Mary Phagan, the forgotten victim

The Missiles at Ground Zero

Immigration: Not About Race?

Don’t believe those who have usurped conservatism and the Tea Party movement when they tell you “it’s not about race.”

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHILE I WAS in a restaurant the other day with a few friends and their children, I saw another group enter the establishment and take a table nearby. It was a handsome-looking White family, a father and mother with a teenage son and daughter. I was close enough to hear parts of their conversation.

The father was almost a double for a writer I know personally, a rugged-looking brunet of medium height with piercing eyes and ruddy complexion, about 50, with a tall, fine-haired slender blonde wife perhaps ten or twelve years younger. The children were well-behaved, good-looking, and intermediate in appearance to their parents, to whom they bore an obvious family resemblance. They weren’t speaking English.

Where were they from? I wondered. Listening a little more closely, I realized they were speaking Spanish. As we left the restaurant, one of the young children in my party decided to try her schoolgirl Spanish on the lady of the family at the other table. The wife was delighted to be greeted in her native tongue and spoke a bit in Spanish with the little girl in our group, then switched to flawless and almost unaccented English to talk to the rest of us. Her husband was a mechanical engineer working on a project in this country, and she was an accomplished pianist and music instructor. Both spoke three languages, French being the third.

Mexican girls of European descent: Throughout Latin America, there are substantial White populations; Mexico's may be more than 10%, and in some other Latin American nations it is a plurality or majority of the population.

I eventually asked where they hailed from. The answer was Mexico, where they were born and where they had lived almost all their lives. They were Mexicans. They were Mexicans of entirely European descent. They were Hispanics. And in those facts there are two lessons. (ILLUSTRATIONS, above and right: Mexican girls of European descent.)

The first lesson is that using the term “Hispanic” for the Mestizos who are crossing our southern marches is inappropriate. The term Hispanic, strictly speaking, should be used only to refer to people of Iberian descent — like this family. As it is it misused today, the word “Hispanic” is racially ambiguous. It can refer to a Spanish-speaking Black — or a totally European person from Spain or from the substantial Spanish-speaking White populations of Latin America. We should prefer racial terms when we’re talking about race. That’s why we should, like Latin Americans themselves, say “Mestizo” when referring to those of mixed European and Amerindian descent, and “Amerindian” or, better yet, a proper tribal or national name when referring to Amerindians. (Often, except when it causes misunderstandings, it’s good to call people what they call themselves. It might be a good thing if the Nation of Aztlan nationalists forged a new name for their people, replacing the broad-brush words “Hispanic” or “Mexican” that have almost no biological meaning. “American,” by the way, is rapidly becoming meaningless too.) Race is what matters. And that brings us to the second lesson illustrated by my restaurant encounter.

Chilean presidential candidates, 2005

The accomplished and cultured White family from Mexico I met is no more likely than I am to join MS-13 or chop someone’s head off with a machete. This family is not a threat to our culture — in fact, it would not surprise me if they were more imbued with Western culture than 95 per cent. of Americans and Europeans. And this family, most important of all, is not a threat to our gene pool. They are as European as any of us, they are indistinguishable from us, and their offspring could intermarry with ours and our future generations would continue as ever, their destiny undimmed. And all of this would remain true no matter what papers they had or didn’t have in their wallets. It would remain true even if these engineers and piano virtuosi came here illegally. What really matters isn’t laws or papers or even geography. It’s race. It’s genes. And we can never have sane laws or sane immigration policies until we understand that fact.

A rugby match with a Uruguayan team (in blue) playing a British team

The anti-immigration “conservatives” on Fox News are always screaming about how they’re “not racists” and how “it’s not about race, it’s about obeying the law.” Well, if it’s about “the law,” what are they going to say when Congress simply legalizes every illegal immigrant? They won’t be able to say a thing. The conservatives are simply wrong. In fact, they’re more than wrong — they’re lying. It is about race.

*  *  *

Based on the American Dissident Voices broadcast of June 5, 2005

FacebookTumblrShare

Related Articles:

8 comments to Immigration: Not About Race?

  • This article is illustrative of the folly of thinking in exclusively racial and supremacist terms. It’s not about race, it’s about tribe. Being White is a necessary but insufficient condition of being a member of the White American ethnonational identity.

    As we left the restaurant, one of the young children in my party decided to try her schoolgirl Spanish on the lady of the family at the other table. The wife was delighted to be greeted in her native tongue and spoke a bit in Spanish with the little girl in our group, then switched to flawless and almost unaccented English to talk to the rest of us.

    Of course she was delighted. Who’s not delighted to see their cultural imperialism in full effect?

    It might be a good thing if the Nation of Aztlan nationalists forged a new name for their people, replacing the broad-brush words “Hispanic” or “Mexican” that have almost no biological meaning.

    Some of the most fervent, and certainly the most powerful, anti-White pro-Latino activists are racially White. Rick Sanchez is an excellent example of this, spewing anti-White rhetoric and thinking himself a victimized Latino.

    The accomplished and cultured White family from Mexico I met is no more likely than I am to join MS-13 or chop someone’s head off with a machete. This family is not a threat to our culture — in fact, it would not surprise me if they were more imbued with Western culture than 95 per cent. of Americans and Europeans.

    I bet he’s more likely than you are to be an immigration lawyer, or to chain migrate a non-White extended family. He thinks “us” when he sees a Mestizo and “them” when he see you, which is the bottom line. He may be White in form, but not in function. I know more than a few of these “White Hispanics” and I’ve only known of one my entire life (Chechar, a blogger) who doesn’t tribally identify in opposition to me.

    It’s race. It’s genes. And we can never have sane laws or sane immigration policies until we understand that fact.

    I don’t care how well these Mexicans play the piano or recite Shakespeare, they’re still tribally Mexican and are an even greater threat to our future than the Mestizo minions they use as pawns in their conquest of my country.

  • admin

    Matt Parrott said:

    I bet he’s more likely than you are to be an immigration lawyer, or to chain migrate a non-White extended family. He thinks “us” when he sees a Mestizo and “them” when he see you, which is the bottom line. He may be White in form, but not in function. I know more than a few of these “White Hispanics” and I’ve only known of one my entire life (Chechar, a blogger) who doesn’t tribally identify in opposition to me.

    Your experience is different than mine.

    I’ve had an opportunity to work closely with a number of White Latin Americans, some of them at Radio Marti, and in my conversations with them I found them on the whole more racially conscious than the average White American — at least they were more willing to speak up and say so. You’d have been amazed at the things they said about race — and Jewish power — right there in the Voice of America building in downtown Washington, DC.

    I also recall the (racially White, geographically Mexican) engineering director of a large chain of southern broadcast stations exhorting his staff engineers to improve their performance by stating “Let’s make it look like the White people are in charge around here.”

    To have a family lineage that has remained White over many generations in a place like Mexico or Cuba implies not only racial consciousness, but family traditions and codes of mate choice handed down to each generation. It seems to me that those are two things that White Americans will need to develop as we descend into multiracialism and minority status.

    You are right, though, about millions of White Hispanics identifying with the monstrous, multiracial, artificial ethnonational construct called “Mexico” — or “Latino” itself. Such self-identification causes them to oppose their own racial kin and their own racial interests.

    The very same problem applies to English-speaking Whites who identify with the monstrous, multiracial, artificial ethnonational construct called “America.” They also are White in form, but not in function. They also hate racially conscious Whites, and are far more likely than I to subsidize non-White adoptions, immigrant “sanctuary” churches, and the like.

    You seem very sure that a much larger percentage of Whites from Latin countries are dedicated multiracialists than are White Americans. If that is so, then they should be kept out of our nation for the same reason that perfectly White Muslims or converts to Judaism should be kept out: They have joined the enemy’s army. But I am not sure that that is so.

    In any case, I still maintain that the founders’ purely racial basis for immigration and nationalization was wise and would have, had it been retained, been sufficient to prevent the destruction of our nation which is nearly complete.

    Being White is a necessary but insufficient condition of being a member of the White American ethnonational identity.

    I agree with you. But the White American ethnonational identity is something new we are trying to build (perhaps the more romantic among us would say “revive”). It is not the same as — in fact, it is in opposition to — the current “American” ethnonational identity.

  • Alberto

    I am a naturalized US Citizen , native of Argentina , did you know that Argentina is one of the “whitest” countries in the world ( 97% white European as per CIA “Book of Facts” ) . Any white American or European will feel “at home ” walking down the streets of Buenos Aires , all the faces are familiar faces .There are no african Blacks in Argentina ( you hardly see a black person , and if you do chances are is a tourist ) , in fact I first met face to face with an african black when arrived to the US ,at JFK International Airport in New York City , I was 20 Years Old .

    • Josef

      I hope that I will live to see the day when we can live in a White Homeland in North America that would place, for example, it’s international relations with Argentina firmly over rival nations like Israel, China, India, or Saudia Arabia… or perhaps to send it’s military to South Africa to help the Afrikaners. Unfortunately, Argentinians or Afrikaners are the furthest thing from the minds of our misleaders.

  • I found them on the whole more racially conscious than the average White American — at least they were more willing to speak up and say so. You’d have been amazed at the things they said about race — and Jewish power — right there in the Voice of America building in downtown Washington, DC.

    I believe you’re confusing a shared understanding of facts with a shared agenda. If you’re really proud of being White, and want to get maximum mileage out of it, then you lord it over non-Whites all day, condescending to them. Why be around a bunch of people who are as fair and fancy as yourself when you can be the fairest and fanciest of them all? This is why supremacism is so insidious, because it turns Whiteness against itself.

    To have a family lineage that has remained White over many generations in a place like Mexico or Cuba implies not only racial consciousness, but family traditions and codes of mate choice handed down to each generation.

    Their ethnocentrism is impressive, but it’s not our heritage they’re preserving through the generations. We can learn from them without bringing them and their aggressively endogamous habits over here. Hopefully, we’ve learned our lesson about groups that look pretty much White but are culturally anti-White and ethnocentric.

    The very same problem applies to English-speaking Whites who identify with the monstrous, multiracial, artificial ethnonational construct called “America.” They also are White in form, but not in function. They also hate racially conscious Whites, and are far more likely than I to subsidize non-White adoptions, immigrant “sanctuary” churches, and the like.

    This new Cosmic American identity is very recent, and there are plenty of anecdotal reasons to believe that a huge subset of White Americans retain the White American ethnonational identity as opposed to the Cosmic American ethnonational identity. Mexico’s identity has been multiracial and interracial for centuries, as opposed to decades.

    I agree with you. But the White American ethnonational identity is something new we are trying to build (perhaps the more romantic among us would say “revive”). It is not the same as — in fact, it is in opposition to — the current “American” ethnonational identity.

    Well stated, though I appear to be a bit more optimistic than you about there being some warm embers of authentic White American ethnonational identity. I reckon we’ll see.

  • FED UP

    The same can also be said of white South Africans. They would also integrate well, and in fact huge numbers of them have emigrated to western countries, but especially Australia, New Zealand, the UK and US.

    Their traditional sports are rugby and cricket, both from Europe. They often have tournaments playing against Australia and New Zealand, which are both former British colonies, just like the US.

    Aside from being white, their western way of thinking simply is not compatible with the blacks. They also frown on bulls and goats being slaughterd in backyards and they also want to contribute to society and the economy, rather than to live off welfare and sit around being comfortable, but dripping in bling the way blacks do.

    European countries are now starting to put a stop to immigration and asylum seekers from African and other 3rd world countries. One would hope that they would consider the Brandon Huntley case (where Canada granted refugee status to a white South African) and take into account the race and culture of the prospective immigrants, because white South Africans are just as hard-working as any European or American and share similar cultures, work ethics, and value systems.

    With that recent mine rescue in Chile, a team of white South Africans was one of the first teams there and played an important role in the rescue.

    There are about 22 million illegal immigrants in the US and only about 3 million whites in SA, some 600,000 to 800,000 of whom are literally starving (http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/08/afrikaners-are-starving-pictures.html) and would love a job, even start a business which would create jobs, rather than live of your tax $$. Unfortunately, extreme Affirmative Action (BEE – black economic empowerment) legislation makes it very hard for many white South Africans to find work.

    If you start your own business, you have to face steep fines if you do not sign over a chunk of your business to a black. Blacks also lie about the black ownership of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, by grossly understating their shareholding in order to continue playing the victim, as well as to increase the incitement of anti-white violence.

    Even Genocide Watch has created a separate division on its site to deal with these problems white South Africans face.

    Because of this, I have to absolutely agree with this article. It is race that makes a difference. Whites trying to leave 3rd world countries should not suffer the consequences of so-called refugees from Africa gang-raping their women.

    Wow, Alberto, I did not know that. I knew there are whites (some even German), but I didn’t quite know there are that many. Maybe some of those SA farmers should go there. As far as I know, Argentina has a lot of ranchers producing beef, and SA farmers would probably fit right in. At least then they wouldn’t have their cattle stolen by blacks who chase them for miles (some die of exhaustion) then hack their legs hacked to bits so they won’t run away overnight. And the police won’t investigate because they call it ‘petty crime’.

    Apparently Georgia (EU country next to Russia & Turkey, not the US state) have asked for white farmers to move there and assist them to build their economy, seeing as they’re unwanted and being uhm… butchered (literally) in their own country.
    http://www.truthtube.tv/play.php?vid=3855
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/06/boer-womens-cruel-torture-murders.html
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/06/boer-womans-womb-carved-from-her-body.html
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/06/tortured-farm-womens-gardener-guilty.html
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/05/cornelia-de-wet-survives-fifth-attack.html

    Of course when then have a peaceful protest (standing around with posters) outside a courthouse, the ANC mayor goes ahead and protests again their protest, mocking the horrible torture murders:
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2009/04/odendaalsrust-law-court-scene-of-angry.html

    Nigeria is another country that has offered white SA farmers land in exchange for building infrastructure and teaching their people, however the same will probably happen there once things are up and running and they don’t need the whites anymore. Georgia wants them to buy the land from the government and they have apparently received great interest. Although I think the language barrier may be a bit of an issue, since Georgian is their official language and as far as I know, it doesn’t even use the Roman or Cyrillic alphabets. Argentina, the US, Australia or Europe would probably be easier in this regard.

    I think people from those countries also don’t always realise who they are, for example Eva Longoria discovered in that DNA reality show that she’s actually 75% or more European. In SA, people are probably more aware of their history and their European roots.

    So I really have to agree with this article. If those European Mexican girls want to immigrate to the US, they should be allowed to without being mistaken for drug-dealing human traffickers.

    Unfortunately for South Africans, this isn’t as easy. They tend to go the legal route and this can be very difficult. I know of only one (Canada) who went illegally and then applied for refugee status. Apparently he had tried several times before for residency visas, but was always denied.

    Unfortunately to apply for asylum, it seems you have to enter illegally and then apply, which is a route that people of European descent are very unlikely to follow. You simply don’t see them on overcrowded boats trying to sneak into Spain or Australia or the US.

    What really gets me is the fact that they’re so quick to hate on whites, but they all want to flock to white countries!?

  • Gerjen

    I agree with this article. I have spent some time living in both Argentina and Chile. I am a native of the U.S. of Danish and Celtic ancestry. I learned Spanish as a second language ( I also speak Russian and Mandarin). After spending two years interacting with Argentinians, Chileans, and Uruguayans of European descent, I came to understand that they not only consider themselves European (which they certainly are) but they are also proud of that fact too. Apparently, in those countries they are not brainwashed into thinking that European civilization is evil. To the contrary, they rightly understand and take for granted that European civilization is superior in nearly every way. They seem to be conscious about their heritage and shun intermarriage with non-Europeans or mestizos to a degree that exceeds their north- american counterparts. Once while I was in a metro station in B.A. I passed by a kiosk and the owner was selling Spanish translations of Mien Kamf and another book that looked like it was promoting nazi ideology about blood and race. I had a very interesting conversation with an Argentinian woman who asked me how white Americans could vote for a black president when he wasn’t even the same race as them. Of course, these observations are based only on anecdotal experience but it is still valuable.

    It’s true that there are left-wing Hispanics who identify with nonwhites but there are also left-wing Anglo Americans who identify with non-whites. This is due to a defect in their thinking and/or personality and they should not be considered as enemies as such.

  • Ilsa

    Greetings everyone,

    I am a person of Latin American descent..that is..Mediterranean, Iberian roots whose ancestors were Roman Catholics and maybe even Romans in the distant past. I understand all accents of Spanish just as good as I can understand the accents of the Anglosphere. I sympathize with the first two comments. I agree that there are White Mexicans, the resurgence of fairer skinned peoples in Mexico and elsewhere in the Americas was a result thanks in part to the World wars of Europe that drove many Germanic, Slavic, Nordic people and other European races to seek refuge and security in the Americas (North, Central South America)during those times. USA was not the only place Europeans fled to.

    I have dealt with Mexicans before and they have a world of their own. The ultra nationalistic sentiment of the Mexican is a staple of that country regardless of race..which is why I don’t like White Mexicans. They really believe they are better than anyone else including White Americans. There will be the random few who wont fall into that category but the vast majority are what you would call a liberal lemming in America. I wont pretend to know everything about Mexico as I have never really been there personally but have had encounters with Mexican Indios, Mestizos, Sambos, Criollos, and the newer immigrants, the Northern Europeans and Eastern Europeans etc. I dont like patriotic White Mexicans, to me they are lemmings. I REALLY dont like the Mestizos and Indios who want to take credit for what Mother Spain achieved in that land 500 years ago.

    Same can be said about South America. I come from a humble background, farming family with extensive lineage intertwined; but I can recall the past century’s bloodlines. The place where I come from White people ARE a rarity…we are dying. The few members that remain White have no options as far as mates go. I foresee the death of my immediate family’s names and people in the next generation UNLESS they can somehow move to a place where there are Whites to marry and mate with. I don’t think it will happen.

    My Mother was always very ambitious to stand above the fray of stagnancy of that country and went to school and became a fervent student. She understood that this was the only option to get out of the poverty she and her siblings were raised in. She went to school where unfortunately she met the ridiculous political correctness spiel…the one that taught her that White people are evil. So she bought into this nonsense until, 23 yrs later, I helped her realize those propagandists had agendas and still do. My mother is incredibly intelligent which is why I am where I am today and I owe it all to her and my dad. She has awakened finally to the questions that plague the mind of an awakened White person and she feels deceived..naturally so. We realize the gravity of it all.

    Point I am trying to make is..White Latin Americans, that is the real Hispanics and descendants of Latins (which are very few), are no different than the White American. Both have sell outs, traitors, ignorants, the generic j e w in their midst, both have fallen for lies and both have patriots and racial realists. When it comes to picking who is righteous and who isn’t..just remember..we are not that different with the exception that White Hispanics are a REALLY small minority in countries where non-Whites are a majority. Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay and Chile have the most Whites in South America.

    This all boils down to getting the truth to ALL White people around the world. They are only getting politically correct information that only serves to distort the truth and keep us ignorant of who is behind the scenes. Hope this helps someone out there who might be confused. Immigration IS about race and if White Americans don’t want to find themselves being such a minority that your children wont have anyone to marry except a person of color (which means the end), then people need to spread the message to other fast because I see SO MUCH miscegenation going on today I am afraid we will be past a point of no return in no time.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. More than three hyperlinks in your comment will delay its appearance; it will have to be manually approved.