Blacks are Several Times More Likely to be on Public Assistance, as Compared with Whites
by David Sims
FEW SUBJECTS are more muddied by leftists than the matter of which race is the most likely to be on welfare programs.
The correct answer is “blacks.”
But the liberals never seem to tire of finding ways to obfuscate. One of the commonest methods they use, in order to convince the public that blacks aren’t quite as dependent on hand-outs as racists say they are is to point out, correctly, that there are more whites than blacks on welfare.
But, of course, there are far more whites than blacks in the US population. It isn’t the total counts of whites and of blacks that form the proper comparison, but their per capita rates.
If we wanted to know whether Californians or Nevadans were the more criminally inclined, would we simply compare the total number of crimes committed in California with the total number of crimes committed in Nevada? No. California has a much larger population than Nevada does, and comparing the total counts that way would be unfair to the average Californian. Instead, we take the total counts and divide them by the population size of the state from which the count comes. Then, when we have the per capita rates, we can make a valid comparison.
The same is true when you are comparing two races, instead of the residents of two different states. The same methods apply.
I’ve learned that 2006 was the last year that the Department of Agriculture still published complete data on race. In that year, then President George W. Bush told the Department that they no longer had to report the race of welfare recipients. They continued to report the whites as whites, but they began assigning most of the non-whites to the “unknown race” category starting in 2007.
But, in 2006, of households on welfare in the United States:
41.7% were white
33.7% were black
19.9% were Hispanic
2.6% were Asian
1.7% were Injun
0.4% were “unknown race.”
Meanwhile, of the US population,
63% were white
12% were black
15% were Hispanic
4% were Asian
Adjusting for the populations of these racial groups, we see that in 2006, compared to whites…
Blacks were 4.24 times more likely to be on welfare
Hispanics were 2.00 times more likely to be on welfare
Asians were only 98% as likely to be on welfare
These ratios fluctuate a bit because the data change from year to year, and sources vary. But the general picture the data create remains the same, when the statistics are properly treated. The point is that blacks are, yes indeed, for sure, without any doubt, several times more likely than whites to be living on welfare.
And the leftists/liberals are trying as hard as they can to make it seem otherwise.
* * *
* * *Listen: Turner Diaries commercial
OUR NEW, remastered audio book edition of The Turner Diaries read by the author, Dr. William Pierce is now available. You can get your copy now — the CDs are are shipping as soon as orders come in.
The original recordings, made by Dr. Pierce and Kevin Strom on reel-to-reel tape in 1995, had been digitized in the early 2000s, but that digitization process was primitive compared to what we are capable of today; we have remastered this important work using the latest software — and we did it the careful, slow, difficult, craftsman-like way — the way Dr. Pierce would have wanted it.
We are proud to offer you the result, which can be ordered online via http://natall.com/td or by postal mail from National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery TN 37680 USA. The fidelity of the disc is excellent: On a good speaker system, it sounds as if Dr. Pierce is with you, reading his book to you personally. There is nothing quite like hearing the man who created The Turner Diaries read it to you himself. And, by purchasing this mp3-CD, you will be supporting the important work of the National Alliance.Listen: Turner Diaries commercial
* * *