News

Facebook Unveils New Censorship Plan

Stories that Jews deem to be “fake news” will be automatically flagged and moved to the bottom of your timeline, where they unlikely to be read or even seen.

Editor’s Introduction: Facebook will now decide for you whether or not information posted to your timeline is “fake news,” and effectively moved off screen, for Facebook-approved news, which will be as visible as ever. Here’s what controlled media publication Forbes magazine (they are delighted that censorship has begun) reported today:

THE NEW PROTOCOL, which will be rolled out in Germany first, is simple; new tools for users will allow them to flag links as potential fake news. This will prompt an independent fact-checking organisation, Correctiv, to verify the article’s veracity.

If they deem to it to be fake news, then the link is given a ‘disputed’ badge and shunted down to the bottom of your newsfeed.

It’s a clever, pragmatic solution that will have an immediate impact on fake news, which is important given that Germany has an election coming up.

But I can see potential flashpoints with Facebook’s new tools that might blunt their effectiveness.

The Disputed Badge Will Become a Badge of Honour

The Facebook pages that spread fake news and the people that share it revel in being anti-establishment. If their posts are routinely flagged with ‘disputed’ then they’ll wear that as a badge of honour.

They’ll complain that the establishment, backed by the boogeyman mainstream media, is trying to silence dissenters and whoever supports their cause. That the establishment is trying to shut down debate and hide the truth, which plays perfectly into the fake news agenda.

The communities these organisations create are a large part of why they’re so successful. It’s not just that some people are duped by fake news, it’s also that they want to believe it. It’s confirmation bias.

Of course, not everyone is an ideological zealot. Many people are simply fooled into sharing an article they thought was true and will accept that it’s not. But many willingly play their role in the creation and spread of fake news.

People Will Flag Real News as Fake News

Within the above example, retaliation is a likely possibility. Armies of believers who feel slighted by Facebook’s ‘intrusion’ will likely seek revenge by flagging mainstream media articles as fake news.

There’s also the people who steadfastly believe that established media outlets are little more than puppets of the government. That’s not entirely without merit (which is a debate for another day), but expect people with differing opinions to CNN to flag their content as fake.

I do wonder how well equipped the fact-checkers are to handle a deluge of requests, too. They could be buried in requests they can’t keep up with, or, alternatively, a new independent fact-checking industry could be born.

Check out how I bought Reddit’s front page with fake news

It will become clear that making these posts less visible is the only real solution.

I hope that making it clear to users that the content they’re reading is fake will put a dent in the fake news problem. But, as I’ve laid out above, that could very well not be the case.

Part of the German Facebook experiment includes making stories marked as ‘disputed’ appear lower in newsfeeds. I suspect this will have the greatest impact on tackling fake news. If it can’t be seen, then it can’t spread and the organisations can’t make money.

This, of course, brings with it other headaches. Namely, Facebook having the power to determine what isn’t ‘acceptable’ news, which is not a road anyone wants to go down. However, having the backing of an independent, non-profit, investigative journalism fact-checking group does alleviate those concerns.

The time I’ve spent looking into fake news and the people that believe/share it tells me that it’s an entirely unpredictable beast that’s hard to control. Facebook will have to adapt its tools quickly to make sure its solution remains relevant. On a wider note, to truly tackle fake news, society needs to trust the media again and people need to  apply critical thinking to every bit of information they receive. The latter two points aren’t solved overnight, but at least we’ve finally started that journey.

* * *

Source: Forbes

* * *

Download our PDF flier

* * *

For Further Reading

Previous post

Austria: Freedom Party Goes Full-On Kosher

Next post

In Memoriam: John Amery

3 Comments

  1. Anthony Collins
    January 16, 2017 at 10:26 pm — Reply

    Facebook is effectively marking news it doesn’t like as tref, i.e., unclean, unkosher, but prefers to call it “false news.”

    Jews like to stigmatize what they don’t like, but they don’t like to be identified as Jews. When one recognizes Jews as Jews, all kinds of patterns become visible, as regular and interconnected as the lines that form the Mogen David. And when one sees these patterns, one realizes that one is not dealing with a few crooked individuals who just happen to be Jewish, but with a race that is more crooked than one can comprehend.

    Persons interested in “hacking” company logos and advertisements should note that Facebook’s logotype uses Klavika. I don’t know if there are symbol fonts including kosher marks, or which kosher marks are used most widely, but a little k in a circle, placed next to the logos of offending companies in place of the trademark sign, and perhaps made a little bigger, should make the point to the Jew-wise.

  2. January 17, 2017 at 3:30 pm — Reply

    “This, of course, brings with it other headaches. Namely, Facebook having the power to determine what isn’t ‘acceptable’ news, which is not a road anyone wants to go down. However, having the backing of an independent, non-profit, investigative journalism fact-checking group does alleviate those concerns.”

    Oh, come on. We’re all adults living in the 21st century here. We get what’s going on. Just like any other right or freedom the Jews can’t take away altogether, they do their best to limit access to that action, product or behavior. Limiting access to something to the point where you can’t utilize it properly or at all (i.e. burying information where you can’t find it, instituting lots of cumbersome regulations on an activity, etc.) creates a de facto ban while they can still say they haven’t “taken your rights away” or aren’t “censoring” content because technically, that product or choice is still available to you. It’s the perfect kind of hair-splitting semantics that they play all the time.

    This is a blatant move toward full censorship, not of “fake news”, whatever that is, but of only specific kinds of content that contradict the mainstream narrative that serves their purpose. Do you really think that Facebook users flagging CNN or ABC content will actually result in those articles getting booted way down the list feed? I hardly think so, and would bet money on the fact that they won’t end up at the bottom, no matter how many negative hits they get.

    Make no mistake, this move is content specific, and anyone who even thinks this so-called “independent, nonprofit, investigative journalism” agency Facebook is using to umm…”fact-check” the articles in question is going to be objective in even the remotest sense of the word is shockingly naive.

    In truth, NO ONE should have the power to determine what they think is real or so-called fake news. We must stop using and therefore reinforcing these globalist, anti-freedom memes like fake news. In fact, all that really exists is information, and it should be up to the consumer of that knowledge as to what he will take or leave of it for himself. There are no information gatekeepers in a free society.

    It stuns me that anyone even remotely familiar with the way the world really works and the pervasive threat of globalism would still be using a service like Facebook or paying for cable TV or going to movie theaters, and putting hundreds of billions of dollars into the coffers of those that then use that money to destroy them.

  3. Anthony Collins
    January 22, 2017 at 1:09 am — Reply

    People who value freedom of speech should unfriend Facebook.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.