that we should all go out and find the n–– and beat them up.”

The late William Stuntz, a Harvard law professor, addressed this history in his 2011 book, The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. “The lenient turn of the mid-twentieth century was, in part, the product of judges, prosecutors and politicians who saw criminal punishment as too harsh a remedy for ghetto violence,” wrote Mr. Stuntz. “The Supreme Court’s expansion of criminal defendants’ legal rights in the 1960s and after flowed from the Justices’ percep­tion that poor and black defendants were being victimized by a system run by white government officials. Even the rise of harsh drug laws was in large measure the product of reformers’ efforts to limit the awful costs illegal drug markets impose on poor city neighborhoods. Each of these changes flowed, in large measure, from the decisions of men who saw themselves as reformers. But their reforms showed an uncanny ability to take bad situations and make them worse.”

Crime rates rose by 139 percent during the 1960s, and the murder rate doubled. Cities couldn’t hire cops fast enough. “The number of police per 1,000 people was up twice the rate of the population growth, and yet clearance rates for crimes dropped 31 percent and conviction rates were down 6 percent,” wrote Lucas A. Powe Jr. in The Warren Court and American Politics, his history of the Warren Court. “During the last weeks of his [1968] presidential campaign, Nixon had a favorite line in his standard speech. ‘In the past 45 minutes this is what happened in America. There has been one murder, two rapes, forty-five major crimes of violence, countless robberies and auto thefts.’”

As remains the case today, Blacks in the past were overrepre­sented among those arrested and imprisoned. In urban areas in 1967, Blacks were 17 times more likely than Whites to be arrested for robbery. In 1980 Blacks comprised about one-eighth of the population but were half of all those arrested for murder, rape and robbery, according to FBI data. And they were between one-fourth and one-third of all those arrested for crimes such as burglary, auto theft and aggravated assault.

Today Blacks are about 13 percent of the population and continue to be responsible for an inordinate amount of crime. Between 1976 and 2005 Blacks com­mitted more than half of all murders in the United States. The Black arrest rate for most offenses — including robbery, aggravated assault and property crimes — is still typically two to three times their representation in the population. Blacks as a group are also overrepresented among persons arrested for so-called white-collar crimes such as counterfeiting, fraud and embezzlement. And blaming this decades-long, well-documented trend on racist cops, prosecutors, judges, sentencing guidelines and drug laws doesn’t cut it as a plausible explanation.

“Even allowing for the existence of discrimination in the criminal justice system, the higher rates of crime among black Americans cannot be denied,” wrote James Q. Wilson and Richard Herrnstein in their classic 1985 study, Crime and Human Nature. “Every study of crime using official data shows blacks to be overrepresented among persons arrested, convicted, and imprisoned for street crimes.” This was true decades before the authors put it to paper, and it remains the case decades later.

“The overrepresentation of blacks among arrested persons persists throughout the criminal justice system,” wrote Wilson and Herrnstein. “Though prosecutors and judges may well make discriminatory judgments, such decisions do not account for more than a small fraction of the overrepresentation of blacks in prison.” Yet liberal policy makers and their allies in the press and the academy consistently downplay the empirical data on black crime rates, when they bother to discuss them at all. Stories about the racial makeup of prisons are commonplace; stories about the excessive amount of black criminality are much harder to come by.

“High rates of black violence in the late twentieth century are a matter of historical fact, not bigoted imagination,” wrote Mr. Stuntz. “The trends reached their peak not in the land of Jim Crow but in the more civilized North, and not in the age of segrega­tion but in the decades that saw the rise of civil rights for African Americans — and of African American control of city governments.” The left wants to blame these outcomes on racial animus and “the system,” but Blacks have long been part of running that system. Black crime and incarceration rates spiked in the 1970s and ’80s in cities such as Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Washington under Black mayors and Black police chiefs. Some of the most violent cities in the United States today are run by Blacks.

* * *

Source: David Sims and the Washington Times

For Further Reading

Previous post

Former BNP Chief Nick Griffin Plans Move to Hungary

Next post

World War 2: Battling the People of the Lie, part 1

6 Comments

  1. Anthony Collins
    March 25, 2017 at 8:22 am — Reply

    “Some of the most violent cities in the United States today are run by Blacks.” They’re also overrun by Blacks, like a kitchen infested with cockroaches.

  2. Mr. Ugly
    March 25, 2017 at 11:17 am — Reply

    The biggest mistake that whites had ever made was bringing enslaved blacks to the western hemisphere, to begin with.

    • March 25, 2017 at 1:25 pm — Reply

      Whites didn’t bring the slaves to America; the Jews did. Jews ran the entire international slave trade through their base in Newport Rhode Island with their own slave ships and Jewish crews. It was the Jews that were dealing with the African tribal leaders who were selling their own people out. The Whites in America, however, were dumb enough to buy the slaves. Of course, running the entire slave operation (and bragging about it in their own literature) helped the Jews kill two birds with one stone: They were able to flood the U.S. with a foreign race very early in our history, starting the dilution of our homogeneous nation while at the same time making obscene amounts of money doing it. Check out the book: The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. Lots of videos online about this, too.

      • Mr. Ugly
        March 25, 2017 at 5:18 pm — Reply

        As long as they keep them here, it is one mistake that they, as well as future generations, will pay for the rest of their lives. All because either they were too lazy to pick their own cotton or too cheap to pay one of their own to do so.

  3. March 25, 2017 at 1:16 pm — Reply

    Not exactly a “newsflash”. This guy is just a little late to the party. The thing that gets me is why does a black person have to say something like this to give it any credibility, when these stats have been around for generations? Honest stats don’t lie, regardless of who’s sharing them.

    I find one of the most truthful parts of the article the caption to the photo. Never forget Jews present themselves as Whites all the time to give the impression that we support self-destructive political movements and convince real Whites to hop on board to hasten their own demise.

    When we liberated women, we got feminism; when we liberated blacks, we got massive crime; when we liberated Jews, we got corruption and degeneracy.

  4. Anthony Collins
    April 10, 2017 at 12:14 pm — Reply

    The picture at the top of the article above reminds me of the shrewd observation of one writer, whose name eludes me at the moment, that Jewish identity is a shell game. The Jews define Jewishness in terms of religion, culture, race, ethnicity, nationality, or whatever category is the most effective for advancing their ethnic interests and befuddling their gentile hosts (e.g., Jews denying the Jewishness of communism will typically define Jewishness in religious terms). Jews will claim to be White or non-White according to their interests, their chutzpah, and the credulity of their audiences.

    Jews hate being identified as Jews, being made identifiable as Jews, and being made accountable as Jews.

    When Richard Wagner referred to the Jews as “the plastic demon,” perhaps he was referring to their ability to change their guises. As Revilo P. Oliver said in “What We Owe Our Parasites”:

    “That strange and unique international people, the Jews, who for all the time in which they are known to history have lived and flourished by planting their colonies in other people’s countries, have owed much of their success to the chameleon-like ability to take on, when they choose, the manners and attitudes of whatever country they choose to reside in. . . . But all observers . . . have commented on the Jews’ amazing ability to seem a German in Berlin, a Czech in Prague, an Italian in Rome, and an Englishman in London, shifting from one role to the other with the ease with which a man might change his suit of clothes. The Jews have, of course, the great advantage that their skins are white, and that many of them resemble, in features, members of our race, even to the point of being indistinguishable, at least to an untrained eye, and including persons with such non-Oriental characteristics as blond or red hair.”

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.