American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromOpinionRadio

Real Child Abuse

Norman_Spack_cropAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of April 30, 2016

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

HE’S JUST LIKE Josef Mengele, but real. Mengele was a World War 2 German medical doctor who was alleged by Jews to have been a “Nazi” monster who performed horrible medical experiments, especially on helpless children — experiments such as injecting blue dye into a child’s eyeballs to “turn brown eyes blue” and the like. The 70-year-old story of Joseph Mengele, however, is almost entirely mythical and unbelievable. But the story I am going to tell you is about a real monster. The story I will tell you, about a Jewish doctor named Norman Spack (pictured), is true by Spack’s own voluminous admissions — and is happening right now, as I speak, and it is happening right here in the United States of America. In my opinion, which I will now explain, and in the opinion of a growing number of concerned people, what Spack and his colleagues — many of whom are also his fellow Jews — are doing constitutes real child abuse under the color of medicine.

Spack takes little children, most of them evidently White children, some of them as young as six years old, and using his knowledge of endocrinology, injects them with “hormone blockers” to suppress the normal onset of sexual puberty. The so-called “treatments” last for years. These children never develop their normal sexual characteristics and take on a weird, androgynous look as Dr. Spack sets the stage for more bizarre injections and mutilations by him and his colleagues to follow.

Then, a few years later, these children’s helpless bodies are medically flooded with the hormones of the opposite sex from their actual sex — little girls are flooded with the male hormone testosterone; little boys are flooded with the female hormone estrogen — in such huge quantities that the boys start to develop female breasts, and never develop their normal masculine bone and muscle structure; and the young girls never develop female breasts or the feminine curve of the hips, but instead get broad shoulders, square jaws, and facial hair.

And after long, long years of this severe chemical abuse of a child’s body — along with equally severe abuse of the child’s mind in the form of “counseling” from Spack’s cohorts — come the surgeons with their knockout drops and their knives to cut and mutilate the child’s body into a twisted mockery of a body of a member of the opposite sex. Norman Spack has built his entire career on deforming the bodies of little children into such mockeries, not coincidentally rendering them totally infertile in the process, and his watchword and message to his fellow abusers is in essence “get to them while they’re young” for a more “successful” and believable mutilation job.

What Normal Spack and his co-conspirators and imitators do is irreversible. And the abuse never ends — the victims end up “needing” a lifetime of hormone treatments — and, in many cases, doubtlessly a lifetime of psychotropic drugs and psychiatric sessions to keep them from going any more insane than they already are — to keep them hypnotized into placid acceptance of what has been done to them — and to keep any feelings of resentment or anger they might naturally experience pointed at the nonexistent evil White heteropatriarchy, and away from the unfortunately real nice Jewish doctor and his accomplices.

Further consider this: When Spack and company create a fake sterile male or a fake sterile female, they are not just taking one White man or one White woman out of the gene pool, out of the pool of future parents. No — it goes far beyond that. For when the fake male takes a real female partner, that coupling is taking her out of the gene pool too and rendering her sterile too. The same is true of the fake sterile female — whose husband is also rendered a reproductive nullity. And such mutilated victims also have an effect on the next generation through example.

(What Spack and other Jews and their Gentile collaborators are doing is very similar to what scientists have done to exterminate insects: If they desire to wipe out a certain kind of fly, for example, they create genetically- or chemically-modified flies which look and act like normal male or female flies, but are incapable of reproduction. Releasing the modified flies into the environment, the scientists create a situation in which the normal flies will mate with the fakes and thereby bring about their own extermination.)

When these mutilated victims are praised, coddled, and lavished with attention for their “strength” and their “bravery” and their “fight against White hetero oppression” and the like, what effect does that have on the very impressionable and very imitative younger generation, longing to be liked and to be praised and to make their mark on the world? How many of them will be impelled to multiply this sick practice tenfold or a hundredfold?

And how many family members, or even just observers of this sick abuse and near-insanity in our society, become demoralized, suicidal, or depressed to the point that they give up on life and never have a family? How many take one look at this sickness and degeneracy and say “I want nothing to do with this world anymore”? How many think, perhaps even unconsciously, “I would never bring children into a sick world like this, a world where Spack or his like might get hold of them at age six”? — and then effectively sterilize themselves by using contraception their entire lives? And how many of them will be recruited into Spack’s crusade and devote their utterly wasted lives to the sick cause of transsexualism and other sex perversions and the effective genocide of their own people?

Norman Spack and his cohorts do not do all of this for free, of course. It takes time and money to convince little Johnny that his liking for playing with girls occasionally means that he really wants to be one. It takes a lot more time and money to convince little Sally’s parents that tomboy Sally is really a “boy trapped in the body of a girl” and that she should be chemically altered and surgically mutilated by having a fake penis attached to her body. Consider the costs to the family — and to society — of years, possibly a lifetime, of psychological counseling sessions for the children, the parents, the siblings — you’re easily talking half a million dollars, or in some cases four times that.

A lifetime of hormone treatments at hundreds every month — again, a total of many hundreds of thousands of dollars per victim. The cost of the actual sexual mutilation “surgeries” and directly related treatments can often go higher than $100,000 to $150,000 per procedure. And the figures I have seen quoted are “out of pocket” — how much does insurance pay? (Insurance companies which almost never pay for innovative new cancer treatments are being increasingly induced by Jewish and homosexual pressure to be Politically Correct to pay for Spack-style mutilations and related abuses.) What about a lifetime of counseling and mental health drugs? And the figures I am quoting don’t include the charges for the many doctor’s office appointments related to each procedure. I think we’re really talking a cool half million per victim as an absolute minimum. Multiply that by hundreds — soon to be thousands — of victims every year and you have such a handsome haul that your tithe to the synagogue won’t even hurt this year.

And consider well who is on Norman Spack’s team: According to one of his own publications, five out of seven are Jews: Spack himself, Henry Feldman, Scott Leibowitz, Francie Mandel, and David Diamond — the race of the other two, who may just have Gentile-sounding names, isn’t known. (According to that same publication, applications for “transsexual services” quadrupled when Spack’s clinic was publicized.)

Many children are unsure of themselves around puberty and in their early teens. Often the best people develop more slowly than their fellows, and this can lead to frustration and lack of perceived success with the opposite sex. Who hasn’t at times thought that the opposite sex has all the luck? Norman Spack and friends are there to make sure that a just-developing adolescent is told what those feelings “really mean.”

And children are imitative. They naturally want to please others, and please society, and be praised and admired. They naturally want to do what is expected of them, and to excel at doing it, and be rewarded. Spack and his kind set up a situation where a child can be rewarded and admired — told he is “special” — told he is on the leading edge of a new “civil rights” revolution, a “fight against evil” — by “recognizing” that he is “trapped inside the body” of the “wrong sex.” The Jewish media provide endless glowing examples of people being rewarded for “recognizing” that they are “really” not the sex they were born with.

Coming at a time of puberty — of becoming a new person — with all the confusion and lack of self-confidence that that can bring — Spack and his ilk exploit the very vulnerable. They convince parents to “go along” and make a gelded freak out of their precious child — all “for his own good” of course.

In the past, it was recognized that some people had confusion about their sexual identity, and this was rightly classed as a mental illness, and the medical profession tried to heal the troubled minds of such people — and that was the right thing to do. Now Jews like Norman Spack take the delusions of the mentally troubled, and parlay them into excuses for hormonally castrating our young boys and masculinizing our young girls, surgically mutilating them, guaranteeing them a life of mental torture, agony, and suicide, and permanently and irreversibly sterilizing them so they can never have children.

And this can never be repeated often enough: There is no such thing as a “sex change” operation or a “sex change” anything. Such a thing is categorically impossible. (And it doesn’t matter that they keep changing the Politically Correct language used to describe such abuse and mutilations — one of the latest is “gender confirmation surgery.” It’s enough to make you retch.) Each and every cell in your body — a trillion cells or more, as many as there are stars in the Milky Way galaxy — is encoded with your sex, which was determined at your conception. And nothing, absolutely nothing that is known or is likely ever to be known in the entire future of this universe can ever change that fact. If you were born a man, you will always be a man. If you were born a woman, you will always be a woman. A microscopically small number of birth defects exist, but do not change that fact. The hallucinations of the mentally ill or those deluded by Spack and company that they are “really” a member of the opposite sex have no more validity than the delusions of an inmate that he is Napoleon. And amputating his two front legs does not make a dog a biped.

Children should be given only healthy choices. We should no more allow them to choose what sex they want to be after allowing them to watch Jewish media glamorizing castrated freaks like Bruce Jenner than we should allow them to “choose” lobotomy after telling them lies about how wonderful and “special” it is to be half brainless.

Let me tell you what is really needed.

Boys and young men need strong, masculine role models, and their natural male aptitudes need to be fostered and encouraged and directed into the best and highest possible expressions they can have. Girls and young women need powerfully feminine role models, and their natural feminine aptitudes need to be praised, fostered, and encouraged into the best and highest possible expressions they can have. They do not need someone telling them that “gender is fluid” or “hey, wouldn’t it be cool to change your sex,” or “we all need the freedom to make sexual identity choices, man,” or “you can be whoever you want to be.” Such things should never be told to our six- to ten-year-olds. They should never be told to anyone.

No indeed. Down that road lies madness and death. Join the men and women who have seen through the lies and who are determined to build a healthy future for our children. Join the National Alliance.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at Whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. You can join and support us by visiting natall.com — or write to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

* * *

COTB-copyTHE INCOMPARABLE, AMAZING music of Dresden’s Call of the Blood is now available in a digitally remastered 20th Anniversary edition CD. Crafted with jewel-like care and true artistry, this is unlike any music you have ever heard before.

Listen to a low-bitrate sampler here:

Listen to the Call of the Blood sampler

You can get your copy of Call of the Blood by clicking here.

For Further Reading

Previous post

Is 1984 Safely Past?

Next post

The Jewish Influence on Religion

7 Comments

  1. Anthony Collins
    April 30, 2016 at 9:03 am — Reply

    Apparently the first “sex change operations” were performed under the auspices of Magnus Hirschfeld, a Jewish homosexual, transvestite, “sexologist,” “gay rights” activist, and “anti-racist.” Jews really seem to excel as entrepreneurs of every kind of degeneracy.

  2. Jon Sobieski
    May 1, 2016 at 2:46 am — Reply

    There was a documentary by several old transsexuals where they denounced sex change surgery and how it destroyed them. Sky high suicide rates and deep regret were common. The truth of course is suppressed by the LGBTQ industry. Has Caitlyn had her penis cut off yet?

  3. Anthony Collins
    May 1, 2016 at 10:00 am — Reply

    For what it’s worth, Joel Best’s book, Stat-Spotting: A Field Guide to Identifying Dubious Data, rev. ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013), says this about the frequency of intersexuality (pp. 12-13):

    “A person’s sex — male or female — strikes most people as the most fundamental basis for categorizing people. Classification usually occurs at the moment of birth (if not earlier, thanks to ultrasound imagery): ‘It’s a girl!’ or ‘It’s a boy!’ This seems so obvious and natural that most of us rarely give it a thought.

    “Still, there are babies who don’t fit neatly into the standard male/female framework. Some babies have ambiguous genitalia; they can be recognized as hermaphrodites at birth. Others have less visible conditions that may take years to be recognized. People with androgen insensitivity syndrome, for instance, have the XY chromosomes found in males, but because their cells do not respond to testosterone, they develop female genitalia; the condition is usually not discovered until puberty. There are several such conditions, and people with any of them may be categorized as intersex.

    “Some advocates argue that intersex people are common enough to challenge the naturalness of the male/female distinction and that we ought to reconceptualize sex as a continuum rather than a dichotomy. Just how common is intersexuality? One widely cited estimate is that 1.7 percent of people are intersex: ‘For example, a city of 300,000 would have 5,100 people with varying degrees of intersexual development.’ (The Internet circulates claims that the actual proportion may be closer to 4 percent.)

    “However, many of the people included in these estimates live their entire lives without discovering that they are intersex. The most common form of intersexual development is late-onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia (LOCAH — estimated to occur in 1.5 percent of all people, and therefore accounting for nearly 90 percent of all intersex individuals: 1.5 ÷ 1.7 = .88). Babies with LOCAH have normal genitalia that match their chromosomes; their condition may never be identified. In other words, the most common variety of intersex — accounting for the great majority of cases — is subtle enough to go undiscovered. In contrast, ‘true hermaphrodites’ — babies born with obviously ambiguous genitalia — are in fact rare; there are only about 1.2 per 100,000 births.

    “Intersexuality, then, displays the pattern common to so many phenomena: the most dramatic cases are relatively rare, whereas the most common cases aren’t especially dramatic.”

    In short, genuine intersexuality is vanishingly rare. It’s obviously absurd to count people who “live their entire lives without discovering that they are intersex” as intersex.

    All this raises the question: who has been driving the agitation in recent years relating to intersexuality, transsexuality, and the like, and for what ends? It’s clear enough that this agitation is driven more by the Jews and their lackeys than by those afflicted with such biological and psychological disorders. It’s extremely suspicious how causes like these are suddenly discovered and feverishly promoted by the mass media.

  4. Walt Hampton
    May 2, 2016 at 2:23 am — Reply
  5. Christopher Strenta
    May 3, 2016 at 3:26 am — Reply

    Sometimes I wonder if the Jews aren’t actual, literal parasites.

    • Anthony Collins
      May 4, 2016 at 3:16 am — Reply

      There’s no need to wonder about that. A parasite is as a parasite does. The Jews have been parasites for millennia.

      One of the best discussions of Jewish parasitism I have read is Adolf Hitler’s great speech of August 15, 1920, “Why We Are Antisemites.” An English translation of it is available here:

      http://carolynyeager.net/why-we-are-antisemites-text-adolf-hitlers-1920-speech-hofbr%C3%A4uhaus

      Hitler’s definition of parasitism is a derivative of his definition of work and the Volksgemeinschaft (national community) that work should serve. I think his speech explains and illustrates things much better than the chapter “Nation and Race” in Mein Kampf.

  6. Christopher Strenta
    May 9, 2016 at 4:37 pm — Reply

    I just submitted my comment on “A Babylonian Captivity” and lo and behold, I find “Real Child Abuse” mysteriously appear in my search history (not the first time) as though I’m being tracked. How I love the chosenites.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.