Essays

Progressivism – The Truth After the Lie

ProgressivismPROGRESSIVISM is a leftist thought process implemented into society via media, academia, politics and entertainment. It desires a world with no white European people, no traditional families, no religion, no pride, and no identity. It promotes degeneracy, immorality, ugliness,  miscegenation, false history and self loathing. Progressivism is societal rot, it eats away at the foundations of a civilisation until it falls in on itself. What is left is the decayed remnants of a once great civilisation, the one time envy of the world and eternal enemy of the progressives.

Progressivism thrives off certain traits unique to the European that work against the best interests of the European. Those traits being empathy and altruism. It promotes out group empathy and out group altruism, and attacks those who practice in group empathy and in group altruism.

An example of this would be the concept that ‘charity begins at home.’ This basically means that you look after your own first and foremost, but progressivism would call this ‘racist’ and ‘discriminatory.’ They believe that charity is for all even if it is damaging to the person or nation being charitable. The empathetic and altruistic nature of the European is manipulated in this scenario, they will part with their money to feed the third world, and will support the foreign aid budget sent to the third world, but have no idea about their own nations needy.

They will naively support immigration from the third world believing that third world people are merely seeking a better life, yet they ignore the consequences for themselves and their own people in the long term. They fall victim to the steering of their emotions by mass media and the progressive agenda. Empathy and Altruism are emotions based on concern and sympathy for others, that is why the progressive left appeal to emotion and rarely use logic based in reality.

‘Progress’ basically means moving forward, advancing, onward. In relation to society, ‘progress’ supposedly means moving society forward, advancing society, or moving society onward. The question has to be therefore, progress to what exactly?

The answer to this question is all around you, the ‘progress’ they seek is not to advance society or Western civilisation as a whole, it is to deconstruct it. To the progessives, Western civilisation is the enemy, they don’t want to advance us they want to destroy us. Can anybody who is not a brainwashed drone say hand on heart that society is better today?

Progressivism is a false term when applied to what progressives say advances society, this is intentional. For them to deconstruct and destroy Western Civilisation they needed to give it a positive term, and ‘progress’ is that term. When somebody thinks of the word progress, they think of a positive rather than a negative and this is capitalised on by the progressives.

Strip away the layers surrounding ‘progressivism’ and you will find Cultural Marxism, an ideology hell bent on the collapse of Western Civilisation. Progressivism is a lie based on hatred, there is nothing positive about it and nothing that benefits us as a society, people or culture by falling for the agenda. The hatred of the progressives is directed at the West and the European people, our culture and traditionalism.

Anybody opposing the anti-Western progressive agenda will be subject to the Alinskyite tactics outlined in ‘Rules for Radicals,’ these are tactics that are used to advance the agenda. It can also be called repressive tolerance which is the brainchild of Herbert Marcuse. In practice it means the toleration of all ideas and views that are in line with the anti-Western narrative, and intolerance for all ideas and views that oppose them.

A good explanation of progressivism is the following:

‘Starting in the 1960s, academics took heightened interest in Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci’s cultural Marxism. Members of the political class glommed onto the resulting “social justice,” affirmative action, “diversity,” multiculturalism, political correctness, and other malignancies spawned by cultural Marxism.  Progressive politicians came to view society as a hodge-podge of racial, ethnic, gender-based, and now also sexual orientation-based groups locked in zero-sum combat with Western whites.

‘Generally speaking, cultural Marxism’s indoctrinees have learned to view morality and knowledge as “constructs” and social and economic power as commodities to be transferred from “oppressor” to “oppressed.”  Progressives routinely label minorities as oppressed and anything that benefits minorities as moral.’ – Chuck

Some examples of the Cultural Marxist Progressivism agenda:

Multiculturalism/Multiracialism

This is one tenet of progressivism. They say that having a multiracial society is ‘progress’ and that ‘diversity is our strength.’ Progressives want a ‘post-racial’ society devoid of racial identity. They promote and support mass immigration and miscegenation and desire the day when white Europeans are a minority in once White European homelands. Can anybody who is not an anti-white see how this can possibly be called progress? When you are able to think freely and evaluate the facts, you will see that progressivism is an anti white European agenda. It isn’t about progressing the white European people, it is about destroying them.

Proof of this is seen in the demographic predictions by expert demographers that European nations including Britain, France, Sweden, the Netherlands and others, will be minority European this century. We are anti-European Union and anti EU migration, we fully recognise the problems it brings, however the main issue is the tens upon tens of millions of non-Europeans who have been brought to Europe. This is the primary reason European nations will soon become minority European.

Modernism

So called modern art and architecture is the result of the hatred of classical Western art and architecture. The progressives produce and promote ugliness in every way possible, it is all about removing the individual away from his cultural heritage. By producing modernist art and architecture they replace the historical Western character of our culture, with so called ‘modern’ and ‘progressive’ monstrosities. The progressives want to move past the historical character of our culture because they hate it, not because they want to advance it. They do this not only by attacking the culture in academia, but also by replacing the cultural expression of the West which was once a prominent feature of our culture.

Sexual Liberation

This tenet of progressivism has resulted in a culture of degeneracy promoted by the entertainment industry, porn industry and media. The sexualisation of our culture has led to a decline in family values and has stigmatised the pursuit of creating a traditional family environment which includes man woman and child. Cultural Marxists thought that if you could free people from what they called ‘sexual oppression’ then you could start the process of deconstructing the West.

The process was started by the pseudo-scientist Sigmund Freud who tried to suggest that sexual oppression was the cause of unhappiness. The sexual revolution, a term coined by Wilhelm Reich, became the manifestation of what Freud had created. The progressives say that ‘sexual liberation’ is freedom from Western morality and religious indoctrination.

Eros and civilisation, written by Herbert Marcuse created an environment in the 60s of ‘free love’  among the baby boomers or counterculture movement. The book is about how the oppression of human sexual instinct is geared towards social control. In a nutshell it suggests that the freedom of sexual desire and the pleasure principle is a means of human liberation from civilisation, ie Western Civilisation which they see a being the capitalist West. The progressives see the family as being part of the capitalist conspiracy to control people and therefore it must be deconstructed.

Homosexuality

Homosexuality is part of the ‘sexual liberation’ agenda, however it is also a different kind of strategy. The goal behind the normalising and promotion of homosexuality is to corrupt and distort the natural realities behind the reasons for sex. Sex is primarily about reproduction, the continuation of the species. Without heterosexuality then the species would die out within a generation. Homosexuality and the homosexual agenda is one of the main progessive agendas. They deny at every turn the real reasons behind it and its ultimate goals, and use that term ‘progress’ to brainwash people into believing that support for, and promotion of ‘gay rights’ is good for society.

They say that homosexuality is normal and that it is nobody’s business what two adults get up to. They say ‘love is love’ and that we should all tolerate it. Anybody who doesn’t, and who doesn’t conform to the agenda is an ‘Intolerant homophobic bigot.’ They want children forced into same-sex households to be raised by homosexuals and believe that children should be indoctrinated from the earliest age possible to support the gay agenda. Children are the primary target of the homosexual agenda, as the new generation they are viewed as pivotal in the ‘normalisation’ process.

Another main strategy of the homosexual agenda is to legalise ‘same-sex marriage.’ This is an assault on Western Culture which was once largely based on Christian teachings and values which does not allow same-sex marriage or accept homosexuality as a normal or acceptable practice in the eyes of God. It is not about ‘equality in marriage’ it is about targeting one of the foundations of the West in order to destroy it. In order for the homosexual agenda to ‘progress’ therefore, means a concerted attack upon the religious opposition to it.

Another reason for the promotion of the homosexual agenda, is because the progressives believe that there is no absolute truth or moral standard, no moral absolutism. Anything goes as far as the progressive is concerned, anything that advances the ongoing assault on the West. They will say that nothing is absolute, and therefore we ‘shouldn’t judge.’ Yes the people who scream ‘who are you to judge’ are the most judgemental people you could ever have the misfortune to meet.

An example of moral relativism would be any practice that we in the West consider barbaric such as Female Genital Mutilation, the moral relativist would say that the practice is a moral practice within a certain culture, and therefore we shouldn’t judge.

The educational institutions push moral relativism onto the young and impressionable, telling them that all beliefs and lifestyles are moral and therefore valid, except beliefs that run counter to the narrative of the agenda however. This means that parents are losing the fight to be the moral educators of their children. The progressives believe that in order to create a ‘truly egalitarian and equal society,’ that education should teach (indoctrinate) children with homosexual propaganda.

Homosexuality is also opposed on the basis of the natural requirement and natural intention for man and woman to procreate. The progressive will say that ‘homosexuality can be found in nature,’ but that wouldn’t make it normal or natural. In nature, things have a design and purpose, and the design and purpose of the male and female is to procreate. Attraction and sexual chemistry between male and female therefore is the normal and natural requirement for procreation. Anything else is abnormal and unnatural. Any examples of so called ‘homosexuality in nature’ are merely an act of dominance and not a normal natural sexual act.

Progressives believe that an extreme minority in society who engage in this type of behaviour, should be empowered to dictate to the overwhelming heterosexual majority, who they consider to be a ‘bigoted majority.’

The term ‘homophobia’ was created by George Weinberg, it has become one the main Cultural Marxist buzzwords and along with ‘racist’ has caused untold damage. ‘Homophobia’ suggests a fear of homosexuals and what they say is an illogical heterosexual reaction to them. I would call ‘homophobia’ a natural feeling of utter revulsion for an unnatural behaviour.

Eradication of the Nuclear Family

Progressives see the family as an oppressive unit that pushes racism, sexism, homophobia and fascism onto children. They say that the family is patriarchal, authorative and hierarchical. They believe that after the eradication of the family, they can fill children with the ideas of ‘equality’ and ‘egalitarianism.’ The methods in which they set out to destroy the family are to promote homosexuality, feminism, sexual liberation and a reliance on the state. The role of the father has also been under attack, cut the father out of the family unit and the job is already half done. The family is labeled as a ‘generational chain of oppression.’

No Borders

Progressives believe that there should be no national borders anywhere, they believe in the full and absolute freedom of movement for all people of the world. This in reality means no borders in nations that are majority white European. The desire of the non-European people to come to Europe is vastly greater than the reverse. This belief in no borders is in line with the Communist ‘world without borders’ mantra.

Progressivism is the rejection of reality and the rejection of the natural order of things.

* * *

Source: Smash Cultural Marxism

For Further Reading

Previous post

New 'Superhenge' Remains Found Near Stonehenge

Next post

The Delusional Wail of the Christian Culture Warrior

6 Comments

  1. Heinemann
    September 10, 2015 at 7:19 pm — Reply

    All of this is propagated by a spirit that conceives new words conveying ideas which in any European language are alien and hateful.

    John Dewey prolix writing and circumlocution could be easily expressed in a few words but then he would be revealed as communist , radicle subversive , that he was.

    Genesis 3 is brief but immortal: the Serpent , who was actually a modern Freud spoke and seduced Eva, who then would seduce Adam.

    Consequently Satan was punished and the myth was used to curse the first Jew, the deceiver( philosopher or impostor) and make it crawl on its belly ,

    as a serpent to provoke instinctive fear and abhorrence , which most feminine, European women once possessed.

    This was to instruct one never to speak to a serpent (Jewish intellectual) but crush his head
    before he writes his books or engages the young , white
    woman to be his next victim.

    Do not ridicule the ancient text. It was written for today.

    Violence is often wiser than diplomacy or the current craze in casuistry and intellectualism.

    essential to all this “new morality” of progressivism is passivism. It is prerequisite for the other lies explained above to succeed.

    It gives the subtle poison oxymoron, “tolerant repression” its validity and long life.

    Much more could be written here instigated by the above warning . Thanks to its vigilance and loyalty.

  2. Thomas Plaster
    July 17, 2017 at 11:55 pm — Reply

    It isn’t homophobia, fear of homosexuals. It is homotaedium, disgust of homosexuals. Disgust at their violation of nature.

  3. Walt Hampton
    July 18, 2017 at 5:24 am — Reply

    >It isn’t homophobia, fear of homosexuals.

    I disagree. Homophobia especially runs true among the
    so-called “Alpha” male set. Many of them seem to think
    it is “catching,” like the flu. It is also no small coincidence
    that there is a fine line of distinction between genius
    and insanity.

    • Thomas Plaster
      July 18, 2017 at 11:51 am — Reply

      That’s queer talk. Only queers would claim the “alpha-male” set are borderline queers, which I presume you are insinuating. It makes the queer feel better about themselves. No justification or logic behind it. What does make sense is having revulsion about homos.

      Just because there is a fine line between genius/insanity, doesn’t mean there is a fine line between (well developed) masculinity and homos.

  4. Walt Hampton
    July 18, 2017 at 10:27 pm — Reply

    >That’s queer talk.

    Fer shame! I should be taken out and horsewhipped!
    Very well then. Allow me to introduce you to an “alpha
    male queer”:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne_Gacy

    • Thomas Plaster
      July 19, 2017 at 10:10 am — Reply

      And who/when decided that he was an alpha male? When was that agreed to?

      That alpha males are borderline queers is the same tactic as claiming that 10% of the general population is queer. That canard was done in maximum security male prisons and then extrapolated to the general population.

      Or the tactic of claiming a legislator who consistently votes against queer favored legislation is a closet homo.

      The only thing readily discernable about queers is that they have a predilection to commit sex crimes and worse against male youth they can overpower in some way. That is something all can SEE. Not this garbage about something that requires reading another’s mind i.e. their private thoughts.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.