Essays

Where Did the Universe Come From?

Quasar-1

by David Sims

A CHRISTIAN smartypants posted a YouTube video to challenge atheists with the question “Where did the universe come from, and why?” It is a good question. Until the 20th century, no atheist could have answered it, except with a characteristically honest “I don’t know.”

Where did the universe come from?

First, get rid of any preconceptions you might have regarding the nature of empty space, and, unless you are very good with physics, shed any pretensions that you understand what a vacuum is.

Long ago, a philosopher asked “Why something rather than nothing?” Pure logic suffices to answer that question. Nothing can’t be because “be” is just a word that means “exists,” whereas nothing or “no thing” is a negation of existence. The being of existence is tautological. Existence exists because there can be no alternative.

In fact, “existence exists” is the only non-trivial tautology. Usually, when you say “A is A,” you don’t mean that there is no such thing as a B. But in this case, you do.

But having figured out that much, you still don’t know what existence is like when it has no special reason to be any way at all. And you haven’t explained the universe by finding an explanation for existence itself. For those answers, pure logic isn’t enough, and you must turn to empiricism.

Existence in its default condition is what physicists call the unperturbed vacuum state. It’s a cold spacetime in which there are no potential differences in energy levels that endure beyond the limitation of the uncertainty principle. There are no causes or effects. On the quantum level, random events happen, fluctuations of vacuum energy having magnitudes that follow a Planck distribution for a cold blackbody. Spacetime boils with this “zero-point energy” flux.

Our universe isn’t in this default condition. It is a radical departure from it, with the difference having been greater in the past, and will be less in the future, than it is now. The default state of existence is what our universe is slowly evolving back to, as it expands and as it cools and as its entropy rises. The universe has already undergone several very conspicuous changes in its broad character, with more such changes yet to come, though the time scales over which such changes occur are lengthening.

Vacuum fluctuations happen simply because they are intrinsic to the nature of spacetime, which means they are the primary characteristic of existence in its default state. The classical identification of “emptiness” or of “nothingness” as this default condition is in error, and most people, entertaining these classical ideas regarding existence and its negation, are wrong.

Fluctuations of energy in vacuum, having actions less than Planck’s reduced constant, are intrinsic to the nature of spacetime, and they are the primary characteristic of existence in its default condition. The apparent emptiness of otherwise unoccupied space is an emergent property. The averaging that our senses do with the huge numbers of quantum events involved, and the randomness and rapidity of their changes, causes the large-scale featurelessness of space, which we associate with “emptiness,” giving us two incorrect ideas: (1) “nothing is there” and (2) “nothing happens there.”

A couple of comparisons might help us understand the principle of emergent properties like the apparent emptiness of vacuum.

First, let us suppose that someone lay a very large sheet of sandpaper on the ground, and you could see it from the window of an airplane that was passing over it at the altitude of one mile. Looking at it, you would say that it was a smooth sheet because you would be too far away from it to see the roughness of its texture.

Second, consider an LED flashlight. You turn it on, and it seems to emit a steady beam of light. But that’s an illusion. In reality, the LED is turning itself on and off at the rate of 120 flashes per second. But since this is faster than your eye records visual events, you can’t see the individual flashes. Hence, the illusion that the beam has a constant magnitude over time.

Vacuum fluctuations occur within our universe, and everywhere else, regardless of whether, or the extent to which, spacetime is perturbed by forces. But our universe has, on top of this background of vacuum noise, enduring potential differences in energy levels that go far above the uncertainty principle. These potential differences give our universe its structure and create many possibilities for the organization of matter, such as stars and life.

The way a universe is born is as follows. Within another spacetime, the fluctuations of energy in vacuum occur with magnitudes that follow a Planck distribution. Most of these energy bumps and dips, relative to the energy level of the vacuum state, are too small to be of any importance. A small percentage, however, are energetic enough to produce virtual elementary particles, such as (e-,e+), by pair production. And a very, very, very small percentage has enough energy to do much more.

When it happens, purely by chance, that a vacuum fluctuation causes, within a parent spacetime, enough energy to be at the same place and time, it will form an object called a kugelblitz, a quantum black hole. The vacuum energy will, by the gravitation of its equivalent mass, separate itself from the parent spacetime by an enclosing event horizon. The amount of energy needed to do this is called the Planck energy, which is:

E = √(ћc 5 /G) = 1.9561e9 Joules = 543.36 kilowatt-hours

Unlike larger black holes, these quantum ones won’t emit Hawking radiation. If they did, they’d violate the conservation of energy in the spacetime in which they appeared, causing the parent spacetime to gain energy over time. Instead, the virtual kugelblitzes will simply detach from their parent spacetime: their gravitational field will disturb it no more.

Once in its own trivial universe, the energy that had been in the vacuum fluctuation is in a state that is hypercertain with respect to the uncertainty principle. It’s basically all in one quantum address, without anything else to relate to, and without any forces to do the relating with. That state is metastable, like a bicycle hub balanced on one spoke. After a half-life or so of a few billion Planck times, it decays spontaneously, just as radioactive nuclei do.

(Indeed, this is a good place to remark that a wise person is not confused by mere matters of scale. A quantum kugelblitz is very much like any other unstable particle subject to decay. Universes are among the possible products of quantum kugelblitz decay.)

The “unity” of the energy that had been in the vacuum fluctuation is broken when a force, which in our universe was the strong nuclear force, breaks free of the original symmetry. This makes possible a plurality of quantum addresses, and the singular initial state, being now very improbable, is quickly abandoned. Quantum addresses proliferate with great rapidity, causing the inflation of space in a new universe.

And that’s where universes come from. The question has had its answer.

* * *

Source: David Sims

* * *

Listen: Turner Diaries commercial

OUR NEW, remastered audio book edition of The Turner Diaries read by the author, Dr. William Pierce, is now available. You can get your copy now — the CDs are are shipping as soon as orders come in.

The original recordings, made by Dr. Pierce and Kevin Strom on reel-to-reel tape in 1995, had been digitized in the early 2000s, but that digitization process was primitive compared to what we are capable of today; we have remastered this important work using the latest software — and we did it the careful, slow, difficult, craftsman-like way — the way Dr. Pierce would have wanted it.

We are proud to offer you the result, which can be ordered online via http://natall.com/td or by postal mail from National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery TN 37680 USA. The fidelity of the disc is excellent: On a good speaker system, it sounds as if Dr. Pierce is with you, reading his book to you personally. There is nothing quite like hearing the man who created The Turner Diaries read it to you himself. And, by purchasing this mp3-CD, you will be supporting the important work of the National Alliance.

Listen: Turner Diaries commercial

* * *

For Further Reading

Previous post

Sir Oswald Mosley at Belle Vue, Manchester, in 1933

Next post

Four More Years

5 Comments

  1. Janus Door
    October 18, 2015 at 3:04 am — Reply

    “Indeed, this is a good place to remark that a wise person is not confused by mere matters of scale.”

    Real intelligent people are not fooled by false scale in either direction. Because something is said to be in the billions and trillions it is therefore more complex and more ‘scientifically’ sound is a lie. But something measured in the ‘mere’ thousands like the Christian version of the world is somehow ‘simple’ and for the ‘scientifically’ ignorant. Another lie.

    What is hilarious is that The Bible has already beaten you to it by mocking your stupidity. The Bible describes atheists who create new creation myths as the most ignorant of all people on the planet. Their ignorance being so tremendous and significant that it is described as only being willing. That you’d have to be actively ignorant to deny the biblical version of creation.

    I have a PHD in Public Health and therefore I have spent (wasted) too many of my life’s hours sitting in lectures of men who claimed to be ‘scientists’. Yet they knew nothing. I went to a MAJOR American university where you could get a PHD in Holocaust studies. Looking back I realize that I spent a fortune on being brainwashed.

    What is the purpose of this site? To spread ignorance? Because that’s what I see. Race theory is real. But Evolution is a lie. There’s more to learn about race from the Bible than any other source.

    If this site is meant to STOP the global government from ruining the white race then you need to read The Bible. That book that talks about the Antichrist’s reign on earth where we are getting dangerously close to realizing.

  2. Marc
    October 19, 2015 at 1:03 pm — Reply

    Once again, the cretinous Christian trolls go on the attack, every single time someone gives a RATIONAL explanation of the creation of the Universe!! PLEASE explain HOW the childish story of the Biblical creation can possibly even come close to reasonable scientific explanations?? There is absolutely ZERO information about RACE in the Bible, which was entirely concocted by some degenerate goat shepherds, living in some Middle Eastern waste-land, 3000 years ago… and who possessed ABSOLUTE ZERO KNOWLEDGE about anything relating to elementary Physics and Astronomy!

  3. Marc
    October 19, 2015 at 1:08 pm — Reply

    The Bible is a disgusting book, which promotes despicable things which are diametrically OPPOSED to real White European mentality and racial psyche!!… It was entirely concocted by SEMITIC PEOPLE, who have always been the MORTAL ENEMIES of everything White and European!
    For more details: http://www.evilbible.com

  4. Marc
    October 21, 2015 at 1:00 am — Reply

    Very nice and profound article! David Sims has a remarkable understanding of the latest theories of Quantum Astrophysics and Cosmology. Brilliant!! Is there some kind of great Intelligence or Consciousness behind all of this? I am personally inclined to believe so! “Intelligent Design” is CERTAINLY NOT a monopoly of christianity! “Consciousness” could be indeed an integral part of the very fabric of the Universe/Multiverse… Who knows??

  5. February 2, 2016 at 8:10 am — Reply

    The theory that the universe can simply come out of nothing due to the quantum energy fluctuation in a vacuum has one major flaw in it. Scientists are treating this quantum vacuum as nothing, and they are claiming that the entire space, time, matter and energy of our present universe have spontaneously appeared from that quantum nothing. Scientists remain quite logical in their argument when they show that the total matter and energy of the universe are zero. The totality of both of these two should always remain zero if they have actually originated from nothing. We expect from the scientists that they apply the same kind of logic to the entire space-time also, because as per them the total space-time of our present universe has also appeared from nothing. So by the same kind of logic the entire space-time of our present universe should also always remain zero. As the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, so the pertinent question will be: How does the total space-time of an ever-expanding universe always remain zero?

    This problem has been discussed in detail in the two below-listed links:

    1. https://sekharpal.wordpress.com/2015/10/23/a-fundamental-flaw-in-the-thesis-a-universe-from-nothing-part-I/

    2. https://sekharpal.wordpress.com/2015/10/23/a-fundamental-flaw-in-the-thesis-a-universe-from-nothing-part-II/

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.