EditorialsEssays

Implications of the Jewish Theft of the McCorkill Fortune

WWW_portrait_xby William White Williams (pictured)
Chairman, National Alliance

AT JEWISH BEHEST, Canadian Courts recently declared the National Alliance’s educational and organizing program to be “against Canadian public policy,” effectively finding us guilty of thought crimes — even though the Alliance has never been charged in Canada with any crime whatsoever, nor has evidence ever been presented, defenses mounted, or arguments heard. That judge then proceeded to overturn former Alliance member Dr. Robert McCorkill’s will, and canceled his bequest to our organization, valued at several hundred thousand dollars. The Jews who engineered this theft may end up regretting their dishonorable deeds.

“This case is crucial for freedom of speech and freedom of beliefs and for property rights in Canada,” said Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), speaking on behalf of the National Alliance.

John Hughes of Moncton, lawyer for the Trustee of the Estate, Fred Streed, weighed in to support CAFE: “The International Boundary separates the U.S. from Canada,” he explained. “The McCorkill will makes a bequest in New Brunswick but the proceeds go to a beneficiary in the United States… The beneficiaries are in the U.S. and this raises the question of ‘public policy.’ Whose public policy? There is no evidence that the National Alliance was ever charged or convicted in either Canada or the U.S. The National Alliance in the U.S. is protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution.” And, Mr. Hughes added, “How can a Canadian Court deny a bequest to a U.S. citizen or group? This is extraterritoriality.”

Mr. Hughes then turned his guns on the mischievous organization behind this raid on the estate: “The outrage of minorities to this bequest is irrelevant. This estate is being sent to the United States. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is the puppet master behind this case. The League for Human Rights of B’nai B’rith in its submissions made clear references to the SPLC’s Web site.”

Arguing for the Jewish groups in opposition to the bequest, Marc-Antoine Chiasson insisted: “Promoting the White Race if it is the majority, is detrimental to minorities.”

When the SPLC moved to block the bequest to our Alliance they quoted our Membership Handbook as justification: “We must have White work spaces, White farms, White schools.… We want an environment where our own nature can express itself. We must root out Semitic and non-Aryan influences.” And this: “The Aryan Race has the right to ensure its own survival and it must have a White living space including Europe, North America, and the southern tip of Africa.”

Such “hate”! One thing the anti-White Jewish advocacy groups don’t seem to grasp is that the Alliance’s loss of this fight in Canada sets a most dangerous legal precedent for property rights for everyone in Canada — including even Jews. The hatred against goyim found in the Jew’s Torah and Talmud, for example, could be trotted out in court — just as our Handbook was — to judge the character of Jewish beneficiaries and to prove that B’nai B’rith, for but one example, is a “hate group,” and thus unworthy, according to Canadian public policy, to receive bequests from testators.

Consider this passage from the Jews’ spiritual leader Moses to his people in the seventh chapter of Deuteronomy on how to deal with non-Jews:

And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them. Neither shalt thou make marriages unto them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire… thine eye shall have no pity upon them. But the Lord thy God shall deliver them unto thee and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed.

Parenthetically, this passage reminds us that, as Polydorus is reputed to have said, “If you worship your enemy, you are defeated. If you adopt your enemy’s religion, you are enslaved. If you breed with your enemy, you are destroyed.”

Despite the unjust outcome of this case, we will continue our Alliance-building.

* * *

Source: National Alliance BULLETIN

* * *

Download our PDF flier

* * *

For Further Reading

Previous post

Breivik, Modern Prisons, and the What the Jews Plan for Us

Next post

Angelic Whites and Demonic Blacks

4 Comments

  1. H. Millard
    July 31, 2016 at 11:15 am — Reply

    The intent of the law of wills, at least in the U.S., is to fulfill the wishes of a dying person, not go against those wishes. No matter the law in Canada, the immoral and unethical action is outrageous–denying a dying man’s wishes because the government and non-government groups and individuals do not agree with the religion/philosophy/politics of those to whom he wants to leave his money. It is not a just, right or good thing that is being done in Canada. I’ll say it again: It is immoral and unethical. And, it is evil.

    • Christopher
      July 31, 2016 at 7:24 pm — Reply

      Right, It IS immoral, unethical and evil. The rigged court systems ARE just that, in many cases. The late Dr. McCorkill should’ve known that. And subsequently, Whites should also know that and plan accordingly.

  2. Walt Hampton
    July 31, 2016 at 4:55 pm — Reply

    As a septuagenarian, I am gravely concerned with this case.
    Canada’s “hate laws” seem to have a way of finding their way
    down here. I certainly would not want to have my small
    fortune fall into the hands of the enemy Jews and their
    Goy cohorts.

  3. Christopher
    July 31, 2016 at 7:17 pm — Reply

    Once again, this demonstrates that courts are not working for Whites’ interests, including probate court. If the bulk finances of Dr McCorkill’s estate were exclusively in Gold, i.e. bullion, stocks and shares – those could have been delivered to the NA 10 days after his death with no court involvement. This is important because the bequest is between the testator and beneficiary, no one else.

    More White families need to avoid courts and their usual suspects, in post death activities to transfer estates.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.