Reports

Israeli Army Rabbi: Jewish Soldiers May Rape Non-Jewish Women

Rabbi_Colonel_Eyal_KarimA Jewish soldier can do whatever he wants to “satisfy the evil urge in his soul” — including rape — if it helps advance the Jews’ success in war, according to this rabbi.

AN ISRAELI RABBI, Colonel Eyal Qarim of the Israeli Military Rabbinate (pictured), has stated it is permissible for Jewish soldiers to rape Gentile women, including White women or Palestinian women, during wartime.

The permission came as an answer to this question: “Is it allowed in our days for an Israeli occupation soldier, for example, to rape girls during a fight, or is such a thing forbidden?”

“The wars of Israel are religious wars, in which they differ from the rest of the wars the nations wage among themselves,” the Israeli rabbi said.

He stated that during wars waged by Jews, which are fundamentally different from wars waged by non-Jews, the Israeli soldier has to maintain his fighting ability; therefore, any prohibitions which weaken his ability must be broken — even if they are related to morals.

“As in war the prohibition against risking your life is broken for the benefit of others, so are the prohibitions against immorality,” the rabbi said.

To make things clearer, he explained: “Wine touched by Gentiles, consumption of which is prohibited in peacetime, is allowed at war, to maintain the good spirit of the warriors. Consumption of prohibited foods is permitted at war to maintain the fitness of the warriors, even though they are prohibited during peacetime.

“Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations and even though fraternising with a Gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors.”

He even went beyond rape, saying: “And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge in his soul.”

Here is the full exchange from Mondoweiss:

Q. Is it allowed in our days [sic] for an IDF soldier, for example, to rape girls during a fight, or is such a thing forbidden?

Rabbi Qarim answered thus:

“The wars of Israel […] are mitzvah wars, in which they differ from the rest of the wars the nations wage among themselves. Since, essentially, a war is not an individual matter, but rather nations wage war as a whole, there are cases in which the personality of the individual is “erased” for the benefit of the whole. And vice versa: sometimes you risk a large unit for the saving of an individual, when it is essential for purposes of morale. One of the important and critical values during war is maintaining the army’s fighting ability […]

As in war the prohibition against risking your life is broken for the benefit of others, so are the prohibitions against immorality and of kashrut. Wine touched by gentiles, consumption of which is prohibited in peacetime, is allowed at war, to maintain the good spirit of the warriors. Consumption of prohibited foods is permitted at war (and some say, even when kosher food is available), to maintain the fitness of the warriors, even though they are prohibited during peacetime. Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations (gilui arayot in the original – YZG), and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge (yetzer ha’ra in the original -YZG), under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.”

Wow. Herein lies a hornet’s nest. The first is that according to Qarim, the rape of female prisoners is not just permitted, it is also essential to war; the success of the whole at war relies on it. Even Genghis Khan, who (according to tradition) said that the best thing in the world is “to crush your enemies, to see them fall at your feet — to take their horses and goods and hear the lamentation of their women. That is best” – even he, who excelled at rape, did not see it as essential to warfare, just a satisfactory outcome. Stalin, likewise, dismissed complaints about rapes carried out massively by the Red Army by saying “a soldier has urges,” but he did not see it as an essential element of military life.

This is indicative of the underlying mentality of Jews, who control so much of the media, finance, and the political process in the United States — and who are using their power to exterminate Whites.

* * *

Source: Days of Palestine and National Vanguard correspondents

* * *

Download our PDF flier

* * *

For Further Reading

Previous post

Canada: Anti-White Judge Voids Another Will — Because Whites Would Benefit

Next post

Brooklyn Rabbi Charged with Teen Sex Assault Gets 60 Days in Jail

5 Comments

  1. Anthony Collins
    February 26, 2016 at 11:04 pm — Reply

    This article is shocking and revealing. I think, however, that the Jews have effectively committed or enabled a larger number of rapes by proxy, such as by suppressing the truth about interracial rape via the mass media, by “integrating” and importing racial aliens whose instincts and “culture” make them prone to rape, by dissolving social and state controls on rape (as seen in Rotherham, where so-called authorities did nothing for fear of being accused of “racism”), and even by explicitly inciting rape, à la Ilya Ehrenburg (“Break the pride of the Germanic women”). It can thus be seen that, in more than one way, the Jews have given their blessing to the rape of White women, who in their eyes are nothing but shiksas, i.e., unclean meat.

    Needless to say, the feminists who accuse White men of being party to a “rape culture” are silent about these things.

  2. Bruce Arney
    February 27, 2016 at 2:10 am — Reply

    Talmudic logic is used to justify all the evil they do. The Rabbis justify sociopathic behavior as being good for the Jew, therefore, morally good, but for them, only.

    • Anthony Collins
      February 27, 2016 at 7:38 am — Reply

      There’s a term for Talmudic logic: pilpulism. In The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed wrote:

      “What was actually permitted in the synagogues and schools was a unique form of dialectics, designed still further to strengthen the edifice of The Law. The disputants were merely allowed to prove that anything was legal under the Talmud; one debater would state a proposition and another the contrary, each demonstrating that The Law allowed it!

      “This practice (the brothers Thoreau [i.e., Jean and Jérôme Tharaud] give glimpses of it in their books) was called ‘pilpulism.’ It gives the key to a mystery which often baffles Gentiles: the agility with which Zionists are often able to justify, in themselves, precisely what they reproach in others. A polemist trained in pilpulism would have no difficulty in showing the Judaic law ordaining the enslavement of household Gentiles to be righteous and the Roman ban on the enslavement of Christians by Jewish masters to be ‘persecution’; the Judaic ban on intermarriage to be ‘voluntary separation’ and any Gentile counter-ban to be ‘discrimination based in prejudice’ (Dr. Kastein’s terms); a massacre of Arabs to be rightful under The Law and a massacre of Jews to be wrongful under any law.”

      http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Controversybook_eng_16.htm

      For his part, Joseph Goebbels wrote:

      “Schopenhauer once said that the Jew is the master of the lie. He is such an expert on twisting the truth that he can tell his innocent opponent the exact opposite of the truth even on the plainest matter in the world. He does this with such astonishing impudence that the listener becomes uncertain, at which point the Jew has usually won.

      “The Jews call this chutzpah. Chutzpah is a typically Jewish expression that really cannot be translated into any other language, since chutzpah is a concept found only among the Jews. Other languages have not needed to invent such a word, since they do not know the phenomenon. Basically, it means unlimited, impertinent, and unbelievable impudence and shamelessness.

      “As long as we had the doubtful pleasure of having to put up with Jews, we had more then enough examples of the typical Jewish characteristic they call chutzpah. Cowards became heroes and decent, industrious, and brave men became contemptible idiots or fools. Fat and sweaty stockbrokers presented themselves as communists saving the world, and decent soldiers were characterized as beasts. Normal families were mocked as breeding pens, while group marriages were praised as the highest form of human development. The most disgusting junk the human mind could create was presented as great art while real art was ridiculed as Kitsch. The murderer was not guilty, but rather his victim.”

      http://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb18.htm

  3. Bruce Arney
    February 27, 2016 at 11:30 am — Reply

    Pilpulism. A new word to add to my vocabulary and knowledge base, Anthony Collins — thanks. Insights into the Jewish mindset are always interesting and many may prove to be valuable tools in exposing and defeating their agenda.

    • Anthony Collins
      February 28, 2016 at 6:41 am — Reply

      Understanding the Jewish mentality can be very hard because one is dealing with a mentality profoundly foreign to our own. It isn’t surprising that many people react to anti-Jewish publications with incredulity — even Adolf Hitler, George Lincoln Rockwell, and David Duke did this when they were new to the Jewish problem — because the information they present is so bizarre and disturbing. There are some things that are hard to accept even when you know they’re true. The evidence may be incontrovertible, the logic may be irrefragable, but something in your mind says “That can’t be!” The monstrous facts about this monstrous people are mind-boggling.

      Misology is defined as the hatred of reason, discussion, learning, or knowledge. Among the Jews, misology involves the perversion rather than the open denigration or repudiation of reason, discussion, learning, and knowledge. The Jews are adept at using these things to defeat their purpose. They’re like hackers who exploit the vulnerabilities of computer systems and their users (such as by engaging in “social engineering” to bypass security measures), or corporate swindlers who “game the system.” Communities of reason, discussion, learning, and knowledge assume a common purpose and good faith on the part of those involved in them. They need to be fairly open in order to perform their functions. They aren’t designed to deal with subversion. They find it hard to recognize and expel cuckoos in the nest. They’re easily hacked by members of the tribe, who have a morality that enjoins predatory and manipulative behavior, a high verbal IQ, and a hive mentality.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.